Saturday, September 18, 2010
You and I both know that howdy doody has got more sense that barack obama or any of the Liberal democrates in congress
(You and I both know that howdy doody has got more sense that barack obama or any of the Liberal democrates in congress. So even if howdy doody is supported by the tea party patriots it makes more sense than supporting barack obama and his fellow thugs. Its howdy doody time obama!)
It seems Christine O’Donnell is "howdy doody". She was a "created" tv character. Now she is a senate candidate. Obama is a created character. Like I said even howdy doody makes more sense than obama. I would prefer to choose someone other than howdy doody. Which would you pick? Howdy doody or obama? If I could only choose between the two I would pick howdy doody every time. Its howdy doody time, its howdy doody time, its howdy doody time, its howdy doody time boys and girls in the peanut voting gallery.
Story Reports
.......................................................................................
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Every mayor in attendance signed the UN the Green Cities Declaration
ICLEI is a foreign organization on a mission to transform local governments. Each ICLEI mandate, policy and agenda is based on the principle that the collective good is more important than individual rights; this in direct opposition to the principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence.
Public Policy throughout America is implementing the global political‐economic program referred to as Sustainable Development. Most Americans do not know or understand the integrated policy and philosophy of Sustainable Development.
Illegitimate government
Green Cities, Cool Mayors = Red Ink, Dead Culture
At the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on June 5 (World Environment Day), 2005, two documents - the "Green Cities Declaration" and the "Urban Environmental Accords" - were presented. Every mayor in attendance signed them, and because of that, every citizen in America is threatened. The elected officials have signed on (knowingly or not) to the destruction of property rights and the U.S. Constitution, and now individual citizens must arm themselves with the knowledge of the problem, educate their fellow citizens, and take back their cities. With knowledge about Green Cities and Sustainable Development, we are going to be the solution.
At the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on June 5 (World Environment Day), 2005, two documents - the "Green Cities Declaration" and the "Urban Environmental Accords" - were presented. Every mayor in attendance signed them. Because of that, every citizen in America is threatened.
The two documents are part and parcel of the United Nations’ Agenda 21. The first is the declaration that the mayors of all the cities of the United States and the world are going to be the implementers of Agenda 21. The second explains how it will be implemented, closing with the statement “The goal is for cities to pick three actions to adopt each year.”
If the cities achieve the goal of implementing three actions each year from 2005, they will have completed their 21 Actions in the seven years leading up to June 5, 2012, the date of World Environment Day. And what exactly will each city have achieved by then if they have completed each of the 21 Actions set out in the Green Cities/Green Mayors plan?
They will have received 21 green stars. That’s it. Besides being in deep debt and having taken away their citizens’ rights along with their property.
While the website for Green Cities touts cost savings, jobs creation and happy citizens, the reality is just the opposite. Seven areas that comprise three actions each make up the 21 “practical” actions called for in the Accords. The seven areas are energy, waste reduction, urban design, urban nature, transportation, environmental health and water.
Under the Agreement, participating cities commit to take the following actions:
● Strive to meet or beat the Koyoto Protocol targets in their own communities, through actions ranging from anti-sprawl land-use
policies to urban forest restoration projects to public information campaigns. (Read that as stack-em' and pack em' housing,
use of eminent domain to take private property – developed or not – and replace it with tiny surveillance-monitored 'parks' and
greenswards, and indoctrination campaigns at all levels from schools to workplace to media.)
● Urge their state governments, and the federal government, to enact policies and programs to meet or beat the greenhouse gas
emission reduction target suggested for the United States in the Kyoto Protocol – 7% reduction from 1990 levels by 2012.
● Urge the U.S. Congress to pass the bipartisan greenhouse gas reduction legislation, which would establish a national emission
trading system – Waxman-Markey.
Since that meeting in 2005, the total number of U.S. mayors to sign on has passed 900.
But because not every mayor in every city has not yet signed on to Green Cities, local citizens are asked to take charge of the project for their cities and move them forward.
Some mayors have turned down the offer of being a "Cool Mayor." One suggests that the program “appears likely to lose its way and simply redistribute wealth in the state.” Whoa, that mayor can read between the lines.
A columnist in Michigan wrote that, “While some may argue that it is logical to provide this type of funding (the program offers $100,000 ‘catalyst grants’ to big cities while offering small towns matching grants) to larger cities, it is important to remember that past state and local government efforts to stimulate economic growth in larger cities have failed. . . . The governor’s attempts to revitalize Michigan’s economy through the Cool Cities initiative might seem honorable, but it is ironic that the state is handing out hundreds of thousands of dollars in dubious grants at a time when legislators are debating the per-pupil funding for schools, money for higher education and restraining Medicaid benefits. It should shift its focus to providing a secure environment that is open to new business by restructuring the single business tax, rationalizing its regulatory environment and removing other roadblocks to economic development.”1 So at least one person in Michigan sees where this is going.
Calling for cities to increase renewable energy to meet ten percent of the city’s peak electric load within seven years expects a lot from the cities and even more from renewal energy sources. The cities will have to fork out a lot of money to provide that much renewable energy because it is still prohibitively expensive technology. And where are they going to install the equipment needed to produce this energy? On every roof in the city? And in public parks? And on baseball, football and soccer fields? Where do they expect to find the other 100+ acres they will need?
According to Paul Driessen, “Spain increased its installed wind-power capacity to 10% of its total electricity, although actual energy output is 10% to 30% of this, or 1% to 3% of total electricity, because the wind is intermittent and unreliable. “Still, Spain spent $3.7 billion on the program in 2007 alone, King Juan Carlos University economics professor Gabriel Calzada determined. It created 50,000 jobs, mostly installing wind turbines, at $73,000 in annual subsidies per job — and 10,000 of these jobs have already been terminated. Spain's economic problems put the remaining 40,000 jobs at risk. Meanwhile, soaring electricity prices forced other businesses to cut 2.2 jobs for every"green" job created, says Calzada. Spain's unemployment rate is now 17% and rising.2
As to Waste Reduction, the mayors are told to establish a policy to achieve zero waste to landfills and incinerators by 2040. One must assume that the United Nations knows something we don’t -- like the technology to achieve this will be invented in the very near future.
Skipping down to Environmental Health, our mayors are told that every year they must identify one product, chemical, or compound that is used within the city that represents the greatest risk to human health and adopt a law and provide incentives to reduce or eliminate its use. Cities already ban those things that are deleterious to the health of its citizens, so how are they to find things to ban?
The Supreme Court just decided that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Humans breathe out carbon dioxide, in fact breathing produces approximately 2.3 pounds (1 kg) of carbon dioxide per day per person. I guess the cities could begin by banning people to achieve the Environmental Health goal.
And when these cities have banned three products a year for so many years, they will eventually have to start banning good things. In fact, most cities will run out of actual things to ban in the first year. Will they then emulate Anchorage in the '90s when the EPA mandated that all water districts remove a certain percentage of pollutants from their water supply? Because Anchorage’s water was so clean naturally, they had to dump the refuse from fish canneries into the water so they could turn around and remove it in order to comply with the EPA mandate.
So where does all this anti-human nonsense come from? Why would anyone, any mayor, want to afflict their community with destruction of property rights, while reducing energy consumption and simultaneously raising the cost of energy?
At the beginning, I referred to the source of the threat to our way of life, the United Nations’ Agenda 21.
Chapter 5 of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 states:
The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet. These interactive processes affect the use of land, water, air, energy and other resources. Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed, face major environmental problems. The increase in both the number and size of cities calls for greater attention to issues of local government and municipal management. The human dimensions are key elements to consider in this intricate set of relationships and they should be adequately taken into consideration in comprehensive policies for sustainable development.
Population policy should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and development concerns. There is a need to increase awareness of this issue among decision makers at all levels and to provide both better information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.
