Saturday, January 9, 2010
The Big Lie Obama
C-Span asks ‘most transparent administration in history’ to televise health care negotiations.
C-Span CEO Brian Lamb has directed a letter to Democrats asking the party to allow January negotiations on the health care reform bill to be televised. Read This news arrives just as we learn that congressional leaders Sen. Harry Reid and Rep. Nancy Pelosi plan to craft a final health care reform bill in secret.
It’s important to recall that then-candidate Obama promised in 2008 that all deliberations when he unveiled a health care reform bill would be open to the public. Here is what he said in a debate: “That’s what I will do in bringing all parties together, not negotiating behind closed doors, but bringing all parties together, and broadcasting those negotiations on C-SPAN so that the American people can see what the choices are, because part of what we have to do is enlist the American people in this process.”
Two years later, and this is what it has come to: C-Span is forced to beg the most transparent administration in history for permission to allow citizens to better understand landmark legislation that will affect a sixth of the economy. Is it any wonder that support for ObamaCare is now well below 40 percent?
.........................................................................................
Obama said he would not negotiaite behind closed doors. A lie.
Obama said negotiations would be broadcast on c-span. A lie.
Obama said he would enlist the American people in the process. A lie.
Who is the number one domestic enemy of the American people? Obama
.........................................................................................
C-SPAN Challenges Congress to Open Health Care Talks to TV Coverage
The head of C-SPAN has implored Congress to open up the last leg of health care reform negotiations to the public, as top Democrats lay plans to hash out the final product among themselves.
C-SPAN CEO Brian Lamb wrote to leaders in the House and Senate Dec. 30 urging them to open "all important negotiations, including any conference committee meetings," to televised coverage on his network.
"The C-SPAN networks will commit the necessary resources to covering all of the sessions LIVE and in their entirety," he wrote.
In a Tuesday afternoon press conference on health legislation negotiations, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appeared to object to the premise behind the request.
However, Republican leaders sided with C-SPAN's calls for transparency.
"As House Republican leader, I can confidently state that all House Republicans strongly endorse your proposal and stand ready to work with you to make it a reality," Minority Leader John Boehner wrote in response to the letter. "Hard-working families won't stand for having the future of their health care decided behind closed doors. These secret deliberations are a breeding ground for more of the kickbacks, shady deals and special-interest provisions that have become business as usual in Washington."
Democratic leaders could bypass the traditional conference committee process, in which lawmakers from both parties and chambers meet to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of a bill. Top Democrats in the House, Senate and White House were meeting Tuesday evening to figure out the final product in three-way talks before sending it back to both chambers for a final vote.
..........................................................................................
(Note its all top democrates. They are bypassing the conference committee process. Its just like communist russia and a one party rubber stamp system. This is not representation. This is not open government. Obamacare is being bought and paid for behind closed doors. Obama has hundreds of millions to pay off democrats. He won't let it be televised.)
Obamacare slush fund via the stimulus money Federal Reserve Board Of San Francisco ECONOMIC LETTER
"The other three ARRA state programs cited above are allocated according to formulas specified in the legislation, though each program also includes a small portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive branch."
A small portion is allocated to obama to be spent at his discretion. No formula. He can do what he wants to with it. How much is it? We don't know.
Is a small portion $3,000,000,000 or 1%. Is a small portion $15,000,000,000 or 5%?
Lets say it only $3,000,000,000 or just a "small portion" 1%.
Three Thousand Million. Three thousand million to buy the votes of anyone in congress to illegally pass obamacare. Obama is a traitor.
Read the Federal Reserve Board Of San Francisco ECONOMIC LETTER Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009 Are Fiscal Stimulus Funds Going to the “Right” States? FRBSF Economic Letter 2 Number 2009-14, April 17, 2009
........................................................................................
"We don't even know yet whether there's going to be a conference," Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen said responding to a question about the C-SPAN request. "It's not clear whether or not that's going to happen yet."
This format would seem ideal for closed-door meetings, which congressional Democrats have used many times to figure out sensitive provisions in the health care bill -- though President Obama pledged during the campaign to open up health care talks to C-SPAN's cameras.
"That's what I will do in bringing all parties together, not negotiating behind closed doors, but bringing all parties together, and broadcasting those negotiations on C-SPAN so that the American people can see what the choices are," Obama said at a debate against Hillary Clinton in Los Angeles on Jan. 31, 2008.
(Obama is a liar. He just happens to be a "black man".) Story Reports
Asked about the request to Congress, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said he hadn't seen the letter.
"I know the president is going to begin discussions today on health care to iron out differences between the House and Senate bills," he said.
Lamb urged Congress in his letter to fling open the doors in the final stretch of the negotiations.
"President Obama, Senate and House leaders, many of your rank-and-file members, and the nation's editorial pages have all talked about the value of transparent discussions on reforming the nation's health care system," he wrote. "Now that the process moves to the critical stage of reconciliation between the chambers, we respectfully request that you allow the public full access, through television, to legislation that will affect the lives of every single American."
Lamb said his network would use "the latest technology" to be "as unobtrusive as possible" during the talks
..........................................................................................
Imagine c-span begging the liar obama to let them televise the closed door secret meetings that obama will use to pay off congress using the stimulus funds at his own discretion. Congress voted itself millions and millions in kick backs. Our government is corrupt. The people need to rise up and remove the corrupt government.
Story Reports
"though each program also includes a small portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive branch."
Where do you think obama is using his personal millions?
I'm sure his is also using it to coverup his past. Obama is using it also to hide his true identity. Why wouldn't he. Obama can spend it as he wishes. Millions and millions.
I'm sure he is paying off the nation news media, lawyers, judges and anyone else necessary.
I'm sure he is using this money laundered to seem as if its something else. Obama can use this money just like hush money.
Has anyone asked or tried to get details on what obama is doing with his millions and millions. No? Why? They have been bought off.
Nothing has been said about the millions obama has received via the "stimulus slush fund" and what obama is doing with the money. Congress isn't talking. Congress is being paid off. Congress is being bought off.
Millions and Millions via the stimulus slush fund
Lets audit the funds obama has received via the "stimulus fund".
Lets have some of that open government you said you wanted obama. If your not a liar let us see what you did with the millions and millions congress has given you according to the Federal Reserve Board Of San Francisco ECONOMIC LETTER Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009 Are Fiscal Stimulus Funds Going to the “Right” States? FRBSF Economic Letter 2 Number 2009-14, April 17, 2009
Obama The Successful Failure
Obama The Successful Failure
People are turned out on the street at 5:00AM walking to an unknown destination, waiting for the noon soup kitchen to open at noon.
Some recently lost their homes, jobs or maybe have no more unemployment funds.
These people represent the false hope and change of barack obama.
His failure has continued to destroy the US economy. He changed their lives by helping to put them on the street.
Obama's hope is a false sense of security that has become a reality for many people on the street because of his economic policies.
Obama the failure breeds failure. Mass unemployment continues.
The disaster called obama said the buck stops with him.
He makes excuses for people going hungry and loosing jobs. He lies and says its getting better.
The increasing street population attests to obama's version of hope and change.
America elected the first "black" president. They also elected the first "black" president failure.
What America did not know is that to obama a failure is a success. This is because he acted to make the economy fail on purpose.
By doing this obama know people will look to him for government help or hope and change.
So every failure to obama is a success. Obama is our number one domestic enemy.
Some people won't tell the truth about obama because he is a "black" man. They are afraid if they criticize him they will be branded a "racist". Its as if one is not suppose to speak ill of obama just because he is the first "black" president.
Obama has used this fake immunity to avoid the real world. Everything about obama is fake, even the muted criticizm he receives.
The truth be told. Obama is a successful failure. Obama by design has used a manufacutured "crisis" to inflict harm on the American people. Obama's nature is to destroy. Everything he comes in contact with ends up being a failure. Obama has ability. He is not stupid.
