Friday, August 13, 2010
THE US GOVERNMENT IS THE LARGEST "FOUNDATION" THAT DESPENSES TAX FREE GRANTS THAT ARE USED FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES TO SUBVERT THE US CONSTITUTION
.......................................................................................
Dodd Report to the Reece Committee on Foundations (1954)
“The Dodd Report to the Reece Committee on Foundations,” from 1954.
(The Dodd report to the Reese Committe on Foundations, 1954, explains how foundation grants given to various gantees for purposes contrary to those for which they were established are at the core of un-American activities.
Various foundation grants have been used to subvert the general population for political purposes.
Foundations and those receiving tax free foundation grants have resorted to propaganda in order to achieve their hidden objectives.
THE US GOVERNMENT IS THE LARGEST "FOUNDATION" THAT DESPENSES TAX FREE GRANTS THAT ARE USED FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES TO SUBVERT THE US CONSTITUTION.
Barack Hussein Obama is a product of the US government "foundation" and other foundations.
The foreign imposter obama was produced to further subvert the US Constitution through political means.) Story Reports
Investigators of Globalist Conspiracy, Meet your Mentor, Mr. Norman Dodd
Famous Foundations of the Tycoons Chose Marxist World Empire
(The interlocking pieces of the various foundation puzzle form a picture that represents planning and control of every aspect of American life through a combination of the federal government and the subversive public education system.
In 1934 the american historical association published a report that concluded, "The day of the individual in the US had come to an end and that the future would be characterized, inevitably, by some form of collectivian and an increase in the authority of the state".
Collectivism means the subjugation of the individual to a group—whether to a race, class or state does not matter. Collectivism holds that man must be chained to collective action and collective thought for the sake of what is called “the common good.”
Collectivism holds that, in human affairs, the collective—society, the community, the nation, the proletariat, the race, etc.—is the unit of reality and the standard of value. On this view, the individual has reality only as part of the group, and value only insofar as he serves it.
This is the view of liberal socialist democrates, "the individual has reality only as part of the group, and value only insofar as he serves it." SLAVERY!!!!!!!)
The FRAUD or foreign agent posing as president emphasized "change" over and over again.
He was talking about social change.
The social change obama is implementing now is detrimental to the American people. American sovereignty and indvidual freedom is being destroyed by obama and his fellow traitors to America.
The Dodd report pointed out a group, ie the democratic party, backed by disproportionaly large amounts of money, ie stimulus money funds, tarp fund, BP slush fund, could threaten America. Dodd was so right.)
The Dodd report in 1954 pointed out how foundations use propaganda under the guise of being "essential" to the security of the United States.
Wow that is exactly what the federal government and other foundations tell Americans to get the public to believe they are protecting American's individual freedoms.)
Public education focuses on EMPIRICAL DATA and its application.
PRINCIPLES AND THEIR TRUTH OR FALSITY ARE OF LITTLE CONCERN, IE "climate change", "global warming" etc.
PAST EXPERIENCE WHICH INDICATES THAT THIS APPROACH TO THE PROBLEMS OF SOCIETY COULD LEAD TO TYRANNY, HAS BEEN DISREGARDED.
Social Engineering in the form of public education has spawned the supporters of barack obama.
Dodd's conclusion is that American fortunes created foundations that have financed ideas and practices incompatible with the fundamental concepts of the US Constitution. Dodd's report was created in 1954.)
Hitler used social engineering to indoctrinate the german people in virtues of natzism.
Hitler's state run media fed the german people lies to perpetuate the natzi mith.
What hitler did is similar to what social engineering has done in America. The proof is the election of an imposter as president.
The mith of obama as one who would change America for the better was sold to the American people.
Today the fraud obama insists America is better off and the economy is improving despite all his efforts to destroy economic activity. The state run media propaganda continues to cover for the imposter using imperical data with principles of the truth or falsity, of no concern to social engineers of change.
Obama is the "engineer in chief" of imperical data ignoring the facts while propagating the myth he can be trusted to guard our freedoms.
Obama is engineering our complete and total slavery by destroying our economic system and subverting the US Constitution.
Obama is a usurper whom George Washington would have summarily judged and made an example for all to see as a traitor to the United States!) Story Reports
Dodd's report explains why America elected an imposter as president
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Janice Okubos birth certificate was used to forge obama's fake colb online
Janice Okubos birth certificate was used to forge obama's fake colb online.
This is a real possibility. I published this information Jun 26, 2010.
Of all the possible ways obama could have obtained a fake birth certificate I believe this is the best one.
