Obama is a traitor as are all in congress who support obama. Barney frank leads the way.

Unqualified home buyers were not the only ones who benefitted from Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank’s efforts to deregulate Fannie Mae throughout the 1990s, so did Frank’s partner, herb moses, a Fannie Mae executive at the forefront of the agency’s push to relax lending restrictions.

Frank met Moses in 1987, the same year he became the first openly gay member of Congress.

"I am the only member of the congressional gay spouse caucus," Moses wrote in the Washington Post in 1991. "On Capitol Hill, Barney always introduces me as his lover."

The two lived together in a Washington home until they broke up in 1998, a few months after Moses ended his seven-year tenure at Fannie Mae, where he was the assistant director of product initiatives. According to National Mortgage News, Moses "helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs."

The biggest villain in the whole financial meltdown isn't the "private sector," as some in Congress — like Rep. Frank — have tried to claim. It's Congress itself, and barney frank. Govenment influenced wallstreet to go bust. Barney frank played the race card when he was warned feddie mac and fannie mae were about to go bust. His "boyfriend" at the time was over freedie mac. While barney was groping, congress was requiring banks to make bad loans. Barney and the democrates created the manufactured financial crisis. Yes it was barney gay boy frank and his fellow democrates that pushed the economic system over the edge. Democrates created a crisis that obama would not let go to waste. Barney set America up for a fall so the FRAUD obama could appear to solve a manufactured crisis by pushing the US in debt. This was a cover to make the US economic system collapse. Obama and the democrates could claim they did their best to solve the crisis they created by spending the US into economic destruction. Obama and all his fellow comrades have a plan to destroy capitalism. It is working. Obama is a traitor as are all in congress who support obama. Americans must fight for their freedoms. Domestic enemies have taken over the federal government in the form of elected "officials" who are ruling and not responsive to the people as "elected" officials. Story Reports
........................................................................................
Greenspan implied it was Congress' meddling incompetence — not the Fed, or free markets, or greedy bankers — that created the financial meltdown

Regulation:

Sometimes, long after their public careers are done, those once in power speak openly about the past. Like Alan Greenspan, who on Wednesday told Congress what he could never tell them while in office.

Testifying before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, the former Fed chairman told some plain truths he didn't dare utter when he headed the central bank. Most notably, Greenspan implied it was Congress' meddling incompetence — not the Fed, or free markets, or greedy bankers — that created the financial meltdown.

"If the Fed as a regulator had tried to thwart what everyone perceived as a fairly broad consensus that the trend was in the right direction, homeownership was rising and that was an unmitigated good, then Congress would have clamped down on us," he said.

That, of course, is dead right. But the maestro wasn't finished.

"There's a presumption that the Federal Reserve's an independent agency, and it is up to a point, but we are a creature of Congress and if ... we had said we're running into a bubble and we need to retrench, the Congress would say 'we haven't a clue what you're talking about,'" he said.

Indeed, that's precisely what happened.

Yes, the Fed may have kept interest rates too low for too long in the middle of this decade. But it also might be true that it had no other real choice — given the sluggish recovery following the 2000 stock market meltdown, the 2001 recession and the 9/11 attacks.

Regardless, it wasn't the Fed that caused the housing crash and financial meltdown. It was Congress and the White House.

(Yes bush is also to blame. He could have done more to stop the fed I believe. Only congress could have made the fed, fannie mae, feddie mac be responsible. Congress let the crisis be created when congress under the control of the democrates could have stopped the comming meltdown. Congress wanted to create the manufactured crisis. The democratic congress would do anything to stay in power.) Story Reports

The mess began in the 1970s when, during the Carter administration, left-wing activists attacked banks for supposed "redlining" practices that let them discriminate in making home loans.

In response, Congress passed the Community Reinvestment Act, which gave regulators the power to force banks to lend money to "low-income, minority, and distressed neighborhoods."

To fund all this new lending, they used two little-known government-sponsored enterprises — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — and essentially rewrote credit standards for the banks, weakening them substantially. Banks made loans, then Fannie and Freddie bought them — using borrowed money to do it.

In this environment, credit ratings no longer mattered much. Neither did having a job or a steady income. What mattered was race.

The process got supercharged in 1992, when a Democrat-led Congress pushed Fannie and Freddie to buy even more mortgages from banks that had made loans to low-income and minority buyers. In 1996, President Clinton's Department of Housing and Urban Development told Fannie and Freddie that 42% of their financing had to go to those with incomes below the median.

By 2000, HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo proudly unveiled "new regulations" to "provide $2.4 trillion in mortgages for affordable housing for 28.1 million families." Despite subsequent efforts at reform, Democrats in Congress — led by Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank — rejected major changes to Fannie and Freddie.

(Yes dodd and frank were responsible for not changing the policies of fannie and freddie. Their democrate leader bill clinton didn't try to do anything to curtail the wild, crazy, insane policy of making loans to people who could not afford them. He added fuel to the fire just like "butt buddy" barney frank did. Congress ignored the warnings. These two bums added even more fuel to the manufactured crisis. The DEMOCRATES CREATED THE MANUFACTUTED FINANCIAL CRISIS! The democrates are still manufacturing the "FINANCIAL CRISIS." Reagan said, "In this time of financial crisis it is not the government that is the answer it is the government that is the problem" Reagan was correct. The manufactured democratic congress created a massive slush fund to be used for their own reelection. This is the dirty little secret.) Story Reports

We're still paying for that today. Fannie and Freddie have gotten a blank check from the government for their losses, and still owe more than $5 trillion that they can't pay off.

We've been critical of Greenspan in the past, but on this, he's completely right. The biggest villain in the whole financial meltdown isn't the "private sector," as some in Congress — like Rep. Frank — have tried to claim. It's Congress itself, UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE DEMOCRATES.

Obama supporters are similar to japs in world war 2 that would do anything for their master

In this Feb. 10, 2010 photo, Fox News political analyst Angela McGlowan announces at the Tupelo, Miss., City Hall, that she is running for the 1st Congressional District as a Republican. Black conservatives are taking heat for their involvement in the mostly white tea party movement, and McGlowan has spoken at several tea party events.

(Yes there are also black Americans who believe barack obama must be removed from office because he is a liar. Many black American's know obama is a FRAUD. These people have taken the time to inform other black Americans that their "brother" is an IMPOSTER. Other blacks call anti obama supporters oreos, traitors and uncle toms. I call them Americans, patriots and freedom fighters. Many white and black people refuse to accept the truth obama is a radical communist imposter. Those that give a shout out to obama in the form of resign or be impeached receive insults from brothers that are grafted into obama. These people are not worth wasting time on because they have "drank the cool aid" and are in a ritual that requires them to never reject anything obama says or does. They are in fact obama "slaves" who will do anything for their master of deception. Lincoln freed the slaves and obama inslaved them again and they don't realize it. Any opposition to obama and the "race card" is played to counter the truth. Obama is a racist, not only when it comes to whites but with his own "people".) Story Reports
.........................................................................................

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - They've been called Oreos, traitors and Uncle Toms, and are used to having to defend their values. Now black conservatives are really taking heat for their involvement in the mostly white tea party movement—and for having the audacity to oppose the policies of the nation's first black president.

"I've been told I hate myself. I've been called an Uncle Tom. I've been told I'm a spook at the door," said Timothy F. Johnson, chairman of the Frederick Douglass Foundation, a group of black conservatives who support free market principles and limited government.

"Black Republicans find themselves always having to prove who they are. Because the assumption is the Republican Party is for whites and the Democratic Party is for blacks," he said.

Johnson and other black conservatives say they were drawn to the tea party movement because of what they consider its commonsense fiscal values of controlled spending, less taxes and smaller government. The fact that they're black—or that most tea partyers are white—should have nothing to do with it, they say.

