There Is NO Recorded voting in South Carolina's General Assembly

There Is NO Recorded voting in South Carolina's General Assembly

Undocumented SC legislators voting means no accountability for anything that is done.

A state senator or house member can vote on a voice vote and it is not recorded. They pass bills anonymously with unrecorded voice votes.

When I first heard about the lack of recorded voting in our General Assembly, my first reaction was disbelief. How can it be? If I want to research how my representative voted on a piece of legislation, 92% of the time, that information is not there! Most of the time, they pass bills anonymously with unrecorded voice votes. What we need is to have their votes recorded by a "roll call".


Be sure to scroll to the bottom of this message to see a sample of bills that were passed in 2009 in SC with only an anonymous voice vote. Go ahead and ask your representative how they voted on one of those bills. I bet they will tell you exactly what they think you want to hear.



There is no accountability with a voice vote. It is our right to know how they vote. Now we must demand a roll call on all significant legislation.



Here are the facts:

As reported in the Free Times, the results of a SC Policy Council study states that in the 117th session of the General Assembly (2007-2008) only 8% of the votes in the SC House of Representatives were recorded. Only 1% in the SC Senate. The rest of their votes were unrecorded voice votes. SC ranks dead last in this category compared to other states. How can we know if we want to re-elect our state representatives and senators if we cannot even know how they have voted on things that are important to us?



For 2009, Representative Nikki Haley introduced H3047 and Senator Harvey Peeler introduced S11. These are two identical bills that if passed, will require a recorded vote on all significant legislation.



In an effort to undermine the public outcry to pass these bills, the House and Senate leadership changed their rules to require more roll call votes. Still, in 2009, the General Assembly voted anonymously 75% of the time according to the SC Policy council.



We must demand our right to know how our representatives vote. The house and senate must be pressured to pass H3047 and S11. In the 2010 legislative session, we will be working to get his law passed. Please be prepared to act quickly when you receive an ACTION ALERT. The ACTION ALERT will have specific items for you to do, such as call your representative, write a letter to the editor of your local paper, or attend a subcommittee meeting. Everyone will not be able to do every item listed on the alert. But if everyone does what they can, it will be enough. Then we will get this law passed. It will be a big step forward in holding our elected representatives accountable!
Here is what has happened so far with H3047:

12/9/2008 - Prefiled in the House by Nikki Haley with 37 co-sponsors. That is a huge number of co-sponsors and was very encouraging.



1/13/09 - The bill was referred to the Ways and Means committee, chaired by Danny Cooper.



1/13/09 to 5/22/09 - The bill gained 9 more sponsors due to faithful phone and e-mail contacts from constituents to their representatives.



4/21/09 - A Ways and Means subcommittee reports the bill favorably to the full committee. This was a huge victory in the battle with house leadership. This bill was set to die in this subcommittee. With four members on the committee, only two were co-sponsors. One was dead set against it, and the chair of the committee was making no commitment. We needed a majority vote to get a favorable report, and we didn't have it.



However, we did have dozens of supporters who showed up to speak in favor of the bill. The room was packed and we had a local TV reporter there with a camera man. As the meeting started, Chairperson Denny Neilson reviewed the list of people who had signed up to speak and saw that it was quite lengthy. She asked if maybe we could just send up a couple of representative speakers. Brian White, the one committee member who was dead set against the bill, asked if there was anyone there to speak against the bill. Seeing that there was no one to speak against the bill, he surprised us and moved that the bill be given a favorable report. The sub-committee voted unanimous to give the bill a favorable report to the whole committee. Victory! The bill was scheduled for a hearing by the full committee the following day.



We saw the effect of having dozens of witnesses there to record and report how they voted. Had we not been there, the vote would likely have gone against us with no record of who voted for and who voted against the bill. This is a good example of why we must have recorded votes, even at the subcommittee level. With accountability, our representatives often vote they way the should. With no accountability, we have no such hope.



4/22/09 - Subcommittee chairperson Denny Neilson had her name added as a co-sponsor.

Also, The bill should have been heard by the full Ways and Means committee. However, we began to see the devious tricks played by the House leadership. The Ways and Means committee was scheduled to meet an hour after the House adjourns for the day. That normally happens at 2 PM. Bobby Harrell, speaker of the house, who opposes this bill, held the house in session until after 5PM. So the Ways and Means committee did not meet. He did not want a repeat of what happened the day before. He would rather have the committee meet with no witnesses, so that the bill could be voted down without individual accountability.



