AnyCalculator.com
Over 200 FREE Online Calculators

Friday, November 22, 2019

Adam Schiff is the 'Admiral Yamamoto' of Trump impeachment proceedings



 

Editor Note

If Schiff is the 'admiral yamamoto' of the Trump impeachment hearings that would make nancy pelosi a 

kamikaze

[ kah-mi-kah-zee ]

A person or thing that behaves in a wildly reckless or destructive manner.





Mark Levin said Thursday, Nov 21 2019, that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had awakened the "sleeping giant" of the American people by leading impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

Mark Levin compared Schiff's actions to a famous quote from Japanese Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto after Japan bombed the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on Dec. 7, 1941.

"After we were attacked at Pearl Harbor, Admiral Yamamoto of Japan said, 'I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve'.


"You know, Adam Schiff, you are in some ways Admiral Yamamoto: You just awakened a sleeping giant. You threw everything you had at the president, at the Republicans, at 63 million voters who voted for this president."

Levin said Schiff failed to gain any ground in his bid to prove Trump committee a high crime or misdemeanor worthy of impeachment, despite having control over the hearing rules and many of the witnesses.


House speaker pelosi changed the house rules on dec 2018 to impeach Preident Trump
Minority need not be notified.
Minority need not be present.
Committee staff and/or hired contractors can do all depositions.
Outcomes need not be shared with minority.

Pelosi’s House Rule Changes are Key Part of Articles of Impeachment

Levin, a former chief of staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese, said that once Democrats craft articles of impeachment and vote to send the matter to the Senate for a trial, Schiff will be effectively stripped of his prominent role in the remainder of the process.

Senate Republicans will have the opportunity to call their own witnesses and that Trump and the White House will be able to defend themselves with counsel.

Levin described many of the witnesses who testified as "a small cabal of State Department and NSC bureaucrats who didn't like Trump or his policies," but were still unable to confirm the existence of bribery or extortion on the part of the president when pressed by Republican committee members.

He remarked that if the Democrats want to impeach a president for failing to offer sufficient aid to Ukraine, they should "retroactively impeach Obama."

"It was Trump who got the Ukrainians the weapons that they needed. It was Trump who stopped the Russians.

It was Trump who put the most severe sanctions in modern history on the Russians. It was Obama who appeased the Russians.

 It was Obama under whose presidency the Russians invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea," Levin said.

  

Thursday, November 21, 2019


President Trump tells ambassador sondland, " I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo” 

 

The fake media  repeats what schiff and other democrate liars say in the fake hearings.


President Trump will be reelected in 2020 even if the democrates impeach him on false charges.

 

 ____________________________

 

Editor Note

If Schiff is the 'admiral yamamoto' of the Trump impeachment hearings that would make nancy pelosi a 

kamikaze

[ kah-mi-kah-zee ]

A person or thing that behaves in a wildly reckless or destructive manner.




kamikaze pelosi is about to implode on the orders  Admiral Yamamoto Schiff.

________________________________

 

 
StreamZones.com 








Thursday, November 21, 2019

President Trump tells ambassador sondland, " I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo”


11/20/2019

Media and schiff inquisition media collusion FAKE hearings


Adam schiff asked ambassador sondland about what President Trump said in the phone conversation with the ukraine president.

Schiff didn't get the answer he wanted but got an answer that 100% reveals that schiff and the deep state bureaucrats etc have lied about the phone call and are continuing to lie.


Testifying in an impeachment hearing, Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, recounted his phone call with President Donald Trump in which the president said there was “no quid pro quo.”

 “It was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood and he just said, I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo,” Sondland said.

 The ambassador said he then relayed that message to Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, “not to defend what the president was saying, not to opine on whether the president was being truthful or untruthful” but to express that he had done what he could to address Taylor’s concerns. 

Earlier in his Nov. 20 testimony, Sondland had said, however, that there was a 'quid pro quo' between Trump and the Ukrainian president.


______________________________________________



Editor Note:


In ambassador sondlands opening statement he said, there was a quid pro quo between President Trump and the ukrainian president.

This opening statement reflected ONLY HIS OWN OPINION!

When schiff asked him the question about the phone call ambassador sondlands answer WAS NOT HIS OPINION but a statement of fact of what President Trump actually said during the phone call.


This is real evidence Prsident Trump NEVER asked for a quid pro quo as schiff and the democrates are claiming.

To me this is real evidence President Trump did nothng wrong and real evidence schiff and democratic members of congress are deceiving the public and are subverting our government.

These people who are conducting the fake impeachment enquiry are criminals involved in collusion to defraud and deceive the American people!


__________________________________________________





__________________________________________________


Ambassador sondland is a cunning deceiver also. He talked about President Trump's phone call in terms of his own opinion and not actually what was said by President Trump.

If schiff had not stepped in it with his own question the facts about what President Trump actually said would have not been revealed by the cunning ambassador sondland.



This video is solid evidence President Trump is trying to be removed from elected office by a  Coup.

This Coup is in collusion with the state run media, deep state and the democrates.

Hitler said, if you tell a lie enough people will begin to believe it.

Schiff is a modern day  equivalent of hitler who is telling lies over and over!

The fake media  repeats what schiff and other democrate liars say in the fake hearings.


President Trump will be reelected in 2020 even if the democrates impeach him on false charges.

I am praying those who are involved in the coup to overthrow President Trump will be brought to justice.










Wednesday, November 13, 2019

It only takes 1 idiot to put your life in danger.



I recently watched a youtube video about and actual dual engine failure in a citation jet.

