Rayshard Brooks was found asleep in his car while in a wendys drive thru. The officer woke him up several times. Each time he went back to sleep and did not more his car.
Finally he moved his car out of the drive thru and parked hearby. The officer continued o watch him noting he went to sleep again. After a few minutes he ask him for his drivers license and had to ask him over and over to stay in his car.
Rayshard Brooks was talking and acting like he was under the influence of something. He was given a field soberiety test, which he failed.
He was then told he was under arrest. He struggled with two officers and resisted arrest then ran after taking the officer's taser.
While running away he turned toward the officer and fired his taser at the officer.
The officer then shot rayshard brooks three times after he began to turn away and run away from him.
He shot brooks in the back while he was running away.
This was justified by the officer. He killed a man while he was running away with a tazer while he had poseing a threat to the officer and those he is sworn to protect, ie those in the wendy's parking lot also.
badgewize Explains why the officer was justified in shooting Brooks.
Officer Garrett Rolfe is another example of a cop doing his job correctly while trying to arrest Brooks.
Brooks was a threat to the public and should have been arrested.
Rayshard Brooks should NOT have been shot while running from Garrett Rolfe even though he had fired the officer's taser at him.
The threat from Rayshard Brooks was increased when Rayshard Brooks turned and fired the officers tazar at him. The tazar had more than one shot. At this point deadly force use by the officer was justified.
In most states if you shoot someone when they are running away from you it is a big mistake and you can be charged with murder.
Garrett Rolfdidi not just shoot someone running away from him but a person who was also using a lethal weapon, a tazar, in the hands of someone who was a threat to the police officers life.
A police officer can only use lethal force when he is protecting himself or others from a threat to his life or others.
Pointing and shooting a taser is a threat of course.
If I had a weapon and someone other than a police officer pointed and fired a taser at me yes I would return fire.
The cop was justified using his weapon when the taser was fired at him.
WHY? badgewize Explains why the officer was justified in shooting Brooks.
In Review:
Yes the police officer had the right to defend himself when Rayshard Brooks fired his taser at him.
It was a close call and the cop made the right call. He is now charged with murder but this is NOT justified.
The cop made a split decision that was a good decision.
Raymond Brooks has payed the price for sleeping in a drive thru and made a decision to grab the cop's taser while resisting arrest.
The protesters or protester also mad a bad choice by burning down wendy's because of the shooting.
I hope the person or persons who burned down the wendys will be caught and charged with arson etc.
Some people will be incited to riot and persecute the police.
Garrett Rolf and Raymond James should NOT be blamed for what happened.
Raymond James did not overreact nor did Garret Rolf.
There was NO EXCUSE for protesters to overreact because of what happened.
The burning down of wendys was an act of terrorism only.
The violence by antifa and "black lives matter" are also just acts of terrorism that are in no way justified.
"black lives matter" and antifi blames ALL cops for ANY act of violence by ANY cop.
This violence is in NO WAY justified!
Cops nationwide are not responsible for what Ramond Brooks death nor is it a common problem with cops nationwide.
The news media promotes violence and terrorism by the radical groups 'black lives matter" and antifa etc.
Anytime you blame a massive group of people for a crime committed by one person or a few persons is not logical and makes NO sense.
I could easily blame ALL blacks for the violence "black lives matter" commits but this is not true.
Some protesters commit violence and cause destruction and in some cases the death of other people especially the recent murder of some cops.
Not all protesters commit crimes or commit violence or commit murder.
Some in the groups antifa and 'black lives matter" do.
The problem is this:
If you support antifa or 'black lives matter" radical violent groups you are helping to promote their cause of violence and anarchy all in the name of justice for those who they have painted as needing justice whom the majority have committed crimes.
You also are promoting the LIE that all cops are bad and the police should be disbanded.
When you join antfi or "black lives matter" radical groups you become a big part of the problem.
You become associated with destruction and violence thinking you are part of the solution
Taking a knee to "black lives matter" is taking a knee to violence and destruction.
Support the police and realize there is a big difference in a bad cop and all cops.
George Floyd was murdered by a bad cop.
Don't have a knee jerk reaction to what you see in the news.
Don't bend you knee to your emotions while allowing you logic to be gone with the wind.
Don't include yourself in groups that support destruction and violence.
Like dabo sweeny said, read the fine print of the group you are supporting be fore you join in the protest.
badgewize Explains why the officer was justified in shooting Brooks. The fine print.
Dabo sweeny did not follow his own advice and did not read the fine print about "black lives matter".
