While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.
OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT
SLIPSLIDIN
While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN. OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE COULD BE WAR
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States in the UN On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments.
These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.
Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress.
We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
This has happened in other countries, past and present! THIS IS NOT A JOKE OR A FALSE WARNING.
As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.
Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters)
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."
(This is a traitor representing the US. Hillary clinton is operating under obama's orders to "operate under the rules of consensus decision-making." A community organizer's way of saying if everyone in the UN agrees to disarm America it will be a valid excuse to DISARM Americans. There is a growing consensus in America our government under the control of obama is the ENEMY WITHIN that Americans must defend themselves against. This is just more proof positve that obama and his socialaist/communist comrades are preparing us for a dictatorship. Lock and load America obama is trying to disarm you.) Story Reports
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Janet Napolitano officially requested that the Russian Federation contribute 4 brigades of Advanced Security Forces Sep 14, 2009

Russian un troops confirmed
(Obama has been quoted as saying he is going to "kick ass" and BO is not just talking about BP he is also planning to "kick ass" to any American who resists his dictator takover.) Story Reports
While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.
Retired flag officer of the US Army
"In my hands was a letter from Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Janet Napolitano officially requesting that the Russian Federation contribute 4 brigades of “Advanced Security Forces” as part of a larger multinational force to assist in quelling domestic violence within the United States of America. The letter was dated September 14, 2009 and signed by Secretary Napolitano."
Lt. Gen. Steven Blum Deputy commander NORTHCOM’s request for 3 – 4 Brigades of Russian troops pursuint to an agreement between the US and Russia.
...........................................................................................
The Intel Hub
Confirmed: Russian & Foreign Troops Ordered IntoU.S.
Intel Hub – Once again, a story that we broke has been confirmed. The Intel Hub has broke some of the most valuable Intel out there to date. We broke this information almost a full week ago. It has now been confirmed through multiple sources. The Intel Hub does not post anything that isn’t well researched and these revelations have proved that once again. We have contacts embedded within many factions of the government and military. The Intel we have now suggests this situation will get far more sinister over the coming weeks. Please check out our shows and website at www.TheIntelHub.com.
Patriot Resistance
PatriotResistance.com
Recent numerous reports have been circulated in various web sites and blogs about two seemingly major unusual events taking place in the U.S.
The First event involved extremely large and unusual numbers of National Guard Units in various states being called up for drills or exercises potentially for upcoming deployments. Many have speculated that these are unusual call ups because of the sheer numbers being engaged and the so-called secrecy behind them.
Many people have commented that they are simply being activated in preparation for deployments to Iraq this summer, but one ‘CONFIRMED’ report involved the Minnesota 1st Brigade Combat Team and marks the largest deployment of Minnesota military forces since World War II. This alone is highly suspicious.
The More disturbing INTEL that has hit the wire in the past couple of days is the report of large numbers of foreign troops arriving at a large naval base in San Diego, California. This report came at dusk on Wednesday May 19, 2010.
U.S. Navy vessels were spotted unloading extremely large numbers of UN and Russian troops and Equipment. They disembarked the vessels as it was still light out in plain sight. Mostly Russian troops.
Up until recently this was not confirmed, but merely rumor of a report from an undisclosed military source. Kudos to the Intel Hub!
AS OF TONIGHT MAY 24, 2010……..We here at SENTINEL COMMAND have been able to actually CONFIRM this report to be true, by means of an On-The-Ground
This is extremely important INTEL because there have been reports that U.S. Secretary Napolitano had previously requested 3 to 4 brigades of troops from the Russian government to specifically assist in the quelling of domestic civil unrest by U.S. Citizens. This was done by the Obama Administration
The arrival of these troops obviously confirms this earlier rumor, otherwise they would not be here at this particular time. Although there doesn’t appear to be any ‘immediate’ threat …….this highly unusual event does cause extreme alarm and should have us all on our toes and looking for signs that something is going to happen and happen soon.
Battle Flag
Intel Hub – As of the evening of Wednesday May 19, 2010 at dusk; an on duty undisclosed military source was in a meeting in or around 32nd street Naval Base in San Diego, CA. They heard rumbling of big ships and went to see what was going on. Navy vessels were spotted unloading many UN and Russian troops. They disembarked the vessels as it was still light out in plain sight. Mostly Russian troops. We will be providing coverage as we get it.
Russian Un Troops Confirmed
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Reparations And Redistribution
(Obama is offering deeds in the form of obamacare and the stimulus bills. He is taking money not only out of white Americans pockets but black Americans pockets. Obamacare and the stimulus bills include provisions for taxing Americans for everything under the sun. Obama is fleecing ALL Americans not just those that obama feels should be held accountable for "tragic elements in our histoy". Personally I believe obama should pay "reparations" to Americans in the form of turning himself in and confessing his crimminal activities.) Story Reports
Reparations And Redistribution
Speaking to a gathering of minority journalists in Chicago, Obama said, "I personally would want to see our tragic history, or the tragic elements of our history, acknowledged."
