YES WE CAN EXPOSE THE IMPOSTER OBAMA
[ed. The news rags are propaganda. nobody goes to newspapers for news. that's a joke. the blogs break news. The rags just issue Goebbels PR. This is a good example of doublespeak... the guy starts out as if he will answer the question then doesnt. I told you, this report was a trial balloon. something is triggering drastic measures. They know the UIPA is not going away. the UIPA is a game changer. thank TeriK for staying on point and for being tenacious.] Leo Donfrio's answer to the question posed below about the newspaper, Colorado Independent. He calls it a "game Changer" I hope so.
.........................................................................................
Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA)
The Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified), chapter 92F, Hawaii Revised Statutes ("UIPA"), is Hawaii's public records law. The Office of Information Practices ("OIP") was created by the Legislature in 1988 to administer the UIPA.
.........................................................................................
UIPA is a "Game Changer" says Leo Donofrio
.........................................................................................
Alex Says:
September 27, 2009 at 2:59 pm
I don’t know if anyone has posted this yet, but the editor – or it may be the author – at the Colorado Independent posted the following non-answer about the long-form birth certificate:
“** Edit Note: The author has apparently initiated a small blog storm by writing that the “long-form” certificate “does not exist.” This unfortunate turn of phrase was not the result of our uncovering any new information. For those who haven’t followed this pressing matter, this concerns the question of long-form versus short-form birth certificates, which is also the question of “Certificates of Live Birth” versus “Certifications of Live Birth.” Officials at the Hawaiian Dept of Health and officials of the state’s Vital Statistics registrar’s office have verified the president’s birth records, as has the governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican who at the time was stumping for Obama’s rival for the presidency, Republican John McCain. The Hawaii Dept of Health also reported the birth to local newspapers at the time, which published birth announcements the week infant Obama, with no designs on the presidency, came into the world. The Colorado Independent subscribes to the reporting on the matter done by Politifact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning factcheck site run by the St Petersburg Times.”
My response:
“Your ‘Editor’s Note’ doesn’t answer anything. How did the author come up with the statement that a long-form birth certificate doesn’t exist? May I remind you of your mission statement:
“The Center for Independent Media is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization that operates an independent online news network in the public interest. The Center’s reporters adhere to the highest standards of journalism, follow the code of ethics adopted by the Society of Professional Journalists, and are the recipients of numerous awards for excellence in journalism. The Center views an informed citizenry as a fundamental principle of civil society and American democracy; in the words of the Supreme Court in Garrison v. Louisiana: “Speech concerning public affairs is more than self-expression; it is the essence of self-government.”
The “highest standards of journalism” would include due diligence when making statements of supposed fact. Why did this author write that the long-form birth certificate doesn’t exist? Where exactly did he pull that out of?”
Alex01
[ed. the news rags are propaganda. nobody goes to newspapers for news. that's a joke. the blogs break news. the rags just issue Goebbels PR. This is a good example of doublespeak... the guy starts out as if he will answer the question then doesnt. I told you, this report was a trial balloon. something is triggering drastic measures. they know the UIPA is not going away. the UIPA is a game changer. thank TeriK for staying on point and for being tenacious.]
.........................................................................................
Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA). This is an up-to-date, but "unofficial," copy of the Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified), Chapter 92F, Hawaii Revised Statutes ("UIPA").
Text of the 2008 Cumulative Supplement of the Hawaii Revised Statutes has been incorporated and noted in this copy. Official text of the UIPA can be found in the Hawaii Revised Statutes and its supplements.
.........................................................................................
PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
.........................................................................................
[§92F-1] Short title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified). [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
[§92F-2] Purposes; rules of construction. In a democracy, the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power. Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy. Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public's interest. Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy—the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies—shall be conducted as openly as possible.
The policy of conducting government business as openly as possible must be tempered by a recognition of the right of the people to privacy, as embodied in section 6 and section 7 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of Hawaii.
This chapter shall be applied and construed to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are to:
(1) Promote the public interest in disclosure;
(2) Provide for accurate, relevant, timely, and complete government records;
(3) Enhance governmental accountability through a general policy of access to government records;
(4) Make government accountable to individuals in the collection, use, and dissemination of information relating to them; and
(5) Balance the individual privacy interest and the public access interest, allowing access unless it would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
[§92F-3] General definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, in this chapter:
"Agency" means any unit of government in this State, any county, or any combination of counties; department; institution; board; commission; district; council; bureau; office; governing authority; other instrumentality of state or county government; or corporation or other establishment owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of this State or any county, but does not include the nonadministrative functions of the courts of this State.
