666 first jesuit pope francis

Darwin's Deadly Legacy
.........................
.............................

“IHS” The Seal of the Society of Jesus
.......................
Created by the first Jesuit General, Ignatius Loyola, wherever this Seal is openly displayed the Jesuit Order is in Control, including every Protestant Church affiliated with the evil National Council and World Council of Churches which are under the occult influence of the Black Pope’s High-Level, Shriner Freemasonry. These initials are the abbreviations for the names of the gods of the pagan Egyptian trinity, they being Isis (the Mother goddess and “Queen
of Heaven”), Horus (the deified Child) and Seb (the Father of the gods.
.......................
“As much as I had admired the German Benedictines, I admired the Jesuits more . . .the Society of Jesus was something special; the shock troop of the Catholic church. So effective an organization was it that . . .Heinrich Himmler used it as the model for his own corps of Ubermenschen [Supermen], the Schutzstaffel
[the SS, known as “the Order of the Death’s Head,” considered by Catholic Archbishop Grober of Freiburg to be the most respectable of the Nazi Party organizations], whose hand-picked members swore a special oath of loyalty to the Fuhrer as the highest rank of Jesuits [Professed of the Fourth Vow ] did to the Pope . . . These men [Professed Jesuits at the Fordham University

Vatican Assassins G. Gordon Battle Liddy, 1960

................................

“Were God to order me through the voices of my superiors to put to death, father, mother, children, brothers and sisters, I would doit with an eye as tearless, and a heart as calm, as if I were seated at the banquet of the Paschal Lamb. Affirmation of a Jesuit”

................................

American Jesuits React to News of Historic Announcement of their Brother Jesuit’s Election as Pope (The FIRST Jesuit pope.)

...............................

Vatican Assassins Book PDF 663 Pages A Must Read 666

..............................

Ignatius Loyola, 1491 – 1556 Founder and “Father” General of the Society of Jesus, 1540 – 1556

This most sinister White Gentile, Ignatius of the Basque House of Loyola, was born into the wealth and power of a noble Spanish dynasty and later became a page in the royal court of King Ferdinand II of Aragon (1479-1516) and Queen Isabella, they having formally expelled the Jewish Race from Spain in 1492. As
Satan’s great servant in beginning the Counter-Reformation, Loyola, a member of the occult and Luciferian Spanish “Alumbrados,” purposed to restore the Dark Ages in making the “infallible” Pope of his creation, herein called “ the Papal Caesar,” being continually overseen and sustained by his diabolical Order, to be the Universal Monarch of the World ruling all Nations from within King Solomon’s rebuilt Hebrew Temple on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem. The Jesuits: Their Complete History, Theodor Griesinger, (London: W. H. Allen & Co.,1903).

..............................

The Jesuits; a complete history of their open and secret proceedings from the foundation of the order to the present time (1885) Various Formats

The Jesuits; a complete history of their open and secret proceedings from the foundation of the order to the present time (1885) PDF Free PDF Download Of Book

Read The jesuits book online here. A comple history.

.....................

It was actually a Jesuit (Bernhard Stempfle) who wrote Hitlers Mein Kampf (My Struggle). Jesuits teach this Darwinian Humanism in their schools. The Nazis were founded by the Catholic Teutonic Knight's Thule Society

.....................
(Here is the evidence that roman catholics teach and believe as the muslims that you either CONVERT OR DIE!) Story Reports

“The Roman Catholics have not only the right, but it is their duty to kill heretics[evidenced] that the following law was among those promulgated [expounded] by St. Thomas [Aquinas in his Summa Theologica , II-II, Q. 11, A. 3, 4] as one of the present and unchangeable laws of the Church of Rome:


‘. . . they [heretics] deserve not only to be separated from the Church by excommunication, but also to be severed from the world by death. . . . much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death. . . . after the first and
second admonition, . . . if he [the heretic] is yet stubborn . . .[the Church]. . . by excommunicating him and separating him from the Church, delivers him
to the secular tribunal to be exterminated thereby from the world by death.’

Every heretic and Protestant is condemned to death, and every oath of allegiance to a government which is Protestant or heretic is abrogated by the [ Fourth
]Council of Lateran, held in 1215 [by the demon Pope Innocent III].”

