Nazi Euthanasia Vs Obamacare

Hitler's T4 Program Revived In Obama's Health-Care `Reform'. You will have no recourse because the government can't be sued nor will there be any appeal after a committee determines you are unworthy or life. This is what national health care is all about. Yes there are "death care" panels. In effect "killing off old people", its not crazy or stupid to say that because your health care would be determinded by one of several panels, with no appeal. I WOULD CALL THIS A DEATH PANEL!! - THERE WILL BE A GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get! No the "death panel" is not in obamacare its is in HR 1 the "stimulus" bill pages 442, 446.

Hr 1 stimulus bill contains provisions for the government to decide if you live or die!
.........................................................................................
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional.

Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department.

Page 445
•HR 1 EH
1 ‘‘(ii) The utilization of an electronic
2 health record for each person in the United
3 States by 2014.

Page 454
•HR 1 EH
1 ‘‘(iii) The utilization of a certified
2 electronic health record for each person in
3 the United States by 2014.

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.

(Having the government control your personal health records is taking away your freedom disguised as health care.) Story Reports

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions hr 1 pages (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”

(See I told you the government will decide and control if and when you get health care. They don't call it a death panel but it is. Its just like hitler's "experts" placed a + mark in red pencil or - mark in blue pencil under the term "treatment" on a special form. A red plus mark meant a decision to kill the child. A blue minus sign meant meant a decision against killing. Three plus symbols resulted in a euthanasia warrant being issued and the transfer of the child to a 'Children's Specialty Department' for death by injection or gradual starvation.

Same thing almost. The National Coordinator of Health Information Technology will review your "case" and mark with a pencil as they monitor treatments for you to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective.

National coordinator will give you a red mark if he or they deem its not appropriate or cost effective. What the mean by cost effective is the key. If the government deems you to be to old or sick to receive treatment from a doctor, the government "death panel" will mark a "red plus" which means you will not see the doctor. If you get a blue minus or something like it you will be put in a cue to receive treatment in the future. Its all hidden in the "stimulus" bill H. R. 1 pages 442, 446.

HR 1 Read The "stimulus" bill and the fact obama can see everthing in your medical records and the government will decide if you get health care

(This is how obama and others could get away with lying about "death panels" which are used by The National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. The bill of course does refer to "death panels" but in effect the national coordinator of health information technology is the "death panel". This government agency will review your health records. This gov agency will determine if you live or die according to what the government deems appropriate and cost effective. A DEATH PANEL in the form of The National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. No the "death panel" is not in obamacare its is in HR 1 pages 442,446.) Story Reports

Page 442 or HR 1
10 ‘‘(4) provides appropriate information to help
11 guide medical decisions at the time and place of
12 care;


Page 446
8 ‘(C) MEASURABLE OUTCOME GOALS.—
9 The strategic plan update shall include measur
10 able outcome goals.

(Remember the goals are to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions on your health care. Yes obamacare will determine what level of medical care you receive and if you get medical care at all. Obamacare will reduce costs by just using the nazi euthansia idea in the form of what obama had in mind for his grandmother whch was, just go home, take a pill and die!) Story Reports

HR 1 Read The "stimulus" bill and the fact obama can see everthing in your medical records and the government will decide if you get health care

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)

What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.

The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Elderly Hardest Hit

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision.

Hidden Provisions of HR 1 "stimulus" bill the real obamacare bill

The Obama administration’s economic stimulus bill provides for seniors in the U.S. will face similar rationing. Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.

The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).

Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”

(Yes the real obamacare is not in the healthcare bill it was in HR 1 the "stimulus" bill that was rushed through congress. The dirty Illegitimate illegal alien obama made sure it was the first thing he got passed. Obama is the scum of the earth! The provisions of HR 1 will make sure millions of people will die an early death. Obama is a devil.) Story Reports

The destruction of American lives unworthy of life via obamacare

Hr 1 obama "stimulus" plan is also obamacare in disguise Read the facts.

Pg335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339 – Govt mandates estab. of outcome based measures. HC the way they want. Rationing.

PG 253 Line 10-18 Govt sets value of Dr’s time, prof judg, etc. Literally value of humans. We’re nxt.

Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill – Doctors, doesnt matter what specialty u have, you’ll all be paid the same.

Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill Govt will reduce physician svcs 4 Medicaid. Seniors, low income, poor affected.

Pg 195 HC Bill -officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access 2 ALL Americans finan/pers recs.

Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from indiv. taxes. (Americans will pay)

Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesnt have acceptable HC accrdng 2 Govt will be taxed 2.5% of inc.

pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill – Doctors – The Govt will tell YOU what u can make.

pg 126 lines 10-15 HC Bill – The Govt can make up prices for anything at anytime for any reason.

pg 124 lines 24-25 HC No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No “judicial review” against Govt Monop.

Pg 111 Sec 208 The Federal Govt will usurp all State powers in State Based HC Exchng. Violation 10th Amend.

PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill – Specs of Ben Levels 4 Plans. #AARP members – U Health care WILL b rationed.

Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Govt will have direct access 2 ur banks accts 4 elect. funds transfer!

PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill – HC will be provided 2 ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise.

Pg 42 of HC Bill – The Health Choices Commissioner will choose UR HC Benefits 4 you. U have no choice!

Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill – YOUR HEALTHCARE IS RATIONED!!!

Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill – THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benes u get.


Hitler's T4 Program Revived In Obama's Health-Care `Reform' Bill
......................................................................................
Nazi Euthanasia

Hitlers healthcare plan

In October of 1939 amid the turmoil of the outbreak of war Hitler ordered widespread "mercy killing" of the sick and disabled.

Code named "Aktion T 4," the Nazi euthanasia program to eliminate "life unworthy of life" at first focused on newborns and very young children. Midwives and doctors were required to register children up to age three who showed symptoms of mental retardation, physical deformity, or other symptoms included on a questionnaire from the Reich Health Ministry.

