Leo Donofrio and Steven Pidgeon were in the forefront of exposing obama as a FRAUD before the 2008 presidential election. Leo Donofrio had an ironclad lawsuit that would have prevailed if the US Supreme Court had heard the case. The Court would not because of standing etc. The US Supreme Court did not want to answer the question: Is barack obama a natural born citizen and qualified to be president. The court ignored the facts of the case that without a doubt proved obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER president.
Fraud has also occurred in the case involving the Chrysler dealers that lost their dealerships because the Bankruptcy Court records, including thousands of pages of hearing transcripts, clearly establish that Old Chrysler made the decision to cut the dealers on their own with no insistence or pressure by the Government or Fiat.
"Well, as we looked at filing bankruptcy, and knowing that being over-dealered has been an issue for Chrysler for some time, and it has been a process that was there prior to me in trying to get dealer consolidation, not only in Chrysler but in the industry, it presented an opportunity to accelerate the plan."
The bottom line is the "old" chrysler destroyed dealerships not because of filing bankruptcy but because "old" chrysler used the "crisis" to purge those dealerships as they needed.
Obama closed Chrysler dealerships to payoff his political cronies.
Obama closed Chrysler dealerships to payoff his political cronies.
If you go back and understand what happened to the old chrysler dealers and who benefited the most you see a pattern of corruption under the control of obama.
The government can say they didn't force the closings of the old chrysler dealers but obama did benefit from the closings that were never required in the first place.
Michelle Malkin made a small mistake inluding the name chrysler when she said the gov forced the closings. She was correct when she said the gov forced the closings of many gm dealerships.
Chrysler was taken over by obama. After the purge of dealerships "Project Genesis" was put into action.
Chrysler dealerships lost millions because of the chrysler purge that had nothing to do with the chrysler bankruptcy. It had everything to do with the fact obama used the "crisis" to pay off his fellow thugs in the form of new dealerships etc.
If the truth can be exposed and obama can be held accountable for the purge of the chrysler dealships because of financial gain this would be enough to impeach the imposter obama. (Story Reports)
.........................................................................................
Shoddy Reporting Concerning Closed Chrysler Dealers:What the TARP Inspector General Report Does NOT Say.
Posted in Uncategorized on July 23, 2010 by naturalborncitizen
The TARP Inspector General’s office, SIGTARP, recently released a report entitled, “Factors Effecting The Decision of General Motors and Chrysler To Reduce Their Dealership Networks“. This report set off a firestorm of shoddy reporting, which, if left unchecked, will confuse those familiar with the Chrysler Dealers’ pending litigation on appeal in federal district court. This blog posting has been designed to educate the public as to the truth of the SIGTARP Report.
My assertion of shoddy reporting is levelled specifically at The New York Times, the AP, and unfortunately also at Michelle Malkin who has been a staunch supporter of the dealers throughout. Regardless, her recent discussion of the SIGTARP report is fundamentally flawed and damaging to the case we have brought in our federal appeal to the Southern District of New York (where a Court ordered oral argument is scheduled for July 28, 2010, a fact the media doesn’t seem remotely interested in mentioning).
Malkin specifically urged her readers to read the entire SIGTARP Report, but it appears she failed to read the full report herself since she erroneously reported:
“The independent review of how and why the Obama administration forced Chrysler and General Motors to oversee mass closures of car dealerships across the country reveals grisly incompetence, fatal bureaucratic hubris and Big Labor cronyism.”
Nowhere in the SIGTARP Report does it say that the Government “forced” (as Malkin put it) Chrysler to reduce its dealership network. As to GM, yes the Government did specifically urge dealership reductions, but as to Chrysler the Government did not. The SIGTARP Report is very clear on this point.
The GM Bankruptcy was a vastly different beast than the Chrysler Bankruptcy. And the SIGTARP Report stresses this point in multiple citations throughout the 45 page document. It is repeated multiple times that the Government did not insist upon dealer reductions for Chrysler. For example, on pg. 5, the SIGTARP Report discusses the pre-bankruptcy viability plans offered by both GM and Chrysler, stating:
“In contrast to GM’s plan, the Chrysler restructuring plan did not contain any specific details about planned dealership closures, such as how many dealerships would close, or what factors would be considered in deciding which dealerships to retain. However, the plan referred to Project Genesis, an ongoing Chrysler effort to reduce the number of Chrysler dealerships…”
The “contrast” between GM and Chrysler was entirely skipped over by Malkin and the rest of the media reports. Chrysler was already reducing its dealership network years before the auto industry crisis hit, years before TARP even existed.
On pg. 7 of the SIGTARP Report, it lists five key factors the Government told GM to focus upon when submitting their updated viability plans. Accelerated dealership restructuring was listed as one of the five factors stressed by the Government for GM to accomplish if it expected future financial assistance. However, in contrast to GM, the five factors the Government stressed for Chrysler’s viability – listed on pgs. 7-8 of the SIGTARP Report – do not include dealership reduction at all.
In fact, on pg. 13 of the SIGTARP Report, it is unequivocally stated that in contrast to GM’s situation, the Government’s analysis of Chrysler’s viability did not address dealership reductions:
“GM was given 60 days to submit a ‘more aggressive plan’ overall, including planning for their dealership terminations, and was provided an additional $ 6 billion of TARP funds…Treasury also listed five challenges for Chrysler in a separate viability determination…The Viability Determination for Chrysler did not address dealership terminations.” (Emphasis added.)
The SIGTARP Report acknowledges that the concepts behind dealership restructuring were openly discussed by GM, Chrysler and the Government. It’s no secret that the Obama administration’s Auto Team were in favor of restructuring GM’s dealership networks and so they insisted upon it. As to Chrysler, the SIGTARP Report only mentions that the Obama Auto Team encouraged a continuation of the pre-existing dealership restructuring Chrysler had begun years before.
There’s a huge difference between suggesting/encouraging a course of action and forcing a course of action. As to GM, the Government forced dealership reductions. As to Chrysler, the Government did not force or insist upon dealership reductions. The SIGTARP Report is very clear about this issue. If one reads the entire 45 page report, one understands this important distinction.
But let’s not lay the blame entirely on Malkin, who has certainly proved to be an ally of the Chrysler and GM auto dealers. The New York Times and AP also printed stories pertaining to the closing of the auto dealers which highlighted the SIGTARP Report. Unfortunately, these reports have also created a false impression.
The AP was misleading in the following statement, “The Treasury Department failed to consider the economic fallout when it told General Motors and Chrysler to quickly shutter many dealerships as part of government-led bankruptcies, a federal watchdog found.“ Again, the SIGTARP Report makes it clear that Chrysler was never ordered to “shutter many dealerships”.
Nick Bunkley of the New York Times published the following on July 18th: “President Obama’s auto task force pressed General Motors and Chrysler to close scores of dealerships”. Bunkley also failed to mention the important contrast between GM and Chrysler laid out in the SIGTARP Report.
WHY THE CONTRAST IS SO IMPORTANT TO FORMER CHRYSLER DEALERS
Nothing in the SIGTARP Report nor in the underlying record of the bankruptcy case supports Old Chrysler’s decision to cut the dealership network once bankruptcy was filed. Old Chrysler had no sound business purpose in doing so. The bankruptcy court records are very clear and the SIGTARP Report includes nothing to counter the underlying record of the case. SIGTARP actually confirms our position.
The Bankruptcy Court records, including thousands of pages of hearing transcripts, clearly establish that Old Chrysler made the decision to cut the dealers on their own with no insistence or pressure by the Government or Fiat. Old Chrysler’s CEO and Chairman, Robert Nardelli, testified on May 28, 2009 as follows (at pgs. 389-390):
Q. And approximately fifteen days later, on May 14th, Chrysler filed a motion to reject approximately 800 dealers, is that correct?
