Supreme Court will give obama eligibility case another look

Supreme Court will possibly ask "where's the birth certificate" on March 4.

The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.

The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.

In January the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments but the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

The Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request" and it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.

Attorney Hemenway:

"We have not exaggerated in presenting the question of the constitutional rule of law being at stake in this matter," Hemenway wrote in a petition for rehearing before the high court. "A man has successfully run for the office of president and has done so, it appears, with an awareness that he is not eligible under the constitutional requirement for a person to be president.

"Despite a vigorous campaign that he has conducted to make 'unthinkable' the very idea of raising the issue of his eligibility under the Constitution to 'be' president the issue has not gone away,".

"Instead it has steadily grown in the awareness of the public. Should we be surprised that he shows no respect for the constitutional rule of law? What else would we expect?"

"The real question here is one of getting members of the judiciary to take seriously the oath that they swore to protect and preserve the Constitution," Hemenway wrote in his petition for rehearing. "To continue to avoid the issue will destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system when it is under vigorous assault as surely as if the conscious decision were made to cease preserving and protecting our founding charter."

Hemenway's arguments came in the petition for rehearing that followed the decision last month by the court not to hear the arguments. However, he pointed out in the petition for rehearing that the U.S. Supreme Court appears to have broken its own rules in his case by failing to respond to a pending recusal motion.

That circumstance is enough, he argues, for another hearing to be held on the case, and this time without participation by the two justices appointed to the court by Obama.

"Rule 21 (4) of the court requires that any motion shall have an opposition to it filed, if one is to be filed, 'as promptly as possible considering the nature of the relief sought … and, in any event, within 10 days of receipt.' Thus by January 14, 2011, when petitioners' petition was denied without comment, the respondents had failed to respond to the motion," Hemenway wrote.

"Therefore, as a matter of due process of the court, petitioners suggest that the court should have on that day considered the possibility that the motion had been conceded by respondents with an examination of the consequences of that failure," the brief explains.

"If petitioners are entitled to have their motion for recusal as conceded because of lack of a timely opposition, as petitioners contend is the case, then the court was obliged to make sure that the Justices Sotomayor and Kagan did not participate in the decision. Yet there was no statement that they did not participate," the brief states.

The brief further argues that because of the lack of a response or acknowledgment by the court, the court should have considered "the law of nations on matters of citizenship such as the phrase in question here as placed in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, namely, the requirement that a president 'be' a 'natural born citizen.'"

The argument continued, "Thus, it would seem, with all due respect, that if the court is required to and does treat the petitioners' motion for recusal as conceded the court would be required to consider the intent of the Framers of the Constitution in choosing the Article II phrase 'natural born citizen.'

"That is, of course, assuming that the majority of its members still believe that the intent of the Framers is essential to the constitutional rule of law in this country," the filing said.

In the original petition to the high court, the pleadings noted that if Obama is not constitutionally eligible, it will create a crisis.

"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," stated the pleading.

"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.

"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it continued.

Elgin earlier confirmed that Hemenway, as the attorney of record, got the notice from the court that the certiorari petition was denied without comment. But he said there was nothing from the court on the motion for recusal.

The order on Jan. 18 from the high court simply listed case 10-678, Hollister, Gregory S. v. Soetoro, Barry, et al as "denied" with no explanation.

It appears from the court's documentation that Kagan and Sotomayor participated in the "conference," the meeting at which Supreme Court justices determine which cases they will take. On other cases there are notations that Kagan or Sotomayor did not participate, and the Hollister case is without any such reference.

Although proceedings are not public, it is believed that a case must earn four votes among the nine justices before it is heard.

"Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get four people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument.

The Supreme Court was considered to have a 4-4 conservative-liberal split, with one swing vote on most issues. On the conservative side generally was Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Samuel Alito, Scalia and Thomas. Justice Anthony Kennedy often is the swing vote. The liberal side frequently included Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens.

(All we need is four justices to agree to hear the case against the fraud obama. If it happens it will be the beginning of the end for the hoax called obama.) Story Reports

The answer is obama has no long for birth certificate.

Obama only has an index notation with his name and sex.

This index notation was generated in 2007 when his campaign request Hawaii make up a "birth certificate" out of thin air.

If you are a US citizen Mr obama, prove it.

Sixty Seven Million "Birthers" can't be wrong and ask, WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Astonishing number of citizens don't believe "president's" story of his origin
..........................................................................................
55 million are registered Republicans.

28 Million don't believe obama was born in the US. (Public Policy Polling)

42 million are registered as independents.

Maybe 15 million of these voters also don't believe obama was born in the US. (estimate)

This means there are at least 67 million "birthers" who think obama is a FRAUD.

The "state run media" would have you believe only "nuts" would question the origin of obama.

Origin is a better word than birth.

Sixty Seven Million ask the question: WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Sixty Seven Million get NO answer from obama except, "I can't go around with my birth certificate plasted on my head."

Obama told the truth probably for the first time when he made that stupid statement.

Evidence indicates obama has no long form birth certificate, only an index record notation in Hawaii with his name and sex.

Obama's lack of any records of any kind including his 'UN NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP' are only a SIDE SHOW to the main attraction which is he is NOT a US citizen or he could and would validate his origin.

Sixty Seven Million "birthers" can't be wrong.

Obama knows the first time a court requires his origin to be probated he will be forced to explain his origin. Obama lacks documentation of his origin an must hide this fact.

The usurper elected "president" CANNOT validate his US citizenship.

If obama could answer Sixty Seven Million people with a valid long form hospital generated birth certificate indicating the hospital and doctors name; he would validate his origin.

Now you know the rest of the story as Paul Harvey use to say.

Obama's whole history "smells' like something is rotten.

The rotten something is BO himself and his undocumented origin. Obama IS an ILLEGAL ALIEN.
.........................................................................................
Obama Continues His Campaign To make 'Unthinkable' The Issue Of His US Citizenship To Hide The Fact He Cannot Produce Valid Documentation Verifying His US Citizenship

(The reason obama has not released the long form is because it does not exist. I am an origin originator investigator, a dedicated "birther", that has determined, as others have, that obama has only an index notation as proof of his origin.

This index notation was generated around Jun 6, 2007 when obama requested a short form colb from Hawaii. Obama's birthday is Jun 6, 2007. This is the date his online colb was generated out of thin air. This explains why obama doesn't go around with his colb pasted on his forehead.

Obama's number one priority is to keep his origin anonymous. He must continue to hide any and all documentation about his origin. Origin is a better term for "obama" than birth because there is NO EVIDENCE than can be verified where "obama" was born.

It is a probable hypothesis that obama is the originator of his own online "certification of live birth". The fake online "certification" has a bleed through date of Jun 6, 2007. Why did obama use as proof of his US citizenship before Jun 6, 2007? If it was an original long form hospital generated "certificate of live birth" why did obama request a new "certification of live birth" from Hawaii that is only generated or requested for those who: don't have an original birth certifcate, or are born outside of Hawaii.

Jun 6, 2007 is a very important date. It seems it was the day obama faked his origin. It was the day he faked his "birth". Obama's "birthday" is Jun 6, 2007. Obama has NEVER claimed the online colb as his.

The "Certification of Live Birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii.