A decision on whether to allow the child to live was then made by three medical experts solely on the basis of the questionnaire, without any examination and without reading any medical records.

Each expert placed a + mark in red pencil or - mark in blue pencil under the term "treatment" on a special form. A red plus mark meant a decision to kill the child. A blue minus sign meant meant a decision against killing. Three plus symbols resulted in a euthanasia warrant being issued and the transfer of the child to a 'Children's Specialty Department' for death by injection or gradual starvation.

The decision had to be unanimous. In cases where the decision was not unanimous the child was kept under observation and another attempt would be made to get a unanimous decision.

The Nazi euthanasia program quickly expanded to include older disabled children and adults. Hitler's decree of October, 1939, typed on his personal stationery and back dated to Sept. 1, enlarged "the authority of certain physicians to be designated by name in such manner that persons who, according to human judgment, are incurable can, upon a most careful diagnosis of their condition of sickness, be accorded a mercy death."

Questionnaires were then distributed to mental institutions, hospitals and other institutions caring for the chronically ill.

Patients had to be reported if they suffered from schizophrenia, epilepsy, senile disorders, therapy resistant paralysis and syphilitic diseases, retardation, encephalitis, Huntington's chorea and other neurological conditions, also those who had been continuously in institutions for at least 5 years, or were criminally insane, or did not posses German citizenship or were not of German or related blood, including Jews, Negroes, and Gypsies.

A total of six killing centers were established including the well known psychiatric clinic at Hadamar. The euthanasia program was eventually headed by an SS man named Christian Wirth, a notorious brute with the nickname 'the savage Christian.'

At Brandenburg, a former prison was converted into a killing center where the first Nazi experimental gassings took place. The gas chambers were disguised as shower rooms, but were actually hermetically sealed chambers connected by pipes to cylinders of carbon monoxide. Patients were generally drugged before being led naked into the gas chamber. Each killing center included a crematorium where the bodies were taken for disposal. Families were then falsely told the cause of death was medical such as heart failure or pneumonia.

But the huge increase in the death rate for the disabled combined with the very obvious plumes of odorous smoke over the killing centers aroused suspicion and fear. At Hadamar, for example, local children even taunted arriving busloads of patients by saying "here comes some more to be gassed."

On August 3, 1941, a Catholic Bishop, Clemens von Galen, delivered a sermon in Münster Cathedral attacking the Nazi euthanasia program calling it "plain murder." The sermon sent a shockwave through the Nazi leadership by publicly condemning the program and urged German Catholics to "withdraw ourselves and our faithful from their (Nazi) influence so that we may not be contaminated by their thinking and their ungodly behavior."

As a result, on August 23, Hitler suspended Aktion T4, which had accounted for nearly a hundred thousand deaths by this time.

The Nazis retaliated against the Bishop by beheading three parish priests who had distributed his sermon, but left the Bishop unharmed to avoid making him into a martyr.

However, the Nazi euthanasia program quietly continued, but without the widespread gassings. Drugs and starvation were used instead and doctors were encouraged to decide in favor of death whenever euthanasia was being considered.

The use of gas chambers at the euthanasia killing centers ultimately served as training centers for the SS. They used the technical knowledge and experience gained during the euthanasia program to construct huge killing centers at Auschwitz, Treblinka and other concentration camps in an attempt to exterminate the entire Jewish population of Europe. SS personnel from the euthanasia killing centers, notably Wirth, Franz Reichleitner and Franz Stangl later commanded extermination camps.

Obamacare Bill

The real obamacare bill is HR 1 the "stimulus bill". This bill is the real obamacare. It has provisions for the government to decide if and when you get health care. Your health care will be decided not by your doctor alone but by the government and your doctor. Also if your doctor exceeds the government's quota he is penalized. Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. If you happen to be the one that exceeds the quota, sorry, to bad no health care if you are not cost effective or appropriate to be treated by a doctor.

Obama and the government starting in 2014 will determine if you live or die via HR 1 the real obamacare bill.

We must remove the cancer in Nov 2010 or America will die. The cancer is obama. The malignant cancer on America obama must be removed as much as possible. Obama must be neutered, if thats possible. He must be made dormant or benign.

H.R.4872
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)

17 more states planning Arizona type of crackdown on illegal aliens

17 more states planning Arizona type of crackdown on illegal aliens

Bob Unruh

In what is developing into a standoff between states and the federal government that could be bigger than gun control or even health care, 17 states have launched versions of Arizona's immigration law, even as federal officials say they may not bother to process illegal aliens caught by the states.

(What kind of federal govrnment would selectively inforce immigration laws? A federal government that itself is using the immigration laws to garner votes of illegal aliens. Obama and his administration are corrupt and should be removed from office before obama declares himself dictator. Obama and his administration are traitors to America. Obama ignores the will of the people in Arizona and America. The biggest threat to America is not illegals or terrorism but it is the "illegal alien" "president" obama and his fellow radical socialists. Obama is The Manchurian Candidate who is programmed to destroy America. Obama is a fake president whose objective is the destruction of capitalism and the US economy. He is a successful failure in my opinion.) Story Reports

"Over the last couple days, Obama and the chief of ICE have refused to honor their oaths of office," he said. "Their constitutional requirement is to enforce existing laws.

"Seventeen states are now filing versions of Arizona's SB 1070, which is designed to help local police enforce America's existing immigration laws."

Numerous national and local polls indicate 60 to 81 percent of Americans support local police enforcing immigration laws.

(Obama ignores this just as he ignores the effects of the tea party people causing democrates to drop like flies in elections with the exception of districts that are 2 to 1 democrate and rely on the federal government for everything.) Story Reports

"Arizona no longer stands alone and we have now documented state lawmakers filing, or announcing they will file, versions of the Arizona bill in seventeen states!

The states where some form of immigration crackdown is under development include Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas and Utah.

The Arizona law and the plans it has spawned in other states is a victory for Americans. But he said those are just battles, and winning the war will require success in elections this fall.

