Gerald Walpin speaks: The inside story of the AmeriCorps firing

Obama is as phony a a trillion dollar bill.
The inspector general obama fired, Gerald Walpin, could expose obama as a FRAUD if he filed a quo warranto upon obama's eligibility in DC Distric Court.

Gerald Walpin speaks: The inside story of the AmeriCorps firing

Somebody like former Inspector General Walpin – fired from his civil service position by Obama – would have a fair chance at qualifying as an “interested person” to make a direct attack via quo warranto upon Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court. It is that final line issued by the SCOTUS which provides the best possible access to the quo warranto statute and the DC District Court for review of Obama’s eligibility. "and there might be cases under the civil service law in which the relator would have an interest and therefore a right to be heard." Newman v. United States ex rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 (1915).


Gerald Walpin could make a direct attack via quo warranto upon Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court. Gerald Walpin could expose the FRAUD obama in the DC District Court.

“…there might be cases under the civil service law in which the relator would have an interest and therefore a right to be heard.”

This one line is the single most important precedent concerning the issue of who may be an “interested person” under 16-3503 of the quo warranto statute.

Dispute that resulted in firing involved stimulus money.

Why would Barack Obama fire Gerald Walpin?

Walpin was investigating the possible misuse of federal grants by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson and the St. Hope Academy, a nonprofit program that Johnson founded. Kevin Johnson is a friend of the Obamas and is a former NBA All-Star basketball player.

Many in the Obama administration criticized Walpin for mishandling the investigation, because they believed Walpin was overstating the case against Kevin Johnson.

Here’s the kicker though: the firing may have been illegal.

Walpin claims that he was fired without warning. That would be a violation of the 2008 Inspectors General Reform Act. The law states that firing an inspector general requires 30 days warning and a written explanation.

According to the Walpin, he only received a written notice AFTER he was fired.

The White House's decision to fire AmeriCorps inspector general Gerald Walpin came amid politically-charged tensions inside the Corporation for National and Community Service, the organization that runs AmeriCorps. Top executives at the Corporation, Walpin explained in an hour-long interview Saturday, were unhappy with his investigation into the misuse of AmeriCorps funds by Kevin Johnson, the former NBA star who is now mayor of Sacramento, California and a prominent supporter of President Obama. Walpin's investigation also sparked conflict with the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento amid fears that the probe -- which could have resulted in Johnson being barred from ever winning another federal grant -- might stand in the way of the city receiving its part of billions of dollars in federal stimulus money. After weeks of standoff, Walpin, whose position as inspector general is supposed to be protected from influence by political appointees and the White House, was fired.

Walpin learned his fate Wednesday night. He was driving to an event in upstate New York when he received a call from Norman Eisen, the Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government Reform. "He said, 'Mr. Walpin, the president wants me to tell you that he really appreciates your service, but it's time to move on,'" Walpin recalls. "Eisen said, 'You can either resign, or I'll tell you that we'll have to terminate you.'"

At that moment, Walpin says, he had finished not only a report on the Sacramento probe but also an investigation into extensive misuse of AmeriCorps money by the City University of New York, which is AmeriCorps' biggest program. Walpin says he told Eisen that, given those two investigations, neither of which was well-received by top Corporation management, the timing of his firing seemed "very interesting." According to Walpin, Eisen said it was "pure coincidence." When Walpin asked for some time to consider what to do, Eisen gave him one hour. "Then he called back in 45 minutes and asked for my response," Walpin recalls.

The method of Walpin's firing could be a violation of the 2008 Inspectors General Reform Act, which requires the president to give Congress 30 days' notice, plus an explanation of cause, before firing an inspector general. Then-Sen. Barack Obama was a co-sponsor of that legislation. In the case of Walpin, Eisen's efforts to force Walpin to resign could be seen as an effort to push Walpin out of his job so that the White House would not have to go through the 30-day process or give a reason for its action. When Walpin refused to quit, the White House informed Congress and began the 30-day countdown.

Eisen's phone call came after months of increasing conflict inside the Corporation for National and Community Service. "We issued two reports that the management of the Corporation and the board of directors didn’t like, because they criticized what the board was doing," Walpin recalls. There is no question that Walpin discovered misuse of federal money in Kevin Johnson's program, known as St. HOPE, and at City University of New York. But as a result of those investigations, relations between Walpin and top executives became frosty, and he says they cut him out of Corporation business that should normally include the inspector general.

The heart of the matter is a dispute that began last year over Walpin's recommendation that Johnson and St. HOPE be barred from receiving and using federal grant money. The process is known as "suspension and debarment," meaning that Johnson would be suspended from receiving federal funds under any current arrangement and might ultimately be barred from receiving any such funds in the future. "The whole purpose of suspension and debarment," Walpin says, "is to say that somebody who was involved in the misuse of government funds in the past should not be trusted with federal funds in the future."

In the course of his investigation, Walpin found Johnson and St. HOPE had failed to use the federal money they received for the purposes specified in the grant and had also used federally-funded AmeriCorps staff for, among other things, "driving [Johnson] to personal appointments, washing his car, and running personal errands." Walpin came to the conclusion that Johnson and St. HOPE should be subject to suspension and debarment. But it was not Walpin's decision to make; there is another official at the Corporation whose job it is to make that call. In September 2008, after reviewing Walpin's evidence, the official decided to order a suspension, with the distinct possibility that it would lead to a permanent debarment.

