Obama committed FRAUD the day he entered the 2008 presidential race because only one of his parents was a US citizen at the time of his birth

(1) The certification of live birth has never been probated in court therefore it is not a legal document that should have been used by the DNC in 2008 to verify obama’s US citizenship.

(2) Obama has defined the term “natural born citizen” in S511 2010th congress. He cosponsored this resolution in which he declares Mccain is a natural born citizen because he was born to TWO American Citizens at his birth.

Obama committed FRAUD the day he entered the 2008 presidential race because only one of his parents was a US citizen at the time of his birth.

(3) VP Dick Cheney did not follow 3 U.S.C. § 15 and failed to call for objections to be registered and resolved when the electorial votes were counted by the 110th congress

(4) Obama was administered the second oath of office in SECRET with no audio or video recording of the oath.

Because the required procedure to legally determine Obama’s birth facts has never happened we know that Obama could not have “qualified” by January 20th, and anybody who certified his eligibility documentably perjured him/herself since even his age has never been legally determined and could disqualify him from eligibility for the Office of President.

The President elect becomes President automatically at noon on Jan 20th, but there are 2 Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers: he must take the oath of office and he must “qualify”.

Obama bungled the oath of office and it was again repeated in SECRET with no video or audio only a snapshot of him taking the oath again. We know obama didn’t take the oath of office correctly the first time and we don’t know if he did the second time correctly because there is no valid evidence. He in affect had an “amended oath of office” just like the ammended certificate of live birth on the web.

Both “amended qualifications” deny him the ability to act as president.

Neither of the two Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers has been verified or completed.

The HOAX called obama explained and exposed

(If the Supreme Court did hear a case forcing obama to prove his online certification of live birth is of legal value he would be forced to validate his US citizenship. As of this date obama has not provided a validated birth certificate. The DNC and 110th congress relied on a worthless jpeg on the web that has never be probated in a court of law.

The DNC has committed fraud. Obama has committed fraud. Congress relied on the DNC to validate obama as a US citizen. Congress failed to certify obama as a US citizen also. The 110th congress should have objected to electorial votes cast for a candidate that cannot validate his own US citizenship. The Supreme Court should have taken the Leo Donofrio case before the election in 2008 and decided obama’s citizenship.) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio

Quo warranto applies not just to eligibility but to the “exercise” of authority through public office.

“The Chrysler dealers have the requisite injury – loss of their franchises – to meet the standing requirements,”

Leo and Steve will bring two counts under quo warranto 3501, eligibility and illegal use of Government funds. The second count refers to the use of TARP funds to facilitate the Chrysler Bankruptcy sale.

Donofrio and Pidgeon also plan a third quo warranto count based upon 16-3521(2) of the quo warranto statute. The actions taken by the government were an illegal exercise of corporate authority. The government has acted as a political agent (acting as board of directors) against corporations using taxpayer money to restructure the auto industry under their vision.

Listen to internet radio with HoaxDetector on Blog Talk Radio

The coverup continues for the HOAX called obama

Kapi'olani used a letter, allegedly written by President Obama in which he declares his birthplace to be at the facility, to solicit donations in its spring 2009 edition of its Inspire Magazine. The hospital, after refusing to confirm the letter even existed, is now vouching for its authenticity but not its content. The White House has refused to confirm both the letter and its content. The FBI and Secret Service have indicated criminal charges are possible if a fraudulent letter from the White House is being used to raise funds.
.........................................................................................


Did Obama even write letter to 'birth hospital'?
.........................................................................................
Gov. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii quote:

"My thought is, rather than get into some kind of argument or play into that mentality, why not just simply try to authenticate this and let the facts speak for themselves?”

Gov. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii befriended President Obama’s parents when they were university students in Hawaii.

The governor, a Democrat and former congressman, said he has initiated conversations with the state’s attorney general and the chief of its Health Department about how he can release more explicit documentation of Mr. Obama’s birth on Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital. He said he has done so of his own accord, without consulting the White House, which declined to comment.

Mr. Abercrombie, 72, said that although he did not see the elder Obamas at the hospital with their newborn son, he did remember the couple bringing the baby to social events.

At the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children hospital's Centennial Dinner Jan. 24, 2009 the same day the letter from obama to the hospital in question is dated, U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, now gov of Hawaii, read the letter's contents – straying at times from the actual text.

