Over 100 FREE Online Calculators

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Obama and holder are nothing but criminals that should be removed from office

The Fast and Furious program has sent about 2,000 guns to Mexican drug cartels.

Tom Tancredo

Over 100 members of Congress – I think it is 112 at the latest count – have called for Holder’s resignation.

What possible “deal” could the White House offer to Boehner to persuade him to end the investigation?

The reported “deal” Boehner and Holder are discussing would let higher ups in the Department of Justice off the hook if they prosecute one or two individual ATF supervisors. Holder would then claim he “cleaned up the mess” and be free from any moral or political culpability.

(Speaker Boehner is not only protecting holder he is protecting obama from criminal
charges. Both Boehner and holder should be investigated.)
Story Reports

Every time Issa’s committee holds a public hearing, new evidence comes to light.

The interesting question is why Speaker Boehner and other Republicans in leadership positions in the House are trying to hamper and curtail the Issa investigation. If Holder is innocent of the allegations, won’t that become evident when all the evidence is made public? If he is innocent, why does the White House fear the investigation?

Some us remember that President Nixon was not impeached and removed for instigating the Watergate break-in of June 1972. He was impeached for his part in the cover up that followed the break-in. In essence, he made the mistake of lying about it, which is what Holder has done.

(Obama is a certified LIAR. Obama has said he has full confidence in holder. Of course obama is lying about what holder knew and did making sure guns went to mexican criminals.
Obama and holder are nothing but criminals that should be removed from office.)
Story Reports

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Orly Taitz seems to display a need to help obama

Dean C. Haskins

While there may still be some who believe that Orly Taitz advanced our cause in the past, many now question her motives, and understand the damage she continues to inflict on our efforts. Whatever her motives may be, it is time for her to stand down and let professional law enforcement proceed in its investigation without any further hampering or interference.

It should be understood that the Cold Case Posse never considered any evidence submitted by Orly Taitz; but it developed, and successfully utilized many other sources of evidence. Early on in the investigation, Taitz attempted to provide evidence, and was instructed as to how to submit evidence to the MCSO/ Cold Case Posse.

Unfortunately, and for reasons only she could know, she refused to follow those directions, so nothing she attempted to provide was ever considered.

When she is hampered in her quests to hijack what others are trying to accomplish (to try to claim their efforts as her own), she will inevitably do all she can to sabotage them.

This was also demonstrated in Taitz's involvement in the Georgia Ballot Challenge hearings. The basis of the first two hearings had been underway long before she ever injected herself into the proceedings; and, once she did, the other two lawyers did everything they could to separate their cases from hers—and even symbolically left the courtroom before her “case” was heard. Even Judge Malihi's findings made it clear that he perceived Taitz's case much differently than he did those of Irion and Hatfield; and it was evident that he wanted to publicize that understanding. However, it has been reported that Taitz was the “lead attorney in the cases” and was “responsible for the cases being heard.” Those were demonstrable lies.

(The above Editorial from Dean C. Haskins exposes problems with Orly Taitz. I have said in the past that something is very wrong with her approach to exposing obama as a fraud.

The fact is i believe orly taitz is as much a fraud as obama. The above partial editorial just begins to expose taitz as something other than a real attorney seeking the truth about obama.

She could be an operatrive working for obama. One thing for sure she is not for real. She is like Romney..IE a plastic bananna.)
Story Reports


Monday, February 6, 2012

Mitt Romney believes the US Constitution is Sacred

Mitt Romney And His Cult Ambitions Revisited

The book of Mormon teaching unique doctrine is their belief that the US Constitution is a divinely inspired document. They view it in virtually the same way they view the Bible or the Book of Mormon or other standard works of their church. The idea that the document they are studying is virtually holy writ.

Like his father, George Romney -- who ran unsuccessfully for president a generation ago (1968) -- Mitt is a high priest in the Church priesthood hierarchy. What cost George Romney the candidacy was the LDS Church's stand on race. Until 1978, the LDS Church taught that black people were “loathsome, filthy and lazy” (Mormon leaders' words, NOT mine) and that no black could ever hold the priesthood until all white men had received it. But, in 1978, the Church received a “revelation” changing that teaching. However, young Mitt Romney grew up believing this loathsome doctrine about blacks!

