How to Open a Coconut

How to Open a Coconut

20,000 fine for Taitz acting like she is on obama's defense team

So you've got a coconut, and you're dying to get at it. Opening up the shell can be quite a challenge unless you know the trick to it.

........................................................................................
........................................................................................
It is clear the "shell" would never be cracked by Orly Taitz. Leo Donofrio can "crack" the shell as can TerryK. They know where to find the "seam".

Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes.
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
Orly Taitz has been slapped with a five-figure fine for “wasting the judicial resources” of the Middle District of Georgia, where she’d filed one of her numerous lawsuits demanding that President Obama prove his citizenship before deploying soldiers to Iraq and Afghanistan. The judgment, which calls Taitz’s case and tactics “delusional”:
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
I said a few weeks ago that something was wrong with Taitz. Something is very strange here. It would seem Orly Taitz is is acting incompetent. It was just a matter of time before Taiyz would be sanctioned for her misconduct. She acted incompetent. Although most of her other documentation on the FRAUD obama is solid. Because of this she playes into the hands of the FRAUD obama. Orly did not use the solid facts she had, instead she filed
documents improperly. (Story Reports)

..........................................................................................

Mission Viejo lawyer Orly Taitz filed the document, which claimed to be a registration of Obama’s birth. The filing was part of a complaint Taitz has in Santa Ana federal court - filed on behalf of Alan Keyes, Buena Park Pastor Wiley Drake and others - alleging that Obama is not U.S. born and should be removed from office.

Judge Nakazato 's comment in his "Order Striking Filed Documents from the Record" reads thusly:

WHEREAS, the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reason(s)

Lacks proper notice (L.R. 6-1, 7-4); improper form and format (L.R. 11-3.3, 11-3.6); Counsel failed to identify her Cal. State Bar No. (L.R. 11-3.8(a)); description of motion conflicts or differs from that which counsel entered on Court's e-docket

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the documents shall be striken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court....

Taitz filed documents improperly. Really STUPID.

.........................................................................................
The courts seem to be in obama's 'court' anyway. Taiz had the ball but could not move it passed the 20 yard line. I don't think she wanted to. I do think she was and is a spoiler acting to be there first with the worst. Because of her "incompetence" act she has succeeded in effect covering up for obama.
.........................................................................................

Counsel Orly Taitz is hereby ordered to pay $20,000.00 to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of the date of this Order as a sanction for her misconduct in violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Judge Clay Land makes the toughest statement about Taitz’s antics here:

The Court finds that counsel’s conduct was willful and not merely negligent. It demonstrates bad faith on her part. As an attorney, she is deemed to have known better. She owed a duty to follow the rules and to respect the Court. Counsel’s pattern of conduct conclusively establishes that she did not mistakenly violate a provision of law. She knowingly violated Rule 11. Her response to the Court’s show cause order is breathtaking in its arrogance and borders on delusional. She expresses no contrition or regret regarding her misconduct. To the contrary, she continues her baseless attacks on the Court.

And here’s the time line of Taitz’s appearance in court:

Counsel’s frivolous and sanctionable conduct wasted the Defendants’ time and valuable judicial resources that could have been devoted to legitimate cases pending with the Court. When she filed the Rhodes case, counsel indicated that it was urgent that the matter be heard because her client was facing imminent deployment. The Court rearranged its schedule, took time to read the legal papers, and conducted preliminary research in preparation for the hearing. The Army had to activate its legal team on short notice, sending a Major from the Army Litigation Division in Washington, D.C. and a Captain from the CONUS Replacement Center at Ft. Benning. In addition, the Assistant U.S. Attorney had to accompany them. Like the Court, the government attorneys had to prepare in an expedited manner for the hearing. During the week preceding Captain Rhodes’s deployment, the Court was in the midst of a jury trial. Therefore, the Court had to alter the trial schedule to conduct the hearing during an extended lunch break, thus affecting other counsel and jurors. The Clerk’s Office was burdened by Ms. Taitz’s inability to follow the Court’s rules regarding pro hac vice admission and the Court’s rules for electronic filing. On five separate occasions in a short period, the Clerk’s Office personnel error-noticed counsel for her failure to follow simple rules. At the hearing, counsel failed to make coherent legal arguments but instead wasted the Court’s time with press conference sound bites and speeches.
.........................................................................................
Judge Smacks Down Orly Taitz For Abusing Court
.........................................................................................

Gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.28.0

.........................................................................................

Strange isn't it.

Obama is a loser

One that fails consistently, especially a person with poor skills. Obama is a loser. A loser at defending America. A purposeful loser. A COMMUNIST. A FRAUD. An IMPOSTER. A COWARD. A LIAR.

Obama's First Six Months' Accomplishments

1. Offended the Queen of England.
2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.
3. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega.
4. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek.
5. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia.
6. Sided with Hugo Chavez and Communist Fidel Castro against Honduras.
7. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions while they're building their nuclear weapons.
8. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions.
9. Expanded the bailouts.
10. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian.
11. Doubled our national debt.
12. Announced the termination of our new missile defense system the day after North Korea launched an ICBM.
13. Released information on U.S. intelligence gathering despite urgings of his own CIA director and the prior four CIA
directors.
14. Accepted without comment that five of his cabinet members cheated on their taxes and two other nominees
withdrew after they couldn't take the heat.
15. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who identified military veterans and abortion opponents as "dangers to
the nation."
16. Ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used and instead refers to such acts as "man made disasters."
17. Circled the globe to publicly apologize for America's world leadership.
18. Told the Mexican president that the violence in their country was because of us.
19. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from the Department of Commerce.
20. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the forced removal and expulsion to Cuba of a 9-year-
old whose mother died trying to bring him to freedom in the United States.
21. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three terrorists who threatened one American life and the
next day announces members of the Bush administration may stand trial for "torturing" three 9/11 terrorists by
pouring water up their noses.
22. Low altitude photo shoot of Air Force One over New York City that frightened thousands of New Yorkers.
23. Sent his National Defense Advisor to Europe to assure them that the US will no longer treat Israel in a special
manner and they might be on their own with the Muslims..
24. Praised Jimmy Carter's trip to Gaza where he sided with terrorist Hamas against Israel.
25. Nationalized General Motors and Chrysler while turning shareholder control over to the unions and freezing out
retired investors who owned their bonds. Committed unlimited taxpayer billions in the process.
26. Passed a huge energy tax in the House that will make American industry even less competitive while costing
homeowners thousands per year.
27. Announced nationalized health care "reform" that will strip seniors of their Medicare, cut pay of physicians,
increase taxes yet another $1 trillion, and put everyone on rationed care with government bureaucrats deciding
who gets care and who doesn't.
28."ordered" the closing of Gitmo

Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them," while former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die." If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that the President, Senators and Congressmen have their own special gold plated health care plan which is guaranteed the remainder of their lives and they are not subject to this new law if they pass it. The Obamanation health care plan, if passed, will be the first step towards euthanasia of a nation.

Ask Hawaii per 338-16 the follwing question(s), plural using Op.No. 84-14 instructions when filing UIPA requests

.........................................................................................
Senior official in the State of Hawaii's Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, in her comment on the purported Birth Certificate image that appears on the Obama "Fight the Smears" propaganda site: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."

Janice Okubo said, "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."

A senior official in the State of Hawaii's Department of Health, Director of Communications Janice Okubo, confirms that the image published and circulated by the Obama campaign as his "birth certificate" lacks the necessary embossed seal and signature. Backing away from a quote attributed to her that the image on the campaign site was "valid," she told the St. Petersburg (Florida) Times in an article published yesterday Jun 27,2008: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."

Janice Okubo Director of Communications Hawaii's Department of Health has "doubts" about obama's colb posted on the web. She unlike Dr. Chiyome Fukino has not stated she has "seen" obama's original birth certificate. Okubo publicy stated she has doubts about the amended colb that obama posted on the web. It would be interesting to email Dr. Chiyome Fukino and ask her if she too has DOUBTS about the colb obama has posted on his web site.
(story reports) I feel another email comming on.
.........................................................................................
..........................................................................................

..........................................................................................
Hawaii Revised Statutes Vol 6 Title Chap 321-344 html format
..........................................................................................
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates
..........................................................................................
Obama's original birth certificate could reveal it was issued 1 year or more after his birth or was altered because of the requirement of 338-16; "shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”. If obama has a birth certificate that was filed late or altered the original would be marked distinctly "late" or "altered". This would explain why he has not released the original. (Very Important Fact about obama deception to "hide" his true identity) StoryReports
..........................................................................................
Ask Hawaii per 338-16 the follwing question(s), plural using Op.No. 84-14 instructions when filing UIPA requests.

(1) Any INDEX DATA evidence of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration.

(2) Any INDEX DATA evidence kept in a special permanent file.

(3) Any INDEX DATA of a statement of disagreement included in the individual’s vital records ‘on file with the agency.’

(4) Any INDEX DATA indicating the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.

(StoryReports)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..........................................................................................
§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates. (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.

(b) A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration shall be endorsed on the certificates.

(c) Such evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.

(d) When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required by the rules for late registration or when the state registrar finds reasons to question the validity or adequacy of the certificate or the documentary evidence, the state registrar shall not register the late certificate and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action.

The department of health may by rule provide for the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.

(e) As used in this section, “late” means one year or more after the date of birth. [L 1949, c 327, §20; RL 1955, §57-19; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-16; am L 1972, c 66, §1(2); am L 1997, c 305, §3]


..........................................................................................

.........................................................................................

§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates. (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.

(b) A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration shall be endorsed on the certificates.

(c) Such evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.

(d) When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required by the rules for late registration or when the state registrar finds reasons to question the validity or adequacy of the certificate or the documentary evidence, the state registrar shall not register the late certificate and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action.

The department of health may by rule provide for the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.

(e) As used in this section, “late” means one year or more after the date of birth. [L 1949, c 327, §20; RL 1955, §57-19; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-16; am L 1972, c 66, §1(2); am L 1997, c 305, §3]


Hawaii revised Statutes338-16

.........................................................................................
CHAPTER 338 VITAL STATISTICS Index
.........................................................................................

§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates.

§338-16 Procedure concerning late and altered birth certificates. (a) Birth certificates registered one year or more after the date of birth, and certificates which have been altered after being filed with the department of health, shall contain the date of the late filing and the date of the alteration and be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.

(b) A summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for late filing or the alteration shall be endorsed on the certificates.

(c) Such evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.

(d) When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required by the rules for late registration or when the state registrar finds reasons to question the validity or adequacy of the certificate or the documentary evidence, the state registrar shall not register the late certificate and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action.

The department of health may by rule provide for the dismissal of an application which is not actively prosecuted.

(e) As used in this section, “late” means one year or more after the date of birth. [L 1949, c 327, §20; RL 1955, §57-19; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-16; am L 1972, c 66, §1(2); am L 1997, c 305, §3]
.........................................................................................

How to Apply for Certified Copies of Vital Records
.........................................................................................

Letters of Verification Is this what obama is using as proof of his birth in Hawaii? Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). [Was obama aborted and born alive?]?
.........................................................................................

Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). This document verifies the existence of a birth/death/marriage/divorce certificate on file with the Department of Health and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event. (For example, that a certain named individual was born on a certain date at a certain place.) The verification process will not, however, disclose information about the vital event contained within the certificate that is unknown to and not provided by the applicant in the request.

Letters of verification are requested in similar fashion and using the same request forms as for certified copies.

The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.