The letter in question, dated Jan. 24, 2009, was trumpeted and used to raise funds – then later concealed – by the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu.

The White House has refused to say if the letter itself is authentic and that its content originated with the president.

The Kapi'olani Medical Center claims to "know" the letter is real, but hospital spokeswoman Keala Peters refused to corroborate the content, specifically that Obama was born at her facility as the letter asserts.

"We know that [the letter] came from Mr. Obama," spokeswoman Keala Peters said.

When asked how she "knew" that and how the hospital came to receive the message, Peters only stated, "[Congressman] Neil Abercrombie, now gov, personally brought it."

When WND correspondent Les Kinsolving asked Press Secretary Robert Gibbs about the letter at the July 13 news briefing, Gibbs dodged the question, refusing to confirm its authenticity while belittling Kinsolving for even posing the question.

Since the medical center has been using the letter for a high-profile fundraising campaign in the spring edition of its Inspire Magazine, the FBI and United States Secret Service said the matter could potentially lead to criminal prosecution were the letter determined to be fraudulent.

U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, posted a message on his website explaining President Obama settled the question of his actual birthplace "once and for all" merely by declaring it in a letter he read to the Kapi'olani Medical Center's Centennial Dinner in Honolulu Jan. 24, 2009.

(The "letter" from the whitehouse that obama signed cannot be verified by anyone in the whitehouse itself, the Kapi'olani Medical Center, or Gov Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii.

U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii read from the "letter" at the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children hospital's Centennial Dinner Jan. 24, 2009 the same day the letter from obama to the hospital in question is dated. The letter is more than suspicious because it is exactly like obama's certification of live birth that has not and cannot be verified by anyone to prove it is authentic.

The "letter" U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii read was a fake fundraising campaign FRAUD.

U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii used this FAKE letter at The Kapi'olani Medical Center Centennial Dinner Jan. 24, 2009.

Not only must obama prove his is a US citizen in court by someone probating his "certification of live birth" now the gov of Hawaii should be indicted for FRAUD because of the fake obama fundraising letter.)
Story Reports

The coverup continues for the HOAX called obama.

White House Ignores repeated requests to authenticate Obama message declaring exact hospital

(Misinformation or propaganda is used by obama to conceal his true identity. The letter that U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii read as authentic letter from obama was used to persuade the public of obama's legitimacy as an Hawaiian born citizen.

Its nothing but pure propaganda conceived to deceive the American public. The letter from obama has never been authenticated by obama nor the hospital in Hawaii.

It is a total fake letter.

Its more of the news media and obama deception.

You have heard the phrase, "don't believe everything you hear". This is good advice.

Adolf Hitler quote:

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”

Not everybody will believe the proaganda or lies of obama.

If you read between the lines and check out the facts you then become aware that "the fruit of selma" aka barack obama is a total hoax and fraud. Story Reports

Don't Ask Won't Tell

The ever important atheist, lesbian, male-to-female, transexual lobby on display at the Democratic National Convention. Or, your typical Obama Supporter. A person who will erode military effectiveness and unit readiness.

Don't ask won't tell
(This is like an unfunded mandate. An unspoken regulation that obama uses as a guide to deceive the public. This unspoken obama regulation specifies that any and all lawsuits filed to bring discovery about the unprobated obama birth certificate must automatically be dismissed without any evidence being produced as to the US citizenship of one barack hussain obama. No time, effort or money is to be spared hiding documentation related to barack obama's true identity. I look forward to the day when don't ask won't tell will be repealed and the undocumented obama will be exposed as a HOAX.) Story Reports

........................................................................................
Don't Ask Don't Tell

The policy remains in place until the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that repeal will not harm military readiness, followed by a 60-day waiting period.

§ 654. Policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces

(9) The standards of conduct for members of the armed forces regulate a member’s life for 24 hours each day beginning at the moment the member enters military status and not ending until that person is discharged or otherwise separated from the armed forces.

(10) Those standards of conduct, including the Uniform Code of Military Justice, apply to a member of the armed forces at all times that the member has a military status, whether the member is on base or off base, and whether the member is on duty or off duty.

(11) The pervasive application of the standards of conduct is necessary because members of the armed forces must be ready at all times for worldwide deployment to a combat environment.