"I consistently believe that when it comes to whether it's Native Americans or African-American issues or reparations, the most important thing for the U.S. government to do is not just offer words, but offer deeds."
From The Obama File
It seems to be something of an endorsement of the idea of "reparations for slavery," which is usually taken to mean cash payments. In this view, the following deeds are insufficient to balance the ledger between America and the descendants of slaves: the Civil War, the ratification of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, Brown v. Board of Education, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the continuing practice of racial preferences.
This is the first direct quote I've seen where Obama clearly endorses reparations.
.........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio represents the old chrysler dealers that the thug obama robbed
Here is a past example of how the thug obama operates.
A leading bankruptcy attorney representing hedge funds and money managers told ABC News Saturday that Steve Rattner, the leader of the Obama administration’s Auto Industry Task Force, threatened one of the firms, an investment bank, that if it continued to oppose the administration’s Chrysler bankruptcy plan, the White House would use the White House press corps to destroy its reputation.
The White House and a spokesperson for the investment bank in question challenged the accuracy of the story.
“The charge is completely untrue,” said White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton, “and there’s obviously no evidence to suggest that this happened in any way.”
Thomas Lauria, Global Practice Head of the Financial Restructuring and Insolvency Group at White & Case, told ABC News that Rattner suggested to an official of the boutique investment bank Perella Weinberg Partners that officials of the Obama White House would embarrass the firm for opposing the Obama administration plan, which President Obama announced Thursday, and which requires creditors to accept roughly 29 cents on the dollar for an estimated $6.8 billion owed by Chrysler.
Lauria first told the story, without naming Rattner, to Frank Beckmann on Detroit’s WJR-AM radio.
Perella Weinberg Partners, Lauria said, “was directly threatened by the White House and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under the threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. That’s how hard it is to stand on this side of the fence.”
A Perella Weinberg Partners spokesperson told ABC News on Sunday that “The firm denies Mr. Lauria’s account of events.”* The spokesperson would not elaborate.
Perella Weinberg Partners, which owned Chrysler debt through its Xerion Fund, was one of Lauria’s clients in this bankruptcy, but no longer is. The firm is led by Joseph Perella. On Thursday afternoon — after the Wedneday deadline — the portfolio manager for the Xerion fund decided to join the larger four creditors who are owed roughly 70% of Chrysler’s debt and had already agreed to participate with the administration’s plan.
Those four financial institutions - JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs — are recipients of up to $100 billion in federal government bailout funds, though the Obama administration insists the matters were kept completely separate.
Someone familiar with the Perella Weinberg Partners’ portfolio manager’s thinking told ABC News that the decision to go along with the government plan “was based on an assessment of investment risk and reward and nothing else.”
Lauria said his clients “are mainly fiduciaries for pension plans, college endowments, retirement plans and credit unions who invested in low yield supposedly very secure first lien debt” with Chrysler.
President Obama singled out Lauria’s clients for criticism when he announced the Chrysler plan on Thursday.
“While many stakeholders made sacrifices and worked constructively, I have to tell you some did not,” the president said. “In particular, a group of investment firms and hedge funds decided to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout. They were hoping that everybody else would make sacrifices, and they would have to make none.”
Lauria said the president’s assertion that his clients weren’t willing to make any sacrifice is false. The clients were willing to take 50 cents on the dollar from Chrysler for their debt, he said.
President Obama also said of Lauria’s clients, “I don’t stand with them. I stand with Chrysler’s employees and their families and communities. I stand with Chrysler’s management, its dealers, and its suppliers. I stand with the millions of Americans who own and want to buy Chrysler cars. I don’t stand with those who held out when everybody else is making sacrifices.”
“He stands my clients up as basically the reason Chrysler is going into bankruptcy,” Lauria said. “He wrongly says they’re not willing to make any sacrifice. And then he says he does not stand with us.”
Lauria said the president saying he doesn’t stand with his clients “kind of sounds like ‘You’re fair game.’ In whatever sense. People are scared. They have gotten death treats. Some have been told people are going to come to their houses. God forbid if some nut did something, I’m just wondering how the president would feel.”
The Miami area-based attorney describes himself as an independent, and says after waiting in line for six hours last November he ended up not voting in the presidential election. He donated $10,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2008 and $1,000 to then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, in 2006.
Reparations And Redistribution
Speaking to a gathering of minority journalists in Chicago, Obama said, "I personally would want to see our tragic history, or the tragic elements of our history, acknowledged."
"I consistently believe that when it comes to whether it's Native Americans or African-American issues or reparations, the most important thing for the U.S. government to do is not just offer words, but offer deeds."