.........................................................................................
Interesting Message:

From: (.....)
> Date: 02/02/07 17:13:55
> To: hihonolu@rootsweb.com; hawaii@rootsweb.com
> Subject: Re: [HAWAII] [HIHONOLU] Ulukau genealogy
> indexes
>
> Hello, Jeanne, and thanks for all your information.
> I have indeed ordered
> many certificates from Oahu; they wouldn't give one
> death certificate I
> wanted because I was related through the spouse, but
> it was also not 75
> years "old". I have had good luck with that office
> for many of my requests.
> There were a few where they returned all my papers
> and checks because I didn
>
> t know the district (I thought they would look in
> all districts if I had a
> pretty narrow window on the date, but they
> wouldn't).
>
> Where it gets difficult is if one is "pretty sure"
> there was a marriage but
> can't find it in the indexes. Sometimes going to the
> actual sources yields
> something missed.

.........................................................................................

Verification copies of BMD (Interesting information on getting a record from Hawaii)
.........................................................................................

Download Request For Certified Copy of Birth Record Hawaii

Download Request For Certified Copy of Birth Record (pdf)

.........................................................................................

.........................................................................................

.........................................................................................

chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov

janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov

Ted Olson Is Not What You Think

Olson and partner. (Don't ask we'll tell)
.........................................................................................
NBC - Natural Born Citizenship - McCain

.........................................................................................
I'm not saying 911 did not occur but I am saying Ted Olson lied about phone calls from his wife. This is a Big Big problem because Olson's story about the hijackers and boxcutters was based on the phone calls he said his wife made. They never happened. So why did Olson lie? You tell Me. I only know he set up obama though testimony to congress about Mccain as a natural born citizen. But olson lied about that also. So I must conclude Olsen is a LIAR. (Story Reports)
.........................................................................................

Former Solicitor General Ted Olson's claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.

However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cellphone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.

According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.

Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials

.........................................................................................

Late in the day on 9/11, CNN put out a story that began: “Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN.” According to this story, Olson reported that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters.”2

Ted Olson’s report was very important. It provided the only evidence that American 77, which was said to have struck the Pentagon, had still been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA radar around 9:00 AM (there had been reports, after this disappearance, that an airliner had crashed on the Ohio-Kentucky border). Also, Barbara Olson had been a very well-known commentator on CNN. The report that she died in a plane that had been hijacked by Arab Muslims was an important factor in getting the nation’s support for the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s report was important in still another way, being the sole source of the widely accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters.3

However, although Ted Olson’s report of phone calls from his wife has been a central pillar of the official account of 9/11, this report has been completely undermined.

Olson’s Self-Contradictions

Olson began this process of undermining by means of self-contradictions. He first told CNN, as we have seen, that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone.” But he contradicted this claim on September 14, telling Hannity and Colmes that she had reached him by calling the Department of Justice collect. Therefore, she must have been using the “airplane phone,” he surmised, because “she somehow didn’t have access to her credit cards.”4 However, this version of Olson’s story, besides contradicting his first version, was even self-contradictory, because a credit card is needed to activate a passenger-seat phone.

Later that same day, moreover, Olson told Larry King Live that the second call from his wife suddenly went dead because “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well.”5 After that return to his first version, he finally settled on the second version, saying that his wife had called collect and hence must have used “the phone in the passengers’ seats” because she did not have her purse.6

By finally settling on this story, Olson avoided a technological pitfall. Given the cell phone system employed in 2001, high-altitude cell phone calls from airliners were impossible, or at least virtually so (Olson’s statement that “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well” was a considerable understatement). The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004.7

However, Olson’s second story, besides being self-contradictory, was CONTRADICTED by American Airlines.

American Airlines Contradicts Olson’s Second Version

A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones. After he wrote to ask if that had been the case on September 11, 2001, an AA customer service representative replied: “That is correct; we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.”8

In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been CONTRADICTED by the FBI.

Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI

The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10 And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.

This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.

Olson’s Story Also Rejected by Pentagon Historians

Ted Olson’s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.11

According to Olson, his wife had said that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers.”12 This is an inherently implausible scenario. We are supposed to believe that 60-some people, including the two pilots, were held at bay by three or four men (one or two of the hijackers would have been in the cockpit) with knives and boxcutters. This scenario becomes even more absurd when we realize that the alleged hijackers were all small, unathletic men (the 9/11 Commission pointed out that even “[t]he so-called muscle hijackers actually were not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5” and 5’7” in height and slender in build”13), and that the pilot, Charles “Chic” Burlingame, was a weightlifter and a boxer, who was described as “really tough” by one of his erstwhile opponents.14 Also, the idea that Burlingame would have turned over the plane to hijackers was rejected by his brother, who said: “I don't know what happened in that cockpit, but I'm sure that they would have had to incapacitate him or kill him because he would have done anything to prevent the kind of tragedy that befell that airplane.”15

The Pentagon historians, in any case, DID NOT ACCPT the Olson story, according to which Burlingame and his co-pilot did give up their plane and were in the back with the passengers and other crew members. They instead wrote that “the attackers either incapacitated or murdered the two pilots.”16

Conclusion

This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?

..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
Theodore Olson Is A Traitor And Liar. Theodore Olson and Laurence Tribe letter by Theodore Olson and Laurence Tribe, reported in 154 Congress

..........................................................................................
As requested by Senator McCain's campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law.
..........................................................................................

Gabriel J. Chin (University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law on McCain & the "Natural Born Citizen" Clause & a Comment Info applies to obama in that he also is Not a natural born citizen.


Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President

..........................................................................................

Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen parents. The Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States, but it was not incorporated into the Union. As requested by Senator McCain's campaign, distinguished constitutional lawyers Laurence Tribe and Theodore Olson examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law. The Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive U.S. jurisdiction, may have been covered by the Fourteenth Amendment's grant of citizenship to "all persons born . . . in the United States." However, in the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court held that "unincorporated territories" were not part of the United States for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold that persons born in unincorporated territories are not Fourteenth Amendment citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion also suggests that Senator McCain obtained citizenship by statute. However, the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover the Canal Zone. Recognizing the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law applicable only to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but eleven months too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John McCain was not a citizen at birth, he is not a "natural born Citizen" and thus is not "eligible to the Office of President" under the Constitution.
(Mccain Was NOT born in the canal zone, he was born in Colon Panama OUTSIDE the canal zone) Story Reports

.........................................................................................
What olson did was to also provide cover for obama as a "natural born citizen also". Neither mccain nor Obama are natural born citizens. Mccain isn't even a citizen because he was born in Colon Panama out side of the canal zone. Obama like Mccain says he is a US citizen but has never stated he was a natural born citizen nor provided proof he is. Obama has not provided proper legal, certified by Hawaii, documentation that he is a citizen. His colb he posted only stated it was "filed with registrar" which means his documents to amend his origianl birth certificate have never been accepted by Hawaii. Obama has not produced ANY legal evidence he is a US citizen. With no proof it must be he, like Mccain are NOT even US citizens let alone natural born citizens. The DNC will not release any information on how they determined obama was a a US citizen citing the freedom of information act does not apply to a contractor they hired to "check Obama Out". This is the SCAM of the century and obama the thug has pulled it off!
........................................................................................

Leo Haffey Attorney

Free Leo Haffney

We are still waiting to find out what is going to happen to Nashville attorney Leo Haffey who was arrested on suspicious affidavits, denied bond in a hearing by presiding judge Gloria Dumas, who received a lengthy formal complaint from the TN Judiciary for illegal and unprofessional behaviour a few days later. Is Leo Haffey a political prisoner?

“Who Is This Guy Leo Haffey I Keep Hearing About?

My first contact with Leo the Lawyer (Leo Haffey) was back on March 27th of 2009. I had discovered a post on a forum that struck me as “brass tacks” straight line reasoning with inescapable conclusions. I posted it on my blog “The Steady Drip. It was awhile before I knew Leo’s real name but that evening I got this thank you note.

Leo the Lawyer said…

Thanks for posting & hosting!
Love your Blog!

Leo’s article is archived at Two ideas to empower Patriots-by passing lawyers if you would care to review it. Here is a short excerpt:

THE POWER OF A PATRIOT
by EA_LEO

People tend to either credit lawyers and judges far too much or discredit them to the extreme. The truth is lawyers and judges are greatly restricted by the privilege of license or of office. The people who are patriots have far more freedom of action and far less restrictions in our society.

Did you know that any citizen patriot can bring a criminal case against Barrack Hussein Obama in the County in which they reside? You do not have to be an Attorney General to indict a ham sandwich or a Barrack Obama. If a patriot had evidence of a crime committed by the 2008 BO campaign and that patriot presented said evidence to a sympathetic Grand Jury with a charge of conspiracy to commit said crime against Barrack Obama, that patriot could get BO indicted like that proverbial ham sandwich.

I had been blogging about the power of Citizen Grand Juries to directly counteract the conspiracy of the government against the people. Leo quickly understood the legal theory and the supporting Constitutional Provisions and case law.

The very next day this blockbuster headline grabbed my attention: Barack Hussein Obama Indicted in GA. Carl Swenson at http://www.riseupforamerica.com/ had scooped everybody and without warning had empanelled a Citizen Grand Jury and acted while the rest of us were still arguing legal theory.

From that point forward Leo and I corresponded on a regular basis. I became National Spokesperson for American Grand Jury and Leo advised me, and collaborated with other leaders in the Citizen Grand Jury movement while writing some of the early motions.

On April 29th I got a cryptic email from Leo “Where the Bodies R Buried in Tennessee?” The email had a link to a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) case concerning the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Election Commission. This was an issue Leo was working on in Nashville having to do with missing computers from the Nashville Elections Commission. I didn’t understand it, and I didn’t respond.

On April 30th Leo’s next email seemed hastily composed and was confusing: “Mayor, Police Chief, Former VP & Nashville DA. Next Door Neighbor CRIMINAL LAWYER Brent Horst. If anything happens to me those are the suspects. PI Grady Vaughn has more details. Keep the Faith, Leo Haffey.

At least I now knew Leo’s real name. However I was beginning to suspect that Leo wasn’t just brilliant but maybe a little weird. Less than an hour later I got this email “Have surveillance cameras surrounding my house. I have video of Nashville PD and neighbor, Nashville CRIMINAL lawyer Brent Horst, harassing me, my wife and my daughter.”

My day job is as a psychotherapist. My red flags pop up when people start claiming that folks are out to get them. Yet Leo made it clear that he had video evidence of police harassment. Next Leo sent me several news links along with this message: “These seemingly petty burglaries are to the Nashville BO Campaign what Watergate was to the Nixon Campaign.” Since delusions of persecution are not reported by the news media, I decided I should start paying attention to the corruption and police intimidation situation Leo faced in Nashville.

At 8:54 PM on May 2nd I got this email from Leo’s 11 year old daughter: “my dad was arrested and he said if he was, that i should email you.” At 4:05 Am I get this email from Leo: “Don’t report this because I don’t want any Grand Jury members to be scared off by this Police harassment, but please add judge Thomas w. Brothers, Brent & Tracy Horst of 6953 Highland Park Dr. Nashville, TN to the list of co-conspirators along with, Mayor Dean, Police Chief Serpas and District Attorney Johnson. Those are the people for the Constitutional Grand Jury to indict, along with BO, in Nashville. Keep the Faith, Leo P. Haffey”

One could easily forgive Leo if at this point he reacted to the intimidation by keeping his mouth shut and presenting a low profile. Not Leo! The next email said: “Please have the Grand Jury Foremen in Tennessee contact me. I want to present evidence against all the co-conspirators in Tennessee that I know about. Keep the Faith, Leo Haffey.” Leo might have been brave enough to testify to a Citizen Grand Jury in Nashville but there wasn’t one in existence. It wasn’t until June 18, that I was able to announce

NASHVILLE CITIZEN’S GRAND JURY FORMING!

I told Leo that there was not Citizen’s Grand Jury in Nashville yet. Rather than thinking he was out of ammo, later on May 3rd Leo asked me to post this message on my blog:

Co-conspirators Tom w. Brothers, Karl Dean, Ronal Serpas, & Torry got my neighbor the CRIMINAL Lawyer Brent Horst & his wife Tracy to file false charges.