A "comprehensive" solution to the problem will arrive when there are enough "hostile" members of Congress to tell the administration to uphold the existing immigration and border laws or the impeachments will start, he said.

"[We need to send] to Washington a hostile Congress that is going to encircle the executive branch and tell them to [follow the law] or we'll impeach all the way down to the speaker of the House," he said.

The pending release, expected sometime just before the election, of a movie called "Machete," which reportedly is the story of a Mexican uprising in the United States, is just what BO ordered.

The message in the movie reportedly is that Americans will either submit to the "rape" of their land or else. The project is intended to create turmoil just as the mid-term elections draw near.

(Remember obama said republicans bring a knife to a fight and he would bring a gun. A machete is just a big knife the liberal democrates are bringing to the fight. Americans need to heed obama's warning about knives and guns. They should arm themselves to the max for self defense. Obama is raping America every day.) Story Reports

Sen. Barack Obama talks at a town hall meeting at Radnor Middle School in Wayne, Pa., Saturday, June 14, 2008. (AP)

That’s exactly what Barack Obama said he would do to counter Republican attacks “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”

"It is incumbent upon our states to protect American lives, property, jobs, wages, security, and health, when the executive branch fails to honor its constitutional responsibility to do so by enforcing our existing border and immigration laws."

The Arizona law, strictly prohibits racial profiling, empowers local police to enforce immigration laws.

Remember obama is an illegal alien. Read my previous blog and find out how I can prove BO should be deported to any country that will take him.

Obama Has Always Been An Illegal Alien And Still Is

Mexico Immigration law mandates illegal aliens are crimminals

UNDERSTANDING WHAT HAPPENED ON THE DEEPWATER HORIZON

Oceaneering’s blowout preventor

Click anywhere on story to view diagram of blowout preventor and the news media efforts to spin a story that I don't believe

UNDERSTANDING WHAT HAPPENED ON THE DEEPWATER HORIZON
Excellent diagram of the blowout preventor and what the news media and BO says happened. The mass news media can't be trusted nor can obama a know liar.

(I began reading about what probably happened to cause the Deepwater Horizon explosion. The preventative safety measures should have worked to keep the gas from leaking to the surface causing the explosion and oil spill. Either the primary or secondary cementing failed, pushing a huge column of natural gas into the well pipe. I can't see how this could happen?) Story Reports

When the cement failed, the natural gas rocketed to the surface, as the weakened mixture of mud and seawater did not have the pressure necessary to hold the gas back. The gas exploded the rig, killing 11 men and destroying the rig.

(The secondary safety measure, the blowout preventor, that should have worked failed. This is what I can't understand. BP representatives suggested that the preventer could have suffered a hydraulic leak. If the BOP is tested frequently to make sure it works it seems that a hydraulic leak would be very unlikely. Representatives said documents and company briefings suggested that BP, Transocean and Halliburton ignored tests that flagged up faults in the BOP. This is hard for me to believe.) Story Reports

A committee heard testimony from oil executives suggesting multiple failures of safety systems that should have given advance warning of a blowout, or should have promptly cut off the flow of oil.

The failures included a dead battery in the BOP, suggestions of a breach in the well casing, and failure in the shear ram.

How could this be possible when the BOP is tested frequently to make sure it works. All three companies transocean, bp and haliburton would have known the safety measure were not going to work if needed. This would mean all three companies would be willing to take an unnecessary risk. It would be like me getting into a car and driving knowing the breaks didn't work. I just don't buy this. It smells like BO. BO and the democrates know any disaster can be used to their advantage to push unwanted "global warming" legislation through congress when it could not have passed before without a "crisis". Rham will not let this "crisis" go to waste.) Story Reports

About 11 hours before the Deepwater Horizon exploded, a disagreement took place between the top manager for oil giant BP PLC on the drilling rig and his counterpart for the rig's owner, Transocean Ltd., concerning the final steps in shutting down the nearly completed well, according to a worker's sworn statement.

(I don't buy this. BP was leasing the rig for $1,000,000.0 a day. I can't believe the rig owner transocean would argue about the critical final steps in shutting down the well.) Story Reports

Michael Williams, a Transocean employee who was chief electronics technician on the rig, said there was "confusion" between those high-ranking officials in an 11 a.m. meeting on the day of the rig blast, according to a sworn statement from Mr. Williams reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. Mr. Williams himself attended the meeting.

(These people were confused so thats why the oil rig blew up. I don't buy it.) Story Reports

The confusion over the drilling plan in the final hours leading up to the explosion could be key to understanding the causes of the blowout and ultimately who was responsible.

What is known from drilling records and congressional testimony is that after the morning meeting, the crew began preparations to remove from the drill pipe heavy drilling "mud" that provides pressure to keep down any gas, and to replace this mud with lighter seawater.

Ultimately, the crew removed the mud before setting a final 300-foot cement plug that is typically poured as a last safeguard to prevent combustible gas from rising to the surface. Indeed, they never got the opportunity to set the plug.


Tim Probert, Halliburton's president of global business lines, plans to testify Tuesday that his company had finished an earlier step, cementing the casing, filling in the area between the pipe and the walls of the well; pressure tests showed the casing had been properly constructed, he will testify. At this point it is common practice to pour wet cement down into the pipe. The wet cement, which is heavier than the drilling mud, sinks down through the drilling mud and then hardens into a plug thousands of feet down in the well.

The mud then is removed and displaced by seawater; the hardened cement plug holds
back any underground gas.

In this case, a decision was made, shortly before the explosion, to perform the remaining tasks in reverse order, according to the expected Senate testimony of Mr. Probert, the Halliburton executive.

