Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty
On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel College in St. Paul, MN in which he issued a dire warning regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty which is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009. This is a 4-minute video of his concluding remarks.
See his entire 95-minute speech in which he utterly destroys the so-called ’science’ behind global warming.
Sign a petition opposing cap-and-trade.
.........................................................................................
A collaborator cooperates treasonably with the enemy
An enemy is something destructive or injurious in its effects
Who collaborates with someone who is destructive or injurious to America. A collaborator.
Who is destructive or injurious to America.
The enemy within.
Who is the enemy within? (Barack Hussein Obama) The IMPOSTER
.........................................................................................
The United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 goal is 1-world government. Obama, the imposter, will sign the treaty. A world government is going to be created. Obama will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. Global warming hysteria is an ideological position of the political Left advanced in the interest of imposing global taxes on the United States in the pursuit of international control of the U.S. economy under a one-world government to be administered by the U.N.
.........................................................................................
'Global warming' to be used as 'pretext' for 'change'. (This is the change we don't need) Obama is the change we don't need. He along with the DNC and congress will force it on America. Obama is a TRAITOR and an IMPOSTER who will not verify his own birth record.
.........................................................................................
"Your president will sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because they think they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it," "I read that treaty and what it says is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word 'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. Monkton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
"The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to Third World countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, 'climate debt' – because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't. We've been screwing up the climate and they haven't. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government is enforcement."
........................................................................................
In an hour and a half lecture illustrated by slides featuring scientific data on a wide range of climate issues, Monkton refuted claims made by former Vice President Al Gore in his movie and book entitled "An Inconvenient Truth," as well as scientific arguments made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Monckton argued that President Obama will sign the Copenhagen treaty at the December meeting, without seeking a two-thirds ratification of the treaty by the Senate, or any other type of Congressional approval.
"So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free," he continued. "But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever.
"But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with the climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it."
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Obama's righteous wind quotes mao
.........................................................................................
Obama's 'righeous wind' 'at our backs' smells like a garbage dump. Obama has spread his 'righeous wind' in the face of America in the form of lies and deception. Bo has spoke of America as if it was another country not worthy of existing. Obama is a traitor and imposter.
.........................................................................................
Obama's "righteous wind" quotes Mao
fm. robboyce.com blog:
Obama:
I feel like we got a 'RIGHEOUS WIND' at our backs here, but we’re going to have to work. We’re going to have to struggle. We’re going to have to fight
From the writings of Chairman Mao:
The ill wind of opportunism is falling, the 'RIGHEOUS WIND' of socialism is on the rise.
By the end of this year the victory of socialism will be greatly assured. Naturally there will be many struggles ahead and we must struggle hard.
In November of 2008, I verified that this quotation was documented on the page to which it links. You may notice that this has since been "scrubbed" from it's online site. Here is one of many of Obama's "righteous wind" references, in his home-stretch speeches, oft delivered before the general election.
Friday, October 16, 2009
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty
On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel College in St. Paul, MN in which he issued a dire warning regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty which is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009. This is a 4-minute video of his concluding remarks.
.......................................................................................
........................................................................................
See his entire 95-minute speech in which he utterly destroys the so-called ’science’ behind global warming.
........................................................................................
Sign a petition opposing cap-and-trade.
........................................................................................
Global Climate SCAM
On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel College in St. Paul, MN in which he issued a dire warning regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty which is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009. This is a 4-minute video of his concluding remarks.
.......................................................................................
........................................................................................
See his entire 95-minute speech in which he utterly destroys the so-called ’science’ behind global warming.
........................................................................................
Sign a petition opposing cap-and-trade.
........................................................................................
Global Climate SCAM
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Dark Days For US Because Of The IMPOSTER Obama
Hawaii Long Form Original Example Certificate Of Live Birth. It CAN BE VERIFIED because it contains, doctor name, hospital, residence of father and mother, and the signatures of certification, Parent or Informant signature, Doctor or Attendant, and date accepted by Local Registrar. A Certificate Of Live Birth CAN BE VERIFIED. A "Certification Of Live Birth", CANNOT. Obama wants you to believe he was born in Hawaii with no verification. Obama has offered proof that CAN'T BE VERIFIED. Obama's "Certification Of Live Birth" redacted document was DOA and still is. Obama is an IMPOSTER and a FRAUD. I HAVE JUST PROVED IT!
Hawaii Obama Short Form redacted "birth certification" is not the same as a "certificate of live birth". It has 27 less birth questions displayed. Because of this obama's 'certification of live birth' CANNOT BE VERIFIED IN ANY WAY. No hospital name. No doctor name. No signatures of Parent or Informant Item (18a), Doctor or Attendant Item (19a), or Date accepted by Local Registrar Item (21). Obama wants you to believe he was born in Hawaii. Obama has offered proof that CAN'T BE VERIFIED. This document was DOA and still is.
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
The problem with obama's 'certification of live birth' is NOTHING ABOUT IT CAN BE VERIFIED!
........................................................................................
(6C) Name of Hospital or Institution, If not in hospital or institution, give street address.
This is critical information that obama will not reveal. Why? Where was obama born? According to Hawaii law he could have been born out of the country and Hawaii would still have issued a birth certificate. So this is crucial information that would reveal if obama was born in Hawaii or not.
* In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
*( This means obama could have been born in Kenya or anywhere else)
**This also is possible scenario for obama. Obama could have requested a certificate of live birth HIMSELF years later. Any ADULT could have requested a colb also. It just says ADULT. It doesn't say relative. So Hillary Clinton or ANY adult could have requested and been issued a colb for obama if the Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii was satisfied.
**If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
***Any ADULT could, upon testimony, file a "Delayed Certificate", of which an endorsement, item (23) would be required on the LONG-FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH which obama rufuses to produce. A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the ACCCEPTANCE for delayed filing. This EVIDENCE must be kept in a SPECIAL PERMANENT FILE. Also a judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence must determine if the evidence is valid. Who if anyone reviewd obama's evidence? Who determined it was valid if he or someone filed for a 'delayed certificate'?
***In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an adult could, upon testimony, file a “Delayed Certificate”, which required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
****(6C) Name of Hospital or Institution is only on the 'certificate of live birth' long form original. This is not indicated on the 'certification of live birth' obama says is his evidence he was born in Hawaii. Because obama has not provided valid proof of where he was actually 'born' it is just more evidence of deception. No hospital or address where obama was born but on the original colb. But as I have indicated above, ANY adult could have asked for a certificate of live birth from Hawaii and if only 1 offical determined it was valid documentation for a delayed colb it would have been issued indicating obama was born in Hawaii. So the CRITICAL information. if it exists, is in a "a special permanent file". THIS IS THE INFORMATION THAT MUST BE REVEALED TO EXPOSE THE IMPOSTER OBAMA. Also if the a 'special permanent file' contains information on a rejection by Hawaii of the delayed colb documentation. A disagreement letter or file. This MUST BE REVEALED ALSO TO EXPOSE THE IMPOSTER OBAMA.
*****(18a) Certification of information, Parent or other informant. Only the 'certificate of live birth will reveal this signature. Who's signature is on obama's original colb? Maybe his own? It could be ANY adult. Anybody.
******(19b) Certification of attendant, a doctor, midwife or "witch doctor". Again only the 'certificate of live birth' will reveal this signature also. Who "birthed" obama? This is the REAL "BIRTHER". Who is this 'birther'? Only the "birthers" know who attended obama's birth.
*******(20) Date ACCEPTED BY LOCAL REGISTRAR. The long form original 'certificate of live birth' indicates this information. What is his or her name?
********(22) Date accepted by Reg. General. This is just another indication the original colb has been accepted. What is the date on obama's original colb?
*********(23) Evidence of delayed filing or alteration. This is the mother of all questions obama will not reveal. What does his original 'certificate of live birth' reveal?
Has his original colb been altered or filed on a delayed basis. WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?
Obama's 'certification of live birth' does not indicate this information therfore the colb obama posted on the web CANNOT BE VERIFIED IN ANY WAY. It is an empty document to match his empty suit.
*********(3,4) Does obama have a twin? This would indicate he has a brother or sister not yet revealed to the public. A possibility because the public has not seen obama's original long form colb. If he does is he/she still alive? Who is he/she? (This would only be a bombshell if obama's long form indicated this and obama assumed the 'others' identity.)
Otherwise it isn't important. :) (A little birther humor here.) Down the "rabbid hole on that idea".
Who is Eligible to Apply for an Amended Certificate of Birth?
As provided by law (HRS §§338-17.7, 338-20.5), the following persons may apply for an amended certificate of birth:
* A person born in the State of Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health and
1. has become legally adopted, or
2. has undergone a sex change operation, or
3. a legal determination of the nonexistence of a parent and child relationship for a person identified as a parent on the birth certificate on file has been made, or
4. previously recorded information in relation to the person’s surname and/or the father’s personal particulars has been altered pursuant to law.
* A person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii.
.........................................................................................
