THE EVIL OF ZERO
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Thursday, 19 March 2009
Is Zero a fascist dedicated to destroying the life savings of Americans, or is he criminally incompetent?
The answer is yes.
So let me tell you about Gao Xiqing (gow shee-ching). He's one of the smartest Chinese you'll ever meet (and that's saying something). Graduate of Duke law school, worked at a major Wall Street law firm, returned to his native China to direct the CIC, China Investment Corp., the Chicoms' trillion dollar sovereign wealth fund.
In other words, he's the guy who owns $700 billion of US Treasurys, the guy who Zero is depending on to keep buying. Should he not show up at the next Treasury auction, the dollar disintegrates the next day.
A friend of mine has gotten to know him (don't ask me how). "Gao is super-smooth, sophisticated, speaks English as good as you or me, and knows America inside and out," he says. "He can talk the language of high finance and international capitalism as good as anyone - yet he is a hard core Chinese Communist who regards America as China's enemy. He despises Obama as the epitome of American weakness."
Gao also thinks that gold is going to $5,000 an ounce and that the dollar's goose is cooked.
To The Point News
....................................................................................
The Mother of All Bells by Peter Schiff
....................................................................................
There is an old adage on Wall Street that no one rings a bell at major market tops or bottoms. That may be true in normal times, but as many have noticed, we are now completely through the looking glass. In this parallel reality, Ben Bernanke has just rung the loudest bell ever heard in the foreign exchange and government debt markets. Investors who ignore the clanging do so at their own peril. The bell’s reverberations will be felt by everyday Americans, whose lives are about to change in ways few can imagine. While nearly every facet of America’s economy has been devastated over the past six months, our national currency has thus far skipped through the carnage with nary a scratch. Ironically, the U.S dollar has been the beneficiary of the global economic crises which the United States set in motion. As a result, our economy has thus far been spared the full force of the storm.
This week the Federal Reserve finally made clear what should have been obvious for some time – the only weapon that the Fed is willing to use to fight the economic downturn is a continuing torrent of pure, undiluted, inflation. The announcement should be seen as a game changer that redirects the fury of the financial storm directly onto our shores.
In its statement, the Fed announced its intention to purchase an additional $1 trillion worth of U.S. treasury and agency debt. The purchases, of course, will be made with money created out of thin air through the Fed’s printing presses. Few can doubt that they will persist with these operations until the economy returns to its former health. Whether or not this can ever be accomplished with a printing press alone has never been seriously considered. Bernanke himself admits that we are in uncharted waters, with no map or compass, just simply a hope that more dollars are the answer.
Rather than solving our problems, more inflation will only add to the crisis. Falling asset prices, the credit crunch, declining consumer spending, bankruptcies, foreclosures, and layoffs are all part of the necessary rebalancing of our economy. These wrenching movements, however painful, are the market’s attempts to resolve the serious problems at the root of our bubble economy. Attempts to literally paper-over these problems will lead to disaster.
Now that the Fed has recklessly shown its hand, the mad dash to get out of Treasuries and dollars should not be far off. The more the Fed prints to buy bonds the less the dollar is worth. Holders of our debt (read China and Japan) understand this dynamic. We must expect that they will not only refuse to buy new bonds, but they will look to unload those bonds they already own.
Under normal circumstances, if creditors grew concerned that inflation was eating into their returns, the Fed would raise interest rates to entice them to buy. However, the Fed will avoid this course of action as it fears higher rates are too heavy a burden for our debt laden economy to bear. To maintain artificially low rates, the Fed will be forced to purchase trillions more debt than it expects as it becomes the only buyer in a seller’s market.
Just last week, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao voiced concern about his country’s massive investments in U.S. government debt. In the most unequivocal statement yet by the Chinese leadership on this issue, Wen made it plain that he was concerned with depreciation, not default. With his fears now officially confirmed by the Fed statement, we must wonder when the Chinese will finally change course.
There is a growing consensus that if China no longer wants to buy our bonds, we can simply print the money and buy them ourselves. This naïve view fails to consider the consequences implicit in such a change. When the Treasury sells bonds to China, no new dollars are printed. Instead, China prints yuan to buy dollars which it then uses to purchase treasurers. This effectively allows America to export its inflation to China. However, now that we will be printing the money ourselves, the full inflationary impact will fall directly on us.
With such a policy in place, America has now become a banana republic. It won’t be too long before our living standards reflect our new status. Got Gold?
Peter Schiff
The more the Fed prints to buy bonds the less the dollar is worth. Holders of our debt (read China and Japan) understand this dynamic. We must expect that they will not only refuse to buy new bonds, but they will look to unload those bonds they already own. (This is when the dollar will collapse and then marshal law will be declared. Just what obama wants)
Friday, March 20, 2009
How To Survive A Depression
How to survive economic collapse
If This Isn't Financial Armageddon Then I Don't Know What is
This is huge!
I don't even know where to begin, except to say…Historians will mark down yesterday, March 18, 2009, as the day the Federal Reserve thrust a dagger into the heart of the U.S. dollar. The dollar is now lying on its death bed bleeding to death with the blessings of the Fed doctors watching over it.
Yesterday's Fed announcement that they would buy $300 Billion in U.S. Treasury Bonds and over $1 Trillion in government held mortgage backed securities, should remove all doubt as to the fate of the dollar. The announcement means the U.S. government is monetizing its own debt through the Federal Reserve System by simply printing paper dollars to pay its own debts.
Normally, when the government borrows money by issuing bonds, foreign countries put up the money for the bonds, expecting a return on their money with interest. However, because our government has created so much debt (more than the combined worth of our country's assets) no one is willing any longer to buy Treasury Bonds. That is because we (the U.S.A.) have become the world's largest debtor nation, and are at big risk that we could ever repay our debt. The world fears the U.S. government will default on all its debts. Egad!!!
So, to keep the system afloat, our government is now printing its own money to pay its own debt. Isn't this wonderful? The U.S.A. from now on whenever it needs more money will just print more paper dollars. Gee, don't you wish you could do that…just print money?
Here's what all of this means to you and I.
First, get ready for a flood of paper dollars. The theory is by flooding the country with paper money, it will stave off a depression and put more people back to work. That is the theory, but no one really knows if in fact the theory works, or for how long.
Secondly, as ever increasing amounts of dollars begin to make the rounds through the banks, businesses and into people's pockets, everything we buy will cost more. At first, it will not be too noticeable. But about 12 months from now, expect prices on everything you buy to begin inflating in price up to as much as 50% and more…much more!
Hard assets, like silver and gold will soar in price as stated in dollars.
The dollar, which devalued 250 Basis Points (a huge amount) against foreign currencies after yesterday's announcement, will continue to lose value. Stock prices will move upward as will 401K's and other paper investments, that is at least for the short term. After a time, the stock market will tumble down to maybe as low as 500 in the Dow Jones Industrials.
In order to save the world from total economic collapse, a new currency will replace the dollar. Those left holding dollars and any paper assets like bonds, mutual funds, etc. will see their value go to zero.
Those who have studied the Fed and our worthless dollar, have wondered how the final chapter in the death of the dollar will unfold. There were several possibilities. However, with yesterday's announcement, how the last chapter will read is now known…Hyperinflate the dollar (print money like mad) in hopes of paying off an impossible, unpayable debt.
What you should do
Our own government is out of control. Everything it does to stop a depression only makes the situation worse.
Get informed and think for yourself. Think through what will happen as the economy worsens. Take action to protect yourself and family. Read this daily Blog. Our sole purpose is to give you helpful information on how to survive a depression. Talk with your family and make a plan. Think about food, water, home security, finances, medicine, etc. and begin a program to insure you can survive a total collapse of the dollar. Discuss the dollar collapse with your neighbors, Work together as much as you can and be there for one another.
Yesterday's Fed announcement is historic. It should be to you as the sound of the starter's gun in a race. Those who refuse to run, those who remain milling around the start line, are fools to ignore the loud and clear sound of the gun. They will all be the losers.
Prepare for the worst, and pray for the best.
....................................................................................
Read The Information Below
....................................................................................
Economic data tells us that food supplies are down nearly 50% from over a year ago. The problem behind this growing food shortage lies with the financial crisis in the banks. Few banks have the money or are willing to loan large factory farms the money needed to buy fertilizer, irrigated water, and other necessities related to food production. This forces more and more large food producers to not plant new crops. Their land lies idle.
On the consumer side, the food shortage means less food available in stores in the coming months. How severe the food shortage will become, and for how much longer the financial crisis will continue is anyone's guess.
