EMP EIB INFORMATION

.........................................................................................
UPDATE: Rush just had a news conference at 4pm est Jan 1, 2010 in Hawaii. A dumb ass reporter ask him if he was still taking pain killers. He said no. He looked and sounded great. The reporter sounded stupid as usual.

Rush Limbaugh says tests show no problems after chest pains.

Limbaugh said Friday at a Honolulu news conference that he was being released from the hospital, where he’d been since Wednesday. Doctors said he did not have a heart attack or heart disease. Limbaugh says they don’t know what caused the chest pains.
.........................................................................................

On Wed Dec 30, 2009 there was an EIB BLAST.

WHAT IS AN EIB?

EIB is shorthand for Excellence In Broadcasting. It is not the usual by-product of broadcasting by a powerful tool that Rush Limbaugh uses daily to expose the LIAR and IMPOSTER obama. It was Detonated by Rush himself and the effects have been felt all over America. I do believe this is the beginning of the end for obama via the EIB pulse.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

To "call a spade a spade" is to speak honestly and directly about a topic, specifically topics that others may avoid speaking about due to their sensitivity or embarrassing nature. Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (1913) defines it as:

To be outspoken, blunt, even to the point of rudeness; to call things by their proper names without any "beating about the bush".

.........................................................................................
This is what Rush does. This is what I admire. He is not afraid to call a spade a spade not even if the "topic" is obama. He speaks bluntly, honestly, and directly to the point. If obama tells a lie Rush points this out and exposes him as a liar. If obama hides the truth Rush points this out and exposes obama as a liar. Others because of "political correctness" or because when obama is exposed as a liar they will be called racists will not call a spade a spade.

Calling a spade a spade means just telling it like it is. It means not spinning anything. It means not making excuses or telling a lie. To call obama a "spade" would be incorrect. He is neither a spade as in a deck of cards or a spade as a shovel.

To call a spade a spade by calling things by their proper names and correctly discerning what has been infered is all important. Because of the lies masked as truth that obama speaks he cannot be believed. He will not call a spade a spade. He will not tell the truth. He can't be trusted. He is an IMPOSTER. He speaks in high empty tones. Its like he calls a dog a cat or a car a truck etc. He says he is for single payer health care then he says he is not. He calls his poison his medicine. He lies about government health care. He tells you it will be for all and it will be better. It will not be for all and it will be worse much worse. If anyone with just a little thought would read the house bill they would see obama is a LIAR. By reaing some of house bill 3200 a person would see the devil, obama, is in all the details. It is in the bill for all to see. I admit the bill is very very complicated to read but obama made it that way to confuse and frustrate the average American. He does not what you to read it. Obama does not want you to know what nationalized health care will do. Please don't believe what obama says or the national media is telling you. Obama is a liar. He is just a thug selling your health using the stimulus funds.
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
*****************************************************************************************
SUGGESTIONS FOR PREPAREDNESS

WHAT IS AN EMP?

EMP is shorthand for Electro Magnetic Pulse. It is a rather unusual and frightening by-product when a nuclear bomb is detonated above the earth’s atmosphere. We all know that our atmosphere and the magnetic field which surrounds our planet is a thin layer which not only keeps us alive, but also protects us from dangerous radiation from the sun. On a fairly regular basis there are huge solar storms on the sun’s surface which emit powerful jets of deadly radiation. If not for the protective layer of our atmosphere and magnetic field, those storms would fry us. At times though, the storm is so power that enough disruptive energy reaches the earth’s surface that it drowns out radio waves and even shorts electrical power grids. . .this happened seve ral years back in Canada.
View the detonation of a nuclear bomb, two hundred miles straight up as the same thing, but infinitely more powerful since it is so close by.
As the bomb explodes it emits a powerful wave of gamma rays. As this energy release hits the upper atmosphere it creates a electrical disturbance know as the Compton Effect. The intensity is magnified. View it as a small pebble rolling down a slope, hitting a larger one, setting that in motion, until finally you have an avalanche.
At the speed of light this disturbance races to the earth surface. It is not something you can see or hear, in the same way you don’t feel the electrical disturbance in the atmosphere during20a large solar storm.
For all electrical systems though, it is deadly.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THIS “PULSE” HITS THE SURFACE?

Those who might remember ham radio operators, or even the old CB radios of the 1970s can recall that if you ran out a wire as an antenna you could send and receive a better signal. The wire not only transmitted the very faint power of a few watts of electricity from your radio, it could receive even fainted signals in return. As the Pulse strikes the earths surface, with a power that could range up to hundreds of amps per square yard, it will not affect you directly, at most you’ll feel a slight tingling, the s ame as when lightning is about to strike close by, and nearly all the energy will just be absorbed into the ground and dissipate. The bad news, however, is wherever it strikes wires, metal surfaces, antennas, power lines it will now travel along those metal surfaces (in the same way a lightning bolt will always follow the metal of a lightning rod, or the power line into your house.)

The longer the wire, the more energy is absorbed, a high tension wire miles long will absorb tens of thousands of amps, and here is where the destruction begins as it slams into any delicate electronic circuits, meaning computer chips, relays, etc. In that instant, they are overloaded by the massive energy surge, short circuit, and fry. Your house via electric, phone and cable wires is connected, like all the rest of us into the power and communications grids. This energy surge will destroy all delicate electronics in your home, even as it destroys all the major components all the way back to the power company’s generators and the phone company’s main relays. In far less than a milli second the entire power grid of the United States, and all that it supports will be destroyed.


WOULD CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND SURGE PROTECTORS PROTECT AGAINST IT?

This is where the effect of EMP starts to get complex. All electricity travels, of course, at the speed of light. The circuit breakers that are built into our electrical system or the ones you buy to plug your own computer in to, are designed to “read’ the flow of current. If it suddenly exceeds a certain level, the breaker snaps and takes you off line, thus protecting everything beyond it. More than a few of us have found out that when you buy a cheap surge protector for ten or twenty bucks sure it will snap off, but the surge has already passed through and fried your expensive pla sma television or new computer. Unlike a lightning strike, or other power surge, an EMP surge is “front loaded.” Meaning it doesn’t do a build up for a couple of mirco-seconds, allowing enough time for the circuit breaker to “read” that trouble is on the way and shut down. It comes instead like a wall of energy, without any advance wave building up as a warning. It therefore slams through nearly all commercial and even military surge protectors already in place, and is past the “safety barrier” and into the delicate electronics before the system has time to react.


WHAT HAPPENS TO CARS?

Here is more bad news regarding EMP. =2 0If you own a 1965 Volkswagen bug or Mustange you’re ok. . .there are no solid state electronics under the hood, it still has an old fashion carburetor, the radio still might even have tubes rather than transistors. However, even that is in question. In 1962 both we and the Soviets detonated nuclear weapons in space (saber rattling during the Cuban Missile Crisis) and it is reported that a number of cars. . .their ignition systems a thousand miles away from the detonation were fried because of EMP. (Check out a few of the more “tech head” links on this site for detailed explanations).

From about 1980 on, cars increasingly went solid state and by the 1990s were getting ever more complex computers installed. Consider a visit to the mechanic today. He runs a wire in under the hood, plugs it into his computer and within seconds has a full diagnostic, types in what his computer is suppose to do, the problem is solved and you are handed a rather large bill. Great modern conveniences from airbag sensors, to fuel injectors and all of it more and more dependent on computers. At the instant the “Pulse” strikes, the body of your car and the radio antenna will feed the overload into your vehicle’s computer and short it out.

Some police departments are even now experimenting with using a specially designed bumper on their car for high speed chases. If they can brush up against the car they are pursuing the officer just hits a button, and through his bumper a high energy surge will be released, flooding into the car being pursued and shorting out its computer system. Result. . .whether you are being chased by the police with this new device, or an EMP burst has been fired off. . .your car will essentially be a useless hunk of metal that will slowly roll to a stop. In that instant, most of America will be on foot again.