A. That’s correct.
Q. So prior to — the deal originally with Fiat would have been Chrysler bringing in 3,200 dealers into the alliance; however, now Chrysler is giving only 2,400 dealers to the Fiat alliance; is that correct?
A. That’s correct.
Q. Who asked for that change?
A. Well, as we looked at filing bankruptcy, and knowing that being over-dealered has been an issue for Chrysler for some time, and it has been a process that was there prior to me in trying to get dealer consolidation, not only in Chrysler but in the industry, it presented an opportunity to accelerate the plan.
Q. Did the UAW ask for this dealer reduction?
A. No.
Q. Did the American government ask for this dealer reduction?
A. No.
CEO/Chairman Nardelli clearly stated that the Government did not ask for Chrysler dealer reductions. Furthermore, every piece of testimony in the case confirmed this to be true. For example, review key Fiat executive Alfredo Altavilla’s May 27, 2009 testimony on this point:
Q. To your knowledge, in any of your discussions with the United States Treasury, has the United States Treasury requested or demanded any reduction in the dealer network?
A. U.S. Treasury has never demanded such a restructuring, at least in presence of Fiat.
Q. Are you aware of any request by any government agency, including the Auto Task Force, that has demanded a reduction in Chrysler’s dealer network?
A. We have never been part of a discussion in which the Treasury has requested the restructuring.
Peter Grady was the Chrysler executive in charge of dealer restructuring, who testified as follows (May 28, 2009 transcript at 517):
Q. At whose request was this done?
A. At whose request what was done?
Q. The rejection? The idea to reject all these dealers?
A. Well, it’s after consultation with our attorneys. And we had an opportunity to restructure the network.
Q. Was this brought up in connection with any meetings — I believe you testified that you attended some meetings with the Treasury Department?
A. I was on some conference calls and one meeting with the U.S. Treasury — the auto task force.
Q. Now, did they insist that this process be carried out?
A. What they insisted was that we restructure our business in total back in December or February when we originally put forth our viability plan.
Q. Well, my question goes to the more specific point of whether or not the task force instructed Chrysler in your presence to reduce the number of dealers –
A. No.
All of the sudden concern with dealer closings in the press has the appearance of providing a counter-point to the issues we have raised in our appeal to the Southern District of New York. These media reports appear to provide a basis by which Old Chrysler would have been under pressure by the Government to cut the dealership network, a position which, as we have demonstrated in our filings (by testimony as quoted above) is not supported by the record.
The rejected Chrysler Dealers’ current appeal relies upon the fact that Old Chrysler was not under forced pressure by the Government as lender, or Fiat as purchaser, to cut the dealership network. Without forced pressure, Old Chrysler’s decision to cut 789 dealers does not stand up to scrutiny and should not have been approved by the Bankruptcy Court. These erroneous media reports are having the effect of revising history and confusing the issues.
The SIGTARP Report does say that decisions of the auto task force led to thousands of job cuts, and that is what we have said all along as well. But this goes back to the use of TARP funds by the Government to enter the private sector as pseudo venture capitalists. That decision was the general decision that ultimately caused the auto industry to be restructured, but the specific decision to cut the dealership network – according to key Chrysler executives Grady and Nardelli, was Chrysler’s decision alone.
And if that were not the case, Mr. Nardelli and Mr. Grady might be subject to perjury charges. But that won’t happen because the record and the SIGTARP Report are clear and consistent; the Government did not order Chrysler dealerships to be shut down. Only the media is confused.
Michelle Malkin finished her piece with a quote from the SIGTARP Report which highlights a response by Ron Bloom, the key bankruptcy expert employed by the Obama Administration’s Auto Team to oversee the auto industry restructuring:
“…[W]hen asked explicitly whether the Auto Team could have left the dealerships out of the restructurings, Mr. Bloom, the current head of the Auto Team, confirmed that the Auto team ‘could have left any one component (of the restructuring plan) alone,’ but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President’s mandate for ‘shared sacrifice.’ ”
The term “shared sacrifice” with regard to Chrysler had nothing to do with dealer reductions. Instead, that term concerned expectations by the Government and Old Chrysler that the Chrysler Dealers would – in order to help Chrysler avoid bankruptcy – take on additional inventory in buying more cars and parts than they normally purchased.
The testimony offered by Chrysler CEO/Chairman Nardelli in the Bankruptcy Court hearings (pgs. 195-196) established that the dealers rose to that challenge of shared sacrifice by taking on extra inventory in the hope of saving Chrysler from bankruptcy. Nardelli testified that right up until the evening before bankruptcy was filed, April 29, 2009, “the dealers certainly responded in kind“.
Meanwhile, unbeknownst to these dealers who were valiantly buying up extra inventory, Old Chrysler was concurrently contemplating kicking them to the curb with no obligation to buy back the extra inventory which the rejected dealers – post rejection – were forbidden from selling to the public.
That’s the dirty little secret of the so-called “shared sacrifice” mentioned by Herr Bloom.
Frankly, I don’t appreciate the timing of these shoddy news pieces concerning the SIGTARP Report. But if any media outlets are truly interested in the cause of justice here, they ought to mention that 82 rejected Chrysler dealers will have their day in court on this very issue before the Honorable Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein – who ordered oral argument sua sponte – on July 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM in the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y.
I also encourage the media to read the entire SIGTARP Report and to provide an accurate assessment of the issues discussed in this post.
by Leo Donofrio, Esq. for the law firm of Pidgeon & Donofrio GP
Obama closed Chrysler dealerships to payoff his political cronies.
Friday, July 30, 2010
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Obama describes himself as a mongrel Jul 2010 and a mutt Nov 7 2009
On Nov 7, 2008 obama called himself a mutt. On Jul 29, 2010 obama called himself an african american mongrel. So out of his own mouth Americans are to think of obama as a mongrel mutt. I prefer to refer to obama an a fraud and imposter.
mongrel
A derogatory term for a variation that is not genuine; something irregular or inferior or of dubious origin.
Obama admits he is a mongrel. Someone who is not genuine, a FRAUD. Obama's origin has been in question since he was certified by the DNC as a "natural born" US citizen. Hawaiian law required obama to be a "natural born citizen" to get on the presidential ballot.. Obama has defined what he thinks a natural born citizen is. A citizen whose parents were both Americans at the time of birth. Obama has admitted his father was a Kenyan citizen at birth therfore obama is not genuine and IS of a DUBIOUS origin. Obama lied to Hawaiian officals and committed FRAUD!
Obama said, "I can be—you name it". I'll name it. A FRAUD and IMPOSTER! (A nervous belligerent little mongrel dog who has called himself a mutt.)
An extreme insult to muslims is calling someone a "dog' or mongrel. Obama insulted african Americans and the American public in general when he informed us we are mongrels or dogs. Obama knows this is an extreme insult but most Americans don't know he insulted them in an extreme way. Obama considers Americans "unclean" or mongrels.
I consider BO unclean. Even his initials point to the fact he has an aroma that is to be avoided. Obama's aroma is the stench of death. When I look at obama I see a freak who is out of control.
"Americans are a mongrel people, half Jewified, half Negrofied" Adolf Hitler
"We are sort of a mongrel people." Barack Hussein Obama
.......................................................................................
Obama says African Americans are mongrel people
Obama dropped the mongrel comment on the view:
"Part of what I realized was that if the world saw me as African-American, then that wasn’t something that I needed to run away from. That’s something that I could go ahead and embrace. And the interesting thing about the African American experience in this country is that we are sort of a mongrel people. I mean, we’re all kind of mixed up. Now, that’s actually true for white America as well but we just know more about it. And so I’m less interested in how we label ourselves and more interested in how we treat each other. And if we’re treating each other right, then I can be African American, I can be multi-racial, I can be—you name it. What matters is, am I showing people respect. Am I caring for other people. That’s, I think, the message that we want to send."