It was an interview with the actual pilot who flew the jet after both engines failed.

He explains what happened and why it happened.

Near the end of the aviation video he mentioned that information about the dual engine failure was in all the aviation magazines but never reached the mass media.

There is a BIG reason the dual engine failure story in the citation jet never was reported in the mass media.

The mass media, or drive by media does not report what THEY DON"T WANT YOU TO KNOW!

The airline companies and other don't want the public to know that it just takes 1 idiot to put your life in danger when your a passenger in a jet.

_______________________________________________





ACTUAL DUAL ENGINE FAILURE IN A CITATION JET







______________________________________________


On May 9th 2019, a Citation Medivac Flight with 4 crew and 3 passengers would experience a DUAL engine failure. The actions of the two pilots would determine the fate of all seven on board. This is their story......

The lineman, idiot, that fueled the plane was dismissed and the aircraft was deemed totaled. The DEF infiltrates the entire fuel system and the repair/replacement cost would exceed the airplane's value. In fact, the plane still sits in SAV today. Additionally, there was a second aircraft that departed the same airport that was also affected by the fuel contamination. I think he only lost one engine and was able to divert and land safely.


_______________________________________________


Editor Note:

The pilot the safely landed the dual engine failure jet explained that a def container used for Diesel exhaust fluid was used to transport some prist, an anti acing agent, used in jet fuel to a 5 gallon drum on the jet fuel truck. A very small amount of diesel def additive is fatalto any jet engine.

Watching this video I learned that big jets can glide about 1/3 further than a smaller jet.

The pilot said that at 8,000 feet up he could glide about 16 miles in his jet.

A bigger jet at 8,000 miles could glide about 24 miles of approximately 1/3 further.

The pilot of the citation jet had been trained for a single engine failure but not a dual engine failure.

Also most of the jets surface controls were mechanical and not hydraulic.

If the jets surface controls were hydraulic and both engines failed he would have lost control of the jet.

He said the landing gear was hyfraulic but it had an emergency procedure in case of loss of hydraulic pressure to lowet the landing gear.

He did not need to use this because there was enough wind pressure going through the engine to allow for a limted amount of hydraulic pressure to lower the nose gear and landing gear.

The jet was able to land safely because it had few hydraulic surface controls and a pilot who knew what he was doing.

If the pilot had been less experienced or not kept cool under pressure the outcome would have been much different.

Also the wonderful grace of God also made all the difference!


_______________________________________________


Let me equate this story of how an idiot is trying to cause a disaster and how a smart pilot will land the jet of liberty safely.

(1) Adam shift the democratic chairman of a lynch mob of democratcs, the idiot, is trying to cause a disaster by the totally fake impeachment hearing that started today.

(2) President Trump, the smart pilot, commander in chief will land the liberty plane and be reelected as President Of The United States in spite of adam shift or any other liberal socialist democratic idiot that will try to stop him from Making America Great Again.

Yes this is a a different story about an idiot and a hero.

I think the mass media will say the hearings went well for the democrats.

The truth is, if you watched the hearings, they are just 1 more big failure for the liberal democrats.

The mass media, or drive by media does not report what THEY DON"T WANT YOU TO KNOW!

They don't want you to know the Republicans in the shift hearing exposed the fake witnesses as being NOT cedible!

The mass media will not tell you the truth.

Watch the hearing an make a determination for yourself.

Don't let the mass media tell you what to think by reporting news that is only their fake opinion!

And now you know the rest of the story!


______________________________


theconservativetreehouse.com

(Read the real news at The Conservative Tree House.)

Fear is at the core of liberalism, and love/trust is at the core of conservatism. Liberalism is about control. Conservatism is about self-empowerment.


_____________________________


WATCH: Rep. Jordan's full questioning of Bill Taylor | Trump impeachment hearings








Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, questioned Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, in the first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a "clear understanding" that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump's political rivals.

Jordan said there was no "linkage" but Taylor said he came to his conclusion based on people he spoke to. The probe centers around a July phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. Both Kent and Taylor testified to lawmakers in October behind closed doors.


Note:  There is no federal law etc that allows for a whistle blower to accuse The President Of The United States.








Mark Levin Show Podcasts






Listen To The Mark
Levin Show
  on WORD106.3 FM Weekdays 7PM-10PM


StreamZones.com







Thursday, November 7, 2019

Democrats’ embrace of thuggery over democracy is not normal



How Did Democrats Get Here? Democrats’ embrace of thuggery over democracy is not normal.

Karin McQuillan 

 

Democrats have become the party of thuggery, from the top leaders abusing President Trump as a traitor and criminal, to the Antifa black shirts beating up Trump supporters in Democrat cities. The ginned up hysteria over Trump’s election has grown with Trump’s triumphant successes with the economy and national security.

The Democrats’ motivation for the fake impeachment crisis is obvious—they have no platform and no candidate that gives them a path to the White House. What is less obvious is why three years of ugly, crude propaganda, threatened and actual violence, wearisome agitation and lies is playing so well to previously normal Democrats.

The Democrat Party has veered far left very fast, without any pushback from within the party. Their voters have turned, seemingly overnight, from normal American citizens to a deranged mob after Trump’s blood. This weird transformation is normalized by blaming it on Trump himself, and the shock of his victory.

A moment’s reflection shows how superficial that derangement explanation is.
Trump did not make the Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders a powerful political force in 2016. He is not responsible for Elizabeth Warren’s desire to confiscate people’s wealth. Trump did not cause the majority of Democrats to reject freedom of speech and religion, or to prefer socialism to capitalism. How did those radicals become so powerful that they now dominate the party leadership?