We watched and waited for the Ways and Means committee to be scheduled to meet so that we could notify all the folks who wanted to be there to speak and witness the vote. Chairman Danny Cooper never scheduled his committee to meet. Until the House adjourned for the year, on May 22nd, a full month later, the committee never met. Normally they meet every week. Danny Cooper and Bobby Harrell know that no one can credibly oppose this bill. When it comes up for a vote, anyone who votes against it will be known to have something to hide. The only way they can prevent this bill from becoming law, is to prevent a vote on the bill.



This will be one to watch carefully. We cannot let them sneak a vote through without being there to provide accountability.

3/24/2010 - Nikki Haley made a motion to recall the bill from committee. No one objected and so it was done.

3/25/2010 - The bill was unanimously approved by the House on a Roll Call vote 104-0.


Here is what has happened so far with S11:

12/10/08 - prefiled by Harvey Peeler with 23 co-sponsors. That is half the Senate. If it ever comes up for a vote by the full senate, it would pass in a heart beat!



1/13/09 - Referred to Judiciary committee. This is Senator Glenn McConnell's committee. He is the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. If he wanted it passed, it would pass very quickly. However, McConnell has spoken publically against the bill.



1/23/09 - Referred to a Judiciary sub-committee chaired by Larry Martin. Jake Knotts and Robert Ford are the other two members of this subcommittee. There it has been ever since. No hearing, No vote. Nothing!

A conversation with Jake Knotts in March of this year (2009). He is my Senator and I hoped I might get his support. After 10 or 15 minutes of conversation, it was clear to me that he would not support this bill. So, I politely commented to him, "So, Senator, I suppose when this bill comes up for a vote in sub-committee, you won't be supporting it". He replied, "I don't even know what sub-committee it is in." I told him it was in his sub-committee. He looked over the top of his glasses and smiled as he said, "That bill will never come up for a vote."

Our Undocumented White House Resident

Our Undocumented White House Resident

(Obama would like for you to believe this quote from the US Constitution does not apply to him, but it does and boldy exposes him as an Undocumented White House Resident. The article below is proof postive obama is a FRAUD.) Story Reports

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

By JB Williams

“I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

This quote is taken directly from Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations, which has been a world recognized and time honored reference guide to understanding “natural law,” and the natural birthrights of national citizenship recognized by all civilized nations for more than two-hundred and fifty years.

Emerich de Vattel was a Swiss philosopher, diplomat, and legal expert who lived from 1714 – 1767, and whose theories laid the foundation of modern international law and political philosophy. Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations was released in 1758; in English, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns.

Vattel’s book established many time honored standards of natural law recognized the world over and it is an historical reference regarding the Constitutional eligibility requirement for the offices of President and Vice President, Natural Born Citizen, found in Article II – Section I – Clause V.

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

Vattel confirms in clear concise language what a “natural-born citizen” of a nation is…

“The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.”

In other words, by “nature’s law” - not by way of man-made statute. In fact, unalienable by way of man-made statute, as mans law cannot alter or overcome the laws of nature. This is in fact “international law” via the Law of Nations. It is not enough that a sovereign nation identify its citizens. Other nations must recognize the rights of sovereign citizens from foreign lands.

Unconfirmed Obama Scenarios

* Obama was not born in Hawaii, but rather Kenya. He would in this case be a “naturalized” citizen (IF) he went through the standard US Naturalization process. He would in no way be a “natural-born citizen” in this possible scenario. Obama has thus far refused to prove beyond any doubt that he was born in Hawaii.
* Obama was born in Hawaii, but to a US mother and Kenyan Father. In this possible scenario, Obama could be a “native-born” citizen of the US. He would certainly be a “natural-born” citizen of Kenya, due to the birthrights of his father. This would make Obama a “dual citizen” with “divided” national loyalties. On this basis, he would not pass the test for office, but would be the poster-child for why the natural-born citizen clause exists.
* Following scenario (1) or (2), Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. In this case, Obama’s mother would have exchanged his US claim to citizenship for citizenship of Indonesia, as the adoptive son of Lolo Soetoro, for which he has at times claimed the name “Barry Soetoro,” citizen of Indonesia. Even if Obama had endured a naturalization process to return to US citizenship status, he would then be a “naturalized-citizen” rather than a “natural-born” citizen eligible for the office he currently holds.

As the term “citizen” is very broad and includes “naturalized” citizens, it is NOT the requirement for the office of president or vice president.

As the term “native-born” relates only to “place of birth,” and is also not the stated requirement for the Oval Office mentioned in Article II – Section I, it has no bearing on the matter of Obama’s eligibility for office.