.....................

“In Roman Catholic circles it is well known that the Black Pope is the term used for the General of the Jesuits. As the Pope is always robed in white, and the General in black, the contrast is obvious. But those Romanists who do not greatly love the Jesuits, and their number is not limited, use the term as indicating that the Black Pope rules the White Pope . . . even while the former is obligated to make, at least, a show of submission to the latter.”

M. F. Cusack, 1896 Converted Nun of Kenmare The Black Pope
....................

The purpose of the Society of Jesus(jesuits), founded by Ignatius Loyola in 1534 and formally established by Pope Paul III on September 27, 1540 with a Papal Bull titled Regimini militantis Ecclesiae (R[O]ME), is to destroy every vestige of the Lord’s Grand and Glorious Protestant Reformation begun by Martin Luther in 1517. The Jesuits call this “the Counter-Reformation.”

.........................

IUSTUM NECARE REGES IMPIOS

The meaning of which is:It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments or Rulers

........................
The jesuit code:


My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy evenamong your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a Reformer ; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among the Protestants, generally to be a Protestant; and obtaining their confidence to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the
vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among the Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all info rmation for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope. Etc, Etc

....................

Vatican Assassins Book PDF 663 Pages A Must Read 666

Morpho Trust U.S.A. collects data about CWP Holders and sends it to federal agencies!

Department of Revenue spying on Missouri CCW Holders

Department of Revenue spying on Missouri CCW Holders

Jeremy LaFaver
MO House of Representatives
201 West Capitol Avenue
Room 116A-1
Jefferson City MO 65101

Re: Missouri government officials spying on citizens and selling private information

Mr. LaFaver:

I am alarmed to learn that the Missouri Department of Revenue routinely collects information on Missouri Residents who apply for a Carry Concealled Weapon permit (CCW). In Stoddard County, the Department of Revenue Office compiles data on Missouri Citizens and sends this data to a PRIVATE COMPANY, Morpho Trust U.S.A. Morpho Trust U.S.A. collects data for agencies of the federal government.

A judge has issued a temporary restraining order to stop this practice, but only after a lawsuit was filed by a private citizen of the State of Missouri.

Mr. LaFaver, what is going on in Jefferson City? What kind of illegal and unconstitutional crap is playing out down there? Did you know about this practice? How widespread is the practice of compiling data on Missouri gunowners in our state of Missouri? How long has this been going on? Mr. LaFaver, who benefits from this practice of spying on Missouri taxpayers, constituents, and VOTERS? Finally, what are you going to do about it?

Mr. LaFaver, please look into this TRAVESTY in our state and report to us the following:

1. what is going on?
2. what is the extent of this spying behavior?
3. does anyone in Missouri government disapprove of this spying?
4. who in Missouri government approves of this spying?
5. what is being done to stop spying on our citizens?
6. how much information was given to Morpho Trust U.S.A.
7. what is being paid for this information and who is collecting the payoff?
8. where is the money?

Please take action to punish those involved in this travesty of trust and to retrieve all information leaked on Missouri Citizens. Also please compile a list of names who were reported to Morpho and the feds, and inform the victims so that they can be aware that their trust has been abused and that their PRIVACY has been violated by the State of Missouri.

Sincerely yours,

Steve Graessle
8030 Main Street
Kansas City, MO 64114

...........................

What is an IdentoGO Center?

IdentoGO Centers are locations where MorphoTrust and its partners offer electronic fingerprinting services in support of the many contracts we have with state and federal agencies, as well as many commercial businesses. Additionally, we’ve identified many new service offerings for our centers to provide added value and increased convenience to our customers.

What does my company need to become an IdentoGO Center?

Our customers include state and federal law enforcement agencies, teachers, youth sports workers and volunteers, child care workers, adoptive and foster parents, elder care and nursing home employees, insurance agents, real estate brokers, mortgage brokers, healthcare workers, security guards, airline and airport employees, concealed firearm permits, casino employees, and many others. For this reason, fingerprinting centers must maintain adequate staffing and all employees with access to fingerprint program information and equipment must pass a security assessment that includes credit, criminal, and drug screenings.

..............

Federal Agency Solutions MorphoTrust USA can help. ??

