Friday, May 13, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Obama Working As An Absentee President
Obama Working As An Absentee President
White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden
“What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound.”
(If this story is true, and I believe it is, it figures. Obama is NOT capable of being president because he must be told what to do. He follows orders from those who control him. He lacks the ability to make an executive decision on his own. He is like a dummy president. A dummy president who has not provided a COPY of a long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii. A dummy preident who has displayed an abstract of a document that can't be verified. It seems nothing obama does can be verified.) Story Reports
Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?
A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.
I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.
Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?
A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.
What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him.
What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go….including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself.
Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval.
Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.
(Obama's "senior" advisor is a rabid fanatical loser. Its like his "advisor" is on crack or something. This is why obama acts in a disjointed manner and even if he did make a decision on his own it would be similar. He is following orders from rabid, fanatical advisors, his comrades. The dummy president and the white house advisors must reach a consensus through valarie jarrett his rabid senior advisor. We have a "third world" executive branch at the present time.) Story Reports
White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden
“What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound.”
(If this story is true, and I believe it is, it figures. Obama is NOT capable of being president because he must be told what to do. He follows orders from those who control him. He lacks the ability to make an executive decision on his own. He is like a dummy president. A dummy president who has not provided a COPY of a long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii. A dummy preident who has displayed an abstract of a document that can't be verified. It seems nothing obama does can be verified.) Story Reports
Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?
A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.
I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.
Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?
A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.
What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him.
What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go….including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself.
Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval.
Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.
(Obama's "senior" advisor is a rabid fanatical loser. Its like his "advisor" is on crack or something. This is why obama acts in a disjointed manner and even if he did make a decision on his own it would be similar. He is following orders from rabid, fanatical advisors, his comrades. The dummy president and the white house advisors must reach a consensus through valarie jarrett his rabid senior advisor. We have a "third world" executive branch at the present time.) Story Reports
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Blackout during raid on bin Laden compound
The head of the CIA admitted yesterday that there was no live video footage of the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound as further doubts emerged about the US version of events.
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off.
A photograph released by the White House appeared to show the President and his aides in the situation room watching the action as it unfolded. In fact they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound.
(These 'top" figures in the obama regime continue to stumble and fumble every detail about the osama raid. The pictures released by the white house led Americans to believe obama and his comrades were watching the seals kill osama. It was just another lie.
This is more evidence that the osama obama saga is filled with fiction and spin.) Story Reports
Mr Panetta said: "Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes where we really didn't know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
"We had some observation of the approach there, but we did not have direct flow of information as to the actual conduct of the operation itself as they were going through the compound."
Mr Panetta also revealed that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
(Obama led us to believe he directed the military to kill osama when in fact he did not.) Another lie. Obama is a liar.
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off.
A photograph released by the White House appeared to show the President and his aides in the situation room watching the action as it unfolded. In fact they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound.
(These 'top" figures in the obama regime continue to stumble and fumble every detail about the osama raid. The pictures released by the white house led Americans to believe obama and his comrades were watching the seals kill osama. It was just another lie.
This is more evidence that the osama obama saga is filled with fiction and spin.) Story Reports
Mr Panetta said: "Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes where we really didn't know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
"We had some observation of the approach there, but we did not have direct flow of information as to the actual conduct of the operation itself as they were going through the compound."
Mr Panetta also revealed that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
(Obama led us to believe he directed the military to kill osama when in fact he did not.) Another lie. Obama is a liar.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Obama Spin About Osama Death Continues As Osama Helps Obama Bury BC Issue
Obama regime spin continues as affirmative action results are on display. Does anyone think there are competent people in the obama regime? Only the US military deserves credit considering the blithering idiots in the whitehouse.
White House spokesman Jay Carney is quick to tell reporters, the process of declassifying information about the U.S. military team that assaulted Osama bin Laden’s compound--the “most highly classified operation this government has taken in many, many years,” he said--is a difficult and often frustrating process. Which means that the narrative that has flowed from top U.S. officials to reporters has sometimes been incomplete, ambiguous, or incorrect.