The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

(Thats because obama know he is "screwed" if that cat gets out of the bag he only has an index notation of his name and sex as documentation for his online certification of live birth that can't be validated.)

Other documentation not yet available for Obama, and will never be released, includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

Is the any reason for SIXTY SEVEN MILLION people NOT to believe obama is an ILLEGAL alien?

In other words there is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship. There are many people including Michael Reagan, Bill O'reilly and others who would tell you not to get into the minutiae of details that expose the UNCONSTITUTIOAL President obama. They want you to IGNORE THE FACT obama CANNOT VALIDATE HIS US CITIZENSHIP.

The nut cases that believe the origin of the universe was just a spontaneous burst of something from nothing are the same type of people who want you to believe obama's origin originated from a spontaneous notation in the index record in Hawaii.

Obama exhibits the symptoms of a fraud

Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood shooter was on Obama's Homeland Security Transition Team! An example of obama fraud.
.........................................................................................
The act of fraud is seldom observed. Symptoms and indicators of fraud are discoverable and observable. If symptoms of fraud are observed, many frauds can be detected at an early stage and either stopped or prevented. Fraud over time tends to grow larger and larger, so early detection is a preferable method to stop fraud.

Fraud symptoms include:

Inconsistent, vague or implausible responses or behaviour by an individual can represent fraud sysmptoms.

Lifestyle changes are often the easiest of all symptoms to detect. Although looking at bank records, investment records, and tax return information are difficult to access; property records, UCC filings, and other records are easy to check to determine whether there are assets that have been purchased or liens that have been removed. Unusual behavior is seen through an individual's recognizable behavior pattern to attempt to cope with the stress. Their guilt leads to fear, fear leads to stress, and stress leads to behavior changes.

Personal Characteristic Red Flags

Rationalization of contradictory behavior
Lack of a strong code of personal ethics
A wheeler-dealer personality
Lack of stability
A strong desire to beat the system
A criminal or questionable background

Characteristics of the Top-Management Fraud

(The following characteristics match obama almost exactly)

Tend to have highly material personal values.
Success to them means financial success, not professional recognition.
Tend to treat people as objects, not individuals and often as objects for exploitation.
Are highly self-centered.
Are often eccentric in the way they display their wealth or spend their money.
They tend to be conspicuous consumers and often boast of the things they have acquired, the friends they have in high office, and all the fine places they have visited.
Speak about their cunning achievements and winnings more than their losses.
Appear to be reckless or careless with facts and often enlarge on them.
Appear to be hard working, almost compulsive, but most of their time at work is spent scheming and designing short cuts to get ahead or beat the competition.
May gamble or drink a great deal.
Buy expensive gifts for their families usually to compensate for spending so little time with them.
Are hostile to people who oppose their views.
They feel exempt from accountability and controls because of their station or position.
Create a greet deal of turnover among their subordinates and often set off one subordinate against the other.
Play favorites among subordinates, but the relationship can cool very quickly because a subordinate often falls from grace after one mistake, even an insignificant one.
Manage by crisis more often than by objectives.

Demand absolute loyalty from subordinates, but they themselves are loyal only to their own self-interests.

Indicators of Possible Fraudulent Activities

Unsupported or unauthorized records, balances, or transactions.

Conflicting or Missing Evidential Matter or Missing documents. Unavailability of other than photocopied documents. Alterations on documents (e.g. back dating),Duplications, Questionable handwriting on documents. Denied access to records or facilities. Unusual delays in providing requested information. (Obama also matches this fraud profile.) Story Reports

Understanding Symptoms/Red Flags of Fraud

Understanding symptoms of fraud is the key to detecting fraud. A symptom of fraud may be defined as a condition which is directly attributable to dishonest or fraudulent activity. It may result from the fraud itself or from the attempt to conceal the fraud.

No proper documentation.

Lack of documentation.

(Fraud symptoms can be from the fraud itself or THE ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL THE FRAUD. Obama is a fraud who is daily attempting to conceal the fact he has committed fraud. His symtoms include NO proper documentation of his birth origin. Obama continues to refuse to disclose any documentation about his origin.) Story Reports

Obama continues to conceal the evidence of his birth origin. Obama refuses to release any documentation validating his online certification of live birth which he has never claimed was his own 'birth certificate'.

Obama knows the first time his fake colb is probated in a court of law he will be forced to validate his US citizenship.

This is what obama fears most because he cannot validate his US citizenship.

Obama has no documentation to back up his online jpeg as evidence of his US citizenship.

If obama did have ANY documentation that could be validated to prove he is a US citizen he would release it. He cannot because obama knows he is a fraud "president".

Where's the long form birth certificate from a hospital in Hawaii mr obama?

There is NO long form birth certificate from a hospital in Hawaii.

Obama only has an index notation of his name and sex.

This is obama's only documentation of his US citizenship and it can't be validated by anyone.

More information is needed such as hospital name, doctors name, parents signatures, doctors signature, registrar signature etc.

Obama is a no record or zero

I want to know where's the birth certificate

There is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship

Bill O'Reilly slammed the "birther" story Monday night, 07-27-09, on his show, saying that he had investigated the theory last year and debunked it.

But although he questioned why CNN's Lou Dobbs was still discussing the theory on the air, O'Reilly disagreed with those who would like to see Dobbs kicked off the air, defending his free speech rights in a spirited discussion with the Southern Poverty Law Center's president Richard Cohen.

In his "Talking Points Memo" segment, O'Reilly said:

"That theory has been around for a while. The Factor investigated, found out it's bogus. But Mr. Dobbs is still engaged...

Again, we found out that President Obama was born in Hawaii.. we were sent the documents. And what are you gonna do? I don't know why it's still around..."

(Bill O'Reilly has "the documents" the Governor of Hawaii abercrombie was searching to prove obama was born in Hawaii.

O'reilly says he was "sent the documents". He asks the question, "And what are you gonna do?"

The question is, what are you gonna do o'reilly? Will you help governor abercrombie in his quest to find the "missing documents" he an all of America want to see?

How can you get documentation from Hawaii when no one else in America can including the governor of Hawaii?

Does your documentation include a simple index record notation?

The index data regarding President Obama is:

Birth Index
Obama II, Barack Hussein
Male

Hawaii "vital records"

This information is open to the public but it only indicates obama applied for a birth certificate in 2007. The online colb is the only thing the obama campaign, not obama, has claimed as evidence he is a US citizen.

Does your documentation include a newspaper birth announcement that has an address where obama's "parents" NEVER lived but where his "grandparents" lived? The birth announcement is bogus.

There is no evidence obama's "parents" EVER lived togeather in Hawaii, NONE.

What are you documents mr o'reilly?

If you have any "documents" that proves obama is not an illegal alien why don't you give them to the public and the governor of Hawaii?

Did you get the factcheck "documents". If that is what you are referring to you don't have any evidence obama is a US citizen that can be verified. A certification of live birth cannot be verified with NO hospital name, No doctors name, No doctors,parents or registrar signatures.

You mr o'reilly are helping to coverup obama's true origin just like Hawaii, factcheck, obama and all the other media that can not prove obama is a valid US citizen.

All you can do is indicate you have documents or like the state of Hawaii, has seen the vital documents.

All spin from Mr o'reilly in the "no spin zone".