So we have the “information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.” Agenda 21 mandates all of this and more. They rail against the number and size of our cities while at the same time they are rounding us up from the suburbs and rural areas and cramming us into the cities so the land we now occupy can “go back to its natural state” (read: without human presence debasing its perfection).
Then note the hint at population policy – that the teeming multitudes (us) they have forced into the cities must be culled. But they haven’t directly – yet – told us how the will handle that problem.
And now the mayors are implementing the anti-human, anti-property rights programs called Sustainable Development devised by the United Nations with the assistance of ICLEI and other NGOs (non-governmental organizations).3
One has to wonder if any of the mayors and city legislators truly comprehend what they are seemingly so whole-heartedly endorsing. If they do, they must understand that they are destroying their cities; businesses will close and residents will loose their homes, thus the tax base will dry up. A city cannot survive without the taxes derived from businesses and property owners.
So how will these mayors survive? Do they have buried gold? Or have they thought that far ahead? And do they realize that their positions are to be taken over by non-elected entities connected to the U.N.?
If the mayors do not understand what they have signed onto, if they have stuck their heads in the sand and gone along for the sake of political correctness, they deserve what they get but their constituents do not.
This brings it all down to the lowest common denominator, the citizen. Because the elected officials have signed on (knowingly or not) to the destruction of property rights and the U.S. Constitution, Joe and Jane Doe have to take it upon themselves to correct the situation. They must arm themselves with the knowledge of the problem, educate their fellow citizens, and take back their cities. We are the Joe and Janes. With knowledge about Green Cities and Sustainable Development, we are going to be the solution.
REFERENCE (from the United Nations Urban Environmental Accords
21 Actions to be implemented by Green Cities
Energy: Renewable Energy | Energy Efficiency | Climate Change
Action 1 Adopt and implement a policy to increase the use of renewable energy to meet ten per cent of the city’s peak electrical load within seven years.
Action 2 Adopt and implement a policy to reduce the city’s peak electric load by ten per cent within seven years through energy efficiency, shifting the timing of energy demands, and conservation measures.
Action 3 Adopt a citywide green house gas reduction plan that reduces the jurisdictions emissions by twenty five percent by 2030, and which includes a system for accounting and auditing greenhouse gas emissions.
Waste Reduction: Zero Waste | Manufacturer Responsibility | Consumer Responsibility
Action 4 Establish a policy to achieve zero waste to landfills and incinerators by 2040.
Action 5 Adopt a citywide law that reduces the use of a disposable, toxic or non-renewable product category by at least fifty per cent in seven years.
Action 6 Implemented “user-friendly” recycling and composting programs, with the goal of reducing by twenty per cent per capita solid waste disposal to landfill and incineration in seven years.
Urban Design: Green Building | Urban Planning | Slums
Action 7 Adopt a policy that mandates a green building rating system standard that applies to all new municipal buildings.
Action 8 Adopt urban planning principles that advance higher density, mixed use, walkable, bikeable and disabled-accessible neighborhoods which coordinate land use and transportation with open space systems for recreation and ecological restoration.
Action 9 Adopt a policy or implement a program that creates environmentally beneficial jobs in slums and/or low-income neighborhoods.
Urban Nature: Parks| Habitat Restoration | Wildlife
Action 10 Ensure that there is an accessible park or recreational open space within half-a-kilometer of every city resident by 2015.
Action 11 Conduct an inventory of existing canopy coverage in the city; and then establish a goal based on ecological and community considerations to plant and maintain canopy coverage in not less than fifty per cent of all available sidewalk plating sites.
Action 12 Pass legislation that protects critical habitat corridors and other key habitat characteristics (e.g., water features, food bearing plants, shelter for wildlife, use of native species, etc.) from unsustainable development.
Transportation: Public Transportation | Clean Vehicles | Reducing Congestion
Action 13 Develop and implement a policy which expands affordable public transportation coverage to within half-a-kilometer of all city residents in ten years.
Action 14 Pass a law or implement a program that eliminates leaded gasoline (where it is still used); and that phases down sulfur levels in diesel and gasoline fuels, concurrent with using advanced emission controls on all buses, taxis, and public fleets to reduce particulate matter and smog-forming emissions from those fleets by fifty per cent in seven years.
Action 15 Implement a policy to reduce the percentage of commute trips by single occupancy vehicles by ten per cent in seven years.
Environmental Health: Toxics Reduction | Healthy Food Systems | Clean Air
Action 16 Every year, identify one product, chemicals, or compounds that is used within the city that represents the greatest risk to human health and adopt a law to provide incentives to reduce or eliminate its use by the municipal government.
Action 17 Promote the public health and environmental benefits of supporting organic foods. Ensure that twenty per cent of all city facilities (including schools) serve locally grown and organic food within seven years.
Action 18 Establish an Air Quality Index (AQI) to measure the level of air pollution and set the goal of reducing by ten per cent in seven years the number of days categorized in the AQI range as "unhealthy" to"hazardous."
Water: Water Access & Efficiency | Source Water Conservation | Waste Water Reduction
Action 19 Develop policies to increase adequate access to safe drinking water, aiming at access for all by 2015. For cities with potable water consumption greater than 100 liters per capita per day, adopt and implement policies to reduce consumption by ten per cent by 2015.
Action 20 Protect the ecological integrity of the city’s primary drinking water sources (i.e., aquifers, rivers, lakes, wetlands and associated eco-systems).
Action 21 Adopt municipal wastewater management guidelines and reduce the volume of untreated wastewater discharge by ten per cent in seven years through the expanded use of recycled water and the implementation of sustainable urban watershed planning process that includes participants of all affected communities and is based on sound economic, social, and environmental principles.
At the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on June 5 (World Environment Day), 2005, two documents - the "Green Cities Declaration" and the "Urban Environmental Accords" - were presented. Every mayor in attendance signed them, and because of that, every citizen in America is threatened. The elected officials have signed on (knowingly or not) to the destruction of property rights and the U.S. Constitution, and now individual citizens must arm themselves with the knowledge of the problem, educate their fellow citizens, and take back their cities. With knowledge about Green Cities and Sustainable Development, we are going to be the solution.
"Consensus" meetings have predetermined outcomes. They pretend to garner community input.
Here are some local examples, of 'regional' consensus meetings to implement UN agenda 21 by urging local business to implement the UN plan.
September Coffee & Conversation
Date: September 22, 2010 - September 22, 2010
Coffee & Conversation is a monthly event for Upstate SC Alliance Contributors. Each month the UA brings in experts from across the region/state to share their expertise on a variety of topics.
Euphoria / Fall Consultant Event
Date: September 24, 2010 - September 26, 2010
Now in its 4th year, Euphoria is a weekend festival celebrating food, wine and music. The Upstate SC Alliance will utilize this event as an inbound mission for companies and Centers of Influence. Participation is limited.
Q3 Contributor Networking Event
Date: September 15, 2010 - September 15, 2010
Q3 Contributor Networking Event.
Public Policy throughout America is implementing the global political‐economic program referred to as Sustainable Development. Most Americans do not know or understand the integrated policy and philosophy of Sustainable Development.
Illegitimate government
Green Cities, Cool Mayors = Red Ink, Dead Culture
At the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on June 5 (World Environment Day), 2005, two documents - the "Green Cities Declaration" and the "Urban Environmental Accords" - were presented. Every mayor in attendance signed them, and because of that, every citizen in America is threatened. The elected officials have signed on (knowingly or not) to the destruction of property rights and the U.S. Constitution, and now individual citizens must arm themselves with the knowledge of the problem, educate their fellow citizens, and take back their cities. With knowledge about Green Cities and Sustainable Development, we are going to be the solution.
At the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on June 5 (World Environment Day), 2005, two documents - the "Green Cities Declaration" and the "Urban Environmental Accords" - were presented. Every mayor in attendance signed them. Because of that, every citizen in America is threatened.
