Janice S. Okubo's Hawaiian "birth certificate" was used to make obama's online fake colb

Janice Okubos birth certificate was used to forge obama's fake colb online

Dr. Ron Polland is reporting that Obama's COLB was forged using Hawaii Communications Officer, Janice Okubo's, 2007 issued COLB. Dr. Polland names 4 other people, among the many, complicit in this long known fraud and cover-up, including Hawaii Governor, Linda Lingle, and, Politifact Reporter, Amy Hollyfield. Can't forget Factcheck!

Dr. Polland also reports that Obama's vital records were amended between 2008-2009.

Dr. Polland points out; "for the past two years, Hawaii has refused to confirm that the online COLB copy is a genuine 2007 COLB issued to Obama on June 6, 2007."

Hawaii changed obama's "birth certificate" pursuant to HS 338-17.7 (5)

It was done for the "safety" of the FRAUD obama.

Place of birth: changed to Hawaii

Father's race: Changed to african

Father's name: changed to barack hussein obama

Dr Fukino saw an index record indicating that they had an entry for obama's "original birth certificate" in their database.

That is what her "on record" comment meant.

If obama was born in Jawaii then Fukino would have confirmed it.

Janice S. Okubo's Hawaiian "birth certificate" was used to make obama's online fake colb.


What did Hawaiian health officials know?

They knew obama was not born in Hawaii.

They knew that they did not issue his online colb.

They knew that they worked with politifac and factcheck to FORGE a fake colb for obama.

They knew that they had broken the law by disclosing private records.

They knew they lied and perjured themselves in covering for obama.

They knoew that the governor would cover for them while the Hawaiian attorney general would not.

.....................................................................................

Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino's two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama's birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification) was issued to him. The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that "President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website" even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama's birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery and Fukino knows it! That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH.


FRAUD IN THE USA

Dr Pollard is exposing the FRAUD obama

I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse . Obama is cursed.

I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse. King James Bible

Obama is cursed.

Joe Kovacs

"April the 19th, Israel celebrates its independence in 2010," Gallups says in narration on the video. "On April the 19th, Fox News reports that the U.S. will no longer automatically support Israel in the United Nations. The next day, on April the 20th, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explodes. Coincidence? Or the hand and judgment of God?"

"I believe this is evidence that when you turn your back on Israel, especially when you've been a supporter, you're gonna see judgments come from God," said Hal Lindsey, author of "The Late Great Planet Earth."

"It's finally reaching the point where God is removing His protection from us," he said. "I believe we back away from being a friend to Israel at our peril. We need to come back to be a supporter of one who is so important in God's plan."
WAVELAND, MS - MAY 05: A dead drum fish is seen laying in the surf as concern continues that the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico may harm animals in its path on May 5, 2010 in Waveland, Mississippi. It is unknown if the fish died due to the oil spill. Oil is still leaking out of the Deepwater Horizon wellhead at a estimated rate of 1,000-5,000 barrels a day.

Regarding the oil spill specifically, Lindsey said, "I think that this disaster is just one of many disasters. Our country is falling apart economically. The current government is overturning our constitutional republic, turning it into a socialist country. That's about as big a curse as you can get. We just have one catastrophe after another and then we have this big wake-up call in the gulf."

(Obama is a closet muslim. He also wants the destruction of Israel. Obama is a destroyer. He is not just an inept bumbling "leader". His talent is deception not leadership or honesty. He says he supports Israel but his actions speak otherwise. What he says is the opposite of what he does. American has become a thugocracy under the "don" obama.) Story Reports

Compare these two SC candidates

Tim Scott Republican conservative from SC wins SC primary tue Jun 23, 2010

Vote Tim Scott Website
.........................................................................................



Al Green Democrate candidate winner from SC.

Al Green has NO website. Another NO record just like obama.
.........................................................................................

Compare these two candidates. Tim Scott is lucid. Al Green is not. Tim Scott can complete a full sentence and not repeat the same sentence. Al Green cannot complete a sentence in a lucid manner.

Both are african Americans.

Al green is an example of an african American who is not capable of being an effective or even lucid senator. He would have to be told everything to do just like obama. They could be twins.

Tim Scott is an example of an african American who seems very capable of representing voters in SC in a lucid and effective manner.

Al Green is similar to obama. Obama is not capable of representing Americans, its very obvious. It if wasn't for the teleprompter Obama would sound like Al Green. We have an "Al Green" type of empty suit in the white house. Al is "impared" as is BO.

Al Green was not vetted by the democrates. Obama was not vetted by the democrates. Al green has a felony obscenity charge pending. Obama cannot prove using documentation his colb is valid and that he is a US citizen.

The democratic party nominates people who are in no way qualified for office.
.......................................................................................

COLUMBIA, S.C. � A day after an unemployed veteran charged with a felony shocked South Carolina's Democratic establishment by winning the U.S. Senate primary, party officials were still scratching their heads: What happened?

Alvin Greene, 32, didn't raise any money. He didn't have a website. And his opponent was a relatively better-known former legislator, Vic Rawl, who was already preparing for the general election.

Greene was considered such a long shot that his opponent and media didn't even bother to check his background. If they had, they would have discovered he faces a felony obscenity charge after an alleged encounter with a college student last fall.

After The Associated Press reported Greene's charge Wednesday, the leader of the state Democratic party said she asked Greene to withdraw from the race.

"I did not do this lightly, as I believe strongly that the Democratic voters of this state have the right to select our nominee," Fowler said. "But this new information about Mr. Greene ... would certainly have affected the decisions of many of those voters."

(I can see a similar admission coming in the future for obama. It would say something like: "I did not take this lightly, as I believe strongly that the Democratic voters of this nation have the right to select our nominee but this new information about Mr obama... would certainly have affected the decisions of many of those voters. The democratic party admits we certified a FRAUD as qualified to be a presidential candidate. We expect to plead guilty and serve jail time. We ask that obama resign and coorporate with federal authorities in his many criminal offenses.") Story Reports

Like A Fly On You Know What

It appears in this picture BO doesn't have enough sense to brush the fly off himself. The fly was attracted to BO. The fly didn't live long after coming into contact with BO. BO appointed a panel of fly experts to determine how to keep flys off his face. They will report back in a week. In the mean time flys will keep being attacted to the smell of BO. Bo decreed a no fly zone around his face whenever he is on camera. Obama seems to not notice the fly. The fly seems at home.
...........................................................................................

