Saturday, January 22, 2011
Why doesn't obama give the Hawaii DOH his consent to disclose his birth documentation?
Why doesn't obama give the Hawaii DOH his consent to disclose his birth documentation?
Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie will end his quest to prove President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii because it's against state law to release private documents, his office said today.
State Attorney General David Louie told the governor he can't disclose an individual's birth documentation without a person's consent, Abercrombie spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz said.
(Isn't it crazy to think Gov Abercrombie didn't know it was against Hawaii state law to release obama's "private documents"?
Is Gov Abercrombie so incompetent he didn't know he needed to get obama's permission to release the in question "private documents".
The press release by Gov Abercrombie would have you believe there are "private documents" related to obama's US citizenship.
I think all this talk from abercrombie was a PR stunt to plant the idea in people's minds that there are "private documents" in Hawaii that pertain to obama's US citizenship.
Hawaii's health director said in 2008 and 2009 that she had seen and verified Obama's original vital records.
She didn't say she had seen an original long form certificate of birth from an Hawaiian hospital.
Gov abercrombie read a letter that stated obama was born in an Hawaiian hospital but he nor the white house would confirm the letter was from obama.
Gov abercrombie read a FAKE fund raising letter.
Hawaii's health director said she had seen Obama's original vital records, which could be nothing more than an index record notation.
An index record only means there was a request to issue a birth certificate.
Obama's "private documents" seem to only be an index record notation.
An index record notation could have been generated when obama requested a short form "certification of live birth" from the state of Hawaii.
The bottom line is gov abercrombie has produced no evidence obama is a US citizen.
Obama is silent about releasing any "private documents" that could verify he is a US citizen.
Why doesn't obama give the Hawaii DOH his consent to disclose his birth documentation?
I believe the answer is the only "private documents" obama could disclose to document his US citizenship would only be an index record notation.
Obama truly is a NO RECORD and a FRAUD.
Obama has never claimed any of the 5 different forms of the colb online as his.
Obama as far as I know has never claimed to be a US citizen.
Obama has never offered to prove his US citizenship.
Why doesn't obama give the Hawaii DOH his consent to disclose his birth documentation?
This is what Americans should be asking obama in addition to where's the birth certificate.) Story Reports
Any online document that can't be verified is worthless.
Obama's online colb is worthless because it can't be verified as actual proof he was born in Hawaii and is a US citizen.
It contains NO hospital name that can be verified.
It contains NO doctor's name that can be verified.
It contains No signatures that can be verified.
Obama has never claimed the worthless online document that people say is proof he is a US citizen.
Don't you think that is proof he is not a US citizen?
Friday, January 21, 2011
How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue
How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue
Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program (TARP)
....................................................................................
How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue
Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program
Washington Post is Monday, June 29th, 2009: "How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue -- Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program."
General Electric, the world's largest industrial company, has quietly become the biggest beneficiary of one of the government's key rescue programs for banks.
At the same time, GE has avoided many of the restrictions facing other financial giants getting help from the government.
The company did not initially qualify for the program, under which the government sought to unfreeze credit markets by guaranteeing debt sold by banking firms.
But regulators soon loosened the eligibility requirements, in part because of behind-the-scenes appeals from GE.
As a result, GE has joined major banks collectively saving billions of dollars by raising money for their operations at lower interest rates. Public records show that GE Capital, the company's massive financing arm, has issued nearly a quarter of the $340 billion in debt backed by the program, which is known as the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, or TLGP. The government's actions have been "powerful and helpful" to the company, GE chief executive Jeffrey Immelt acknowledged in December.
GE's finance arm is not classified as a bank. Rather, it worked its way into the rescue program by owning two relatively small Utah banking institutions, illustrating how the loopholes in the U.S. regulatory system are manifest in the government's historic intervention in the financial crisis.
Unlike other major lenders participating in the debt guarantee program, including Bank of America, Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase, GE has never been subject to the Fed's stress tests or its rules for limiting risk. Also unlike firms that have received bailout money in the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, GE is not subject to restrictions such as limits on executive compensation.
The debt guarantee program that GE joined is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which was reluctant to take on the new mission, according to current and former officials who were not authorized to speak publicly. The FDIC also initially resisted expanding the pool of eligible companies, fearing it would add more risk to the program, the officials said.
........................................................................................
Rush Limbaugh
The Regime-Immelt Deal Smells
I'm sure you saw it by now -- Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of General Electric (who now they're saying is a big Republican, lifelong Republican), has been appointed to replace somebody on the Council of Economic Advisors.
Now, folks I'm gonna tell you something. This really smells. Congress needs to really look into this. We have another advisory board created by executive order to tell the government what it needs to do to help create jobs. They have a deficit-reduction board. Did you know that? How good a job has that bumbling done? Diddly-squat. A giant failure. Now we've got this, and who is it made up of? The new Congress and a lot of people saying that this really needs to be investigated. General Electric and Obama are in bed with each other. General Electric got gobs of TARP money.
They got stimulus money. They don't need it. General Electric didn't need any of that money. General Electric has been in bed with Obama on this green energy garbage. MSNBC, the NBC networks, "go green" many weeks a year with their graphics and all this other stuff -- and they've used government money to create this green energy division that they have, and they're behind these compact fluorescent lightbulbs. They run NBC and MSNBC at a steep loss in order to give Obama his own cheerleading news network, and this CEO ends up on an advisory board now.
Let me summarize this story for you: TARP was expanded by Obama for GE, which did not qualify as a bank. Remember, now, TARP was to bail out banks. TARP was expanded by Obama for GE, which didn't qualify as a bank. GE's "bank" became the top beneficiary of TARP funds. Jeffrey Immelt is involved here. The story from the Washington Post is Monday, June 29th, 2009: "How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue -- Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program."
You need any more? I'll give you more. It's astounding here. There needs to be a stop right now and an investigation of all of this. "General Electric, the world's largest industrial company, has quietly become the biggest beneficiary of one of the government's key rescue programs for banks. At the same time, GE has avoided many of the restrictions facing other financial giants getting help from the government. The company did not initially qualify for the [TARP] program, under which the government sought to unfreeze credit markets by guaranteeing debt sold by banking firms.
So GE -- unlike AIG and Goldman Sachs -- can bonus their execs whatever they want. They can pay their execs whatever amount they want. They were recategorized as a bank so as to get bank bailout money, and now yesterday GE's chairman ends up on a new advisory committee on jobs and the economy set up by executive order. And the Washington Post is totally unfazed as they report this. Ho-hum! It's just more Obama structural brilliance as far as they are concerned.