"You have to be honest and true to yourself. What am I supposed to do, vote Democratic just to be popular? Just to fit in?" asked Clifton Bazar, a 45-year-old New Jersey freelance photographer and conservative blogger.

Opponents have branded the tea party as a group of racists hiding behind economic concerns—and reports that some tea partyers were lobbing racist slurs at black congressmen during last month's heated health care vote give them ammunition.

But these black conservatives don't consider racism representative of the movement as a whole—or race a reason to support it.

Angela McGlowan, a black congressional candidate from Mississippi, said her tea party involvement is "not about a black or white issue."

"It's not even about Republican or Democrat, from my standpoint," she told The Associated Press. "All of us are taxed too much."

Still, she's in the minority. As a nascent grassroots movement with no registration or formal structure, there are no racial demographics available for the tea party movement; it's believed to include only a small number of blacks and Hispanics.

Some black conservatives credit President Barack Obama's election—and their distaste for his policies—with inspiring them and motivating dozens of black Republicans to plan political runs in November.

For black candidates like McGlowan, tea party events are a way to reach out to voters of all races with her conservative message.

"I'm so proud to be a part of this movement! I want to tell you that a lot of people underestimate you guys," the former national political commentator for Fox News told the cheering crowd at a tea party rally in Nashville, Tenn., in February.

Tea party voters represent a new model for these black conservatives—away from the black, liberal Democratic base located primarily in cities, and toward a black and white conservative base that extends into the suburbs.

Black voters have overwhelmingly backed Democratic candidates, support that has only grown in recent years. In 2004, presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry won 88 percent of the black vote; four years later, 95 percent of black voters cast ballots for Obama.

Black conservatives don't want to have to apologize for their divergent views.

"I've gotten the statement, 'How can you not support the brother?'" said David Webb, an organizer of New York City's Tea Party 365, Inc. movement and a conservative radio personality.

Since Obama's election, Webb said some black conservatives have even resorted to hiding their political views.

"I know of people who would play the (liberal) role publicly, but have their private opinions," he said. "They don't agree with the policy but they have to work, live and exist in the community ... Why can't we speak openly and honestly if we disagree?"

Among the 37 black Republicans running for U.S. House and Senate seats in November is Charles Lollar of Maryland's 5th District.

A tea party supporter running against House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Lollar says he's finding support in unexpected places.

The 38-year-old U.S. Marine Corps reservist recently walked into a bar in southern Maryland decorated with a Confederate flag. It gave his wife Rosha pause.

"I said, 'You know what, honey? Many, many of our Southern citizens came together under that flag for the purpose of keeping their family and their state together,'" Lollar recalled. "The flag is not what you're to fear. It's the stupidity behind the flag that is a problem. I don't think we'll find that in here. Let's go ahead in."

Once inside, they were treated to a pig roast, a motorcycle rally—and presented with $5,000 in contributions for his campaign.

McGlowan, one of three GOP candidates in north Mississippi's 1st District primary, seeks a seat held since 2008 by Democrat Travis Childers. The National Republican Congressional Committee has supported Alan Nunnelee, chairman of the state Senate Appropriations Committee, who is also pursuing tea party voters.

McGlowan believes the tea party movement has been unfairly portrayed as monolithically white, male and middle-aged, though she acknowledged blacks and Hispanics are a minority at most events.

Racist protest signs at some tea party rallies and recent reports by U.S. Reps. John Lewis, D-Ga., and Barney Frank, D-Mass., that tea partyers shouted racial and anti-gay slurs at them have raised allegations of racism in the tea party movement.

Black members of the movement say it is not inherently racist, and some question the reported slurs. "You would think—something that offensive—you would think someone got video of it," Bazar, the conservative blogger, said.

"Just because you have one nut case, it doesn't automatically equate that you've got an organization that espouses (racism) as a sane belief," Johnson said.

Hilary Shelton, director of the Washington bureau of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, suggested a bit of caution.

"I'm sure the reason that (black conservatives) are involved is that from an ideological perspective, they agree," said Shelton. "But when those kinds of things happen, it is very important to be careful of the company that you keep."

___

You are invited to "Upcountry Tea Party" on Saturday, April 17 at 1:00pm

Don't let obama and his thugs intimidate or harass you. Tell obama and his fellow democrates to go to hell if they think Americans won't fight for their freedoms. (story Reports)


You are invited to "Upcountry Tea Party" on Saturday, April 17 at 1:00pm

Event: Upcountry Tea Party What: Rally Start Time: Saturday, April 17 at 1:00pm End Time: Saturday, April 17 at 4:00pm Where: BI-LO Center Plaza.

Tea party details

Featured Speaker: Jerome Corsi Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry"

John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians," and most recently, "Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders." He will soon author a book on the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and the prospect of the forthcoming North American Union.

Master of Ceremonies: Bob McLain, WORD Bob McLain.

Gov Gary Johnson, Gary Earl Johnson (born January 1, 1953) is an American businessman, triathlete, and libertarian-leaning Republican politician who served as the 29th Governor of the U.S. state of New Mexico from 1995 to 2003. Since leaving office, Johnson has advocated libertarian ideals of limited government and non-interventionism.

Dan Gonzales, State Chairman for the Constitution Party of Florida and Vice President of Continental Congress Jeff Williams, Like many citizens, Jeff Williams was content to have political "opinions" and sit on the sidelines. He thought it was enough to be a successful small business owner, raise a family and stay as far away from politics as possible. He was wrong. After an 8-Hour baptism by Michael Badnarik in the form of his popular online constitution class and sensing a "clear and present danger" to our republic, Williams picked up the torch of Liberty and has been running with it ever since. In the past two years, Williams has become an active, high-profile face in the Liberty movements of Washington and Idaho as a speaker and event organizer, known for his no-excuse "common sense" approach to politics. Williams has run for public office, participated in the 9-12 March on Washington, and was elected as a delegate from Washington to Continental Congress 2009, where he served on multiple committees, established himself as a powerful and articulate speaker and wrote the preamble to the resultant Articles of Freedom.

"Paradigm Shift" Jeff Williams

Maj. Rex H. McTyeire (Ret.) US Army Special Forces, South Carolina Chapter President Member of the National Board of Directors for Oath Keepers Major McTyeire started his military career from southern Georgia (Albany) as a volunteer, on orders to Jump School at eighteen years old. At Ft Benning, he was recruited into Special Forces, and offered an age waiver to volunteer. Rex brings to Oath Keepers a solemn commitment to the US Constitution, and avidly supports the rights and voice of all people everywhere.

(Voice your opinion of obama. Vote out all the democrates that voted for obamacare. We must fight for our freedoms not only on foreign soil but against the enemy within which is the radical obama and his fellow Liberal socialist/communist democrates. Tell these people in washington to go to hell) Story Reports

Obama Is A Traitor An Enemy Of America

Keep in mind william charles ayers was obama's employer and held his first fundraiser for political office in his house. A terrorist hires obama and raises funds for him. These funds helped to elect the FRAUD and domestic terrorist obama. Now the domestic terrorist obama is using the power of the federal government against the will of the American people. Obama and his fellow terrorist friends from chicago have an agenda. It is to destroy America.

Obama Is A Traitor An Enemy Of America

The enemy is "president" obama. A FRAUD who was elected through deception of the DNC.

The domestic enemies have dictated to Americans via obamacare.

Now obama is going to disarm America.

"The United States will pledge not to use nuclear weapons against most non-nuclear countries -- no matter what they use against us -- but will keep "all options" on the table for nations like North Korea and Iran, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday."

Gates said, "countries that don't have nuclear capabilities that are following the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Gates said they need not fear the United States' still-vast nuclear stockpile."

"The United States pledges not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against (those countries)," Gates said -- even in the case of a biological or chemical attack.

"I'm going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the people are safe and secure," Obama told the Times.

