Obama and holder are nothing but criminals that should be removed from office

The Fast and Furious program has sent about 2,000 guns to Mexican drug cartels.

Tom Tancredo

Over 100 members of Congress – I think it is 112 at the latest count – have called for Holder’s resignation.

What possible “deal” could the White House offer to Boehner to persuade him to end the investigation?

The reported “deal” Boehner and Holder are discussing would let higher ups in the Department of Justice off the hook if they prosecute one or two individual ATF supervisors. Holder would then claim he “cleaned up the mess” and be free from any moral or political culpability.

(Speaker Boehner is not only protecting holder he is protecting obama from criminal
charges. Both Boehner and holder should be investigated.) Story Reports

Every time Issa’s committee holds a public hearing, new evidence comes to light.

The interesting question is why Speaker Boehner and other Republicans in leadership positions in the House are trying to hamper and curtail the Issa investigation. If Holder is innocent of the allegations, won’t that become evident when all the evidence is made public? If he is innocent, why does the White House fear the investigation?

Some us remember that President Nixon was not impeached and removed for instigating the Watergate break-in of June 1972. He was impeached for his part in the cover up that followed the break-in. In essence, he made the mistake of lying about it, which is what Holder has done.

(Obama is a certified LIAR. Obama has said he has full confidence in holder. Of course obama is lying about what holder knew and did making sure guns went to mexican criminals.
Obama and holder are nothing but criminals that should be removed from office.) Story Reports

Orly Taitz seems to display a need to help obama

Dean C. Haskins

While there may still be some who believe that Orly Taitz advanced our cause in the past, many now question her motives, and understand the damage she continues to inflict on our efforts. Whatever her motives may be, it is time for her to stand down and let professional law enforcement proceed in its investigation without any further hampering or interference.

It should be understood that the Cold Case Posse never considered any evidence submitted by Orly Taitz; but it developed, and successfully utilized many other sources of evidence. Early on in the investigation, Taitz attempted to provide evidence, and was instructed as to how to submit evidence to the MCSO/ Cold Case Posse.

Unfortunately, and for reasons only she could know, she refused to follow those directions, so nothing she attempted to provide was ever considered.

When she is hampered in her quests to hijack what others are trying to accomplish (to try to claim their efforts as her own), she will inevitably do all she can to sabotage them.

This was also demonstrated in Taitz's involvement in the Georgia Ballot Challenge hearings. The basis of the first two hearings had been underway long before she ever injected herself into the proceedings; and, once she did, the other two lawyers did everything they could to separate their cases from hers—and even symbolically left the courtroom before her “case” was heard. Even Judge Malihi's findings made it clear that he perceived Taitz's case much differently than he did those of Irion and Hatfield; and it was evident that he wanted to publicize that understanding. However, it has been reported that Taitz was the “lead attorney in the cases” and was “responsible for the cases being heard.” Those were demonstrable lies.

(The above Editorial from Dean C. Haskins exposes problems with Orly Taitz. I have said in the past that something is very wrong with her approach to exposing obama as a fraud.

The fact is i believe orly taitz is as much a fraud as obama. The above partial editorial just begins to expose taitz as something other than a real attorney seeking the truth about obama.

She could be an operatrive working for obama. One thing for sure she is not for real. She is like Romney..IE a plastic bananna.) Story Reports

HAS THE COLD CASE POSSE'S INVESTIGATION BEEN DELAYED?

Obama 's "tragedy of the commons" is state organized theft

Occupy Dallas leaves a mess

Obama 's "tragedy of the commons" is state organized theft.

Marxists admit that many "socialist" countries around the world fail. However marxists say the reason for failure is not that socialism is deficient, but that the socialist economies are not practicing "pure" socialism. The perfect version of socialism would work; it is just the imperfect socialism that doesn’t work.

Marxists like to compare a theoretically perfect version of socialism with practical, imperfect capitalism which allows them to claim that socialism is superior to capitalism.

Under socialism, incentives either play a minimal role or are ignored totally. A centrally planned economy without market prices or profits, where property is owned by the state, is a system without an effective incentive mechanism to direct economic activity. By failing to emphasize incentives, socialism is a theory inconsistent with human nature and is therefore doomed to fail.

Socialism is based on the theory that incentives don’t matter!

In a capitalist economy, incentives are of the utmost importance. Market prices, the profit-and-loss system of accounting, and private property rights provide an efficient, interrelated system of incentives to guide and direct economic behavior.