Our Founding Fathers could not have been any more specific about the requirements for the office of president, “NO PERSON except a NATURAL-BORN Citizen.” It isn’t their fault that too many Americans don’t care about or can’t comprehend this term or the purpose behind it today.

Vattel could not have been any more clear about the definition of “natural-born citizen,” “I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

The 14th Amendment Obama Defense

The Dred Scott Decision - was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants [2]—whether or not they were slaves—were not protected by the Constitution.

Elks Vs Wilkins (1872) - was an issue concerning “native born” Indian’s born on Indian reservations and whether or not their loyalty to the Indian tribe was enough to deny them US citizenship, unrelated to the subject of natural born citizenship and Article II.

Slaughterhouse Cases (1872) was a case on the 14th Amendments, once again, regarding immigration and naturalization, which of course does not pertain to natural born citizens at all.

Minor vs Happersett (1874) - is another 14th Amendment case, regarding women’s right to vote, as equal “citizens.”

US Vs Wong Kim Ark (1898) - was a case of “native born citizenship” - when both parents were immigrants from China, naturalized US citizens who gave birth to a son on US soil before returning to China. The son was held up upon returning from a trip to China, but was granted re-entry as a “native-born” citizen, having been born on US soil to two immigrant parents. Once again, immigration and no relationship whatsoever to natural born citizenship.

Perkins Vs Elg (1939) - also a ruling on “acquired citizenship” for children of alien parentage…. immigration and naturalization.

Schneider Vs Rusk (1964) - was a 5th Amendment case, relative passport and travel rights to immigrant citizens…

Rogers Vs Bellei (1971) - Appellee challenges the constitutionality of § 301(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which provides that one who acquires United States citizenship by virtue of having been born abroad to parents, one of whom is an American citizen, who has met certain residence requirements, shall lose his citizenship unless he resides in this country continuously for five years between the ages of 14 and 28.

Now, every case listed is completely unrelated to natural born citizen and Article II of the Constitution. All of them were cases revolving around immigration and naturalization laws.

So, are the people ignorant or unable to read? Or are they simply willing to stretch the truth, assuming that you won’t bother to check their facts?

The Bottom Line on Obama

He is NOT a “natural-born citizen” of the United States of America, no matter which "natural's" propaganda argument you choose to buy. He can, therefore, not legally hold the office of President or Vice President of the United States and all laws and orders given while he fraudulently holds that office are null and void.

Legal US citizens or sovereign states are NOT obligated to follow illegal laws from a fraudulent resident of the people’s White House. Obama has “no constitutional standing” as an “undocumented resident” of the Oval Office.

(I totally agree. Obama is a total FRAUD! Obama has NO CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING as an UNDOCUMENTED RESIDENT of the Oval Office. Every word, every signature, and every telepromper speech is that of a comple FRAUD who cannot prove he is a natural born citizen!) Story Reports

Running Out of Options

With each passing day, our nation is being driven deeper and deeper into irreversible disaster. Obama & Co. have no intention of backing up or backing off their anti-American agenda of global Marxism via American assets.

The courts have never ruled on Obama’s constitutional standing. In fact, they have refused to hear evidence from the people on the matter, or force Obama to unseal all of his records to answer legitimate questions coming from a growing number of US citizens.

Before only violent options for upholding the rule of law remain, the people MUST find a peaceful means by which to force Obama to become “transparent.”

Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations (internationally recognized citizenship laws) was released in 1758. Unlike modern society, many of our Founding Fathers were quite familiar with the language of the original book. They did not need to wait for English translation in order to read or understand the book, or the Law of Nations at the foundation of Vattel’s book.

For the record, pretty much all informed people recognize Vattel’s writings as the authority on the subject, even those who have trouble understanding what he wrote and don’t agree with his opinions. He was in fact a well-known “legal scholar” of that era, one that most Founding Fathers were quite familiar with.

The book was released eighteen years before our Declaration of Independence and twenty-nine years before those words “natural-born citizen” appeared in Article II of our US Constitution.

Our Founders were VERY well read individuals.

Further, it is NOT enough for each nation to recognize only their own citizens. Other nations MUST recognize and respect the sovereign citizens and related rights of other nations, hence the purpose for the Law of Nations, or a set standard recognized by all civilized nations.

Cut off from all peaceful remedies, I hate to think of what happens when patriotic American souls take matters into their own hands.