I want to know where's the birth certificate?

I'm talking about a long form hospital generated certificate of live birth that contains the hospital name, doctors name, parents names, registrar name and signatures.

I want to see an actual birth certificate from Hawaii for obama that CAN be verified with more that just the spin of a press release or a verbal announcement.) Story Reports

There is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship. No public records of any kind that can be used to valid obama's true origin. Obama is like a mannequin. At least a mannequin has a serial number.

There is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship

Black Muslim movements and the muslim brotherhood

Shariah, the Threat to America Via The Muslim Brotherhood

During the first half of the 20th century few numbers of African Americans established groups based on Islamic and Black supremacist teachings. The first of such groups created was the Moorish Science Temple of America, founded by Timothy Drew (Drew Ali) in 1913. Drew taught that Black people were of Moorish origin but their Muslim identity was taken away through slavery and racial segregation, advocating the return to Islam of their Moorish ancestry.

The Nation of Islam (NOI) was the largest organization, created in 1930 by Wallace Fard Muhammad. It however taught a different form of Islam, promoting Black supremacy and labeling white people as "devils". Fard drew inspiration for NOI doctrines from those of Noble Drew Ali's Moorish Science Temple of America.

He provided three main principles which serve as the foundation of the NOI: "Allah is God, the white man is the devil and the so called Negroes are the Asiatic Black People, the cream of the planet earth".

In 1934 Elijah Muhammad became the leader of the NOI, he deified Wallace Fard, saying that he was an incarnation of God, and taught that he was a prophet who had been taught directly by God in the form of Wallace Fard. Although Elijah's message caused great concern among White Americans, it was effective among Blacks attracting mainly poor people including students and professionals.

One of the famous people to join the NOI was Malcolm X, who was the face of the NOI in the media. Also boxing world champion, Muhammad Ali. Malcolm X was one of the most influential leaders of the NOI, he advocated complete separation of blacks between whites. He left the NOI after being silenced for 90 days, he then formed his own black nationalist movement, and made the pilgrimage to Mecca, converting to Sunni Islam. He is viewed as the first person to start the movement among African Americans towards Sunni Islam.

A few number of Black Muslims however rejected these new reforms brought by Imam Mohammed, Louis Farrakhan who broke away from the organization, re-established the Nation of Islam under the original Fardian doctrines, and remains its leader. As of today it is estimated there are at least 20,000 members. However, today the group has a wide influence in the African American community.

The Nation of Islam has received a great deal of criticism for its anti-white, anti-Christian, and anti-semitic teachings, and is listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Nearly a quarter of the Muslims are converts to Islam (23%), mainly native-born. Of the total who have converted, 59% are African American and 34% white.

In addition to immigration, the state, federal and local prisons of the United States may be a contributor to the growth of Islam in the country. J. Michael Waller claims that Muslim inmates comprise 17-20% of the prison population, or roughly 350,000 inmates in 2003. He also claims that 80% of the prisoners who "find faith" while in prison convert to Islam. These converted inmates are mostly African American, with a small but growing Hispanic minority.

Muslim Students Association

As we have seen, the Muslim Student Association (MSA) was the first Muslim Brotherhood entity formed in the United States at the University of Illinois, Urbana campus in 1962-63. The MSA has chapters at nearly every major college and university campus in the United States making it the most visible and influential of all Islamic student organizations in North America. The MSA is a point of recruitment for the Muslim Brotherhood and for jihadis.

The MSA’s own website previously noted that all major Muslim organizations in America grew out of the MSA.

These references have been removed from the MSA website, however. It is nonetheless indisputable that among the MSA’s offshoots are: the Islamic Medical Association (IMA), the Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA), the Association of Muslim Social Scientists, the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)

While presenting itself as just another moderate Muslim group working on college campuses, MSA in fact promotes a shariah-based Islamic agenda dedicated to spreading Islam among North American youth by way of an aggressive dawa program. The ideology that underpins the MSA mission is the same ideology as defines the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. The MSA perspective is global and its aspirations are closely linked to those of the “global Islamic Movement.”

A succession of MSA leaders have made statements condemning the United States and/or calling for the killing of all Jews. Several MSA presidents have publicly supported jihad, and in the case of at least one, Omar Hammami from Alabama, have actually participated in violent jihad overseas. MSA members routinely express admiration and support for terror organizations such as Hamas and Hizballah and for the foundational leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood such as Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb.

In addition to promoting aggressive political influence and intimidation operations like “Israel Apartheid Week” on many campuses, MSA chapters are also focal points for efforts to impose shariah blasphemy rules or otherwise control speech. To this end, members frequently engage in disruptive actions aimed at preventing speakers from exposing students to information about shariah Islam, jihad and their targets – notably, the United States and Israel – that would be deemed “offensive” or otherwise contrary to the ambitions of the Ikhwan.

Islamic Society of North America

In 1980, the Muslim Brotherhood created the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) “to be a nucleus for the Islamic Movement in North America.” From the time of its founding in Plainfield, Indiana, ISNA has been run by the senior leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Movement in the United States and Canada, and has emerged as the largest of the MB fronts in North America.

Tell the children the truth about the muslim brotherhood

ISNA’s prominent role in the Ikhwan operations in America is suggested by its listing at the top of the Explanatory Memorandum’s roster of its front groups. The subheading on that list is: “Imagine if they all march according to one plan.” ISNA was established as an umbrella organization to help foster such a plan, and ensure that all MB organizations “march” according to it.

Over the past three decades, thanks largely to its numerous chapters, its “over 300 community and professional organizations in North America,” its substantial resources and aggressive influence operations, the U.S. government has accorded ISNA considerable stature as its leading “educational” and “outreach” partner in the Muslim-American community.

The Muslim Brotherhood has, as a matter of historical fact, established, built and maintained control over most of the prominent Muslim organizations in America.

Mapping The Muslim Brotherhood In America

The identified MB fronts and the other, as-yet-unknown groups share an inherent enmity for the United States and the West. It follows that when any friendly entity – to include federal, state and local law enforcement or intelligence units in the United States, other public officials, media organizations and religious institutions – works with individuals representing a self-described “Muslim” group, there is the probability those with whom such outreach is being conducted and the group with whom it is being undertaken, are actually hostile to the United States.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s own Explanatory Memorandum identifies the following groups under the heading “a list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends”:

Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)

• Muslim Student Association (MSA)

• The Muslim Communities Association (MCA)

• The Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS)

• The Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers (AMSE)

• Islamic Medical Association (IMA)

• Islamic Teaching Center (ITC)

• North American Islamic Trust (NAIT)

• Foundation for International Development (FID)

• Islamic Housing Cooperative (IHC)

• Islamic Centers Division (ICD)

• American Trust Publications (ATP)

• Audio-Visual Center (AVC)

• Islamic Book Service (IBS)

• Muslim Businessmen Association (MBA)

• Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA)

• ISNA Fiqh Committee (IFC)

• ISNA Political Awareness Committee (IPAC)

• Islamic Education Department (IED)

• Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA)

• Malasian (sic) Islamic Study Group (MISG)

• Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP)

• United Association for Studies and Research (UASR)

• Occupied Land Fund (OLF)

• Mercy International Association (MIA)

• Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)

• Baitul Mal Inc (BMI)

• International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT)

• Islamic Information Center (IIC)

Several of the preeminent Muslim-American organizations in the United States today (notably, the Council on American Islamic Relations [CAIR], the Muslim Public Affairs Council [MPAC] and the Islamic Free Market Institute [II]) had not been established at the time in 1991 when this document was adopted by the Muslim Brotherhood.