"Government record" means information maintained by an agency in written, auditory, visual, electronic, or other physical form.
"Individual" means a natural person.
"Person" means an individual, corporation, government, or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, or any other legal entity.
"Personal record" means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency. It includes, but is not limited to, the individual's education, financial, medical, or employment history, or items that contain or make reference to the individual's name, identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
[§92F-4] Funding, services, and other federal assistance. Where compliance with any provision of this chapter would cause an agency to lose or be denied funding, services, or other assistance from the federal government, compliance with that provision shall be waived but only to the extent necessary to protect eligibility for federal funding, services, or other assistance. [L 1992, c 118, §1]
........................................................................................
PART II. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
........................................................................................
[§92F-11] Affirmative agency disclosure responsibilities. (a) All government records are open to public inspection unless access is restricted or closed by law.
(b) Except as provided in section 92F-13, each agency upon request by any person shall make government records available for inspection and copying during regular business hours.
(c) Unless the information is readily retrievable by the agency in the form in which it is requested, an agency shall not be required to prepare a compilation or summary of its records.
(d) Each agency shall assure reasonable access to facilities for duplicating records and for making memoranda or abstracts.
(e) Each agency may adopt rules, pursuant to chapter 91, to protect its records from theft, loss, defacement, alteration, or deterioration and to prevent manifestly excessive interference with the discharge of its other lawful responsibilities and functions. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
§92F-12 Disclosure required. (a) Any other provision in this chapter to the contrary notwithstanding, each agency shall make available for public inspection and duplication during regular business hours:
(1) Rules of procedure, substantive rules of general applicability, statements of general policy, and interpretations of general applicability adopted by the agency;
(2) Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders made in the adjudication of cases, except to the extent protected by section 92F-13(1);
(3) Government purchasing information, including all bid results, except to the extent prohibited by section 92F-13;
(4) Pardons and commutations, as well as directory information concerning an individual's presence at any correctional facility;
(5) Land ownership, transfer, and lien records, including real property tax information and leases of state land;
(6) Results of environmental tests;
(7) Minutes of all agency meetings required by law to be public;
(8) Name, address, and occupation of any person borrowing funds from a state or county loan program, and the amount, purpose, and current status of the loan;
(9) Certified payroll records on public works contracts except social security numbers and home addresses;
(10) Regarding contract hires and consultants employed by agencies:
(A) The contract itself, the amount of compensation,
(B) The duration of the contract, and
(C) The objectives of the contract,
except social security numbers and home addresses;
(11) Building permit information within the control of the agency;
(12) Water service consumption data maintained by the boards of water supply;
(13) Rosters of persons holding licenses or permits granted by an agency that may include name, business address, type of license held, and status of the license;
(14) The name, compensation (but only the salary range for employees covered by or included in chapter 76, and sections 302A-602 to 302A-640, and 302A-701, or bargaining unit (8)), job title, business address, business telephone number, job description, education and training background, previous work experience, dates of first and last employment, position number, type of appointment, service computation date, occupational group or class code, bargaining unit code, employing agency name and code, department, division, branch, office, section, unit, and island of employment, of present or former officers or employees of the agency; provided that this paragraph shall not require the creation of a roster of employees; and provided further that this paragraph shall not apply to information regarding present or former employees involved in an undercover capacity in a law enforcement agency;
(15) Information collected and maintained for the purpose of making information available to the general public; and
(16) Information contained in or compiled from a transcript, minutes, report, or summary of a proceeding open to the public.
(b) Any provision to the contrary notwithstanding, each agency shall also disclose:
(1) Any government record, if the requesting person has the prior written consent of all individuals to whom the record refers;
(2) Government records which, pursuant to federal law or a statute of this State, are expressly authorized to be disclosed to the person requesting access;
(3) Government records pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of any individual;
(4) Government records requested pursuant to an order of a court;
(5) Government records pursuant to a subpoena from either house of the state legislature; and
(6) Information from the motor vehicle registration files, provided that the person requesting such files shall have a legitimate reason as determined by rules. [am L 1996, c 89, §8; am L 2000, c253, §150; am L 2004, c 92, §3; am L 2005, c 85, §1; am L 2007, c 14, §1]
§92F-13 Government records; exceptions to general rule. This part shall not require disclosure of:
(1) Government records which, if disclosed, would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
(2) Government records pertaining to the prosecution or defense of any judicial or quasi-judicial action to which the State or any county is or may be a party, to the extent that such records would not be discoverable;
(3) Government records that, by their nature, must be confidential in order for the government to avoid the frustration of a legitimate government function;
(4) Government records which, pursuant to state or federal law including an order of any state or federal court, are protected from disclosure; and
(5) Inchoate and draft working papers of legislative committees including budget worksheets and unfiled committee reports; work product; records or transcripts of an investigating committee of the legislature which are closed by rules adopted pursuant to section 21-4 and the personal files of members of the legislature. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1993, c 250, §1]
§92F-14 Significant privacy interest; examples.