Most of us do not see a food shortage or have a concern when we shop for groceries. All we are concerned over is increasing food prices. After all, grocery store shelves are constantly being restocked, even as we shop. So we do not see or have a concern over supposed food shortages. If we have any complaints, it is that food keeps getting more expensive taking more and more of our money.
What we fail to understand is why food keeps getting more expensive. Sure there is inflation, but inflation is only part of the cause. The primary cause for increasing food prices has to do with supply and demand. There is less food available and more demand. If there were more food to meet growing demand, food prices would stabilize. But just the opposite is happening.
If it comes down to it, no matter what the news reports say, it will not be until store shelves are suddenly seen empty of canned goods and fresh produce that people will realize the situation and panic.
We seem to be in the perfect storm that is bringing down so much of what we take for granted. Never in a thousand years could this happen we reason. And yet, in disbelief, it is happening before our very eyes.
Do you realize our standard of living depends on: 1. A worthless piece of paper that requires an equal amount of debt to be created, and 2. A system of credit no longer able to sustain itself? Our generation is now bearing the fruit of this unsound monetary system.
Our Great, Great Grandparents would laugh over our unsustainable and foolish way of life. As with the generations before them, their greatest wealth was not money but plant seeds. They understood the basics of life we have long forgotten. For if you possess plant seeds, you hold insurance against an unknown future.
There are some of us, though our number is small, who appreciate the old ways, and have foresight to understand the meaning of unfolding events. We are the people who are preparing to survive a great and terrible depression. Part of our preparation includes stocking and storing plant seed. We are growing our own vegetables and preserving the food we produce.
Consider this: What would you give for a packet of vegetable seeds, if people around you were eating anything they could find to satisfy their hunger? If you had seed set aside for yourself and family in such a situation, at what price would you be willing to sell part of them???
I hope nothing like that ever comes to pass. But if it did, plant seeds would once again be like having money in the bank. They would become as precious as gold.
The first rule of life is to have food to eat. The second rule of life is not to forget rule number one! That means if food disappears from store shelves you still have to feed yourself and family. Betting your life that food will always be in stores during the perfect economic storm we are in is fool hardy. Better to buy some seed and plant a garden to secure you have food to eat.
How to survive a depression
If This Isn't Financial Armageddon Then I Don't Know What is
This is huge!
I don't even know where to begin, except to say…Historians will mark down yesterday, March 18, 2009, as the day the Federal Reserve thrust a dagger into the heart of the U.S. dollar. The dollar is now lying on its death bed bleeding to death with the blessings of the Fed doctors watching over it.
Yesterday's Fed announcement that they would buy $300 Billion in U.S. Treasury Bonds and over $1 Trillion in government held mortgage backed securities, should remove all doubt as to the fate of the dollar. The announcement means the U.S. government is monetizing its own debt through the Federal Reserve System by simply printing paper dollars to pay its own debts.
Normally, when the government borrows money by issuing bonds, foreign countries put up the money for the bonds, expecting a return on their money with interest. However, because our government has created so much debt (more than the combined worth of our country's assets) no one is willing any longer to buy Treasury Bonds. That is because we (the U.S.A.) have become the world's largest debtor nation, and are at big risk that we could ever repay our debt. The world fears the U.S. government will default on all its debts. Egad!!!
So, to keep the system afloat, our government is now printing its own money to pay its own debt. Isn't this wonderful? The U.S.A. from now on whenever it needs more money will just print more paper dollars. Gee, don't you wish you could do that…just print money?
Here's what all of this means to you and I.
First, get ready for a flood of paper dollars. The theory is by flooding the country with paper money, it will stave off a depression and put more people back to work. That is the theory, but no one really knows if in fact the theory works, or for how long.
Secondly, as ever increasing amounts of dollars begin to make the rounds through the banks, businesses and into people's pockets, everything we buy will cost more. At first, it will not be too noticeable. But about 12 months from now, expect prices on everything you buy to begin inflating in price up to as much as 50% and more…much more!
Hard assets, like silver and gold will soar in price as stated in dollars.
The dollar, which devalued 250 Basis Points (a huge amount) against foreign currencies after yesterday's announcement, will continue to lose value. Stock prices will move upward as will 401K's and other paper investments, that is at least for the short term. After a time, the stock market will tumble down to maybe as low as 500 in the Dow Jones Industrials.
In order to save the world from total economic collapse, a new currency will replace the dollar. Those left holding dollars and any paper assets like bonds, mutual funds, etc. will see their value go to zero.
Those who have studied the Fed and our worthless dollar, have wondered how the final chapter in the death of the dollar will unfold. There were several possibilities. However, with yesterday's announcement, how the last chapter will read is now known…Hyperinflate the dollar (print money like mad) in hopes of paying off an impossible, unpayable debt.
What you should do
Our own government is out of control. Everything it does to stop a depression only makes the situation worse.
Get informed and think for yourself. Think through what will happen as the economy worsens. Take action to protect yourself and family. Read this daily Blog. Our sole purpose is to give you helpful information on how to survive a depression. Talk with your family and make a plan. Think about food, water, home security, finances, medicine, etc. and begin a program to insure you can survive a total collapse of the dollar. Discuss the dollar collapse with your neighbors, Work together as much as you can and be there for one another.
Yesterday's Fed announcement is historic. It should be to you as the sound of the starter's gun in a race. Those who refuse to run, those who remain milling around the start line, are fools to ignore the loud and clear sound of the gun. They will all be the losers.
Prepare for the worst, and pray for the best.
....................................................................................
Read The Information Below
....................................................................................
Economic data tells us that food supplies are down nearly 50% from over a year ago. The problem behind this growing food shortage lies with the financial crisis in the banks. Few banks have the money or are willing to loan large factory farms the money needed to buy fertilizer, irrigated water, and other necessities related to food production. This forces more and more large food producers to not plant new crops. Their land lies idle.
On the consumer side, the food shortage means less food available in stores in the coming months. How severe the food shortage will become, and for how much longer the financial crisis will continue is anyone's guess.
Most of us do not see a food shortage or have a concern when we shop for groceries. All we are concerned over is increasing food prices. After all, grocery store shelves are constantly being restocked, even as we shop. So we do not see or have a concern over supposed food shortages. If we have any complaints, it is that food keeps getting more expensive taking more and more of our money.
What we fail to understand is why food keeps getting more expensive. Sure there is inflation, but inflation is only part of the cause. The primary cause for increasing food prices has to do with supply and demand. There is less food available and more demand. If there were more food to meet growing demand, food prices would stabilize. But just the opposite is happening.
If it comes down to it, no matter what the news reports say, it will not be until store shelves are suddenly seen empty of canned goods and fresh produce that people will realize the situation and panic.
We seem to be in the perfect storm that is bringing down so much of what we take for granted. Never in a thousand years could this happen we reason. And yet, in disbelief, it is happening before our very eyes.
Do you realize our standard of living depends on: 1. A worthless piece of paper that requires an equal amount of debt to be created, and 2. A system of credit no longer able to sustain itself? Our generation is now bearing the fruit of this unsound monetary system.
Our Great, Great Grandparents would laugh over our unsustainable and foolish way of life. As with the generations before them, their greatest wealth was not money but plant seeds. They understood the basics of life we have long forgotten. For if you possess plant seeds, you hold insurance against an unknown future.
There are some of us, though our number is small, who appreciate the old ways, and have foresight to understand the meaning of unfolding events. We are the people who are preparing to survive a great and terrible depression. Part of our preparation includes stocking and storing plant seed. We are growing our own vegetables and preserving the food we produce.
Consider this: What would you give for a packet of vegetable seeds, if people around you were eating anything they could find to satisfy their hunger? If you had seed set aside for yourself and family in such a situation, at what price would you be willing to sell part of them???
I hope nothing like that ever comes to pass. But if it did, plant seeds would once again be like having money in the bank. They would become as precious as gold.
The first rule of life is to have food to eat. The second rule of life is not to forget rule number one! That means if food disappears from store shelves you still have to feed yourself and family. Betting your life that food will always be in stores during the perfect economic storm we are in is fool hardy. Better to buy some seed and plant a garden to secure you have food to eat.
How to survive a depression
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Oath Keepers Guardians of the Republic
Oath Keepers Guardians of the Republic
"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army" - Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island
The time is now near at hand. The FRAUD who was elected by the mass media along with the other thugs in congress are slowly, methodically, purposefully, pillaging our freedoms and destroying our country. They know by stealth legislation and illegal executive orders our liberty as free Americans can be insidiously taken away. It is being done in various ways. Our attention is being diverted from the real TRAITORS in congress. Congress and obama are traitors. ANY MEMBER of congress that votes or supports unconstitutional legislation is a TRAITOR! [Story Reports]
....................................................................................
Oath Keepers Guardians of the Republic, Honor Your Oath. Join Us.