One thing is certain, however… It is NOT within the U.S. DNA to live in fear of our government for very long. Americans prefer peace, but will in the end defend freedom, liberty, and our rule of law at any cost. We will not leave this nation in ruins for future generations. We hate tyranny worse than death…

I call upon all peace-loving patriots to find a peaceful solution before only violent solutions remain.

There is no such thing as a “pro-war” American citizen. There are only “pro-American” citizens unwilling to exchange their freedom and liberty for a moment of faux temporary peace.

May God guide the hearts, minds and hands of all patriots, in this time of great national challenge.

(There are those who would deny the truth no matter what. These are individuals who for various reasons cling to obama like the average American clings to their bibles and guns. Obama fears the average American and wants to totally control everything a person does. Obama fears free speech and seeks to quell it.) Story Reports

From Transcript of Resident Barack Obama's Commencement Address at Hampton University

"And meanwhile, you're coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don't always rank that high on the truth meter. And with iPods and iPads; and Xboxes and PlayStations -- none of which I know how to work -- (laughter) -- information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation. So all of this is not only putting pressure on you; it's putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy."

"information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment". This information obama is talking about doesn't rank high on his "truth meter" if its not a lie. His "truth meter" of information relies on his deception of Americans. Obama wants to quell the "distration and diversion" of free speech when anyone disagrees with him or exposes him as a liar. Obama would prefer we were all emancipated from the diverson and distraction of free speech so he could promote his lies without fear of exposure. If obama had his way free speech would be a thing of the past because it has become a distraction and diverson in his mind. This is the mind of a dictator and narcissist.

Barack Hussein Obama an undocumented white house resident. Story Reports

Barack Hussein Obama an undocumented white house resident Obama is the biggest "natural" disaster America has ever seen. This excellent article exposes obama as the FRAUD he is.

Arizona Tells Federal Government To Go To Hell

Arizona governor signs restriction on ethnic studies classes

PHOENIX (AP) – Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill targeting a school district’s ethnic studies program Tuesday, hours after a report by United Nations human rights experts condemned the measure.

State schools chief Tom Horne, who has pushed the measure for years, claims a Tucson school district program promotes “ethnic chauvinism” and racial resentment toward whites while segregating students by race.

“It’s just like the old South, and it’s long past time that we prohibited it,” Horne said.

The measure prohibits classes that advocate ethnic solidarity, that are designed primarily for students of a particular race or that promote resentment toward a certain ethnic group. It also prohibits classes that promote the overthrow of the U.S. government.

The Tucson Unified School District program offers specialized courses in African-American, Mexican-American and Native-American studies that focus on history and literature and include information about the influence of a particular ethnic group.

For example, in the Mexican-American Studies program, an American history course explores the role of Hispanics in the Vietnam War, and a literature course emphasizes Latino authors

Horne said he is convinced that the Mexican-American studies program teaches Latino students that they are oppressed by white people. Public schools should not be encouraging students to resent a particular race, he said.

Brewer’s signature on the bill comes less than a month after she signed the nation’s toughest crackdown on illegal immigration – a move that ignited international backlash amid charges the measure would encourage racial profiling of Hispanics.

A Republican running for attorney general, Horne has been trying to restrict the program ever since he learned that Hispanic civil rights activist Dolores Huerta in 2006 told students that “Republicans hate Latinos.”

(This is what it is all about. The "ethnic studies" programs are used to create racism. Now Arizona is telling the federal government and obama to go to hell! Arizona is starting to "kick" obama in the "butt". This is exactly what all America is going to also do in the Nov 2010 elections. I hope more states tell the federal government and the obama administration hell no. Its about time!) Story Reports

Sean Arce, director of the district’s Mexican-American Studies program, said last month that students perform better in school if they see in the curriculum people who look like them.

(I want additional ethnic programs for "white" people because I also believe that students perform better in school if they see in the curriculum people who look like them. If I believed this I would be making a racist comment just like sean arce. Sean acre is obviously a racist promoting racism just like obama and his administration) Story Reports

Not only is obama an illegal alien he is also a racist promoting racism.

Six UN human rights experts released a statement earlier Tuesday expressing concern about the measure. All people have the right to learn about their own cultural and linguistic heritage, they said.

Brewer spokesman Paul Senseman didn’t directly address the UN criticism, but said Brewer supports the bill’s goal.

“The governor believes ... public school students should be taught to treat and value each other as individuals and not be taught to resent or hate other races or classes of people,” Senseman said.