But it backfired on all of them. My daughter is doing fine. Isn’t she Great! Thanks for your help! That is all I can say at this point. Other than:

It is very important that Patriots know to do this:

1) Find the CROOKED politicians in your City or Town that supported BO.

2) Link these CROOKED politicians to crimes committed by the BO Campaign.

3) Charge CROOKED politicians and BO as co-conspirators in the commission of campaign crimes, and you have a Criminal Case against BO that can be prosecuted in Court in your County Seat.

4) Of course, you add all the other Crimes that BO committed elsewhere to your INDICTMENT also. But to prosecute BO in your State, you have to link him as a co-conspirator to crimes committed in your State.

I have a stat counter on my blog. I was able to detect the hits coming from Nashville. Leo was really rattling the monkey cage of some big monkeys. Over the next few days I got dozens of emails documenting the evidence and suspicions Leo had about corruption in Nashville. He asked me to act as a depository for all of his evidence because he wasn’t sure he would be able to protect his documents, and he had some serious concerns about his own life being in jeopardy.

Over the next few days there were reports of unmarked and marked police vehicles parked outside Leo’s house. I didn’t realize it, but Leo had also been working on the child abuse and molestation activity at a local mosque. Pam Geller at Atlas Shrugs really blew the lid of that case, but nothing was done and children remain in danger. Go here for a review of the various Crimes and Corruption Leo the Lawyer Exposed in Nashville.

I posted this notice on a blog in Nashville:

The power elite in Nashville are perverting justice! The police, politicians, judiciary, and administrators of government are conspiring against the citizens. Citizens have the constitutional authority to investigate corruption and establish justice.

All citizens who have evidence or reports of crimes, violations of oath of office, or sabotage of justice by elected or appointed officials are encouraged to report their information to the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury. Those who wish to serve as members of the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury can contact xxxxx

Honest public officials who faithfully serve “we the people” are expected to support the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury.

A member of the Tennessee Bar will act as advisor to the Nashville Citizen’s Grand Jury.

That last line in the notice might have been a mistake. Of course, those who knew the situation immediately guessed who the “member of the Tennessee Bar” was. By May 13th Leo was back in jail. We heard from Leo again on May 20th was able to send this email: “Help! On the 13th, I was arrested again by the Nashville PD without Probable Cause and falsely imprisoned, first at the Metro Jail, then I was taken to Nashville General Hospital where I was physically and mentally abused. My blood pressure medication was withheld from me for 38 hours. Then, I was taken to Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute where they repeated tried to force me to take anti-psychotic medications.”

I live in south Florida. I felt powerless to help. However, I was able to determine that the Mental Health Professionals did their jobs according to the book, and Leo was released as “not being a danger to himself or others.” However, Leo couldn’t go home. Leo’s neighbors had contacted Leo’s wife right after he was arrested and told them that the Neighborhood Association was going to place a lien on her home and take the house away from her if she did not file a restraining order against Leo so that he could not return home. Leo took up residence in a Holiday Inn. Things were really getting nasty.

Leo was rearrested in September and this time his bond was revoked. This is where he remains:

HAFFEY, LEO PATRICK Facility: Criminal Justice Center
Unit-Pod: 2-E
Security Level: Minimum

........................................................................................

The facts are being hidden by the authorities. We are using private investigators to find out what we can. We will not release our research until it is nailed down tight.

The “unconfirmed and unofficial story goes like this:

Leo is an entertainment attorney in Nashville.

Nashville is a liberal enclave in an otherwise moderate to conservative state.

Leo was an active Democrat and worked on Democratic candidates campaigns until Obama came along.

Leo has acquired some powerful enemies by being anti-Obama and attempting to expose local corruption.

When Leo began his anti-Obama activates and began advising Citizen Grand Juries, his enemies amplified their animosity toward him.

Leo had some marriage problems which his enemies exploited by pressuring his wife to file abuse charges against him.

After Leo was arrested, Leo’s wife had the integrity and courage to resist, and decided to “out” the people who had pressured her to file the false charges and sent this email to the Nashville DA:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nashville Obama supporter Brent Horst THREATENED to SUE me if I didn’t help him get an Order of Protection against my husband, Leo Haffey.

Also Nashville ADA Bottoms pressured me to get an Order of Protection against my husband, Leo Haffey.

I would appreciate it if you and Nashville District Attorney Torry Johnson would investigate Mr. Horst.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am in possession of further documentation about Leo’s wife being pressured to file false charges and my wife and I have interviewed Leo’s wife thoroughly.

The people who are trying to harass Leo are neighbors. They used the Neighborhood Association to threaten Leo’s wife that they would file a lien and take her house away if she didn’t file a charge against Leo. Leo’s wife is now being represented by counsel, so she isn’t likely to fall for that kind of pressure again. Leo arranged for her to have counsel while he was in jail.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

· The charges against Leo were dropped, or soon will be, because Leo’s wife withdrew her allegation.

· Without skipping a beat Leo, was then charged with molesting his 11 year old daughter. One of his neighbors is a social worker, and I suspect her of involving the authorities. Child abuse accusations can be made anonymously without the accused ever knowing who the accuser was.

· Both the wife and daughter told the truth, and these charges were dropped.

· One of Leo’s enemies filed a false charge of vehicular assault – This was the same woman I suspect of making the false charge of molestation – no witness – no injuries – but they managed to get Leo arrested have him admitted to a mental health institution. Leo properly refused all medications without being informed as to what the official diagnosis was. There was none.

· The doctors said he wasn’t a danger to himself or anyone else, and released him

· Next he was re-arrested on the vehicular assault charge and they revoked his bail

· That is why he is in jail now. Leo continues to resist their attempts to administer drugs to him without a diagnosis. This has an uncanny resemblance to the plight of political prisoners in Russia back a few decades ago.

Caution: I live in Florida and my only sources are Leo, his wife, and his daughter who I communicate with regularly. I may not have all the details straight.

