Interfering
(1) Prevent (a process or activity) from being carried out properly.
When a non producer ie supervisor, manager or president interferes with a producer a process or activity is prevented from being carried out.
The higher the pay level or the more important the job is, the non producer is expected to produce something other than interference.
When someone is in a position to influence the entire country and produces interference the producers produce less.
A position of authority or high office can be used to enhance production or destroy production on a vast scale.
I look at obama not only as a non producer but an obstacle to more production and prosperity.
The non producer obstacle obama must be replaced to resume production at a normal or higher level.
Until obama the unachiever is removed from office he will continue to be an obstacle and interfere with the US economy and normal production.
Obama is no educated idiot. He is a bump in the road that won't go away. People would like to avoid the bumb but until the bump is replaced or removed it (he) will continue to be an albatross or burden to Americans.
Obama needs to be fired for non production. Obama, Jackson, Sharpton etc are all non producers. They are parasites that feed on America's producers.
If the recent presidential election was a contract with obama he has broken the contract by not producing results as promised. The egg sucker obama takes money from hard working Americans rich and poor. Obama is like a tick that won't let go.
The "contract" needs to be terminated before obama bankrupts the country through mismanagement! It will be terminated in Nov 2010 but the parasite obama will continue to feed off his American hosts as long as he can.
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe
1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
1 Cor 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
1 Cor 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Genesis Chapter 1
1 Cor 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
1 Cor 1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
James 3:14 But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.
3:15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.
James 3:17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.
1 Cor 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
........................................................................................
Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe. The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe, Stephen Hawking has concluded.
The scientist has claimed that no divine force was needed to explain why the Universe was formed.
In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”
He added: “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”
In his new book he rejects Sir Isaac Newton's theory that the Universe did not spontaneously begin to form but was set in motion by God.
In June this year Prof Hawking told a Channel 4 series that he didn't believe that a "personal" God existed. He told Genius of Britain: "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second. If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."
(Hawking believes there is no GOD. His "god" is the law of science. He has knowledge but lacks wisdom. Divine wisdom can't be empirically deduced by analyzing data and physical evidence. The evidence of a creator is all around him yet he denies the existence of GOD. Hawkings says their is a law of gravity but he can't explain what it is or how it came into existance except by speculation. It is an invisible force that holds every thing togeather. GOD is an invisible being that created gravity the unseen force. Hawkings believes in the unseen force that GOD created. He needs to think out of the "box" and realize that it was no accident or "big bang" that created this invisible force.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
God has given man the ability to study, analyze, categorize, and develop the physical resources of this earth to benefit physical life. But that's where his wisdom ends.
Because of sin, his mind is totally unable to discern the spiritual dimension. He has no power to change his own heart, no understanding to solve his spiritual dilemma, and no resources to satisfy his soul–he is spiritually dead.
1 Cor 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
1 Cor 2:7 But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:
The Greek word translated "mystery" doesn't refer to something strange or puzzling; it's a technical term for the kind of truth man has not previously known but is now revealed. The truth that God saves sinners through the substitutionary sacrifice of His Son is now plain for all to see.
However, no one can come to that truth by himself because of sin. "A natural man [an unconverted person] does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised" (1 Cor. 2:14).
Divine wisdom can't be empirically deduced by analyzing data and physical evidence (1 Cor verse 9). It comes only as a gift God gives when His Spirit reveals His Word to individuals.
Human wisdom is limited. I believe men in their foolishness will never obtain the knowlege and wisdom necessary to solve the creation of the universe through man made science.
Hawking believes the universe spontaneously begin to form on its own. He is asking you to believe matter and energy were created from nothing by nothing.
Hawking says, "If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."
Hawking talks about other demensions etc and other possible universes etc. He doesn't address who GOD is.
God is a non-material personal being, self-conscious and self-determining.
God is someone we can get to know. He, unlike ourselves, doesn't need to be told what to do. On the other hand He tells us what to do and how to live in a manner pleasing to Him. Just because He can't be seen by the human eye doesn't mean He is not there and therefore should be ignored.
Quite the opposite is true, His creation demonstrates His existence. Also, since he cannot be seen, we need to devote ourselves to study everything that has been written about Him so that we can get to know Him like He wants us to and begin to live our lives in a way that pleases Him.
John 4:24
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
John 1:18
No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
Colossians 1:15
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
I Timothy 6:16
Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.
Luke 24:39
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
Psm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
19:2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
19:3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
19:4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,
Romans 1:20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
God has no image. He cannot be seen by the human eye, but creation points to His existence. His Son, Jesus testified to His existence and desire to be sought by His creatures. He also provided us with an example of how to live our lives seeking and serving God.
The laws of science are man made and limited in their ability to explain creation.
The best that Hawkings can come up with is that creation was a big bang from nothing.
I've got a much better non scientific explanation:
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
A scientific the·o·ry is speculation.
It is something Hawking believes and trusts. Hawking has faith in his own theory.
I believe in Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
My "theroy' or faith in my 'theory' has been proven.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Psm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Praise the Lord!
The Holy Bible (KJV)
Army Major General (Ret) Jerry Curry agrees with Lt Col Lakin that barry soetoro should provide proof of eligibility
.........................................................................................
(In additon to the fact obama is not a natural born citizen the Indonesian school registration above translated to english reveals obama was a muslim. Also for obama to be enrolled in an Indonesian school he had to be adopted by his step father, Lolo Soetoro. Because of this barry soetoro became an Indonesian citizen also.
What does this all mean. It means obama at some point because he became an Indonesian citizen had to renounce his Indonesian citizenship and become a NATURALIZED citizen. He never has done this.
This is also another hidden fact about obama and the document above proves it.
Obama has never said he was adopted or that he was a citizen of Indonesia because he was enrolled in an Indonesian school yet this had to be.
Not only is obama NOT a natural born citizen obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia now or has become a naturalized citizen and is hiding this fact claiming he is a US citizen.
This is why it is critical that obama be exposed as an IMPOSTER.) Story reports
.........................................................................................
Army Major General (Ret) Jerry Curry a decorated combat veteran has issued statement saying he agrees with Lakin that the President should provide proof of eligibility.
Many of the President’s supporters have encouraged Obama not to release the information claiming it would not silence the critics. Curry dismissed that claim saying the President should say “here it is, you wanted it you got it, now get off my back.”
A recent CNN poll showed that only 42 percent of Americans feel that the President was definitely born in the United States. When asked how he feels the president should respond to the many Americans who have expressed doubt about his eligibility, Curry said as a leader the President should “look the American people in the eye” and say “I am under a cloud because there are some folks that think I am illegitimate. If you will tell me what you think I need to provide to cause you to throw this mess out the window, and to understand that I am legitimate then I will provide what you folks want because the most important thing is this country and carrying out the constitution.”
(58 percent of Americans have doubts as to where obama was born. A majority of American also question obama's identity. Only 42 percent of the respondents said they believed the President was definitely born in the United States while probably in the United States received 29 percent meaning 6 in 10 Americans are uncertain about Obama’s birth.) Story Reports
Major General Paul Vallely has also publically supported Lt. Col. Lakin saying in a radio interview “I think many in the military – and many out of the military – question the natural-birth status of Barack Obama. … I'm not convinced that he's a natural-born
citizen.”
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews said those who continued to doubt Obama’s eligibility were guilty of racism saying they want “to destroy this president not because of what he does but because of who he is, not because of where he was born but what his race is when he was born” and wanting to “assassinate him with their lies.”
(Chirs matthews is playing the race card for obama. Anyone who questions obama's citizenship is labeled a racist. Also anyone who questions ANYTHING obama does is labeled a racist. All Americans who doubt obama is a citizen are not doubling obama is a citizen because he claims to be a black man. I and others doubt obama's eligibility because he has NOT provided ANY proff of his US citizenship that can be validated. No hospital name or doctors signature, or parents signatures that can be verified.
Also in senate Resolution S 511 that obama cosponsored it confirms a natural born citizen is a citizen who parents were American citiens at the time of birth.
Only one of obama's parents was a US citizen at his birth. His father was a Kenyan citizen at obama's birth.
Also obama claims that he was a Kenyan citizen until age 22 because his father was a Kenyan citizen.
Obama has admitted he was a DUAL CITIZEN at birth and that only one of his prents was an American citizen at the time of his birth. Again obama admits he is NOT a natural born citizen as the US Constituiton requires to be eligibile as a valid president.
Obama is an IMPOSTER president and has actually admitted this fact by admitting he was a DUAL citizen at birth and admitting a natural born citizen is one born to American citizen(s) at birth as Mcain was.
This is what is amazing to me. Obama has admitted he is a FRAUD and he is defended to this day by those play the race card. Those that defend obama just because he claims to be a black man and don't answer the question, "where is the birth certificate proof that can be validated" are not defending the IMPOSTER in a valid manner.
They know obama has admitted he is an IMPOSTER yet they defend him on the basis of race only. They think the best defence is race bating. It doesn't work.
Americans want to know how obama can be elected president yet he is not a natural born citizen. They want to see a validated long form certificate of live birth with the hospital and doctors names. They want obama to come clean and come out of the shadows.
Be a man obama. Be all that you can be. Shed your dual identity and reveal who you really are. Explain the birth certificate that you say you don't have time to go around with plasted on your forehead.
Explain to America and validate the hospital you were born in. Explain and validate the doctor who signed you certificate of live birth. Explain why you continue to spend thousands of dollars in court costs refusing to reveal your real identity.
I'll explain it, its simple, you are a FRAUD and IMPOSTER!
Could it be all this is really about obama is still an Indonesian citizen or that he is a naturalized citizen?
It could be.
For some reason people seem to get the fact that a naturalized citzen cannot be president.
Also for some reason many people don't get the fact the a anyone who is not a natural born citizen cannot be president.
Note that obama has never mentioned anything about natural born citizenship or naturalized citizenship about himself.