In order to be considered by the Muslim Brotherhood to be one of “our organizations” or an “organization of our friends,” all of these entities had to have embraced the aforementioned Ikhwan creed: “Allah is our goal; the Messenger is our guide: the Koran is our law; Jihad is our means; and martyrdom in the way of Allah is our inspiration.”

The actualization of the Muslim Brotherhood creed demands the triumph of shariah globally and the re-establishing the caliphate on a global basis. This end-state will entail subordinating to shariah the governing system of non-Islamic nations like ours (and Muslim nations not currently adhering to Islamic law) and, in due course, the destruction of such alternatives.

The inherently seditious nature of the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda and its incompatibility with Western civilization and governments is typically obscured in the Free World by the assertion that the Ikhwan only seeks to achieve its objectives through non-violent means. As a result, the Brothers, their allies and proxies are all-too-often considered to be acceptable and reliable partners for governments seeking to counter violent jihad.

Even more dispositive is the fact that the U.S. State Department-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, Hamas, was formed out of the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood. In addition, jihadi organizations such as al Qaeda sprang out of the Muslim Brotherhood and have among their leaders senior Muslim Brothers.

These realities underscore the inadvisability of any “outreach” to American Muslim organizations that espouse shariah, whether or not they acknowledge a tie to the Muslim Brotherhood.

(Obama supports the muslim brotherhood. The brotherhood like obama has the ultimate goal of the destruction of the United States as we know it.) Story Reports

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and his family have amassed a fortune estimated at $70 billion according to analysis by Middle East experts poll by the London Guardian. And very little of that stash is kept in his own country, they say. Much of his wealth is in British and Swiss banks or tied up in real estate in London, New York, Los Angeles and along expensive tracts of the Red Sea coast.

"The business ventures from his military and government service accumulated to his personal wealth," she told ABC news. "There was a lot of corruption in this regime and stifling of public resources for personal gain.

"This is the pattern of other Middle Eastern dictators so their wealth will not be taken during a transition. These leaders plan on this."

Egypt is a semi-presidential republic under Emergency Law (Law No. 162 of 1958)[28] and has been since 1967, except for an 18-month break in 1980s (which ended with the assassination of Sadat). Under the law, police powers are extended, constitutional rights suspended and censorship is legalized.[29] The law sharply circumscribes any non-governmental political activity: street demonstrations, non-approved political organizations, and unregistered financial donations are formally banned. Some 17,000 people are detained under the law, and estimates of political prisoners run as high as 30,000.[30] Under that "state of emergency", the government has the right to imprison individuals for any period of time, and for virtually no reason, thus keeping them in prisons without trials for any period.

The government continues the claim that opposition groups like the Muslim Brotherhood could come into power in Egypt if the current government did not forgo parliamentary elections, confiscate the group's main financiers' possessions, and detain group figureheads, actions which are virtually impossible without emergency law and judicial-system independence prevention.

(Obama wants the muslim brotherhood to gain power in Egypt. Obama knows that if elctions are held the hood will take over as planned.) Story Reports

Obama Continues His Campaign To make 'Unthinkable' The Issue Of His US Citizenship

.........................................................................................
factcheck FAKE colb number two containing the certificate number 151-1961-01641. The certificate number is not redacted, and the "1961" suggests the document was not generated by a 1961 computer, which generally did not print dates in four digit formats, as evidenced by the long-form original birth certificates. The Nordyke twins, who were born in Honolulu the day after President Obama's reported birthdate, is very different and can be verified by the information it contains. Obama's fake colb is not an image of a HOSPITAL GENERATED LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH.

This document of obama's origin CANNOT be verified because it contains NO hospital name, NO doctors name, No signatures of a doctor, parents or registrar.
.........................................................................................

.......................................................................................

......................................................................................

.......................................................................................

BO FAKE BC
......................................................................................
......................................................................................
Obama Continues His Campaign To make 'Unthinkable' The Issue Of His US Citizenship To Hide The Fact He Cannot Produce Valid Documentation Verifying His US Citizenship.

(Attorney John D. Hemenway has "hit" the fake certification of live birth virtually pasted on the forehead of obama. Obama spends millions in court to keep his fake birth certificate from being probated in court because he would be required to prove his US citizenship.

He continues to feed propaganda and talking points to the 'state run media' via his personal whitehouse cover story machine.

Obama's number one priority is to keep his origin anonymous. He must continue to hide any and all documentation about his origin. Origin is a better term for "obama" than birth because there is NO EVIDENCE than can be verified where "obama" was born.

Instead of left wing nuts calling people who question obama's US citizenship "birthers" a better term would be obama originator investigator.

I am an obama originator investigator.

It is a probable hypothesis that obama is the originator of his own online "certification of live birth". The fake online "certification" has a bleed through date of Jun 6, 2007. Why did obama use as proof of his US citizenship before Jun 6, 2007? If it was an original long form hospital generated "certificate of live birth" why did obama request a new "certification of live birth" from Hawaii that is only generated or requested for those who: don't have an original birth certifcate, or are born outside of Hawaii.

Jun 6, 2007 is a very important date. It seems it was the day obama faked his origin. It was the day he faked his "birth". Obama's "birthday is Jun 6, 2007.) Story Reports

In June 2008, Ben LaBolt, an Obama campaign spokesman, released the initial short-form Obama COLB to various newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times, declaring, "This is Sen. Obama's birth certificate."

This short-form Obama COLB was released as a .jpg Internet image, displaying no signs of having been folded or of carrying an official State of Hawaii embossed seal.

In June 2008, Ben LaBolt, an Obama campaign spokesman, released the initial short-form Obama COLB

The COLB the Obama campaign released in June 2008 apparently had a date stamped on the back that bled through to the document's front side.

When magnified and reversed, the date "JUN 8 2007" appears to be legible.

When this short-form COLB was released, the Obama campaign did not explain who obtained the document from the Hawaii DOH or why the document had been held for a year before being released to the public.

(Obama has NEVER claimed the online colb as his.) Story Reports

Evidence the Jun 6, 2007 "certificate of origin" was faked:


* The father's "race" was listed as "African," not "Negro," the more expected designation in the less politically correct environment of the early 1960s.

* As noted above, the document evidenced no embossed seal from the State of Hawaii.

* The lack of folds on the document raised questions if and how the document had been mailed by the Hawaii DOH to the requesting recipient.

Two months later, on Aug 21 2008, another FAKE was produced by FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers.The additional short-form Obama COLB was very different in appearance. (This is obama colb number two.)

FactCheck.org offered no explanation as to why various images of the COLB displayed in the Aug. 21, 2008, article varied dramatically from the originally released Obama campaign COLB.

Both the Obama campaign, when releasing the short-form COLB in June 2008, and FactCheck.org, when analyzing their version of the short-form COLB in August 2008, referred to the document as a "birth certificate" without distinguishing that neither COLB resembles the type of long-form original birth certificate the Nordyke twins received, (the day after obama's conceived origin.)