From The Obama File
It seems to be something of an endorsement of the idea of "reparations for slavery," which is usually taken to mean cash payments. In this view, the following deeds are insufficient to balance the ledger between America and the descendants of slaves: the Civil War, the ratification of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, Brown v. Board of Education, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the continuing practice of racial preferences.
This is the first direct quote I've seen where Obama clearly endorses reparations.
.........................................................................................
Leo Donofrio represents the old chrysler dealers that the thug obama robbed
Here is a past example of how the thug obama operates.
A leading bankruptcy attorney representing hedge funds and money managers told ABC News Saturday that Steve Rattner, the leader of the Obama administration’s Auto Industry Task Force, threatened one of the firms, an investment bank, that if it continued to oppose the administration’s Chrysler bankruptcy plan, the White House would use the White House press corps to destroy its reputation.
The White House and a spokesperson for the investment bank in question challenged the accuracy of the story.
“The charge is completely untrue,” said White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton, “and there’s obviously no evidence to suggest that this happened in any way.”
Thomas Lauria, Global Practice Head of the Financial Restructuring and Insolvency Group at White & Case, told ABC News that Rattner suggested to an official of the boutique investment bank Perella Weinberg Partners that officials of the Obama White House would embarrass the firm for opposing the Obama administration plan, which President Obama announced Thursday, and which requires creditors to accept roughly 29 cents on the dollar for an estimated $6.8 billion owed by Chrysler.
Lauria first told the story, without naming Rattner, to Frank Beckmann on Detroit’s WJR-AM radio.
Perella Weinberg Partners, Lauria said, “was directly threatened by the White House and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under the threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. That’s how hard it is to stand on this side of the fence.”
A Perella Weinberg Partners spokesperson told ABC News on Sunday that “The firm denies Mr. Lauria’s account of events.”* The spokesperson would not elaborate.
Perella Weinberg Partners, which owned Chrysler debt through its Xerion Fund, was one of Lauria’s clients in this bankruptcy, but no longer is. The firm is led by Joseph Perella. On Thursday afternoon — after the Wedneday deadline — the portfolio manager for the Xerion fund decided to join the larger four creditors who are owed roughly 70% of Chrysler’s debt and had already agreed to participate with the administration’s plan.
Those four financial institutions - JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs — are recipients of up to $100 billion in federal government bailout funds, though the Obama administration insists the matters were kept completely separate.
Someone familiar with the Perella Weinberg Partners’ portfolio manager’s thinking told ABC News that the decision to go along with the government plan “was based on an assessment of investment risk and reward and nothing else.”
Lauria said his clients “are mainly fiduciaries for pension plans, college endowments, retirement plans and credit unions who invested in low yield supposedly very secure first lien debt” with Chrysler.
President Obama singled out Lauria’s clients for criticism when he announced the Chrysler plan on Thursday.
“While many stakeholders made sacrifices and worked constructively, I have to tell you some did not,” the president said. “In particular, a group of investment firms and hedge funds decided to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout. They were hoping that everybody else would make sacrifices, and they would have to make none.”
Lauria said the president’s assertion that his clients weren’t willing to make any sacrifice is false. The clients were willing to take 50 cents on the dollar from Chrysler for their debt, he said.
President Obama also said of Lauria’s clients, “I don’t stand with them. I stand with Chrysler’s employees and their families and communities. I stand with Chrysler’s management, its dealers, and its suppliers. I stand with the millions of Americans who own and want to buy Chrysler cars. I don’t stand with those who held out when everybody else is making sacrifices.”
“He stands my clients up as basically the reason Chrysler is going into bankruptcy,” Lauria said. “He wrongly says they’re not willing to make any sacrifice. And then he says he does not stand with us.”
Lauria said the president saying he doesn’t stand with his clients “kind of sounds like ‘You’re fair game.’ In whatever sense. People are scared. They have gotten death treats. Some have been told people are going to come to their houses. God forbid if some nut did something, I’m just wondering how the president would feel.”
The Miami area-based attorney describes himself as an independent, and says after waiting in line for six hours last November he ended up not voting in the presidential election. He donated $10,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2008 and $1,000 to then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, in 2006.
Why do Obama, BP refuse to use most effective method of oil cleanup?
(This is an interesting article. It is more evidence obama is destroying the economy on purpose. Obama is a FRAUD. He is a traitor. Obama has and will do anything a common thug would do. Don't you think its strange the oil pipe has not been plugged yet? Don't you find it strange obama was slow to act and when he did as the article below explains it was not the correct course of action. All this was done on purpose. Its not because obama is stupid. Obama is hell bent on doing everything in his power to take American's freedoms away. Obama will push bills through congress to take away more of our freedoms. He is a destroyer.) Story Reports
The Liberty Sphere
Conservative Examiner
Anthony G. Martin
Why do Obama, BP refuse to use most effective method of oil cleanup?
As the Gulf oil disaster closes in on the 50-day mark, the Obama Administration and BP refuse to use the most effective method of oil cleanup. The top oil barons of the world--the Saudis--have used this method to avoid a mammoth oil disaster.