(a) Disclosure of a government record shall not constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the privacy interests of the individual.
(b) The following are examples of information in which the individual has a significant privacy interest:
(1) Information relating to medical, psychiatric, or psychological history, diagnosis, condition, treatment, or evaluation, other than directory information while an individual is present at such facility;
(2) Information identifiable as part of an investigation into a possible violation of criminal law, except to the extent that disclosure is necessary to prosecute the violation or to continue the investigation;
(3) Information relating to eligibility for social services or welfare benefits or to the determination of benefit levels;
(4) Information in an agency's personnel file, or applications, nominations, recommendations, or proposals for public employment or appointment to a governmental position, except:
(A) Information disclosed under section 92F-12(a)(14); and
(B) The following information related to employment misconduct that results in an employee's suspension or discharge:
(i) The name of the employee;
(ii) The nature of the employment-related misconduct;
(iii) The agency's summary of the allegations of misconduct;
(iv) Findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
(v) The disciplinary action taken by the agency; when the following has occurred: the highest non-judicial grievance adjustment procedure timely invoked by the employee or the employee's representative has concluded; a written decision sustaining the suspension or discharge has been issued after this procedure; and thirty calendar days have elapsed following the issuance of the decision; provided that this subparagraph shall not apply to a county police department officer except in a case which results in the discharge of the officer;
(5) Information relating to an individual's nongovernmental employment history except as necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements for a particular government position;
(6) Information describing an individual's finances, income, assets, liabilities, net worth, bank balances, financial history or activities, or creditworthiness;
(7) Information compiled as part of an inquiry into an individual's fitness to be granted or to retain a license, except:
(A) The record of any proceeding resulting in the discipline of a licensee and the grounds for discipline;
(B) Information on the current place of employment and required insurance coverages of licensees; and
(C) The record of complaints including all dispositions; and
(8) Information comprising a personal recommendation or evaluation; and
(9) Social security numbers. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1993, c 191, §1; am L 1995, c 242, §1; am L 2004, c92, §4]
§92F-15 Judicial enforcement.
(a) A person aggrieved by a denial of access to a government record may bring an action against the agency at any time within two years after the agency denial to compel disclosure.
(b) In an action to compel disclosure the circuit court shall hear the matter de novo. Opinions and rulings of the office of information practices shall be admissible. The circuit court may examine the government record at issue, in camera, to assist in determining whether it, or any part of it, may be withheld.
(c) The agency has the burden of proof to establish justification for nondisclosure.
(d) If the complainant prevails in an action brought under this section, the court shall assess against the agency reasonable attorney's fees and all other expenses reasonably incurred in the litigation.
(e) The circuit court in the judicial circuit in which the request for the record is made, where the requested record is maintained, or where the agency's headquarters are located shall have jurisdiction over an action brought under this section.
(f) Except as to cases the circuit court considers of greater importance, proceedings before the court, as authorized by this section, and appeals therefrom, take precedence on the docket over all cases and shall be assigned for hearing and trial or for argument at the earliest practicable date and expedited in every way. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §3]
§92F-15.3 Notice to the office of information practices. When filing a civil action that is under, related to, or is affected by this chapter, a person shall notify the office of information practices in writing at the time of the filing. The office of information practices may intervene in the action.
[L 1998, c 82, §1]
§92F-15.5 Alternative method to appeal a denial of access. (a) When an agency denies a person access to a government record, the person may appeal the denial to the office of information practices in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to section 92F-42(12). A decision to appeal to the office of information practices for review of the agency denial shall not prejudice the person's right to appeal to the circuit court after a decision is made by the office of information practices.