The only office in America that requires that a person be a natural born citizen and not a naturalized citizen is the office of president of the US.
All other offices including senate and house of rep only require that a person be a naturalized citizen.) Story Reports
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty
While listening to the local talk radio a caller called in to inform us of a city inforcing the UN international property maintenance code. It is part of UN agenda 21.
A local business owner was told he must replace an cloth awning that had a rip in it. The awning also has the name of the company on it. The problem is with the economy so bad he didn't have the money to replace it now. The owner had to just take the cloth awning down.
Also the city told the owner if he didn't replace the cloth awning he would be fined a $1,000. a day. This is crazy excessive.
The point is the city was follwing the UN international maintenace property code.
Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty. Story Reports
Check Here to see if your city has sold out to the UN
ICLEI, now known as Local Governments for Sustainability is in the process of purging their website of United Nations references despite an abundant history of association. There are now over 600 cities and counties within the United States that have contracts with ICLEI. The following quotation was found on the ICLEI.org website in 2009:
"During the Local Government Session at the World Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa (August 2002), local government leaders from around the world, as well as representatives from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), UN-HABITAT and the World Health Organization (WHO), joined ICLEI in launching Local Action 21 as the next phase of Local Agenda 21 (LA21)."
ICLEI: Local Governments for Sustainability and the U.N. Connection
(Do you understand the UN is controlling your local government and not you?) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property
.........................................................................................
Under the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has produced several volumes of text that facilitates, and simplifies the process of promoting and implementing Sustainable Development through Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Each state has its Emergency Management Agency that receives its directives from FEMA. Most, if not all, states have established regional councils (soviets—regionalism) that exist as an extra-constitutional, quasi-public, quasi-governmental layer of governance.
Above county government and seemingly below state government, these regional councils are the pipelines through which the international community, and the federal government exercise their will over local governments. Programmes of action and grants-in-aid flow through these regional non-profits.
They may be likened to drug pushers or pimps in the global “casino”, the “city of crime.” We the people, and the governments instituted among men, have become hooked on OPM that is, “Other People’s Money.”
We have forsaken our founder’s advice, “A people willing to sacrifice their Liberty for security deserve neither security nor Liberty.” Socialism demands that it be so.
.........................................................................................
Here is the complete article on the international property maintenance code agenda 21
.........................................................................................
The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property by William Roberts
Summary:
Chapter Seven of Agenda 21 calls for the establishment of a “culture of safety.” All of Agenda 21, Chapter 7 is the expansion of UN Resolution 44/236 and the foundational material for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA's) "Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Planning" programme that fails to provide safety and destroys liberty.
Hazard Mitigation Planning-Building a Sustainable America
As children didn’t we learn that ours is the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave? Wasn’t this catechism served up with a slice of Martha Washington’s apple pie, a breast of Mayflower Compact wild turkey on a platter full of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, smothered under a generous helping of his Age of Reason? But in the sissified, materialist “Mommy State” of 21st Century America haven’t we altogether been programmed to believe that insurance policies can be had to indemnify against all of our losses whether from hang nail or heart attack, auto crash or airline disaster, bank failure, hurricane, tornado, heat wave, winter storm, drought, or wildfire?
What remains of our former hallmark “rugged individualism?” Where is that free land today? Are there yet any brave souls in this, our national home?
Chapter Seven of Agenda 21 calls for the establishment of a “culture of safety?” A global safety cult, that guarantees neither safety nor permits liberty, has raised from the ashes of the Cold War era Civil Defense programme. This cult has many names, of which Sustainable Development is but one. Outwardly, its exoteric intent is to keep our earthly home safe from the destructive forces of man. Esoterically, it pursues man’s ancient quest: the mastery of nature. That through the mastery of the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God—man will himself be as god and master of not only Earth, but in a larger sense—master of the Universe.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt took office as President on March 4, 1933, the depression had reached its lowest point. The people had no assurance of their future course, and a paralyzing fear gripped the nation. In his inaugural address, Roosevelt struck a note of calm confidence: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes efforts to convert retreat into advance.” The President said he would ask Congress for “broad executive power to wage a war against the emergency as great as the power that would be given me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.”
A review of the Emergency Power Statutes: Provisions of Federal Law Now in Effect Delegating to the Executive [Branch] Extraordinary Authority in Time of National Emergency, Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, United States Senate, November 19, 1973, reveals that since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.
In what some call “the permanent revolution” and others have written “perpetual war for perpetual peace,” the brotherhood of man remains in a constant state of emergency. In this way, the globalist cabal facilitates its end run around national sovereignty, borders, constitutions and governments. Using its “broad executive power to wage war against the emergency,” often a state-sponsored event, even Terrorism, the international community advances it’s programme de jour, in the Hegelian Dialectic fashion—problem, reaction, and solution—the crisis theory.
On December 22, 1989, The United Nations General Assembly, during it’s 85th Plenary Meeting adopted resolution 44/236, and following on the direction of it’s December 11, 1987, resolution 42/169, the United Nations proclaimed the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction beginning on January 1, 1990 and terminating on December 31, 1999, which all remember as Y2K; a much heralded and feared, yet toothless, non-event. October 11, 2006, was the International Day for Natural Disaster Reduction.
The Annex to Resolution 44/236 had as its first objective and goal, “to reduce through concerted international action, especially in developing countries, the loss of life, property damage and social and economic disruption caused by natural disasters such as earthquakes, windstorms, tsunamis, floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, grasshopper and locust infestations, drought and desertification and other calamities of natural origins.”
A/Res/44/236, states at 2(a) To improve the capacity of each country to mitigate the effects of natural disasters expeditiously and effectively, . . .the establishment of early warning systems and disaster resistant structures when and where needed;
And, in A/Res/44/236, 2(e) To develop measures for the assessment, prediction, prevention and mitigation of natural disasters through programmes of technical assistance and technology transfer, demonstration projects, education and training, tailored to specific disasters and locations, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these programmes;
From the entirety of the above-cited resolutions has been crafted the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Planning programme which, I believe, in all aspects, has been adopted by the State of Florida, Polk County, and the City of Lakeland, and likely, your hometown, your county, and your state, too!
How does a United Nations Resolution make the transition from global initiative to local law? First, through agreements negotiated by governments at the United Nations conferences, in this case, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) June 3-14, 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil—agreed to by President George Herbert Walker Bush; and second, through voluntary adoptions made by national, state and local governments.
In the Foreword of the UN publication Earth Summit Agenda 21, the United Nations Programme of Action from Rio, 1992, Maurice Strong, Secretary-General, wrote, “Humanity today is in the midst of a profound civilizational change.” Mr. Strong contends that we are in a “second industrial revolution—this eco-revolution.” Further, he states that the levers of economic power and change are held by “Industrialists, economists, financiers, engineers, [and] scientists.” Mr. Strong looks “to the new United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development to be the focal point for the massive effort,”
This revolution planned to effect a profound civilizational change away from production and consumption to a more secure, sustainable and equitable future is but another phase of the permanent revolution. Agenda 21 is the book that defines this ideology. Let’s look at Chapter 7:
Chapter 7 Promoting sustainable human settlement development
F) PROMOTING HUMAN SETTLEMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER-PRONE AREAS
__________________
BASIS FOR ACTION
7.55 Natural disasters cause loss of life, disruption of economic activities and urban productivity, particularly for highly susceptible low-income groups, and environmental damage, such as loss of fertile agricultural land and contamination of water resources, and can lead to major resettlement of populations. Over the past two decades, they are estimated to have caused some 3 million deaths and affected 800 million people. Global economic losses have been estimated by the Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator to be in the range of $30 billion per year. [150,000 disaster related deaths/year? Compared to abortion, medical malpractice, auto accident, or AIDS related deaths, this number loses its intended impact. Compared to the hundreds of billions budgeted for annual implementation of Agenda 21, and much of this from grants and concessions made by the International Community, natural disasters are almost a non-issue.]
___________
OBJECTIVE
7.58 The objective is to enable all countries, in particular those that are disaster-prone, to mitigate the negative impact of natural and man-made disasters on human settlements, national economies and the environment.
__________
ACTIVITIES
7.59 Three distinct areas of activity are foreseen under this programme area, namely, the development of a “culture of safety”, pre-disaster planning and post-disaster reconstruction.
A) DEVELOPING A CULTURE OF SAFETY
7.60 To promote a “culture of safety” in all countries, especially those that are disaster-prone, the following activities should be carried out:
(a) Completing national and local studies on the nature and occurrence of natural disasters, their impact on people and economic activities, the effects of inadequate construction and land use in hazard-prone areas, and the social and economic advantages of adequate pre-disaster planning;
(b) Implementing nationwide and local awareness campaigns through all available media, translating the above knowledge into information easily comprehensible to the general public and to the populations directly exposed to hazards; [Propaganda!]
B) DEVELOPING PRE-DISASTER PLANNING
7.61 Pre-disaster planning should form an integral part of human settlement planning in all countries. The following should be included:
(a) Undertaking complete multi-hazard research into risk and vulnerability of human settlement infrastructure, including water and sewerage, communication and transportation networks, as one type of risk reduction may increase vulnerability to another [e.g., an earthquake-resistant house made of wood will be more vulnerable to wind storm events];
(c) Redirecting inappropriate new development and human settlements to areas not prone to hazards; [relocation out of harms way]
(e) Developing tools (legal, economic, etc.) to encourage disaster-sensitive development, including means of ensuring that limitations on development options are not punitive to owners, or incorporate alternative means of compensation; [floodplain buyout]
(f) Further developing and disseminating information on disaster-resistant building materials and construction technologies for buildings and public works in general; [International Codes]
(g) Developing training programmes for contractors and builders on disaster-resistant construction methods. Some programmes should be directed particularly to small enterprises, which build the great majority of housing and other small buildings in the developing countries as well as to the rural populations, which build their own houses;
(h) Developing training programmes for emergency site managers, non-governmental organizations and community groups which cover all aspects of disaster mitigation, including urban search and rescue, emergency communications, early warning techniques, and pre-disaster planning;
(j) Preparing action plans for the reconstruction of settlements, especially the reconstruction of community lifelines.