And the result was swift, effective, and conclusive.
In 1993 and '94 the Saudis faced an oil spill of historic proportions in the Arabian Gulf as four leaking tankers and two oil gushers threatened to spur a catastrophic event that was 65 times worse than the Exxon-Valdez spill.
An American engineer, Nick Pozzi, was part of a task force charged with developing a solution to the looming disaster.
Pozzi had used various methods to clean up oil spills prior to this event. However, the time was short, and an effective solution was needed post-haste.
That's when Pozzi decided that the huge, empty oil tankers, sitting in the dock, could be used to simply vacuum up the oil right off of the top of the water.
The result was that 85% of the oil was recovered.
Pozzi believes that the tanker method is the fastest and most effective way of dealing with the Gulf Oil disaster, but no one in the Obama Administration or BP is willing to consider the idea. Instead, they have insisted on using untested techniques, one of which involves the use of chemical dispersants manufactured and sold by a company in which Obama cronies, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Hathaway-Berkshire, and BP, are heavily invested.
That company, NALCO, is also one of the so-called 'green' industries that Obama and the Leftwing favor due to its development of water purification systems.
In an interview with Esquire, Pozzi stated the following:
NICK POZZI: Keep in mind that what supertankers typically do is they sit in the middle of the ocean waiting for all the traders to come up with the right price. When they feel that the price is right, the tankers that are full, they take off, and they can be anywhere in the world in a few days. Right now there are probably 25 supertankers, waiting for orders, full of oil. So all they got to do is come to Texas, in the Gulf, unload the oil, and then turn around and suck up all this other stuff and pump it onto shore into on-shore storage. It's not rocket science. It's so simple. It's a Robinson Crusoe fix, but it works.
However, Esquire also reported that nearly FIFTY (50) super-tankers were sitting empty and ready to go, and on the cheap.
The Obama Administration and BP have totally ignored them.
In fact, BP has curiously skirted around the super-tanker solution when asked about it by reporters.
Esquire has clear evidence showing that the government has flat-out ignored or refused to consider the super-tanker method, in spite of its track-record of resounding success. Both Obama and the Coast Guard have been dragging their feet on this solution, although they have been made aware of it repeatedly.
Why?
Even Obama cheerleaders such as Chris Matthews are questioning the President's refusal to act, particularly in light of the fact that former Shell Oil executive John Hofmeister has insisted in numerous interviews that the super-tanker method should have been utilized at the very start.
It is also clear that BP and the Obama Administration could have not only used government equipment in the effort but recruited the help of all of the various oil companies. BP, obviously, could not handle the severity of this catastrophe alone. Yet it refused to request the help of other oil companies, refused to use the super-tankers to vacuum up the oil, and seemed to collude with Barack Obama to drag its feet on a real cleanup in lieu of testing out the chemical dispersants peddled by a company with dubious ties.
And it must not be overlooked that BP is much more than an oil company. The corporation is heavily invested in developing so-called 'green technology' that will supposedly replace the need for oil.
Increasingly it is beginning to appear that the Obama Administration and BP together deliberately closed their eyes, ears, and brains to fairly simple solutions that could have spared the Gulf coast from an historic catastrophe.
And that, to be blunt, is unconscionable.
(This is an interesting article. It is more evidence obama is destroying the economy on purpose. Obama is a FRAUD. He is a traitor. Obama has and will do anything a common thug would do.) Story Reports
The Liberty Sphere
Conservative Examiner
Anthony G. Martin
Why do Obama, BP refuse to use most effective method of oil cleanup?
As the Gulf oil disaster closes in on the 50-day mark, the Obama Administration and BP refuse to use the most effective method of oil cleanup. The top oil barons of the world--the Saudis--have used this method to avoid a mammoth oil disaster.
And the result was swift, effective, and conclusive.
In 1993 and '94 the Saudis faced an oil spill of historic proportions in the Arabian Gulf as four leaking tankers and two oil gushers threatened to spur a catastrophic event that was 65 times worse than the Exxon-Valdez spill.
An American engineer, Nick Pozzi, was part of a task force charged with developing a solution to the looming disaster.
Pozzi had used various methods to clean up oil spills prior to this event. However, the time was short, and an effective solution was needed post-haste.
That's when Pozzi decided that the huge, empty oil tankers, sitting in the dock, could be used to simply vacuum up the oil right off of the top of the water.
The result was that 85% of the oil was recovered.
Pozzi believes that the tanker method is the fastest and most effective way of dealing with the Gulf Oil disaster, but no one in the Obama Administration or BP is willing to consider the idea. Instead, they have insisted on using untested techniques, one of which involves the use of chemical dispersants manufactured and sold by a company in which Obama cronies, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Hathaway-Berkshire, and BP, are heavily invested.