Capitalism is based on the theory that incentives matter!

(Of course incentives don't matter if your on welfare, unemployment and won't work living off obama state organized theft. Those also on welfare, unemployment, food debt cards etc who do look for work and want to work are caught in the obama trap of state organized theft that has destroyed their opportunity for work and taken away the incentive to find a job and work because jobs have been purposefully destroyed to make organized state theft PERPETUATE itself.) Story Reports

In the same way that a Ponzi scheme or chain letter initially succeeds but eventually collapses, socialism may show early signs of success. But any accomplishments quickly fade as the fundamental deficiencies of central planning emerge. It is the initial illusion of success that gives government intervention its pernicious, seductive appeal. In the long run, socialism has always proven to be a formula for tyranny and misery.

A pyramid scheme is ultimately unsustainable because it is based on faulty principles. Likewise, collectivism is unsustainable in the long run because it is a flawed theory. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Another fatal defect of socialism is its blatant disregard for the role of private property rights in creating incentives that foster economic growth and development. The failure of socialism around the world is a "tragedy of commons" on a global scale.

The "tragedy of the commons" refers to the British experience of the sixteenth century when certain grazing lands were communally owned by villages and were made available for public use. The land was quickly overgrazed and eventually became worthless as villagers exploited the communally owned resource.

When assets are publicly owned, there are no incentives in place to encourage wise stewardship. While private property creates incentives for conservation and the responsible use of property, public property encourages irresponsibility and waste.

If everyone owns an asset, people act as if no one owns it. And when no one owns it, no one really takes care of it. Public ownership encourages neglect and mismanagement.

(A perfect example is the recent obama organized paid "occupy" movement. Everywhere these people are their temporary public occupying or "grazing' of public land showcases their irresponsibility and waste because their is NO incentive for conservation or responsibility. They always leave their occupied area in a getto state of neglect and trash. They are examples of communally occupied "grazing" of public use land.) Story Reports

(This is what we see in the obama regime as it continues to add more "public" ownership of everything that can be turned into a "state" asset through regulation and unconstitutional "laws". We see massive mismanagement and failure.) Story Reports

Since socialism, by definition, is a system marked by the "common ownership of the means of production," the failure of socialism is a "tragedy of the commons" on a national scale. Much of the economic stagnation of socialism can be traced to the failure to establish and promote private property rights.

As Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto remarked, you can travel in rural communities around the world and you will hear dogs barking, because even dogs understand property rights. It is only statist governments that have failed to understand property rights.

(Obama is a "dog" of a "president" that understands communist socialist organized state theft of everything you own.) Story Reports

A real chicken "nugget" is better for you than a mcnugget from macdonalds

Hooked on chicken nuggets: Girl, 17, who has eaten nothing else since age TWO rushed to hospital after collapsing

mcnugget and wendy's fries contain silicone
Polydimethylsiloxane


Wendy's natural-cut fries with sea salt sound almost like granola in their commercials. The fast-food chain touts that the fries are natural-cut russet potatoes, sprinkled with sea salt for a fry that's better (and better for you).

Shocker of a lifetime -- Wendy's may not be exactly telling the whole truth. According to Yahoo Finance, it's true that Wendy's fries have a bit of skin left on them (making them look all golden and natural).

A visit to Wendy's nutrition information website confirms the use of dimethylpolysiloxane, a silicone-based antifoaming agent.
........................................................

American McNuggets (190 calories, 12 grams of fat, 2 grams of saturated fat for 4 pieces) contain the chemical preservative tBHQ, tertiary butylhydroquinone, a petroleum-based product. They also contain dimethylpolysiloxane, “an anti-foaming agent” also used in Silly Putty.

Dimethylpolysiloxane is used as a matter of safety to keep the oil from foaming, McComb says. The chemical is a form of silicone also used in cosmetics and Silly Putty.

BHQ is a preservative for vegetable oils and animal fats, limited to .02 percent of the oil in the nugget. One gram (one-thirtieth of an ounce) can cause "nausea, vomiting, ringing in the ears, delirium, a sense of suffocation, and collapse," according to “A Consumer’s Dictionary of Food Additives.”

(What does this mean? It means they put Dimethylpolysiloxane in mcnuggets/fries and wendy's fries to help them hold their shape and look good.

Yes thats right they are putting the same silicone in the fries and mcnuggets that are used in cosmetics.

