Transgender Bathrooms

..................
..................
..................
(People can call themselves anything. They can identify with anything. A man who wants to be a woman calls himself transgender but he is still a man.

His genes and dna can't be changed. He was born a man and not a woman or a transgender.

The same is for a woman who wants to be a man. Her genes and dna can't be changed. She was born a woman and not a man or a transgender.

God didn't create a transgender. Her created a male and female.

Today as in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah homosexuals/trangenders, blinded in the commission of sin are searching for transgender doors and wearing themselves out hoping to find someone they can prey on like an animal. They seek recognition and acceptance as a "New" gender creation. God has warned them in Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.")

.....................
.....................
.....................
What does the Bible really say about homosexuality?

The sin of Sodom

The first mention, and the first overt condemnation, of homosexuality takes place in the account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. When the angels come to investigate the sinfulness of the people there, it is evident that Lot knows the angels are in danger because of the urgency with which he pleads that they spend the night in his house, and not in the open square. He may have wanted to get them inside before anyone noticed the newcomers, but word had spread to the whole town, and they gathered outside his house that night.

The universality of the description is impossible to miss—all of the men, rich and poor, young and old, gathered outside the house and demanded that Lot give up his guests. They bluntly demanded that Lot bring out his guests so that they could rape them. In that culture, hospitality was a sacred duty, and Lot was obliged to defend his guests, even if it cost his own life. So he goes out and pleads with them, even offering his own daughters instead of his guests. It’s possible he was making a bad choice endangering his daughters, or it’s possible he knew the crowd had no interest in women and he was simply trying to buy time. Either way, the crowd responded by trying to break in, but the angels protected Lot and struck the whole crowd blind.

Most people, if they were suddenly blinded in the commission of a heinous sin, as well as all their accomplices, would at least pause to consider the extraordinary coincidence. But this did not deter them—in fact, the text says that they went on trying to find the door for so long that they wore themselves out! The picture is certainly one of immorality run amok.

Some who want to soften the condemnation of homosexuality say that it was the intended rape, not the homosexuality, that was the sin, and point to Ezekiel 16 for a definition of the ‘actual’ sin of the Sodomites. However, we should not interpret Scripture in such a way to make it contradict itself. Ezekiel gives a fuller picture of the sin of Sodom, without contradicting the story of the city’s destruction:

Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty and did an abomination before me. So I removed them, when I saw it (Ezekiel 16:49–50).

The homosexual sin of Sodom is presented as a culmination of the growing sinful decadence of the city. Lesser sins preceded it, such as refusing to aid the needy when they themselves had more than enough. But the word “abomination” clearly refers to the homosexual sin which resulted in its destruction.

The New Testament also discusses Sodom in a few places:

For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment; if he did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah, a herald of righteousness, with seven others, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly; if by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to ashes he condemned them to extinction, making them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly; and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by the sensual conduct of the wicked (for as that righteous man lived among them day after day, he was tormenting his righteous soul over their lawless deeds that he saw and heard); then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment, and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority (2 Peter 2:4–10).

Peter was writing to encourage Christians who were experiencing persecution because of their faith. His argument proceeds:

God punished the angels who sinned, and destroyed the world with a global Flood, but preserved Noah and his family.
God destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, but preserved righteous Lot; therefore
God can keep the unrighteous under judgment and rescue the godly from trials.

Jude says:

Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day—just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

Jude was warning his congregation against false teachers, so he gave examples of other people who were judged for unbelief and immorality.

Peter and Jude don’t argue that Sodom and Gomorrah were wicked; they assume it based on everything the Old Testament says about them. So the entire testimony of Scripture is that Sodom and Gomorrah were wicked cities, and that homosexuality was the sin they were destroyed for.
.............
.............
.............

These 4 sermons make it clear what the Bible says about homosexuality. If you are a Bible believer these messages will help and encourange you in your understanding of what God says in the Bible about homosexuals. It is a sin and will be judged by the Word Of God. Take the time to listen and learn.

These are MP3 files that can be downloaded also.  (Click On Links To Listen.)

Christian Perspective On Supreme Court Ruling On Same Sex Marriage Part 1 (1 HR 6 Min)  (Right Click To Save)

Christian Perspective On Supreme Court Ruling On Same Sex Marriage Part 2 (1 HR 21 Min)  (Right Click To Save)

Rightly Related to Sodom Part 1 (1 HR 8 Min)  (Right Click To Save)

Rightly Related to Sodom Part 2 (1 Hr 5 Min)  (Right Click To Save)

Shocking Results from Fluoride Tests On Top Brands of Bottled Water

Shocking Results from Fluoride Tests On Top Brands of Bottled Water



.....................

Water tested, with the results below.