....................................................................................
Oath Keepers Guardians of the Republic
Such a time is near at hand again. The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this Army - and this Marine Corps, This Air Force, This Navy and the National Guard units of these sovereign states.
Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, peace officers, and veterans who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic … and meant it.
Our oath is to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and that oath will be kept. We won’t “just follow orders."
Below is our declaration of orders we will NOT obey because we will consider them unconstitutional (and thus unlawful) and immoral violations of the natural rights of the people. Such orders would be acts of war against the American people by their own government, and thus acts of treason. We will not make war against our own people. We will not commit treason. We will defend the Republic.
Declaration of Orders We Will NOT Obey
Recognizing that we each swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and affirming that we are guardians of the Republic, of the principles in our Declaration of Independence, and of the rights of our people, we affirm and declare the following:
1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people.
The attempt to disarm the people on April 19, 1775 was the spark of open conflict in the American Revolution. That vile attempt was an act of war, and the American people fought back in justified, righteous self-defense of their natural rights. Any such order today would also be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason. We will not make war on our own people, and we will not commit treason by obeying any such treasonous order.
Nor will we assist, or support any such attempt to disarm the people by other government entities, either state or federal.
In addition, we affirm that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military power of the people so that they will, in the last resort, have effective final recourse to arms and to the God of Hosts in the face of tyranny. Accordingly, we oppose any and all further infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In particular we oppose a renewal of the misnamed “assault-weapons” ban or the enactment of H.R. 45 (which would register and track gun owners like convicted pedophiles).
2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects - such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the use of warrantless searches known as “writs of assistance” and the first fiery embers of American resistance were born in opposition to those infamous writs. The Founders considered all warrantless searches to be unreasonable and egregious. It was to prevent a repeat of such violations of the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects that the Fourth Amendment was written.
We expect that warrantless searches of homes and vehicles, under some pretext, will be the means used to attempt to disarm the people.
3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the denial of the right to jury trial, the use of admiralty courts (military tribunals) instead, and the application of the laws of war to the colonists. After that experience, and being well aware of the infamous Star Chamber in English history, the Founders ensured that the international laws of war would apply only to foreign enemies, not to the American people. Thus, the Article III Treason Clause establishes the only constitutional form of trial for an American, not serving in the military, who is accused of making war on his own nation. Such a trial for treason must be before a civilian jury, not a tribunal.
The international laws of war do not trump our Bill of Rights. We reject as illegitimate any such claimed power, as did the Supreme Court in Ex Parte Milligan (1865). Any attempt to apply the laws of war to American civilians, under any pretext, such as against domestic “militia” groups the government brands “domestic terrorists,” is an act of war and an act of treason.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the attempt “to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power” by disbanding the Massachusetts legislature and appointing General Gage as “military governor.” The attempt to disarm the people of Massachusetts during that martial law sparked our Revolution. Accordingly, the power to impose martial law – the absolute rule over the people by a military officer with his will alone being law – is nowhere enumerated in our Constitution.
Further, it is the militia of a state and of the several states that the Constitution contemplates being used in any context, during any emergency within a state, not the standing army.
The imposition of martial law by the national government over a state and its people, treating them as an occupied enemy nation, is an act of war. Such an attempted suspension of the Constitution and Bill of Rights voids the compact with the states and with the people.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union.
In response to the obscene growth of federal power and to the absurdly totalitarian claimed powers of the Executive, upwards of 20 states are considering, have considered, or have passed courageous resolutions affirming states rights and sovereignty.
Those resolutions follow in the honored and revered footsteps of Jefferson and Madison in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, and likewise seek to enforce the Constitution by affirming the very same principles of our Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights that we Oath Keepers recognize and affirm.
Chief among those principles is that ours is a dual sovereignty system, with the people of each state retaining all powers not granted to the national government they created, and thus the people of each state reserved to themselves the right to judge when the national government they created has voided the compact between the states by asserting powers never granted.
Upon the declaration by a state that such a breach has occurred, we will not obey orders to force that state to submit to the national government.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the blockade of Boston, and the occupying of that city by the British military, under martial law. Once hostilities began, the people of Boston were tricked into turning in their arms in exchange for safe passage, but were then forbidden to leave. That confinement of the residents of an entire city was an act of war.
Such tactics were repeated by the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto, and by the Imperial Japanese in Nanking, turning entire cities into death camps. Any such order to disarm and confine the people of an American city will be an act of war and thus an act of treason.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
Mass, forced internment into concentration camps was a hallmark of every fascist and communist dictatorship in the 20th Century. Such internment was unfortunately even used against American citizens of Japanese descent during World War II. Whenever a government interns its own people, it treats them like an occupied enemy population. Oppressive governments often use the internment of women and children to break the will of the men fighting for their liberty – as was done to the Boars, to the Jewish resisters in the Warsaw Ghetto, to the Cossacks, and to the Chechens, for example.
Such a vile order to forcibly intern Americans without charges or trial would be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason, regardless of the pretext used. We will not commit treason, nor will we facilitate or support it.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war.
During the American Revolution, the British government enlisted the aid of Hessian mercenaries in an attempt to subjugate the rebellious American people. Throughout history, repressive regimes have enlisted the aid of foreign troops and mercenaries who have no bonds with the people.
Accordingly, as the militia of the several states are the only military force contemplated by the Constitution, in Article I, Section 8, for domestic keeping of the peace, and as the use of even our own standing army for such purposes is without such constitutional support, the use of foreign troops and mercenaries against the people is wildly unconstitutional, egregious, and an act of war.
We will oppose such troops as enemies of the people and we will treat all who request, invite, and aid those foreign troops as the traitors they are.
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the seizure and forfeiture of American ships, goods, and supplies, along with the seizure of American timber for the Royal Navy, all in violation of the people’s natural right to their property and to the fruits of their labor. The final spark of the Revolution was the attempt by the government to seize powder and cannon stores at Concord.
Deprivation of food has long been a weapon of war and oppression, with millions intentionally starved to death by fascist and communist governments in the 20th Century alone.
Accordingly, we will not obey or facilitate orders to confiscate food and other essential supplies from the people, and we will consider all those who issue or carry out such orders to be the enemies of the people.
10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
There would have been no American Revolution without fiery speakers and writers such as James Otis, Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Sam Adams “setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.” Tyrants know that the pen of a man such as Thomas Paine can cause them more damage than entire armies, and thus they always seek to suppress the natural rights of speech, association, and assembly. Without freedom of speech, the people will have no recourse but to arms. Without freedom of speech and conscience, there is no freedom.
Therefore, we will not obey or support any orders to suppress or violate the right of the people to speak, associate, worship, assemble, communicate, or petition government for the redress of grievances.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually affirm our oath and pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. Oath Keepers
Oath Keepers is a non partisan association of currently serving military, veterans, and peace officers who will fulfill our oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God.
Our oath is to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and not to any political party. In the long-standing tradition of the U.S. military, we are apolitical. We don’t care if unlawful orders come from a Democrat or a Republican, or if the violation is bi-partisan. We will not obey unconstitutional (and thus unlawful) and immoral orders, such as orders to disarm the American people or to place them under martial law. We won’t “just follow orders." Our motto: “Not on Our Watch!” or to put it even more succinctly, in the words of , "NUTS!"
There is at this time a debate within the ranks of the military regarding their oath. Some mistakenly believe they must follow any order the President issues. But many others do understand that their loyalty is to the Constitution and to the people, and understand what that means.
The mission of Oath Keepers is to vastly increase their numbers.
We are in a battle for the hearts and minds of our own troops.
Help us win it.
Oath Keepers
"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army" - Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island
The time is now near at hand. The FRAUD who was elected by the mass media along with the other thugs in congress are slowly, methodically, purposefully, pillaging our freedoms and destroying our country. They know by stealth legislation and illegal executive orders our liberty as free Americans can be insidiously taken away. It is being done in various ways. Our attention is being diverted from the real TRAITORS in congress. Congress and obama are traitors. ANY MEMBER of congress that votes or supports unconstitutional legislation is a TRAITOR! [Story Reports]
....................................................................................
Oath Keepers Guardians of the Republic, Honor Your Oath. Join Us.
....................................................................................
Oath Keepers Guardians of the Republic
Such a time is near at hand again. The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this Army - and this Marine Corps, This Air Force, This Navy and the National Guard units of these sovereign states.
Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, peace officers, and veterans who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic … and meant it.
Our oath is to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and that oath will be kept. We won’t “just follow orders."
Below is our declaration of orders we will NOT obey because we will consider them unconstitutional (and thus unlawful) and immoral violations of the natural rights of the people. Such orders would be acts of war against the American people by their own government, and thus acts of treason. We will not make war against our own people. We will not commit treason. We will defend the Republic.