Two separate Mormon prophecies about the "endtime". The first is a belief taught by many LDS leaders – including Brigham Young - that a time would come when the US Constitution would “hang by a thread” and that the elders of Israel (meaning the LDS leadership) would come in and save the day.

Many LDS (and indeed many conservative Americans) believe that today the Constitution is indeed in peril, whether it is from the encroachments on civil liberties from the Homeland Security people OR from groups like the ACLU who seem determined to move through liberal courts to virtually outlaw religion (and especially Christianity) from the public square and public discourse.

How the “elders” would save the Constitution is not entirely clear, but it is presumed that there would be a restoration of the Kingdom of God (LDS church) over the whole nation and that the United Order would be restored by a benevolent LDS Prophet who was also priest and king over America.

Not many Americans know that LDS founder Joseph Smith had himself crowned king over America (soon before he was shot at the Carthage jail by a mob). It is believed that all LDS prophets since him believe themselves to be sovereigns as well.

Believe it or not, Smith established a highly secret “Council of Fifty” which was called the “Council of Ytfif” to outsiders (fifty spelled backwards) 50 Mormon-Masons. With these fifty men, some of whom were not even LDS, he intended to set up the foundations for a secret government of the United States with himself as its head. Ironically enough, one of the LDS splinter groups which broke away from Brigham Young after Smith's assassination established a similar council in rural Wisconsin. They called it “The Illuminati!”

The Mormon Oath of Vengeance Against AMERICA!

An open letter to:

The President, First Presidency and members of the General Authorities of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

August 21, 1980


I was recently reflecting that although the actual blood oath and the oath of vengeance were removed from the Temple ceremonies sometime after 1930, you gentlemen are of an age to have received your own endowments prior to their removal, and therefore, are still under these oaths.

I am particularly interested in your personal position on your oath of vengeance against the United States of America. As you recall, the oath was basically as follows:

You and each of you do solemnly promise and vow that you will pray and never cease to importune high heaven to AVENGE THE BLOOD OF THE PROPHETS (Joseph and Hiram Smith) ON THIS NATION, and that you will teach this to your children and your children’s children unto the third and fourth generation.

Have you officially renounced this oath? Or are you still bound by it?

If you have not renounced it, how can you presume to lead four-and-one-half [now over six and a half million Americans] million people [US citizens] under item 12 of your Articles of Faith and still be bound to call upon heaven to heap curses upon our nation? (“We believe in being subject to Kings, Presidents, Rulers and Magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.”)

If you have renounced it, how can you justify having sworn such an oath in the most holy of holy places on this earth, before the sacred altar of your omnipotent God, and then renounce it? Gentlemen, I call upon you to repent of this abomination and proclaim to both the Mormon people and to the people of the United States of America that you renounce that oath and all it represents.

I also call upon all members of the Mormon Church who hold office in our government, serve in the Armed Services, work for the FBI and CIA who have gone through the Mormon Temple and sworn oaths of obedience and sacrifice to the church and its leaders (above), to repent of these oaths in the light of the obvious conflict of interest between their pledge of allegiance to the USA and their higher loyalty to a group of men who are sworn to seek vengeance against this great nation.


(Signed) J. Edward Decker

Ed Decker Blog

cc: President J. Carter, Mr. Ronald Reagan

No response was received to this letter.


The other prophecy is even more controversial. It is known as the “White Horse Prophecy” or the prophecy of the “One mighty and strong.” Now, this is not public, formal LDS doctrine, but it was taught by many leaders of the Church and is still taught today. It is said by LDS leadership that when the Constitution is in dire peril, one will come who is mighty and strong. He will come riding (figuratively perhaps) on a white horse and will wield awesome political and spiritual power.