(b) If the decision is to disclose, the office of information practices shall notify the person and the agency, and the agency shall make the record available. If the denial of access is upheld, in whole or in part, the office of information practices shall, in writing, notify the person of the decision, the reasons for the decision, and the right to bring a judicial action under section 92F-15(a). [L 1989, c 192, §1]
[§92F-16] Immunity from liability. Anyone participating in good faith in the disclosure or nondisclosure of a government record shall be immune from any liability, civil or criminal, that might otherwise be incurred, imposed or result from such acts or omissions. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
[§92F-17] Criminal penalties. (a) An officer or employee of an agency who intentionally discloses or provides a copy of a government record, or any confidential information explicitly described by specific confidentiality statutes, to any person or agency with actual knowledge that disclosure is prohibited, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless a greater penalty is otherwise provided for by law.
(b) A person who intentionally gains access to or obtains a copy of a government record by false pretense, bribery, or theft, with actual knowledge that access is prohibited. or who intentionally obtains any confidential information by false pretense, bribery, or theft, with actual knowledge that it is prohibited [by] a confidentiality statute, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
§92F-18 Agency implementation. (a) Each agency shall:
(1) Issue instructions and guidelines necessary to effectuate this chapter; and
(2) Take steps to assure that all its employees and officers responsible for the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of government records are informed of the requirements of this chapter.
(b) Each agency shall compile a public report describing the records it routinely uses or maintains using forms prescribed by the office of information practices. The public reports shall be filed with the office of information practices on or before December 31, 1994. The public reports shall include:
(1) The name and location of each set of records;
(2) The authority under which the records are maintained;
(3) The categories of individuals for whom records are maintained;
(4) The categories of information or data maintained in the records;
(5) The categories of sources of information in the records;
(6) The categories of uses and disclosures made of the records;
(7) The agencies and categories of persons outside of the agency which routinely use the records;
(8) The records routinely used by the agency which are maintained by:
(A) Another agency; or
(B) A person other than an agency;
(9) The policies and practices of the agency regarding storage, retrievability, access controls, retentions, and disposal of the information maintained in records;
(l0) The title, business address, and business telephone number of the agency officer or officers responsible for the records;
(11) The agency procedures whereby an individual may request access to records; and
(12) The number of written requests for access within the preceding year, the number denied, the number of lawsuits initiated against the agency under this part, and the number of suits in which access was granted.
(c) Each agency shall supplement or amend its public report, or file a new report, on or before July 1 of each subsequent year, to ensure that the information remains accurate and complete. Each agency shall file the supplemental, amended, or new report with the office of information practices, which shall make the reports available for public inspection. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §4; am L 1991, c 167, §2; am L 1992, c 118, §2; am L 1993, c 57, §1]
§92F-19 Limitations on disclosure of government records to other agencies. (a) No agency may disclose or authorize disclosure of government records to any other agency unless the disclosure is:
(1) Necessary for the performance of the requesting agency's duties and functions and is also:
(A) Compatible with the purpose for which the information was collected or obtained; or
(B) Consistent with the conditions or reasonable expectations of use and disclosure under which the information was provided;
(2) To the state archives for the purposes of historic preservation, administrative maintenance, or destruction;
(3) To another agency, another state, or the federal government, or foreign law enforcement agency or authority, if the disclosure is:
(A) For the purpose of a civil or criminal law enforcement activity authorized by law; and
(B) Pursuant to:
(i) A written agreement or written request, or
(ii) A verbal request, made under exigent circumstances, by an officer or employee of the requesting agency whose identity has been verified, provided that such request is promptly confirmed in writing;
(4) To a criminal law enforcement agency of this State, another state, or the federal government, or a foreign criminal law enforcement agency or authority, if the information is limited to an individual's name and other identifying particulars, including present and past places of employment;
(5) To a foreign government pursuant to an executive agreement, compact, treaty, or statute;
(6) To the legislature, or a county council, or any committee or subcommittee thereof;
(7) Pursuant to an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;
(8) To authorized officials of another agency, another state, or the federal government for the purpose of auditing or monitoring an agency program that receives federal, state, or county funding;
(9) To the offices of the legislative auditor, the legislative reference bureau, or the ombudsman of this State for the performance of their respective functions;
(10) To the department of human resources development, county personnel agencies, or line agency personnel offices for the performance of their respective duties and functions, including employee recruitment and examination, classification and compensation reviews, the administration and auditing of personnel transactions, the administration of training and safety, workers' compensation, and employee benefits and assistance programs, and for labor relations purposes; or
(11) Otherwise subject to disclosure under this chapter.