Summary: 4 pieces of critical information to determine who obama really is:
(1) original certificate of live birth, not a certification of live birth. Because item (23) would indicate if the colb was a delayed colb. This information cannot be acertained from the limited information on the 'certification of live birth' obama has published on the web.
(2) The 'special permanent file' information, if it exists.
(3) The name of the hospital or address where obama was actually born. This is only indicated on the long form 'certificate of live birth'. But remember this information is only as good as the documentation contained in the 'special permanent file', if it exists.
(4) The information indicating obama's 'legal parents' had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child. If this happened. Evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The documentation provided to Hawaii is all important. It doesn't matter who submitted it obama or "ANY ADULT". Any certificate of live birth issued by Hawaii is only as good as the documentation backing it up. If the documentation is FLAWED obama's colb is flaed and not VALID. This means obama is a FRAUD or IMPOSTER. No one including obama has proven who he is or where he was born up to this point.
( IT IS AMAZING TO ME OBAMA COULD HAVE BEEN BORN OUT OF THE US AND STILL HAWAII WOULD ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH.) Therefore if this has occurred the original colb must be made public to assertain what path obama or ANY ADULT has taken to prove he is a US citizen. Obama's online certification of live birth does not prove obama had a father or mother or where he was born or when. Because it has NOT BEEN VALIDATED. It will only be valided when we the American people are allowed to know what files Hawaii maintains concerning the birth of obama. Until Hawaii reveals critical HIDDEN records of who obama is no one in the world can validate obama's online colb.
Its not simple. Its similar to what clinton said, when he said, "it depends on what is, is." Is obama a US citizen? Is obama a natural born citizen?
...........................................................................................
Is you is or is you ain't a natural born US citizen.
Is you is or is you ain't my baby?
The way you're actin' lately makes me doubt
Yous is still my baby-baby
...........................................................................................
Hawaii Birth Certificates – Overview.
..........................................................................................
1. In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were three different birth certificates that were obtainable:
a. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
b. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an adult could, upon testimony, file a “Delayed Certificate”, which required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
c. If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
2. In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
..........................................................................................
Every now and then I hear "spin" covering up the IMPOSTER obama. Today George bush sr said his son and obama have endured "attacks". Is any valid point an "attack"? No. It is just a word to use for DISTRACTION from the facts or the truth. It also can be lies told about someone also. When I state obama an IMPOSTER is is not an "attack". It is a FACT because obama cannot and will not VERIFY his birth documents. I have explained why the "certification of live birth" is not a validation of who his is, who his parents are or where he was born. It is in fact an empty document because it has not been VALIDATED by anyone. Any "verbal statement" validation is just as empty as providing no documentation validate. Just because an "offical from Hawaii" said she has "seen the original records maintained on file" means nothing. Until America validates obama he will be a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
Could anybody tell me Why obama will not release his original vital records? There is only one reason. He is a FRAUD. A fraud hides behind the cover of illusion. Obama's illusion is his "certification of live birth", it can't be verified without seeing the "original vital records maintained on file" in Hawaii.
..........................................................................................
Hawaii Obama Short Form redacted "birth certification" is not the same as a "certificate of live birth". It has 27 less birth questions displayed. Because of this obama's 'certification of live birth' CANNOT BE VERIFIED IN ANY WAY. No hospital name. No doctor name. No signatures of Parent or Informant Item (18a), Doctor or Attendant Item (19a), or Date accepted by Local Registrar Item (21). Obama wants you to believe he was born in Hawaii. Obama has offered proof that CAN'T BE VERIFIED. This document was DOA and still is.
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
The problem with obama's 'certification of live birth' is NOTHING ABOUT IT CAN BE VERIFIED!
........................................................................................
(6C) Name of Hospital or Institution, If not in hospital or institution, give street address.
This is critical information that obama will not reveal. Why? Where was obama born? According to Hawaii law he could have been born out of the country and Hawaii would still have issued a birth certificate. So this is crucial information that would reveal if obama was born in Hawaii or not.
* In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
*( This means obama could have been born in Kenya or anywhere else)
**This also is possible scenario for obama. Obama could have requested a certificate of live birth HIMSELF years later. Any ADULT could have requested a colb also. It just says ADULT. It doesn't say relative. So Hillary Clinton or ANY adult could have requested and been issued a colb for obama if the Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii was satisfied.
**If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
***Any ADULT could, upon testimony, file a "Delayed Certificate", of which an endorsement, item (23) would be required on the LONG-FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH which obama rufuses to produce. A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the ACCCEPTANCE for delayed filing. This EVIDENCE must be kept in a SPECIAL PERMANENT FILE. Also a judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence must determine if the evidence is valid. Who if anyone reviewd obama's evidence? Who determined it was valid if he or someone filed for a 'delayed certificate'?
***In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an adult could, upon testimony, file a “Delayed Certificate”, which required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
****(6C) Name of Hospital or Institution is only on the 'certificate of live birth' long form original. This is not indicated on the 'certification of live birth' obama says is his evidence he was born in Hawaii. Because obama has not provided valid proof of where he was actually 'born' it is just more evidence of deception. No hospital or address where obama was born but on the original colb. But as I have indicated above, ANY adult could have asked for a certificate of live birth from Hawaii and if only 1 offical determined it was valid documentation for a delayed colb it would have been issued indicating obama was born in Hawaii. So the CRITICAL information. if it exists, is in a "a special permanent file". THIS IS THE INFORMATION THAT MUST BE REVEALED TO EXPOSE THE IMPOSTER OBAMA. Also if the a 'special permanent file' contains information on a rejection by Hawaii of the delayed colb documentation. A disagreement letter or file. This MUST BE REVEALED ALSO TO EXPOSE THE IMPOSTER OBAMA.
*****(18a) Certification of information, Parent or other informant. Only the 'certificate of live birth will reveal this signature. Who's signature is on obama's original colb? Maybe his own? It could be ANY adult. Anybody.
******(19b) Certification of attendant, a doctor, midwife or "witch doctor". Again only the 'certificate of live birth' will reveal this signature also. Who "birthed" obama? This is the REAL "BIRTHER". Who is this 'birther'? Only the "birthers" know who attended obama's birth.
*******(20) Date ACCEPTED BY LOCAL REGISTRAR. The long form original 'certificate of live birth' indicates this information. What is his or her name?
********(22) Date accepted by Reg. General. This is just another indication the original colb has been accepted. What is the date on obama's original colb?
*********(23) Evidence of delayed filing or alteration. This is the mother of all questions obama will not reveal. What does his original 'certificate of live birth' reveal?
Has his original colb been altered or filed on a delayed basis. WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?
Obama's 'certification of live birth' does not indicate this information therfore the colb obama posted on the web CANNOT BE VERIFIED IN ANY WAY. It is an empty document to match his empty suit.
*********(3,4) Does obama have a twin? This would indicate he has a brother or sister not yet revealed to the public. A possibility because the public has not seen obama's original long form colb. If he does is he/she still alive? Who is he/she? (This would only be a bombshell if obama's long form indicated this and obama assumed the 'others' identity.)
Otherwise it isn't important. :) (A little birther humor here.) Down the "rabbid hole on that idea".
Who is Eligible to Apply for an Amended Certificate of Birth?
As provided by law (HRS §§338-17.7, 338-20.5), the following persons may apply for an amended certificate of birth:
* A person born in the State of Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health and
1. has become legally adopted, or
2. has undergone a sex change operation, or
3. a legal determination of the nonexistence of a parent and child relationship for a person identified as a parent on the birth certificate on file has been made, or
4. previously recorded information in relation to the person’s surname and/or the father’s personal particulars has been altered pursuant to law.
* A person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii.
.........................................................................................
Summary: 4 pieces of critical information to determine who obama really is:
(1) original certificate of live birth, not a certification of live birth. Because item (23) would indicate if the colb was a delayed colb. This information cannot be acertained from the limited information on the 'certification of live birth' obama has published on the web.
(2) The 'special permanent file' information, if it exists.
(3) The name of the hospital or address where obama was actually born. This is only indicated on the long form 'certificate of live birth'. But remember this information is only as good as the documentation contained in the 'special permanent file', if it exists.
(4) The information indicating obama's 'legal parents' had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child. If this happened. Evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The documentation provided to Hawaii is all important. It doesn't matter who submitted it obama or "ANY ADULT". Any certificate of live birth issued by Hawaii is only as good as the documentation backing it up. If the documentation is FLAWED obama's colb is flaed and not VALID. This means obama is a FRAUD or IMPOSTER. No one including obama has proven who he is or where he was born up to this point.
( IT IS AMAZING TO ME OBAMA COULD HAVE BEEN BORN OUT OF THE US AND STILL HAWAII WOULD ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH.) Therefore if this has occurred the original colb must be made public to assertain what path obama or ANY ADULT has taken to prove he is a US citizen. Obama's online certification of live birth does not prove obama had a father or mother or where he was born or when. Because it has NOT BEEN VALIDATED. It will only be valided when we the American people are allowed to know what files Hawaii maintains concerning the birth of obama. Until Hawaii reveals critical HIDDEN records of who obama is no one in the world can validate obama's online colb.