A fly lands on President Barack Obama's face

A fly lands on President Barack Obama's face as he delivers remarks on the Affordable Care Act and the New Patients Bill of Rights, Tuesday, June 22, 2010, in the East Room of the White House in Washington.

Flies are attracted to filth. Obama represents filth. Filth in the form of abortion on demand, partial birth abortion etc. Obama defends and condones perversion. Beelzebub, "Lord of the Flies"

General McChrystal has kicked the FRAUD obama in the butt because bo deserves NO respect

Man-child obama talks to the general.


General talks to man-child obama.
.........................................................................................

General McChrystal has kicked the FRAUD obama in the butt because BO deserves NO respect. Obama is a COWARD and surrounded himself with cowards.

When Barack Obama entered the Oval Office, he immediately set out to deliver on his most important campaign promise on foreign policy: to refocus the war in Afghanistan on what led us to invade in the first place. "I want the American people to understand," he announced in March 2009. "We have a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan." He ordered another 21,000 troops to Kabul, the largest increase since the war began in 2001. Taking the advice of both the Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he also fired Gen. David McKiernan – then the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan – and replaced him with a man he didn't know and had met only briefly: Gen. Stanley McChrystal. It was the first time a top general had been relieved from duty during wartime in more than 50 years, since Harry Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur at the height of the Korean War.

Even though he had voted for Obama, McChrystal and his new commander in chief failed from the outset to connect. The general first encountered Obama a week after he took office, when the president met with a dozen senior military officials in a room at the Pentagon known as the Tank. According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal thought Obama looked "uncomfortable and intimidated" by the roomful of military brass. Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn't go much better. "It was a 10-minute photo op," says an adviser to McChrystal. "Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was. Here's the guy who's going to run his f__king war, but he didn't seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty disappointed."

(General McChrystal thought obama looked "uncomfortable and intimidated" by the roomfull of military brass. "Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was."

The man-child obama was intimidated by the other adults in the room. Obama is not an adult but as Limbaugh says is a man-child. The community organizer had not done his homework and figured out who he was meeting with. This is how a man-child thinks.) Story Reports

From the start, McChrystal was determined to place his personal stamp on Afghanistan, to use it as a laboratory for a controversial military strategy known as counterinsurgency. COIN, as the theory is known, is the new gospel of the Pentagon brass, a doctrine that attempts to square the military's preference for high-tech violence with the demands of fighting protracted wars in failed states. COIN calls for sending huge numbers of ground troops to not only destroy the enemy, but to live among the civilian population and slowly rebuild, or build from scratch, another nation's government – a process that even its staunchest advocates admit requires years, if not decades, to achieve. The theory essentially rebrands the military, expanding its authority (and its funding) to encompass the diplomatic and political sides of warfare: Think the Green Berets as an armed Peace Corps. In 2006, after Gen. David Petraeus beta-tested the theory during his "surge" in Iraq, it quickly gained a hardcore following of think-tankers, journalists, military officers and civilian officials. Nicknamed "COINdinistas" for their cultish zeal, this influential cadre believed the doctrine would be the perfect solution for Afghanistan. All they needed was a general with enough charisma and political savvy to implement it.

As McChrystal leaned on Obama to ramp up the war, he did it with the same fearlessness he used to track down terrorists in Iraq: Figure out how your enemy operates, be faster and more ruthless than everybody else, then take the fuckers out. After arriving in Afghanistan last June, the general conducted his own policy review, ordered up by Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The now-infamous report was leaked to the press, and its conclusion was dire: If we didn't send another 40,000 troops – swelling the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan by nearly half – we were in danger of "mission failure." The White House was furious. McChrystal, they felt, was trying to bully Obama, opening him up to charges of being weak on national security unless he did what the general wanted. It was Obama versus the Pentagon, and the Pentagon was determined to kick the president's ass.

Last fall, with his top general calling for more troops, Obama launched a three-month review to re-evaluate the strategy in Afghanistan. "I found that time painful," McChrystal tells me in one of several lengthy interviews. "I was selling an unsellable position." For the general, it was a crash course in Beltway politics – a battle that pitted him against experienced Washington insiders like Vice President Biden, who argued that a prolonged counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan would plunge America into a military quagmire without weakening international terrorist networks. "The entire COIN strategy is a fraud perpetuated on the American people," says Douglas Macgregor, a retired colonel and leading critic of counterinsurgency who attended West Point with McChrystal. "The idea that we are going to spend a trillion dollars to reshape the culture of the Islamic world is utter nonsense.

In the end, however, McChrystal got almost exactly what he wanted. On December 1st, in a speech at West Point, the president laid out all the reasons why fighting the war in Afghanistan is a bad idea: It's expensive; we're in an economic crisis; a decade-long commitment would sap American power; Al Qaeda has shifted its base of operations to Pakistan. Then, without ever using the words "victory" or "win," Obama announced that he would send an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, almost as many as McChrystal had requested. The president had thrown his weight, however hesitantly, behind the counterinsurgency crowd.

(Man-child obama takes months to make an adult decision why Americans are dying on the battle field.) Story Reports

Today, as McChrystal gears up for an offensive in southern Afghanistan, the prospects for any kind of success look bleak. In June, the death toll for U.S. troops passed 1,000, and the number of IEDs has doubled. Spending hundreds of billions of dollars on the fifth-poorest country on earth has failed to win over the civilian population, whose attitude toward U.S. troops ranges from intensely wary to openly hostile. The biggest military operation of the year – a ferocious offensive that began in February to retake the southern town of Marja – continues to drag on, prompting McChrystal himself to refer to it as a "bleeding ulcer." In June, Afghanistan officially outpaced Vietnam as the longest war in American history – and Obama has quietly begun to back away from the deadline he set for withdrawing U.S. troops in July of next year. The president finds himself stuck in something even more insane than a quagmire: a quagmire he knowingly walked into, even though it's precisely the kind of gigantic, mind-numbing, multigenerational nation-building project he explicitly said he didn't want.

Even those who support McChrystal and his strategy of counterinsurgency know that whatever the general manages to accomplish in Afghanistan, it's going to look more like Vietnam than Desert Storm. "It's not going to look like a win, smell like a win or taste like a win," says Maj. Gen. Bill Mayville, who serves as chief of operations for McChrystal. "This is going to end in an argument."

(Obama doesn't look or smell like a winner either.) Story Reports

McChrystal and his staff described the president as unprepared for their first one-on-one encounter.