(This is a bold face lie. Obama is disarming America. He is telling all terrorists even in the case of a biological or chemical attack the US will not use its nuclear weapons. A biological or chemical attack on America could kill millions yet obama is telling terrorists they have nothing to fear when it comes to nuclear weapons to deter the killing of possibly millions of Americans. How does this make American's feel safe and secure? It makes me feel like the "president " of the US is a terrorist dictator. The tool he is talking about using is the iron fist of the government against opposition to his radical dictatorship.) Story Reports

Gates on Tuesday also announced major changes in the positioning of nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). (Gates is a traitor also.)

"Our ICBMs are all targeted right now on the oceans, so that if, God forbid ... for the first time in 60 years there were an accidental launch, or a problem ... it would put a missile right into the middle of the ocean, rather than targeted on any country", Gates said.

(Does this make you sick like me? If the ICBM's were needed to defend Americans because of a russian or other country's missle attack obama has made sure America CANNOT RESPOND because he has decreed our military must point our missles toward the oceans and not potential enemies. Obama is exposing America to a first strike destruction of America.) Story Reports

Prior to this review, all ICBM's were pointed at potential targets, most of them in Eastern Europe. Obama's message is that the U.S. will abandon that Cold War mentality and holster its guns, rather than keep them pointed at a possible threat.

(You and I know obama would rip your gun from your side if he could and command you to point it at the ground if a potential murder or thief was about to blow you away. This is insane. Who else are you aware of thats insane. None other than satan.) Story Reports

Obama declared war on America! If you can't see this fact you to are the enemy also. The enemy that would destroy America through an elected dictatorship. I hope America can overcome the enemy within, obama and his fellow radicals. If obama allows his comrades to use biological or chemical weapons at specific targets he can then kill people who oppose him by letting his terrorist buddies do his dirty work. To obama it would be a cleansing or purging like hitler or stalin.

When I look at obama I see a manikin who mimics a human. I see a shell of a being that has no humanity toward people who oppose him in any way. I see a modern day manifestation of corruption and destruction. I see evil on display, barack hussein obama.

ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK BENNETT SAYS THEY HAVE “NO GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE PREPARATION OF THE PUBLIC STATEMENTS MADE BY DR. FUKINO"

ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK BENNETT’S OFFICE SAYS THEY HAVE “NO GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE PREPARATION OF THE PUBLIC STATEMENTS MADE BY DR. FUKINO”

Hawwiian Attory General Says There Is No Records Of Dr Fukinos Statements In Support Of Obama

As the attorney general claims it has “no government documents pertaining to the preparation of the public statements made by Dr. Fukino in regard to vital records which pertain to Barack Hussein Obama II,” then either the attorney general is lying and breaking the law, or Dr. Fukino and Janice Okubo are.

(Okubo says attorney general reviewed and approved her statement yet the attorney general says their are no government documents pertainng to the statements made by fukino about the FRAUD obama. Many times people who have supported obama have referred to okubo's statements about obama. As I have said all along okubo's statements mean nothing without verification of her assurance obama has a "birth certificate" and that he is a natural born citizen. All her statements are not backed up by the attorney general of Hawaii. She has lied about obama to cover up for his hoax or being born in Hawaii. Obama's birth place can't be verified and neither can this officals statements.) Story Reports

A lie about the FRAUD obama.

The statement was reviewed and approved by our Attorney General Mark Bennett. I am unable to provide further comment.

Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health…

......................................................................................
by Sharon Rondeau

Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health

(Mar. 28, 2010) — The Post & Email is in receipt of a letter signed by Jill T. Nagamine, Deputy Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, which affirms her email early last month to our Editor-in-Chief, Mr. John Charlton, stating that her office will not or cannot corroborate any of the Department of Health’s public statements regarding the alleged birth of Barack Hussein Obama in Hawaii.

Ms. Nagamine’s March 19, 2010 formal letter was sent in response to the Hawaii Petition Campaign’s request for Hawaii officials to release Obama’s birth records and proof that he is a “natural born Citizen” as required for the office of President by Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

On July 27, 2009, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, issued a public statement which declared that Obama was “born in Hawai’i” and a “natural-born American citizen.” She did not expound on how she arrived at her conclusions. An earlier statement made on October 31, 2008 was less specific, claiming only that Fukino had seen Obama’s vital records on file with her department.

The office of the attorney general has now contradicted in a formal letter the content of an email sent by Janice Okubo, Public Information Officer at the Hawaii Department of Health, in which she responded to a student researcher that the attorney general, Mark Bennett, “had reviewed and approved” Dr. Fukino’s July 27 statement:

From: Justin Riggs [email address redacted]
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:03 PM
To: …janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov, [redacted other recipient]

…Ms. Okubo,

I am currently a masters degree candidate at …

The reason that I am contacting your organizations is that you are, as far as I can tell from my research, the only two groups that have openly stated that President Obama is a natural born citizen (one of the Article II, Section I qualifications for being President). I would like to document how you came to that conclusion: i.e. what the criteria is for your organization, what evidence the candidate provides, etc. I thank you for your time, and look forward to receiving a response in the near future.

Sincerely,

Justin W. Riggs

Janice Okubo responded later that day:

From: Okubo, Janice S..
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:20 PM
To: Justin Riggs [email address redacted]…

Aloha Justin,

The statement was reviewed and approved by our Attorney General Mark Bennett. I am unable to provide further comment.

Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health…

Hawaii UIPA law requires that state officials and agencies must make information available to the public which is used to formulate public statements and opinions. However, despite many requests for the “index data” relied upon to prepare Dr. Fukino’s statements, no information has been forthcoming from anyone at the Hawaii Department of Health. The very limited index data released by Dr. Fukino on the Health Department’s website does not contain enough information to substantiate Fukino’s claim that Obama is a “natural-born American citizen.”

The Post & Email reported the initial email exchange between Ms. Nagamine and Mr. Charlton on February 2, 2010.

As the attorney general claims it has “no government documents pertaining to the preparation of the public statements made by Dr. Fukino in regard to vital records which pertain to Barack Hussein Obama II,” then either the attorney general is lying and breaking the law, or Dr. Fukino and Janice Okubo are.

Why are Fukino and Okubo the only ones talking? And why does Fukino “strongly support” SB2937, which, although recommended to be “deferred” on March 16, 2010, is now headed towards passage to block requests made under the state’s own UIPA law?

To what lengths are Okubo and Fukino willing to go to protect Obama? Why are they doing it, and what do they expect to gain from it? What do they fear they will lose if they do not continue their charade?

There is no one else in Hawaii claiming that Obama was born there. No other public official will confirm it. The birthplace of past presidents has always been common knowledge which becomes part of our nation’s history and our children’s textbooks. Why, then, the secrecy? What is it that Obama is going to extraordinary lengths to hide?

(The scheme of obama is beginning to unravel. Nov 2010 will be a critical time. Obama knows he must do all his dirty deeds before he is limited by a new congress that will not be a socialist rubber stamp. Obama knows people are trying to expose him as a FRAUD and soon may be successful. Therefore he knows his time is short to put into place everything it will take for him to rule with an iron fist. Americans must resist the shadow dictator at all costs or lose our freedoms. We must stop obama and his communist/fascist hell bent quest to destroy America.) Story Reports

A Medical Doctor Helps Reveal The FRAUD obama and his obamacare

A Medical Doctor Helps Reveal The FRAUD obama

A doctor in Flordia is telling the truth about obamacare. He is correct. A sign on his door reads: “If you voted for Obama … seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your healthcare begin right now, not in four years.”

What he is telling his patients and the general public is that obama is a LIAR. Dr. Jack Cassell, 56, a Mount Dora urologist is helping to expose the FRAUD of obamacare and what it actually does. He has been bold enough to put his life and job on the line for Americans. He is telling his patients to dig deeper below the "state run media" side show of obamacare and read the facts of how obamacare will destroy America and American lives. This man should be given a medal for courage!

