Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Friday, February 3, 2012

U.S. Constitution beneath the foot of Barack Obama


Against the background of a darkening sky, all of the past Presidents of the United States gather before the White House, as if to commemorate some great event. In the left hand corner of the painting sits a man. That man, with his head bowed appears distraught and hopeless as he contemplates his future. Some of the past Presidents try to console him while looking in the direction of the modern Presidents as if to say, “What have you done?” Many of these modern Presidents, seemingly oblivious to anything other than themselves, appear to be congratulating each other on their great accomplishments. In front of the man, paper trash is blowing in the wind. Crumpled dollar bills, legislative documents, and,

like a whisper—the U.S. Constitution beneath the foot of Barack Obama.

Judge says Obama can be on Georgia ballot

An administrative law judge in Georgia today ruled that Barack Obama’s name can be on the state’s 2012 presidential election ballot because he was born in Hawaii, is “native born,” and thus also is “natural born” as required by the Constitution.

He cited a little-known determination by an Indiana judge.

“The Indiana court determined that a person qualifies as a natural born citizen if he was born in the United States because he became a United States citizen at birth,” wrote Michael Malihi, an administrative law judge in Atlanta.

“For the purposes of this analysis, this court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.”

Malihi’s decision came without any evidence being presented by Obama or his lawyer, after they snubbed the court by refusing to participate in the required hearing under a state law that mandates all candidates qualify for the office they seek.
Georgia Judge Rules Against Plaintiffs:
Attorney Mark Hatfield "taking it up on appeal"
Article II Super PAC Email


As you know we were expecting word out of Georgia today and we got it. Late this afternoon Judge Malihi issued his ruling against all four Plaintiffs.

We caught up with Swensson/Powell's counsel, Mark Hatfield, late this afternoon to get his initial take on the ruling. Here is what he stated “obviously we are disappointed w/the decision, but there are a couple of items in the ruling that we are looking at. First, the Judge never made any ruling on who has the burden of proof even though he indicated in chambers prior to the hearing that making the determination of the burden of proof laid with Defendant Obama."

He went onto state "the Judge has a record of placing the burden on the candidate, but didn't do so in this case." Another point Hatfield made was the “Indiana Court of Appeals ruling in Arkeny elevates the Indiana case above the Constitution" while also noting the Judge ignored the Minor court in Minor v Happersett, a ruling that clearly defined natural born Citizen, established precedent. When asked about next steps Hatfield stated "we are going full bore and taking it up on appeal”.

An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

Please visit and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.


(Judge malibi is acting like obama's attorney instead of a judge of law. Judge malibi totally ignored a supreme court ruling that has defined who a natural born citizen is.

Obama Is NOT a Natural Born Citizen But an Illegal President.

"Natural Born Citizen" was defined by an 1875 Supreme Court ruling (Minor v. Happersett) as children born of two U.S. citizens. It found: "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

I am seeing more of a fixed numbers game from the government in every area. Obama and his controllers have allready FIXED the "election". We the people are watching obama ignore the US Constitution and destroy the rule of law.

How can Judge malibi tell the lawyers in effect you have won a default judgement but then the lawyers ask to present their case so it will be on the record and a week later hand everything over to obama on a silver platter.

Something smells and is rotten like bo.

The above picture is a good visual explanation of the fraud obama and what he is doing to our freedom under the Constitution.

Obama is a lawless president.)
Story Reports

Ginsburg doesn't recommend the US Constitution yet she is a supreme court justice

(She looks like she is saying "you sweet boy now tell momma why you havn't declared martial law yet.")

The U.S. Embassy in Cairo has posted an Alhayat TV interview of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She traveled to the region last month in coordination with the State Department to meet Egyptian counterparts as they begin the nation’s constitutional transition.

Asked by the English-speaking interviewer whether she thought Egypt should use the Constitutions of other countries as a model, Ginsburg said Egyptians should be “aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II.”

“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa,” says Ginsburg, whom President Clinton nominated to the court in 1993. “That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.”

(Suprerme Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wants a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. She doesn't "look" to the US Constitution if she were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012.

This woman doesn't think the US Constitution which she distains is good enough for any country to emulate.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg might as well be registered as a foreign government agent.

She as many other Traitors and Saboteurs of the US Constitution are the enemy within.)
Story Reports

Ginsburg quotes:

"Boy Scouts should be required to accept gay scoutmasters." (Jun 2000)

"State laws can protect gay rights." (May 1996)

"Disallow all sodomy laws against same-sex activity." (Jun 2003)

"Grandparents get no visitation rights unless parents agree." (Jun 2000)

"Treaty giving individual rights should bind US courts." (Mar 2008)

"Votes with liberal bloc against states’ rights." (Dec 2000)

"Waiting to decide on ObamaCare will provide better decision." (Feb 2011)

"Congress authorized detaining US citizens as enemy soldiers." (Jun 2004)

Thursday, February 2, 2012

How Billionaires Rule Schools

How Billionaires Rule Our Schools

Joanne Barkan

THE COST of K–12 public schooling in the United States comes to well over $500 billion per year. So, how much influence could anyone in the private sector exert by controlling just a few billion dollars of that immense sum? Decisive influence, it turns out. A few billion dollars in private foundation money, strategically invested every year for a decade, has sufficed to define the national debate on education; sustain a crusade for a set of mostly ill-conceived reforms; and determine public policy at the local, state, and national levels. In the domain of venture philanthropy—where donors decide what social transformation they want to engineer and then design and fund projects to implement their vision—investing in education yields great bang for the buck.