(b) An agency receiving government records pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the same restrictions on disclosure of the records as the originating agency. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1993, c 250, §2; L 1994, c 56, §21]
.........................................................................................
PART III. DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL RECORDS
.........................................................................................
Note
Part heading amended by L 1989, c 192, §5.
[§92F-21] Individual's access to own personal record. Each agency that maintains any accessible personal record shall make that record available to the individual to whom it pertains, in a reasonably prompt manner and in a reasonably intelligible form. Where necessary the agency shall provide a translation into common terms of any machine readable code or any code or abbreviation employed for internal agency use. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
§92F-21.5 REPEALED. L 199O, c 250, §4.
§92F-22 Exemptions and limitations on individual access. An agency is not required by this part to grant an individual access to personal records, or information in such records:
(1) Maintained by an agency that performs as its or as a principal function any activity pertaining to the prevention, control, or reduction of crime, and which consist of:
(A) Information or reports prepared or compiled for the purpose of criminal intelligence or of a criminal investigation, including reports of informers, witnesses, and investigators; or
(B) Reports prepared or compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the criminal laws from arrest or indictment through confinement, correctional supervision, and release from supervision.
(2) The disclosure of which would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the agency under an express or implied promise of confidentiality.
(3) Consisting of testing or examination material or scoring keys used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in public employment, or used as or to administer a licensing examination or an academic examination, the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity, fairness, or effectiveness of the testing or examination process.
(4) Including investigative reports and materials, related to an upcoming, ongoing, or pending civil or criminal action or administrative proceeding against the individual.
(5) Required to be withheld from the individual to whom it pertains by statute or judicial decision or authorized to be so withheld by constitutional or statutory privilege. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1993, c 250, §3]
[92F-23] Access to personal record; initial procedure. Upon the request of an individual to gain access to the individual's personal record, an agency shall permit the individual to review the record and have a copy made within ten working days following the date of receipt of the request by the agency unless the personal record requested is exempted under section 92F-22. The ten-day period may be extended for an additional twenty working days if the agency provides to the individual, within the initial ten working days, a written explanation of unusual circumstances causing the delay.
[L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 2000, c 254, §1]
[§92F-24] Right to correct personal record; initial procedure.(a) An individual has a right to have any factual error in that person's personal record corrected and any misrepresentation or misleading entry in the record amended by the agency which is responsible for its maintenance.
(b) Within twenty business days after receipt of a written request to correct or amend a personal record and evidence that the personal record contains a factual error, misrepresentation, or misleading entry, an agency shall acknowledge receipt of the request and purported evidence in writing and promptly:
(1) Make the requested correction or amendment; or
(2) Inform the individual in writing of its refusal to correct or amend the personal record, the reason for the refusal, and the agency procedures for review of the refusal. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
§92F-25 Correction and amendment; review procedures. (a) Not later than thirty business days after receipt of a request for review of an agency refusal to allow correction or amendment of a personal record, the agency shall make a final determination.
(b) If the agency refuses upon final determination to allow correction or amendment of a personal record, the agency shall so state in writing and:
(1) Permit, whenever appropriate, the individual to file in the record a concise statement setting forth the reasons for the individual's disagreement with the refusal of the agency to correct or amend it; and
(2) Notify the individual of the applicable procedures for obtaining appropriate judicial remedy. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §6]
§92F-26 Rules. The office of information practices shall adopt rules, under chapter 91, establishing procedures necessary to implement or administer this part, which the agencies shall adopt, insofar as practicable, in order to ensure uniformity among state and county agencies. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §7]
§92F-27 Civil actions and remedies. (a) An individual may bring a civil action against an agency in a circuit court of the State whenever an agency fails to comply with any provision of this part, and after appropriate administrative remedies under sections 92F-23, 92F-24, and 92F-25 have been exhausted.
(b) In any action brought under this section the court may order the agency to correct or amend the complainant's personal record, to require any other agency action, or to enjoin such agency from improper actions as the court may deem necessary and appropriate to render substantial relief.
(c) In any action brought under this section in which the court determines that the agency knowingly or intentionally violated a provision of this part, the agency shall be liable to the complainant in an amount equal to the sum of:
(1) Actual damages sustained by the complainant as a result of the failure of the agency to properly maintain the personal record, but in no case shall a complainant (individual) entitled to recovery receive less than the sum of $1,000; and
(2) The costs of the action together with reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court.
