Obama Dictatorship Uses Government Regulations To Inslave Americans
Obama Dictatorship Uses Government Regulations To Inslave Americans
In June the Department of Labor, at the behest of union bosses, issued a 160-page proposal to expand the interpretation of “advice” under a little-known law called the Labor-Management Reporting & Disclosure Act that will cause many job creators, instead of focusing on job creation, to spend more time and resources on more paperwork, or risk going to jail.
Moreover, it will cause many unsuspecting service providers who currently do not know they will fall into the Department of Labor’s trap to either violate the law, or open their personal, company or firm earnings to the Department of Labor, the public and union bosses.
In addition to companies who hire attorneys to assist them with union issues, the Department of Labor’s broad expansion into areas that most would not consider remotely connected to unions, but because it could indirectly affect [read deter] employees’ choice to unionize, the Department of Labor will likely call this “persuader activity.”
Here are the types of vendors (and the employers that hire them or purchase goods from them) who will likely be caught up in the DOL’s new proposed rules:
Writers (or authors) who may write a website, publication, sell a book, or other material that may promote a positive employee relations culture, thereby dissuading employees from unionizing.
Website designers who may be contracted to design and build a website to be used for internal communications with employees.
Consultants who coach management on how to structure and effectively manage employee teams.
Employee engagement consultants who help companies and employees with positive employee relations.
Productivity consultants who design and implement quality, or any other type of teams that may give employees a voice in the success of their companies’ products.
Safety consultants who help establish safety committees that give employees the ability to voice safety concerns to their employer to resolve safety issues.
Human resources consultants that design, write, or implement employee handbooks or policies.
Compensation and benefit consultants who design and administer any type of benefit, pay or incentive plans for companies.
Consultants who conduct surveys to determine employee satisfaction at their jobs.
Since the Department of Labor’s phraseology is: “…activities that have as a direct or indirect object to, explicitly or implicitly, influence the decisions of employees with respect to forming, joining or assisting a union, collective bargaining, or any protected concerted activity (such as a strike) in the workplace,” the type of activity that an employer and consultant may be required to report to the Department of Labor is almost endless.
(Many job creators, instead of focusing on job creation, to spend more time and resources on more paperwork, or risk going to jail. Moreover, it will cause many unsuspecting service providers who currently do not know they will fall into the Department of Labor’s trap to either violate the law, or open their personal, company or firm earnings to the Department of Labor, the public and union bosses.
Obama is taking over the private sector through government regulations that require companies to open their personal, company or firm earnings to the Department of Labor, the public and union bosses. This will allow obama to control corporate America.
This is just one example of the obama dictatorship bypassing congress and the US Constitution using government regulations.) Story Reports
Friday, November 11, 2011
Thursday, November 10, 2011
The combination of ever-bigger government financed by an ever-smaller tax base is doomed to failure
The combination of ever-bigger government financed by an ever-smaller tax base is doomed to failure.
Robert Ringer
From Greece and Portugal to California and Wisconsin, from Italy and Spain to Illinois and New York, the socialist model is collapsing under its own weight. Economic and demographic forces are shining a spotlight on the reality that the combination of ever-bigger government financed by an ever-smaller tax base is doomed to failure.
Nevertheless, Obama and his class-warfare pals can win. The more obvious their failure becomes, the more angry and panicked the wealth redistributors, especially in Washington, D.C., will be. Their bull slinging is easy enough to laugh off, but if it doesn't work – if it becomes clear that the Democrats are going down to defeat in 2012 – look for them to go to their weapon of last resort and use brute force to "temporarily" suspend elections.
How 2012 elections could be suspended
Robert Ringer
From Greece and Portugal to California and Wisconsin, from Italy and Spain to Illinois and New York, the socialist model is collapsing under its own weight. Economic and demographic forces are shining a spotlight on the reality that the combination of ever-bigger government financed by an ever-smaller tax base is doomed to failure.
Nevertheless, Obama and his class-warfare pals can win. The more obvious their failure becomes, the more angry and panicked the wealth redistributors, especially in Washington, D.C., will be. Their bull slinging is easy enough to laugh off, but if it doesn't work – if it becomes clear that the Democrats are going down to defeat in 2012 – look for them to go to their weapon of last resort and use brute force to "temporarily" suspend elections.