WHAT HAPPENS TO PLANES?

This is a terrifying aspect of an attack that no government report has publicly discussed along with the potential casualty rate in the first seconds after an attack. Commercial airliners today are all computer driven. In fact, from lift off to landing, a pilot no longer even needs to be in the cockpit, a computer can do all of it if need be.

When the pilot pulls back on the “stick” it is no longer connect by wires stretching all the way back to the tail and the elevator assembly. Instead, his motion is read by a computer which sends a signal to an electrical servo-motor in the tail, which then moves the tail. In short, the entire plane is computer driven. It is estimated that at any given moment during regular business hours, somewhere between three to four thousand commercial airliners are crisscrossing the skies. (There is a fascinating site you can find via Goggle that shows typical air traffic around the world during a twenty four hour period. From dawn til way after dusk, the entire USA is one glowing blob of commercial flights crisscrossing our sky). All of them would be doomed, the pilots sitting impotent, staring at blank computer screens, pulling on controls that no longer respond as the plane finally noses over and heads in.

Somewhere between 250,000 to 500,000 people will die in the first few minutes. . .more than all our battle casualties across four years of World War II.

ARE WE PREPARING? IS THERE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT AND TRAINED PERSONNEL READY?

The frightening answer is no. This author has spent over four years researching this topic, interviewing scores of personnel from Congressmen and Generals, to your local police chief and sheriff. At your local level, since 9/11, first responders have received hundreds of hours of training and briefings on all sorts of terrorist scenarios. Only a few have told me that they even discussed the topic for more than a few minutes at an official level. As to emergency stockpiles of supplies and crucial replacement parts, there is nothing in place.

HAVE WE BEEN DECEIVED?

EMP, has managed to “stealth” its way on to the highly dangerous list and few, except for a small number of personnel in the Pentagon, various research labs, and men like Congressman Bartlett (R., MD) who heads the Congressional Investigative Committee on EMP, are aware of it. For one it has a certain “sci-fi” sound to it, which makes many dismiss the potential before the discussion has even started. Second, the only way to truly evaluate the threat and demonstrate it is to detonate a nuclear weapon, something we have not done since the full test ban went into effect decades ago.

It is therefore not “visible” to us, the way another airliner smashing into a skyscraper is now forever imprinted on our national psyche, feared, and prepared for. Next, with all the competing issues and threats in the world, EMP simply does not have a “constituency” of influence. Only a few members of Congress, our military and scientific community are issuing the warnings. There are no Hollywood stars placing themselves in front of cameras with this as their cause, the few times it has been used in popular movies, it has been portrayed inaccurately, often absurdly.

An EMP attack is different since it only requires but one nuclear weapon, detonated 300 miles above the middle of the United States. One bomb. The launch could even be done from a container ship somewhere in the Gulf of Mexico and in that instant, the war is already over and won.

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN AFTER THE ATTACK?

Unless you are in a jet liner, plummeting to earth, or caught in a massive traffic jam of stalled vehicles on the interstate, you might not even know anything has changed. Sure the power is off, but we’ve all been through that dozens of times. You call the power company. But the phone doesn’t work and that might be slightly more unnerving. You might go to your car to drive around and see what happened and then it becomes more unnerving when the car does not even turn over, nor any other car in your neighborhood.

Twelve hours later the food in your freezer starts to thaw, if it is winter and you don’t have a wood stove the frost will start to penetrate in to your house, if summer and you live in Florida your house will be an oven. And that will just be the start.

Law enforcement will be powerless without radios, cell phones, and squad cars, unable to know where there is a crisis and how to react. The real horror show within hours will be in hospitals and nursing homes. They’re required by law to have back up generators, but those generators are “hot wired” into the building so power can instantly kick in if the main system shuts down. That “hot wiring” means the Electro Magnetic Pulse will take out the generators and their circuitry as well.

If you are familiar with what happened in New Orleans after Katrina, multiply that ten thousand times over to every hospital and nursing home in America. Nearly everyone dependent on life support equipment in ICUs will be dead within hours. Nearly everyone in nursing homes dependent on oxygen generators, respirators, etc., will be dead or dying while depending on the time of year temperatures within plummet or soar.

As to medical supplies, not just in hospitals but across the nation to every local pharmacy, they are all dependent on something called Fed Ex. As we have perfected a remarkable system of instant delivery, guided by computers, local inventories have dropped to be more cost efficient and even for reasons of security with controlled substances, which to ordinary citizens means pain killers. Supplies will run out in a matter of days. Those of us dependent on medications to control asthma, heart disease, diabetes, and a host of other aliments which a hundred years ago would have killed us shortly after the onset. . .will now face death within days or weeks, unless the national power grid comes back on line quickly and order is restored.

In an age not so long ago, nearly all that we needed for our lives was produced locally, and then came railroads, which could link a farmer’s wif e in Nebraska, via a catalog and telegraph to the Sears office in Chicago for that new set of dishes or a replacement part for a threshing machine. . .to our complex web of today.

Few of us ever realized that with each advance in convenience and the latest new gadget or necessity we took another step towards dependence which in a global market today means that the chip needed to repair an important computer might be made in Japan, and ordered via a sales rep at a desk in India, and yet we expect it to arrive within two days and see nothing remarkable about that. Globalization with all its benefits and woes for some workers here, has made us infinitely more dependent on a global network of communications and transportation. . .that fragile spider’s web.

Here is the true nightmare of EMP. Once the entire system collapses, how and where does anyone build it back when that one crucial part you need is in a warehouse in Shanghai or Seoul and you don’t even have means to even ask for that part.

THE TRUTH BE TOLD DON'T USE A VOTING MACHINE

Rigged USA Elections Exposed
..........................................................................................
Rigged USA Elections Exposed
..........................................................................................

*****************************************************************************************
THE TRUTH BE TOLD

*****************************************************************************************
Any group of Americans opposed to Barack Hussein Obama could be considered a "conspiracy" (This is more evidence why I indicate we are no longer a nation of laws.)

24 lines of code can flip an election

Black Box Voting Report on Diebold Voting Machine Test

Who's Counting: Hacking Diebold Voting Machines

This link is an incomplete sample of the problems with voting in America, with particular emphasis on the fallacies and disasters of electronic voting

The Diebold Bombshell by David Dill, Doug Jones, and Barbara Simons

Chapter 3 — Direct Recording Electronic Voting (Take Time To Read This.)

****************************************************************************************

Request An Absentee Ballot. Don't Use A Voting Machine.

Absentee Paper Ballots

Even An Absentee Paper Ballot Can Have A Problem If Not Marked In Black Ink Etc But Its Still Better

****************************************************************************************

(This is why the congress is no longer listening nor following the rules of the US Constitution. This is why we are not longer a nation of laws. This is why I believe there will be civil war in a limited way. 24 lines of code. 24 lines of code can change your vote. This is what I believe elected the imposter obama. It would only have taken a few hundred of these machines to tip the balance in a few key states. Read the article by the programmer and you will see that the code can be changed and it can't be detected that it was changed. This is why I say were are not longer a nation of laws. We have no way to verify our votes unless there is a paper trail. In electronic voting voters have no paper trail and 24 lines of code can change the recorded vote and it can't be detected by ANYONE!) Story Reports

****************************************************************************************
Lets not be naive about electronic voting.
****************************************************************************************

This article presents the findings of three of the leading experts on electronic voting equipment.

July 24, 2006 — Most computer scientists have long viewed Diebold as the poster child for all that is wrong with touch screen voting machines. But we never imagined that Diebold would be as irresponsible and incompetent as they have turned out to be.

Recently, computer security expert Harri Hursti revealed serious security vulnerabilities in Diebold's software. According to Michael Shamos, a computer scientist and voting system examiner in Pennsylvania, "It's the most severe security flaw ever discovered in a voting system."