The "Certification of Live Birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii.

The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

(The reason obama has not released the long form is because it does not exist. I am an origin originator investigator that has determined as others have that obama has only an index notation as proof of his origin.

This index notation was generated around Jun 6, 2007 when obama requested a short form colb from Hawaii. Obama's birthday is Jun 6, 2007. This is the date his online colb was generated out of thin air. This explains why obama doesn't go around with his colb pasted on his forehead.) Story Reports

Other documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

(In other words there is NOTHING that validates obama's US citizenship. There are many people including Michael Reagan who would tell you not to get into the minutiae of details that expose the UNCONSTITUTIOAL President obama. They want you to IGNORE THE FACT obama CANNOT VALIDATE HIS US CITIZENSHIP.) Story Reports

It Costs What? Bio fuel scam increases food prices while you are paying for food scam.

Food inflation can be blamed on U.S. policies to subsidize ethanol. Your tax dollars are given to farmers to grow more corn for ethanol. Because farmers are growing more corn and less wheat etc it is driving the price of all food up. Obama and his fellow green crazies are in fact to blame for the price increases in food because ethanol is not cost effective to produce without a government bail out. According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2001, only 7 percent of U.S. corn went to ethanol. By 2010, the ethanol share was 39 percent. So instead of growing wheat, our farmers are growing corn in order to cash in on ethanol subsidies. Egyptians who can’t afford to buy bread and have taken to the streets in protest might be very interested to know this.

The amount of grain needed to fill the tank of an SUV with ethanol just once can feed one person for an entire year.
..........................................................................................

“Today, the government decides and they misdirect the investment to their friends in the corn industry or the food industry. Think how many taxpayer dollars have been spent on corn [for ethanol], and there’s nobody now really defending that as an efficient way to create diesel fuel or ethanol. The money is spent for political reasons and not for economic reasons. It’s the worst way in the world to try to develop an alternative fuel.” - Ron Paul

From Food Freedom Blog

Ethanol: How Many Senators Does It Take to Screw a Taxpayer?

When bipartisanship breaks out in Washington DC, check to make sure your wallet is still in your pocket. Every time you fill up your car this winter you are participating in the biggest taxpayer swindle in history. Forcing consumers to use domestically produced ethanol is one of the single biggest boondoggles ever committed by the corrupt brainless twits in Washington DC. Ethanol prices have soared 30% in the last year as the supplies of corn have plunged.

Only a policy created in Washington DC could drive up the prices of gasoline and food, with the added benefits of costing the American taxpayer billions in tax subsidies and killing people in 3rd world countries.

The grand lame duck Congress tax compromise extended a 45-cent incentive to ethanol refiners for each gallon of the fuel blended with gasoline and renewed a 54-cent tariff on Brazilian imports. The extension of these subsidies, besides costing American taxpayers $6 billion per year, has the added benefit of driving up food costs across the globe, causing food riots in Tunisia, and resulting in the starving of poor peasants throughout the world.

A bipartisan group of 15 senators signed a letter in late November demanding an extension of U.S. ethanol subsidies. I wonder if the fact they have received hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions during the past six years from pro-ethanol companies and interest groups like ADM, Monsanto, the National Corn Growers Association, and the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association had anything to do with this demand. You can always count on a Senator to do what’s best for his re-election campaign rather than what is best for the country. These symbols of political integrity will always spout the standard talking points:

* Promoting ethanol reduces our dependence on foreign oil
* Ethanol is green renewable energy
* Ethanol is cheaper than gasoline

As we all know when dealing with a politician, “half the truth, is often a great lie.”

Amaizing

Corn is the most widely produced feed grain in the United States, accounting for more than 90% of total U.S. feed grain production. 81.4 million acres of land are utilized to grow corn, with the majority of the crop grown in the Midwest. Although most of the crop is used to feed livestock, corn is also processed into food and industrial products including starch, sweeteners, corn oil, beverage and industrial alcohol, yogurt, latex paint, cosmetics, and last but not least, fuel Ethanol. Of the 10,000 items in your average grocery store, at least 2,500 items use corn in some form during the production or processing. The United States is the major player in the world corn market providing more than 50% of the world’s corn supply. In excess of 20% of our corn crop had been exported to other countries, but the government ethanol mandates have reduced the amount that is available to export.

This year, the US will harvest approximately 12.5 billion bushels of corn. More than 42% will be used to feed livestock in the US, another 40% will be used to produce government mandated ethanol fuel, 2% will be used for food products, and 16% is exported to other countries. Ending stocks are down 963 million bushels from last year. The stocks-to-use ratio is projected at 5.5%, the lowest since 1995/96 when it dropped to 5.0%. As you can see in the chart below, poor developing countries are most dependent on imports of corn from the US. Food as a percentage of income for peasants in developing countries in Africa and Southeast Asia exceeds 50%.

When the price of corn rises 75% in one year, poor people starve.

(Do you understand now why obama and his fellow traitors are pushing ethanol production?) Story Reports

The combination of an asinine ethanol policy and the loosest monetary policy in the history of mankind are combining to kill poor people across the globe.

This month, the U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) reported that its food price index jumped 32% in the second half of 2010 — surpassing the previous record, set in the early summer of 2008, when deadly clashes over food broke out around the world, from Haiti to Somalia.

The United States is the big daddy of the world food economy. It is far and away the world’s leading grain exporter, exporting more than Argentina, Australia, Canada, and Russia combined. In a globalized food economy, increased demand for corn, to fuel American vehicles, puts tremendous pressure on world food supplies. Continuing to divert more food to fuel, as is now mandated by the U.S. federal government in its Renewable Fuel Standard, will lead to higher food prices, rising hunger among the world’s poor and to social chaos across the globe. By subsidizing the production of ethanol, now to the tune of $6 billion each year, U.S. taxpayers are subsidizing skyrocketing food bills at home and around the world.

The energy bill signed by that free market capitalist George Bush in 2008 mandates that increasing amounts of corn based ethanol must be used in gasoline sold in the U.S. This energy legislation requires a five-fold increase in ethanol use by 2022. Some 15 billion gallons must come from traditional corn-blended ethanol. Nothing like combining PhD models and political corruption to cause worldwide chaos.

In the U.S. only about 10% of disposable income is spent on food. By contrast, in India, about 40% of personal disposable income is spent on food. In the Philippines, it’s about 47.5%. In some sub-Saharan Africa, consumers spend about 50% of the household budget on food. And according to the U.S.D.A., “In some of the poorest countries in the region such as Madagascar, Tanzania, Sierra Leone, and Zambia, this ratio is more than 60%.”

The 107 million tons of grain that went to U.S. ethanol distilleries in 2009 was enough to feed 330 million people for one year at average world consumption levels. More than a quarter of the total U.S. grain crop was turned into ethanol to fuel cars last year. With 200 ethanol distilleries in the country set up to transform food into fuel, the amount of grain processed has tripled since 2004. The government subsidies led to a boom in the building of ethanol plants across the heartland. As usual, when government interferes in the free market, the bust in 2009, when fuel prices collapsed, led to the bankruptcy of almost 20% of the ethanol plants in the U.S.