Hawaii changed obama's "birth certificate" pursuant to HS 338-17.7 (5)
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 338-17.7 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 338-17.7: Establishment of new certificates of birth, when.
(5) Upon request of a law enforcement agency certifying that a new birth certificate showing different information would provide for the safety of the birth registrant; provided that the new birth certificate shall contain information requested by the law enforcement agency, shall be assigned a new number and filed accordingly, and shall not substitute for the birth registrant's original birth certificate, which shall remain in place.
(b) When a new certificate of birth is established under this section, it shall be substituted for the original certificate of birth. Thereafter, the original certificate and the evidence supporting the preparation of the new certificate shall be sealed and filed. Such sealed document shall be opened only by an order of a court of record. [L 1973, c 39, §1; am L 1975, c 66, §2(3); am L 1979, c 130, §1 and c 203, §1; am L 1982, c 4, §1; am L 1983, c 65, §1; am L 1984, c 167, §1; am L 1993, c 131, §2] HS 338-17.7 (5)
........................................................................................
"Upon request of a law enforcement agency certifying that a new birth certificate showing different information would provide for the safety of the birth registrant; provided that the new birth certificate shall contain information requested by the law enforcement agency, shall be assigned a new number and filed accordingly".
(All that had to be done was any law enforement agency could request a NEW FAKE obama birth certificate be issued for the "safety of the birth registrant". So what do we have now? Is the certification of live birth obama has presented to the world the original fake birth certificate or is it the new fake birth certificate requested by any law enforment agency to provide for the "safety" of obama?????
If its the new fake birth certificate what was on the original fake certificate?
"When a new certificate of birth is established under this section, it shall be substituted for the original certificate of birth".
(1) The new FAKE obama birth certificate was susbstituted for the original certificate of birth because the original certificate of birth, if it exists, would reveal obama was born outside of the US most likely in Kenya.
(2) or the new FAKE birth certificate included information that covered up some facts that would disqualify obama as eligible to be president.
........................................................................................
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 338-17.8 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 338-17.8: Certificates for children born out of State.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate. Section 338-17.8
Janice Okubos birth certificate was used to forge obama's fake colb online
Obama Records
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Obama Authorizes Killing American Citizens Without Charge or Trial
Obama Authorizes Killing American Citizens Without Charge or Trial on Feb 3, 2010 when national intelligence director dennis blair testified before congress.
Obama has erased Habeas corpus, abolished privacy, justified torture, increased taxes, expanded government, and suspended the Bill of Rights. Even a whisper of the word, T-E-R-R-O-R-I-S-M, will activate a multi-billion dollar system of electronic eaves dropping equipment unlike any that tyranny has ever known in the history of mankind.
Remember the obama administration declared people who are members of the NRA and support anti abortion as terrorists, American citizens! Obama also through homeland security declared veterans who have returned from irac and afghanistan as potential terrorists.
Obama deems veterans as potential terrorists
"the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks"
"Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists,” it says. “DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities"
Target Freedom
Obama Authorizes Killing American Citizens Without Charge or Trial
Obama Has Committed criminal matters involving the Constitutional rule of law
(Obama Has Committed criminal matters involving the Constitutional rule of law. The democrates in congress are in total control as the majority party. The article below points out the impending investigation by Rep. Issa, California and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee when the Republicans take control in Nov 2010.
Constitutional rule of law demands action by the congress. The problem is the majority in control of congress has committed crimes right in front of us all.
The democrate majority in congress will not investigate obama or itself.
The republican manority could try to investigate obama but the process would fail because of the democrate majority. I know Rep Issa, California knows this. The CORRECT time to INVESTIGATE obama is Nov, 2010 when it will be feasible to move the investigations through the house.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
Stand Up For America
The Stand Up America BlogViolation of Oath of Office
Group to File Complaint with FBI on Obama’s Alleged Crimes
Published on 08/10/10
Editor’s Note:
Several friends of Stand Up America have compiled yet another method to remove Mr. Obama from office for High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Here is their letter to describe what they seek to do, and how you can get involved.
As most readers of SUA know, Major General Paul E. Vallely US Army (retired) has advocated for DEMAND RESIGNATION of all oath breakers in office, and therefore is in support of any legal manner in which to achieve these ends.
Please read the following letter by Suzanne Short:
Dear Fellow Patriots,
If after you explore this email you feel this is for you, please feel free to share this with others who may also be in the same position. There is absolutely no cost involved to participate. However you will enjoy the pure satisfaction that you have taken a step to help return control of our republic to the rule of law, the constitution and the American People.