That company, NALCO, is also one of the so-called 'green' industries that Obama and the Leftwing favor due to its development of water purification systems.
In an interview with Esquire, Pozzi stated the following:
NICK POZZI: Keep in mind that what supertankers typically do is they sit in the middle of the ocean waiting for all the traders to come up with the right price. When they feel that the price is right, the tankers that are full, they take off, and they can be anywhere in the world in a few days. Right now there are probably 25 supertankers, waiting for orders, full of oil. So all they got to do is come to Texas, in the Gulf, unload the oil, and then turn around and suck up all this other stuff and pump it onto shore into on-shore storage. It's not rocket science. It's so simple. It's a Robinson Crusoe fix, but it works.
However, Esquire also reported that nearly FIFTY (50) super-tankers were sitting empty and ready to go, and on the cheap.
The Obama Administration and BP have totally ignored them.
In fact, BP has curiously skirted around the super-tanker solution when asked about it by reporters.
Esquire has clear evidence showing that the government has flat-out ignored or refused to consider the super-tanker method, in spite of its track-record of resounding success. Both Obama and the Coast Guard have been dragging their feet on this solution, although they have been made aware of it repeatedly.
Why?
Even Obama cheerleaders such as Chris Matthews are questioning the President's refusal to act, particularly in light of the fact that former Shell Oil executive John Hofmeister has insisted in numerous interviews that the super-tanker method should have been utilized at the very start.
It is also clear that BP and the Obama Administration could have not only used government equipment in the effort but recruited the help of all of the various oil companies. BP, obviously, could not handle the severity of this catastrophe alone. Yet it refused to request the help of other oil companies, refused to use the super-tankers to vacuum up the oil, and seemed to collude with Barack Obama to drag its feet on a real cleanup in lieu of testing out the chemical dispersants peddled by a company with dubious ties.
And it must not be overlooked that BP is much more than an oil company. The corporation is heavily invested in developing so-called 'green technology' that will supposedly replace the need for oil.
Increasingly it is beginning to appear that the Obama Administration and BP together deliberately closed their eyes, ears, and brains to fairly simple solutions that could have spared the Gulf coast from an historic catastrophe.
And that, to be blunt, is unconscionable.
(This is an interesting article. It is more evidence obama is destroying the economy on purpose. Obama is a FRAUD. He is a traitor. Obama has and will do anything a common thug would do.) Story Reports
Monday, June 7, 2010
Crazy Fool On The Hill

(A fraud off the street who assumes he can do anything but in fact is a total failure. A man who cannot prove nor validate his existence as a US citizen. An imposter who blames everyone but himself for his own failures. A community organizer and not a leader. A sad excuse for a president. One who creates panels and committees to do nothing. A man child as Rush said.) Story Reports
Abc News
More people give the federal government's response a negative rating than did the response to Hurricane Katrina. A month and a half after the spill began, 69 percent in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll rate the federal response negatively. That compares with a 62 negative rating for the response to Katrina two weeks after the August 2005 hurricane.
BP's response to the spill draws even broader criticism – 81 percent rate it negatively. And 64 percent say the government should pursue criminal charges against BP and other companies involved in the spill, which has poured oil into the Gulf from a well 5,000 feet beneath the surface since an explosion and fire destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig April 20.
(Crimminal charges should also be brought against obama for fraud. He can't validate nor prove he is a US citizen when asked to do so by the American people. His response is to delay and stonewall any answer. He functions in an odd manner. In every instance he delays acting until its to late and then blames others for his failure to produce results. Obama is a dollar short and a day late every time.) Story Reports
The post American world via an Obama Cloward-Piven Government

The above displayed photographs of BO carrying (and presumably reading) the book, the post American world, is a real one according to snopes.com. Snapped by Doug Mills of the new york times in Bozeman Montanna, in May 2008. Obama had plans fpr America in 2008 and America is systematically being dismantled. In time if obama has his way it will be a post American world. Nov 2010 must be the turning point in history for obama to succeed in his destruction of America or America to succeed in containing the traitor that is in the whitehouse.
.........................................................................................
Obama Cloward-Piven Government
James Simpson
"It is high time we overcome the denial...."
Excerpt 1
In September of last year, American Thinker published Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis. Part of a series, it connected then presidential candidate Barack Obama to individuals and organizations practicing a malevolent strategy for sabotaging our society. Since then the story of that strategy has found its way across the blogosphere, onto the airwaves of radio stations across the country, the Glenn Beck television show, Bill O’Reilly and now Mark Levin.
Excerpt 2:
The real goal of “healthcare” legislation, the real goal of “cap and trade,” the real goal of “stimulus” is to rip the guts out of our private economy and transfer wide swaths of it over to government control. Do not be deluded by the propaganda. These initiatives are vehicles for change. They are not goals in and of themselves, except in their ability to deliver power, and will make matters much worse, for that is their design.