(This is obama regime spin to coverup the fact once again that incompetence is the norm for "top" US "officials" whatever that means. If "top" US "officals" can't get it right why would anyone believe anything that "top" US "officals" say about osama or obama.
The "top" US official obama has said he was born in Hawaii and would prove it. Obama released an ABSTARCT of his birth certificate from Hawaii. The top official obama DID NOT release a COPY of the ORIGINAL long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii.
Obama the "top" offical's certificate of live birth long form cannot be verfied because it has not been released, only an ABTSRACT of a document has been displayed.
Certainly an ABSTRACT of an original document cannot be verified without seeing or knowing what the original document contains. Just think about that a little and it will sink in maybe.
The "top" offical wants you to believe he is a US citizen because he has displayed an ABSTRACT of a document. Obviously it is also a difficult and often frustrating process for the "top" US offical in American to also come clean about his citizenship. Obama has presented an incomplete and ambiguous ABSTRACT of his birth information on purpose to deceive America. He has also used the timing of osama's demise to bury his birth certificate issue.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
“[Bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in. And whether or not he got off any rounds, I quite frankly don’t know.” This statement by Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan at Monday’s press briefing at the White House left unanswered one of the biggest questions of the operation: Was bin Laden armed? Brennan’s answer implied that he was, but at Tuesday’s briefing, Carney settled the debate: “He was not armed,” he said, in a scripted narrative written by the Defense Department. Bin Laden did “resist” U.S. forces, Carney said. He declined to elaborate beyond saying that “resistance does not require a firearm.”
"There was a female who was, in fact, in the line of fire that reportedly was used as a shield to shield bin Laden from the incoming fire,” Brennan told reporters at the Monday briefing. His statement was further backed up by a senior Defense official, who told reporters at a Defense Department briefing that, “One woman, who was used as a human shield by one of the four military-age males on the compound, was killed; he was firing behind her.” The White House started to backtrack on this report Monday night, and by Tuesday, it was debunked by Carney’s statement. There was a woman on the first floor of the compound who was killed “in the cross fire,” he said.
The woman who was killed was bin Laden’s wife, and she had been used as a shield.This information also came out of Brennan’s briefing on Monday, and was also clarified by Carney’s narrative on Tuesday: “In the room with bin Laden, a woman, bin Laden's wife, rushed the assaulter and was shot in the leg but not killed.” The woman who was killed was not with bin Laden, and she was killed in the cross fire of a firefight.
Bin Laden's son Khalid was killed. At Monday’s briefing, Brennan said it was the al-Qaida leader's son Khalid who was killed; by the time the White House released a transcript of the briefing a few hours later, it had been altered to say that bin Laden's son Hamza was killed. The White House did not return calls for comment on whether Brennan misspoke or had received incorrect information.
Bin Laden was shot twice in the head. Many news reports said that bin Laden was shot twice in the head. But a senior intelligence official clarified to National Journal that he was shot once in the head and once in the chest.
(Americans who are STUPID enough to believe top officals in the obama regime including obama will believe everything the "top" officials say in the obama regime even after they say it different two or three times. All liars.
Obama timed the osama raid to help coverup his birth certificate problem. To date NO public information such as osama photo, dna or face recognition verification has been released. Are you stupid enough to believe obama? I don't.
A summary or abstract of a document is a short form or outline of information. The original document contains additional information that can confirm the abstract, short form, information.
Obama has done nothing but display a "warmed over" online certification of live birth as a certificate of live birth and still refuses to display a copy of an original long form certificate of live birth from an Hawaiian hospital that can be verified by anyone in America. Story Reports
Osama helped bury the obama birth certificate issue to hide the fact obama didn't produce a copy of a long form certificate of live brith but only an ASTRACT version that can't be verified. Obama continues to hide his true identity and the "state run media" continues to help deceive America. Obama timed the death of osama to coverup his birth certificate questions. A terrorist helped a traitor.