(I don't buy this either. Seawater can't hold back gas from a well and of course BP know this. This seems to me to not make sense. They use mud to hold back the gas and oil from popping to the surface. This is why it is used. They know darn well sea water is not going to hold back anything before the well is plugged with cement. I'm sure they also know darn well the cement must be the correct kind also. All this makes no sense. How could an oil company get "confused" and possibly waste millions or billions of dollars using seawater instead of mud to cap an oil well temporarily? This really stinks and does not smell right. It smells just like BO. Think about it.) Story Reports

"We understand that the drilling contractor then proceeded to displace the riser with
seawater prior to the planned placement of the final cement plug…," Mr. Probert says in
the prepared testimony, which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The "riser" is
part of the pipe running from the sea floor up to the drilling rig at the surface

The BOP stack is a 450-ton series of valves developed to prevent a gusher if the mud control is overwhelmed.

Since BOPs are important for the safety of the crew, as well as the drilling rig and the wellbore itself, BOPs are regularly inspected, tested and refurbished. Tests vary from daily test of functions of critical wells to monthly or less frequent testing of wells with low likelihood of control problems.

.........................................................................................
Oceaneering Web Site

Oceaneering ad:

Oceaneering supplies advanced critical service control and data acquisition components and systems for worldwide use in the oil and gas industry. The company, including Oceaneering Intervention Engineering (OIE), designs and manufactures blowout preventer (BOP) control systems that provide engineered solutions for applications in drilling operations.

Oceaneering’s BOP control systems offer long-term operational track records, setting new standards for reliability and performance. Our products range from conventional and modular surface systems to discrete hydraulic and deepwater electro-hydraulic systems. Each system is developed in our state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities and is backed by a company with decades of experience in the subsea industry.

(The blowout preventor was state of the art. It should have been tested on a regular basis. The media and BO want us all to believe BP, haliburton and transocean ignored the safety features of a multimillion dollar piece of safety equipment because of greed. I don't buy it. Onama is a known liar. I would believe oceaneering's ability to produce a blowout preventor that would be top quality and its extra backup systems would work when needed. I don't believe the news media spin or obama the illegal alien! The story smells.) Story Reports

Is Article 67 is Mexico's version of SB 1070

(Mexico DEMANDS that foreigners prove they are not an illegal alien. Mexico is doing exactly what the US should be doing. The US should DEMAND that ALL illegal aliens, including barack obama, prove they are not illegal aliens!) Story Reports

Article 67 reads, “Authorities, whether federal, state or municipal, are required to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country, before attending to any issues.”

by CNN

Mexican officials have recently criticized Arizona's immigration law, but they've been less vocal about their own immigration laws and practices. Under Mexican law, Article 67 reads, “Authorities, whether federal, state or municipal, are required to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country, before attending to any issues.”

James Kelly is an American tourist who recently visited the Mexican resort city of Cancun. Kelly says, “I got stopped on the street and asked for my I.D.” When asked if he felt he was being racially profiled, Kelly said, “absolutely not. It was making sure the good tourists weren't going to be in any trouble.”

Bruce Greenberg is an American business owner with 26 offices throughout Mexico. He’s been traveling to Mexico for 50 years and says no police officer has ever randomly asked for his identification. Greenberg believes Mexican and American immigration laws are more similar than you think.

“The process is identical. You have to have proper identification” said Greenberg. When asked if he had a problem with the idea of showing his identification while in Mexico, Greenberg said “No, nor in the United States.”

Is Elena Kagan a Lesbian?

(Obama caters to homosesexuals and lesbians. He defends them and seems to mentor them also. Obama is a not a closet supporter. Not only is obama an illegal alien he supports preveted individuals who promote disgusting relationships between the same sex.) Story Reports

Is Elena Kagan a Lesbian?

As far back as 2006 and 2007, four different Harvard Law Students confirmed that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was a Lesbian. Why is the Obama Administration now suddenly ashamed of Kagan’s homosexual orientation?

CBS News first reported that President Obama’s new Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan will be the “first openly gay justice,” pleasing much of Obama’s liberal base. But after pressure from the White House they amended the report: “I have to correct my text here to say that Kagan is apparently still closeted—odd, because her female partner is rather well known in Harvard circles.” CBS later pulled the report entirely, after The Washington Post criticized CBS policy, saying “most major news organizations have policies against ‘outing’ gays or reporting on the sex lives of public officials unless they are related to their public duties.”

Why the sudden media blackout, even among conservative news organizations?

Chaplain Klingenschmitt reveals that four different Harvard Law School students reported Kagan was Lesbian Homosexual as far back as 2006 and 2007.

Harvard Student #1) "HLS has changed over the years, and the newest, high-energy dean is Elena Kagan, a lesbian professor who has revitalized the community...I actually attended HLS. And I did so RECENTLY to boot, not 10 years ago."

In December 2007, three more Harvard Law Students confirmed Elena Kagan is a Lesbian while writing on the Harvard Law School Admissions Discussion Board, posting under the topic "Is Elena Kagan married?" Their comments all agree:

Date: December 16th, 2007 2:16 PM
Author: 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator
Harvard Student #2) Isn't she known to be a lesbian?

Date: December 16th, 2007 3:10 PM
Author: anonprestigiousguy
Harvard Student #3) well she is in ma.

Date: December 16th, 2007 2:10 PM
Author: notatooliswear
Harvard Student #4) pretty sure she's with a female former partner of another leading legal academic.

The last author, notatooliswear, frequently posts elsewhere as a Harvard law clerk who personally observed Kagan up close.

"Kagan's boldest foray into public life was, as dean of Harvard Law School, throwing the military off campus over its 'don't ask, don't tell' policy on gay soldiers. Kagan called the policy, implemented by her former boss President Bill Clinton, 'a profound wrong — a moral injustice of the first order.' She pursued the matter all the way to the Supreme Court, where the justices unanimously slapped down her arguments, forcing Harvard to allow the military to return....

"On the Defense of Marriage Act, Kagan damned with faint praise — she defended the law, but not without first saying the Obama administration opposed it, thought it was discriminatory and hoped to overturn it. Pro-homosexual marriage lawyer Dale Carpenter wrote the move was a 'gift to the gay-marriage movement' because the administration was 'helping knock out a leg from under the opposition to gay marriage.'...