Excerpt 3:
It is time to acknowledge that these people are our enemies. They don’t use guns, yet, but they are just as dangerous, determined and duplicitous as the communists we faced in the Cold War, Korea, Vietnam and bush wars across the globe, and the Nazis we faced in World War II. It is high time we overcome the denial, and fully digest and internalize this fact, with all its ugly ramifications.
Excerpt 4:
Every single citizen who cares about this country should be spending every minute of his/her spare time lobbying, organizing, writing and planning. Fight every initiative they launch. It is all destructive. If we are to root out this evil, it is critical that in 2010 we win competent, principled leaders willing to defend our constitution and our country. Otherwise the malevolent cabal that occupies the seat of government today will become too entrenched.
Obama's agenda is to overwhelm the system
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Nikki Haley Still Strongly Favored In Poll

From Public Policy Polling Raleigh, N.C.
Nikki Haley For Governor
Public Policy Polling
Nikki Haley hasn’t suffered any damage whatsoever after accusations of multiple extramarital affairs and is headed for an easy first place finish in Tuesday’s Republican primary for Governor of South Carolina.
Haley has a 20 point lead, getting 43% of the vote. Gresham Barrett looks like the favorite for the second runoff spot. He’s at 23%, followed by Henry McMaster at 16%, and Andre Bauer at 12%.
.........................................................................................
Raleigh, N.C. – Nikki Haley had a 20 point lead in her bid for the Republican Gubernatorial nomination in South Carolina two weeks ago before allegations of an extramarital affair surfaced. Only 13% of likely primary voters believe the charges that have been lobbed against her and she continues to hold that 20 point lead heading into the final couple days of the campaign.
A first place finish for Haley Tuesday appears to be a near certainty. She’s at 43% to 23% for Gresham Barrett, 16% for Henry McMaster, and 12% for Andre Bauer. There’s probably a better chance of her avoiding a runoff on Tuesday than not finishing first unless something crazy happens to shake up the race in the final 24 hours. 54% of primary voters flatly do not believe the rumors about Haley. 33% aren’t sure and only 13% come right out and say they think they’re true. The numbers do suggest serious consequences for Haley if they are proven though- 42% of voters think she should drop out of the race in that scenario.
Haley’s favorability was a net +34 on our poll two weeks ago and it now stands at a net +35 (58/23). The person who’s really had a good couple of weeks is Gresham Barrett. His favorability has improved from +10 to +25 (44/19) and he’s emerged as the clear frontrunner for the second runoff spot, with his support going from 16% to 23%.
In the 4th Congressional District six term Congressman Bob Inglis looks to be headed to a runoff with challenger Trey Gowdy, who leads the incumbent 37-33. “Nikki Haley’s in good shape,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “Her campaign has deflected the allegations against her well and so far she hasn’t suffered any political damage in the wake of them.”
PPP did not survey the Democratic primary for Governor on this poll. PPP surveyed 998 likely South Carolina Republican primary voters including 300 in the 4th Congressional District on June 5th and 6th. The margin of error on the overall sample is +/-3.1% and for the 4th district subsample is +/-5.7%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.
Haley's support is pretty universal. She gets 43% with both moderates and conservatives, 45% in the Low Country, 44% in the Midlands, and 40% in the Upstate. At this point the chances of her winning an outright majority and avoiding a runoff appear to be better than the ones of her not finishing first.
(Vote the good ole boys republican or democrate out of office if they are doing business as usual. Vote all liberals and moderates out just because they are moderates and liberals. Vote conservatives in if they are the real deal and not RINO's.) Story Reports
Story Reports Questions Obama About His Natural Born Citizenship Status
S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008 Obama Cosponsored
Story Reports Questions Obama About His Natural Born Citizenship Status
Question 1:
How do you define the term natural born citizen?
Answer 1:
Mr. OBAMA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008.
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 2:
Let me be clear and use this same phrase you have used over and over. I am asking you barack obama did the S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008 that you cosponsored define just John Mccain as a natural born citizen because both his parents were American citizens at the time of his birth?
Answer 2:
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 3:
If John Mccain had been born to just 1 parent that was an American citizen at the time of his birth would John Mccain be considered a natural born citizen?
Answer 3:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens", John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 4:
You are just repeating the S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008 that you cosponsered. I take it you are saying if John Mccain was born to just one American parent at the time of his birth he would not be considered a natural born citizen.
Answer 4:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens"
Question 5:
Let me be clear, does this mean you are not a natural born citizen because at the time of your birth only one parent was an American citizen?
Answer 5:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens"
Question 6:
Did you commit FRAUD when you certified through the dnc that you were a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States to the state of Hawaii only and not to the other 49 states?
Answer 6:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens"
Question 7:
Let me be clear, you are admitting you are a FRAUD?