(C) INITIATING POST-DISASTER RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION PLANNING
7.62 The international community, as a major partner in post-reconstruction and rehabilitation, should ensure that the countries involved derive the greatest benefits from the funds allocated by undertaking the following activities:
(a) Carrying out research on past experiences on the social and economic aspects of post-disaster reconstruction and adopting effective strategies and guidelines for post-disaster reconstruction, with particular emphasis on development-focused strategies in the allocation of scarce reconstruction resources, and on the opportunities that post-disaster reconstruction provides to introduce sustainable settlement patterns;
(c) Supporting efforts of national Governments to initiate contingency planning, with participation of affected communities, for post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation.
Now let’s jump from point to point:
7.28 The objective is to provide for the land requirements of human settlement development through environmentally sound physical planning and land use so as to ensure access to land to all households and, where appropriate, the encouragement of communally and collectively owned and managed land.
7.29 All countries should consider, as appropriate, undertaking a comprehensive national inventory of their land resources in order to establish a land information system in which land resources will be classified according to their most appropriate uses and environmentally fragile or disaster-prone areas will be identified for special protection measures.
7.30 (a) Establish, as appropriate, national legislation to guide the implementation of public policies for environmentally sound urban development, land utilization, housing and for the improved management of urban expansion.
(d) Encourage partnerships among the public, private and community sectors in managing land resources for human settlements development;
(e) Establish appropriate forms of land tenure that provides security of tenure for all land-users,
7.62 Scientists and engineers specializing in this field in both developed and developing countries should collaborate with urban and regional planners in order to provide the basic means to mitigate losses owing to disasters as well as environmentally inappropriate development.
7.66 Training programmes should be extended to government officials, planners, community, and non-governmental organizations to cover all aspects of disaster mitigation, such as early warning techniques, pre-disaster planning and construction, post-disaster construction and rehabilitation.
7.69 (d) Formulate appropriate land-use policies and introduce planning regulations specially aimed at the protection of eco-sensitive zones against physical disruption by construction and construction related activities;
All of Agenda 21, Chapter 7 is the expansion of UN Resolution 44/236 and the foundational material for the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Planning programme. Agenda 21 is Sustainable Development. Hazard mitigation planning is an implementation tool for the transformation of our several states into a communal, collective, new form of land tenure that fulfills the first plank of the Communist Manifesto: The Abolition of Private Property.
How the United States is Implementing Agenda 21:
In Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 USC 5165, authority to create natural hazard mitigation plans exists.
In the past, federal legislation has provided funding for disaster relief, recovery, and some hazard mitigation planning. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) is the latest legislation to improve this planning process and was put into motion on October 10, 2000, when the President signed the Act (Public Law 106-390). The new legislation emphasizes planning for disasters before they occur. The Act establishes a pre-disaster hazard mitigation program and new requirements for the national post-disaster Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP).
Under the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has produced several volumes of text that facilitates, and simplifies the process of promoting and implementing Sustainable Development through Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Each state has its Emergency Management Agency that receives its directives from FEMA. Most, if not all, states have established regional councils (soviets—regionalism) that exist as an extra-constitutional, quasi-public, quasi-governmental layer of governance. Above county government and seemingly below state government, these regional councils are the pipelines through which the international community, and the federal government exercise their will over local governments. Programmes of action and grants-in-aid flow through these regional non-profits. They may be likened to drug pushers or pimps in the global “casino”, the “city of crime.” We the people, and the governments instituted among men, have become hooked on OPM that is, “Other People’s Money.”
We have forsaken our founder’s advice, “A people willing to sacrifice their Liberty for security deserve neither security nor Liberty.” Socialism demands that it be so.
Even a schoolboy knows that man, even a group of sincerely dedicated wealthy men, is powerless against the mighty energy of creation. “[T]o reduce through concerted international action, especially in developing countries, the loss of life, property damage and social and economic disruption caused by natural disasters such as earthquakes, windstorms, tsunamis, floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, grasshopper and locust infestations, drought and desertification and other calamities of natural origin”, is at best a humanitarian and altruistic pipe dream. This is the stuff of the snake oil salesman, the shrill bark of the carney, the studied deception of change agents and propagandists.
The Department of Homeland Security, like Civil Defense before it, has as its primary objective: the continuation of government. Ensuring the continuity of government, and the preservation and protection of records and critical facilities, therefore, is at the apex of the mitigation plan. Immediately below the preservation of government is the preservation of business and banking interests.
Stripped of its bluster, obfuscatory demographics and pseudo-science, the hazard mitigation plan may be reduced to one element: Floodplain Ordinance. People have been either causing floods for irrigation and other purposes, or rebuilding after floods have occurred, from the beginning of recorded time. FEMA understands and can respond to flooding.
FEMA is prepared to use the property owner’s fear of loss due to flooding, as the vehicle to relocate development out of the 100-year floodplains, which defined is any land area that has a one percent or greater chance on any day to be inundated, and other hazardous or sensitive environments. The concept is known as “floodplain buyout”, but could also be labeled “Fear Motivation.”
FEMA publications state, “citizens are ultimately responsible for their own safety and for protecting their assets from damage by preparing for potential disasters that could occur within their community.”
FEMA says that, “a sustainable community is a disaster-resistant community.” This is where Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, flood plain buyouts, relocation of human settlement development, and the International Code Council come to the fore. Before Agenda 21, we knew much of this as Urban Renewal, but whatsoever cannot be bought out, demolished, relocated or retrofitted will soon have to be built to resist whatever the Almighty can cast upon it.
How Local Governments Implement Agenda 21:
Former FEMA director James Lee Witt has partnered with the International Code Council as CEO and serves as Chairman of the International Code Foundation. What are these International Codes and how will their implementation affect each and every American?
The International Code Council, established in 1994, is based in the United States and is a nonprofit organization dedicated to developing a single set of national model construction codes. The ICC is ahead of the curve as we move further into the Free Trade Area of the Americas. With more than 250 well-qualified super social scientists at 16 offices throughout the United States and Latin America, the International Code Council and their International Building Codes, may just be another rapidly expanding globalist monopoly.
The International Codes published by the International Code Council (ICC), include:
* International Building Code®
* ICC Electrical Code®—Administrative Provisions
* International Energy Conservation Code®
* International Existing Building Code®
* International Fire Code®
* International Fuel Gas Code®
* International Mechanical Code®
* ICC Performance Code®
* International Plumbing Code®
* International Private Sewage Disposal Code®
* International Residential Code®
* International Wildland-Urban Interface Code®, and
* International Zoning Code®
These comprehensive ICC codes are created following the model code development process and are performance and prescriptive code requirements. The codes are subject to and capable of revision. A new edition is promulgated every three years. Model codes encourage international consistency in application.
The 1998 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code, begun in 1996, supercedes earlier property maintenance codes; for brevity, we will consider only the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC), which governs the maintenance of existing buildings.
Ostensibly, the International Property Maintenance Code seeks to protect public health, safety and welfare without unnecessarily increasing construction costs, restricting the use of new materials, products or methods of construction, and without giving preferential treatment to particular types or classes of materials, products, or methods of construction.
Neither the ICC, nor any of those participating in the development of their codes accept any liability (accountability) resulting from compliance or non-compliance because “ICC does not have the power or authority to police or enforce compliance” with the contents of the code. “Only the governmental body that enacts the code into law has such authority.”
As with all ICC code products, the International Property Maintenance Code is available by adoption by jurisdictions internationally in accordance with proceedings establishing the jurisdictions laws. Sample adoption ordinances written with fill-in-the-blank simplicity are included in the code booklet.
The adoption Ordinance reveals the broad range of the code which embraces existing structures and premises; regulates and governs the conditions and maintenance of all property, buildings and structures; provides standards for supplied utilities and facilities and other physical things and conditions that are essential to ensure that structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupation and use; for the condemnation of buildings and structures unfit for human occupancy and use; for the demolition of such existing structures; and provides for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefore; together with, the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of such 2006 International Property Maintenance Code.
The ordinance is in full force and effect from and after the date of its final passage and adoption. States, counties, municipalities and other forms of governance may adopt any or all of the ICC products in like manner, and many have already done so.
We will now examine several individual sections within the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code:
SECTION 101 GENERAL
In Section 101.2 Scope, the code shall “apply to all residential and nonresidential structures and all existing premises and constitute minimum requirements and standards for premises, structures, equipment and facilities for light, ventilation, space, heating, sanitation, protection from the elements, life safety, safety from fire and other hazards, and for safe and sanitary maintenance; the responsibility of owners, operators and occupants; the occupancy of existing structures and premises, and for administration, enforcement and penalties.”
Section 101.3 Intent, states that “existing structures and premises that do not comply with these provisions shall be altered or repaired to provide a minimum level of health and safety as required within.”
SECTION 102 APPLICABILITY
The universe of command and control expands in Section 102.1 General, where “the code shall apply to all matters affecting or relating to structures and premises,” as set forth in Section 101. 102.1 continues by stating that where “different sections of the code specify different requirements, the most restrictive shall apply.”
Section 102.2 Maintenance declares that the owner or the owner’s designated agent shall be responsible for the maintenance of buildings, structures and premises.
“None are so hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
One might add that anyone who actually believes that he owns real property is under a strong delusion, as our further study of the IPMC will demonstrate.
Section 102.8 Requirements not covered by code, states, “Requirements necessary for the strength, stability or proper operation of an existing fixture, structure or equipment, or for the public safety, health and general welfare, not specifically covered by this code shall be determined by the code official.”
SECTION 103 DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INSPECTION
Government thrives upon bureaucracy. Section 103.1 General creates upon adoption “the department of property maintenance inspection” and the appointed “executive official in charge thereof shall be known as the code official.” “The code official shall not be removed from office except for cause” (103.2), and “shall have the authority to appoint a deputy code official, other related technical officers, inspectors and other employees.”