Even more shockingly, we learned recently that Diebold and the State of Maryland had been aware of these vulnerabilities for at least two years. They were documented in analysis, commissioned by Maryland and conducted by RABA Technologies, published in January 2004. For over two years, Diebold has chosen not to fix the security holes, and Maryland has chosen not to alert other states or national officials about these problems.

Basically, Diebold included a "back door" in its software, allowing anyone to change or modify the software. There are no technical safeguards in place to ensure that only authorized people can make changes.

A malicious individual with access to a voting machine could rig the software without being detected. Worse yet, if the attacker rigged the machine used to compute the totals for some precinct, he or she could alter the results of that precinct. The only fix the RABA authors suggested was to warn people that manipulating an election is against the law.

Typically, modern voting machines are delivered several days before an election and stored in people's homes or in insecure polling stations. A wide variety of poll workers, shippers, technicians, and others who have access to these voting machines could rig the software. Such software alterations could be difficult to impossible to detect.

Diebold spokesman David Bear admitted to the New York Times that the back door was inserted intentionally so that election officials would be able to update their systems easily. Bear justified Diebold's actions by saying, "For there to be a problem here, you' re basically assuming a premise where you have some evil and nefarious election officials who would sneak in and introduce a piece of software... I don't believe these evil elections people exist."

While Diebold's confidence in election officials is heartwarming, Diebold has placed election officials in an awkward position, with no defense against disgruntled candidates or voters questioning the results of an election. The situation is even worse for those states and localities using Diebold touch-screen machines that have no voter-verified paper records to recount.

Diebold voting machines have been certified to be in compliance with 2002 Voting System Standards, as required by the Help America Vote Act. These standards prohibit software features that raise any doubt "that the software tested during the qualification process remains unchanged and retains its integrity." We must ask, how did software containing such an outrageous violation come to be certified, and what other flaws, yet to be uncovered, lurk in other certified systems?

(Here I must also ask how could software that was so flawed in that it could be hacked so votes could be changed so easy be qualified by the US government? My answer kickbacks, payoffs, bribes and threats etc.) Story Reports

There have been many significant problems — some resulting in lost votes — involving paperless voting machines produced by other vendors. Recognizing the intrinsic risks of paperless voting machines, the Association for Computing Machinery issued a statement saying that each voter should be able "to inspect a physical (e.g., paper) record to verify that his or her vote has been accurately cast and to serve as an independent check on the result."

Without voter-verified paper records of all the votes, and without routine spot audits of these records, no currently available voting system can be trusted. With such records, even when machines do not function correctly, each voter can make sure that his or her vote has been correctly recorded on paper.

Our republic depends on our having secure, reliable, and accurate elections.

David L. Dill is a Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University and the founder of VerifiedVoting.org.

Douglas W. Jones is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Iowa.

Barbara Simons is retired from IBM Research and a former ACM President.
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
Computer scientists reveal new voting machine hack successfully changed votes

By David Edwards and John Byrne

Published: August 12, 2009

A team of computer scientists at University of California, San Diego, the University of Michigan and Princeton University announced a new way to electronically steal votes Monday.

“We wanted to find if a real criminal could do this, starting from scratch, with no access to source code or other closely guarded technical information,” the announcer begins. “We faced several challenges: getting a voting machine, figuring out how it works, discovering a weakness, overcoming the machine’s security features and constructing attack software.”

“In the end we found that it is possible to undetectably change votes and that such an attack takes a lot less time and money than one might expect,” the announcer said.

A Princeton professor was able to acquire five voting machines for just $82 that had been resold on a government surplus website. The acquired machines were originally sold by Sequoia Voting Systems.

While the voting machines were older and had been discontinued by North Carolina, where they were originally used, the voting apparatus are still in use in Louisiana and New Jersey.

Professors and computer science graduate students found that they could switch votes use a technique called “return oriented programming.”

The students theorized that voting machines could be easily broken into by attackers the night before the election, and vote hacking software installed. The following day, machines would produce altered votes without being able to be detected.

The study was done using 16 graduate students and cost a total of $100,000 — a tiny fraction of the money spent by both parties during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Computer scientists reveal new voting machine hack successfully changed votes

________________________________________________________________________________________

Tony Dale Investment & Retirement

Sen Dodd D Conn slashed aviation security funding

Who is to blame for the financial mess we are in today, DEMOCRATES! A majority of DEMOCRATES and a few Republicans. The same CORRUPT TRAITORS who are in control of the government. The same Buffoons/Clowns that were voted in by other Buffoons/Clowns!

The Unlimited Corruption of the IMPOSTER "obama" continues

The Obama administration pledged Thursday December 24, 2009 to provide unlimited financial assistance to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, an eleventh-hour move that allows the government to exceed the current $400 billion cap on emergency aid without seeking permission from a bailout-weary Congress.

The Christmas Eve announcement by the Treasury Department means that it can continue to run the companies, which were seized last year, as arms of the government for the rest of President Obama's current term.

But even as the administration was making this open-ended financial commitment, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac disclosed that they had received approval from their federal regulator to pay $42 million in Wall Street-style compensation packages to 12 top executives for 2009.

The compensation packages, including up to $6 million each to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's chief executives, come amid an ongoing public debate about lavish payments to executives at banks and other financial firms that have received taxpayer aid. But while many firms on Wall Street have repaid the assistance, there is no prospect that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will do so.

The administration faced a congressionally mandated deadline of Dec. 31 to increase the amount of aid it could provide to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which together have already received $111 billion in assistance.

How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis.

Sen. Dodd, D-Conn., slashed aviation security funding for pet constituency

Chris Dodd Charter member of the Team Obama Culture of Corruption

U.S. promises unlimited financial assistance to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
...........................................................................................
The Turning Point of the US Congress manufactured "financial crisis" that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd caused came by protecting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These corrupt traitors received mind-boggling levels of financial support from them over the years.

Back in 2005 legislative momentum emerged for an attempt to create a ``world-class regulator'' that would oversee the pair more like banks, imposing strict requirements on their ability to take excessive risks. Politicians who previously had associated themselves proudly with the two accounting miscreants were less eager to be associated with them. The time was ripe to do something to stop the crisis dodd, barney frank and other fellow democrates had created.

The clear gravity of the situation pushed the legislation forward. Some might say the current mess couldn't be foreseen, yet in 2005 Alan Greenspan told Congress how urgent it was for it to act in the clearest possible terms: If Fannie and Freddie ``continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road,'' he said. ``We are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk.''

What happened next was extraordinary. For the first time in history, a serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets.

If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market would likely have not existed.

But the bill didn't become law, for a simple reason: Democrats and a few Republicans opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn't even get the Senate to vote on the matter.

Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd among others.

These people had the power to stop the manufactured crisis they had created in the first place by allowing Fannie MAe and Freddie Mac to go unregulated. These people, Barack the IMPOSTER obama, Hillery the Clinton, and Chris let me stuff my own pockets Dodd, DID create the manufactured crisis caused by fannie mae and freddie mac.

These corrupt TRAITORS voted to not regulate the wild and crazy government spending they had approved of in the past.

.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................

Sen. Dodd, D-Conn., slashed aviation security funding for pet constituency
.........................................................................................

Sen. Dodd, D-Conn., slashed aviation security funding for pet constituency
By: Mark Hemingway
Commentary Staff Writer
12/28/09 12:24 PM EST

Now that our attention is focused on airline security measures thanks to the failed airline attack on Christmas Day, it's worth mentioning that one senator took money away from aviation security to line the pockets of a constituency that supported his presidential campaign in a big way.

