Army Refers Charges Against Lakin To Court Martial

(LTC Terry Lakin is one man who is putting his life on the line to prove obama is a FRAUD. He is asking obama to prove he is a US citizen. Obama can't prove he is a US citizen. Time after time revelant records dissapear or ar destroyed. The most recent is obama's mothers 1961 passport records. The US government under the control of the obama justice dept is hiding obama's true identity. LTC Lakin knows this as do millions of other Americans. GOD speed LTC Lakin in your quest to expose the IMPOSTER obama!) Story Reports

Birther Report

LTC TERRY LAKIN INTERVIEW

Press Release: Army Refers Charges Against Lakin To Court Martial

PRESS RELEASE

Army Refers Charges Against Lakin To Court Martial
Military Judge Appointed
Arraignment Set for Hearing on August 6, 2010

Washington, D.C., August 2, 2010. The Army has now referred charges against LTC Terrence Lakin for a General Court Martial. This action triggered the appointment of a Military Judge to preside over the trial, which will likely be scheduled before October, and held in Washington, D.C. at Ft. McNair.

On August 6, 2010 at Ft. McNair in Washington, D.C., the court will convene for the purpose of Judge Lind taking Lakin’s plea to the charges which consist of “missing movement” and of refusing to obey orders.

Today Lakin stated: “I am not guilty of these charges, and will plead ‘not guilty’ to them because of my conviction that our Commander-in-Chief may be ineligible under the United States Constitution to serve in that highest of all offices. The truth matters. The Constitution matters. If President Obama is a natural born citizen then the American people deserve to see proof, and if he is not, then I believe the orders in this case were illegal.”

If convicted, Lakin faces up to four years at hard labor in a federal penitentiary.

LTC Lakin is a doctor and is in his 18th year of service in the Army. He is Board Certified in Family Medicine and Occupational and Environmental Medicine. He has been recognized for his outstanding service as a flight surgeon for year-long tours in Honduras, Bosnia and Afghanistan. He was also awarded the Bronze Star for his service in Afghanistan and recognized in 2005 as one of the Army Medical Department’s outstanding flight surgeons. In March of this year, he announced in a video posted on YouTube that he would refuse to obey orders until receiving proof of the President’s eligibility. So far, more than 200,000 people have viewed that video.

Army Col. Denise R. Lind will preside over the trial. Before becoming a judge, she served tours of duty both prosecuting and defending soldiers in court martial proceedings. She is a 1982 magna cum laude graduate of Siena College, and earned her law degree from Albany Law School in 1985. As Military Judge, she will decide all matters of law, including requests from the defense for discovery, and a motion the prosecution has said it will make to determine the lawfulness of the orders LTC Lakin is charged with refusing to obey. A “jury” comprised of Army officers will decide based on the facts whether Lakin is guilty or not guilty of the various felony-equivalent charges pending against him.

In standing up for his convictions and in keeping with his training that illegal orders must be disobeyed, LTC Lakin has been widely praised for upholding the rule of law and the paramount supremacy in our society of the United States Constitution.

Lakin is represented by military counsel, and by Paul Jensen, a civilian attorney from California who has been provided to him by the American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, which has established a fund for Lakin’s legal defense. Further details are available on the Foundation’s website,

Safe Guard Our Constitution

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc

Obama on MySpace: I'm now 4 years younger! This is obama's offical myspace website. On his purported birthday, president actually subtracts from his age. His comrads are playing games with the American people.


On Aug 21, 2008 / 05:47 pm (CNA).- The advocacy group, The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., filed a motion to seek an injunction against the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice to permit the broadcast of a new ad accusing Barack Obama of lying about his voting record on abortion.

The real truth about obama has been supressed by obama's new supreme court justice in her role as solicitor general

She was the solicitor general for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural-born citizenship.

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. (RTAO), is an issue advocacy 527 group created to inform the American people the real truth about Senator Obama’s public policy positions.

The text of RTAO’s ad titled “Survivors:”

NURSE: The abortion was supposed to kill him, but he was born alive. I couldn’t bear to follow hospital policy and leave him on a cold counter to die, so I held and rocked him for 45 minutes until he took his last breath.

MALE VOICE: As an Illinois Democratic State Senator, Barack Obama voted three times to deny lifesaving medical treatment to living, breathing babies who survive abortions. For four years, Obama has tried to cover-up his horrendous votes by saying the bills didn’t have clarifying language he favored. Obama has been lying. Illinois documents from the very committee Obama chaired show he voted against a bill that did contain the clarifying language he says he favors.

Obama’s callousness in denying lifesaving treatment to tiny babies who survive abortions reveals a lack of character and compassion that should give everyone pause.

........................................................................................

(This ad was issued Aug 21, 2008. It exposed obama as a liar and one who lacks any character and compassion toward the unborn. Obama has continued to reveal his lack of any character and compassion toward the American people also.) Story Reports


Elena Kagan tied to Obama's birth certificate

WE THE PEOPLE ARE "COLLATERAL" FOR LOANS OF CREDIT FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!

(I heard some interesting information from a caller to a talk radio show today. I checked out this information. It seems "WeThe People" are "COLLATERAL" FOR LOANS OF CREDIT FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM! If we are "collateral" what is obama? He cannot produce a valid birth certificate'.) Story Reports

WE THE PEOPLE ARE "COLLATERAL" FOR LOANS OF CREDIT FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!

The birth certificate is nothing more than an evidence of title, that is to say ownership. In plain English, this means that that innocent baby boy or girl, has become a slave of the state.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America. The Uniform Commercial Code is looked upon as the bible in the world of business. Under Caeser of Rome, it was established that all nations in the empire that do any form of business, should all play on a level field, but what is not told is that the UCC is based directly on Vatican Canon Law, of the Roman Canon Law, which means, its regulations are under the Roman Catholic Church. Now, you maybe wondering what this has to do with birth certificates, so let's break down the origin of birth certificates.

Despite illusions to the contrary, the Constitution is no longer applicable because the government on all levels, operates on the plane of international commerce, known as the Uniform Commercial Code. (See Public Law 88-244 by which the U.S. subscribed to private international law). (See also definition of “goods” under Uniform Commercial Code section 2-105(1) in which animals, i.e. humans and their unborn offspring, become marketable “goods” for the purpose of commerce).

Question: What is a berth? To come into or dock at a wharf such as when a ship comes into a dock, it arrives. So consequently, when a ship pulls into a port, it pulls in and stops, that is called its berth, because the ship has now arrived. So because it is on the laws of the high seas, it is governed by the UCC Commercial Law. So when the ship pulls in to it's berth, the first thing the captain must do is to present a certificate of manifest to the port authorities. What is a certificate of manifest? It is a document listing a ship’s contents, cargo, crew, and passengers.