McChrystal has been called to the White House Situation Room on Wednesday to explain his comments to the magazine directly to the president, a senior administration official told Fox News. Normally, he would appear on a conference call for a regular strategy session.

(The man-child is mad because McChrystal told the truth about him and exposed his total incompetence as a leader. Obama does not have the ability to be president. His best effort has been to be a community organizer. This is why obama is a failure. He has the power of the presidency but is an empty suit.) Story Reports

The general was making a flurry of calls and decisions in the wake of the article's publication. Fox News has learned that he fired the press aide, Duncan Boothby, who booked the interview. McChrystal also called Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen late Monday to apologize. Mullen told the general he was deeply disappointed, according to a senior military official at the Pentagon.

The article says that although McChrystal voted for Obama, the two failed to connect from the start. Obama called McChrystal on the carpet last fall for speaking too bluntly about his desire for more troops.

"I found that time painful," McChrystal said in the article, on newsstands Friday. "I was selling an unsellable position."

It quoted an adviser to McChrystal dismissing the early meeting
with Obama as a "10-minute photo-op."

(Obama's modus operandi is the same as "rev" jessie J. and "rev" al S. BO, jessie and al are all community organzer shakedown artists. They all very similar in this respect.) Story Reports

The article claims McChrystal has seized control of the war "by never taking his eye off the real enemy: The wimps in the White House."

(Obama is definitely a wimp and the "real enemy". He is not capable of descerning what the general says or does.) Story Reports

"Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was. The boss was pretty disappointed," the adviser told the magazine.

(Why did General McChrystal give an interview kicking the man-child obama in the butt? He knew what he said would cause obama to do something. The question I have is why. My speculation is the General wanted Americans to know how inept obama really is. I think the general also wanted Americans to know about the inept people running the white house. Obama i'm sure cringes at the thought of comparing himself with a real adult man.

Al green the Democratic candidate for US senate in SC seems to be retarded in his speech. He says the same thing over and over and does not elaborate. Obama and al green are exactly alike except obama has a speech writer and a teleprompter. Even so obama manages to repeat himself often with little or no elaboration. This is because obama is a fake and a fraud. He is "retarted" in the sense that his leadership abilities are very limited. Obama is a one trick pony that has trouble learning new tricks. Obama is a prop for the UN and other enemies who want to destroy US Sovereignty. General McChrystal knows this. He also knows obama is the enemy within. He is trying to expose a traitor.) Story Reports

Tim Adams talks about the FRAUD obama on tv

(Something kinda smells because this guy says obama does not have a long form birth certificate but he believes obama is a US citizen. He also says he believes obama was not born in Hawaii. If obama was not born in Hawaii how could he possibly be a US citizen? Adams is relying on Hawaiian law that allows someone to obtain a "birth certificate" even though they were not born in Hawaii. It is probably a fact that obama has no long form birth certificate and that he was not born in Hawaii. I think this is what obama has covered up but maybe now obama is paving the way for the eventual disclosure that he was not born in Hawaii in a hospital.

This guy sounds like a front man for obama. After hearing adams I now think he is a scam artist. Adams talks about all the web sites he has about obama about 2,000? Sounds like something written for a telepromper. He is kissing up to much to the US government and obama. He even talks like the US Constitution was written long ago and today it is different so it is less relevant. This is what obama believes also that it is flawed. Is Tim Adams for real or a pr man for obama. He sounds like a pr man for obama making excuses for the US Constitution. Adams also sounds flakey.) Story Reports

(UpDate: 6/28/10 "There have been attempts by various parties, some bloggers and others to attempt to discredit [my] claims, but none of them has held up to any scrutiny or rebuttal," Tim Adams, the former senior elections clerk in 2008 for the city and county of Honolulu, is now telling WND. Well do tell! You discredited yourself when you actually started to sound like you were defending obama in your tv interview. You actually inferred that white people are racists because they wanted to know obama's origin. Why just white people tim? There are other races also that don't believe obama is for real and think he is a FRAUD!) Story Reports

Tim Adams talks about the FRAUD obama on tv

Communism through legislation via a left wing majority

Obama The THUG In Chief or Chief Thug.

(What most people don't realize is "obamacare" part 1 was implemented in the Hr 1 stimulus bill which also contains provisions for the government to decide if you live or die! This bill was rammed through congress before any congressman even read what the "bill" contained. It was a STEALTH bill that contained provisions for the overhaul of the health care system to control Americans and rip their freedoms away. The devil is in the details and the devil's details are now coming out.) Story Reports
Hr 1 stimulus bill contains provisions for the government to decide if you live or die! HR1 was a stealth obamacare bill, part 1

...........................................................................................
(Part 2 of obamacare contains more provisions to make sure you don't get obamacare if you need it.) Story Reports

Scott Gottlieb, a physician and American Enterprise Institute fellow, was a senior official at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. He is partner in a firm that invests in health-care companies.

You're losing your plan
ObamaCare's true face emerges

Late last week saw the first leaks of the administration's draft regulations for implementing the ObamaCare law -- and everything is playing out just as the critics warned.

The 3,000-odd pages of legislation left most of the really important (and controversial) policy decisions to the regulations that government agencies were told to issue once the bill passed. Now that those regs are starting to take shape, it's clear that the Obama team is using its new power to exert tight control over the payment and delivery of all formerly "private" health insurance.

The ObamaCare law references the Secretary of Health and Human Services almost 2,200 times and uses the phrase "the secretary shall" more than 725. Each reference requires HHS to set new rules on medical care, giving control to an existing federal office or one of 160 new agencies that the bill created.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (who was once the Kansas state-insurance commissioner) has taken to these tasks with zeal. In some circles, she's now known as the nation's "insurance regulator in chief."

She's starting off by applying new regs to health plans offered by large employers -- even though these costly rules were supposedly only going to apply to plans sold in the state insurance "exchanges" that don't get created until 2014. This twist is spelled out in an 83-page draft of a new regulation that leaked late last week.

Bottom line: Sebelius means to dictate what your insurance plan must look like almost from day one, no matter how you get your coverage.

Indeed, the draft regs envision more than half of all policies having to change within three years -- an unmistakable break with President's Obama's oft-repeated promise, "If people like their insurance, they will be able to keep it."

Yet that may be the least of the broken promises.