This mysterious priesthood elder would somehow seize control of the US government to prevent the total abrogation of the Constitution. He would assume total power and create an LDS “Kingdom” in America. At that time, this “one mighty and strong” would be proclaimed the new “Prophet “ (First President) of the LDS church and would also be president of the United States. Thus, he would wield both supreme political power of the most powerful nation on earth and also be the “Prophet, Seer and Revelator” of the LDS Church.

At the same time, through the vast corporate and agricultural holdings of the LDS Church (through its various subsidiaries), he would have the power to either feed the world or with-hold food from the world. The implication is that getting food would be dependent on being obedient to the United Order.

Now, to a Bible-believer, all of this sounds chillingly like the description of the “man of sin” (2 Thess. 2:3) or the Anti-Christ. He will be a great political leader (Rev. 13:2) but with a religious component (Rev. 13:4). He will control commerce and especially food distribution (Rev. 13:17). But most Mormons do not see that connection. They believe he will be a mighty spiritual and political leader who will save the USA from destruction and ultimately bring peace to the world.

Whether or not any of this actually happens in this way is obviously up to the LORD, and to his prophecies concerning Anti-Christ.. But well-trained temple Mormons believe it is literally their manifest destiny to rescue the United States and bring about the Kingdom of God on earth, with their prophet as its head.

The Mormon temple is located in Washington DC Silver Springs, Maryland. On the fifth floor of the temple there is a council room that is an exact replica of the Oval Office of the White House. It includes all the radio and telemetry equipment in place, hidden beneath a dome on top of the temple. From this council room, the prophet could run the nation just as easily as he could from the White House itself.
(I can't see myself voting for someone who believes the above. If it ends up being romney vs obama there will not be a choice. It won't be the "lesser of 2 evils." It doesn't look good, in fact it does seem that the "fix" is in. It is and will be all about individual survival in the future. The government is turning into a police state either way.) Story Reports

Mitt Romney And His Cult Ambitions

Would you vote for a Presidential candidate who truly believes that he will become a “god” in the next life?

Tricia Erickson

(Tricia, as a former Mormon Bishop’s daughter and Mormon wife, went through the cultic, violent and bizarre Mormon secret temple ceremonies of which Mitt and Ann Romney continue to attend to this day. As a former Mormon, it took Tricia many years to deprogram herself from the lies, strange ceremonies and strategic misinformation that continue to be fed to all Mormons.

"They've been trying since the beginning to get someone in the presidency, because they believe they have to establish their authority so when Jesus comes to Earth, the Mormon Church will take control of the government and the Mormons will be the government of God on Earth," she continued.

When asked for specific rituals she considers bizarre, Erickson claims Romney and other Mormons take part in clandestine marriage ceremonies involving "outrageous" customs. Explaining her own Mormon wedding, she says she was forced to completely disrobe against her will.

"It was horrific," she told WND. "There I was standing naked. They brought this bowl of water, and started washing my body down and whispering prayers over my body. They stopped over the right and left breast, the navel and knees and prayed specific prayers."

To help ensure the general public did not learn details of the rituals, she says believers took a symbolic knife to feign their own murder if members spilled the beans of what really goes on behind closed doors.

"They actually had us slashing our guts open and our guts falling to the ground if we told people of the secret dogma of the ceremonies," Erickson said.

"Mitt is not a casual Mormon," she told online interviewer Thom Hartmann, noting Romney has reached the upper echelons of the faith. "There is no way that he will be able to not listen to the [Mormon] prophet. His eternal salvation depends on it. He has to put the church first over country." )

Tricia Erickson Blog

Mitt Romney seriously believes what Mormonism teaches, that he will become a God in the afterlife. Mitt also believes that he will be given his own heavenly kingdom/planet to rule over in which he will be able to call his wife, Ann, into by her secret name that only he knows (this gives him, not God, control over Ann’s place in the afterlife/salvation—-if he doesn’t call her in to his kingdom, she has to remain in a lower kingdom /degree of glory), and they will live together there for time and all eternity. Mitt and Ann believe that they will be able to have external sexual relations to create spirit children in which to populate their kingdom. As time goes by, their spirit children will also inhabit the new born baby bodies of our babies here on planet earth.

