Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Friday, April 13, 2012

Removal jurisdiction Takes Away States Rights Under 10th Amendment

Removal jurisdictionTakes away States 10th ammendment rights

About 30 years ago the Federal government quietly took away a little more of the states’ sovereignty by changing the rules related to cases being "removed” from state courts.

This rule change gave any defense attorney unfettered authority to take any case away from any state court without asking permission from any judge simply by notifying both courts.


Removal Jurisdiction

In the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. This is a general exception to the usual American rule giving the plaintiff the right to make the decision on the proper forum. Removal occurs when a defendant files a "notice of removal" in the state court where the lawsuit is presently filed and the federal court which the defendant would like to remove the case to.

Removal is governed by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq. With rare exceptions, a case may be removed only if, at the time of removal, the case could be filed in federal court. Removal requires an independent ground for subject-matter jurisdiction such as diversity jurisdiction or federal question jurisdiction. A case must be removed to the federal district court that encompasses the state court where the action was initiated.

Once removed, the case can be transferred to, or consolidated in, another federal court, despite the plaintiff's original intended venue.

Ordinarily, defendants face no difficulty removing claims based on federal law if every defendant desires removal (the unanimity rule). Removal of claims under state law, even when a federal court indisputably has diversity jurisdiction, is more restricted. Except in certain class actions governed by the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), a plaintiff can successfully object to removal in diversity actions if any defendant is a citizen of the forum state where the suit is taking place.


(If I am reading and understanding this rule correctly the federal government says "we don't need no stikin state court to hear any case law."

This rule takes away any states right to hear and decide on a state level something that the federal government has nothing to do with.

This rule has been in effect for 30 years. For 30 years the federal courts have been hearing and deciding what states can and cannot do. Is there no 10th ammendment? Do the states have no right to hear cases that any defendent simply wishes the federal court to hear and decide.


Its not just the "state run media" its the all powerful federal government "state" that has been deciding cases the states should have been deciding for years.

No wonder Leo Donofrio just decided to stop practing law and turn his law license in.
What good is it? There is no justice in state courts when the federal courts can take state cases and rule on state matters. We truly are living in a "police state"!!!!!)
Story Reports

Removal jurisdictionTakes away States 10th ammendment rights

Unfortunately America’s courts are corrupt

Liberty Legal Foundation

Unfortunately America’s courts are corrupt.

In an LLF Arizona lawsuit the defendants were served, but failed to show up in court. When LLF filed motions for default judgment, Judge Susan Bolton acted more like a defense attorney than a Judge. She denied one motion for default judgment by interpreting a procedural rule in a way that it has apparently never before been interpreted. She denied the other motion for default by refusing to accept a confirmation of delivery from the U.S. Postal Service and noting that a return receipt was missing. The return receipt was somehow “lost” by the postal service.

What’s disturbing about these rulings is the fact that most courts routinely grant default judgments when defendants don’t show up. If a defendant later shows up and proves that they were not properly served the court can easily vacate the judgment and pick up the case where it left off. Issuing a default judgment forces a defendant that is avoiding the litigation to show up or accept the judgment. It is interesting that the Arizona court instead decided to assert defenses that the absent defendant didn't offer on its own behalf. LLF has now served the defendants, again, and expect responses in our Arizona case later this month.

In Tennessee we filed a motion for an injunction only to have our case removed from state court to federal court the evening before our injunction hearing.

You see, about 30 years ago the Federal government quietly took away a little more of the states’ sovereignty by changing the rules related to cases being "removed” from state courts. This rule change gave any defense attorney unfettered authority to take any case away from any state court without asking permission from any judge simply by notifying both courts.

The defendants in our Tennessee case waited until the evening before our injunction hearing to notify the courts and LLF that the hearing wouldn’t be taking place. Neat trick, huh? Of course they waited until we had traveled over 400 miles to attend the hearing before informing us of their plans.

LLF has filed a motion in Tennessee Federal Court to have our case returned back to the state court. We’re still waiting for a ruling from the Federal court. Unfortunately the Federal court may not rule for months.

Another rule change from just five years ago leaves no effective method to force any Federal court to rule on a pending motion. So, Federal courts can effectively sit on motions, and entire cases, until they are moot.

We can only hope and pray that the Tennessee Federal Court will actually rule on our motion in time to make a difference.

(Because some courts in America are corrupt it allows obama (an illegal alien) to hide behind the law and still be able to not validate his US citizenship. Its bad and does discourage but remember and believe what I do that the truth will prevail in the end. Remember what happened to hitler, tojo etc. The truth caught up with them.) Story Reports

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Project FunVax: A Genetic Weapon Aimed at Religious Fundamentalism

Project FunVax: A Genetic Weapon Aimed at Religious Fundamentalism.


PROJECT FUN-VAX is allegedly a “live” US Government Operation thats develops, plans and executes the release of a biological agent designed to attack & destroy a specific segment of a human set of DNA. Basically, it is a genetic weapon. It apparently was designed to be used against persons with high level expressions of the ‘VMAT-2′ gene. It is to be delivered covertly to on a massive scale (whether you have elevated VMAT-2 or not) without the publics knowledge through re-engineering and disseminating the common airborne influenza or rhino-virus.