How 2012 elections could be suspended
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
OBAMA DIVERSON TO KEEP AMERICANS FROM KNOWING HIS REAL IDENTITY
FOR YOU IDIOTS WHO DIDN'T CATCH ON, THE USURPER SAID HIS APPROVAL RATING JUST WENT DOWN IN AMERICA BUT HIS APPROVAL RATING IS STILL HIGH IN THE COUNTRY OF HIS BIRTH MEANING HE WASN'T BORN IN AMERICA.
THIS IS A DIVERSON TO KEEP AMERICANS FROM KNOWING HIS REAL IDENTITY.
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
The person who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama II was born on October 28, 1959, in New York City. He was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz.
Bâri′ discovered that he was the son of Malcolm X. He then wanted to complete what his father had started in the political world. But he realized that he could not do it if the world knew that he was the illegitimate son of Malcolm X, a Muslim revolutionary. Hence, he had to change his birth identity and take on a new one.
“father” Barack Obama was Malcolm X’s Kenyan friend.
"obama" must hide his identity. He is the son of malcolm X.
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Update: Visit ParrotNewsreport.com Real news about obama's FAKE birth certificate, analysis and commentary on REAL news. Citizen Journalist
Is "President" Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Bâri′ - Muslim name meaning “Of Allah”. Malik / Malachi Malik is Arabic for Malachi [Messenger of God]. Shabazz - Malcolm X chosen Muslim last name.
Malcolm X A Life Of Reinvention
Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.
In August 1994, at the age of 34, five years younger than was his father Malcolm X at his untimely death, Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died.
From the Social Security Death Index database:
SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - didn’t really die. His birth identity ‘had’ to die.
The SSDI record states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”.
V signifies: “Verified: Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.”
The report is not coded “P“.
P signifies: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”.
Notice of death was made by an informant who did not present verification of his/her reporting, that is, no death certificate was presented with the notification of death.
Once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.
The first listed address for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is One street over from Malcolm X’s house!
From his conception in 1959 through shortly before Malcolm X death in 1965, Malcolm X lived just one street over from Bâri′ M. Shabazz’s first address in East Elmhurst, New York.
The person who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama II was born on October 28, 1959, in New York City. He was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz.
The names Bâri′, Malik, and Shabazz were “sacred" to Malcolm X.
Bâri′ discovered that he was the son of Malcolm X. He then wanted to complete what his father had started in the political world. But he realized that he could not do it if the world knew that he was the illegitimate son of Malcolm X, a Muslim revolutionary. Hence, he had to change his birth identity and take on a new one.
“father” Barack Obama was Malcolm X’s Kenyan friend.
Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.
Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?
.........................................................................................
Go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts
Hawaii traffic court’s web site is called eCourt Kokua.
Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.”
What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at 45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.
The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.
On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”
The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.
The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
This information raises the following questions:
1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.
2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.
3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?
4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.
5.Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.
6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?
7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person called “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation.
If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of "President", Barack Hussein Obama II. That is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports the position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz.
What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.
8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record.
A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Obama Mother Pictures Were Faked Because Malcolm X Is obama's Sire
(Now you see why the usurper "obama" must hide his identity. He is the son of malcolm X. Where did he get the head scars and when? Now we know.)Story Reports
Is "President" Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Bâri′ - Muslim name meaning “Of Allah”. Malik / Malachi Malik is Arabic for Malachi [Messenger of God]. Shabazz - Malcolm X chosen Muslim last name.
Malcolm X A Life Of Reinvention
Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.
In August 1994, at the age of 34, five years younger than was his father Malcolm X at his untimely death, Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died.
From the Social Security Death Index database:
SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - didn’t really die. His birth identity ‘had’ to die.
The SSDI record states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”.
V signifies: “Verified: Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.”
The report is not coded “P“.
P signifies: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”.
Notice of death was made by an informant who did not present verification of his/her reporting, that is, no death certificate was presented with the notification of death.
Once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.
The first listed address for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is One street over from Malcolm X’s house!