(Again this proves obama is a liar. Obama is going to make sure you cannot keep your current insurance plan. Obama wants to control your every move from birth to death. Obama, the man who cannot prove he is a US citizen and is in fact a FRAUD.) Story Reports

Ultimately, these rules force consumers to buy one of just four health policies -- which vary mostly only by trading off higher co-payments for lower premiums, while offering essentially the same actual benefits. In arguing for passage of the law, ObamaCare's defenders claimed the rules were aimed at health plans sold in the "exchanges." Oops: Now Sebelius is applying them to employer plans. Eventually, this would force all but the very wealthiest Americans into a single government-designed insurance scheme.

This is far from the only area where Secretary Sebelius is exploiting the law's fuzzy language to tighten her control over the private insurance market. In recent weeks, she has said that the new law gives her authority to review and even set the rates on health policies sold in private markets, a role previously left to state insurance regulators.

(Obama is directing his fellow thugs to set the insurance rates on private markets. Obama is a thug. A thug who is mugging all America. The white house criminal syndicate is using extorsion via the tarp and stimulus bills to buy, extort and control American free enterprise. Part of the stimulus bill money goes directly to the white house, 1 to 5%, Billions directly unter the control of the thug obama.) Story Reports

Obama Slush Fund for buying votes or bribing public officials. A small portion is allocated to obama to be spent at his discretion. No formula. He can do what he wants to with it. How much is it? We don't know. Is a small portion $3,000,000,000 or 1%. Is a small portion $15,000,000,000 or 5%? ECONOMIC RESEARCH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO

Obama stimulus slush fund ECONOMIC RESEARCH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO

The ObamaCare bills were written to paper over an intellectual divide between White House economists and HHS policy wonks. Some economists wanted genuine competition to take root in the new federally managed insurance "exchanges." The HHS crew favored a one-sized government plan with tight federal regulation over benefits.

The law itself didn't explicitly side with either school -- but it did leave the writing of the implementing regs to those same HHS wonks. Unfortunately, those more moderate White House economists are now leaving the administration, including the rumored departure of widely admired businessman and health-care expert Robert Kocher.

Washington insiders refer to this HHS team as "true believers" -- a group of earnest, left-leaning activists who've long favored a single nationalized health plan. They are massaging the law's vagueness to give themselves the tight federal control over health care that will bring their vision into practice.

(This is dictatorship via majority control. Legislation that sets into law communist health care practices. Communism through legislation via a left wing majority. This is what obama is all about. Massaging the laws of the US to circumvent the US Constitution. These people are traitors. Obama is a traitor. He should be charged with treason and sentenced according to his crimes along with his crime syndicate comrades.) Story Reports

Critics warned that the Obama bill meant a federal takeover of health care, with Washington bureaucrats making core decisions about medical care. With ObamaCare taking shape, that's exactly what consumers are getting. Saying "we told you so" is no consolation to those who took the president at his word.

You're losing your plan
ObamaCare's true face emerges

Communism through legislation via a left wing majority

.........................................................................................
Obama stimulus slush fund ECONOMIC RESEARCH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO

QUOTE FROM STIMULUS BILL:

"The other three ARRA state programs cited above
are allocated according to formulas specified in the
legislation, though each program also includes a small
portion to be allocated at the discretion of the executive
branch."

A small portion is allocated to obama to be spent at his discretion. No formula. He can do what he wants to with it. How much is it? We don't know.

Is a small portion $3,000,000,000 or 1%. Is a small portion $15,000,000,000 or 5%?

Lets say it only $3,000,000,000 or just a "small portion" 1%.

Three Thousand Million.

Three Thousand Million that obama can use anyway he wants. It says at his discretion.

535 people in congress.

$5,607,476.63 each

Five Million six hundred and seven thousand each.

This is just a "small portion" of 1% obama could have spent at his own discretion to BUY the votes of any congressman or senator.

This is what congress voted for. Congress has voted for a kickback.

How much money has obama used in the stimulus slush fund that is at his discrection to buy the votes of congress.

How much money has obama used to buy or pay off people to keep quiet about his birth certificate?

How much money has obama used to pay off the "state run media".

How much money has obama used to buy off federal judges and lawyers?

How much money has obama used to coverup his true agenda?

HOW MUCH?

1% or 3 Billion
2% o3 6 Billion
3% or 9 Billion
4% or 12 Billion
4% or 15 Billion

I would like to know how this money was used.

If you are a liberal democrate you will of course want some of this money yourself.

If you are anyone other than a liberal democrate or communist i'm sure you won't get any of this money.

Three Thousand Million or Fifteen Thousand million for obama to control congress and America.

Now you know.

I want to address the possibility of sabotage

I want to address the possibility of sabotage.

It is clear to me BP and the other oil companies want cap and trade to become the law of the land. Why? Ask yourself that.

BP America President and Chairman Lamar McKay: “BP supports an economy-wide price for carbon based on fair and equitable application across all sectors and believes that market based solutions, like a cap and trade or linked-fee, are the best solutions to manage GHG emissions.” (Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing, 6/15/10)

Shell President Marvin E. Odum: “That is why Shell supports legislating a solution to energy and climate issues as a means to create a secure U.S. energy future, reduce dependence on foreign oil and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. This requires setting a price for carbon, and we recommend cap and trade.” (Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing, 6/15/10)

ConocoPhillips CEO James J. Mulva: “Another key element of a comprehensive energy policy should be federal action to address global climate change. As you are aware, ConocoPhillips supports passage of a comprehensive federal law establishing a clear and transparent price for carbon.” (Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing, 6/15/10)

They thought the BOP shut off the oil and gas on the sea floor. It did not.

(1) Could the BOP malfunctioned?
(2) Could the operator have make a mistake and not closed the BOP correctly or fast enough?
(3) Could a waco environmentalist have had his hands on the controls and faked the closing off of the blowout preventor???
(4) Could BP have done this on purpose to make billions through the CCX that obama and gore created?

Sabotage is a possibility and almost no one is talking about it, especially the 11 men that were killed.

Why was BP so lax in their safety standards?

Where were the government inspections or inspectors?

How could these safety standards be ignored?

Are the safety standards voluntary only?

This who thing smells like BO. It stinks like a big scam.

Oil rig survivor says that the well was shut in and they were going through the process of separating the rig from the well, and moving it off

Pictures of the oil flows

Revisiting Oil Well Pressures and Blowout Preventers after BP's Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

BP and BO are using the scam or the "oil crisis" and "carbon credits" on the CCX to bilk America. obama is also bilking Americans out of their Constitutional freedoms.
.......................................................................................
A blowout

Oil rig survivor says that the well was shut in and they were going through the process of separating the rig from the well, and moving it off.