Its not simple. Its similar to what clinton said, when he said, "it depends on what is, is." Is obama a US citizen? Is obama a natural born citizen?
...........................................................................................
Is you is or is you ain't a natural born US citizen.
Is you is or is you ain't my baby?
The way you're actin' lately makes me doubt
Yous is still my baby-baby
...........................................................................................
Hawaii Birth Certificates – Overview.
..........................................................................................
1. In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were three different birth certificates that were obtainable:
a. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
b. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an adult could, upon testimony, file a “Delayed Certificate”, which required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
c. If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
2. In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
..........................................................................................
Every now and then I hear "spin" covering up the IMPOSTER obama. Today George bush sr said his son and obama have endured "attacks". Is any valid point an "attack"? No. It is just a word to use for DISTRACTION from the facts or the truth. It also can be lies told about someone also. When I state obama an IMPOSTER is is not an "attack". It is a FACT because obama cannot and will not VERIFY his birth documents. I have explained why the "certification of live birth" is not a validation of who his is, who his parents are or where he was born. It is in fact an empty document because it has not been VALIDATED by anyone. Any "verbal statement" validation is just as empty as providing no documentation validate. Just because an "offical from Hawaii" said she has "seen the original records maintained on file" means nothing. Until America validates obama he will be a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
Could anybody tell me Why obama will not release his original vital records? There is only one reason. He is a FRAUD. A fraud hides behind the cover of illusion. Obama's illusion is his "certification of live birth", it can't be verified without seeing the "original vital records maintained on file" in Hawaii.
..........................................................................................
Obama is An Imposter Promoted By The DNC
Congress has relied on what, to certify obama under the Constitution? Not the US Constitution because it clearly states to be president you must be a natrual born citizen. Many people don't take the time to find out who a natural born citizen is. If you take the time to research it you will find obama is not a natural born citizen. He even said so when he proclaimed his father was a Kenyan citizen and he was also until age 21. That statement is still on the fightthesmears.com web site. An admission of FRAUD!
Its in you face evidence by the imposter himself he is not a natural born citizen therefore is not qualified under the US Constitution. Congress ignored this fact. All the states relied on the DNC to certify he was qualified under the US Constitution. The DNC lied about obama. I challenge anyone to prove the DNC evidence obama is a natural born citizen. I callenge anyone in Congress to prove this also. I challenge all the US states to prove obama is a natural born citizen. No one can prove this fact. No one.
Obama was never "vetted by anybody but the DNC. All the US states relied on the DNC to certify obama as qualified to be president under the US Constitution. Only one state recieved assurance of this. It was Hawaii. The DNC nomination document contained different language in it. Also the DNC will no release any information on how they certified obama. They only say he was check out by a non profit organization and they are covered by the freedom of information act. So the DNC will not reveal how they certified obama as qualified. Why? Its because obama is not qualified to be president. If he was the DNC would release all the information proving he is. Obama would release his original form COB if he had nothing to hide also. Its real simple. America has been conned by an IMPOSTER.
Here is the startling admission
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”
..........................................................................................
It doesn't matter if his Kenyan citizenship expired in 1982. He allready had an allengiance to the United Kingdom.
..........................................................................................
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children:
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
(A dual citizen with dual allengiances. This is what the US Constitution prohibits. This fact was ignored by congress and the state run media.) This means obama is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.
The deception of obama's Kenyan citizenship expiring at age 21 which is true conceals the fact it doesn't matter if it expired at age 21. What does matter is the FACT obama was a DUAL CITIZEN AT BIRTH. A citizen of the United Kingdom and the US. This FACT means he IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This is the deception of fightthesmears and factcheck obama web sites. Obama is a master of only explaining part of the story. Obama will only tell you part of the facts. Obama has also done this with his colb. He fails to reveal his colb from Hawaii posted on the web was an amended copy of his original colb that has NEVER BEEN "ACCEPTER BY THE REGISTRAR". His colb only states "filed by registrar". Hawaii has not accepted his documents explaining why he wanted his original colb amended. This means the colb on the web is totally BOGUS. Again obama has only offered an explaination of part of his birth story.
Just enough truth to cover the LIE that he is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This means he is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER. The US congress and the American public relied on his colb for proof he is a citizen. The US Congress just IGNORED the FACT he ADMITTED he was a DUAL CITIZEN at birth which automatically means he was NOT a natural born citizen at birth as required by the US Constitution. Not only did obama commit FRAUD but so has all the 50 STATE DNC officials that certified obama was conforming to the requirement in the Constitution.
Fraud has occurred because in 2008 although the certification language was only on the DNC certification sent to hawaii, it had the same signatures exactly as what the DNC sent to the individual states minus any certification language concerning the US Constitution. In other words the DNC just added a few lines for Hawaii and kept the same signatures as the DNC certification of nomination. Two DIFFERENT documents but the SAME EXACT signatures. That means one of them was forged. The DNC has committed FRAUD!
DNC has 2 different documents but the same signatures.
Under the laws in every state, once elections officials receive the Official Certification of Nomination, the name of the nominee for POTUS from the major political party is AUTOMATICALLY entitled to appear on the state’s general election ballot except HAWAII. In HAWAII, just identifying the name of the nominee does not guarantee his name will be placed on the ballot. In order to get Barack Obama's name on the ballot in HAWAII only, the DNC also had to swear he was Constitutionally eligible for the job. The DNC swore obama was legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the US Constitution. This was TREASON and FRAUD. The DNC could only have relied on the colb obama posted online. It indicates his father was Barack Obama Sr. Barack Obama Sr was a CITIZEN of KENYA when OBAMA JR was born. Because BOTH parents must be US citizens at obama's birth, naturalized or native, obama IS NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Obama is NOT legally qualified to serve under the US Constitution. TREASON and FRAUD have occurred certifying obama by the NATIONAL DNC and ALL STATE DNC PARTIES!
.........................................................................................
What can any US concerned citizen do to help expose this fraud? You and I can file an election fraud complaint against the following people in each state. Howard Dean, former chair, dnc services corporation, and Joseph E. Sandler, former general counsel; chair person of DNC in each state, DNC treasurer in each state; Nancy Pelosi, acting in a non-governmental role as chair, 2008 DNC convention and Alice Germond, ssecretary DNC convention.
.........................................................................................
Use this example election fraud complaint letter below as a "template" to file election fraud complaints in all states against the DNC national and DNC local parties who have committed TREASON and FRAUD. Post your election complaints on scribd.com to document it to help others expose the IMPOSTER obama.
.........................................................................................
jbjdscmodelelectionfraudcomplaintag
Its in you face evidence by the imposter himself he is not a natural born citizen therefore is not qualified under the US Constitution. Congress ignored this fact. All the states relied on the DNC to certify he was qualified under the US Constitution. The DNC lied about obama. I challenge anyone to prove the DNC evidence obama is a natural born citizen. I callenge anyone in Congress to prove this also. I challenge all the US states to prove obama is a natural born citizen. No one can prove this fact. No one.
Obama was never "vetted by anybody but the DNC. All the US states relied on the DNC to certify obama as qualified to be president under the US Constitution. Only one state recieved assurance of this. It was Hawaii. The DNC nomination document contained different language in it. Also the DNC will no release any information on how they certified obama. They only say he was check out by a non profit organization and they are covered by the freedom of information act. So the DNC will not reveal how they certified obama as qualified. Why? Its because obama is not qualified to be president. If he was the DNC would release all the information proving he is. Obama would release his original form COB if he had nothing to hide also. Its real simple. America has been conned by an IMPOSTER.
Here is the startling admission
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”
..........................................................................................
It doesn't matter if his Kenyan citizenship expired in 1982. He allready had an allengiance to the United Kingdom.
..........................................................................................
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children:
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
(A dual citizen with dual allengiances. This is what the US Constitution prohibits. This fact was ignored by congress and the state run media.) This means obama is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.
The deception of obama's Kenyan citizenship expiring at age 21 which is true conceals the fact it doesn't matter if it expired at age 21. What does matter is the FACT obama was a DUAL CITIZEN AT BIRTH. A citizen of the United Kingdom and the US. This FACT means he IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This is the deception of fightthesmears and factcheck obama web sites. Obama is a master of only explaining part of the story. Obama will only tell you part of the facts. Obama has also done this with his colb. He fails to reveal his colb from Hawaii posted on the web was an amended copy of his original colb that has NEVER BEEN "ACCEPTER BY THE REGISTRAR". His colb only states "filed by registrar". Hawaii has not accepted his documents explaining why he wanted his original colb amended. This means the colb on the web is totally BOGUS. Again obama has only offered an explaination of part of his birth story.
