In 2010 the Tea Party Was The Republican Dashboard

..........
(I've been reading about the dashboard app obama used in 2008 and updated in 2012 to gather information that was used as a high tech obama "tea party" with unlimited obama funding. The 2009 tea party was a grass roots organization that resulted in the 2010 republican landslide. After 2010 the republican party stabbed the tea party in the back therefore in the 2012 election the tea party was deluted and frustrated at the moderate republican party. They didn't turn out the vote in 2012. This is also another big reason the usurper/fraud/emptysuit/liar obama got "reelected." High tech "matrix" network organiztion/manipulation of unsuspecting dupes by obama resulted in checkmate. You have got to ask yourself why didn't the republican's take advantage of a similar "dashboard." It seems all they had was a "floorboard" approach to winning just like the low tech 2008 effort of mccain.) Story Reports
.......
NationalField: The Private Social Network That's Reinventing the Ground Game

The New and Not-So-New In Obama's "Dashboard"

NationalField

In 2008 a suite of online tools geared towards making field organizing more trackable, measurable, immediate immersive became known as NationalField, a software platform now turned social data company.

NationalField is a startup tech company headquartered in Washington, DC.

Its primary product is enterprise-specific private social networks that permit each member of a business or institution to communicate salient information within their organizational hierarchies via Facebook-style news feeds.

The network addresses inefficiencies in information transmission typical of an enterprise's intranet by relying on real-time input and feedback instead of spreadsheets and email.

Unlike Facebook, group members do not self-direct membership via "friending", rather their inclusion depends on their position within the organization.

Networks can feature user-generated apps that allow their organizations to reduce or eliminate typical administrative costs like redundant work, data compilation, information tracking and sharing, and accountability.

It is a narrowly-focused communication tool that allowed any member of a particular group to post progress reports, pertinent campaign information (e.g. how many doors knocked on, phone calls made, etc.), strategic and tactical Q&A, and other important project data to a real-time news feed.

Campaign finance filings show that the Obama campaign is a client of National Field. The company's software advertises its product as something that can help managers within organizations to coach and enhance the performance of their staffers more efficiently. According to the campaign, some National Field ideas are incorporated in Dashboard, but Dashboard was designed and created in-house.

It was a significant advantage in Obama's re-election bid that most of the public never even knew was there.

Together, the hard metrics and softer ephemera alike got poured into a dashboard that gave campaign organizers a quick way to take the pulse of a campaign, and to dive in deeper if they need to.
........

(The republican party is a loser. Only a new third party with high tech savy that can attract conservatives can hope to counter the obama matrix of deception. I'm hoping and waiting for something to imerge to defeat the deciever in chief barack obama.

If one waits for the republican party to defeat obama it is a wasted effort.

I hope to see another tea party type grass roots collection of patriots that will organize to defeat obama and the republicans in the future.

There is hope but not in the republicans.

Americans can save America if they are not DUPED again by the republicans and the state run media.) Story Reports

Walmart Black Friday 2012 Hunger Games

....

“Walmart is really going to crack down on the fighting this year,” said chief marketing officer Flutarch Peavensdee. “We can’t just open the doors and have everyone attacking each other at once without giving them something to fight for or showing it on TV.”

Peavensdee elaborated on how the current, chaotic state of Black Friday is a sad testament to America’s dangerous obsession with commercial goods. “It’s absolutely tragic to hear stories of people getting trampled to death over an iPad.”

“We’re thinking of implementing an instant replay feature for any of the customers that are especially hungry for a big deal.”

Walmart’s customers are equally enthusiastic about participating. One customer eva coin said, "I won't let anybody get in front of me like last year. I brought a baseball bat this time. Another customer, Bow Kuncles said, " I'm going to stomp any old lady that gets in my way."

.......................

(The above is of course not a real quote. It is true people have been trampled to death, stabbed, arrested etc on black friday. Its is somewhat similar to the hunger games. We do see replays of some of the black friday games. There are winners and losers.

Its is a sad testament to Americans obsession to commercial goods. People are just being manipulated through various methods such as the delphi technique Psychological control in advertising etc.