From his conception in 1959 through shortly before Malcolm X death in 1965, Malcolm X lived just one street over from Bâri′ M. Shabazz’s first address in East Elmhurst, New York.
The person who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama II was born on October 28, 1959, in New York City. He was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz.
The names Bâri′, Malik, and Shabazz were “sacred" to Malcolm X.
Bâri′ discovered that he was the son of Malcolm X. He then wanted to complete what his father had started in the political world. But he realized that he could not do it if the world knew that he was the illegitimate son of Malcolm X, a Muslim revolutionary. Hence, he had to change his birth identity and take on a new one.
“father” Barack Obama was Malcolm X’s Kenyan friend.
Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.
Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?
.........................................................................................
Go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts
Hawaii traffic court’s web site is called eCourt Kokua.
Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.”
What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at 45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.
The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.
On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”
The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.
The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
This information raises the following questions:
1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.
2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.
3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?
4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.
5.Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.
6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?
7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person called “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation.
If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of "President", Barack Hussein Obama II. That is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports the position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz.
What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.
8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record.
A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.
Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth
Obama Mother Pictures Were Faked Because Malcolm X Is obama's Sire
(Now you see why the usurper "obama" must hide his identity. He is the son of malcolm X. Where did he get the head scars and when? Now we know.)Story Reports
Is President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years?
Is President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years?
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
On November 2, 2011, I published an article entitled and asking the question, “Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?”.
Is President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years?
breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack
The basis of the question that I asked came from a November 2, 2011 breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack,
In her article, Ms. Trowbridge’s contends that putative President Barack Hussein Obama II’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz and that his date of birth is October 28, 1959, and his social security number is 084-54-5926. She says he was born in New York City. She adds that he was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz. She also says that to be able to enter the political world, Bâri′ M. Shabazz had to change his birth identity and take on a new one which became Barack Hussein Obama II.
Ms. Trowbridge says: “We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.”
Ms. Trowbridge has found that the Social Security Death Index shows: “SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926.” From this, one would think that Bâri′ died in August 1994. But no, Ms. Trowbridge informs that only his identity was made “dead.” The real person continued to live and that person became “Barack Hussein Obama II.” Note how she explains that the “death” of Bâri′ was only reported by someone (“V” or “Verified”) and that the person did not present any valid death certificate (“P” or “Proof).
(Obama not only has no proof of birth now it seems he has no proof of death. It figures.) Story Reports
What’s more Ms. Trowbridge explains that “[o]nce in the federal system, the [death] record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.”
Finally, and the most shocking part of her report is that Ms. Trowbridge contends that Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the biological son of Malcolm X. Hence, if Barack Hussein Obama II is the same person as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that would make putative President Obama the biological son of Malcolm X.
On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.
did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to Access to the court’s web set Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.”
The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at
45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744
. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.
The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.
On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”
The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.
The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”
Continue Reading About Malcolm X Jr Here
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
On November 2, 2011, I published an article entitled and asking the question, “Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?”.
Is President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years?
breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack
The basis of the question that I asked came from a November 2, 2011 breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack,
In her article, Ms. Trowbridge’s contends that putative President Barack Hussein Obama II’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz and that his date of birth is October 28, 1959, and his social security number is 084-54-5926. She says he was born in New York City. She adds that he was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz. She also says that to be able to enter the political world, Bâri′ M. Shabazz had to change his birth identity and take on a new one which became Barack Hussein Obama II.
Ms. Trowbridge says: “We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.”
Ms. Trowbridge has found that the Social Security Death Index shows: “SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926.” From this, one would think that Bâri′ died in August 1994. But no, Ms. Trowbridge informs that only his identity was made “dead.” The real person continued to live and that person became “Barack Hussein Obama II.” Note how she explains that the “death” of Bâri′ was only reported by someone (“V” or “Verified”) and that the person did not present any valid death certificate (“P” or “Proof).
(Obama not only has no proof of birth now it seems he has no proof of death. It figures.) Story Reports
What’s more Ms. Trowbridge explains that “[o]nce in the federal system, the [death] record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.”
Finally, and the most shocking part of her report is that Ms. Trowbridge contends that Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the biological son of Malcolm X. Hence, if Barack Hussein Obama II is the same person as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that would make putative President Obama the biological son of Malcolm X.