He is a con man. A snake oil salesman. A charlatan. A counterfeit. When you see obama you see a man devoid of humanity. Because of this he is a clear and present danger to all.
Obama is the "goldfinger" of failure.
Obama is a successful failure!
Friday, January 8, 2010
Obama Admits He Is A Systemic Failure
Obama Admits He Is A Systemic Failure.
The terrorists have been energized by obama's lack of leadership. Obama thinks the most recent failure was cause by Bush people who tried to make him look bad. He blames the CIA etc for his administrations failure to connect the dots. Obama "leads" the nation. Obama appointed Janet Napolitano. He said the buck stops here. That means he takes the responsibility for the TSA security failures.
Obama "the worthless" should resign.
Aside from being the first "black" president he can claim no other success.
Obama is a total failure and he has admitted it.
“As president, I have a solemn responsibility to protect our nation and our people, and when the system fails, it is my responsibility,” Obama said.
It wasn't just the system that failed, it was the failed leadership of obama.
“It appears this incident was not the fault of a single individual or organization but rather a systemic failure across organizations and agencies. … I am less interested in passing out blame than I am in learning from and correcting these mistakes to make us safer,” Obama said.
Obama said it appears, which is smoke and mirrors talk. The systemic failure was his administration and homeland "insecurity". The failure was Janet Napolitano his cabinet member.
The blame should be "passed" out. It should be given to obama for his failure to secure the US. Obama the systemic failure will not name names, organizations or agencies because they are HIS OWN!
Obama is the MISTAKE. It is not possible for obama to learn from himself.
As long as the SYSTEMIC FAILURE Barack Obama is President we will NEVER be safer. We are in PERIL because of the failure called obama.
Obama informs us of how some of these failures occurred. Obama has once again aided the terrorists as he did when the TSA recently published their own security manual on the net.
It would appear obama and his security people are idiots. I think obama is actually trying to help our enemy.
(1) Tells enemy how recent failures occurred.
(2) Recently published TSA security manual on the web helping enemy.
A systemic failure executed to help the enemy. This is what a TRAITOR does.
Obama is a TRAITOR. Obama is a domestic enemy. Obama helps foreign enemys.
85,000 jobs lost in Dec 09. This figure is in no way a measure of success. Again it appears obama is a systemic failure in "stimulating" the economy. He has only stimulated the media and others whom he has paid off via the 300 billion "stimulus" bill.
Obama is a dismal systemic failure. The truth is obama is working the systemic failure on purpose. In this sense his systemic stimulus failure is a success.
This is the hidden truth.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Focus On Obama
Filed means filed. Accepted means accepted. Obama's certification has not been accepted.
The obvious question must be asked: If Obama has an original "long form" birth certificate issued on the day of his birth by the state of Hawaii, why would he also have a "Certification of Live Birth"?
It would not be necessary.
Barack Obama was asked if he was eligible to become president under the Article II "natural born" eligibility clause. Obama masked the truth by posting a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth (COLB).
Upon further investigation, the mask of the C.O.L.B. started to be more and more revealing of the original 1961 certificate, made much of by Hawaii’s Governor Lingle and the state’s Department of Health official, Dr. Fukino, as more probably a Dept. of Health document and not a hospital long form.
If Obama was trying to promote his Hawaiian native born status, he would have willingly posted a hospital certificate as solid, best evidence. A C.O.L.B. is labeled as only prima facie evidence; the validity of its information open to inspection by a proper Hawaiian court venue.
If the C.O.L.B. referenced document was not a hospital birth certificate, what was it? Under Hawaiian statute, specifically §338-5, it is compulsory for the Dept. of Health to register a newborn child of a Hawaiian resident, even if no documentation of place and time of birth is presented. Only the word of one parent is required by law.
If the hidden 1961 certificate is a §338-5 form, face down like a card in a poker game, the $1,400,000 Barack Obama ponied up to prevent its public release means Obama is not just bluffing, but covering up perjury and other violations of law.
In the end, a §338-5 compulsory registration will be more probative of the direct testimony evidence of Obama’s Kenyan birth, than of his claimed Hawaiian birth.
Who Is Obama?
We Don't Know.
The Certification Of Live Birth obama presented to the world has never been validated by the registrar in Hawaii on the form.
The Certification Of Live Birth obama has asked you to believe is valid cannot be validated unless it is compared against his original long form "certificate of live birth" hidden in Hawaii, which obama has refused to reveal.
We really don't know who obama is.
No medical records will be released. Barack Obama stands alone in the last three elections as the only candidate to not release medical records to the public. What is in those medical records?
No medical records to indicate who obama is.
Obama refuses to release his medical history in any form.
There is nothing to verify or prove obama exists. There is nothing to verify obama is a male or female. Nothing. No medical records that can be verified or checked out.
We really don't know who obama is. We don't know what obama is.
No record that can be verified. No college records. Nothing.
Instead of people focusing on whatever is in the news, people should focus on who or what obama is.
As of this date there is no record that can be verified that obama exists.
Obama is a no record.
This is amazing. Obama is an avatar that has been presented to the public as a real person.
Obama looks and acts like a real person yet obama will not reveal or prove who or what he is. The mass propaganda has convinced the public obama is real.
Obama is not real. Obama cannot prove he exists. Obama is a mirage that is believed to exist by millions.
I saw the matrix movie. I understood it was a program that controlled people through deception.
The deception was not easily perceived by most people.
Today the "matrix" in effect is the "state controlled mass media".
It is similar to a program that controls the population through deception.
The deception is that we are living in a country that has elected the first black president.
The state run media matrix continues to mask the real world or obama and who he is.
There are people who are not deceived by the matrix of the state run media.
I do not listen to the propaganda of obama.
I know he can't prove he exists. I have just proved he can't prove he exists.
Two big problems affect obama.
(1) No Medical Records Released To Public
(2) No Birth Certificate Released That Can Be Verified
Can you prove obama exists? A paper trail or documentation.
Its also a real possibility no long form "certification of live birth exists".
It is possible no documentation exists that obama exists.
This would be my best guess.
No records for a no record failure barack hussein obama.
A voiced opinion by an Hawaiian public official is in no way documented evidence that obama was born in Hawaii.
There are NO DOTS TO CONNECT!
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
No medical records will be released
No medical records will be released. Odd man out.
The Obama campaign has stated that no medical records will be released. Instead, a one-page undated letter from a doctor will have to satisfy reporters on that issue.
The New York Times on Barack Obama in May: 2008
The letter is the first publicly released information about Mr. Obama’s medical history or current condition. The six-paragraph, one-page statement summarized the senator’s health for the last 21 years and was signed by Dr. David L. Scheiner, who said he has been Mr. Obama’s primary care physician since March 23, 1987. The undated letter was released less than a week after Senator John McCain of Arizona, the presumptive Republican nominee, released his medical records.
A spokesman for Mr. Obama said his campaign would not make Dr. Scheiner available for a telephone interview.”
–New York Times, May 8 2008, “Obama’s Doctor, Praising His Health, Sees No Obstacles to Service”
Barack Obama stands alone in the last three elections as the only candidate to not release medical records to the public.
Gore did it in 1999: Gore’s Health ‘Outstanding,’ Doctors Say
Bush released medical and service records in 2000 and again in 2004: Bush releases his Vietnam-era military files
Though there were some questions, Kerry released records in 2004: Kerry allows Navy release of military, medical records
What is in those medical records?
The medical records join Obama’s college and university records as parts of the candidate’s past that is off-limits.
Birth records: That can't be verified are off-limits.
NO MEDICAL RECORDS. Obama has more than a no record birth to hide. Something is super ODD about obama. Something doesn't smell right. I could make a guess. Its one of two things.
Both would qualify for not releasing the obama medical or birth records.
Three Thousand Million Or Fifteen Thousand Million For Obama To Control Congress And America
1% of 300,000,000,000 equals 3,000,000,000
2% of 300,000,000,000 equals 6,000,000,000
3% of 300,000,000,000 equals 9,000,000,000
4% of 300,000,000,000 equals 12,000,000,000
5% of 300,000,000,000 equals 15,000,000,000
Obama Stimulus Slush Fund
Slush Fund: A fund for buying votes or bribing public officials.