A quote from the self described mongrel mutt, barack hussein obama, imposter and fraud.
........................................................................................
Rush Limbaugh Transcript
Rush Limbaugh
Thur Jul 29, 2010
RUSH: I was asking myself the other night, -- I'm serious about this -- you can have a political figure or a celebrity involved in one of the most embarrassing, illegal or borderline legal things, take your pick, truly despicable things, and yet they become famous, they become the focus of even more attention, they become wealthy, with genuine reprobate behavior. I was asking myself, "At what point in our culture did it change?" It used to be that there was a stigma, an embarrassment to being a reprobate, or to have broken the law or to have just engaged in utter moral depravity. When did it change that this became a resume enhancement? I can't put my finger on it. All I know is that ever since I started this show in the late eighties, early nineties, I have watched this happen, and I have watched this deviancy in our culture get defined downward. We've just given up. As Moynihan said, "We've defined deviancy down." We can't fix that so it's now normal. Bad behavior, we can't stop it so we're just going to say it's normal now.
(Rush is right. The abnormal behavior of obama talking about himself as a mongrel is now "normal" to some people. Obama's behavior as a self described mongrel mutt is accepted as normal by people who are abnormal themselves. It becomes clear when you think of obama supporters as the product of the deviancy in our culture. The lie becomes the truth. Fiction becomes fact. Obama is a lunatic that represents the growing population in America. Its not just liberal vs conservative, its insane people representing themselves as sane. Its also sane people being represented as insane. Obama the insane imposter represents his insane supporters.) Story Reports
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Miracle Gel Will Help People Who Have Been Denied A Dentist Visit Because Of An Obamacare Panel
(This gel could be big on the "black" market that will be created as the result of obamacare. At least if a person is denied dental care by one of obama's medical panels they could possibly get some "miracle gel" to rub on their teeth.) Story Reports
Gel that can help decayed teeth grow back could end fillings
Gel that can help decayed teeth grow back could end fillings
Pat Hagan
A gel that can help decayed teeth grow back in just weeks may mean an end to fillings.
The gel, which is being developed by scientists in France, works by prompting cells in teeth to start multiplying. They then form healthy new tooth tissue that gradually replaces what has been lost to decay.
Researchers say in lab studies it took just four weeks to restore teeth back to their original healthy state. The gel contains melanocyte-stimulating hormone, or MSH.
We produce this in the pituitary gland, a pea-sized gland just behind the bridge of the nose.
MSH is already known to play an important part in determining skin colour - the more you have, the darker your flesh tone.
But recent studies suggest MSH may also play a crucial role in stimulating bone regeneration.
As bone and teeth are very similar in their structure, a team of scientists at the National Institute for Health and Medical Research in Paris tested if the hormone could stimulate tooth growth.
Their findings, published in the American Chemical Society journal ACS Nano, could signal hurtnot just an end to fillings, but the dreaded dentist drill as well. Tooth decay is a major public health problem in Britain. Around £45m a year is spent treating decayed teeth and by the age of 15, teenagers have had an average of 2.5 teeth filled or removed.
Decay is caused by bacteria, called streptococcus mutans, that live in the mouth and feed on sugar in the diet. Once the bacteria stick to the enamel, they trigger a process called demineralisation - they turn sugar in the diet into a harmful acid that starts to create holes in the teeth.
For decades, the main treatment for cavities has been to 'drill and fill'. However, an estimated one in five Britons suffers from dental phobia, a fear of dentists which means some would rather endure pain and suffering than face the prospect of having their teeth drilled.
The new treatment is painless. And although fillings halt decay, they can come loose and sometimes need refilling.
Experts believe new tooth cells would be stronger and a permanent solution.
The French team mixed MSH with a chemical called poly-L-glutamic acid. This is a substance often used to transport drugs inside the body because it can survive the harsh environments, such as the stomach, that might destroy medicines before they get a chance to work.
The mixture was then turned into a gel and rubbed on to cells, called dental pulp fibroblasts, taken from extracted human teeth. These cells are the kind that help new tooth tissue to grow.
But until now there has been no way of 'switching' them back on once they have been destroyed by dental decay. The researchers found the gel triggered the growth of new cells and also helped with adhesion - the process by which new dental cells 'lock' together.
This is important because it produces strong tooth pulp and enamel which could make the decayed tooth as good as new.
In a separate experiment, the French scientists applied the gel to the teeth of mice with dental cavities. In just one month, the cavities had disappeared. The gel is still undergoing testing but could be available for use within three to five years.
Professor Damien Walmsley, the British Dental Association's scientific adviser, said the gel could be an interesting new development, but stressed it is unlikely to be able to repair teeth that have been extensively damaged by decay.
'There are a lot of exciting developments in this field, of which this is one,' he said. 'It looks promising, but we will have to wait for the results to come back from clinical trials and its use will be restricted to treating small areas of dental decay.'
(The only way to afford this gel would be to get it on the "black" market. Obama will also tax or outlaw this gel if possible.) Story Reports
Monday, July 26, 2010
DECORATED ARMY PHYSICIAN LT. COL. TERRENCE LAKIN APPEALS ARMY’S DISPARAGING FITNESS REPORT
Court Martial Process Proceeding
Washington, D.C., July 16, 2010. Army Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who is being court-martialled for his principled stance in refusing to obey what he feels are illegal orders because they are given by a chain of command headed by a President who may be ineligible under the United States Constitution, has today released his appeal of the Army's version of a “fitness report” which disparages him unjustly. The “Officer Evaluation Report,” or “OER,” as it was originally drafted praised LTC Lakin as one of the top 10% of all Army medical department officers and recommended him both for promotion to full Colonel and for medical clinic command. A few days later it was redrafted and said he was unfit for continued military service. Only one event had intervened.
On March 30, 2010, the American Patriot Foundation posted on YouTube a video (which has now been viewed more than 200,000 times) of LTC Lakin stating: “I am today compelled to make the distasteful choice to invite my own court martial, in pursuit of the truth about the president's eligibility under the Constitution to hold office.” LTC Lakin then refused to deploy to Afghanistan as he had been ordered, until the issue of the President's eligibility has been resolved.
The revised OER failed to note Lakin’s reasons for his position and failed to indicate that all soldiers are trained that they must disobey illegal orders. Lakin has appealed the Army's pejorative and unfair OER that now recommends he in effect be thrown out of the Army, as the Army could do even if the Court Martial proceeding were dropped.
The American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, has received more than a thousand donations to the legal defense fund it set up for LTC Lakin.
Art. II, sec. 1 of the U. S. Constitution explicitly provides that only “natural born” citizens can serve as president and commander-in-chief. Mr. Obama’s continuing refusal to release his original 1961 birth certificate has brought Lt. Col. Lakin to the point where he feels his orders are unlawful, and thus MUST be disobeyed.
Press Release: Lakin Appeals Army's Fitness Report
.......................................................................................
Lt. Col. Lakin is correct in disobeying orders that are issued by an imposter who calls himself president.
The Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 was revised.
(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.
Obama was an ILLEGAL ALIEN for 33 years until The Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 was revised. On this date obama became a US citizen but not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Obama’s "American citizen parent", Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.
If 17 year old Ann Dunham gave birth to a child on foreign soil whose father was not an American citizen, then the Immigration and Nationality Act at that time denied Barack Obama any right to American citizenship of any kind. Obama's mother Stanley Ann Dunham was born Nov 29, 1942. Obama was born on Aug 4, 1961 as his undocumented "cerfication of live birth" shows. Obama was born 18 years 8 months after his mother was born.