Declaration of Orders We Will NOT Obey
Recognizing that we each swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and affirming that we are guardians of the Republic, of the principles in our Declaration of Independence, and of the rights of our people, we affirm and declare the following:
1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people.
The attempt to disarm the people on April 19, 1775 was the spark of open conflict in the American Revolution. That vile attempt was an act of war, and the American people fought back in justified, righteous self-defense of their natural rights. Any such order today would also be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason. We will not make war on our own people, and we will not commit treason by obeying any such treasonous order.
Nor will we assist, or support any such attempt to disarm the people by other government entities, either state or federal.
In addition, we affirm that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military power of the people so that they will, in the last resort, have effective final recourse to arms and to the God of Hosts in the face of tyranny. Accordingly, we oppose any and all further infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In particular we oppose a renewal of the misnamed “assault-weapons” ban or the enactment of H.R. 45 (which would register and track gun owners like convicted pedophiles).
2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects - such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the use of warrantless searches known as “writs of assistance” and the first fiery embers of American resistance were born in opposition to those infamous writs. The Founders considered all warrantless searches to be unreasonable and egregious. It was to prevent a repeat of such violations of the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects that the Fourth Amendment was written.
We expect that warrantless searches of homes and vehicles, under some pretext, will be the means used to attempt to disarm the people.
3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the denial of the right to jury trial, the use of admiralty courts (military tribunals) instead, and the application of the laws of war to the colonists. After that experience, and being well aware of the infamous Star Chamber in English history, the Founders ensured that the international laws of war would apply only to foreign enemies, not to the American people. Thus, the Article III Treason Clause establishes the only constitutional form of trial for an American, not serving in the military, who is accused of making war on his own nation. Such a trial for treason must be before a civilian jury, not a tribunal.
The international laws of war do not trump our Bill of Rights. We reject as illegitimate any such claimed power, as did the Supreme Court in Ex Parte Milligan (1865). Any attempt to apply the laws of war to American civilians, under any pretext, such as against domestic “militia” groups the government brands “domestic terrorists,” is an act of war and an act of treason.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the attempt “to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power” by disbanding the Massachusetts legislature and appointing General Gage as “military governor.” The attempt to disarm the people of Massachusetts during that martial law sparked our Revolution. Accordingly, the power to impose martial law – the absolute rule over the people by a military officer with his will alone being law – is nowhere enumerated in our Constitution.
Further, it is the militia of a state and of the several states that the Constitution contemplates being used in any context, during any emergency within a state, not the standing army.
The imposition of martial law by the national government over a state and its people, treating them as an occupied enemy nation, is an act of war. Such an attempted suspension of the Constitution and Bill of Rights voids the compact with the states and with the people.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union.
In response to the obscene growth of federal power and to the absurdly totalitarian claimed powers of the Executive, upwards of 20 states are considering, have considered, or have passed courageous resolutions affirming states rights and sovereignty.
Those resolutions follow in the honored and revered footsteps of Jefferson and Madison in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, and likewise seek to enforce the Constitution by affirming the very same principles of our Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights that we Oath Keepers recognize and affirm.
Chief among those principles is that ours is a dual sovereignty system, with the people of each state retaining all powers not granted to the national government they created, and thus the people of each state reserved to themselves the right to judge when the national government they created has voided the compact between the states by asserting powers never granted.
Upon the declaration by a state that such a breach has occurred, we will not obey orders to force that state to submit to the national government.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the blockade of Boston, and the occupying of that city by the British military, under martial law. Once hostilities began, the people of Boston were tricked into turning in their arms in exchange for safe passage, but were then forbidden to leave. That confinement of the residents of an entire city was an act of war.
Such tactics were repeated by the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto, and by the Imperial Japanese in Nanking, turning entire cities into death camps. Any such order to disarm and confine the people of an American city will be an act of war and thus an act of treason.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
Mass, forced internment into concentration camps was a hallmark of every fascist and communist dictatorship in the 20th Century. Such internment was unfortunately even used against American citizens of Japanese descent during World War II. Whenever a government interns its own people, it treats them like an occupied enemy population. Oppressive governments often use the internment of women and children to break the will of the men fighting for their liberty – as was done to the Boars, to the Jewish resisters in the Warsaw Ghetto, to the Cossacks, and to the Chechens, for example.
Such a vile order to forcibly intern Americans without charges or trial would be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason, regardless of the pretext used. We will not commit treason, nor will we facilitate or support it.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war.
During the American Revolution, the British government enlisted the aid of Hessian mercenaries in an attempt to subjugate the rebellious American people. Throughout history, repressive regimes have enlisted the aid of foreign troops and mercenaries who have no bonds with the people.
Accordingly, as the militia of the several states are the only military force contemplated by the Constitution, in Article I, Section 8, for domestic keeping of the peace, and as the use of even our own standing army for such purposes is without such constitutional support, the use of foreign troops and mercenaries against the people is wildly unconstitutional, egregious, and an act of war.
We will oppose such troops as enemies of the people and we will treat all who request, invite, and aid those foreign troops as the traitors they are.
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the seizure and forfeiture of American ships, goods, and supplies, along with the seizure of American timber for the Royal Navy, all in violation of the people’s natural right to their property and to the fruits of their labor. The final spark of the Revolution was the attempt by the government to seize powder and cannon stores at Concord.
Deprivation of food has long been a weapon of war and oppression, with millions intentionally starved to death by fascist and communist governments in the 20th Century alone.
Accordingly, we will not obey or facilitate orders to confiscate food and other essential supplies from the people, and we will consider all those who issue or carry out such orders to be the enemies of the people.
10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
There would have been no American Revolution without fiery speakers and writers such as James Otis, Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Sam Adams “setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.” Tyrants know that the pen of a man such as Thomas Paine can cause them more damage than entire armies, and thus they always seek to suppress the natural rights of speech, association, and assembly. Without freedom of speech, the people will have no recourse but to arms. Without freedom of speech and conscience, there is no freedom.
Therefore, we will not obey or support any orders to suppress or violate the right of the people to speak, associate, worship, assemble, communicate, or petition government for the redress of grievances.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually affirm our oath and pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. Oath Keepers
Oath Keepers is a non partisan association of currently serving military, veterans, and peace officers who will fulfill our oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God.
Our oath is to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and not to any political party. In the long-standing tradition of the U.S. military, we are apolitical. We don’t care if unlawful orders come from a Democrat or a Republican, or if the violation is bi-partisan. We will not obey unconstitutional (and thus unlawful) and immoral orders, such as orders to disarm the American people or to place them under martial law. We won’t “just follow orders." Our motto: “Not on Our Watch!” or to put it even more succinctly, in the words of , "NUTS!"
There is at this time a debate within the ranks of the military regarding their oath. Some mistakenly believe they must follow any order the President issues. But many others do understand that their loyalty is to the Constitution and to the people, and understand what that means.
The mission of Oath Keepers is to vastly increase their numbers.
We are in a battle for the hearts and minds of our own troops.
Help us win it.
Oath Keepers
Monday, March 16, 2009
Open Letter To United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
Open Letter To United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
Open Letter To United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor from Leo C. Donofrio, Esq
March 15, 2009
United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
United States Attorney’s Office
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Mr. Taylor,
I am writing to make you aware of a brewing danger to members of our active military who have been influenced to join law suits challenging the eligibility of President Barack Obama as Commander In Chief. I hope you will deem it proper to take appropriate action to protect our military and the nation from further damage.
Recently, 1st Lt. Scott R. Easterling, currently serving in Iraq, agreed to be a plaintiff in a pending law suit being brought on behalf of several active and retired military persons by California attorney, Orly Taitz. Easterling agreed to sign a consent form for participation in this action. Beside asking for a publicity photograph and donations, the consent form requests a signature below the following language:
Attn. Orly Taitz, Esq.
26302 La Paz, Ste. 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
I agree to be a plaintiff in the legal action to be filed by Orly Taitz, Esq. in a PETITION FOR A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT whether Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia and possibly still citizen of Kenya, aka BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT of the U.S or TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the U.S. ARMED FORCES, in that I am or was a sworn member of the U.S. military (subject to recall) and I could conceivably be given unlawful orders by a Constitutionally unqualified Commander In Chief, and by following such orders I can be subject to court martial. I further understand that additional arguments may be inserted into this lawsuit at the above-mentioned attorneys deem necessary. Please attach a copy of your military ID card.