The black friday hunger games are everywhere. Its just the beginning of 4 more years or more with obama. I suggest not getting into the frey of "black" friday for your own safety.) Story Reports

...............................
LA Times

Aimee Drolet Rossi, a consumer psychologist at UCLA's Anderson School of Management, said it should not be surprising that some people act out on Black Friday. Research on rats and monkeys has shown that they become more aggressive when placed in a crowded situation, and Rossi said humans are no different.

"Crowding leads people to behave less altruistically, in part because people's sense of responsibility lags when a lot of other people are around," she said. "People assume that other people will step up to help someone who is in distress."

"For some people, shopping is a competitive sport," LAPD Commander Andy Smith said. "But it should not be a contact sport."

The LAPD has been visiting stores across the city this week, talking to managers about the psychology of the frantic shopper.

Officials said the push was prompted by a series of incidents at Black Friday sales, notably one last year at a Porter Ranch Wal-Mart in which two dozen people were injured when a woman unleashed pepper spray during a frantic battle for some discounted video games.

The LAPD has also suggested that retailers avoid stacking sales items on pallets "to mitigate crowd aggression."

Obama Uses The Delphi Technique To Manipulate

(Obama Used The Delphi Technique To Manipulate People In America In The "Election". He makes up a "strawman" to attack. In todays news conference the facilitator or change agent obama made republican senators the "straw man"/bad guys to be attacked. Obama the facilitator is perceived as the “good guy” by causing a split in the audience.

Obama the facilitator makes people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc. His "straw men". Once this is done, the facilitator establishes himself or herself as the “friend” of the rest of the audience.

Obama is an expert at this psychological weapon developed during the cold war.) Story Reports
.........

Top Georgia GOP Lawmakers Host Briefing on Secret Obama Mind-Control Plot
..........

Albert V. Burns

The Delphi Technique: Let’s Stop Being Manipulated!

The Delphi Technique: Let’s Stop Being Manipulated!

More and more, we are seeing citizens being invited to “participate” in various forms of meetings, councils, or boards to “help determine” public policy in one field or another. They are supposedly being included to get ”input” from the public to help officials make final decisions on taxes, education, community growth or whatever the particular subject matter might be.

Sounds great, doesn’t it? Unfortunately, surface appearances are often deceiving.

You, Mr. or Mrs. Citizen, decide to take part in one of these meetings.

Generally, you will find that there is already someone designated to lead or “facilitate” the meeting. Supposedly, the job of the facilitator is to be a neutral, non-directing helper to see that the meeting flows smoothly.

Actually, he or she is there for exactly the opposite reason: to see that the conclusions reached during the meeting are in accord with a plan already decided upon by those who called the meeting.

The process used to “facilitate” the meeting is called the Delphi Technique. This Delphi Technique was developed by the RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Defense back in the 1950s. It was originally intended for use as a psychological weapon during the cold war.

However, it was soon recognized that the steps of Delphi could be very valuable in manipulating ANY meeting toward a predetermined end.

How does the process take place? The techniques are well developed and well defined.

First, the person who will be leading the meeting, the facilitator or Change Agent must be a likable person with whom those participating in the meeting can agree or sympathize.

It is, therefore, the job of the facilitator to find a way to cause a split in the audience, to establish one or a few of the people as “bad guys” while the facilitator is perceived as the “good guy.”

Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc. Once this is done, the facilitator establishes himself or herself as the “friend” of the rest of the audience.

The stage is now set for the rest of the agenda to take place.

At this point, the audience is generally broken up into “discussion—or ‘breakout’—groups” of seven or eight people each. Each of these groups is to be led by a subordinate facilitator.

Within each group, discussion takes place of issues, already decided upon by the leadership of the meeting. Here, too, the facilitator manipulates the discussion in the desired direction, isolating and demeaning opposing viewpoints.

(The discussion or breakout groups are in your tv in the form of many different liberal tv "panels" etc. These as subordinate facilitators. They are also late night liberal talk show hosts, cable discussion groups ie tv shows etc. They can also be comedians etc. The "view" is a prime example of a group led by subordinate facilitators who are using the delphi technique to manipulate you using the psychological weapon of mind control.