The "certification of live birth" obama has presented to the world is issued to persons who are not born in hospitals and most likely were born outside of the US. This is why his "birth certification" does not list a hospital, doctor or registrar name.
Obama has FAILED to present proof he was born in an Hawaiian hospital. The "certification of live birth" he presented on the web does not indicate this information. Obama has not presented ANY conclusive proof he is a US citizen!
Obama has only prseented a "certification of live birth" on the web that is a flawed document. The "proof" obama has presented to the world has not and cannot be verified by anyone in the United States. DECORATED ARMY PHYSICIAN LT. COL. TERRENCE LAKIN KNOWS THIS and is willing to put his life on the line for Americans.
Obama does not even qualify under the 14th amendment because he has failed to prove he was born or naturalized in the United States. The cut and pasted "certification of live birth" obama displayed to the world is an unvalidated document. It appears to be a forged document designed to deceive Americans into believing obama is a legitimate US citizen.
Anyone who believes obama's BC is legitimate ignores the facts about the cut and pasted web based forgery. Obama is illegitimate in more ways than one.
I believe obamacare and the massive tax increases can be made null and void.
I also believe every rule, regulation and law obama has signed can be made null and void.
This can be accomplished if obama is exposed as a fraud and imposter.
When obama is exposed as an illegitimate president everything he has done will become null and void as law.
I believe the answer to the obama nightmare is exposing him as the fraud and imposter he is.
I agree with Lt Col Lakin and attempt to prove obama is an imposter explaining why he must hide his true identity.
Obamacare Tax Increases For 2011
Jan 2011 The Largest Tax Hikes in History Begin. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:
Obamacare Tax Increases For 2011 And Beyond
Americans for Tax Reform
First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief
In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:
Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:
- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
- The 25% bracket rises to 28%
- The 28% bracket rises to 31%
- The 33% bracket rises to 36%
- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%
Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.
The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.
Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.
Second Wave: Obamacare
twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare
There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:
The Tanning Tax. This went into effect on July 1st of this year. It imposes a new, 10% excise tax on getting a tan at a tanning salon. There is no exemption for tanners making less than $250,000 per year.
The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).
The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.
Brand Name Drug Tax. Starting next year, there will be a multi-billion dollar tax assessment imposed on name-brand drug manufacturers. This tax, like all excise taxes, will raise the price of medicine, hurting everyone.
Economic Substance Doctrine. The IRS is now empowered to disallow perfectly-legal tax deductions and maneuvers merely because it judges that the deduction or action lacks “economic substance.” This is obviously an arbitrary empowerment of IRS agents.
Employer Reporting of Health Insurance Costs on a W-2. This will start for W-2s in the 2011 tax year. While not a tax increase in itself, it makes it very easy for Congress to tax employer-provided healthcare benefits later.
Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes
When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the Alternative Minimum Tax won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. These major items include:
The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.
Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”
Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.
Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.
Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.
(Obama has caused the national debt to vastly increase for the purpose of stripping Americans of their freedom through federal taxation. Obama is spreading the wealth around. These new taxes are also a form of reparations through taxation. Obama is using the power of the federal government to grow the federal government and destroy the private economy through regulations and massive tax increases.) Story Reports
Reparations for slavery is a proposal that some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of enslaved people in the United States, in consideration of the coerced and uncompensated labor their ancestors performed over several centuries.
This compensation has been proposed in a variety of forms, from individual monetary payments to land-based compensation schemes related to independence. The idea remains highly controversial and no broad consensus exists as to how it could be implemented.
(Reparations in the form of individual monetary payments, income tax, has been implemented by barack obama.) Story Reports
Obamacare Tax Increases For 2011 And Beyond
Americans for Tax Reform
First Wave: Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief
In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families. These will all expire on January 1, 2011:
Personal income tax rates will rise. The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed). The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent. All the rates in between will also rise. Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates. The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:
- The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
- The 25% bracket rises to 28%
- The 28% bracket rises to 31%
- The 33% bracket rises to 36%
- The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%
Higher taxes on marriage and family. The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income. The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child. The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level. The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.
The return of the Death Tax. This year, there is no death tax. For those dying on or after January 1 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes and a retirement account could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones.
Higher tax rates on savers and investors. The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011. The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011. These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.
Second Wave: Obamacare
twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare
There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:
The Tanning Tax. This went into effect on July 1st of this year. It imposes a new, 10% excise tax on getting a tan at a tanning salon. There is no exemption for tanners making less than $250,000 per year.
The “Medicine Cabinet Tax” Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).
The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.
Brand Name Drug Tax. Starting next year, there will be a multi-billion dollar tax assessment imposed on name-brand drug manufacturers. This tax, like all excise taxes, will raise the price of medicine, hurting everyone.
Economic Substance Doctrine. The IRS is now empowered to disallow perfectly-legal tax deductions and maneuvers merely because it judges that the deduction or action lacks “economic substance.” This is obviously an arbitrary empowerment of IRS agents.
Employer Reporting of Health Insurance Costs on a W-2. This will start for W-2s in the 2011 tax year. While not a tax increase in itself, it makes it very easy for Congress to tax employer-provided healthcare benefits later.
Third Wave: The Alternative Minimum Tax and Employer Tax Hikes
When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise—the Alternative Minimum Tax won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired. These major items include:
The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year. According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families—rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.
Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear. Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000. This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their purchases of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”
Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses. There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.
Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced. The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available. Tax credits for education will be limited. Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses. Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut. Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed. The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.
Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed. Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA. This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.
(Obama has caused the national debt to vastly increase for the purpose of stripping Americans of their freedom through federal taxation. Obama is spreading the wealth around. These new taxes are also a form of reparations through taxation. Obama is using the power of the federal government to grow the federal government and destroy the private economy through regulations and massive tax increases.) Story Reports
Reparations for slavery is a proposal that some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of enslaved people in the United States, in consideration of the coerced and uncompensated labor their ancestors performed over several centuries.
This compensation has been proposed in a variety of forms, from individual monetary payments to land-based compensation schemes related to independence. The idea remains highly controversial and no broad consensus exists as to how it could be implemented.
(Reparations in the form of individual monetary payments, income tax, has been implemented by barack obama.) Story Reports
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Deepwater Horizon alarms were switched off
(I've said all along the oil spill in the gulf was done on purpose to futher the agenda of obama. Bp is obama's partner. Its not going to get any better until the thug obama is removed from office.) Story Reports
Deepwater Horizon alarms were switched off 'to help workers sleep'.
guardian.co.uk
Transocean is under scrutiny after it emerged that Deepwater Horizon’s safety systems were off when it exploded.
Vital warning systems on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig were switched off at the time of the explosion in order to spare workers being woken by false alarms, a federal investigation has heard.
The revelation that alarm systems on the rig at the centre of the disaster were disabled – and that key safety mechanisms had also consciously been switched off – came in testimony by a chief technician working for Transocean, the drilling company that owned the rig.
Mike Williams, who was in charge of maintaining the rig's electronic systems, was giving evidence to the federal panel in New Orleans that is investigating the cause of the disaster on 20 April, which killed 11 people.
Williams told the hearing today that no alarms went off on the day of the explosion because they had been "inhibited". Sensors monitoring conditions on the rig and in the Macondo oil well beneath it were still working, but the computer had been instructed not to trigger any alarms in case of adverse readings.
Both visual and sound alarms should have gone off in the case of sensors detecting fire or dangerous levels of combustible or toxic gases.
The evidence of deliberate dilution of the rig's safety mechanisms is likely to have wide ramifications for BP and Transocean, the world's largest offshore drilling company. It switches the spotlight of blame away from BP and towards the subcontractor which took the decisions. Of the 126 crew on board the rig on 20 April, seven worked for BP and 79 for Transocean.