The two documents are part and parcel of the United Nations’ Agenda 21. The first is the declaration that the mayors of all the cities of the United States and the world are going to be the implementers of Agenda 21. The second explains how it will be implemented, closing with the statement “The goal is for cities to pick three actions to adopt each year.”
If the cities achieve the goal of implementing three actions each year from 2005, they will have completed their 21 Actions in the seven years leading up to June 5, 2012, the date of World Environment Day. And what exactly will each city have achieved by then if they have completed each of the 21 Actions set out in the Green Cities/Green Mayors plan?
They will have received 21 green stars. That’s it. Besides being in deep debt and having taken away their citizens’ rights along with their property.
While the website for Green Cities touts cost savings, jobs creation and happy citizens, the reality is just the opposite. Seven areas that comprise three actions each make up the 21 “practical” actions called for in the Accords. The seven areas are energy, waste reduction, urban design, urban nature, transportation, environmental health and water.
Under the Agreement, participating cities commit to take the following actions:
● Strive to meet or beat the Koyoto Protocol targets in their own communities, through actions ranging from anti-sprawl land-use
policies to urban forest restoration projects to public information campaigns. (Read that as stack-em' and pack em' housing,
use of eminent domain to take private property – developed or not – and replace it with tiny surveillance-monitored 'parks' and
greenswards, and indoctrination campaigns at all levels from schools to workplace to media.)
● Urge their state governments, and the federal government, to enact policies and programs to meet or beat the greenhouse gas
emission reduction target suggested for the United States in the Kyoto Protocol – 7% reduction from 1990 levels by 2012.
● Urge the U.S. Congress to pass the bipartisan greenhouse gas reduction legislation, which would establish a national emission
trading system – Waxman-Markey.
Since that meeting in 2005, the total number of U.S. mayors to sign on has passed 900.
But because not every mayor in every city has not yet signed on to Green Cities, local citizens are asked to take charge of the project for their cities and move them forward.
Some mayors have turned down the offer of being a "Cool Mayor." One suggests that the program “appears likely to lose its way and simply redistribute wealth in the state.” Whoa, that mayor can read between the lines.
A columnist in Michigan wrote that, “While some may argue that it is logical to provide this type of funding (the program offers $100,000 ‘catalyst grants’ to big cities while offering small towns matching grants) to larger cities, it is important to remember that past state and local government efforts to stimulate economic growth in larger cities have failed. . . . The governor’s attempts to revitalize Michigan’s economy through the Cool Cities initiative might seem honorable, but it is ironic that the state is handing out hundreds of thousands of dollars in dubious grants at a time when legislators are debating the per-pupil funding for schools, money for higher education and restraining Medicaid benefits. It should shift its focus to providing a secure environment that is open to new business by restructuring the single business tax, rationalizing its regulatory environment and removing other roadblocks to economic development.”1 So at least one person in Michigan sees where this is going.
Calling for cities to increase renewable energy to meet ten percent of the city’s peak electric load within seven years expects a lot from the cities and even more from renewal energy sources. The cities will have to fork out a lot of money to provide that much renewable energy because it is still prohibitively expensive technology. And where are they going to install the equipment needed to produce this energy? On every roof in the city? And in public parks? And on baseball, football and soccer fields? Where do they expect to find the other 100+ acres they will need?
According to Paul Driessen, “Spain increased its installed wind-power capacity to 10% of its total electricity, although actual energy output is 10% to 30% of this, or 1% to 3% of total electricity, because the wind is intermittent and unreliable. “Still, Spain spent $3.7 billion on the program in 2007 alone, King Juan Carlos University economics professor Gabriel Calzada determined. It created 50,000 jobs, mostly installing wind turbines, at $73,000 in annual subsidies per job — and 10,000 of these jobs have already been terminated. Spain's economic problems put the remaining 40,000 jobs at risk. Meanwhile, soaring electricity prices forced other businesses to cut 2.2 jobs for every"green" job created, says Calzada. Spain's unemployment rate is now 17% and rising.2
As to Waste Reduction, the mayors are told to establish a policy to achieve zero waste to landfills and incinerators by 2040. One must assume that the United Nations knows something we don’t -- like the technology to achieve this will be invented in the very near future.
Skipping down to Environmental Health, our mayors are told that every year they must identify one product, chemical, or compound that is used within the city that represents the greatest risk to human health and adopt a law and provide incentives to reduce or eliminate its use. Cities already ban those things that are deleterious to the health of its citizens, so how are they to find things to ban?
The Supreme Court just decided that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Humans breathe out carbon dioxide, in fact breathing produces approximately 2.3 pounds (1 kg) of carbon dioxide per day per person. I guess the cities could begin by banning people to achieve the Environmental Health goal.
And when these cities have banned three products a year for so many years, they will eventually have to start banning good things. In fact, most cities will run out of actual things to ban in the first year. Will they then emulate Anchorage in the '90s when the EPA mandated that all water districts remove a certain percentage of pollutants from their water supply? Because Anchorage’s water was so clean naturally, they had to dump the refuse from fish canneries into the water so they could turn around and remove it in order to comply with the EPA mandate.
So where does all this anti-human nonsense come from? Why would anyone, any mayor, want to afflict their community with destruction of property rights, while reducing energy consumption and simultaneously raising the cost of energy?
At the beginning, I referred to the source of the threat to our way of life, the United Nations’ Agenda 21.
Chapter 5 of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 states:
The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet. These interactive processes affect the use of land, water, air, energy and other resources. Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed, face major environmental problems. The increase in both the number and size of cities calls for greater attention to issues of local government and municipal management. The human dimensions are key elements to consider in this intricate set of relationships and they should be adequately taken into consideration in comprehensive policies for sustainable development.
Population policy should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and development concerns. There is a need to increase awareness of this issue among decision makers at all levels and to provide both better information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.
So we have the “information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.” Agenda 21 mandates all of this and more. They rail against the number and size of our cities while at the same time they are rounding us up from the suburbs and rural areas and cramming us into the cities so the land we now occupy can “go back to its natural state” (read: without human presence debasing its perfection).
Then note the hint at population policy – that the teeming multitudes (us) they have forced into the cities must be culled. But they haven’t directly – yet – told us how the will handle that problem.
And now the mayors are implementing the anti-human, anti-property rights programs called Sustainable Development devised by the United Nations with the assistance of ICLEI and other NGOs (non-governmental organizations).3
One has to wonder if any of the mayors and city legislators truly comprehend what they are seemingly so whole-heartedly endorsing. If they do, they must understand that they are destroying their cities; businesses will close and residents will loose their homes, thus the tax base will dry up. A city cannot survive without the taxes derived from businesses and property owners.
So how will these mayors survive? Do they have buried gold? Or have they thought that far ahead? And do they realize that their positions are to be taken over by non-elected entities connected to the U.N.?
If the mayors do not understand what they have signed onto, if they have stuck their heads in the sand and gone along for the sake of political correctness, they deserve what they get but their constituents do not.
This brings it all down to the lowest common denominator, the citizen. Because the elected officials have signed on (knowingly or not) to the destruction of property rights and the U.S. Constitution, Joe and Jane Doe have to take it upon themselves to correct the situation. They must arm themselves with the knowledge of the problem, educate their fellow citizens, and take back their cities. We are the Joe and Janes. With knowledge about Green Cities and Sustainable Development, we are going to be the solution.
REFERENCE (from the United Nations Urban Environmental Accords
21 Actions to be implemented by Green Cities
Energy: Renewable Energy | Energy Efficiency | Climate Change
Action 1 Adopt and implement a policy to increase the use of renewable energy to meet ten per cent of the city’s peak electrical load within seven years.
Action 2 Adopt and implement a policy to reduce the city’s peak electric load by ten per cent within seven years through energy efficiency, shifting the timing of energy demands, and conservation measures.