Opra is another example of a subordinate facilitator. You see and hear them constantly. The facilitators also use audio and video ads as a psychological weapon of mind control.) Story Reports

Generally, participants are asked to write down their ideas and disagreements with the papers to be turned in and “compiled” for general discussion after the general meeting is reconvened.

This is the weak link in the chain, which you are not supposed to recognize. Who compiles the various notes into the final agenda for discussion? Ahhhh! Well, it is those who are running the meeting.

How do you know that the ideas on your notes were included in the final result? You Don’t! You may realize that your idea was not included and come to the conclusion that you were probably in the minority. Recognize that every other citizen member of this meeting has written his or her likes or dislikes on a similar sheet of paper and they, too, have no idea whether their ideas were “compiled” into the final result! You don’t even know if anyone’s ideas are part of the final “conclusions” presented to the reassembled group as the “consensus” of public opinion.

Rarely does anyone challenge the process, since each concludes that he or she was in the minority and different from all the others.

So, now, those who organized the meeting in the first place are able to tell the participants and the rest of the community that the conclusions, reached at the meeting, are the result of public participation.

Actually, the desired conclusions had been established, in the back room, long before the meeting ever took place. There are variations in the technique to fit special situations but, in general, the procedure outlined above takes place.

The natural question to ask here is: If the outcome was preordained before the meeting took place, why have the meeting? Herein lies the genius of this Delphi Technique.

It is imperative that the general public believe that this program is theirs! They thought it up! They took part in its development! Their input was recognized!

If people believe that the program is theirs, they will support it.

If they get the slightest hint that the program is being imposed upon them, they will resist.

This very effective technique is being used, over and over and over, to change our form of government from the representative republic, intended by the Founding Fathers, into a “participatory democracy." Now, citizens chosen at large are manipulated into accepting preset outcomes while they believe that the input they provided produced the outcomes which are now theirs! The reality is that the final outcome was already determined long before any public meetings took place, determined by individuals unknown to the public. Can you say “Conspiracy?”

...................

These “Change Agents” or “Facilitators” can be beaten! They may be beaten using their own methods against them.

One: Never, never lose your temper! Lose your temper and lose the battle, it is that simple! Smile, if it kills you to do so. Be courteous at all times. Speak in a normal tone of voice.

Two: Stay focused! Always write your question or statement down in advance to help you remember the exact manner in which your question or statement was made.

These agents are trained to twist things to make anyone not acceding to their agenda look silly or aggressive. Smile, wait till the change agent gets done speaking and then bring them back to your question. If they distort what you said, simply remind those in the group that what he or she is saying is not what you asked or said and then repeat, verbatim, from your notes the original objection.

Three: Be persistent! Wait through any harangues and then repeat the original question.

Four: Don’t go alone! Get as many friends or relatives who think as you do, to go along with you to the meeting. Have each person ”armed” with questions or statements which all generally support your central viewpoint. Don’t sit together as a group! Spread out through the audience so that your group does not seem to be a group.

When the facilitator or change agent avoids answering your question and insists that he must move on so everyone may have a chance to speak, your own agents in the audience can then ask questions, worded differently, but still with the same meaning as yours. They can bring the discussion back to your original point.

They could even point out, in a friendly manner, that the agent did not really answer your question. The more the agent avoids your question, and the more your friends bring that to the attention of the group, the more the audience will shift in your favor.

“Turn the technique back on them and isolate the change agent as the kook. I’ve done it and seen steam come out of the ears of those power brokers in the wings who are trying to shove something down the citizen’s throats. And it’s so much fun to watch the moderator squirm and lose his cool, all while trying to keep a smile on his face.”

Now that you understand how meetings are manipulated, let’s show them up for the charlatans which they are.

..............................


Agenda 21 is a plan put forth by the United Nations that seeks to implement “sustainable development.” Nebulous government-speak terms like “smart meters,” “smart growth,” “sustainable communities,” “greenways,” and my personal favorite, “social justice” all have to do with the U.N.’s Agenda 21. On the surface, sure they sound good. Why would we not be in favor of “smart” things and “sustainability?” Why would we not be in favor of “social justice?” They sound like things we could be in favor of, but what do they mean by them?