Williams said he discovered that the physical alarm system had been disabled a full year before the disaster. When he asked why, he said he was told that the view from even the most senior Transocean official on the rig had been that "they did not want people woken up at three o'clock in the morning due to false alarms".
Williams' testimony will raise questions about whether lives could have been saved had the alarms been properly set and the disaster mitigated.
He also revealed that a crucial safety device, designed to shut down the drill shack in the case of dangerous gas levels being detected, had been disabled, or bypassed as it is called.
(This story would lead you to believe the disaster was caused by Transocean. Remember BP leased the rig from transocean. Also remember the obama administration waved all the inspections of the rig that would have discovered the safety violations.
BP, Transocean and obama conspired to make sure this disaster could not be averted. The state run media are not talking about the fact BP set this disaster up . BP deliberately affected the disaster. Bp was given a green light by obama.) Story Reports
When he saw that the system had been bypassed, Williams protested to a Transocean supervisor, Mark Hay, who dismissed his concerns. Hay responded: "Damn thing been in bypass for five years. Matter of fact, the entire [Transocean] fleet runs them in bypass."
In a third significant disclosure, Williams also revealed that a computer system used to monitor the drill shack was constantly freezing up, and on one occasion even produced wrong information. The system failed to indicate that a vital valve inside the blowout preventer, the device designed to shut down the well in case of problems, had been damaged.
Pressure is now likely to mount on Transocean to explain the discrepancies.
The New York Times reported earlier this week that a survey of workers carried out by Transocean shortly before the blast suggested key safety practices had not been followed.
Workers said that, while they were aware of unsafe practices on the rig, they were afraid to report mistakes for fear of reprisals.
A BP spokesman said last night: "The investigations continue to demonstrate that a range of things went wrong and that responsibility lies with a whole load of different companies."
(BP and obama are in bed togeather. They produced this disaster. A crisis obama could use to move his radical agenda forward. It was a setup from the beginning. The state run media is covering for obama and BP.) Story Reports
Deepwater Horizon alarms were switched off 'to help workers sleep'
Deepwater Horizon alarms were switched off 'to help workers sleep'.
guardian.co.uk
Transocean is under scrutiny after it emerged that Deepwater Horizon’s safety systems were off when it exploded.
Vital warning systems on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig were switched off at the time of the explosion in order to spare workers being woken by false alarms, a federal investigation has heard.
The revelation that alarm systems on the rig at the centre of the disaster were disabled – and that key safety mechanisms had also consciously been switched off – came in testimony by a chief technician working for Transocean, the drilling company that owned the rig.
Mike Williams, who was in charge of maintaining the rig's electronic systems, was giving evidence to the federal panel in New Orleans that is investigating the cause of the disaster on 20 April, which killed 11 people.
Williams told the hearing today that no alarms went off on the day of the explosion because they had been "inhibited". Sensors monitoring conditions on the rig and in the Macondo oil well beneath it were still working, but the computer had been instructed not to trigger any alarms in case of adverse readings.
Both visual and sound alarms should have gone off in the case of sensors detecting fire or dangerous levels of combustible or toxic gases.
The evidence of deliberate dilution of the rig's safety mechanisms is likely to have wide ramifications for BP and Transocean, the world's largest offshore drilling company. It switches the spotlight of blame away from BP and towards the subcontractor which took the decisions. Of the 126 crew on board the rig on 20 April, seven worked for BP and 79 for Transocean.
Williams said he discovered that the physical alarm system had been disabled a full year before the disaster. When he asked why, he said he was told that the view from even the most senior Transocean official on the rig had been that "they did not want people woken up at three o'clock in the morning due to false alarms".
Williams' testimony will raise questions about whether lives could have been saved had the alarms been properly set and the disaster mitigated.
He also revealed that a crucial safety device, designed to shut down the drill shack in the case of dangerous gas levels being detected, had been disabled, or bypassed as it is called.
(This story would lead you to believe the disaster was caused by Transocean. Remember BP leased the rig from transocean. Also remember the obama administration waved all the inspections of the rig that would have discovered the safety violations.
BP, Transocean and obama conspired to make sure this disaster could not be averted. The state run media are not talking about the fact BP set this disaster up . BP deliberately affected the disaster. Bp was given a green light by obama.) Story Reports
When he saw that the system had been bypassed, Williams protested to a Transocean supervisor, Mark Hay, who dismissed his concerns. Hay responded: "Damn thing been in bypass for five years. Matter of fact, the entire [Transocean] fleet runs them in bypass."
In a third significant disclosure, Williams also revealed that a computer system used to monitor the drill shack was constantly freezing up, and on one occasion even produced wrong information. The system failed to indicate that a vital valve inside the blowout preventer, the device designed to shut down the well in case of problems, had been damaged.
Pressure is now likely to mount on Transocean to explain the discrepancies.
The New York Times reported earlier this week that a survey of workers carried out by Transocean shortly before the blast suggested key safety practices had not been followed.
Workers said that, while they were aware of unsafe practices on the rig, they were afraid to report mistakes for fear of reprisals.
A BP spokesman said last night: "The investigations continue to demonstrate that a range of things went wrong and that responsibility lies with a whole load of different companies."
(BP and obama are in bed togeather. They produced this disaster. A crisis obama could use to move his radical agenda forward. It was a setup from the beginning. The state run media is covering for obama and BP.) Story Reports
Deepwater Horizon alarms were switched off 'to help workers sleep'
Thursday, July 22, 2010
The Paycheck Fairness Act would impose unparalleled government control over how employees are paid, among even the nation’s smallest businesses
The Paycheck Fairness Act would impose unparalleled government control over how employees are paid, among even the nation’s smallest businesses.
Government control of the workers paycheck though allege discrimination. Its a gigantic rev al sharpton/jessie jackson shakdown by the thug obama
White House Backs Bill to Collect Employee Pay Information from Businesses.
The Obama administration is backing legislation that includes regulations requiring U.S. businesses to provide to the government data about employee pay as it relates to the sex, race and national origin of employees.
(Obama wants to control your paycheck. Obama wants to know what you make. Obama wants to use the race card to perpetuate racism in the form of alleged discrimination. Its easy to allege discrimination. This obama law is just a way to control how much the American worker makes. Its another way to raise the minimum wage or contol who is hired through the quota system of alleged discrimination. Its is a government subsidy to democratic voters or potential democratic voters. It is just another giant government slush fund created to micromanage Americans by further enslaving the American population.) Story Reports
The National Association of Manufacturers issued a statement about the Paycheck Fairness Act in April.
“The Paycheck Fairness Act, which purports to prevent instances of illegal gender-based discrimination, could outlaw many legitimate practices employers use to set employee pay rates, even where there is no evidence of intentional discrimination and employers act with reasonable belief that their pay policies are lawful,” the statement said.
“Manufacturers strongly oppose unlawful discrimination in any form, but the Paycheck Fairness Act would impose unparalleled government control over how employees are paid, among even the nation’s smallest businesses,” it added.
“It would drastically alter the Equal Pay Act to allow unprecedented penalties of unlimited punitive and compensatory damages in cases of alleged discrimination,” the statement said.
Government control of the workers paycheck though allege discrimination. Its a gigantic rev al sharpton/jessie jackson shakdown by the thug obama
White House Backs Bill to Collect Employee Pay Information from Businesses.
The Obama administration is backing legislation that includes regulations requiring U.S. businesses to provide to the government data about employee pay as it relates to the sex, race and national origin of employees.