So whatever the ship brings in at berth, the captain has to present a certificate of manifest showing the identity and value of the items on the ship. Now consequently, when people are born, they come out of their mother's water, therefore they must have a birth certificate, which is a certificate of manifest, because the people are considered a corporation owned item, they are a human resource. This goes back to the German Nazi concept, that every human coming out of their mother's water must be birthed, and therefore the people have to have a certificate of manifest, to see who this individual is and how much they are going to make for the government in their New World Order.

So, since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge the people as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks. The "Full faith and credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt. That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt. In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources," that is.

Why do you think when you call to see if a company is hiring, you have to go through a division known as Human Resource? The people are resources to the government, their birth certificates are a security on the New York Stock Exchange, which is why if you look at all birth certificate's in America, it will say at the bottom this is printed on security paper, do not accept if not on full color security paper. At the bottom, you will always have a series of numbers, red numbers printed on the birth certificate, in which those numbers are a security stock exchange number on the World Stock Exchange, in which the American people are worth money to the International Bank that bought the government in the 1930's.

Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens in America began on July 14, 1862, when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a "per head" basis. See the government knows that they can only extract so much money out of the economy, so their idea is to bankrupt private owners so that the banks who are behind this syndicate become the owners of all the assets in this country. That's the real scheme; that's the real motive. By encouraging Congress to spend money it doesn't have, Congress has to turn around and "lien" on American labor and American private property for collateral.

See they do that by fraudulent conversion of birth certificates, for example.

Doctors, who are franchisees of the state, are obliged to sign birth certificates and forward them on to the Secretary of State in each state. They make certified copies and forward those birth certificates to the Department of Commerce in Washington, D.C. The Department of Commerce does the same thing: they make certified copies and forward them on to the International Monetary Fund in Brussels, Belgium.

Now this is the center of the hub of the banking syndicate and they are, of course, loaning these huge sums to various governments around the world, including the Congress of the United States. The Congress needs something for collateral, and what they use for collateral are these birth certificates. They get treated as certificates in equity which mature on the 18th birthday of the person whose name appears on the birth certificate. The bank then keeps track of these and uses the number that any particular nation has available, as collateral on the international debt, as "performance units" on the international debt. These certificates in equity end up being regarded as "performance units" on the international debt.

The more of those you have, the more money you can borrow. It's like this: the more collateral I have, the more money I can borrow from banks and the more I can secure. So, governments are securing their international debt by "liening" on the persons and property of their citizens. They're doing this on a massive scale, and it's technically a fraudulent conversion of the birth certificate because, if they did that with your birth certificate, they never told you they were doing it. They never told you they were obtaining a lien on your person and starting a third-party debt that you're responsible for. You had no meaningful choice in the matter, which makes it an "unconscionable contract" by definition.

Think of it very simply, as walking into a department store and saying to the salesman, "I really like that refrigerator over there, I want to buy it, ship it to my home tomorrow, and send the bill to, say, Willy Brown." So the next day, the refrigerator ends up in your garage, and the bill ends up in Willy Brown's mail. Willy Brown opens his mail and says, "What's this, Sears? One refrigerator, $800? What is this? I didn't buy this. I'm not a party to this transaction. I didn't even know about it. Why are they billing me? There must be a mistake here." Well, this is kind of like what is happening now. In this example, the department store is the Federal Reserve. They're supplying Federal Reserve Notes, right? Willy Brown is the American people, and I -- the one who went in there and bought the refrigerator in the first place -- I represent Congress. And I'm saying, "Don't send the bill to me, send it to the American people. And you can lien on their property, by the way. You can use our police, we'll enforce it for you; we'll extract the money."

Obama is keeping from the American people. The fraud is that Congress bankrupted the U.S. Treasury and turned all their gold over to the Federal Reserve banks, which are not federal government agencies.

The Federal Reserve is a "municipal corporation" created by an act of Congress, but it's still a corporation. And all that gold is now in their hands. But there wasn't enough to discharge the debt that had accumulated up to 1933. They had to go into bankruptcy to discharge the rest of the debt. They're using standard federal bankruptcy rules for this, but the creditors, of course, are in charge. And they're back there telling Congress, "Go ahead, continue spending more money that you don't have, because we know we'll take it out of the land and the labor of the American people, ultimately." And that's what's going on. Look at the current economic situation, the government is using Obama to push this idea concept of stimulus checks as a way for slowing down inflation, creating jobs, and giving the American people more money to spend.

Now to the average puppet, this doesn't seem like a bad idea, but what the government doesn't tell the people is that, in the process of them giving these stimulus checks for the American people to spend more money, it will only devalue the American Dollar, and the banks will close up, because how can you spend more in a recession to boost the economy? Therefore by the banks closing up, it will force the American people into a one way electronic spending money system, that will be monitored and administered by the government, forcing the people into compliance with their New World Order.

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth "registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes." One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures.

What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating "federal children." This government, under the doctrine of "Parens Patriae," now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for "permission" from the government imposing as God, to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a "free country."

Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as "official" records.

Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child's birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United States , thereby making him/her a United States Citizen.

For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth. In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt.

(WE THE PEOPLE ARE "COLLATERAL" FOR LOANS OF CREDIT FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!)

The governors of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system. To wit:"Full faith and credit" clause of Const.

U.S. article 4. sec. 1, requires that foreign judgement be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgement or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken.

The state claims an interest in every child within it's jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. Why do you think they teach teachers to not only teach their students, but their parents that their child needs a good education so that they can grow up and get a good job? Lol they been making the people slaves for years and no one has ever stopped to question them on it?

The child itself, when born, is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked, thus making whomever gets a birth certificate owned by the state. Everyone who has a birth certificate, are considered assets of the bankrupt United States of America, which makes them designated by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES". Again, ask yourself, why do you think when you call to see if a company is hiring, you have to go through a division known as Human Resource? Better wakeup folks!

Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by the government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist. They have no legislation for ordering you to have a identification card, health card, and so forth, but they know the people are ignorant to the Law, so therefore by ignorance of the people, the government is allowed to freely at will keep coming up with forms of taxation against the American people. Birth Certificates proves that you are national property of the International Banks. The birth certificate thus becomes a form of theft, the theft of the child’s true identity as a free child of God to a servant of the State.

By affixing a national seal of approval to a child, the state denies the freedom, rights, and dignity that God has ordained in the scriptures. You don't need proof that you were born, you breathing is proof enough for these hypocrites. By requiring a license, the state is claiming complete control and ownership over your liberty, and property.

Christ's assembly does not exist on paper, but in the hearts of men, and is expressed in their outward acts. Because there is no breath of Life from God in such pieces of paper, we should not look to them for any authority for doing anything. Christ is our authority for doing the things we do.