On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.
did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to Access to the court’s web set Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.”
The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at
45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744
. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.
The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.
On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”
The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.
The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”
Continue Reading About Malcolm X Jr Here
Monday, November 7, 2011
EAS Test Allows Obama to ‘Seize Control’ of Communications Nov 9 At 2PM
EAS Test Allows Obama to ‘Seize Control’ of Communications Nov 9 At 2PM
(An actual alert code is being used by fema, not a test code so an actual alert will be broadcast on radio an tv. People who are not aware that it is supposed to be a test will think it is a REAL national emergency. Why is fema using a real code and not just a test code? Expect people to panic because they think it is real. Expect the government to screw the test up. This is test to control all communications. Its not for national emergencies.
The upcoming Emergency Alert System test being conducted by Homeland Security and FEMA on November 9 gives the government the pretext to “seize control” of communications in America, because for the first time broadcasters will have no choice on whether to partake. I don't trust the government, do you? This will be a government manufactured crisis.) Story Reports
In every previous instance where the EAS system was tested, broadcasters were in control of whether or not to flip the switch, although they did face losing their broadcast license if they failed to partake.
For the very first time, the federal government will have complete control over the broadcast frequency and will be able to override all radio and television stations.
Next month’s test also marks the first time that the alert has been conducted nationwide.
“The nationwide test may last up to three and a half minutes. The public will hear a message indicating that “This is a test.” The audio message will be the same for radio, television and cable,” states a FEMA press release.
The first of its kind test will give the government the pretext to take over all civilian communication outlets under the guise of a national emergency.
The process “seizes control of the broadcast frequency.”
Why it was being conducted in the middle of a work day at 2pm and not at midnight on a Saturday.
FEMA has indicated it isn’t even sure whether television broadcasts will display a message or not during the test.
The fact that the government has also chosen a date which is the reverse of 9/11 (the 9th of November being 11/9), is also unlikely to reduce anxiety surrounding the test.
According to a message being circulated by local school and government officials, there is "great concern in local police and emergency management circles about undue public anxiety over this test."
"Fear is that the lack of an explanation message might create panic.
The test is being conducted jointly by the US Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Federal Communications Commission and the National Weather Service.
The test is part of the Emergency Alert System designed to transmit, via TV and radio, emergency alerts and warnings regarding weather threats, child abductions and other types of emergencies, according to officials.
While state and local tests already take place frequently, a simultaneous, nationwide test of the national EAS "emergency action notification" code has never occurred.
........................................................................................
Various Comments By Other People:
Reminds me of this old movie called ‘Don’t Open the Window’. Makes me wonder what this broadcast signal is really prepping us for. On 9/11 we did not need the siren it was live on TV. This is really creepy that they want the attention of the masses all at once. Like a Pied Piper the Feds definitely have a hidden plan for this. And it is coming to a broadcast near you whether we like it or not.
My question is what is the validity of a Nationwide Alert System. From what I have read it is to report tsunamis, earthquakes, tornados, etc. Typically disasters like this are localized events that would be covered by localized emergency alert systems right? Something seems Nefarious about a system that needs to control the entire media nationwide for any duration. This feels like a prelude to a much larger story.
Did it ever occur to you that the worlds internet and interdependent communications system is not a light switch that can be turned on and off?
It is far more complicated than that. Shutting down may be possible but the real trick is turning it all back on.
The governemnt says it is a test. Now eliminate that from a possible outcome and proceed from there.
Why Wednesday???? Most people are at work and also restaurant business begins to pick up slightly on Wednesday. Sunday would make more sense so as not to interfere with trafic, and normal routine human behavior. We do know that AU 55 makes is closest earth approach on Nov 9, 2011. Not a conincidence. The largest sun spot in many many years is evolving and more earth facing. Also the sun blew a huge CME of the north polar region. Very strange indeed because it did not come from a sun spot.
(An actual alert code is being used by fema, not a test code so an actual alert will be broadcast on radio an tv. People who are not aware that it is supposed to be a test will think it is a REAL national emergency. Why is fema using a real code and not just a test code? Expect people to panic because they think it is real. Expect the government to screw the test up. This is test to control all communications. Its not for national emergencies.