.......................................................................................
Read the facts for yourself and become informed. Don't believe the "state run medaia" lies of obama and his fellow Liberal socialist comrades.
........................................................................................
Timeline of major provisions of obamacare

Timeline of Major Provisions in the Democrats "Health Care Package" of economic destruction, extortion though taxation, and stripping away of American's freedom under the guise of "health care".

2009

2009

•2-year tax credit (total cap of $1B) for new chronic disease therapy investments
•Medicare cuts to hospitals begin (long-term care (7/1/09) and inpatient and
rehabilitation facilities (FY10))
•States and Federal officials review premium increases
•FDA authorized to approve "follow-on" biologics
•Increase brand name pharmaceutical Medicaid rebate (from 15.1% to 23.1%)
•Medicare payments to physicians in primarily rural areas increase (2 years)
•Deny "black liquor" eligibility for cellulosic biofuel producers credit
•Tax credits provided to certain small employers for health care-related expenses
•Increase adoption tax incentives for 2 years

2010

•Codify economic substance doctrine and impose penalties for underpayments
(transactions on/after 3/23/10)
•Provide income exclusion for specified Indian tribe health benefits provided after
3/23/10
•Temporary high-risk pool and high-cost union retiree reinsurance ($5 B each for 3.5
years) (6/23/10)
•Impose 10% tax on indoor UV tanning (7/1/10)
•Medicare cuts to inpatient psych hospitals (7/1/10)
•Prohibits lifetime and annual benefit spending limits (plan years beginning 9/23/10)
•Prohibits non-group plans from canceling coverage (rescissions) (plan years
beginning 9/23/10)
•Requires plans to cover, at no charge, most preventive care (plan years beginning
9/23/10)
•Allows dependents to stay on parents’ policies through age 26 (plan years
beginning 9/23/10)
•Provides limited protections to children with pre-existing conditions (plan years
beginning 9/23/10)
•Hospitals in "Frontier States" (ND, MT, WY, SD, UT ) receive higher Medicare
payments (FY11)
•Hospitals in “low-cost” areas receive higher Medicare payments for 2 yrs ($400
million, FY11)
•Medicare Advantage cuts begin
•No longer allowed to use FSA, HSA, HRA, Archer MSA distributions for over-the-
counter medicines
•Medicare cuts to home health begin
•Wealthier seniors ($85k/$170k) begin paying higher Part D premiums (not indexed
for inflation in Parts B/D)
•Medicare reimbursement cuts when seniors use diagnostic imaging like MRIs, CT
scans, etc.
•Medicare cuts begin to ambulance services, ASCs, diagnostic labs, and durable
medical equipment
•Impose new annual tax on brand name pharmaceutical companies
•Americans begin paying premiums for federal long-term care insurance (CLASS Act)
•Health plans required to spend a minimum of 80% of premiums on medical claims
•Physicians in "Frontier States" (ND, MT, WY, SD, UT ) receive higher Medicare
payments

2011

•Prohibition on Medicare payments to new physician-owned hospitals
•Penalties for non-qualified HSA and Archer MSA distributions double (to 20%)
•Seniors prohibited from purchasing power wheelchairs unless they first rent for 13
months
•Brand name drug companies begin providing 50% discount in the Part D “donut
hole”
•10% Medicare bonus payment for primary care and general surgery (5 years)
•Employers required to report value of health benefits on W-2
•Steps towards health insurance administrative simplification (reduced paperwork,
etc) begins (5 yr process)
•Additional funding for community health centers (5 years)
•Seniors who hit Part D “donut hole "in 2010 receive $250 check (3/15/11)
•New Medicare cuts to long-term care hospitals begin (7/1/11)
•Additional Medicare cuts to hospitals and cuts to nursing homes and inpatient
rehab facilities begin (FY12)
•New tax on all private health insurance policies to pay for comp. eff. research (plan
years beginning FY12)

•Medicare cuts to dialysis treatment begins
•Require information reporting on payments to corporations
•Medicare to reduce spending by using an HMO-like coordinated care model
(Accountable Care Organizations)

2012

•Medicare Advantage plans with a 4 or 5 star rating receive a quality bonus payment
•New Medicare cuts to inpatient psych hospitals (7/1/12)
•Hospital pay-for-quality program begins (FY13)
•Medicare cuts to hospitals with high readmission rates begin (FY13)
•Medicare cuts to hospice begin (FY13)
2012
•Impose $2,500 annual cap on FSA contributions (indexed to CPI)
•Increase Medicare wage tax by 0.9% and impose a new 3.8% tax on unearned , non-
active business income for those earning over $200k/$250k (not indexed to inflation)
•Generally increases (7.5% to 10%) threshold at which medical expenses, as a % of
income, can be deductible
•Eliminate deduction for Part D retiree drug subsidy employers receive

2013

•Impose 2.3% excise tax on medical devices
•Medicare cuts to hospitals who treat low-income seniors begin
•Post-acute pay for quality reporting begins
•CO-OP Program: Secretary awards loans and grants for establishing nonprofit health
insurers
•$500,000 deduction cap on compensation paid to insurance company employees and
officers
•Part D “donut hole” reduction begins, reaching a 25% reduction by 2020
•Individuals without gov't-approved coverage are subject to a tax of the greater of
$695 or 2.5% of income
•Employers who fail to offer "affordable" coverage would pay a $3,000 penalty for
every employee that receives a subsidy through the Exchange
•Employers who do not offer insurance must pay a tax penalty of $2,000 for every full-
time employee
•More Medicare cuts to home health begin
•States must have established Exchanges
•Employers with more than 200 employees can auto-enroll employees in health
coverage, with opt-out
•All non-grandfathered and Exchange health plans required to meet federally-
mandated levels of coverage
•States must cover parents /childless adults up to 138% of poverty on Medicaid,
receive increased FMAP

2014

•Tax credits available for Exchange-based coverage, amount varies by income up to
400% of poverty
•Insurers cannot impose any coverage restrictions on pre-existing conditions
(guaranteed issue/renewability)
•Modified community rating: individual or family coverage; geography; 3:1 ratio for
age; 1.5 :1 for smoking
•Insurers must offer coverage to anyone wanting a policy and every policy has to be
renewed
•Limits out-of-pocket cost-sharing (tied to limits in HSAs, currently $5,950/$11,900
indexed to COLA)
•Insurance plans must include government-defined "essential benefits " and coverage
levels
•OPM must offer at least two multi-state plans in every state
•Employers can offer some employees free choice vouchers for health insurance in the
Exchange
•Government board (IPAB) begins submitting proposals to cut Medicare
•Impose tax on nearly all private health insurance plans
•Medicare payment cuts for hospital-acquired infections begin (FY15)

2015

•More Medicare cuts to home health begin
2016

•States can form interstate insurance compacts if the coverage with HHS approval (2016)

2017

•Physician pay-for-quality program begins for all physicians
•States may allow large employers and multi-employer health plans to purchase coverage
in the Exchange.
•States may apply to the Secretary for a limited waiver from certain federal requirements

2018

•Impose "Cadillac tax on “high cost” plans, 40% tax on the benefit value above a certain
threshold: ($10,200 individual coverage, $27,500 family or self-only union multi-
employer coverage)


In his waiting room, Cassell also has provided his patients with photocopies of a health-care timeline produced by Republican leaders that outlines “major provisions” in the health-care package. The doctor put a sign above the stack of copies that reads: “This is what the morons in Washington have done to your health care. Take one, read it and vote out anyone who voted for it.”

