A former United States Geological Survey scientist says a major quake on the West Coast is imminent

A former United States Geological Survey scientist says a major quake on the West Coast is imminent

A former United States Geological Survey scientist says a major quake on the West Coast is imminent.

Geologist: Alarming magnetic field changes signal major quake for West Coast

He's worried about the prospects of a strong quake hitting the West Coast of the US sometime during March 2011, particularly around March 19th.

The "ring of fire" that encircles the Pacific rim includes the region from Alaska south to South America. During the past several years earthquake and volcanic activity has been on the upswing all along the rim except on the northeastern perimeter.

Berkland believes that's about to change. He told as much to Cavuto: "The month of October, March, and April are the three most devastating earthquakes in terms of damage in the San Francisco Bay Area in history. And we are having on the 19th of this month not only the full moon, but within an hour the closest approach of the moon to the earth until the year 2016. The next day is the equinoctial tides. So you're bringing together three of the maximum tide raising forces. We know about the ocean tides. But there is also an Earth tide. And there is a tide in the ground water. All of these help to release sudden, built up strain, and cause earthquakes."

Recent research on the geomagnetic field and its relation to tectonic plates, earthquakes, and volcanic action tends to support his hypotheses.

Berkland says that the approaching seismic window is one of the largest in many years. He sees it developing between the 19th to the 26th of March 2011.

When asked if the quake that's coming will be another 9.0 event, Berkland admitted he just didn't know.

A former United States Geological Survey scientist says a major quake on the West Coast is imminent

(Maybe the mayan's knew something after all.)

Nuclear pressure water reactors are safe but the environmental crazies will continue to spew their lies about nuclear reactors as if the US was Japan

Boiling water reactor

Japan uses boiling water reactors.

The BWR was developed by the Idaho National Laboratory and General Electric in the mid-1950s. The main present manufacturer is GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, which specializes in the design and construction of this type of reactor.

The BWR uses demineralized water as a coolant and neutron moderator. Heat is produced by nuclear fission in the reactor core, and this causes the cooling water to boil, producing steam. The steam is directly used to drive a turbine, after which it is cooled in a condenser and converted back to liquid water. This water is then returned to the reactor core, completing the loop. The cooling water is maintained at about 75 atm (7.6 MPa, 1000–1100 psi) so that it boils in the core at about 285 °C (550 °F). In comparison, there is no significant boiling allowed in a PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) because of the high pressure maintained in its primary loop—approximately 158 atm (16 MPa, 2300 psi).

A boiling water reactor, by contrast, has only one coolant loop.

.........................................................................................
Pressurized water reactor

Pressurized water reactor

The US uses Pressurized water reactors


Two things are characteristic for the pressurized water reactor (PWR) when compared with other reactor types: coolant loop separation from the steam system and pressure inside the primary coolant loop. In a PWR, there are two separate coolant loops (primary and secondary), which are both filled with demineralized/deionized water.

The transfer of heat is accomplished without mixing the two fluids, which is desirable since the primary coolant might become radioactive.

Pressurized water reactors (PWRs) constitute a majority of all western nuclear power plants and are one of two types of light water reactor (LWR), the other type being boiling water reactors (BWRs). In a PWR the primary coolant (water) is pumped under high pressure to the reactor core where it is heated by the energy generated by the fission of atoms. The heated water then flows to a steam generator where it transfers its thermal energy to a secondary system where steam is generated and flows to turbines which, in turn, spins an electric generator. In contrast to a boiling water reactor, pressure in the primary coolant loop prevents the water from boiling within the reactor.

Several hundred PWRs are used for marine propulsion in aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and ice breakers. In the US, they were originally designed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for use as a nuclear submarine power plant.

Two things are characteristic for the pressurized water reactor (PWR) when compared with other reactor types: coolant loop separation from the steam system and pressure inside the primary coolant loop. In a PWR, there are two separate coolant loops (primary and secondary), which are both filled with demineralized/deionized water.

(After you read this information about the pwr reactors used in the US and bwr reactors used in Japan it becomes obvious that boiling water reactors are not as safe as the pwr reactors used in the US.