(12) The worldwide deployment of United States military forces, the international responsibilities of the United States, and the potential for involvement of the armed forces in actual combat routinely make it necessary for members of the armed forces involuntarily to accept living conditions and working conditions that are often spartan, primitive, and characterized by forced intimacy with little or no privacy.

(13) The prohibition against homosexual conduct is a longstanding element of military law that continues to be necessary in the unique circumstances of military service.

(14) The armed forces must maintain personnel policies that exclude persons whose presence in the armed forces would create an unacceptable risk to the armed forces’ high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.

(15) The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.

(If the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that repeal will not harm military readiness, they are certifying: that homosexuals and bisexuals who engage in sodomy or perverted acts would not create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of the military.

Homosexuals and bisexuals are a small part of the military. Most people in the military are not homosexuals and bisexuals. Just the terms themselves mean unatural acts between the same sex or opposite sex.

The majority of the military will be affected by obama's homosexual brothers and sisters. This majority will find the "outing" of these gays offensive because they will engage in perverted acts, that normally where kept in the closet, causing unit cohesion to become some kind of obama joke in units controlled by the perverted.

I did say perverted because I consider a man having sex with another man perverted and unnatural. Just as I consider a woman having sex with another woman perverted and unnatural. I also consider a man acting as a transexual female to be perverted just as I consider a woman acting as a transexaul man perverted.

GOD didn't create adam and steve. He created male and female not homosexual and transexual. The politically correct would say this is "hate speech" because it is opposition to false propaganda. The politically correct use this term to silence opposition because of the fear of being labeled. I believe the "politically correct" have perverted free speech. This is why I also consider barack obama perverted. :) Story Reports

It completely unnecessary for any church to seek 501c3 status, to do so becomes a grant of jurisdiction to the IRS

501c3 facts and questions you should be asking

Info from hushmoney.org

(Since 1954 when churches were only added to section 501c3 of the tax code freedom of speech has been controlled by the irs. Before the irs had churches obeying its regulations warnings came from various church speakers about communism, abortion, sodomy etc. The irs has stopped free speech about these issues under the threat of a church losing its tax exempt status.

The fact is Churches Are “Automatically Tax-Exempt” and should never apply to the irs for a tax exmpt status. Not only is it completely unnecessary for any church to seek 501c3 status, to do so becomes a grant of jurisdiction to the IRS by any church that obtains that State favor.

Through Ignorance or wanting to get favors from the government churches have allowed this to happen.

Now the government wants to control free speech on the internet also. The fcc has just ruled, or made a law, that controls internet free speech.

Church members allowed forms of freedom of speech to die in their churches. Will the public in general allow the government to kill various forms of free speech on the internet.

I believe some will allow the government tell them what they can say, just as they allow the government to tell them what to do.

Abortion is murder. Sodomy is a perversion. The administration of barck obama is a communist dictatorship disguised as a "the fruit of selma" politcally correct enemy within.) Story Reports

For a 501c3 church to openly speak out, or organize in opposition to, anything that the government declares "legal," even if it is immoral (e.g. abortion, homosexuality, etc.), that church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a "chilling effect" upon the free speech rights of the church.
.........................................................................................

Most churches in America have organized as "501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations."

Most churches in America have organized as "501c3 tax-exempt religious organizations." This is a fairly recent trend that has only been going on for about fifty years. Churches were only added to section 501c3 of the tax code in 1954. We can thank Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson for that. Johnson was no ally of the church. As part of his political agenda, Johnson had it in mind to silence the church and eliminate the significant influence the church had always had on shaping "public policy."

Although Johnson proffered this as a "favor" to churches, the favor also came with strings attached (more like shackles). One need not look far to see the devastating effects 501c3 acceptance has had to the church, and the consequent restrictions placed upon any 501c3 church. 501c3 churches are prohibited from addressing, in any tangible way, the vital issues of the day.

For a 501c3 church to openly speak out, or organize in opposition to, anything that the government declares "legal," even if it is immoral (e.g. abortion, homosexuality, etc.), that church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a "chilling effect" upon the free speech rights of the church. LBJ was a shrewd and cunning politician who seemed to well-appreciate how easily many of the clergy would sell out.