You see, they, and all Mormons, believe that we all were spirit children in the “pre-existence” before we came to earth, and that we came to earth for a period of testing in order to merit our own heavenly kingdoms when we pass on to the eternal next life.

Mitt and family (and all Mormons) also believe that there are many gods in the highest degree of Mormon heaven. They believe that our God has a wife with him in heaven, and they were “begotten” by their god mothers and fathers and their god mothers and fathers were begotten by their god mothers and fathers and on and on throughout the beginning of time. So gods begat gods begat gods.

The secret Mormon temple ceremonies are directed to this afterlife fiction. You see, I experienced this myself when I was a young Mormon bride of 19 years of age, so I know of what I write here.

So again, would you vote for a Presidential candidate who truly believes that he will become a “god” in his next life? Or, would you be concerned for his judgment, his ability to discern fact from fiction, and for his literal sanity?


"Mormons deny the divinity of Jesus and salvation by faith alone, it is a cult, and a Mormon candidate should never be elected president."

Mitt Romney And His Cult Ambitions

Magic Mormon Underware Ritual (Additional information about the Mountain Meadows Massacre also.)

An Urgent Message from Ed Decker about Mormonism

Ed Decker's Blog

LDS doctrine teaches that we were all born as spirit children in our pre-existent life on a planet near the great star, Kolob. Mormonism teaches that the god of this world, Elohim, was once a man on some other planet, earned godhood, was exalted and with many goddess wives, sent to his heavenly orb, where through sexual union, he and his goddess wives have been busy procreating enough spirit children to people this earth, over which he exercises his godhood authority.

Worthy LDS men and women, through obedience to all the laws and ordinances of the LDS gospel and through vows and sacred rituals in the LDS temple, learn the sacred words, handgrips and ‘passwords’ needed to enter into Celestial glory and begin the same process for their own planet. That is a pretty simple explanation for the core of Mormon theology and religious practice.

If you want specific LDS proof documentation, go to my website Saints Alive and look at the articles, Do They Really Believe that? And The Law of Eternal Progression.

Obama 's "tragedy of the commons" is state organized theft

Occupy Dallas leaves a mess

Obama 's "tragedy of the commons" is state organized theft.

Marxists admit that many "socialist" countries around the world fail. However marxists say the reason for failure is not that socialism is deficient, but that the socialist economies are not practicing "pure" socialism. The perfect version of socialism would work; it is just the imperfect socialism that doesn’t work.

Marxists like to compare a theoretically perfect version of socialism with practical, imperfect capitalism which allows them to claim that socialism is superior to capitalism.

Under socialism, incentives either play a minimal role or are ignored totally. A centrally planned economy without market prices or profits, where property is owned by the state, is a system without an effective incentive mechanism to direct economic activity. By failing to emphasize incentives, socialism is a theory inconsistent with human nature and is therefore doomed to fail.

Socialism is based on the theory that incentives don’t matter!

In a capitalist economy, incentives are of the utmost importance. Market prices, the profit-and-loss system of accounting, and private property rights provide an efficient, interrelated system of incentives to guide and direct economic behavior.

Capitalism is based on the theory that incentives matter!

(Of course incentives don't matter if your on welfare, unemployment and won't work living off obama state organized theft. Those also on welfare, unemployment, food debt cards etc who do look for work and want to work are caught in the obama trap of state organized theft that has destroyed their opportunity for work and taken away the incentive to find a job and work because jobs have been purposefully destroyed to make organized state theft PERPETUATE itself.) Story Reports

In the same way that a Ponzi scheme or chain letter initially succeeds but eventually collapses, socialism may show early signs of success. But any accomplishments quickly fade as the fundamental deficiencies of central planning emerge. It is the initial illusion of success that gives government intervention its pernicious, seductive appeal. In the long run, socialism has always proven to be a formula for tyranny and misery.