Hundreds of private philanthropies together spend almost $4 billion annually to support or transform K–12 education, most of it directed to schools that serve low-income children (only religious organizations receive more money). But three funders—the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli and Edythe Broad (rhymes with road) Foundation, and the Walton Family Foundation—working in sync, command the field.

Other foundations—Ford, Hewlett, Annenberg, Milken, to name just a few—often join in funding one project or another, but the education reform movement’s success so far has depended on the size and clout of the Gates-Broad-Walton triumvirate.

How do these foundations operate on the ground? How do they leverage their money into control over public policy? And how do they construct consensus? We know the array of tools used by the foundations for education reform: they fund programs to close down schools, set up charters, and experiment with data-collection software, testing regimes, and teacher evaluation plans; they give grants to research groups and think tanks to study all the programs, to evaluate all the studies, and to conduct surveys; they give grants to TV networks for programming and to news organizations for reporting; they spend hundreds of millions on advocacy outreach to the media, to government at every level, and to voters. Yet we don’t know much at all until we get down to specifics.

(School choice is in fact teaching left wing socialism to students. Just look at the above left wing foundations that are buying influence in the schools of their "choice".

I think the only answer is to get you child the heck out of "school choice" and public schools. The only answer is to home school your child yourself.)
Story Reports

Sunday, January 29, 2012


Visit: (Real News) (Citizen Journalist)

Susan Daniels Testifies in Atlanta: Obama's Social Security Number is Fraudulent


Susan Daniels is a licensed private investigator who has researched the use of the social security number currently being used by Barack Hussein Obama which she has determined was issued in the state of Connecticut, where Obama has neither lived nor worked. Daniels has stated that the number had originally been assigned to a man from Connecticut born in 1890.

Daniels is president of Susan Daniels & Associates, which is located in Ohio and was incorporated in 1995.

Author Jack Cashill has consulted with Susan Daniels on the issue of Obama’s social security number and has written a book, Deconstructing Obama, which presents Cashill’s evidence that Obama did not write his own autobiography, Dreams From My Father. Cashill believes that Bill Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground wrote the book.

Ayers has been described as an “unrepentant domestic terrorist” who had bombed the Capitol building in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972. Ayers and his later wife, Bernardine Dohrn, had built bombs which accidentally killed Ayers’s girlfriend at the time, Diana Oughton, in 1970. The Weather Underground had planned unsuccessfully to bomb Ft. Dix, a U.S. Army base in New Jersey and has been accused by one writer of treason.

Obama has been described as “comfortable” in the company of such former terrorists and radicals. Ayers and his wife still live in Hyde Park, where the Obamas lived before moving in to the White House in January 2009.

*** ***
There is evidence that Ayers committed identity fraud, stealing birth certificate numbers from young children who had passed away.

During her investigation of Obama’s use of the Connecticut social security number, Daniels also located two social security numbers associated with Michelle Obama, one of which Daniels stated does not belong to her.

On September 30, 2009, Daniels submitted a sworn affidavit of her findings for both of the Obamas which was assimilated into the Barnett v. Obama lawsuit. A second sworn affidavit was submitted on October 19, 2009.

In March 2011, Daniels wrote to the Social Security Administration and told them that Obama had been using a fraudulent social security number. Of the response she received, she said, “Usually if you get something back from the government, it will say, ‘You’re wrong because of Section such-and-such…’ They’ll cite something proving that you were wrong and why you were wrong. This one is a four-sentence letter, and it said, ‘After reviewing the information you provided, we disagree with your conclusion that a person’s social security number depends upon the address of residence.’ ‘We disagree!’ It’s hysterical, because they didn’t cite any reason why I wasn’t right. It’s not a question of opinion; it’s whether or not my contention was accurate.”


(Its very obvious obama has a manufacutred identity. Its is also obvious his terrorist buddy bill ayers helped him fake his identity when they were working together. Not only does obama use a fake ss number but almost everything associated with his past is covered up or faked. If obama was really checked out by the federal governent he could not even get a green card to work in the US.

Obama is NOT a natural born citizen because he also claims on his fake "birth certificate" that his "father" was born in kenya. Obama is a foreign agent who has presented himself as a US citizen.)
Story Reports