Federal Agency Solutions

As demand for services expands and budgets continue to shrink, federal agencies are being asked to do more with less. Pre-employment standards are increasingly rigorous, requiring you to deploy comprehensive, interoperable systems for managing background checks, enrollment and credentialing of government personnel. Passports and visas must meet the highest security standards, beginning with quality enrollment document authentication procedures, and resulting in physical credentials that have the most advanced anti-fraud and anti-counterfeiting features available. Agencies also need to provide faster and more efficient customer service, so that citizens who are entitled to government services and benefits receive them in a manner that is expedient and convenient.

MorphoTrust USA can help.

We are uniquely qualified to partner with federal agencies to design and implement solutions and policies for secure, reliable identity management. Our expertise is built upon decades of innovation in software development, sophisticated biometrics (finger, face, palm and iris), document authentication, data verification and secure credentialing. We are the Department of State’s exclusive provider for the U.S. Passport and Passport Cards, producing more than 12 million annually. We also provide them with two visa facial recognition systems that manage over 100 million images.

.......................

(Morpho Trust USA can't be trusted just as the federal government cannot. Morpho trust collects personal data on you and sends it to the federal government!!

Its not just concealed weapons permits, its state and federal law enforcement agencies, teachers, youth sports workers and volunteers, child care workers, adoptive and foster parents, elder care and nursing home employees, insurance agents, real estate brokers, mortgage brokers, healthcare workers, security guards, airline and airport employees, concealed firearm permits, casino employees, and many others.

Its a lie to say federal agencies are being asked to do more with less. Their budgets increase every year by law.

It would seem the federal government already has a NATIONAL GUN REGISTRY via morpho trus usa and you and I are paying for morpho to tell the feds everything about our personal business!!!) Story Reports

Obama wants to make a combat zone a gun free zone also!

(The traitor obama will bring the Bin Laden son-in-law to try him in court. Lt Behenna was charged with murder in a combat zone and givin 25 years for defending himself against a terrorist. How crazy is this!!!!) Story Reports

Bin Laden son-in-law pleads not guilty, lawmakers blast move to use civilian courts

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/08/lawmaker-bin-laden-spokesman-caught-in-jordan/#ixzz2N0C4nR5g

.........................

In April 2008, Lieutanant Behenna, U.S. Army, was a Platoon Leader deployed to Bayji, Iraq (north of Baghdad). That month he shot and killed a detainee named Ali Mansur. The shooting occurred during an unauthorized interrogation in a desert culvert, during which LT Behenna stripped Ali Mansur naked and threatened him with a pistol. LT Behenna was charged with murder, and at trial in March 2009 he claimed self-defense, asserting that Ali Mansur had thrown a piece of concrete at him and tried to grab his pistol just before the shooting. LT Behenna was convicted, by members and contrary to his pleas, of unpremeditated murder and assault consummated by a battery, and was sentenced to a dismissal, total forfeitures, and confinement for 25 years (reduced by the convening authority to 20 years, and then by the clemency and parole board to 15 years).

Two trial-level objections were reviewed by the Army CCA (which denied relief), and then by CAAF. The first objection (which was raised at trial and denied) involved part of the military judge’s instructions to the members on self-defense. The second objection involved a defense-friendly opinion held by a government blood-spatter expert (who did not testify) that wasn’t disclosed until after findings were announced, leading to a defense request for a mistrial (that was denied).

This is the only officer that has been charged with murder in a combat zone since the Global War on Terror began.

...........................

Opinion Analysis: United States v. Behenna, No. 12-0030/AR

Supreme Court debating whether to review Behenna 2nd degree murder conviction

lt behenna charged with murder in a combat zone defending himself, obama wants to make a combat zone a gun free zone!!!!!

There is an elegant solution for Medicaid patients costs

NJ volunteer physician protection act, a cure for obamacare. Every State should adopt this plan now!
.......................
Support the Volunteer Physician Protection Act THIS COULD BE THE CURE FOR OBAMACARE!!!!!!
..........
Caller's Day Made by Telling Host Something He Didn't Know About Medicaid

March 04, 2013

RUSH LIMBAUGH
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: This is Barney in Tucson. Barney, I'm glad you waited, sir. Great to have you on the program. Hi.

