Obama was illegitimate from the day he was born

Contained in petition to the supreme court the pleadings noted that if Obama is not constitutionally eligible, it will create a crisis.

"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," stated the pleading.

"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.

"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it said.

(I agree. Every command, appointment, and signature on every law passed while obama occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office.

The entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue.

Obama not only knows he is not constitutional eligible to be president, he knows he can't provide ANY valid documentation to validate his US citizenship.

The online colb is an obvious fraud and has been proven to be so.

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

The question is why would obama and his "people" fake an online colb?

(1) If obama applied for a late birth certificate and it was never validated by the state of Hawaii because the online colb indicates "filed with registrar' which means it was filed with a local Hawaiian registrar only and never validated/accepted by the state registrar.

It was never accepted by the state registrar, if it was it would have a stamp with the state registrar's signature.

The online colb obama's people indicate is his has NO stamp with the state registrar's signature. This alone invalidates the fake online colb.

The online colb obama's people claim is his also has NO raised Hawaii state seal proving it was issued by the state of Hawaii. This alone invalidates the fake online colb also.

(2) Obama's people have presented an online colb that has been altered and is therefore invalid and worthless.

It says at the bottom of the online colb, "any alterations INVALIDATE this certificate".

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

(3) If all the information was valid on the online colb, it is information that can't be verified.

It has no hospital, doctor or signatures of doctor and parents.

The information indicated on obama's online colb is a DEAD END that can't be validated as real.

Everything about the online colb is bogus and a deception.

Everything about obama also is bogus and deceiving.

Obama was illegitimate from the day he was born.

Obama colb is just a picture of a printout

Obama colb is just a picture of a printout

Obama colb is just a picture of a printout

Pamela Geller

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

There are two obvious scenarios used to create the image that can be ascertained from evidence. Either a real COLB was scanned into Photoshop and digitally edited or a real COLB was first scanned to obtain the graphic layout then blanked by soaking the document in solvent to remove the toner. After rescanning the blank page to a separate image the graphics from the previously obtained scan could then be easily applied to the blank scan after some editing and rebuilding. It would also explain why date stamp bleeds through the paper and the various bits of toner located around the image as well as the remnants of the previous location of a security border.

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery.
.......................................................................................

A form is always going to be filed with the local registrar before it is going to be accpeted by the State Registrar.

Janice Okubo said that the designation “date filed” or “date accepted” was not an important one.

It is very important. Janice Okubo lied.

My best guess is obama and his fellow deceivers forged a certificate of live birth because the information obama had on file could not be made public or there was no information on file so obama forged an online colb.

Date filed indicates the date information was filed with a local Hawaiian registrar.

Date accepted indicates the date it was accepted by the Hawaiian state registrar.

Big difference.

Obama has no document that has been accepted by the state registrar.

He only has a forged online colb.

Dr. Conspiracy

Samples with issuance dates.

September 5, 1991 – “Peter Boy” – “Date received by local registrar”

Sept 9, 2002 – Patricia Decosta – “Date accepted by State Registrar”

June 6, 2007 – Obama – “Date filed by registrar”

Janice Okubo said that the designation “date filed” or “date accepted” was not an important one. From that, we may reasonably conclude that it is not stored in the database at all; it is a constant value on every certificate printed during a particular era. On the 1991 “Peter Boy” certificate (issued 2 months before Hawaii switched to the COLB) we see that the certificate says “Date Received by Local Registrar”, and that is most certainly a constant value, and probably is the most historically accurate statement of what is in the database date field (it makes sense that if they are only going to display one date, it’s the earliest one).

(Of course all this talk about date filed and date accepted means nothing because the online colb was forged and is a fake. Obama has presented nothing to the world to validate his US citizenship.

This is the bottom line. A fake online colb proves nothing except that obama is a hoax.) Story reports


Date filed or date accepted It doesn't matter because the online colb obama has never claimed was forged.

The continuing battle to enforce the rules of political correctness

It's simply politically incorrect to be a "birther."

It's simply politically incorrect to force presidential candidates to prove their eligibility for office.

WND

It's simply politically incorrect to question why the political system broke down in 2008, leaving most Americans deeply suspicious that the man in the White House does not meet the simple requirements of office.

It doesn't take any courage to malign the reputations of good people who look at the facts and come to the logical conclusion that Barack Obama is hiding something.