"Black lives matter" is a misnomer. A name that is incorrectly applied. Misnomers often arise because something was named long before its correct nature was known, or because an earlier form of something has been replaced by something to which the name no longer applies.
The group that calls itself black lives matter is a organization that has only coopted the meaning of the phrase "black lives matter".
Many people might not realize that Black Lives Matter is a distinct political organization, not just a slogan or social media hashtag, and it has both enormous funding and a wide-ranging political agenda.
The Complex Funding and Ideology of Black Lives Matter
THIS IS THE FINE PRINT THAT DABO SWEENY, CLEMSON FOOTBALL COACH, FAILED TO READ HIMSELF BEFORE HE TOOK AN KNEE TO BLACK LIVES MATTER AND SAID, "I WHOLE HEARTEDLY SUPPORT BLACK LIVES MATTER".
Many other people have also failed to read the fine print about the black lives matter political slogan.
Political and
corporate support for Black Lives Matter has become ubiquitous over the
past week. Everyone’s email inbox is bulging with messages of support
from corporate sponsors, every website is covered with Black Lives
Matter logos, and the group has benefited from numerous fundraisers and
charity sales. But, many people might not realize that Black Lives
Matter is a distinct political organization, not just a slogan or social
media hashtag, and it has both enormous funding and a wide-ranging
political agenda.
BLM describes its own founders as “three radical Black organizers” named Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, who “created a Black-centered political will and movement building project… in response to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman.”
BLM’s history page proudly salutes the radical causes built into its DNA since its 2013 founding, including “liberation” politics and transgenderism.
In fact, BLM thinks other black civil rights movements aren’t nearly radical enough, especially when it comes to the gender politics of the hard Left:
“Black liberation movements in this country have created room, space, and leadership mostly for Black heterosexual, cisgender men – leaving women, queer and transgender people, and others either out of the movement or in the background to move the work forward with little or no recognition.”
Transgenderism is a big thing with the group called black lives matter and one of its main themes and causes.
BLM incessantly refers to the deaths of Trayvon Martin, Mike Brown, and others as “murder,” ignoring all court decisions to the contrary, and describes police work as “state-sanctioned violence” against oppressed populations.
{This is a constant lie BLM promotes.}
In the course of explaining how it was formed, the group refers to cities like Ferguson, Missouri, as “occupied territory” – with law enforcement cast as a brutal invading force – and insists most other cities should be seen the same way: “We understood Ferguson was not an aberration, but in fact, a clear point of reference for what was happening to Black communities everywhere.”
Corporate and foundation sponsors appear unconcerned that BLM is unclear about who runs the movement today and commands its vast resources.
The group itself claims it has no top-level leadership at all: “The project is now a member-led global network of more than 40 chapters.
Our members organize and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes.”
The BLM founders are involved in a sprawling network of other left-wing groups and clearly remain influential with Black Lives Matter, although they are not held accountable as its executives.
A New Yorker interview with Tometi on June 3, for example, treated her as a top BLM spokeswoman while noting that she has moved on to create and manage other organizations, most recently including an immigration activist group called the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, which is listed as a “partner” by Black Lives Matter.
Another partner is the UndocuBlack Network, a “multigenerational network of currently and formerly undocumented black people.”
“We have been fighting and advocating to stop a war on black lives. And that is how we see it – this is a war on black life.
{This is another constant lie BLM promotes.}
And people understand that this system is filled with all sorts of inequality and injustice, and that implicit bias and just outright racism is embedded in the way that policing is done in this nation
{Another constant distortion of the truth by BLM that they promote.}
– and when you think about it historically, it was founded as a slave patrol. The evolution of policing was rooted in that,” Tometi said in her New Yorker interview.
BLM call the police, "A slave patrol".
Police protect both black and whites on a daily basis.
badgewize Explains why the officer was justified in shooting Brooks.
Most prople don't consider themselves as slaves being patrolled by cops, only the BLM radical racist hate group does.
Hate for cops and hate for all of America.
BLM Funding
As the Washington Times noted in 2016, Black Lives Matter (BLM) presents itself as a plucky street-level movement with shoestring resources, but in truth it receives millions of dollars from corporate and political sponsors.
The movement’s funding gives a hint of how far its political agenda stretches beyond criticizing the excessive use of force by police officers.
Fortune also looked at BLM funding in 2016 and noticed its agenda and funding streams could “help dispel the myth that the movement itself is set on violence,” but could also “confirm the worst fears” of skeptics who saw BLM becoming another part of the vast and protean left-wing money machine.
