Editor Note
The democrcats plan is to increase the FAKE news about covid-19 to allow for massive mail in ballots with no verification in Nov 2020.
Massive FRAUD will occur with unverified mail in ballots.
It is no accident and is being engineered to steal the Nov 2020 election fro President Trump.
This is why hillary clinton and joe biden have said President Trump will no accept the nov 2020 election results.
Have you asked yourself why they have said this over and over?
Hillary clinton and sleepy joe know that the massive FRAUD scheme of mail in ballots nationwide because of covid-19 will allow them to steal the nov 2020 election by mail in ballot fraud.
Joe biden said this week 7/12/20 that the democrates have 600 lawyers waiting to take republicans to court in Nov 2020.
Here is the bottom line:
On November 3, 2020 beause of the massive nationwide voter FRAUD caused by massive mail in ballot FRAUD this county will be in a national Constitutional crisis again like it was in 2000 when al gore tried to steal the election.
If you plan to vote in the Nov 2020 election I suggest you vote in person if possible.
Bottom line: Make sure you vote and vote in person if possible.
If you send in a mail in ballot, which is different from an absentee ballot it could not be counted for various reasons or if you are a democrate you can use a mail in ballot to vote over and over because it is not a secure way to vote and is not verified.
All absentee ballots are sent through the mail (or very occasionally fax), but not all ballots sent through the mail are absentee ballots.
The takeaway:
- An absentee ballot is generally used in every state to
refer to a ballot filled out by a voter who cannot, for various reasons,
physically make it to a voting location on Election Day.
- A mail-in ballot is used more broadly to refer to ballots sent through the mail, including in all-mail voting states and some forms of absentee voting.
Bush v. Gore, case in which, on December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States
Bush v. Gore, case in which, on December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a Florida Supreme Court request for a selective manual recount of that state’s U.S. presidential election ballots. The 5–4 decision effectively awarded Florida’s 25 votes in the electoral college—and thus the election itself—to Republican candidate George W. Bush.
A tug-of-war ensued between Harris, who initially sought to certify the state’s election results on November 14, and the Florida Supreme Court, which ruled that hand recounts of questionable ballots should proceed in four counties and that the results must be included in the state’s final count.
In the month following the election, some 50 individual suits were filed concerning the various counts, recounts, and certification deadlines. On December 8, in a 4–3 decision, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that manual recounts should continue in all counties where a statistically significant number of undervotes were observed for the office of president.
The Bush campaign immediately filed suit, and the U.S. Supreme Court issued a writ of certiorari to take up the case the following day.
On December 9, in a 5–4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of Bush v. Gore that the manual recounts must halt, and it agreed to hear oral arguments from both parties.
On December 11, the two sides presented their cases, Bush’s team asserting that the Florida Supreme Court had exceeded its authority by authorizing the recount of undervotes and Gore’s team stating that the case, having already been decided at the state level, was not a matter for consideration at the federal level.
The following day, in a 7–2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Florida decision, holding that the various methods and standards of the recount process violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The court ruled 5–4 on the remedy of the matter, with the majority holding that the Florida Supreme Court’s decision had created new election law—a right reserved for the state legislature—and that no recount could be held in time to satisfy a federal deadline for the selection of state electors.
{It took 5 1/2 weeks to settle the 2000 presidential election.}
As ballots pile up in the mail, a potential 'nightmare' looms on Election Night
As ballots pile up in the mail, a potential 'nightmare' looms on Election Night
The potential chaos "could make Florida in 2000 look like a garden party."
New York's polls closed nearly three weeks ago. But many candidates still don't know whether they've won -- because New York City is still counting ballots that arrived in the mail.
These votes would be an afterthought in most years. In fact, in New York, which is typically far more reliant on in-person voting, state law requires a weeklong delay before counting absentee ballots.
But this year, amid widespread worries of COVID-19 spreading at polling places, the number of mail-in ballots is surging far faster than states' ability to count them.
Elections experts are increasingly convinced that this surge, and the nation's patchwork method of handling it, could lead to a constitutional crisis in November.
Professor Charles Stewart III, director of the MIT Election Data & Science Lab, said he's concerned the confusion could last for "a couple weeks, maybe longer."
The resulting acrimony, he said, "could make Florida in 2000 look like a garden party."
Every state processes ballots that arrive in the mail, but the number can vary widely. In Oregon and Colorado, elections are conducted almost entirely by mail.
But in many others, the absentee ballots are reserved for voters who can't otherwise get to a polling place -- a number usually too small to swing an election.
But that's changed because of the pandemic.
In many cases, states have actively promoted mail-in ballots, hoping to mitigate potential viral outbreaks at polling places. For the first time, Nevada sent a primary ballot to every active registered voter, a system California plans to adopt in November. Other states, including Georgia, sent forms with which voters could request an absentee ballot.