Signature: ______________________
As Attorney Orly Taitz is performing this service for her country Pro Bono, any amount that you can contribute will be most helpful. Please, attach your picture in the uniform, a short bio and a letter to fellow citizens and elected officials
[See attached consent form copied directly from the official Orly Taitz web site at http://defendourfreedoms.org/ATTENTIONALLMILITARYPERSONNEL.htm ]
On February 23, 2009, this story broke via World Net Daily with the following headline:
Soldier doubts eligibility, defies president’s orders ‘As an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this’
The story included the following text:
“As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States,” wrote Scott Easterling in a “to-whom-it-may-concern” letter. Obama “has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility,” Easterling wrote. “In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so.”
Taitz told WND she had advised Easterling to obtain legal counsel before making any statements regarding the commander-in-chief, but he insisted on moving forward. His contention is that as an active member of the U.S. military, he is required to follow orders from a sitting president, and he needs – on pain of court-martial – to know that Obama is eligible.
Taitz said other legal cases questioning Obama’s eligibility filed by members of the military mostly have included retired officers, and courts several times have ruled they don’t have standing to issue their challenge.
Easterling, however, is subject to enemy fire and certainly would have a reason to need to know the legitimacy of his orders, she argued.
“Until Mr. Obama releases a ‘vault copy’ of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office – an impostor,” his statement said.
Later in the article Easterling requests that other military get involved:
“I implore all service-members and citizens to contact their senators and representatives and demand that they require Mr. Obama prove his eligibility. Our Constitution and our great nation must not be allowed to be disgraced,” he wrote.
Taitz said Easterling is among the plaintiffs she is assembling for a new legal action over Obama’s eligibility. Others include a list of state lawmakers who also would be required in their official position to follow orders of the president.
“My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz’s lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me to do this, but as an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this action,” he said.
Easterling was “saluted” in a forum on Taitz’ website.
“Lt. Easterling, As a retired US Army SFC, I salute you sir as a true American patriot and hero! Thank you for your unselfish service to our country. It is rare to find someone today with such moral courage to do the right thing regardless of repercussions,” said one contributor.
The false headline was also republished to the Drudge Report that same day.
After reading the article, it appeared that, despite the sensational headline, Easterling had not defied any Presidential order. I complained in my blog to World Net Daily and to Orly Taitz about the punitive danger they had put this soldier in. Of course, the greater danger existed that other military might believe the headline and be influenced to defy orders as well.
By the next morning, the headline had been altered to read:
Soldier questions eligibility, doubts president’s authority ‘As an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this’
( http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89837 )
Neither World Net Daily nor Orly Taitz have ever officially addressed, or apologized for, the false headline published to millions of readers via bold faced caption at the Drudge Report which lasted for approximately twenty-four hours.
Yesterday, I was informed that the latest edition of The Globe Newspaper contains the following headline on the front page next to a picture of Officer Easterling holding a rifle:
“OBAMA MUTINY!
G.I. in Iraq rejects prez as Commander - In - Chief
Lawyer:Hundreds of troops set to follow”
http://www.globemagazine.com
The story includes gatefold coverage including the various statements made by Officer Easterling. I was also quoted in the article to the effect that these statements and the law suit they represent are wrong, dangerous and unnecessary.
I have received numerous letters from active military - and/or the parents of soldiers - expressing gratitude for making this issue public and explaining the laws involved
The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 88, makes it an offense - punishable by up to one year in prison - to use “contemptuous language” against the President. Other UCMJ provisions, along with various federal statutes, provide a plethora of charges under which persons may be convicted of corrupting the morale of the military and encouraging sedition or insubordination. It’s alarming to consider our military, who take their Constitutional oath seriously, could suffer such disease in the relationship of command. This is exactly what will happen as more join the Taitz law suit or others like it and similar news reports are released.
The viral effect this publicity will have has the potential to destroy the chain of command if allowed to fester without resolve. And this brings me to why I’m writing to you, US Attorney Taylor.
I feel a sense of responsibility since an application for emergency stay I brought against the the New Jersey Secretary of State, Donofrio v. Wells, SCOTUS Docket # 08A407 - with regard to her failure to verify the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama - was the first eligibility suit that went all the way to full conference of the United States Supreme Court after having been referred to the full court by the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
I also feel responsible since back in late January of this year, I published a blog concerning “standing” to challenge Presidential eligibility wherein I suggested active military might hypothetically have standing as citizens but without breaking orders as soldiers. Immediately after publishing this hypothetical discussion, I received messages from military personnel requesting I remove the blog. They forwarded various statutory authority such as applicable provisions of the UCMJ which convinced me that our active military should not be involved in the eligibility issue at all. I subsequently removed the blog post and have continued to strongly discourage active military participation in any eligibility law suits. Recently, I have received messages from various active military asking my opinion, and I have consistently told them to refrain from joining any of these law suits.
I am sure you are aware of the numerous law suits which challenged President Obama as to whether he was a natural born citizen of the United States. Other than my case, a few of those law suits also made it to conference before all nine justice of the United States Supreme Court.
Donofrio v Wells was featured on MSNBC, ABC, CNN, AP, The Washington Times and various other main stream media. It was the publicity of this case and the others which grabbed the attention of soldiers like Officer Easterling since the issues were never decided on the merits as each case was rejected on grounds of standing, or, as to SCOTUS, simply denied full review with no comment.
As long as the issues are left open to wreak havoc, there is no way to foresee or contain the myriad of damage now pending before the nation. The Officer Easterling saga is certainly alarming considering Barack Obama has only held the office of President for less than two months.
The core legal issue of my case against the New Jersey Secretary of State concerned the fact that President Obama’s father was a native of Kenya - but a citizen of Great Britain via the British Nationality Act of 1948 - at the time of President Obama’s birth. Obama Sr. never became - or applied to be - a US citizen. President Obama, at his web site “Fightthesmears.com” admits his birth status was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948.
The legal question I asked the court to decide was whether a person governed by the laws of Great Britain at the time of their birth could be considered a natural “born” citizen of the United States as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of our Constitution. The question remains unanswered in any United States court.
Most of the other cases which worked their way through various state and federal courts concerned whether Barack Obama was actually born in Hawaii. At his web site, Obama posted a photocopy of a Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii and had it verified by a private website called “factcheck.org”. This was his response to all parties requesting proof he was actually born in Hawaii. The audacity of this stunt generated a rush of litigation to have Obama’s credentials verified. Of course, while there is no Constitutional requirement for a birth certificate to be tendered, ordinary people could not understand why Obama was fighting so hard to prevent anyone from seeing his genuine documents apparently on file in Hawaii. It was this attitude of defiance which stimulated citizens across the nation - who are required to present an original birth certificate to any number of Government agencies - to institute litigation challenging Obama’s eligibility.
I do not write to you today to convince you that President Obama is not eligible to the office of President.
I write to convince you that having his title to office cleared of all doubt is in the best interest of the nation at large and specifically the military chain of command. Since you are the main law enforcement officer charged with enforcing the District of Columbia Code, and since you are listed in 16-3502 as one of only two people who may institute a proceeding - upon their own motion - in quo warranto to investigate any United States public office holder’s qualifications if the office concerned is within the District of Columbia. I respectfully request that you bring such an action before the District Court for the District of Columbia as soon as possible.
The Code provides - at 16-3544 - for a jury trial. I respectfully submit that this is the best possible way to settle the fact issue as to whether Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. As to the legal issue of whether he is a natural born citizen, even if born in Hawaii, the Judicial branch has been charged with the power to interpret exactly what those words mean.
I have done extensive research on the quo warranto statute and all possible Constitutional issues which may arise from its use as to a sitting President. The Congressional enactment of the DC Code’s quo warranto statute reflects the authority of Congress as the only branch which may remove the President. I have published the research at my blog.
The URL for my blog is:
http:naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com . (See Quo Warranto Legal Brief, parts 1-3).
The most important aspect of this research, as it may affect your decision to act, comes from the seminal US Supreme Court decision that interpreted the District of Columbia quo warranto statute, Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 at 546 (1915) wherein the court stated:
“The District Code… permits those proceedings to be instituted by the Attorney General of the United States and by the attorney for the District of Columbia. By virtue of their position, they, at their discretion and acting under the sense of official responsibility, can institute such proceedings in any case they deem proper.”
Please sir, nothing could be more proper for the benefit of the nation than having this issue settled. Under 16 - 3502, only the “United States attorney” and/or the “US Attorney General” have the authority, without requesting leave of the court, to institute this action. Under the holding in Newman, it requires no belief on your part that President Obama is actually ineligible. The US Supreme Court holding in Newman only requires that you “deem it proper” out of a “sense of official responsibility”.