They began by cleaning out the drilling mud from the riser, replacing it with sea water. However, when they re-opened the valves at the top of the well, the pipe in the well had become filled with gas from the well, under considerable pressure, and this “Kicked” the well as the valve opened.

Gas, as the pressure gets less as it moves up the pipe, expands much more than oil. And unfortunately in the process of disconnection, the pressure to hold the gas, which comes from the density of the drilling mud in the riser initially, had been removed as part of the disconnection process.

So the high pressure gas was able to blow all the sea water in the riser out onto the deck of the rig. (This happens extremely quickly, well below a minute) The gas then followed, and as it flowed out of the pipe at the top of the well there was some hot source that caused it to ignite.

(This could even be from a static electricity spark). Because of the depth of the well, the pressure in the bottom of the well was in the 30-40,000 psi range.

Part of the problem that arises with flows at that pressure is that any abrasive particles (such as small pieces of rock) will cut through metal at the speeds at which it is carried.

(Such jets were used to remove the damaged tops of the wells in Kuwait after the Gulf War, for example).

So that it is possible that as the Blow Out Preventor started to function the high-velocity flow may have eroded part of the system to allow some fluid to bypass the plug that the BOP inserted.

If that happened then the continued flow would just enlarge the passage again fairly quickly, so that the BOP will become ineffective.

However there are pictures of the leaks available.

There is a recent report that the accident may have been caused by a poor cementing job by Haliburton:

After an exploration well is drilled, cement slurry is pumped through a steel pipe or casing and out through a check valve at the bottom of the casing. It then travels up the outside of the pipe, sheathing the part of the pipe surrounded by the oil and gas zone. When the cement hardens, it is supposed to prevent oil or gas from leaking into adjacent zones along the pipe.

As the cement sets, the check valve at the end of the casing prevents any material from flowing back up the pipe. The zone is thus isolated until the company is ready to start production.

The process is tricky. A 2007 study by the U.S. Minerals Management Service found that cementing was the single most-important factor in 18 of 39 well blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico over a 14-year period. But at the time of the accident, "well operations had not yet reached the point requiring the placement of the final cement plug, which would enable the planned temporary abandonment of the well," the Halliburton statement said.

However it is hard to see from what is known, that this was a cause in this case.

If a well is shut in it closes of the blow-out preventor. There is a report from a survivor (h/t Fractional Flow ) that says that the well was shut in and they were going through the process of separating the rig from the well, and moving it off.
........................................................................................
Story Reports analyzes the BO and BP manure. Don't believe BP or BO they are liars.

It could be they thought the well was "shut in" or closed off by the blow out preventor closing its valves to cut off the oil and gas pressure. The survivor says this was done. It could be he thought this was done. Maybe they thought the bop was closed off.

If they thought it was closed off preventing the oil and gas from comming to the surface they would start going through the process of seperating the rig from the well. This process involves cleaning out the drilling mud from the riser, replacing it with sea water.

However, when they re-opened the valves at the top of the well, the pipe in the well had become filled with gas from the well, under considerable pressure, and this “Kicked” the well as the valve opened.

If the BOP only partially closed when they re-opened the valves at the top of the well, the pipe in the well had become filled with gas from the well, under considerable pressure.
Only 30 to 40,000 PSI!

"Gas, as the pressure gets less as it moves up the pipe, expands much more than oil. And unfortunately in the process of disconnection, the pressure to hold the gas, which comes from the density of the drilling mud in the riser initially, had been removed as part of the disconnection process."

So now I think I understand what the heck could have happened.

They thought the BOP shut off the oil and gas on the sea floor. It did not.

(1) Could the BOP malfunctioned?
(2) Could the operator have make a mistake and not closed the BOP correctly or fast enough?
(3) Could a waco environmentalist have had his hands on the controls and faked the closing off of the blowout preventor???
(4) Could BP have done this on purpose to make billions through the CCX that obama and gore created?

YES!!!

Which one do I think it is? I can only take a guess because the 11 men who died are not talking.

If BP goes bankrupt then morphs into a carbon based trading company I would say, (3)or (4) a waco environmentalist faked the closing of the BOP to create a manufactured crisis and BP did it on purpose to make millions on the CCX.

If after testimony under oath and corroborating evidence is creditable I could possibly believe it was an accident waiting to happen just like BO before he was "elected".

The tooler or foreman that died on the rig told his father that BP was cutting corners and taking safety risks and he was having to fight them all the time.

If this is true it must be also happening on other rigs. BP has made their employees sign a gag order not to talk.

This is why I suspect a coverup by BP. Remember BP was in bed with obama before this oil crisis. BP was obama's biggest contributor to his campaign. Rohn E and BP were also in bed together.

Drudge
BARACK PETROLEUM

Caron credits are the greatest scam in human history

BP America President and Chairman Lamar McKay: “BP supports an economy-wide price for carbon based on fair and equitable application across all sectors and believes that market based solutions, like a cap and trade or linked-fee, are the best solutions to manage GHG emissions.” (Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing, 6/15/10)

Shell President Marvin E. Odum: “That is why Shell supports legislating a solution to energy and climate issues as a means to create a secure U.S. energy future, reduce dependence on foreign oil and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. This requires setting a price for carbon, and we recommend cap and trade.” (Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing, 6/15/10)

ConocoPhillips CEO James J. Mulva: “Another key element of a comprehensive energy policy should be federal action to address global climate change. As you are aware, ConocoPhillips supports passage of a comprehensive federal law establishing a clear and transparent price for carbon.” (Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing, 6/15/10)

(Of course cap and trade is just an excuse to tax Americans on a problem that does not exist. Why do all the oil companies support cap and trade? Why would oil companies want a price for carbon set?

I'll tell you. They are invested in the obama/raines/gore carbon credit scheme.

Caron credits are the greatest scam in human history

Gary E explains:

If you have ever sat back, scratching your head and wondering why the Marxists are pushing for a “cap and trade” bill that would not only make energy costs “necessarily skyrocket,” to quote Barack Obama, but do absolutely nothing to effect fictional “climate change, ” one way or the other, you are about to find out.

We have long known this Marxist idea was nothing more than a continuation of the communist desire to “spread the wealth” by forcibly stealing from those who create and earn, and giving to those that don’t. This is an inbred mental defect that can’t be cured, only contained, the most effective way being: not to elect these evil, corrupt bastards in the first place!