But because of the vicious rules of engagement of political correctness, it does indeed take courage and conviction to stand up to this onslaught

There seems to be an unwritten rule among Republican presidential candidates and leaders to downplay the significance of the issue of constitutional eligibility – with Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, House Speaker John Boehner and others distancing themselves from a concern held by a significant majority of Americans and an overwhelming percentage of Republicans.

The local, state and national media are running scared now – in full attack mode on state legislators across the country who have the audacity to insist that future presidential elections conducted in their states should actually live up to constitutional qualifications for office.

They insist all questions have been answered, that we've all seen the actual birth certificate, that Barack Obama's life is an open book.

But now that the integrity of the Constitution has rightfully become a state issue, because of the abject failure of all controlling legal authorities at the federal level, media at the state and local level are jumping into the act, attempting to enforce acceptance of Obama's story on an unwilling public through the sheer tyranny of "political correctness."

(Let me add that there is, as Rush Limbaugh points out daily, a concerted effort by politically correct people to cover for obama and the fact he can't provide any documented proof he is a US citizen, that can be validated. The fact that on the front of his "birth certificate" states "filed with registrar" instead of "accepted by state registrar" is proof positive the colb posted on the web is not a valid birth certificate.

Obama has ONLY applied for an amended or late birth certificate and Hawaii has issued nothing to him or his campaign. Hawaii does not issue certifications of live birth that do not have a registrar's stamp/signature and raised state seal.

Obama and his campaign have forged the online colb and it is totally fake.) Story Reports

An application for a late birth certificate that has not been accepted by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'

Nne aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, "Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?" It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for obliterating it.

Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’. Hawaii doesn't issue any 'certification of live birth certificates' that indicate ‘Date Filed by Registrar’.

The story really does begin here.

Two terms have plagued the Obama birth certificate issue from the beginning and have fueled many questions about Obama’s posted alleged ‘certified copy’ of a ‘Certification of Live Birth.’ For example, what do they mean in terms of the legal veracity behind a copy of a birth certificate? What is the difference between the “Registrar” and the “State Registrar?”

When would it be important that a record states whether or not it has been accepted by the State Registrar? Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’ as opposed to the ‘Date Accepted by State Registrar,’ that’s why many people, including myself, have been curious whether that matters.

By now, I am sure most of us are aware that Alvin T. Onaka is the ‘State Registrar’ in Hawaii, but who is the ‘Registrar’ to which Obama’s alleged COLB refers?

The difference in these terms is crucial.

It is not a “valid” record until it has been accepted and filed by the ‘State Registrar.’ Furthermore, the ‘State Registrar’s’ certification attests to the evidentiary value of ‘Date of Birth,’ ‘Parentage’ and ‘Place of Birth.’ So, until the ‘State Registrar’ accepts and takes custody of the record, it is only a non-valid ‘application’ for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ in procedural limbo, so to speak, and in the custody of the ‘Registrar.’

(The certification of live birth the DNC and obama used to prove his US citizenship is only a non-valid ‘application’ for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ because it is not a "valid" record that has been accepted and filed by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'.

Obama has presented to the world a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ in procedural limbo that is in the custody of the 'registrar'.

Until it has been accepted for filing by the ‘State Registrar:’ is is ONLY a non-valid 'application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’.

This is the so called "vital records" on file in the state of Hawaii.

An application for a late birth certificate that has not been accepted by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'.) Story Reports

On October 31, 2008 – five days before the 2008 Presidential election – Dr. Fukino put out a press release and according to Factcheck.org, she was quoted as stating that both she and “Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate.” We all know that Onaka is the ‘State Registrar,’ so that settles it – Hawaii’s ‘State Registrar’ must have custody of the record, right?

Besides, many gorgeous news organizations apparently reported the same thing. So, they all must be correct, right? And, we’ve all seen Dr. Fukino’s statement, by now, and that’s what she said, right? Dr. Fukino said that the State Registrar had verified with her that the HDOH had Obama’s original birth certificate on record and that he, as State Registrar, had the statutory authority to maintain and oversee the record – so he is the custodian of that record and the record is valid and official, right?

Right?

RIGHT?

Nope.

Believe it or not, on October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino actually stated that THIS individual had “statutory authority” to maintain and oversee Obama’s “original birth certificate,” and that this individual was THE legal custodian of Obama’s “original birth certificate” just FIVE days before the 2008 U.S. Presidential election:...