In order to put an end to the bottomless pit of pending litigation, whether in direct attacks by quo warranto, or via collateral attacks - based on eligibility of office challenges - as described and allowed by the DC Court of Appeals decision in Andrade v. Lauer, 729 F.2d 1475, 234 U.S.App.D.C. 384 (1984), quo warranto appears both proper and necessary.
The nation and the military cannot have the chain of command subject to the rot of insubordination by multiple plaintiffs on a case by case basis each challenging specific orders as they arise. The floodgate of litigation will flow too heavily for certain containment.
However, the issue could be settled in one single quo warranto proceeding brought in the proper court by the proper officials. I strongly urge you and Attorney General Holder to act. I am forwarding to Attorney General Holder this same letter.
TWO IMPORTANT ISSUES
I offer the following two points regarding the natural born citizen legal issue to prove that there is convincing evidence, by way of authority and precedent, for citizens to be concerned that the Constitution has been circumvented by Obama’s holding office regardless of whether he was born in the United States. I do not expect to sway you to act on the basis of these points. I simply hope that you will see that, despite media attempts to paint all questions as to Obama’s eligibility as conspiracy theories, the core issue is not a conspiracy theory. It is a question of legal interpretation never decided by any court of law.
Prior to Obama’s taking office, no post grandfather clause President or Vice President had ever openly held office after having been born subject to the jurisdiction of another nation’s laws. The following two points are an introduction to the great body of authority which touches the issue, but they are by no means exhaustive.
POINT I: Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirmed the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House of Representatives on March 9, 1866:
[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]
The 14th Amendment was interpreted by Justice Horace Gray for the holding of the US Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 101-102(1884), as follows:
“The persons declared to be citizens are “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other…Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States…although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more “born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government…” (Emphasis added.)
Fourteen years later, Justice Horace Gray did a complete about face on this issue in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) although the holding in the Elk case was not reversed. Regardless, the direct holding in Wong Kim Ark was restricted to the children of foreign parents permanently domiciled in the United States. Barack Obama Sr. was never permanently domiciled in the United States. I urge you to read both decisions in light of the following recent historical discovery.
POINT II: The recent historical revelation that Chester Arthur was a usurper to the office of President.
Chester Arthur faced an identical scandal as Barack Obama when Arthur ran for Vice President. It was alleged he had been born in Canada or Ireland and that he was a British subject at birth and therefore wasn’t eligible to be President. Recently, my research team discovered, via the official New York State naturalization record of Chester Arthur’s father - available at the Library of Congress - that his father did not become a naturalized citizen until 14 years after Chester Arthur was born. So, at the time of his birth, Chester Arthur was a British subject due to his father’s heritage and failure to be naturalized before Chester Arthur was born even though history has proved Chester Arthur was actually born in Vermont.
Our research also proved that Chester Arthur actively concealed this fact by blatantly lying about his parental heritage in various interviews with the Brooklyn Eagle newspaper at the time he was running for VP. (See articles at my blog.)
This is an important revelation because it establishes that Barack Obama is the first President in our national history who - at the time of his birth - was openly subject to and governed by the laws of another nation. The issue which needs to be heard in court is whether such a person’s citizenship will be considered “natural born” for the rest of our nation’s history.
Allowing this issue to avoid judicial interpretation will forever raise questions to President Obama’s title to office, and it will set a precedent that two generations of citizenship (and loyalty) are no longer required before one can become President and Commander in Chief.
It’s important to note that Justice Horace Gray was appointed by Chester Arthur and Gray’s mysterious and complete about face from Elk to Wong Kim Ark must be re-examined in the light of revelations concerning Chester Arthur’s secret since Wong Kim Ark appears to sanitize, for history, the illegitimacy of Chester Arthur as President, the man who appointed Justice Horace Gray to the United States Supreme Court.
Regardless, I must reiterate that I am not writing to convince you to take a position as to whether President Obama is actually eligible for the office of President. I am writing to beg that you bring an action in quo warranto so that the issue will be resolved once and for all which must be in the best interest of the nation.
Very Truly Yours,
Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.
PO Box 6231, East Brunswick NJ 08816
[The above letter is being sent via certified mail and e mail to Jeffrey Taylor, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. The same letter will also be sent to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.]
Open Letter To United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor from Leo C. Donofrio, Esq
March 15, 2009
United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
United States Attorney’s Office
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Mr. Taylor,
I am writing to make you aware of a brewing danger to members of our active military who have been influenced to join law suits challenging the eligibility of President Barack Obama as Commander In Chief. I hope you will deem it proper to take appropriate action to protect our military and the nation from further damage.
Recently, 1st Lt. Scott R. Easterling, currently serving in Iraq, agreed to be a plaintiff in a pending law suit being brought on behalf of several active and retired military persons by California attorney, Orly Taitz. Easterling agreed to sign a consent form for participation in this action. Beside asking for a publicity photograph and donations, the consent form requests a signature below the following language:
Attn. Orly Taitz, Esq.
26302 La Paz, Ste. 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
I agree to be a plaintiff in the legal action to be filed by Orly Taitz, Esq. in a PETITION FOR A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT whether Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia and possibly still citizen of Kenya, aka BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT of the U.S or TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the U.S. ARMED FORCES, in that I am or was a sworn member of the U.S. military (subject to recall) and I could conceivably be given unlawful orders by a Constitutionally unqualified Commander In Chief, and by following such orders I can be subject to court martial. I further understand that additional arguments may be inserted into this lawsuit at the above-mentioned attorneys deem necessary. Please attach a copy of your military ID card.
Signature: ______________________
As Attorney Orly Taitz is performing this service for her country Pro Bono, any amount that you can contribute will be most helpful. Please, attach your picture in the uniform, a short bio and a letter to fellow citizens and elected officials
[See attached consent form copied directly from the official Orly Taitz web site at http://defendourfreedoms.org/ATTENTIONALLMILITARYPERSONNEL.htm ]
On February 23, 2009, this story broke via World Net Daily with the following headline:
Soldier doubts eligibility, defies president’s orders ‘As an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this’
The story included the following text:
“As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States,” wrote Scott Easterling in a “to-whom-it-may-concern” letter. Obama “has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility,” Easterling wrote. “In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so.”
Taitz told WND she had advised Easterling to obtain legal counsel before making any statements regarding the commander-in-chief, but he insisted on moving forward. His contention is that as an active member of the U.S. military, he is required to follow orders from a sitting president, and he needs – on pain of court-martial – to know that Obama is eligible.
Taitz said other legal cases questioning Obama’s eligibility filed by members of the military mostly have included retired officers, and courts several times have ruled they don’t have standing to issue their challenge.
Easterling, however, is subject to enemy fire and certainly would have a reason to need to know the legitimacy of his orders, she argued.
“Until Mr. Obama releases a ‘vault copy’ of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office – an impostor,” his statement said.
Later in the article Easterling requests that other military get involved:
“I implore all service-members and citizens to contact their senators and representatives and demand that they require Mr. Obama prove his eligibility. Our Constitution and our great nation must not be allowed to be disgraced,” he wrote.
Taitz said Easterling is among the plaintiffs she is assembling for a new legal action over Obama’s eligibility. Others include a list of state lawmakers who also would be required in their official position to follow orders of the president.
“My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz’s lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me to do this, but as an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this action,” he said.
Easterling was “saluted” in a forum on Taitz’ website.
“Lt. Easterling, As a retired US Army SFC, I salute you sir as a true American patriot and hero! Thank you for your unselfish service to our country. It is rare to find someone today with such moral courage to do the right thing regardless of repercussions,” said one contributor.
The false headline was also republished to the Drudge Report that same day.
After reading the article, it appeared that, despite the sensational headline, Easterling had not defied any Presidential order. I complained in my blog to World Net Daily and to Orly Taitz about the punitive danger they had put this soldier in. Of course, the greater danger existed that other military might believe the headline and be influenced to defy orders as well.
By the next morning, the headline had been altered to read:
Soldier questions eligibility, doubts president’s authority ‘As an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this’
( http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89837 )
Neither World Net Daily nor Orly Taitz have ever officially addressed, or apologized for, the false headline published to millions of readers via bold faced caption at the Drudge Report which lasted for approximately twenty-four hours.
Yesterday, I was informed that the latest edition of The Globe Newspaper contains the following headline on the front page next to a picture of Officer Easterling holding a rifle:
“OBAMA MUTINY!
G.I. in Iraq rejects prez as Commander - In - Chief
Lawyer:Hundreds of troops set to follow”
http://www.globemagazine.com
The story includes gatefold coverage including the various statements made by Officer Easterling. I was also quoted in the article to the effect that these statements and the law suit they represent are wrong, dangerous and unnecessary.