In 2016, a quarter of ballots cast in the general were absentee or mail-in ballots. This year, University of Florida political science professor Michael McDonald expects that share to double -- whether counties are ready or not.
"When we called up [a county in] Alabama, for example," he said, "you could hear him open up a filing drawer, getting a manila envelope, counting, 'I got one, two, three, four, five, six mail ballots.' They've never had to run an election like this. And we still haven't seen some of these states run elections under COVID."
Even in states that have conducted primaries, and even with federal aid, the volume of mail ballots has led to some of those elections being labeled disasters.
'What a mess'
MORE: Biden claims Trump will try to 'steal this election'
{Joe Biden is telling you what they are planning. Mail in ballot FRAUD nationwide.}
On June 9, around Atlanta, many voters who couldn't stand on their feet for three hours gave up and went home. Others brought folding chairs.
"What a mess," said Marilyn Marks, executive director of the Coalition for Good Governance, a group that advocates for election transparency. "If you had asked me before June 9, I would have told you, 'I'm not worried about mail-in ballots.'
MORE: 'This is not just a Georgia problem': Primary election troubles foreshadow challenges for November
That changed, she said, when she saw lines spilling out of Georgia polling places and into the streets.
The long wait times have been chalked up to poll workers refusing to show up because of COVID-19, delayed poll openings and issues with voting machines -- all true, but also compounded by the huge number of voters who applied for absentee ballots and never received them, Marks said.
"There were probably 40,000 to 50,000 voters who requested an absentee ballot who never received it," says Georgia House Minority Leader Bob Trammell. Those voters, largely concentrated in key counties, began arriving in person at the polls.
Poll workers then had to make a call to verify voters never received one.
"And then they had to verify their name on a list. It's a drag on the system," Trammell said.
Many voters simply gave up. But, experts added, the chaos at the polls may pale in comparison to what's about to happen in elections offices.
{The longer the couting goes the more votes for the democrates come in. Its called the Blue Shift.}
The task of counting absentee ballots is arduous and time consuming.
"When an absentee ballot comes back to the board of elections, the board has to sort the ballots into assembly districts," said Steiner, the New York City elections lawyer. "They have to verify that it was mailed by a certain time. Then they check the outer envelope, make sure it's intact.
They open the envelope, clip the outer envelope to the inner envelope. Then they check the signature and date. And then they have to check all of this against the voter rolls to make sure the person didn't vote in person."
That's difficult enough under the best of circumstances. But this year, the people and machines charged with processing the crush of paperwork are already struggling -- some New York voters, in one case, said they didn't receive return envelopes.
MORE: The Note: Messy elections become new normal
Battleground states will face even more pressure in November.
"We're always concerned with the actual counting of ballots," said Micah Kubic, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida.
In normal times, he said, a pileup of absentee ballots can lead to harried elections officials accepting -- or rejecting -- ballots without proper consideration.
"The thing i'm very nervous about is the signature-match rule," Kubic said, in which the signature on an absentee envelope is compared with the signature made by a voter when registering. "We're talking about signatures that might have been put on a registration form 30 years ago.
Taking a one-hour handwriting seminar at the Holiday Inn by the airport does not make you a handwriting expert."
After accepted ballots make their way back to elections offices, city officials still need to find space count them.
"For a really large place like NYC, they're going to need commercial-grade extracting machines to deal with all these ballots," said Stewart of MIT. "These things are big and expensive. It's like buying a fire truck."
As part of the CARES Act, Congress allocated $400 million to help states administer elections, but much of that money was burned on primaries, and buying new machinery for a temporary pandemic is politically unpalatable in many states.
'Our worst-case scenario'
On a general election night, Americans are accustomed to knowing who's won the presidency relatively quickly. A candidate declaring victory before the results are clear could result in electoral mayhem."There's an election administrator's prayer -- that the election is not close," said Professor Michael McDonald of the University of Florida. "I think that's what we all need to pray for."
If it's not a blowout, he said, there is a real possibility of a vote tally that could hinge on absentee votes. And while experts have said mail-in ballots don't favor either party, Trump claiming that they favor Democrats could be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
MORE: Coronavirus muddles competitive House special election in California
"There's this thing called the blue shift," McDonald said, "in which the longer counting goes, the more Democratic votes come in."
Groups that traditionally lean Democrat, like young people, are more likely to send in absentee ballots closer to the deadline. Postal delays can contribute to the phenomenon as well.
"You think your ballot is just going to go across the city or even across the street.
But that's not what actually happens," McDonald added.
Since mail is processed in large cities, it's possible that a ballot dropped in a suburban Colorado mailbox can be sent to Albuquerque, New Mexico, for sorting, and then sent back to the same Colorado county's elections office.