When we first learned of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) we smelled a rat. No one has been more radical than Barack Obama when it comes to pushing the “global warming” hoax, and the “cap and trade” scheme. Being based in Chicago, common sense told us that Obama was somehow involved, and it was as corrupt as the day is long.

It took Glenn Beck to put it all together, and he has done a remarkable job of spelling it all out. In the videos below, Glenn documents Obama’s ties to the multi-trillion dollar carbon trading scam, Goldman Sachs, the Joyce Foundation, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers’ brother, Al Gore, George Soros, Maurice Strong and a whole cast of nerdowells.

Beck does a great job of connecting the dots here, as well as spelling out the scam itself. It’s quite interesting to note that all of the Marxist-democrats were pounding Goldman Sachs in their “show trial” for their handling of derivatives, a “synthetic” financial product, created out of thin air. Never mind it was the Marxist-democrat Party controlled Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac who were involved in the creation of this product, and President Bill Clinton who sanctioned it. (IE carbon credits)

Caron credits are the greatest scam in human history

Even Obama’s boss, George Soros, got in on the act writing an essay on his website speaking to the dangers of derivatives.

And yet, this is what carbon trading is, in a way. You are not buying a real product, or producing a benefit. Trading carbon credits can best be described as a “sin tax” with the “sinner” being able to purchase the ability to continuing “sinning,” without stopping the “sinful behavior” in any way whatsoever. You are simply redistributing wealth. In this case, those who actually produce will be forced to purchase the right to continue to produce from those who don’t produce. A real triumph for the glorious communist revolution!

But stealing money from the producers, and giving it to the non-producers is only half the story. These carbon credits will have to be tracked and traded. These credits will be treated as any other commodity, and traded on the open market. This is where the Chicago Climate Exchange comes in. They will be the only exchange for trading these credits and will make hefty commissions buying and selling these credits. (They get paid coming and going)

Energy prices will “necessarily skyrocket” because of two factors. One, because producers will have to purchase these credits, adding to the cost of doing business, a cost that will be passed on to the consumer, and two, these producers will be forced to buy the privilege of continuing to produce, from the Chicago Climate Exchange, which will raise the cost of doing business even more, again this will be passed on to the consumer.

(Did ya get that? Bp and the other oil companies will purchase these credits and make millions off of the fake carbon credits. So will BO and al gore etc. All of the cost will be passed on to Americans.) Story Reports

This is where Obama, and the rest of what Beck is calling Crime, Incorporated come in. Conservative estimates are Obama, Gore and the other scam artists involved in this deal will gross ten trillion dollars yearly, selling nothing but thin air. This is a fact.

(Obama will be good at this because he produces nothing now and never has except the total destruction of America.) Story Reports

Carbon credits are the greatest scam in human history

(Now does the gulf "oil crisis" make sense??. Its all about BP, BO and other scum making millions through a scam. A scam obama created in chicao with al gore. The CCX or chicago climate exchange. Yes obama and gore did conceive this evil black nationalist/communist plan to spread the wealth around. BP is like I said in bed with BO. Its a backdoor way to spread the wealth around and pay reparations. Its a scam to make thugs like obama and gore wealthy. Its a way to control the American people through the scam of global warming/ climate change/ pollution reduction and investment, or PRI.

Even if it was true that carbon emissions make the temperature of the earth rise, the cap and trade bill will not make any difference because china and other countries will not stop doing what they are doing. They are polluting but it does not cause the temperature of the earth to increase. So even on the surface of the scam it is evident carbon emissions will NOT be reduced by the CCX. Its a total BO and BP scam! ) Story Reports

........................................................................................
Author's Note: This is a guest post by William Semple. Mr. Semple is a drilling engineer and independent drilling consultant with 37 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. He worked for 16 years with a major oil company and has 24 years of experience as a drilling supervisor.

Sequence of events

Drilling of the Macondo well had reached total depth (TD) at 18,360 feet (ft). The previous casing shoe was at 17,168 ft. Open hole diameter was 8 ½ inches (in). Rotary Kelly Bushing (RKB) to Mud line was 5,067 ft. The open hole had been logged over a four-day period.

7 in by 9 7/8 in casing was run from TD all the way back to the wellhead--a single string.

The casing had been cemented using +/-100 bbls of slurry. There were no losses and the plug was bumped. No back flow was observed after displacement (although “U” tube effect was not significant.) Top of cement is estimated at 16,200 ft.

9 7/8 in casing hanger was landed with no lock ring (Reason not known).

No pack off or secondary seal was run (Reason not known).

11 hrs after cementing, the casing was tested to 2,650 pounds per square inch (psi) with the blind shear rams closed.

Drilling string was run to 8,367 ft.

Sequence of events

16.5 hrs after bumping the cement plug, the draw down or negative test was carried out to establish well integrity prior to displacing 14.3 pound per gallon (ppg) oil-based mud out of the well from a depth of 8,367 ft.

This test was carried out part-way through the displacement of the well to seawater including a complex spacer pill, with the well shut in and the kill line open & full of seawater. Kill line pressure was zero but there was 1400 psi on the drill pipe.

The inflow/draw down test was probably flawed. It would not equate to what the well would see after the riser was displaced to seawater. There is also witness statement information that the observation of return flow from the kill line to the cement unit was 15 bbls during the inflow test. As can been seen in the BP report, there was quite a lot going on during this process, and the data seems rather confusing. However, the test was deemed to be satisfactory.

The annular was opened up and the process of displacing the well to seawater continued at 25 to 31 barrels per minute. During this time, oil-based mud was being transferred to the supply boat, so total fluid in and out volumes could not be monitored. However, flow in and out was being monitored.

20:58-21:08 hrs there was an indication of increased flow from the riser returns. This coincided with a slowdown in pump rates and then stopping of pumps to carry out a sheen test in preparation to dump “clean” fluid returns to the sea (fluid spacer). During this period the drill pipe pressure increased (+/- 200 psi increase over five minutes).

21:15 hrs pumping restarted and returns were dumped overboard. The diverter was closed for this operation so there was no longer flow-out measurement.

21:31 pumps off. The pump pressure just prior to this had been increasing but then showed, a drop off which could have been a sign of the gas coming up to surface. Records show 4 telephone calls between the rig floor and the Toolpusher (drilling manager responsible for all operations) during this time.