In March 2008, a report commissioned by the Coalition for Balanced Food and Fuel Policy estimated that the bio-fuels mandates passed by Congress cost the U.S. economy more than $100 billion from 2006 to 2009. The report declared that “The policy favoring ethanol and other bio-fuels over food uses of grains and other crops acts as a regressive tax on the poor.” A 2008 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (O.E.C.D.) issued its report on bio-fuels that concluded: “Further development and expansion of the bio-fuels sector will contribute to higher food prices over the medium term and to food insecurity for the most vulnerable population groups in developing countries.” These forecasts are coming to fruition today.

It Costs What?

The average American has no clue about the true cost of ethanol. They probably don’t even know there is ethanol mixed in their gasoline. The propaganda spread by the ethanol industry and their mouthpieces in Congress obscures the truth and proclaims the clean energy mistruths and the thousands of jobs created in America.

The truth is that producing ethanol uses more energy than is created while driving costs higher.

The jobs created in Iowa are offset by the jobs lost because users of energy incur higher costs and hire fewer workers as a result. It takes a lot of Saudi oil to make the fertilizers to grow the corn, to run the tractors, to build the silos, to get the corn to a processing plant, and to run the processing plant. Also, ethanol cannot be moved in pipelines, because it degrades. This means using thousands of big diesel sucking polluting trucks to move the ethanol – first as corn from the fields to the processing plants, and then from the processing plants to the coasts.

The current ethanol subsidy is a flat 45 cents per gallon of ethanol usually paid to the an oil company, that blends ethanol with gasoline. Some States add other incentives, all paid by the taxpayer. On top of this waste of taxpayer funds, the free trade capitalists in Congress slap a 54 cent tariff on all imported ethanol.

It costs money to store, transport and blend ethanol with gasoline. Since ethanol absorbs water, and water is corrosive to pipeline components, it must be transported by tanker to the distribution point where it is blended with gasoline for delivery to your gas station. That’s expensive transportation. It costs more to make a gasoline that can be blended with ethanol. Ethanol is lost through vaporization and contamination during this process. Gasoline/ethanol fuel blends that have been contaminated with water degrade the efficiency of combustion. E-85 ethanol is corrosive to the seals and fuel systems of most of our existing engines (including boats, generators, lawn mowers, hand power tools, etc.), and can not be dispensed through existing gas station pumps. And finally, ethanol has about 30 percent less energy per gallon than gasoline. That means the fuel economy of a vehicle running on E-85 will be about 25% less than a comparable vehicle running on gasoline.

Multiple studies by independent non-partisan organizations have concluded that mandating and subsidizing ethanol fuel production is a terrible policy for Americans:

# In May 2007, the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development at Iowa State University released a report saying the ethanol mandates have increased the food bill for every American by about $47 per year due to grain price increases for corn, soybeans, wheat, and others. The Iowa State researchers concluded that American consumers face a “total cost of ethanol of about $14 billion.” And that figure does not include the cost of federal subsidies to corn growers or the $0.51 per gallon tax credit to ethanol producers.

# In May 2008, the Congressional Research Service blamed recent increases in global food prices on two factors: increased grain demand for meat production, and the bio-fuels mandates. The agency said that the recent “rapid, ‘permanent’ increase in corn demand has directly sparked substantially higher corn prices to bid available supplies away from other uses – primarily livestock feed. Higher corn prices, in turn, have forced soybean, wheat, and other grain prices higher in a bidding war for available crop land.”

Mark W. Rosegrant of the International Food Policy Research Institute, testified before the U.S. Senate on bio-fuels and grain prices. Rosegrant said that the ethanol scam has caused the price of corn to increase by 29 percent, rice to increase by 21 percent and wheat by 22 percent. Rosegrant estimated that if the global bio-fuels mandates were eliminated altogether, corn prices would drop by 20 percent, while sugar and wheat prices would drop by 11 percent and 8 percent, respectively, by 2010. Rosegrant said that “If the current bio-fuel expansion continues, calorie availability in developing countries is expected to grow more slowly; and the number of malnourished children is projected to increase.” He continued, saying “It is therefore important to find ways to keep bio-fuels from worsening the food-price crisis. In the short run, removal of ethanol blending mandates and subsidies and ethanol import tariffs, in the United States—together with removal of policies in Europe promoting bio-fuels—would contribute to lower food prices.”

The true cost of the ethanol boondoggle is hidden from the public. The mandates, subsidies and tariffs take place out of plain view. The reason blenders (and gas stations) will pay the same for ethanol is because they can sell it at the same price as gasoline to consumers. A consumer will pay the same for ten gallons of E10 as for ten gallons of gasoline even though the E10 contains a gallon of ethanol. Consumers pay the same for the gallon of ethanol for three reasons. (1) They don’t know there’s ethanol in their gasoline. (2) There is often ethanol in all the gasoline because of state requirements, so they have no choice. (3) They never know the ethanol has only 67% the energy of gasoline and gets them only 67% as far. The result is that drivers always pay much more for ethanol energy than for gasoline energy, simply because they pay the same amount per gallon. When gasoline prices are $3.00 per gallon, Joe Six-pack pays $4.50 for the same amount of ethanol energy.

You know a politician, government bureaucrat or central banker is lying when they open their mouths. Whenever evaluating a policy or plan put forth by those in control, always seek out who will benefit and who will suffer. Who benefits from corn based ethanol mandates and subsidies? The beneficiaries are huge corporations like Archer Daniels Midland and Monsanto, along with corporate farming operations (80% of all US farm production), and Big Oil.

The mandated ethanol levels are set in law. By providing tax subsidies we are bribing oil companies with taxpayer dollars to do something they are legally required to do, resulting in a $6 billion windfall profit to oil companies. The other beneficiaries are the Senators and Representatives from the farming states who are bankrolled by the corporate ethanol beneficiaries and their constituents who will re-elect them.

The environment does not benefit, as many studies have concluded that it requires more fossil fuel energy (oil & coal) to produce a gallon of ethanol than the energy created. The jobs created in the farm belt at artificially profitable ethanol plants are more than offset by job losses due to the added costs in the rest of the economy. When subsidies are removed or oil prices drop, the ethanol plant jobs disappear, resulting in a massive capital mal-investment.

Our supposedly wise PhD and MBA leaders have created a perfect storm. The unintended consequences of government intervention in the markets are causing havoc, food riots, starvation and intense suffering for the poor and middle class. Brazil produces sugar cane ethanol in vast quantities and can export it to the U.S. much cheaper than we can produce corn ethanol. Fuel prices would be lower without tariffs on Brazilian ethanol imports.

The average cost of food as a percentage of disposable income for an American is 10%. Averages obscure the truth that the cost is probably .0001% for Lloyd Blankfein, Ben Bernanke and Chuck Grassley, while it is 30% for a poor family in Harlem. America’s horribly misguided ethanol policy combined with Ben Bernanke’s Wall Street banker subsidy program are resulting in soaring fuel and food prices across the globe. Poor people around the world suffer greatly from these policies. Below are two assessments of ethanol.