Action 3 Adopt a citywide green house gas reduction plan that reduces the jurisdictions emissions by twenty five percent by 2030, and which includes a system for accounting and auditing greenhouse gas emissions.
Waste Reduction: Zero Waste | Manufacturer Responsibility | Consumer Responsibility
Action 4 Establish a policy to achieve zero waste to landfills and incinerators by 2040.
Action 5 Adopt a citywide law that reduces the use of a disposable, toxic or non-renewable product category by at least fifty per cent in seven years.
Action 6 Implemented “user-friendly” recycling and composting programs, with the goal of reducing by twenty per cent per capita solid waste disposal to landfill and incineration in seven years.
Urban Design: Green Building | Urban Planning | Slums
Action 7 Adopt a policy that mandates a green building rating system standard that applies to all new municipal buildings.
Action 8 Adopt urban planning principles that advance higher density, mixed use, walkable, bikeable and disabled-accessible neighborhoods which coordinate land use and transportation with open space systems for recreation and ecological restoration.
Action 9 Adopt a policy or implement a program that creates environmentally beneficial jobs in slums and/or low-income neighborhoods.
Urban Nature: Parks| Habitat Restoration | Wildlife
Action 10 Ensure that there is an accessible park or recreational open space within half-a-kilometer of every city resident by 2015.
Action 11 Conduct an inventory of existing canopy coverage in the city; and then establish a goal based on ecological and community considerations to plant and maintain canopy coverage in not less than fifty per cent of all available sidewalk plating sites.
Action 12 Pass legislation that protects critical habitat corridors and other key habitat characteristics (e.g., water features, food bearing plants, shelter for wildlife, use of native species, etc.) from unsustainable development.
Transportation: Public Transportation | Clean Vehicles | Reducing Congestion
Action 13 Develop and implement a policy which expands affordable public transportation coverage to within half-a-kilometer of all city residents in ten years.
Action 14 Pass a law or implement a program that eliminates leaded gasoline (where it is still used); and that phases down sulfur levels in diesel and gasoline fuels, concurrent with using advanced emission controls on all buses, taxis, and public fleets to reduce particulate matter and smog-forming emissions from those fleets by fifty per cent in seven years.
Action 15 Implement a policy to reduce the percentage of commute trips by single occupancy vehicles by ten per cent in seven years.
Environmental Health: Toxics Reduction | Healthy Food Systems | Clean Air
Action 16 Every year, identify one product, chemicals, or compounds that is used within the city that represents the greatest risk to human health and adopt a law to provide incentives to reduce or eliminate its use by the municipal government.
Action 17 Promote the public health and environmental benefits of supporting organic foods. Ensure that twenty per cent of all city facilities (including schools) serve locally grown and organic food within seven years.
Action 18 Establish an Air Quality Index (AQI) to measure the level of air pollution and set the goal of reducing by ten per cent in seven years the number of days categorized in the AQI range as "unhealthy" to"hazardous."
Water: Water Access & Efficiency | Source Water Conservation | Waste Water Reduction
Action 19 Develop policies to increase adequate access to safe drinking water, aiming at access for all by 2015. For cities with potable water consumption greater than 100 liters per capita per day, adopt and implement policies to reduce consumption by ten per cent by 2015.
Action 20 Protect the ecological integrity of the city’s primary drinking water sources (i.e., aquifers, rivers, lakes, wetlands and associated eco-systems).
Action 21 Adopt municipal wastewater management guidelines and reduce the volume of untreated wastewater discharge by ten per cent in seven years through the expanded use of recycled water and the implementation of sustainable urban watershed planning process that includes participants of all affected communities and is based on sound economic, social, and environmental principles.
At the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on June 5 (World Environment Day), 2005, two documents - the "Green Cities Declaration" and the "Urban Environmental Accords" - were presented. Every mayor in attendance signed them, and because of that, every citizen in America is threatened. The elected officials have signed on (knowingly or not) to the destruction of property rights and the U.S. Constitution, and now individual citizens must arm themselves with the knowledge of the problem, educate their fellow citizens, and take back their cities. With knowledge about Green Cities and Sustainable Development, we are going to be the solution.
"Consensus" meetings have predetermined outcomes. They pretend to garner community input.
Here are some local examples, of 'regional' consensus meetings to implement UN agenda 21 by urging local business to implement the UN plan.
September Coffee & Conversation
Date: September 22, 2010 - September 22, 2010
Coffee & Conversation is a monthly event for Upstate SC Alliance Contributors. Each month the UA brings in experts from across the region/state to share their expertise on a variety of topics.
Euphoria / Fall Consultant Event
Date: September 24, 2010 - September 26, 2010
Now in its 4th year, Euphoria is a weekend festival celebrating food, wine and music. The Upstate SC Alliance will utilize this event as an inbound mission for companies and Centers of Influence. Participation is limited.
Q3 Contributor Networking Event
Date: September 15, 2010 - September 15, 2010
Q3 Contributor Networking Event.
Every one of the 30 lawmakers who voted against "obamacare" and is seeking another term won re-nomination
There isn’t any such thing as an Anti Obama-Care Democrat. There are only Liars and Thieves. The thieving liars won their primaries tuesday. There are those smart enough to lie about being “anti” in order to try and get re-elected. These will suddenly see the light following November’s wins for the Dems and return to the Obama-coven and again take up their support for the IMPOSTER obama.
Every one of the 30 lawmakers who voted against "obamacare" and is seeking another term won re-nomination.
After 34 House Democrats voted against the health care bill in March, liberal groups and their allies in the labor movement vowed to exact revenge.
The threats ranged from crippling primary election challenges to a withdrawal of support for some of the offending lawmakers. In a few cases, activists even went so far as to say they would run third-party candidates against the Democrats in November.
But five months later, the group of 34 has emerged from primary season not much worse for the wear. Every one of the 30 lawmakers who voted against the health care bill and is seeking another term won re-nomination.
The last of the group to be tested, Massachusetts Rep. Stephen Lynch, won his primary Tuesday, dispatching former Service Employees International Union Regional Political Director Mac D’Alessandro.
“The last man standing — the last primary challenger to a Democrat who voted against the health care bill,” is how D’Alessandro labeled himself in a recent post on the liberal Daily Kos website.
What a perfect Democrat standard-bearer. A SEIU thug who is also a Daily Kos writer.
While they may have dodged a bullet during primary season, it’s not entirely clear what effect the no votes will have in November. Some of Democrats still must confront residual resentment from party activists whose support will be critical to their political survival on Election Day.
(A democrate that votes against obama is still a democrate. A anti obama vote is commendable. A egg sucking Liberal democrate dog that votes against obama is still an egg sucking democrate Liberal Dog! Even a Liberal democrate dog can learn a new trick.) Story Reports
The 911 phone calls from the hijacked plane were never made according to the FBI
UPDATE: some of the links below have changed or been hidden in an attempt to hide the truth.
Please visit http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/#N_14 This link has the proof there were NEVER any phone calls that connected from flight 77 to Ted Olsen!
Barbera Olsen wife of Ted Olsen NEVER talked to him on a cell phone during flight 77. Ted Olsen LIED as did George Bush about the flight 77 phone calls.
The entire "offical" story of what happened on 911 is based on a LIE!
(The smell test has been done on some of the information below and the test indicates the facts propagated in the state run media stink. The 911 phone calls were never made according to the FBI. The FBI has changed its story about the 911 phone calls several times. All the information about box cutters etc was made up. This along with the fact the airspace over New York City and Washington, DC was intentionally left unprotected by the military agency tasked to protect it is big big evidence 911 was a setup.) Story Reports
September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack on America
The airspace over New York City and Washington, DC was intentionally left unprotected by the military agency tasked to protect it. That group is the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).