The upcoming Emergency Alert System test being conducted by Homeland Security and FEMA on November 9 gives the government the pretext to “seize control” of communications in America, because for the first time broadcasters will have no choice on whether to partake. I don't trust the government, do you? This will be a government manufactured crisis.) Story Reports
In every previous instance where the EAS system was tested, broadcasters were in control of whether or not to flip the switch, although they did face losing their broadcast license if they failed to partake.
For the very first time, the federal government will have complete control over the broadcast frequency and will be able to override all radio and television stations.
Next month’s test also marks the first time that the alert has been conducted nationwide.
“The nationwide test may last up to three and a half minutes. The public will hear a message indicating that “This is a test.” The audio message will be the same for radio, television and cable,” states a FEMA press release.
The first of its kind test will give the government the pretext to take over all civilian communication outlets under the guise of a national emergency.
The process “seizes control of the broadcast frequency.”
Why it was being conducted in the middle of a work day at 2pm and not at midnight on a Saturday.
FEMA has indicated it isn’t even sure whether television broadcasts will display a message or not during the test.
The fact that the government has also chosen a date which is the reverse of 9/11 (the 9th of November being 11/9), is also unlikely to reduce anxiety surrounding the test.
According to a message being circulated by local school and government officials, there is "great concern in local police and emergency management circles about undue public anxiety over this test."
"Fear is that the lack of an explanation message might create panic.
The test is being conducted jointly by the US Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Federal Communications Commission and the National Weather Service.
The test is part of the Emergency Alert System designed to transmit, via TV and radio, emergency alerts and warnings regarding weather threats, child abductions and other types of emergencies, according to officials.
While state and local tests already take place frequently, a simultaneous, nationwide test of the national EAS "emergency action notification" code has never occurred.
........................................................................................
Various Comments By Other People:
Reminds me of this old movie called ‘Don’t Open the Window’. Makes me wonder what this broadcast signal is really prepping us for. On 9/11 we did not need the siren it was live on TV. This is really creepy that they want the attention of the masses all at once. Like a Pied Piper the Feds definitely have a hidden plan for this. And it is coming to a broadcast near you whether we like it or not.
My question is what is the validity of a Nationwide Alert System. From what I have read it is to report tsunamis, earthquakes, tornados, etc. Typically disasters like this are localized events that would be covered by localized emergency alert systems right? Something seems Nefarious about a system that needs to control the entire media nationwide for any duration. This feels like a prelude to a much larger story.
Did it ever occur to you that the worlds internet and interdependent communications system is not a light switch that can be turned on and off?
It is far more complicated than that. Shutting down may be possible but the real trick is turning it all back on.
The governemnt says it is a test. Now eliminate that from a possible outcome and proceed from there.
Why Wednesday???? Most people are at work and also restaurant business begins to pick up slightly on Wednesday. Sunday would make more sense so as not to interfere with trafic, and normal routine human behavior. We do know that AU 55 makes is closest earth approach on Nov 9, 2011. Not a conincidence. The largest sun spot in many many years is evolving and more earth facing. Also the sun blew a huge CME of the north polar region. Very strange indeed because it did not come from a sun spot.
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Obama and congress are allowing a shadow government of czars to exist that are not accountable to congress but only to obama
(Why does congress allow obama to appoint a shadow government of "czars"? Congress has the power to stop the unconstitutional appointment of a shadow government of "czars". Obama and congress are allowing a shadow government of czars to exist that are not accountable to congress but only to obama.) Story Reports
Obama's czars are seizing more power
Obama Proposes New Czar
Barack Obama has made a number of decisions during his tenure proving that he has little regard for the U.S. Constitution or the rule of law. At the top of the list is Obama’s penchant for installing radical leftists as czars in his administration without the constitutionally-mandated vetting and approval by the U.S. Senate.
These political appointees, called “czars,” are powerful and difficult to track. Nonetheless, Judicial Watch’s investigation team has taken on the important and exhaustive task of documenting these czar appointments (which number 45 according to our latest tally) and detailing the control these czars have over government operations.