Back in July, Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., proposed an amendment reducing aviation security appropriations by $4.5 million in favor of firefighter grants -- a notoriously inneffective program. In fact, the money was specifically "for screening operations and the amount for explosives detection systems." The amendment was also sponsored by Sen. Lieberman, D-Conn., and Sen. Carper, D-Del., but Dodd deserves to be singled out here because the firefighters union is a pet constituency of his. In 2007 he campaigned all through Iowa with the firefighters union. It was one of the few distinguishable features of Dodd's ill-fated presidential bid.

The text of the amendment is below:

(Purpose: To provide additional funds for FIRE grants under section 33 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974)

On page 77, between lines 16 and 17, insert the following:

SEC. X (a) The amount appropriated under the heading "firefighter assistance grants'' under the heading "Federal Emergency Management Agency'' under by title III for necessary expenses for programs authorized by the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 is increased by $10,000,000 for necessary expenses to carry out the programs authorized under section 33 of that Act (15 U.S.C. 2229).

(b) The total amount of appropriations under the heading "Aviation Security'' under the heading "Transportation Security Administration'' under title II, the amount for screening operations and the amount for explosives detection systems under the first proviso under that heading, and the amount for the purchase and installation of explosives detection systems under the second proviso under that heading are reduced by $4,500,000.

(c) From the unobligated balances of amounts appropriated before the date of enactment of this Act for the appropriations account under the heading "state and local programs'' under the heading "Federal Emergency Management Agency'' for "Trucking Industry Security Grants'', $5,500,000 are rescinded.

.........................................................................................
The IMPOSTER DETECTOR EXPOSES OBAMA THE IMPOSTER AGAIN.
.........................................................................................
Obama, Dodd other democrates actually created the manufactured financial crisis by allowing it to continue unabated. Obama and Dodd aided and assisted our enemies by allowing our economic system to almost collapse. This is what a TRAITOR does. Obama and Dodd along with others who could have voted to stop the fannie mae freddie mac corruption did NOTHING. By doing NOTHING obama and Dodd allowed the CORRUPTION to continue.

Obama has a talent for doing NOTHING and voting PRESENT. Obama himself is a NO RECORD. It is a documented fact there is no documentation available that can verify who or what obama is.

He says he was born in Hawaii. He will not provide the long form "certificate of live birth" from Hawaii to prove it. The certification of live birth on file in Hawaii indicates his race, his mothers and fathers names and signatures, the doctors name and signature, the hospital name and the offical registrar's signature.

The short form "certification of live birth" does not indicate his mothers or fathers signatures. It does not indicate the doctors name or signature. It does not indicate the hospital. It does not indicate the registrar's official signature. There is No Offical signature on the form obama has posted on the web.

Any and all the information that is on the original long form "certificate of live birth" in Hawaii could have been changed.

Obama could have changed his name, his sex, his date of birth, his mothers and fathers name and place of birth. The short form "certification of live birth" is an AMMENDED "birth certificate".

Obama says he was born in Hawaii. No one can verify this because the original could have been generated a year or more after he was born according to Hawaiian law. look it up.

The original could have been generated if obama was born in Kenya or anywhere else outside the US.

All that was needed was a relative and some simple documentation for Hawaiian officials to issue an "Hawwain birth certificate".

Obama's certificate is what the Hawaii DOH calls a "Late" Certificate of Birth, and it is not an original Birth Certificate for a birth recorded near the date of actual birth. In Hawaii, anyone can claim they were born there and submit the evidence years after the birth to obtain a late "Certificate of Birth".

"Who is Eligible to Apply for Late Registration? As provided by law (HRS §§338-15, 338-29.5), the following persons may apply for late registration: Any person born in Hawaii who is one year old or older and whose birth has not been previously registered in Hawaii, or that person’s parent, guardian, next of kin, or older person acting for that person and having knowledge of the facts of birth may request the registration of a late certificate of birth.

Wo ccould have applied for obama's fake birth "certification of live birth under Hawaiian law (HRS §§338-15, 338-29.5), a guardian.

(A guardian is someone who has been legally appointed to look after the affairs of another person, for example a child or someone who is mentally ill.)

(Next of kin is sometimes used to refer to the person who is your closest relative, especially in official or legal documents.)

(Older person, (adult), acting for that person and having knowledge of the facts of birth.)

So just about anyone even me could have requested an "after the fact" "birth certificate".

NO one can refute this. Its is Hawaiian law (HRS §§338-15, 338-29.5).

NO one including the IMPOSTER himself can say his "certification of live birth" is authentic. It has not been verified or certified by ANYONE with an offical signature!

........................................................................................
And now for a little Story Reports hunor. :)
.......................................................................................

If you could put obama through a TSA xray machine that would reveal what he truly is, it would expose him as smuggling a fake "birth certificate".

Obama is just like a terrorist that is hiding something in his underwear he doesn't want you to see.

The "xray" machine is QUO WARRANTO.

The "tsa" officials that will catch obama are Leo Donofrio and Steve Pidgeon.

N Born Citizens

Exposing the imposter obama

Obama is a fraud who says he was born at two different hospitals in hawaii

Leo Donofrio Speaks About The Fraud Obama

Pompous Ass Obama The Imposter

Obama fires watchdog Inspector General

Questioning Authority Especially obama

How An Ethnic Group Mixes Religious Righteousness With Obama

Odd: Obama told reporters that his grandmother Madelyn Dunham was struggling from osteoporosis in Aug 2008

*****************************************************************************************
THE TRUTH BE TOLD

*****************************************************************************************
Any group of Americans opposed to Barack Hussein Obama could be considered a "conspiracy" (This is more evidence why I indicate we are no longer a nation of laws.)

24 lines of code can flip an election

(This is why the congress is no longer listening nor following the rules of the US Constitution. This is why we are not longer a nation of laws. This is why I believe there will be civil war in a limited way. 24 lines of code. 24 lines of code can change your vote. This is what I believe elected the imposter obama. It would only have taken a few hundred of these machines to tip the balance in a few key states. Read the article by the programmer and you will see that the code can be changed and it can't be detected that it was changed. This is why I say were are not longer a nation of laws. We have no way to verify our votes unless there is a paper trail. In electronic voting voters have no paper trail and 24 lines of code can change the recorded vote and it can't be detected by ANYONE!) Story Reports

An Amendment To Executive Order #12425, Signed By The Personification Of Evil Obama

An Amendment To Executive Order #12425, Signed By The Personification Of Evil Barack Obama

Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER
- – – – – – -
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 16, 2009.

.........................................................................................

Obama has just handed over our sovereignty. Interpol headquarters in the US is currently headquartered in the Department of Justice. A ‘separate’ Interpol agency has been created in the DOJ.

.........................................................................................
theundergroundconservative.wordpress.com/

This now says that Interpol is no longer subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Their premises or staff can no longer be searched either. Their files are not subject to legal subpoena or discovery. Our government could just hand documents and files over to Interpol and Americans would no longer have access to them. Interpol can legally keep files now on all citizens of the US with no right to redress.

In reality, we have just handed over our sovereignty. Interpol headquarters in the US is currently headquartered in the Department of Justice. A ‘separate’ Interpol agency has been created in the DOJ – let that sink in for a moment. Interpol has been granted diplomatic immunity now by Obama – they have exemption from being subject to search and seizure by law enforcement, US taxes and immunity from FOIA requests, etc. This action could also be used to divulge American military secrets and a whole host of horrific practices having to do with going after our military. It’s the road to internationalism on steroids.

I contend this is the foundation for an international governing and policing body. A modern day SS here in the US if you like. Remember how Obama wanted to create a civilian police force? Well, it’s here, just from a direction I never saw it coming from. I really believe you will see Interpol police forces on US soil in the near future. It will resemble the Gestapo and their intelligence gathering techniques. This police force would not be subject to our normal Constitutional oversights – remember, no search and seizure etc.
.........................................................................................

Personification of evil barack obama.

.........................................................................................

Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order “Amending Executive Order 12425.” It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other “International Organizations” as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.