(d) The court may assess reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred against the agency in any case in which the complainant has substantially prevailed, and against the complainant where the charges brought against the agency were frivolous.
(e) An action may be brought in the circuit court where the complainant resides, the complainant's principal place of business is situated, or the complainant's relevant personal record is situated. No action shall be brought later than two years after notification of the agency denial, or where applicable, the date of receipt of the final determination of the office of information practices. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §8]
§92F-27.5 Alternative method to appeal a denial of access. (a) When an agency denies an individual access to that individual's personal record, the individual may appeal the denial to the office of information practices in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to section 92F-42(12). A decision to appeal to the office of information practices for review of the agency denial shall not prejudice the individual's right to appeal to the circuit court after a decision is made by the office of information practices.
(b) If the decision is to disclose, the office of information practices shall notify the individual and the agency, and the agency shall make the record available. If the denial of access is upheld, in whole or in part, the office of information practices shall, in writing, notify the individual of the decision, the reasons for the decision, and the right to bring a judicial action under section 92F-27. [L 1989, c 192, §2]
[§92F-28] Access to personal records by order in judicial or administrative proceedings; access as authorized or required by other law. Nothing in this part shall be construed to permit or require an agency to withhold or deny access to a personal record, or any information in a personal record:
(1) When the agency is ordered to produce, disclose, or allow access to the record or information in the record, or when discovery of such record or information is allowed by prevailing rules of discovery or by subpoena, in any judicial or administrative proceeding; or
(2) Where any statute, administrative rules, rule of court, judicial decision, or other law authorizes or allows an individual to gain access to a personal record or to any information in a personal record or requires that the individual be given such access. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]
PART IV. OFFICE OF INFORMATION PRACTlCES; DUTIES
§92F-41 Office of information practices; established. (a) There is established a temporary office of information practices for a special purpose within the office of the lieutenant governor for administrative purposes.
(b) The governor shall appoint a director of the office of information practices to be its chief executive officer and who shall be exempt from chapter 76.
(c) All powers and duties of the office of information practices are vested in the director and may be delegated to any other officer or employee of the office.
(d) The director may employ such other personnel as are necessary, including but not limited to attorneys and clerical staff without regard to chapter 76. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §9; am L 1998, c 137, §4; am L 2000, c 253, §150 ]
§92F-42 Powers and duties of the office of information practices. The director of the office of information practices:
(1) Shall, upon request, review and rule on an agency denial of access to information or records, or an agency's granting of access; provided that any review by the office of information practices shall not be a contested case under chapter 91 and shall be optional and without prejudice to rights of judicial enforcement available under this chapter;
(2) Upon request by an agency, shall provide and make public advisory guidelines, opinions, or other information concerning that agency's functions and responsibilities;
(3) Upon request by any person, may provide advisory opinions or other information regarding that person's rights and the functions and responsibilities of agencies under this chapter;
(4) May conduct inquiries regarding compliance by an agency and investigate possible violations by any agency;
(5) May examine the records of any agency for the purpose of paragraph (4) and seek to enforce that power in the courts of this State;
(6) May recommend disciplinary action to appropriate officers of an agency;
(7) Shall report annually to the governor and the state legislature on the activities and findings of the office of information practices, including recommendations for legislative changes;
(8) Shall receive complaints from and actively solicit the comments of the public regarding the implementation of this chapter;
(9) Shall review the official acts, records, policies, and procedures of each agency;
(10) Shall assist agencies in complying with the provisions of this chapter;
(11) Shall inform the public of the following rights of an individual and the procedures for exercising them:
(A) The right of access to records pertaining to the individual;
(B) The right to obtain a copy of records pertaining to the individual;
(C) The right to know the purposes for which records pertaining to the individual are kept;
(D) The right to be informed of the uses and disclosures of records pertaining to the individual;
(E) The right to correct or amend records pertaining to the individual; and
(F) The individual's right to place a statement in a record pertaining to that individual;
(12) Shall adopt rules that set forth an administrative appeals structure which provides for:
(A) Agency procedures for processing records requests;
(B) A direct appeal from the division maintaining the record; and
(C) Time limits for action by agencies;
(13) Shall adopt rules that set forth the fees and other charges that may be imposed for searching, reviewing, or segregating disclosable records, as well as to provide for a waiver of such fees when the public interest would be served;
(14) Shall adopt rules which set forth uniform standards for the records collection practices of agencies;
(15) Shall adopt rules that set forth uniform standards for disclosure of records for research purposes;
(16) Shall have standing to appear in cases where the provisions of this chapter are called into question;
(17) Shall adopt, amend, or repeal rules pursuant to chapter 91 necessary for the purposes of this chapter; and
(18) Shall take action to oversee compliance with Part I of chapter 92 by all state and county boards including:
(A) Receiving and resolving complaints;
(B) Advising all government boards and the public about compliance with chapter 92; and
(C) Reporting each year to the legislature on all complaints received pursuant to section 92-1.5.