At the U.N.’s “Earth Summit” in 1992, George H. W. Bush was one of 178 world leaders who signed the Agenda 21 protocol and agreed with its goals. Maurice Strong was the Secretary General at this conference. He stated that “current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.”

Agenda 21 is all about environmental control. It seeks to ration natural resources in the same way that Obamacare will ration healthcare. Energy will be rationed based on the assumption that our government owns all resources including food, water and land. Local Agenda 21 initiatives will mandate certain appliances and outlaw others based on energy consumption, and your energy consumption will be monitored so that you don’t “go over your limit.” Homes and buildings will have to be built or rebuilt to meet new “green” building codes or else face hefty fines. It seeks to transition citizens away from rural areas and into cities. It wants to “wean” people off private vehicles (because of “dirty” fossil fuels) and have them start using public transportation like high-speed rail. Outdoor recreational activities will be restricted because those practices are not “sustainable.”

“Social justice” means the abolition of private property.

........................
Public Input Summary


This is what a firm called greenways uses to get public input. Greenways uses the delphi technique of psychological control also to push the UN agenda 21 all over America. They of course make the public think they have some real input in their meetings to control the use of land all over the United States.


C.3 Comment Form
A comment form was developed for the City of Greenville during this process and made available in both hardcopy and online form. The comment form was available online for over three months. To maximize the responses to the online form, the web address was distributed at the public meeting, to local interest groups, in newsletters, and on flyers throughout the City. Over 600 forms were completed providing significant input into the development of this Plan.
The comment form results shown on the following pages have been tabulated by Greenways Incorporated to provide insight into local......


Do you see this is real and is used by people manipulating you? Its the delphi technique.

Consensus decision-making is a group decision making process that seeks the consent of all participants. The delphi mind control technique makes you feel good about a "consensus" of the facilitator or change agent's agenda.

Citizens chosen at large are manipulated into accepting preset outcomes while they believe that the input they provided produced the outcomes which are now theirs! The reality is that the final outcome was already determined long before any public meetings took place, determined by individuals unknown to the public called facilitator or change agent.

Obama is nothing more than a facilitator used to manipulate public opinion through the delphi technique of mind control!!!!!!

Doesn't this make you sick? Remember the guy in the Matrix. When he found out he was being used as a battery, he got very ill.

The delphi technique is used as a "matrix" to control and manipulate public opinion.

Nike Dual Fusion Shoes (Mtlc/Platinum/Mtlc D) - Women's Shoes - 5.0 M (Google Affiliate Ad)

The republican "parity" and democrat party are corrupt.

Gulag Bound

The GOP Can Not Legally Help Stop Vote Fraud.

My good friend Alan Vera of True the Vote told me long ago that we have a two party system: the Corrupt Party and the Stupid Party. To that fact, during the weekly True the Vote webcast, Catherine Engelbrecht related a meeting she had with RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, asking what the GOP would do about voter integrity. The answer?

Nothing. They aren’t legally able to.

Lawsuit settlement with the Democrat Party

As part of a lawsuit settlement with the Democrat Party, the Gutless Old Party agreed to not engage in any voter protection initiatives. Two of the clauses read this way:

(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

..........
ACORN Whistleblower Anita Moncrief added that when she spoke at the Republican National Convention, she had to submit her speech to make sure nothing she said could be construed as violating the order not to assist voter integrity.

.....................

(Here is just another reason to form another party asap that will promote a true conservative candidate for president. The gop is corrupt not just because they settled a lawsuit with the democrat party that allows for voter fraud but because the gop will promote only moderate candidates that the conservative base will not support fully.

The gop is a losing party now. The writing is on the wall. Form a third party to defeat the gop and democrat parties.

Let the moderates nominate their moderate loser candidate. Let the democrates nominate anoother liberal socialist.

Let the new third party nominate a real conservative that will turn out the base and also garner some of the other two parties votes in national and local elections.

Its time for a political party revolution!

We only need a third party that can compete and win. We don't need anything other than a real conservative party candidate. Anything else will lose. The republican "parity" is equivalent to the democrat party.) Story Reports

Parity

1. equality, as in amount, status, or character.
2. equivalence; correspondence; similarity; analogy.