"Long ago, Kagan wrote a memo while clerking for the late Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall that said religious organizations that provide care for teen pregnancies shouldn't get federal funds because of a strict line separating church and state."

Needless to say, Kagan is a bomb-thrower, who would rule as a pro-homosexual, pro-abortion, anti-Christian activist, and she must be filibustered if nominated.

Mexico's Immigration Law

Mexico's Immigration Law

Mexican officials have recently criticized Arizona's immigration law, but they've been less vocal about their own immigration laws and practices. Under Mexican law, Article 67 reads, “Authorities, whether federal, state or municipal, are required to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country, before attending to any issues.”

Mexico's immigration laws makes the law in Arizona look like joke. Mexico treats illegal aliens like crimminals.

President Barack Obama stepped up his criticism of Arizona's controversial immigration law Wednesday, calling it "misdirected" and warning that it has the potential to be applied in a discriminatory fashion.

.........................................................................................
Arizona Law S.B. 1070

Sec. 6. Section 23-212
B.
28 The attorney general or county
29 attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race,
30 color or national origin.

Obama said, "it has the potential to be applied in a discriminatory fashion." The Arizona law clearly states: "The attorney general or county attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race, color or national origin."

Obama is once again exposed as a LIAR!
.........................................................................................

Speaking at a joint news conference with Mexico's President Felipe Calderon, Obama called for overhauling the nation's immigration laws and said that can't be done unless Republicans support it.

Mexico doesn't discimminate when it comes to illegal aliens in mexico. It is a crimminal offense to be an illegal alien in Mexico. It should be a crimminal offence to be an illegal alien in America. Obama is also an illegal alien. His Kenyan citizenship expired when he was 21 and because his mother fell short of the requirment for him to be a US citizen at birth, obama himself is an illegal alien. I advise BO not to go to mexico.
.........................................................................................

J. Michael Waller

Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.

That's too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

* in the country legally;

* have the means to sustain themselves economically;

* not destined to be burdens on society;

* of economic and social benefit to society;

* of good character and have no criminal records; and

* contributors to the general well-being of the nation.

The law also ensures that:

* immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;

* foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;

* foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;

* foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;

* foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;

* those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.

Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens -- and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or
General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country's immigration policy.

It is an interesting law -- and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a
crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.

We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. [1] Now let's look at Mexico's main immigration law.

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

* Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32)

* Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)

* Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)

* The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

* Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)

* A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)

* A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

* Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)

* Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

* Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

* Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

* Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico -- such as working with out a permit -- can also be imprisoned.

Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

* "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)

* Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

* Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126)

Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

* A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

* Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico's immigration practices versus its American immigration preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government's agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

(This is what obama wants as does the mexican presidente. Both are liars. Obama is a traitor who will not defend the US borders. The mexican president wants US sovereignty to be destroyed. Obama knows mexico's policy on illegals. Obama wants our borders to be open to mexicans but mexico will not tolerate illegal aliens. Americans should not tolerate obama nor the mexican presidente. Both of them should be deported!) Story Reports

Oil rig got Obama administration safety award last year

Oil rig got Obama administration safety award last year

At first, officials said 83 inspections had been performed since the rig arrived in the Gulf 104 months ago, in September 2001. While being questioned about the once-per-month claim, the officials subsequently revised the total up to 88 inspections. The number of more recent inspections also changed — from 26 to 48 in the 64 months since January 2005.

No explanation was given for the upward revisions.

(This is just like obama. No explanation for cooking the books to make the federal minerals mangement agency cover their butts. Revised numbers don't hide the fact the agency responsible for checking out the failed oil rig did not check the oil rig out every month. These numbers were "rigged" to look better.) Story Reports

Whatever the correct citation total — five or six — the Deepwater Horizon's record was exemplary, according to MMS officials, who said the rig was never on inspectors' informal "watch list" for problem rigs. In fact, last year MMS awarded the rig an award for its safety history.

(Obama administration gives out awards like it appoints officals. The awards are not creditable. Officals that inspect oil rigs are not creditable if they present awards for failure. Its just like obama to present an award for failure. Obama himself is in fact a "successful failure" and not creditable!) Story Reports

.......................................................................................
Obama awards successful failures that mirror his efforts.
.......................................................................................

By JUSTIN PRITCHARD, Associated Press Writer Justin Pritchard, Associated Press Writer – Sun May 16, 4:34 pm ET

LOS ANGELES – The federal agency responsible for ensuring that the Deepwater Horizon was operating safely before it exploded last month fell well short of its own policy that the rig be inspected at least once per month, an Associated Press investigation shows.

In fact, the agency's inspection frequency on the Deepwater Horizon fell dramatically over the past five years, according to federal Minerals Management Service records. The rig blew up April 20, killing 11 people before sinking and triggering a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Since January 2005, inspectors issued just one minor infraction for the rig. That strong track record led the agency last year to herald the Deepwater Horizon as an industry model for safety.

The inspection gaps are the latest in a series of questions raised about the agency's oversight of the oil drilling industry. Members of Congress and President Barack Obama have criticized what they call the cozy relationship between regulators and oil companies and vowed to reform MMS, which both regulates the industry and collects billions in royalties from it.

Earlier AP investigations have shown that the doomed rig was allowed to operate without safety documentation required by MMS regulations for the exact disaster scenario that occurred; that the cutoff valve which failed has repeatedly broken down at other wells in the years since regulators weakened testing requirements; and that regulation is so lax that some key safety aspects on rigs are decided almost entirely by the companies doing the work.

The AP sought to find out how many times government safety inspectors visited the Deepwater Horizon, and what they found. In response, MMS officials offered a changing series of numbers. The MMS has had long-standing issues with its data management.

At first, officials said 83 inspections had been performed since the rig arrived in the Gulf 104 months ago, in September 2001. While being questioned about the once-per-month claim, the officials subsequently revised the total up to 88 inspections. The number of more recent inspections also changed — from 26 to 48 in the 64 months since January 2005.