I have received numerous letters from active military - and/or the parents of soldiers - expressing gratitude for making this issue public and explaining the laws involved
The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 88, makes it an offense - punishable by up to one year in prison - to use “contemptuous language” against the President. Other UCMJ provisions, along with various federal statutes, provide a plethora of charges under which persons may be convicted of corrupting the morale of the military and encouraging sedition or insubordination. It’s alarming to consider our military, who take their Constitutional oath seriously, could suffer such disease in the relationship of command. This is exactly what will happen as more join the Taitz law suit or others like it and similar news reports are released.
The viral effect this publicity will have has the potential to destroy the chain of command if allowed to fester without resolve. And this brings me to why I’m writing to you, US Attorney Taylor.
I feel a sense of responsibility since an application for emergency stay I brought against the the New Jersey Secretary of State, Donofrio v. Wells, SCOTUS Docket # 08A407 - with regard to her failure to verify the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama - was the first eligibility suit that went all the way to full conference of the United States Supreme Court after having been referred to the full court by the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
I also feel responsible since back in late January of this year, I published a blog concerning “standing” to challenge Presidential eligibility wherein I suggested active military might hypothetically have standing as citizens but without breaking orders as soldiers. Immediately after publishing this hypothetical discussion, I received messages from military personnel requesting I remove the blog. They forwarded various statutory authority such as applicable provisions of the UCMJ which convinced me that our active military should not be involved in the eligibility issue at all. I subsequently removed the blog post and have continued to strongly discourage active military participation in any eligibility law suits. Recently, I have received messages from various active military asking my opinion, and I have consistently told them to refrain from joining any of these law suits.
I am sure you are aware of the numerous law suits which challenged President Obama as to whether he was a natural born citizen of the United States. Other than my case, a few of those law suits also made it to conference before all nine justice of the United States Supreme Court.
Donofrio v Wells was featured on MSNBC, ABC, CNN, AP, The Washington Times and various other main stream media. It was the publicity of this case and the others which grabbed the attention of soldiers like Officer Easterling since the issues were never decided on the merits as each case was rejected on grounds of standing, or, as to SCOTUS, simply denied full review with no comment.
As long as the issues are left open to wreak havoc, there is no way to foresee or contain the myriad of damage now pending before the nation. The Officer Easterling saga is certainly alarming considering Barack Obama has only held the office of President for less than two months.
The core legal issue of my case against the New Jersey Secretary of State concerned the fact that President Obama’s father was a native of Kenya - but a citizen of Great Britain via the British Nationality Act of 1948 - at the time of President Obama’s birth. Obama Sr. never became - or applied to be - a US citizen. President Obama, at his web site “Fightthesmears.com” admits his birth status was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948.
The legal question I asked the court to decide was whether a person governed by the laws of Great Britain at the time of their birth could be considered a natural “born” citizen of the United States as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of our Constitution. The question remains unanswered in any United States court.
Most of the other cases which worked their way through various state and federal courts concerned whether Barack Obama was actually born in Hawaii. At his web site, Obama posted a photocopy of a Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii and had it verified by a private website called “factcheck.org”. This was his response to all parties requesting proof he was actually born in Hawaii. The audacity of this stunt generated a rush of litigation to have Obama’s credentials verified. Of course, while there is no Constitutional requirement for a birth certificate to be tendered, ordinary people could not understand why Obama was fighting so hard to prevent anyone from seeing his genuine documents apparently on file in Hawaii. It was this attitude of defiance which stimulated citizens across the nation - who are required to present an original birth certificate to any number of Government agencies - to institute litigation challenging Obama’s eligibility.
I do not write to you today to convince you that President Obama is not eligible to the office of President.
I write to convince you that having his title to office cleared of all doubt is in the best interest of the nation at large and specifically the military chain of command. Since you are the main law enforcement officer charged with enforcing the District of Columbia Code, and since you are listed in 16-3502 as one of only two people who may institute a proceeding - upon their own motion - in quo warranto to investigate any United States public office holder’s qualifications if the office concerned is within the District of Columbia. I respectfully request that you bring such an action before the District Court for the District of Columbia as soon as possible.
The Code provides - at 16-3544 - for a jury trial. I respectfully submit that this is the best possible way to settle the fact issue as to whether Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. As to the legal issue of whether he is a natural born citizen, even if born in Hawaii, the Judicial branch has been charged with the power to interpret exactly what those words mean.
I have done extensive research on the quo warranto statute and all possible Constitutional issues which may arise from its use as to a sitting President. The Congressional enactment of the DC Code’s quo warranto statute reflects the authority of Congress as the only branch which may remove the President. I have published the research at my blog.
The URL for my blog is:
http:naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com . (See Quo Warranto Legal Brief, parts 1-3).
The most important aspect of this research, as it may affect your decision to act, comes from the seminal US Supreme Court decision that interpreted the District of Columbia quo warranto statute, Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 at 546 (1915) wherein the court stated:
“The District Code… permits those proceedings to be instituted by the Attorney General of the United States and by the attorney for the District of Columbia. By virtue of their position, they, at their discretion and acting under the sense of official responsibility, can institute such proceedings in any case they deem proper.”
Please sir, nothing could be more proper for the benefit of the nation than having this issue settled. Under 16 - 3502, only the “United States attorney” and/or the “US Attorney General” have the authority, without requesting leave of the court, to institute this action. Under the holding in Newman, it requires no belief on your part that President Obama is actually ineligible. The US Supreme Court holding in Newman only requires that you “deem it proper” out of a “sense of official responsibility”.
In order to put an end to the bottomless pit of pending litigation, whether in direct attacks by quo warranto, or via collateral attacks - based on eligibility of office challenges - as described and allowed by the DC Court of Appeals decision in Andrade v. Lauer, 729 F.2d 1475, 234 U.S.App.D.C. 384 (1984), quo warranto appears both proper and necessary.
The nation and the military cannot have the chain of command subject to the rot of insubordination by multiple plaintiffs on a case by case basis each challenging specific orders as they arise. The floodgate of litigation will flow too heavily for certain containment.
However, the issue could be settled in one single quo warranto proceeding brought in the proper court by the proper officials. I strongly urge you and Attorney General Holder to act. I am forwarding to Attorney General Holder this same letter.
TWO IMPORTANT ISSUES
I offer the following two points regarding the natural born citizen legal issue to prove that there is convincing evidence, by way of authority and precedent, for citizens to be concerned that the Constitution has been circumvented by Obama’s holding office regardless of whether he was born in the United States. I do not expect to sway you to act on the basis of these points. I simply hope that you will see that, despite media attempts to paint all questions as to Obama’s eligibility as conspiracy theories, the core issue is not a conspiracy theory. It is a question of legal interpretation never decided by any court of law.
Prior to Obama’s taking office, no post grandfather clause President or Vice President had ever openly held office after having been born subject to the jurisdiction of another nation’s laws. The following two points are an introduction to the great body of authority which touches the issue, but they are by no means exhaustive.
POINT I: Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirmed the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House of Representatives on March 9, 1866:
[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]
The 14th Amendment was interpreted by Justice Horace Gray for the holding of the US Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 101-102(1884), as follows:
“The persons declared to be citizens are “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other…Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States…although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more “born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government…” (Emphasis added.)
Fourteen years later, Justice Horace Gray did a complete about face on this issue in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) although the holding in the Elk case was not reversed. Regardless, the direct holding in Wong Kim Ark was restricted to the children of foreign parents permanently domiciled in the United States. Barack Obama Sr. was never permanently domiciled in the United States. I urge you to read both decisions in light of the following recent historical discovery.
POINT II: The recent historical revelation that Chester Arthur was a usurper to the office of President.
Chester Arthur faced an identical scandal as Barack Obama when Arthur ran for Vice President. It was alleged he had been born in Canada or Ireland and that he was a British subject at birth and therefore wasn’t eligible to be President. Recently, my research team discovered, via the official New York State naturalization record of Chester Arthur’s father - available at the Library of Congress - that his father did not become a naturalized citizen until 14 years after Chester Arthur was born. So, at the time of his birth, Chester Arthur was a British subject due to his father’s heritage and failure to be naturalized before Chester Arthur was born even though history has proved Chester Arthur was actually born in Vermont.
Our research also proved that Chester Arthur actively concealed this fact by blatantly lying about his parental heritage in various interviews with the Brooklyn Eagle newspaper at the time he was running for VP. (See articles at my blog.)
This is an important revelation because it establishes that Barack Obama is the first President in our national history who - at the time of his birth - was openly subject to and governed by the laws of another nation. The issue which needs to be heard in court is whether such a person’s citizenship will be considered “natural born” for the rest of our nation’s history.
Allowing this issue to avoid judicial interpretation will forever raise questions to President Obama’s title to office, and it will set a precedent that two generations of citizenship (and loyalty) are no longer required before one can become President and Commander in Chief.