Now ask yourself, have you ever, in your entire life, "signed" your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS? Of course not! Haven’t you always used both upper and lower case letters to sign your name? Yes. And why is that? Because that is what you have been taught since a child. Because the standard Rule of Law governing the use of English Grammar states that the correct Capitalization of Proper Names must begin with a capital letter, and the rest of the name must be spelled in smaller case letters. At Law, this lets others know you are an entity created by God, and not an entity created by man.

Now, there are entities created by man, Corporations for example. Corporations are known as "persons" created by the government. They are created on a piece of paper and brought into existence by the government. To differentiate between those created by God and those created by the government, those created by the government have their names spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. This lets others know that this entity does not have a body, soul, and spirit like man has, but that this is a fictitious entity created for the purpose of making a profit.

Now, if you look at a license, or ID Card or Birth Certificate, you will notice the name that appears on it is spelled in all capital letters! What this means, at law, is that the entity that is named on this license is a creature of the government.

WE THE PEOPLE ARE "COLLATERAL" FOR LOANS OF CREDIT FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!

.........................................................................................
Additional Information About The Government Corporation That Owns You!
.........................................................................................

We all have birth certificates don't we? Just exactly what are they and why are we required to have one?

We all have birth certificates don't we? Just exactly what are they and why are we required to have one?

Consider the following definition of the word certificate:

cer-tif-i-cate, noun Middle English certificat, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin ceruficatum. from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3: a document evidencing ownership or debt.

Merriam Webster Dictionary, 1998. [emphasis added]

Once a birth has been certified, this all capital letter corporation format is given to all certified persons from the corporation, (that is to say, the Federal Government) which also has an all capital letter name, since it is incorporated.

How it happened

In 1871, after the Civil War, congress passed the first act to allow the government to operate as a corporation. This was done under the guise of forming a government for the District of Columbia. The process was completed in 1878 by the final act allowing the "U.S. Government" to act as a corporation, operating under the laws of commerce.

How it works

After a live birth, Doctors, who are franchisees of the state , are obliged to sign birth certificates as fiduciaries of the State, and forward them on to the Secretary of State in the State Capitol. They make certified copies and forward those birth certificates to the Department of Commerce in Washington, D.C.

After it is created, the Birth Certificate issued by the State is then registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce, which is the Executive Office through which their own sub-agency, the U.S. Census Bureau operates, and which has the responsibility of registering all vital statistics from each states in the union. They also make certified copies and forward them on to the International Monetary Fund in Brussels, Belgium. At the same time the "Birth Certificate" is created, the newborn child is also assigned a number for the corporate government's accounting, tracking and control system. It's called a Social Security Number. This is also referenced in Revelation 13:17 as the number of your name.

The word registered as it is used with commercial or legal based equity law, does not mean that the name was simply recorded in a reference book for the sake of the government's convenience. When a birth certificate is registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce, it means that a legal (as opposed to lawful) corporate entity was created, and the person born, has become tied to that corporate fictitious name on that document, and has become a surety, or guarantor, for an indebtedness. To put it simply, that document which is known in the world of finance as a security instrument, has tied the real person born to a debt, using the person (and all their present or future property and productive capacity) as collateral for the debt. The value of their labor is pledged as security for the debt referred to.

This birth certificate, which was created by the state, is a document which creates a Corporate Entity using the all capital letter corporate format, evidencing debt the moment it is issued. Once a state has registered a birth document with U.S. Department of Commerce, the Department notifies the Treasury Department, which takes out a loan from the Federal Reserve Bank. The Treasury uses the loan to purchase a bond (the Fed holds a "purchase money security interest" in the bond) from the Department of Commerce, which invests the sale proceeds in the stock or bond market.

This process of using a security instrument to guarantee a debt is known in financial business as hypothecation. The Federal Reserve Bank uses this certificate of live birth as collateral, against which they issue Federal Reserve Notes, or some other form of “debt obligation.” (See 18 USC 411). The bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street in New York City. But why would our nation, as wealthy as we seem to be, do such a thing?.

In 1911, after more than a couple of attempts, our leaders foisted upon the American people an income tax, and in 1913 a Central Bank, known as the Federal Reserve Bank. This is of course fraudulent, as there is no reserve of capital, and because this bank is no more Federal that is Federal Express Parcel Service, or the Federal Firearms Manufacturing Corporation. The Federal Reserve Bank is a "municipal corporation" created by an act of Congress. In a 20 year period, from 1913 to 1933, our nation was financially ruined through this central bank, owned and operated by foreign bankers.

The idea that we have all been sold into slavery is more than most Americans can comprehend. Are we not free to move about, to live, work and play as we please. Although the illusion of freedom is all about us, we are slaves economically. But how and why could this be? It is because the United States is bankrupt.

The hard truth

All privately held and federally held gold coins and bullion in America was seized via Executive Order of April 5, 1933 and paid to the creditor, the private Federal Reserve under the terms of the bankruptcy. The gold supplies which were in the hands of the people at that time, and circulated as money prior to the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes in lieu of money, were confiscated from the people (for a face value of $20 per ounce) and placed into the hands of the Federal government, which used it to partially settle their debts at ($35 an ounce).

This made the perceived value of the Federal Reserve Notes (which the people were forced to use in their financial transactions) vis a vis things of actual intrinsic value such as gold, goods and services, drop (through the principal of inflation) to the point where private business and individuals could not pay their debts. This resulted in the great depression and the bank panic of 1933. At that time, the gold that was in the U.S. Treasury was handed over to the Federal Reserve Corporation. They "called" the loans and foreclosed on the U.S. Treasury in 1933. This foreclosure of the government, "forced" the Federal government into bankruptcy.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt declared a national emergency and closed the banks for three days, a so called bank holiday. (The term "holiday", sounds nice don't you think? Kind of like Thanksgiving or Independence day.) While the banks were closed, most of the safe deposit boxes were raided by federal agents, and the gold was stolen. In their place were left Federal Reserve Notes.

Since the government no longer has any gold or silver as required by the Constitution, the only asset America left is the labor of the people.

How then does the U.S. finance its day to day operations? By collateralizing the people for credit. How they have done this is by registering the people in the international commerce marketplace, and selling bonds against their labor value.

The people become the surety on the bonds, or the “pledge.” The asset bonded (surety) is the “energy,” or the labor of the people, which is payable at some other determined future date, just as any note used for security purposes has a "due date".

These certificates in equity mature on the 18th birthday of the person whose name appears on the birth certificate. The bank then keeps track of these and uses the number of that persons name which in America is called a Social Security Number, (See Revelation 13:17) that each nation uses as collateral on the international debt, as "performance units" on the international debt. These certificates in equity end up being regarded as performance units on the international debt. The more of those a nation has, the more money they can borrow from the international bankers.