No explanation was given for the upward revisions. AP granted the officials anonymity because without that condition, communications staff at the Interior Department, which oversees MMS, would not have let them talk.

Based on the last set of numbers provided, the Deepwater Horizon was inspected 40 times during its first 40 months in the Gulf — in line with agency policy for offshore drilling rigs.

Even using the more favorable numbers for the most recent 64 months, 25 percent of monthly inspections were not performed. The first set of data supplied to AP represented a 59 percent shortfall in the number of inspections.

Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff would not comment on the inspection numbers. Instead, she offered a general statement: "We are looking at all the questions that are coming out of the Deepwater Horizon incident."

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by AP, the agency has released copies of only three inspection reports — those conducted in January, February and April. According to the documents, inspectors spent two hours or less each time they visited the massive rig. Some information appeared to be "whited out," without explanation.

Since the explosion, the agency has reiterated several times the inspection-once-per-month assertion, which appeared on its website at least as early as 1999.

In an e-mail to AP, an Interior Department official emphasized with italics that the MMS inspects rigs "at least once a month" when drilling is under way. Monthly inspections of offshore drilling rigs are an agency policy, though not required by regulation, said David Dykes, chief of the agency's office of safety management for the Gulf region.

Last week, at a joint Coast Guard-MMS investigatory hearing in Kenner, La., MMS official Jason Mathews asked Michael Saucier, MMS's regional supervisor for field operations in the Gulf, "And how often do we perform drilling inspections in the Gulf of Mexico?"

"We perform them at a minimum once a month, but we can do more if need be," Saucier said.

The job falls to the 55 inspectors in the Gulf who are supposed to visit the 90 drilling rigs once per month and the approximately 3,500 oil production platforms once per year.

The Deepwater Horizon's inspection frequency numbers struck Kenneth Arnold, a veteran offshore drilling consultant and engineer.

"I'd certainly question it," he said. "I'd ask, 'Why aren't you doing it?'"

When the AP did ask, MMS and Interior would not answer directly. Instead providing a set of conditions when a rig would not typically be inspected — including during bad weather, when it is jumping among short-term jobs, when a rig is preparing to drill or is done drilling but hasn't left for another site.

Transocean Ltd., which owned the Deepwater Horizon and leased it to BP PLC, would not provide a detailed accounting of the rig's activity history. According to RigData, a Texas firm that monitors offshore activity in the Gulf, the Deepwater Horizon was working approximately 2,896 days of the 3,131 days since it started its first well — about 93 percent of the time. That number represents the total number of days between when the Deepwater Horizon broke the sea floor during a drilling operation to when it was released to another site.

A summary of the inspection history that the MMS officials provided AP said the Deepwater Horizon received six "incidents of noncompliance" — the agency's term for citations.

The most serious occurred July 16, 2002, when the rig was shut down because required pressure tests had not been conducted on parts of the rig's blowout preventer — the device that was supposed to stop oil from gushing out if drilling operations experienced problems.

That citation was "major," said Arnold, who characterized the overall safety record related by MMS as strong.

A citation on Sept. 19, 2002, also involved the blowout preventer. The inspector issued a warning because "problems or irregularities observed during the testing of BOP system and actions taken to remedy such problems or irregularities are not recorded in the driller's report or referenced documents."

During his Senate testimony last week, Transocean CEO Steven Newman said the blowout preventer was modified in 2005.

According to MMS officials, the four other citations were:

• Two on May 16, 2002, for not conducting well control drills as required and not performing "all operations in a safe and workmanlike manner."

• One on Aug. 6, 2003, for discharging pollutants into the Gulf.

• One on March 20, 2007, which prompted inspectors to shut down some machinery because of improper electrical grounding.

Late last week, several days after providing the detailed accounting, Interior officials told AP that in fact there had been only five citations, that one had been rescinded. The officials said they could not immediately say which of the six had been rescinded.

The agency's problems with providing information extends to the data on display on its website. For example, the accounting of accident and incident reports is incomplete, making it very difficult to perform a thorough data analysis of the agency's performance and preventing a full accurate tracking of safety records of the rigs.

Data problems date back at least a decade. According to John Shultz, who as a graduate student in the late 1990s studied MMS' inspection program in depth for his dissertation, the agency's data infrastructure was severely limited.

"The thing I regret most is that, to my knowledge, MMS has not fixed the data management problem they have," said Shultz, who now works in the Department of Energy's nuclear program. "If you have the data you need, the analysis becomes fairly straightforward. Without the data, you're simply stuck with conjectures."

Whatever the correct citation total — five or six — the Deepwater Horizon's record was exemplary, according to MMS officials, who said the rig was never on inspectors' informal "watch list" for problem rigs. In fact, last year MMS awarded the rig an award for its safety history.

Did President Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime

Did President Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime? More evidence obama is a FRAUD.

Debbie Schlussel

The few obama records that have been found seem to all be faked or cannot be verified

Retired Federal Agent Source Reveals Himself:

The recently retired federal agent has requested that his identity be disclosed so that there is no question as to the source of the information.
His name is Stephen Coffman. He retired last year from the position of the Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Galveston, Texas office. He has over 32 years of government service and has held a Secret or higher security clearance for the majority of those years.
He filed the FOIA with Selective Service and has the original letter and the attachments. He first notified the Selective Service of his findings and they ignored the questions.
He can be reached via email at retirediceagent@sbcglobal.net.

The Environmental Movement Is Funded By The Eastern Liberal Establishment IE; CFR And Trilateral Commission

Official lore from the environmental movement's publications asserts that the movement emerged from the grass roots. The truth, however, is that funding and policy lines comes from the most prestigious institutions of the Eastern Liberal Establishment, centered around the New York Council on Foreign Relations, and including the Trilateral commission, the Aspen Institute, and a host of private family foundations. ..

I think this could be true but I'm not sure. I do know environmental waco's will stop at nothing to serve "mother earth." Oil companies are in business to make money. I see nothing wrong with that as long as people are not taken advantage of because of their dependence on oil. Capitalism vs communism. I'll take capitalism every time. Something smells like BO when it comes to the recent oil spill in the gulf.
...........................................................................................