Obama's Garden dedicated to digging up the truth about obama's true origin

Dr. Fukino stated, this person, had it on record “in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

Not in accordance with regulations. Not in accordance with law:

That’s right. Incredibly, just five days before the election, Obama’s “original birth certificate” was NOT “valid” or in the custody of the ‘State Registrar,’ Dr. Fukino, herself, said it was in the custody of the “Registrar.”

And if the “Registrar” had custody of the record, Alvin T. Onaka would not and could not certify a copy of it with his signature.

So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar….or perhaps he had a record that had been rejected by the State Registrar entirely.

And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”

The Hawaii State Registrar did not have the legal authority to maintain and oversee Obama’s original birth certificate just five days before the presidential election.

Barrack Obama did not have the valid original birth certificate that he and ‘his people’ have claimed he had and Dr. Fukino said so.

It means that Dr. Fukino said Barrack Obama, his people, our Congress and the media are all LIARS.

So, thank you, Dr. Fukino, for speaking up – twice. Thank you for not letting this go unsaid and thank you for putting it on the public record so that we can prove our Congress failed us so completely…if only in hindsight.

The nation owes you much gratitude for giving us a chance to open our eyes before the election even if most of us missed it.

(I had noticed the online fake certification of live birth indicated date filed by registrar and also noticed it did not indicate date accepted by registrar.

You have made it clear now that the online colb is just an application for a delayed birth certificate that was not accepted before the DNC declared obama was a US citizen/natural born citizen to get him on the presidential ballot in Hawaii in 2008.

An application for a birth certificate is not legal evidence of birth in the US.

This is why obama hides his true identity and spends millions in court to keep his origin from being probated.

Thank you for your excellent work Miss Tickly!) Story Reports

The Story of the Century

Compare a real certification of live birth with obama's fake certification of live birth

How to make a dummy

Dummies are often made to look like small boys and feature a limp body with a fully articulated head.

Making ventriloquist dummies is a complex art, requiring a good deal of skill. The internal structure of the dummy's head is made up of a network of wires and pulleys. These are manipulated by the ventriloquist to bring the dummy to life, moving his eyes, eyebrows, jaw, and sometimes even ears or tongue. If you already are familiar with the construction of plastic, resin, or papier-mâché dummies, however, making a wooden dummy isn't all that difficult.

Instructions

Draw patterns for the dummy's head. You will need both profile and full-face patterns for best results. Draw large rectangles over the profile pattern to determine the size and position of the wood blocks from which you'll carve the head. The head will need to be made of four main blocks---the face, the forward-middle head, the rear-middle head, and the back of the head---as well as a small block for the nose.

Cut wood blocks to the sizes you have determined and glue them together in the positions marked on your pattern. Rather than gluing the wood pieces directly to each other, put a piece of paper between the wood at each connection: This will allow you to take the head apart later. Only the nose should be glued normally, at this point, since you won't have to remove it later. Trace the patterns onto the rough block-head with carbon paper placed under your drawing.

Carve the rough shape of the head with the gouges, removing large chunks of wood until the dummy's head is nearly down to the size desired. Use the bench knife to add detail and finish the carving process. Smooth the head with sandpaper until it looks exactly as you want it.

Break the pieces of the head apart with a chisel and use the gouges to hollow out the inside for the dummy's mechanism. Do this very carefully; you want to make the cavity as large as possible without accidentally puncturing the wall of the head. The head should be approximately half an inch thick at all points.

Cut the dummy's jaw out with the scroll saw so that it can freely articulate. Cut holes for the eyes. You may need to cut other apertures as well, depending on what you want the dummy to be able to do. Install the internal mechanism of the head and connect everything so that the dummy's face is fully functional. Glue the head together, paint it if desired, and give it a coat of varnish.

Finish the dummy. Carve a torso from a large block of wood to hide your hand while operating it and to give the body some definition. Since this will be covered by the dummy's clothes, it needn't be nearly as detailed as the head. Simply give it a chest cavity and shoulders. Sew clothes, add a wig, and make stuffed cloth hands and arms for the dummy.

(Observing the above finished "dummy" it seems it is self manipulated because letterman's hand is not completely hidden.) Story Reports

7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES"

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs

7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES"

c. Birth on U.S. Military Base Outside of the United States or Birth on U.S. Embassy or Consulate Premises Abroad:

(1) Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not born in the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.

7 FAM 1112 WHAT IS BIRTH “IN THE UNITED STATES”?

a. INA 101(a)(38) (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(38)) provides that “the term ‘United States,’ when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.”

