How is Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) able to hide his true identity? How was Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama able to get on the ballot in all 50 states? Information from the daily pen reviewed.
The state of Hawaii “Certificate of Live Birth” document actually conceals a person's full natal identity rather than reveal it. The Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” is an unauthorized reduction of content otherwise prescribed to confirm the bearer’s natal identity. Hawaii Violates Federal Guidelines.
In the entire 110 year history of the standard, official, federal, U.S. “Certificate of Live Birth” document’s existence, only the state of Hawaii has gone astray from the standard version to such a degree that it actually conceals one’s full natal identity rather than reveal it.
Hawaii’s Permission To Violate Federal Law. Hawaii Revised Statute HRS 338-17.8 states:“Certificates for children born out of State.(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
The law permits anyone born to parents who claimed Hawaii as their residence within one year of their birth, at any time before or after the enactment of the law, regardless of the actual location of the birth, to receive an original birth record which states that the location of birth is Hawaii, and, therefore, occurred in the U.S. Hawaiian lawmakers have confirmed that the law is not constrained to the date of birth. It is applicable to the date of application for the certificate.
This means this law would enable Obama, anytime after the age of 21 to apply for and receive a newly created original Hawaiian birth certificate after providing evidence that his mother or father merely resided in Hawaii for one year prior to his birth. He could have applied for this certificate any time since is parents are known to have resided in Hawaii since 1960. He could have been born outside of the U.S., however, the State of Hawaii is obligated by law to grant him an original birth certificate stating that Hawaii is his birth place simply because he was able to show that his parents claimed Hawaii as their residence.
(Keep in mind the "original birth certificate" would not contain any information about where obama was born in Hawaii except maybe a city and county. It would not contain a name of a hospital, doctor or any information that could validate a US citizenship. It would be like a certification of live birth on the web that contains no information that can be verified. The big difference also would be it contains information much different that the web versions of the colb. This is why the web version has been faked and found to not be real. Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) must hide the true information about his birth origin. Hawaii has never confirmed the online version is real nor has Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) ever claimed it was his.) Story Reports
How obama hides his true identity........................................................................................
The DNC used the certificate of nomination to "validate" obama's citizenship to Hawaiian election officals. Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) held a secret meeting with members of the Elections Commission on friday Oct 24, 2008 in Hawaii.
In order to avoid the destructive political consequences, Obama had to engage a private meeting away from the media. Such a private meeting would also have to be justifiable under Hawaii Revised Statutes Adminstrative Rules 91, 92-4, 92-5, and 3-170-11. Specifically, any correspondence or meeting between any candidate or representative of the candidate and members of the Hawaiian Election commission would have to be held in accord with these rules. However, it is HRS 92-5-8 which affords the permission to hold a secret meeting between members of the Elections Commission and Obama.
In summary, Obama sought a way to be in Hawaii at a time that would:1. Occur as long after the Official Certification Of Nomination deadline as possible, but no later than October 24th.
2. Allow him to cancel campaign events, but not miss prescheduled debates with McCain or televised town hall meetings.
3. Meet legal deadlines for ballot approval, but not violate deadlines to refute the findings of ineligibility by the DPH.
4. Give the media a "decoy" story to serve as his excuse for being in Hawaii, but not allow the public to discover that the real reason he was in Hawaii was because he was attending executive hearings with the Chief Elections Officer and the DPH per HAR 3-170, HRS 92-4 and 92-5 to contest the DPH's refusal to certify his nomination.
5. Exploit the story of Obama's grandmother's illness, allowing Obama to schedule the trip precisely while citing the doctor's assessment of his grandmother's condition as an excuse to be in Hawaii. However, if Dunham died too soon, or was "not sick enough" to warrant his cancellation of campaign events so close to an election, Obama would be left exposed to media investigation about the truth of all of his activities in Hawaii on October 24th, 2008.
The certification of each candidate’s eligibility falls under the autonomous authority of each candidate’s state affiliated political party authority, with support of the national party authority, while the approval of the candidate’s placement on each state’s ballot then becomes the responsibility of the Chief Elections Officer of each state.
It was Kevin B. Cronin, Senior Elections Officer constitutional authority to oversee elections in the state of Hawaii under the advisement of the Election Commission.
Cronin does not have the authority to certify the Constitutional eligibility of a candidate, however, his most powerful authority is his ability, according to HRS 11-113, to mediate conflict over eligibility and, as a result of mediation, officially approve candidates for placement on the state’s ballot even when the state party's vetting authority refuses to certify the legal qualifications of that candidate.
An investigation of Hawaii Revised Statutes, along with documented evidence, reveals that, Cronin, being bound by law from partisan participation, still had the legal authority to circumvent the vetting process for Obama and simply approve his placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot without ever verifying that he was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President.