Real Story of Offshore Drilling

The Daily Bell Newswire

U.S. President Barack Obama (left) has approved a move to ban any new offshore oil drilling until an investigation into what caused the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that threatens to destroy U.S. coastal areas and wildlife. Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Texas are all facing potentially devastating effects from last week's explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig. That explosion eventually sank the rig and has led to as many as 5,000 barrels of oil a day spilling into the Gulf waters and heading to the shores. Environmental experts have already said the oil spill will eclipse the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster off the Alaska coast. That spilt 11 million gallons into the water and destroyed a large portion of the wildlife in the area. At its current pace the Deepwater Horizon oil spill will eclipse the damage of the Exxon Valdez in 50 days. There has been no official word on what caused the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon and White House officials have demanded that answer be provided. Until a full report on the cause is known the White House will back a drill ban in any new areas offshore. – WooEB

Free-Market Analysis: We blame American oil companies for this most recent oil spill, but not for the predictable reasons. American oil companies, in our opinion, have helped set up a situation where there is a substantial amount of oil production offshore, even though there doesn't need to be. It's been our opinion all along that US oil companies especially, have been funding Green movements in the US and abroad to help ensure that regulatory issues prevent drilling in the lower 48. This forces drilling offshore and inevitably there will be oil spills – maybe massive ones that are hard to clean up.

How convenient! This in turn, creates more legislative activity to further regulate drilling. And the largest oil companies are not averse to increased regulation that helps drive out smaller players. The largest companies in any industry will always welcome increased regulation because they tend to control the tempo and kinds of regulations being inflicted on a given industry, and therefore on their rivals.

Of course we're aware that American president Barack Obama is sending SWAT teams to the Gulf to inspect oil rigs. This has been seen – by elements of the anti-Obama, conservative press – as precursor to some sort of nationalization. But we would be surprised if the Obama administration messed with Big Oil in a serious way. Big Oil's allies and owners are an elite bunch and tend to be in our estimation the same people that supported Obama's bid for power. Currents and countercurrents swirl deeply around all these issues, to be sure.

In this article, we shall restrict ourselves to an analysis of how Big Oil has used environmental regulation to generate a competitive advantage – and no doubt will try to take advantage of British Petroleum's Deepwater spill in much the same fashion. This sort of mercantilism is endemic to the industry, in fact, and we're not the only ones to have noticed it. Here's an excerpt we found on the Internet – adapted from Chapter 10 of the Holes in the Ozone Scare: The Scientific Evidence That the Sky Isn't Falling, published in June 1992 by 21st Century by Rogelio A. Maduro and Ralf Schauerhammer:

Who Owns the Environmentalist Movement? ... Far from a grass roots movement, environmentalism is a big business, funded and directed by the leading families of the U.S. and European establishments ... Twenty-five years ago, those who believed that Mother Nature comes first and humankind second were part of an insignificant fringe, considered radical by most Americans. ... Official lore from the environmental movement's publications asserts that the movement emerged from the grass roots. The truth, however, is that funding and policy lines comes from the most prestigious institutions of the Eastern Liberal Establishment, centered around the New York Council on Foreign Relations, and including the Trilateral commission, the Aspen Institute, and a host of private family foundations. ...

The vast wealth of the environmentalist groups may come as a shock to most readers who believe that these groups are made up of "public interest", "nonprofit" organizations that are making great sacrifices to save the Earth from a looming doomsday caused by man's activities. In fact, the environmental movement is one of the most powerful and lucrative businesses in the world today. ...

Where do the environmental groups get their money? Dues from members represent an average of 50 percent of the income of most groups; most of the rest of the income comes from foundation grants, corporate contributions, and U.S. government funds. Almost every one of today's land-trust, environmental, animal-rights, and population-control groups was created with grants from one of the elite foundations, like the Ford foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. These "seed grants" enable the radical groups to become established and start their own fundraising operations. These grants are also a seal-of-approval for the other foundations. ...

Another huge source of contributions to the environmental movement is private corporations. Unlike tax-exempt foundations, however, corporations are not required by law to report what they do with their money, so it is difficult for an independent researcher to estimate the level of funding for the environmentalist movement from business and industry. There are watchdog groups, however, that have investigated these money flows and come up with startlingly large figures.

For example, the April 1991 newsletter of the Capital Research Center in Washington, D.C., which monitors trends in corporate giving, scathingly denounces those corporations it has discovered financing the environmentalists. The newsletter states that oil companies "are heavy financial supporters of the very advocacy groups which oppose activities essential to their ability to meet consumer needs". Further, it reports, "The Nature Conservancy's 1990 report reflects contributions of over $1,000,000 from Amoco, over $135,000 from Arco, over 4100,000 from BP Exploration and BP Oil, more than $3,200,000 (in real estate) from Chevron, over $10,000 from Conoco and Phillips Petroleum and over $260,000 from Exxon".

From the scant information publicly available (largely annual reports from the major environmental groups), one can conservatively estimate that corporations contribute more than $200 million a year to the environmentalist movement. This should come as no surprise. Over the past 20 years, giant corporations have discovered that by using environmental regulations they can bankrupt their competition, the small- and medium-sized firms that are the most active and technologically innovative part of the U.S. economy.

Yes, indeed ... America's largest oil companies and those who own them have been busy pushing discoveries out into the sea or overseas for decades, and the environmental movement has provided a lever. It certainly makes sense. In the case of deep-sea drilling, the effort tends to be prohibitive unless you are the size of Exxon – and thus the barriers to entry are tremendous. In the case of Middle Eastern and other foreign drilling, the supply chain is long enough to tolerate considerable pricing shenanigans that oil companies could never get away with were they drilling at home.

