Saturday, June 9, 2012
District court’s preliminary injunction against the marxist fraud obama
U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest preliminary injunction order on May 16 enjoined enforcement of Section 1021(b)(2), ndaa act of 2012, against anyone until further action by this, or a higher, court – or by Congress.
U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest: “Here, plaintiffs argue that they and others could be subject to indefinite military detention under Section 1021 (b)(2); accordingly, the public interest in ensuring that ordinary citizens understand the scope of such a statute justifies its breadth.”
(The judge is right, ordinary citizens don't understand the scope of the ndaa act that did allow obama to "snatch" ie, kidnap any US citizen with out ANY JUSTIFICATION, CHARGES OR TRIAL!) Story Reports
The judge explained that the plaintiffs alleged paragraph 1021 is “constitutionally infirm, violating both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the 1st Amendment as well due process rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment.”
She noted the government “did not call any witnesses, submit any documentary evidence or file any declarations.”
“It must be said that it would have been a rather simple matter for the government to have stated that as to these plaintiffs and the conduct as to which they would testify, that [paragraph] 1021 did not and would not apply, if indeed it did or would not,” she wrote.
Instead, the administration only responded with, “I’m not authorized to make specific representations regarding specific people.”
“To put it bluntly, to eliminate these plaintiffs’ standing simply by representing that their conduct does not fall within the scope of 1021 would have been simple. The government chose not to do so – thereby ensuring standing and requiring this court to reach the merits of the instant motion.
“Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the 1st Amendment,” she wrote.
Forrest found that the plaintiffs had a reasonable fear of detention based on the language of the statute. She ordered the provision not to be enforced until further proceedings in her court or “remedial” action by Congress that would restore those protections.
“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs – or others – are not within [paragraph] 1021. It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on 1st Amendment rights as reasonable – and real,” Forrest said.
(The reason obama and his fellow marxists did not state unambiguously that all American citizens are subject to kidnapping and indefinite detention is because obama wants to be able to kidnap anybody at will for any reason under the guise of section 1021.
Obama is a marxist fraud who cannot validate his US citizenship.) Story Reports
U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest: “Here, plaintiffs argue that they and others could be subject to indefinite military detention under Section 1021 (b)(2); accordingly, the public interest in ensuring that ordinary citizens understand the scope of such a statute justifies its breadth.”
(The judge is right, ordinary citizens don't understand the scope of the ndaa act that did allow obama to "snatch" ie, kidnap any US citizen with out ANY JUSTIFICATION, CHARGES OR TRIAL!) Story Reports
The judge explained that the plaintiffs alleged paragraph 1021 is “constitutionally infirm, violating both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the 1st Amendment as well due process rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment.”
She noted the government “did not call any witnesses, submit any documentary evidence or file any declarations.”
“It must be said that it would have been a rather simple matter for the government to have stated that as to these plaintiffs and the conduct as to which they would testify, that [paragraph] 1021 did not and would not apply, if indeed it did or would not,” she wrote.
Instead, the administration only responded with, “I’m not authorized to make specific representations regarding specific people.”
“To put it bluntly, to eliminate these plaintiffs’ standing simply by representing that their conduct does not fall within the scope of 1021 would have been simple. The government chose not to do so – thereby ensuring standing and requiring this court to reach the merits of the instant motion.
“Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the 1st Amendment,” she wrote.
Forrest found that the plaintiffs had a reasonable fear of detention based on the language of the statute. She ordered the provision not to be enforced until further proceedings in her court or “remedial” action by Congress that would restore those protections.
“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs – or others – are not within [paragraph] 1021. It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on 1st Amendment rights as reasonable – and real,” Forrest said.
(The reason obama and his fellow marxists did not state unambiguously that all American citizens are subject to kidnapping and indefinite detention is because obama wants to be able to kidnap anybody at will for any reason under the guise of section 1021.
Obama is a marxist fraud who cannot validate his US citizenship.) Story Reports
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
STANDING ON THE PROMISES
STANDING ON THE PROMISES
You Have Everything You Need to Do God's Will for Your Life
(Click on the text to enlarge the tract. This is a wonderful tract about GOD blessing an individual. I have included a sermon that was preached by Pastor John C. Vaughn that mentions this tract and includes instruction and inspiration for those with disabilities.) Story Reports
You Have Everything You Need to Do God's Will for Your Life
(Click on the text to enlarge the tract. This is a wonderful tract about GOD blessing an individual. I have included a sermon that was preached by Pastor John C. Vaughn that mentions this tract and includes instruction and inspiration for those with disabilities.) Story Reports
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Obama Using Drones to Spy on Cattle Ranchers in Nebraska and Iowa
Obama EPA Using Drones to Spy on Cattle Ranchers in Nebraska and Iowa.
Kurt Nimmo
Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency is using aerial drones to spy on farmers in Nebraska and Iowa. The surveillance came under scrutiny last week when Nebraska’s congressional delegation sent a joint letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.
“They are just way on the outer limits of any authority they’ve been granted,” said Mike Johanns, a Republican senator from Nebraska.
In fact, the EPA has absolutely zero authority and is an unconstitutional entity of an ever-expanding and rogue federal government. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution does not authorize Congress to legislate in the area of the environment. Under the Tenth Amendment, this authority is granted to the states and their legislatures, not the federal government.
The EPA has not addressed the constitutional question, including its wanton violation of probable cause under the Fourth Amendment. It merely states that it has authority to surveil the private property of farmers and ranchers. It defends its encroaching behavior as “cost-efficient.”
(Just more evidence obama is making the US into a police state. The epa is like the gestapo except they don't gas us yet. They can just snatch you away with cause, ie national "defense act" of 2012.) Story Reports
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