"The other three ARRA state programs cited above
are allocated according to formulas specified in the
legislation, though each program also includes a small
portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive
branch."
A small portion is allocated to obama to be spent at his discretion. No formula. He can do what he wants to with it. How much is it? We don't know.
Is a small portion $3,000,000,000 or 1%. Is a small portion $15,000,000,000 or 5%?
Lets say it only $3,000,000,000 or just a "small portion" 1%.
Three Thousand Million.
Three Thousand Million that obama can use anyway he wants. It says at his discretion.
535 people in congress.
$5,607,476.63 each
Five Million six hundred and seven thousand each.
This is just a "small portion" of 1% obama could have spent at his own discretion to BUY the votes of any congressman or senator.
This is what congress voted for. Congress has voted for a kickback.
How much money has obama used in the stimulus slush fund that is at his discrection to buy the votes of congress.
How much money has obama used to buy or pay off people to keep quiet about his birth certificate?
How much money has obama used to pay off the "state run media".
How much money has obama used to buy off federal judges and lawyers?
How much money has obama used to coverup his true agenda?
HOW MUCH?
1% or 3 Billion
2% o3 6 Billion
3% or 9 Billion
4% or 12 Billion
4% or 15 Billion
I would like to know how this money was used.
If you are a liberal democrate you will of course want some of this money yourself.
If you are anyone other than a liberal democrate or communist i'm sure you won't get any of this money.
Three Thousand Million or Fifteen Thousand million for obama to control congress and America.
Now you know.
.........................................................................................
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (ARRA) was signed into law on February 17,
and already its impact is being felt in state capitals
around the nation.Governors and state legislators are
incorporating expected stimulus funds into 2009–2010
budgets and a number of state public works projects
predicated on ARRA funding already have begun.
As states start spending these ARRA funds, the debate
about their likely economic impact has taken
on new life.
One question is whether federal stimulus funds are
heading to those states best positioned to put the
money to good use right away.That is, have the funds
been allocated in a way that maximizes their potential
impact on national economic growth? This
Economic Letter addresses this question by comparing
the degree of economic need in different states with
each state’s expected share of ARRA funds.
Such an analysis is important in evaluating the likelihood
that stimulus money will be spent effectively.While
it is too early to tell whether the overall stimulus
package will have its intended effects, this review
suggests that, by and large, the distribution of federal
stimulus funds is indeed tilted toward those states most
likely to spend the funds quickly and effectively.
The economics of state allocations
Of the $787 billion in ARRA, state governments will
receive as much as $300 billion.
The bulk of these state funds will be spread over four key programs:
• A $54 billion Fiscal Stabilization Fund meant primarily
to stave off cuts in state education spending
• A $90 billion Fiscal Relief Fund meant to shore up
financing for state Medicaid programs
• A $40 billion program to allow states to extend and
increase unemployment insurance (UI) benefits
• At least $70 billion to fund transportation projects
The money going to states is meant to reduce their
need to raise taxes or cut government spending to
meet their constitutional balanced-budget requirements.
According to ARRA proponents, such fiscal
austerity could intensify the contraction of the national
economy (see, e.g., Romer 2009).
The total impact of ARRA money going to states
will depend on how quickly and productively states
use the funds. How a given state spends its ARRA
allocation will depend importantly on two factors:
the restrictions tied to the use of the funds and the
state’s budget position. For unrestricted funds, states
facing more severe budget deficits will probably spend
the money quickly. States in stronger fiscal health,
however, potentially could receive more unrestricted
money than they need to fund planned obligations
and might save the excess by adding to their rainy
day funds or transferring it to residents in the form
of tax cuts.A good indicator then of how likely a
state is to spend unrestricted federal funds immediately
is its projected near-term budget deficit.
I look at the relationship between state ARRA allocations
and projected state budget gaps below.
For restricted funds, such as money earmarked for
specific transportation projects, a different question
is in order:Will these new public investments crowd
out potential private investment, as some have argued
(e.g., Becker and Murphy 2009), by drawing away
productive resources such as capital and labor? The
closer a state’s economy is to operating at capacity,
the greater the potential for such crowding out.Below
I also analyze whether ARRA’s transportation spending
is expected to go disproportionately to states with
the greatest idle productive capacity, which would
reduce the potential for crowding out.
How are stimulus funds allocated to states?
The way in which ARRA funds will be distributed
to states differs for each component of the stimulus
package. For the $40 billion UI component, the federal
government will almost fully reimburse each
state’s cost of expanding and extending unemployment
benefits. Hence, these funds will be allocated
roughly in proportion to state unemployment rates.
The other three ARRA state programs cited above
are allocated according to formulas specified in the
legislation, though each program also includes a small
portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive
branch.The Fiscal Stabilization Fund, which
is meant to prevent cuts in state education spending,
uses the simplest of the three formulas.
Aside froma small portion set aside for incentive grants, program
funds will be allocated to each state according to a weighted average of its total population and its schoolage population.
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER
Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009
Are Fiscal Stimulus Funds
Going to the “Right” States?
FRBSF Economic Letter 2 Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009
weighted average of its total population and its schoolage
population.
The Fiscal Relief Fund piggybacks on the existing
formula for federal government assistance to state
Medicaid programs and has three parts.The first is
a simple scaling up of the existing federal share of
a state’s Medicaid costs. Second, a so-called “holdharmless”
component is meant to offset cuts in federal
support called for by the existing formula in
states where per capita income grew rapidly in the
last few years prior to the start of the recession.The
third part provides for an additional increase in a
state’s federal Medicaid share in proportion to the
rise in the state’s unemployment rate during the recession.
Taken together, the Fiscal Relief Fund’s three
components direct the most support to states that
have experienced the most rapid reversals in economic
fortunes,where strong pre-recession economic growth
was followed by rapidly rising unemployment and
expanding Medicaid rolls.
The Fiscal Stabilization and Fiscal Relief Funds are
partially restricted.They are meant to enable states
to maintain spending on Medicaid and education
above minimum thresholds laid out in the legislation.
However, once a state has met those minimum requirements,
stimulus funds from these two programs
allow the state to shift resources to other parts of
its budget. For practical purposes, these funds are
largely unrestricted.
Are needy states getting more of the money?
Earlier I suggested that a reasonable indicator of how
likely a state is to spend unrestricted ARRA funds
immediately is its projected budget deficit. So one test
of the legislation’s potential impact is whether states
with bigger projected budget gaps are likely to receive
disproportionate shares of the Fiscal Stabilization and
Fiscal Relief Funds, the primary sources of unrestricted
state money in ARRA.To answer this, I look at the
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities data on projected
state fiscal 2010 budget gaps, as well as the
Center’s estimates of state Fiscal Stabilization and
Fiscal Relief Fund allocations.The budget gap data
are based on state reports forecasting the difference
between revenue and spending, assuming no change
in current state laws.
Figure 1 shows a scatter plot depicting the relationship
between these projected budget gaps and the
expected allocations of Fiscal Stabilization and Fiscal
Relief Funds. Each point in the plot represents a
state, identified by its postal code. Its placement along
the horizontal axis indicates its per capita budget gap.
Its placement along the vertical axis represents the
per capita funds it is expected to receive.The size of
the circle for each state is proportional to its population.
Finally, the line running through the data
points depicts the relationship between the two series
as estimated by population-weighted ordinary
least squares regression, a statistical technique for
measuring correlation.
The figure clearly shows a strong positive correlation
between a state’s degree of fiscal strain and the amount
of federal stimulus funds it is expected to receive.A
separate analysis indicates that this positive relationship
largely reflects the allocation of Fiscal Relief
Funds, rather than Fiscal Stabilization Funds.This is
Notes: Data points indicated by state postal codes. Size of circles is proportional to state population.A dozen states are missing due to
unavailability of budget gap data.