Despite illusions to the contrary, the Constitution is no longer applicable because the government on all levels, operates on the plane of international commerce, known as the Uniform Commercial Code. (See Public Law 88-244 by which the U.S. subscribed to private international law). (See also definition of “goods” under Uniform Commercial Code section 2-105(1) in which animals, i.e. humans and their unborn offspring, become marketable “goods” for the purpose of commerce).

The birth certificate is nothing more than an evidence of title, that is to say ownership. In plain English, this means that that innocent baby boy or girl, has become a slave of the state.

These Security Instruments, are bought and sold between the Central Banks of the world, as we use Federal Reserve Notes in America today, trading them between one business to another, and from one bank to another, in exchange for goods, services, and other things of value.

t is notable that the business of the sale of these instruments is transacted through the Main Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank in New York City, New York. This is the center of all global commerce of the United States, and is identified in the 13th chapter of the book of Revelation as "that mighty city" Babylon. We are told of the destruction of this global marketplace, and the lament of the kings and the merchants of the earth over her demise, and of the merchandise traded from her ports in Revelation 18, verses 9-13

New York City is indeed the place where slaves are traded, and in combination with that practice of the sale of the very life and labor of these slaves, their very souls are likewise bargained over like so much merchandise.

Palin: Obama lacks 'the cojones'

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said Sunday that Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) has "the cojones" that President Obama "does not have" to take on illegal immigration.

Appearing on "Fox News Sunday," Palin blasted Obama for suing Arizona to block the state's controversial new law without addressing "sanctuary cities" -- in which local law enforcement are prohibited from asking people about their immigration status.

(I must agree with Sara Palin. Obama acts effeminate. When obama was on the "view" he certainly looked like just one of the "girls" on the couch. In France, generally men don't cross their legs as it is seen as a no-manly (pas virile) position. In some countries it is acceptable for men to cross their legs all the way until the knees touch (like the ladies). In others it is seen as a homosexual gesture. Moreover it is an unforcomtable position for men, except it doesn't seem to bother obama because obama "does not have" "the cojones", according to Sara Palin. Obama really is an "empty suit".) Story reports

Palin: Obama lacks 'the cojones' to tackle immigration

Copyright law and the fair use doctrine

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report;

(I refer to excerpts when reviewing, criticizing and illustrating the "state run media" propaganda.) Story Reports

.........................................................................................

A company working on behalf of a Las Vegas newspaper has filed a spate of copyright-infringement lawsuits against as many as 80 individuals and publications since March, and now bloggers reveal the CEO may have crossed paths with Barack and Michelle Obama during their stints at a Chicago law firm.

According to Wired.com, copyright group Righthaven has filed more than 80 federal lawsuits against websites and bloggers who posted articles from the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

.........................................................................................

Uses That Are Generally Fair Uses

* Criticism and comment -- for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment.
* News reporting -- for example, summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report.
* Research and scholarship -- for example, quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author's observations.
* Nonprofit educational uses -- for example, photocopying of limited portions of written works by teachers for classroom use.
* Parody -- that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way.

Non-commercial use is often fair use.

Benefit to the public may be fair use.

When Is a Use a "Fair Use"?

Are You Creating Something New or Just Copying?

The purpose and character of your intended use of the material involved is the single most important factor in determining whether a use is a fair use. The question to ask here is whether you are merely copying someone else's work verbatim or instead using it to help create something new.

........................................................................................

(My thoughts on the "state run media" propaganda are my own. I use the quotes and comments of others to form my own opinions. I write my opinions in this blog. It is my way of checking out the "state run media" propaganda and other interesting information. I not only comment on "state run media" propaganda, I also comment on other information I gleen from public news sources. I quote what I need to quote to make my point. When ever I comment the name Story Reports is appended to my comments. My comments reflect my thoughts about the constant lies of obama and the democrates in congress.

My blog is a journal that exposes and refutes the constant lies of obama and congress. It is like an accounting record. I add the numbers up, ie the published information or propaganda. If the numbers don't add up or balance I 'audit" the propaganda and disprove the government lies. Remember what hitler said: "If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed." This is obama propaganda, big lies repeated often by the liberal "state run media.) Story Reports

........................................................................................

Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are generally permitted.

Core Political Speech

This is the most highly guarded form of speech because of its purely expressive nature and importance to a functional republic. Most simply, core political speech is interactive communications about political ideas or issues that are not motivated by profit. Restrictions placed upon core political speech must weather strict scrutiny analysis or they will be struck down.

Viewpoint-based restrictions

Restrictions that apply to certain viewpoints but not others face the highest level of scrutiny, and are usually overturned, unless they fall into one of the court's special exceptions.

........................................................................................

Freedom of speech on the Internet

In a rare 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court extended the full protection of the First Amendment to the Internet in Reno v. ACLU, a decision which struck down portions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, a law intended to outlaw so-called "indecent" online communication (that is, non-obscene material protected by the First Amendment). The court's decision extended the same Constitutional protections given to books, magazines, films, and spoken expression to materials published on the Internet. Congress tried a second time to regulate the content of the Internet with the Child Online Protection Act (COPA). The Court again ruled that any limitations on the internet were unconstitutional in American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft (2002).

In United States v. American Library Association (2003) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress has the authority to require public schools and libraries receiving e-rate discounts to install filters as a condition of receiving federal funding. The justices said that any First Amendment concerns were addressed by the provisions in the Children's Internet Protection Act that permit adults to ask librarians to disable the filters or unblock individual sites.

.....................................................................................

Vikram Buddhi, a Phd student and teaching assistant at Purdue University, has been in the custody of the United States authorities since 2006 for allegedly writing anti-Bush content and publishing it online.

Vikram S. Buddhi (born May 10, 1971) is an Indian Phd student and teaching assistant at Purdue University who since 2006, has been in the custody of the United States authorities for writing anti-Bush content, which involved direct death threats via his yahoo account, and publishing them online. He is scheduled to be released in May 2011.

Buddhi was arrested on April 14, 2006 and found guilty of threatening the life of a US President in 2007. Earlier on February 3, 2006, Buddhi was questioned by the Secret Service who made a formal report saying that Buddhi was not a threat to the US President or any Secret Service protected person.

The prosecution has alleged that Buddhi posted messages on a Yahoo business discussion forum which appeared in December 2005 and January 2006 calling upon the people of Iraq to retaliate against the perceived unjust war against them and kill then president George W. Bush, vice-president Dick Cheney and their spouses. Buddhi's lawyer Somnath Bharti has alleged that the indictment did not mention any of the alleged charges and the prosecution failed to establish Buddhi as the author of the messages although they originated from a Purdue University IP address.

(What kind of justice is this? If what buddhi's lawyer says is true what was buddhi charged with? If buddhi was not charged with anything the prosecution alleged nor did the prosecution prove it was buddhi that sent the messages, why is buddhi in jail?