By removing language from President Reagan’s 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates – now operates – on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests. …

After initial review and discussions between the writers of this analysis, the context was spelled out plainly.

Through EO 12425, President Reagan extended to INTERPOL recognition as an “International Organization.” In short, the privileges and immunities afforded foreign diplomats was extended to INTERPOL. Two sets of important privileges and immunities were withheld: Section 2© and the remaining sections cited (all of which deal with differing taxes).

And then comes December 17, 2009, and President Obama. The exemptions in EO 12425 were removed.

Section 2c of the United States International Organizations Immunities Act is the crucial piece.

Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable. (Emphasis added.)

Inviolable archives means INTERPOL records are beyond US citizens’ Freedom of Information Act requests and from American legal or investigative discovery (“unless such immunity be expressly waived.”)

Property and assets being immune from search and confiscation means precisely that. Wherever they may be in the United States. This could conceivably include human assets – Americans arrested on our soil by INTERPOL officers.

Interpol’s property and assets are no longer subject to search and confiscation, and its archives are now considered inviolable. This international police force (whose U.S. headquarters is in the Justice Department in Washington) will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States.

Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court — which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes — i.e., for actions taken in America’s defense).

Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?

This is why:

Obama has just handed over our sovereignty. Interpol headquarters in the US is currently headquartered in the Department of Justice. A ‘separate’ Interpol agency has been created in the DOJ.

.........................................................................................

During his presidency, Ronald Reagan granted the global police agency Interpol the status of diplomatic personnel in order to engage more constructively on international law enforcement. In Executive Order 12425, Reagan made two exceptions to that status. The first had to do with taxation, but the second was to make sure that Interpol had the same accountability for its actions as American law enforcement — namely, they had to produce records when demanded by courts and could not have immunity for their actions.

Barack Obama unexpectedly revoked those exceptions in a change to EO 12425 last month, as Threats Watch reports:

(Nothing obama does is unexpected. He is a communist. A destroyer. His sole purpose is to change America into a nation of slaves under his command. He has said he would like to change the Constitution but he knows though the power of executive orders and obamacare he can have complete control of America bypassing the Constitution. Should we resist this dictator? Yes. Some will as they did hitler. It will be a struggle for freedom and liberty. Obama wants your freedom and liberty. Don't let him and the Congress that is being payed off through the stimulus slush fund take your freedom.

This is the foundation for Obama’s civilian national security force. His SS, His Gestapo.He will use this to quiet his opposition. He will make people disappear as the ss and gestapo did. He will use his civilian police force to spy as hitler did on fellow Americans, mother, fathers, sons, daughters etc. Because he is a narcississt he will not hesitate to send people where necessary to get rid of them. It could be via no health care. It could be via an Interpol arrest without a warrant or court appearance. This EO signed by obama means Americans can be arrested and detained without cause. We are now living in a police state via obama. Obama will get rid of the people who pose the least and most threat as hitler did. The infirm and those who protest..) Story Reports

..........................................................................................

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law? [Andy McCarthy]

You just can't make up how brazen this crowd is. One week ago, President Obama quietly signed an executive order that makes an international police force immune from the restraints of American law.

Interpol is the shorthand for the International Criminal Police Organization. It was established in 1923 and operates in about 188 countries. By executive order 12425, issued in 1983, President Reagan recognized Interpol as an international organization and gave it some of the privileges and immunities customarily extended to foreign diplomats. Interpol, however, is also an active law-enforcement agency, so critical privileges and immunities (set forth in Section 2(c) of the International Organizations Immunities Act) were withheld. Specifically, Interpol's property and assets remained subject to search and seizure, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions like the Freedom of Information Act. Being constrained by the Fourth Amendment, FOIA, and other limitations of the Constitution and federal law that protect the liberty and privacy of Americans is what prevents law-enforcement and its controlling government authority from becoming tyrannical.

On Wednesday, however, for no apparent reason, President Obama issued an executive order removing the Reagan limitations. That is, Interpol's property and assets are no longer subject to search and confiscation, and its archives are now considered inviolable. This international police force (whose U.S. headquarters is in the Justice Department in Washington) will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States.

Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court — which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes — i.e., for actions taken in America's defense).

Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?

Steve Schippert .

Janet Reno's Ugly Cousin Secretary Janet Napolitano Didn't Do Anything But Aid And Abet The Enemy Through Incompetence

"One thing I'd like to point out is that the system worked," Napolitano said. The passengers and crew of the flight took appropriate action.

Thats right Janet Reno's Ugly Cousin secretary Janet Napolitano praised "the system". In other words she gave herself a big pat on the back for being a complete idiot.

Remember TSA released their own security manual on the web and said it was not a problem?

Napolitano releases TSA own security manual on the web and says its not a problem...Do you believe this?

Homeland "insecurity" Janet Reno's Ugly Cousin secretary Janet Napolitano is in command of the TSA.

Napolitano pointed out her system worked. First she releases the TSA's own security manual on the web Dec 9, 2009. Then Dec 26 2009 her system of informing the terrorists of how airport security functions helps so they can plan and try to blow up a planes. Then she points out the system worked.

If you look at it through her perspective of helping the terrorists, it did work.

If you look at the system as it was suppose to work ie, protect travelers, of course it did not.

The only thing that worked was the FACT that the passengers helped subdue the muslim terrorist once again.

Janet Reno's Ugly Cousin secretary Janet Napolitano didn't do anything but aid and abet the enemy.

Does obama claim any responsibility here? He should. He appointed the ugly cousin and supports her every move including directing her every move. Obama controls the ugly cousin which controls the TSA. Obama is the creep behind the scenes that should be held accountable for the massive failure of "homeland insecurity". He is not held accountable for anything because he is the "first black president". He also is a failure as the first black president. History is recording failure after failure after failure. The state run media is recording something else or nothing at all. I would say nothing at all equals a NO RECORD. This is in fact what obama is, a NO RECORD.

.........................................................................................
Officials: Only A Failed Detonator Saved Northwest Flight
.........................................................................................

Screening Machines May Need to Be Replaced; Al Qaeda Aware of 'Achilles heel'
By RICHARD ESPOSITO and BRIAN ROSS

Dec. 26, 2009 —

Officials now say tragedy was only averted on Northwest flight 253 because a makeshift detonator failed to work properly.

Bomb experts say there was more than enough explosive to bring down the Northwest jet, which had nearly 300 people aboard, had the detonator not failed, and the nation's outdated airport screening machines may need to be upgraded.

"We've known for a long time that this is possible," said Richard Clarke, former counterterrorism czar and ABC News consultant, "and that we really have to replace our scanning devices with more modern systems."

Clarke said full body scans were needed, "but they're expensive and they're intrusive. They invade people's privacy."

Al Qaeda, said Clarke, is aware of this vulnerability in the U.S. airport security system. "They know that this is a weakness and an Achilles' heel in our airport security system and this is the second time they've tried it."

In 2001, would-be "shoe bomber" Richard Reid failed in his attempt to blow up a transatlantic flight with a highly explosive chemical known as PETN. He attempted to light a fuse to his shoe on a December 22 American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami but was subdued by other passengers.

According to investigators, the bomb on Northwest flight 253, which was en route from Amsterdam to Detroit when suspect Umar farouk Abdulmutallab allegedly detonated it, contained more than 80 grams of PETN. The material was allegedly sewn into Abdulmutallab's underwear, and was not detected by airport security.

READ THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ABDULMUTALLAB HERE

The bomb was built and the plot organized, say U.S. officials, by al Qaeda leaders in Yemen, just north of the capital city of Sanaa.

Suspect Was On Terrorism Watch List

Authorities say the 23-year-old suspect spent months in Yemen being trained for the Christmas Day suicide mission.

Investigators believe Abdulmutallab was connected to al Qaeda by the same radical imam, American-born Anwar Awlaki, who is linked to the American Army major accused of opening fire at Fort Hood in November.