Glaceau Smart Water was Distilled- .00 ppm (This is available at SAM's) No fluoride plus it is a zero calorie, vapor distilled, electrolyte- enhanced water (added electrolytes: potassium, magnesium, calcium)


The bottled water below have fluoride in the water. Fluoride is a poison. I once called my local water supplier and ask how much fluoride was in the tap water. He told me it was not as much as it used to be. I also asked him if he knew it was a poison. He said he did but that it was added in such a small amount that it should be ok.

The story is flouride is added to water to help prevent tooth decay. The real story is fluoride does not prevent tooth decay and water systems are a dumping ground for an industrial waste byproduct

Ice Mountain- .11 ppm
Family Gourmet- .14 ppm
Dasani- .16 ppm
Propel- .17 ppm
Deja Blue- .17 ppm
Crystal Geyser- .31 ppm
Fiji- .35 ppm

VOSS .25 ppm
Kiwaii .04 ppm
Aqua was .13 ppm

Kroger was .00 ppm (It is distilled.) This has no fluoride also.)

Evian was .00 ppm As well. (Natural mineral water) This has no fluoride also plus natural minerals ie electrolytes.) Evian Water

(When you drink water that has no electrolytes your body needs these replaced. It makes good sense to drink water that has electrolytes such as Glaceau Smart Water or Evian. You don't need to drink gator aid to get electrolytes, drink water that has electrolytes! These are what I recommend.)


50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation

Don't drink ANY tap water. It accumulates in the body so any amount you injest is a hazard to your health. Don't cook with it.

Fluoride accumulates in the body. Healthy adult kidneys excrete 50 to 60% of the fluoride ingested each day (Marier & Rose 1971). The remainder accumulates in the body, largely in calcifying tissues such as the bones and pineal gland (Luke 1997, 2001).

Infants and children excrete less fluoride from their kidneys and take up to 80% of ingested fluoride into their bones (Ekstrand 1994). The fluoride concentration in bone steadily increases over a lifetime (NRC 2006).

Benefit is topical not systemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 1999, 2001) has now acknowledged that the mechanism of fluoride’s benefits are mainly topical, not systemic.

There is no need whatsoever, therefore, to swallow fluoride to protect teeth. Since the purported benefit of fluoride is topical, and the risks are systemic, it makes more sense to deliver the fluoride directly to the tooth in the form of toothpaste.

Since swallowing fluoride is unnecessary, and dangerous, there is no justification for forcing people (against their will) to ingest fluoride through their water supply.

The dose cannot be controlled. Once fluoride is put in the water it is impossible to control the dose each individual receives because people drink different amounts of water. Being able to control the dose a patient receives is critical.

Some people (e.g., manual laborers, athletes, diabetics, and people with kidney disease) drink substantially more water than others.

.............

Fluoride: Highly toxic waste byproduct of "aluminum"


The main fluoride chemical added to water today is hydrofluorosilicic acid an industrial by-product from the phosphate fertilizer industry.

Hydrofluorosilicic acid is what is added to drinking water. It is untreated toxic waste from the phosphate fertilizer industry added to city tap water, and has trace amounts of other toxins in the waste including arsenic and heavy metals. Fluoride is classified as a neurotoxin, just as harmful as lead and aluminum to the human developing brain

Fluoride given to rats has been proven to cause bone cancer, liver cancer, and a host of other physical ailments.

Bill Clinton’s Alleged Former Mistress: ‘Hillary Is A Lesbian'

Hillary Clinton wears leather, talks trash and blows a stop light


Hillary Clinton showed her wild side at an LGBT event at SoHo's Capitale, where the presidential wannabe sported a leather jacket, boasted about her Democratic-leading campaign and ran a red light on her way out.

"Stars" including Rosie O'Donnell, Billie Jean King and former Rep. Barney Frank — celebrating his 76th birthday — were all in the house as Hill went on a roll.

.............
Sally Miller was told by Bill Clinton about his "wife"

Miller, who is about to release a tell-all memoir, entitled “The Beauty Queen: Let No Deed Go Unpublished” of her and Bill Clinton’s relationship said, “I take [Bill Clinton] at his word and he told me [Hillary] liked females more than men. She was the child of a more progressive community.”

Former Miss Arkansas and Bill Clinton’s alleged former mistress Sally Miller claims, “Hillary is a lesbian.

...................

(I have noticed she smiles a lot more at these type of "events". I think she feels more relaxed and at home with whom she has bonded. Its obvious she identifies with them and supports them. She is one of them. Hillary is on home turf speaking to her own.)

The Radon Business Is A Scam

 

streamzones.com

 
 

The radon business is a scam

It's put out by the same folks who are selling us man-made global warming scam; WHO, the EPA, the NIH, all of whose best interests it serves to create crises so they can get money to keep "studying" the problem.