Outside of the country – the status of the land upon which a military base is located is governed by international treaty, law and what are known as Status of Forces agreements.

The citizenship acquired by birth on a military installation or consular facility is through the US Citizenship status of the parents. Also, any births to US citizen overseas must be registered with the consulate or authority on the base.

"U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment."

A parent can only pass citizenship onto a child born on foreign soil if the parent in question has been a resident of the usa for at least ten years with those ten years not beginning before the age of sixteen.

(This means people born on military bases overseas are not considered born in the US. The citizenship of the parents determines the citizenship of person born on a US military base. Here it is in black and white.) Story Reports

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs

Arizona scam to hide obama identity in next election, SB 1308 is unconstitutional

Arizona Senate Bill 1308 Defines Dual Citizens As Natural Born Citizens.

SB 1308 is unconstitutional because it would render the natural born citizen clause (from Article 2 Section 1) superfluous.

"Arizona had a nice dog and pony show there for awhile, but it’s all bunk." – Leo Donofrio

"America is being scrubbed." – Leo Donofrio
..........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio, Esq.

BEWARE: Arizona Senate Bill 1308 Defines Dual Citizens As Natural Born Citizens. Leo Donofrio Atty

Arizona Senate Bill 1308 passed out of committee yesterday by an 8-5 vote. This bill is a cleverly disguised attempt to protect President Obama from eligibility scrutiny. It does this by declaring persons born with dual citizenship as natural born citizens. But it does this in a very sneaky manner.

That’s right. Arizona has now passed out of committee a bill which states that persons born with dual citizenship are natural born citizens of the United States. This same bill is being considered by all states party to the compact.

So infamous congratulations to the 8 votes in Arizona who passed this unconstitutional bill to the full Senate floor. They’ve just declared those born as dual citizens eligible to be Commander In Chief of the US Armed Forces.

The Arizona Republic completely failed to mention this incredible turn of events in their report:

“Late Tuesday, the committee advanced two of the bills, becoming the first state legislative committee in the nation to pass legislation intended to challenge the practice of granting citizenship to children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants.

Committee members voted 8-5 to approve a controversial package of bills, which would challenge the 14th Amendment interpretation about citizenship.”

This so called “compact” is being pushed by a conglomerate of states, and it looks like it’s being done to protect Obama. SB 1308 declares:

ARTICLE 6. INTERSTATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE COMPACT…

ARTICLE II

Definition

As used in this compact, “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” has the meaning that it bears in section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, namely that the person is a child of at least one parent who owes no allegiance to any foreign sovereignty, or a child without citizenship or nationality in any foreign country.

ARTICLE III

Terms

…A person who is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is a natural born United States citizen.

Article II defines a person… “born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” … as … “a child born to at least one parent who owes no allegiance to any foreign sovereignty“.

Article III declares that… “A person who is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is a natural born United States citizen.”

Sneaky bastards all around. When the relevant section of Article II is read in conjunction with the relevant section of Article III, you have a complete declaration that a person born of one citizen parent is a “natural born United States citizen”.

According to that definition, a person born with dual citizenship is also a “natural born United States citizen”.

ANCHOR BABIES OUT… OBAMA IN.

Anchor babies will not be eligible for US citizenship according to this bill, but Obama will be eligible to be POTUS. Looks like a deal was struck to protect Obama by attacking the citizenship of children born on US soil to illegal immigrant parents.

Apparently, the US citizenship of anchor babies is being sacrificed to protect Obama from competing eligibility legislation – such as Arizona HB 2544 – which does, in fact, require Presidential candidates to prove they have never owed allegiance to a foreign nation.

Arizona HB 2544

14th AMENDMENT – MARBURY v. MADISON – JOHN BINGHAM

SB 1308 is unconstitutional because it would render the natural born citizen clause (from Article 2 Section 1) superfluous. That is not allowed according to the famous SCOTUS decision, Marbury v. Madison, wherein Chief Justice Marshal stated:

‘It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect; and therefore such construction is inadmissible, unless the words require it.’

If the 14th Amendment defined “natural born citizen” for the purposes of POTUS eligibility, then the nbc clause in Article 2 Section 1 would be rendered meaningless.

If the framers of the 14th Amendment had sought to declare all 14th Amendment citizens to be “natural born citizens” then that’s exactly what the 14th Amendment would say.

But it doesn’t.