It is occasionally called dimethicone makes hair shiny and slippery), food (antifoaming agent), caulking, lubricating oils, and heat-resistant tiles.

A real "chicken nugget" doesn't contain silicone, it can be found in a farm yard.. A chicken mcnugget contains silicone.

Doesn't this make you just say ummmmmm give me a mcnugget to eat.) Story Reports

Congress Asks Obama To Accelerate Use of Drones in U.S.

Congress Asks Obama To Accelerate Use of Drones in U.S.

The pending authorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration directs the Secretary of Transporation to develop within nine months “a comprehensive plan to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.”

Congress Calls for Accelerated Use of Drones in U.S.

The Department of Defense is pursuing its own domestic UAS activities for training purposes and “domestic operations,” according to a 2007 DoD-FAA memorandum of agreement.

Army Foresees Expanded Use of Drones in U.S. Airspace

In the recently enacted FY2012 National Defense Authorization Act (section 1097), Congress mandated that “the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a program to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system at six test ranges.” This new test range program is supposed to be established within 180 days.

(Its interesting that the test range program must be established in 180 days and obama has 60 days from his signature of the ndaa of 2012 to determine how and when Americans can be SNACHED or KIDNAPPED without warning and without arrest or trial. See sec 1031 of ndaa of 2012.

The domestic drones will not only be used to surveil Americans. Nothing is stopping obama from delivering some kind of payload with a civilian drone.) Story Reports

***************************************************

Who Is Flying Unmanned Aircraft in the U.S.?

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Who Is Flying Unmanned Aircraft in the U.S.?

Government Withholds Information on Drone Flight Authorizations

San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed suit today against the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), demanding data on certifications and authorizations the agency has issued for the operation of unmanned aircraft, also known as drones.

Drones are designed to carry surveillance equipment – including video cameras, infrared cameras and heat sensors, and radar – that can allow for sophisticated and almost constant surveillance. They can also carry weapons. Traditionally, drones have been used almost exclusively by military and security organizations. However, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection uses drones inside the United States to patrol the U.S. borders, and state and local law enforcement are increasingly using unmanned aircraft for investigations into things like cattle rustling, drug dealing, and the search for missing persons.

Any drone flying over 400 feet needs a certification or authorization from the Federal Aviation Administration, part of the DOT. But there is currently no information available to the public about who specifically has obtained these authorizations or for what purposes. EFF filed a Freedom of Information Act request in April of 2011 for records of unmanned aircraft activities, but the DOT so far has failed to provide the information.

"Drones give the government and other unmanned aircraft operators a powerful new surveillance tool to gather extensive and intrusive data on Americans' movements and activities," said EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Lynch. "As the government begins to make policy decisions about the use of these aircraft, the public needs to know more about how and why these drones are being used to surveil United States citizens."

Dozens of companies and research organizations are working to develop even more sophisticated drones, so their use is poised for a dramatic expansion in the coming years. Meanwhile, news reports indicate that the FAA is studying ways to integrate more drones into the national airspace because of increased demand from federal, state, and local governments. EFF's lawsuit asks for immediate response to our FOIA request, including the release of data on any certificates and authorizations issued for unmanned aircraft flights, expired authorizations, and any applications that have been denied.

"The use of drones in American airspace could dramatically increase the physical tracking of citizens – tracking that can reveal deeply personal details about our private lives," said Lynch. "We're asking the DOT to follow the law and respond to our FOIA request so we can learn more about who is flying the drones and why."

*********************************************

NPR’s domestic drone commercial

Excitement over America’s use of drones in multiple Muslim countries is, predictably, causing those weapons to be imported onto U.S. soil. Federal law enforcement agencies and local police forces are buying more and more of them and putting them to increasingly diverse domestic uses, as well as patrolling the border, and even private corporations are now considering how to use them. One U.S. drone manufacturer advertises its product as ideal for “urban monitoring.” Orlando’s police department originally requested two drones to use for security at next year’s GOP convention, only to change their minds for budgetary reasons.

One new type of drone already in use by the U.S. military in Afghanistan — the Gorgon Stare, named after the “mythical Greek creature whose unblinking eyes turned to stone those who beheld them” — is “able to scan an area the size of a small town” and “the most sophisticated robotics use artificial intelligence that [can] seek out and record certain kinds of suspicious activity”; boasted one U.S. General: “Gorgon Stare will be looking at a whole city, so there will be no way for the adversary to know what we’re looking at, and we can see everything.”