Now, this seems to call for an investigation. I mean, this is serious insider dealing here between this company and this president. Now, it's obvious, it's been clear to everybody, Obama has a plan in place (and, again, as I say, it's a very obvious plan) to use the bureaucracy, not legislation. Use the bureaucracy to advance the most radical agenda possible in health and environment (which is what this GE stuff is all about) while creating a PR perception in the opposite direction, that of the cool headed, moderate, open-to-ideas, civil president. It's a complete ruse. It's a complete attempt to deceive the people: Say one thing but act another way.
(Rush you have hit the nail on the head here. Obama is nothing but a PR perception dedicated to deceiving the American people.) Story Reports
Now, on the PR front, the president talks about growing jobs when he destroys them. He talks about free markets when he attacks them. He talks about civility when he refuses to denounce the haters among his friends -- and notice, too, now how he rewards huge corporations who toe the line like all the finance houses that were at the state dinner with China. He attacks corporations that actually create things or build things, like oil, steel, coal, et cetera.
But back during... I think it was 2007, 2008. Don't hold me to these dates; I gotta figure this out in just a second. During the campaign when Obama's out there ripping Walmart to shreds. His wife shows up there the other day and has somehow bullied or pressured Walmart, which already sells things for low prices, into selling healthy food at lower prices during the winter. Michelle Obama shows up and she and her husband are now partners with Walmart when in 2000 and 2008 this guy joined the unions in trying to put 'em out of business.
Moochelle Obama, the first lady, is now in charge what you eat at Walmart and what it costs! She just shows up. Last I looked, Walmart's a private sector company. First lady can go in there all she wants. She could even call a press conference. But she does so, and why do you think Walmart's listening to this? Look, don't get mad at Walmart. That's not the point here. What would you do if this bunch strolls in your front door? This bunch, this regime has a representative high up, strolls in your front door; demands a microphone, press conference; demands you lower your prices? What are you gonna do?
Most people are gonna cave. It's not worth the trouble. And this on top of this General Electric stuff. That state dinner was filled with leftist Wall Street welfare recipients. Very few people were there from real industry, which are the subject of the EPA's job killing and growth killing agenda.
The Regime-Immelt Deal Smells
Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program (TARP)
....................................................................................
How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue
Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program
Washington Post is Monday, June 29th, 2009: "How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue -- Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program."
General Electric, the world's largest industrial company, has quietly become the biggest beneficiary of one of the government's key rescue programs for banks.
At the same time, GE has avoided many of the restrictions facing other financial giants getting help from the government.
The company did not initially qualify for the program, under which the government sought to unfreeze credit markets by guaranteeing debt sold by banking firms.
But regulators soon loosened the eligibility requirements, in part because of behind-the-scenes appeals from GE.
As a result, GE has joined major banks collectively saving billions of dollars by raising money for their operations at lower interest rates. Public records show that GE Capital, the company's massive financing arm, has issued nearly a quarter of the $340 billion in debt backed by the program, which is known as the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, or TLGP. The government's actions have been "powerful and helpful" to the company, GE chief executive Jeffrey Immelt acknowledged in December.
GE's finance arm is not classified as a bank. Rather, it worked its way into the rescue program by owning two relatively small Utah banking institutions, illustrating how the loopholes in the U.S. regulatory system are manifest in the government's historic intervention in the financial crisis.
Unlike other major lenders participating in the debt guarantee program, including Bank of America, Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase, GE has never been subject to the Fed's stress tests or its rules for limiting risk. Also unlike firms that have received bailout money in the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, GE is not subject to restrictions such as limits on executive compensation.
The debt guarantee program that GE joined is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which was reluctant to take on the new mission, according to current and former officials who were not authorized to speak publicly. The FDIC also initially resisted expanding the pool of eligible companies, fearing it would add more risk to the program, the officials said.
........................................................................................
Rush Limbaugh
The Regime-Immelt Deal Smells
I'm sure you saw it by now -- Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of General Electric (who now they're saying is a big Republican, lifelong Republican), has been appointed to replace somebody on the Council of Economic Advisors.
Now, folks I'm gonna tell you something. This really smells. Congress needs to really look into this. We have another advisory board created by executive order to tell the government what it needs to do to help create jobs. They have a deficit-reduction board. Did you know that? How good a job has that bumbling done? Diddly-squat. A giant failure. Now we've got this, and who is it made up of? The new Congress and a lot of people saying that this really needs to be investigated. General Electric and Obama are in bed with each other. General Electric got gobs of TARP money.
They got stimulus money. They don't need it. General Electric didn't need any of that money. General Electric has been in bed with Obama on this green energy garbage. MSNBC, the NBC networks, "go green" many weeks a year with their graphics and all this other stuff -- and they've used government money to create this green energy division that they have, and they're behind these compact fluorescent lightbulbs. They run NBC and MSNBC at a steep loss in order to give Obama his own cheerleading news network, and this CEO ends up on an advisory board now.
Let me summarize this story for you: TARP was expanded by Obama for GE, which did not qualify as a bank. Remember, now, TARP was to bail out banks. TARP was expanded by Obama for GE, which didn't qualify as a bank. GE's "bank" became the top beneficiary of TARP funds. Jeffrey Immelt is involved here. The story from the Washington Post is Monday, June 29th, 2009: "How a Loophole Benefits GE in Bank Rescue -- Industrial Giant Becomes Top Recipient in Debt-Guarantee Program."
You need any more? I'll give you more. It's astounding here. There needs to be a stop right now and an investigation of all of this. "General Electric, the world's largest industrial company, has quietly become the biggest beneficiary of one of the government's key rescue programs for banks. At the same time, GE has avoided many of the restrictions facing other financial giants getting help from the government. The company did not initially qualify for the [TARP] program, under which the government sought to unfreeze credit markets by guaranteeing debt sold by banking firms.
So GE -- unlike AIG and Goldman Sachs -- can bonus their execs whatever they want. They can pay their execs whatever amount they want. They were recategorized as a bank so as to get bank bailout money, and now yesterday GE's chairman ends up on a new advisory committee on jobs and the economy set up by executive order. And the Washington Post is totally unfazed as they report this. Ho-hum! It's just more Obama structural brilliance as far as they are concerned.
Now, this seems to call for an investigation. I mean, this is serious insider dealing here between this company and this president. Now, it's obvious, it's been clear to everybody, Obama has a plan in place (and, again, as I say, it's a very obvious plan) to use the bureaucracy, not legislation. Use the bureaucracy to advance the most radical agenda possible in health and environment (which is what this GE stuff is all about) while creating a PR perception in the opposite direction, that of the cool headed, moderate, open-to-ideas, civil president. It's a complete ruse. It's a complete attempt to deceive the people: Say one thing but act another way.