CALLER: Rush, there's another hidden reason why the problem with nobody having any money is gonna get much worse under this Medicaid expansion. There's an additional Trojan horse in this legislation where the government will seize as much of the estates of Medicaid recipients when they die as it takes to reimburse the government for the services it provided. And nothing's gonna be off-limits, including homes which have been in families for generations. It's not a brand-new thing. It goes back to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, and it's called estate recovery and it mandates --

RUSH: Under what auspices can they seize a home? Under what auspices can they seize a home from somebody's estate?

CALLER: They already have the provision set up, but states have not pursued it aggressively. There is an accounting procedure there where they track what benefits have gone to recipients, and a spouse is living in the house, there are provisions for them, but if it's the only asset, nobody's living there, they will be able to seize it when they die.

RUSH: Okay, hang on. I gotta take a break here. I want to explore this further with you, and I don't have time to do it right now. So be patient.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I did some quick searching here during the break; I may have a little bit on this. I want to go back here to Barney in Tucson, Arizona. You say this goes back to budget reconciliation 1993, did you say?

CALLER: Yes. That was when the original provision was put in, but it stands to be greatly expanded under Obamacare --

RUSH: Right. So --

CALLER: -- because there's a multiplier for, you know, the federal poverty level, which is going to get a great deal more individuals enrolled in Medicaid's program, but with the federal government essentially being able to do a reverse block grant of Medicaid funding, it can force the states to exhaust a state recovery before reimbursing the states for their Medicare cost. It's just another Trojan horse in here.

But if I may, Rush, there is an elegant solution for all of this that we've been pushing in Arizona.

RUSH: Elegant solution?

CALLER: Elegant.

RUSH: Elegant.

CALLER: It's a beauty. It consists of volunteer doctors treating Medicaid patients at no cost to the state in exchange for complete med-mal coverage under the state's existing policy, which it has -- all states have them for university hospitals and clinics. And there's been a model clinic in operation in New Jersey for over a decade that has taken the cost of a Medicare encounter down from 150 bucks a pop to $15.

RUSH: Really?

CALLER: And -- you bet.

RUSH: That is elegant.

CALLER: It's a beauty. Trade doctors, it's been figured that it --

RUSH: Okay. I want to go back to the government, to a state being able to seize your house --

CALLER: Yup.

RUSH: -- when you die to satisfy Medicare expenses. Now, I did some research here. Didn't have much time. It was only a three and a half minute break here at the bottom of the hour. I found a Christian Science Monitor story from 2006, and the headline: "A Flap Over Recouping Costs of Medicaid". Folks, I have to tell you, I'm ashamed to admit that I didn't know this existed. I knew it did for drug dealers.

CALLER: (laughs)

RUSH: I knew they could seize the assets of any drug dealer any -- boat, yacht, airplane, homes, whatever.

CALLER: Well, Rush, it's a rare privilege to be able to tell you something you don't already know.

RUSH: I can imagine. Probably made your day.

CALLER: (laughs)

RUSH: But here it is: " States try harder to recover their losses from providing healthcare to the poor -- even seizing homes.... In the face of soaring Medicaid" -- remember, folks, now, this is seven years old now. States try harder, "[i]n the face of soaring Medicaid costs, Tennessee and every other state are required to set up a Medicaid estate-recovery program. Many have been launched only recently, and some -- like Tennessee's -- are becoming more aggressive. Often, they target the home because it's all that's left after beneficiaries have spent their assets to pay for nursing-home care."

Now, from the article: "States base their programs" -- like what you said -- "on a 1993 federal law mandating that they recover what Medicaid spends on a beneficiary's long-term care. Congress approved the law to prevent states from forcing the sale of beneficiaries' homes while they were still living, in case their conditions improve and they can return home".

So the way I'm reading this, somebody's not living there. They're either in a convalescent home, or they die, and if nobody's in the home and the state calculates that it's gone bankrupt or gone -- not bankrupt -- if the states calculated that the amount of money they have spent treating this person has resulted in a net loss, they can try to recoup what they've spent by seizing the person's house.

CALLER: That's exactly right.

RUSH: Well, the death panels are gonna take care of this.