The law doesn’t prohibit classes that teach about the history of a particular ethnic group, as long as the course is open to all students and doesn’t promote ethnic solidarity or resentment.

Obama, in his own words documents his racism

From Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

From Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother?s race."

From Dreams of My Father: "There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white."

From Dreams of My Father: "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

From Dreams of My Father: "I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela."

From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'

From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'

Obama Is Using Conn SS Number But Never Had A Mailing Address In Conn

Barack Obama: A Fraud You Can Believe In

Obama using Connecticut Social Security Number But No Record Can Be Found That Obama Ever Had A Mailing Address In Connecticut.

Jerome R. Corsi

(Three experts insist White House answer new questions about documentation.)

Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

Copies of affidavits have been filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.

The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.

The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."

The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation.

(The extraordinary lack of public documentation is fueling my effort to expose obama as a FRAUD. The fact obama supported John Mccain in his senate resolution S 511 that defined the term natural born citizen as it applied to Mccain proves obama is a FRAUD. The senate resolution S 511 applied to Mccain but it also was a statement by obama defining not just Mccain but himself and others also. To just explain the resolution as pertaining to just Mccain is incorrect because it also defined ther term "natural born citizen" for Mccain and of course any one else who was or would be a candidate for US president.) Story Reports

Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.

(The "naturals" or people who support obama claim obama is legitimate. If obama was legitimate his educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state senate, Illinois State Bar Association Records, any baptism records or adoption papers would be made public. The fact is not one of these records has been made public. I believe it is because if any of these hidden records were made ppublic it would expose obama as the FRAUD he is. Obama is a total NO RECORD. The records and the "birth certificate" issue are a side show to the main attraction that obama has defined the natural born citizen term in S 511. Obama has documented the fact he is a FRAUD in S 511.) Story Reports

Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social Security number should be questioned.

"I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states where they don't live, but there's usually a good reason the person applied for a Social Security number in a different state," Siciliano said.

Siciliano was asked whether he thought the question was one the White House should answer.

"Yes," he replied. "In the case of President Obama, I really don't know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of Hawaii."

(This is just more evidence to question obama as legitimate. In addition to asking "where's the birth certificate", the question should also be asked "why the additional ss number" when there is NO RECORD of employment at the time the SS number was issued.) Story Reports

The Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service System. Inserting the Social Security number, his birth date and his last name produces a valid Selective Service number.

To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama's were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.

"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?

"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."

Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."

There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

(Its interesting the NO RECORD obama had a ss record created out of thin air. The dnc certified obama as legitimate. It seems obama and the dnc have stolen a dead persons ss number in Connecticut. Not only does the dnc stuff the ballot box with dead persons voting, it has stuffed the persidential election ballot box with a dead person's ss identity also.) Story Reports

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.

Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.

Sampson's affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, "it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence."

Daniels said she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security number,". "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii."

(So why was obama issued a ss number again when there is NO RECORD of obama ever living in Conn or working in Conn. It is because obama is a TOTAL FRAUD, an empty suit, the man that never was or an avitar created by the media and the dnc to deceive the American public.) Story Reports

The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama's inauguration.

Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the number in question.

"It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins," she insisted. "Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime."

Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama's birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama's birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.

Daniels disclosed that the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 Social Security number.

Daniels said she can't be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.

After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama's association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.

Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.

(This is what the dnc does to acquire votes also. The dnc registers dead people to vote so it makes perfect sense the dnc would use a dead person's ss number to register obama in Connecticut. This is EXACTLY what ILLEGAL ALIENS do to steal identities of US citizens. OBAMA has STOLEN the identiy of a legitimate US citizen because he is a FRAUD! Amazing!) Story Reports

Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995. Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

.........................................................................................
Text of S. Res. 511 [110th]: A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen

April 10, 2008

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

("Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens" The quote indicates American Citizens, plural. Obama cosponsored this resolution and agreed that a natural born citizen is a citizen that "was born to American citizens". This is something the "naturals" try to minimize or explain away the quote as obama just saying Mccain is a natural born citizen. It is of course more than just a statement about Mccain because the US Constitution pertains to obama and anyone else who is running for president.