Section 103.4 Liability provides immunity from personal liability for all charged with the enforcement of the code. The jurisdiction (adopting body) shall defend the enforcers against all claims.
SECTION 104 DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE CODE OFFICIAL
Section 104.1 General “The code official shall enforce the provisions of this code.” The code is made law; the code official is the law enforcement officer. As with Conservation Department “Agents,” and Forest Service “Rangers,” who were initially unarmed and believed to be friendly—but are now armed, generally feared, or considered likely to be hostile—may one expect that code enforcement “deputies” shall one day holster a sidearm.
Recall that in many cities the Department of Public Safety is its police, and often, fire departments. Section 104.2 Rule-making authority, grants the code official “authority as necessary in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare,” this is police, or executive power. 104.2 continues: “to adopt and promulgate rules and procedures,” this is legislative power. And 104.2 continues: “to interpret and implement the provisions of this code; to secure the intent thereof,” this is judicial power.
Sections 104.3–104.7. The code official shall make all of the required inspections, or shall accept inspections made by approved agencies or individuals, and keep written reports. The code official is authorized to enter structures or premises at reasonable times to inspect subject to constitutional restrictions on unreasonable searches and seizures, if any yet exist. The code official shall carry proper identification (badge and a gun?). And the code official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with the code (ticket book?).
With the powers granted him, the opportunity and likelihood of arbitrary and capricious enforcement of the code is without question. The potential for graft, corruption, bribery, and abuse of power inherent within a system without adequately defined oversight, checks and balances, or limitations is reason alone to reject the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code at first glance.
* The code official may order the owner of any premises upon which is located any structure that is so old, dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and such that it is unreasonable to repair the structure, to demolish and remove such structure (110.1).
* All exterior property and premises shall be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary condition (302.1).
* All premises and exterior property shall be maintained free from weeds or plant growth in excess of (jurisdiction inserts height in inches). All noxious weeds shall be prohibited (302.4).
* No inoperative or unlicensed motor vehicle shall be parked, kept or stored on any premises, and no vehicle shall at any time be in a state of major disassembly, disrepair, or in the process of being stripped or dismantled. Painting of vehicles is prohibited unless conducted in an approved spray booth (302.8).
* Peeling, flaking and chipped paint shall be eliminated and surfaces repainted.
* Roof drains, gutters and downspouts shall be maintained in good repair and free from obstructions (304.7).
* All glazing materials (window glass) shall be maintained free from cracks and holes (304.13.1).
* All exterior property and premises, and the interior of every structure, shall be free from any accumulation of rubbish or garbage.
Rubbish. Combustible and noncombustible waste materials, excepting garbage; the term shall include the residue from the burning of wood, coal, coke and other combustible materials, paper, rags, cartons, boxes, wood, excelsior, rubber, leather, tree branches, yard trimmings, tin cans, metals, mineral matter, glass, crockery and dust, and other similar materials.
Garbage. The animal or vegetable waste resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food.
-Definitions Chapter 2—Section 202
The above citations from the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code should be adequate to alert people and governments to the intentioned assault on private property ownership that is the heart of ICC’s Frankenstein creation. We must recall that the International Property Maintenance Code is but “A Member of the International Code Family.”
The intention of this code package may be to so regulate, restrict, condition and invade individual self-determination, that the abolition of private property will be soon realized. Americans will retain all the expense, toil and responsibility of private property ownership without their customary and traditional right to and benefit from individual initiative that our forefathers enjoyed.
The surest pathway available to governments implementing the United Nations Agenda 21: Sustainable Development programme for action in their communities is via the Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan. And the surest way for We the People to prevent the destruction of our unalienable right to Life, Liberty and Property is to become Vocal Local and say No! to Mitigation Planning, No! to Comprehensive Planning and Zoning, and again, No! to the International Code Council and their comprehensive model codes!
As globalism transitions from global to local (localism) we the people must be ever vigilant, well informed, and prepared to meet the globalists at the grassroots level, then become Vocal Local!
Are there any questions?
Freedom Advocates
A local business owner was told he must replace an cloth awning that had a rip in it. The awning also has the name of the company on it. The problem is with the economy so bad he didn't have the money to replace it now. The owner had to just take the cloth awning down.
Also the city told the owner if he didn't replace the cloth awning he would be fined a $1,000. a day. This is crazy excessive.
The point is the city was follwing the UN international maintenace property code.
Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty. Story Reports
Check Here to see if your city has sold out to the UN
ICLEI, now known as Local Governments for Sustainability is in the process of purging their website of United Nations references despite an abundant history of association. There are now over 600 cities and counties within the United States that have contracts with ICLEI. The following quotation was found on the ICLEI.org website in 2009:
"During the Local Government Session at the World Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa (August 2002), local government leaders from around the world, as well as representatives from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), UN-HABITAT and the World Health Organization (WHO), joined ICLEI in launching Local Action 21 as the next phase of Local Agenda 21 (LA21)."
ICLEI: Local Governments for Sustainability and the U.N. Connection
(Do you understand the UN is controlling your local government and not you?) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property
.........................................................................................
Under the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has produced several volumes of text that facilitates, and simplifies the process of promoting and implementing Sustainable Development through Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Each state has its Emergency Management Agency that receives its directives from FEMA. Most, if not all, states have established regional councils (soviets—regionalism) that exist as an extra-constitutional, quasi-public, quasi-governmental layer of governance.
Above county government and seemingly below state government, these regional councils are the pipelines through which the international community, and the federal government exercise their will over local governments. Programmes of action and grants-in-aid flow through these regional non-profits.
They may be likened to drug pushers or pimps in the global “casino”, the “city of crime.” We the people, and the governments instituted among men, have become hooked on OPM that is, “Other People’s Money.”
We have forsaken our founder’s advice, “A people willing to sacrifice their Liberty for security deserve neither security nor Liberty.” Socialism demands that it be so.
.........................................................................................
Here is the complete article on the international property maintenance code agenda 21
.........................................................................................
The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property by William Roberts
Summary:
Chapter Seven of Agenda 21 calls for the establishment of a “culture of safety.” All of Agenda 21, Chapter 7 is the expansion of UN Resolution 44/236 and the foundational material for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA's) "Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Planning" programme that fails to provide safety and destroys liberty.
Hazard Mitigation Planning-Building a Sustainable America
As children didn’t we learn that ours is the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave? Wasn’t this catechism served up with a slice of Martha Washington’s apple pie, a breast of Mayflower Compact wild turkey on a platter full of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, smothered under a generous helping of his Age of Reason? But in the sissified, materialist “Mommy State” of 21st Century America haven’t we altogether been programmed to believe that insurance policies can be had to indemnify against all of our losses whether from hang nail or heart attack, auto crash or airline disaster, bank failure, hurricane, tornado, heat wave, winter storm, drought, or wildfire?
What remains of our former hallmark “rugged individualism?” Where is that free land today? Are there yet any brave souls in this, our national home?
Chapter Seven of Agenda 21 calls for the establishment of a “culture of safety?” A global safety cult, that guarantees neither safety nor permits liberty, has raised from the ashes of the Cold War era Civil Defense programme. This cult has many names, of which Sustainable Development is but one. Outwardly, its exoteric intent is to keep our earthly home safe from the destructive forces of man. Esoterically, it pursues man’s ancient quest: the mastery of nature. That through the mastery of the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God—man will himself be as god and master of not only Earth, but in a larger sense—master of the Universe.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt took office as President on March 4, 1933, the depression had reached its lowest point. The people had no assurance of their future course, and a paralyzing fear gripped the nation. In his inaugural address, Roosevelt struck a note of calm confidence: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes efforts to convert retreat into advance.” The President said he would ask Congress for “broad executive power to wage a war against the emergency as great as the power that would be given me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.”
A review of the Emergency Power Statutes: Provisions of Federal Law Now in Effect Delegating to the Executive [Branch] Extraordinary Authority in Time of National Emergency, Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, United States Senate, November 19, 1973, reveals that since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.
In what some call “the permanent revolution” and others have written “perpetual war for perpetual peace,” the brotherhood of man remains in a constant state of emergency. In this way, the globalist cabal facilitates its end run around national sovereignty, borders, constitutions and governments. Using its “broad executive power to wage war against the emergency,” often a state-sponsored event, even Terrorism, the international community advances it’s programme de jour, in the Hegelian Dialectic fashion—problem, reaction, and solution—the crisis theory.
On December 22, 1989, The United Nations General Assembly, during it’s 85th Plenary Meeting adopted resolution 44/236, and following on the direction of it’s December 11, 1987, resolution 42/169, the United Nations proclaimed the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction beginning on January 1, 1990 and terminating on December 31, 1999, which all remember as Y2K; a much heralded and feared, yet toothless, non-event. October 11, 2006, was the International Day for Natural Disaster Reduction.
The Annex to Resolution 44/236 had as its first objective and goal, “to reduce through concerted international action, especially in developing countries, the loss of life, property damage and social and economic disruption caused by natural disasters such as earthquakes, windstorms, tsunamis, floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, grasshopper and locust infestations, drought and desertification and other calamities of natural origins.”
A/Res/44/236, states at 2(a) To improve the capacity of each country to mitigate the effects of natural disasters expeditiously and effectively, . . .the establishment of early warning systems and disaster resistant structures when and where needed;
And, in A/Res/44/236, 2(e) To develop measures for the assessment, prediction, prevention and mitigation of natural disasters through programmes of technical assistance and technology transfer, demonstration projects, education and training, tailored to specific disasters and locations, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these programmes;
From the entirety of the above-cited resolutions has been crafted the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Planning programme which, I believe, in all aspects, has been adopted by the State of Florida, Polk County, and the City of Lakeland, and likely, your hometown, your county, and your state, too!