The Deepwater spill is sure to put pressure on deep-water drilling, which in turn will make the price of oil even more expensive. US oil companies are, at the least, facing the prospect of more regulation as regards deep-drilling, off-shore efforts. Is this something US big oil conglomerates fear? Hardly. More regulation merely raises the barriers to entry once again. Worst case, exploration moves to Africa and central Europe and prices rise once more for American consumers.

There are so many large discoveries of oil in the Americas that we have all-but-lost track. There have been huge discoveries of oil in the Gulf of Mexico and the Bakken Formation in the Dakotas promises additional billions, if not hundreds of billions of barrels. There are the oil-rich tar sands in Canada and of course manifold discoveries in Alaska, some of which are being exploited, others not. The Sahara is rich with oil, much of which has not yet even been drilled, and one assumes that there are other as yet undiscovered deposits throughout Africa.

Then there is the idea that oil is abiotic, or caused by naturally occurring geological processes deep in the earth – which would explain why some wells seem to refill, at least partially. This theory is not opposed to the idea that oil is also composed of dead plants and animals, but one can certainly speculate that there is more to the creation of oil than has thus far been explained. The nomenclature "fossil fuels" makes us suspicious to begin with. When the elite labels something so forthrightly, it's usually for a reason. In this case, the name defines the process, something which is either extraordinarily convenient or in a sense propagandistic.

Oil companies generally hope to keep the price of oil aloft by preventing supply from coming online. Domestic production in North America has definitely been slowed by the environmental movement, even though as we just pointed out, above, there is likely plenty of oil were it to be actually tapped. We won't go so far as to say that there is rejoicing in the corporate boardrooms of the American oil giants tonight as they face the prospect of a widely publicized Deepwater spill. But in fact additional regulations put in place as a result of Deepwater will actually only further cement the competitive advantages that American oil giants already enjoy. The barriers to entry are vast. The amounts of money necessary to compete these days, given the regulatory blockages, continue to rise.

Conclusion: To visualize the oil industry as fighting like mad to stave off environmental attacks is to utilize a paradigm that is from our point of view a bit naïve. Environmentalism, to date, has been one of the power elite's most successful promotions, a dominant social theme worthy of an Oscar nomination. But in the 21st century, we shall see if the elite is able to maintain the momentum. That's not just a sociopolitical question, but an important issue from an investment standpoint as well.

The Rockefellers push environmentalism with all their might.

Obama Has Always Been An Illegal Alien And Still Is

.........................................................................................
Obama's mother Stanley Ann Dunham was born Nov 29, 1942 as her application for a social security number shows.

Obama was born on Aug 4, 1961 as his undocumented "cerfication of live birth" shows.

Obama was born 18 years 8 months after his mother was born.

Obama’s "American citizen parent", Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.

I have been stating the fact that a naural born citizen of the US must have been born to parents who were both citizens at the time of birth, which is correct. Obama is not a natural born citizen because of this fact.

I have over looked the fact that Staley Ann Dunham was 18 years 8 months old at the time of obama's "birth". Obama is an illegal alien because of this fact.

Obama says he was citizen of Kenya and a British subject at birth.

Obama was not an American citizen at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

So what was he and what is he now?

Did his Kenyan citizenship expire at age 21?

The Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenya's Constitution specifies that at age 23, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1984.

The fact is obama was never a US citizen because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

Obama was never a dual citizen.

If obama didn't swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya he is not a Kenyan citizen either.

So what is the citizship status of obama?

It would seem from all the evidence obama is just an ILLEGAL alien.

At birth he was just a citizen of Kenya but that expired at age 21.

All this talk about natural born citizenship is for nothing if obama's mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

In 1866, Senator
Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by stating:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:

"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."

The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.


Obama's allegiance to the United States was not complete at the time of his birth as he states on his website because he was a citizen of Kenya.

Was obama an illegal alien at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

It would seem so. Also obama's automatic citizenship because of the 14th Amendment is in doubt because his allegiance at birth was to Kenya.

Obama, Jr. then automatically became a citizen of Kenya when the independent nation was formed (from what had been Zanzibar) in 1963 because his father was a citizen of the British East African Protectorate of Zanzibar at the time of obama's birth.

Although it is complicated to understand it can be stated obama was an illegal alien at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952, for obama to become a US citizen therefore obama was just a British citizen at birth because his father was a citizen of the British East African Protectorate of Zanzibar.

Obama was and is an illegal alien.

Obama as far as we know did not swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya, therfore he is no longer a Kenyan citizen.

Obama is not only a big no record he is in fact a "MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY!"


"The Man Without a Country" was a short story about American army lieutenant Philip Nolan, who renounces his country during a trial for treason.

The "man without a country" I am talking about here has none because his temporary Kenyan citizenship expired at age 21 unless he swore an oath of allegiance to Kenya in secret and is now a Kenyan citizen.

One thing for sure is, because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952 at the time of obama's birth obama is not now and was never an American citizen! Obama's allegiance to the United States was not complete at the time of his birth as he states on his website because he was a citizen of Kenya. Obama's automatic citizenship because of the 14th Amendment is also in doubt because his allegiance at birth was to Kenya.

The birth certificate issue as I stated before is just a side show. Now I also realize the natural born citizenship status of obama is also a side show.

The "main attraction" is the fact obama was never an American citizen. Obama has only been a british subject then a Kenyan citizen until age 21.

The main attraction is the fact obama is now an ILLEGAL alien.

If any amnesty law is passed obama will, as an illegal alien, be given a US citizenship.

But what good is an amnesty law signed by an ILLEGAL ALIEN?

The obama timeline exposes obama as an illegal alien!


.........................................................................................


Kenyan Birth Allegations And Facts About The FRAUD Obama



Obama’s American citizen parent, Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.

The law confers U.S. nationality on the infant of a foreign father only under certain circumstances; it would apply to a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.”

Obama's mother didn't qualify obama to be a US citizen. Obama was the infant of a foreign father. This is the key. His mother had to be physically present in the US 5 years after the age of fourteen. She missed it by 4 months. Obama missed it by 4 months. Obama is an illegal alien. Its very obvious. Story Reports