{This is because the post office consolidated mail processing facilities to save money a few years ago.
For instance if you live in Asheville NC and mail a letter of mail in ballot it will not be processed in Asheville NC but will be trucked 100 miles to Greenville SC to be "processed' on machines.
This "processed" mail is then trucked back to Asheville NC to be delivered.
This happens all over the United States.
Just because you mail a letter in the city where you live don't think it is processed there.
Most are not. Your letter or mail in ballot is trucked to another city, processed and then trucked back to your city for delivery. Your mail is first sent to another city and then sent back to you city.
All this helps the mail in voter FRAUD and the democrates efforts to steal the Nov 2020 election!}
In states where ballots need to simply be postmarked before Election Day, that means ballots may keep trickling in days later.
In states where ballots need to simply be postmarked before Election Day, that means ballots may keep trickling in days later.
This raises other concerning prospects, including that traditionally "safe" states can't be immediately called on election night.
"Think about how the narrative gets played out on election night," he said. "You need a New York to be called, because what the nation is looking for is, 'Has someone gotten past the electoral college threshold?'"
A once-in-a-lifetime surge of absentee ballots could make analysts even less likely to call states early.
And if vote counting goes beyond a couple days, Stewart said, darker scenarios begin to unfold.
{This is what hillary, biden, the deep state and the democrats are couting on.
MASSIVE MAIL IN BALLOT VOTER FRAUD AND VOTE COUNTING THAT GOES ON FOR DAYS PAVING THE WAT FOR A "Blue Shift" of mail in ballot voter FRAUD!
Bidens 600 lawyers turning every state into a hanging chad type of 2000 election vote count, that took 5 and one half weeks to resolve, could occur in all 50 states again. This time it could take much longer to resolve.}
In the meantime, the counting continues in New York City, leaving Steiner scurrying between offices.
"We're still worrying about these races," she said. "We don't know who won! We can't worry about November yet."
Bonus Editor Note
The DNC wants you to think that ballot fraud was just expected and not planned by the DNC.
The DNC knows that massive ballot FRAUD is a way to steal the election in Nov 2020.
Expect the year 2000 election to look like a garden party election compared to the Nov 2020 election.
The 2020 presidential election will be decided by the supreme court like it was in the year 2000.
It won't be just Florida and its hanging chads this time but man other states having their own type of "hanging chad" mail in ballot fraud crisis.
The United States again will be in a real Constitutional crisis.
The presidential election will be resolved by these supreme court voters.
Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito., Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh.
Here is the real Nov 2020 Presidential election voter outcome prediction:
This is my prediction based on oberservation of the supreme court of disgrace.
Breyer votes for sleepy joe
Thomas votes for Trump
Roberts votes for sleepy joe
Ginsburg, ruth buzzy, votes for sleepy joe or will she vote?
Alito votes for Trump, I hope
Gorsuch votes for Trump, I hope
Sotomayer votes for sleepy joe
Kagan votes for sleepy joe
Kavanaugh votes for Trump
Sleepy joe 5 votes ???
Trump 4 votes???
If it is a supreme disgrace tie then what ever the lower court decided stands.
If the lower court sided with the Republicans then Trump wins.
If the lower court sided with the democrates then the communist biden wins.
Also there is a question of how many cases about the Nov 2020 election will the supreme disgrace take?
I suspect the supreme disgrace court will hear only one case that will effect all the other cases about the 2020 presidential election.
Which lower court case will it be?
Who knows.
This is why my Nov 2020 presidential election supreme digrace court vote count is fluid as they say.
There is NO doubt the "Supreme Disgrace Court" will determine if the United States becomes a communist nation or will stay free for an extened priod of time because President Trump was elected by the "Supreme Disgrace" court in Nov 2020.
The dirty dems are hoping their nationwide ballot fraud will include "supreme disgrace court" ballot fraud.
Yes the supreme court will cast ballots. The ballot fraud will involve the scotus not following the US Constitution and casting fradulent supreme disgrace ballots that pushes the joe biden madman into office.
Will the scod, the supreme court of disgrace, enslave us all in Nov 2020?
Or will the scod FREE the slaves of covid and chaos as lincoln did with his
Emancipation Proclamation?
I suspect it will take longer than 1 week as it did in the 2000 presidential elction decision.
Either way there will be riots of various kinds.
Just be "packin" and ready.
I suspect it will take much more than a week for the scod, supreme court of disgrace, to determine who won the 2020 presidential election.
FREEDOM will continue to live in the US if President Trump is elected.
FREEDOM will die if the communist radical joe biden is elected.
Everything your see about the covid-19, antifa, blm, fake news and the democrates is a massive scheme to keep President Trump from being reelected in Nov 2020.
Its that simple.
No comments:
Post a Comment