There is nothing in what Trump has done as president that explains the unconstitutional attacks against him. It is the reverse—the attempt to frame and entrap President Trump and his team as traitors with Russia, was begun by the Obama DOJ, FBI, CIA and White House before his inauguration. It was the Obama Administration’s actions that necessitated the all-out attempt to delegitimize President Trump before he could expose them.

President Trump did nothing to provoke the Obama intelligence community framing him as a Russian traitor. You have to look at President Obama to understand this unprecedented attempt to overturn a presidential election. Our press, including most of the conservative press, has always been unwilling to focus on Obama, and the Marxist forces he unleashed in American politics.

We can’t even use the word Marxist without the taint of supposed “McCarthyism.” Better to use vague terms such as “radical” or “Left,” or better still, avoid the deeper issues by calling the war against our president “derangement.”

The Mueller investigation and the phony impeachment would have been impossible without #TheResistance insisting on radical partisanship. The propaganda war against Trump hasn’t touched his loyal, grateful, voters, but it has turned normal Democrats into mindless haters.

There is nothing so terrible about President Trump that he can’t be treated fairly and rationally by the press and his opponents. Derangement is a choice. It is a strategy. It is true that President Trump often breaks norms of how politicians talk. He is rude. He does troll his opponents and purposely make them lose control. At the same time, his policies and his achievements are centrist; they would have been acceptable if a President Clinton proposed them.

Trump is obnoxious to his political opponents, but he is also warm, charming, and funny. He is loving and protective towards ordinary Americans of all colors, genders and sexual preferences, new citizens and old. He has off-the-charts common sense and patriotism, and plain speaking.

The president’s reality-based policies on energy, regulation, trade, job creation, and China have made each of us more prosperous and safer. These are not distant achievements. Trump has made the lives of ordinary people better in concrete ways that can’t be hidden by Democrat talking points, by bringing the working class and unemployed jobs, fighting crime, and controlling our southern border. And he would have done more if not for Democrat obstruction. He has done more to help the poorest Americans achieve a better life than any president in living memory.

Ordinary Democrats’ extreme hatred of Trump and his supporters is far from normal. Insisting we enforce immigration laws on the books is not the second coming of Hitler. Democrats genuinely believe it is. They talk themselves into nonsense, while Trump is gains popularity among Hispanic voters (who made up 30 percent of the audience at his rally in New Mexico). The fact that Presidents Clinton and Obama both urged securing our borders makes no difference. When Trump obeys American law, he is evil.

I asked a neighbor, a Democrat moderate, why he hated President Trump. His answer: Charlottesville.
The idea that Trump praised neo-Nazis after Charlottesville is an outright lie about what the president said. It is easily rebutted by the videos and transcripts, but—typical of the propaganda-inflamed mob—rebutting the lie makes absolutely no difference. My neighbor “knows” Republicans are racists and nothing will shake that belief.

This is a huge winning propaganda stroke for the Democrats. My neighbor actually agrees with the president’s policies on the border, on China, knows the economy is doing well, can see the country is at peace—none of that matters, he thinks Republicans are deplorable racists.

We accept Democrats despising Republicans as racist as though it were normal, but we shouldn’t. Republicans believe what every decent American believed during the Civil Rights era—that everyone should be treated equally regardless of race, period.

The Democrats’ conviction that half the country, led by Donald Trump, is white supremacist in its outlook is just plain weird. Trump was elected by winning over Midwestern voters, the salt of the earth, who had previously voted for Obama. Trump’s rhetoric on race has been unifying, not divisive, typified by his favorite phrase, “whether we are black or brown or white, we all bleed the same red blood of patriots, we all enjoy the same glorious freedoms, and we all salute the same great American Flag.” Remember his great line in his inaugural address: “When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice. The Bible tells us, ‘How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity.’”

Trump’s actions on race follow his rhetoric. Whether it is with mainstream economic opportunity zones in the inner city, or his response to the black communities desire for incarceration reform, or his economic policies which have helped minorities more than any other segment of the population, his policies show a deep commitment to helping the black community.
Yet good-hearted Democrats “know” Trump is divisive, and that it is their party which brings the country together.

The number of Democrat liberals fighting back against the libel, the hate, and hard leftists taking over over their party is miniscule. Alan Dershowitz comes to mind. I know there are a few others, but I can’t recall them at the moment.

What is going on?

“How evil is the left? This evil,” John Hinderaker wrote after the “appalling” Antifa attacks on Trump supporters and police in “nice” Minnesota. But not a single Democrat politician or media voice finds the violence appalling. Just the opposite—a Democrat legislator participated in the riot, while others, including U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), tweeted their approval.

“Are there any moderate Democrats left?” Hinderaker asked.

It’s an important question. Why aren’t Democrats fighting for their own party—and our country—against the hostile takeover by the Left?



Rush Limbaugh Podcast     11/6/2019 

Rush Limbaugh comments on the above Karin McQuillan article.

Listen in beginning about 1:05 of the podcast.

Rush explains why the left is So Crazy.

amgreatness.com/2019/11/02/how-did-democrats-get-here/

Rush details why the  democrates are going crazy and have become a threat to those who support President Trump.

The left is evil. They are thugs. They are abnormal and deranged.

They are all dangerous.




Friday, November 1, 2019

"They ain't out here arresting people for (shoplifting) and everyone knows it in California."