A pyramid scheme is ultimately unsustainable because it is based on faulty principles. Likewise, collectivism is unsustainable in the long run because it is a flawed theory. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Another fatal defect of socialism is its blatant disregard for the role of private property rights in creating incentives that foster economic growth and development. The failure of socialism around the world is a "tragedy of commons" on a global scale.

The "tragedy of the commons" refers to the British experience of the sixteenth century when certain grazing lands were communally owned by villages and were made available for public use. The land was quickly overgrazed and eventually became worthless as villagers exploited the communally owned resource.

When assets are publicly owned, there are no incentives in place to encourage wise stewardship. While private property creates incentives for conservation and the responsible use of property, public property encourages irresponsibility and waste.

If everyone owns an asset, people act as if no one owns it. And when no one owns it, no one really takes care of it. Public ownership encourages neglect and mismanagement.

(A perfect example is the recent obama organized paid "occupy" movement. Everywhere these people are their temporary public occupying or "grazing' of public land showcases their irresponsibility and waste because their is NO incentive for conservation or responsibility. They always leave their occupied area in a getto state of neglect and trash. They are examples of communally occupied "grazing" of public use land.) Story Reports

(This is what we see in the obama regime as it continues to add more "public" ownership of everything that can be turned into a "state" asset through regulation and unconstitutional "laws". We see massive mismanagement and failure.) Story Reports

Since socialism, by definition, is a system marked by the "common ownership of the means of production," the failure of socialism is a "tragedy of the commons" on a national scale. Much of the economic stagnation of socialism can be traced to the failure to establish and promote private property rights.

As Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto remarked, you can travel in rural communities around the world and you will hear dogs barking, because even dogs understand property rights. It is only statist governments that have failed to understand property rights.

(Obama is a "dog" of a "president" that understands communist socialist organized state theft of everything you own.) Story Reports

Sunday, February 5, 2012

A real chicken "nugget" is better for you than a mcnugget from macdonalds

Hooked on chicken nuggets: Girl, 17, who has eaten nothing else since age TWO rushed to hospital after collapsing

mcnugget and wendy's fries contain silicone

Wendy's natural-cut fries with sea salt sound almost like granola in their commercials. The fast-food chain touts that the fries are natural-cut russet potatoes, sprinkled with sea salt for a fry that's better (and better for you).

Shocker of a lifetime -- Wendy's may not be exactly telling the whole truth. According to Yahoo Finance, it's true that Wendy's fries have a bit of skin left on them (making them look all golden and natural).

A visit to Wendy's nutrition information website confirms the use of dimethylpolysiloxane, a silicone-based antifoaming agent.

American McNuggets (190 calories, 12 grams of fat, 2 grams of saturated fat for 4 pieces) contain the chemical preservative tBHQ, tertiary butylhydroquinone, a petroleum-based product. They also contain dimethylpolysiloxane, “an anti-foaming agent” also used in Silly Putty.

Dimethylpolysiloxane is used as a matter of safety to keep the oil from foaming, McComb says. The chemical is a form of silicone also used in cosmetics and Silly Putty.

BHQ is a preservative for vegetable oils and animal fats, limited to .02 percent of the oil in the nugget. One gram (one-thirtieth of an ounce) can cause "nausea, vomiting, ringing in the ears, delirium, a sense of suffocation, and collapse," according to “A Consumer’s Dictionary of Food Additives.”

(What does this mean? It means they put Dimethylpolysiloxane in mcnuggets/fries and wendy's fries to help them hold their shape and look good.

Yes thats right they are putting the same silicone in the fries and mcnuggets that are used in cosmetics.

It is occasionally called dimethicone makes hair shiny and slippery), food (antifoaming agent), caulking, lubricating oils, and heat-resistant tiles.

A real "chicken nugget" doesn't contain silicone, it can be found in a farm yard.. A chicken mcnugget contains silicone.

Doesn't this make you just say ummmmmm give me a mcnugget to eat.) Story Reports

Congress Asks Obama To Accelerate Use of Drones in U.S.