The 14th Amendment – by its very own text – defines who are “citizens”, but it does not define who is a “natural born citizen”. Elsewhere in the Constitution, the word “citizen” was used to define those who are eligible to be Representatives and Senators. But the word “citizen” was not used to define those eligible to be POTUS. For that the framers demanded one be a “natural born citizen”.

The 14th Amendment does not use the words “natural born”. The framers could have included those words in the 14th Amendment, but they chose not to.

The compact between the states referenced in Arizona SB 1308 attempts to rewrite the 14th Amendment by adding the words “natural born” to it.

Such may only be accomplished by the Constitutional amendment process. This compact does not meet that standard.

In conclusion, I leave you with the words of John Bingham, one of the people who drafted the 14th Amendment:

“…every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural-born citizen.”

Parents. Plural. Not one parent. Two. Two parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty. Mr. Bingham would know more about the intent of the drafters of the 14th Amendment than anyone alive today… seeing as how Mr. Bingham wrote the 14th Amendment.

But hey, who cares about facts? Who cares about the text of the 14th Amendment? This is America. The Constitution is what people say it is, not what it actually says for itself. Welcome to the living Constitution… and the dying of the USA.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.

(Sneaky bastards is right Leo. Thanks for the heads up about another scam to get obama on the ballot even though he can't provide any documentation validating his US citizenship. The natural born question is almost moot because you must be a citizen before you can be a natural born citizen. Up to this point obama has provided nothing that can be verified to validate his US citizenship. Nothing.) Story Reports

2 main facts about the "certification of live birth" the obama campaign put on the internet

.........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio Additional Comments:

Mr. Donofrio, is there ANY WAY to get some Arizonans to enforce ARS 16-311?

I have to be honest when someone asks, “is this hopeless too”. It’s hopeless… yup. Nothing will be done. I started writing this blog,natural born citizen, again because I saw state legislatures acting to protect their ballots from unconstitutional candidates. The fiasco I just witnessed with regard to Arizona SB 1308 took the wind right out of me. I do not believe HB 2544 was ever intended as anything more than a chess move leading to 1308. I’m sick about it, really sick.

This appears to have been well thought out and deals were made behind doors… somebody bartered anchor baby citizenship to protect Obama. And the language used was so evasive that it looked like it was designed to check Obama’s credentials and dual citizenship, but it does neither. It doesn’t even require to see his COLB let alone a long form BC and it defines a person born to only one citizen parent as nbc. Wolf in sheeps clothing.-Leo

The situation in Hawaii is beyond Twilight Zone, probably by intention but Im just not sure. – Leo

(Be Careful What You Wish For, you just might get it was the Twilight Zone deconstruction of the meaning of an idea.

Deconstruction (or deconstructionism) is an approach which pursues the meaning of a text to the point of exposing the supposed contradictions and internal oppositions upon which it is founded—supposedly showing that those foundations are irreducibly complex, unstable, or impossible.

"Deconstruction is not a dismantling of the structure of a text, but a demonstration that it has already dismantled itself. Its apparently-solid ground is no rock, but thin air."
J. Hillis Miller

The Hawaii "twilight zone" deconstruction exposing contradictions, internal oppositions etc and has exposed obama's claim of US citizenship that has already dismantled itself.

Leo is right again Hawaii is in the "twilight zone" of exposing the flawed logic of a valid obama certification of live birth. Hawaii continues the twilight zone deconstruction approach pursuing the meaning of the text, WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Hawaii has deconstructed obama's "birth certificate" and shown it to have been conjured up out of thin air.) Story Reports

Do you have any comment on the Texas bill authored by Leo Berman? The bill simply asks a candidate to present a long form birth certificate.

ed. I think it actually only requires an “original birth certificate”. There’s wiggle room there, but even that wont pass. Nobody is going to ask Obama for anything, not even a COLB. It’s not gonna happen. – leo

Naturalized covers naturalized by oath or naturalized-at-birth: Under US Code 1401 it has a section called “Born Citizens” under the total umbrella of naturalized Citizens. Naturalized just means via statute or treaty, and it includes naturalized-at-birth or “born citizens” and naturalized by oath. But the 2 US Citizen/born on US soil permutation is the only one omitted from US Code 1401, and rightly so as that is the definition of NBC, and it is not a naturalized citizen.