U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson Lied about 9/11: FBI Now Admits his Wife Couldn’t Have Called Him from Hijacked Plane
(If this is true it would be big big evidence to me that the 911 attack in New York and Washington was a setup. I do know that ted olson lied about his wife making phone calls to him on 911. The FBI admits this.
The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10,” “9/11 Commission, FBI Source Documents, Chronological, September 11,” 2001Intelfiles.com, March 14, 2008
the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred
And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.)
Olson’s Story Also Rejected by Pentagon Historians
Ted Olson’s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.
According to Olson, his wife had said that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers.”
This is an inherently implausible scenario. We are supposed to believe that 60-some people, including the two pilots, were held at bay by three or four men (one or two of the hijackers would have been in the cockpit) with knives and boxcutters. This scenario becomes even more absurd when we realize that the alleged hijackers were all small, unathletic men (the 9/11 Commission pointed out that even “(t)he so-called muscle hijackers actually were not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5” and 5’7” in height and slender in build”., and that the pilot, Charles “Chic” Burlingame, was a weightlifter and a boxer, who was described as “really tough” by one of his erstwhile opponents.[14. Shoestring, “The Flight 77 Murder Mystery: Who Really Killed Charles Burlingame?” Shoestring911, February 2, 2008
The Flight 77 Murder Mystery: Who Really Killed Charles Burlingame?
Also, the idea that Burlingame would have turned over the plane to hijackers was rejected by his brother, who said: “I don’t know what happened in that cockpit, but I’m sure that they would have had to incapacitate him or kill him because he would have done anything to prevent the kind of tragedy that befell that airplane.”
The Pentagon historians, in any case, did not accept the Olson story, according to which Burlingame and his co-pilot did give up their plane and were in the back with the passengers and other crew members. They instead wrote that “the attackers either incapacitated or murdered the two pilots.”
Conclusion
This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?
The fact that Ted Olson’s report has been contradicted by other defenders of the official story about 9/11 provides grounds for demanding a new investigation of 9/11. This internal contradiction is, moreover, only one of 25 such contradictions discussed in my most recent book, 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press.
(I agree the cell phone calls on 911 that never occurred point to a government deception. The police state "homeland security" laws were a result of 911. The information about what occurred on 911 has been disputed by the FBI.) Story Reports
U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson Lied about 9/11: FBI Now Admits his Wife Couldn’t Have Called Him from Hijacked Plane
Sunday, September 12, 2010
The highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany
UN Agenda 21 - Coming to a Neighborhood near You
The highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany
Just as America is passing through a period of economic stress, the Nazis in the 1930s sought to tap into the German psyche and a “return to nature” myth was seen as a unifying measure. The same regime that would later create the means to systematically kill Europe’s Jews shared a lot in common with any number of present-day environmentalist leaders and academics.
.......................................................................................
Nazi Dreams were Green Dreams
Alan Caruba
In a week when Jews will celebrate Rosh Hashanah, the New Year–5771, the connection between the Nazi’s rebellion against the Judeo-Christian worldview and the present-day ideology that drives the environmental movement needs to be exposed.
Anti-Semitism is on the rise in Europe and elsewhere around the world, driven in part by the Islamic hatred of Jews, but also reflected in the liberal antipathy to corporations and the financial community, often portrayed as “Jewish bankers”, as history’s favorite scapegoat for economic problems. The situation mirrors Germany in the 1930s.
Few know of the connection, but it is spelled out in “Nazi Oaks” by R. Mark Musser ($12.75, Advantage Books, softcover, via Amazon.com). Thanks to his research we learn that “the highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany. By 1935, the Third Reich was the greenest regime on the planet.”
“It is no coincidence that sweeping Nazi environmental legislation preceded the racially charged anti-Semitic Nuremburg Laws.”
In the decades during which I have seen the rise of the environmental movement in America I have also seen its inherent totalitarian drive to not merely alter society, but to completely control the lives of all Americans. It is fundamentally an attack on the American credo of individual freedom and it has become commonplace to suggest that environmentalism has become a pseudo-religion.
Mark Musser is a 1989 graduate from the Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, widely regarded as one of the premier environmental institutions in the nation. In 1994, he received a Master of Divinity from Western Seminary in Portland and, for seven years, was a missionary in Belarus and the Ukraine. He is currently a pastor.
The history spelled out in Musser’s book needs to be understood in terms of what is occurring in America today. The title of the book comes from the fact that, “With the oak tree being such a powerful symbol of German nationalism and the German natural landscape, Hitler had oaks planted all over the Reich in hundreds of towns and villages.” The practice was dubbed by Nazi environmentalists as “concordant with the spirit of the Fuhrer.”
Just as America is passing through a period of economic stress, the Nazis in the 1930s sought to tap into the German psyche and a “return to nature” myth was seen as a unifying measure. The same regime that would later create the means to systematically kill Europe’s Jews shared a lot in common with any number of present-day environmentalist leaders and academics.
Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics at Princeton University, is on record saying, “Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.”
Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the United Nations Environmental Program, said, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our duty to bring that about?” When you contemplate the many measures taken by the U.S. government against the mining of coal, the drilling for oil, and even the shutdown of a nuclear waste repository, is it not obvious that denying America the energy it requires is one way to destroy its economy?
In one chilling way in particular, the hatred of the human race, does the environmental movement reflect the Nazi’s merciless destruction, not only of Jews, but of millions of others consigned to its concentration camps and the relentless killing wherever they sought conquest.
This is why the Club of Rome could say, “The earth has a cancer and the cancer is Man.” How does this differ from Hitler’s many expressions of hatred for Jews and others, Africans and Asians that he deemed to be “sub-human”?
This is the naked face of environmentalism.
Remember, too, this did not happen a long time ago. The “greatest generation”, some of whom still live, fought the Nazi regime a scant seventy years ago.
President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic warns that “it should be clear by now to everyone that environmental activism is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a ‘noble’ idea.”
Couple that with a torrent of falsified “science” and you have the modern environmental movement.
The single greatest threat to freedom in America is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s current efforts to acquire the authority to regulate a gas that is responsible along with oxygen for all life on Earth, carbon dioxide (CO2).
If the EPA gets that control, it will be able to determine every aspect of life in America because it is the use of electricity, industrial and all other machine-based technology that generates carbon dioxide.
And it is the Big Lie that CO2 is causing global warming that is being used to justify the agency’s quest. There is no global warming. The Earth is in a natural cooling cycle.
The Nazi regime was made up of animal rights advocates, environmentalists, and vegetarians, of which Hitler was all three.
And it led ultimately to mass murder.
The highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany
Just as America is passing through a period of economic stress, the Nazis in the 1930s sought to tap into the German psyche and a “return to nature” myth was seen as a unifying measure. The same regime that would later create the means to systematically kill Europe’s Jews shared a lot in common with any number of present-day environmentalist leaders and academics.
.......................................................................................
Nazi Dreams were Green Dreams
Alan Caruba
In a week when Jews will celebrate Rosh Hashanah, the New Year–5771, the connection between the Nazi’s rebellion against the Judeo-Christian worldview and the present-day ideology that drives the environmental movement needs to be exposed.
Anti-Semitism is on the rise in Europe and elsewhere around the world, driven in part by the Islamic hatred of Jews, but also reflected in the liberal antipathy to corporations and the financial community, often portrayed as “Jewish bankers”, as history’s favorite scapegoat for economic problems. The situation mirrors Germany in the 1930s.
Few know of the connection, but it is spelled out in “Nazi Oaks” by R. Mark Musser ($12.75, Advantage Books, softcover, via Amazon.com). Thanks to his research we learn that “the highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany. By 1935, the Third Reich was the greenest regime on the planet.”
“It is no coincidence that sweeping Nazi environmental legislation preceded the racially charged anti-Semitic Nuremburg Laws.”