Data sources: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and U.S. Census Bureau.
AZ
AR
CA
CO
CT
DE
FL
GA
HI
ID
IA
KS
LA
ME
MD
MA
MI
MN
MS
NE NV
NJ
NY
OK OH NC
RI
SC
SD
TN
TX
UT
VT
VA
WA
WI
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fiscal stabilization and relief funds (per capita $)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
FY10 state budget gap (per capita $)
Figure 1
Fiscal stabilization and relief funds vs. fiscal year 2010 budget gap
not surprising. Recall that the majority of the $54
billion Stabilization Fund is allocated to each state
based on a weighted average of its total population
and its school-age population.This means the per
capita allocation of the Fund will be in proportion
to the school-age share of a state’s total population.
Of course, there’s little reason to expect these youth
shares of the population to be correlated with projected
budget deficits, and in fact they are not.And
recall that the allocation of the $90 billion Fiscal
Relief Fund favors states that experienced rapid
economic growth leading up to the recession followed
by steep declines during the recession. Such
reversals of fortune also take a heavy toll on state
budgets, so it’s not surprising that the Fiscal Relief
funds are strongly correlated with these budget gaps.
I turn next to the issue of whether the impact of the
restricted funds ARRA distributes to states could be
hindered by crowding out of private-sector resources.
Specifically, I assess whether transportation funds,
the program’s largest source of restricted funds, will
be allocated disproportionately to those states most
likely to have idle capacity, especially unemployed
labor.The bulk of ARRA’s transportation funds is
expected to be allocated using the same formulas
that the Department of Transportation (DOT) uses
to distribute non-ARRA highway and other transportation
funds to states.These formulas are based
on factors such as a state’s total highway miles, and
needed repairs to roads and bridges previously identified
by DOT.They are not designed to account for
a state’s economic condition, and there is no reason
to expect a positive relationship between expected
per capita ARRA transportation funds and unemployment
rates. Data from the National Conference
of State Legislatures and the Bureau of Labor Statistics
confirm the absence of a positive correlation. In fact,
a slight negative correlation exists, since less densely
populated states tend to have more highway miles
per capita. In addition, low-population-density states
tend to be in better fiscal shape during this downturn,
thanks largely to booms in their natural resources
industries in recent years.
From the standpoint of maximizing the national
economic impact of the stimulus package, this distribution
of transportation spending clearly appears
less than optimal. However, all states have seen substantial
increases in their unemployment rates since
the start of the recession, so it’s hard to argue that
any state currently is at full employment and does
not have idle capacity that can be put to use on
major construction projects.
Conclusion
As far as maximizing its impact on national economic
growth,ARRA’s allocation across states clearly is not
perfect.The transportation funds are skewed toward
states with lower unemployment rates, albeit rates
above full employment levels.The Fiscal Stabilization
Fund is distributed to states based on the age composition
of each state’s population, which turns out,
not surprisingly, to be unrelated to state fiscal health.
The Fiscal Relief Fund, however, appears to be
well-targeted because it is geared toward those states
with the most serious fiscal strains.And the sheer
magnitude of the $90 billion fiscal relief program is
enough to ensure that ARRA fiscal aid funds will
in aggregate be allocated to those states most likely
to spend the money quickly.What’s more, aid provided
to states to fund additional unemployment
insurance benefits is directly aimed at getting money
into the hands of unemployed people, who are generally
considered to have high propensities to spend
rather than save.
So, while ARRA’s state allocations do not represent
the absolute optimal stimulus, they are on the whole
well directed.Overall, that means that the economic
impact of this support for state governments is more
likely to exceed than to fall short of forecasts.
DanielWilson
Senior Economist
References
Becker, Gary S., and Kevin M.Murphy. 2009.
“There’s No Stimulus Free Lunch.”Wall Street
Journal Op-Ed, Feb. 10.
Romer, Christina. 2009.“The Case for Fiscal Stimulus:
The Likely Effects of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act.” Speech delivered at Brookings
Institution, Feb. 27. http://www.whitehouse.gov/
administration/eop/cea/speeches_testimony/02272009
FRBSF Economic Letter 3 Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009
PRESORTED
STANDARD MAIL
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
PERMIT NO. 752
San Francisco, Calif.
Printed on recycled paper
with soybean inks
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 7702
San Francisco, CA 94120
Address Service Requested
Opinions expressed in the Economic Letter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.This publication is edited by Sam Zuckerman
and AnitaTodd. Permission to reprint portions of articles or whole articles must be obtained in writing. Permission to photocopy
is unrestricted. Please send editorial comments and requests for subscriptions, address changes, and reprint permission to: Public
Information Department,Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,P.O.Box 7702, San Francisco,CA 94120, phone (415) 974-2163,
fax (415) 974-3341, e-mail sf.pubs@sf.frb.org. The Economic Letter and other publications and information are available
on our website, http://www.frbsf.org.
2% of 300,000,000,000 equals 6,000,000,000
3% of 300,000,000,000 equals 9,000,000,000
4% of 300,000,000,000 equals 12,000,000,000
5% of 300,000,000,000 equals 15,000,000,000
Obama Stimulus Slush Fund
Slush Fund: A fund for buying votes or bribing public officials.
"The other three ARRA state programs cited above
are allocated according to formulas specified in the
legislation, though each program also includes a small
portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive
branch."
A small portion is allocated to obama to be spent at his discretion. No formula. He can do what he wants to with it. How much is it? We don't know.
Is a small portion $3,000,000,000 or 1%. Is a small portion $15,000,000,000 or 5%?
Lets say it only $3,000,000,000 or just a "small portion" 1%.
Three Thousand Million.
Three Thousand Million that obama can use anyway he wants. It says at his discretion.
535 people in congress.
$5,607,476.63 each
Five Million six hundred and seven thousand each.
This is just a "small portion" of 1% obama could have spent at his own discretion to BUY the votes of any congressman or senator.
This is what congress voted for. Congress has voted for a kickback.
How much money has obama used in the stimulus slush fund that is at his discrection to buy the votes of congress.
How much money has obama used to buy or pay off people to keep quiet about his birth certificate?
How much money has obama used to pay off the "state run media".
How much money has obama used to buy off federal judges and lawyers?
How much money has obama used to coverup his true agenda?
HOW MUCH?
1% or 3 Billion
2% o3 6 Billion
3% or 9 Billion
4% or 12 Billion
4% or 15 Billion
I would like to know how this money was used.
If you are a liberal democrate you will of course want some of this money yourself.
If you are anyone other than a liberal democrate or communist i'm sure you won't get any of this money.
Three Thousand Million or Fifteen Thousand million for obama to control congress and America.
Now you know.
.........................................................................................
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (ARRA) was signed into law on February 17,
and already its impact is being felt in state capitals
around the nation.Governors and state legislators are
incorporating expected stimulus funds into 2009–2010
budgets and a number of state public works projects
predicated on ARRA funding already have begun.
As states start spending these ARRA funds, the debate
about their likely economic impact has taken
on new life.
One question is whether federal stimulus funds are
heading to those states best positioned to put the
money to good use right away.That is, have the funds
been allocated in a way that maximizes their potential
impact on national economic growth? This
Economic Letter addresses this question by comparing
the degree of economic need in different states with
each state’s expected share of ARRA funds.
Such an analysis is important in evaluating the likelihood
that stimulus money will be spent effectively.While
it is too early to tell whether the overall stimulus
package will have its intended effects, this review
suggests that, by and large, the distribution of federal
stimulus funds is indeed tilted toward those states most
likely to spend the funds quickly and effectively.
The economics of state allocations
Of the $787 billion in ARRA, state governments will
receive as much as $300 billion.