(Rush you have hit the nail on the head here. Obama is nothing but a PR perception dedicated to deceiving the American people.) Story Reports
Now, on the PR front, the president talks about growing jobs when he destroys them. He talks about free markets when he attacks them. He talks about civility when he refuses to denounce the haters among his friends -- and notice, too, now how he rewards huge corporations who toe the line like all the finance houses that were at the state dinner with China. He attacks corporations that actually create things or build things, like oil, steel, coal, et cetera.
But back during... I think it was 2007, 2008. Don't hold me to these dates; I gotta figure this out in just a second. During the campaign when Obama's out there ripping Walmart to shreds. His wife shows up there the other day and has somehow bullied or pressured Walmart, which already sells things for low prices, into selling healthy food at lower prices during the winter. Michelle Obama shows up and she and her husband are now partners with Walmart when in 2000 and 2008 this guy joined the unions in trying to put 'em out of business.
Moochelle Obama, the first lady, is now in charge what you eat at Walmart and what it costs! She just shows up. Last I looked, Walmart's a private sector company. First lady can go in there all she wants. She could even call a press conference. But she does so, and why do you think Walmart's listening to this? Look, don't get mad at Walmart. That's not the point here. What would you do if this bunch strolls in your front door? This bunch, this regime has a representative high up, strolls in your front door; demands a microphone, press conference; demands you lower your prices? What are you gonna do?
Most people are gonna cave. It's not worth the trouble. And this on top of this General Electric stuff. That state dinner was filled with leftist Wall Street welfare recipients. Very few people were there from real industry, which are the subject of the EPA's job killing and growth killing agenda.
The Regime-Immelt Deal Smells
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Obama is a great liar but not a great magician
In an extraordinary outburst on the House floor, Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) invoked the Holocaust to attack Republicans on health care and compared rhetoric on the issue to the work of infamous Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.
“They say it's a government takeover of health care, a big lie just like Goebbels," Cohen said. "You say it enough, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, and eventually, people believe it.
(I agree with Rep steve cohen. You say it enough, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, and eventually, people believe it. Rep steve cohen is a liar. Obama is a liar.
If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.
Adolf Hitler
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.
Adolf Hitler
Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
Obamacare is a massive expansion of government and is a blueprint for massive additional federal regulation.
Also hidden in the massive bill, no one read before it was passed, provisions for the federal government to turn America into a "POLICE STATE."
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
A NEW ARMY!... This monsterous socialized medicine bill that recently passed is full of hidden nightmares and none of it pertains to BETTER health!
SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
Great liars are also great magicians. Adolf Hitler
Obama is a great liar but not a great magician. He has been asked to produce evidence by millions of Americans that he is a US citizen. The only "rabbit" obama has pulled out of his hat is a colb that has no hospital, no doctors names and no signatures that can be traced to his claim of American citizenship.) Story Reports
* Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
* Obamacare threatens to increase costs for American businesses by more than $4 billion.
* The Obama administration has threatened companies who dare to blame Obamacare’s new
regulations and taxes as a reason for their higher operating costs
.
* The law is so toxic that even several Democrats introduced legislation in 2010 to repeal part of the bill.
* Health care premium costs are going up under Obamacare, even though President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid all claimed that would not happen.
* Citing high costs and the potential for employees to lose their health coverage, the Obama administration has already issued more than 250 waivers for companies to be exempt from certain provisions in Obamacare.
If Senators don’t take two procedural steps this week, they will make it virtually impossible to ever get a vote on the House-passed full repeal bill this Congress.
Here is how.
Under Senate Rule 14, any one Senator can object to the second reading of the bill and conservatives would be dumb not to do so. It serves no purpose to allow liberals to send the bill to repeal ObamaCare into a committee populated by members who helped write the bill and controlled by liberals.
This procedural objection will “hold at the desk” the House-passed bill and allow the Senate to act on the full repeal measure.
If the bill is referred to committee, it will never get to the Senate floor.
This procedural objection by one or a number of Senators will stop the bill from being referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP).
If the bill is referred to committee, there is little to no expectation that the committee will pass the bill, let alone have one hearing on the bill.
Once you object to the bill being read a second time, it can sit on the Calendar for the next 2 years or until conservatives have mustered the votes to pass the bill.
Once the bill is on the Senate Calendar, then conservative have a few options. First, any Senator could use the provisions in Rule 22 to commence debate on H.R. 2 if they have gathered up the signatures of sixteen Senators as early as next week.
If conservatives merely wanted to force a cloture vote on H.R. 2, then they could file the cloture petition early next week and have a vote two days later.
Repeal of ObamaCare in the Senate - How To Do It The Right Way
“They say it's a government takeover of health care, a big lie just like Goebbels," Cohen said. "You say it enough, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, and eventually, people believe it.
(I agree with Rep steve cohen. You say it enough, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, and eventually, people believe it. Rep steve cohen is a liar. Obama is a liar.
If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.
Adolf Hitler
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.
Adolf Hitler
Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
Obamacare is a massive expansion of government and is a blueprint for massive additional federal regulation.
Also hidden in the massive bill, no one read before it was passed, provisions for the federal government to turn America into a "POLICE STATE."
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
A NEW ARMY!... This monsterous socialized medicine bill that recently passed is full of hidden nightmares and none of it pertains to BETTER health!
SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
Great liars are also great magicians. Adolf Hitler
Obama is a great liar but not a great magician. He has been asked to produce evidence by millions of Americans that he is a US citizen. The only "rabbit" obama has pulled out of his hat is a colb that has no hospital, no doctors names and no signatures that can be traced to his claim of American citizenship.) Story Reports
* Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
* Obamacare threatens to increase costs for American businesses by more than $4 billion.
* The Obama administration has threatened companies who dare to blame Obamacare’s new
regulations and taxes as a reason for their higher operating costs
.
* The law is so toxic that even several Democrats introduced legislation in 2010 to repeal part of the bill.
* Health care premium costs are going up under Obamacare, even though President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid all claimed that would not happen.
* Citing high costs and the potential for employees to lose their health coverage, the Obama administration has already issued more than 250 waivers for companies to be exempt from certain provisions in Obamacare.
If Senators don’t take two procedural steps this week, they will make it virtually impossible to ever get a vote on the House-passed full repeal bill this Congress.
Here is how.
Under Senate Rule 14, any one Senator can object to the second reading of the bill and conservatives would be dumb not to do so. It serves no purpose to allow liberals to send the bill to repeal ObamaCare into a committee populated by members who helped write the bill and controlled by liberals.
This procedural objection will “hold at the desk” the House-passed bill and allow the Senate to act on the full repeal measure.
If the bill is referred to committee, it will never get to the Senate floor.