EPA's magical 4 picocuries/cubic liter threshold is arbitrary. There have never been tests of the effects of varying amounts of radon in a home setting. The only tests come from mine shafts in Pennsylvania where miners developed cancers, and where radon was among 25 or so radioactive elements present The results pf these findings were extrapolated to homes. In other words, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SINGLE VERIFIABLE CASE WHERE RADON IN A HOME WAS LINKED TO AN OCCURRENCE OF CANCER. Even the EPA has admitted it.

From a 1994 EPA report: "Facts Concerning Environmental Radon"
"To date the EPA has had little success in stimulating home owners to measure levels in their homes which would be the first step in the process of deciding on a course of action if a high radon level is found. This is partly because it is difficult to get people concerned that their home, a place that one looks to for security, is a potential source of hidden danger. Also, it has not yet been possible to generate convincing data on increased risk at or below 4-8 pCi/liter"

What? No evidence of increased risk in the 4-8 range? Yet the EPA recommends action on any reading above 4? And all the radon companies are making $800 to $2000 setting up bogus vent systems for this number pulled out of thin air? And all the realtors, like sheep, fall into line?

Finally, two most widespread claims about radon all come from one source, the EPA:

1) Radon is the second-leading cause of lung cancer
2) 21,000 people die of lung cancer each year due to radon.

The rub here is that these two statements, long considered gospel, FAIL TO SEPARATE SMOKERS VS. NONSMOKERS. Furthermore, the numbers used are on the HIGH END of the actual findings which said 3,000 to 32,000. Ergo, it is IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE EITHER CLAIM ABOVE without pulling numbers out of thin air.

ERGO, THERE IS NO WAY TO TELL WHETHER RADON OR SMOKING CAUSED CANCER IN THE ABOVE CASES.

Below is the sole source for these two claims which have been repeated thousands of times, so much, in fact, that they are considered gospel. It is from the public summary of the EPA report, "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation".

Note: "EVER-SMOKERS' is defined as ANYONE WHO IS SMOKING OR HAS EVER SMOKED.


"The BEIR VI committee's preferred central estimates... are that about 1 in 10 or 1 in 7 of all lung cancer deaths-amounting to ... about 15,400 to 21,800 per year in the United States- can be attributed to radon among ever-smokers and never-smokers together."
"The number of radon-related lung cancer deaths resulting from (our analysis) could be as low as 3000 or as high as 32,000. Most of the radon-related lung cancers occur among ever-smokers, and because of the synergism between smoking and radon, many of the cancers in ever-smokers could be prevented by either tobacco control or reduction of radon exposure."

So...."15,400 to 21,800 per year in the United States- can be attributed to radon among ever-smokers and never-smokers together".....So how can they arrive at the claim that "21,000 people die in America from radon each year? It's a bogus lie.

And from that lie sprang the industry of radon mitigation for residential homes that we are all paying for.

When you think about it, anybody with an IQ over 75 would question the idea of paying a thousand bucks to "cure" a problem you can't see or smell; a problem nobody has ever noticed or observed negative results from; a problem that apparently didn't even exist until 1984.

The radon business scam is similar to "dark matter" or "dark energy" scam in that neither has been observed or actually seen.

.........................................................................................

Sleeping radon hoax from early 90s reawakened in 2002

Regulators capitalizing on nation's 9-11-induced fear of unseen enemies -- regardless of facts or science

Two years ago Tom Macy produced a research paper showing science discredits the radon scare as a hoax. We believed then that radon was used as a cover for strict building codes requiring homes and buildings to be airtight and energy efficient -- causing people to get sick from breathing fumes emanating from synthetic carpet fibers, paints, floor finishes and solvents.

However, Macy's research was not timely two years ago as the dominant media had put the issue to bed -- until January 16, 2002. “CdA, Spokane radon levels highest in region” was the headline attached to a story by Spokesman-Review staff writer Susan Drumheller. As an odorless and invisible gas by-product of the decomposition of uranium in soil, “experts” claim that radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the nation. Drumheller's article appears to be a vehicle to rekindle public hysteria over the unseen radon enemy so Kootenai county officials will be supported in their efforts to implement a regulatory scheme protecting the public from a problem that doesn't exist.

By Tom Macy

Prior to the 1850s, scientific endeavors were marred by the lack of a specified set of procedures for conducting inquiries. In many (if not most) cases, it was common to find mere opinions being passed off as facts and unsupported speculations being heralded as profound discoveries.

The “Scientific Method”, as the accepted procedure came to be called, consists of the following steps: 1) Problem identification; 2) data collection; 3) formulation of hypothesis; 4) empirically testing the hypothesis and; 5) publishing the results for peer review.

By adhering to this rather rigid framework, it became possible to limit the amount of erroneous data that was collected and to coordinate the work of researchers on a worldwide basis. Unfortunately, it appears that research into the radon issue has not followed this model.