SAN FRANCISCO – In a lighted garage on one of San Francisco's busiest streets, a young man in baggy trousers and messy brown hair pulled down his pants. He had been hiding two pairs of stolen jeans with the tags still on them. He handed them to another man waiting nearby, took some money, pulled up his pants and headed back into another store on Market Street — home to the city's high-end designers and big-chain retail shops.

The incident wasn't a one-off. These brazen acts of petty theft and shoplifting are a dangerous and all-too-common consequence of Proposition 47, a referendum passed five years ago that critics say effectively gives shoplifters and addicts the green light to commit crimes as long as the merchandise they steal or the drugs they take are less than $950 in value.

The decision to downgrade theft of property valued below the arbitrary figure from felony to misdemeanor, together with selective enforcement that focuses on more “serious” crimes, has resulted in thieves knowing they can brazenly shoplift and merchants knowing the police will not respond to their complaints, say critics.


SAN FRANCISCO HOMELESS STATS SOAR: CITY BLAMES BIG BUSINESS, RESIDENTS BLAME OFFICIALS 

Over in the City by the Bay's famous Tenderloin district, Cassie, a 21-year-old mother of two and a former heroin junkie, told Fox News that when times were tough, she too has stolen from stores.

"If my babies need diapers or formula, who is going to get that for me? No one. I have to do it," she said. "They ain't out here arresting people for (shoplifting) and everyone knows it."

Proposition 47 is seen by critics as one of California's biggest blunders. Supported by the state Democratic Party and championed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the referendum was passed by a wide margin in 2014. The idea behind it was to reduce certain non-violent felonies to misdemeanors in order to free up resources for cops and prosecutors to focus on violent offenders.



Editor Note 


This is exactly what the democrates want for all the United States.

1/4 of California is on fire because of enviromental waco's and government not cutting under brush for the last several years.

California is also letting shoplifters steal up to $950.00 anytime they want knowing they can get away with it.

This is what you will get in your local area in other states if you vote democratic in any election.

California is a NUT house. The inmates have taken over.

These inmates want to do the same thing in all 50 states. Nancy Pelosi and her fellow nut cases want it to happen asap along with every illegal alien they can push on you in every county in the US.

I live about 3,000 miles away from California and I am thankful I do.

The nut jobs are on their way. Pelosi wants them in your neighbourhood sooner than you think!

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Senate prepared to reject a kangaroo democrate court








President Donald Trump Will Be Reelected in 2020 No Matter What Pelosi And The Democrates Do.




Senator Lindsey Graham has created a new reality for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Graham has written a powerful resolution which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell joined in co-sponsoring. Together they have attracted 50 co-sponsors – which means with Vice President Pence supporting them they would win a vote to dismiss any phony impeachment from the House that failed to meet a key standard of fairness.

The resolution:
  • “calls on the House of Representatives, prior to proceeding any further with its impeachment investigation into President Trump, to vote to initiate a formal impeachment inquiry;
  • calls on the House of Representatives to provide President Trump, like every other American, with due process, to include the ability to confront his accusers, call witnesses on his behalf, and have a basic understanding of the accusations against him that would form any basis for impeachment; and
  • calls on the House of Representatives to provide members of the minority with the ability to participate fully in all proceedings and have equal authority to issue subpoenas and other compulsory process.”
Faced with this new reality, Speaker Pelosi suddenly ended months of avoiding a vote on the impeachment process and announced today that the House would vote this week.

The real reason for the thursday Oct 31, 2019 is because:


Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are hoping to achieve this by bringing in the House Judiciary Committee and the judicial enforcement authority they were just granted by Judge Howell.

They are also in a big rush to do this; hence the Thursday vote.  The rush is because the DOJ has filed a motion for stay, as they appeal the Judge Howell ruling.



As a practical matter, the House Democrats had no choice but to bring the impeachment process to a vote. They were faced with a Trump administration that refused to cooperate with a secret investigation which lacked rules and authorization by the full House.

They were also faced with a Senate that was prepared to reject a kangaroo court-style secret approach.

 

Don't be tricked by pelosi's "vote".  It is a resolution, to affirm her previous declaration of a House “inquiry”.  The resolution is currently being written by Lawfare.

Pelosi is not delivering a House “Resolution on Impeachment” for a vote, because if she did hold a vote on an impeachment resolution, the minority and the Executive branch would gain rights therein. 

Pelosi is careful to say “this is not an impeachment resolution”

There are NO plans to vote on a formal inquiry of impeachment.

Lawfare is hoping that through this Thursday vote scheme they will be able to twist the legal process into providing their House inquiry judicial enforcement authority, or punishment possible for the executive not complying with a House committee subpoena.

Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are hoping to achieve this by bringing in the House Judiciary Committee and the judicial enforcement authority they were just granted by Judge Howell.

They are also in a big rush to do this; hence the Thursday vote.  The rush is because the DOJ has filed a motion for stay, as they appeal the Judge Howell ruling.

Remember, the Lawfare intent is to pierce the constitutional firewall that creates a distinct separation of powers; and the Legislative branch is trying to force documents from the Executive branch, overriding executive privilege.

This is a constitutional issue. This level of impeachment intent is why judicial enforcement authority (the full house authorization to grant weight to legal subpoena power) becomes much more important.

Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler and Lawfare are attempting to create “judicial enforcement authority” without having an actual and constitutional vote to authorize an official “impeachment investigation”.

That’s what this Thursday House resolution is all about.