This procedural objection by one or a number of Senators will stop the bill from being referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP).
If the bill is referred to committee, there is little to no expectation that the committee will pass the bill, let alone have one hearing on the bill.
Once you object to the bill being read a second time, it can sit on the Calendar for the next 2 years or until conservatives have mustered the votes to pass the bill.
Once the bill is on the Senate Calendar, then conservative have a few options. First, any Senator could use the provisions in Rule 22 to commence debate on H.R. 2 if they have gathered up the signatures of sixteen Senators as early as next week.
If conservatives merely wanted to force a cloture vote on H.R. 2, then they could file the cloture petition early next week and have a vote two days later.
Repeal of ObamaCare in the Senate - How To Do It The Right Way
Repeal of ObamaCare in the Senate - How To Do It The Right Way
Repeal of ObamaCare in the Senate - How To Do It The Right Way
Brian Darling (Red State)
How To Repeal Obamacare In The Senate
Although it is unlikely that the Senate will take up the House repeal measure H.R. 2 in the next few months, it is possible to bring it up later this year or some time next year if Republicans are smart.
If Senators don’t take any action when the bill is transmitted from the House to the Senate, then there is little to no chance to pass the House repeal measure. This will show that Senate Republicans are not serious about a full repeal of ObamaCare. It is possible for conservative Senators to force a vote on H.R. 2, when the time is right, if they follow two simple procedures in the Senate to protect their rights.
The bottom line is that it is possible for opponents of ObamaCare to set themselves up for an extended debate on ObamaCare in the Senate — if they have the will. It is also possible to pass the bill in the Senate, if conservatives are patient and ready to spring a vote on liberals when the time is right.
This week the House will pass a bill to repeal Obamacare. Congressional experts will argue that the Senate won’t pass a full repeal. They are correct to argue that full repeal will not be passed by both the House and Senate in the next few months, but they may be wrong that a full repeal bill will not pass in this Congress within the next two years. If Senators don’t take two procedural steps this week, they will make it virtually impossible to ever get a vote on the House-passed full repeal bill this Congress.
Just to be clear, I understand that there are 53 Senators that caucus with the Democrats and 47 Republicans. The math is not good for the proponents of repeal, yet if Republicans can pick up 4 Democrats then they can win this fight.
Here is how.
Under Senate Rule 14, any one Senator can object to the second reading of the bill and conservatives would be dumb not to do so. It serves no purpose to allow liberals to send the bill to repeal ObamaCare into a committee populated by members who helped write the bill and controlled by liberals.
This procedural objection will “hold at the desk” the House-passed bill and allow the Senate to act on the full repeal measure. If the bill is referred to committee, it will never get to the Senate floor. This procedural objection by one or a number of Senators will stop the bill from being referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP). If the bill is referred to committee, there is little to no expectation that the committee will pass the bill, let alone have one hearing on the bill.
Once you object to the bill being read a second time, it can sit on the Calendar for the next 2 years or until conservatives have mustered the votes to pass the bill. Once the bill is on the Senate Calendar, then conservative have a few options. First, any Senator could use the provisions in Rule 22 to commence debate on H.R. 2 if they have gathered up the signatures of sixteen Senators as early as next week.
If conservatives merely wanted to force a cloture vote on H.R. 2, then they could file the cloture petition early next week and have a vote two days later. As I noted in my Foundry piece “this would put many Senate Democrats in the interesting situation of voicing support for so-called ‘filibuster reform’ while at the same time using the filibuster rule to block an up or down vote on Obamacare.” Liberals would have to filibuster the motion to proceed to H.R. 2.
A second option is for Senators to take the temperature of the Senate periodically and launch the cloture vote when they have secured 4 votes of Democrats to support H.R. 2. Jennifer Rubin writes for the Washington Post:
The Republican Senate leadership does not expect any Senate Democrats to flip sides on the vote for an out-and-out repeal. The consolation prize is that Democratic senators such as Jim Webb, Claire McCaskill, Ben Nelson and Bill Nelson will have to defend those votes in 2012.
What if these 4 Senators start to see poll numbers that indicate it would help them to vote for repeal of ObamaCare? All of a sudden, there may be a coalition of 51 Senators who would vote to repeal ObamaCare.
If that scenario plays out, then conservatives can keep the ObamaCare repeal measure on the floor until the liberals stop obstructing passage of the bill. They can do so by filing cloture petitions over and over again if there are only between 50 and 60 votes to shut off debate on the motion to proceed to the bill. Make these liberals who have been crying about the filibuster and obstructionism for a year engage in a real filibuster of the repeal of ObamaCare.
Furthermore, if a number of federal courts declare parts of ObamaCare unconstitutional, then there will be more of an incentive for Senators to vote for repeal. The poll numbers on ObamaCare have consistently shown that the American people despise this law. The probability of full repeal may go up over time if you combine upside down poll numbers and a potential court attack on the individual mandate in ObamaCare.
At a minimum, Senators have the power to force a vote on full repeal of Obamacare if they have the will to do so.
If the supporters of a full repeal of Obamacare don’t use the Senate’s rules to force a vote on full repeal, don’t take them seriously when they say they are really want to repeal President Obama’s de facto government takeover of health care.
A repeal vote is fully within the power of Senators — if they are serious about repeal.
Brian Darling (Red State)
How To Repeal Obamacare In The Senate
Although it is unlikely that the Senate will take up the House repeal measure H.R. 2 in the next few months, it is possible to bring it up later this year or some time next year if Republicans are smart.
If Senators don’t take any action when the bill is transmitted from the House to the Senate, then there is little to no chance to pass the House repeal measure. This will show that Senate Republicans are not serious about a full repeal of ObamaCare. It is possible for conservative Senators to force a vote on H.R. 2, when the time is right, if they follow two simple procedures in the Senate to protect their rights.
The bottom line is that it is possible for opponents of ObamaCare to set themselves up for an extended debate on ObamaCare in the Senate — if they have the will. It is also possible to pass the bill in the Senate, if conservatives are patient and ready to spring a vote on liberals when the time is right.
This week the House will pass a bill to repeal Obamacare. Congressional experts will argue that the Senate won’t pass a full repeal. They are correct to argue that full repeal will not be passed by both the House and Senate in the next few months, but they may be wrong that a full repeal bill will not pass in this Congress within the next two years. If Senators don’t take two procedural steps this week, they will make it virtually impossible to ever get a vote on the House-passed full repeal bill this Congress.
Just to be clear, I understand that there are 53 Senators that caucus with the Democrats and 47 Republicans. The math is not good for the proponents of repeal, yet if Republicans can pick up 4 Democrats then they can win this fight.
Here is how.