(Obama wants to control your paycheck. Obama wants to know what you make. Obama wants to use the race card to perpetuate racism in the form of alleged discrimination. Its easy to allege discrimination. This obama law is just a way to control how much the American worker makes. Its another way to raise the minimum wage or contol who is hired through the quota system of alleged discrimination. Its is a government subsidy to democratic voters or potential democratic voters. It is just another giant government slush fund created to micromanage Americans by further enslaving the American population.) Story Reports
The National Association of Manufacturers issued a statement about the Paycheck Fairness Act in April.
“The Paycheck Fairness Act, which purports to prevent instances of illegal gender-based discrimination, could outlaw many legitimate practices employers use to set employee pay rates, even where there is no evidence of intentional discrimination and employers act with reasonable belief that their pay policies are lawful,” the statement said.
“Manufacturers strongly oppose unlawful discrimination in any form, but the Paycheck Fairness Act would impose unparalleled government control over how employees are paid, among even the nation’s smallest businesses,” it added.
“It would drastically alter the Equal Pay Act to allow unprecedented penalties of unlimited punitive and compensatory damages in cases of alleged discrimination,” the statement said.
Gallup caught lying about the generic ballot trend
(In other words its a damn lie. Gallup is telling a lie when they say 99% of the adults in their daily tracking poll are registered voters. Like redstate says, the odds or statistics don't add up for the July 19 poll because of gallup's fabrication. So the July 19 poll was a fabrication and the correction was a fabrication. It has been exposed as an "elite controlled media" LIE!) Story Reports
....................................................................................
Rush Limbaugh
We know there is no media. They're just leftists. These are the propagandists, the pretenders, the apparatchiks. An apparatchik is a Russian colloquial term for a full-time, professional functionary of the Communist Party or government; i.e., an agent of the governmental or party "apparat" (apparatus)
....................................................................................
Gallup caught lying about the generic ballot trend [Updated 6PM ET]
Neil Stevens
Gallup is combining two different sampling methods into one so-called trend of Registered Voters (complete with captioned graph), getting different results, but pretending they show one trend all the same.
On June 2 when Republicans took a big lead in the Gallup generic ballot. It projected conservatively a 45 seat Republican gain in the House. This was a poll of registered voters, according to Gallup’s Survey Methods notes:
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted May 24-30, 2010, with a random sample of 1,594 registered voters, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using a random-digit-dial sampling technique.
Now on July 19 that Democrats are showing a big lead, despite the fact that Gallup’s graph now is titled Candidate Preferences in 2010 Congressional Elections, Among Registered Voters, the sampling is different:
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking July 12-18, 2010, with a random sample of 1,535 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling.
Catch the difference? The Republicans lead with a sample of Registered Voters, but the Democrats lead with a sample of Adults. Someone who trusted Gallup’s picture would never have noticed.
It is terribly dishonest for Gallup to string together two different polls as one series, as Gallup does not only in their graphs, but in their write-ups as well. Here’s an example from the July 19 release:
The Democrats’ six-point advantage in Gallup Daily interviewing from July 12-18 represents the first statistically significant lead for that party’s candidates since Gallup began weekly tracking of this measure in March.
Notice, they call the series one measure, even though it’s at least two different kinds of polls with two different kinds of sampling pools. You cannot pretend that a poll of all adults and a poll filtered by registered voters are part of the same series, even if the same questions are asked. That’s Polling 101, and whoever’s responsible for the Gallup release should have known this, and certainly whoever’s responsible for oversight of the Gallup releases would know this.
Somebody’s lying.
(The ruling elite control the "media" that no longer exists. Polls and statistics from polls can be easly manipulated. The July 19 gallup poll was manipulated to produce "manufactured" numbers for the democrates and obama. The July 19 poll is an obvious lie. Neil Stevens along with others have exposed the ruling elite lie in the July gallup poll. Obama is nothing but a total lie. Polls and stastics must be manipulated to conceal his total failure as a leader.) Story Reports
(Gallup’s actual polling in the Jul 19 poll is fabricated, and it’s easy to see how Gallup packages results that are designed to mislead readers into seeing trends that just aren’t there. This is what the obama regime does every day. Obama is a total fabrication designed to deceive the American public. If any American relies on the "media", that is controlled by the ruling elite, for their "news", they will be fed a lie to consume as the truth.) Story Reports
Observe the Gallup trend, per Real Clear Politics, with polls of adults distinguished from polls of registered voters, the most honest approach:
Date Pool Lead
7-18 A D+6
7-11 RV D+1
7-3 RV R+6
6-27 RV D+1
6-20 RV D+0
6-13 RV R+5
6-6 RV D+0
Sorted this way the trend is clear: Registered Voters oscillate between near-ties for the Democrats, and big leads for the Republicans. But once we switch to Adults, Democrats suddenly take a big edge of their own.
Is this credible? No, but you’d never know it if you took Gallup’s releases at face value. Even if the truth was there if you dig deep enough, it’s still a lie to misrepresent the data as Gallup has done.
As a final note, I have a prediction: Somebody, perhaps even Gallup, will claim that the Survey Notes were mistaken in this last release, and that the poll was of Registered Voters, but was just recorded wrongly. If this is the case, then that still suggests a serious lapse of quality control at Gallup leading to misinformation being published, and still calls into question every poll release Gallup makes. So I don’t buy it as a defense.
Update: Gallup has now issued a correction alongside the bare changing of ‘adults’ to ‘registered voters’ in the Survey Methods:
Editor’s note: The original version of this story inadvertently referred to national adults rather than registered voters in the survey methods statement. The results reported here and in all Gallup generic ballot trends so far this year are based on registered voters; the survey methods statement now correctly reflects that.
A commenter at RedState.com pointed out a significant flaw in this story: the sample size didn’t change. Originally the post read 1,535 adults, now it reads 1,535 registered voters. However the overall daily Obama Job Approval tracking poll also surveys “approximately 1,500 national adults.” are we to believe that approximately 99% of the adults in daily tracking sample were registered to vote? MSNBC reported in 2008 that about 80% of American adults were registered, and that number will decline from 2008 to 2010 as voters are purged and don’t re-register for the midterm. The odds against this are astronomical, making this poll an incredible outlier for so many to be registered.
(In other words its a damn lie. Gallup is telling a lie when they say 99% of the adults in their daily tracking poll are regeistered. Like redstate says, the odds or statistics don't add up for the Jul 19 poll because of gallup's fabrication. So the July 19 poll was a fabrication and the correction was a fabrication. It has been exposed as an "elite controlled media" LIE!) Story Reports
.....................................................................................
Story #1: Gallup Caught Lying About the Generic Ballot Trend
Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page
July 22, 2010
Story #1: Gallup Caught Lying About the Generic Ballot Trend
RUSH: There was a story recently. The Gallup poll generic ballot showed the Democrats were all of a sudden way ahead of the Republicans. Nobody could figure it out. "What brought this about? What happened?" and the spin from the apparatchiks... I'm really... I'm still looking for a term. It's ingrained in us to refer to these people as "the media." We know there is no media. They're just leftists. These are the propagandists, the pretenders, the apparatchiks. Regardless, these people who pretend to be media, the spin was, "Well, the reason the Democrats have launched themselves ahead of the Republicans in the generic ballot is because the Republicans opposed extending unemployment benefits."
Well, Neil Stevens at RedState.com has looked into it and has a post that Gallup was caught lying about the generic ballot. "The Gallup Generic Ballot is a trusted, widely reported resource. I've analyzed it extensively, and defended it to others. But yesterday, when I covered the poll's latest release, Gallup lied. I was lied to, you were lied to, everyone who's trusted the Gallup name got lied to. How? Gallup is combining two different sampling methods into one so-called trend of Registered Voters (complete with captioned graph), getting different results, but pretending they show one trend all the same."