“VMAT-2″, (VMAT2) is a physiological arrangement that produces the sensations associated, by some, with mystic experiences, including the presence of God, or more specifically spirituality as a state of mind. Based on research by psychologist Robert Cloninger, this tendency toward spirituality is quantified by the self-transcendence scale, which is composed of three sub-sets: “self-forgetfulness” (as in the tendency to become totally absorbed in some activity, such as reading); “transpersonal identification” (a feeling of connectedness to a larger universe); and “mysticism” (an openness to believe things not literally provable, such as ESP).

Project FunVax:

(There are things going on that seem unbelievable. Yes there was a briefing at the pentagon pitching a virus that would kill a gene that people have. This gene "they think" has something to do with people believing in GOD. The government would like you to catch this virus, especially obama. More proof we are in the last days and Jesus is coming soon.) Story Reports

Insane federal government?

Kraft nestle and pepsi use aborted baby parts to test their products flavor and we eat their products

Obama gives ok to use aborted baby parts to test flavor of pepsi, kraft and nestle.

The Obama Administration has given its blessing to PepsiCo to continue utilizing the services of a company that produces flavor chemicals for the beverage giant using aborted human fetal tissue.

The Obama Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) has decided that PepsiCo's arrangement with San Diego, Cal.-based Senomyx, which produces flavor enhancing chemicals for Pepsi using human embryonic kidney tissue, simply constitutes "ordinary business operations."

The issue began in 2011 when the non-profit group Children of God for Life (CGL) first broke the news about Pepsi's alliance with Senomyx, which led to massive outcry and a worldwide boycott of Pepsi products. At that time, it was revealed that Pepsi had many other options at its disposal to produce flavor chemicals, which is what its competitors do, but had instead chosen to continue using aborted fetal cells -- or as Senomyx deceptively puts it, "isolated human taste receptors"

A few months later, Pepsi' shareholders filed a resolution petitioning the company to "adopt a corporate policy that recognizes human rights and employs ethical standards which do not involve using the remains of aborted human beings in both private and collaborative research and development agreements." But the Obama Administration shut down this 36-page proposal, deciding instead that Pepsi's used of aborted babies to flavor its beverage products is just business as usual, and not a significant concern.

"We're not talking about what kind of pencils PepsiCo wants to use -- we are talking about exploiting the remains of an aborted child for profit," said Debi Vinnedge, Executive Director of CGL, concerning the SEC decision. "Using human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) to produce flavor enhancers for their beverages is a far cry from routine operations!"

To be clear, the aborted fetal tissue used to make Pepsi's flavor chemicals does not end up in the final product sold to customers, according to reports -- it is used, instead, to evaluate how actual human taste receptors respond to these chemical flavorings. But the fact that Pepsi uses them at all when viable, non-human alternatives are available illustrates the company's blatant disregard for ethical and moral concerns in the matter.

Back in January, Oklahoma Senator Ralph Shortey proposed legislation to ban the production of aborted fetal cell-derived flavor chemicals in his home state. If passed, S.B. 1418 would also reportedly ban the sale of any products that contain flavor chemicals derived from human fetal tissue, which includes Pepsi products as well as products produced by Kraft and Nestle

(Everyday I read stuff that is crazy but this is sick. Obama is a destroyer. He is a puppet of satan. This is just another example. Kraft, nestle and pepsi use aborted baby parts to test their products flavor, how sick is this! Makes me want to puke.) Story Reports

Obama intentionally wanting to cause racial chaos

Obama intentionally wanting to cause racial chaos.

(Obama intentionally wanting to cause racial chaos to divert attention from himself and his total destruction of the US economy. Obama is again creating a "crisis" to help himself get elected. Obama is diverting attention to keep the public's attention away from his lack of valid proof of US citizenship. Obama is in fact an illegal "president" who will stop at nothing to destroy America as we know it. White Americans = Zimmerman to obama/the black panthers. People who listen to the white house race bater will follow his directions and cause racial trouble.) Story Reports

Radio host Rush Limbaugh says President Obama and officials in his administration are intentionally stoking racial chaos in America in connection with the Trayvon Martin case.

“There’s no question that the White House wants this kind of chaos and unrest in the culture,” Limbaugh said this afternoon.

His comments came moments before the Washington Post reported Florida special prosecutor Angela Corey planned to announce she is charging neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman in the shooting of Martin.

Limbaugh said the situation is “a powder keg waiting to go off,” and that “nobody that I see is doing anything to try to make sure that powder keg doesn’t explode.”

He added: “If in the White House they wanted to cool this down, which they should do, they could do it. All it would take … would be Obama addressing the nation to calm this down, and then speaking about it in genuine American terms, not racial terms. If they wanted tot do that, they could. Other presidents have. It’s not happening here.”

Limbaugh says the White House has determined “it is helpful for Obama’s re-election because they believe that they can tie all of this to the existence of Republicans and conservatives, that the racial problems exist because of never-ending racism of the right, never-ending racism of Republicans. And that’s why George Zimmerman in the New York Times is called a white Hispanic. There are people un the race industry who became excited that this event took place because it allowed them to carry forward with their template, that we still are a nation, essentially, with slaves. You couple that with what I think is a chip on Obama’s shoulder about the founding of the country, the engrained discrimination, his anger over it, his opportunity now here to finally make it right.”

Martin, 17 and unarmed, was shot and killed Feb. 26 by Zimmerman, who said he was acting in self-defense after getting his bashed by Martin. Police in Sanford, Fla., where the shooting took place, initially did not charge Zimmerman, based on the state’s “stand your ground” law.