Under Senate Rule 14, any one Senator can object to the second reading of the bill and conservatives would be dumb not to do so. It serves no purpose to allow liberals to send the bill to repeal ObamaCare into a committee populated by members who helped write the bill and controlled by liberals.
This procedural objection will “hold at the desk” the House-passed bill and allow the Senate to act on the full repeal measure. If the bill is referred to committee, it will never get to the Senate floor. This procedural objection by one or a number of Senators will stop the bill from being referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP). If the bill is referred to committee, there is little to no expectation that the committee will pass the bill, let alone have one hearing on the bill.
Once you object to the bill being read a second time, it can sit on the Calendar for the next 2 years or until conservatives have mustered the votes to pass the bill. Once the bill is on the Senate Calendar, then conservative have a few options. First, any Senator could use the provisions in Rule 22 to commence debate on H.R. 2 if they have gathered up the signatures of sixteen Senators as early as next week.
If conservatives merely wanted to force a cloture vote on H.R. 2, then they could file the cloture petition early next week and have a vote two days later. As I noted in my Foundry piece “this would put many Senate Democrats in the interesting situation of voicing support for so-called ‘filibuster reform’ while at the same time using the filibuster rule to block an up or down vote on Obamacare.” Liberals would have to filibuster the motion to proceed to H.R. 2.
A second option is for Senators to take the temperature of the Senate periodically and launch the cloture vote when they have secured 4 votes of Democrats to support H.R. 2. Jennifer Rubin writes for the Washington Post:
The Republican Senate leadership does not expect any Senate Democrats to flip sides on the vote for an out-and-out repeal. The consolation prize is that Democratic senators such as Jim Webb, Claire McCaskill, Ben Nelson and Bill Nelson will have to defend those votes in 2012.
What if these 4 Senators start to see poll numbers that indicate it would help them to vote for repeal of ObamaCare? All of a sudden, there may be a coalition of 51 Senators who would vote to repeal ObamaCare.
If that scenario plays out, then conservatives can keep the ObamaCare repeal measure on the floor until the liberals stop obstructing passage of the bill. They can do so by filing cloture petitions over and over again if there are only between 50 and 60 votes to shut off debate on the motion to proceed to the bill. Make these liberals who have been crying about the filibuster and obstructionism for a year engage in a real filibuster of the repeal of ObamaCare.
Furthermore, if a number of federal courts declare parts of ObamaCare unconstitutional, then there will be more of an incentive for Senators to vote for repeal. The poll numbers on ObamaCare have consistently shown that the American people despise this law. The probability of full repeal may go up over time if you combine upside down poll numbers and a potential court attack on the individual mandate in ObamaCare.
At a minimum, Senators have the power to force a vote on full repeal of Obamacare if they have the will to do so.
If the supporters of a full repeal of Obamacare don’t use the Senate’s rules to force a vote on full repeal, don’t take them seriously when they say they are really want to repeal President Obama’s de facto government takeover of health care.
A repeal vote is fully within the power of Senators — if they are serious about repeal.
The RINO Newt Gingrich On Obamacare
Newt Gingrich, a RINO, Supports Obama on Health Care Reform. Before he wanted to repeal obamacare he supported it.
Newt Gingrich said, “President Obama is right: we cannot wait any longer to fix the problems we face in health – they are beyond critical. We waste billions of dollars every day and people die unnecessarily every day at the hands of a broken, fragmented healthcare system.”
Gingrich called for a health care reform plan that focuses on four priorities, adoption of the practices that work best, modernization of health information technology, the rooting out and prevention of health care fraud, and elimination of the broken models of budgeting and scoring.
.........................................................................................
Sign The Petiton To Repeal Obamacare
Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government
Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
Get the Facts. Obamacare is a massive expansion of government and is a blueprint for massive additional federal regulation.
There are also hidden in the massive bill, no one read before it was passed, provisions for the federal government to turn America into a POLICE STATE.
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
“This diagram shows obamacare is a massive expansion of government and is a blueprint for massive additional federal regulation.
* Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
* Obamacare threatens to increase costs for American businesses by more than $4 billion.
* The Obama administration has threatened companies who dare to blame Obamacare’s new regulations and taxes as a reason for their higher operating costs.
* The law is so toxic that even several Democrats introduced legislation in 2010 to repeal part of the bill.
* Health care premium costs are going up under Obamacare, even though President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid all claimed that would not happen.
* Citing high costs and the potential for employees to lose their health coverage, the Obama administration has already issued more than 100 waivers for companies to be exempt from certain provisions in Obamacare.
........................................................................................
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
A NEW ARMY!... This monsterous socialized medicine bill that recently passed is full of hidden nightmares and none of it pertains to BETTER health!
SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.
Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (4215 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows:
SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency.
‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and
1313
HR 3590 EAS/PP
compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended.
‘‘(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(Did ya get that? The IMPOSTER obama appoints commissioned officers to the "ready reserve corps" and commissioned officers to the regular corps. This is similar to the exclusive control hitler had over his private army the SS!!!
The NEW provision includes the fact that obama appoints all the commissioned officers in the ready reserve corps and also the regular corps.
This is total control over all the officers. Its similar to swearing an oath of allegiance to one person, obama. Remember what happened in WWII when the oath of allegiance was demanded by another imposter posing as a dictator.
WAKE UP AMERICA! WE ARE SEEING THE BEGINNING OF A HITLER TYPE CONTOL OF THE US via an obama gestapo type army.) Story Reports
‘‘(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training.
‘‘(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may be appointed to the Service for the purpose of providing support to the health and delivery systems maintained by the Service and any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be considered for purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code, to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corps of the Service.
‘‘(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULAR CORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date.
1314
HR 3590 EAS/PP
of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.
‘‘(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.—
‘‘(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions. ??????
(Note that it says “national emergency”, not “national health emergency”, which point is reinforced by page 1314, where it says,
15 ..(B) be available and ready for involuntary
16 calls to active duty during national emergencies
17 and public health crises, similar to the uni-
18 formed service reserve personnel;
That’s “national emergencies” -AND- “public health crises”, so the conceivable claim that this is nothing to worry about because it is just a public health response force seems to be incorrect.) Story Reports
‘‘(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—
‘‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;
‘‘(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;
‘‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and
‘‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved
1315
HR 3590 EAS/PP
communities (as defined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated
$5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and $12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for the Ready Reserve Corps.’’
HR 3590 ~ (The Obamacare) Health Bill
(Obamacare must be repealed at all costs if America is to survive as a free nation. Obama the hoax must be exposed as an imposter before his SS type troops are in control of the population.