The bulk of these state funds will be spread over four key programs:
• A $54 billion Fiscal Stabilization Fund meant primarily
to stave off cuts in state education spending
• A $90 billion Fiscal Relief Fund meant to shore up
financing for state Medicaid programs
• A $40 billion program to allow states to extend and
increase unemployment insurance (UI) benefits
• At least $70 billion to fund transportation projects
The money going to states is meant to reduce their
need to raise taxes or cut government spending to
meet their constitutional balanced-budget requirements.
According to ARRA proponents, such fiscal
austerity could intensify the contraction of the national
economy (see, e.g., Romer 2009).
The total impact of ARRA money going to states
will depend on how quickly and productively states
use the funds. How a given state spends its ARRA
allocation will depend importantly on two factors:
the restrictions tied to the use of the funds and the
state’s budget position. For unrestricted funds, states
facing more severe budget deficits will probably spend
the money quickly. States in stronger fiscal health,
however, potentially could receive more unrestricted
money than they need to fund planned obligations
and might save the excess by adding to their rainy
day funds or transferring it to residents in the form
of tax cuts.A good indicator then of how likely a
state is to spend unrestricted federal funds immediately
is its projected near-term budget deficit.
I look at the relationship between state ARRA allocations
and projected state budget gaps below.
For restricted funds, such as money earmarked for
specific transportation projects, a different question
is in order:Will these new public investments crowd
out potential private investment, as some have argued
(e.g., Becker and Murphy 2009), by drawing away
productive resources such as capital and labor? The
closer a state’s economy is to operating at capacity,
the greater the potential for such crowding out.Below
I also analyze whether ARRA’s transportation spending
is expected to go disproportionately to states with
the greatest idle productive capacity, which would
reduce the potential for crowding out.
How are stimulus funds allocated to states?
The way in which ARRA funds will be distributed
to states differs for each component of the stimulus
package. For the $40 billion UI component, the federal
government will almost fully reimburse each
state’s cost of expanding and extending unemployment
benefits. Hence, these funds will be allocated
roughly in proportion to state unemployment rates.
The other three ARRA state programs cited above
are allocated according to formulas specified in the
legislation, though each program also includes a small
portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive
branch.The Fiscal Stabilization Fund, which
is meant to prevent cuts in state education spending,
uses the simplest of the three formulas.
Aside froma small portion set aside for incentive grants, program
funds will be allocated to each state according to a weighted average of its total population and its schoolage population.
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER
Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009
Are Fiscal Stimulus Funds
Going to the “Right” States?
FRBSF Economic Letter 2 Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009
weighted average of its total population and its schoolage
population.
The Fiscal Relief Fund piggybacks on the existing
formula for federal government assistance to state
Medicaid programs and has three parts.The first is
a simple scaling up of the existing federal share of
a state’s Medicaid costs. Second, a so-called “holdharmless”
component is meant to offset cuts in federal
support called for by the existing formula in
states where per capita income grew rapidly in the
last few years prior to the start of the recession.The
third part provides for an additional increase in a
state’s federal Medicaid share in proportion to the
rise in the state’s unemployment rate during the recession.
Taken together, the Fiscal Relief Fund’s three
components direct the most support to states that
have experienced the most rapid reversals in economic
fortunes,where strong pre-recession economic growth
was followed by rapidly rising unemployment and
expanding Medicaid rolls.
The Fiscal Stabilization and Fiscal Relief Funds are
partially restricted.They are meant to enable states
to maintain spending on Medicaid and education
above minimum thresholds laid out in the legislation.
However, once a state has met those minimum requirements,
stimulus funds from these two programs
allow the state to shift resources to other parts of
its budget. For practical purposes, these funds are
largely unrestricted.
Are needy states getting more of the money?
Earlier I suggested that a reasonable indicator of how
likely a state is to spend unrestricted ARRA funds
immediately is its projected budget deficit. So one test
of the legislation’s potential impact is whether states
with bigger projected budget gaps are likely to receive
disproportionate shares of the Fiscal Stabilization and
Fiscal Relief Funds, the primary sources of unrestricted
state money in ARRA.To answer this, I look at the
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities data on projected
state fiscal 2010 budget gaps, as well as the
Center’s estimates of state Fiscal Stabilization and
Fiscal Relief Fund allocations.The budget gap data
are based on state reports forecasting the difference
between revenue and spending, assuming no change
in current state laws.
Figure 1 shows a scatter plot depicting the relationship
between these projected budget gaps and the
expected allocations of Fiscal Stabilization and Fiscal
Relief Funds. Each point in the plot represents a
state, identified by its postal code. Its placement along
the horizontal axis indicates its per capita budget gap.
Its placement along the vertical axis represents the
per capita funds it is expected to receive.The size of
the circle for each state is proportional to its population.
Finally, the line running through the data
points depicts the relationship between the two series
as estimated by population-weighted ordinary
least squares regression, a statistical technique for
measuring correlation.
The figure clearly shows a strong positive correlation
between a state’s degree of fiscal strain and the amount
of federal stimulus funds it is expected to receive.A
separate analysis indicates that this positive relationship
largely reflects the allocation of Fiscal Relief
Funds, rather than Fiscal Stabilization Funds.This is
Notes: Data points indicated by state postal codes. Size of circles is proportional to state population.A dozen states are missing due to
unavailability of budget gap data.
Data sources: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and U.S. Census Bureau.
AZ
AR
CA
CO
CT
DE
FL
GA
HI
ID
IA
KS
LA
ME
MD
MA
MI
MN
MS
NE NV
NJ
NY
OK OH NC
RI
SC
SD
TN
TX
UT
VT
VA
WA
WI
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fiscal stabilization and relief funds (per capita $)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
FY10 state budget gap (per capita $)
Figure 1
Fiscal stabilization and relief funds vs. fiscal year 2010 budget gap
not surprising. Recall that the majority of the $54
billion Stabilization Fund is allocated to each state
based on a weighted average of its total population
and its school-age population.This means the per
capita allocation of the Fund will be in proportion
to the school-age share of a state’s total population.
Of course, there’s little reason to expect these youth
shares of the population to be correlated with projected
budget deficits, and in fact they are not.And
recall that the allocation of the $90 billion Fiscal
Relief Fund favors states that experienced rapid
economic growth leading up to the recession followed
by steep declines during the recession. Such
reversals of fortune also take a heavy toll on state
budgets, so it’s not surprising that the Fiscal Relief
funds are strongly correlated with these budget gaps.
I turn next to the issue of whether the impact of the
restricted funds ARRA distributes to states could be
hindered by crowding out of private-sector resources.
Specifically, I assess whether transportation funds,
the program’s largest source of restricted funds, will
be allocated disproportionately to those states most
likely to have idle capacity, especially unemployed
labor.The bulk of ARRA’s transportation funds is
expected to be allocated using the same formulas
that the Department of Transportation (DOT) uses
to distribute non-ARRA highway and other transportation
funds to states.These formulas are based
on factors such as a state’s total highway miles, and
needed repairs to roads and bridges previously identified
by DOT.They are not designed to account for
a state’s economic condition, and there is no reason
to expect a positive relationship between expected
per capita ARRA transportation funds and unemployment
rates. Data from the National Conference
of State Legislatures and the Bureau of Labor Statistics
confirm the absence of a positive correlation. In fact,
a slight negative correlation exists, since less densely
populated states tend to have more highway miles
per capita. In addition, low-population-density states
tend to be in better fiscal shape during this downturn,
thanks largely to booms in their natural resources
industries in recent years.
From the standpoint of maximizing the national
economic impact of the stimulus package, this distribution
of transportation spending clearly appears
less than optimal. However, all states have seen substantial
increases in their unemployment rates since
the start of the recession, so it’s hard to argue that
any state currently is at full employment and does
not have idle capacity that can be put to use on
major construction projects.
Conclusion
As far as maximizing its impact on national economic
growth,ARRA’s allocation across states clearly is not
perfect.The transportation funds are skewed toward
states with lower unemployment rates, albeit rates
above full employment levels.The Fiscal Stabilization
Fund is distributed to states based on the age composition
of each state’s population, which turns out,
not surprisingly, to be unrelated to state fiscal health.