Just enough truth to cover the LIE that he is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This means he is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER. The US congress and the American public relied on his colb for proof he is a citizen. The US Congress just IGNORED the FACT he ADMITTED he was a DUAL CITIZEN at birth which automatically means he was NOT a natural born citizen at birth as required by the US Constitution. Not only did obama commit FRAUD but so has all the 50 STATE DNC officials that certified obama was conforming to the requirement in the Constitution.
Fraud has occurred because in 2008 although the certification language was only on the DNC certification sent to hawaii, it had the same signatures exactly as what the DNC sent to the individual states minus any certification language concerning the US Constitution. In other words the DNC just added a few lines for Hawaii and kept the same signatures as the DNC certification of nomination. Two DIFFERENT documents but the SAME EXACT signatures. That means one of them was forged. The DNC has committed FRAUD!
DNC has 2 different documents but the same signatures.
Under the laws in every state, once elections officials receive the Official Certification of Nomination, the name of the nominee for POTUS from the major political party is AUTOMATICALLY entitled to appear on the state’s general election ballot except HAWAII. In HAWAII, just identifying the name of the nominee does not guarantee his name will be placed on the ballot. In order to get Barack Obama's name on the ballot in HAWAII only, the DNC also had to swear he was Constitutionally eligible for the job. The DNC swore obama was legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the US Constitution. This was TREASON and FRAUD. The DNC could only have relied on the colb obama posted online. It indicates his father was Barack Obama Sr. Barack Obama Sr was a CITIZEN of KENYA when OBAMA JR was born. Because BOTH parents must be US citizens at obama's birth, naturalized or native, obama IS NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Obama is NOT legally qualified to serve under the US Constitution. TREASON and FRAUD have occurred certifying obama by the NATIONAL DNC and ALL STATE DNC PARTIES!
.........................................................................................
What can any US concerned citizen do to help expose this fraud? You and I can file an election fraud complaint against the following people in each state. Howard Dean, former chair, dnc services corporation, and Joseph E. Sandler, former general counsel; chair person of DNC in each state, DNC treasurer in each state; Nancy Pelosi, acting in a non-governmental role as chair, 2008 DNC convention and Alice Germond, ssecretary DNC convention.
.........................................................................................
Use this example election fraud complaint letter below as a "template" to file election fraud complaints in all states against the DNC national and DNC local parties who have committed TREASON and FRAUD. Post your election complaints on scribd.com to document it to help others expose the IMPOSTER obama.
.........................................................................................
jbjdscmodelelectionfraudcomplaintag
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
2000 and 2004 Democrat and Republican Party HI Certifications
2000 and 2004 Democrat and Republican Party HI Certifications
Your Fellow Citizen
...........................................................................................
In 2000, there is "constitutionally eligible" language, but that language is in a different typeface than the rest of the document.
In 2004, there is NO "constitutionally eligible" language on the Cert.
As we know, the 2008 Cert does contain "constitutionally eligible" language, but it's significantly different than the language that was on the 2000 Cert.
I also have 2000, 2004, and 2008 Certs from the Democratic Party of HI
The 2000 state Cert contains the "constitutionally eligible" language.
The 2004 state Cert ALSO contains "constitutionally eligible" language, BUT
The 2008 state Cert DOES NOT contain "constitutionally eligible" language, instead saying "...the following candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus...".
Again, in 2000, both the national and the state Certs contained the proper language. In 2004, the proper language gets dropped from the national Cert, but remains on the state Cert. Then, in 2008, the proper language reappears on the national Cert only, but on the state Cert, which had been correct up to that point, the language is removed and replaced with a nearly indecipherable statement.
WHY?
Fraud has occurred because in 2008 although the certification language was only on the DNC certification sent to hawaii, it had the same signatures exactly as what the DNC sent to the individual states minus any certification language concerning the US Constitution. In other words the DNC just added a few lines for Hawaii and kept the same signatures as the DNC certification of nomination. Two DIFFERENT documents but the SAME EXACT signatures. That means one of them was forged. The DNC has committed FRAUD!
Proof the DNC has 2 different documents but the same signatures.
Hawaii 2000 and 2004 Certs (Rep and Dem)
Your Fellow Citizen
...........................................................................................
In 2000, there is "constitutionally eligible" language, but that language is in a different typeface than the rest of the document.
In 2004, there is NO "constitutionally eligible" language on the Cert.
As we know, the 2008 Cert does contain "constitutionally eligible" language, but it's significantly different than the language that was on the 2000 Cert.
I also have 2000, 2004, and 2008 Certs from the Democratic Party of HI
The 2000 state Cert contains the "constitutionally eligible" language.
The 2004 state Cert ALSO contains "constitutionally eligible" language, BUT
The 2008 state Cert DOES NOT contain "constitutionally eligible" language, instead saying "...the following candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus...".
Again, in 2000, both the national and the state Certs contained the proper language. In 2004, the proper language gets dropped from the national Cert, but remains on the state Cert. Then, in 2008, the proper language reappears on the national Cert only, but on the state Cert, which had been correct up to that point, the language is removed and replaced with a nearly indecipherable statement.
WHY?
Fraud has occurred because in 2008 although the certification language was only on the DNC certification sent to hawaii, it had the same signatures exactly as what the DNC sent to the individual states minus any certification language concerning the US Constitution. In other words the DNC just added a few lines for Hawaii and kept the same signatures as the DNC certification of nomination. Two DIFFERENT documents but the SAME EXACT signatures. That means one of them was forged. The DNC has committed FRAUD!
Proof the DNC has 2 different documents but the same signatures.
Hawaii 2000 and 2004 Certs (Rep and Dem)
Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes
America is in perial. If obama is not exposed soon as an imposter he and his communist/fascist comrades will enslave free Americans.
The smoke and mirrors have cleared. This is no longer a partisan issue, partisan issues are reserved for constitutional governments, which we do not have. There is only those who understand the peril we are in, and those who do not, and we are all Americans.
..........................................................................................
October 14, 10:23 AM Portland Civil Rights Examiner Dianna Cotter
The latest legal turn out of Hawaii leaves very little wiggle room for the state.
On July 27th 2009 The Hawaii Department of Health in a press release declared that Barack Obama was a Natural Born Citizen.
Researcher Justin Riggs on July 29th was informed by email that Hawaii Attorney General Mark Bennett reviewed and approved the Statement released by DoH Director Fukino.
Attorney Leo Donofrio has been investigating the irregularities in the State of Hawaii at his blog Natural Born Citizen and has published a copy of the emails between Riggs and the Attorney General's office:
From: Justin Riggs [email address redacted]
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:03 PM
To: …janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov, [redacted other recipient]
…Ms. Okubo,
I am currently a masters degree candidate at …
The reason that I am contacting your organizations is that you are, as far as I can tell from my research, the only two groups that have openly stated that President Obama is a natural born citizen (one of the Article II, Section I qualifications for being President). I would like to document how you came to that conclusion: i.e. what the criteria is for your organization, what evidence the candidate provides, etc.
I thank you for your time, and look forward to receiving a response in the near future.
Sincerely,
Justin W. Riggs
Janice Okubo responded later that day:
From: Okubo, Janice S..
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:20 PM
To: Justin Riggs [email address redacted]…
Aloha Justin,
The statement was reviewed and approved by our Attorney General Mark Bennett. I am unable to provide further comment.
Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health…
According to law, the State of Hawaii must now disclose how it came to the decision that is found in Director Fukino’s July 27th Press Release that was approved by the State’s Attorney General. Haw. Rev. Stat. 28-4 states very clearly that formal opinions of the Attorney General must be made public. Further, the Hawaiian Office of Information Practices in 1991 formally set out the requirements that informal opinions of the AG must also be made available for public inspection. According to Donofrio, under the Uniform Rules of Evidence (Rule 510): “when the conclusions of an informal Attorney General opinion are made public by the agency/client, then the accompanying record of that opinion must also be disclosed to the public:”
The State of Hawaii declared that Obama was a Natural Born Citizen and that this disclosure was approved by the Attorney General of the State. The State of Hawaii must now release any and all communications and documentation that led it to making this determination. Because Janice Okubo on July 29th revealed that the decision was approved by the State’s Attorney General, and the state made its Natural Born Citizen statement, the state is now required by law to disclose how it reached that conclusion. As Donofrio explains, there can be no secret law. The State of Hawaii cannot simply make a statement with legal weight, and then when asked to provide how it reached that decision, simply say: ‘You just have to trust us on that’. They must release any and all information that led them to make their public declarations.
On October 5th, Donofrio wrote to the office of the Attorney General, contacting Jill Nagamine:
Subject: Request for AG Opinion letter
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009 8:34 PM
From:”Leo Donofrio” [email redacted]
To: Jill.T.Nagamine@hawaii.gov
Dear Ms. Nagamine,
The following request for Government records is made pursuant to the UIPA.
I request a copy (or access to a copy) of the Attorney General Opinion Letter the Attorney General provided to Department of Health Director Fukino which reviewed and approved her July 27, 2009 statement/press release about President Barack Obama wherein it was stated that he is a “natural-born American citizen.”