Ethanol doesn’t burn cleaner than gasoline, nor is it cheaper. Our current ethanol production represents only 3.5 percent of our gasoline consumption — yet it consumes twenty percent of the entire U.S. corn crop, causing the price of corn to double in the last two years and raising the threat of hunger in the Third World.” –

(Ethanol production is a total government scam. Its similar to the scam of the unemployment numbers that leave out the people who have just quit looking for work and then calculate the total. You and I pay 45 cents a gallon to have the scam blended with gas. When we drive with the stuff in our cars we get 67% the energy of gasoline. Fuel economy of a vehicle running on E-85 will be about 25% less than a comparable vehicle running on gasoline. So we are paying to have the government scam us while we get 25% less energy out of the scam we put in our cars.) Story Reports

The numbers don't add up. Ethanol is a green environmental waco scam.

Credible Minutia About Obama's Lack Of Any Documentation That Can Be Examined To Verify His US Citizenship

Credible Minutia About Obama's Lack Of Any Documentation That Can Be Examined To Verify His US Citizenship.

What is Michael Reagan afraid of? Why is he concerned with the minutia of obama's lack of any validated documentation that would prove he is a US citizen?

Michael Reagan stated on the Jim Bohannon show, "Overstating your case to the point of undermining your credibility....This whole thing with the birthers."

"Don't get caught up in those programs. They are not a winning program for us."

"Those are the programs that get us painted as far right extremists that have no credibility."

"If you deal with those things that are credible you win the argument each and every time."

(I will endeavour to explain the minutia of obama's US citizenship.

There is no evidence any validated documentation exists on earth that can verify obama is a US citizen.

To Micheal Reagan this is minutia from a "birther" that is overstating the case of the minutia about the fact obama CANNOT PROVE ANY VALID DOCUMENTATION PROVING HE IS A US CITIZEN.

This minutia has been ignored by the "state run media" and Michael Reagan.

It is in no way a minor detail to overlook and ignore barack obama's certification of live birth as proof positive of his US citizenship.

The details about obama's claim to US citizenship can't be verified in any way.

The devil is in the details surrounding the "minutia" about obama's online certification of live birth that cannot be verified in any way because it doesn't contain verifiable "minutia" that can be validated by any American.

Reagan is telling all of America that its not important to verify obama's US citizenship, there are bigger fish to fry.

To me the minutia about obama's need to hide his true identity is not a "minor" detail that should be overlooked and dismissed because it paints Michael Reagan or myself as one who is an extremist.

It is in no way an odd or extreme view to ask obama to prove he is a US citizen.

It is the duty of every American to ask obama, "Where's the birth certificate", why don't you tell the Hawaiian DOH to release any an all documentation validating your US citizenship?

Why do you continue to spend millions in court to stop the online colb from being probated in court?

Why barry do you hide your identity?

I know why, you barry obama are a fraud and imposter who it seems can't provide any valid documentation to back up the online colb that cannot be verified as your "birth certificate."

The minutia of obama's lack of documentation is indeed something that Michael Reagan and all Americans should know about and then ask the question, "where's the birth certificate" mr obama. Are you a US citizen?) Story Reports
........................................................................................

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate
Signs affidavit declaring long-form, hospital-generated document absent

Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate signs affidavit declaring long-form, hospital-generated document absent

(This also to Michael Reagan is a minor detail in the credible minutia of obama's lack of documentation to validate his US citizenship.

Michael Reagan has no evidence or credibility when it comes to the minutia of obama's citizenship.) Story Reports

Obama could have ordered the cia/nsa to start the unrest in Egypt and create a diverson from news obamacare is unconstitutional or his BC is missing

(This pic says it all.)
The fraud president obama is not just commander of the armed forces, but the CIA and NSA both answer to him as well. They MUST follow his every order as long as it is not illegal.

He does not need Congressional approval to dispatch the military or to give the CIA/NSA orders. They can, however, hold him accountable after the fact but it would have to something particularly egregious for them to successfully remove him, which gives him a LOT of room to play.

(Did ya notice the senate hearing putting out the cover story and asking if the president was told that the riots in Egypt were about to happen. The hearing made it look like obama was in the dark about what was going on in Egypt. The cia testified that the white house was told.

What is possible is obama told the cia or nsa to make the unrest happen in Egypt. Notice how it started suddenly. Also notice how the Egyptian military is going along with the protests. Don't you think that is very odd?

All obama had to do was give the order for a "crisis" to begin.

The previous days before this manufactured crisis began was filled with news about the governor of Hawaii trying to find evidence obama was born in Hawaii but could not find any, remember?) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
Obama Can Do Anything He Wants Because the CIA Has His Back

DID Zbigniew Brzezinski HELP TO INVENT A HISTORY FOR OBAMA?


The evidence is all there for anyone to see if they take the time to look. Zbigniew Brzezinski has “spoon-fed” Obama ever since he took him under his wing from Occidental College in 1980, apprenticed him through his first job in Pakistan and Afghanistan to his second job at Business International Corp. and ultimately, by manufacturing a background, faking his academic credentials and resume’, to the top job in America.

Brzezinsky was National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter from 1977-1981 and a professor at Columbia University 1960-1989 where he taught at the Institute of Communist Affairs. He’s a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, trustee of the Trilateral Commission and has attended Bilderberg meetings. He’s still a predominant presence in Obama’s “inner sanctum” and conveniently located near the White House at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies where he’s Professor of American Foreign Policy.

(A communist is a professor of American foreign policy. The imposter president is also a former communist professor with no birth documentation.) Story Reports

Obama cannot be questioned about any of this because, “It’s a matter of national security.” No one will talk about the fake birth certificate because, “It’s a matter of national security.” There is no attempt to investigate his stolen social security number, originally issued in CT, because “It’s a matter of national security.”

Word is, the White House Press Corps members will have their credentials yanked if they were to ask Obama about his Oxy or Columbia days, his work at BIC, a well-known CIA front, or his trips to Pakistan. Also on the list of banned questions is the birth certificate, his name Barry Soetero and his Indonesian passport of that name.

All the FOX News folks have gotten the word as to what’s off limits, too. Beck can go as far as linking all the players destroying our country but can’t mention the birth certificate. He “busted” Obama’s mother for her involvement with Shore Bank but doesn’t talk about her working for Asia Development Bank in Karachi, Pakistan while living in a five-star hotel for years laundering money to aid Mujahadeen and Taliban. Oops, that’s CIA and Pakistan; can’t go there. If you do, the FCC will shut you down so fast your head will spin.

Every once in a while, though, Obama really blows it and states a falsehood that sends the CIA into a panicked frenzy to cover his misstatement. As we all know, mistakes are made when you hurriedly try to fix an error. Obama’s error was saying that he signed up for selective service when he graduated from high school. That would be 1979 when there was no draft. The selective service was reinstituted in 1980 and so a record for Obama had to be created. Unfortunately for Obama’s “fixers” creating a record after the fact is a difficult thing to do and faced with time constraints they were forced to settle on a flawed document and probably unwittingly forever linked that document to another fraud, his social security number.

Brzezinski has been there for Obama all along and their secrets have to stay hidden because of national security measures. It’s really sad that America has been hijacked by wicked people like Brzezinski, Soros, Kissinger, the Clintons, Obama and all the godless members of their One World team.

If our country is to survive, we only need one brave patriot to break through the CIA’s code of silence into the mainstream and let the treasonous pieces fall where they may.

.......................................................................................