How does a United Nations Resolution make the transition from global initiative to local law? First, through agreements negotiated by governments at the United Nations conferences, in this case, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) June 3-14, 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil—agreed to by President George Herbert Walker Bush; and second, through voluntary adoptions made by national, state and local governments.
In the Foreword of the UN publication Earth Summit Agenda 21, the United Nations Programme of Action from Rio, 1992, Maurice Strong, Secretary-General, wrote, “Humanity today is in the midst of a profound civilizational change.” Mr. Strong contends that we are in a “second industrial revolution—this eco-revolution.” Further, he states that the levers of economic power and change are held by “Industrialists, economists, financiers, engineers, [and] scientists.” Mr. Strong looks “to the new United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development to be the focal point for the massive effort,”
This revolution planned to effect a profound civilizational change away from production and consumption to a more secure, sustainable and equitable future is but another phase of the permanent revolution. Agenda 21 is the book that defines this ideology. Let’s look at Chapter 7:
Chapter 7 Promoting sustainable human settlement development
F) PROMOTING HUMAN SETTLEMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN DISASTER-PRONE AREAS
__________________
BASIS FOR ACTION
7.55 Natural disasters cause loss of life, disruption of economic activities and urban productivity, particularly for highly susceptible low-income groups, and environmental damage, such as loss of fertile agricultural land and contamination of water resources, and can lead to major resettlement of populations. Over the past two decades, they are estimated to have caused some 3 million deaths and affected 800 million people. Global economic losses have been estimated by the Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator to be in the range of $30 billion per year. [150,000 disaster related deaths/year? Compared to abortion, medical malpractice, auto accident, or AIDS related deaths, this number loses its intended impact. Compared to the hundreds of billions budgeted for annual implementation of Agenda 21, and much of this from grants and concessions made by the International Community, natural disasters are almost a non-issue.]
___________
OBJECTIVE
7.58 The objective is to enable all countries, in particular those that are disaster-prone, to mitigate the negative impact of natural and man-made disasters on human settlements, national economies and the environment.
__________
ACTIVITIES
7.59 Three distinct areas of activity are foreseen under this programme area, namely, the development of a “culture of safety”, pre-disaster planning and post-disaster reconstruction.
A) DEVELOPING A CULTURE OF SAFETY
7.60 To promote a “culture of safety” in all countries, especially those that are disaster-prone, the following activities should be carried out:
(a) Completing national and local studies on the nature and occurrence of natural disasters, their impact on people and economic activities, the effects of inadequate construction and land use in hazard-prone areas, and the social and economic advantages of adequate pre-disaster planning;
(b) Implementing nationwide and local awareness campaigns through all available media, translating the above knowledge into information easily comprehensible to the general public and to the populations directly exposed to hazards; [Propaganda!]
B) DEVELOPING PRE-DISASTER PLANNING
7.61 Pre-disaster planning should form an integral part of human settlement planning in all countries. The following should be included:
(a) Undertaking complete multi-hazard research into risk and vulnerability of human settlement infrastructure, including water and sewerage, communication and transportation networks, as one type of risk reduction may increase vulnerability to another [e.g., an earthquake-resistant house made of wood will be more vulnerable to wind storm events];
(c) Redirecting inappropriate new development and human settlements to areas not prone to hazards; [relocation out of harms way]
(e) Developing tools (legal, economic, etc.) to encourage disaster-sensitive development, including means of ensuring that limitations on development options are not punitive to owners, or incorporate alternative means of compensation; [floodplain buyout]
(f) Further developing and disseminating information on disaster-resistant building materials and construction technologies for buildings and public works in general; [International Codes]
(g) Developing training programmes for contractors and builders on disaster-resistant construction methods. Some programmes should be directed particularly to small enterprises, which build the great majority of housing and other small buildings in the developing countries as well as to the rural populations, which build their own houses;
(h) Developing training programmes for emergency site managers, non-governmental organizations and community groups which cover all aspects of disaster mitigation, including urban search and rescue, emergency communications, early warning techniques, and pre-disaster planning;
(j) Preparing action plans for the reconstruction of settlements, especially the reconstruction of community lifelines.
(C) INITIATING POST-DISASTER RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION PLANNING
7.62 The international community, as a major partner in post-reconstruction and rehabilitation, should ensure that the countries involved derive the greatest benefits from the funds allocated by undertaking the following activities:
(a) Carrying out research on past experiences on the social and economic aspects of post-disaster reconstruction and adopting effective strategies and guidelines for post-disaster reconstruction, with particular emphasis on development-focused strategies in the allocation of scarce reconstruction resources, and on the opportunities that post-disaster reconstruction provides to introduce sustainable settlement patterns;
(c) Supporting efforts of national Governments to initiate contingency planning, with participation of affected communities, for post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation.
Now let’s jump from point to point:
7.28 The objective is to provide for the land requirements of human settlement development through environmentally sound physical planning and land use so as to ensure access to land to all households and, where appropriate, the encouragement of communally and collectively owned and managed land.
7.29 All countries should consider, as appropriate, undertaking a comprehensive national inventory of their land resources in order to establish a land information system in which land resources will be classified according to their most appropriate uses and environmentally fragile or disaster-prone areas will be identified for special protection measures.
7.30 (a) Establish, as appropriate, national legislation to guide the implementation of public policies for environmentally sound urban development, land utilization, housing and for the improved management of urban expansion.
(d) Encourage partnerships among the public, private and community sectors in managing land resources for human settlements development;
(e) Establish appropriate forms of land tenure that provides security of tenure for all land-users,
7.62 Scientists and engineers specializing in this field in both developed and developing countries should collaborate with urban and regional planners in order to provide the basic means to mitigate losses owing to disasters as well as environmentally inappropriate development.
7.66 Training programmes should be extended to government officials, planners, community, and non-governmental organizations to cover all aspects of disaster mitigation, such as early warning techniques, pre-disaster planning and construction, post-disaster construction and rehabilitation.
7.69 (d) Formulate appropriate land-use policies and introduce planning regulations specially aimed at the protection of eco-sensitive zones against physical disruption by construction and construction related activities;
All of Agenda 21, Chapter 7 is the expansion of UN Resolution 44/236 and the foundational material for the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Planning programme. Agenda 21 is Sustainable Development. Hazard mitigation planning is an implementation tool for the transformation of our several states into a communal, collective, new form of land tenure that fulfills the first plank of the Communist Manifesto: The Abolition of Private Property.
How the United States is Implementing Agenda 21:
In Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 USC 5165, authority to create natural hazard mitigation plans exists.
In the past, federal legislation has provided funding for disaster relief, recovery, and some hazard mitigation planning. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) is the latest legislation to improve this planning process and was put into motion on October 10, 2000, when the President signed the Act (Public Law 106-390). The new legislation emphasizes planning for disasters before they occur. The Act establishes a pre-disaster hazard mitigation program and new requirements for the national post-disaster Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP).
Under the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has produced several volumes of text that facilitates, and simplifies the process of promoting and implementing Sustainable Development through Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Each state has its Emergency Management Agency that receives its directives from FEMA. Most, if not all, states have established regional councils (soviets—regionalism) that exist as an extra-constitutional, quasi-public, quasi-governmental layer of governance. Above county government and seemingly below state government, these regional councils are the pipelines through which the international community, and the federal government exercise their will over local governments. Programmes of action and grants-in-aid flow through these regional non-profits. They may be likened to drug pushers or pimps in the global “casino”, the “city of crime.” We the people, and the governments instituted among men, have become hooked on OPM that is, “Other People’s Money.”
We have forsaken our founder’s advice, “A people willing to sacrifice their Liberty for security deserve neither security nor Liberty.” Socialism demands that it be so.
Even a schoolboy knows that man, even a group of sincerely dedicated wealthy men, is powerless against the mighty energy of creation. “[T]o reduce through concerted international action, especially in developing countries, the loss of life, property damage and social and economic disruption caused by natural disasters such as earthquakes, windstorms, tsunamis, floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions, wildfires, grasshopper and locust infestations, drought and desertification and other calamities of natural origin”, is at best a humanitarian and altruistic pipe dream. This is the stuff of the snake oil salesman, the shrill bark of the carney, the studied deception of change agents and propagandists.
The Department of Homeland Security, like Civil Defense before it, has as its primary objective: the continuation of government. Ensuring the continuity of government, and the preservation and protection of records and critical facilities, therefore, is at the apex of the mitigation plan. Immediately below the preservation of government is the preservation of business and banking interests.
Stripped of its bluster, obfuscatory demographics and pseudo-science, the hazard mitigation plan may be reduced to one element: Floodplain Ordinance. People have been either causing floods for irrigation and other purposes, or rebuilding after floods have occurred, from the beginning of recorded time. FEMA understands and can respond to flooding.
FEMA is prepared to use the property owner’s fear of loss due to flooding, as the vehicle to relocate development out of the 100-year floodplains, which defined is any land area that has a one percent or greater chance on any day to be inundated, and other hazardous or sensitive environments. The concept is known as “floodplain buyout”, but could also be labeled “Fear Motivation.”
FEMA publications state, “citizens are ultimately responsible for their own safety and for protecting their assets from damage by preparing for potential disasters that could occur within their community.”
FEMA says that, “a sustainable community is a disaster-resistant community.” This is where Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, flood plain buyouts, relocation of human settlement development, and the International Code Council come to the fore. Before Agenda 21, we knew much of this as Urban Renewal, but whatsoever cannot be bought out, demolished, relocated or retrofitted will soon have to be built to resist whatever the Almighty can cast upon it.
How Local Governments Implement Agenda 21:
Former FEMA director James Lee Witt has partnered with the International Code Council as CEO and serves as Chairman of the International Code Foundation. What are these International Codes and how will their implementation affect each and every American?
The International Code Council, established in 1994, is based in the United States and is a nonprofit organization dedicated to developing a single set of national model construction codes. The ICC is ahead of the curve as we move further into the Free Trade Area of the Americas. With more than 250 well-qualified super social scientists at 16 offices throughout the United States and Latin America, the International Code Council and their International Building Codes, may just be another rapidly expanding globalist monopoly.