This is a very good point. The US code lists all types of paths to citizenship but it does not list “born in the US to “parents” who are citizens”. This is because such a person is a natural born citizen and no statute or Amendment is necessary to make one a US citizen.-leo

I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT WOULDN’T YOU THINK THAT A THREAT TO THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES BY ANY GOVERNMENT LEADER THAT ABUSES HIS AUTHORITY BY DeSTROYING THE VALUE OF THE DOLLAR ON THE WORLD MARKET BY PUSHING US INTO DEBT IN AN ATTEMPT TO GIVE US NO OTHER CHOICE BUT TO AGREE ON HAVING A SINGLE WORLD CURRENCY TO MAKE UP FOR OUR LOSSES. THIS WOULD FORCE US ANOTHER STEP DEEPER INTO A NEW WORLD ORDER. IS THIS AN ACT OF AN AMERICAN PATRIOT OR AN ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES.

ed. Kill the caps Ken. It’s considered bad netiquette. As to the content of your comment, I think that all federal reserve notes are not Constitutional money and that more than anything will eventually lead to the inevitable destruction of the dollar. No President has done anything to change this, other than perhaps JFK… and we all know how that story ended.- Leo

U.S. Dept of State Foreign Affairs Manual~
Presidential Eligibility:

” a natural born Citizen pursuant to a statute is not necessarily one for Constitutional purposes”

What’s the ” Constitutional purpose” for a ‘natural born Citizen’? Gee, … I can’t think of too many (lol)

ed. I forgot about that. Good one. Leo

Leo, do you think the ‘vital stats’ of Obama will only, eventually come out once he is out of office and therefore power?

If eligibility bills for the next election are passed and enacted, there will undoubtedly be suits. That of course is ironic if Obama has nothing to worry about … but my question remains do you think it will there will then be a challenge and SCOTUS will finally take it?

I’m still skeptical about the “reconferencing” of the Hollister case on March 4th.

Thoughts?

ed. No state will pass a bill that even requires Obama to show a real COLB from Hawaii. That’s my prediction. Obama won’t even be required to show his COLB to the SOS of even one state because that would make it a public document. And nobody will see that document in this, or any other lifetime. That’s my prediction after seeing what Arizona tried to pull with the bait and switch between the real birther bill that Burgess instituted and SB 1308. Arizona had a nice dog and pony show there for awhile, but it’s all bunk. – Leo


ed. If the comments attributed to Burgess at this blog, natural born citizens.wordpress.com, are accurate, and I have no reason to believe they aren’t, HB 2544 is dead and dusted.

Furthermore, I am comfortable with the following prediction – NOT ONE BILL REQUIRING POTUS CANDIDATES TO SUPPLY ANY FORM OF US CITIZENSHIP DOCUMENTATION WILL BE PASSED. You won’t even get to see Obama’s real COLB. The photocopy of the COLB that has become well known has never been shown to any election official and it never will be so shown. That’s my opinion.

What just happened with SB 1308 in Arizona is the scariest damn thing I’ve seen yet in this fight. All that language in 1308 about birth certificates and COLB etc., none of it has any meaning in the bill. None of it. This compact was cleverly designed to look as if it had some teeth while it’s really support for Obama at the expense of anchor baby citizenship. Why does that not surprise me? The Constitution is confetti. – leo

(If what you say is true Leo, and I do believe it is, our government and especially our "president" is lawless. My question to you is what should Americans do to maintain our liberty and freedom?) Story Reports

Don't get your hopes up with the Hollister case. best of luck to them, but it appears that the SCOTUS failed to issue a judgment on the motion and will correct that error with a one line denial as with all other cases before them on this issue. I would be happy to eat my words on this one, but will not have to. – Leo

Wa McCain was born on a military installation?

ed. I have not seen any evidence McCain was born on a military installation, but even if he was, he’s still not eligible.

U.S. State Department policy (as codified in the department­’s Foreign Affairs Manual) at 7 FAM 1114 (c)(1) reads:

“Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installati­ons abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdicti­on of the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenshi­p by reason of birth.” - Leo

(Leo is correct again, johm mccain is also not a US citizen. Because he is also not a naturalized citizen. He is in fact an illegal alien. Mccain has indicated he was born in Colon Panama and has a birth certificate.

John McCain: Citizen of Panama At Birth

Obama has indicated he was born in Hawaii and has a "birth certificate". Mccain's birth certificate can be verified. It indicates he was born out side of the canal zone in Panama.

Obama's "birth certificate" can't be verified if he was born inside or outside of Hawaii because it can't be verified as to the hospital he was born in nor the doctors name.

Mccain is not a US citizen according to his own birth certificate.