I know why. Its because the US Government enforces only what it wants to enforce. Its the same thing with the borders and illegal aliens. Obama doesn't want to enforce the immigration laws against illegal aliens so the government looks the other way. It not justice when the government uses selective inforcement!) Story Reports

Leo Donofrio is still going after the fraud obama with Steve Pidgeon via the old chrysler dealships

Leo Donofrio and Steven Pidgeon were in the forefront of exposing obama as a FRAUD before the 2008 presidential election. Leo Donofrio had an ironclad lawsuit that would have prevailed if the US Supreme Court had heard the case. The Court would not because of standing etc. The US Supreme Court did not want to answer the question: Is barack obama a natural born citizen and qualified to be president. The court ignored the facts of the case that without a doubt proved obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER president.

Fraud has also occurred in the case involving the Chrysler dealers that lost their dealerships because the Bankruptcy Court records, including thousands of pages of hearing transcripts, clearly establish that Old Chrysler made the decision to cut the dealers on their own with no insistence or pressure by the Government or Fiat.

"Well, as we looked at filing bankruptcy, and knowing that being over-dealered has been an issue for Chrysler for some time, and it has been a process that was there prior to me in trying to get dealer consolidation, not only in Chrysler but in the industry, it presented an opportunity to accelerate the plan."

The bottom line is the "old" chrysler destroyed dealerships not because of filing bankruptcy but because "old" chrysler used the "crisis" to purge those dealerships as they needed.

Obama closed Chrysler dealerships to payoff his political cronies.

Obama closed Chrysler dealerships to payoff his political cronies.

If you go back and understand what happened to the old chrysler dealers and who benefited the most you see a pattern of corruption under the control of obama.

The government can say they didn't force the closings of the old chrysler dealers but obama did benefit from the closings that were never required in the first place.

Michelle Malkin made a small mistake inluding the name chrysler when she said the gov forced the closings. She was correct when she said the gov forced the closings of many gm dealerships.

Chrysler was taken over by obama. After the purge of dealerships "Project Genesis" was put into action.

Chrysler dealerships lost millions because of the chrysler purge that had nothing to do with the chrysler bankruptcy. It had everything to do with the fact obama used the "crisis" to pay off his fellow thugs in the form of new dealerships etc.

If the truth can be exposed and obama can be held accountable for the purge of the chrysler dealships because of financial gain this would be enough to impeach the imposter obama. (Story Reports)

.........................................................................................

Shoddy Reporting Concerning Closed Chrysler Dealers:What the TARP Inspector General Report Does NOT Say.

Posted in Uncategorized on July 23, 2010 by naturalborncitizen

The TARP Inspector General’s office, SIGTARP, recently released a report entitled, “Factors Effecting The Decision of General Motors and Chrysler To Reduce Their Dealership Networks“. This report set off a firestorm of shoddy reporting, which, if left unchecked, will confuse those familiar with the Chrysler Dealers’ pending litigation on appeal in federal district court. This blog posting has been designed to educate the public as to the truth of the SIGTARP Report.

My assertion of shoddy reporting is levelled specifically at The New York Times, the AP, and unfortunately also at Michelle Malkin who has been a staunch supporter of the dealers throughout. Regardless, her recent discussion of the SIGTARP report is fundamentally flawed and damaging to the case we have brought in our federal appeal to the Southern District of New York (where a Court ordered oral argument is scheduled for July 28, 2010, a fact the media doesn’t seem remotely interested in mentioning).

Malkin specifically urged her readers to read the entire SIGTARP Report, but it appears she failed to read the full report herself since she erroneously reported:

“The independent review of how and why the Obama administration forced Chrysler and General Motors to oversee mass closures of car dealerships across the country reveals grisly incompetence, fatal bureaucratic hubris and Big Labor cronyism.”

Nowhere in the SIGTARP Report does it say that the Government “forced” (as Malkin put it) Chrysler to reduce its dealership network. As to GM, yes the Government did specifically urge dealership reductions, but as to Chrysler the Government did not. The SIGTARP Report is very clear on this point.

The GM Bankruptcy was a vastly different beast than the Chrysler Bankruptcy. And the SIGTARP Report stresses this point in multiple citations throughout the 45 page document. It is repeated multiple times that the Government did not insist upon dealer reductions for Chrysler. For example, on pg. 5, the SIGTARP Report discusses the pre-bankruptcy viability plans offered by both GM and Chrysler, stating:

“In contrast to GM’s plan, the Chrysler restructuring plan did not contain any specific details about planned dealership closures, such as how many dealerships would close, or what factors would be considered in deciding which dealerships to retain. However, the plan referred to Project Genesis, an ongoing Chrysler effort to reduce the number of Chrysler dealerships…”

The “contrast” between GM and Chrysler was entirely skipped over by Malkin and the rest of the media reports. Chrysler was already reducing its dealership network years before the auto industry crisis hit, years before TARP even existed.

On pg. 7 of the SIGTARP Report, it lists five key factors the Government told GM to focus upon when submitting their updated viability plans. Accelerated dealership restructuring was listed as one of the five factors stressed by the Government for GM to accomplish if it expected future financial assistance. However, in contrast to GM, the five factors the Government stressed for Chrysler’s viability – listed on pgs. 7-8 of the SIGTARP Report – do not include dealership reduction at all.

In fact, on pg. 13 of the SIGTARP Report, it is unequivocally stated that in contrast to GM’s situation, the Government’s analysis of Chrysler’s viability did not address dealership reductions:

“GM was given 60 days to submit a ‘more aggressive plan’ overall, including planning for their dealership terminations, and was provided an additional $ 6 billion of TARP funds…Treasury also listed five challenges for Chrysler in a separate viability determination…The Viability Determination for Chrysler did not address dealership terminations.” (Emphasis added.)

The SIGTARP Report acknowledges that the concepts behind dealership restructuring were openly discussed by GM, Chrysler and the Government. It’s no secret that the Obama administration’s Auto Team were in favor of restructuring GM’s dealership networks and so they insisted upon it. As to Chrysler, the SIGTARP Report only mentions that the Obama Auto Team encouraged a continuation of the pre-existing dealership restructuring Chrysler had begun years before.

There’s a huge difference between suggesting/encouraging a course of action and forcing a course of action. As to GM, the Government forced dealership reductions. As to Chrysler, the Government did not force or insist upon dealership reductions. The SIGTARP Report is very clear about this issue. If one reads the entire 45 page report, one understands this important distinction.

But let’s not lay the blame entirely on Malkin, who has certainly proved to be an ally of the Chrysler and GM auto dealers. The New York Times and AP also printed stories pertaining to the closing of the auto dealers which highlighted the SIGTARP Report. Unfortunately, these reports have also created a false impression.