You would think Japan would have constructed reactors that had two coolant loops and could be controlled better like the pressure water reactors in the US. Also you would think that Japan, knowing that a major fault line was near the coast of Japan, would have built their reactors at least a few miles inland and not right on the coast where a tsunami could easily cause a reactor to fail. The island of Japan is one big fault from top to bottom.

All the green nuts will be yelling about the threat of nuclear reactors which is a lie in the US.

Nuclear pressure water reactors are very safe but the environ-mental crazies will continue to spew their lies about nuclear reactors as if the US was Japan.) Story Reports

This is an interesting story about a woman who chose not to continue to be a drunk

This is an interesting story about a woman who chose not to continue to be a drunk.

Wind Turbine Death Rates Vs Nuclear Energy Death Rates

Wind Turbine Death Rates Vs Nuclear Energy Death Rates

Wind Turbines

Number of accidents: 966 From 1980 Until Dec 2010

Fatal accidents 67

Summary of Wind Turbine Accident data to 31 December 2010


Nuclear Reactors

In the USA From Jan 61 Until Mar 2011

Fatal accidents 3 In 1961 Explosion at SL-1, National Reactor Testing Station.


99 accidents at nuclear power plants from 1952 to 2009

In the last 50 years there has only been 3 deaths from a nuclear reactor and that was from a reactor that was in the development stage of testing. There has been NONE since then.

Compare that information with the wind mill/turbine death rate.

Nuclear power plant accidents

The environ-mantal waco's want you to think windmills/turbines are safer and can generate power at a rate that can compete with nuclear power.

The truth is turbines are very noisy, kill birds, and are not environ-mentally friendly.

Obama is a liar. Recently a nuclear project was halted because the government was going to charge an 11% interest rate to some propective business people to build a nuclear plant.

Normally only 1 or 2 percent is charged as interest.

This killed the nuclear plant from being built yet obama tells you he wants to build nuclear plants.

Obama will kill the nuclear option one way or another and tell you he is going to ensure nuclear energy plants are the future.

Its the same with his birth certificate. He tells you he has one but can't produce any validating evidence that he is a US citizen.

He says he can't go around with his birth certificate planted on his forehead.

He can't because he doesn't have one that anyone in the US can validate as his.

Obama was illegitimate from the day he was born

Contained in petition to the supreme court the pleadings noted that if Obama is not constitutionally eligible, it will create a crisis.

"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," stated the pleading.

"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.

"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it said.

(I agree. Every command, appointment, and signature on every law passed while obama occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office.

The entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue.

Obama not only knows he is not constitutional eligible to be president, he knows he can't provide ANY valid documentation to validate his US citizenship.

The online colb is an obvious fraud and has been proven to be so.

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

The question is why would obama and his "people" fake an online colb?

(1) If obama applied for a late birth certificate and it was never validated by the state of Hawaii because the online colb indicates "filed with registrar' which means it was filed with a local Hawaiian registrar only and never validated/accepted by the state registrar.

It was never accepted by the state registrar, if it was it would have a stamp with the state registrar's signature.

The online colb obama's people indicate is his has NO stamp with the state registrar's signature. This alone invalidates the fake online colb.

The online colb obama's people claim is his also has NO raised Hawaii state seal proving it was issued by the state of Hawaii. This alone invalidates the fake online colb also.

(2) Obama's people have presented an online colb that has been altered and is therefore invalid and worthless.

It says at the bottom of the online colb, "any alterations INVALIDATE this certificate".

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

(3) If all the information was valid on the online colb, it is information that can't be verified.

It has no hospital, doctor or signatures of doctor and parents.

The information indicated on obama's online colb is a DEAD END that can't be validated as real.

Everything about the online colb is bogus and a deception.

Everything about obama also is bogus and deceiving.

Obama was illegitimate from the day he was born.