Obama has a short form forged certification of live birth on the web that can't be verified and that he himself has never claimed as his.

Obama is not a US citizen because he has no birth certificate that can be verified as real.) Story Reports

Pod cast explains the price of oil and what is going to happen

A unique monetary arrangement was formalized in June 1974 by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, establishing the U.S.-Saudi Arabian Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation. The U.S. Treasury and the New York Federal Reserve would ‘allow’ the Saudi central bank to buy U.S. Treasury bonds with Saudi petrodollars. Likewise, London banks would handle eurozone-based international oil transactions, loan these revenue via “Eurobonds” to oil importing countries. The debt and interest from these loans would then flow to the dollar denominated payments to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), thereby completing the recycling of surplus petrodollars back to the Federal Reserve.

Lindsey Williams returns to follow up on information he revealed about the price of oil and Middle East turmoil on the Alex Jones Show This pod cast explains the price of oil and what is going to happen.

Video Exposes Obama Citizenship FRAUD

...........................................................................................

2-minute video destroys obama birth certificate fraud.
...........................................................................................
The FIRST EIGHT SECONDS of this video buries your rabid liberal media in their own lies.

You were not born in Hawaii. You are not a US citizen. Your FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE, fabricated by Annenberg Factcheck, proves you are a liar, a fraud, an imposter, and an illegal alien.

Mr. Obama - or whoever you are - you have had seven years to prove who you are, and you refused to do so.

Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's

(Yep there are 2 main facts about the "certifcation of live birth" the obama campaign put on the internet.

(1) It can't be verfied because it contains no hospital or doctors names. No signatures. Nothing that can be verfied by the American public.

(2) The strange fact that it was forged and yet Hawaii has indicated that some kind of record exists in Hawaii.

The video above proves it was forged as has been proven before. It seems there is a coverup that includes many people that can't afford for the "cat" to get out of the bag because it would be not just obama resigning or removed in disgrace but many other people going to prison for FRAUD.

I continue to ask, "where's the birth certificate" at work and elsewhere. It is making people think and question who obama is. Yesterday I was confronted by an individual who told me obama does not have to prove he has a birth certificate and then he said he has one.

I told him there are at least 5 different versions of the online short form colb and none of them can be verfied.

I also informed the individual that obama can't prove he is a US citizen because all he has is a index notation in Hawaii that indicates his name and sex.

I also informed the individual there are 5 different ways to get a birth certificate in Hawaii.

One of the ways is to prove the parents were married for at least 1 year prior to the birth and lived in Hawaii. A "birth certificate" then could be issued even if the baby was born OUTSIDE of the US!

Because obama's short form can't be verified as to how he obtained it and it has no hospital or doctors name to verify he was born in Hawaii, no one on earth can prove obama was born in Hawaii especially the usurper obama himself.

The individual got frustrated and asked me if I could prove I was a US citizen. I said yes, I have a birth certificate with a hospital and doctors name, signatures and seal.

My record can be verfied because my birth certificate states facts that can be "fact checked" and verified.

The individual I was talking started to make various excuse for obama such as maybe someone other than obama has altered his birth certificate.

I informed him also that obama has never claimed any of the five colb's online are his.

My point is I as others need to keep asking, "where's the birth certifivate".

There were many other people in the room "fact checking" what I said against what the obama supporter said.

Because I have the cahonas to speak out and ask "where's the birth certificate", there are people who when they see me instead of saying hello say, "where's the birth certificate". I am making people think and question obama's US citizenship because of the fact I have questioned who obama is and his orign.) Story Reports

MLK Observance In Columbia, SC Had A Box To Conceal The Father Of His Country

The annual MLK observance at the state house in Columbia, SC had an interesting twist this year. The event is held on the north side steps of the statehouse. Prominent at that location is a large bronze statue of George Washington. This year a "box" to conceal the Father of His Country from view was constructed apparently so that participants would not be offended by his presence.

George Washington and Slavery

George Washington and slavery

George Washington and Slavery A message For President's Day

George Washington was born into a world in which slavery was accepted. He became a slave owner when his father died in 1743. At the age of eleven, he inherited ten slaves and 500 acres of land. When he began farming Mount Vernon eleven years later, at the age of 22, he had a work force of about 36 slaves. With his marriage to Martha Custis in 1759, 20 of her slaves came to Mount Vernon. After their marriage, Washington purchased even more slaves. The slave population also increased because the slaves were marrying and raising their own families. By 1799, when George Washington died, there were 316 slaves living on the estate.