The Fiscal Relief Fund, however, appears to be
well-targeted because it is geared toward those states
with the most serious fiscal strains.And the sheer
magnitude of the $90 billion fiscal relief program is
enough to ensure that ARRA fiscal aid funds will
in aggregate be allocated to those states most likely
to spend the money quickly.What’s more, aid provided
to states to fund additional unemployment
insurance benefits is directly aimed at getting money
into the hands of unemployed people, who are generally
considered to have high propensities to spend
rather than save.
So, while ARRA’s state allocations do not represent
the absolute optimal stimulus, they are on the whole
well directed.Overall, that means that the economic
impact of this support for state governments is more
likely to exceed than to fall short of forecasts.
DanielWilson
Senior Economist
References
Becker, Gary S., and Kevin M.Murphy. 2009.
“There’s No Stimulus Free Lunch.”Wall Street
Journal Op-Ed, Feb. 10.
Romer, Christina. 2009.“The Case for Fiscal Stimulus:
The Likely Effects of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act.” Speech delivered at Brookings
Institution, Feb. 27. http://www.whitehouse.gov/
administration/eop/cea/speeches_testimony/02272009
FRBSF Economic Letter 3 Number 2009-14,April 17, 2009
PRESORTED
STANDARD MAIL
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
PERMIT NO. 752
San Francisco, Calif.
Printed on recycled paper
with soybean inks
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 7702
San Francisco, CA 94120
Address Service Requested
Opinions expressed in the Economic Letter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.This publication is edited by Sam Zuckerman
and AnitaTodd. Permission to reprint portions of articles or whole articles must be obtained in writing. Permission to photocopy
is unrestricted. Please send editorial comments and requests for subscriptions, address changes, and reprint permission to: Public
Information Department,Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,P.O.Box 7702, San Francisco,CA 94120, phone (415) 974-2163,
fax (415) 974-3341, e-mail sf.pubs@sf.frb.org. The Economic Letter and other publications and information are available
on our website, http://www.frbsf.org.
Obama has appointed Amanda Simpson, a woman who used to be a man, to a Commerce Department security post
Obama has appointed Amanda Simpson, a woman who used to be a man, to a Commerce Department security post, which would make her the highest-level transgender person chosen by a president.
Ms Simpson, who is single and tall with shoulder-length blond hair, is an expert on technology development at defense contractor Raytheon Missile Systems in Tucson, Arizona.
She earned degrees in physics, engineering and business and is a certified flight instructor.
She also used to be Mitchell Simpson, a 5-foot-10, 150-pound test pilot who flew the T-39 and A-3 Sky Warrior in those planes' development stages for Hughes Aircraft.
She was born in Chicago as the oldest of four boys.
SHE was born in Chicago the oldest of four BOYS.
He the FAILURE as president OBAMA has appointed Amanda Simpson, a woman who used to be a man, to his administration. THIS IS THE REAL CHANGE obama has talked about a SEX CHANGE!
Obama supports and admires homosexuals and transexuals. Obama is a pervert also.
.........................................................................................
U.S. President Barack Obama asserted on Tuesday the U.S.government had enough information to foil the attempted bombing on a Christmas Day airline flight but intelligence agencies "failed to connect those dots."
Obama called that unacceptable. "I will not tolerate it," he said.
Obama admits he can't connect the dots. He doesn't want to. He is not an idiot. He wants you to think he is. He is a communist.
America is connecting the dots obama. Soon the O in Obama will change to an X. X president.
Xposed, Xpelled.
How about a shout out obama. Why don't you give a shout out to you communist buddies and fellow thugs in congress.
Especially the fruit of kaboom that almost brought down a plane because you are a failure.
Resign obama. America wants a winner. American does not want a loser as a president.
The democrates are resigning because its tough to get an appointment or lobbist job if they lose an election. They are resigning now to avoid a loss of income later.
These liberal democrates are truly scum of the earth.
According to a profile in the Arizona Daily Star from 2002, Simpson spent $70,000 for six surgeries around that time to help her look more female, having her Adam's apple removed, breasts added, and genital surgery.
Obama approves of this. Obama admires this. Obama is a sick communist. Is obama who he says "he" is? Since he appoints people who have sex changes to his merry band it brings into question his identity. It seems to identify closely with transgender perverts.
Obama has no proven identity. No certification of gender. No valid legal document to prove identity claims. Because of this it DOES bring into question who or "what" the person known as "obama" is. We don't really know. Its like the picture you see above. Its not real. She is a fake. She is a he. A he who wants to be known as a she. Until American validates and certifies "its" long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii. It will be a case of it depends on what is is. Why does "it" hide "it's" identity? We must refer to obama as "it" because he or it has refused to confirm who it is.
It is a mystery. Obama won't tolerate "it" but it expects America to tolerate "it".
Don't you just smell the BO BS.
Liberal Propaganda In Avatar Is Essentially A Cartoon With A Pacifist, Naturalist Message
TALK RADIO Avatar Pooping On The Deck Of Naive Liberal Environmentalism.
Liberal Propaganda in Avatar is essentially a sentimental cartoon with a pacifist, naturalist message. Only children—including, adult-children ie obama, will see Avatar as simply an adventure film. It portrayes humans as vile, greedy, money-grubbing bipedal primates. The world elected an "avatar", obama. Obama the picture of a person representing a person. A person who can't and won't prove, certify, reveal or disclose his long form certificate of live birth.
The underlying purpose: Avatar is the corniest movie ever made about the white man’s need to lose his identity and assuage racial, political, sexual and historical guilt. Not me. I don't feel the need to pay reparations. Story Reports
On Today: James Cameron Reveals Liberal Propaganda in Avatar
Geoffrey Dickens
Prompted by NBC's Meredith Vieira, on Monday's Today show, Avatar director James Cameron revealed the liberal undertones in his new blockbuster as he told the Today co-anchor the plot centers on how greed and imperialism "tends to destroy the environment..." and how the human characters in the sci-fi flick "are doing the same thing on another pristine planet that we've done on earth."
[audio available here]
Avatar is Pure Propaganda
Big Hollywood's John Nolte reports, in his review of the film, "Avatar is a thinly disguised, heavy-handed and simplistic sci-fi fantasy/allegory critical of America from our founding straight through to the Iraq War," in which the human characters want to "strip mine" the alien planet for its resources.
Vieira first broached the politics of Avatar with Cameron by noting, "There's a message about, you know, greed and when people want a lot of things, imperialism. All of that," to which Cameron espoused, "And how that tends to destroy the environment and so on."
.........................................................................................
The following is the relevant exchange as it was aired on the December 14 Today show:
.........................................................................................
MEREDITH VIEIRA: You know, you have obviously directed some ground-breaking movies, in the past, we listed them, before. But this you say is your greatest challenge, ever. Why, what separates this film from all the others that you have done?
JAMES CAMERON: This is a particularly tough film, because of the time, you know? And there was a lot of animation of all of these creatures and characters and so on, and we had live action as well, plus we were shooting it in 3-D. So it was just kind of, all these layers of complexity. And the trick in that, of course, is to stay, is keep the heart of the movie alive while you're dealing with all of this technology.
VIEIRA: Yeah because ultimately, you say for all the talk about the technology, your say this is really, at its heart, a chick flick?
CAMERON: Oh yeah. All of my movies are chick flicks. I can't, I can't help it. Aliens was a chick flick. So was, so were the Terminator films, you know? And this film is no different because I love strong female characters. I love writing complex women. And even though this is Sam Worthington's character's story and we follow him, we have these amazing women in the story as well and there's a love story.
VIEIRA: Yeah there's a love story and also there's a message about, you know, greed and when people want a lot of things, imperialism. All of that.
CAMERON: And how that tends to destroy the environment and so on. And here they are doing the same thing on another pristine planet that we've done here on earth. So it's a way, sort of looking back at ourselves from this other world and seeing what we're doing here.
.........................................................................................
