Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Are you licensed to reload that ammo?
Get Your Reloading Kit Now before BO bans them along with guns and ammo
Are you licensed to reload that ammo?
Alarm raised over treaty provision to ban activity
By Bob Unruh
President Obama, who supported the handgun ban in Washington, D.C., before it was tossed by the Supreme Court, since his election has watched various proposals to ban "assault" weapons, require handgun owners to submit to mental health evaluations and sparked a rush on ammunition purchases that caused some retailers to name him their salesman of the year. Now he apparently is going after citzens who reload their ammunition.
It was during an official visit earlier this month to Mexico that he affirmed his support for a proposed international treaty that addresses "firearms trafficking."
B.A. Lawson
The treaty was adopted by President Clinton years ago but never ratified by the U.S. Senate, a goal Obama now has adopted.
The writer, B.A. Lawson, says, "If you reload your own ammo you may find yourself engaged in 'Illicit Manufacturing' of ammunition under an arms control treaty that President Obama started pushing last week in Mexico."
"Virtually everyone who supports the 2nd Amendment or has an interest in firearms has heard the numerous recent reports of ammunition shortages. The shortages have extended to reloading supplies that many folks rely on to keep their shooting costs down or to assemble exotic or hard to find ammunition. Many shooters have considered reloading their own ammo as insurance against limited supplies should legislation be enacted that would make ammo more scarce or dramatically more expensive," the blogger continued.
"Those thoughts may be in vain if the current administration is successful in getting the 'INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST THE ILLICIT MANUFACTURING OF AND TRAFFICKING IN FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES, AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS' treaty passed."
The treaty defines "illicit manufacturing" as "the manufacture or assembly of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials."
It then gives authority for that activity only with "a license from a competent governmental authority of the State Party where the manufacture or assembly takes place."
"The section … clearly identifies ammo reloaders that are not licensed by the government as 'Illicit Manufacturers' of ammunition. Now that we have reloaders properly labeled, lets move down to Article IV to see what we should do with them," the commentary said.
He then quotes Article IV, which states, "State Parties that have not yet done so shall adopt the necessary legislative or other measures to establish as criminal offenses under their domestic law the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials."
"This is pretty straightforward. If you reload ammunition without a license after the treaty is signed you will be a criminal," Lawson wrote.
The National Rifle Association said the treaty "does include language suggesting that it is not intended to restrict 'lawful ownership and use' of firearms. Despite those words, the NRA knows that anti-gun advocates will still try to use this treaty to attack gun ownership in the U.S."
INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST THE ILLICIT MANUFACTURING OF AND TRAFFICKING IN FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, EXPLOSIVES, AND OTHER RELATED MATERIALS Treaty
Even accessories "which can be attached to a firearm" are targeted.
"It would presumably also ban home manufacture of these items without a government license. Do you own trigger jobs? Reload your own ammunition? Not any more, not without a government license!"
John Velleco, director of federal affairs for Gun Owners of America, notes the benefits for Obama of having such rules in treaties, not legislation.
"If ratified and the U.S. is found not to be in compliance with any provisions of the treaty – such as a provision that would outlaw reloading ammunition without a government license – President Obama would be empowered to implement regulations without congressional approval," he wrote.
"If the kind of 'change' that Obama wants is for the United States to take its marching orders from third world countries regarding our gun rights, we're in big trouble!"
resident Obama would be empowered to implement regulations without congressional approval!!!!