21:31 – 21:47 erratic drill pipe pressure probably due to unloading of riser because of gas expansion.


21:49 Drill pipe pressure had risen rapidly to 5,800 psi. It is thought that the annular preventer may have been closed at this time. But since the drill pipe valve (Kelly cock/stab in valve) was not closed, the pressure would have reached the pumps where the relief valve pressure could have been exceeded and tripped gas would have flooded the pump room (this is speculation but quite likely).

21:49 All data transmission from the rig were lost presumably due to the explosions & fire.

21:56 hrs The EDS (emergency disconnect system which closes all valves & rams & blind shear rams on the BOP --blowout preventer--and disconnects the riser) was pressed from a remote location but it did not appear to work.

After loss of hydraulics and communication from the well the AMF (automatic mode failure system) on the BOP should have functioned. This would have closed all BOP rams but not the disconnect. This did not appear to work.

Post-explosion ROV (remotely operated vehicle) interventions were conducted to attempt to activate the blind shear rams, variable rams and other BOP functions.

Leaks were found in the system that were previously noted in the rig log.

Hydraulic system errors such that test rams (lower pipe rams) were activated instead of the lower variable rams.

Subsequent NDT (non-destructive testing) examination of the BOP indicated that the blind shear rams & variable rams did move and may be in the locked position, but final status will not be possible until the BOP is recovered.

Conclusions

Well Planning

* The hanger was run without a lock ring. Pressures from gas leaking up from the producing formation could have provided sufficient pressure to move the hanger and affect seal integrity. There was no lock ring or secondary seal (pack off) to prevent this.
* Hanger was only a single barrier—the cement was and could not be tested.
* Gas from the annulus getting past the hanger seal was the most likely source of the kick and subsequent blowout.

Policy & Procedure

The method of conducting the inflow or draw-down test in conjunction with displacement of the well from weighted mud to seawater is suspect at best, and possibly fundamentally flawed.

Basic Rig Practices

# The inflow/draw down test did not appear to offer satisfactory results, and also took place over a relatively short period of time.
# During the displacement of the well to seawater, volume, flow show and pressure anomalies were evident but did not result in the well being shut in in a timely manner.
# Even after there were some indications that all was not well, pumping operations continued. Returns were dumped and the return flow meter was bypassed,so the rig was effectively blind until things started to get quite serious.

(Here is the definitive answer to the question, what caused the manufactured crisis in the gulf.)

When the well was shut in, the drill pipe safety valve or IBOP was not closed in time to stop rapid rise in pressure getting back to the pumps and probably blowing the pressure relief valves.

(Why? Answers 1,2,3,4 of my previous questions apply.

(1) Could the BOP malfunctioned?
(2) Could the operator have make a mistake and not closed the BOP correctly or fast enough?
(3) Could a waco environmentalist have had his hands on the controls and faked the closing off of the blowout preventor???
(4) Could BP have done this on purpose to make billions through the CCX that obama and gore created?) Story Reports

What lessons can we learn from this tragedy?


(It was done on purpose.) Story reports

1. The practice of running a long string instead of a liner to seal off a reservoir means any failure in the cement job cannot be monitored. It is well known that, in certain circumstances, some of the hydrostatic pressure of the cement column can be lost during the cement-curing process. Running a liner means the cement job can be monitored or tested, or that a liner-top packer can be used to act as an additional barrier.
2. The industry should embrace existing techniques to prevent or compensate for potential loss of hydrostatic pressure during the cement-curing process.
3. Hanger assemblies can and should offer dual barriers.
4. Hangers should always include a locking mechanism. This should not be left out for the sake of convenience.
5. Cement should not be considered as a barrier unless it can be properly tested in the direction of flow.
6. Barrier policy should require dual barriers tested in the direction of flow.
7. Inflow/draw down testing and displacing wells to lighter fluids is not part of the IWCF syllabus. It should be.
8. Displacing wells to under-balance hydrostatics should require monitoring of volumes pumped and returned. The process should stop while volume is pumped to a boat.
9. Flow checks during such displacements to lighter fluids should be mandatory and thorough.
10. Basic well control training teaches us that, when there are indications of a kick, the well should be shut in.
11. Basic well control training teaches us that before closing in a well, the drill pipe should be shut in first.
12. Drillers must be empowered to have the confidence and authority to close the well in if they have any suspicions that a well might be flowing. Close the well in first – ask questions later.
........................................................................................
(Here is some additional information about the coast guard. After reading this you start to think it really is BP and BO in bed together giving birth to a crisis. Like I said the whole thing smells like BO!) Story Reports

The inevitable happened via the US government and BO.

Stu255

Obama doesn't let a crisis go to waste

The US Coast Guard turned up on site and deluged an abandoned Deepwater Horizon until it sunk 2 days later as the Coast Guard flooded the pontoons. The sinking of the rig resulted in the failure of the riser and the initiation of the worst spill in US history. Now I am NOT apportioning any blame to the US Coast Guard, but the decision to deluge the rig? Was it really wise? I mean if they had let the fire rage what would have happened?
i). The fire would have burned fiercely above the drill floor and would have eventually consumed everything from there up.
ii). Is it possible that the pontoons, the rig legs and the drill floor could have survived the fire for a week or two or maybe even more?
iii). Is it possible that the riser could have maintained intact for many days after the blowout? Simply feeding oil and gas to a giant inferno above the rig.

It is my opinion that, the best cause of action would have been for the Coast Guard to sit back and watch the rig burn. In fact there should have been a conscious effort to keep the rig dry, as the fire would have consumed all the oil that would otherwise be spilling into the gulf. Even if the rig burned for just two weeks that time would have been invaluable for planning the response.

The current set up over the Malongo well is actually identical in principle to the set up that was sunk by the Coast Guard two days into the response operation. In fact the original set up was better as we had a Marine Riser from sea floor to deck that was structurally intact and preloaded in place.

I wonder how much BP would pay to get that scenario back in place?

Darrell Issa is making plans to hire dozens of subpoena-wielding investigators if Republicans win the House this fall

........................................................................................
(This is good news. Maybe Issa can expose the FRAUD obama. BO should be impeached for corruption as president. Obama is a traitor and a thug. A total disgrace to America. A real piece of work. The first question I would ask BO is where is your birth certificate?) Story Reports

By JAMES HOHMANN & JAKE SHERMAN

HERSHEY, Pa.— Rep. Darrell Issa, the conservative firebrand whose specialty is lobbing corruption allegations at the Obama White House, is making plans to hire dozens of subpoena-wielding investigators if Republicans win the House this fall.