The Thursday House resolution is intended to authorize and validate the pre-existing Pelosi “impeachment inquiry”, and then expand the authority within the rules to create the impression of a full House impeachment investigation; without actually having a House  “impeachment investigation vote”…. because that would open-up rights to the minority and rights to the executive.



Pelosi's resolution vote is not a formal vote on the impeachment process!

This will be on thursday Oct 31, 2019  haloween.

Will the wicked witch of the house wave her broomstick wand and continue the fake impeachment without any rules or while she mix something else in her wicked brew of impeachment objectives?


The House Democrats have a clear model of a fair, systematic bipartisan approach in the rules adopted by the Democrats in 1973 and by the Republicans in 1998. Former Democratic Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Peter Rodino of New Jersey developed a bipartisan set of rules in 1973 during the Nixon impeachment proceedings.

The house democrates will totally ignore a fair bipartisan approach by not holding a real impeachment process vote, not just a phoney house resolution.

Rodino’s rules allowed the White House Counsel to be present at all hearings – including those held in secret. They also allowed the Republican minority to offer subpoenas to bring in the witnesses they wanted in addition to the witnesses the Democrats wanted.

When we were faced with an impeachment process in 1998, we sent a congressman to interview then-retired Chairman Rodino, and we literally adopted all of his rules.

So, there is a bipartisan precedent for a fair, orderly approach to the impeachment process.

If Speaker Pelosi offers a resolution which includes these precedents – and if her resolution answers the 10 questions Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy has written posed to her – then it is possible the impeachment process will be back on a bipartisan track.

This is never going to happen of course.


If, however, Speaker Pelosi introduces a resolution to continue the secret kangaroo court-Star Chamber-partisan approach Representative Adam Schiff has adopted, then the vote will be meaningless.

This is what the wicked witch pelosi will do on haloween Oct 31, 2019. 

In fact they will try to increase the power of their fake kangaroo court investigation.

If the House Democrats fail to heed the warning of the Graham-McConnell Resolution, they will be setting up all their efforts to be dismissed out of hand by the senators who have called on them for real reforms in the current impeachment process.


Graham and McConnell have already had a big impact in just a few days. They are now poised to judge whether the Democrats’ proposed rules represent real fairness and real bipartisanship or are simply more of the same dishonest, secretive, one-sided baloney Schiff has served up so far.

It will be very interesting to see what kind of resolution Speaker Pelosi brings forward.

Don't be confused by what the wicked witch of the house pelosi is doing.

The democrates will just vote for a resolution to increase their fake kangaroo court inquiry.

IT IS NOT A VOTE TO START A REAL FORMAL IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

A REAL VOTE ON IMPEACHMENT IS NOT A RESOLUTION VOTE!!!!

I can understand why people will be confused by the witch of the house.



Resolution legal definition of resolution - Legal Dictionary


A spontaneous expression of opinion, a resolution is intended to be timely and to have a temporary effect. Typically resolutions are used when passage of a law is unnecessary or unfeasible. In many cases relevant laws already exist. The resolution merely asserts an opinion that lawmakers want to emphasize.

ITS JUST AN OPINION VOTE!





Editor Note:

Yes it will be very interesting to see what is in the witch's brew on oct 31, 2019 haloween.

Graham,  McConnell, 50 Senate co-sponsors and 10 questions Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy has written posed to her are arrayed for the witch's response on her favorite day
haloween.

President Trump and the Senate Republicans will throw water on Pelosi if her witch's brew is lacking the right  ingredients and you know what that will do to the wicked witch of the house!

Its trick or treat time for pelosi.






Gender reveal party blows up




An American family's gender reveal celebrations have ended in tragedy after an accidental "pipe bomb" exploded and killed a 56-year-old woman that was 45 feet away.

Iowa woman, in Rural Knoxville,   Pamela Kreimeyer died instantly after an explosion during the gender reveal announcement caused a piece of metal debris to hit her, De Moines Register reported.
Police arrived at the Knoxville home on Sunday (NZ time) to find her dead.

The woman's son used gunpowder and colorants in an iron tube mounted on a metal plate, they had created a pipe bomb. As soon as the device was lit, it exploded, shooting pieces of shrapnel in all directions.

In a statement send to De Moines Register, police said the Kreimeyer family had planned to make a fun announcement of the child's gender for social media, but instead inadvertently created a pipe bomb.


Sheriff Jason Sandholdt's office said members of the family had been experimenting with different types of explosive material.

Police said gunpowder and some coloured powder had been put inside a homemade stand which had a metal base. The idea was for that, once lit, the coloured power would blast out the top of the stand.
But instead the explosion sent shrapnel flying and Pamela Kreimeyer died after being struck in the head, De Moines Register reported.

Bad Idea 




Editor Note

It is true you can't fix stupid.

How can you make an "accidential" pipe bomb?

It would seem this was an accident but that is the wrong word to describe what happened.

The family had been experimenting with different types of explosive material.

In other words what they made was NO accident.

They were making home made explosives and experimenting making bomb material.

When you use gun powder mixed with whatever its going to explode.

They knew what they were making would explode.

Grandmaw in the corner 45 feet away was not safe.


I think a "gender reveal" party is stupid anyway.

Thank makes this even more stupid.





Monday, October 28, 2019

Environmentalists have turned California into a tinderbox



Liberals are blaming California's wildfires on "climate change."

Now, they believe it will go up in flames unless we do something immediately to stop "climate change." But climate change hasn't turned California into a tinderbox, the environmentalists have.

California power company PG&E is pulling the plug on its customers. PG&E has been deliberately cutting power to its customers in an effort to avoid wildfires. It isn't working. Massive wildfires erupted in areas where PG&E provides service.