{BLM is just a radical socialist money machine.}
The machinery of BLM funding has only grown more complex since 2016, exacerbating a problem skeptics have warned about from the start: it is very difficult to know what each dollar donated to the movement will actually be used for.
BLM’s major financial supporters include:
- Airbnb – $500,000 to BLM and the NAACP
- Anastasia Beverly Hills fashions – $1 million pledged, $100,000 donated so far to groups including BLM
- Bad Robot Productions – film studio involved in Star Trek, Star Wars, and Mission Impossible, $10 million pledged to “anti-racist” groups. BLM among the first recipients
- BTS, a Korean pop group – $1 million, matching donations from fans
- Cisco, electronics giant – $5 million to groups including BLM and its own Fighting Racism and Discrimination fund
- DECIEM cosmetics – $100,000 to NAACP and BLM
- Democracy Alliance – another Soros-linked group, added BLM to its annual $500 million donor list
- Door Dash – food delivery company, $500,000
- Ford Foundation and Borealis Philanthropy – Left-wing groups that established a $100 million donor fund
- George Soros’ Open Society Foundation – $33 million - {NOTE 33 MILLION!}
- Glossier cosmetics – $500,000
- Pokemon Company – owners of the popular card game and its characters, $100,000
- Scopely – mobile phone game developer, $1 million to BLM, NAACP, and Equal Justice Initiative
- Spanx – undergarment manufacturer, $100,000 to groups including BLM
- Square Enix computer games – $250,000 to BLM, also matching employee donations
- Ubisoft computer games – $100,000 to NAACP and BLM
- The Weeknd – Canadian R&B singer, $250,000
Sources include the above-mentioned Washington Times and Fortune pieces, Politico, Rolling Stone, Forbes, NBC News, The Wrap, and Elle, which has a long list of fashion and cosmetics firms making donations to BLM. ArtNet on Monday published a list of artists and galleries holding charity sales to support BLM.
The L.A. Times on Tuesday reported numerous companies are implementing donor-match programs that will match individual employee donations to Black Lives Matter with corporate funds.
As several of the above sources pointed out, it’s not always easy to tell when donations are going to BLM itself or its partners.
The Financial Times reported that a flood of cash is pouring into civil rights groups, many of them allied with BLM or supportive of its projects.
NBC News’ article about “corporate donations for BLM” only mentioned a few direct donations to the Black Lives Matter organization; the rest went to groups like the NAACP, ACLU, and Southern Poverty Law Center.
Groups like the Ford Foundation, Borealis Philanthropy, and Democracy Alliance tend to establish large funds that are disbursed to many smaller organizations, chapters, and individual activists. Not everyone who claims to be with “Black Lives Matter” is a certified member of the group founded by Garza, Cullors, and Tometi.
New York Magazine published an approving article on June 4 telling readers how to donate money to the Black Lives Matter movement.
The article listed one hundred and fifteen “funds, organizations, and individual activists” linked to BLM, and those were just the financial intakes New York felt it had adequately “vetted” to ensure they weren’t outright scams.
The article subdivided these 115 recommended donation recipients based on how they pledge to use the money they are given, “whether that’s to post bail/bonds for demonstrators arrested at protests, to purchase protective equipment to protesters on the front lines, to invest in rebuilding black communities where protests have occurred, or to invest in community enrichment programs for black and brown youth.”
In the course of a very approving June 6 piece about the growth of bail funds, The Atlantic let slip a little hint about the difficulty of tracing these tens of millions of dollars in donations: “Whether celebrities – or anyone, for that matter – who donate to a bail fund believe that the system needs a total overhaul is almost irrelevant.
Their money equips activists and organizers to do work that tangibly improves the lives of people whom the police often target.”
{This is also a BIG LIE of BLM.}
In other words, money is fluid and fungible, and donors often end up financing agendas they might not fully agree with when they give money to a slogan.
If you take a knee to BLM like dabo sweeny did without reading the fine print about BLM like he told his students to do you too will be supporting and financing political agendas you don't agree with. I doubt if dabo sweeny agrees with the transgenger movement but again I don't really know I haven't ask him nor has any of the nation or local media.}
The value of nearly-ubiquitous corporate promotion of the Black Lives Matter name over the past week is incalculable – there is nothing that kind of full-spectrum, all but inescapable advertising across television, print media, and the Internet could be compared to.
The Full BLM Agenda
From the earliest days of the BLM movement, as the 2016 pieces cited above indicate, critics have noticed it has a very wide-ranging agenda that reaches far beyond police issues – and, sometimes, working against black lives.
At the time of this writing, the top agenda item on the BLM web page is “Defund the Police” – a position only a very small minority of Americans supports, including a very small share of black Americans.