CALLER: Well --

RUSH: They won't be treating these people ad infinitum like --

CALLER: Well that's just means they'll be able to get their homes sooner. A lot of states have not been pursuing this aggressively and they've made provisions for individuals and surviving spouses to be able to keep the homes permanently, but the pressures put on by this legislation is likely to force states to recover costs wherever they can.

RUSH: Yeah. Exactly. And you're right, it's a Bill Clinton law, it's a budget reconciliation, 1993. It's his first year in orifice. And so, in a nutshell, I hate to tell you here, folks, but old Barney's right. States can seize houses for money they say they are still owed for their Medicaid treatment costs after somebody dies.

CALLER: -- about this solution because it's the opposite of greater government involvement. It's where doctors can connect better with patients, treat them directly at no cost to the state, it's --

RUSH: Okay, well, where does the Medicaid patient get the 150 bucks?

CALLER: They don't. The 150 was the prior cost of the Medicaid --

RUSH: Okay, whatever it cost the Medicaid patient, the government's paying that they're no longer paying because the patient's dealing directly with the doctor. Where do they get the money to pay for it?

CALLER: There is no money to pay for it because the doctors are treating these patients under this provision. We have a bill proposed, but it's not getting any traction in Arizona, called the "Arizona Volunteer Physicians Protection Act", and doctors donate four hours a week of their time in exchange for complete med-mal coverage, which can run into the six figures. So it's a great way -- for doctors --

RUSH: Wait a minute. You're talking about -- you're saying "med-mal", you're talking about malpractice. You're saying that states can exchange Medicaid charges for the state covering malpractice coverage?

CALLER: Well, actually the Medicaid charges will disappear because the Medicaid patient will now go to clinics set up by volunteer doctors at no charge, and the doctors are amply compensated for their services --

RUSH: By who? That's what I -- by who?

CALLER: The state will put these doctors under the state's existing medical malpractice coverage, which is very cheap for the state, and they have it in place for their university hospitals and clinics, and the payouts under that are minuscule. The state will -- the problem is, in Arizona, there's huge opposition from health insurance industry lobbyists.

RUSH: Well, of course there is. And of course there would be.

CALLER: But, Rush, this solution could solve Medicaid nationally.

RUSH: Well, Medicaid would become a charity run by the state, then?

CALLER: Bingo.

RUSH: That's the way your system works.

CALLER: Yep. Everybody wins. Almost everybody.

RUSH: No, everybody doesn't win.

CALLER: Nope. The insurance industry lobbyists lose. The health care administrators --

RUSH: The people that count are losing. (Laughing) The big enemies of this, the insurance companies, governments, they -- the problem here is... Look it. I don't want to be negative. I don't doubt that your program works. Here's the thing. What government, especially an Obama-type guy, what government official can allow for Medicaid to appear to be this inexpensive versus what it is now?

CALLER: Well, the fact is they're showing it in New Jersey, and they've done it for the last 11 years. It's called the Zarephath Clinic --

RUSH: The Arafat Clinic?

CALLER: -- they've been operating it for more than a decade.

RUSH: Arafat Clinic?

CALLER: Zarephath.

RUSH: Oh.

CALLER: It's with a Z. It's a tough spell. But the doctors are -- have the last name "Eck" -- E-C-K -- so if somebody Googles them, they'll find the clinic.

RUSH: Look, we've already lost 90% of the people in the audience with this. I'm just exploring in my own curiosity.

CALLER: Rush, the more you think about it, the more you're gonna realize this could solve our Medicaid problem nationally. It's the cure for Obamacare --

RUSH: Well, I'll tell you what I'm gonna do. I'll go home and think about it. I got nothing else to do to do today. I'll go home and think about this, and you may be right.

CALLER: Rush, thank you so much for all the time. I wanted to --

RUSH: Barney, it's --

CALLER: -- get on this --

RUSH: -- my pleasure.

CALLER: -- for about a year and a half.