Ask yourself, why didn't obama produce a copy of the original long form that could be verified?
Ask youself why didn't obama produce any dna, photo or face recognition evidence of the death of osama?
Ask yourself why the "top" officials can't get their storys straight or even agree. Its because they are liars.
White House spokesman Jay Carney is quick to tell reporters, the process of declassifying information about the U.S. military team that assaulted Osama bin Laden’s compound--the “most highly classified operation this government has taken in many, many years,” he said--is a difficult and often frustrating process. Which means that the narrative that has flowed from top U.S. officials to reporters has sometimes been incomplete, ambiguous, or incorrect.
(This is obama regime spin to coverup the fact once again that incompetence is the norm for "top" US "officials" whatever that means. If "top" US "officals" can't get it right why would anyone believe anything that "top" US "officals" say about osama or obama.
The "top" US official obama has said he was born in Hawaii and would prove it. Obama released an ABSTARCT of his birth certificate from Hawaii. The top official obama DID NOT release a COPY of the ORIGINAL long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii.
Obama the "top" offical's certificate of live birth long form cannot be verfied because it has not been released, only an ABTSRACT of a document has been displayed.
Certainly an ABSTRACT of an original document cannot be verified without seeing or knowing what the original document contains. Just think about that a little and it will sink in maybe.
The "top" offical wants you to believe he is a US citizen because he has displayed an ABSTRACT of a document. Obviously it is also a difficult and often frustrating process for the "top" US offical in American to also come clean about his citizenship. Obama has presented an incomplete and ambiguous ABSTRACT of his birth information on purpose to deceive America. He has also used the timing of osama's demise to bury his birth certificate issue.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
“[Bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in. And whether or not he got off any rounds, I quite frankly don’t know.” This statement by Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan at Monday’s press briefing at the White House left unanswered one of the biggest questions of the operation: Was bin Laden armed? Brennan’s answer implied that he was, but at Tuesday’s briefing, Carney settled the debate: “He was not armed,” he said, in a scripted narrative written by the Defense Department. Bin Laden did “resist” U.S. forces, Carney said. He declined to elaborate beyond saying that “resistance does not require a firearm.”
"There was a female who was, in fact, in the line of fire that reportedly was used as a shield to shield bin Laden from the incoming fire,” Brennan told reporters at the Monday briefing. His statement was further backed up by a senior Defense official, who told reporters at a Defense Department briefing that, “One woman, who was used as a human shield by one of the four military-age males on the compound, was killed; he was firing behind her.” The White House started to backtrack on this report Monday night, and by Tuesday, it was debunked by Carney’s statement. There was a woman on the first floor of the compound who was killed “in the cross fire,” he said.
The woman who was killed was bin Laden’s wife, and she had been used as a shield.This information also came out of Brennan’s briefing on Monday, and was also clarified by Carney’s narrative on Tuesday: “In the room with bin Laden, a woman, bin Laden's wife, rushed the assaulter and was shot in the leg but not killed.” The woman who was killed was not with bin Laden, and she was killed in the cross fire of a firefight.
Bin Laden's son Khalid was killed. At Monday’s briefing, Brennan said it was the al-Qaida leader's son Khalid who was killed; by the time the White House released a transcript of the briefing a few hours later, it had been altered to say that bin Laden's son Hamza was killed. The White House did not return calls for comment on whether Brennan misspoke or had received incorrect information.
Bin Laden was shot twice in the head. Many news reports said that bin Laden was shot twice in the head. But a senior intelligence official clarified to National Journal that he was shot once in the head and once in the chest.
(Americans who are STUPID enough to believe top officals in the obama regime including obama will believe everything the "top" officials say in the obama regime even after they say it different two or three times. All liars.