I request the opinion letter referenced above whether it was prepared as a formal Opinion Letter under Haw. Rev. Stat. 28-3 (and/or any other authority) or as an informal letter if prepared under Haw. Rev. Stat. 28-4 (and/or any other authority).
Please have your response conform to the OIP administrative rules.
A few hours later he received the following response:
Subject: Re Request for Ag Opinion letter
From: “Jill.T.Nagamine@hawaii.gov”
To: “Leo Donofrio” [email redacted]
Dear Mr. Donofrio:
No formal (emphasis added) attorney general opinion was generated relating to the July 27, 2009 public statement made by Chiyome L. Fukino, M.D. Any other legal advice rendered to our clients is privileged communication. We have nothing to release based on your request.
Very truly yours,
Jill T. Nagamine
Deputy Attorney General
State of Hawaii
The response is disingenuous in the extreme. First, Mr. Donofrio asked for all formal and informal communications. Under the law, the state has to release this information once any part of the resulting decisions are publically released, which happened on July 27th with Director Fukino’s Press Release, and again on July 29th When Janice Okubo informed Mr. Riggs that the Attorney General approved the statement. Second, Ms Nagamine’s response states that the informal communications are attorney client privilege, where none exists.
According to OIP Opinion letter 91-23, the conclusions of an informal Attorney General opinion made public by the agency or client (The Department of Health) the accompanying record of that opinion must be made public.
A client cannot voluntarily and selectively disclose those portions of a communication between the client and the client’s attorney without forfeiting the right to keep other portions of the communication on the same subject matter privileged.
The privilege may be said to be waived when the client relinquishes its protection. The waiver of this privilege follows as a consequence from any conduct by the client that would make it unfair for the client thereafter to assert the privilege. See generally, Marcus, The Perils of Privilege: Waiver and the Litigator, 84 Mich. L. Rev. 1065 (1986)
Similarly, under Rule 510 of the Uniform Rules of Evidence, the holder of a privilege waives it if the privilege holder consents to the disclosure of “any significant part of the privileged matter.”
The response of Ms Nagamine is very clearly not addressing the informal communications between Director Fukino and the Attorney General. By law, the public has the right to see any communications between these two parties once the client, in this case the Department of Health, publically releases the conclusions reached through those communications.
Donofrio is currently filing an appeal with the OIP, and the Judiciary as well. Because of the nature of the law involved, Donofrio will get that judicial review in an expedited manner.
The State of Hawaii will soon be forced to reveal the information it used to declare Barack Obama a Natural Born citizen. This will be very interesting, considering Obama’s Father was a British Citizen. therefore Barack Obama Jr is also a British Citizen, and was at birth by the very nature of his parentage.
Barack Obama, by legal definitions going back to the 1600’s is not, was not, and never has been a Natural Born Citizen. It does not matter where Barack Obama was born; he was a dual American/British/Kenyan citizen. He could have been born on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C. itself, and it would not matter. The basic fact of Barack Obama’s parentage remains the same. A Dual Citizen cannot ever be a Natural Born Citizen.
There is absolutely no doubt.
There is an Usurper in the White House, and his name is Barack Obama. He and those who aided him in this usurpation, including the DNC are guilty of Treason to the United States. Every law that has been passed, every treaty signed, every order issued to the military has zero legal weight.
This leads to a singularly terrifying reality that must be dealt with. The United States does not have a constitutional government.
This is the reason the Democrats in Congress are pushing things through as fast as they possibly can, without reading and in the case of the Senate even writing the legislation they are voting on. Once it becomes public knowledge what the Democrats and the DNC have done in their fraud upon America with Barack Obama, they will not be able to get anything done. Rightly so.
This is a scandal and cover-up 100 times the size of Watergate. This time, it won’t be just a President resigning in disgrace, it will also be the DNC Leadership who will be under the criminal investigation microscope for the cover-up, and it is a scrutiny they cannot withstand.
This is the reason Barack Obama is doing everything he can to keep people focused on the irrelevant issue of his birth certificate. He would rather people be thinking about where he was born rather than the citizenship that was conferred upon him by his British father.
The smoke and mirrors have cleared. This is no longer a partisan issue, partisan issues are reserved for constitutional governments, which we do not have. There is only those who understand the peril we are in, and those who do not, and we are all Americans.
How to Open a Coconut
How to Open a Coconut
20,000 fine for Taitz acting like she is on obama's defense team
So you've got a coconut, and you're dying to get at it. Opening up the shell can be quite a challenge unless you know the trick to it.
........................................................................................
........................................................................................
It is clear the "shell" would never be cracked by Orly Taitz. Leo Donofrio can "crack" the shell as can TerryK. They know where to find the "seam".
Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes.
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
Orly Taitz has been slapped with a five-figure fine for “wasting the judicial resources” of the Middle District of Georgia, where she’d filed one of her numerous lawsuits demanding that President Obama prove his citizenship before deploying soldiers to Iraq and Afghanistan. The judgment, which calls Taitz’s case and tactics “delusional”:
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
I said a few weeks ago that something was wrong with Taitz. Something is very strange here. It would seem Orly Taitz is is acting incompetent. It was just a matter of time before Taiyz would be sanctioned for her misconduct. She acted incompetent. Although most of her other documentation on the FRAUD obama is solid. Because of this she playes into the hands of the FRAUD obama. Orly did not use the solid facts she had, instead she filed
documents improperly. (Story Reports)
..........................................................................................
Mission Viejo lawyer Orly Taitz filed the document, which claimed to be a registration of Obama’s birth. The filing was part of a complaint Taitz has in Santa Ana federal court - filed on behalf of Alan Keyes, Buena Park Pastor Wiley Drake and others - alleging that Obama is not U.S. born and should be removed from office.
Judge Nakazato 's comment in his "Order Striking Filed Documents from the Record" reads thusly:
WHEREAS, the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reason(s)
Lacks proper notice (L.R. 6-1, 7-4); improper form and format (L.R. 11-3.3, 11-3.6); Counsel failed to identify her Cal. State Bar No. (L.R. 11-3.8(a)); description of motion conflicts or differs from that which counsel entered on Court's e-docket
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the documents shall be striken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court....
Taitz filed documents improperly. Really STUPID.
.........................................................................................
The courts seem to be in obama's 'court' anyway. Taiz had the ball but could not move it passed the 20 yard line. I don't think she wanted to. I do think she was and is a spoiler acting to be there first with the worst. Because of her "incompetence" act she has succeeded in effect covering up for obama.
.........................................................................................
Counsel Orly Taitz is hereby ordered to pay $20,000.00 to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of the date of this Order as a sanction for her misconduct in violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Judge Clay Land makes the toughest statement about Taitz’s antics here:
The Court finds that counsel’s conduct was willful and not merely negligent. It demonstrates bad faith on her part. As an attorney, she is deemed to have known better. She owed a duty to follow the rules and to respect the Court. Counsel’s pattern of conduct conclusively establishes that she did not mistakenly violate a provision of law. She knowingly violated Rule 11. Her response to the Court’s show cause order is breathtaking in its arrogance and borders on delusional. She expresses no contrition or regret regarding her misconduct. To the contrary, she continues her baseless attacks on the Court.
And here’s the time line of Taitz’s appearance in court:
Counsel’s frivolous and sanctionable conduct wasted the Defendants’ time and valuable judicial resources that could have been devoted to legitimate cases pending with the Court. When she filed the Rhodes case, counsel indicated that it was urgent that the matter be heard because her client was facing imminent deployment. The Court rearranged its schedule, took time to read the legal papers, and conducted preliminary research in preparation for the hearing. The Army had to activate its legal team on short notice, sending a Major from the Army Litigation Division in Washington, D.C. and a Captain from the CONUS Replacement Center at Ft. Benning. In addition, the Assistant U.S. Attorney had to accompany them. Like the Court, the government attorneys had to prepare in an expedited manner for the hearing. During the week preceding Captain Rhodes’s deployment, the Court was in the midst of a jury trial. Therefore, the Court had to alter the trial schedule to conduct the hearing during an extended lunch break, thus affecting other counsel and jurors. The Clerk’s Office was burdened by Ms. Taitz’s inability to follow the Court’s rules regarding pro hac vice admission and the Court’s rules for electronic filing. On five separate occasions in a short period, the Clerk’s Office personnel error-noticed counsel for her failure to follow simple rules. At the hearing, counsel failed to make coherent legal arguments but instead wasted the Court’s time with press conference sound bites and speeches.
.........................................................................................
Judge Smacks Down Orly Taitz For Abusing Court
.........................................................................................
Gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.28.0
.........................................................................................
Strange isn't it.
Obama is a loser
One that fails consistently, especially a person with poor skills. Obama is a loser. A loser at defending America. A purposeful loser. A COMMUNIST. A FRAUD. An IMPOSTER. A COWARD. A LIAR.
Obama's First Six Months' Accomplishments
1. Offended the Queen of England.
2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.
3. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega.
4. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek.
5. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia.
6. Sided with Hugo Chavez and Communist Fidel Castro against Honduras.
7. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions while they're building their nuclear weapons.
8. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions.
9. Expanded the bailouts.
10. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian.
11. Doubled our national debt.
12. Announced the termination of our new missile defense system the day after North Korea launched an ICBM.
13. Released information on U.S. intelligence gathering despite urgings of his own CIA director and the prior four CIA
directors.
14. Accepted without comment that five of his cabinet members cheated on their taxes and two other nominees
withdrew after they couldn't take the heat.
15. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who identified military veterans and abortion opponents as "dangers to
the nation."
16. Ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used and instead refers to such acts as "man made disasters."
17. Circled the globe to publicly apologize for America's world leadership.
18. Told the Mexican president that the violence in their country was because of us.
19. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from the Department of Commerce.
20. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the forced removal and expulsion to Cuba of a 9-year-
old whose mother died trying to bring him to freedom in the United States.
21. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three terrorists who threatened one American life and the
next day announces members of the Bush administration may stand trial for "torturing" three 9/11 terrorists by
pouring water up their noses.
22. Low altitude photo shoot of Air Force One over New York City that frightened thousands of New Yorkers.
23. Sent his National Defense Advisor to Europe to assure them that the US will no longer treat Israel in a special
manner and they might be on their own with the Muslims..
24. Praised Jimmy Carter's trip to Gaza where he sided with terrorist Hamas against Israel.
25. Nationalized General Motors and Chrysler while turning shareholder control over to the unions and freezing out
retired investors who owned their bonds. Committed unlimited taxpayer billions in the process.
26. Passed a huge energy tax in the House that will make American industry even less competitive while costing
homeowners thousands per year.
27. Announced nationalized health care "reform" that will strip seniors of their Medicare, cut pay of physicians,
increase taxes yet another $1 trillion, and put everyone on rationed care with government bureaucrats deciding
who gets care and who doesn't.
28."ordered" the closing of Gitmo
Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them," while former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die." If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that the President, Senators and Congressmen have their own special gold plated health care plan which is guaranteed the remainder of their lives and they are not subject to this new law if they pass it. The Obamanation health care plan, if passed, will be the first step towards euthanasia of a nation.
Obama's First Six Months' Accomplishments
1. Offended the Queen of England.
2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.
3. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega.
4. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek.
5. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia.
6. Sided with Hugo Chavez and Communist Fidel Castro against Honduras.
7. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions while they're building their nuclear weapons.
8. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions.
9. Expanded the bailouts.
10. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian.
11. Doubled our national debt.
12. Announced the termination of our new missile defense system the day after North Korea launched an ICBM.
13. Released information on U.S. intelligence gathering despite urgings of his own CIA director and the prior four CIA
directors.
14. Accepted without comment that five of his cabinet members cheated on their taxes and two other nominees
withdrew after they couldn't take the heat.
15. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who identified military veterans and abortion opponents as "dangers to
the nation."
16. Ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used and instead refers to such acts as "man made disasters."
17. Circled the globe to publicly apologize for America's world leadership.
18. Told the Mexican president that the violence in their country was because of us.
19. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from the Department of Commerce.
20. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the forced removal and expulsion to Cuba of a 9-year-
old whose mother died trying to bring him to freedom in the United States.
21. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three terrorists who threatened one American life and the
next day announces members of the Bush administration may stand trial for "torturing" three 9/11 terrorists by
pouring water up their noses.
22. Low altitude photo shoot of Air Force One over New York City that frightened thousands of New Yorkers.
23. Sent his National Defense Advisor to Europe to assure them that the US will no longer treat Israel in a special
manner and they might be on their own with the Muslims..
24. Praised Jimmy Carter's trip to Gaza where he sided with terrorist Hamas against Israel.
25. Nationalized General Motors and Chrysler while turning shareholder control over to the unions and freezing out
retired investors who owned their bonds. Committed unlimited taxpayer billions in the process.
26. Passed a huge energy tax in the House that will make American industry even less competitive while costing
homeowners thousands per year.
27. Announced nationalized health care "reform" that will strip seniors of their Medicare, cut pay of physicians,
increase taxes yet another $1 trillion, and put everyone on rationed care with government bureaucrats deciding
who gets care and who doesn't.
28."ordered" the closing of Gitmo
Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them," while former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die." If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that the President, Senators and Congressmen have their own special gold plated health care plan which is guaranteed the remainder of their lives and they are not subject to this new law if they pass it. The Obamanation health care plan, if passed, will be the first step towards euthanasia of a nation.
Ask Hawaii per 338-16 the follwing question(s), plural using Op.No. 84-14 instructions when filing UIPA requests
.........................................................................................
Senior official in the State of Hawaii's Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, in her comment on the purported Birth Certificate image that appears on the Obama "Fight the Smears" propaganda site: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."
Janice Okubo said, "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."
A senior official in the State of Hawaii's Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, confirms that the image published and circulated by the Obama campaign as his "birth certificate" lacks the necessary embossed seal and signature. Backing away from a quote attributed to her that the image on the campaign site was "valid," she told the St. Petersburg (Florida) Times in an article published yesterday Jun 27,2008: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."
Janice Okubo Director of Communications Hawaii's Department of Health has "doubts" about obama's colb posted on the web. She unlike Dr. Chiyome Fukino has not stated she has "seen" obama's original birth certificate. Okubo publicy stated she has doubts about the amended colb that obama posted on the web. It would be interesting to email Dr. Chiyome Fukino and ask her if she too has DOUBTS about the colb obama has posted on his web site.
(story reports) I feel another email comming on.
.........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
Hawaii Revised Statutes Vol 6 Title Chap 321-344 html format
..........................................................................................
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates
..........................................................................................
Obama's original birth certificate could reveal it was issued 1 year or more after his birth or was altered because of the requirement of 338-16; "shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”. If obama has a birth certificate that was filed late or altered the original would be marked distinctly "late" or "altered". This would explain why he has not released the original. (Very Important Fact about obama deception to "hide" his true identity) StoryReports
..........................................................................................
Ask Hawaii per 338-16 the follwing question(s), plural using Op.No. 84-14 instructions when filing UIPA requests.
(1) Any INDEX DATA evidence of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration.
(2) Any INDEX DATA evidence kept in a special permanent file.
(3) Any INDEX DATA of a statement of disagreement included in the individual’s vital records ‘on file with the agency.’
(4) Any INDEX DATA indicating the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.
(StoryReports)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..........................................................................................
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates. (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.
(b) A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration shall be endorsed on the certificates.
(c) Such evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.
(d) When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required by the rules for late registration or when the state registrar finds reasons to question the validity or adequacy of the certificate or the documentary evidence, the state registrar shall not register the late certificate and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action.
The department of health may by rule provide for the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.
(e) As used in this section, “late” means one year or more after the date of birth. [L 1949, c 327, §20; RL 1955, §57-19; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-16; am L 1972, c 66, §1(2); am L 1997, c 305, §3]
..........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates. (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.
(b) A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration shall be endorsed on the certificates.
(c) Such evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.
(d) When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required by the rules for late registration or when the state registrar finds reasons to question the validity or adequacy of the certificate or the documentary evidence, the state registrar shall not register the late certificate and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action.
The department of health may by rule provide for the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.
(e) As used in this section, “late” means one year or more after the date of birth. [L 1949, c 327, §20; RL 1955, §57-19; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-16; am L 1972, c 66, §1(2); am L 1997, c 305, §3]
Hawaii revised Statutes338-16
.........................................................................................
CHAPTER 338 VITAL STATISTICS Index
.........................................................................................
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates.
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates. (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.
(b) A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration shall be endorsed on the certificates.
(c) Such evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.
(d) When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required by the rules for late registration or when the state registrar finds reasons to question the validity or adequacy of the certificate or the documentary evidence, the state registrar shall not register the late certificate and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action.
The department of health may by rule provide for the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.
(e) As used in this section, “late” means one year or more after the date of birth. [L 1949, c 327, §20; RL 1955, §57-19; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-16; am L 1972, c 66, §1(2); am L 1997, c 305, §3]
.........................................................................................
How to Apply for Certified Copies of Vital Records
.........................................................................................
Letters of Verification Is this what obama is using as proof of his birth in Hawaii? Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). [Was obama aborted and born alive?]?
.........................................................................................
Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). This document verifies the existence of a birth/death/marriage/divorce certificate on file with the Department of Health and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event. (For example, that a certain named individual was born on a certain date at a certain place.) The verification process will not, however, disclose information about the vital event contained within the certificate that is unknown to and not provided by the applicant in the request.
Letters of verification are requested in similar fashion and using the same request forms as for certified copies.
The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.
.........................................................................................
Interesting Message:
From: (.....)
> Date: 02/02/07 17:13:55
> To: hihonolu@rootsweb.com; hawaii@rootsweb.com
> Subject: Re: [HAWAII] [HIHONOLU] Ulukau genealogy
> indexes
>
> Hello, Jeanne, and thanks for all your information.