Leo needs simple help from a lawyer in filing a Write of Habeus Corpus, to get him out of jail. Once released, Leo can participate in his own defense.

Leo Haffey defense fund

Michelle Obama’s Militant Racism Revealed And Reviewed

Michelle Obama’s Militant Intellectually Refined Racism Revealed

In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on “crime and hatred”. Moreover, she stated that whites in America were “ineradicably racist”. The 1985 thesis, titled ‘Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community’ was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.

Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to ‘Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first…’ However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, “If those ‘Whites at Princeton’ really saw Michelle as one who always would ‘be Black first,’ it seems that she gave them that impression”.

Most alarming is Michele Obama’s use of the terms “separationist” and “integrationist” when describing the views of black people.

Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a “separationist” view of race.
“By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.”

Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her ‘further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.

Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder.

Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but she elevates black over white in her world.

Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning:

“There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.“

The conclusion of her thesis is alarming.

Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. “I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.”

Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.

Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.

The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama’s thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. This is a very divisive view for a first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.

..........................................................................................

Michelle Obama's senior year thesis at Princeton University Exposes michelle da bell as a racist.

..........................................................................................

Part 1 Michele Thesis

Part 2 Michele Thesis

Part 3 Michele Thesis

Part 4 Michele Thesis

.........................................................................................

Unlike her husband, whose focus on his audience is unwavering, Michelle Obama remains at the mercy of the same internal conflict that she reported in her senior thesis. She is too bitter at the hopelessness of lower-class blacks to assimilate, but too attracted to money and privilege to reject white society. She hates the white institutions that made her prosperous, not only because they cannot solve the problems of the black lower class, but even more so because they made her feel guilty about her own success. Michele Obama is a perfect mach for Barack. She is a "sick" woman just like her husband is a "sick" man. Both have identity problems. Both are dangerous RACISTS.
........................................................................................

Excellant review of Michele's racist comments below:

Review of Michele Obama's Racist Thesis

........................................................................................

Dr Carolyn Dejoie plays the race card as does michele

Heres a quote from one of Michele's mentors. Dr Carolyn Dejoi in another book she wrote about "white racism". She knew how to play the "race card" which is in reality displaying her own racism in the form of "white racism".


One theme common to all the identified factors, although not always stated or acknowledged, is institutional and individual racism. As Love states "...there has been little institutional recognition of White racism, little discussion of how it is manifested on campus, and little attention to how it affects black students, even in the absence of overt intent to discriminate"
........................................................................................
When you read enough of michele and barack's background information it becomes clear they were, "trained" to be domestic racists. That right I said domestic racists, not domestic terrorists but these are similar. The phrase "all muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are muslims" is catchy. All racists are not domestic racists but all domestic racists are RACISTS!. Barack Obama and Micele Obama are "domestic racists". A term I just made up that applies to the imposters in the white house. Ummmm, Ummmm, Ummmm

Obama Funny Money

Obama Funny Money. Chaos at Cobo Center: 35,000 line up for housing help in Detroit
.........................................................................................

.........................................................................................

.........................................................................................



Detroit Woman: 'Obama Money' (Audio)

Ken Rogulski, WJR News, interviewed some people waiting on line at the Cobo Center in Detroit to apply for stimulus money.

Transcript

KEN ROGULSKI: Why are you here?

WOMAN: To get some money.

ROGULSKI: What kind of money?

WOMAN: Obama money.

ROGULSKI: Where's it coming from?

WOMAN: Obama.

ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get it?

WOMAN: I don't know. His stash. I don't know. I don't know where he got it from but he's giving it to us, to help us. We love him. That's why we voted for him. Obama! Obama!



Here's how another woman responded to Rogulski's questions:

ROGULSKI: Did you get an application to fill out yet?

WOMAN: I sure did. And I filled it out, and I am waiting to see what the results are going to be.

ROGULSKI: Will you know today how much money you're getting?

WOMAN: No, I won't, but I'm waiting for a phone call.

ROGULSKI: Where's the money coming from?

WOMAN: I believe it's coming from the City of Detroit or the state.

ROGULSKI: Where did they get it from?

WOMAN: Some funds that was given by Obama.

ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get the funds?

WOMAN: Obama getting the funds from... Ummm, I have no idea, to tell you the truth. He's the president.

.........................................................................................

Ummmm. Ummmm, Ummmmm barcak hussein obama, Ummmm, Ummmm, Ummmm, barrack hussein obama etc.


What this woman is applying for will amount to very little. She seems to convey that obama will supply everything she needs. Just because he is the president. How stupid! Ignorance is bliss for people who think because obama is president he is the answer to all their problems. Its like his supporters are on bo crack.

Given the promises he made in order to get elected, his constituents should be lining up at the White House everyday to get some of His stash. They thought they were getting $3,000 stimulus checks from obama. Wrong. 50,000 applications for anti homelessness funds. Only 3,500 will receive anything. ummmmm, ummmm, ummmmm barack hussein obama, ummmm, ummmmm, ummmm barack hussein obama.......an imposter.

......................................................................................

Scuffles erupted as several thousand Detroit residents jockeyed, pushed and shoved Wednesday to get free money being offered to only 3,500 of the city's recently or soon to be homeless. (Oct. 7)
......................................................................................
The city distributed more than 50,000 applications for the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing program over the past several days before running out Wednesday morning. Only 3,500 people who qualify will receive the money — a maximum $3,000 per applicant, Dumas said.

Many residents taking applications won't qualify because of the program's strict income requirements. Dumas also fears people who really need the money might have missed out on applications because of the long lines.

To be considered, applicants must have lived in Detroit for the past six months, been homeless within the past year and be of low to moderate income. A single applicant is ineligible with an income of more than $24,850 annually; the maximum annual income for an eligible family of four is $35,500.

Individuals and families meeting the income criteria and facing eviction and foreclosure also are eligible. Being able to maintain housing after getting the assistance also is a condition of the program.


.........................................................................................