Did the church ever need to seek permission from the government to be exempt from taxes? Were churches prior to 1954 taxable? No, churches have never been taxable. To be taxable a church would first need to be under the jurisdiction, and therefore under the taxing authority, of the government. The First Amendment clearly places the church outside the jurisdiction of the civil government: "Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Religion cannot be free if you have to pay the government, through taxation, to exercise it. Since churches aren't taxable in the first place, why do so many of them go to the IRS and seek permission to be tax-exempt? It occurs out of:

* Ignorance ("We didn't know any better")
* Bandwagon logic ("Everyone else is doing it")
* Professional advice (many attorneys and CPAs recommend it)

Does the law require, or even encourage, a church to organize as a 501c3? To answer that question let's turn to what the IRS itself has to say.

Churches Need Not Apply

In order to be considered for tax-exempt status by the IRS an organization must fill out and submit IRS Form 1023 and 1024. However, note what the IRS says regarding churches and church ministries, in Publication 557:

Some organizations are not required to file Form 1023. These include:

Churches, interchurch organizations of local units of a church, conventions or associations of churches, or integrated auxiliaries of a church, such as a men’s or women’s organization, religious school, mission society, or youth group. These organizations are exempt automatically if they meet the requirements of section 501(c)(3).

Churches Are “Automatically Tax-Exempt”

According to IRS Code § 508(c)(1)(A):

Special rules with respect to section 501(c)(3) organizations.

(a) New organizations must notify secretary that they are applying for recognition of section 501(c)(3) status.
(c) Exceptions.

(1) Mandatory exceptions. Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to—

(A) churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches.

This is referred to as the "mandatory exception" rule. Thus, we see from the IRS’ own publications, and the tax code, that it is completely unnecessary for any church to apply for tax-exempt status. In the IRS’ own words a church “is automatically tax-exempt.”

Churches Are “Automatically Tax-Deductible”

And what about tax-deductibility? Doesn’t a church still need to become a 501c3 so that contributions to it can be taken as a tax deduction? The answer is no! According to IRS Publication 526:

Organizations That Qualify To Receive Deductible Contributions

You can deduct your contributions only if you make them to a qualified organization. To become a qualified organization, most organizations other than churches and governments, as described below, must apply to the IRS.

In the IRS’ own words a church “is automatically tax-deductible.”

Churches Have a Mandatory Exception To Filing Tax Returns

Not only is it completely unnecessary for any church to seek 501c3 status, to do so becomes a grant of jurisdiction to the IRS by any church that obtains that State favor. In the words of Steve Nestor, IRS Sr. Revenue Officer (ret.):

"I am not the only IRS employee who’s wondered why churches go to the government and seek permission to be exempted from a tax they didn’t owe to begin with, and to seek a tax deductible status that they’ve always had anyway. Many of us have marveled at how church leaders want to be regulated and controlled by an agency of government that most Americans have prayed would just get out of their lives. Churches are in an amazingly unique position, but they don’t seem to know or appreciate the implications of what it would mean to be free of government control."

From the Forward of In Caesar's Grip, by Peter Kershaw

In Caesar's Grip, by: Peter Kershaw

The History of Political Correctness

The History of Political Correctness

The origins of Political Correctness can be found in the early part of the 20th Century.

This video produced by the Free Congress Foundation explains that political correctness is a product of Marxist ideology, and that it's been in the making for more than eighty years. It's 22 minutes but well worth your time.

Origins of "Political Correctness"

(Communist "political correctness" dictates that one never questions the origin of obama's non validated "certification of live birth".

If one does question "the fruit of selma's" US citizenship one is labeled a racist or radical.

Political correctness demands that just because obama claims to be a "black man" one must automatically be a racist if one questions the "fruit of selma's" US citizenship.

Communists like obama do not want any questions asked about their background.

I am immune to political correctness as THE HOAX DETECTOR.

I do not have the "political correctness" disease therefore I am able to discern the simple truth that obama cannot prove he is a US citizen.) Story Reports aka the Hoax Detector

250,000 homes are now being targeted every month by the Census Bureau to comply, under threat of prosecution, with a survey demanding answers

250,000 homes are now being targeted every month by the Census Bureau with a survey demanding answers to over 70 privacy invading questions

250,000 homes are now being targeted every month by the Census Bureau and its corporate lackeys to comply, under threat of prosecution, with a survey demanding answers to over 70 privacy invading questions.

Questions, that as Congressman Ron Paul and others have pointed out, are none of the government's business.

This new program will cost taxpayers well over $150,000,000 a year and is envisioned by Census Bureau personnel as a permanent fixture to the new American police state. It was developed and implemented by unelected career bureaucrats at the Department of Commerce in close consultation with other government interests including but not limited to the Department of Justice, Health and Human Services and Homeland Security.