In the decades during which I have seen the rise of the environmental movement in America I have also seen its inherent totalitarian drive to not merely alter society, but to completely control the lives of all Americans. It is fundamentally an attack on the American credo of individual freedom and it has become commonplace to suggest that environmentalism has become a pseudo-religion.
Mark Musser is a 1989 graduate from the Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, widely regarded as one of the premier environmental institutions in the nation. In 1994, he received a Master of Divinity from Western Seminary in Portland and, for seven years, was a missionary in Belarus and the Ukraine. He is currently a pastor.
The history spelled out in Musser’s book needs to be understood in terms of what is occurring in America today. The title of the book comes from the fact that, “With the oak tree being such a powerful symbol of German nationalism and the German natural landscape, Hitler had oaks planted all over the Reich in hundreds of towns and villages.” The practice was dubbed by Nazi environmentalists as “concordant with the spirit of the Fuhrer.”
Just as America is passing through a period of economic stress, the Nazis in the 1930s sought to tap into the German psyche and a “return to nature” myth was seen as a unifying measure. The same regime that would later create the means to systematically kill Europe’s Jews shared a lot in common with any number of present-day environmentalist leaders and academics.
Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics at Princeton University, is on record saying, “Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.”
Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the United Nations Environmental Program, said, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our duty to bring that about?” When you contemplate the many measures taken by the U.S. government against the mining of coal, the drilling for oil, and even the shutdown of a nuclear waste repository, is it not obvious that denying America the energy it requires is one way to destroy its economy?
In one chilling way in particular, the hatred of the human race, does the environmental movement reflect the Nazi’s merciless destruction, not only of Jews, but of millions of others consigned to its concentration camps and the relentless killing wherever they sought conquest.
This is why the Club of Rome could say, “The earth has a cancer and the cancer is Man.” How does this differ from Hitler’s many expressions of hatred for Jews and others, Africans and Asians that he deemed to be “sub-human”?
This is the naked face of environmentalism.
Remember, too, this did not happen a long time ago. The “greatest generation”, some of whom still live, fought the Nazi regime a scant seventy years ago.
President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic warns that “it should be clear by now to everyone that environmental activism is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a ‘noble’ idea.”
Couple that with a torrent of falsified “science” and you have the modern environmental movement.
The single greatest threat to freedom in America is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s current efforts to acquire the authority to regulate a gas that is responsible along with oxygen for all life on Earth, carbon dioxide (CO2).
If the EPA gets that control, it will be able to determine every aspect of life in America because it is the use of electricity, industrial and all other machine-based technology that generates carbon dioxide.
And it is the Big Lie that CO2 is causing global warming that is being used to justify the agency’s quest. There is no global warming. The Earth is in a natural cooling cycle.
The Nazi regime was made up of animal rights advocates, environmentalists, and vegetarians, of which Hitler was all three.
And it led ultimately to mass murder.
Friday, September 10, 2010
2nd Largest Shareholder Of Fox News Is Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal
(Fox News Is only as fair and balanced as its 2nd largest shareholder will let them be. Don't believe everything fox news tells you. Check out the new major stockholder of fox a muslim saudi prince.) Story Reports
Saudi Prince, Now Part Owner of Murdoch's News Corp., Influences Fox News
Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal now owns a 7 percent stake in Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., the parent company of Fox News, making him the company's largest shareholder outside of Murdoch's own family. Alwaleed is best known for going to Ground Zero after the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks and personally handing then-mayor Rudolph Giuliani a check for $10 million to help finance relief efforts. Afterwards, Alwaleed released a statement blaming the attacks not on the Saudi airline hijackers, but on U.S. policies in the middle east.
As a result, Giuliani returned the prince's donation, gaining him praise from Fox News for doing so. Now that Alwaleed has a controlling ownership in News Corp., he is gaining influence over Fox News. In 2005, just months after Alwaleed acquired his first 5.4 percent stake in News Corp., Fox News covered riots in Paris under a banner saying "Muslim riots." Alwaleed allegedly called Murdoch and had him change the banner to say "Civil riots." Investigative journalist Joseph Trento also reported that a comment he recently made on a Fox Network morning news show, Fox and Friends, about Saudi Arabian money still financing Al Qaeda, was edited out of the show.
Trento also reports that Alwaleed "has personally donated huge amounts of money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers." In a rare interview with Fox News' Neil Cavuto in January, AlWaleed explained his personal reasons for seeking influence in American politics: the U.S. buys Saudi Arabia's oil, and the bulk of his country's gross domestic product (GDP) comes from oil. Fox News reliably broadcasts misinformation on clean energy, and aggressively fights efforts to move America away from being dependent on a fossil fuels.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Jobless claims data is officially made up by US government and 2 states
Jobless claims data is officially made up by US government and 2 states, California and Virginia estimated themselves. The U.S. government estimated the other seven States.
The continuing claims figure does not include the number of Americans receiving extended benefits under federal programs.
For the latest reporting week, nine states didn’t file claims data to the Labor Department in Washington because of the federal holiday earlier this week, a Labor Department official told reporters. As a result, California and Virginia estimated their figures and the U.S. government estimated the other seven, the official said.
("Jobless Claims in U.S. Decreased 27,000 to 451,000 Last Week", is a total fabrication just like obama's US citizenship. Obama the IMPOSTER estimated 7 states jobless claims and California and Virgina estimated their own. The "estimation" resulted in a net decrease of 27,000 jobless claims. I heard a local news program report the jobless claims information as UNEXPECTED!. The local talk radio news guy just read the propaganda state run media script and NEVER mentioned the fact that 5.6% or 27,000 of the jobless claims were totally made up.
Many people believe the state run media propaganda and just accept it as fact. Obama wants people to believe the economy is getting better so he just makes numbers up. Its the same type of invalid documentation obama makes up when asking you and I to believe he is a valid legitimate US citizen.
Obama believes he can just make up numbers etc an you will believe it all.
Obama can't estimate the impact tea party patriots will have on his illegitimate presidency.
Obama has UNDER estimated the impact of people like me will have on exposing him as a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.
Numbers can lie if the data is not documented and valid. Its the same with anything else including obama's certification of live birth that CANNOT be validated in any way by anyone seeking proof obama is not an illegal alien. He presents no hospital name or doctor name. No official signatures of any kind.
You may must be willing to take him at his word but every word that comes out of his mouth is a lie or twisted half truth.
Obama recently told America he doesn't have time to go around with his birth certificate pasted on his forehead.
Obama can't go around with a documented, verified 'birth certificate' on his head because obama does NOT have one!
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
George H.W. Bush infused every federal department with the UN sustainable development principles, and they've been followed by all presidents since
Linkages between the UN, IUCN, WWF, WRI and federal agencies and environmental groups, from Dr. Coffman, “The Greening of America”
Sustainable Development has continued to evolve as that of protecting the world’s resources while its true agenda is to control the world’s resources.
Green Global Dictatorship: Regional Governance, UN Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and the Wildlands Project
The “Greening of America” Notice more bicycle paths and lanes lately in your hometown? It puts a stealth face on the real intentions of your local government which is the implemtation of UN agenda 21 and the removal of your property rights and freedom.
Regional Governance is the method whereby would-be rulers intend to control every aspect of our lives. Without the full implementation of Regional Governance, their plan for world dominance cannot succeed…. (Governance, as opposed to Government, means “control by rules, restrictions, and regulations.”). In order to subvert the sovereignty of the United States and the individual states guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution, a parallel and entirely unconstitutional governance structure, termed “Regional Government,” has been covertly established over the past half century
Agenda 21, the U.N.-sponsored environmental initiative was revealed at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992. Agenda 21 has three main goals: "1. Abolition of private property. 2. Education for global citizenship. 3. Control over human action."
Sen. Christopher Dodd is trying to leave us all another "gift" before he "retires". Dodd and his gay friend frank are also most responsible for the current economic mess America is in.