Have you had enough email exchanges and find your level of frustration at an unbelievable level? Are you “mad as Hell” at Obama and the entire criminal entity called the 111th Congress?
1 – Do you feel as though you have been unfairly abused by big government?
2 – Disenfranchised by those whom you elected?
3 – Been a victim to race baiting by the Obama administration?
4 – Fallen victim to political correctness?
5 – Had your pockets picked with your eyes wide open?
6 – Lied to and deceived by those elected to protect your best interest?
So are you really going to take it? What? Don’t know what to do?
Read on with anticipation my friends. You may find the following will pleasantly surprise you.
The best part…no one will ask you for any donations or contributions. This is from one patriot to another.
So far over 30 people have joined just based on the development of the preliminary document. A document I will share if you are inclined to participate. See more on this later in this email.
RE: Filing Criminal Complaints – Deadline for filing the final document will be 8/17/2010
Please review the following as it inspired a course of action in which you may wish to participate:
For more information please review the content at Canada Free Press
This article conclusively documents the deliberate criminal violations of our constitution by members of the Obama administration, and other related entities. Some of the more basic violations are addressed in the following US Criminal Code as annotated below:
Violation of Oath of Office
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order, which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.
1 – 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.
2 – 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,
3 – 5 U.S.C. 7311 , which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.
4 – The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 , which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311, for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”
Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
Here is another related article that also helped inspire this effort.
Washington Times – The Case for Impeachment Page 1
Washington Times – The Case for Impeachment Page 2
The only exception I raise is the suggestion of impeachment as the solution, As I see it, Impeachment is not the correct legal remedy. The suggestion of impeachment, leads me to speculate that the real purpose of this article is to send us off on one more wild goose chase and permitting more time for Obama to further his agenda. Historically, impeachment has never been an effective way in which to deal with these issues of such a criminal nature. It is my view most of what we have seen so far amounts to legal scrimmaging in the judicial system to buy time for Obama to continue to implement his agenda.
Please note the part of the second page of this article. This details that Rep. Issa, California and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is promising criminal investigations when the Republicans take control (assuming that occurs in November). Can anyone explain to me why Obama’s action will be more criminal when the Republicans are in control?
As I see it is a crime. Violation of the Constitution is a violation regardless of who is in power. Again my dear friends…this is not a political question as the courts might wish us to believe. This is a criminal issue.
Even Rep. Issa, based on the statement above (if it was properly attributed by the author) , is guilty of misprision of felony at this very moment! And he is not alone…every member of Congress and the Senate is also guilty! And there are others…
US Criminal Code:
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 4
§ 4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Crimes, many of them, have been committed right in front of us all. Crimes that require the appropriate government and law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute as indicated, regardless of which party is in power.
These are criminal matters involving the Constitutional rule of law!
Not political in nature!
As a result you are invited to participate in a plan of action that, in this instance, is a bit unique. Instead of my filing criminal charges against those involved as an individual, I am suggesting a much more aggressive action with a much greater legal impact.
This time, not only will I file criminal charges alone, but I will also invite those of you who are so inclined, to join me in this action.
If you are indeed made of real patriotic material, you know…”the real stuff” and find this idea acceptable and also meets your level of risk tolerance, please respond appropriately to this email and I will forward the additional details to fully participate.
Email Arnie Rosner
Group to File Complaint with FBI on Obama’s Alleged Crimes
Constitutional rule of law demands action by the congress. The problem is the majority in control of congress has committed crimes right in front of us all.
The democrate majority in congress will not investigate obama or itself.
The republican manority could try to investigate obama but the process would fail because of the democrate majority. I know Rep Issa, California knows this. The CORRECT time to INVESTIGATE obama is Nov, 2010 when it will be feasible to move the investigations through the house.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
Stand Up For America
The Stand Up America BlogViolation of Oath of Office
Group to File Complaint with FBI on Obama’s Alleged Crimes
Published on 08/10/10
Editor’s Note:
Several friends of Stand Up America have compiled yet another method to remove Mr. Obama from office for High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Here is their letter to describe what they seek to do, and how you can get involved.
As most readers of SUA know, Major General Paul E. Vallely US Army (retired) has advocated for DEMAND RESIGNATION of all oath breakers in office, and therefore is in support of any legal manner in which to achieve these ends.
Please read the following letter by Suzanne Short:
Dear Fellow Patriots,
If after you explore this email you feel this is for you, please feel free to share this with others who may also be in the same position. There is absolutely no cost involved to participate. However you will enjoy the pure satisfaction that you have taken a step to help return control of our republic to the rule of law, the constitution and the American People.