Congress Asks Obama To Accelerate Use of Drones in U.S.

The pending authorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration directs the Secretary of Transporation to develop within nine months “a comprehensive plan to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.”

Congress Calls for Accelerated Use of Drones in U.S.

The Department of Defense is pursuing its own domestic UAS activities for training purposes and “domestic operations,” according to a 2007 DoD-FAA memorandum of agreement.

Army Foresees Expanded Use of Drones in U.S. Airspace

In the recently enacted FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (section 1097), Congress mandated that “the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a program to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system at six test ranges.” This new test range program is supposed to be established within 180 days.

(Its interesting that the test range program must be established in 180 days and obama has 60 days from his signature of the ndaa of 2012 to determine how and when Americans can be SNACHED or KIDNAPPED without warning and without arrest or trial. See sec 1031 of ndaa of 2012.

The domestic drones will not only be used to surveil Americans. Nothing is stopping obama from delivering some kind of payload with a civilian drone.)
Story Reports


Who Is Flying Unmanned Aircraft in the U.S.?

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Who Is Flying Unmanned Aircraft in the U.S.?

Government Withholds Information on Drone Flight Authorizations

San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed suit today against the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), demanding data on certifications and authorizations the agency has issued for the operation of unmanned aircraft, also known as drones.

Drones are designed to carry surveillance equipment – including video cameras, infrared cameras and heat sensors, and radar – that can allow for sophisticated and almost constant surveillance. They can also carry weapons. Traditionally, drones have been used almost exclusively by military and security organizations. However, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection uses drones inside the United States to patrol the U.S. borders, and state and local law enforcement are increasingly using unmanned aircraft for investigations into things like cattle rustling, drug dealing, and the search for missing persons.

Any drone flying over 400 feet needs a certification or authorization from the Federal Aviation Administration, part of the DOT. But there is currently no information available to the public about who specifically has obtained these authorizations or for what purposes. EFF filed a Freedom of Information Act request in April of 2011 for records of unmanned aircraft activities, but the DOT so far has failed to provide the information.

"Drones give the government and other unmanned aircraft operators a powerful new surveillance tool to gather extensive and intrusive data on Americans' movements and activities," said EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Lynch. "As the government begins to make policy decisions about the use of these aircraft, the public needs to know more about how and why these drones are being used to surveil United States citizens."

Dozens of companies and research organizations are working to develop even more sophisticated drones, so their use is poised for a dramatic expansion in the coming years. Meanwhile, news reports indicate that the FAA is studying ways to integrate more drones into the national airspace because of increased demand from federal, state, and local governments. EFF's lawsuit asks for immediate response to our FOIA request, including the release of data on any certificates and authorizations issued for unmanned aircraft flights, expired authorizations, and any applications that have been denied.

"The use of drones in American airspace could dramatically increase the physical tracking of citizens – tracking that can reveal deeply personal details about our private lives," said Lynch. "We're asking the DOT to follow the law and respond to our FOIA request so we can learn more about who is flying the drones and why."


NPR’s domestic drone commercial

Excitement over America’s use of drones in multiple Muslim countries is, predictably, causing those weapons to be imported onto U.S. soil. Federal law enforcement agencies and local police forces are buying more and more of them and putting them to increasingly diverse domestic uses, as well as patrolling the border, and even private corporations are now considering how to use them. One U.S. drone manufacturer advertises its product as ideal for “urban monitoring.” Orlando’s police department originally requested two drones to use for security at next year’s GOP convention, only to change their minds for budgetary reasons.

One new type of drone already in use by the U.S. military in Afghanistan — the Gorgon Stare, named after the “mythical Greek creature whose unblinking eyes turned to stone those who beheld them” — is “able to scan an area the size of a small town” and “the most sophisticated robotics use artificial intelligence that [can] seek out and record certain kinds of suspicious activity”; boasted one U.S. General: “Gorgon Stare will be looking at a whole city, so there will be no way for the adversary to know what we’re looking at, and we can see everything.”