PG&E's equipment couldn't start these huge wildfires without a bunch of dead brush fueling the flames.

As Chuck Devore writes in Forbes, "the outrageous cost to remove a few dead trees from private land is a consequence of California's Byzantine environmental regulatory patchwork."

It's not climate change that's responsible for these massive fires, "it's decades of environmental mismanagement that has created a tinderbox of unharvested timber, dead trees, and thick underbrush."

Devore writes, "forest management is so bad on public lands that a new report, ordered by the California legislature in 2010, shows that the portion of California's National Forests protected from timber harvesting is now a net contributor to atmospheric carbon dioxide due to fires and trees killed by insects and disease."

Global Warming 101       Dr Roy Spencer   Ph.D.     Carbon Dioxide Growth Rate

While you have probably seen graphs of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration slowly increasing over time, the graph above shows the yearly growth RATE, as well as the estimated yearly rate of emissions by humanity. It shows a couple of interesting things.

First, the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 is, on average, only about 50% of what mankind emits. This means that Mother Nature takes out about 50% of the ‘excess’ CO2 that we pump into the atmosphere every year.

And it seem like it doesn’t matter how much MORE we put in each year…nature still takes out an average of 50% of that amount.

So if environmentalists really believed climate change was causing the fires, they would be calling for more timber harvesting to stop it.


How many people have to die before environmentalists wake up?

Gov. Gavin Newsom has attributed California's wildfires to the effects of "climate change." But in 2018, President Trump correctly identified the problem and threatened to cut off federal funds if California didn't change its self-harming policies.

Trump tweeted, "There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor. Billions of dollars are given each year, with so many lives lost, all because of gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!"



Editor Note:


Environmentalists  don't deal in facts but they do believe their own waco propaganda about man made global warming or climate change causing california's wildfire disaster.


What contributed to the severity of recent CA fires is the state’s decades long mismanagement of the woodlands. No burn-offs, overgrown fire breaks, no debrushing.

One problem increasing the size of the acreage burned is that california stopped logging the public forests. Stopped removing dead trees. Stopped putting in logging roads that acted as barriers and allowed better access into the forest and  stopped fires.

Fire has benefits in that it clears the brush on the forest floor which removes some of the fuel needed to let a fire grow.

Environmental waco's are responsible for no logging the public forests.

Environmental waco's are responsible for dead trees not being removed.

Environmental waco's are responsible for less logging roads that acted as barriers for fires and also allowed better access into the forests.

Environmental waco's are responsible for less burning of acreage to help curtail wild fires.

Environmental waco's are responsible for the deaths and destruction in california!  

 
ExactWeather.com


AnyCalculator.com

StreamZones.com


 



Friday, October 25, 2019

FBI misconduct probe is now a criminal investigation




U.S. Attorney John Durham's ongoing probe into potential FBI and Justice Department misconduct in the run-up to the 2016 election through the spring of 2017 has transitioned into a full-fledged criminal investigation, two sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News on Thursday night 10/24/19.

One source added that DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's upcoming report on alleged FBI surveillance abuses against the Trump campaign will shed light on why Durham's probe has become a criminal inquiry.

Horowitz announced on Thursday his report would be available to the public soon, with "few" redactions.

The investigation's new status means Durham can subpoena witnesses, file charges, and impanel fact-finding grand juries.

Fox News reported on Tuesday that Durham's probe had expanded significantly based on new evidence uncovered during a recent trip to Rome with Attorney General Bill Barr.

Sources told Fox News that Durham was "very interested" to question former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan, an anti-Trump critic who recently dismissed the idea.

The New York Times reported Thursday that Durham's criminal review has prompted some CIA officials to obtain criminal legal counsel in anticipation of being interviewed.

 Brennan and Clapper were at the helm not only when Mifsud spoke to Papadopoulos, but also when an unverified and largely discredited dossier, written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele and funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, was used to help justify a secret surveillance warrant against former Trump adviser Carter Page in the run-up to the 2016 election.

The FBI apparently obscured the fact that the Clinton campaign and DNC funded the dossier in its warrant application, telling the secret court only that the dossier was prepared at the behest of an unidentified presidential campaign.

Also on Thursday, top Republicans revealed never-before-seen texts from fired FBI agent Peter Strzok, in which he apparently discussed systemic leaking at the bureau.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, revealed the texts in a letter to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) requesting an update on whether the FBI's apparent leaks to the media were being probed.


The senators pushed to know whether the ICIG was looking into Strzok's email to FBI colleagues on April 13, 2017, when he wrote that an unidentified "agency" might be the "source of some of the leaks" to the media that he'd been seeing.

READ THE FULL LETTER TO ATKINSON, INCLUDING THE NEWLY RELEASED STRZOK TEXTS


Fox News John-durham-investigation-fbi-misconduct-criminal-probe 



Editor Note 

Hopefully all the criminals including those in the fake news media will be doing jail time when
U.S. Attorney John Durham's full-fledged criminal investigation into the deep state has exposed some of the deep state corruption.

I am sure the fake news media won't report anything but fake news about the new criminal probe into the deep state that they are in bed with.

I hope those who want to destroy American freedom will lose there freedom in jail for a long long time.

I am sure the fake news media and the deep state scum will do all they can to keep their criminal past a secret but it seems the information may be investigated after all.

Ya you boys better get a lawyer. Your time is coming.


Listen To 1063word.radio.com

Attorney General Barr should revoke Hillary Clinton's passport before she flees the country along with pelosi and the other seditionists in the fake news media, congress and the deep state!