The AP was misleading in the following statement, “The Treasury Department failed to consider the economic fallout when it told General Motors and Chrysler to quickly shutter many dealerships as part of government-led bankruptcies, a federal watchdog found.“ Again, the SIGTARP Report makes it clear that Chrysler was never ordered to “shutter many dealerships”.

Nick Bunkley of the New York Times published the following on July 18th: “President Obama’s auto task force pressed General Motors and Chrysler to close scores of dealerships”. Bunkley also failed to mention the important contrast between GM and Chrysler laid out in the SIGTARP Report.

WHY THE CONTRAST IS SO IMPORTANT TO FORMER CHRYSLER DEALERS

Nothing in the SIGTARP Report nor in the underlying record of the bankruptcy case supports Old Chrysler’s decision to cut the dealership network once bankruptcy was filed. Old Chrysler had no sound business purpose in doing so. The bankruptcy court records are very clear and the SIGTARP Report includes nothing to counter the underlying record of the case. SIGTARP actually confirms our position.

The Bankruptcy Court records, including thousands of pages of hearing transcripts, clearly establish that Old Chrysler made the decision to cut the dealers on their own with no insistence or pressure by the Government or Fiat. Old Chrysler’s CEO and Chairman, Robert Nardelli, testified on May 28, 2009 as follows (at pgs. 389-390):

Q. And approximately fifteen days later, on May 14th, Chrysler filed a motion to reject approximately 800 dealers, is that correct?

A. That’s correct.

Q. So prior to — the deal originally with Fiat would have been Chrysler bringing in 3,200 dealers into the alliance; however, now Chrysler is giving only 2,400 dealers to the Fiat alliance; is that correct?

A. That’s correct.

Q. Who asked for that change?

A. Well, as we looked at filing bankruptcy, and knowing that being over-dealered has been an issue for Chrysler for some time, and it has been a process that was there prior to me in trying to get dealer consolidation, not only in Chrysler but in the industry, it presented an opportunity to accelerate the plan.

Q. Did the UAW ask for this dealer reduction?

A. No.

Q. Did the American government ask for this dealer reduction?

A. No.

CEO/Chairman Nardelli clearly stated that the Government did not ask for Chrysler dealer reductions. Furthermore, every piece of testimony in the case confirmed this to be true. For example, review key Fiat executive Alfredo Altavilla’s May 27, 2009 testimony on this point:

Q. To your knowledge, in any of your discussions with the United States Treasury, has the United States Treasury requested or demanded any reduction in the dealer network?

A. U.S. Treasury has never demanded such a restructuring, at least in presence of Fiat.

Q. Are you aware of any request by any government agency, including the Auto Task Force, that has demanded a reduction in Chrysler’s dealer network?

A. We have never been part of a discussion in which the Treasury has requested the restructuring.

Peter Grady was the Chrysler executive in charge of dealer restructuring, who testified as follows (May 28, 2009 transcript at 517):

Q. At whose request was this done?

A. At whose request what was done?

Q. The rejection? The idea to reject all these dealers?

A. Well, it’s after consultation with our attorneys. And we had an opportunity to restructure the network.

Q. Was this brought up in connection with any meetings — I believe you testified that you attended some meetings with the Treasury Department?

A. I was on some conference calls and one meeting with the U.S. Treasury — the auto task force.

Q. Now, did they insist that this process be carried out?

A. What they insisted was that we restructure our business in total back in December or February when we originally put forth our viability plan.

Q. Well, my question goes to the more specific point of whether or not the task force instructed Chrysler in your presence to reduce the number of dealers –

A. No.

All of the sudden concern with dealer closings in the press has the appearance of providing a counter-point to the issues we have raised in our appeal to the Southern District of New York. These media reports appear to provide a basis by which Old Chrysler would have been under pressure by the Government to cut the dealership network, a position which, as we have demonstrated in our filings (by testimony as quoted above) is not supported by the record.

The rejected Chrysler Dealers’ current appeal relies upon the fact that Old Chrysler was not under forced pressure by the Government as lender, or Fiat as purchaser, to cut the dealership network. Without forced pressure, Old Chrysler’s decision to cut 789 dealers does not stand up to scrutiny and should not have been approved by the Bankruptcy Court. These erroneous media reports are having the effect of revising history and confusing the issues.

The SIGTARP Report does say that decisions of the auto task force led to thousands of job cuts, and that is what we have said all along as well. But this goes back to the use of TARP funds by the Government to enter the private sector as pseudo venture capitalists. That decision was the general decision that ultimately caused the auto industry to be restructured, but the specific decision to cut the dealership network – according to key Chrysler executives Grady and Nardelli, was Chrysler’s decision alone.

And if that were not the case, Mr. Nardelli and Mr. Grady might be subject to perjury charges. But that won’t happen because the record and the SIGTARP Report are clear and consistent; the Government did not order Chrysler dealerships to be shut down. Only the media is confused.

Michelle Malkin finished her piece with a quote from the SIGTARP Report which highlights a response by Ron Bloom, the key bankruptcy expert employed by the Obama Administration’s Auto Team to oversee the auto industry restructuring:

“…[W]hen asked explicitly whether the Auto Team could have left the dealerships out of the restructurings, Mr. Bloom, the current head of the Auto Team, confirmed that the Auto team ‘could have left any one component (of the restructuring plan) alone,’ but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President’s mandate for ‘shared sacrifice.’ ”

The term “shared sacrifice” with regard to Chrysler had nothing to do with dealer reductions. Instead, that term concerned expectations by the Government and Old Chrysler that the Chrysler Dealers would – in order to help Chrysler avoid bankruptcy – take on additional inventory in buying more cars and parts than they normally purchased.

The testimony offered by Chrysler CEO/Chairman Nardelli in the Bankruptcy Court hearings (pgs. 195-196) established that the dealers rose to that challenge of shared sacrifice by taking on extra inventory in the hope of saving Chrysler from bankruptcy. Nardelli testified that right up until the evening before bankruptcy was filed, April 29, 2009, “the dealers certainly responded in kind“.

Meanwhile, unbeknownst to these dealers who were valiantly buying up extra inventory, Old Chrysler was concurrently contemplating kicking them to the curb with no obligation to buy back the extra inventory which the rejected dealers – post rejection – were forbidden from selling to the public.

That’s the dirty little secret of the so-called “shared sacrifice” mentioned by Herr Bloom.

Frankly, I don’t appreciate the timing of these shoddy news pieces concerning the SIGTARP Report. But if any media outlets are truly interested in the cause of justice here, they ought to mention that 82 rejected Chrysler dealers will have their day in court on this very issue before the Honorable Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein – who ordered oral argument sua sponte – on July 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM in the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y.