RUSH: Well, I'm glad you made it, I'm glad you got through. By the way, his original point that he was discussing -- the seizing of your home business -- would apply even now to the states taking $300 billion from the federal government for Medicaid, they can still take your home even after taking the $300 billion from the Feds. He's calling it a Trojan horse, only because you don't know it's there. Anyway, I'm glad he got through, and I made his day: he told me something I didn't know. Let me ask you: Mr. Snerdley, now that you know this, are you glad that you've learned this? Was it worthwhile? (interruption) Says it's worthwhile, but he's not glad. Okay. I appreciate it, Barney. Thanks much.

A brief, obscene profit time-out. Just think of it, folks, as Medicaid becoming a charity as far as the doctor-patient relationship is concerned. That's what he was saying, Medicaid becomes a charity, and medical malpractice insurance fees end up being directed somehow to compensate the doctors for their charity work at no loss to the doctors, but not nearly as expensive as straight Medicaid -- Medicare.

END TRANSCRIPT

Fatherland Security Will Use 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks To Get Your Guns

Father land security could use massive killer tanks to make you a "gun free zone" if you resist.
.........................

(Knock Knock, who's there? Father land security. Father land who. Father land security, you must give us all your guns now.

Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile. Thats 54 of these killer tanks for each state.

Think of this fact alone. Why would der father land security need or want these massive assault weapons all over the US?

There is a reason. It is to DISARM Americans when they resist the state or federal government efforts to make you a "gun free zone".

The government considers you a threat if you own guns.) Story Reports

.........................

Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile

Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile

According to one estimate, since last year the Department of Homeland Security has stockpiled more than 1.6 billion bullets, mainly .40 caliber and 9mm.

DHS also purchased 2,700 Mine Resistant Armor Protected Vehicles (MRAP).

The Department of Homeland Security (through the U.S. Army Forces Command) recently retrofitted 2,717 of these ‘Mine Resistant Protected’ vehicles for service on the streets of the United States.

The new DHS sanctioned ‘Street Sweeper’ (my own slang due to the gun ports) is built by Navistar Defense (NavistarDefense.com), a division within the Navistar organization.

Barack Obama uses a relative's social security number (Harrison J. Bounel)

Supreme Court denies Obama birther eligibility case Noonan v. Bowen
.......................
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public, media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket.

Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case.

One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.

In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.

Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON.

The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.

Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.

Conclusion:

Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
....................................

Orly Taitz - an attorney for the plaintiffs - conveyed some additional allegations against the president beyond what was included in Noona's case pleadings. This week, an unidentified source has informed the California-based lawyer that the reason why Michelle Robinson Obama (a graduate of Harvard Law School) ceased to have a law license in Illinois is because she got in trouble for letting Barack Obama use a relative's social security number (Harrison J. Bounel).

The SSN 042-68-4425 is simultaneously tied to Obama and Bounel in background check systems.

The plaintiffs also protested lower-level clerks' decision to withhold the Supplemental Brief and other case pleadings from several of the Supreme Court justices. Taitz had vouched for a thorough review of the arguments to as many of the high court's judges.

Court records show that on Dec. 26, 2012, or three weeks before Obama's second inauguration, Chief Justice John Roberts reversed Justice Anthony Kennedy's rejection and ordered the case distributed for conference on Feb. 15.

However, on that day SCOTUS released its list of granted petitions and Noonan v. Bowen was not included.

Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.
........................

online petition requesting a formal investigation into the president's government IDs and SSN

The right to bear arms is a constitutional issue

..........................

10th Circuit rules that concealed carry is not a right

It is very clear, however, that the right to bear arms is a constitutional issue, so states that try to ban carry of any form are infringing. If this gentleman wanted to carry in Denver, which has asserted a "Home Rule" authority to ban open carry, and that authority has been upheld by the Colorado Supreme Court, then he would have had a very valid argument. Unable to carry openly due to the city ordinance, and unable to carry concealed due to state law, his right was truly infringed. I don't know if he needed to carry in Denver, but, whatever, that wasn't the argument he made.

Colorado Constitution Article II, Section 13

The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.

............................
Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."


The territorial jurisdiction of the Tenth Circuit includes the six states of Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah, plus those portions of the Yellowstone National Park extending into Montana and Idaho.

.........................

The U.S. Constitution and 44 States have Constitutional provisions enumerating the Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms

(Colorado has an open carry law. Their state constitution has it written in stone that concealed carry is not justified. People in Colorado do have a right to bear arms. They will be able to still bear arms in the open.