Czar appointees have seized unprecedented control over major aspects of government policy and programs. In some instances, unconfirmed czars have authority, in seeming violation of the U.S. Constitution, over certain Senate-confirmed officers.
A number of the czars have been linked to scandals, thefts and kickbacks, flagrant and offensive statements, conflicts of interest, and radical leftist political ideologies and policies.
The Obama administration fights tooth-and-nail to allow these czars to operate in secret.
Every time Obama creates a new federal government bureaucracy he also creates the opportunity for more czars to join the Obama Big Government team.
Obama is proposing a new group of czars as a part of his “jobs” act – the American Infrastructure Financing Authority (AIFA) czars. President Obama’s newest czars will be given the authority to manage over a trillion dollars of federal funding for roads, bridges, buildings, waterways, dams and other infrastructure.
Obama's style of management--bypassing the senate-confirmed agency heads--has failed to yield the results promised to the American people. You would think Obama would give up on the failed idea of using a curious collection of White House czars to manage complex economic and regulatory issues. No way.
Obama hopes that few legislators or American citizens will read the deadly details buried within the 199 pages of his proposed American Jobs Act that will establish this latest czar-ship, nor understand just how expensive AIFA is going to be.
As with Obama’s other czars, the AIFA czar comes with infrastructure requirements of his own: staff, office space and technology needed to perform the job. Managing what is in reality a trillion dollar budget is going to require a huge new staff that will, essentially represent an entire new federal agency.
Of course, nowhere does President Obama tell us why a new czar is required to manage infrastructure projects. More importantly, Obama does not explain why the vast federal bureaucracy now responsible for these activities must be bypassed and a new, redundant agency is built.
Make no mistake: the AIFA Czar position is redundant. All of the infrastructure projects and tasks identified to be performed by Obama’s new Czar are already the responsibilities of the Senate-confirmed heads of Department of Transportation, the U.S. General Services Administration and the Department of Energy.
Some of these tasks are:
"oversee entering into and carry out contracts, leases, cooperative agreements or any other transactions as are necessary"
to approve the acquisition, lease, pledge, exchange and disposal of real personal property
to review all financial assistance packages to all eligible infrastructure projects" which includes “any non-Federal transportation, water, or energy infrastructure project, or an aggregation of such infrastructure projects, as provided in this Act.
the construction, alteration, or repair, including the facilitation of intermodal transit, of the following subsectors:
Highways or roads.
Bridges.
Mass transit.
Inland waterways.
Commercial ports.
Airports.
Air traffic control systems.
Passenger rail, including high-speed rail.
Freight rail systems.
Waterwaste treatment facilities.
Storm water management systems.
Dams.
Solid waste disposal facilities.
Drinking water treatment facilities.
Levees.
Open space management systems.
Pollution reduced energy generation.
Transmission and distribution.
Storage.
Energy efficiency enhancements for buildings, including public and commercial buildings.
(Obama won't need to declare martial law to control everything because if his fake jobs bill passes obama through his czars will control everthing. Obama will morph from a hoax "president" into a full blown dictator.
Why does congress allow obama to appoint unconstitutional czars when congress could make law to keep obama from managing his shadow "government" of czars?
ANSWER: Congress is just as corrupt as obama!) Story Reports
Find Your Lawmaker And Ask Why Has Congress Allowed Obama To Form A Shadow Government Of CZARS?
Example Email:
Every time Obama creates a new federal government bureaucracy he also creates the opportunity for more czars to join the shadow government that congress allows obama to control like a dictator!
Obama won't need to declare martial law to control every thing because if his fake jobs bill passes, obama through his czars will control every thing.
Why do you sir allow obama to appoint unconstitutional czars?
If your answer is the executive branch can appoint czars why doesn't congress make law to keep obama from controlling America bypassing congress through a shadow government of his CZARS?
I want a simple answer.
Signed
Obama's czars are seizing more power
Obama Proposes New Czar
Barack Obama has made a number of decisions during his tenure proving that he has little regard for the U.S. Constitution or the rule of law. At the top of the list is Obama’s penchant for installing radical leftists as czars in his administration without the constitutionally-mandated vetting and approval by the U.S. Senate.