Answer 7:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens", John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 8:
You keep referring to your cosponsored resolution 511 April 30, 2008. It clearly says John Mccain is a natural born citizen because he was born to American citizens at birth. Why didn't the US senate pass a resolution confirming your naturn born citizenship status at birth like they did for John Mccain? Is it because you are not a natural born citizen?
Answer:
No answer
Question 9:
You have defined what the US senate and yourself consider a natural born citizen in S 511. Yet you yourself do not conform to this definition because only one of your parents was an American citizen at the time of your birth. Will you hold a press conference to explain why you should continue to hold the office of president when you clearly are not a natural born citizen as you have defined the term yourself?
Answer 9:
No answer
Question 10:
When will you resign?
Answer 10:
No answer
.........................................................................................
Friday June 4, 2010...
"Most People's Historical Perspective Begins With the Day of Their Birth." -Rush Limbaugh
Story Reports Questions Obama About His Natural Born Citizenship Status
Question 1:
How do you define the term natural born citizen?
Answer 1:
Mr. OBAMA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008.
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 2:
Let me be clear and use this same phrase you have used over and over. I am asking you barack obama did the S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008 that you cosponsored define just John Mccain as a natural born citizen because both his parents were American citizens at the time of his birth?
Answer 2:
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 3:
If John Mccain had been born to just 1 parent that was an American citizen at the time of his birth would John Mccain be considered a natural born citizen?
Answer 3:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens", John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 4:
You are just repeating the S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008 that you cosponsered. I take it you are saying if John Mccain was born to just one American parent at the time of his birth he would not be considered a natural born citizen.
Answer 4:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens"
Question 5:
Let me be clear, does this mean you are not a natural born citizen because at the time of your birth only one parent was an American citizen?
Answer 5:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens"
Question 6:
Did you commit FRAUD when you certified through the dnc that you were a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States to the state of Hawaii only and not to the other 49 states?
Answer 6:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens"
Question 7:
Let me be clear, you are admitting you are a FRAUD?
Answer 7:
"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens", John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Question 8:
You keep referring to your cosponsored resolution 511 April 30, 2008. It clearly says John Mccain is a natural born citizen because he was born to American citizens at birth. Why didn't the US senate pass a resolution confirming your naturn born citizenship status at birth like they did for John Mccain? Is it because you are not a natural born citizen?
Answer:
No answer
Question 9:
You have defined what the US senate and yourself consider a natural born citizen in S 511. Yet you yourself do not conform to this definition because only one of your parents was an American citizen at the time of your birth. Will you hold a press conference to explain why you should continue to hold the office of president when you clearly are not a natural born citizen as you have defined the term yourself?
Answer 9:
No answer
Question 10:
When will you resign?
Answer 10:
No answer
.........................................................................................
Friday June 4, 2010...
"Most People's Historical Perspective Begins With the Day of Their Birth." -Rush Limbaugh
MCatney Visits Fool On The Hill And Sings For Obama
FOXNews.com
Paul McCartney knows you can't buy him love, but some are suggesting he should try to buy himself a little class after he took a cheap shot at former President George W. Bush following a performance at the White House this week.
The 67-year-old former Beatle attacked Bush's intelligence after receiving the Gershwin Prize from the Library of Congress on Wednesday.
All together now . . .
"It's a fantastic honor (for) the Gershwin family to give me this incredible award and for me to be awarded it by the Library of Congress. And in fact, after the last eight years, it's great to have a president who knows what a library is," McCartney said, drawing cheers from the audience.
"It was completely ungracious and undignified," said Fox News contributor Dana Perino, who was Bush's final White House press secretary.
"And it showed how shallow people can be, and it was sad to me someone of Paul McCartney's stature can in one moment erase years of goodwill that he built up with so many people in America," she said.
But Perino added that maybe she wasn't amazed.
"To be honest, given all of the nasty and ridiculous things that many in the world of entertainment have said about President Bush over the years, I'm not surprised," she said.
Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for Bush, called the comment "crass" and "rude."
"One, it shows no class. Two, it's ignorant," Thiessen told FoxNews.com, noting that Bush's wife, Laura, is a librarian.
"They made literacy an issue during his presidency and he is probably, as Karl Rove has pointed out, one of the best read presidents in recent history," he said.
Thiessen likened the comments to him making fun of the plastic surgery McCartney has had and how silly he looked accepting the award. "But I would never do that," he said. He did, however, call McCartney a "sad left winger" who is among those who still have not gotten over their "Bush Derangement Syndrome."
.........................................................................................
(Story Reports Version)
Day after day, (In Nov 2010 obama will acquire a collar and be taught new tricks.)
Alone on a hill, (In the white house)
Obama with the foolish grin is keeping perfectly still (You know he when his lips move.)
But nobody knows who he is, (Can't prove he is a US citizen.)
They can see that he's just a fool, (Proves this on a daily basis.)
And he never gives an answer, (Refuses to answer questions that are germaine or relevant.)