Before about 1970, radon was regarded as something of a laboratory curiosity and was used mainly for therapeutic purposes. One textbook refers to it as “nasty stuff” and it was generally regarded to be a health hazard for workers in laboratories and hospitals where it was in use. Up to that point it appears that very little analytical work had been done with it because of the difficulties encountered in its handling.

Sometime in the early 1970s a serious problem was reportedly noticed at a uranium mine in Europe. It seems that the miners were contracting lung cancer at a rate 50 times higher than normal. A study of some sort was apparently conducted and it was concluded that the cancer was being caused by radon.

No information appears to be available regarding the location of the mine, who may have conducted the study, or what methods were employed in arriving at the conclusion presented. What is obvious, however, is that this was the beginning of the worldwide indictment of radon as a public health hazard. Many of the reports that have been published regarding the radon hazard nebulously refer to the “European uranium mine.”

Subsequent studies were conducted in the U.S. and involved coal miners in Pennsylvania. It has been reported that the data and conclusions originating from the uranium mine study were supported by the coal mine results. Again, the studies themselves have been impossible to locate and no data from them appears in the reports that are available. There is also a complete lack of information about who made such studies or which mines were involved.

A review of the material that is readily available to the consumer has illuminated one very important fact. There is absolutely no mention made of any qualitative or quantitative analytical techniques that might have been used to identify the radon that is supposedly present in homes all across America and around the world. The only measurements that are ever identified are those that detect the presence of radioactivity.

If radon were the only radioactive element in the universe, simply checking for the presence of radioactivity would be sufficient. But there are literally hundreds of radiation sources, both natural and man-made. The purpose of this paper is to point out the futility of trying to sort out which element is responsible when we live in a veritable stew of low-level radioactive sources. We eat, drink, breathe, bathe in and eliminate dozens of such materials every day.

The only reason that the radon story has retained any credibility at all is because its promoters, including the EPA and other government agencies, can depend upon the general public's ignorance of the science involved. The only way that anyone can begin to unscramble the misinformation is by understanding the problem. In order to accomplish that, radon and all of its relatives should be studied along with some of the ideas on how they interact with the rest of the world.

The following information was taken from the prestigious CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; 68th edition:

1. Radon is but one of 14 radioactive elements that are created as Uranium 238 disintegrates to become Lead 206

2. The half-life for the whole 14-step process is 4.5 billion years -- it takes 10 half-lives for 99.9 percent of the radioactive material to decay

3. The half-life for radon is 3.8 days -- 99.9 percent of the radon in any given sample will be gone in 38 days

4. It takes seven tons of uranium ore to produce 1 gram of radium (radium is radon's parent)

5. One gram of radium will emanate 0.0001 ml. (1 ten-millionth of a liter) of radon per day

6. One square mile of soil six inches deep contains approx. 1 gram of radium

7. Radium emits alpha and beta particles as well as gamma rays.

8. Radon emits alpha particles only

The following information has been derived from a variety of physics, chemistry and geology textbooks:

1. Geologists use a process called “radiometric dating” in order to establish the age of rocks

2. In this process, the amount of Uranium 238 is compared to the amount of Lead 206

3. Since the 14-step decay process takes a known amount of time for the uranium to disintegrate to Lead 206, younger rocks will have more uranium while older rocks will have more lead

4. This process PRESUMES that the entire decay process takes place within the rock and that NONE OF THE DECAY PRODUCTS (INCLUDING RADON) is able to escape.

( Note: It is possible that a small amount of radon is able to leave the rock matrix if it is formed very near the surface of the rock or if the rock is very finely pulverized. If a significant amount were to routinely escape, the uranium dating method would be useless.)

The above information leads to the following inescapable conclusions: Under laboratory conditions, extremely small amounts of radon are produced and collected (It is not likely that these results are indicative of what occurs in the field because the laboratory sample is pure, refined radium while the field variety is trapped in rock matrices and widely distributed throughout non-uniform conditions).

If the entire daily production from one gram of radium were uniformly distributed over an area one-mile square and 8 to 10 feet high, the amount per unit of air would be extraordinarily small. Since most of the radon produced in rocks and soils is likely to stay there to become Lead 206, the amount available for distribution is so small that it approximates zero.

On the other hand, data obtained from Radium in natural sources in an article titled “Radioactivity in Nature” under the heading “Food” it is discovered that Brazil Nuts contain from 1,000 to 7000 pico curies per kilogram (pCi/kg) or 2.2 lbs.* There are approximately 120 nuts in a kilogram so each nut contains from 8.33 to 58.33 pCi of radium. Compare this to the 4 pCi/liter safety limit established by the EPA for radon in room air. Radium is far more dangerous because will replace calcium in bone structures and irradiate the marrow -- a known cause of leukemia.