"The Livable Communities Act" is a name choosen for subversive legislation. It paints a nice face on a law that gives the UN ultimate control of your property and life.
The new law would create a new federal bureaucracy, the Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities, armed with some $4 billion in federal grants, to pressure local communities into a more "green" development agenda.
It can be traced back to the U.N., which at an Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 adopted Agenda 21, outlining the goal of having government control over people.
The program would have grants to underwrite local community planning efforts that direct actions toward a "sustainable development."
The term "sustainable development" is a term used by the UN. It means UN control of your property and life through subversive tactics.
The "greenies' that run around promoting a "clean green" bicycle UN environment are knowingly or unknowingly implementing local UN control of America.
Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty through follwing the UN international maintenace property code and UN agenda 21.
Check Here to see if your city has sold out to the UN Many US cities have subverted your freedom.
Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty through "sustainable development" in UN agenda 21. The environmental bible of world government.
ICLEI, now known as Local Governments for Sustainability is in the process of purging their website of United Nations references despite an abundant history of association. There are now over 600 cities and counties within the United States that have contracts with ICLEI.
Do you understand the UN is controlling your local government and not you when your city or county government officals allow the UN to dictate local maintenace property codes?
The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property
The dodd "legislation" is promoted as an effort to fight traffic congestion, strip malls and ugly urban sprawl, and it would "encourage" local communities to create high-density population centers linked by mass transit networks.
Its called 'smart growth by the UN.' The UN and the stealth legislation rammed through congress paints a picture through terms that are deceptive. "smart growth" means UN control of your property and life.
It literally means they draw a circle around the community and say nothing will be developed outside of this wall. Land inside the wall goes up in price as shortages develop. You end up with highrises, with people living on the top floors, stores on bottom floors and offices in the middle. Humans wind up living in the sky. They never touch the ground or leave the building.
The Democrats are doing everything they can before they lose power in the next election. They're working on a plethora of environmental bills.
What makes the Dodd bill unique is they've mostly done this through executive orders or grant programs, but now this is the first time they've put together a federal bill to put this stuff in place.
There are numerous unpublicized consequences of the Livable Communities Act and similar "sustainable development" legislation. It's a "socialist trap.
The Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities would end up overseeing development in every community. They say it's voluntary, but it really isn't. The $4 billion in grants will be used by radical green groups, who helped write it, to force your city council to comply. If your city says no to the pressure to take the grant money, the radical greens will tell your citizens that their city officials are losing them millions of dollars that is owed to the community. Then, when the council caves into the pressure and takes the money, it will force compliance. That is not voluntary, it is blackmail.
Homeowners would end up paying exorbitant costs and losing control over their own homes. To get the money a community must meet environmental standards. That requires houses to be equipped with new roofs, new windows, and efficient appliances. They did this last year in Oakland. It costs an estimated $35,000 to make a house comply with the environmental regulations. They say homeowners can't sell their houses if they don't meet these standards.
It's the application of new technological breakthroughs to control people.
The legislation traces back to Agenda 21, the U.N.-sponsored environmental initiative revealed at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992.
Agenda 21 has three main goals: "1. Abolition of private property. 2. Education for global citizenship. 3. Control over human action."
Agenda 21 originated in the U.N. 178 nations have signed onto it, including the U.S. in 1992. It's not a treaty, it's a soft law agreement, so it doesn't require treaty ratification.
George H.W. Bush infused every federal department with sustainable development principles, and they've been followed by all three presidents since.
As globalism transitions from global to local (localism) we the people must be ever vigilant, well informed, and prepared to meet the globalists at the grassroots level, then become Vocal Local!
(Be aware of the fact that your local government working with the local environmental waco "greenies" are subverting your freedom and the US Constitution using UN agenda 21 and its goals for a one world government!!!) Story Reports
Every American must know how the UN is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty
The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Burning a koran is in my opinion useless
(Islam is idol worship. Islam is a caustic blend of paganism and twisted Bible stories. Muhammad, its lone "prophet", who made no prophecies, conceived his religion to satiate his lust for power, sex, and money. He was a terrorist. Islam spreads the lie that Jesus never even died on a cross. That alone makes it demonic.
You can always know a false god. False gods always demand the blood of innocents. Whenever the innocent and just are being slain, there you will find Moloch the god Ba'al; always masquerading. The god of Muslims is revealed as a tyrant who demands Muslims and all others submit to him.
Whereas in the New Testament, Jesus revealed to Christians a God who is a loving Father, who wants us to come to Him via free will. In the Old Testament (Exodus 34:6) the real God revealed Himself as "merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth". He is the Creator of the Universe, the God of Love, and Lord of Life. The God of Israel is this true God. He insists "Thou shall not kill the innocent and just".
When a Muslim declares that Islam is a religion of peace, he/she is either ignorant of the Koran (Qur'an), or is deceitfully thinking of this "peace", as it extends only to those within the Muslim Community. The deceit is that they will not tell you exactly what they mean. According to the Qur'an: "Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another, but ruthless to unbelievers" Surah 48:29. "Kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush..." Surah 9:5. Also see Surah 9:29:
PICKTHAL: "Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture (Christians & Jews) as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.". Please note that there is not a single verse in the entire Christian Bible that contains this "open-ended", universal command to kill/or be ruthless to unbelievers.)
(The koran should not be burned as a publicity stunt to draw attention to the fact that it is antichrist or a counterfeit religion. This is a mistake. To me it is a ploy to divert attention from the need to refute the false religion islam. There are those who are out to gain 15 min of fame at any cost, even American lives. This proposed action by Rev. Terry Jones is similar to a jessie jackson or al sharpton stunt to gain fame. It will only cause more confusion.) Story Reports
Satan The Father of Lies
Though Satan has been defeated by Jesus Christ, he continues as an unrelenting foe in his warfare against God and His people. So it is important that we be aware of the tactics and ways of our great adversary. The apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians: "Lest Satan should get advantage of us; for we are not ignorant of his devices" (2 Cor. 2:11).
The Lord said to the Pharisees who hated Him: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not" (Jn. 8:44-45).
Judas and Satan
A quite different illustration of the way and victory of Satan in his work as an adversary of Christ is seen in Judas Iscariot. He was chosen as the twelfth apostle by the Lord, who knew all along his real character. Jesus once said to the twelve: "Have not I chosen twelve, and one of you is the devil? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon, for he it was that should betray him" (Jn. 6:70-71).
We will see that Satan later took possession of Judas and used him as his instrument in the betrayal of Christ to the multitude that arrested him and brought him to the high priest and elders. But before this happened, Judas was a thief, stealing out of the treasury bag of the apostolic band as John 12:6 tells us. He was covetous and loved money. So we find him going to the chief of priests of the Jews and saying to them" "What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. And from that time he sought to betray him" (Matt. 26:14-16).
The next thing we read of Judas is that when the Passover supper was ended, the devil "now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son to betray him" (Jn. 13:2). Though Judas accompanied the Lord in His marvelous ministry three and one-half years, heard all His wonderful words, and witnessed His gracious acts of mercy and miracles, his heart was untouched by all. He carried out his thievery and covetousness which opened his heart to carry out Satan's evil design.
At the last supper, the Lord dipped a morsel of bread in sauce and gave it to Judas. This was a custom of the host to honor a guest and it is indicated as a pledge of love. We read that "after the sop Satan entered into him (Judas). He then having received the sop went immediately out; and it was night" (Jn. 13:15-30). Judas turned his back upon his last appeal of love from the Lord and Satan possessed him to do his work of betraying the Savior to His enemies with an insincere kiss.
How Satan Operates by Demons
We previously noted that Satan is spoken of as "the prince of this world" on three occasions (Jn. 12:31; 14:30; 16:11). The word "prince" here means "ruler." A prince is head of a principality and has a kingdom. So we are told that our warfare is "against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places" (Eph. 6:12). Satan thus heads up a great kingdom of evil. He has a great host of demons that are evil spirits in his kingdom.