According to investigators, the bomb used yesterday was built in Yemen by a top al Qaeda bomb maker.

Northwest Airlines flight 253 -- operated on a Delta airplane - was getting ready to land in Detroit just before noon Friday when "a passenger caused a disturbance," said Delta spokeswoman Susan Chana Elliott. The man, later identified as Abdulmutallab, was trying to ignite when was initially reported as firecrackers.

According to the criminal complaint filed against Abudlmutallab, he boarded KLM Flight 588 from Lagos, Nigeria and transferred to Northwest Flight 253 at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam.

Prior to the incident, Abdulmutallab went to the bathroom for about 20 minutes. Upon returning to his seat, Abdulmutallab said he had an upset stomach, and pulled a blanket over himself.

Passengers then heard popping noises similar to firecrackers and smelled an odor. Some saw Abdulmutallab's pants leg and the wall of the airplane on fire. Passengers and crew then subdued Abdulmutallab and used blankets and fire extinguishers to put out the flames.

A passenger apparently saw the suspect holding what a partially melted and smoking syringe. The passenger took the syringe, shook it to stop it from smoking and threw it to the floor. Dutch filmmaker Jasper Schuringa has been identified in the media as a passenger who subdued Mutallab.

Abdulmutallab, who flew from Nigeria to Amsterdam and then Detroit, was taken into custody at the Detroit airport and was interviewed by authorities there. He was then taken to an area hospital to be treated for burns.

Abdulmutallab was on a terrorism watch list, but not on a no-fly list. Said Clarke, "So once again, we have the U.S. government, as in the case of the Fort Hood attacks, knowing about someone, knowing that they were suspicious, but that information didn't get to the right people in time."

Revolution Number 2010

REVOLUTION Number 2010

A D
You say you want a revolution, well you know

D A
Obamacare GUTS the Constitution

A D
You tell me that its evil-ution, well you know

A E
the commies want to change the world

Bm E
But when you talk about devastation

Bm A G F# E
Don't you know that you can count me out, (wayout)


A A D/A
Don't you know its not gonna be, alright

A A D/A
Don't you know we know you, aren't right

A A D/A
Don't you know its not gonna be, alright


A D
You say you want us to pay restitution, well you know

D A
We know obamacare is the plan

A D
You ask me for a contribution, well you know

D E
We all know your a mad man


Bm Bm
Well if you want money from people because of your hate

Bm A G F# E
All I can tell you is sister you'll have to wait


A A D/A
Don't you know its not gonna be, alright

A A D/A
Don't you know we know you, aren't right

A D/A
Don't you know its not gonna be, alright


A D
You say you want to change the Constitution, well you know

D A
We all know what you've said

A D
You tell us its the restitution, well you know

D E
You better watch your backside in stead

Bm E
Well when you hang pictures of chairman mao


Bm A G F# E
The transvestite on your tree is You a-ny how


A A D/A
Don't you know we know you, aren't right

A A D/A
Don't you know we know you aren't right

A A D/A
Don't you know bo-zo that we will, fight

Senator DeMint Objects to the Appointment of the Conferees

I see these people also have an astonished look on their face as obama walks by. Notice that one guy. He is looking at obama as if he is an IDIOT. Of course obama has not noticed this. Obama acts if he doesn't notice what people do. When millions tell him not to spend money the government doesn't have or that they don't want obamacare he just walks on by as if he doesn't hear or care what anyone thinks. Of course what he thinks of himself is not reality. He, as this picture illustrates, is a baffoon on parade for all to see and make fun of. Obama does not deserve any respect because obama has not earned any respect!
.............................................................................................
The Best Christmas Present Ever: Senator DeMint Objects to the Appointment of the Conferees

The Best Christmas Present Ever: Senator DeMint Objects to the Appointment of the Conferees
...........................................................................................
Posted by Dan Perrin

When Senator DeMint engineered, and Republican Leader McConnell actually objected to the appointment of the conferees, he was really handing the ball off to the left wingers — progressives if you will — and now they have their shot to either hold their own clan members who are against the Senate compromises and force them to vote No, or have their policy demands be ignored and take the crumbs from Senator Nelson’s and Senator Lieberman’s table.

Now, because of the Senator DeMint’s objection, unless the House votes for the Senate bill unchanged — which is highly unlikely (see below) — then the Senate ObamaCare bill must be amended on the House floor to gain the votes they need to pass it on the House floor. And because of Senator DeMint’s objection to the appointment of the conferees, there will be no conference, or conference report.

If the House amends the Senate bill, they then have to send the amended bill back to the Senate — where all the 60 vote margin cloture votes still apply — cloture on the motion to proceed, and cloture to end the filibuster and cloture on any amendment.

Do I believe that this objection to the appointment of the conferees will kill ObamaCare? Yes, if the progressives or those 64 House Democrats who voted for the Stupak amendment do not roll over and play dead.

This monkey wrench may explain why the White House is putting out the word that it wants the health care bill to pass the House after the State of the Union, in February.

The Best Christmas Present Ever: Senator DeMint Objects to the Appointment of the Conferees

Sarah Palin Is Correct About Death Panels

PolitiFact's Lie of the Year: 'Death panels'

Yes PolitiFact.com did produce a "lie of the year". The lie of the year is misquoting and spinning what Sarah Palin said about "Death Panels".

Let me set the record straight. I will provide a link and references to page numbers in the house bill HR 3200.

Obama care does contain provisions for panels which are in effect death panels... Sarah Palin Is Correct Palin is correct they just are not called death panels but a government committee.

HR 3200 House Bill Obamacare

Sarah Palin:

"The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's ‘death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil."

She said obama's "bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgement of their level of productivity in society". The Title IV quality: Subtitle A says the cost of proposed treatment will be divided by the remaining years of your statistical life expectancy. If your per year life cost exceeds the state mandated threshold your won't get health care. So Sara Palin was correct. Sarah Palin was totally correct. Politifact.com did produce the lie of the year not Sara Palin.


See TITLE IV–QUALITY: Subtitle A–Comparative Effectiveness Research. “Comparative Effectiveness Research” means that they will take the cost of your proposed treatment and divide that by the remaining years of your statistical life expectancy. If your per-year life cost exceeds the state-mandated threshhold, you won’t get the health care. Are you a military veteran over 59 who risked everything for your country? No heart by-pass surgery for you, you expensive old goat!

(You ask what is a "death panel". I will tell you.)

The "health care" bill provides for mandatory euthanasia counseling for senior citizens every five years AND whenever they receive a diagnosis of terminal illness (page 425, House version of the bill — H.R.3200, America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009).

But we are not just talking about those very near the end of life. The specific wording in the bill is:

….if there is a significant change in the health condition of the individual, including diagnosis of a chronic, progressive, life-limiting disease, a life-threatening or terminal diagnosis or life-threatening injury, or upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a long-term care facility (as defined by the Secretary), or a hospice program.

Just a “life-limiting” disease is enough to trigger the state’s interest in you. Down’s Syndrome? Muscular dystrophy? Alzheimer’s? Senile dementia? You could be encouraged to “go home” early.

But even if you are in fairly good shape, and you are past middle age, you have cause for concern.

See TITLE IV–QUALITY: Subtitle A–Comparative Effectiveness Research. “Comparative Effectiveness Research” means that they will take the cost of your proposed treatment and divide that by the remaining years of your statistical life expectancy. If your per-year life cost exceeds the state-mandated threshhold, you won’t get the health care. Are you a military veteran over 59 who risked everything for your country? No heart by-pass surgery for you, you expensive old goat!