(Did ya get that? If ya got about 2 pounds of brazil nuts you could have up to 14 times the safe level of radon the EPA has established as safe. Just think about that. All it would take is a bag of brazil nuts under your house to cost you about $1200.00 to get rid of a problem that doesn't exit. A scam for sure.) Story reports

But what of the miners?

They really died of lung cancer, we are told.

The most likely explanation for this entire scenario goes something like this:

1. The mining company is negligent in providing the miners with adequate breathing equipment

2. The miners breathe the mining dust containing at least 14 different radioactive elements

3. The miners get sick and die

4. The company seeks a way of avoiding any liability for the problem and hires someone to invent a cover story -- it is very successful; they can hardly be held responsible for something that occurs naturally

5. The story is picked up by the American Tobacco Institute which is looking for an alternate explanation for the causes of lung cancer in smokers

6. The ATI provides funds for research, hoping to avoid liability, as did the mining company

7. The ploy did not work, but misguided researchers confused laboratory data from the research by applying it to field conditions to make it appear that radon is a major health hazard.

8. The radon abatement industry is born!

* A picoCurie is one-trillionth of a Curie, the unit of measure for radioactive material.


Sleeping radon hoax from early 90s reawakened in
2002
.............
.............
Exposure To Low Levels Of Radon Appears To Reduce The Risk Of Lung Cancer, New Study Finds


ScienceDaily (Mar. 26, 2008) — Exposure to levels of radon gas typically found in 90 percent of American homes appears to reduce the risk of developing lung cancer by as much as 60 percent, according to a study published in the March issue of the journal Health Physics. The finding differs significantly from the results of previous case-control studies of the effects of low-level radon exposure, which have detected a slightly elevated lung cancer risk (but without statistical significance) or no risk at all.

The study, undertaken jointly by researchers at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), Fallon Clinic, and Fallon Community Health Plan, is the first to observe a statistically significant hormetic effect of low-level radon exposure. Toxins and other environmental stressors (including radiation) that have a beneficial effect at very low doses are said to exhibit hormesis (scientists believe that the low doses of toxins may stimulate repair mechanisms in cells). Home exposure to radon, a naturally occurring radioactive decay product of radium, has been thought to be the second leading cause of lung cancer, after cigarette smoking. Chemically inert, it can percolate out of the ground into basements.

The study was initiated and managed by Donald F. Nelson, now professor emeritus of physics at WPI, during the 1990s, a time when concern over the link between residential radon exposure and lung cancer was growing. Nelson says the aim was to try to establish what level of radon exposure actually correlated with significant lung cancer risk and to establish a safety zone for home radon levels. “We were certainly not looking for a hormetic effect,” says co-author Joel H. Popkin of Fallon Clinic and St. Vincent Hospital in Worcester. “Indeed, we were stunned when the data pointed to that conclusion in such a strong way.”

In the study, the exposure of 200 individuals with confirmed cases of primary lung cancer to radon was compared to the exposure of 397 carefully matched, randomly selected control subjects. All subjects were 40 years old or older and had lived in their homes for at least 10 years. All of the cases and controls were residents of Worcester County in Massachusetts and were enrolled in the same health maintenance organization, Fallon Community Health Plan.

The results were statistically adjusted for factors known to be correlated with lung cancer risk, including smoking, occupational exposure to carcinogens, and level of education. The adjusted results show that the odds ratios of developing lung cancer fall below one (the no effect level) at radon exposure levels within the range measured in about 90 percent of homes across the United States (0-150 Becquerel per cubic meter of air, or about 0-4 picoCuries per liter). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends that homeowners take remediation actions when household radon exposure levels rise above 4 picoCuries per liter, based on the belief that radon exposure presents a linearly increasing lung cancer risk (a view not supported by the new study in the low-dose region).

In a statistical analysis led by Richard E. Thompson, associate scientist in the department of biostatistics at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, two mathematical techniques were used to compute the odds ratios of developing lung cancer. They each showed a statistically significant lowered lung cancer risk—a reduction of as much as 60 percent–over portions of the 0-150 Becquerel per cubic meter range.

The results of the current study do not fall within the “linear, no threshold” (LNT) model commonly used to analyze radon’s cancer risk (in fact, the current study calls into question the validity of that model). The model starts with cancer risks documented for exposure to high levels of radon (for example, by uranium miners) and extrapolates a considerable distance to risks at low levels (for example, for homeowners). In that model, the odds ratios of developing cancer rise linearly from one, beginning at a radon level of zero. The model has been used by the EPA to derive its estimate that 21,000 cancer deaths annually can be attributed to radon exposure, and also accounts for the common belief that there is no safe level of radon exposure.

Donald Nelson says the differences in the outcomes of this and previous studies may be attributable to key elements of the new study’s design. For example, he noted, care was taken to place radon monitors (for yearlong measurements) in areas of the home where the subjects spent the most wakeful time. Monitors were also place in the subjects’ present and former bedrooms and on any other home level where they spent as little as one hour per week.

