Is This Real?
Is this the real obama birth certificate?
Friday, April 29, 2011
Examine The New Fake Obama Birth Certificate
(There are many difference between a real 1961 Certificate of Live Birth and the FAKE one obama has presented to world. There are at lease 15 FAKE Document clues.
The number one obvious fact is that the document obama has presented to the world is NOT A COPY OF AN ORIGINAL LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. It is therefore an ABSTRACT of a record. The document obama has presented can't be verified as real because it is not a true copy of the original. It is only an abstract.) Story Reports
..........................................................................................
A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates with the Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many differences, some with regard to content, others to format.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, in Box 20, "Date Accepted by Local Reg." and Box 22, "Date Accepted by Reg. General," the date is stamped "AUG 11 1961," while the date is stamped on Obama's birth certificate as "AUG -8 1961," with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, the type in Box 8, "Name of the Father" lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, "Age of Father," and Box 15, "Age of Mother," are indented below the "R" in "Barack" in Box 8.
* In the Nordyke twins's birth certificate, the type in Box 9, "Race of Father," Box 12b, "Kind of Business or Industry," and Box 14, "Race of Mother," line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
* In Box 16, "Birthplace of Mother," in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, the letters of "Los Angeles, California," are aligned at the bottom margin, while in the Obama birth certificate, the "K" in Kansas rides up and appears only partially struck at the top.
* The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins' birth certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
* The typed letters in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates appear irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes 8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
* In Box 3, "This Birth," the "X" marking "Twins" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, "If Twin or Triple, Was Child Born," while Box 3 in Obama's is struck top right.
* Similar differences in how the "X" strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d and 7e where the "X" on Obama's birth certificate fits squarely into the box, drifting toward the top, and the "X" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug. 5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama's in Box 5a lists the birthdate as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates the "H" in "Honolulu" in Boxes 7a and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in Obama's birth certificate the "H" in "Honolulu" is consistently on line with the other letters in the word.
* The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle, while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line, at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
* The local registrar in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, Box 21, is different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital at this time?
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificate at the bottom have the printed signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the date the copies were issued, "5-5-1966," while the Obama birth certificate has no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the registrar general to be a "true and correct copy" of the original record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department of Health.
* The Norydke twins' birth certificates appear white against black, in the format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in Obama's modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation is seen in the Nordyke twins's photostatic copy.
* As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier.
* Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
* Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke twins' birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.
Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.
This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.
At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.
The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.
The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth certificate was stamped.
The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when their birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama's number?
The number one obvious fact is that the document obama has presented to the world is NOT A COPY OF AN ORIGINAL LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. It is therefore an ABSTRACT of a record. The document obama has presented can't be verified as real because it is not a true copy of the original. It is only an abstract.) Story Reports
..........................................................................................
A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates with the Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many differences, some with regard to content, others to format.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, in Box 20, "Date Accepted by Local Reg." and Box 22, "Date Accepted by Reg. General," the date is stamped "AUG 11 1961," while the date is stamped on Obama's birth certificate as "AUG -8 1961," with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, the type in Box 8, "Name of the Father" lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, "Age of Father," and Box 15, "Age of Mother," are indented below the "R" in "Barack" in Box 8.
* In the Nordyke twins's birth certificate, the type in Box 9, "Race of Father," Box 12b, "Kind of Business or Industry," and Box 14, "Race of Mother," line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
* In Box 16, "Birthplace of Mother," in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, the letters of "Los Angeles, California," are aligned at the bottom margin, while in the Obama birth certificate, the "K" in Kansas rides up and appears only partially struck at the top.
* The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins' birth certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
* The typed letters in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates appear irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes 8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
* In Box 3, "This Birth," the "X" marking "Twins" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, "If Twin or Triple, Was Child Born," while Box 3 in Obama's is struck top right.
* Similar differences in how the "X" strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d and 7e where the "X" on Obama's birth certificate fits squarely into the box, drifting toward the top, and the "X" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug. 5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama's in Box 5a lists the birthdate as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates the "H" in "Honolulu" in Boxes 7a and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in Obama's birth certificate the "H" in "Honolulu" is consistently on line with the other letters in the word.
* The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle, while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line, at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
* The local registrar in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, Box 21, is different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital at this time?
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificate at the bottom have the printed signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the date the copies were issued, "5-5-1966," while the Obama birth certificate has no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the registrar general to be a "true and correct copy" of the original record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department of Health.
* The Norydke twins' birth certificates appear white against black, in the format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in Obama's modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation is seen in the Nordyke twins's photostatic copy.
* As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier.
* Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
* Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke twins' birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.
Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.
This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.