(I would say this is a DEATH PANEL that decides if you are WORTHY OF LIFE using an amount obama has decided it will cost the state. The older you are the less the government DEATH PANEL will pay out for your medical need. This is a fact. It is not assuming anything. I talked with IDIOTS that deny this is in the bill. They say the government would never do this. I am surrounded by a vast number of IDIOTS who deny this is in the obama bill. Story Reports)

• Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process)

• Page 42: The "Health Choices Commissioner" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.

( NO APPEALS. THE GOVERNMENT COMMITTE OR DEATH PANEL RULING IS FINAL, PAGE 30 of PDF House Bill 3200)

Health Care Nullification

Health Care Nullification: Things have just gotten underway

Health Care Nullification Underway By The States

by Michael Boldin

“The several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government.”
–Thomas Jefferson

For the past few days, I’ve received loads of emails urging me to get active regarding the healthcare vote – most of which had a subject line similar to: “Last Chance to Stop National Healthcare!”

Well, if you believe the only way to protect your rights is by begging federal politicians to do what you want, then these emails are certainly right. The vote went as expected, and so will the next.

So if you think marching on D.C. or calling your Representatives, or threating to “throw the bums out” in 2010 or 2012 or 20-whatever, is going to further the cause of the Constitution and your liberty – you might as well get your shackles on now. Your last chance has come and gone.

But, those of you who visit this site regularly already know that the Senate’s health care vote is far from the end of things – and you also know that even when it goes into effect (which I assume some version will), it’s still not the end of the road for your freedom.

The real way to resist DC is not by begging politicians and judges in Washington to allow us to exercise our rights…it’s to exercise our rights whether they want to give us “permission” to or not.

Nullification – state-level resistance to unconstitutional federal laws – is the way forward.

Nullification

When a state ‘nullifies’ a federal law, it is proclaiming that the law in question is void and inoperative, or ‘non-effective,’ within the boundaries of that state; or, in other words, not a law as far as that state is concerned.

It’s peaceful, effective, and has a long history in the American tradition. It’s been invoked in support of free speech, in opposition to war and fugitive slave laws, and more.

Regarding nullification and health care, there’s already a growing movement right now. Led by Arizona, voters in a number of states may get a chance to approve State Constitutional Amendments in 2010 that would effectively ban national health care in their states. Our sources here at the Tenth Amendment Center indicate to us that we should expect to see 20-25 states consider such legislation in 2010.

20 States resisting DC can do what calling, marching, yelling, faxing, and emailing has almost never done. Stop the feds dead in their tracks.

For example, 13 states are already defying federal marijuana prohibition, and the federal government is having such a hard time dealing with it that the Obama administration recently announced that they would no longer prioritize enforcement in states that have medical marijuana laws.

Better yet, in the last 2+ years more than 20 states have been able to effectively prevent the Real ID Act of 2005 from being implemented. How did they do that? They passed laws and resolutions refusing to comply with it. And today, it’s effectively null and void without ever being repealed by Congress or challenged in court.

While the Obama administration would like to revive it under a different name, the reality is still there – with massive state-level resistance, the federal government can be pushed back inside its constitutional box. Issue by issue, law by law, the best way to change the federal government is by resisting it on a state level.

That’s nullification at work.

Over the years, wise men and women warned us that the Constitution would never enforce itself. The time is long overdue for people to start recognizing this fact, and bring that enforcement closer to home.

The bottom line? If you want to make real change; if you want to really do something for liberty and for the Constitution…focus on local activism and your state governments.
..........................................................................................
Particular to the United States, the U.S. Constitution was voluntarily formed as a compact by existing sovereign states with existing state constitutions.
..........................................................................................
Particular to the United States, the U.S. Constitution was voluntarily formed as a compact by existing sovereign states with existing state constitutions.

See FP 39. Despite the deceptive proposition that the States were created by Congress, the States existed prior to and independent of any Congress, as confirmed by the Treaty of Paris in 1783 (which, by the way, was not overturned by any subsequent legal action of the states). “The State governments, by their original constitutions, are invested with complete sovereignty.” Alexander Hamilton, FP 31. And, “Each State, in ratifying the constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act.” James Madison, FP 39.

Today, there is a fraudulent notion in America which places the U.S. Constitution above the importance and relevance of the state constitutions and state sovereignty, despite the fact that we were told (in efforts to get us to ratify the U.S. Constitution) that “the State governments would clearly retain all rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, exclusively delegated to the United States.” Alexander Hamilton, FP 32. The authoritative advocates of the U.S. Constitution confirm that even with the U.S. Constitution ratified or with the U.S. Constitution dissolved, the states would have their own constitutions to protect freedom and secure the blessings of liberty within that state.

.........................................................................................
10th Amendment Resolutions
.........................................................................................
Non-binding resolutions, often called “state sovereignty resolutions” do no carry the force of law. Instead, they are intended to be a statement of the legislature of the state. They play an important role, however.

If you owned an apartment building and had a tenant not paying rent, you wouldn’t show up with an empty truck to kick them out without first serving notice. That’s how we view these Resolutions – as serving “notice and demand” to the Federal Government to “cease and desist any and all activities outside the scope of their constitutionally-delegated powers.” Follow-up, of course, is a must.
.........................................................................................

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Flight 77 United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui, Exhibit Number P200054

Flight 77 United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui, Exhibit Number P200054

This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology that pretended to be his wife. In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson were based on deception. If that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?
..........................................................................................

Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington.

The fact is Barbara Olson made one phone call from flight #77 at 09:18:58.

IT WAS AN UNCONNECTED CALL ACCORDING TO SWORN TESTIMONY BY THE FBI IN THE United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui trial in 2006.

The link to the FBI Prosecution Trial Exhibits Exhibit Number P200054 . Summary of Flight 77 depicting: the identity of pilots and flight attendants, seat assignments of passengers, and telephone calls from the flight This exhibit also includes information about the other three flights hijacked on September 11.

Summary of Flight 77 telephone calls

Download FBI exhibit

..........................................................................................
This is solid evidence Ted Olson lied. The FBI says no calls ever connected. Olson says he talked with his wife. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. The FAA said flight 77 disappeared from the radar. It seems something very strange happened to flight 77 but what? What is even more strange is the government has not prosecuted olsen for perjury. Also the government proclaimed what olsen said his wife told him but denies his wife ever talked to him!!!!

(1) FAA says fight 77 disappeared from the radar.

(2) No evidence flight 77 retured to Washington.

(3) No evidence Hijackers used box cutters

(4) No evidence olson talked to his wife.

Ted Olson’s report was very important. It provided the only evidence that American 77, which was said to have struck the Pentagon, had still been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA radar around 9:00 AM (there had been reports, after this disappearance, that an airliner had crashed on the Ohio-Kentucky border). Also, Barbara Olson had been a very well-known commentator on CNN. The report that she died in a plane that had been hijacked by Arab Muslims was an important factor in getting the nation’s support for the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s report was important in still another way, being the sole source of the widely accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters.
..........................................................................................
A plane hit the pentagon no doubt. Was it flight #77? Ted olson's story is a lie. Why?
Why has the government contradicted itself? Something is very wrong.
..........................................................................................

Ted olson was the solicitor general. The task of the Office of the Solicitor General is to supervise and conduct government litigation in the United States Supreme Court.

Don't tell me this man can't remember what his wife said in a phone call from an airplane and he just made a error.

Don't tell me this man just made a mistake. His "mistake" or bold face lie was used as a basis for legislation to prevent hijacking planes. His testimony to the FBI was a lie. So the legislation the government carved out was based on a phone call that never happened. Of course all the homeland security bills were not based on olsons phone calls. Why has this dog been left to die? Why is the US government saying olson lied?
Why is the US government lying but not investigation olson? The government continues to say what olson told them about what happened on flight #77. But this never happened. It can't be confirmed. There were never any connected phone calls. Amazing isn't it.