The subjects’ exposures were then obtained by weighting the measurements according to the time typically spent near each detector. The results were further adjusted to account for how subjects’ home use changed with changing lifestyle (for example, transitioning from full-time employment to retirement). “Our analysis shows this to be an important improvement over exposure measures used by almost all other studies,” he said.

“It is important to note,” Nelson added, “that these new results do not dispute the lung cancer risk associated with higher levels of radon exposure experienced by uranium miners. Nevertheless, the results represent a dramatic departure from previous results and beliefs. Of course, a single epidemiological study is seldom regarded as definitive, so our results point to the need for new studies using our techniques.”

Nelson also noted that the study revealed a dramatic correlation between level of education and lung cancer risk. Subjects who had at least some college education were found to have only 30 percent of the lung cancer risk of those with less than a high school education. “While education has been found to be an important correlated variable in many health studies,” he said, “this is a particularly striking and statistically significant result, one found after smoking, job exposures, and radon were statistically adjusted for.”
.............
.............
.............
(If this is true, and you be the judge, the radon scam business not only rips you off but increases your risk of lung cancer!!!!)
.............

 

streamzones.com

AnyCalculator.com (Over 100 FREE online calculators.)

ExactWeather.com (Not Exact But Close Enough.)

FineTunedUniverse.com (Atheist evolutionary theories disproven. There are No valid models proving anything except GOD created the heavens and earth in 6 days.)

Paul Harvey - Warning to America

.................................
Paul Harvey Warning To America MP3 2Min 31 Sec

Which political figures fit the mold Paul Harvey was talking about?

Its obvious.

When you vote keep Paul Harvey's advice in mind.
.......................
.......................
.......................

Listen to an episode of the Last Man Out.

Last Man Out MP3 24 Min

(The episode "The Last Man Out" describes in similar fashion the PC "progressive " subversion that has taken effect in America and American schools today.)

case of dorothy k funn
Air Date 12.06.1953 ( December 6, 1953)

Plot A former Communist tells how "The Party" instructs public school teachers to slant American education in favor of the Soviet Union. After her story is dramatized, the teacher herself appears on the program to praise the House Un-American Activities Committee.

...................
Top Cat Bernie Sanders is a communist

Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders,ie "top cat", has been getting away for years with describing himself as a socialist, when in reality he is an outright America-hating communist.
...................

AnyCalculator.com

Hillary Unsecured Classified Emails Detailed exact location and time of Murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens movments.

Hillary Clinton Unsecured Classified Emails Detailed exact location and time of Murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens movments.

Obama and Hillary Clinton both knew al Queda terrorists had planned to attack Benghazi 10 days in advance.

Hillary Clinton and Obama made sure al Qaeda knew the location/movements of Ambassador Stevens including the exact time of a Stevens meeting in Benghazi!


Judicial Watch: Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance.


Hillary Clinton and Obama are Traitors and should be arrested for Treason!

.....................
.....................

Aaron Klein

An email containing the whereabouts and plans of murdered U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens passed through Hillary Clinton’s private server, dispatches released Monday in the final group of messages from Clinton’s emails reveal.

The email was actually first released last May but was contained in Monday’s batch as well, serving as a reminder that numerous emails sent to Clinton’s private address betrayed Stevens’ location while he was stationed in arguably one of the most dangerous zones in the world for an American diplomat.

The email in question was written Sunday, April 10, 2011 by State employee Timmy Davis and sent to the State email addresses of other employees, including Clinton’s then-foreign policy aide, Jacob Sullivan and Clinton’s senior aide.

Abedin forwarded the message to Clinton. At the time, Stevens was the U.S. envoy to the Libyan rebels.

The dispatch read:

The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc). He will monitor the situation to see if it deteriorates further, but no decision has been made on departure. He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure.

The email is one of several giving away Stevens’ location and movements.

A March 27, 2011 email released last year was titled, “Chris Stevens mission.” It divulged: “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage offshore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”

An April 8, 2011 email was forwarded to Clinton revealing the “security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”

An April 22, 2011 email revealed Stevens was on the road: “I want to let you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has been in Benghazi since April 5.”

An April 24, 2011 email has the exact time of a Stevens meeting: “”Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa,but that is some way off.”

..............
..............
..............
Why would anyone in the right mind support and vote for Hillary Clinton knowing she purposely used her private unsecured email server to send beyond top secret emails?

Anyone who supports hillary clinton supports a Traitor to America.
Anyone who supports obama supports a traitor to America.

I don't accept the idea that the majority of hillary clinton and obama supporters are guilty of just sincere ignorance or conscientious stupidity.

I think obama and hillary clinton supporters either don't care what they do or they know both hillary clinton and obama are criminals and support them anyway!