Slaves played an integral role in Mount Vernon's history. Although little written documentation exists from the slaves themselves, much is known about their lives through primary documents left by Washington and visitors to Mount Vernon. The skilled and manual labor needed to run Mount Vernon was largely provided by slaves. Many of the working slaves were trained in crafts such as milling, coopering, blacksmithing, carpentry,and shoemaking. The others worked as house servants, boatmen, coachmen or field hands. Some female slaves were also taught skills, particularly spinning, weaving and sewing, while others worked as house servants or in the laundry, the dairy, or the kitchen. Many female slaves also worked in the fields. Almost three-quarters of the 184 working slaves at Mount Vernon worked in the fields, and of those, about 60% were women.

Food grown at Mount Vernon was distributed to the slaves and their families and to the Washingtons. Any surplus was sold at market. The slaves received their food rations weekly. Many slaves also kept their own gardens to supplement their diet. The slaves could sell their food at local markets to earn extra income. The slaves were also issued clothing once a year.

The work-day at Mount Vernon was from sunrise to sunset, with 2 hours off for meals. Sunday was a holiday. Slaves also received 3-4 days off at Christmas, and the Monday after Easter and Pentecost as holidays. If a slave was required to work a Sunday during harvest, Washington would allow them a day off later, and sometimes compensated them with pay.

George Washington's attitude toward slavery changed as he grew older. During the Revolution, as he and fellow patriots strove for liberty, Washington became increasingly conscious of the contradiction between this struggle and the system of slavery. By the time of his presidency, he seems to have believed that slavery was wrong and against the principles of the new nation.

As President, Washington did not lead a public fight against slavery, however, because he believed it would tear the new nation apart. Abolition had many opponents, especially in the South. Washington seems to have feared that if he took such a public stand, the southern states would withdraw from the Union (something they would do seventy years later, leading to the Civil War). He had worked too hard to build the country to risk tearing it apart.

Privately, however, Washington could -- and did -- lead by example. In his will, he arranged for all of the slaves he owned to be freed after the death of his wife, Martha. He also left instructions for the continued care and education of some of his former slaves, support and training for all of the children until they came of age, and continuing support for the elderly.

Washington's habit of extensive recordkeeping, such as his 1799 Slave Census, has helped Mount Vernon's historians research and interpret slave life on his five farms. Extensive archaeological excavation and research at Mount Vernon has also furthered our understanding of the large slave community that lived here.

In 1778, while Washington was at war, he wrote to his manager at Mount Vernon that he wished to sell his slaves and "to get quit of negroes", since maintaining a large (and increasingly elderly) slave population was no longer economically efficient. Washington could not legally sell the "dower slaves", however, and because these slaves had long intermarried with his own slaves, he could not sell his slaves without breaking up families, something which he had resolved not to do. Confronted with this dilemma, his plan to divest himself of slaves was dropped.

(I suggest people try to think "outside of the box" when it comes to George Washington.
George Washington should not be shunned or hidden. His treatment of slaves was honorable. Washington should not be dishonored by putting a box around his statue.

According to government statistics, 72 percent of African-American children are born to unmarried Mothers. The girls don't think they have to get married.

This is shameful and is something that should be addressed by the MLK observance. The MLK observance should think "out of the box" and work to free modern day African-American children that are born into the "slavery" of the mindset that its expected or normal for a son or daughter to be born illegitimate.) Story Reports

"While we can blame the government, history, slavery, poverty and a slew of other reasons for the state of our communities and the issues our children face, ultimately, the responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of the parent in the mirror. And that's exactly where it should be." Kirsten West Savali

72 Percent of African-American Children Born to Unwed Mothers

After the war, Washington often privately expressed a dislike of the institution of slavery. In 1786, he wrote to a friend that "I never mean ... to possess another slave by purchase; it being among my first wishes to see some plan adopted, by which slavery in this Country may be abolished by slow, sure and imperceptible degrees." To another friend he wrote that "there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see some plan adopted for the abolition" of slavery. He expressed moral support for plans by his friend the Marquis de Lafayette to emancipate slaves and resettle them elsewhere, but he did not assist him in the effort.

MLK was "caught in the act" by MLK closest friend Ralph Abernathy, King's hand-picked successor as president of S.C.L.C. from 1968 to 1976 The Rev Ralph David Abernathy should be honored on MLK day not MLK. If anybody should be "boxed" in it should be a statue of MLK.