These political appointees, called “czars,” are powerful and difficult to track. Nonetheless, Judicial Watch’s investigation team has taken on the important and exhaustive task of documenting these czar appointments (which number 45 according to our latest tally) and detailing the control these czars have over government operations.
Czar appointees have seized unprecedented control over major aspects of government policy and programs. In some instances, unconfirmed czars have authority, in seeming violation of the U.S. Constitution, over certain Senate-confirmed officers.
A number of the czars have been linked to scandals, thefts and kickbacks, flagrant and offensive statements, conflicts of interest, and radical leftist political ideologies and policies.
The Obama administration fights tooth-and-nail to allow these czars to operate in secret.
Every time Obama creates a new federal government bureaucracy he also creates the opportunity for more czars to join the Obama Big Government team.
Obama is proposing a new group of czars as a part of his “jobs” act – the American Infrastructure Financing Authority (AIFA) czars. President Obama’s newest czars will be given the authority to manage over a trillion dollars of federal funding for roads, bridges, buildings, waterways, dams and other infrastructure.
Obama's style of management--bypassing the senate-confirmed agency heads--has failed to yield the results promised to the American people. You would think Obama would give up on the failed idea of using a curious collection of White House czars to manage complex economic and regulatory issues. No way.
Obama hopes that few legislators or American citizens will read the deadly details buried within the 199 pages of his proposed American Jobs Act that will establish this latest czar-ship, nor understand just how expensive AIFA is going to be.
As with Obama’s other czars, the AIFA czar comes with infrastructure requirements of his own: staff, office space and technology needed to perform the job. Managing what is in reality a trillion dollar budget is going to require a huge new staff that will, essentially represent an entire new federal agency.
Of course, nowhere does President Obama tell us why a new czar is required to manage infrastructure projects. More importantly, Obama does not explain why the vast federal bureaucracy now responsible for these activities must be bypassed and a new, redundant agency is built.
Make no mistake: the AIFA Czar position is redundant. All of the infrastructure projects and tasks identified to be performed by Obama’s new Czar are already the responsibilities of the Senate-confirmed heads of Department of Transportation, the U.S. General Services Administration and the Department of Energy.
Some of these tasks are:
"oversee entering into and carry out contracts, leases, cooperative agreements or any other transactions as are necessary"
to approve the acquisition, lease, pledge, exchange and disposal of real personal property
to review all financial assistance packages to all eligible infrastructure projects" which includes “any non-Federal transportation, water, or energy infrastructure project, or an aggregation of such infrastructure projects, as provided in this Act.
the construction, alteration, or repair, including the facilitation of intermodal transit, of the following subsectors:
Highways or roads.
Bridges.
Mass transit.
Inland waterways.
Commercial ports.
Airports.
Air traffic control systems.
Passenger rail, including high-speed rail.
Freight rail systems.
Waterwaste treatment facilities.
Storm water management systems.
Dams.
Solid waste disposal facilities.
Drinking water treatment facilities.
Levees.
Open space management systems.
Pollution reduced energy generation.
Transmission and distribution.
Storage.
Energy efficiency enhancements for buildings, including public and commercial buildings.
(Obama won't need to declare martial law to control everything because if his fake jobs bill passes obama through his czars will control everthing. Obama will morph from a hoax "president" into a full blown dictator.
Why does congress allow obama to appoint unconstitutional czars when congress could make law to keep obama from managing his shadow "government" of czars?
ANSWER: Congress is just as corrupt as obama!) Story Reports
Find Your Lawmaker And Ask Why Has Congress Allowed Obama To Form A Shadow Government Of CZARS?
Example Email:
Every time Obama creates a new federal government bureaucracy he also creates the opportunity for more czars to join the shadow government that congress allows obama to control like a dictator!
Obama won't need to declare martial law to control every thing because if his fake jobs bill passes, obama through his czars will control every thing.
Why do you sir allow obama to appoint unconstitutional czars?
If your answer is the executive branch can appoint czars why doesn't congress make law to keep obama from controlling America bypassing congress through a shadow government of his CZARS?
I want a simple answer.
Signed
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