They other shoe is starting to drop!












Thursday, October 17, 2019

Elijah Cummings Democrat Swamp Predator



Elijah Cummings Democrat Icon Of Corruption.


Elijah Cummings’s Wife Used Her Charity To Pay Her For-Profit Company, Documents Show

House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings’s wife has funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars from her charity to her private for-profit organization, according to a previously undisclosed cost-sharing arrangement that multiple experts said raises red flags.

Maya Rockeymoore Cummings’s charity, the Center for Global Policy Solutions (CGPS), paid her for-profit venture, Global Policy Solutions LLC, over $250,000 in “management fees” between 2013 and 2015, according to the charity’s audited financial statements covering those years. The management fees were paid in addition to a cost-sharing agreement where the charity pays for its share of equipment, personnel and other expenditures.

Rockeymoore Cummings’s charity is funded by companies with interests before her husband’s congressional committee.

“It’s self-dealing. It’s taking the charity’s resources and turning them into personal profits,” National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) investigator Tom Anderson told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “IRS law doesn’t allow a charity for this purpose.



Elijah Cummings Conspired With IRS

Corruption: New IRS emails released by a congressional panel show staff working for the Democratic ranking member communicated with the IRS multiple times in 2012 and 2013 about a voter-fraud prevention group.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said on CNN's "State of the Union" last year, "Based upon everything I've seen, the case is solved. And if it were me, I would wrap this case up and move on, to be frank with you."

Of course he wanted to move on, for he had been working hand in glove with the IRS to target conservative groups and wanted the fact to remain a secret.

On Feb. 6, in a subcommittee hearing that heard the testimony of Catherine Engelbrecht — founder of True the Vote, who was targeted by the IRS, FBI and other federal agencies — Cummings vehemently denied having any contact or coordination in targeting True the Vote.

Responding, attorney Cleta Mitchell, who is representing True the Vote, indicated that staff on the committee had been involved in communication with the IRS. In short, Cummings was not telling the truth.

After the hearing, Engelbrecht filed a formal ethics complaint accusing the Maryland Democrat of trying to intimidate her by causing the targeting.

Cummings on three separate occasions had sent letters with his title on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee stating that he had concerns and that True the Vote should be investigated.

Emails released by House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, a California Republican, show that Cummings' Democratic staff had requested information from the IRS' tax-exempt division, the one headed by Lois Lerner, on True the Vote, a conservative group that monitors polling places for voter fraud and supports the use of voter IDs, something Cummings opposes. "The IRS and the Oversight Minority made numerous requests for virtually identical information from True the Vote, raising concerns that the IRS improperly shared protected taxpayer information with Rep. Cummings' staff," the Oversight panel said in a statement.

According to Issa, Cummings and his staff sought "copies of all training materials used for volunteers, affiliates or other entities" from True the Vote.

Five days later, the group received an almost identical request from the IRS for (1) "a copy of (True the Vote's) volunteer registration form," (2) "the process you use to assign volunteers," (3) "how you keep your volunteers in teams" and (4) "how your volunteers are deployed ... following the training they receive by you."

As Townhall.com reports, the first contact between the IRS and Cummings' staffers about True the Vote happened in August 2012.

On Jan. 25, 2013, Cummings' staff asked for more information from the IRS about the group.

Three days after that, Lerner wrote an email to her deputy, Holly Paz, asking, "Did we find anything?"

Paz responded by saying not yet, to which Lerner replied, "Thanks, check tomorrow please."

On Jan. 31, Paz sent True the Vote's 990 forms to Cummings' staff.

"Although you have previously denied that your staff made inquiries to the IRS about conservative organization True the Vote that may have led to additional agency scrutiny, communication records between your staff and IRS officials — which you did not disclose to majority members or staff — indicates otherwise," states a letter to Cummings from Issa and five other subcommittee chairmen.

After Engelbrecht formed her group and sought tax-exempt status, she and her family, which previously had no contact with any government agency of any kind, were buried by an alphabet soup of government harassers, including the ATF, OSHA and the IRS that Cummings was coordinating with.

"This is what the beginning of tyranny looks like," Engelbrecht told Breitbart.com.

Indeed it is. Elijah Cummings has a lot of explaining to do.

 House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) released a report implicating Democrat Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in colluding with the IRS and Lois Lerner against the nonpartisan voters rights group “True the Vote.”

Catherine Engelbrecht, the founder of “True the Vote,” testified before Congress in February.
She was targeted by FBI, IRS, ATF, and OSHA after she filed for tax exempt status for her voters rights group.


  • The IRS and the Oversight Minority made numerous requests for virtually identical information from True the Vote, raising concerns that the IRS improperly shared protected taxpayer information with Rep. Cummings’ staff.
  • Five days after Cummings contacted True the Vote seeking “copies of all training materials used for volunteers, affiliates, or other entities,” the IRS sent True the Vote a letter requesting True the Vote provide “a copy of [True the Vote’s] volunteer registration form,” “…the process you use to assign volunteers,” “how you keep your volunteers in teams,” and “how your volunteers are deployed … following the training they receive by you.”
  • On or before January 25, 2013, Cummings’ staff requested more information from the IRS about True the Vote.  The head of the IRS Legislative Affairs office e-mailed several IRS officials, including former Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner, that “House Oversight Committee Minority staff” sought information about True the Vote.  On Monday, January 28, Lerner wrote to her deputy Holly Paz: “Did we find anything?”  When Paz informed her minutes later that she had not heard back about True the Vote’s information, Lerner replied: “thanks – check tomorrow please.”
  • On January 31, 2013, Paz attached True the Vote’s form 990s, which she authorized the IRS to share with the Minority staff.  Neither Cummings nor the IRS shared these requested documents with the Oversight Majority.  None of the Minority’s communications about True the Vote with the IRS were shared with the Committee Majority even though Ranking Member Cummings frequently complains about the Committee Majority contacting individuals on official matters without the involvement of Minority staff.
Cummings denied that his staff, “might have been involved in putting True the Vote on the radar screen of some of these Federal agencies” at a February 6, 2014, Subcommittee hearing:

Elijah Cummings is a corrupt liar.