Obama colb is just a picture of a printout

Obama colb is just a picture of a printout

Obama colb is just a picture of a printout

Pamela Geller

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

There are two obvious scenarios used to create the image that can be ascertained from evidence. Either a real COLB was scanned into Photoshop and digitally edited or a real COLB was first scanned to obtain the graphic layout then blanked by soaking the document in solvent to remove the toner. After rescanning the blank page to a separate image the graphics from the previously obtained scan could then be easily applied to the blank scan after some editing and rebuilding. It would also explain why date stamp bleeds through the paper and the various bits of toner located around the image as well as the remnants of the previous location of a security border.

Obama's birth certificate is a forgery.
.......................................................................................

A form is always going to be filed with the local registrar before it is going to be accpeted by the State Registrar.

Janice Okubo said that the designation “date filed” or “date accepted” was not an important one.

It is very important. Janice Okubo lied.

My best guess is obama and his fellow deceivers forged a certificate of live birth because the information obama had on file could not be made public or there was no information on file so obama forged an online colb.

Date filed indicates the date information was filed with a local Hawaiian registrar.

Date accepted indicates the date it was accepted by the Hawaiian state registrar.

Big difference.

Obama has no document that has been accepted by the state registrar.

He only has a forged online colb.

Dr. Conspiracy

Samples with issuance dates.

September 5, 1991 – “Peter Boy” – “Date received by local registrar”

Sept 9, 2002 – Patricia Decosta – “Date accepted by State Registrar”

June 6, 2007 – Obama – “Date filed by registrar”

Janice Okubo said that the designation “date filed” or “date accepted” was not an important one. From that, we may reasonably conclude that it is not stored in the database at all; it is a constant value on every certificate printed during a particular era. On the 1991 “Peter Boy” certificate (issued 2 months before Hawaii switched to the COLB) we see that the certificate says “Date Received by Local Registrar”, and that is most certainly a constant value, and probably is the most historically accurate statement of what is in the database date field (it makes sense that if they are only going to display one date, it’s the earliest one).

(Of course all this talk about date filed and date accepted means nothing because the online colb was forged and is a fake. Obama has presented nothing to the world to validate his US citizenship.

This is the bottom line. A fake online colb proves nothing except that obama is a hoax.) Story reports


Date filed or date accepted It doesn't matter because the online colb obama has never claimed was forged.

The continuing battle to enforce the rules of political correctness

It's simply politically incorrect to be a "birther."

It's simply politically incorrect to force presidential candidates to prove their eligibility for office.

WND

It's simply politically incorrect to question why the political system broke down in 2008, leaving most Americans deeply suspicious that the man in the White House does not meet the simple requirements of office.

It doesn't take any courage to malign the reputations of good people who look at the facts and come to the logical conclusion that Barack Obama is hiding something.

But because of the vicious rules of engagement of political correctness, it does indeed take courage and conviction to stand up to this onslaught

There seems to be an unwritten rule among Republican presidential candidates and leaders to downplay the significance of the issue of constitutional eligibility – with Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, House Speaker John Boehner and others distancing themselves from a concern held by a significant majority of Americans and an overwhelming percentage of Republicans.

The local, state and national media are running scared now – in full attack mode on state legislators across the country who have the audacity to insist that future presidential elections conducted in their states should actually live up to constitutional qualifications for office.

They insist all questions have been answered, that we've all seen the actual birth certificate, that Barack Obama's life is an open book.

But now that the integrity of the Constitution has rightfully become a state issue, because of the abject failure of all controlling legal authorities at the federal level, media at the state and local level are jumping into the act, attempting to enforce acceptance of Obama's story on an unwilling public through the sheer tyranny of "political correctness."

(Let me add that there is, as Rush Limbaugh points out daily, a concerted effort by politically correct people to cover for obama and the fact he can't provide any documented proof he is a US citizen, that can be validated. The fact that on the front of his "birth certificate" states "filed with registrar" instead of "accepted by state registrar" is proof positive the colb posted on the web is not a valid birth certificate.

Obama has ONLY applied for an amended or late birth certificate and Hawaii has issued nothing to him or his campaign. Hawaii does not issue certifications of live birth that do not have a registrar's stamp/signature and raised state seal.

Obama and his campaign have forged the online colb and it is totally fake.) Story Reports

An application for a late birth certificate that has not been accepted by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'

Nne aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, "Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?" It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for obliterating it.

Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’. Hawaii doesn't issue any 'certification of live birth certificates' that indicate ‘Date Filed by Registrar’.

The story really does begin here.

Two terms have plagued the Obama birth certificate issue from the beginning and have fueled many questions about Obama’s posted alleged ‘certified copy’ of a ‘Certification of Live Birth.’ For example, what do they mean in terms of the legal veracity behind a copy of a birth certificate? What is the difference between the “Registrar” and the “State Registrar?”

When would it be important that a record states whether or not it has been accepted by the State Registrar? Obama’s alleged ‘Certification of Live Birth’ shows only the ‘Date Filed by Registrar’ as opposed to the ‘Date Accepted by State Registrar,’ that’s why many people, including myself, have been curious whether that matters.

By now, I am sure most of us are aware that Alvin T. Onaka is the ‘State Registrar’ in Hawaii, but who is the ‘Registrar’ to which Obama’s alleged COLB refers?

The difference in these terms is crucial.

It is not a “valid” record until it has been accepted and filed by the ‘State Registrar.’ Furthermore, the ‘State Registrar’s’ certification attests to the evidentiary value of ‘Date of Birth,’ ‘Parentage’ and ‘Place of Birth.’ So, until the ‘State Registrar’ accepts and takes custody of the record, it is only a non-valid ‘application’ for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ in procedural limbo, so to speak, and in the custody of the ‘Registrar.’

(The certification of live birth the DNC and obama used to prove his US citizenship is only a non-valid ‘application’ for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ because it is not a "valid" record that has been accepted and filed by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'.

Obama has presented to the world a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ in procedural limbo that is in the custody of the 'registrar'.

Until it has been accepted for filing by the ‘State Registrar:’ is is ONLY a non-valid 'application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’.

This is the so called "vital records" on file in the state of Hawaii.

An application for a late birth certificate that has not been accepted by the 'state registrar of Hawaii'.) Story Reports

On October 31, 2008 – five days before the 2008 Presidential election – Dr. Fukino put out a press release and according to Factcheck.org, she was quoted as stating that both she and “Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate.” We all know that Onaka is the ‘State Registrar,’ so that settles it – Hawaii’s ‘State Registrar’ must have custody of the record, right?

Besides, many gorgeous news organizations apparently reported the same thing. So, they all must be correct, right? And, we’ve all seen Dr. Fukino’s statement, by now, and that’s what she said, right? Dr. Fukino said that the State Registrar had verified with her that the HDOH had Obama’s original birth certificate on record and that he, as State Registrar, had the statutory authority to maintain and oversee the record – so he is the custodian of that record and the record is valid and official, right?

Right?

RIGHT?

Nope.

Believe it or not, on October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino actually stated that THIS individual had “statutory authority” to maintain and oversee Obama’s “original birth certificate,” and that this individual was THE legal custodian of Obama’s “original birth certificate” just FIVE days before the 2008 U.S. Presidential election:...

Obama's Garden dedicated to digging up the truth about obama's true origin

Dr. Fukino stated, this person, had it on record “in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

Not in accordance with regulations. Not in accordance with law:

That’s right. Incredibly, just five days before the election, Obama’s “original birth certificate” was NOT “valid” or in the custody of the ‘State Registrar,’ Dr. Fukino, herself, said it was in the custody of the “Registrar.”

And if the “Registrar” had custody of the record, Alvin T. Onaka would not and could not certify a copy of it with his signature.

So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar….or perhaps he had a record that had been rejected by the State Registrar entirely.

And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”

The Hawaii State Registrar did not have the legal authority to maintain and oversee Obama’s original birth certificate just five days before the presidential election.

Barrack Obama did not have the valid original birth certificate that he and ‘his people’ have claimed he had and Dr. Fukino said so.

It means that Dr. Fukino said Barrack Obama, his people, our Congress and the media are all LIARS.

So, thank you, Dr. Fukino, for speaking up – twice. Thank you for not letting this go unsaid and thank you for putting it on the public record so that we can prove our Congress failed us so completely…if only in hindsight.