But the fool on the hill, (Obama)
Sees the sun going down, (Dragging the US economy down daily alone with the Constitution.)
And the eyes in his head, (Deceptive, fradulent, deceiving empty soul of a destroyer.)
See the world spinning 'round. (Sees a one world government run from the hill.)
Well on the way, (Obama's well on the way to the destruction of America.)
Head in a cloud, (Obama acts as if he is in charge but obama is just the fool on the hill.)
The man with a teleprompter talking perfectly loud
But nobody ever hears him, (Reporters parrot his twisted contrived deceptive words.)
or the sound he appears to make, (Most Americans know obama is a manipilated dummy.)
and he never seems to notice, (Obama ignores the majority of Americans.)
But the fool on the hill, (Obama)
Sees the sun going down,
And the eyes in his head,
See the US spinning 'down.
And nobody seems to like him, (Unemployment, recession and no leadership. A total failure.)
they can tell what he wants to do, (Destroy America via legislation and executive orders.)
and he never shows his feelings, (Obama is a unprincipled narcissist, he has none.)
But the fool on the hill, (Obama)
Sees the sun going down, (Obama seeing the sun going down on American Sovereignty.)
And the eyes in his head, (His laser like vision is focused on abomination of America.)
See the world spinning 'round. (He sees the US economy spinning round and down.)
Ooh, ooh,
Round and round and round. (Obama is a successful failure via the US economy.)
And he never listens to them,
He knows that they're the fools
They don't like him,
The fool on the hill (Obama)
Sees the sun going down,
And the eyes in his head,
See the world spinning 'round.
Ooh,
Round and round and round (A traitor who has exposed his radical left agenda of hate.)
RUSH BEAU Ties The Knott Again

(Alright Rush. At least you didn't marry a racist like obama did. Lets hope the 4th time is the charm. Looks like yu made a good choice. Dittos!) Story Reports
Rush Limbaugh Wedding:Kathryn Rogers Married
Jerry Reth US News
Rush Limbaugh Wedding:Kathryn Rogers Married
Rush Limbaugh is getting married for the fourth time, according to recent reports. He is marrying a woman who is 26 years younger than he is, and is currently working as an event coordinator. Her name is Kathryn Rogers, and she is 33 years old. Many have said that the difference in their ages is wrong or awkward because Limbaugh is 59 years old, but Limbaugh has responded to these criticisms by saying that he just wanted to live his own life, and that people should not worry about everything that he does.
(Remember Rush is not the resident in the whitehouse but a private citizen. Obama acts like he is a private citizen when it comes to disclosing his real identity.) Story Reports
“We try to live our lives as normal people,” he said in a statement. “We do NOT seek media attention, we do not want it, especially for this. It is very special, obviously, and we just don’t want any media attention.”
He has done his best to keep the news of the marriage as secret as possible, even deciding not to comment about the upcoming marriage to any of the many reporters who have questioned him about his marriage.
The two reportedly met in 2007, and have hit it off ever since then. At the time, Limbaugh had been linked to former CNN anchor Daryn Kagan. Limbaugh suffered a heart attack while going to meet her family in Hawaii at one point, and has had numerous health issues since that point. Limbaugh has often said that he did not plan on getting married a fourth time but apparently he changed his mind.
........................................................................................
Lauren Johnston
The conservative firebrand, 59, exchanged vows with Kathryn Rogers – a blond bombshell half his age – in a lavish Hawaiian-themed wedding bash headlined by none-other-than Sir Elton John Saturday in Florida.
It's an odd pairing considering El Rushbo's history of anti-gay commentary on his conservative radio show and the openly gay "Tiny Dancer" singer's longtime commitment to gay rights.
The Palm Beach Post reported the British superstar will pocket $1 million for playing the wedding reception at the posh Breakers Hotel.
The hotel has reportedly staffed about 50 additional security guards for the event.
Limbaugh and Rogers, 33, hosted a rehearsal dinner luau for 400 close friends and family at the hotel Friday night and the wedding will take place at Limbaugh's beachfront mansion at an undisclosed time.
Rogers told the Post in 2008 that the couple's age gap is part of what makes the romance work.
"I grew up so differently, traveling around the world, that I'm sometimes not able to relate to the average person my age," Rogers said. "Rush has such amazing experience."
The always outspoken radio talk show host has been uncharacteristically tight-lipped about his wedding plans – posting only a vague note on his website that he would be "out until Tuesday, June 15."
He made a plea for privacy in an e-mail statement to the Post.
"We try to live our lives as normal people. We do not seek media attention.We do not want it, especially for this," he wrote.
Limbaugh met Rogers in 2004 at a celebrity golf tournament.
He was divorcing his third wife at the time and the pair has dated for three years.
(Hey man what you got in that suitcase? If your out you better buy some more of those little blue pills, your gonna need it. Um, um, ahh. :)) Story Reports
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)