(I have provided the same copy Dr Cassel has provided to his patients. This has been done to educate the uninformed and deceived public about the provisions of obamacare. Take the time to read the above time line of what obamacare will do. It does not include the additional last minute changes that the democrates voted on and had not read in the obamacare bill. As you can see by the time line its all about government control of every aspect of you health care and life. Obamacare is all about stripping away your personal freedoms. Yes all the Liberal democrates voted for a bill they had not read but passed it anyway. Our government is not longer representing the will of the people when congress passes a "law" that had not been fully amended nor published for inspection before it was vote on. We have a form now of DICTATORSHIP under the leadership of a FRAUD!) Story Reports

“I’m not turning anybody away — that would be unethical,” Dr. Jack Cassell, 56, a Mount Dora urologist and a registered Republican opposed to the health plan, told the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday. “But if they read the sign and turn the other way, so be it.”

(The good doctor is saying if you believe everything obama says then you are STUPID! If you voted for obama, now he has seen to it that your health care system is going to over a short period of time be destroyed and the federal government will enure that your quality of life will be greatly decreased or eliminated. Dr Cassell is telling everyone be aware of whom you voted for. You voted for a FRAUD! Your voted for an IMPOSTER! You voted for your own medical destruction via obamacare beginning NOW! Dr Cassell is also saying read the bill. Read what obama has in store for you. Obama is the "Dr. Kevorkian" of health care. Obama will see to it that you get the best health care your deserve with a big push from obamacare into an early grave.) Story Reports

Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace

Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace

By Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.

The following discussion assumes President Obama was born in Hawaii and is a United States citizen.

The purpose of this article is to highlight judicial and historical evidence suggesting that a "natural born citizen" must be born in the United States to parents who are citizens. By that definition, Obama is not eligible to be president. Therefore, his presidency and official administrative acts remain subject to being rendered void by the Supreme Court.

The relevant Obama admission

At the official Obama campaign website – Fightthesmears.com – just below the Certification of Live Birth (COLB) – the following admission was also published:

When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children.
This was republished from a Factcheck.org, article which further stated:

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
The constitutional question presented is whether a person born with citizenship in and allegiance to a foreign nation can be considered a "natural born citizen" of the United States as required by Article II, Section 1.

The U.S. State Department's Foreign Affairs Manual discusses problems associated with dual citizenship:

7 FAM 081: U.S. Policy on Dual Nationality:
(e)While recognizing the existence of dual nationality, the U.S. Government does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Dual nationality may hamper efforts by the U.S. Government to provide diplomatic and consular protection to individuals overseas. When a U.S. citizen is in the other country of their dual nationality, that country has a predominant claim on the person.

This helps explain why the definition of "natural born citizen" as one born in the nation to parents who are citizens makes perfect sense in that such a person will not be infected by dual-allegiance problems. If the parents are citizens, neither will confer allegiance to a foreign nation. Additionally, if one is born on soil foreign to the parents, that nation is likely to recognize the person as a citizen. Owing allegiance to more than one nation is an unnatural circumstance of citizenship.

While the Constitution requires representatives, senators and presidents to be citizens, Article II, Section 1, additionally requires that the president's citizenship be "natural born." A natural born citizen is not a higher level of citizen. "Natural born" simply describes a circumstance of citizenship.

There are multiple circumstances that create "citizens at birth." Some require a federal statute for citizenship while others rely on the 14th Amendment. Had the framers of the 14th Amendment sought to deem every person born in the United States a natural born citizen, they certainly could have included such plain, unequivocal language. But they didn't.

In 1790, the first Congress deemed all persons born of two United States citizen parents abroad to be "natural born citizens," but the words "natural born" were repealed in 1795. Congress never again legislated the definition of "natural born citizen," and no United States statute currently defines the term or even mentions it.

The citizenship of a person born in the United States to parents who are citizens is self-evident and has never required naturalization, a federal statute or an amendment, and the Supreme Court has indicated that such persons are the only citizens who satisfy the natural born citizen requirement of Article II, Section 1.

Origin of the natural born citizen clause

The strict constitutional requirements were enacted to exclude citizens for the sake of national security in safeguarding the office from inexperience and from persons who may not have sole allegiance. It appears the clause was first introduced for constitutional consideration in a letter from John Jay to George Washington dated July 25, 1787:

Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.
Jay underlined "born" which signifies the importance of allegiance from birth. The "natural born" requirement renders irrelevant that a person – born to foreign or dual allegiance – may not have renewed his foreign citizenship upon reaching maturity. One is either eligible to be president at birth, or one will never be eligible.

An important historical definition of "natural born citizen" comes from a 1797 translation of the "Law of Nations," a 1758 text by Emerich de Vattel, which summarized that body of international law known also as the "Law of Nations":

The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

Note that a child of former aliens can be a natural born citizen under this standard if born in the United States to parents who were naturalized prior to the child's birth. That was made clear by the Supreme Court's opinion in Perkins v. Elg.

It appears from James Madison's notes of August 1787 that the delegates used the terms "native" and "natural born citizen" synonymously. Additionally, Ben Franklin stated that the framers frequently consulted Vattel's text. Also consider that Article I, Section 8, grants Congress the authority to "punish ... offenses against the Law of Nations."

In the case of The Venus 12 U.S. 253, 289 (1814), Chief Justice John Marshall stated:

Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. ..."
Chief Justice Marshall relied upon a pre-1797 edition of Vattel's text. The 1797 translation was adopted by the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), where Chief Justice Waite stated:

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. ...
It's significant that this decision was issued six years after the 14th Amendment was enacted. As such, Minor illustrates that the 14th Amendment simply defines who is a citizen, not which citizens are natural born.

If Obama had run for president in 1874 – six years after the 14th Amendment went into effect – he wouldn't have been eligible since he doesn't fit the Minor Court's standard for a natural born citizen.

The strange case of Chester Arthur

The holding in Minor v. Happersett must have given Chester Arthur nightmares when he ran for vice president in 1880, six years after Minor. Arthur, a prominent New York lawyer, managed to conceal from public view that his father didn't become a naturalized citizen until 14 years after he was born. Therefore Chester Arthur was a British subject at birth.

Arthur's deception in concealing this fact involved numerous lies to the Brooklyn Eagle newspaper concerning his father's heritage, immigration and age. He also quite famously burned most of his papers and lied about his own age.

Historical records bear witness that this issue was never discussed in relation to Chester Arthur's eligibility until recently. Helping to cloud the issue all these years was a famous conspiracy theory expounded by a New York lawyer named Arthur Hinman who alleged Chester Arthur was born in Canada and was therefore not eligible. This sensational and unfounded conspiracy theory took the spotlight and unfortunately provided a smokescreen to conceal the true eligibility defect.

Chester Arthur is the only president prior to Obama who – after the grandfather clause of Article II, Section 1, expired – was not born in the United States of two citizen parents. As such, Obama supporters have sought to use Chester Arthur as precedent for justifying Obama's eligibility. Such reliance is unfounded because it wasn't known at the time Chester Arthur held office that he was born with dual nationality. That this was concealed from the general public is confirmed by two important law review articles.

In the September/October 1884 issue of The American Law Review, George C. Collins discussed the citizenship status of persons born on U.S. soil to foreign parents. In the concluding paragraph, Collins stated:

Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and it is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth.
It's ridiculous to imagine the sitting president wouldn't be mentioned when the article concerns the issue of whether a person born of an alien father is even a United States citizen.

Chester Arthur's true eligibility defect doesn't appear to have been mentioned in any historical record until December 2008 when it was exposed at my blog. Clearly, Chester Arthur's deception cannot serve to validate anyone's presidential eligibility. He got away with it, but that doesn't make it right.

U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

In 1898, Justice Horace Gray wrote one of the most controversial opinions in Supreme Court history wherein a man born in the United States of Chinese alien parents was held to be a citizen. Wong Kim Ark is the precedent relied upon for the assertion that any person born on United States soil, regardless of parentage, is a citizen. But that's not accurate. The holding in Wong Kim Ark appears to require for citizenship that a person be born on United States soil to parents who are permanently domiciled here. If the domicile requirement is upheld in future cases, anchor babies will no longer be assumed to be United States citizens.

Regardless, the holding in Wong Kim Ark did not state that such a citizen was "natural born." In fact, Justice Gray reiterated the definition of natural born citizen as one born on United States soil to parents who are citizens when he favorably discussed Minor v. Happersett:

That neither Mr. Justice Miller nor any of the justices who took part in the decision of The Slaughterhouse Cases understood the court to be committed to the view that all children born in the United States of citizens or subjects of foreign States were excluded from the operation of the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment is manifest from a unanimous judgment of the Court, delivered but two years later, while all those judges but Chief Justice Chase were still on the bench, in which Chief Justice Waite said: "Allegiance and protection are, in this connection (that is, in relation to citizenship), reciprocal obligations. The one is a compensation for the other: allegiance for protection, and protection for allegiance. ... At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens. ..."
While the dissent feared the majority holding would make Wong Kim Ark eligible to be president, Justice Gray's restatement of the Minor Court's definition of a natural born citizen as one born in the United States to parents who are citizens stands in direct contrast to the dissent's fear.

A few years after Wong Kim Ark was decided, the Albany Law Journal published an article by Alexander Porter Morse entitled, "NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES: ELIGIBILITY FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT" (Albany Law Journal Vol. 66 (1904-1905)):

If it was intended that anybody who was a citizen by birth should be eligible, it would only have been necessary to say, "no person, except a native-born citizen"; but the framers thought it wise, in view of the probable influx of European immigration, to provide that the president should at least be the child of citizens owing allegiance to the United States at the time of his birth. It may be observed in passing that the current phrase "native-born citizen" is well understood; but it is pleonasm and should be discarded; and the correct designation, "native citizen" should be substituted in all constitutional and statutory enactments, in judicial decisions and in legal discussions where accuracy and precise language are essential to intelligent discussion.

The term "native born citizen" has been erroneously substituted for "natural born citizen" by numerous commentators. Mr. Morse correctly points out that the two are not synonymous. His article also proves once again that Chester Arthur's dual nationality was hidden from the public. There would have been no point in writing the article – which doesn't mention Chester Arthur – had the nation previously condoned a president born with dual allegiance.

The argument against Obama being eligible rests on multiple Supreme Court cases that define a "natural born citizen" as one born in the United States to parents who are citizens. This is not a political issue. It's a legal issue faced by a nation where nobody is supposed to be above the law. As such, it deserves judicial review.

[For the most comprehensive etymological deconstruction of the term "natural born Citizen," I strongly recommend, "What Is A Natural Born Citizen Of The United States?" by John Greschak.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leo Donofrio is an attorney with 20 years' experience. He is a partner in the law firm of Pidgeon & Donofrio and he authors the Natural Born Citizen blog.

.................................................................................

No only is obama not eligible to be president because he is not a "natural born citizen" this blog entry exposes the fact that he is hiding his true identity and is a FRAUD

Obama is an IMPOSTER promoted by the DNC

Obama can't prove he is a US citizen with any document that can be validated by a US citizen or court of law. Obama is in fact an undocumented alien that has been elected president. (Story Reports)

The short form "certification of live birth" obama claims as proof he is a US citizen cannot be validated because Hawaii and obama will not let any US citizen validate his "certification of live birth". Its a limited information document with nothing that can be verfied. Obama hides behind the state of Hawaii and its deception of his true identity.

Wasted Time With People Who Lie And Defend The Liar obama

People who believe obama are either deceived or are themselves like obama deceivers. Don't waste your time trying to convince them obama is a liar.
Brief History of the United States Citizen Militia

It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men. … If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands, which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. --- Samuel Adams


Wasted Time With People Who Lie And Defend The Liar obama

Time for a reality check. There are people who will defend obama and not deny he is a liar. How do they do this? These people will counter with the argument that people who listen to Rush Limbaugh, for example, believe a liar.

They will not deny obama is a liar and also add that both republicans and democrates promise things and lie during campaigns. They say both republicans and democrates don't keep promises they make. They equate not keeping promises with not doing what was promised during a campaign. This a form of lying. Not only does obama not keep promises he makes but lies about what he will do and has done. Obama lies about what congress is doing. He only speaks in partial terms or vague, obscure and minimal ways. He uses key words to invoke emotions and hide the truth of his lies.

Obama supporters become surrogates for obama. They morph into liars just like obama. They transform themselves into the epitome of a liar and mimic obama.

My point is these people waste a sane person's valuable time. Don't waste anymore time with people who mimic their hero obama. Don't argue with them. Don't engage them. These people are not worth the energy expended to explain simple facts.

Instead work to explain real facts about the FRAUD obama to sane people who have not given themselves over literally to "the dark side". "The dark side" represents all who deny the truth and believe a lie.

These people are beyond hope. There are many who lack the knowledge of the truth about obama or ignore it. There are many who have been deceived by obama and the "state run media". Many people can be told the truth and then make up their own minds without the "state run media" obama uses to sell his lies to the public.

I confronted an individual today about obama and this was the result. He attempted to make an example out of Rush Limbaugh as a liar. I asked him, give me one example of a lie Rush has told. (Remember a mistake is not a lie if it is corrected and was done in honesty.) There was total silence. No response. No answer to my question. I was surprised. I expected him to say something Rush had said then corrected and then try to tell me this was a lie Rush had spoken. Obama does not make mistakes but lies on purpose. Seldom is there a correction unless he must because it is so obvious.

This is one way obama supporters operate. They can deny the truth. They can also ignore the truth and point to another individual as their example of a liar to hide the facts about obama.

As I said these people are not worth wasting any time on. Concentrate on people who live in reality. Work with people who still are able to think on their own.

There is hope. I won't waste my time anymore with people who believe and support the liar obama. Obama is not just an occasional liar. Obama is a lie manifested as somebody that everyone can trust and belive.

Obama was cross bred as a liar and deceiver. People who believe obama are either deceived or are themselves like obama deceivers. The blind leading the blind. Most of them are beyond hope.

Find free men and women who want to stay free and speak the truth to them. The truth will set you free but a lie will keep you in bondage. Obama supporters are in bondage to obama. They are in effect his "slaves". Obama purchased them with his deception and half truths or twisted truths.

Don't stay in bondage to obama. Break the chains of his lies and deceptions. Think for yourself. Research what obama does and says. Compare what he does and says with what happens. You will find obama is a con man and a FRAUD. If you check out what obama does and says with the truth of what really happens you will loose the chains of your bondgage.

Obama is a destroyer. A deceiver. A task master or slave owner.

.........................................................................................

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." -George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

"The militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves, ... all men capable of bearing arms;..." -"Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic", 1788 (either Richard Henry Lee or Melancton Smith).

"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress shall have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People." --Tench Coxe, 1788.

"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, Liberty decreases." -- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd president of the US (1743 - 1826)

Obama is a sick man and should be removed from office

This is a limited record of a habitual, shameless liar, a man who will say anything to get what he wants.

President Obama evidently believes that he can solve any problem with a speech. But he really does not care whether what he says is true or not, nor does he feel any responsibility to honor the assurances and promises he makes. As a result, this nation is now in a position where it cannot believe a word that he says, and that amounts to an unprecedented crisis of confidence in the Presidency. Democratic government will atrophy if we allow lying on this scale to count as the business as usual of politics.

(The point here is that obama will do or say anything to further his marxist communist agenda which is the total destruction of America as we know it. Obama has said he will transform and change America. Obama was saying he would enslave Americans and strip their freedoms away two ways. Some would be taken away slowly others faster but all opposition would be crushed under the heavy hand of the obama marxism sold to the public as "change" for their good. Obama is domestic enemy number one. A traitor to America and the enemy from within.) Story Reports

Barack Obama’s lies are far more corrosive and destructive, because they go to the heart of legislation and governance, and seriously undermine trust in government. His lies generally take a specific form: they attempt to persuade people to vote for him or his policies by categorically assuring them that they need not have the anxieties that they have been expressing. The lies say, essentially: trust me, support what I want, and I promise that what you fear will never happen. But in every case it soon becomes clear either that he knew perfectly well that what the public feared would in fact happen, or that he was giving a firm assurance that he was in no position to give, or that he had no intention of following through on his promise.

A short list of accumulated deciet by Obama’s is overwhelming:

* During his campaign for the presidency and since, Obama repeatedly assured us that he would protect Medicare against cuts; but he now presses for passage of bills that include savage cuts in Medicare.

* To obtain passage of his first stimulus bill, Obama assured us that 90% of the jobs created would be in the private sector; but as he well knew, most of them were to be in the public sector.

* Early in the health care debate, Obama assured us that he had not said that he favored a single payer system; but he was on record as having said exactly that.

* Obama gave primary voters a firm assurance that if he became the nominee of the Democratic party he would (unlike Hillary Clinton) abide by the campaign finance limits of public funding; but as soon as he became the party’s nominee, he reneged on that pledge.

* During the presidential campaign Obama criticized the presence of former lobbyists in the Bush administration and solemnly assured us that he would appoint no lobbyists to his administration; but once elected he proceeded to appoint even more lobbyists than his predecessors.

* Obama criticized the size of George Bush’s deficit and promised to stop deficit spending if elected; but he has already quadrupled the size of the deficit he objected to and recklessly continues new federal spending in the trillions.

* When campaigning Obama criticized bills before the congress that were too long for anyone to be able to read and promised to stop that; but the bills he has been backing throughout his first year are infinitely longer (2000+ pages) than the ones he criticized.

* Candidate Obama promised an end to the corruption of earmarks and pork, but in the bills he has supported this year there have been more and bigger earmarks than ever before.

* Candidate Obama promised us that CIA personnel involved in the interrogation of terrorists would not be prosecuted; but his administration is now doing exactly that.

* Obama assured a joint session of Congress that the health bill he supported (pre-Stupak) would not provide public funding for abortions; but bitter resistance on the part of House Democrats to inclusion of language to that effect soon proved that it did.

* Candidate Obama promised that he would make sure that there was always enough time for the public to read legislation before it was enacted; but he has done exactly the opposite, repeatedly pressing for even faster passage of even longer bills.

* Candidate Obama met fears that he would be a tax and spend liberal by promising, emphatically and repeatedly, that those earning under $200,000 would see no increase in their taxes of any kind; but he now urges passage of a healthcare bill that breaks that pledge in many different ways, and his unrestrained increase in federal spending makes more tax increases inevitable.

* Candidate Obama promised bipartisanship and an end to partisan bickering; but in a display of especially ruthless partisanship his allies have shut Republicans out of all key meetings on his health care initiative, with the unprecedented result that domestic legislation of historic importance garnered not a single Republican vote in the Senate.

* Candidate Obama criticized his opponent’s plan to tax employer paid healthcare benefits, and promised he would not tax them; but the bill he now backs will do just that.

* Obama had promised that he would not sign a healthcare bill that would add one dime to the federal deficit; but the bill he now backs adds trillions in new federal spending, offset only by new sources of revenue that are both uncertain and more properly seen as offsetting the already existing deficit.

* Obama coerced congress into passing his stimulus bill by promising that if it were passed unemployment could go no higher then 8%; but unemployment is now at 10%, and he could not possibly have had good reason to exclude that possibility.

* Obama promised that his cap and trade legislation will create jobs; but its massive tax increases will certainly hobble the economy and destroy jobs, while green jobs in significant numbers can at best be hoped for, but never promised.

* Obama has repeatedly assured the American people that if they like their current health plan they can keep it; but the House bill which he supported created huge incentives for employers to drop their coverage and shift their members to a public option.

* Obama has just as often assured the public that under his health plan everyone will be able to keep their current doctor; but many are certain to lose their doctors when ObamaCare’s large cuts in Medicare funding induce more doctors to withdraw from Medicare coverage, as they also would were employers to transfer patients to a public option to save money.

* Obama assured a joint session of Congress that his health plan would not fund illegal aliens; but his allies had been busy voting down amendments to that effect. (This was the point of Joe Wilson’s outburst.)

* Obama claimed that Caterpillar’s CEO had told him that Caterpillar would begin hiring again as a result of the stimulus bill; but that individual immediately announced that he had said no such thing, and that Caterpillar would in fact be laying off more workers.

* Candidate Obama promised that Guantanamo would be closed by January 1, 2010; but it is still open.

* Candidate Obama promised that his administration (unlike his predecessor’s) would be so transparent that TV cameras (C-Span) would be there for key deliberations; but an unprecedented level of secrecy prevails as the final stages of Obamacare are negotiated behind closed doors and kept so secret that even the Senate majority whip admitted that he had no idea what was going on. Requests for Obama to honor the promise of C-Span cameras are being ignored.

* To gain traction for his attempt to return a would-be socialist dictator in Honduras to power, Obama claimed that he had been overthrown in an illegal coup; but the congressional research service pointed out correctly that ex-President Zelaya had been removed for constitutionally sufficient cause by legal and constitutional means.

* Obama claims that he wants a public option only to increase choice and competition; but the House bill would clearly reduce choice both by squeezing unsubsidized private health plans out of the market, and by setting rigid conditions on acceptable plans that would narrow available options.

* Candidate Obama claimed that violent radical Bill Ayers was just another guy in his neighborhood; but the record shows that the two had worked closely together.

* Obama assured us that his stimulus bill would create or save a million jobs; but he was claiming as fact what could never have been more than a wild (and highly improbable) guess, and his more recent attempts to justify that guess have been fraudulent.

* Obama assured us that his health plan would never ration care, or “pull the plug” on grandma; but the legislation he backs sets up panels to make crucial decisions on when to withhold care, and it makes such deep cuts in Medicare that rationing is inevitable.

* Obama now assures us that health insurance premiums will not go up if ObamaCare becomes law, insisting indignantly that people who say this have not read the bill; but the legislation forces insurers to cover preexisting conditions, which will compel them to raise premiums substantially.

(Obama's lies go beyond irrational. Obama is irrational. He now knows his time is short. His season is about to come to a close with the nov 2010 elections. Obama must make his marxist moves now without regard to what Americans do or think. Obama I believe is mentally ill in addition to being a narcissist. I believe he has pathological narcissism and megalomania. Obama has an obsession with grandiose or extravagant things or actions. Obama is a sick man. He should be removed from office.) Story Reports

State revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat via the FCC regulating the internet

Red State:

Fcc chairman genachowski and the obama FCC are placing sensible cost-cutting and efficiency-gaining innovations in jeopardy with their talk of heavy-handed government regulation of the industry. The Internet has flourished since it came out from the thumb of government control when it was the ARPAnet, and became the free-wheeling marketplace it is today. Clearly, that scares people who want government to be in control of things.

And it’s total control they want, too. Because the second principle Genachowski asked for, “transparency,” doesn’t mean transparency of government. No, it means that the government is to claim the right to have access to every router in America, every switch, and every other piece of hardware that makes the Internet go. Public or Private, the FCC wants to be able to snoop on how it runs, to be able to control how it runs.

(This is the State revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat, lower class, as obama views Americans. The FCC wants control of even your personal home router. To control how it runs. To control what you read and hear. To control the population. To turn American into a police state.) Story Reports

Does that scare you? It should. When you connect to the Internet, your home computer network (even if it’s just one computer) is now on the Internet. The Internet is not like a public road. It’s a vast series of private networks, all connected together. Government wants control over the whole ball of yarn, how everyone configures and runs their own private computers routing the packets of the Internet.

That control will have one immediate impact: The FCC will be picking winners and losers on the Internet, which is why Google is 100% behind this effort. Google will be a winner, thanks in no small part to its close ties with the Obama administration through Google CEO and Obama advisor Eric Schmidt, while those who invest in the capital of the Internet, the wires that criss-cross the country and the planet, will lose. If you look at any of the literature put out by the pro-Net Neutrality forces, you’ll see plenty of villification of ISPs, AT&T in particular.

The hope of the Net Neutrality left is that you’ll forget that today’s AT&T isn’t the huge monopolist of old, big and hated by many Americans. No, that AT&T is gone, and what is now called AT&T is actually the scrappy little Cingular, a company comparable in market capitalization to Internet firms like Google and Microsoft (and in fact Cingular/AT&T’s a bit smaller).

Of course, such class warfare is old hat to a little left-wing organization called "Free Press". Co-founded by a man named Robert McChesney, the organization I believe is best expressed as neo-Marxist. While the original Marxists wanted control of the means of production of goods, today the groups like Free Press want the state to control the means of production of information, as ours is increasing an information-driven economy.

(Remember obama is a MARXIST and wants to control all information through government regulation to regulate and kill any objection to his rule over America.) Story Reports

"Free Press" traditionally has sought tight state controls over television and radio, but now they have turned their attention to the Internet. They even have a front group for that purpose, called Save the Internet.

(These marxists groups work hand in sickle with obama to rape Americans freedoms. Obama uses these front groups and supports them as they support him. Obama wants to kill free speech on the internet and every where else he possibly can. He must do this so his propaganda will be majority of what we hear or read. Obama can't kill the messege but he can kill the messenger and the message of the free internet.) Story Reports

Save the Internet is innocuous looking at first. They take full advantage both major deceptions of the Net Neutrality movement. First, they make you think this is all a harmless little bit of technocracy, and not a power grab. In fact they’ve used that to trick some rightys into thinking that without Net Neutrality, ISPs might censor content. In fact it’s just the opposite: It’s only if Net Neutrality comes into effect that the censors of the left will even have the power to control the Internet.

Phase one, Net Neutrality, includes no plans to regulate content, just routing. But just as the FCC regulates content on television and radio, most famously in the case of the Janet Jackson Super Bowl show, so too will it be able to regulate content on the Internet should Net Neutrality be the law of the land.

The fight has already begun to prevent it, though. Comcast has taken the FCC to court, arguing that the FCC’s current reaches into Internet regulation go beyond the statutory powers the FCC has been granted. In fact, those who watch this industry closely tell me that the federal courts at this point are almost sure to rule in Comcast’s favor.

Genachowski has a plan though. It’s one you may have heard of before: Deem and pass. The backup plan the FCC has, in the event that the courts rule that the FCC no longer has the authority to regulate information services on the Internet, is to deem that ISPs are no longer information providers, and then re-pass the same regulations that the courts just threw out, then pass Net Neutrality on top of that. Once that happens, the government will be taking over another sixth of the economy.

Verizon is taking a leading role against the new deem and pass (demonpass?), and AT&T agrees, calling upon the Congress to take up these issues rather than leaving the FCC to expand beyond its legal bounds to do these things on its own. Of course, Democrats lack the votes for Net Neutrality, so it’s easy to see why nothing’s happened on that front.

We have to stop it, though. If ISPs are hindered, then the very foundation of the Internet will be hindered. The Internet’s backbone must continue to grow and to innovate as needed to withstand the ever-growing traffic burden we put on it, and no regulatory framework can keep up with how fast the Internet is changing. The market and competition will stamp out any hostile behavior faster than the government ever could, and without even any distortions or government-chosen winners and losers.

In particular, the coming wave of wireless, high-speed Internet access is going to rock the foundations of the broadband market. Sprint is already deploying its 4G WiMax network. When AT&T and Verizon counter with their 4G LTE networks, cable and DSL Internet will feel unprecedented pressure to deliver the best service to their customers for the lowest price. Unfettered technological advancement will save the day, not government.

As Reagan put it, “government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.”

(Its more than just a problem now. Its all of Americans freedoms at stake. Obama will do anything to limit free speech. Anything. The FRAUD must be stopped at all cost. We as Americans are in a life and death struggle for our freedoms with the marxist obama. This is reality.) Story Reports

Ultimately, the goal of neo-Marxists like McChesney and Free Press is to have Single Payer Internet, with all the central government control and lack of freedom that the comparison with Single Payer Socialized Medicine would imply. Just as the “Public Option” for medicine was described as a “right” by the Democrats, so too do the Free Press people want Internet access to be a “right,” owned, operated, and controlled by the government. The UK has its doctors and hospitals controlled by the National Health Service, and McChesney would have our Internet under the control of a National Internet Service.

Phase 1 of Single Payer Internet is Net Neutrality, which establishes the baseline of FCC authority over the Internet. Phase 2 is the National Broadband Plan. To continue the Obamacare comparison, the goal of the Plan is to get “universal coverage.” Even if you live in the middle of nowhere, in a place that’s far too expensive to wire up, even though the technology is right around the corner for wireless Internet to come at high speed, the FCC neo-Marxists want to say everyone has a right to wired Internet access. And guess what will pay for it?

That’s right, you and I will pay for it with new taxes. For phones we already pay a “universal service” tax. The FCC wants to expand that to high speed Internet connections, thus, an Internet Tax. This is a tax that would never see a single Congressional vote, because the FCC would apply it all on its own with the authority vested in it by deem-and-pass Net Neutrality.

On top of that, prices will go up if the National Broadband Plan becomes reality. Your Internet bill at home could go up 25%.

And again, innovation will suffer further. Once the FCC starts dictating control over even the set top boxes your cable providers hand out to you, and after they’ve already taken control over routing on the Internet, truly there will be few or no ways for Internet service to get better in America without a game of Mother May I. Just think: In 10 years maybe even Iraq would have better Internet access than we’d have, should all this come about.

Of course, just as with Net Neutrality’s two big lies, the National Broadband Plan has a big lie behind it. Namely, the claim is that America “lags behind” the rest of the world in high-speed Internet access, and the problem is that there isn’t enough government involved yet. Once you stop laughing when given this argument, ask the neo-Marxist questioning you to adjust the broadband statistics for demographics and geography. Countries like Japan and the Netherlands have better Internet access per person not because their governments are working better, but because they are smaller, more densely populated countries. America will always have a different profile of Internet access as long as Americans are free to live anywhere we want on the fruited plain, whether in an apartment in a big city, on a farm on the plain, or in a cabin in the mountains.

(This is the type of information obama uses and tells Americans. It is a combination of half truth and lie. Obama cannot tell Americans the truth. The truth is not in him. Obama is just a marxist liar. Nothing more nothing less) Story Reports

It’s the same reason that American Internet access varies from Europe and Asia, that our need for the automobile varies from the rest of the world. We’re spread out, and we value our freedom to be spread out. And just as you can’t run public transit to every little suburb and rural area, so too can’t you immediately and cheaply get the best Internet access out to everyone at the same time. Higher costs, delayed implementations. These are facts of geography, and no amount of FCC regulation can fix that.

(Obama will tell you though this is possible and this is needed. It is like a "crisis" he creates to grab more control of your freedoms while telling you its all for your own good. Obama is poison. Obama is death to America. Obama is similar to rohm E. in that he is evil and they could be twins. Sons of the devils spawn or worse.) Story Reports

It’s harder to fight an unelected, unaccountable regulatory agency than it is a congressional action, but we can try. We’re the people and we will be heard.

(An elected and unaccountable congress is hard to fight also. It is obvious that this is what we are also fighting.) Story Reports