[L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 1989, c 192, §10; am L 1998, c 137, §5]
..........................................................................................
A comment that is interesting from bho boo
..........................................................................................
bho boo Says:
September 27, 2009 at 3:22 pm
I think this is just phase one. There’s no way the marxist usurpation will be intercepted by forcing documentation. He’s got to have failsafe plans in the works, even if DoH officials are held to account, there will be nothing shown, it will have all been destroyed by now. He’s looking to shut down the internet, the only real news source left available. We have to ask ourselves, with the number of corrupt gov’t officials willing to break the law for enrichment or their own crony agendas, just how deep does the corruption run, does it go down to the levels of members imposing marshall law or is that why BO’s busily recruiting his youth brigades now and letting black panthers off the hook? If so, we need to intercept this before he’s got armed zombies willing to take down the American citizenry. We may work the legal end only to find a thug with a club as the reward, and ask what if the next level of resistance just doesn’t care about laws, about documents. They already have shown contempt for us citizens, the judiciary is corrupt, so what’s next? Certainly not their cooperation, though I am not ruling out the great importance of voting out the demarxists in 2010.
All I’m saying is that valiant truthful efforts have been thwarted by an unanticipated level of overt corruption and criminality. We can’t be caught unawares any longer, even if we have the law on our side, they will not uphold it–”they” being key gov’t officials who’ve been bribed coerced threatened or who are complicit. We have to have people to GO AROUND to, and a back up plan for when we are met with corruption, such as clerks forgetting to file, or judges who rationalize with twitter, etc. The problem is that up the legal food chain you find more and more Obama corrupt cronies like Holder, so that can’t be the answer!!
[ed. until we exercise the law to the best of our ability we will be guilty of failing our duty. the UIPA has not been tested. in fact, it's already revealed that his vital records have been amended... that has been proved and confirmed by the DoH via their denial of access to TerriK.]
..........................................................................................
Leo's answer to a question gives me hope that yes obama can and will be exposed. Read his answer to another question below. Better sooner than later.
..........................................................................................
RJJohnson Says:
September 27, 2009 at 5:29 pm
TerriK to Fukino:
1.) I request an electronic copy of the invoice and receipt for the fee(s) charged to and paid by President Barack Obama, or anyone claiming to represent him, for amendments made to his vital records…
Joesting to TerriIK:
If no amendments were made, there would not be any such documents and the agency should inform you of that fact.
Okubo to TerriK:
You have not shown that you have such an interest in President Obama’s birth certificate, so we cannot disclose to you the birth certificate or any related information. We now consider this matter closed.
Okubo can and should disclose if the requested documents exist or don’t exist at the DoH. She did not explicitly do this. Was this a deliberate incomplete response, or did Okubo implicitly indicate that the requested documents do exist? That is the question.
.........................................................................................
[ed. by denying access, she has admitted that the records are maintained by the DoH. Her repsonses have a pattern of trying to hide this. But she can't deny access to a record they do not maintain. It's such a simple concept but they are depending on the ADD of the citizens and we are determined to enlighten the citizens.
The OIP administrative rules are clear. Joesting has confirmed that if they do not have the records they are to inform you of that. If they deny access then they are admitting they have the records. People are not understanding this fine point. Doesn't really matter... we're going to get the records we need one way or the other. whether people understand it or not. The UIPA is a very good law and the OIP appears ready to enforce it.
The DoH and OIP are going to face off down the road... I'm not saying there won't be bumps in the road, but I believe we can win this battle for information.]
.........................................................................................
Another question and another answer from Leo Donofrio.
.........................................................................................
Pete Says:
September 27, 2009 at 9:09 pm
Leo,
The question to the DoH is: Was a receipt generated for the sale of a COLB for Barrack Obama for June 7th 2007. We are NOT requesting personal information, only to humbly ask the state if payment for a government sale took place for COLB for said individual. I repeat, we are not asking for any identifiable information, just if a bill of sale exists, and the price and date of the transaction.