Ronald Reagan

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.

Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.

(Remember Ronald Reagan left the Democrat party. After he switched to the Republican Party in 1962, Ronald Reagan famously quipped: “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party. The party left me.” This is exactly what the republican "parity" has done to conservative voters, it left them twisting in the wind!) Story Reports

16 Million White Votes Missing In Recent "Election"

............................

..................
Gulag Bound


Arlen Williams

Remember just a few days ago, seeing the polls show extremely high voter intensity numbers for Republicans, compared to 2008?

Here is one example from Gallup’s, “Voters Say This Election Matters More Than Most,” 11/6.

It clearly shows voter intensity was up for Republicans compared to 2008, by their measurement at a ratio of 85 to 74. Other polls reported similar results to similar questions. Especially with more poll respondents calling themselves Republicans than in 2008, that greater qualitative measurement should have translated into a greater quantitative measurement of votes — and certainly not a great deal fewer votes. Yet, somehow, by the figures below, we are expected to believe that “the white vote” was down 16 million, which happens to translate into a whopping 16%.


WHERE DID 16 MILLION WHITE VOTES GO????

It is being widely reported that there were 117 million votes cast: 60 million Obama and 57+ million for Romney.

This is down 13 million from 2008 total of 131.4 million.

In 2008 it is recorded that 100 million whites cast a vote representing 74% of the total and the minority share of the vote was 26%.

Now they are reporting out of a total of 117 million votes, whites cast 72% and minorities cast 28%.

That means that only 84 million whites voted in 2012 down 16 million from the 100 million whites who voted in 2008.

Extrapolating from that, we have to say that 3 million more minorities voted in 2012 than in 2008.

In 2010 the resident population of voting age (including aliens of voting age) was 234,564,000. This was an increase in resident population of almost 5 million from the 2008 figure.

Yet we are expected to believe that there was a net loss of votes of 13 million representing 16 million fewer white voters and an additional 3 million minority voters.

I mean, this is just NOT BELIEVABLE.

I refer you to a chart of all the Presidential elections from 1932 -2010. Census.Gov

As you can see, as the population increases, the number of voters increases in every election cycle except when Clinton ran for re-election against Dole. Not a hotly contested election. Kind of a walk away for Clinton. And, even with this….the drop in voters is not near 13 million, and 16 million whites.

This turn out and loss of 16 million whites in a hotly contested election such as this one is absolutely NOT believable.

What is really going on?

...................................

AMERICA'S CLAIRVOYANT ELECTION SYSTEM

Bev Harris

Perhaps one of the oddest moments of all during last night's live election coverage was what happened to Karl Rove on Fox Network News.

With Florida still too close to call and hundreds of thousands of votes still out in Ohio (including a large hunk of votes in Romney strongholds), and with a spread of about 100,000 votes separating the candidates in Ohio, Fox called Ohio for Obama. Karl Rove arranged to come on the Fox network to voice his rebuttal.

Now, whatever you think of Rove, I think most of us agree that he's a numbers guy. His numbers didn't support the calling of the state of Ohio at that point in time. When he explained his reasoning, the Fox anchor quickly shut him down. "It's a science" he was told.

Based not on actual votes, but on projections from a single private entity, the National Election Pool (NEP), we were all told what the election results were going to be. When Rove pulled out his notes and calculations, he was basically told "Shut up, this is a science."

But is that what your vote really is? A science project, to be viewed only by experts inside a nesting set of black boxes, completely out of public view?

If we are to have real self-governance, we need to be able to authenticate each essential step in our own elections -- without need for special expertise to explain to us what the result is. What more centralized, privatized form of declaring a result is there than to commission the NEP to provide a single set of statistics to ALL of the TV networks for a declaration of results without human eyes ever looking at a single ballot.

The media called the election in Tennessee just 11 minutes after the polls closed and by the way, exit polls had already been cancelled in Tennessee because, it was explained, everyone already knew who the winner was going to be so why bother with the expense. Even the voting machines, opaque and controlled by whatever their programmers put into them, had not yet issued results printouts. Is this the new, NEW method for pretending at democracy?