I also encourage the media to read the entire SIGTARP Report and to provide an accurate assessment of the issues discussed in this post.

by Leo Donofrio, Esq. for the law firm of Pidgeon & Donofrio GP

Obama closed Chrysler dealerships to payoff his political cronies.

Obama describes himself as a mongrel Jul 2010 and a mutt Nov 7 2009

On Nov 7, 2008 obama called himself a mutt. On Jul 29, 2010 obama called himself an african american mongrel. So out of his own mouth Americans are to think of obama as a mongrel mutt. I prefer to refer to obama an a fraud and imposter.

mongrel

A derogatory term for a variation that is not genuine; something irregular or inferior or of dubious origin.

Obama admits he is a mongrel. Someone who is not genuine, a FRAUD. Obama's origin has been in question since he was certified by the DNC as a "natural born" US citizen. Hawaiian law required obama to be a "natural born citizen" to get on the presidential ballot.. Obama has defined what he thinks a natural born citizen is. A citizen whose parents were both Americans at the time of birth. Obama has admitted his father was a Kenyan citizen at birth therfore obama is not genuine and IS of a DUBIOUS origin. Obama lied to Hawaiian officals and committed FRAUD!

Obama said, "I can be—you name it". I'll name it. A FRAUD and IMPOSTER! (A nervous belligerent little mongrel dog who has called himself a mutt.)

An extreme insult to muslims is calling someone a "dog' or mongrel. Obama insulted african Americans and the American public in general when he informed us we are mongrels or dogs. Obama knows this is an extreme insult but most Americans don't know he insulted them in an extreme way. Obama considers Americans "unclean" or mongrels.

I consider BO unclean. Even his initials point to the fact he has an aroma that is to be avoided. Obama's aroma is the stench of death. When I look at obama I see a freak who is out of control.

"Americans are a mongrel people, half Jewified, half Negrofied" Adolf Hitler

"We are sort of a mongrel people." Barack Hussein Obama
.......................................................................................
Obama says African Americans are mongrel people

Obama dropped the mongrel comment on the view:

"Part of what I realized was that if the world saw me as African-American, then that wasn’t something that I needed to run away from. That’s something that I could go ahead and embrace. And the interesting thing about the African American experience in this country is that we are sort of a mongrel people. I mean, we’re all kind of mixed up. Now, that’s actually true for white America as well but we just know more about it. And so I’m less interested in how we label ourselves and more interested in how we treat each other. And if we’re treating each other right, then I can be African American, I can be multi-racial, I can be—you name it. What matters is, am I showing people respect. Am I caring for other people. That’s, I think, the message that we want to send."

A quote from the self described mongrel mutt, barack hussein obama, imposter and fraud.
........................................................................................
Rush Limbaugh Transcript

Rush Limbaugh
Thur Jul 29, 2010

RUSH: I was asking myself the other night, -- I'm serious about this -- you can have a political figure or a celebrity involved in one of the most embarrassing, illegal or borderline legal things, take your pick, truly despicable things, and yet they become famous, they become the focus of even more attention, they become wealthy, with genuine reprobate behavior. I was asking myself, "At what point in our culture did it change?" It used to be that there was a stigma, an embarrassment to being a reprobate, or to have broken the law or to have just engaged in utter moral depravity. When did it change that this became a resume enhancement? I can't put my finger on it. All I know is that ever since I started this show in the late eighties, early nineties, I have watched this happen, and I have watched this deviancy in our culture get defined downward. We've just given up. As Moynihan said, "We've defined deviancy down." We can't fix that so it's now normal. Bad behavior, we can't stop it so we're just going to say it's normal now.

(Rush is right. The abnormal behavior of obama talking about himself as a mongrel is now "normal" to some people. Obama's behavior as a self described mongrel mutt is accepted as normal by people who are abnormal themselves. It becomes clear when you think of obama supporters as the product of the deviancy in our culture. The lie becomes the truth. Fiction becomes fact. Obama is a lunatic that represents the growing population in America. Its not just liberal vs conservative, its insane people representing themselves as sane. Its also sane people being represented as insane. Obama the insane imposter represents his insane supporters.) Story Reports

Miracle Gel Will Help People Who Have Been Denied A Dentist Visit Because Of An Obamacare Panel

(This gel could be big on the "black" market that will be created as the result of obamacare. At least if a person is denied dental care by one of obama's medical panels they could possibly get some "miracle gel" to rub on their teeth.) Story Reports

Gel that can help decayed teeth grow back could end fillings

Gel that can help decayed teeth grow back could end fillings

Pat Hagan

A gel that can help decayed teeth grow back in just weeks may mean an end to fillings.

The gel, which is being developed by scientists in France, works by prompting cells in teeth to start multiplying. They then form healthy new tooth tissue that gradually replaces what has been lost to decay.

Researchers say in lab studies it took just four weeks to restore teeth back to their original healthy state. The gel contains melanocyte-stimulating hormone, or MSH.

We produce this in the pituitary gland, a pea-sized gland just behind the bridge of the nose.

MSH is already known to play an important part in determining skin colour - the more you have, the darker your flesh tone.

But recent studies suggest MSH may also play a crucial role in stimulating bone regeneration.

As bone and teeth are very similar in their structure, a team of scientists at the National Institute for Health and Medical Research in Paris tested if the hormone could stimulate tooth growth.

Their findings, published in the American Chemical Society journal ACS Nano, could signal hurtnot just an end to fillings, but the dreaded dentist drill as well. Tooth decay is a major public health problem in Britain. Around £45m a year is spent treating decayed teeth and by the age of 15, teenagers have had an average of 2.5 teeth filled or removed.

Decay is caused by bacteria, called streptococcus mutans, that live in the mouth and feed on sugar in the diet. Once the bacteria stick to the enamel, they trigger a process called demineralisation - they turn sugar in the diet into a harmful acid that starts to create holes in the teeth.

For decades, the main treatment for cavities has been to 'drill and fill'. However, an estimated one in five Britons suffers from dental phobia, a fear of dentists which means some would rather endure pain and suffering than face the prospect of having their teeth drilled.

The new treatment is painless. And although fillings halt decay, they can come loose and sometimes need refilling.

Experts believe new tooth cells would be stronger and a permanent solution.

The French team mixed MSH with a chemical called poly-L-glutamic acid. This is a substance often used to transport drugs inside the body because it can survive the harsh environments, such as the stomach, that might destroy medicines before they get a chance to work.

The mixture was then turned into a gel and rubbed on to cells, called dental pulp fibroblasts, taken from extracted human teeth. These cells are the kind that help new tooth tissue to grow.

But until now there has been no way of 'switching' them back on once they have been destroyed by dental decay. The researchers found the gel triggered the growth of new cells and also helped with adhesion - the process by which new dental cells 'lock' together.

This is important because it produces strong tooth pulp and enamel which could make the decayed tooth as good as new.