Obama and his 2nd "private army" the "state run media" will constantly be trying to get your attention on everything else but what obama and his fellow conrades are doing. Its like obama wants you to just watch a "reality show" while he produces and controls the PARTICIPANTS and the ultimate outcome, the total control of America though subversion.) Story Reports
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
Newt Gingrich said, “President Obama is right: we cannot wait any longer to fix the problems we face in health – they are beyond critical. We waste billions of dollars every day and people die unnecessarily every day at the hands of a broken, fragmented healthcare system.”
Gingrich called for a health care reform plan that focuses on four priorities, adoption of the practices that work best, modernization of health information technology, the rooting out and prevention of health care fraud, and elimination of the broken models of budgeting and scoring.
.........................................................................................
Sign The Petiton To Repeal Obamacare
Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government
Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
Get the Facts. Obamacare is a massive expansion of government and is a blueprint for massive additional federal regulation.
There are also hidden in the massive bill, no one read before it was passed, provisions for the federal government to turn America into a POLICE STATE.
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
“This diagram shows obamacare is a massive expansion of government and is a blueprint for massive additional federal regulation.
* Obamacare adds 159 new agencies, offices, and commissions to an already bloated federal government.
* Obamacare threatens to increase costs for American businesses by more than $4 billion.
* The Obama administration has threatened companies who dare to blame Obamacare’s new regulations and taxes as a reason for their higher operating costs.
* The law is so toxic that even several Democrats introduced legislation in 2010 to repeal part of the bill.
* Health care premium costs are going up under Obamacare, even though President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid all claimed that would not happen.
* Citing high costs and the potential for employees to lose their health coverage, the Obama administration has already issued more than 100 waivers for companies to be exempt from certain provisions in Obamacare.
........................................................................................
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
A NEW ARMY!... This monsterous socialized medicine bill that recently passed is full of hidden nightmares and none of it pertains to BETTER health!
SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.
Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (4215 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows:
SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency.
‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and
1313
HR 3590 EAS/PP
compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended.
‘‘(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(Did ya get that? The IMPOSTER obama appoints commissioned officers to the "ready reserve corps" and commissioned officers to the regular corps. This is similar to the exclusive control hitler had over his private army the SS!!!
The NEW provision includes the fact that obama appoints all the commissioned officers in the ready reserve corps and also the regular corps.
This is total control over all the officers. Its similar to swearing an oath of allegiance to one person, obama. Remember what happened in WWII when the oath of allegiance was demanded by another imposter posing as a dictator.
WAKE UP AMERICA! WE ARE SEEING THE BEGINNING OF A HITLER TYPE CONTOL OF THE US via an obama gestapo type army.) Story Reports
‘‘(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training.
‘‘(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may be appointed to the Service for the purpose of providing support to the health and delivery systems maintained by the Service and any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be considered for purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code, to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corps of the Service.
‘‘(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULAR CORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date.
1314
HR 3590 EAS/PP
of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.
‘‘(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESEARCH.—
‘‘(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions. ??????
(Note that it says “national emergency”, not “national health emergency”, which point is reinforced by page 1314, where it says,
15 ..(B) be available and ready for involuntary
16 calls to active duty during national emergencies
17 and public health crises, similar to the uni-
18 formed service reserve personnel;
That’s “national emergencies” -AND- “public health crises”, so the conceivable claim that this is nothing to worry about because it is just a public health response force seems to be incorrect.) Story Reports
‘‘(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—
‘‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;
‘‘(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;
‘‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and
‘‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved
1315
HR 3590 EAS/PP
communities (as defined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.
‘‘(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated
$5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and $12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for the Ready Reserve Corps.’’
HR 3590 ~ (The Obamacare) Health Bill
(Obamacare must be repealed at all costs if America is to survive as a free nation. Obama the hoax must be exposed as an imposter before his SS type troops are in control of the population.
Obama and his 2nd "private army" the "state run media" will constantly be trying to get your attention on everything else but what obama and his fellow conrades are doing. Its like obama wants you to just watch a "reality show" while he produces and controls the PARTICIPANTS and the ultimate outcome, the total control of America though subversion.) Story Reports
Ready Reserve Corps... Obama's NEW 'PRIVATE' ARMY Hidden In The 'Healthcare' Bill!
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Barack Obama defends the murder of the unborn and born-alive failed abortions that occur 3,000 times a day in the US
Barack Obama defends the murder of the unborn and born-alive failed abortions.
1997: opposed bill preventing partial-birth abortion
In 1997, Obama voted in the Illinois Senate against SB 230, a bill designed to prevent partial-birth abortions. In the US Senate, Obama has consistently voted to expand embryonic stem cell research. He has voted against requiring minors who get out-of-state abortions to notify their parents. The National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) gives Obama a 100% score on his pro-choice voting record in the Senate for 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Opposed legislation protecting born-alive failed abortions
Obama has consistently refused to support legislation that would define an infant who survives a late-term induced-labor abortion as a human being with the right to live. He insists that no restriction must ever be placed on the right of a mother to decide to abort her child.
On March 30, 2001, Obama was the only Illinois senator who rose to speak against a bill that would have protected babies who survived late term labor-induced abortion. Obama rose to object that if the bill passed, and a nine-month-old fetus survived a late-term labor-induced abortion was deemed to be a person who had a right to live, then the law would "forbid abortions to take place." Obama further explained the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow somebody to kill a child, so if the law deemed a child who survived a late-term labor-induced abortion had a right to live, "then this would be an anti-abortion statute."
Voted against banning partial birth abortion
In 1997, Obama voted against SB 230, which would have turned doctors into felons by banning so-called partial-birth abortion, & against a 2000 bill banning state funding. Although these bills included an exception to save the life of the mother, they didn’t include anything about abortions necessary to protect the health of the mother. The legislation defined a fetus as a person, & could have criminalized virtually all abortion.
........................................................................................
(Is obama responsibe for the murder of the innocent? Yes. Obama has voted for and supports the murder of the unborn and the "born-alive" failed abortions. He is nothing short of a mass murderer because he made it possible for the murder of the innocent to continue. Its not that he just supports abortion he has voted to support abortions.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
Red State
lexington_concord
Witness to Atrocity
Although it is a fact that we only dare to confront in the occasional dark night of our souls, this country has been teetering on the brink of moral illegitimacy for the last 38 years.
Yesterday, I was forcibly reminded of this when someone sent me this excerpt from the forthcoming book Unplanned, in which former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson explains her conversion from pro-choice activist to pro-life activist, as she watched an abortion being performed live on an ultrasound:
At first, the baby didn’t seem aware of the cannula. It gently probed the baby’s side, and for a quick second I felt relief. Of course, I thought. The fetus doesn’t feel pain. I had reassured countless women of this as I’d been taught by Planned Parenthood. The fetal tissue feels nothing as it is removed. Get a grip, Abby. This is a simple, quick medical procedure. My head was working hard to control my responses, but I couldn’t shake an inner disquiet that was quickly mounting to horror as I watched the screen.