I can only hope Gerald Walpin will help America before its to late.

Gerald Walpin Speaks About Whya He Was Fired

Obama Crotch Salute

..........................................................................................
Obama salutes russian flag while in russia but not American flag. Obama is a communist.
..........................................................................................


==========================================================================================
Obama is an obvious TRAITOR who dishonors America, Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
==========================================================================================


=============================================================================================
The Man Who Despises America. The Crotch Salute Returns
=============================================================================================

GLOBAL WARMING OR 'CLIMATE CHANGE' IS A HOAX

.........................................................................................
Real climate change occurs 4 times a year. Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer. Seasons change because the axis of the earth is tilted by 23.5 degrees (from a line perpendicular to its orbit). As the earth moves around its orbit there is a time when it is tilted towards the sun and so receives a higher concentration of the sun's energy (summer) and a time when it is tilted away and receiving less energy (winter).
This also explains why it is summer in N hemisphere when it is winter in S hemisphere.

The suns energy controls the Climate Change! People who believe in 'global warming' ie so called 'climate change' don't mention the effect of the earth's orbit around the sun. The natural effect of the seasons by the orbit of earth in proximity to the sun affects the weather on the earth. Man in all his glory doesn't effect the weather in any way like the sun. To say that man controls the natural climate change of the earth is foolishness. This foolishness has now been exposed. What is amazing to me is that anybody with common sense would believe man is more powerful than the sun in controlling natural climate change. I do believe I am living in a country that harbors dummed down idiots educated by the government.

I knew global warming was a hoax and here is the proof. Documented information. Man does not control the climate of the earth. The sun heats the earth and controls the climate change. The sun in the sky was created by GOD. To think man controls the planet is foolish and naive.Story Reports)

=========================================================================================
Viscount Monckton on Climategate: ‘They Are Criminals’
=========================================================================================

Viscount Monckton on Climategate: ‘They Are Criminals’ (PJM Exclusive)

The man who challenged Al Gore to a debate is furious about the content of the leaked CRU emails — and says why you should be, too.

November 23, 2009 - by Christopher Monckton

This is what they did — these climate “scientists” on whose unsupported word the world’s classe politique proposes to set up an unelected global government this December in Copenhagen, with vast and unprecedented powers to control all formerly free markets, to tax wealthy nations and all of their financial transactions, to regulate the economic and environmental affairs of all nations, and to confiscate and extinguish all patent and intellectual property rights.

The tiny, close-knit clique of climate scientists who invented and now drive the “global warming” fraud — for fraud is what we now know it to be — tampered with temperature data so assiduously that, on the recent admission of one of them, land temperatures since 1980 have risen twice as fast as ocean temperatures. One of the thousands of emails recently circulated by a whistleblower at the University of East Anglia, where one of the world’s four global-temperature datasets is compiled, reveals that data were altered so as to prevent a recent decline in temperature from showing in the record. In fact, there has been no statistically significant “global warming” for 15 years — and there has been rapid and significant cooling for nine years.

Worse, these arrogant fraudsters — for fraudsters are what we now know them to be — have refused, for years and years and years, to reveal their data and their computer program listings. Now we know why: As a revealing 15,000-line document from the computer division at the Climate Research Unit shows, the programs and data are a hopeless, tangled mess. In effect, the global temperature trends have simply been made up. Unfortunately, the British researchers have been acting closely in league with their U.S. counterparts who compile the other terrestrial temperature dataset — the GISS/NCDC dataset. That dataset too contains numerous biases intended artificially to inflate the natural warming of the 20th century.

Finally, these huckstering snake-oil salesmen and “global warming” profiteers — for that is what they are — have written to each other encouraging the destruction of data that had been lawfully requested under the Freedom of Information Act in the UK by scientists who wanted to check whether their global temperature record had been properly compiled. And that procurement of data destruction, as they are about to find out to their cost, is a criminal offense. They are not merely bad scientists — they are crooks. And crooks who have perpetrated their crimes at the expense of British and U.S. taxpayers.

I am angry, and so should you be.

What have the mainstream news media said about the Climategate affair? Remarkably little. The few who have brought themselves to comment, through gritted teeth, have said that all of this is a storm in a teacup, and that their friends in the University of East Anglia and elsewhere in the climatological community are good people, really.

No, they’re not. They’re criminals. With Professor Fred Singer, who founded the U.S. Satellite Weather Service, I have reported them to the UK’s Information Commissioner, with a request that he investigate their offenses and, if thought fit, prosecute. But I won’t be holding my breath: In the police state that Britain has now sadly become, with supine news media largely owned and controlled by the government, the establishment tends to look after its own.

At our expense, and at the expense of the truth.

Viscount Monckton on Climategate: ‘They Are Criminals’

Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming.

We have learned numbers have been changed to reflect a "climate change" panic. The climate change was manufactured from nothing. We have learned "global warming" is a HOAX. We see again the state run media is not reporting this HOAX. America is daily given false information to "educate" the common man into believing a crisis is occurring and obama must fix it. Obama is also a HOAX of the state run media.

The common man is "educated" daily on the FALSE employment numbers obama has indicated. Obama has predicted wrong information at every turn. Obama through his website on stimulus jobs has also lied and published false information and will not correct this information. I hope the next big HOAX to be exposed will be the HOAX of obama. This HOAX is more foolish than global warming. Story Reports