DNC AND SC FRAUD ELIGIBILITY STATEMENT OF obama

I wanted to know how South Carolina certified obama as a qualified candidate under the US Constitution and SC law. I requested information and got a DNC letter stating that obama had been nominated. It DID NOT CONTAIN an eligibiilty statement. This phrase was missing, "and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:" This eligibility statement was included in the DNC offical certification of nomination that was required by the State of Hawaii.
.........................................................................................
The Certifications of Nomination submitted to HI state officials by the RNC and DNC to get the names of their respective candidates for POTUS printed on HI’s general election ballots. The cover letter from HI elections officials cites HI’s unique presidential verification law, HRS 11-113.
.........................................................................................
Hawaii - Dems and Repubs Say Constitutionally Eligible

.........................................................................................
Obama South Carolina Sec of State DNC pdf MINUS any certification

.........................................................................................

Under the laws in every state, once elections officials receive the Official Certification of Nomination, the name of the nominee for POTUS from the major political party is AUTOMATICALLY entitled to appear on the state’s general election ballot except HAWAII. In HAWAII, just identifying the name of the nominee does not guarantee his name will be placed on the ballot. In order to get Barack Obama's name on the ballot in HAWAII only, the DNC also had to swear he was Constitutionally eligible for the job. The DNC swore obama was legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the US Constitution. This was TREASON and FRAUD. The DNC could only have relied on the colb obama posted online. It indicates his father was Barack Obama Sr. Barack Obama Sr was a CITIZEN of KENYA when OBAMA JR was born. Because BOTH parents must be US citizens at obama's birth, naturalized or native, obama IS NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Obama is NOT legally qualified to serve under the US Constitution. TREASON and FRAUD have occurred certifying obama by the NATIONAL DNC and ALL STATE DNC PARTIES!

What can any US concerned citizen do to help expose this fraud? You and I can file an election fraud complaint against the following people in each state. Howard Dean, former chair, dnc services corporation, and Joseph E. Sandler, former general counsel; chair person of DNC in each state, DNC treasurer in each state; Nancy Pelosi, acting in a non-governmental role as chair, 2008 DNC convention and Alice Germond, ssecretary DNC convention.

..........................................................................................
Use this example election fraud complaint letter below as a "template" to file election fraud complaints in all states against the DNC national and DNC local parties who have committed TREASON and FRAUD. Post your election complaints on scribd.com to document it to help others expose the IMPOSTER obama.
..........................................................................................
jbjdscmodelelectionfraudcomplaintag
..........................................................................................
Additional Links exposing the imposter obama
..........................................................................................

SC example election fraud complaint letter

Hawaii - Dems and Repubs Say Constitutionally Eligible

election fraud in South Carolina

jbjd exposing the imposter obama

Leo Donofrio naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com

TerryK exposing the IMPOSTER obama

How to request government records from Hawaii to expose the IMPOSTER obama

......................................................................................

How any US citizen can expose obama as an Imposter and a Fraud

Presidential preference primary 2007 FRAUD In South Carolina

Presidential preference primary 2007 FRAUD In South Carolina

The November 1, 2007 typed and hand-written memo Certifying the names and eligibility of D candidates to appear on South Carolina's Presidential Preference primary, signed by both Ms. Fowler and Ms. Hensley, could have ‘election fraud’ written all over it.

How to request government records of obama in Hawaii

An Achilles’ heel is a fatal weakness in spite of overall strength, that can actually or potentially lead to downfall. Obama's 'achilles heel' is part II of the Hawaiian UIPA.

............................................................................................
.........................................................................................

Leo educated his readers on the relevance of §HRS 338-18 and the general rule of UIPA as well as on the finer points: the provisions and exceptions to the general rule.

DoH Reverses Course – Releases Index Data For President Obama, Stanley Ann and Barack, Sr; No Records For Maya Exist.

However, Linden Joesting cited §92F-13(4) in her cover letter denying me access in support of §HRS 338-18. This section refers to ‘Exception 4′ of UIPA and agency records that must not be disclosed:

“Exception 4 The Law or Order Exception (§92F-13(4))

An agency may withhold access to records that are protected from disclosure by a state or federal law or by a court order…”

Given that Linden Joesting herself told me twice that the agency should inform me if the records I requested did not exist, and that the UIPA rules on responding to my request includes a necessary option to tell the requester if a record does not exist, I feel pretty certain that the President filed to amend his birth certificate based on that statutory admission. This is based on the facts as I understand them and I believe that’s reasonable. Ms. Joesting has never attempted to correct or back away from any guidance she provided me and so I believe what she said to be true.

However, I have since remained undecided and uncertain as to whether the filed amendment that I believe exists, has anything to do with the ‘Date Filed By Registrar’ language found on Obama’s COLB. My gut says it does, but that was based wholly on the comparison of Dr. Fukino’s statement on July 27 compared to the language on the COLB and also the fact that now we have two ‘irregularities.’ In both you find the reference to ‘filed’ records. Neither include language indicating the record(s) were accepted, registered, recorded or anything of the sort by the State Registrar. Other credible Hawaiian COLBs found online use the more formal language of having been “Accepted by the State Registrar.” And the fact that I asked Dr. Fukino specifically if the State Registrar had seen and verified that the “amended original birth certificate” was on record with Vital Statistics was, for me, a red flag because the answer seemed to be “no.”

........................................................................................
........................................................................................
Op.No. 84-14 Part III Letter instructions for those individuals who file UIPA requests. The ‘statement of disagreement’ is expressly not to be recorded [with the State Registrar], but to be maintained ‘on file’ at the agency with the locally filed records.

The letter was written in 1984. TerryK indicates to get a clearer picture on how the administrator handles this process we would need to access the Vital Statistics Administrative Rules. However, they are being updated and are currently inaccessible.

This is similar to what the "health care bill" is in that no one has seen the final rules.

Where is the the obama ‘statement of disagreement’ filed? That question is up in the air. Its seems the imposter filed one but there are only "old rules" to use as a guidelines to know where the record is filed and at the moment we can't know where to look. Its like changing the rules in the middle of a game. Leo was right, this is a "game changer".
Its a shell game. Leo Donofrio and TerryK are good playing shell games and can guess correctly under which cup the obama statement of disagreement was filed. Once in hand this would prove obama had his amended colb paperwork rejected by Hawaii and prove the colb on his web site is BOGUS. This would tell the world obama is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER. (Story Reports)
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................