The next movement was the sudden jerk of a tiny foot as the baby started kicking, as if it were trying to move away from the probing invader. As the cannula pressed its side, the baby began struggling to turn and twist away. It seemed clear to me that it could feel the cannula, and it did not like what it was feeling. And then the doctor’s voice broke through, startling me.
“Beam me up, Scotty,” he said lightheartedly to the nurse. He was telling her to turn on the suction — in an abortion the suction isn’t turned on until the doctor feels he has the cannula in exactly the right place.
I had a sudden urge to yell, “Stop!” To shake the woman and say, “Look at what is happening to your baby! Wake up! Hurry! Stop them!”
But even as I thought those words, I looked at my own hand holding the probe. I was one of “them” performing this act. My eyes shot back to the screen again. The cannula was already being rotated by the doctor, and now I could see the tiny body violently twisting with it. For the briefest moment the baby looked as if it were being wrung like a dishcloth, twirled and squeezed. And then it crumpled and began disappearing into the cannula before my eyes. The last thing I saw was the tiny, perfectly formed backbone sucked into the tube, and then it was gone. And the uterus was empty. Totally empty.
The horror that Johnson describes is almost unfathomable, accentuated by the cruelty and insensitivity of the conscienceless monsters cracking jokes as they watched the death of a tiny human unfold live before them.
Perversely, the most shocking aspect of this particular story is its mundanity. It occurs every single day in the United States, over three thousand times a day, and has for almost four decades. The only thing that sets this particular abortion apart is that a person possessed of a conscience and some measure of writing skill happened to be present and witness it on ultrasound.
Every day, including today, probably several dozen times during the course of the time it takes you to read this article, this horror is repeated in America and no one is present who cares to chronicle it in a book about the way it changed their life. Tens of millions of times since 1973 this has occurred in this country under the color and protection of law.
........................................................................................
(Obama is a conscienceless monster, a narcissist. It is difficult to recognize a narcissist because he (or she) spends all of his time acting, protecting his ego by presenting to the world a mask, a false image of himself. Consequently he becomes a master of deceit. Obama wears a mask of deceit.) Story Reports
It has been recognized for some time that narcissists prize intellectual performance above almost everything else,Ref so a better qualified work colleague would likely evoke a hostile affect through upward comparison.
Because of a propensity to internalize failure, the narcissist's emotional response to failure is to feel shame, as opposed to guilt felt by people without the disorder. So in order to avoid shame, which the narcissist feels must be avoided at all costs, he externalizes blame for negative events.
As he feels someone must be guilty, he almost always attributes blame to others. Only when his self-esteem is particularly high, perhaps through some positive feedback he has engineered, does he accept blame, and only then if it can be seen as a magnanimous gesture.
A narcissist is someone who is overtly or subtly arrogant, exhibitionistic, vain, manipulative, and greedy for admiration.
Narcissistic rage, character assassination and projection are some of the overt ways in which the narcissist expresses himself.
The denial of remorse and gratitude by the narcissist are two of the more subtle ways used to protect an internal sense of grandiosity.
An example of a narcissist's ability to be subtle might be when he arrives late for a meeting. Rather than offer a sincere apology, he may blame someone else for keeping him talking, thus externalizing the fault ("It's not my fault") and maintaining his sense of grandiosity.
Despite tending to be exhibitionistic, it is very rare to hear a narcissist brag or boast. Instead, he (or she) tends to 'drop' information in the form of an ostensibly ordinary matter-of-fact report, which appears to be intended to elicit admiration without asking for it. For example, rather than say, "I was so please to meet our CEO, Peter Smith", he will casually allude to "...lunch with Peter", in a way that induces a sense of distance and inferiority in the recipient of the information; again maintaining his sense of grandiosity.
A distinction must be made between 'normal' or 'healthy' narcissism on the one hand and 'pathological' narcissism on the other. We all have some degree and variety of narcissistic delusion which, if it is not too great, is normal and healthy. But the pathological narcissist has a level of delusion that is divorced from reality.
Normal narcissism refers to well integrated representations of the self and others, whilst pathological narcissism relates to an impaired intrapsychic structure with grandiose self-representation and a severe pathology in object relations.
Here are a few pointers that may help you identify a Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Obama has this disorder.
* Their lack of empathy colors everything they do. They may say, "How are you?" when you meet, but they are working from memory. They are not interested in how you are.
* Virtually all of their ideas or ways of behaving in a given situation are taken from others, people they know and perhaps think of as an authority (mirroring).
* Their sense of self-importance and lack of empathy means that they will often interrupt the conversations of others.
* They expect others to do the day-to-day chores as they feel too important to waste their time on common things.
* Listen for the constant use of "I", "me" and "my" when they talk.
* They very rarely talk about their inner life, for example their memories and dreams.
* They feel that the rules at work don't apply to them.
* They will always cheat whenever they think they can get away with it.
* If you share workload with them expect to do the lion's share yourself.
* They love to delegate work or projects, then interfere by micro-managing it. If it goes well, they take the credit, if it goes badly they blame the person they delegated it to.
* There tends to be higher levels of stress with people who work with or interact with a narcissist, which in turn increases absenteeism and staff turnover.
* They get impatient and restless when the topic of discussion is about someone else, and not about them.
1997: opposed bill preventing partial-birth abortion
In 1997, Obama voted in the Illinois Senate against SB 230, a bill designed to prevent partial-birth abortions. In the US Senate, Obama has consistently voted to expand embryonic stem cell research. He has voted against requiring minors who get out-of-state abortions to notify their parents. The National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) gives Obama a 100% score on his pro-choice voting record in the Senate for 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Opposed legislation protecting born-alive failed abortions
Obama has consistently refused to support legislation that would define an infant who survives a late-term induced-labor abortion as a human being with the right to live. He insists that no restriction must ever be placed on the right of a mother to decide to abort her child.
On March 30, 2001, Obama was the only Illinois senator who rose to speak against a bill that would have protected babies who survived late term labor-induced abortion. Obama rose to object that if the bill passed, and a nine-month-old fetus survived a late-term labor-induced abortion was deemed to be a person who had a right to live, then the law would "forbid abortions to take place." Obama further explained the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow somebody to kill a child, so if the law deemed a child who survived a late-term labor-induced abortion had a right to live, "then this would be an anti-abortion statute."