It’s important to note that Justice Horace Gray was appointed by Chester Arthur and Gray’s mysterious and complete about face from Elk to Wong Kim Ark must be re-examined in the light of revelations concerning Chester Arthur’s secret since Wong Kim Ark appears to sanitize, for history, the illegitimacy of Chester Arthur as President, the man who appointed Justice Horace Gray to the United States Supreme Court.
Regardless, I must reiterate that I am not writing to convince you to take a position as to whether President Obama is actually eligible for the office of President. I am writing to beg that you bring an action in quo warranto so that the issue will be resolved once and for all which must be in the best interest of the nation.
Very Truly Yours,
Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.
PO Box 6231, East Brunswick NJ 08816
[The above letter is being sent via certified mail and e mail to Jeffrey Taylor, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. The same letter will also be sent to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.]
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Justice Roberts Agreed to read Dr Orly Taitz documents
Leo I believe can expose the fraud obama. I also believe Dr Orly Taitz can also expose obama as a fraud. 3 people at this time have the power to expose the FRAUD obama in a court of law. (1)Chief Justice Roberts (2) US attorney Jeffrey Taylor (3) Us attorney General Eric Holder.
.......................................................................................
(Dr Orly Taitz)(3/13/2009)
Yesterday I traveled to Idaho. I was able to address Chief Justice Roberts during the question answer session after his lecture. There were numerous cameras recording this event and simultaneous feed broadcast to all the campuses of the University of Idaho. Roughly 5,000 people in all the campuses had an opportunity to hear what I had to say, it is in video archives and now everybody knows the truth and knows that leftist media thugs such as Seattle Washington Observer shamelessly twist the truth to fit their Pro Obama blind idiot agenda.
It was a grueling day, I left home at 3 in the morning after sleeping only 3 hours and drove to San Diego, from there flew to Salt Lake City, from there to Tacoma, Washington, from there I drove for a couple of hours to be in Moscow Idaho, to address Chief Justice Roberts. After the lecture the audience was told, that they can ask questions, give their name and present a shot question. I was the first to run to the microphone and told Roberts. " My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney from Southern California. I left home at three o'clock in the morning and flew and drove thousands of miles to talk to you and ask you a question". Roberts seemed to be impressed by that and I continued. "Are you aware that there is criminal activity going on in the Supreme Court of the United States. I have submitted my case Lightfoot v Bowen to you. You agreed to hear it in the conference of all 9 Justices on January 23. Your clerk, Danny Bickle, on his own accord refused to forward to you an important supplemental brief, he has hidden it from you and refused to post it on the docket. Additionally, my case was erased from the docket, completely erased one day after the inauguration, only two days before it was supposed to be heard in the conference. Outraged citizens had to call and demand for it to be posted. On Monday I saw Justice Scalia and he had absolutely no knowledge of my case, that was supposedly heard in conference on January 23rd. It is inexplicable, particularly knowing that roughly half a million American citizens have written to him and to you Justice Roberts demanding that you hear this issue of eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro to be the President of the United States." At that point I have shown to Roberts a stack of papers, that I held. Those were my pleadings and printouts that I got from WorldNetDaily. It contained your names, names of about 350,000 that signed the petition. (there were others that have written individual letters,) . Roberts stated "I will read your documents, I will review them. Give them to my Secret Service Agent and I will review them". His Secret Service Agent approached me and stated " Give me all the documents, I promise you Justice Roberts will get them". I had a full suitcase of documents. The agent went to look for a box, he found a large box to fit all the documents, he showed me his badge, and introduced himself as Gilbert Shaw, secret Service Agent assigned fto the security of Chief Justice Roberts.
I gave him
1.Motion fo reconsideration of Lightfoot v Bowen with all the supplemental briefs.
2. Quo Warranto Easterling et al v Obama et al
3. 3300 pages of your names, people that signed WorldNetDaily petition, demanding that the Supreme Court hear Obama elligibility case. (StoryReports is on the list)
4. Copy of a 164 page dossier and all the other documents sent to Eric Holder, Attorney General, describing suspected criminal activity, associated with Obama and his supporters. It described a whole campaign of cyber crimes, intimidation, harassment, defamation and assassination of character, impersonation of US army officer Scott Easterling and impersonation of me, it showed screen shots of information being erased from the docket of the Supreme Court, it contained information of court cases being created, fabricated in order to commit voter fraud and sway public opinion, it contained a list of a 100 addresses for Barack Obama with numerous different social security numbers, issued all over the country and attached to those addresses. It showed the address Obama used in Somerville Massachusetts, attached to the social security of a man who is 118 years old. It showed evidence of Obama committing perjury, lying under oath. It had his school registration from Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia, religion Muslim. Right after this page there was a page of Obama's registration to become an attorney and officer of the court in Illinois, where he stated under oath that his name is Barack Hussein Obama and he had no other prior names. It contained a report from a federal agent Steven Coffman, stating that there are numerous signs of forgery in his Selective Service Certificate. It contained a letter from a renown expert Sandra Line, stating that there are signs of forgery in Obama's short version Certification of Live Birth, and original birth certificate needs to be reviewed in order to ascertain his status. It contained 130 current job positions for Barry Obama, Barack H. Obama and Michelle Obama, that were obtained from Intellius Jobs.com. None of them were reported on Obamas' tax returns. All of these documents suggest possible massive tax fraud, corruption of a public official, bribery and massive campaign contributions fraud, whereby large campaign contributions, over allowed limits were reported as fictitious positions with different companies, not surprisingly involving most mainstream media outlets. These need to be reviewed in light of a pattern, I've seen previously. For example, as a State Senator Obama arranged for his friend Robert Blackwell from killerspin to get a grant of $320,000 of our taxpayers money for his ping-pong tournaments. In exchange Blackwell gave Obama back roughly a third, $100,000 in the form of a salary. Similarly Obama arranged for Chicago university hospital to get 1 million grant of our taxpayer money and they gave him back roughly a third $357,000 in the form of a board salary for his wife Michelle for working 20 hours a week, even though Michelle was totally worthless as a board member since she had zero medical education and her law licence is on a mandatory inactive status (I wonder why).
I am writing this in a hurry, ready to leave my hotel room, finishing yesterday's dinner leftovers and ready to board a plane for a grueling flight back home. I'll add one more detail. As one of the announcers introduced Roberts, he stated that Roberts has his priorities straight. He described an event when Roberts missed most of a reception because he wanted to be there for his young son, at the sports tournament where his son was participating. He described Roberts as a caring and loving father. At that point I was just about ready to cry. I have 3 sons, I love them too and I would love to be there, attending their events. I am a proud parent. My oldest son scored in top one percent in the Nation in PSATs and he is in an IVY league school studying to be a doctor. He is also a gifted comedian, who formed a stand up comedy improve group and I would love to see him perform. My wo younger sons are great students. My middle son has a beautiful low bass Elvis Presley voice, he sings opera and I would love to hear him perform. My youngest son is a top student taking 5AP classes in tenth grade, gifted mathematician and basketball player, I would love to see him get academic awards and play basketball. I missed time with my children, time that will never come back because a am criss crossing this country talking to Justices of the Supreme court, Representatives, Senators, FBI agents, Attorney Generals, US attorneys, telling all of them, what is wrong with you? Did some evil magician put a spell on the men in this country and they stopped being men? Why are you afraid to speak up, to stand up for you constitution? Why are you afraid to tell this arrogant jerk from Africa and Indonesia- You need to go home, you cannot be a president and commander in chief because you are not a Natural born Citizen. To be a Natural born Citizen you have to have both parents as citizens. Your father was never a US citizen and you don't qualify and you also spit us in the face by refusing to unseal your vital records. There is no proof that you are even a citizen. For all we know, you need to go back to Kenya and wait for your green card, and that after we try you for all the crimes perpetrated upon American citizens. I hope Justice Roberts teaches his son that he is a descendant of people that were real men and fought in Alamo and at Valley Forge. Chief Justice Roberts has a right to issue a stay and appoint Joe Biden a president pro-tempore until Obama proves his qualifications or until a new president is chosen. I hope Roberts teaches his son by example and not by empty words.
Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God
Philippians 4:6 4:7
4:6 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God.
4:7 And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.
Don't worry about anything. The solution to undue anxiety is prayer in everything, "in any manner of life" to be free of anxiety be prayful about everything.
Philippians 4:6 4:7
GODS WORD (King James Version)
4:6 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God.
4:7 And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.
Don't worry about anything. The solution to undue anxiety is prayer in everything, "in any manner of life" to be free of anxiety be prayful about everything.
Philippians 4:6 4:7
GODS WORD (King James Version)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