******************************************************************************************
..........................................................................................
It seems a possibility obama could have tried to ammend his birth certificate generated after his adoption. What this would mean is speculation but could be he has a different father or mother than indicated, he was born somewhere elese than indicated, his birth date is different than indicated etc. Story Reports
..........................................................................................
******************************************************************************************

“An agency is only required to provide access under part III to an “accessible” personal record, which generally means one that is filed by the person’s name or other identifying information, or which the agency can otherwise readily find.”

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


******************************************************************************************
Send in UIPA requests to Hawaii. Help expose the IMPOSTER obama
******************************************************************************************
You can use this as a guide. They’re very easy to file. I’m sending mine today:

“ Dear Dr. Fukino

‘Under the Uniform Information Practices Act of the State of Hawaii, “…the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power. Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy. Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public’s interest. Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy—the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies—shall be conducted as openly as possible’

1.) I request an electronic copy of President Obama’s “statement(s) of disagreement” on file with the Department of Health.

This request is a Hawaii UIPA (Uniform Information Practices Act) request under section 92F-12. “

Send your request to: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov and chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov

*****************************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************************
.........................................................................................
If such records do not exist, they must tell you if they don’t maintain that record. If we approach things this way, perhaps we can narrow things down more–so be clever. I figure there must be a well thought out reason for this requirement because UIPA is a pretty wonderful bit of legislation, in my opinion.

If you are denied, citing the records are protected, that’s a statutory admission that the records exist. I’ll paraphrase the point Leo made (“An agency can only deny access to a record it does actually maintain.”)


/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I sent a UIPA request Thursday and Friday and Got an answer from Hawaii
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

My Request of Records:

From:
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009
To: Okubo, Janice S.
Subject: RE: UIPA Request #1 From

Please understand my request in that I am not requesting any actual birth record.

I requested a copy of the record (or records) which contributed to the decision of the Hawaii Department of Health (hereinafter DoH) to have indicated that President Obama’s birth had been filed by the DoH registrar on August 8, 1961.

I am requesting records of how the doh came to the decision obama was born on Aug 8, 1961. I am requesting only these records pursuant to UIPA.

Your statements:

Dr. Fukino, Director of the Department of Health on Oct. 31, 2008:

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

Dr. Fukino, Director of the Department of Health on July 27, 2009:

“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”

Very Truly Yours,

Aloha ( )

If you are not requesting copies of vital records, the department has no records responsive to your request.

Janice Okubo

Hawaii State Department of Health

I guess I did not word it correctly. I did say I was not requesting any actual birth record. It also seems Okubo thinks I wasn't asking for copies of vital records. This is exacly what I was requesting. "I am requesting records of how the doh came to the decision obama was born on Aug 8, 1961."

Did she tell me obama has no birth certificate amendments because they are not considered vital records?
........................................................................................
Obama Shell Game
........................................................................................
In the shell game, the tosser lays three half shells or cups face down on the table and slips a ball or pea underneath one. Then he or she slides the shells around while the player tries to track the shell with the pea. So is there any way to win these games? In most cases, no -- the games are rigged so you can't win. In many shell games, the ball isn't under any of the shells!

In most cases, this sleight of hand is actually the simplest part of the scam. Most card and shell games are very elaborate operations involving several crew members. In addition to the tosser, the scam depends on a lookout,(ie Obama thugs) to keep an eye out for the police, a roper, (the state run media) to bring in potential players and one or more shills to get people to play. The shill, (ie liberals) blends in as part of the crowd -- in fact, the shill will appear to be the opposite of the tosser. If the tosser is wearing a dirty T-shirt and a baseball cap, the shill might be dressed in a suit, carrying a briefcase. The shills job is to act as a player or an involved spectator.

Before others join the game, the tosser, (ie obama the IMPOSTER) lets one of the shills win a couple of times. The tosser doesn't switch the cards (or ditch the ball), so the game looks easy to any spectators. When people see the shill winning so easily (or losing by making a dumb choice), they want to play themselves. Another shill might fold a corner of the queen card while the tosser is looking away. This boosts the players' confidence because they think they're pulling one over on the tosser. But when the tosser picks the cards up, he or she subtly unbends the fold in the queen and folds the corner of one of the black cards.

Even armed with all this knowledge, you still can't beat this game. If you see the card switch, track the right card and put down money on the actual queen, one of the shills will just put down a higher bet on another card, and the tosser will decree "one bet at a time." Or a shill might bump into the table, "accidentally" knocking it over, voiding the game. Or the tosser might suddenly spot the police, (IE American patriot), and pack the game up. So in most cases, there really is no way to win these games -- the crew is only out to take money, never to give any of it up. THIS IS A PEFRECT EXAMPLE OF OBAMA AND THE LEFT WING RADICAL SOCIALISTS IN CONTROL

........................................................................................

Obama is like the pea under a cup in a shell game. The state run media keeps moving the, "PEA", around to trick the American public. When America is able to beat the shell game the jig will be up and obama will be exposed as an imposter. Watch the hands of Okubo and Fukino closely and Send your request for information to: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov and chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov

I sent additional requests for information today. I send requests and get answers but not the answers I am looking for. It seems the questions must be worded like a key is cut to a specific lock. So far Hawaii does not like the "cut of the jib" of my requests. Just like a woodpecker i'll keep on trying to carve out an answer to expose the IMPOSTER obama.(Story Reports)

This original post referenced work done by terryk or misstickly. She originally seemed to be creditable but her post on 10/22/09 revealed a dark side. She as does Orly Taitz have a creditabilty problem. I will no longer refenence her work because I don't want to promote anything other than someone who is a "walking the line" when it comes to exposing obama. I see why Leo didn't want to be associated with "misstickly" any longer.