Washington State, where I live, is a forced absentee state, where 100% of the votes are now absentee ballots, which must be postmarked on Election Day. I placed my ballot in the post office at 2 pm. There are no exit polls, because there are no polling places. Apparently a few phone calls now substitute for actual exit polling (to people with land lines? That's an increasingly elderly demographic). Perhaps 40% of all ballots in Washington have not even been counted yet, but we've been told the results.

In California, typically 25% of the votes are counted after Election Day, yet results have been announced. That's a million uncounted ballots in Los Angeles alone. We have no clue what is on those ballots but we've been told not to worry about it. The stats guys have issued their verdict.

Forget voting machines, programmed by insiders to do whatever they do. Let's just skip counting the votes altogether and use statistics.

Creepy little way to run an election, if you ask me.The public must be able to see and authenticate these four essential steps for an election to be public, democratic, and valid: (1) Who can vote (voter list); (2) Who did vote (3) The original count; (4) Chain of custody.

....................

(16 Million Whites decided not to vote this time. I don't believe it. I also don't believe obama won the election. He and his fellow comrads just fixed the election.


"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."
quote of obama comrad.) Story Reports

Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law

.........................
‘Crooked Politics: Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law’

Arlen Williams

Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law

November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.

Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.

Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

...............................
Another Stolen Election

PolitiJim

Another Stolen Election???

The popular vote results reported by the respective secretaries of state of the key swing states last night are a little more than suspect. The concession by Mr. Romney and the GOP was, at best, premature. The election results are not official until the party electors meet to vote the electoral votes in each state. There is time to take action.

Election Data Is Highly Suspicious

The University of Colorado Department of Political Science Electoral Vote projection is the most accurate presidential election model in our history. They were the only source that correctly called the 1980 Reagan/Carter results. They have correctly modeled every presidential election since with their projected electoral totals never off by more than 1%.

Their method is not a standard political poll process. They include surveys, but those are only 1 of many variables in a complex algorithm that includes key economic, employment and social measures. They build their models state by state to assure sufficient granularity for top accuracy. It is mathematically possible that statistical error could cause them to incorrectly project ONE state. But it is mathematically impossible for them to incorrectly project more than one. Their 2012 model projected Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia for the Romney/Ryan ticket. The results reported by those secretaries of state were different.

Add to this the survey data showing the Democrat ticket losing support from 2008 among Blacks, Jews, Catholics and Independents, and the results reported for the above-named states are mathematically impossible.

An army of trained poll watchers/election observers kept a lid on fraud in voter registrations and at the ballot boxes in all the key states. While there is no way these volunteers could have stopped 100% of the fraud, all reports are that they kept it at or below “normal” levels. That means that the discrepancies between scientifically generated data and the election results reported were most likely generated behind the scenes under the auspices of the secretaries of state involved.

....................

The George Soros Secretary of State Project

This leads us to an organized program of election corruption underwritten by George Soros.

DiscoverTheNetwork.org Date: 11/7/2012

Secretary of state project secstateproject.org

SECRETARY OF STATE PROJECT (SOSP)

Worked to help Democrats get elected to the office of Secretary of State in selected swing, or battleground, states

Received funding from Democracy Alliance members George Soros and Rob Stein, among many others

Became moribund in 2010

The Secretary of State Project (SoSP) was established in July 2006 as an independent “527” organization devoted to helping Democrats get elected to the office of secretary-of-state in selected swing, or battleground, states; these were states where the margin of victory in the 2004 presidential election (between George W. Bush and John Kerry) had been 120,000 votes or less.1 One of the principal duties of the secretary of state is to serve as the chief election officer who certifies candidates as well as election results in his or her state.2 The holder of this office, then, can potentially play a key role in determining the winner of a close election.

SoSP’s co-founders were Democracy Alliance member Michael Kieschnick (who also founded Working Assets and serves as a board member of the leftist evangelical group Sojourners); Becky Bond (who also had affiliations with Working Assets and the New Organizing Institute); and James Rucker (who co-founded Color of Change and formerly served as director of grassroots mobilization for MoveOn.org Political Action and Moveon.org Civic Action).


ACTION NEEDED

Citizen Activists of Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia must immediately contact their respective state GOP party, and (if possible) the slate of GOP electors who were chosen at their state party conventions this past year.