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Obama is like crack to some people
I've noticed obama is like crack to some people. No matter how much logic or real facts concerning the FRAUD obama are explained or drawn like a picture for some people they will not accept the truth but almost every time explain obama's lies or deception with another lie or most of the time an insult because obama supporters cannot refute or explain the FRAUD obama. They act like obama is crack to them and instead of selling their mother for crack they sell their freedom and liberty. Obama supporters are addicted and in denial about who obama is and what he is doing. They constantly make excuses for him because he is their human 'crack'. They must injest his lies and believe whatever he says or they will go into obama withdrawal and feel like they are not part of the great crowd of people the mass media talks about suppoting obama's every move. Obama supporters need to be detoxed which means first of all not listening to the mass news media and local news media that supports obama and does not question anything he says or does. They need to read wnd.com, rushlimbaugh.com, investigatingobama.blogspot.com etc and stay of the program until the bo leaves their system. Because bo mania is so toxic there are some withdrawal symptoms such as craving cnn and wanting to believe the obama propaganda. BO is just like crack to all who try it, just one hit and BO "crack" has made them slaves to believe whatever the dnc or the democrates tell them. BO crack is addictive to those who inhale his lies.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Obama Forgery Exposed (Dr. Polarik Official Use)
OBAMA IS A FRAUD. HOW CAN ANYONE DENY THIS?
Obama Certificate of live birth is a forgery
What is the definition of FORGERY?
The Black's Law, American College, and Random House dictionaries along with the court citations below define FORGERY as:
The making, drawing, or altering a document with the intent to defraud. A signature made without the person knowing of or consenting to it.
The law and the courts say:
The Modern Penal Code (MPC sec. 224.1) states that a person is guilty of forgery if:
a) a actor or person alters any writing of any person,
b) makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues, or transfers any writing so that it purports to be an act of another who did not authorize the act or to have been at the time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original when no such original existed; or
c) utters any writing which he knows to be forged.
"Forgery is a crime when it includes the representation of handwriting of another and the act of uttering as true and genuine any forged writing knowing the same to be forged with intent to prejudice, damage, and defraud any person."
State v. May 93 Idaho 343, 461 P. 2d 126, 129.
"Crime of forgery is committed when one makes or passes a false instrument with the intent to defraud, and the element of loss or detriment is immaterial."
People v. McAffey, 182 Cal. App.2d 486, 6 Cal. Rptr. 333,337
"The false making of an instrument, which purports on the face of it to be good and valid for purposes for which it was created, with design to defraud any person or persons."
State v. Goranson, 67 Wash.2d 456, 408 P.2d 7,9.
How do we prove a forgery?
Proving it involves reviewing the totality of the law regarding the facts in evidence. This includes the signatures, a competent analysis of the signatures and an understanding of the law as it applies to the case.
Obama is a FRAUD. His forgery is a crime. He should be impeached from office.
Obama Certificate of live birth is a forgery
What is the definition of FORGERY?
The Black's Law, American College, and Random House dictionaries along with the court citations below define FORGERY as:
The making, drawing, or altering a document with the intent to defraud. A signature made without the person knowing of or consenting to it.
The law and the courts say:
The Modern Penal Code (MPC sec. 224.1) states that a person is guilty of forgery if:
a) a actor or person alters any writing of any person,
b) makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues, or transfers any writing so that it purports to be an act of another who did not authorize the act or to have been at the time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original when no such original existed; or
c) utters any writing which he knows to be forged.
"Forgery is a crime when it includes the representation of handwriting of another and the act of uttering as true and genuine any forged writing knowing the same to be forged with intent to prejudice, damage, and defraud any person."
State v. May 93 Idaho 343, 461 P. 2d 126, 129.
"Crime of forgery is committed when one makes or passes a false instrument with the intent to defraud, and the element of loss or detriment is immaterial."
People v. McAffey, 182 Cal. App.2d 486, 6 Cal. Rptr. 333,337
"The false making of an instrument, which purports on the face of it to be good and valid for purposes for which it was created, with design to defraud any person or persons."
State v. Goranson, 67 Wash.2d 456, 408 P.2d 7,9.
How do we prove a forgery?
Proving it involves reviewing the totality of the law regarding the facts in evidence. This includes the signatures, a competent analysis of the signatures and an understanding of the law as it applies to the case.
Obama is a FRAUD. His forgery is a crime. He should be impeached from office.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)