Refusing to answer, specifically asking that no personal information be released, is to deny the public information on government transactions. That clearly violates the spirit of their UPIA laws.
[ed. we are on this and are prepared to appeal it all the way... this and more.]
.........................................................................................
Another good question for Leo about the "kenyan birth certificate"
.........................................................................................
MadeinAmerica Says:
September 27, 2009 at 10:00 pm
What do you make of Lucas Smith’s claim that he has the original Kenyan birth certificate?
[ed. the UIPA is where my focus is at. i know the UIPA is real and I know we need to utilize ourselves of it... get the real BC info on the record, get the nbc statement info on the record...and move on to the British birth as a nation. That's my focus. I believe Obama was born in Hawaii. If our investigation reveals otherwise, then our burden of proof for him not being nbc is lessened.]
........................................................................................
A question to Leo about Barry Soetoro changing his name to Barack H. Obama
........................................................................................
Tian Min Says:
September 27, 2009 at 11:05 pm
Leo,
Regarding the issue of whether Barack Obama ever used Barry Soetoro as his legal name, maybe the following information would be useful:
I lived in Hawaii for most of the ’80s and ’90s. During that time, I legally changed my name. In Hawaii in the ’80s, name changes were done by executive order of the Lieutenant Governor, rather than through the courts like in most other states. The procedure was remarkably simple–nothing more than submitting the paperwork and filing fee to the Lieutenant Governor’s office and publishing a legal notice for three days in the newspapers. No hearing was held and no judge or lawyers were required, nor was it necessary to even state a reason for wanting the name changed. Note, this transaction did not involve the Department of Health, nor was there anything private about it.
If Barack Obama had a legal name change in Hawaii, there should be archival records at the Lieutenant Governor’s office and probably also from the Honolulu Advertiser and/or Star-Bulletin.
Keep up the good work!
[ed. name changes are not private...and we have been looking into this since last week. good observation.]
.........................................................................................
Oh ya I would like to see this happen. I believe Leo can make it happen. Go Leo!!!!!!!!!
.........................................................................................
O-bam-boozled Says:
September 28, 2009 at 11:02 am
If you can get Hawaiian gov’t officials to acknowledge that the birth certificate posted on FactCheck.org is not real, Obama is toast.
The reason being: That FactCheck.org birth certificate is what many Congressmen/women relied upon in their letters to constituents to justify Obama was/is a legitimate president.
If Hawaii officials concede that is not legitimate, the fat lady is singing.
[ed. we are on this....]
........................................................................................
Yes Yes Yes, lets all request some information from Hawaii. I will be making my request tommorrow. Can't wait to get an answer. I want to be a part of exposing the imposter/fraud obama!
........................................................................................
Leo:
Re: your comment above “…but there.s no way he’s nbc since at the time of his birth, he was British…”
While you and TerriK are at it I respectfully request (without a hint of previously alleged salaciousness or defamation…an allegation which I must protest as being defamatory towards my anonymous persona, Seizethecarp, on behalf of my anonymous persona ;-) …) …I request that you or others request the HI vital index history for Stanley Ann Dunham with special attention to the index for a record in which you have absolute confidence as to its existence, that being her marriage on Maui in 1961.
*****************************************************************************************
[ed. yes, we have that on our list. I will add that there is nothing stopping anyone else from requesting the same...you don't even have to give your real name to do so.]
*****************************************************************************************
The best evidence to date, a 1964 divorce decree for the marriage, supports the fact of that marriage.
Note that Obama himself stated in “Dreams” without a hint of salaciousness or defamation towards his parents:
“How and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I have never quite had the courage to explore.”
[ed. good quote...]
.........................................................................................
Wow! Leo fires another silver bullet here in his answer to a question!!!!! I'm real excited about what Leo is saying. Man he is riding the BIG WAVE NOW. :)
.........................................................................................
bho boo Says:
September 28, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Leo, of course DoH will not obey its own laws, they haven’t so far, and in panic mode you can expect Obama attorneys to twitterify any motions. Like I said, we oughtn’t be surprised any longer, this is a bloodless marxist coup, so far, but that doesn’t mean they won’t uptick things as necessary.
[ed. it's going to take more than the DoH to stop the information coming out. My research is showing this is a slam dunk. You would need the OIP to reverse about 10 Opinion Letters and then you'd need the Hawaii Supreme Court to reverse itself. I am not fooling around here.]
........................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment