About Joe Biden And His Support Of The Confederate Flag

Joe Biden can't remember the state his is in, when talking to voters.

Its not his age thats the problem it is his mind.

Joe Biden is an example of an older person who keeps driving when they should have turned in their driving license.

He is more of a danger to us than he is to himself.

He is lies about what he has said in the past or even his own recent quotes.

Is it lying or is his memory that bad?

His memory is bad but he is an accomplished lier and deceiver that has not forgot his bag of tricks.


Below is an example of Joe Biden. He praises a pro-confederacy group “who continue to display the Confederate flag” as “fine people”.

United Daughters of the Confederacy 

Joe Biden called the United Daughters Of The Confederacy "an organization made up of many fine people who continue to display the Confederate flag."

Biden repeats over and over the patently false claim that the president said white supremacists and neo-Nazis were “very fine people” in the wake of the Charlottesville tragedy in 2017.

In fact as you can see Biden said, those who display the Confederate Flag are "FINE PEOPLE".

President Trump said, 

"And you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and White nationalists, Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."

President Trump was was referring to a group of people who were protesting the removal of a historical monument of Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

THESE PEOPLE WERE VERY FINE PEOPLE.



Click on picture to view the Joe BiteMe Video.

He is reading from a script and slowly in 1993.  This is why President Trump calls him sleepy Joe.

Biden should be called slow Joe.  Watch him slowly read from a script. He underlines to keep his place. Kind of slow even then.

Joe Biden called the United Daughters Of The Confederacy "an organization made up of many fine people who continue to display the Confederate flag."

Former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden praised a pro-confederacy group “who continue to display the Confederate flag” as “fine people” in newly resurfaced video highlighted by the Trump campaign.

The video is significant in large part due to the number of times that Biden has engaged in smearing President Donald Trump with the patently false claim that the president said white supremacists and neo-Nazis were “very fine people” in the wake of the Charlottesville tragedy in 2017.

The video of Biden, from 1993, happened during the confirmation hearing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg while Biden was representing Delaware in the U.S. Senate.

Biden made the remarks while responding to comments from another Senator on the Judiciary Committee about a speech that Democratic Senator Howell Heflin delivered on the floor of the Senate.

Biden said [emphasis added], “I, too, heard that speech and, for the public listening to this, the Senator made a very moving and eloquent speech, as a son of the Confederacy, acknowledging that it was time to change and yield to a position that Senator Carol Moseley-Braun raised on the Senate floor, not granting a Federal charter to an organization made up of many fine people who continue to display the Confederate flag as a symbol.”

Biden has repeatedly lied about remarks that Trump made in the wake of what transpired in Charlottesville in August 2017, falsely claiming that Trump said that there were very fine people on the side of the white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

Biden even launched his campaign on that lie.


Trump was referring to a group of people who were protesting the removal of a historical monument of Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

Even CNN’s Jake Tapper, who is a heavily biased critic of the president, admitted earlier this year in response to Biden’s video that Trump did not call neo-Nazis and white supremacists “very fine people.”

In his speech at the time, Trump said:

And you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and White nationalists, Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. 

Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group.

“He’s not saying that the neo-Nazis and white supremacists are very fine people,” Tapper said, as he noted that Trump was referring to protesters who did not want Confederate monuments removed and who were separate from the neo-Nazis and white supremacists.

Biden was confronted by Breitbart’s Joel Pollak over the false claim and Biden proceeded to explode on Pollak for confronting him on the lie.

Biden, on the other hand, has a history of praising racist segregationist Democratic Senators, stating that they were very civil.

Sleepy Joe Biden and President Trump Support these fine people who are true patriots!



Statement from the President General  
12-1-2018 – For Immediate Release:

The United Daughters of the Confederacy appreciates the feelings of citizens across the country currently being expressed concerning Confederate memorial statues and monuments that were erected by our members in decades past.

To some, these memorial statues and markers are viewed as divisive and thus unworthy of being allowed to remain in public places.

To others, they simply represent a memorial to our forefathers who fought bravely during four years of war. These memorial statues and markers have been a part of the Southern landscape for decades.

We are grieved that certain hate groups have taken the Confederate flag and other symbols as their own. We are the descendants of Confederate soldiers, sailors, and patriots.

Our members are the ones who have spent 123 years honoring their memory by various activities in the fields of education, history and charity, promoting patriotism and good citizenship.

Our members are the ones who, like our statues, have stayed quietly in the background, never engaging in public controversy.

The United Daughters of the Confederacy totally denounces any individual or group that promotes racial divisiveness or white supremacy.

And we call on these people to cease using Confederate symbols for their abhorrent and reprehensible purposes.

We are saddened that some people find anything connected with the Confederacy to be offensive. Our Confederate ancestors were and are Americans.

We as an Organization do not sit in judgment of them nor do we impose the standards of the 21st century on these Americans of the 19th century.

It is our sincere wish that our great nation and its citizens will continue to let its fellow Americans, the descendants of Confederate soldiers, honor the memory of their ancestors.

Indeed, we urge all Americans to honor their ancestors’ contributions to our country as well. This diversity is what makes our nation stronger.

Join us in denouncing hate groups and affirming that Confederate memorial statues and monuments are part of our shared American history and should remain in place.

                    Ms. Nelma Crutchers
                    President General, 2018-2020




Reaffirmation of the Objectives of the United Daughters of the Confederacy®   WHEREAS, The United Daughters of the Confederacy is a tax-exempt, non-profit Organization whose objectives are Historical, Benevolent, Educational, Memorial and Patriotic; AND
WHEREAS, The United Daughters of the Confederacy® is an Organization dedicated to the purpose of honoring the memory of its Confederate ancestors; protecting, preserving and marking the places made historic by Confederate valor; collecting and preserving the material for a truthful history of the War Between the States; recording the participation of Southern women in their patient endurance of hardship and patriotic devotion during and after the War Between the States; fulfilling the sacred duty of benevolence toward the survivors and those dependent upon them; assisting descendants of worthy Confederates in securing a proper education; honoring the service of veterans from all wars as well as active duty military personnel and cherishing the ties of friendship among the members of the organization, AND
WHEREAS, The United Daughters of the Confederacy® is a patriotic Organization which honors and upholds the United States of America and respects its Flag, AND
WHEREAS, The United Daughters of the Confederacy® does not subscribe to policies of individuals, groups or organizations that do not honor and respect the United States of America and its Flag,
THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN, that The United Daughters of the Confederacy® does not associate with or include in its official UDC functions and events, any individual, group or organization known as unpatriotic, militant, racist or subversive to the United States of America and its Flag, AND
BE IT FURTHER KNOWN, that The United Daughters of the Confederacy® will not associate with any individual, group or organization identified as being militant, unpatriotic, racist or subversive to the United States of America and its Flag.


 

Kamala Harris advisers frustrated at the senator’s alleged inability to carry a message beyond the initial script

The face of frustration comes in many forms.


Harris' advisers were also frustrated at the senator’s alleged inability to “carry a message beyond the initial script.”

Kamala is scripted as her advisers admit.

Democrats like harris used scripted questions in fake hearings to push a fake narrative that President Trump has attempted to bribe someone. This total lie has been exposed in the recent house fake hearings.

Democrats are scripted and doomed to loose the 2020 Presidential election.

Kamala never had any chance of being nominated or elected.

The democrate debate exposed her inability to respond in a timely manner.

In other words she has a limited aability to react without a script.

One of President Trump's best assets is his fast ability to respond to questions and false  accusations and fake media lies!


______________________________________



Editor Note:


The democrats will vote in the house of ill repute to impeach President Trump because of 2 reasons.

(1) They are in the majority.

(2) They have a crazed leadership.

Some people think impeachment means removal from office but it does not. Impeachment are only articles, accusation statements, written by the house.

An  accusation statement or statements asserting that another person or entity has done something improper.

The majority democrate FAKE accusation statements in this case is called articles of impeachment.


The the fake impeachment of President Trump will be taken up by the US Senate.

The Senate can set the rules for the impeachment trial.

There will be explosive testimony exposing the FAKE impeachment articles by the Republicans.

I do not think that President Trump will be removed from office.

The democrats will try to use the impeachment of President Trump to elected a democrate as president.

America will not elect a radical crazed democrat as president.

Impeaching President Trump on totally fake impeachment charges will NOT keep Orange man from being reelected!



In the very unlikely event President Trump is removed from office this could happen:


If President Trump is impeached and convicted, the Senate should follow the Hastings precedent and not prevent him from running again for office.

The American electorate should   decide if trump should be reelected.

Remember the US Senate will set the impeachment trial rules.



Of the  17 historic impeachment proceedings brought against  judges and other officials who rank lower than president, 14 went to trial in the Senate and eight resulted in a guilty verdict.

In only three of those cases did the Senate bar – or "disqualify" – those who were convicted from holding office in the future.

If the US Senate convicts President Trump and he is removed from office and also "disqualifies" him from running from office again Trump can't be reelected.

So 3 things must happen if President Trump, Orange man, can't be reelected.

(1) The US Senate votes to convict President Trump on impeachment charges.

(2) The US Senate votes to remove Trump from office.

(3) The US Senate votes to bar President Trump from running for office again by disqualifing him.

THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

The result is Orange man, President Trump WILL be reelected in 2020 by a LANDSLIDE!!!!






Kamala Harris  advisers frustrated at the senator’s alleged inability to carry a message beyond the initial script

Adam Schiff is the 'Admiral Yamamoto' of Trump impeachment proceedings

 

Editor Note

If Schiff is the 'admiral yamamoto' of the Trump impeachment hearings that would make nancy pelosi a 

kamikaze

[ kah-mi-kah-zee ]

A person or thing that behaves in a wildly reckless or destructive manner.

Mark Levin said Thursday, Nov 21 2019, that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had awakened the "sleeping giant" of the American people by leading impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

Mark Levin compared Schiff's actions to a famous quote from Japanese Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto after Japan bombed the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on Dec. 7, 1941.

"After we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, Admiral Yamamoto of Japan said, 'I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve'.


"You know, Adam Schiff, you are in some ways Admiral Yamamoto: You just awakened a sleeping giant. You threw everything you had at the president, at the Republicans, at 63 million voters who voted for this president."

Levin said Schiff failed to gain any ground in his bid to prove Trump committee a high crime or misdemeanor worthy of impeachment, despite having control over the hearing rules and many of the witnesses.


House speaker pelosi changed the house rules on dec 2018 to impeach Preident Trump
Minority need not be notified.
Minority need not be present.
Committee staff and/or hired contractors can do all depositions.
Outcomes need not be shared with minority.

Pelosi’s House Rule Changes are Key Part of Articles of Impeachment

Levin, a former chief of staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese, said that once Democrats craft articles of impeachment and vote to send the matter to the Senate for a trial, Schiff will be effectively stripped of his prominent role in the remainder of the process.

Senate Republicans will have the opportunity to call their own witnesses and that Trump and the White House will be able to defend themselves with counsel.

Levin described many of the witnesses who testified as "a small cabal of State Department and NSC bureaucrats who didn't like Trump or his policies," but were still unable to confirm the existence of bribery or extortion on the part of the president when pressed by Republican committee members.

He remarked that if the Democrats want to impeach a president for failing to offer sufficient aid to Ukraine, they should "retroactively impeach Obama."

"It was Trump who got the Ukrainians the weapons that they needed. It was Trump who stopped the Russians.

It was Trump who put the most severe sanctions in modern history on the Russians. It was Obama who appeased the Russians.

 It was Obama under whose presidency the Russians invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea," Levin said.

  

Thursday, November 21, 2019

President Trump tells ambassador sondland, " I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo” 

 

The fake media  repeats what schiff and other democrate liars say in the fake hearings.


President Trump will be reelected in 2020 even if the democrates impeach him on false charges.

 

 ____________________________

 

Editor Note

If Schiff is the 'admiral yamamoto' of the Trump impeachment hearings that would make nancy pelosi a 

kamikaze

[ kah-mi-kah-zee ]

A person or thing that behaves in a wildly reckless or destructive manner.

kamikaze pelosi is about to implode on the orders  Admiral Yamamoto Schiff.

________________________________

 

 
StreamZones.com 

President Trump tells ambassador sondland, " I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo”

11/20/2019

Media and schiff inquisition media collusion FAKE hearings


Adam schiff asked ambassador sondland about what President Trump said in the phone conversation with the ukraine president.

Schiff didn't get the answer he wanted but got an answer that 100% reveals that schiff and the deep state bureaucrats etc have lied about the phone call and are continuing to lie.


Testifying in an impeachment hearing, Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, recounted his phone call with President Donald Trump in which the president said there was “no quid pro quo.”

 “It was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood and he just said, I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo,” Sondland said.

 The ambassador said he then relayed that message to Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, “not to defend what the president was saying, not to opine on whether the president was being truthful or untruthful” but to express that he had done what he could to address Taylor’s concerns. 

Earlier in his Nov. 20 testimony, Sondland had said, however, that there was a 'quid pro quo' between Trump and the Ukrainian president.


______________________________________________



Editor Note:


In ambassador sondlands opening statement he said, there was a quid pro quo between President Trump and the ukrainian president.

This opening statement reflected ONLY HIS OWN OPINION!

When schiff asked him the question about the phone call ambassador sondlands answer WAS NOT HIS OPINION but a statement of fact of what President Trump actually said during the phone call.


This is real evidence Prsident Trump NEVER asked for a quid pro quo as schiff and the democrates are claiming.

To me this is real evidence President Trump did nothng wrong and real evidence schiff and democratic members of congress are deceiving the public and are subverting our government.

These people who are conducting the fake impeachment enquiry are criminals involved in collusion to defraud and deceive the American people!


__________________________________________________





__________________________________________________


Ambassador sondland is a cunning deceiver also. He talked about President Trump's phone call in terms of his own opinion and not actually what was said by President Trump.

If schiff had not stepped in it with his own question the facts about what President Trump actually said would have not been revealed by the cunning ambassador sondland.



This video is solid evidence President Trump is trying to be removed from elected office by a  Coup.

This Coup is in collusion with the state run media, deep state and the democrates.

Hitler said, if you tell a lie enough people will begin to believe it.

Schiff is a modern day  equivalent of hitler who is telling lies over and over!

The fake media  repeats what schiff and other democrate liars say in the fake hearings.


President Trump will be reelected in 2020 even if the democrates impeach him on false charges.

I am praying those who are involved in the coup to overthrow President Trump will be brought to justice.

It only takes 1 idiot to put your life in danger.

I recently watched a youtube video about and actual dual engine failure in a citation jet.

It was an interview with the actual pilot who flew the jet after both engines failed.

He explains what happened and why it happened.

Near the end of the aviation video he mentioned that information about the dual engine failure was in all the aviation magazines but never reached the mass media.

There is a BIG reason the dual engine failure story in the citation jet never was reported in the mass media.

The mass media, or drive by media does not report what THEY DON"T WANT YOU TO KNOW!

The airline companies and other don't want the public to know that it just takes 1 idiot to put your life in danger when your a passenger in a jet.

_______________________________________________





ACTUAL DUAL ENGINE FAILURE IN A CITATION JET







______________________________________________


On May 9th 2019, a Citation Medivac Flight with 4 crew and 3 passengers would experience a DUAL engine failure. The actions of the two pilots would determine the fate of all seven on board. This is their story......

The lineman, idiot, that fueled the plane was dismissed and the aircraft was deemed totaled. The DEF infiltrates the entire fuel system and the repair/replacement cost would exceed the airplane's value. In fact, the plane still sits in SAV today. Additionally, there was a second aircraft that departed the same airport that was also affected by the fuel contamination. I think he only lost one engine and was able to divert and land safely.


_______________________________________________


Editor Note:

The pilot the safely landed the dual engine failure jet explained that a def container used for Diesel exhaust fluid was used to transport some prist, an anti acing agent, used in jet fuel to a 5 gallon drum on the jet fuel truck. A very small amount of diesel def additive is fatalto any jet engine.

Watching this video I learned that big jets can glide about 1/3 further than a smaller jet.

The pilot said that at 8,000 feet up he could glide about 16 miles in his jet.

A bigger jet at 8,000 miles could glide about 24 miles of approximately 1/3 further.

The pilot of the citation jet had been trained for a single engine failure but not a dual engine failure.

Also most of the jets surface controls were mechanical and not hydraulic.

If the jets surface controls were hydraulic and both engines failed he would have lost control of the jet.

He said the landing gear was hyfraulic but it had an emergency procedure in case of loss of hydraulic pressure to lowet the landing gear.

He did not need to use this because there was enough wind pressure going through the engine to allow for a limted amount of hydraulic pressure to lower the nose gear and landing gear.

The jet was able to land safely because it had few hydraulic surface controls and a pilot who knew what he was doing.

If the pilot had been less experienced or not kept cool under pressure the outcome would have been much different.

Also the wonderful grace of God also made all the difference!


_______________________________________________


Let me equate this story of how an idiot is trying to cause a disaster and how a smart pilot will land the jet of liberty safely.

(1) Adam shift the democratic chairman of a lynch mob of democratcs, the idiot, is trying to cause a disaster by the totally fake impeachment hearing that started today.

(2) President Trump, the smart pilot, commander in chief will land the liberty plane and be reelected as President Of The United States in spite of adam shift or any other liberal socialist democratic idiot that will try to stop him from Making America Great Again.

Yes this is a a different story about an idiot and a hero.

I think the mass media will say the hearings went well for the democrats.

The truth is, if you watched the hearings, they are just 1 more big failure for the liberal democrats.

The mass media, or drive by media does not report what THEY DON"T WANT YOU TO KNOW!

They don't want you to know the Republicans in the shift hearing exposed the fake witnesses as being NOT cedible!

The mass media will not tell you the truth.

Watch the hearing an make a determination for yourself.

Don't let the mass media tell you what to think by reporting news that is only their fake opinion!

And now you know the rest of the story!


______________________________


theconservativetreehouse.com

(Read the real news at The Conservative Tree House.)

Fear is at the core of liberalism, and love/trust is at the core of conservatism. Liberalism is about control. Conservatism is about self-empowerment.


_____________________________

WATCH: Rep. Jordan's full questioning of Bill Taylor | Trump impeachment hearings

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, questioned Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a "clear understanding" that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump's political rivals.

Jordan said there was no "linkage" but Taylor said he came to his conclusion based on people he spoke to. The probe centers around a July phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. Both Kent and Taylor testified to lawmakers in October behind closed doors.


Note:  There is no federal law etc that allows for a whistle blower to accuse The President Of The United States.

---

---

Mark Levin Show Podcasts

---

Listen To The Mark
Levin Show  on WORD106.3 FM Weekdays 7PM-10PM


StreamZones.com

Democrats’ embrace of thuggery over democracy is not normal

How Did Democrats Get Here? Democrats’ embrace of thuggery over democracy is not normal.

Karin McQuillan 

 

Democrats have become the party of thuggery, from the top leaders abusing President Trump as a traitor and criminal, to the Antifa black shirts beating up Trump supporters in Democrat cities. The ginned up hysteria over Trump’s election has grown with Trump’s triumphant successes with the economy and national security.

The Democrats’ motivation for the fake impeachment crisis is obvious—they have no platform and no candidate that gives them a path to the White House. What is less obvious is why three years of ugly, crude propaganda, threatened and actual violence, wearisome agitation and lies is playing so well to previously normal Democrats.

The Democrat Party has veered far left very fast, without any pushback from within the party. Their voters have turned, seemingly overnight, from normal American citizens to a deranged mob after Trump’s blood. This weird transformation is normalized by blaming it on Trump himself, and the shock of his victory.

A moment’s reflection shows how superficial that derangement explanation is.
Trump did not make the Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders a powerful political force in 2016. He is not responsible for Elizabeth Warren’s desire to confiscate people’s wealth. Trump did not cause the majority of Democrats to reject freedom of speech and religion, or to prefer socialism to capitalism. How did those radicals become so powerful that they now dominate the party leadership?

There is nothing in what Trump has done as president that explains the unconstitutional attacks against him. It is the reverse—the attempt to frame and entrap President Trump and his team as traitors with Russia, was begun by the Obama DOJ, FBI, CIA and White House before his inauguration. It was the Obama Administration’s actions that necessitated the all-out attempt to delegitimize President Trump before he could expose them.

President Trump did nothing to provoke the Obama intelligence community framing him as a Russian traitor. You have to look at President Obama to understand this unprecedented attempt to overturn a presidential election. Our press, including most of the conservative press, has always been unwilling to focus on Obama, and the Marxist forces he unleashed in American politics.

We can’t even use the word Marxist without the taint of supposed “McCarthyism.” Better to use vague terms such as “radical” or “Left,” or better still, avoid the deeper issues by calling the war against our president “derangement.”

The Mueller investigation and the phony impeachment would have been impossible without #TheResistance insisting on radical partisanship. The propaganda war against Trump hasn’t touched his loyal, grateful, voters, but it has turned normal Democrats into mindless haters.

There is nothing so terrible about President Trump that he can’t be treated fairly and rationally by the press and his opponents. Derangement is a choice. It is a strategy. It is true that President Trump often breaks norms of how politicians talk. He is rude. He does troll his opponents and purposely make them lose control. At the same time, his policies and his achievements are centrist; they would have been acceptable if a President Clinton proposed them.

Trump is obnoxious to his political opponents, but he is also warm, charming, and funny. He is loving and protective towards ordinary Americans of all colors, genders and sexual preferences, new citizens and old. He has off-the-charts common sense and patriotism, and plain speaking.

The president’s reality-based policies on energy, regulation, trade, job creation, and China have made each of us more prosperous and safer. These are not distant achievements. Trump has made the lives of ordinary people better in concrete ways that can’t be hidden by Democrat talking points, by bringing the working class and unemployed jobs, fighting crime, and controlling our southern border. And he would have done more if not for Democrat obstruction. He has done more to help the poorest Americans achieve a better life than any president in living memory.

Ordinary Democrats’ extreme hatred of Trump and his supporters is far from normal. Insisting we enforce immigration laws on the books is not the second coming of Hitler. Democrats genuinely believe it is. They talk themselves into nonsense, while Trump is gains popularity among Hispanic voters (who made up 30 percent of the audience at his rally in New Mexico). The fact that Presidents Clinton and Obama both urged securing our borders makes no difference. When Trump obeys American law, he is evil.

I asked a neighbor, a Democrat moderate, why he hated President Trump. His answer: Charlottesville.
The idea that Trump praised neo-Nazis after Charlottesville is an outright lie about what the president said. It is easily rebutted by the videos and transcripts, but—typical of the propaganda-inflamed mob—rebutting the lie makes absolutely no difference. My neighbor “knows” Republicans are racists and nothing will shake that belief.

This is a huge winning propaganda stroke for the Democrats. My neighbor actually agrees with the president’s policies on the border, on China, knows the economy is doing well, can see the country is at peace—none of that matters, he thinks Republicans are deplorable racists.

We accept Democrats despising Republicans as racist as though it were normal, but we shouldn’t. Republicans believe what every decent American believed during the Civil Rights era—that everyone should be treated equally regardless of race, period.

The Democrats’ conviction that half the country, led by Donald Trump, is white supremacist in its outlook is just plain weird. Trump was elected by winning over Midwestern voters, the salt of the earth, who had previously voted for Obama. Trump’s rhetoric on race has been unifying, not divisive, typified by his favorite phrase, “whether we are black or brown or white, we all bleed the same red blood of patriots, we all enjoy the same glorious freedoms, and we all salute the same great American Flag.” Remember his great line in his inaugural address: “When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice. The Bible tells us, ‘How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity.’”

Trump’s actions on race follow his rhetoric. Whether it is with mainstream economic opportunity zones in the inner city, or his response to the black communities desire for incarceration reform, or his economic policies which have helped minorities more than any other segment of the population, his policies show a deep commitment to helping the black community.
Yet good-hearted Democrats “know” Trump is divisive, and that it is their party which brings the country together.

The number of Democrat liberals fighting back against the libel, the hate, and hard leftists taking over over their party is miniscule. Alan Dershowitz comes to mind. I know there are a few others, but I can’t recall them at the moment.

What is going on?

“How evil is the left? This evil,” John Hinderaker wrote after the “appalling” Antifa attacks on Trump supporters and police in “nice” Minnesota. But not a single Democrat politician or media voice finds the violence appalling. Just the opposite—a Democrat legislator participated in the riot, while others, including U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), tweeted their approval.

“Are there any moderate Democrats left?” Hinderaker asked.

It’s an important question. Why aren’t Democrats fighting for their own party—and our country—against the hostile takeover by the Left?



Rush Limbaugh Podcast     11/6/2019 

Rush Limbaugh comments on the above Karin McQuillan article.

Listen in beginning about 1:05 of the podcast.

Rush explains why the left is So Crazy.

amgreatness.com/2019/11/02/how-did-democrats-get-here/

Rush details why the  democrates are going crazy and have become a threat to those who support President Trump.

The left is evil. They are thugs. They are abnormal and deranged.

They are all dangerous.

"They ain't out here arresting people for (shoplifting) and everyone knows it in California."

SAN FRANCISCO – In a lighted garage on one of San Francisco's busiest streets, a young man in baggy trousers and messy brown hair pulled down his pants. He had been hiding two pairs of stolen jeans with the tags still on them. He handed them to another man waiting nearby, took some money, pulled up his pants and headed back into another store on Market Street — home to the city's high-end designers and big-chain retail shops.

The incident wasn't a one-off. These brazen acts of petty theft and shoplifting are a dangerous and all-too-common consequence of Proposition 47, a referendum passed five years ago that critics say effectively gives shoplifters and addicts the green light to commit crimes as long as the merchandise they steal or the drugs they take are less than $950 in value.

The decision to downgrade theft of property valued below the arbitrary figure from felony to misdemeanor, together with selective enforcement that focuses on more “serious” crimes, has resulted in thieves knowing they can brazenly shoplift and merchants knowing the police will not respond to their complaints, say critics.

SAN FRANCISCO HOMELESS STATS SOAR: CITY BLAMES BIG BUSINESS, RESIDENTS BLAME OFFICIALS 

Over in the City by the Bay's famous Tenderloin district, Cassie, a 21-year-old mother of two and a former heroin junkie, told Fox News that when times were tough, she too has stolen from stores.

"If my babies need diapers or formula, who is going to get that for me? No one. I have to do it," she said. "They ain't out here arresting people for (shoplifting) and everyone knows it."

Proposition 47 is seen by critics as one of California's biggest blunders. Supported by the state Democratic Party and championed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the referendum was passed by a wide margin in 2014. The idea behind it was to reduce certain non-violent felonies to misdemeanors in order to free up resources for cops and prosecutors to focus on violent offenders.



Editor Note 


This is exactly what the democrates want for all the United States.

1/4 of California is on fire because of enviromental waco's and government not cutting under brush for the last several years.

California is also letting shoplifters steal up to $950.00 anytime they want knowing they can get away with it.

This is what you will get in your local area in other states if you vote democratic in any election.

California is a NUT house. The inmates have taken over.

These inmates want to do the same thing in all 50 states. Nancy Pelosi and her fellow nut cases want it to happen asap along with every illegal alien they can push on you in every county in the US.

I live about 3,000 miles away from California and I am thankful I do.

The nut jobs are on their way. Pelosi wants them in your neighbourhood sooner than you think!

Senate prepared to reject a kangaroo democrate court

President Donald Trump Will Be Reelected in 2020 No Matter What Pelosi And The Democrates Do.

Senator Lindsey Graham has created a new reality for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Graham has written a powerful resolution which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell joined in co-sponsoring. Together they have attracted 50 co-sponsors – which means with Vice President Pence supporting them they would win a vote to dismiss any phony impeachment from the House that failed to meet a key standard of fairness.

The resolution:

• “calls on the House of Representatives, prior to proceeding any further with its impeachment investigation into President Trump, to vote to initiate a formal impeachment inquiry;
• calls on the House of Representatives to provide President Trump, like every other American, with due process, to include the ability to confront his accusers, call witnesses on his behalf, and have a basic understanding of the accusations against him that would form any basis for impeachment; and
• calls on the House of Representatives to provide members of the minority with the ability to participate fully in all proceedings and have equal authority to issue subpoenas and other compulsory process.”

Faced with this new reality, Speaker Pelosi suddenly ended months of avoiding a vote on the impeachment process and announced today that the House would vote this week.

The real reason for the thursday Oct 31, 2019 is because:

Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are hoping to achieve this by bringing in the House Judiciary Committee and the judicial enforcement authority they were just granted by Judge Howell.

They are also in a big rush to do this; hence the Thursday vote.  The rush is because the DOJ has filed a motion for stay, as they appeal the Judge Howell ruling.

As a practical matter, the House Democrats had no choice but to bring the impeachment process to a vote. They were faced with a Trump administration that refused to cooperate with a secret investigation which lacked rules and authorization by the full House.

They were also faced with a Senate that was prepared to reject a kangaroo court-style secret approach.

 

Don't be tricked by pelosi's "vote".  It is a resolution, to affirm her previous declaration of a House “inquiry”.  The resolution is currently being written by Lawfare.

Pelosi is not delivering a House “Resolution on Impeachment” for a vote, because if she did hold a vote on an impeachment resolution, the minority and the Executive branch would gain rights therein. 

Pelosi is careful to say “this is not an impeachment resolution”

There are NO plans to vote on a formal inquiry of impeachment.

Lawfare is hoping that through this Thursday vote scheme they will be able to twist the legal process into providing their House inquiry judicial enforcement authority, or punishment possible for the executive not complying with a House committee subpoena.

Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are hoping to achieve this by bringing in the House Judiciary Committee and the judicial enforcement authority they were just granted by Judge Howell.

They are also in a big rush to do this; hence the Thursday vote.  The rush is because the DOJ has filed a motion for stay, as they appeal the Judge Howell ruling.

Remember, the Lawfare intent is to pierce the constitutional firewall that creates a distinct separation of powers; and the Legislative branch is trying to force documents from the Executive branch, overriding executive privilege.

This is a constitutional issue. This level of impeachment intent is why judicial enforcement authority (the full house authorization to grant weight to legal subpoena power) becomes much more important.

Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler and Lawfare are attempting to create “judicial enforcement authority” without having an actual and constitutional vote to authorize an official “impeachment investigation”.

That’s what this Thursday House resolution is all about.

The Thursday House resolution is intended to authorize and validate the pre-existing Pelosi “impeachment inquiry”, and then expand the authority within the rules to create the impression of a full House impeachment investigation; without actually having a House  “impeachment investigation vote”…. because that would open-up rights to the minority and rights to the executive.

Pelosi calls for house vote to affirm speaker impeachment inquiry that was never authorized 

Pelosi's resolution vote is not a formal vote on the impeachment process!

This will be on thursday Oct 31, 2019  haloween.

Will the wicked witch of the house wave her broomstick wand and continue the fake impeachment without any rules or while she mix something else in her wicked brew of impeachment objectives?


The House Democrats have a clear model of a fair, systematic bipartisan approach in the rules adopted by the Democrats in 1973 and by the Republicans in 1998. Former Democratic Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Peter Rodino of New Jersey developed a bipartisan set of rules in 1973 during the Nixon impeachment proceedings.

The house democrates will totally ignore a fair bipartisan approach by not holding a real impeachment process vote, not just a phoney house resolution.

Rodino’s rules allowed the White House Counsel to be present at all hearings – including those held in secret. They also allowed the Republican minority to offer subpoenas to bring in the witnesses they wanted in addition to the witnesses the Democrats wanted.

When we were faced with an impeachment process in 1998, we sent a congressman to interview then-retired Chairman Rodino, and we literally adopted all of his rules.

So, there is a bipartisan precedent for a fair, orderly approach to the impeachment process.

If Speaker Pelosi offers a resolution which includes these precedents – and if her resolution answers the 10 questions Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy has written posed to her – then it is possible the impeachment process will be back on a bipartisan track.

This is never going to happen of course.


If, however, Speaker Pelosi introduces a resolution to continue the secret kangaroo court-Star Chamber-partisan approach Representative Adam Schiff has adopted, then the vote will be meaningless.

This is what the wicked witch pelosi will do on haloween Oct 31, 2019. 

In fact they will try to increase the power of their fake kangaroo court investigation.

If the House Democrats fail to heed the warning of the Graham-McConnell Resolution, they will be setting up all their efforts to be dismissed out of hand by the senators who have called on them for real reforms in the current impeachment process.


Graham and McConnell have already had a big impact in just a few days. They are now poised to judge whether the Democrats’ proposed rules represent real fairness and real bipartisanship or are simply more of the same dishonest, secretive, one-sided baloney Schiff has served up so far.

It will be very interesting to see what kind of resolution Speaker Pelosi brings forward.

Don't be confused by what the wicked witch of the house pelosi is doing.

The democrates will just vote for a resolution to increase their fake kangaroo court inquiry.

IT IS NOT A VOTE TO START A REAL FORMAL IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

A REAL VOTE ON IMPEACHMENT IS NOT A RESOLUTION VOTE!!!!

I can understand why people will be confused by the witch of the house.

Resolution legal definition of resolution - Legal Dictionary

A spontaneous expression of opinion, a resolution is intended to be timely and to have a temporary effect. Typically resolutions are used when passage of a law is unnecessary or unfeasible. In many cases relevant laws already exist. The resolution merely asserts an opinion that lawmakers want to emphasize.

ITS JUST AN OPINION VOTE!





Editor Note:

Yes it will be very interesting to see what is in the witch's brew on oct 31, 2019 haloween.

Graham,  McConnell, 50 Senate co-sponsors and 10 questions Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy has written posed to her are arrayed for the witch's response on her favorite day
haloween.