Elijah Cummings Wife Hiding Millions Given In Potential Bribes

Maya Rockeymoore Cummings is not willing to reveal the financial documents for her non profit group the Center for Global Policy Solutions.

And the most concerning part about that is that many of the groups and people that have given donations have business before the committee her husband chairs.

At least three different groups have requested the forms, and to each, Rockeymoore Cummings has refused, even when told that the law requires it. 


“Wow. That’s illegal,” Sally Wagenmaker, a Chicago attorney who specializes in nonprofit tax law, told TheDCNF. “It’s interesting and sad. You have the right to get them. The organization absolutely is required to provide the information, so to not do so would appear to be flaunting the law.”

“As a family member of an elected official, we’d expect high-road, integrity and compliance. If anyone should be responding promptly, it should be her. He should be above approach.”


__________________________________________________


Not one Tea Party group was granted tax exempt status for a period of 27 months before the election while numerous progressive groups were granted the privilege by the IRS.

For Twenty-Seven months the Obama IRS refused to approve any Tea Party applications for tax-exempt status.

At the same time the Obama IRS approved dozens of progressive applications.

__________________________________________________



President Donald Trump on  in July 2019 exposed  Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) Saturday morning, calling his district “a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess,” and accusing him of corruption.

Once again attacking a Democratic lawmaker of color, Trump tweeted, “Rep, Elijah Cummings has been a brutal bully, shouting and screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous. His district is considered the Worst in the USA.”

"Why is so much money sent to the Elijah Cummings district when it is considered the worst run and most dangerous anywhere in the United States. No human being would want to live there. Where is all this money going? How much is stolen? Investigate this corrupt mess immediately!”


Rep. Elijah Cummings is a Despicable Human Being

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) looked the Brian Terry family in the eye and assured them justice; he lied to a grieving family. Upon his expression of sincerity, he ran interference for the Obama administration. He’s done the same thing to the families of the Benghazi attack victims.



All in the Family: Elijah Cummings and Big Pharma

The National and Legal Policy Center (NLPC) filed the complaint on May 20, noting that a charity and a for-profit consulting group run by Maya Rockeymoore Cummings have each received millions of dollars over the years from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This foundation, created by the founder of Johnson & Johnson, is not officially affiliated with the pharmaceutical giant, but the two hold close ties. The foundation is a major shareholder in Johnson & Johnson, for example.

It does not take a Sherlock Holmes to spot the reasons to fear political corruption may be at play here. Elijah Cummings chairs a committee that is investigating the high prices of pharmaceutical drugs.

Johnson & Johnson has been hit by a rash of lawsuits over allegations that it was a major player in exacerbating the opioid epidemic that has ravaged America. The company reported in April that its first-quarter earnings for 2019 had fallen by 14% in large part due to the high legal costs involved in battling these suits. It can use all the friends in high places it can find.


“When a powerful chairman of a committee of the House of Representatives has a wife that is bringing in money from entities with interests before his Committee and she is not providing the transparency mandated by the IRS, there’s a serious problem,” Tom Anderson, director of the NLPC, told the Washington Examiner. “The potential for corruption in this situation is simply off the charts and can’t be understated.”

A look into examples of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s financial largesse to Mrs. Cummings’ organizations does nothing to dim suspicion. Her charity and for-profit business have received $5.2 million and $5.5 million respectively, from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

In Sept. 2016, the foundation announced it was awarding a $1.5 million grant to the nonprofit run by Rockeymoore Cummings, The Center For Global Policy Solutions, and its Allies for Reaching Community Health Equity program.

The Examiner reported that  Rockeymoore Cummings’ consulting firm received a $1 million federal General Services Administration grant in 2017 for a “Leadership for Healthy Communities” project to fight childhood obesity. As this grant was awarded, her nonprofit group claims to have “served as the national program office for Leadership for Healthy Communities.”

The IRS complaint filing states that this highlights how both the consulting business and nonprofit organization “appear to operate almost as a single entity, allowing for an illegal private benefit for Maya Rockeymoore Cummings and her husband.”

“The circumstances of this anti-obesity campaign prompt the question of whether its organizers are getting fat off the grants,” the NLRC acidly wrote in its filing.

 Rockeymoore Cummings declares on her nonprofit’s website that the center “equips leaders and organizations with the tools to effect change, driving society toward inclusion.” This hazy undertaking apparently takes multiple millions of Big Pharma-tied funding to achieve.

Meanwhile, her husband just so happens to chair a powerful congressional committee that has government oversight of the pharmaceutical industry. Some would find this alarming. For denizens of the Swamp, however, it’s just another day at the office.

__________________________________



Editor Note:

Elijah Cummings was a swamp predator. He and his wife operated a quid pro quo operation that made millions by preying on the public via Elijah Cummings corruption in congress.

Elijah Cummings legacy will be his corruption while in congress.