These two groups have legal standing in the respective states to legally challenge the results reported by the Secretary of State. The presidential voting was not for the president/vice president ticket. The voting was for the electors pledged to vote for the ticket in December. Romney/Ryan didn’t lose last night. The electors pledged to them in each of the key states were robbed of their election.

There’s time to have a recount observed by trained election observers and representatives of the parties. There’s time to get a look at the actual results of the voting in each of the key states.

Somebody from each state needs to step forward and run with this.

(Please contact Alan via the PolitiJim contact page)


(It seems it wasn't just Romney's fault he lost the election. He got some help from George Soros one of obama's mentors.) Also remember almost 3 million voters didn't vote that could have. Story Reports

Examine, Learn, Adapt And Grow

Examine, Learn, Adapt And Grow

During his youth Abraham Lincoln was "leased out" to nearby farmers by his father to earn money. This was legal at the time.

Today people that work and earn a living are "leased out" by the federal government to earn money for redistribution to those who don't work or want a free ride from the government.

The American people who work and earn a living are in effect "slaves" to the federal government.

To end this slavery they must examine, adapt, learn and grow in knowledge of how to break their bonds of slavery through taxes that are hidden and not hidden.

The status quo republican party candidate who was a moderate did not generate enough votes to "free the slaves" from the government.

A new party that will defeat liberalism ie the federal slave master must be formed.

This new party must nominate a real conservative that will motivate the "slaves" to the federal government to rebel and vote for their own emancipation from the "slavery" of federal government redistribution of wealth.

This new party candidate must convince the federal tax slaves that they can be free and not be "rented out" to earn money for those the federal government wants to continue to support to grow the federal government farm or "plantation".

Do you agree?

Story Reports Comments

The Forces Of Evil Have Won The "Election"

I asked my self how is this possible. How could obama get "elected" again?

I told my son, "This doesn't make sense." The fact is obama's win does make sense to enough people to put the "liar in chief" back in as "president."

I asked myself, is this GOD'S judgement. I answered, yes.

Why? My best guess is to let this country suffer the consequences of having a "leader" who will destroy the status quo.

The status quo, a Latin term meaning the current or existing state of affairs.

Out of destruction comes rebuilding.

The Number of abortions per day: Approximately 3,700 Obama condones this as acceptable, forgivable, or harmless.

Obama condones sodomy as acceptable or harmless.

Obama is GOD'S judgement on America.

Those people who have supported obama have brought the judgement of GOD upon all of us, including those who condone the killing of the unborn, sodomy etc.

GOD lets evil prevail sometimes for various reasons.

So you see it does make sense when you think of the election in this way.

Reason and good judgement have not prevailed.

Judgement is coming for obama supporters and all who are deceived by satan.

............. ................................

2 Thessalonians 2

1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?

6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.

7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

13 But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:

14 Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.

15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

16 Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace,

17 Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

....................


(We who oppose obama and the forces of evil are not without hope. Only those who are not saved are without hope.) Story Reports

GOD's WORD

Good News Post

Obama Campaign Panics Over Exit Polls Before They Occur

(Obama tells his supporters to stay calm and don't panic over exit polls early in the day because the illegal alien knows he is losing. So my message to the fruad president is, don't panic, don't worry, just be cool and realize your time is up.) Story Reports


Obama Campaign to Supporters: Don’t Panic Over Early Exit Polls

In a conference call this afternoon, President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign had one central message for their supporters when Election Day arrives tomorrow: They should “keep calm,” even if they hear snippets of information favoring Republican Mitt Romney.

“My warning, we need to stay calm for much of the day,” Stephanie Cutter, Mr. Obama’s deputy campaign manager, said, touting thousands of early ballots already submitted by voters. “We’ve already banked a pretty big portion of our vote.”

The fear, she explained, was early numbers leaking before voters have finished going to the polls, creating unnecessary panic and pessimism among Democrats.

“Keep calm and tweet on,” Ms. Cutter said. “So, no matter what you hear tomorrow about turnout in Republican counties or exit polls, particularly early in the day, please remember and remind your readers that, because of early votes, we’re where we need to be to win….I don’t think there’s going to be official exits until the end of the day, but if things leak out that aren’t validated or weighted, please stay calm.”