The nation owes you much gratitude for giving us a chance to open our eyes before the election even if most of us missed it.

(I had noticed the online fake certification of live birth indicated date filed by registrar and also noticed it did not indicate date accepted by registrar.

You have made it clear now that the online colb is just an application for a delayed birth certificate that was not accepted before the DNC declared obama was a US citizen/natural born citizen to get him on the presidential ballot in Hawaii in 2008.

An application for a birth certificate is not legal evidence of birth in the US.

This is why obama hides his true identity and spends millions in court to keep his origin from being probated.

Thank you for your excellent work Miss Tickly!) Story Reports

The Story of the Century

Compare a real certification of live birth with obama's fake certification of live birth

How to make a dummy

Dummies are often made to look like small boys and feature a limp body with a fully articulated head.

Making ventriloquist dummies is a complex art, requiring a good deal of skill. The internal structure of the dummy's head is made up of a network of wires and pulleys. These are manipulated by the ventriloquist to bring the dummy to life, moving his eyes, eyebrows, jaw, and sometimes even ears or tongue. If you already are familiar with the construction of plastic, resin, or papier-mâché dummies, however, making a wooden dummy isn't all that difficult.

Instructions

Draw patterns for the dummy's head. You will need both profile and full-face patterns for best results. Draw large rectangles over the profile pattern to determine the size and position of the wood blocks from which you'll carve the head. The head will need to be made of four main blocks---the face, the forward-middle head, the rear-middle head, and the back of the head---as well as a small block for the nose.

Cut wood blocks to the sizes you have determined and glue them together in the positions marked on your pattern. Rather than gluing the wood pieces directly to each other, put a piece of paper between the wood at each connection: This will allow you to take the head apart later. Only the nose should be glued normally, at this point, since you won't have to remove it later. Trace the patterns onto the rough block-head with carbon paper placed under your drawing.

Carve the rough shape of the head with the gouges, removing large chunks of wood until the dummy's head is nearly down to the size desired. Use the bench knife to add detail and finish the carving process. Smooth the head with sandpaper until it looks exactly as you want it.

Break the pieces of the head apart with a chisel and use the gouges to hollow out the inside for the dummy's mechanism. Do this very carefully; you want to make the cavity as large as possible without accidentally puncturing the wall of the head. The head should be approximately half an inch thick at all points.

Cut the dummy's jaw out with the scroll saw so that it can freely articulate. Cut holes for the eyes. You may need to cut other apertures as well, depending on what you want the dummy to be able to do. Install the internal mechanism of the head and connect everything so that the dummy's face is fully functional. Glue the head together, paint it if desired, and give it a coat of varnish.

Finish the dummy. Carve a torso from a large block of wood to hide your hand while operating it and to give the body some definition. Since this will be covered by the dummy's clothes, it needn't be nearly as detailed as the head. Simply give it a chest cavity and shoulders. Sew clothes, add a wig, and make stuffed cloth hands and arms for the dummy.

(Observing the above finished "dummy" it seems it is self manipulated because letterman's hand is not completely hidden.) Story Reports

7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES"

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs

7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF "IN THE UNITED STATES"

c. Birth on U.S. Military Base Outside of the United States or Birth on U.S. Embassy or Consulate Premises Abroad:

(1) Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not born in the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.

7 FAM 1112 WHAT IS BIRTH “IN THE UNITED STATES”?

a. INA 101(a)(38) (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(38)) provides that “the term ‘United States,’ when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.”

Outside of the country – the status of the land upon which a military base is located is governed by international treaty, law and what are known as Status of Forces agreements.

The citizenship acquired by birth on a military installation or consular facility is through the US Citizenship status of the parents. Also, any births to US citizen overseas must be registered with the consulate or authority on the base.

"U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment."

A parent can only pass citizenship onto a child born on foreign soil if the parent in question has been a resident of the usa for at least ten years with those ten years not beginning before the age of sixteen.

(This means people born on military bases overseas are not considered born in the US. The citizenship of the parents determines the citizenship of person born on a US military base. Here it is in black and white.) Story Reports

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7 - Consular Affairs