Basically:
Man runs out of resources
Man goes to planet with loving aliens
Man kills loving aliens
Men are evil
Loving scientists help create cyborg people
Humanity loses
A few description given on movie:
Wounded Knee- Pocahantus type of movie, pure propaganda, UN wants a global Gaia Religion, anti-imperialism, Shaman ceremonies, aliens fighting evil war mongers, Scientists take over after the war mongers are dethroned, You are hero if you like what they are doing, then you join their environmental movement, Natives are moved to reservations then forced sterilized, anti human, anti development
“James Cameron is a useful idiot of the Eugenicists.”
–Alex Jones
No mistake that this movie was timed to come out NOW AFTER THE COPENHAGEN GLOBAL WARMING SCAM SUMMIT.
..........................................................................................
Movie propaganda
We enter the alien world through the eyes of Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a former Marine now confined to a wheelchair. But despite his broken body, Jake is still a warrior at heart. He is recruited to travel light years to the human outpost on Pandora, where corporations are mining a rare mineral that is the key to solving Earth's energy crisis. Because Pandora's atmosphere is toxic, they have created the Avatar Program, in which human "drivers" have their consciousness linked to an avatar, a remotely-controlled biological body that can survive in the lethal air. These avatars are genetically engineered hybrids of human DNA mixed with DNA from the natives of Pandora… the Na'vi.
Reborn in his avatar form, Jake can walk again. He is given a mission to infiltrate the Na'vi, who have become a major obstacle to mining the precious ore. But a beautiful Na'vi female, Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), saves Jake's life, and this changes everything. Jake is taken in by her clan, and learns to become one of them, which involves many tests and adventures. As Jake's relationship with his reluctant teacher Neytiri deepens, he learns to respect the Na'vi way and finally takes his place among them. Soon he will face the ultimate test as he leads them in an epic battle that will decide nothing less than the fate of an entire world.
..........................................................................................
Story Reports New Avatar Revamped Story Line
.........................................................................................
We enter the alien world through the eyes of Talk Radio, a former mass media fan now confined to a wheelchair. But despite his broken body, talk radio is still a warrior at heart. He is recruited to travel light years to the human outpost on Propaganda, where corporations are mining a rare mineral that is the key to solving Earth's fake energy crisis. Because Propaganda's atmosphere is toxic, they have created the Avatar Program, in which human "drivers" have their consciousness linked to an avatar, a remotely-controlled biological body that can survive in the lethal air. These avatars are genetically engineered hybrids of human DNA mixed with DNA from the natives of Propaganda the Naive.
Reborn in his avatar form, talk radio can walk again. He is given a mission to infiltrate the Naive, who have become a major obstacle to mining the precious ore, freedom. But a beautiful Naive female, Eve , saves talk radio's life, and this changes everything. Talk is taken in by her clan, and learns to become one of them, which involves many tests and adventures. He undergoes "woosification" but resists. Talk's relationship with his reluctant teacher Delilah deepens, he learns to disrespect the Naive way and finally takes his place among them. Soon he will face the ultimate test as he leads them in an epic battle that will decide nothing less than the fate of an entire world.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Obama Is A FRAUD
Top radio hosts, including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Mark Levin and Lou Dobbs, have all said unequivocally and publicly that the Obama eligibility issue is legitimate and worthy, a few – including Beck and fellow Fox TV host Bill O'Reilly – have taken the position that the issue is, in O'Reilly's words, "bogus." Both Beck and O'Reilly cite the contemporaneous appearance of birth announcements in two Honolulu newspapers as prima facie evidence Obama was born in Hawaii and "birthers" are conspiracy nuts.
However, what neither talk host realizes is that newspaper birth announcements are not placed by parents phoning their local paper with the good news that they had a child. Based on interviews with the two Hawaii papers involved, the Obama newspaper birth announcements stemmed from information automatically sent to the papers by Hawaii's Department of Health upon the state's issuance of a "Certification of Live Birth," which is considered insufficient on its own to positively document the president's birthplace.
Many people remain unaware that a child does not even have to be born in Hawaii to receive a "Certification of Live Birth – that's the "short form" that provides no hospital name, delivering physician or any of the other information that traditionally appears on a legitimate birth certificate. And yet the "short form" COLB is the one and only piece of evidence the White House has cited in defending its assertion Obama was born in Hawaii.
Hawaiian law specifically allows "an adult or the legal parents of a minor child" to apply to the health department and, upon unspecified proof, be given the birth document.
The only requirement for proof cited in the law doesn't address the birth of the child either, just "that the legal parents of such individual while living without Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child."
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
Questioning obama's citizenship is legitimate. It is not a conspiracy of people who question who obama is. It is in fact a conspiracy to hide the facts about obama's birth.
Who is hiding the facts? Who is helping to hide the facts? Why?
Anyone who thinks a birth announcement in a newspaper is evidence obama was born in Hawaii are very foolish.
The evidence that will explode the mith of obama is his original "certificate of live birth" not a "certification of live birth".
Obama has only provided an unsigned certification of live birth. This provides no evidence that can be verified. The long form certificate of live birth in Hawaii can. It would indicate his parents signatures, doctors signatues, hospital and registrar signature.
The evidence obama has presented of his birth and citizenship can't be verified because of the form nor will he allow it to be verfied. In fact obama has spent millions of dollars in court costs to hide his true identity. Why.
BECAUSE HE IS A FRAUD!
..........................................................................................
Obama's birth papers, however, aren't the only piece of the sitting president's past that Obama has refused to reveal.
Other documentation not yet available includes Obama's kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
Why?
Because obama is a FRAUD!
The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.
The conspiracy continues. The conspiracy of certain radio,television and media people to look the other way when it comes to asking the question, Can you prove to America you are an American as you claim? The evidence is hidden. Obama has not produced any evidence that can be verified. This is a fact. This is not a conspiracy but a fraud hiding the truth.
However, what neither talk host realizes is that newspaper birth announcements are not placed by parents phoning their local paper with the good news that they had a child. Based on interviews with the two Hawaii papers involved, the Obama newspaper birth announcements stemmed from information automatically sent to the papers by Hawaii's Department of Health upon the state's issuance of a "Certification of Live Birth," which is considered insufficient on its own to positively document the president's birthplace.
Many people remain unaware that a child does not even have to be born in Hawaii to receive a "Certification of Live Birth – that's the "short form" that provides no hospital name, delivering physician or any of the other information that traditionally appears on a legitimate birth certificate. And yet the "short form" COLB is the one and only piece of evidence the White House has cited in defending its assertion Obama was born in Hawaii.
Hawaiian law specifically allows "an adult or the legal parents of a minor child" to apply to the health department and, upon unspecified proof, be given the birth document.
The only requirement for proof cited in the law doesn't address the birth of the child either, just "that the legal parents of such individual while living without Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child."
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
Questioning obama's citizenship is legitimate. It is not a conspiracy of people who question who obama is. It is in fact a conspiracy to hide the facts about obama's birth.
Who is hiding the facts? Who is helping to hide the facts? Why?
Anyone who thinks a birth announcement in a newspaper is evidence obama was born in Hawaii are very foolish.
The evidence that will explode the mith of obama is his original "certificate of live birth" not a "certification of live birth".
Obama has only provided an unsigned certification of live birth. This provides no evidence that can be verified. The long form certificate of live birth in Hawaii can. It would indicate his parents signatures, doctors signatues, hospital and registrar signature.
The evidence obama has presented of his birth and citizenship can't be verified because of the form nor will he allow it to be verfied. In fact obama has spent millions of dollars in court costs to hide his true identity. Why.
BECAUSE HE IS A FRAUD!
..........................................................................................
Obama's birth papers, however, aren't the only piece of the sitting president's past that Obama has refused to reveal.
Other documentation not yet available includes Obama's kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
Why?
Because obama is a FRAUD!
The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.