The 2nd amendment to the US Constitution gives the right to Americans to own a gun. It doesn't include a provision that you must carry it around in your home only!!! Colorado has restricted that right to open carry only.

To me the right to bear arms means concealed or open in any state.

Many states have constitution provisions for people to bear arms that the federal government can't over ride.

South Carolina is one of them.) Story Reports

South Carolina Constitution Article I, Section 20

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. As, in times of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly. The military power of the State shall always be held in subordination to the civil authority and be governed by it. No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner nor in time of war but in the manner prescribed by law.

(Its strange that the drudge report has nothing about the 10th circuit court of appeals ruling on concealed carry?? I did mean to say the 10th circus court of appeals. My advise is to go out and buy a handgun or rifle. You have the right to defend yourself against crinimals of any kind including criminals that try to take away you Constitutional right to protect yourself.) Story Reports

Congressman Jeff Duncan Encourages Magpul to Relocate to South Carolina

Magpul PMag versus a Chevy Truck
...........................

Washington, DC—Congressman Jeff Duncan has invited another firearms company to relocate to South Carolina to avoid what he describes as an “anti-gun and anti-gun owner” climate coming from some state governments. On Tuesday, Duncan wrote Magpul’s COO, Doug Smith, to invite the company to consider moving its operations to South Carolina.

Magpul Industries Corp., located in Erie Colorado, has vowed to leave the state if lawmakers pass a bill banning high-capacity magazines. Magpul was founded in 1999, and has a diverse product line ranging from sights and grips, to magazines and iphone cases. Currently, the company employs around 200 workers in their facility and over 400 suppliers and contractors.

On Monday, the Colorado House of Representatives passed the anti-gun measure, prompting Magpul to warn legislators that passage of the bill would “harm the rights of law abiding citizens, and drive jobs out of the state while doing nothing to improve public safety.”

“South Carolina would welcome Magpul with open arms,” said Rep. Duncan. “In South Carolina, we believe in the Second Amendment. We believe in free enterprise. We believe in the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Our state welcomes any individual or business who believes the same.”

Last month, Congressman Duncan sent a similar letter encouraging George Kollitides, the CEO of the parent company for Remington Arms, to consider relocating the company’s New York production facilities to South Carolina.

Members of the South Carolina business community were thrilled by the Congressman’s announcement.

Ronnie Hall, President of the Daucusville Business Association said “I appreciate Congressman Duncan’s leadership in encouraging businesses like Remington and Magpul to relocate to South Carolina. We strongly support the Second Amendment, and would welcome these respectable businesses to relocate to our state.”

................................

Congressman Jeff Duncan Letter to Magpul Industries

................................

(If you want a clip that is fool proof this is it. I suggest buying 6 or more. Obama and his fellow traitors want to ban these in the near future. Congressman Jeff Duncan gets it right. Obama and his fellow traitors will continue to do all they can to disarm Americans and leave them defenseless. I've seen them sell for 30 to 40 in SC. They are worth the cost. I'm sure Jeff Duncan owns several.) Story Reports

................................
Magpul standing firm on threat to leave Colorado if gun bill passes

Magpul standing firm on threat to leave Colorado if gun bill passes

An amendment to one of four gun bills being debated by the Colorado legislature isn't enough to keep a maker of firearms accessories in the state, top management told U.S. Rep. Cory Gardner during a tour Thursday.

Gardner, R-Yuma, and state Sen. Vicki Marble, R-Fort Collins, toured Magpul Industries Corp., watching as workers prepared and assembled ammunition magazines, firearms accessories and other products ranging from dog leashes to smartphone cases.

Magpul has threatened to leave Colorado if the legislature passes and Gov. John Hickenlooper signs gun bills that include one that would limit the capacity of ammunition magazines that can be sold and possessed in the state.

An amendment attached to that bill before it cleared the House in a floor vote this week would allow manufacturers of magazines that hold more than 15 rounds to make them in Colorado and sell them elsewhere.

But Magpul officials told Gardner, Marble and state Rep. Lori Saine — a Dacono Republican who joined the others after they had completed the Magpul plant tour — that the amendment wouldn't be enough to prompt the company to stay in this state if the bill becomes law.