The bottom line here, without going into all the minutia and detail, is that nothing is real. Nothing is real. And I mentioned the other day: Now we know who these people are. They're activists. They're not reporters. They're not media. Their polls, as we've also known, are also unreal.
Gallup caught lying about the generic ballot trend [Updated 6PM ET]
Obamacare could be repealed before election
What the Liberal Media Aren't Telling You About Obama's Healthcare Plans
Check Here For More Signatures To The Discharge Petition To Repeal Obamacare Latest Information
Obamacare could be repealed before election
A plan that would enable members of the U.S. House of Representatives to repeal Obamacare – whether health care takeover advocate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants it or not – is continuing to gain momentum.
In just the last few days, more names have been added to the discharge petition sponsored by U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.
King told WND today the entire GOP leadership team in the House is on board, as well as the full delegations from California and Texas. He's working on obtaining the last few GOP signatures before turning his attention to the Democrats.
All of the GOP representatives and 34 Democrats opposed Obamacare when it was passed on a narrow 219-212 vote earlier this year. King said 212 representatives, at least, should be in favor of overturning it, since they opposed it before.
Then it will be up to the four, five or six Democrat votes that would be needed to turn from endorsement to rejection for it to advance.
"This is starting to come together," King said today. "All the Republicans [earlier] voted no. We should all be for repeal."
He said he's counting on the 34 Democrats who voted no to "demonstrate the courage of their convictions" by supporting a repeal plan.
Many will be running for re-election, King noted, in districts where the majority of voters want the law repealed. And there are Democrats who voted for Obamacare who face election challenges in a field of voters irritated by the law's new taxes and intrusions into their lives.
King told WND that if the discharge petition is successful, it will be a "resounding message" to Pelosi, who said Congress would have to vote for the health care takeover before people could know what was in it.
King's plan is to "pull out by the roots" the legislation that, among other things, will require citizens to "government-approved" health insurance whether they want it or not.
The fact that support is required from 218 members also means any plan thus endorsed likely would pass the 435-member House.
Clerk of the House of Representatives: Current House of Representatives signatures
Motion to Discharge a Committee from the Consideration of a resolution
June 16, 2010
To the Clerk of the House of Representatives:
Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XV, I, Steve King of Iowa, move to discharge the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, Education and Labor, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, Rules, House Administration, and Appropriations from the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4972) to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; which was referred to said committees on March 25, 2010, in support of which motion the undersigned Members of the House of Representatives affix their signatures, to wit:
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
1. Steve King Iowa 05
2. Connie Mack Florida 14
3. Michele Bachmann Minnesota 06
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
4. Todd Tiahrt Kansas 04
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
5. Marsha Blackburn Tennessee 07
6. Tom Price Georgia 06
7. Paul C. Broun Georgia 10
8. Jerry Moran Kansas 01
9. Tom Graves Georgia 09
10. Rob Bishop Utah 01
11. Joseph R. Pitts Pennsylvania 16
12. Mike Pence Indiana 06
Thursday, June 24, 2010
13. Lynn A. Westmoreland Georgia 03
14. Glenn Thompson Pennsylvania 05
15. Jeb Hensarling Texas 05
16. Louie Gohmert Texas 01
17. Judy Biggert Illinois 13
18. John Boozman Arkansas 03
19. Kenny Marchant Texas 24
20. Jim Jordan Ohio 04
21. Jason Chaffetz Utah 03
22. Gary G. Miller California 42
23. Bob Goodlatte Virginia 06
24. Doug Lamborn Colorado 05
25. Robert E. Latta Ohio 05
26. Tom Cole Oklahoma 04
27. Trent Franks Arizona 02
28. K. Michael Conaway Texas 11
29. Jo Bonner Alabama 01
30. Dan Burton Indiana 05
Tuesday,June 29, 2010
31. J. Gresham Barrett South Carolina 03
32. John Linder Georgia 07
33. Bill Posey Florida 15
34. Lynn Jenkins Kansas 02
35. Mike Coffman Colorado 06
36. Roscoe G. Bartlett Maryland 06
37. Virginia Foxx North Carolina 05
38. John Campbell California 48
39. Mike Rogers (AL) Alabama 03
40. Randy Neugebauer Texas 19
41. Charles K. Djou Hawaii 01
42. Pete Sessions Texas 32
43. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. Wisconsin 05
44. Howard Coble North Carolina 06
45. Candice S. Miller Michigan 10
46. Steve Scalise Louisiana 01
47. Robert B. Aderholt Alabama 04
48. Phil Gingrey Georgia 11
49. Kevin Brady Texas 08
50. Pete Olson Texas 22
51. C. W. Bill Young Florida 10
52. Tom McClintock California 04
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
53. Joe Wilson South Carolina 02
54. Mac Thornberry Texas 13
55. John R. Carter Texas 31
56. John Shimkus Illinois 19
57. Mary Fallin Oklahoma 05
58. Gus M. Bilirakis Florida 09
59. John Fleming Louisiana 04
60. Jeff Flake Arizona 06
61. W. Todd Akin Missouri 02
62. Peter Hoekstra Michigan 02
63. Donald A. Manzullo Illinois 16
64. Eric Cantor Virginia 07
65. Scott Garrett New Jersey 05
66. John A. Boehner Ohio 08
67. Henry E. Brown, Jr. South Carolina 01
68. Kay Granger Texas 12
69. Parker Griffith Alabama 05
70. Ted Poe Texas 02
71. Cathy McMorris Rodgers Washington 05
72. Rodney Alexander Louisiana 05
73. Fred Upton Michigan 06
74. Jean Schmidt Ohio 02
75. John Sullivan Oklahoma 01
76. Peter J. Roskam Illinois 06
77. Blaine Luetkemeyer Missouri 09
78. Michael C. Burgess Texas 26
79. Ken Calvert California 44
80. Lee Terry Nebraska 02
Thursday, July 1, 2010
81. Patrick T. McHenry North Carolina 10
82. Mary Bono Mack California 45
83. Spencer Bachus Alabama 06
84. Jeff Miller Florida 01
85. John B. Shadegg Arizona 03
86. Gregg Harper Mississippi 03
87. John Abney Culberson Texas 07
88. Dana Rohrabacher California 46
89. David P. Roe Tennessee 01
90. J. Randy Forbes Virginia 04
91. Bill Cassidy Louisiana 06
92. Brett Guthrie Kentucky 02
93. Denny Rehberg Montana 0
94. Sue Wilkins Myrick North Carolina 09
95. Tom Latham Iowa 04
96. Michael K. Simpson Idaho 02
97. John Kline Minnesota 02
98. Ron Paul Texas 14
99. Thomas J. Rooney Florida 16
100. Daniel E. Lungren California 03
101. Darrell E. Issa California 49
102. Harold Rogers Kentucky 05
103. John J. Duncan, Jr. Tennessee 02
104. Todd Russell Platts Pennsylvania 19
105. Duncan Hunter California 52
106. Sam Graves Missouri 06
107. Bob Inglis South Carolina 04
108. Edward R. Royce California 40
109. Ralph M. Hall Texas 04
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
110. Timothy V. Johnson Illinois 15
111. Michael T. McCaul Texas 10
112. Thaddeus G. McCotter Michigan 11
113. Robert J. Wittman Virginia 01
114. Lamar Smith Texas 21
115. Cynthia M. Lummis Wyoming 00
116. Wally Herger California 02
117. Vern Buchanan Florida 13
118. Christopher H. Smith New Jersey 04
119. Geoff Davis Kentucky 04
120. Jack Kingston Georgia 01
121. Brian P. Bilbray California 50
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
122. Zach Wamp Tennessee 03
123. Jerry Lewis California 41
124. Erik Paulsen Minnesota 03
125. Roy Blunt Missouri 07
126. Jo Ann Emerson Missouri 08
127. Frank R. Wolf Virginia 10
128. George Radanovich California 19
129. Steve Austria Ohio 07
130. Greg Walden Oregon 02
Thursday, July 15, 2010
131. Frank D. Lucas Oklahoma 03
132. Adrian Smith Nebraska 03
133. Jeff Fortenberry Nebraska 01
Monday, July 19, 2010
134. Frank A. LoBiondo New Jersey 02
135. Sam Johnson Texas 03
136. Paul Ryan Wisconsin 01
137. John L. Mica Florida 07
138. Michael R. Turner Ohio 03
139. Aaron Schock Illinois 18
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
140. Cliff Stearns Florida 06
141. Devin Nunes California 21
142. David Dreier California 26
143. Christopher John Lee New York 26
144. Kevin McCarthy California 22
145. Bill Shuster Pennsylvania 09
146. Leonard Lance New Jersey 07
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
147. Howard P. McKeon California 25
148. Ander Crenshaw Florida 04
149. Elton Gallegly California 24