Voted against banning partial birth abortion
In 1997, Obama voted against SB 230, which would have turned doctors into felons by banning so-called partial-birth abortion, & against a 2000 bill banning state funding. Although these bills included an exception to save the life of the mother, they didn’t include anything about abortions necessary to protect the health of the mother. The legislation defined a fetus as a person, & could have criminalized virtually all abortion.
........................................................................................
(Is obama responsibe for the murder of the innocent? Yes. Obama has voted for and supports the murder of the unborn and the "born-alive" failed abortions. He is nothing short of a mass murderer because he made it possible for the murder of the innocent to continue. Its not that he just supports abortion he has voted to support abortions.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
Red State
lexington_concord
Witness to Atrocity
Although it is a fact that we only dare to confront in the occasional dark night of our souls, this country has been teetering on the brink of moral illegitimacy for the last 38 years.
Yesterday, I was forcibly reminded of this when someone sent me this excerpt from the forthcoming book Unplanned, in which former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson explains her conversion from pro-choice activist to pro-life activist, as she watched an abortion being performed live on an ultrasound:
At first, the baby didn’t seem aware of the cannula. It gently probed the baby’s side, and for a quick second I felt relief. Of course, I thought. The fetus doesn’t feel pain. I had reassured countless women of this as I’d been taught by Planned Parenthood. The fetal tissue feels nothing as it is removed. Get a grip, Abby. This is a simple, quick medical procedure. My head was working hard to control my responses, but I couldn’t shake an inner disquiet that was quickly mounting to horror as I watched the screen.
The next movement was the sudden jerk of a tiny foot as the baby started kicking, as if it were trying to move away from the probing invader. As the cannula pressed its side, the baby began struggling to turn and twist away. It seemed clear to me that it could feel the cannula, and it did not like what it was feeling. And then the doctor’s voice broke through, startling me.
“Beam me up, Scotty,” he said lightheartedly to the nurse. He was telling her to turn on the suction — in an abortion the suction isn’t turned on until the doctor feels he has the cannula in exactly the right place.
I had a sudden urge to yell, “Stop!” To shake the woman and say, “Look at what is happening to your baby! Wake up! Hurry! Stop them!”
But even as I thought those words, I looked at my own hand holding the probe. I was one of “them” performing this act. My eyes shot back to the screen again. The cannula was already being rotated by the doctor, and now I could see the tiny body violently twisting with it. For the briefest moment the baby looked as if it were being wrung like a dishcloth, twirled and squeezed. And then it crumpled and began disappearing into the cannula before my eyes. The last thing I saw was the tiny, perfectly formed backbone sucked into the tube, and then it was gone. And the uterus was empty. Totally empty.
The horror that Johnson describes is almost unfathomable, accentuated by the cruelty and insensitivity of the conscienceless monsters cracking jokes as they watched the death of a tiny human unfold live before them.
Perversely, the most shocking aspect of this particular story is its mundanity. It occurs every single day in the United States, over three thousand times a day, and has for almost four decades. The only thing that sets this particular abortion apart is that a person possessed of a conscience and some measure of writing skill happened to be present and witness it on ultrasound.
Every day, including today, probably several dozen times during the course of the time it takes you to read this article, this horror is repeated in America and no one is present who cares to chronicle it in a book about the way it changed their life. Tens of millions of times since 1973 this has occurred in this country under the color and protection of law.
........................................................................................
(Obama is a conscienceless monster, a narcissist. It is difficult to recognize a narcissist because he (or she) spends all of his time acting, protecting his ego by presenting to the world a mask, a false image of himself. Consequently he becomes a master of deceit. Obama wears a mask of deceit.) Story Reports
It has been recognized for some time that narcissists prize intellectual performance above almost everything else,Ref so a better qualified work colleague would likely evoke a hostile affect through upward comparison.
Because of a propensity to internalize failure, the narcissist's emotional response to failure is to feel shame, as opposed to guilt felt by people without the disorder. So in order to avoid shame, which the narcissist feels must be avoided at all costs, he externalizes blame for negative events.
As he feels someone must be guilty, he almost always attributes blame to others. Only when his self-esteem is particularly high, perhaps through some positive feedback he has engineered, does he accept blame, and only then if it can be seen as a magnanimous gesture.
A narcissist is someone who is overtly or subtly arrogant, exhibitionistic, vain, manipulative, and greedy for admiration.
Narcissistic rage, character assassination and projection are some of the overt ways in which the narcissist expresses himself.
The denial of remorse and gratitude by the narcissist are two of the more subtle ways used to protect an internal sense of grandiosity.
An example of a narcissist's ability to be subtle might be when he arrives late for a meeting. Rather than offer a sincere apology, he may blame someone else for keeping him talking, thus externalizing the fault ("It's not my fault") and maintaining his sense of grandiosity.
Despite tending to be exhibitionistic, it is very rare to hear a narcissist brag or boast. Instead, he (or she) tends to 'drop' information in the form of an ostensibly ordinary matter-of-fact report, which appears to be intended to elicit admiration without asking for it. For example, rather than say, "I was so please to meet our CEO, Peter Smith", he will casually allude to "...lunch with Peter", in a way that induces a sense of distance and inferiority in the recipient of the information; again maintaining his sense of grandiosity.
A distinction must be made between 'normal' or 'healthy' narcissism on the one hand and 'pathological' narcissism on the other. We all have some degree and variety of narcissistic delusion which, if it is not too great, is normal and healthy. But the pathological narcissist has a level of delusion that is divorced from reality.
Normal narcissism refers to well integrated representations of the self and others, whilst pathological narcissism relates to an impaired intrapsychic structure with grandiose self-representation and a severe pathology in object relations.
Here are a few pointers that may help you identify a Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Obama has this disorder.
* Their lack of empathy colors everything they do. They may say, "How are you?" when you meet, but they are working from memory. They are not interested in how you are.
* Virtually all of their ideas or ways of behaving in a given situation are taken from others, people they know and perhaps think of as an authority (mirroring).
* Their sense of self-importance and lack of empathy means that they will often interrupt the conversations of others.
* They expect others to do the day-to-day chores as they feel too important to waste their time on common things.
* Listen for the constant use of "I", "me" and "my" when they talk.
* They very rarely talk about their inner life, for example their memories and dreams.
* They feel that the rules at work don't apply to them.
* They will always cheat whenever they think they can get away with it.
* If you share workload with them expect to do the lion's share yourself.
* They love to delegate work or projects, then interfere by micro-managing it. If it goes well, they take the credit, if it goes badly they blame the person they delegated it to.
* There tends to be higher levels of stress with people who work with or interact with a narcissist, which in turn increases absenteeism and staff turnover.
* They get impatient and restless when the topic of discussion is about someone else, and not about them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)