Earnest T Bass defensive weapon in a gun free zone

Earnest T. Bass defending himself in a "gun free zone"

.......................................

Guns Don't Kill People, But 'Gun-Free Zones' Do.

When an owner of a property posts their property as a Gun Free Zone, they imply that they will take on the responsibility for the personal self defense of persons who enter that property.

Gun-free zones have been the most popular response to previous mass killings. But many law-enforcement officials say they are actually counterproductive. "Guns are already banned in schools. That is why the shootings happen in schools. A school is a 'helpless-victim zone,'" says Richard Mack, a former Arizona sheriff.

"Preventing any adult at a school from having access to a firearm eliminates any chance the killer can be stopped in time to prevent a rampage," Jim Kouri, the public-information officer of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, said earlier this year at the time of the Aurora, Colo., Batman-movie shooting.

Indeed, there have been many instances — from the high-school shooting by Luke Woodham in Mississippi, to the New Life Church shooting in Colorado Springs, Colo. — where a killer has been stopped after someone got a gun from a parked car or elsewhere and confronted the shooter.

Economists John Lott and William Landes conducted a groundbreaking study in 1999, and found that a common theme of mass shootings is that they occur in places where guns are banned and killers know everyone will be unarmed, such as shopping malls and schools.

The noted that the Aurora shooter, who killed 12 people earlier this year, had a choice of seven movie theaters that were showing the Batman movie he was obsessed with.

All were within a 20-minute drive of his home. The Cinemark Theater the killer ultimately chose wasn't the closest, but it was the only one that posted signs saying it banned concealed handguns carried by law-abiding individuals.

All of the other theaters allowed the approximately 4 percent of Colorado adults who have a concealed-handgun permit to enter with their weapons.

..........................................

(Its obvious a "gun free zone" is a "killing field" for any criminal. The fact that the government would leave you defenseless in a gun free zone makes them no different than the criminal who takes advantage of "gun free zones" to kill at will. The 2nd amendment gives every American the right to defend themselves against CRIMINALS!) Story Reports

Various businesses send a strong and clear message to government

The All Around Pizza and Deli shop in Virginia Beach

All Around Pizza And Deli Virgina beach, Virginia Order a pizza online.

All Around Pizza Menu
........................................
Various businesses have realized the absurdity of state and federal governments rushing to demonize virtually all gun-owners in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook tragedy, and several have used the opportunity to send a strong and clear message to legislators seeking to eviscerate the Second Amendment.

A Virginia pizza shop is doing its part to uphold the Second Amendment and private gun rights by offering discounts to patrons who present concealed carry permits or visit the eatery possessing visible firearms.

ALL COUPONS WITH THE EXPIRATION DATE OF 1/31/2013 WILL BE EXTENDED TO 3/31/2013!
According to their website, the All Around Pizza and Deli shop in Virginia Beach is offering a 15 percent discount for customers who “show us you carry openly or show us a concealed weapons permit.”

..............................

But some companies have not been as accommodating of gun rights advocates.

Internet deal giant Groupon.com canceled a Texas gun shop’s deal on concealed handgun courses.

According to Central Texas Gun Works owner Michael Cargill, after pressuring him to increase the threshold of his Groupon offer, a representative for Groupon called him back and said that their CEO had “decided to suspend all gun deals, anything having to do with guns, gun training, shooting clays, gun ranges; they suspended all gun deals.”

Cargill labeled Groupon’s actions “a direct attack on lawful gun ownership” and called for a boycott of the company, saying it is “an organization that clearly has no respect for those of us who, whether for recreation or personal protection, choose to exercise their constitutional right.”
..............................

(This is a great idea and a good way for citizens to show their support for businesses that know the 2nd amendment is the only thing keeping obama and his fellow comrads from doing anything they want with Americans. I would like to see this done on a national basis.) Story Reports

..............................

State Ammunition Regulation

Virginia law does not:

Prohibit other individuals ineligible to possess firearms under state law from possessing ammunition;

Prohibit the sale or possession of unreasonably dangerous ammunition;2

Impose a minimum age for the purchase or possession of ammunition (although federal law applies);

Require a license for the purchase or possession of ammunition; or

Require a license to sell ammunition.