150. Rodney P. Frelinghuysen New Jersey 11
Thursday, July 22, 2010
151. Ed Whitfield Kentucky 01
152. Walter B. Jones North Carolina 03
153. Vernon J. Ehlers Michigan 03
Monday, July 26, 2010
154. Thomas E. Petri Wisconsin 06
155. Doc Hastings Washington 04
156. Don Young Alaska 00
157. Ginny Brown-Waite Florida 05
158. Patrick J. Tiberi Ohio 12
159. Mike Rogers (MI) Michigan 08
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
160. Joe Barton Texas 06
161. Adam H. Putnam Florida 12
162. Dave Camp Michigan 04
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
163. Steven C. LaTourette Ohio 14
164. Dean Heller Nevada 02
165. Peter T. King New York 03
Check Here For More Signatures To The Discharge Petition To Repeal Obamacare
(218 is the magic number to possibly bury obamacare. We have 153 now. After the Nov election I'm sure it will be much more. It is a possibility that obamacare could be repealed before the election) Story Reports
Obamacare repeal? 150 House signatures already. Sponsor of repeal plan says it will come down to changing handful of votes
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Obama knows hitler was correct when he said, if you tell a big lie frequently enough it will be believed
(The following quotes are Adolf Hitler's. Obama believes these principles and uses them every time he opens his mouth. Obama knows hitler was correct when he said, "if you tell a big lie frequently enough, it will be believed." This is how obama has forced obamacare through congress. Obama uses hitler's template for propaganda. Obama knows "the broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force.") Every twisted word that comes out of the deranged mind of obama is in the form of a lie. Story Reports
By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise. Adolf Hitler
If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed. Adolf Hitler
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it. Adolf Hitler
The great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one. Adolf Hitler
It is not truth that matters, but victory. Adolf Hitler
The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force. Adolf Hitler
The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it. Adolf Hitler
What good fortune for governments that the people do not think. Adolf Hitler
(Obama is the epitome of evil as was adolf hitler. We know what hitler said. We know what hitler did. Comparing obama to hitler is eye opening. Obama tells lies over and over just like hitler. Obama is acting like a dictator. Obama is evil as was hitler. Obamacare is an evil attempt to control America.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
As the Administration's arguments make clear, we are losing the same freedoms that our founders sought to preserve. The Obama Regime Lawyers Now Assert That Obamacare Mandate is a Tax.
In addition to arguing that the obamacare mandate is authorized by the Commerce Clause the government also justified the mandate by claiming that it was a tax. This assertion contradicts the administration’s previous denial that the mandate is a tax increase.
The Administration's brief acknowledges that the legislation imposes a significant "tax penalty" for those who fail to purchase health insurance (the so-called "individual mandate") that "will raise substantial revenue," while at the same time extending "subsidies and tax credits to the large majority of the uninsured."
The Administration's expansive view of the federal government's power is likewise profoundly disturbing. In order to defend this unprecedented government power grab, the Administration argues that the federal government's authority is essentially unlimited, asserting for example that "Congress's taxing and spending power under the General Welfare Clause is 'extensive.'" However, the federal government has never claimed, and the courts have never held, that the government has authority to essentially dictate one-sixth of the nation's economy. Indeed, while the Administration characterizes the States' lawsuit as meritless and based on "philosophical or political opposition" rather than solid legal grounds, it takes the Administration sixty pages to explain why it has not overstepped constitutional bounds.
Recognizing the tenuous nature of its claims, the Administration's brief seeks to downplay the health care legislation as merely an "expansion" of the existing Medicaid system. Once again, however, the Administration simply ignores reality. The Administration and its supporters repeatedly characterized the health care bill as landmark legislation that "answered the call of history." Indeed, the Administration's own brief acknowledges that the legislation imposes a "comprehensive system of reform" that seeks to regulate "a vast interstate market consuming an estimated 17.5 percent of our gross domestic product."
Perhaps most troubling, the Administration justifies its exercise of this sweeping power by characterizing the American public as either infantile, unable to make appropriate choices regarding its own health care, or as malicious. It argues that the individual mandate is an "essential" aspect of the health care legislation because, in its absence, individuals may make the "wrong" decision and forgo health insurance, potentially leading to a number of negative consequences for their own health and economic welfare. However, the Administration goes even further, arguing that, in the absence of the individual mandate, the American people might "game the system" by "waiting until disease develops or an accident occurs to purchase insurance."
The implications of the government's arguments in defense of the health care legislation are significant. The worldview espoused by the Administration is one in which the power of the federal government is unlimited and in which that power must be exercised because ordinary Americans are simply incapable of managing their own affairs and must have government bureaucrats do it for them.
Fate of Obamacare in Hands of Judge
Fate of Obamacare in Hands of Judge
Suing Obamacare
RUSH LIMBAUGH TRANSCRIPT OF OBAMA DECLARING OBAMACARE IS NOT A TAX
RUSH: Let's go back to September 20th, 2009, This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Obama was being interviewed by a fellow member of the ruling class, George Stephanopoulos, who says, "Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines tax as 'a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.'"
OBAMA: George, the fact this you've looked up Merriam's dictionary, that -- uh, the definition of tax increase indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise you wouldn't have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no!
OBAMA: I mean, what --
STEPHANOPOULOS: I --
OBAMA: If what you're saying --
STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself. Your critics say it is a tax increase.
OBAMA: My critics say everything's a tax increase! My critics say that I'm taking over, uhh, every sector of the economy. You know that. Uh, eh, eh, eh, eh... Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we're going to have an individual mandate or not, but --
STEPHANOPOULOS: You reject that it's a tax increase?
OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.
(Notice what obama has done and continues to do to quell opposition to his lies.
(1) He speaks his lies often.
(2) He almost never answers questions directly.
(3) He makes sure his limited "press conferences" are controlled.
(4) He is only asked limited questions about his radical daily production as president.
(5) Obama or his liberal media deflect any criticism by BRANDING anyone who disagress or points out obama is a liar.
(6) Americans who discover obama is lying and point out this fact are accused of being racist by obama or his liberal media. Obama doesn't utter the word racist, his minions
use this to change the subject.
(7) Obama and his minions also use the "race rard" to curtail free speech and quell the opposition. Obama and his minions use the term "racist" to label Americans who oppose him.
(8) Branding people who are involved with the tea party movement as racists deflect the point that obama is a racist himself and a traitor.)
Don't be afraid of being called a racist. Speak up and tell the truth about obama. Refute his lies and give examples of his lies. That is what I do.
How can anyone refute the video above of obama lying about obamacare?)
Every twisted word that comes out of the deranged mind of obama is in the form of a lie.
Story Reports
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)