Have you had enough email exchanges and find your level of frustration at an unbelievable level? Are you “mad as Hell” at Obama and the entire criminal entity called the 111th Congress?
1 – Do you feel as though you have been unfairly abused by big government?
2 – Disenfranchised by those whom you elected?
3 – Been a victim to race baiting by the Obama administration?
4 – Fallen victim to political correctness?
5 – Had your pockets picked with your eyes wide open?
6 – Lied to and deceived by those elected to protect your best interest?
So are you really going to take it? What? Don’t know what to do?
Read on with anticipation my friends. You may find the following will pleasantly surprise you.
The best part…no one will ask you for any donations or contributions. This is from one patriot to another.
So far over 30 people have joined just based on the development of the preliminary document. A document I will share if you are inclined to participate. See more on this later in this email.
RE: Filing Criminal Complaints – Deadline for filing the final document will be 8/17/2010
Please review the following as it inspired a course of action in which you may wish to participate:
For more information please review the content at Canada Free Press
This article conclusively documents the deliberate criminal violations of our constitution by members of the Obama administration, and other related entities. Some of the more basic violations are addressed in the following US Criminal Code as annotated below:
Violation of Oath of Office
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order, which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.
1 – 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.
2 – 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,
3 – 5 U.S.C. 7311 , which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.
4 – The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 , which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311, for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”
Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
Here is another related article that also helped inspire this effort.
Washington Times – The Case for Impeachment Page 1
Washington Times – The Case for Impeachment Page 2
The only exception I raise is the suggestion of impeachment as the solution, As I see it, Impeachment is not the correct legal remedy. The suggestion of impeachment, leads me to speculate that the real purpose of this article is to send us off on one more wild goose chase and permitting more time for Obama to further his agenda. Historically, impeachment has never been an effective way in which to deal with these issues of such a criminal nature. It is my view most of what we have seen so far amounts to legal scrimmaging in the judicial system to buy time for Obama to continue to implement his agenda.
Please note the part of the second page of this article. This details that Rep. Issa, California and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is promising criminal investigations when the Republicans take control (assuming that occurs in November). Can anyone explain to me why Obama’s action will be more criminal when the Republicans are in control?
As I see it is a crime. Violation of the Constitution is a violation regardless of who is in power. Again my dear friends…this is not a political question as the courts might wish us to believe. This is a criminal issue.
Even Rep. Issa, based on the statement above (if it was properly attributed by the author) , is guilty of misprision of felony at this very moment! And he is not alone…every member of Congress and the Senate is also guilty! And there are others…
US Criminal Code:
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 4
§ 4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Crimes, many of them, have been committed right in front of us all. Crimes that require the appropriate government and law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute as indicated, regardless of which party is in power.
These are criminal matters involving the Constitutional rule of law!
Not political in nature!
As a result you are invited to participate in a plan of action that, in this instance, is a bit unique. Instead of my filing criminal charges against those involved as an individual, I am suggesting a much more aggressive action with a much greater legal impact.
This time, not only will I file criminal charges alone, but I will also invite those of you who are so inclined, to join me in this action.
If you are indeed made of real patriotic material, you know…”the real stuff” and find this idea acceptable and also meets your level of risk tolerance, please respond appropriately to this email and I will forward the additional details to fully participate.
Email Arnie Rosner
Group to File Complaint with FBI on Obama’s Alleged Crimes
Monday, August 9, 2010
If Sandy Wilson Can Make It We All Can
This April 2005 photo provided by Sandy Wilson shows her with her newborn son Christopher in the intensive care unit at Anne Arundel Medical Center in Annapolis, Md. No one knows how Wilson got the flesh-eating bacteria, necrotizing fasciitis. In all of medicine, few infections are as feared as this one. It strikes out of the blue, especially diabetics, cancer patients, transplants recipients and others with weak immune systems — a large and growing group of Americans. It kills 20 percent of its victims and horribly disfigures others.
Eaten Alive: 5-year battle with flesh-eating germ
(This is one story that is really worth reading. Sandy Wilson is an example of a person who never gave up. If she had just gave up I'm sure she would not have survived. Its not all about just her. Many people were and are involved in her recovery. She is the main character in a drama that is just to real.