> I have indeed ordered
> many certificates from Oahu; they wouldn't give one
> death certificate I
> wanted because I was related through the spouse, but
> it was also not 75
> years "old". I have had good luck with that office
> for many of my requests.
> There were a few where they returned all my papers
> and checks because I didn
>
> t know the district (I thought they would look in
> all districts if I had a
> pretty narrow window on the date, but they
> wouldn't).
>
> Where it gets difficult is if one is "pretty sure"
> there was a marriage but
> can't find it in the indexes. Sometimes going to the
> actual sources yields
> something missed.
.........................................................................................
Verification copies of BMD (Interesting information on getting a record from Hawaii)
.........................................................................................
Download Request For Certified Copy of Birth Record Hawaii
Download Request For Certified Copy of Birth Record (pdf)
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov
janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Ted Olson Is Not What You Think
Olson and partner. (Don't ask we'll tell)
.........................................................................................
NBC - Natural Born Citizenship - McCain
.........................................................................................
I'm not saying 911 did not occur but I am saying Ted Olson lied about phone calls from his wife. This is a Big Big problem because Olson's story about the hijackers and boxcutters was based on the phone calls he said his wife made. They never happened. So why did Olson lie? You tell Me. I only know he set up obama though testimony to congress about Mccain as a natural born citizen. But olson lied about that also. So I must conclude Olsen is a LIAR. (Story Reports)
.........................................................................................
Former Solicitor General Ted Olson's claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.
However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cellphone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.
According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.
Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials
.........................................................................................
Late in the day on 9/11, CNN put out a story that began: “Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN.” According to this story, Olson reported that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters.”2
Ted Olson’s report was very important. It provided the only evidence that American 77, which was said to have struck the Pentagon, had still been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA radar around 9:00 AM (there had been reports, after this disappearance, that an airliner had crashed on the Ohio-Kentucky border). Also, Barbara Olson had been a very well-known commentator on CNN. The report that she died in a plane that had been hijacked by Arab Muslims was an important factor in getting the nation’s support for the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s report was important in still another way, being the sole source of the widely accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters.3
However, although Ted Olson’s report of phone calls from his wife has been a central pillar of the official account of 9/11, this report has been completely undermined.
Olson’s Self-Contradictions
Olson began this process of undermining by means of self-contradictions. He first told CNN, as we have seen, that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone.” But he contradicted this claim on September 14, telling Hannity and Colmes that she had reached him by calling the Department of Justice collect. Therefore, she must have been using the “airplane phone,” he surmised, because “she somehow didn’t have access to her credit cards.”4 However, this version of Olson’s story, besides contradicting his first version, was even self-contradictory, because a credit card is needed to activate a passenger-seat phone.
Later that same day, moreover, Olson told Larry King Live that the second call from his wife suddenly went dead because “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well.”5 After that return to his first version, he finally settled on the second version, saying that his wife had called collect and hence must have used “the phone in the passengers’ seats” because she did not have her purse.6
By finally settling on this story, Olson avoided a technological pitfall. Given the cell phone system employed in 2001, high-altitude cell phone calls from airliners were impossible, or at least virtually so (Olson’s statement that “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well” was a considerable understatement). The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004.7
However, Olson’s second story, besides being self-contradictory, was CONTRADICTED by American Airlines.
American Airlines Contradicts Olson’s Second Version
A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones. After he wrote to ask if that had been the case on September 11, 2001, an AA customer service representative replied: “That is correct; we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.”8
In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been CONTRADICTED by the FBI.
Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI
The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10 And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.
Olson’s Story Also Rejected by Pentagon Historians
Ted Olson’s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.11
According to Olson, his wife had said that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers.”12 This is an inherently implausible scenario. We are supposed to believe that 60-some people, including the two pilots, were held at bay by three or four men (one or two of the hijackers would have been in the cockpit) with knives and boxcutters. This scenario becomes even more absurd when we realize that the alleged hijackers were all small, unathletic men (the 9/11 Commission pointed out that even “[t]he so-called muscle hijackers actually were not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5” and 5’7” in height and slender in build”13), and that the pilot, Charles “Chic” Burlingame, was a weightlifter and a boxer, who was described as “really tough” by one of his erstwhile opponents.14 Also, the idea that Burlingame would have turned over the plane to hijackers was rejected by his brother, who said: “I don't know what happened in that cockpit, but I'm sure that they would have had to incapacitate him or kill him because he would have done anything to prevent the kind of tragedy that befell that airplane.”15
The Pentagon historians, in any case, DID NOT ACCPT the Olson story, according to which Burlingame and his co-pilot did give up their plane and were in the back with the passengers and other crew members. They instead wrote that “the attackers either incapacitated or murdered the two pilots.”16
Conclusion
This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
Theodore Olson Is A Traitor And Liar. Theodore Olson and Laurence Tribe letter by Theodore Olson and Laurence Tribe, reported in 154 Congress
..........................................................................................
As requested by Senator McCain's campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law.
..........................................................................................
Gabriel J. Chin (University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law on McCain & the "Natural Born Citizen" Clause & a Comment Info applies to obama in that he also is Not a natural born citizen.
Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President
..........................................................................................
Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen parents. The Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States, but it was not incorporated into the Union. As requested by Senator McCain's campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law. The Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive U.S. jurisdiction, may have been covered by the Fourteenth Amendment's grant of citizenship to "all persons born . . . in the United States." However, in the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that "unincorporated territories" were not part of the United States for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold that persons born in unincorporated territories are not Fourteenth Amendment citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion also suggests that Senator McCain obtained citizenship by statute. However, the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover the Canal Zone. Recognizing the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law applicable only to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but eleven months too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John McCain was not a citizen at birth, he is not a "natural born Citizen" and thus is not "eligible to the Office of President" under the Constitution.
(Mccain Was NOT born in the canal zone, he was born in Colon Panama OUTSIDE the canal zone) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
What olson did was to also provide cover for obama as a "natural born citizen also". Neither mccain nor Obama are natural born citizens. Mccain isn't even a citizen because he was born in Colon Panama out side of the canal zone. Obama like Mccain says he is a US citizen but has never stated he was a natural born citizen nor provided proof he is. Obama has not provided proper legal, certified by Hawaii, documentation that he is a citizen. His colb he posted only stated it was "filed with registrar" which means his documents to amend his origianl birth certificate have never been accepted by Hawaii. Obama has not produced ANY legal evidence he is a US citizen. With no proof it must be he, like Mccain are NOT even US citizens let alone natural born citizens. The DNC will not release any information on how they determined obama was a a US citizen citing the freedom of information act does not apply to a contractor they hired to "check Obama Out". This is the SCAM of the century and obama the thug has pulled it off!
........................................................................................
Monday, October 12, 2009
Leo Haffey Attorney
Free Leo Haffney
We are still waiting to find out what is going to happen to Nashville attorney Leo Haffey who was arrested on suspicious affidavits, denied bond in a hearing by presiding judge Gloria Dumas, who received a lengthy formal complaint from the TN Judiciary for illegal and unprofessional behaviour a few days later. Is Leo Haffey a political prisoner?
“Who Is This Guy Leo Haffey I Keep Hearing About?
My first contact with Leo the Lawyer (Leo Haffey) was back on March 27th of 2009. I had discovered a post on a forum that struck me as “brass tacks” straight line reasoning with inescapable conclusions. I posted it on my blog “The Steady Drip. It was awhile before I knew Leo’s real name but that evening I got this thank you note.
Leo the Lawyer said…
Thanks for posting & hosting!
Love your Blog!
Leo’s article is archived at Two ideas to empower Patriots-by passing lawyers if you would care to review it. Here is a short excerpt:
THE POWER OF A PATRIOT
by EA_LEO
People tend to either credit lawyers and judges far too much or discredit them to the extreme. The truth is lawyers and judges are greatly restricted by the privilege of license or of office. The people who are patriots have far more freedom of action and far less restrictions in our society.
Did you know that any citizen patriot can bring a criminal case against Barrack Hussein Obama in the County in which they reside? You do not have to be an Attorney General to indict a ham sandwich or a Barrack Obama. If a patriot had evidence of a crime committed by the 2008 BO campaign and that patriot presented said evidence to a sympathetic Grand Jury with a charge of conspiracy to commit said crime against Barrack Obama, that patriot could get BO indicted like that proverbial ham sandwich.
I had been blogging about the power of Citizen Grand Juries to directly counteract the conspiracy of the government against the people. Leo quickly understood the legal theory and the supporting Constitutional Provisions and case law.
The very next day this blockbuster headline grabbed my attention: Barack Hussein Obama Indicted in GA. Carl Swenson at http://www.riseupforamerica.com/ had scooped everybody and without warning had empanelled a Citizen Grand Jury and acted while the rest of us were still arguing legal theory.