In the book of Revelation we read about a future time when there will be war in heaven between Michael and his angels, and the dragon, "called the Devil, and Satan," and his angels. Then Satan and his angels will be cast out of heaven on the earth (Rev. 12:7-9). Also in Revelation 9:1-11 we have a prophetic scene in symbolical language; locusts torment men upon the earth. It is stated that they have a king over them who is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name is Abaddon and Apollyon, which means "destroyer" in Hebrew and Greek respectively. This represents the Devil and his demons, whose purpose in the future day will be to torment and destroy mankind.
These Scriptures tell us clearly that Satan has a great host of fallen angels who are under his rule and control, and that he carries on his diabolic work through these spirit beings who are lying and seducing spirits (see 1 Ki. 22:22; 1 Tim. 4:1).
God of this world. Furthermore, as the god of this world system, Satan has authority over a federation that also includes all of the unsaved and fallen humanity whom he takes captive and uses at his will (2 Tim. 2:26). The apostle John wrote: (1Jn 5:19) And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness. We are also told that "the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not" (2 Cor. 4:4).
God of this world. Furthermore, as the god of this world system, Satan has authority over a federation that also includes all of the unsaved and fallen humanity whom he takes captive and uses at his will (2 Tim. 2:26).
The Bible thus clearly reveals that behind every pagan idol there is a demon and that the sacrifices offered to such idols are offered to demons and not the the one and only true God.
Associated with the whole satanic, pagan system of idolatry were many other demon activities about which Moses of old warned the children of Israel. In the book of Deuteronomy we read: "When thou art come in the land which the Lord they God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you any that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all who do such things are an abomination unto the Lord" (Deut. 18:9-12).
(This would include all of islam. Controlled by the 'god" of this world system, satan. Burning a koran is in my opinion useless.) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
GAINESVILLE, Fla. – The government turned up the pressure Tuesday on the head of a small Florida church who plans to burn copies of the Quran on Sept. 11, warning him that doing so could endanger U.S. troops and Americans everywhere.
But the Rev. Terry Jones insisted he would go ahead with his plans, despite criticism from the top U.S. general in Afghanistan, the White House and the State Department, as well as a host of religious leaders.
Jones, who is known for posting signs proclaiming that Islam is the devil's religion, says the Constitution gives him the right to publicly set fire to the book that Muslims consider the word of God.
Gen. David Petraeus warned Tuesday in an e-mail to The Associated Press that "images of the burning of a Quran would undoubtedly be used by extremists in Afghanistan — and around the world — to inflame public opinion and incite violence." It was a rare example of a military commander taking a position on a domestic political matter.
.........................................................................................
Is obama possessed? Yes. Is obama controlled at will, yes.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
I can't wait until Nov 2010 when jessie jackson's wish will come true
(The obama walk. BO looks like he wandered out of a nursing home. I can't wait until Nov 2010 when jessie jackson's wish will come true. Obama will be neutered by the election. I suspect he doesn't have any gonads anyway just like Sara Palin said. The look of an affirmative action failure is on his face. Don't let that fool you he is a Liberal socialist democrat.) Story Reports
From The Steady Drip Blog:
NEVER FORGET WHAT GENERAL GEORGE PATTON SAID ABOUT POLITICIANS
“Politicians are the lowest form of life. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.”
(Obama is scum and so are the people who work for and with him in his administration. This includes all the LIBERAL low life democrats in congress. These people are TRAITORS to America. They have ignored the US Constituion. "Obamacare" is totally unconstitutional.) Story reports
Broader Lawsuit Filed Against ObamaCare
In addition to the lawsuits filed by Virginia and by Florida with another 19 states including Arizona, the Goldwater Institute has filed a private lawsuit against ObamaCare on a much broader basis than that of the state lawsuits which are mostly concerned about the traditional authority of the states to regulate health care. The private lawsuit, Coons v. Geithner, makes the arguments that ObamaCare:
* exceeds the powers of Congress
* violates individual rights
* interferes with the authority of the states
* violates the separation of powers with a bureaucracy lacking sufficient Congressional direction and judicial review
The plaintiffs are Nick Coons, who owns a small business in Tempe, Arizona; U.S. Representatives from Arizona, Jeff Flake, Trent Franks, and John Shadegg; and by the Speaker of the Arizona House Kirk Adams and 28 other Arizona state legislators. Obama, Treasury Sec.Tim Geithner, Health and Human Resources Sec. Kathleen Sibelius, and Attorney General Eric Holder are being sued.
Nick Coons will be forced to buy government approved health insurance by 2014 or face IRS fines. He wants to continue to make his own health care decisions. He also objects to the legislated violations of his medical privacy to an insurance company, the federal government, and others without his permission.
The three U.S. Representatives object to the lack of Congressional oversight of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, which will make assure that costs are controlled and will therefore ration care and care quality. This board will also not be subject to judicial review. Unfathomably, the law also says the board cannot be repealed except for a short window of time in 2017. I cannot understand how a present Congress can override the intentions of a future Congress with any act other than a Constitutional amendment, which requires additional approval from the states.
The Arizona legislators claim they have been forced by the federal government to restore prior cuts they made to their state's relatively generous Medicaid benefits because the federal government had threatened to take away $7 billion in federal payments to the Arizona Medicaid program. They say this violates their First Amendment rights to vote in the best interests of Arizona citizens.
The Obama administration is expected to request that the lawsuit be dismissed since the federal law will not be fully implemented until 2014. U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson already rejected this argument in the state of Virginia lawsuit against the federal government.
While I am delighted that 21 states have challenged the federal government on its over-reach into an area traditionally regulated by the states, I am much more pleased with this lawsuit which seeks to directly defend our individual rights. As I have argued repeatedly, it is impossible to make the case that we have an individual right to life and to the pursuit of happiness if ObamaCare is brought into execution.
We will not even be able to say that we own our own life. We will not be allowed to manage our own health care to maintain our own lives. We will not be free to help those we love to maintain their lives. We will not be free to take medical remedies to ameliorate pain, so we will not be able to pursue our happiness in a most fundamental way. We will not have the freedom to correct medical problems without the consent of the federal government, yet these medical problems may incapacitate us to pursue the interests and values we need to provide us with happiness.
In short, ObamaCare is a prescription all by itself for that illegitimate, tyrannical government we defined in our Declaration of Independence.
ObamaCare gives us much greater reason than our colonist forefathers had to dissolve our allegiance to that illegitimate government and to seek independence from its tyrannical grasp. The several lawsuits and/or a supermajority in Congress capable of repealing ObamaCare are the last hope of saving our Union and our much beloved Constitution.
Posted by Charles R. Anderson, Ph.D. at Tuesday, August 17, 2010
........................................................................................
(As you look at the parasite known as obama ask yourself this question. Is the parasite a US citizen? How do you know he is a US citizen? Can you verify he is a US citzen? What verification are you using?
If you are relying on obama's fight the smears web site don't. This jpeg picture of a certification of live birth can't be verified by the information provided. No hospital name and no doctor name. No signatures of any kind.
If you are relying on what an Hawaiian offical said don't. The statements from Hawaiian officals can't be verified either.
I you are relying on what obama recently said, "I can’t spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead,”.
This is the IMPOSTER'S answer to the millions who question his citizenship and his natural born citizenship status.
If obama was not an IMPOSTER he would answer the multitude of lawsuits asking him to prove he is a US citizen.
If obama were legitimate he would answer the questions about his birth and not avoid the question of his citizenship at all cost.
The fact is obama cannot prove he is a US citizen. Obama has already proved he is not a natural born citizen therefore he has admitted he is a FRAUD!) Story Reports
“Politicians are the lowest form of life. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)