Black Lives Matter has a lengthy “What We Believe” statement on its website that begins with highly contentious and politicized assertions such as expressing rage at “the death of Trayvon Martin and the subsequent acquittal of his killer, George Zimmerman” and moving along to “justice for Mike Brown and all of those who have been torn apart by state-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism.”
Further down the page, the official BLM agenda wanders into support for transgenderism, a vow to “dismantle cisgender privilege,” and some very heavy-duty plans for destroying and rebuilding American society:
We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.
We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).(Emphasis added.)
{Note also that if you whole heartedly support black lives matter, a slogan, you are supporting a QUEER affiriming network!} Did you read that fine print Dabo? Do you support queers?}
In Boston, Massachusetts, a BLM chapter is asking that $15 million in American taxpayer money be spent on providing summer jobs to — not Black Americans — but illegal aliens. Study after study has revealed that every ten percent increase in the immigrant share of an occupation reduces the income of black American men by roughly five percent.
By doing business with companies that support BLM, you might be inadvertently funding its destructive and coercive left-wing policy agenda.
Once upon a time, even Democrats understood how radical that agenda was, as a leaked memo from 2015 revealed Democrat Party leadership warning staffers and politicians to keep their distance from the movement.
{Now because it has become a democrate cash cow they liberal radical democrates support BLM.}
Hashtag Confusion
As mentioned above, many people think “Black Lives Matter” is a slogan, an ideal, or a grassroots movement, not a political organization with eight figures of funding and a hardcore left-wing policy agenda.
{"Black lives matter" IS ONLY A CORPORATE SLOGAN of BLM!}
This is a very old game practiced by both amateurs and political professionals.
Every bill that passes through Congress is given a name that suggests only the most heartless villain could possibly oppose it.
Many organizations on both the Left and Right claim to speak for sympathetic constituencies, or carefully cultivate an image of being much less wealthy and powerful than they actually are.
In the case of Black Lives Matter, the movement’s slogan is effectively becoming the definition of “anti-racism,” which means all disagreement and doubt are racist by definition.
{This the BIG current lie being promoted by the BLM corporation.}
This can be seen in the white-hot rage directed at anyone who dares to say “All Lives Matter,” for example – a phrase as inherently benevolent and obviously true as “Black Lives Matter,” but the “All” formulation has been redefined as a vile curse, an unforgivable assault on the purity of Black Lives Matter.
BLM is a very large ideological umbrella, and plenty of other left-wing groups are jockeying for space beneath it, some of them highly toxic.
The Jerusalem Post on Sunday worried about anti-Semitic and anti-Israel forces climbing aboard the BLM train, making an effort to “hijack the civil rights discourse and portray Israel as a ‘settler’ state linked to ‘white supremacy.’”
“That hostility is clear when voices such as Marc Lamonte Hill retweet a Ben and Jerry’s tweet supporting the protests with the comment ‘we dealing with justice in illegal settlements too or nah?’” the Jerusalem Post noted, neatly bringing together the issues of unreflective corporate support for BLM and the effort to hook other ideologies to its runaway populist locomotive.
More humorously, Yahoo News on Sunday found all sorts of Internet “influencers” trying to hitch their wagons to BLM, only to be rebuffed by activists furious at them for trivializing the movement or hijacking its themes for selfish purposes. The line between welcome support and unacceptable exploitation of the movement is blurry.
Vegan restaurants are praised for donating money to BLM, for example, while a vegan influencer who endorsed BLM because it’s fighting “the same fight” as crusaders against cruelty to animals was forcefully told to keep her deep thoughts to herself.
White social media celebrities are taking some heat for trying to insert themselves into the Black Lives Matter movement, often in ways that trivialize the issues and make the protests seem like giant block parties.
What does “Black Lives Matter” really mean? What agenda are people supporting with their black boxes, tweets, Facebook posts, and financial donations? In this turbulent moment, the movement is having trouble even defining what “Defund the Police” really means, perhaps sensing that the position is so unpopular that it must be hastily redefined as “reform the police, details to come later.”
Some BLM leaders insist they are primarily interested in sensible community policing reforms, while others think New York Governor Andrew Cuomo doesn’t swing far enough to the Left.
It seems remarkable that a group with so little discipline, so much confusion over its agenda, and so much money at its disposal would be allowed to effectively demand compulsory support from the entire American public and corporate and political class, without any deep media investigation of its finances, leadership, or agenda.
Many of BLM’s donors are signing on to a new social contract with a great deal of fine print they should read more carefully.