From that point forward Leo and I corresponded on a regular basis. I became National Spokesperson for American Grand Jury and Leo advised me, and collaborated with other leaders in the Citizen Grand Jury movement while writing some of the early motions.
On April 29th I got a cryptic email from Leo “Where the Bodies R Buried in Tennessee?” The email had a link to a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) case concerning the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Election Commission. This was an issue Leo was working on in Nashville having to do with missing computers from the Nashville Elections Commission. I didn’t understand it, and I didn’t respond.
On April 30th Leo’s next email seemed hastily composed and was confusing: “Mayor, Police Chief, Former VP & Nashville DA. Next Door Neighbor CRIMINAL LAWYER Brent Horst. If anything happens to me those are the suspects. PI Grady Vaughn has more details. Keep the Faith, Leo Haffey.
At least I now knew Leo’s real name. However I was beginning to suspect that Leo wasn’t just brilliant but maybe a little weird. Less than an hour later I got this email “Have surveillance cameras surrounding my house. I have video of Nashville PD and neighbor, Nashville CRIMINAL lawyer Brent Horst, harassing me, my wife and my daughter.”
My day job is as a psychotherapist. My red flags pop up when people start claiming that folks are out to get them. Yet Leo made it clear that he had video evidence of police harassment. Next Leo sent me several news links along with this message: “These seemingly petty burglaries are to the Nashville BO Campaign what Watergate was to the Nixon Campaign.” Since delusions of persecution are not reported by the news media, I decided I should start paying attention to the corruption and police intimidation situation Leo faced in Nashville.
At 8:54 PM on May 2nd I got this email from Leo’s 11 year old daughter: “my dad was arrested and he said if he was, that i should email you.” At 4:05 Am I get this email from Leo: “Don’t report this because I don’t want any Grand Jury members to be scared off by this Police harassment, but please add judge Thomas w. Brothers, Brent & Tracy Horst of 6953 Highland Park Dr. Nashville, TN to the list of co-conspirators along with, Mayor Dean, Police Chief Serpas and District Attorney Johnson. Those are the people for the Constitutional Grand Jury to indict, along with BO, in Nashville. Keep the Faith, Leo P. Haffey”
One could easily forgive Leo if at this point he reacted to the intimidation by keeping his mouth shut and presenting a low profile. Not Leo! The next email said: “Please have the Grand Jury Foremen in Tennessee contact me. I want to present evidence against all the co-conspirators in Tennessee that I know about. Keep the Faith, Leo Haffey.” Leo might have been brave enough to testify to a Citizen Grand Jury in Nashville but there wasn’t one in existence. It wasn’t until June 18, that I was able to announce
NASHVILLE CITIZEN’S GRAND JURY FORMING!
I told Leo that there was not Citizen’s Grand Jury in Nashville yet. Rather than thinking he was out of ammo, later on May 3rd Leo asked me to post this message on my blog:
Co-conspirators Tom w. Brothers, Karl Dean, Ronal Serpas, & Torry got my neighbor the CRIMINAL Lawyer Brent Horst & his wife Tracy to file false charges.
But it backfired on all of them. My daughter is doing fine. Isn’t she Great! Thanks for your help! That is all I can say at this point. Other than:
It is very important that Patriots know to do this:
1) Find the CROOKED politicians in your City or Town that supported BO.
2) Link these CROOKED politicians to crimes committed by the BO Campaign.
3) Charge CROOKED politicians and BO as co-conspirators in the commission of campaign crimes, and you have a Criminal Case against BO that can be prosecuted in Court in your County Seat.
4) Of course, you add all the other Crimes that BO committed elsewhere to your INDICTMENT also. But to prosecute BO in your State, you have to link him as a co-conspirator to crimes committed in your State.
I have a stat counter on my blog. I was able to detect the hits coming from Nashville. Leo was really rattling the monkey cage of some big monkeys. Over the next few days I got dozens of emails documenting the evidence and suspicions Leo had about corruption in Nashville. He asked me to act as a depository for all of his evidence because he wasn’t sure he would be able to protect his documents, and he had some serious concerns about his own life being in jeopardy.
Over the next few days there were reports of unmarked and marked police vehicles parked outside Leo’s house. I didn’t realize it, but Leo had also been working on the child abuse and molestation activity at a local mosque. Pam Geller at Atlas Shrugs really blew the lid of that case, but nothing was done and children remain in danger. Go here for a review of the various Crimes and Corruption Leo the Lawyer Exposed in Nashville.
I posted this notice on a blog in Nashville:
The power elite in Nashville are perverting justice! The police, politicians, judiciary, and administrators of government are conspiring against the citizens. Citizens have the constitutional authority to investigate corruption and establish justice.
All citizens who have evidence or reports of crimes, violations of oath of office, or sabotage of justice by elected or appointed officials are encouraged to report their information to the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury. Those who wish to serve as members of the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury can contact xxxxx
Honest public officials who faithfully serve “we the people” are expected to support the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury.
A member of the Tennessee Bar will act as advisor to the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury.
That last line in the notice might have been a mistake. Of course, those who knew the situation immediately guessed who the “member of the Tennessee Bar” was. By May 13th Leo was back in jail. We heard from Leo again on May 20th was able to send this email: “Help! On the 13th, I was arrested again by the Nashville PD without Probable Cause and falsely imprisoned, first at the Metro Jail, then I was taken to Nashville General Hospital where I was physically and mentally abused. My blood pressure medication was withheld from me for 38 hours. Then, I was taken to Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute where they repeated tried to force me to take anti-psychotic medications.”
I live in south Florida. I felt powerless to help. However, I was able to determine that the Mental Health Professionals did their jobs according to the book, and Leo was released as “not being a danger to himself or others.” However, Leo couldn’t go home. Leo’s neighbors had contacted Leo’s wife right after he was arrested and told them that the Neighborhood Association was going to place a lien on her home and take the house away from her if she did not file a restraining order against Leo so that he could not return home. Leo took up residence in a Holiday Inn. Things were really getting nasty.
Leo was rearrested in September and this time his bond was revoked. This is where he remains:
HAFFEY, LEO PATRICK Facility: Criminal Justice Center
Unit-Pod: 2-E
Security Level: Minimum
........................................................................................
The facts are being hidden by the authorities. We are using private investigators to find out what we can. We will not release our research until it is nailed down tight.
The “unconfirmed and unofficial story goes like this:
Leo is an entertainment attorney in Nashville.
Nashville is a liberal enclave in an otherwise moderate to conservative state.
Leo was an active Democrat and worked on Democratic candidates campaigns until Obama came along.
Leo has acquired some powerful enemies by being anti-Obama and attempting to expose local corruption.
When Leo began his anti-Obama activates and began advising Citizen Grand Juries, his enemies amplified their animosity toward him.
Leo had some marriage problems which his enemies exploited by pressuring his wife to file abuse charges against him.
After Leo was arrested, Leo’s wife had the integrity and courage to resist, and decided to “out” the people who had pressured her to file the false charges and sent this email to the Nashville DA:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nashville Obama supporter Brent Horst THREATENED to SUE me if I didn’t help him get an Order of Protection against my husband, Leo Haffey.
Also Nashville ADA Bottoms pressured me to get an Order of Protection against my husband, Leo Haffey.
I would appreciate it if you and Nashville District Attorney Torry Johnson would investigate Mr. Horst.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am in possession of further documentation about Leo’s wife being pressured to file false charges and my wife and I have interviewed Leo’s wife thoroughly.
The people who are trying to harass Leo are neighbors. They used the Neighborhood Association to threaten Leo’s wife that they would file a lien and take her house away if she didn’t file a charge against Leo. Leo’s wife is now being represented by counsel, so she isn’t likely to fall for that kind of pressure again. Leo arranged for her to have counsel while he was in jail.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
· The charges against Leo were dropped, or soon will be, because Leo’s wife withdrew her allegation.
· Without skipping a beat Leo, was then charged with molesting his 11 year old daughter. One of his neighbors is a social worker, and I suspect her of involving the authorities. Child abuse accusations can be made anonymously without the accused ever knowing who the accuser was.
· Both the wife and daughter told the truth, and these charges were dropped.
· One of Leo’s enemies filed a false charge of vehicular assault – This was the same woman I suspect of making the false charge of molestation – no witness – no injuries – but they managed to get Leo arrested have him admitted to a mental health institution. Leo properly refused all medications without being informed as to what the official diagnosis was. There was none.
· The doctors said he wasn’t a danger to himself or anyone else, and released him
· Next he was re-arrested on the vehicular assault charge and they revoked his bail
· That is why he is in jail now. Leo continues to resist their attempts to administer drugs to him without a diagnosis. This has an uncanny resemblance to the plight of political prisoners in Russia back a few decades ago.
Caution: I live in Florida and my only sources are Leo, his wife, and his daughter who I communicate with regularly. I may not have all the details straight.
Leo needs simple help from a lawyer in filing a Write of Habeus Corpus, to get him out of jail. Once released, Leo can participate in his own defense.
Leo Haffey defense fund
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