Howdy doody or the wicked witch of the west?

I'll admit I am frustrated with the republican debate spectacle.

John Kasich sounds reasonable but has a milk toast delivery that is not effective enough. This means he will not be able to thwart the wicked witch of the west hillary in a general election.

Ted Cruz sounds more reasonable than Rubio or Trump but unfortunately I don't think he will get the nomination and if he did I also don't think he could defeat the wicked witch of the west hillary in a general election. I would like to see him as Trump's VP pick.

Marco Rubio does sound like a light weight scripted puppet on the howdy doody show. This also means he will not be able to thwart the wicked witch of the west hillary in a general election. Rubio is the fall back on puppet of the GOP establishment

Donald Trump at times sounds and looks like howdy doody. I don't believe Trump thinks like howdy doody because howdy doody doesn't think. I also don't think Trump is a puppet. I do think he is kind of a loose cannon sometimes. He shakes thinks up and at this point we need a government shake up.

I do think the sometimes "loose cannon", "howdy doody" character that has the real ability to lead can defeat the wicked witch hillary. I like the fact he kicks the news media in the butt every time its necessary. I also think Trump can make America great again because the fraud obama has done a good job trying to destroy America through deception.


Bottom line:

I do not wish to watch a "debate" that includes stupid verbal attacks.


It is unsettling and disturbing that the gop choices are not more appealing in a way that they would not portray themselves like puppets on a stage out of control.

The cards have been dealt.

Donald is holding the trump card.

The gop is telling the chamber of commerce types they will play their joker card at the convention to get anyone but Trump nominated.

Whoever gets the nomination could face the black widow hillary but I think we are all expecting another shoe to drop about hillary and her emails envolving criminal prosecution or indictment.

There is another possibility hillary could have a coughing fit and drop out but I don't think so.

I can only hope if Trump gets elected the kind of deals he makes will not be like the republicans have been making with the democrats which always favor the democrats.

If Trump makes deals that keep the status quo in place we will be no better off than we are now and will in fact continue to see America in perilous state.


Trump can lead and make deals.

He has said he will run the country like a business and make it more efficient.

I think he can but I hope the cost of doing business is not to much and the profit his "business" makes will make America great again.


I am picking the low hanging fruit because it ripe and the only current alternative.

America is decaying because the democrates and obama have set in place its eventual downfall.

The choices are not what I had hoped for but I know the alternative, the wicked witch of the west hillary will be another plague on America.


Hillary doesn't have the ability to lead. She only has the limited ability to make screeching speaches that annoy and are an extension of her personality which is very unlikeable.


If Rubio, Cruz or Kasich were her opponents she would only win by default and not because she is qualified to be president.

So who are you going to vote for?

I am voting for "howdy doody" this cycle because if hillary gets in there will not be another presidential election cycle!


Its howdy doody time, its howdy doody time.....

Apple Lawyer Ted Olsen Has A Rotten Core

Apple's lawyer Ted Olsen: Government wants 'limitless' power. (He should know because the 911 phone calls to his wife on flight 77 never happened according to FBI testimony.)



....................

911 Phone Calls From Hijacked Flight 77 Never Happened

....................

Please visit The entire "offical" story of what happened on 911 is based on a LIE! http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/#N_14 This link has the proof there were NEVER any phone calls that connected from flight 77 to Ted Olsen!

Barbera Olsen wife of Ted Olsen NEVER talked to him on a cell phone during flight 77. Ted Olsen LIED as did George Bush about the flight 77 phone calls.

The entire "offical" story of what happened on 911 is based on a LIE! A lie that was told by Ted Olsen the current Apple lawer.

Olsen and bush lied about the box cutters and the phone calls to flight 77 according to the FBI testimony.

United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui, Prosecution Trial Exhibit P200054. This FBI report on phone calls from AA 77 can be viewed more easily in an article by Jim Hoffman.

FBI Detailed Account of Telephone Calls From September 11th Flights

Are you living on borrowed time?

Bible, driver survive after car bursts into flames.

..............................

Several good Samaritans came to the driver's aid, trying to get him out, according to CNN affiliates WMC-TV and WHNT-TV.

When an officer arrived on the scene, he saved the driver.

A Bible was also recovered from the car, apparently unscathed by the fire, despite the car ending up a total loss, in ashes.

One witness posted video on Facebook saying, "I just saw GOD on 385."

Anita Irby wrote, "THE ENTIRE EXPRESSWAY STOPPED and people ran from their cars trying to break the windows and open the doors of this mans car to free him; as they were, the others went up in prayer for God to deliver this man from the fire. None of the flames touched him."