President Trump and the Senate Republicans will throw water on Pelosi if her witch's brew is lacking the right  ingredients and you know what that will do to the wicked witch of the house!

Its trick or treat time for pelosi.

Gender reveal party blows up

An American family's gender reveal celebrations have ended in tragedy after an accidental "pipe bomb" exploded and killed a 56-year-old woman that was 45 feet away.

Iowa woman, in Rural Knoxville,   Pamela Kreimeyer died instantly after an explosion during the gender reveal announcement caused a piece of metal debris to hit her, De Moines Register reported.

Police arrived at the Knoxville home on Sunday (NZ time) to find her dead.

The woman's son used gunpowder and colorants in an iron tube mounted on a metal plate, they had created a pipe bomb. As soon as the device was lit, it exploded, shooting pieces of shrapnel in all directions.

In a statement send to De Moines Register, police said the Kreimeyer family had planned to make a fun announcement of the child's gender for social media, but instead inadvertently created a pipe bomb.

Sheriff Jason Sandholdt's office said members of the family had been experimenting with different types of explosive material.

Police said gunpowder and some coloured powder had been put inside a homemade stand which had a metal base. The idea was for that, once lit, the coloured power would blast out the top of the stand.

But instead the explosion sent shrapnel flying and Pamela Kreimeyer died after being struck in the head, De Moines Register reported.

Bad Idea 

Editor Note

It is true you can't fix stupid.

How can you make an "accidential" pipe bomb?

It would seem this was an accident but that is the wrong word to describe what happened.

The family had been experimenting with different types of explosive material.

In other words what they made was NO accident.

They were making home made explosives and experimenting making bomb material.

When you use gun powder mixed with whatever its going to explode.

They knew what they were making would explode.

Grandmaw in the corner 45 feet away was not safe.


I think a "gender reveal" party is stupid anyway.

Thank makes this even more stupid.

Environmentalists have turned California into a tinderbox

Liberals are blaming California's wildfires on "climate change."

Now, they believe it will go up in flames unless we do something immediately to stop "climate change." But climate change hasn't turned California into a tinderbox, the environmentalists have.

California power company PG&E is pulling the plug on its customers. PG&E has been deliberately cutting power to its customers in an effort to avoid wildfires. It isn't working. Massive wildfires erupted in areas where PG&E provides service.

PG&E's equipment couldn't start these huge wildfires without a bunch of dead brush fueling the flames.

As Chuck Devore writes in Forbes, "the outrageous cost to remove a few dead trees from private land is a consequence of California's Byzantine environmental regulatory patchwork."

It's not climate change that's responsible for these massive fires, "it's decades of environmental mismanagement that has created a tinderbox of unharvested timber, dead trees, and thick underbrush."

Devore writes, "forest management is so bad on public lands that a new report, ordered by the California legislature in 2010, shows that the portion of California's National Forests protected from timber harvesting is now a net contributor to atmospheric carbon dioxide due to fires and trees killed by insects and disease."

Global Warming 101       Dr Roy Spencer   Ph.D.     Carbon Dioxide Growth Rate

While you have probably seen graphs of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration slowly increasing over time, the graph above shows the yearly growth RATE, as well as the estimated yearly rate of emissions by humanity. It shows a couple of interesting things.

First, the growth rate of atmospheric CO₂ is, on average, only about 50% of what mankind emits. This means that Mother Nature takes out about 50% of the ‘excess’ CO₂ that we pump into the atmosphere every year.

And it seem like it doesn’t matter how much MORE we put in each year…nature still takes out an average of 50% of that amount.

So if environmentalists really believed climate change was causing the fires, they would be calling for more timber harvesting to stop it.


How many people have to die before environmentalists wake up?

Gov. Gavin Newsom has attributed California's wildfires to the effects of "climate change." But in 2018, President Trump correctly identified the problem and threatened to cut off federal funds if California didn't change its self-harming policies.

Trump tweeted, "There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor. Billions of dollars are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!"



Editor Note:


Environmentalists  don't deal in facts but they do believe their own waco propaganda about man made global warming or climate change causing california's wildfire disaster.


What contributed to the severity of recent CA fires is the state’s decades long mismanagement of the woodlands. No burn-offs, overgrown fire breaks, no debrushing.

One problem increasing the size of the acreage burned is that california stopped logging the public forests. Stopped removing dead trees. Stopped putting in logging roads that acted as barriers and allowed better access into the forest and  stopped fires.

Fire has benefits in that it clears the brush on the forest floor which removes some of the fuel needed to let a fire grow.

Environmental waco's are responsible for no logging the public forests.

Environmental waco's are responsible for dead trees not being removed.

Environmental waco's are responsible for less logging roads that acted as barriers for fires and also allowed better access into the forests.

Environmental waco's are responsible for less burning of acreage to help curtail wild fires.

Environmental waco's are responsible for the deaths and destruction in california!  

 
ExactWeather.com


AnyCalculator.com

StreamZones.com