At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.
The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.
The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth certificate was stamped.
The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when their birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama's number?
Monday, April 25, 2011
Obama wants US citizens to pay the price though oil "reparations"
Wall Street speculators drive up the price of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel by buying and selling oil with no intention of ever using it. (The wall street speculators are institutional investors, (corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and university endowments etc.)
(Obama and the democrates have made the oil speculation profitable by not allowing oil drilling in the US because of their determination to destroy the US economy. Obama uses the epa to "speread the wealth around" though regulations that stop oil production. Obama uses the power of the federal government to increase the cost of food and everything tied to the price of oil and gas.
The US government allows unregulated oil speculation through ICE. Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy. The US government allows this to continue to happen on purpose.
This is why the price of gas goes up. Obama wants US citizens to pay the price though oil "reparations".) Story Reports
Why has oil speculation increased in recent years?
Institutional investors (corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and university endowments) have poured billions of dollars into the commodities markets. These speculative trades have helped to drive up the price oil because the majority of new contracts are betting on increases, rather than decreases. In effect, this swell in "artificial demand" for oil is upsetting the balance between physical supply and demand and, once again, fueling a price "bubble."
What is an index speculator?
An index speculator is a financial player, such as a corporate or government pension fund, sovereign wealth fund, university endowments or other investor, that buys (invests in) the 25 commodities that compose the Standard & Poor's-Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI) and/or the Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index (DJAIG). The value of the index depends on how well the commodities being "tracked" by the index perform in the futures markets.
Should institutional investors be prohibited (or limited) from investing in commodities futures?
The effects of institutional investors have been so great that they have actually altered the price discovery dynamics of today's futures markets. Index speculators buy without sensitivity for the supply and demand of individual commodities, which undermines the price discovery function of the markets. Active trading strategies should be allowed, but they need to be done in a transparent and limited way.
What are position limits?
Currently, a handful of foreign exchanges, most notably the London Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), are trading energy contracts that are identical to those traded in the United States, but are not following U.S. regulations because they claim they are exempt from U.S. law. These exemptions should not exist because they are trading U.S. commodities using terminals based in the United States.
What are swaps trades?
Swaps trades (also known as "over the counter" trades) are commodities transactions that take place between two separate parties outside of the traditional markets. Since they do not take place within regulated markets such as NYMEX, these often secret trades take place without regulatory oversight. We believe these trades should be transparent and under the same rules as traditional markets, so that no price manipulation takes place.
‘Perhaps 60% of today’s oil price is pure speculation’
Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy
(Obama and the democrates have made the oil speculation profitable by not allowing oil drilling in the US because of their determination to destroy the US economy. Obama uses the epa to "speread the wealth around" though regulations that stop oil production. Obama uses the power of the federal government to increase the cost of food and everything tied to the price of oil and gas.
The US government allows unregulated oil speculation through ICE. Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy. The US government allows this to continue to happen on purpose.
This is why the price of gas goes up. Obama wants US citizens to pay the price though oil "reparations".) Story Reports
Why has oil speculation increased in recent years?
Institutional investors (corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and university endowments) have poured billions of dollars into the commodities markets. These speculative trades have helped to drive up the price oil because the majority of new contracts are betting on increases, rather than decreases. In effect, this swell in "artificial demand" for oil is upsetting the balance between physical supply and demand and, once again, fueling a price "bubble."
What is an index speculator?
An index speculator is a financial player, such as a corporate or government pension fund, sovereign wealth fund, university endowments or other investor, that buys (invests in) the 25 commodities that compose the Standard & Poor's-Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI) and/or the Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index (DJAIG). The value of the index depends on how well the commodities being "tracked" by the index perform in the futures markets.
Should institutional investors be prohibited (or limited) from investing in commodities futures?
The effects of institutional investors have been so great that they have actually altered the price discovery dynamics of today's futures markets. Index speculators buy without sensitivity for the supply and demand of individual commodities, which undermines the price discovery function of the markets. Active trading strategies should be allowed, but they need to be done in a transparent and limited way.
What are position limits?
Currently, a handful of foreign exchanges, most notably the London Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), are trading energy contracts that are identical to those traded in the United States, but are not following U.S. regulations because they claim they are exempt from U.S. law. These exemptions should not exist because they are trading U.S. commodities using terminals based in the United States.
What are swaps trades?
Swaps trades (also known as "over the counter" trades) are commodities transactions that take place between two separate parties outside of the traditional markets. Since they do not take place within regulated markets such as NYMEX, these often secret trades take place without regulatory oversight. We believe these trades should be transparent and under the same rules as traditional markets, so that no price manipulation takes place.
‘Perhaps 60% of today’s oil price is pure speculation’
Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