The California Republican’s daily denunciations draw cheers from partisans and bookings from cable TV producers. He even bought his own earphone for live shots. But his bombastic style and attention-seeking investigations draw eye rolls from other quarters. Now, he’s making clear he won’t be so easy to shrug off if he becomes chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in 2011.

Issa has told Republican leadership that if he becomes chairman, he wants to roughly double his staff from 40 to between 70 and 80. And he is not subtle about what that means for President Barack Obama.

At a recent speech to Pennsylvania Republicans here, he boasted about what would happen if the GOP wins 39 seats, and he gets the power to subpoena.

“That will make all the difference in the world,” he told 400 applauding party members during a dinner at the chocolate-themed Hershey Lodge. “I won’t use it to have corporate America live in fear that we’re going to subpoena everything. I will use it to get the very information that today the White House is either shredding or not producing.”

In other words, Issa wants to be to the Obama administration what Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) was to the Clinton administration — a subpoena machine in search of White House scandals.

Even if Republicans don’t take the House, Issa has other ambitions. Those close to him say he is eyeing a potential run for a leadership post, even though he’s a two-time loser for Republican policy chairman.

Issa also is trying to build his national brand, traveling to Pennsylvania for a summer Republican meeting. He basked in praise for his role in creating “Job-gate,” a mini scandal that forced the White House to admit that former President Bill Clinton tried to coax Rep. Joe Sestak out of the Democratic Senate primary in Pennsylvania by offering him an unpaid job.

After calling the White House “corrupt” and Obama’s presidency “failed,” Issa reiterated his claims that — despite a contrary assessment from most experts — the administration violated federal law with the Sestak imbroglio.

He also mentioned e-mail from White House deputy chief of staff Jim Messina to Colorado U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff about three possible administration jobs as the administration apparently tried to steer him away from a primary challenge against Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet.

Many Democrats — and, truth be told, even a few Republicans in the House — regard Issa as something of a clownish figure, full of bluster and a perfect representative of an age of polarized, cable TV-driven politics. He once asked a reporter what planet he was on when he questioned one of Issa’s assertions.

But some Democratic operatives think colleagues are underestimating the threat: A clown with subpoena power is no laughing matter. Issa would have the ability to barrage the White House and executive agencies with document requests and demands for officials to appear under oath.

“He’s very dangerous,” said a Democratic House aide. “He doesn’t have any parameters. He’s scary smart.”

(Would this same aid say BO was scary smart? Bo is scary incompetent. Scary liberal. Scary socialist. Scary demonic in nature.) Story Reports

Lately, Democratic apparatchiks have started flooding reporters with thick files of old articles referring to run-ins with the law during Issa’s youth. Democrats also recently shopped a 12-year-old news story about Issa’s inconsistencies in discussing his military service during a 1998 campaign.

Even with control of the House, Republicans won’t be able to easily pass their agenda into law, since the GOP is unlikely to win the Senate and would face a presidential veto on their most sweeping agenda items.

That’s actually good for Issa. With little policy work to get done, Republicans would focus on fighting and investigating Obama.

Issa is temperamentally suited for the role. He doesn’t mind making enemies, he’s in a very safe district and he craves publicity. With his slicked-back black hair, his BMW motorcycle and his net worth of more than $150 million, Issa fashions himself a rebel with a cause.

Issa already brought down a governor. Seven years ago, he financed and spearheaded the successful drive to collect petitions to recall then-California Gov. Gray Davis. He didn’t achieve his goal going in — to replace the Democrat — but he made a name for himself in the Golden State.

Issa frequently reminds reporters that he has bashed Republicans too. He pushed legislation to restrict fundraising mailers that look like the census after the Republican National Committee used the tactic. And he proudly told the crowd that he resisted pressure from the Bush White House to drop his California recall push on grounds that an unpopular incumbent Democrat could help a Republican’s electoral chances.

And it’s not like Issa would be unique in using the Oversight panel as a bully pulpit.

Most recently, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) held the Bush administration’s feet to the fire when he chaired the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. He aggressively pressed the White House for information about U.S. attorney firings, demanded details about the use by Bush aides of private e-mail accounts, held a hearing on the disclosure of CIA agent Valerie Plame’s identity and published a report on administration officials’ misstatements about Iraq.

Waxman takes a somewhat wait-and-see approach with Issa, saying he hasn’t followed his work as closely since he left to chair the Energy and Commerce Committee. He praised Issa for being “involved in some serious oversight” with the current committee chairman, Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.).

However, Waxman criticized Issa’s recent request for administration travel statements. “That isn’t oversight, as far as I’m concerned,” he told POLITICO. “That’s a fishing expedition. We never did things like that.”

As the committee’s chairman from 1997 to 2002, Burton issued 1,052 subpoenas to the Clinton White House and various Democrats. And he took heat for calling Clinton “a scumbag” and for releasing audiotapes of former White House lawyer Webster Hubbell’s prison telephone conversations.

Burton, who is still on the committee, sees Issa as possibly continuing his work.

“When you go after bad guys who do bad things, you’re going to be criticized,” he said in an interview. “That comes with the territory. But I’ll take somebody like Darrell Issa to milquetoast any day.”

Issa’s accomplishments in the past year also include pressing embattled insurance giant American International Group to release records about payments to Goldman Sachs, uncovering irregularities at ACORN, publicizing pornographic-laden e-mails at the Securities and Exchange Commission and memorably scolding the chief executive of Toyota.

t’s tarring Obama, though, that endears him to tea partiers. Patti Weaver, who has organized rallies in Pittsburgh, said Issa is becoming one of the central characters in Washington that conservative activists admire. She groups him with Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) — all rabble-rousers in their own right.

Yet, for all his cable news prowess and an aggressive press operation, Issa’s still not a celebrity within the Republican establishment. Pennsylvania GOP Chairman Rob Gleason introduced their guest speaker for the night as “Dan Issa.”

That didn’t bother press secretary Kurt Bardella. He updated his Facebook status after the speech: “Something tells me this is just the start of Issa’s outreach to the party and the country.”

(People are aware of the corruption in washington. Many voters know the bought and paid for politicians must be voted out. America can't wait to start grilling obama. The question is will America make it until Nov 2010? Obama is a fraud who will do anything and everything to stay in power, even to the point of destroying Americans.) Story Reports