The conspiracy continues. The conspiracy of certain radio,television and media people to look the other way when it comes to asking the question, Can you prove to America you are an American as you claim? The evidence is hidden. Obama has not produced any evidence that can be verified. This is a fact. This is not a conspiracy but a fraud hiding the truth.
Monday, January 4, 2010
Obama's Intelligence Adviser John Brennan Heads A Firm That Was Cited In March For Breaching Sensitive Files In The State Department’s Passport Office
Obama's Intelligence Adviser John Brennan Heads A Firm That Was Cited In March For Breaching Sensitive Files In The State Department’s Passport Office.
Let me reword this: One of obama's thugs had his passport records "santitized" or modified to hide obama's true identity. Obama's passport records most likely would have revealed he is not a natural born citizen or something else obama does not want America to know.
............................................................................................
Newsmax
Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.
“They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
"This individual's actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards," Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.
The passport files include “personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,” according to the inspector general report.
The files may contain additional information including “original copies of the associated documents,” the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.
The Obama campaign acknowledged at its “Fight the Smears” Web site that Obama was a foreign national until the age of 18, by virtue of his father’s British then Kenyan citizenship.
“Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982,” the Web site stated.
“Fight the Smears” attempted to debunk rumors that Obama was not a U.S. citizen by producing a 2007 computer-generated copy of his certification of live birth.
“The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America,” the Web site states.
However, “native citizen” is a colloquialism, not a legal term. It is not the same as “natural-born citizen,” the requirement to be president set out in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
Chief Justice John Roberts has scheduled a Supreme Court conference on Jan. 23 on Lightfoot v. Bowen, one of several cases alleging that Obama is not a “natural born” citizen because of his birthright British citizenship.
The State Department chalked up the passport file snooping discovered in March 2008 to “imprudent curiosity” by contract employees hired to help process passport applications.
Asked by reporters during a campaign stop in Portland, Ore., to comment on the breach, Obama said that attempts to “tap into people’s personal records” were “a problem not just for me but for how our government functions.
"I expect a full and thorough investigation. It should be done in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight so it's not simply an internal matter," he added.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice phoned Obama and personally apologized for the breach. “I told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file,” Rice told reporters. She phoned Clinton and McCain and offered similar apologies.
Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. Biden will be sworn in as Obama’s vice president on Jan. 20.
The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.
The problems posed by the breach were so serious that the inspector general recommended that the State Department conduct “vulnerability and risk assessments of all passport systems” to identify security weaknesses and suggest “a timetable for implementing corrective actions.”
Acting Assistant secretary for administration William H. Moser sent a six-page reply concurring with the recommendation, all but one paragraph of which was blacked out because of the sensitivity of the information it contained.
Had Brennan been appointed CIA director, as rumored in the Obama campaign shortly after the election, senators also would have questioned him about an article he wrote in an obscure foreign policy magazine over the summer.
The article, entitled “The Conundrum of Iran: Strengthening Moderates without Acquiescing to Belligerence,” appeared in the July issue of "The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science."
Among other recommendations, it argued that the next U.S. administration should grant political legitimacy to the terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas, and should exercise “strategic patience” with Iran rather than engaging in “bellicose” rhetoric and coercive diplomacy.
..........................................................................................
What we have is a fraud in the white house. The fraud has paid off many of his fellow thugs including john brennan. Joe biden made sure his committee did nothing to expose obama, his committe had oversight over obama's passport. Hillery clinton will also make sure obama's passport fix will not be exposed. The fix of course is a coverup of obama's true identity. The obama administration and democrates in congress are corrupt and do not answer to the people. There is taxation without representation.
The Truth Be Told
The voting machines can be hacked and have been hacked. This means Americans really have no real voice at the "electronic polls".
(1) Electonic voter machines are corrupt
(2) Majority of politicians in congress are corrupt and do not answer to the people
So what is the answer?
Lets read what the US Constitution says:
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Nowhere in the US Constitution is made a provision for the US Congress to force all US citizens to purchase a health care plan from the US Government.
No where in the US Constitution is a provision made for US citizens to obey unconstituional laws made by congress.
Therefore America must rise up. America must revolt, rebel and oppose any and all elected officials who do not answer to the people.
Congress is corrupt. Obama is corrupt.
Our leaders have become our task masters. Our leaders lie and deceive for personal gain.
Its 1776 in 2010 again.
Let me reword this: One of obama's thugs had his passport records "santitized" or modified to hide obama's true identity. Obama's passport records most likely would have revealed he is not a natural born citizen or something else obama does not want America to know.
............................................................................................
Newsmax
Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.
“They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
"This individual's actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards," Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.
The passport files include “personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,” according to the inspector general report.
The files may contain additional information including “original copies of the associated documents,” the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.
The Obama campaign acknowledged at its “Fight the Smears” Web site that Obama was a foreign national until the age of 18, by virtue of his father’s British then Kenyan citizenship.
“Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982,” the Web site stated.
“Fight the Smears” attempted to debunk rumors that Obama was not a U.S. citizen by producing a 2007 computer-generated copy of his certification of live birth.
“The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America,” the Web site states.
However, “native citizen” is a colloquialism, not a legal term. It is not the same as “natural-born citizen,” the requirement to be president set out in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
Chief Justice John Roberts has scheduled a Supreme Court conference on Jan. 23 on Lightfoot v. Bowen, one of several cases alleging that Obama is not a “natural born” citizen because of his birthright British citizenship.
The State Department chalked up the passport file snooping discovered in March 2008 to “imprudent curiosity” by contract employees hired to help process passport applications.
Asked by reporters during a campaign stop in Portland, Ore., to comment on the breach, Obama said that attempts to “tap into people’s personal records” were “a problem not just for me but for how our government functions.
"I expect a full and thorough investigation. It should be done in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight so it's not simply an internal matter," he added.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice phoned Obama and personally apologized for the breach. “I told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file,” Rice told reporters. She phoned Clinton and McCain and offered similar apologies.
Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. Biden will be sworn in as Obama’s vice president on Jan. 20.
The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.
The problems posed by the breach were so serious that the inspector general recommended that the State Department conduct “vulnerability and risk assessments of all passport systems” to identify security weaknesses and suggest “a timetable for implementing corrective actions.”
Acting Assistant secretary for administration William H. Moser sent a six-page reply concurring with the recommendation, all but one paragraph of which was blacked out because of the sensitivity of the information it contained.
Had Brennan been appointed CIA director, as rumored in the Obama campaign shortly after the election, senators also would have questioned him about an article he wrote in an obscure foreign policy magazine over the summer.
The article, entitled “The Conundrum of Iran: Strengthening Moderates without Acquiescing to Belligerence,” appeared in the July issue of "The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science."
Among other recommendations, it argued that the next U.S. administration should grant political legitimacy to the terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas, and should exercise “strategic patience” with Iran rather than engaging in “bellicose” rhetoric and coercive diplomacy.
..........................................................................................
What we have is a fraud in the white house. The fraud has paid off many of his fellow thugs including john brennan. Joe biden made sure his committee did nothing to expose obama, his committe had oversight over obama's passport. Hillery clinton will also make sure obama's passport fix will not be exposed. The fix of course is a coverup of obama's true identity. The obama administration and democrates in congress are corrupt and do not answer to the people. There is taxation without representation.
The Truth Be Told
The voting machines can be hacked and have been hacked. This means Americans really have no real voice at the "electronic polls".
(1) Electonic voter machines are corrupt
(2) Majority of politicians in congress are corrupt and do not answer to the people
So what is the answer?
Lets read what the US Constitution says:
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Nowhere in the US Constitution is made a provision for the US Congress to force all US citizens to purchase a health care plan from the US Government.
No where in the US Constitution is a provision made for US citizens to obey unconstituional laws made by congress.
Therefore America must rise up. America must revolt, rebel and oppose any and all elected officials who do not answer to the people.
Congress is corrupt. Obama is corrupt.
Our leaders have become our task masters. Our leaders lie and deceive for personal gain.
Its 1776 in 2010 again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)