Anita Irby said:

I just saw GOD on 385. I'm always in awh of his wonders but today just blew my mind. This car ran off the road and hit a metal post and burst into flames not to mention the passenger was trapped inside as the car was filled with smoke the flames began to fill the inside. THE ENTIRE EXPRESSWAY STOPPED and people ran from their cars trying to break the windows and open the doors of this mans car to free him, as they were the others went up in prayer for God to deliver this man from the paws of the devil.... Now it appeared our prayers was in vain because he couldn't move and the flames had reach the inside of the truck.But God!!!!!! .....the flames were on the inside but the way my God is set up The Way It Look Like and what it is ,None of the flames touched him and even after the car exploded once All these God blessed people ran back up ...Now the passenger even begged them to just let him die . End of Story he's Alive and well. ...... Jesus thats my God

Anita Irby Facebook Post

.........................

We are all initially living on "borrowed time" from the moment we are born. When you are born again you are then living on eternal time.

Click here to read or listen to the sermon: Living On Borrowed Time

Your parmesan cheese could contain more wood pulp than parmesan!!

Your parmesan cheese could contain more wood pulp than parmesan.

Cellulose = Wood Pulp
........................

www.sciencealert.com


Your parmesan cheese could contain more wood pulp than parmesan, studies suggest.

Several investigations suggest that your favourite hard cheese isn't what you think it is, and it might not even be what it says on the label.

In fact, some grated cheeses sold as "100 percent parmesan" contain no parmesan at all - but they do contain a fair chunk of harmless wood pulp, according to independent analysis.

Parmesan cheese is usually made up of Swiss, mozzarella, and cheddar cheese; plus cellulose, which is made from wood pulp, and stops cheese from clumping.

Before you freak out, cellulose isn't that unusual to find in cheese, and the FDA permits it as a safe additive. But the acceptable industry standard is around 2 to 4 percent - just enough to keep the cheese stable.

So what is parmesan supposed to be? In the 1950s, the FDA established an official definition for parmesan, which stated, among other things, that it couldn't contain more than 32 percent moisture, must have a granular texture, come with a hard and brittle rind, grate readily, and be made from cow's milk.

But to achieve those specifications takes time and money, because parmesan takes months to dry out - for the same amount of milk, producers are able to make a whole lot more softer cheese, such as cheddar and mozzarella.

When parmesan comes in a block, it's pretty hard to fake it, but by substituting some of the pre-grated products with these varieties - and adding a little extra cellulose - manufacturers can save millions.

The problem is that these manufacturers haven't changed the label to reflect this composition, and due to the popularity of parmesan, are claiming that their products are "100 percent parmesan".

Companies are using labels as marketing tools, rather than a way to accurately reflect on what they're selling.

The good news is that no problems have been found with blocks of parmesan so far, so if you want to get what you've paid for, you're better off choosing an entire block and grating it yourself.
...........
...........
...........
(Translation: If you buy,

Essential Everyday 100 percent Grated Parmesan Cheese, from Jewel-Osco, was 8.8 percent cellulose (wood pulp)

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Great Value 100 percent Grated Parmesan Cheese registered 7.8 percent cellulose (wood pulp)

Whole Foods 365 brand didn’t list cellulose as an ingredient on the label, but still tested at 0.3 percent cellulose (wood pulp)

Kraft had 3.8 percent cellulose (wood pulp)

Your getting a mouth full of wood pulp and NO parmesan cheese even though its labeled 100% parmesan cheese.

Remember the government definition of parmesan cheese:


It can't contain more than 32 percent moisture, must have a granular texture, come with a hard and brittle rind, grate readily, and be made from cow's milk.

No more than 32% water, must have a granular texture and be made from cow's milk.

The "parmesan cheese you eat is made from various cheeses but does NOT have to contain ANY real parmesan cheese!!!
.........
.........
.........
(Its like what ole bill clinton said, "It depends on what is is"

The government can define anything and deceive you by defining it by depending on the definition of what is is.

Senators, congressmen, people running for president on a regular basis define their positions in speeches via , "it depends on what is means".

"Is" to them for instance is defining themselves as a conservative or something else but in fact when you READ THEIR DEFINITION of what they really mean it IS NOT what your idea of what their meaning IS.

You may think they are real but in fact your buying a pig in a poke or snake oil from a snake oil salesman.

If the snake oil politician salesman tells you everything you want to hear you tend to want to buy their "product".

Check the label on the snake oil bottle:

Dr Baldwin's Bitters

For the cure of dyspepsia, indigestion, nausea, constipation, loss of appetite, fear, dread, neuralgia, melancholy, insomnia and all pains with the stomach and liver!

These bitters have no equal.

Its the same old story. Politicians are telling you what you want to hear and then selling you a cure all....their election to office.

Then after they are elected you realize you voted for just another fraud and you aches and pains still exist.

If you can find a person to vote for who is not a politician there is a possibility he or she is not a snake oil salesman.

Think about that when you vote.)

StoryReports Comment