In addition, the Census Bureau relies heavily on strong support from corporate interests to collect, scan, archive, and conduct follow-up work related to surveys unwittingly filled out by individuals under the false pretense that their responses will be kept 'strictly confidential'.

Indeed, the Census Bureau and its contracted help will all tell you that your responses are protected by statute and any unauthorized disclosure is punishable by severe fines and prison time. What they don't tell you is that the number of 'authorized' disclosures is expansive and corporations and individuals working with the Census Bureau have unfettered access to your personal information while under contract with the Bureau.

You also won't find a list of individuals or organizations that have been prosecuted or sanctioned by the federal government for disclosing your personal information. After all, when the chief executive officer of the country can thumb his nose at the Constitution and federal statutes with impunity in order to spy on American citizens, it's no great leap of logic to realize so-called census privacy protections are in reality non-existent.

(The "fruit of selma" aka barry soetoro aka barack obama wants you and me to answer some 70 privacy invading questions.

The Census Bureau emphasizes that all questions must be answered. The ACS envelope arrives with a warning that a response is required by law. The form threatens a $100 fine for every question that goes unanswered, and a $500 fine for every question answered untruthfully.

In the end, however, the Census Bureau has no authority to enforce the laws that require the ACS be answered.

I want 'the fruit of selma" aka barack obama to answer JUST ONE QUESTION.

Why do your continue to hide your true identity behind a worthless piece of paper you have presented to the world as your "certification of live birth"?

The only document that has been released by obama is of NO LEGAL VALUE until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative.

Congress can ask the above question to "the fruit of selma" aka barack obama.

If any court of law rules that the document presented by obama as his proof of US citizenship is provided as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative, obama knows the jig will be up and he will be exposed as a FRAUD.)Story Reports

........................................................................................

While big business no doubt benefits from having as much information about citizens as possible, many citizens are unwilling to give away their right to privacy. Hence, many are refusing to return the ACS. This automatically results in an additional ACS form being sent, followed by a series of phone calls. In 21% of the cases, an unannounced, personal visit from a Census Bureau representative follows in a final attempt to get the ACS completed. Often more than one visit takes place.

In the end, however, the Census Bureau has no authority to enforce the laws that require the ACS be answered. The Census Bureau can press formal charges for non-compliance, but this is somewhat impractical given the number of ACS forms that are not returned, or returned incomplete. A lawsuit would likely draw media attention and a public outcry that would very probably bring an end to the ACS, or end mandatory compliance. As of early 2007, no legal action has been taken against anyone for refusing to answer the ACS.

Federal agencies are using the Census Bureau as their front for mandating responses to questions that individual agencies or departments aren't authorized to mandate from the general public on their own.

What authority does the Department of Commerce and the U.S. Census Bureau think they have to force sovereign individuals to lay bare their private lives to any federal bureaucrat or their contracted help with a clipboard and a badge (they haven't been issued guns...yet). What I found was more disturbing in some ways than the invasive questions on the survey itself.

It turns out the federal government considers all of us to be either defective, dependent or delinquent and Congress has specifically authorized the Department of Commerce to classify us accordingly. Don't believe me? Check out 13 U.S.C. 101:

13 USC 101

13 USC 101 - Defective, dependent, and delinquent classes; crime:
(a) The Secretary may collect decennially statistics relating—

(1) to the defective, dependent, and delinquent classes; and
(2) to crime, including judicial statistics pertaining thereto.

(b) The statistics authorized by subsection (a) of this section shall include information upon the following questions, namely: age, sex, color, nativity, parentage, literacy by race, color, nativity, and parentage, and such other questions relating to such subjects as the Secretary deems proper.

(c) In addition to the decennial collections authorized by subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the Secretary may compile and publish annually statistics relating to crime and to the defective, dependent, and delinquent classes.

(I consider "the fruit of selma" to be defective, dependent and deliquent. In addition I consider obama to be classified as "the fruit of selma". This "fruit" is spoiled and worthless.) Story Reports

When the Census Bureau field rep. comes knocking on your door in order to invade your families privacy, you may want to gently remind him of the principles associated with private property ownership and point him in the direction of the shortest path OFF your property. -Terry

The U.S. Census Bureau's
American Community Survey Interrogation