In a separate experiment, the French scientists applied the gel to the teeth of mice with dental cavities. In just one month, the cavities had disappeared. The gel is still undergoing testing but could be available for use within three to five years.

Professor Damien Walmsley, the British Dental Association's scientific adviser, said the gel could be an interesting new development, but stressed it is unlikely to be able to repair teeth that have been extensively damaged by decay.

'There are a lot of exciting developments in this field, of which this is one,' he said. 'It looks promising, but we will have to wait for the results to come back from clinical trials and its use will be restricted to treating small areas of dental decay.'

(The only way to afford this gel would be to get it on the "black" market. Obama will also tax or outlaw this gel if possible.) Story Reports

DECORATED ARMY PHYSICIAN LT. COL. TERRENCE LAKIN APPEALS ARMY’S DISPARAGING FITNESS REPORT

Court Martial Process Proceeding

Washington, D.C., July 16, 2010. Army Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who is being court-martialled for his principled stance in refusing to obey what he feels are illegal orders because they are given by a chain of command headed by a President who may be ineligible under the United States Constitution, has today released his appeal of the Army's version of a “fitness report” which disparages him unjustly. The “Officer Evaluation Report,” or “OER,” as it was originally drafted praised LTC Lakin as one of the top 10% of all Army medical department officers and recommended him both for promotion to full Colonel and for medical clinic command. A few days later it was redrafted and said he was unfit for continued military service. Only one event had intervened.

On March 30, 2010, the American Patriot Foundation posted on YouTube a video (which has now been viewed more than 200,000 times) of LTC Lakin stating: “I am today compelled to make the distasteful choice to invite my own court martial, in pursuit of the truth about the president's eligibility under the Constitution to hold office.” LTC Lakin then refused to deploy to Afghanistan as he had been ordered, until the issue of the President's eligibility has been resolved.

The revised OER failed to note Lakin’s reasons for his position and failed to indicate that all soldiers are trained that they must disobey illegal orders. Lakin has appealed the Army's pejorative and unfair OER that now recommends he in effect be thrown out of the Army, as the Army could do even if the Court Martial proceeding were dropped.

The American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, has received more than a thousand donations to the legal defense fund it set up for LTC Lakin.

Art. II, sec. 1 of the U. S. Constitution explicitly provides that only “natural born” citizens can serve as president and commander-in-chief. Mr. Obama’s continuing refusal to release his original 1961 birth certificate has brought Lt. Col. Lakin to the point where he feels his orders are unlawful, and thus MUST be disobeyed.

Press Release: Lakin Appeals Army's Fitness Report

.......................................................................................
Lt. Col. Lakin is correct in disobeying orders that are issued by an imposter who calls himself president.

The Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 was revised.

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.

Obama was an ILLEGAL ALIEN for 33 years until The Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 was revised. On this date obama became a US citizen but not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Obama’s "American citizen parent", Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.

If 17 year old Ann Dunham gave birth to a child on foreign soil whose father was not an American citizen, then the Immigration and Nationality Act at that time denied Barack Obama any right to American citizenship of any kind. Obama's mother Stanley Ann Dunham was born Nov 29, 1942. Obama was born on Aug 4, 1961 as his undocumented "cerfication of live birth" shows. Obama was born 18 years 8 months after his mother was born.

The "certification of live birth" obama has presented to the world is issued to persons who are not born in hospitals and most likely were born outside of the US. This is why his "birth certification" does not list a hospital, doctor or registrar name.

Obama has FAILED to present proof he was born in an Hawaiian hospital. The "certification of live birth" he presented on the web does not indicate this information. Obama has not presented ANY conclusive proof he is a US citizen!

Obama has only prseented a "certification of live birth" on the web that is a flawed document. The "proof" obama has presented to the world has not and cannot be verified by anyone in the United States. DECORATED ARMY PHYSICIAN LT. COL. TERRENCE LAKIN KNOWS THIS and is willing to put his life on the line for Americans.

Obama does not even qualify under the 14th amendment because he has failed to prove he was born or naturalized in the United States. The cut and pasted "certification of live birth" obama displayed to the world is an unvalidated document. It appears to be a forged document designed to deceive Americans into believing obama is a legitimate US citizen.

Anyone who believes obama's BC is legitimate ignores the facts about the cut and pasted web based forgery. Obama is illegitimate in more ways than one.

I believe obamacare and the massive tax increases can be made null and void.

I also believe every rule, regulation and law obama has signed can be made null and void.

This can be accomplished if obama is exposed as a fraud and imposter.

When obama is exposed as an illegitimate president everything he has done will become null and void as law.

I believe the answer to the obama nightmare is exposing him as the fraud and imposter he is.

I agree with Lt Col Lakin and attempt to prove obama is an imposter explaining why he must hide his true identity.

Obamacare Tax Increases For 2011

Jan 2011 The Largest Tax Hikes in History Begin. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:

Obamacare Tax Increases For 2011 And Beyond

Americans for Tax Reform

First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:

Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
- The 25% bracket rises to 28%
- The 28% bracket rises to 31%
- The 33% bracket rises to 36%
- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.

The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.

Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.


Second Wave: Obamacare

twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare

There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The Tanning Tax. This went into effect on July 1st of this year. It imposes a new, 10% excise tax on getting a tan at a tanning salon. There is no exemption for tanners making less than $250,000 per year.

The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

Brand Name Drug Tax. Starting next year, there will be a multi-billion dollar tax assessment imposed on name-brand drug manufacturers. This tax, like all excise taxes, will raise the price of medicine, hurting everyone.

Economic Substance Doctrine. The IRS is now empowered to disallow perfectly-legal tax deductions and maneuvers merely because it judges that the deduction or action lacks “economic substance.” This is obviously an arbitrary empowerment of IRS agents.

Employer Reporting of Health Insurance Costs on a W-2. This will start for W-2s in the 2011 tax year. While not a tax increase in itself, it makes it very easy for Congress to tax employer-provided healthcare benefits later.

Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the Alternative Minimum Tax won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. These major items include:

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”

Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.

Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.

Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.

(Obama has caused the national debt to vastly increase for the purpose of stripping Americans of their freedom through federal taxation. Obama is spreading the wealth around. These new taxes are also a form of reparations through taxation. Obama is using the power of the federal government to grow the federal government and destroy the private economy through regulations and massive tax increases.) Story Reports

Reparations for slavery is a proposal that some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of enslaved people in the United States, in consideration of the coerced and uncompensated labor their ancestors performed over several centuries.

This compensation has been proposed in a variety of forms, from individual monetary payments to land-based compensation schemes related to independence. The idea remains highly controversial and no broad consensus exists as to how it could be implemented.

(Reparations in the form of individual monetary payments, income tax, has been implemented by barack obama.) Story Reports