The International Codes published by the International Code Council (ICC), include:
* International Building Code®
* ICC Electrical Code®—Administrative Provisions
* International Energy Conservation Code®
* International Existing Building Code®
* International Fire Code®
* International Fuel Gas Code®
* International Mechanical Code®
* ICC Performance Code®
* International Plumbing Code®
* International Private Sewage Disposal Code®
* International Residential Code®
* International Wildland-Urban Interface Code®, and
* International Zoning Code®
These comprehensive ICC codes are created following the model code development process and are performance and prescriptive code requirements. The codes are subject to and capable of revision. A new edition is promulgated every three years. Model codes encourage international consistency in application.
The 1998 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code, begun in 1996, supercedes earlier property maintenance codes; for brevity, we will consider only the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC), which governs the maintenance of existing buildings.
Ostensibly, the International Property Maintenance Code seeks to protect public health, safety and welfare without unnecessarily increasing construction costs, restricting the use of new materials, products or methods of construction, and without giving preferential treatment to particular types or classes of materials, products, or methods of construction.
Neither the ICC, nor any of those participating in the development of their codes accept any liability (accountability) resulting from compliance or non-compliance because “ICC does not have the power or authority to police or enforce compliance” with the contents of the code. “Only the governmental body that enacts the code into law has such authority.”
As with all ICC code products, the International Property Maintenance Code is available by adoption by jurisdictions internationally in accordance with proceedings establishing the jurisdictions laws. Sample adoption ordinances written with fill-in-the-blank simplicity are included in the code booklet.
The adoption Ordinance reveals the broad range of the code which embraces existing structures and premises; regulates and governs the conditions and maintenance of all property, buildings and structures; provides standards for supplied utilities and facilities and other physical things and conditions that are essential to ensure that structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupation and use; for the condemnation of buildings and structures unfit for human occupancy and use; for the demolition of such existing structures; and provides for the issuance of permits and collection of fees therefore; together with, the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of such 2006 International Property Maintenance Code.
The ordinance is in full force and effect from and after the date of its final passage and adoption. States, counties, municipalities and other forms of governance may adopt any or all of the ICC products in like manner, and many have already done so.
We will now examine several individual sections within the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code:
SECTION 101 GENERAL
In Section 101.2 Scope, the code shall “apply to all residential and nonresidential structures and all existing premises and constitute minimum requirements and standards for premises, structures, equipment and facilities for light, ventilation, space, heating, sanitation, protection from the elements, life safety, safety from fire and other hazards, and for safe and sanitary maintenance; the responsibility of owners, operators and occupants; the occupancy of existing structures and premises, and for administration, enforcement and penalties.”
Section 101.3 Intent, states that “existing structures and premises that do not comply with these provisions shall be altered or repaired to provide a minimum level of health and safety as required within.”
SECTION 102 APPLICABILITY
The universe of command and control expands in Section 102.1 General, where “the code shall apply to all matters affecting or relating to structures and premises,” as set forth in Section 101. 102.1 continues by stating that where “different sections of the code specify different requirements, the most restrictive shall apply.”
Section 102.2 Maintenance declares that the owner or the owner’s designated agent shall be responsible for the maintenance of buildings, structures and premises.
“None are so hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
One might add that anyone who actually believes that he owns real property is under a strong delusion, as our further study of the IPMC will demonstrate.
Section 102.8 Requirements not covered by code, states, “Requirements necessary for the strength, stability or proper operation of an existing fixture, structure or equipment, or for the public safety, health and general welfare, not specifically covered by this code shall be determined by the code official.”
SECTION 103 DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INSPECTION
Government thrives upon bureaucracy. Section 103.1 General creates upon adoption “the department of property maintenance inspection” and the appointed “executive official in charge thereof shall be known as the code official.” “The code official shall not be removed from office except for cause” (103.2), and “shall have the authority to appoint a deputy code official, other related technical officers, inspectors and other employees.”
Section 103.4 Liability provides immunity from personal liability for all charged with the enforcement of the code. The jurisdiction (adopting body) shall defend the enforcers against all claims.
SECTION 104 DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE CODE OFFICIAL
Section 104.1 General “The code official shall enforce the provisions of this code.” The code is made law; the code official is the law enforcement officer. As with Conservation Department “Agents,” and Forest Service “Rangers,” who were initially unarmed and believed to be friendly—but are now armed, generally feared, or considered likely to be hostile—may one expect that code enforcement “deputies” shall one day holster a sidearm.
Recall that in many cities the Department of Public Safety is its police, and often, fire departments. Section 104.2 Rule-making authority, grants the code official “authority as necessary in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare,” this is police, or executive power. 104.2 continues: “to adopt and promulgate rules and procedures,” this is legislative power. And 104.2 continues: “to interpret and implement the provisions of this code; to secure the intent thereof,” this is judicial power.
Sections 104.3–104.7. The code official shall make all of the required inspections, or shall accept inspections made by approved agencies or individuals, and keep written reports. The code official is authorized to enter structures or premises at reasonable times to inspect subject to constitutional restrictions on unreasonable searches and seizures, if any yet exist. The code official shall carry proper identification (badge and a gun?). And the code official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with the code (ticket book?).
With the powers granted him, the opportunity and likelihood of arbitrary and capricious enforcement of the code is without question. The potential for graft, corruption, bribery, and abuse of power inherent within a system without adequately defined oversight, checks and balances, or limitations is reason alone to reject the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code at first glance.
* The code official may order the owner of any premises upon which is located any structure that is so old, dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and such that it is unreasonable to repair the structure, to demolish and remove such structure (110.1).
* All exterior property and premises shall be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary condition (302.1).
* All premises and exterior property shall be maintained free from weeds or plant growth in excess of (jurisdiction inserts height in inches). All noxious weeds shall be prohibited (302.4).
* No inoperative or unlicensed motor vehicle shall be parked, kept or stored on any premises, and no vehicle shall at any time be in a state of major disassembly, disrepair, or in the process of being stripped or dismantled. Painting of vehicles is prohibited unless conducted in an approved spray booth (302.8).
* Peeling, flaking and chipped paint shall be eliminated and surfaces repainted.
* Roof drains, gutters and downspouts shall be maintained in good repair and free from obstructions (304.7).
* All glazing materials (window glass) shall be maintained free from cracks and holes (304.13.1).
* All exterior property and premises, and the interior of every structure, shall be free from any accumulation of rubbish or garbage.
Rubbish. Combustible and noncombustible waste materials, excepting garbage; the term shall include the residue from the burning of wood, coal, coke and other combustible materials, paper, rags, cartons, boxes, wood, excelsior, rubber, leather, tree branches, yard trimmings, tin cans, metals, mineral matter, glass, crockery and dust, and other similar materials.
Garbage. The animal or vegetable waste resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food.
-Definitions Chapter 2—Section 202
The above citations from the 2006 International Property Maintenance Code should be adequate to alert people and governments to the intentioned assault on private property ownership that is the heart of ICC’s Frankenstein creation. We must recall that the International Property Maintenance Code is but “A Member of the International Code Family.”
The intention of this code package may be to so regulate, restrict, condition and invade individual self-determination, that the abolition of private property will be soon realized. Americans will retain all the expense, toil and responsibility of private property ownership without their customary and traditional right to and benefit from individual initiative that our forefathers enjoyed.
The surest pathway available to governments implementing the United Nations Agenda 21: Sustainable Development programme for action in their communities is via the Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan. And the surest way for We the People to prevent the destruction of our unalienable right to Life, Liberty and Property is to become Vocal Local and say No! to Mitigation Planning, No! to Comprehensive Planning and Zoning, and again, No! to the International Code Council and their comprehensive model codes!
As globalism transitions from global to local (localism) we the people must be ever vigilant, well informed, and prepared to meet the globalists at the grassroots level, then become Vocal Local!
Are there any questions?
Freedom Advocates
The disclosure of Barack Obama's documentation proving his eligibility to be commander in chief is critical to the preservation of the nation itself
The disclosure of Barack Obama's documentation proving his eligibility to be commander in chief is critical to the preservation of the nation itself.
The chain of command issue is critical, since officers are obligated both to follow orders and to disobey illegal orders.
Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney
"Officers in the United States military service are – and must be – trained that they owe their highest allegiance to the United States Constitution," he said in the affidavit.
........................................................................................
Read Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney's
Affidavit [PDF]
(Three-Star General Files Sworn Affidavit Supporting LTC Lakin’s Case. Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney also believes obama is an IMPOSTER. He remindes us that officers highest allegiance is to the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, not barack hussein obama. He also remindes us that the chain of command must not be broken by an imposter president. Unlawful orders should be questioned. Illegal unlawful orders from the commander in chief should be questioned.
All unlawful orders from barack obama should be questioned because, "The president of the United States, as the commander in chief, is the source of all military authority," Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney said. "The Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to hold office.
Obama is NOT a nautral born citzen as I have documented in this blog. Therefore all orders from obama the usurper "commander in chief" are illegal and unlawful. Obama says, "I can't spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead". This is the effort of a man to persuade Americans he is an American citizen. The commander in chief tells American he has not got time to prove, document or validate his status as a natural born citizen.
The fact is obama has admitted he IS NOT a natural born citizen in Senate Resolution S 511. April 30, 2008. Obama has admiited he is an IMPOSTER president. All orders from obama are illegal!
Obama has admitted he is a FRAUD in Senate resolution 511. In this resolution obama agreed that Mccain was a natural born citizen. Why did obama agree Mccain was a natural born citizen in S Res 511? In S Res 511 obama defines the phrase natural born citizen for Mccain and every other American born to two American parents at birth.
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens" "Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen'"
This is an undisputed fact. Obama is NOT a natural born citizen because both of his parents were NOT American citizens at the time of his birth.