Obama timed the osama raid to help coverup his birth certificate problem. To date NO public information such as osama photo, dna or face recognition verification has been released. Are you stupid enough to believe obama? I don't.
A summary or abstract of a document is a short form or outline of information. The original document contains additional information that can confirm the abstract, short form, information.
Obama has done nothing but display a "warmed over" online certification of live birth as a certificate of live birth and still refuses to display a copy of an original long form certificate of live birth from an Hawaiian hospital that can be verified by anyone in America. Story Reports
Osama helped bury the obama birth certificate issue to hide the fact obama didn't produce a copy of a long form certificate of live brith but only an ASTRACT version that can't be verified. Obama continues to hide his true identity and the "state run media" continues to help deceive America. Obama timed the death of osama to coverup his birth certificate questions. A terrorist helped a traitor.
Ask yourself, why didn't obama produce a copy of the original long form that could be verified?
Ask youself why didn't obama produce any dna, photo or face recognition evidence of the death of osama?
Ask yourself why the "top" officials can't get their storys straight or even agree. Its because they are liars.
Friday, April 29, 2011
Examine The New Fake Obama Birth Certificate
(There are many difference between a real 1961 Certificate of Live Birth and the FAKE one obama has presented to world. There are at lease 15 FAKE Document clues.
The number one obvious fact is that the document obama has presented to the world is NOT A COPY OF AN ORIGINAL LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. It is therefore an ABSTRACT of a record. The document obama has presented can't be verified as real because it is not a true copy of the original. It is only an abstract.) Story Reports
..........................................................................................
A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates with the Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many differences, some with regard to content, others to format.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, in Box 20, "Date Accepted by Local Reg." and Box 22, "Date Accepted by Reg. General," the date is stamped "AUG 11 1961," while the date is stamped on Obama's birth certificate as "AUG -8 1961," with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, the type in Box 8, "Name of the Father" lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, "Age of Father," and Box 15, "Age of Mother," are indented below the "R" in "Barack" in Box 8.
* In the Nordyke twins's birth certificate, the type in Box 9, "Race of Father," Box 12b, "Kind of Business or Industry," and Box 14, "Race of Mother," line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
* In Box 16, "Birthplace of Mother," in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, the letters of "Los Angeles, California," are aligned at the bottom margin, while in the Obama birth certificate, the "K" in Kansas rides up and appears only partially struck at the top.
* The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins' birth certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
* The typed letters in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates appear irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes 8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
* In Box 3, "This Birth," the "X" marking "Twins" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, "If Twin or Triple, Was Child Born," while Box 3 in Obama's is struck top right.
* Similar differences in how the "X" strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d and 7e where the "X" on Obama's birth certificate fits squarely into the box, drifting toward the top, and the "X" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug. 5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama's in Box 5a lists the birthdate as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates the "H" in "Honolulu" in Boxes 7a and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in Obama's birth certificate the "H" in "Honolulu" is consistently on line with the other letters in the word.
* The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle, while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line, at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
* The local registrar in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, Box 21, is different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital at this time?
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificate at the bottom have the printed signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the date the copies were issued, "5-5-1966," while the Obama birth certificate has no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the registrar general to be a "true and correct copy" of the original record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department of Health.
* The Norydke twins' birth certificates appear white against black, in the format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in Obama's modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation is seen in the Nordyke twins's photostatic copy.
* As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier.
* Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
* Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke twins' birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.
Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.
This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.
At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.
The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.
The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth certificate was stamped.
The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when their birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama's number?
The number one obvious fact is that the document obama has presented to the world is NOT A COPY OF AN ORIGINAL LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. It is therefore an ABSTRACT of a record. The document obama has presented can't be verified as real because it is not a true copy of the original. It is only an abstract.) Story Reports
..........................................................................................