To say the US Constituion just applies to Mccain in S 511 is what the "naturals" want you to believe. Senate resolution S 511 declares anyone who is not born to American Citizen(s) is not a natural born citizen. Obama was NOT born to American citizen(s). Only one parent was a US citizen, his mother. Obama has declared in S 511 that he is a FRAUD! The naturals know this and try to avoid the quote in S 511, "Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens" If Mccain is a natural born citizen because of this, what is obama?....A FRAUD!) Story Reports

.........................................................................................
Barack Obama: A Fraud You Can Believe In

President Barack Obama: A Fraud You Can Believe In

Herb Denenberg

There was abundant evidence Mr. Obama was a fraud, not a savior, in everything he’s done in life — from his early education to his days in the Illinois legislature then to his U.S. Senate days and finally as a successful candidate for president. If anyone would look at his record and associates they’d see he’s advocated infanticide in the Illinois State Senate, he’s never displayed a glimmer of bipartisanship and he came out of the slime and sewer that is Chicago machine politics. And his associates would prevent him from getting security clearance if he was applying for a government job, rather than being elected to one.

The golden tongue orator can’t move his golden tongue without the aid of a script and a teleprompter.

There have been many false Messiahs in history, but isn’t this going a little too far? We’ve got to set a higher standard, even for false Messiahs.

Documents by: Herb Denenberg

DNC Committed FRAUD When Obama Was CERTIFIED AS A Legitimate Candidate For President

Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle Is Stonewalling

.........................................................................................
(Obama's citizenship was questioned by several lawsuits before his election. Leo Donofrio's lawsuit was also rejected by the US Supreme Court. "Naturals" point to this as proof obama is legitimate. The questions raised in these lawsuits have not been answered by obama. Obama succeeded in avoiding providing proof of his US citizenship before he was elected and after his illegitimate election. Leo Donofrio, Phil Berg and millions of other Americans ask the question: Obama, if you are a natural born citizen of the US, why are you hiding the facts about your birth?) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
JOSEPH FARAH

Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle is playing a very insidious and dangerous game of stonewalling on the most secretive vital record in the state's history.

Last Sunday, she told a New York talk-show host the state's role in Barack Obama's birth certificate drama has "been an odd situation."

"This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it's one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country," she added. "So I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that's just a fact and yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue, and I think it's again a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this."

Now I've already dealt with the Kapi'olani Hospital issue in a column on Saturday. No news release from any Hawaii state office has ever asserted that Obama's birthplace was Kapi'olani. If Gov. Lingle would like to put out such a press release in 2010, that would be a public service. But she is flat-out lying if she claims her state has ever released information about a birth hospital before her dubious statement on a talk show in New York last week.

But I want to point out another striking contradiction in Lingle's latest statement.

Though that 2008 news release never said what Lingle claims it said, the statement by state health director Chiyome Fukino did say something the governor must have forgotten about: "No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii."

Didn't Linda Lingle just tell us she ordered the review of the birth certificate?

And didn't Chiyome Fukino say Lingle never instructed that the record be handled differently from any other?

Isn't an inspection by the state's top health director and a series of press releases about the contents of the document handling "different from any other vital record in the possession of the state of Hawaii"?

Does the governor of Hawaii routinely order the inspection of birth records?

Isn't that highly unusual?

I would say it is.

When is this charade going to end?

When is the double-talk going to cease?

Why are the American people given so many different stories about Obama's nativity?

Why is it all necessary?

Why is a birth certificate a state secret?

How could release of a birth certificate possibly compromise Obama's privacy?

(The clear answer is because obama is an obvious FRAUD who cannot or will not provide documentation to verify his true identity. The governor of Hawaii is also a rabid liar as the above quote proves. Obama must conceal his true identity because if revealed it would prove he is a FRAUD. Obama is either a US citizen who is NOT a natural born citizen or not a US citizen at all. The more I read and investigate obama's identity I believe obama is just an illegal alien. Obama has already admitted he is not a natural born citizen and is therefore a FRAUD for this reason. The other big question is his concealed identity hidden in Hawaii. Obama even has the governor of Hawaii covering up for him.) Story Reports

The public wants to see that document with their own eyes.

Why is the state of Hawaii releasing details in dribs and drabs over a period of years rather than asking Obama for permission to release the document?

Why is Obama fighting tooth and nail and spending millions of dollars keeping it secret?

The more people like Lingle make these absurd and contradictory statements, the more suspicion is aroused.

That's the trouble with state secrets.

That's why we have laws prescribing public disclosure on vital matters of public concern.

The public does have a right to know – especially on matters such as the constitutional eligibility of the president of the United States.

For heaven's sake, if we can't get that document, the term "freedom of information" no longer has meaning in this country.

.........................................................................................
I’ve witnessed some very desperate blogging propaganda trying to stop the bleeding as the nation finally wakes up to the fact that President Obama was a British citizen at the time of his birth. Leo Donofrio