The CIA's most important "Cover Story is that of an "Intelligence" agency. Of course the CIA does make use of "intelligence" and "intelligence gathering", but that is largely a front for its primary interest, "Fun and Games." The CIA is the center of a vast mechanism that specializes in Covert Operations...or as Allen Dulles used to call it, "Peacetime Operations". In this sense, the CIA is the willing tool of a higher level Secret Team, or High Cabal, that usually includes representatives of the CIA and other instrumentalities of the government, certain cells of the business and professional world and, almost always, foreign participation. It is this Secret Team, its allies, and its method
of operation that are the principal subjects of this book.

It must be made clear that at the heart of Covert Operations is the denial by the "operator," i.e. the U.S. Government, of the existence of national sovereignty.

THE SECRET TEAM
The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World L. FLETCHER PROUTY
Col., U.S. Air Force (Ret.)

(This is what rush limbaugh calls the "state run media". "The Agency has a whole stable of writers, its favorite magazines and newspapers, its publishing houses, and its "backgrounders" ready to go at all times." This is the propaganda machine that is nps,cbs,abc,nbc,cnn etc etc.) Story Reports

An organization such as the CIA, which exists in a true never-never land, needs to have someone write about it so that there will always be a plethora of material available and so that this vast stew-pot of material will be what the Agency wants the world to believe about it. The Agency does not answer writers, whether they attack it or not. But it works doggedly and brilliantly at times to bury anything not the party line that is written about it. Thus the Agency has a whole stable of writers, its favorite magazines and newspapers, its publishing houses, and its "backgrounders" ready to go at all times.

Allen Dulles had twelve or thirteen regular members of the news media who would be invited to join him frequently for lunch in the beautiful old dining room he maintained in East Building across from his office. Many an agent or military officer who had been invited to his offices to meet with him or with his deputy, General Cabell, to discuss matters of utmost secrecy, would be astounded at lunch with them to find the room filled with these well known writers and commentators. And then, as lunch proceeded, the same subjects that on the other side of the hall had been so carefully shrouded in secrecy would become table gossip with these men of the press. Dulles believed that if he kept these men well informed, they would then be able to draw that fine line between the CIA party line and its
security limits.

The law permits the NSC, national security agency, to direct the CIA certain duties and functions in the intelligence field in addition to those specifically enumerated in the law.

The NSC, which in effect means the President, can direct the CIA.

(Remember obama was known to be a cia agent in the past. What is he now? This would explain the total coverup of any documentation obama could never do by himself even with the help of the DNC.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
Barack Obama conclusively outed as CIA creation

Far from being the mere ‘son of a goat herder’ (as obama deceptively paraded during and even before his candidacy), strong evidence has emerged that President Barack Obama is the product of the intelligence community.

Barack Obama Sr., Stanley Ann Dunham, Lolo Soetoro and President Barack Obama himself all hold deep ties to the CIA and larger intelligence community.

From 1983-84, Barack Obama worked as Editor at Business Internation Corporation, a Business International Corporation, a known CIA front company.

Presidents and vice presidents do not require security background checks, unlike other members of the federal government, to hold office. That job is left up to the press. In 2008, the press failed miserably in its duty to vet the man who would "win" the White House. With the ties of Obama’s parents to the University of Hawaii and its links to MKULTRA and ARTICHOKE, a nagging question remains: Is Barack Obama a real-life “Manchurian Candidate?”

Obama maintains that his mother and father first met in a Russian-language class at the University of Hawaii in 1959. However, a photograph has emerged of Stanley Armour welcoming Barack Obama, Sr., complete with traditional Hawaiian welcoming leis, from Kenya. Obama, Sr. was the only Kenyan student airlifted to Hawaii as part of the CIA-inspired Airlift Africa project that saw Obama and 279 other students from British eastern and southern African colonies brought to the United States for college degrees prior to their homelands gaining independence from Britain.

There is a strong reason to believe that Armour Dunham worked in the 1950s for the CIA in the Middle East. An FBI file on Armour Dunham existed but the bureau claimed it destroyed the file on May 1, 1997. Considering the sour relations between the FBI and CIA during the Cold War, it is likely that Armour Dunham was being monitored by FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in the same manner as a number of other CIA officials and agents were being surveilled. Similarly, the pre-1968 passport records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, were destroyed by the State Department.

Contempt Of Court For Obama The Lawless Resident

The lawless president who cannot provide valid documented evidence of his US citizenship ignores the federal court.

U.S. in Contempt Over Gulf Drill Ban, Judge Rules

The Obama Administration acted in contempt by continuing its deepwater-drilling moratorium after the policy was struck down, a New Orleans judge ruled.

Interior Department regulators acted with “determined disregard” by lifting and reinstituting a series of policy changes that restricted offshore drilling, following the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, U.S. District Judge, Martin Feldman of New Orleans ruled yesterday.

“Each step the government took following the court’s imposition of a preliminary injunction showcases its defiance,” Feldman said in the ruling.

“Such dismissive conduct, viewed in tandem with the re-imposition of a second blanket and substantively identical moratorium, and in light of the national importance of this case, provide this court with clear and convincing evidence of the government’s contempt,” Feldman said.

President Barack Obama’s administration first halted offshore exploration in waters deeper than 500 feet in May, after the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig off the Louisiana coast led to a subsea blowout of a BP Plc well that spewed more than 4.1 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Feldman overturned the initial ban as overly broad on June 22, after the offshore-drilling industry and Gulf Coast political and business leaders challenged it. U.S. Interior Secretary Kenneth Salazar said later that day that he would “issue a new order in the coming days that eliminates any doubt that a moratorium is needed, appropriate, and within our authorities.”


In July, Salazar instituted a second drilling moratorium that was also challenged by an industry lawsuit claiming the ban was harming the Gulf Coast economy, which is heavily dependent on deepwater drilling activities. That ban was rescinded in October, before Feldman could rule on its validity.

Feldman later ruled that enhanced drilling safety rules Salazar imposed to permit companies to resume offshore exploration violated federal law, and he struck down those as well. Opponents of those rules complained to Feldman that regulators were continuing to block the resumption of drilling after Feldman’s rulings.

Informal Moratorium

The Offshore Marine Service Association, a group representing offshore service vessels and shipyards, urged the president to end what it called an informal moratorium on offshore drilling.

“President Obama claims to have lifted the Gulf moratorium, yet not a single deepwater permit has been issued in nine months,” Jim Adams, the association’s president, said in a release after the ruling. “As a result, thousands of workers are out of jobs, Americans are paying more for gasoline and heating oil, and our nation is becoming even more dependent on unstable nations for our energy needs.”

Feldman also ordered the government to pay the legal fees of Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC, which filed the initial lawsuit. The company had described the fees as “significant.”

Hornbeck “was put to considerable expense, after Judge Feldman issued the injunction, contending with the government’s litigation posturing and defiance of the court’s order,” Sam Giberga, the company’s general counsel, said today in an e-mail.

“The government was not at liberty to impose its own will after the court struck down the policy,” Giberga said. “The government, like any citizen, had to obey the ruling, even if it didn’t like it.”

(Not at liberty,"EXCEPT OBAMA", echoes again through the halls of the lawless resident who is a fraud president.) Story Reports

The case is Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC v. Salazar, 2:10-cv-01663, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).