Obamacare would have made sure Sandy Wilson and similar people would be judged unworthy of life. We know better. Sandy Wilson stands in opposition to obama's "death panel" regulators who would condemn her to death because of the cost of keeping her alive. GOD bless you Sandy, may you live many more years in spite of any efforts by the government to keep you from living because of obamacare.) Story Reports
...........................................................................................
By MARILYNN MARCHIONE AP Medical Writer
BALTIMORE (AP) — Waking from a fog of anesthesia, Sandy Wilson found she was a patient in one of the hospitals where she worked as a nurse. She remembered having a baby, and being told she had gotten an infection. But nothing could prepare her for what lurked beneath the sheets.
Flesh-eating bacteria were eating her alive.
"When I looked down at my belly, basically all the skin was gone and I could see my internal organs," she said. "I remember seeing my intestines. I thought, 'There's no way I can live like this ... This is a death sentence.'"
In all of medicine, few infections are as feared as this one. It strikes out of the blue, especially obese people, diabetics, cancer patients, transplant recipients and others with weak immune systems — a growing group of Americans. It kills 20 percent of its victims and horribly disfigures others.
It used to be caused almost exclusively by one type of strep bacteria. Now there's a scary trend: drug-resistant superbugs like the staph germ MRSA increasingly are able to make "flesh-eating" toxins and cause nightmarish infections like Wilson's.
"In the first 20 years I practiced, I may have seen one case," said Dr. Alan Bisno, a retired University of Miami expert who has lectured other doctors on this. "Within a very few years, everybody in the audience had all seen cases."
To treat it, doctors cut away dead tissue, but the infection often advances after they think they've gotten it all.
Inch by inch, it devoured the 34-year-old Wilson. Spleen, gall bladder, appendix. Part of her stomach and ultimately, all of her intestines.
Over five years, she had countless surgeries, including an unusual organ transplant. For much of that time, she lived in hospitals and rehabilitation centers, fed by tubes and unable to give her young son a bath, to read him a bedtime story, to tuck him in at night. She lost her marriage and endured unimaginable pain.
"It was like I was rotting from the inside out. It felt like things were just being ripped out of me," she said.
Click on the links below to read the rest of the story.
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Eaten Alive: 5-year battle with flesh-eating germ
Christina Romer, chair of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, will resign
THIS IS THE GENUIS OBAMA RELIED ON TO DESTROY THE US ECONOMY ON PURPOSE
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics : Unemployment is 16.3% not 9.6%
The US Bureau Of Labor Statistics introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures
The US government just published the Unemployment Rate, it’s 16.5% as per the U-6 measurement system. Why the U-3 is cited in the Media rather than the U-6 is nothing less than mind boggling.
U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force
U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force.
U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate)
U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers
U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other marginally attached workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.
NOTE: Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. For more information, see “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” in the October 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.
The U-6 is actually the closest to the unemployment rate that was accounted for during the great depression.
So why are they quoting the U-3 rather than U-6 ?
Someone answer that for me?
How the government measures unemployment U1 Through U6
BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures
(Obama did not create the unemployment crisis because of ineptness, or lack of ability. The unemployment rate is much worse than what the state run media is reporting. The true unemployment rate should be sited as the U6 measure of unemployment.) Story Reports
Christina Romer, chair of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, will resign.
Christina Romer, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, has resigned her post to return to her old job as an economics professor at the University of California at Berkeley, the White House said Thursday.
Romer was instrumental in crafting the $862 billion economic stimulus package that Obama signed shortly after being sworn into office. She co-wrote a paper that predicted the stimulus would prevent unemployment rates from rising above 8 percent.
"The opportunity to help shape economic policy these past 20 months, and to work with the other members of the economic team and my colleagues on the CEA, is one I will always cherish," she said.
The jobless rate has hovered near 10 percent and Romer's most recent forecast predicts that it will not drop below 8 percent until the end of 2012.
Romer also said that without the stimulus bill unemployment would rise above 9 percent.
(Obama used romers's stimulus plan and made unemployment worse. Instead of less that 8 percent unemployment there is currently 9.6% U3 unemployment or actually 16.3% using the U6 alternative measure, a more accurate measure of unemployment.
Obama did not create the unemployment crisis because of ineptness, or lack of ability. Obama has made the recession worse on purpose but promised the massive stimulus spending would keep the unemployment rate much lower. In fact the stimulus money has made the
unemployment rate much higher and was a total waste of taxpayer money.
Day after day obama lies about the true unemployment rate. Obama's plan was and is the destruction of the US economy through massive spending. In Nov 2010 Obama will be impeaded in his efforts to destroy America.) Story Reports
Tribble Ad Agency
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)