Read the story for yourself here


My point is the US government lies. You can't believe the US government all the time. Don't believe all the government tells you. Check what the government tells you. Verify what the government says. I did. I found the US Government is saying two different things. It is saying olson is a liar and it is saying what he originally told them happened on flight #77. The FBI says the phone calls never connected.

******************************************************************************************
Flight 77 Passengers

Truly a bizarre passenger list of flight #77

Well, if you look at the occupations of the passengers of Flight 77, you get a strange feeling that something is wrong with this picture:

For a random collection of passengers, this is a very impressive manifest. We use the results of Killtown's work on the passenger list, which was drawn from the canonical sources of 9/11 victims biographical information on the Internet: the numbers in square brackets are the numbers in Killtown's listing .

* a senior scientist with the US Navy, retired Army. [12] A third-generation physicist whose work at the Navy was so classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day. They don't even know exactly why he was headed to Los Angeles on the doomed American Airlines Flight 77.
* a Boeing engineer in Integrated Defense Systems; he served in the US Air Force for four years, and for the National Security Agency for 14 years. [36]
* a director of program management at Raytheon, US Army (ret.) [28] who helped develop and build anti-radar technology for electronic warfare. Raytheon's website notes that they are leaders in every phase of the Precision Strike kill chain; are the world's leading organization at Missile Defense; provides state-of-the-art technology to detect, protect and respond to terrorism and provide Homeland Defense; and that their technology forms the eyes, ears and brains of Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance systems, from the Predator to the Global Hawk.
* a retired naval aviator who worked for Veridian Corp., a defense contractor, who was working with military aircraft and weapons systems [56] A Navy test pilot who worked on the development of the F18. "He had done a number of black programs -- which means top-secret," said his son. "We were given no details."
* an electrical engineer with defense contractor BAE Systems. [41] largest technical support supplier to the US Navy. BAE Systems is an industry leader in flight control systems, which are present on nearly every US military aircraft. BAE electronic warfare systems such as their jamming system are vital to the US Navy operations.
* 2 Boeing propulsion engineers: a lead Propulsion Engineer and a Project Manager with Boeing Satellite Systems, [32] and a lead engineer for Boeing Satellite Systems. [40]
* a software architect with Lockheed Martin Corp., US Army (ret.). [42] A manager in the systems and software architecture department.
* a Vice President for software development, EMSolutions and retired Lieutenant Commander, Navy. [18] He spent 20 years in the US Navy, where he developed high capacity signal processors, multi-processor application software and innovative signal processing algorithms. EMSolutions maintains a facility security clearance, and has contracts with Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and BAE Systems.
* a technical group manager at Xon Tech, a defense-related research and development firm [46] He previously worked as an engineer at the Naval Research Lab. Also a technical manager of Xon Tech [53].
* a retired Navy Rear Admiral, former Navy pilot, and retired American Airlines pilot. [24]
* a senior executive at the Defense Department. [29] A budget analyst/director of the programming and fiscal economics division who worked at the Pentagon.
* a former Navy electronics technician worked as a Department of Defense contractor with Vrendenburg Co. in Washington [57]
* managing partner and co-founder of Stratin Consulting. and retired Marine Corps Lieutenant and Vietnam War veteran [26]
* a lawyer who had worked with the Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps. [49]
* and of course, there was Barbara Olson, attorney, CNN Commentator and wife of the United States Solicitor General. [39]

The odds against this being a random group of 53 American Airlines passengers are simply astronomical! There are more top secret security clearances here than in most medium-sized cities in America.

Especially astounding in this bizarre passenger list is the preponderance of Navy personnel amongst the 4 armed services, and the tilt toward propulsion and guidance systems amongst all of the possible secret technologies. It's almost as if someone put this list together thinking that Navy personnel were expendable - or needed to be expended.

This looks like a charter flight for the military-industrial complex; it's almost as if this plane should have taken off from the Pentagon, rather than supposedly crashing into it.


So why bring this up now? Just because I read this story and want to inform others of these facts about ted olson and his never connected phone calls that were seen 24 hours a day for weeks on broadcast tv and radio. The US government has never explained why it has not explained ted olson's story of fight #77.

Do you trust your government. I don't

Obama Dismantling US

Obama Dismantling US

Thomas Sowell, the brilliant conservative pundit, makes an important point for those who think these radical extremists somehow got into the White House because of a failure to properly vet them. Mr. Sowell writes, “Why should we assume Obama didn’t know what such people were like; he’s been associating with these kinds of people for decades. Nothing is more consistent with his pattern than putting such people in government – people who reject American values, and resent Americans and America’s influence in the world.”

Wake up America. We elected one of the most dangerous enemies of America and he now sits in the White House, filled with other enemies of America, relentlessly going about his task of destroying the country as we know it and as the Founding Fathers intended it. You better join the forces in opposition to Mr. Obama’s vision for America because if he continues unobstructed for three more years, it may then be too late to save it.

It’s later than you think. Mr. Obama can kill the economy and America with his version of ObamaCare standing by itself (See The Bulletin, “ObamaCare Spells Doom for America,” Dec. 6-12, and “Wake Up Before Obama Destroys America,” Dec. 13-19). And, he seems to be firing shots with machine-gun rapidity that have the potential to destroy our economy and our country. There’s some element of truth in talk show host Michael Savage’s assertion that we now have a dictatorship. With supermajorities in both houses of Congress and with seemingly inept Republican leadership, with free use of extra-Constitutional methods, i.e. czars, there seems to be no real checks and balances that should keep an out-of-control radical runaway president in check.

Even our Founders, political geniuses, still could not foresee and plan for the election to the White House of an America-hating radical, backed by supermajorities of the Democratic Party willing to follow him over the cliff to the destruction of America.

Herb Denenberg can be reached at advocate@thebulletin.us

.........................................................................................

What drives obama? Hate. Hate for America. Hate for free America. Hate for anyone who disagrees with him. Obama is evil. He is the embodiment of evil. Evil seeks to promote itself for the sake of destruction. Obama seeks to destroy America. Obama is the enemy within. He is a domestic enemy. I say this because of the overwhelming evidence of his record. All his efforts seek to demean America an appease the world. He promotes sodomy. He declares America is not a christian nation. He defends terrorists on US soil by trying them in civilian courts. Obama waffles on helping the military and declares victory is not the goal. Obama wastes taxpayer funds to pay off his democratic districts 2 to 1 over republican districts. He seeks to control the US population through "obamacare or death panels". Obama seeks to make climate change ie global warming a conduit for new massive taxation and government control. Everything obama does is not just bad its evil. This is because obama is evil. We are fighting against the evil that has control of barack obama. Obama is not in control of himself. To me obama is producing the doctrine of devils.

*****************************************************************************************

"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils ..." 1 Timothy 4:1-2

*A doctrine of devils is a seduction by the devil of those who are willing to depart from the faith due to their own lusts or fears.

Paul first describes these people who will be deceived by lies; "they shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits," and, "they will not endure sound doctrine; they will have itching ears, and will hire [false] teachers to tell them what they lust to hear; and turn aside unto fables. 2 Tim 4:3

Paul defines a "doctrine of devils" as "lies and hypocrisy." Then he describes these teachers of doctrines of devils as having no conscience, or not capable of having a guilty conscience.

Paul goes on to give two examples: forbidding to marry, and, to abstain from meats.

Jesus warned that these false prophets would come, that they would attempt to deceive the Elect. Mat, 24:5, 11, 24, Rev 13:14

2 Thes 2:11 "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie." Those who believe false doctrines have believed a lie.

Eph 5:6 "Let no man deceive you with empty words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the sons of disobedience." Those who teach the lies and false doctrine will receive the plagues of the seven vials of God's wrath in full measure.

To recognize a lie, you must first have some ability to recognize the truth: if you cannot or will not believe the truth, you will believe the lies!
*****************************************************************************************

(This is what I believe is happening today. I believe some people cannot or will not believe the truth, therefore they believe the lies)