Obama quote about white Americans has been edited and hid from the public.

(I recently noticed that the video on fox news did not contain obama calling white people "whitie". The video was also in the movie dreams of my real father at 55 min into the video. I watched the movie dreams of my real father on netflix when it came out about a month ago.

I watched it again today and noticed that at 55 min into the video where obama was leading a protest at harvard and talking about professor bell it had been edited since the first time I saw it. The first time I viewed the video I noted in a past blog that obama referred to white Americans as "whitie".

Now obama's comments about "white" are gone. I also noticed that on you tube it is obvious that this comment obama made about "whitie" has also been edited out.

This means obama and his fellow comrads have gone to the trouble of leaning on the maker of a film to edit out the obama whitie comments on netflix. The you tube video is edited also. Fox news says it was unedited version but this is also not true.

I can see now that this comment obama made about white people at the harvard protest was hid from the public in 2008 and in 2012 was edited to cut out obama's comments about "whitie".

Again I saw and heard the same video clip in the move dreams of my real father on netflix about one month ago and IT DID CONTAIN OBAMA CALLING WHITE AMERICANS "WHITIE"

"Whitie" is under estimated by obama and his comrads.) Story Reports
...................................
Battle ground watch.com Why "whitie" will win the election for Romney

The Folly of David Axelrod’s Turnout Model


The folly of the Obama campaign’s election assumptions is the 2008 perfect storm that doubled the election-over-election decrease in White participation at a pace 3.5x as great as the norm will repeat itself with another -1.4pp rate of change resulting in a -4.3pp decline to 72%.

The doubling of the average decrease in White participation was a combination of 2 competing factors: first, non-Whites were excited over the prospects of the first viable non-White Presidential candidate and White voters of the opposition party were unenthusiastic over their candidate and did not participate in the election. Without the combination of these factors the White vote percentage of the electorate would still have declined but the decline would not doubled. Compared to the recent rate of change of -0.4pp, the change in the decrease of White composition from 2004 to 2008 was -1.4pp, 3.5x greater than the modern trend.

The folly of the Obama campaign’s election assumptions is the 2008 perfect storm that doubled the election-over-election decrease in White participation at a pace 3.5x as great as the norm will repeat itself with another -1.4pp rate of change resulting in a -4.3pp decline to 72%.

This type of assumption is the same as a football team that has a record first quarter outscoring their opponent 35-0 and then game-plans they will repeat that every quarter scoring 140 points. That is clearly not going to happen.

In the 2012 election neither of the two major factors from 2008 that conspired to dramatically decrease White participation are evident. Every survey consistently reveals meaningful decreases in enthusiasm among non-White voters while White voters appear substantially more enthusiastic than 2008. To take a record turnout model from 2008 and extrapolate it to the next election and expect a repeat record decrease from the unusually low 2008 turnout is folly bordering on delusional.

Regarding the macro-trend in the US of an increase in the non-White composition of the population, the return of an enthusiastic white voter coupled with the decreased non-White enthusiasm should strongly mitigate the macro-demographic trend of very real increases in non-White voters overall.

But David Axelrod’s entire campaign is predicated on the above assumptions that expect a “White flight” that exists in no poll nationally or in any state. At a state level, it is due to differences of opinion like the above that both campaigns are reportedly seeing dramatically different electorates in Ohio with each campaign completely confident they will win the state. One of them is very wrong.

National polls often use 74% as the representative White vote in this election, but from a historic stand-point 75% is the more reasonable level which would be a -1.3% decline from 2008. With polls today consistently showing Obama’s support between 36-38% with this segment of the electorate comprising 75% of voters, it is easy to see how a tight race can turn into a blowout rather quickly. As for David Axelrod’s turnout model, he is talking his book when every ounce of data says he is blowing smoke. If Axelrod is right on the racial make-up of the electorate, President Obama probably wins re-election in a close race. But there is little evidence that the 76.3% of White voters in 2008 when combined with a probable return of the missing 1.7 million whites will make up only 72% of the electorate Team Obama needs to avoid a sizable Romney win on November 6.