Obama has defined the term natural born citizen in S. RES. 511. April 30, 2008
Text of S. Res. 511 [110th]: A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary)
Obama became a FRAUD the day he entered the presidential primaries because he had previously cosponsored and signed a resolution, S. RES. 511, stating a natural born citizen must be born of two US citizens at birth. Story Reports
.........................................................................................
Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney
"There can be no question that it is absolutely essential to good order and discipline in the military that there be no break in the unified chain of command, from the lowliest E-1 up to and including the commander in chief who is under the Constitution, the president of the United States. As military officers, we owe our ultimate loyalty not to superior officers or even to the president, but rather, to the Constitution."
He continued, explaining, "good order and disipline requires not blind obedience to all orders but instead requires officers to judge – sometimes under great adversity – whether an order is illegal."
"The president of the United States, as the commander in chief, is the source of all military authority," he said. "The Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to hold office. If he is ineligible under the Constitution to serve in that office that creates a break in the chain of command of such magnitude that its significance can scarcely be imagined."
(What the General is saying is there is an empty suit ILLEGAL ALIEN USURPER that cannot prove he is a natural born citizen nor can obama validate his birth in an Hawaiian hospital at the top of the military chain of command. Every order or any signature to all documents are not valid nor legal. This is the fact the general was talking about.) Story Reports
Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin is being supported by the American Patriot Foundation, which said the affidavit is for use in Lakin's trial, scheduled Oct. 13-15, as well as Thursday's hearing on the evidence to be allowed in the case.
Press Release: Three-Star General Files Sworn Affidavit Supporting LTC Lakin’s Case
FBI obama speak
What is obama speak? Let me explain.
Obama speak are words spoken to conceal the true facts. Obama speak is propaganda speak. The obama regime uses this "black op" tactic to hide the truth. Obama speak is an attempt to coverup the truth. One should always think of his words as a stream of consciousness; like listening to a police radio and hearing codes. You may hear anything. These obama speak code words must be deciphered to be understood.
Let me give you an example:
Obama is stopped for drunk driving because he was weaving lane from lane. The cops find several empty malt liquor cans in obama's car.
Obama says, yes those are malt liquor cans in my car. Those malt liquor cans are not mine. I didn't know the cans were in my care. The malt liquor smell is because of those empty cans. Because I have a cold I can't smell the malt liquor.
The cop asks, why were you weaving?
Obama says, I was adjusting the radio trying to find a talk radio station and didn't realize I was weaving.
The cop tells obama to step out of the car for a test to see if he is sober.
The cop tells obama to raise his hand and touch his nose and asks him if he understands.
Obama raises his hand and touches his enormous ear.
The officer asks why did you touch your ear instead of your nose?
Obama says, I understood you to say raise my hand to my ear.
The cop said you said you understood what I said.
I know thats what I said but I misunderstood officer.
Obama keeps touching his ear when asked to touch his nose.
The cop says i'm taking you in for drunk driving.
Obama says i'll sue you for racism and arresting an innocent black man who correctly touched his ear instead of touching his nose. You are a racist profiling my ears.
Obama speak is also playing the race card when needed.
The Facts:
Airport screeners discovered al Soofi had several items in his checked luggage that raised concerns, including a cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle, other cell phones, and watches wrapped in tape. Such items can be transported legally in checked baggage but authorities raised the possibility they may have been a "mock bomb."
American authorities had initially become concerned when the two men changed their travel plans at O'Hare airport in Chicago Sunday night, while their luggage, with its "strange" contents, continued on the original set of flights bound for Sanaa, Yemen.
FBI obama speak:
American law enforcement officials say their initial concerns about a possible terror "dry run" involving two men on a United Airlines flight to Amsterdam have eased, in part because they have learned the men's abrupt change in flights resulted from them missing their original flight.
"These two passengers have not been charged with any crime in the United States and we caution you against jumping to any conclusions," said a statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security Tuesday afternoon.
American officials say they now believe the two men did not know each other and both were re-booked by United after they missed their flight because of a gate change at O'Hare.
In its statement, DHS said the incident "illustrates how airport security protocols, law enforcement cooperation, and prompt international information sharing allows us to respond quickly to potential threats."
(FBI says there is no terror threat because the two Yeman men just changed their flights.
FBI says the two men did not know each other.
FBI pats inself on the back and tells America how good they are doing at keeping us "safe" from terrorists.
What the FBI is not telling you is that they are working for a muslim terrorist sympathizer who thinks the most beautiful sound in the world is the muslim call to prayer.
The FBI didn't address the strange contents of the Yeman men's luggage. Remember Yeman and the USS COLe terrorist bombing?
A cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle, other cell phones, and watches wrapped in tape
were not considered any potential threat.
Why in the hell would you tape a pepto bismol bottle to a cell phone?
A cell phone is a detonator for a bomb. A bomb could be made from a cell phone and a pepto bismol bottle or any bottle.
Such items can be transported legally in checked baggage but authorities raised the possibility they may have been a "mock bomb."
THIS WAS A DRY RUN TEST to see what the obama speak FBI would do if a mock bomb was discovered that can be transported legally.
Any potential detonator such as a cell phone pager etc could set off a peto bismol bottle full of an explosive!
FBI obama speak says not to worry about it. Obama speak. Obama says the US economy is getting better, obama speak. Obama says he can't go around with his birth certificate plastered on his forehead, obama speak. The state run media says, "Terror Concerns Fade Over Two Men Arrested on United Flight", obama speak.
The state run media is nothing but obama speak.
Obama speak are words spoke to conceal the true facts. Obama speak is propaganda speak. The obama regime uses this black op tactic to hide the truth. Obama speak is an attempt to coverup the truth.) Story Reports
CBS obama speak:
"Terror Concerns Fade Over Two Men Arrested on United Flight"
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
The issue is not that Obama isn't being given a chance; it's that he has been given too many.
The issue is not that Obama isn't being given a chance; it's that he has been given too many.
(Obama has been given too many chances to destroy America. Obama has been given to many race card chances. Obama wants you to believe he needs another chance. Another chance to stab you in the back again. Don't give him any more chances.
By chance does can ANYONE in the world validate obama's short form colb that doesn't include a hospital or doctor name. Fat chance of this happening. America's last chance is NOV 2010. If the usurper obama is not stopped then he will stike like the snake he is and poison America until freedom dies.) Story Reports
Selwyn Duke
Being a cerebral sort, when I ponder President Obama's seduction of America, I think of the story of the snake and the duck. To be brief, the snake wants the duck to take him to the other side of a creek, but the duck is reluctant. He says, "But when we get there, you'll bite me." The snake is very persuasive, however, and convinces the duck he wouldn't do such a thing. He just wants help and would have the utmost appreciation. Well, I think you know what happened upon concluding their little crossing. Bam! The snake bit the foolish bird, who then started stammering, "Bu-bu-bu-but you said . . . ." The snake just replied, "Hey, you knew what I was when you picked me up."
I suppose the duck just wanted to give the serpent a chance.
That certainly is what many want us to give Barack Obama. Criticize the president and you're admonished for being unfair and partisan. "Give the man a chance!" hiss the critics. Or is it that they quack? Whatever.
In reality, Obama has had chance after chance after chance after chance, in the Illinois and U.S. senates and as a community agita . . . uh, I mean, organizer. If you don't believe me, simply peruse the section dedicated to him at OntheIssues.org. It provides 37 pages and more than 14,000 words on his votes, positions and pronouncements, all compiled prior to the election. And, largely drawing from that site, here is a synopsis of Obama the Chanceless' words and deeds (all quotations are from OntheIssues.org):
* He voted for illegal-alien amnesty, "YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security" and "YES on continuing federal funds for declared ‘sanctuary cities.'"
* He said that his policies would bankrupt the coal industry.
* He said, "You need to make sure your child can speak Spanish" and that it's "OK to provide government services in Spanish." He also "voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government."
* He opposes so-called "racial profiling," which is actually just an element of proper, comprehensive profiling.
* He received an 89 percent rating from the NAACP, "indicating that he supports affirmative action."
* In the Illinois and national senates, Obama was Planned Parenthood's poster boy, supporting the murder of not just the unborn but also the born, through his opposition to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.
* He voted against prohibiting minors from crossing state lines for abortion and notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
* He has the worst possible rating - 0 percent - by the National Right to Life Committee.
* He opposed school vouchers.
* He voted YES on factoring mythical anthropogenic global warming into federal project planning.
* He has supported "age-appropriate" sex education for kindergartners, as if there is such a thing.
* While Obama has said he doesn't believe in faux marriage, he opposed California's Proposition 8, the one-man-one-woman marriage amendment, and voted against the constitutional ban on faux marriage.
* He called homosexuality "no more immoral than heterosexuality" and said it's "Ok to expose 6-year-olds to gay couples."
* He "cast 130 ‘present' votes in Il. Senate," indicating an unwillingness to step up to the plate.
* He "sponsored resolution rejecting photo ID for voting."
* He endorsed an Illinois handgun ban, advocated banning semi-automatics (weapons firing one shot every time the trigger is pulled), and voted against prohibiting the frivolous lawsuits designed to destroy gun manufacturers.
* He supports nationalized medicine, and said that he wanted to insure the 47 million people without health insurance, a figure that includes illegal aliens.
Of course, to some, the give-‘im-a-chance plea is a ploy, a political artifice used by snakes to silence critics.
The issue is not that Obama isn't being given a chance; it's that he has been given too many. But this is a persistent problem in our nation; in fact, we live in a second-chance society. Children are given too many chances to misbehave. Miscreants are given too many chances to commit crime. And, worst of all, the ducks are given too many chances to vote.
(America's last chance is NOV 2010. If the usurper obama is not stopped then he will stike like the snake he is and poison America until freedom dies.) Story Reports
(The radical left answers: "if you're so cerebral, you'd realize your an Alarmist and a fool."
I don't see anything foolish when facts are facts as obama says. Telling the sick facts about obama is not alarmist. Its just recounting facts about a loser and imposter. Today I will start including radical left comments that don't make sense. They are actually kinda funny.) Story Reports
(Obama has been given too many chances to destroy America. Obama has been given to many race card chances. Obama wants you to believe he needs another chance. Another chance to stab you in the back again. Don't give him any more chances.
By chance does can ANYONE in the world validate obama's short form colb that doesn't include a hospital or doctor name. Fat chance of this happening. America's last chance is NOV 2010. If the usurper obama is not stopped then he will stike like the snake he is and poison America until freedom dies.) Story Reports
Selwyn Duke
Being a cerebral sort, when I ponder President Obama's seduction of America, I think of the story of the snake and the duck. To be brief, the snake wants the duck to take him to the other side of a creek, but the duck is reluctant. He says, "But when we get there, you'll bite me." The snake is very persuasive, however, and convinces the duck he wouldn't do such a thing. He just wants help and would have the utmost appreciation. Well, I think you know what happened upon concluding their little crossing. Bam! The snake bit the foolish bird, who then started stammering, "Bu-bu-bu-but you said . . . ." The snake just replied, "Hey, you knew what I was when you picked me up."
I suppose the duck just wanted to give the serpent a chance.
That certainly is what many want us to give Barack Obama. Criticize the president and you're admonished for being unfair and partisan. "Give the man a chance!" hiss the critics. Or is it that they quack? Whatever.
In reality, Obama has had chance after chance after chance after chance, in the Illinois and U.S. senates and as a community agita . . . uh, I mean, organizer. If you don't believe me, simply peruse the section dedicated to him at OntheIssues.org. It provides 37 pages and more than 14,000 words on his votes, positions and pronouncements, all compiled prior to the election. And, largely drawing from that site, here is a synopsis of Obama the Chanceless' words and deeds (all quotations are from OntheIssues.org):
* He voted for illegal-alien amnesty, "YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security" and "YES on continuing federal funds for declared ‘sanctuary cities.'"
* He said that his policies would bankrupt the coal industry.
* He said, "You need to make sure your child can speak Spanish" and that it's "OK to provide government services in Spanish." He also "voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government."
* He opposes so-called "racial profiling," which is actually just an element of proper, comprehensive profiling.
* He received an 89 percent rating from the NAACP, "indicating that he supports affirmative action."
* In the Illinois and national senates, Obama was Planned Parenthood's poster boy, supporting the murder of not just the unborn but also the born, through his opposition to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.
* He voted against prohibiting minors from crossing state lines for abortion and notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
* He has the worst possible rating - 0 percent - by the National Right to Life Committee.
* He opposed school vouchers.
* He voted YES on factoring mythical anthropogenic global warming into federal project planning.
* He has supported "age-appropriate" sex education for kindergartners, as if there is such a thing.
* While Obama has said he doesn't believe in faux marriage, he opposed California's Proposition 8, the one-man-one-woman marriage amendment, and voted against the constitutional ban on faux marriage.
* He called homosexuality "no more immoral than heterosexuality" and said it's "Ok to expose 6-year-olds to gay couples."
* He "cast 130 ‘present' votes in Il. Senate," indicating an unwillingness to step up to the plate.
* He "sponsored resolution rejecting photo ID for voting."
* He endorsed an Illinois handgun ban, advocated banning semi-automatics (weapons firing one shot every time the trigger is pulled), and voted against prohibiting the frivolous lawsuits designed to destroy gun manufacturers.
* He supports nationalized medicine, and said that he wanted to insure the 47 million people without health insurance, a figure that includes illegal aliens.
Of course, to some, the give-‘im-a-chance plea is a ploy, a political artifice used by snakes to silence critics.
The issue is not that Obama isn't being given a chance; it's that he has been given too many. But this is a persistent problem in our nation; in fact, we live in a second-chance society. Children are given too many chances to misbehave. Miscreants are given too many chances to commit crime. And, worst of all, the ducks are given too many chances to vote.
(America's last chance is NOV 2010. If the usurper obama is not stopped then he will stike like the snake he is and poison America until freedom dies.) Story Reports
(The radical left answers: "if you're so cerebral, you'd realize your an Alarmist and a fool."
I don't see anything foolish when facts are facts as obama says. Telling the sick facts about obama is not alarmist. Its just recounting facts about a loser and imposter. Today I will start including radical left comments that don't make sense. They are actually kinda funny.) Story Reports
Monday, August 30, 2010
Obama's legacy documented detail
Crimes Against Liberty: An Indictment of President Barack Obama
David Limbaugh (Author)
As Americans, liberty is an inalienable right that is granted to us by God, protected by the Constitution, and upheld by our government. Yet, Barack Obama doesn’t seem to share that view. To him, liberty is a threat to the government’s power and something to be squashed by any means possible, as bestselling author David Limbaugh shows to devastating affect in his new book, Crimes Against Liberty. In Crimes Against Liberty, Limbaugh issues a damning indictment of President Barack Obama for encroaching upon and stripping us of our individual and sovereign rights. Laying out his case like he would a criminal complaint, Limbaugh presents the evidence—count-by-count—against Obama. From exploiting the financial crisis for political gain, to restricting our personal freedoms through invasive healthcare and “green” policies, to endangering America with his feckless diplomacy and reckless dismantlement of our national security systems, Limbaugh proves—beyond a reasonable doubt—that Obama is guilty of crimes against liberty. Comprehensive and compelling, this is Limbaugh’s most powerful book yet.
Was This the Hope and Change America Voted For?
Socialized healthcare?
A foreign policy of abasement to our enemies—and hostility to our friends?
Bailouts upon bailouts?
“Stimulus spending” that’s really pork-barrel spending on steroids?
American voters might have been naïve when they went to the polls in 2008, but New York Times bestselling author David Limbaugh wasn’t. He warned voters of what would be in store. Now he’s back with more than a warning. A practicing lawyer, he has compiled the most comprehensive and devastating indictment of what is turning out to be the most destructive presidency in American history.
Limbaugh charges that this presidency is ambitiously unraveling the Constitution, actively rooting out American traditions and values, and most of all, committing crimes against American liberty. In Limbaugh’s brilliant new book, he documents:
Obama’s offenses against the rule of law (including the administration’s blatant pursuit of race-based justice)Violations of the public trust (including Obama’s Chicago-style bully boy tactics to protect and advance the administration’s cronies)Abuses against the private sector (including how the Obama administration is removing any limits to federal power)Crimes against good governance (including Obama’s mania for secrecy after getting elected on promises of transparency)Betrayals of the national interest (including the administration’s gagging of honest discussion of the threat of radical Islam)
Praise for Crimes Against Liberty
“In Crimes Against Liberty my good friend David Limbaugh presents a thorough, incisive, and compelling indictment of Barack Obama and his administration. His research and writing skills and his legal training have never been put to better use—every liberty-loving American has a patriotic duty to read this book.”
—Sean Hannity, host of Hannity’s America
“Barack Obama likes to pose as a constitutional lawyer, but David Limbaugh is the real deal—and the real guardian of freedom. Crimes Against Liberty is the most effective skewering of Obama’s contempt for the Constitution and our nation’s foundations that I have yet read. Buy it.”
—Mark R. Levin, nationally syndicated talk radio host
“Reading David Limbaugh on the Obama administration is imperative right now. Week in and week out, his devastating columns provide cathartic relief during these dark days for the republic. In his terrific new book Crimes Against Liberty, he has given us a powerful indictment of this administration—its hypocrisy, dishonesty, radicalism, and corruption. Arm yourself with knowledge for the coming showdown: Read this book.”
—Ann Coulter, bestselling author
“In Crimes Against Liberty: An Indictment of President Barack Obama, David Limbaugh charges the egomaniac in the Oval Office with fraudulent campaigning, cold-blooded lying, contempt for free enterprise, and a deep—and disturbing—disrespect for the U.S. Constitution. Limbaugh marshals the often jaw-dropping evidence with a force, clarity, and wit sure to win from any honest jury the verdict Obama deserves: Guilty on all counts.”
—Terence P. Jeffrey, author of Control Freaks: 7 Ways Liberals Plan to Ruin Your Life
David Limbaugh is a lawyer, nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate, political commentator, and author of three New York Times bestsellers: Absolute Power, Persecution, and Bankrupt. The brother of radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh, he lives in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, with his wife and children.
David Limbaugh's espose of the Indictment of President Obama is extremely well documented and can be verified by checking out the extensive footnotes to back up Limbaugh premise of Obama's crimes against Liberty.
Obama's legacy documented in detail. David Limbaugh has done this nation a great service. Read it - then verify what you are reading from other sources - and, if your brain is open to the truth - you will be horrified at what this nation is being put through.
......................................................................................
OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE / ELIGIBILITY / OBAMACARE
RALLY IN WASHINGTON
OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE / ELIGIBILITY / OBAMACARE
RALLY IN WASHINGTON
Saturday, October 23, 2010 – 12 Noon to 4:00 p.m.
U.S. CAPITOL – West Front
BARACK OBAMA IS NOT “CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE” TO SERVE AS
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING:
* The United States Constitution mandates the President of the United States must be a United States “natural born” Citizen – Article II, Section I;
* Obama was born in Mombasa, in what is now Kenya, Africa;
* Obama is an Indonesian Citizen as he was adopted/acknowledged by his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Citizen;
* Obama’s legal name is Barry Soetoro; and
* The Healthcare bill (ObamaCare) signed into Law by Obama on March 23, 2010 is unconstitutional and voidable since he is “Constitutionally ineligible” to serve as President of the United States.
For these reasons, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, Obamacrimes.com is sponsoring the “OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE / ELIGIBILITY / OBAMACARE” RALLY IN WASHINGTON, D.C. The Rally will be on Saturday, October 23, 2010 – 12 Noon to 4:00 p.m. at the U.S. CAPITOL – West Front.
All individuals participating are requested to bring a copy of their Birth Certificate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