{Dabo Sweeny, Clemson university football coach, has signed on to the BLM social contract and NOT read the fine print as he told he students to do. He has assured himself that he will continue to be ENSCONCED in his position as the head football coach at Clemson University.}
The donate button at the BLM website does take you to actblue, the Democrat fundraising platform website.
BLM is a corporation that raises money for the radical left and its radical agenda.
Have you donated Dabo?
Taking a knee to BLM has monetary benefits both to coporations and individuals.
THIS IS WHY SO MANY PEOPLE take a knee and are supporting the BLM corporate slogan, black lives matter.
Its always true, just follow the money.
The BLM medusa is enticing you to join the BLM corporation and donate.
Looking into the BLM medusa's eyes will not turn you to stone but will cause you to take a knee to their corporate fundraising events now in progress around the country and the world.
The BLM fine print like most corporation and contract fine print has information that you probably don't take the time to read.
You just respond to the sales pitch most of the time.
Before investing in the BLM corporation by taking a knee to their stated agenda's read the fine print and know what you are getting into.
BLM should have a disclaimer like you hear on tv and the radio.
BLM corporate wants you to curtail/cutoff free speach if its not according to the false narrative.
On the blm website that ask you to do this:
We need to see what you see. Black Lives Matter is a central target of disinformation and you are a key line of defense. Report suspicious sites, stories, ads, social accounts, and posts about BLM.
The blm fundraiser radical left website wants to target you as an individual or a corporation if you disagree or refute the BLM slogan, "black lives matter', or expose their radical agenda of destruction and deceit.
This is another tactic of the socialists marxists to defend their lies by making you a targent of their radical agenda if you disagree with their radical agenda!
A suspicious story, website or posts about blm makes you and me a target of their radical agenda.
Editor Note
"Black lives matter" is nothing more than a corporate slogan used to raise money for social change of radical socialist/marxists groups.
BLM protests are used as a ploy to raise BLM corporate money that is used to fund other radical groups etc.
If you are in a BLM protest you are actually being used in a BLM fundraiser for other radical groups.
Thats right, "black lives matter" is just a slogan used for BLM corporate fundraisers called "black lives matter" protests.
Jessie Jackson, remember him, was a shakedown artist.
BLM has learned well from Jessie Jackson's fundraiser tactics and lean on corporations for money just like Jessie Jackson did using race baiting etc.
Jesse Jackson's shakedown methods
"Jesse virtually invented black racism," the Rev. Johnny Hunter, a black pastor from Virginia Beach, tells me. The Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, a black conservative, calls Jackson a "gatekeeper of black progress" and a "race hustler" who has cashed in on white guilt to fund an opulent lifestyle and a personal power base. "He is really just a David Duke in black skin," Peterson says.
On the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday in 2000, Peterson convened the first National Day of Repudiation of Jesse Jackson, which he announced would be "an annual event until Jackson repents or retires." This repudiation of Jackson by black community and church leaders came almost a full year before Jackson's public admission that he had fathered a "love child" with an employee.
Booker T Washington described Jessie Jackson and BLM perfectly.
As if foreseeing Jackson, Booker T. Washington warned two generations earlier against "problem profiteers" within the black community:
"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public.
Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs – partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays.
Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs."
{Today the problem profiteers are actually corporations that are being extorted by the corporate slogan of BLM, "black lives matter".
They are paying retributions in the form of "donations" to the corporation BLM.
Corporations are paying "retributions" ie donations to BLM and AT THE SAME TIME profiting from the BLM advertising agency by promoting the BLM corporate slogan and increasing their profits!}
Anyone who gets in their way will pay the price including being fired from their job if not taking a knee to individual corporate mandates which include support of the BLM slogan, "black lives matter".
In Review:
BLM is a corporation advertising agency that has ongoing "fundraisers" in the form of protests that construct the facade of racial bias and injustice to raise money for themselves and other radical groups that seek to overthrow the Government, ie the democratic party and deep state.
BLM has a catchy logo, "black lives matter", that induces massive protests and money donated to the BLM advertising agency.
BLM corporation and other corporations in America are in bed with each other.
Its a kind of political "whore house" run by BLM and the democratic party.
Black lives don't matter to the BLM advertising agency only fundraising does.
Blacks/whites corporations etc are being used as pawns to raise funds for BLM.
READ THE FINE PRINT before you join into a BLM advertising protest fundraiser!
Individual Black Lives Matter but the group called "black lives matter" is telling you lies about individual black lives.
badgewize Explains why the officer was justified in shooting Brooks. The fine print.
No comments:
Post a Comment