Shockingly, adminstrative procedures employed by the Elections Office in the State of Hawaii actually helped Obama avoid public scrutiny by simultaneously allowing him the opportunity to personally attend a hearing about his eligibility while visiting his sick grandmother in late October, 2008.
The birth certificate that is on file and online was not enough to verify obama's candidacy by the Democratic Party Of Hawaii. The Democratic Party Of Hawaii has NEVER validated obama as a presidential candidate!How obama got on the ballot even though the Hawaiian DNC refused to certify him as a candidate in 2008.........................................................................................
How the obama online colb forgery was made explained in detail.The"birth" of this conspiracy began on June 10 when Jim Geraghty questioned whether or not Obama was really born in the US. Two days later, on June 12, the first forged copy appeared on the Daily Kos, followed shortly thereafter by a smaller copy (originally 1000 x 1024 pixels) on Obama's own website, BarackObama.com.
When Obama's Fight The Smears website spinoff was launched on June 13, the image copy was moved to that location,and its size was cut in half to what it is now (575 x 585 pixels). Politifact was next according to claims that they also posted their copy on June 13, it was back-dated.
The forgery began its life as an actual scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian"Certificate of Live
Birth," (COLB) that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister).
The image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a JPG file. This is the file that was sent to the person who would do the actual forging. Whoever that person was, he or she was sent the information that was to go on the image.
In the analyses, the discovery was made that there had to be more than one COLB image used to make the forgery.
(Various media obama supporters will inform you that the online version has a signature and date stamp from the registrar. They will then inform you for this reason it is authentic. What they don't tell you is that the online colb never has been confirmed as valid by Hawaii and therefore could not be real. They also never explain why the various online forms of "obama's certificate" have been manipulated and forged.) Story Reports
The online forged colb exposed and explained........................................................................................
Evidence suggests the State of Hawaii has engaged in a conspiracy based on carefully calculated legal deniability while isolating various officials behind mutually justified administrative secrecy and unaccountability. One official would simply deny personal knowledge while vouching for another official's legal justification for remaining silent or uncooperative with requests by Adams, Abercrombie, Schatz and the American people, for documented verification of Obama's legitimacy.Where one law indicates that Obama is not a Natural-born citizen, another law prevents any official from confirming it. Where one official of the State of Hawaii indicates that Obama is not a Natural born citizen, another official prevents the release of the information needed to prove it.
Executive Order No. 13489. Obama was ensconced as President on January 20, 2009. Just one day after his inauguration, he signed Executive Order No. 13489 which essentially violates the Freedom of Information Act and prohibits the release of Obama’s personal and presidential records, during and after his presidency, by the National Archives without first being consulted by the National Archives Director and the Attorney General.
The Democratic Party of Hawaii included the explicit statement required by HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B) that the 2000 and 2004 candidates were legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution, but the DPH did not do the same for Obama.
The Democratic Party Of Hawaii intentionally omitted the language stating that Obama is legally qualified under the provisions of the U.S. constitution because he is not.
There is no FILING DATE stamped on this document!
The offical document submitted to the Hawaiian Elections Office was one of fifty authored by the DNC and submitted after August 28, 2008. Yet, the OCON received by the State of Hawaii from the DNC is the only one with no filing date or RECEIVED DATE stamped on its face. A review of OCONs submitted to every other state reveals the Elections Office in those states affixed this stamp on their document.
The omission of this date stamp by the Hawaiian Elections Office is particularly suspicious because, in accordance with HRS 11-113(c), (d) and (e), the RECEIPT DATE initiates a roster of deadlines and correspondence between the Chief Elections Officer, the applicant and the candidate, the first of which is a written notification from Kevin Cronin informing the candidate if they were either approved or denied for inclusion on the ballot. The absence of this RECEIPT or FILING DATE suspiciously obscures the time line which would reveal if the second OCON submitted by the DNC was in violation of Hawaiian law or if it was actually submitted BEFORE the DPH's Offical Certification Of Nonomination.
The obvious crime in this intentional dissemination of misinformation is that if the DPH was unable to verify Obama’s eligibility, the DNC would have also not been able to verify it. Why would the DNC not share its verification documentation of Obama's candidacy with the Democrat Party of Hawaii's official? If the DNC was actually able to verify Obama's eligibility, the DPH would have also acquired the same documentation to verify it.
If the eligibility of Obama candidacy was provable and verifiable, both party authorities would have included the same appropriate language in accordance with Hawaiian law.
Any conflict among party authorities over candidate eligibility allows the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer the autonomous choice whether or not to include the candidate on the ballot anyway, per HRS 11-113(b), which Cronin did, regardless if that candidate is proven eligible or not. Cronin is not obligated to verify eligibility per HRS 11-113.
Hawaii and the dnc have commited various crimes to coverup obama's true identity.