A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates with the Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many differences, some with regard to content, others to format.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, in Box 20, "Date Accepted by Local Reg." and Box 22, "Date Accepted by Reg. General," the date is stamped "AUG 11 1961," while the date is stamped on Obama's birth certificate as "AUG -8 1961," with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, the type in Box 8, "Name of the Father" lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, "Age of Father," and Box 15, "Age of Mother," are indented below the "R" in "Barack" in Box 8.
* In the Nordyke twins's birth certificate, the type in Box 9, "Race of Father," Box 12b, "Kind of Business or Industry," and Box 14, "Race of Mother," line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
* In Box 16, "Birthplace of Mother," in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, the letters of "Los Angeles, California," are aligned at the bottom margin, while in the Obama birth certificate, the "K" in Kansas rides up and appears only partially struck at the top.
* The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins' birth certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
* The typed letters in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates appear irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes 8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
* In Box 3, "This Birth," the "X" marking "Twins" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, "If Twin or Triple, Was Child Born," while Box 3 in Obama's is struck top right.
* Similar differences in how the "X" strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d and 7e where the "X" on Obama's birth certificate fits squarely into the box, drifting toward the top, and the "X" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug. 5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama's in Box 5a lists the birthdate as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates the "H" in "Honolulu" in Boxes 7a and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in Obama's birth certificate the "H" in "Honolulu" is consistently on line with the other letters in the word.
* The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle, while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line, at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
* The local registrar in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, Box 21, is different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital at this time?
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificate at the bottom have the printed signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the date the copies were issued, "5-5-1966," while the Obama birth certificate has no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the registrar general to be a "true and correct copy" of the original record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department of Health.
* The Norydke twins' birth certificates appear white against black, in the format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in Obama's modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation is seen in the Nordyke twins's photostatic copy.
* As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier.
* Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
* Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke twins' birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.
Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.
This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.
At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.
The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.
The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth certificate was stamped.
The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when their birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama's number?
Monday, April 25, 2011
Obama wants US citizens to pay the price though oil "reparations"
Wall Street speculators drive up the price of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel by buying and selling oil with no intention of ever using it. (The wall street speculators are institutional investors, (corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and university endowments etc.)
(Obama and the democrates have made the oil speculation profitable by not allowing oil drilling in the US because of their determination to destroy the US economy. Obama uses the epa to "speread the wealth around" though regulations that stop oil production. Obama uses the power of the federal government to increase the cost of food and everything tied to the price of oil and gas.
The US government allows unregulated oil speculation through ICE. Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy. The US government allows this to continue to happen on purpose.
This is why the price of gas goes up. Obama wants US citizens to pay the price though oil "reparations".) Story Reports
Why has oil speculation increased in recent years?
Institutional investors (corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and university endowments) have poured billions of dollars into the commodities markets. These speculative trades have helped to drive up the price oil because the majority of new contracts are betting on increases, rather than decreases. In effect, this swell in "artificial demand" for oil is upsetting the balance between physical supply and demand and, once again, fueling a price "bubble."
What is an index speculator?
An index speculator is a financial player, such as a corporate or government pension fund, sovereign wealth fund, university endowments or other investor, that buys (invests in) the 25 commodities that compose the Standard & Poor's-Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI) and/or the Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index (DJAIG). The value of the index depends on how well the commodities being "tracked" by the index perform in the futures markets.
Should institutional investors be prohibited (or limited) from investing in commodities futures?
The effects of institutional investors have been so great that they have actually altered the price discovery dynamics of today's futures markets. Index speculators buy without sensitivity for the supply and demand of individual commodities, which undermines the price discovery function of the markets. Active trading strategies should be allowed, but they need to be done in a transparent and limited way.
What are position limits?
Currently, a handful of foreign exchanges, most notably the London Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), are trading energy contracts that are identical to those traded in the United States, but are not following U.S. regulations because they claim they are exempt from U.S. law. These exemptions should not exist because they are trading U.S. commodities using terminals based in the United States.
What are swaps trades?
Swaps trades (also known as "over the counter" trades) are commodities transactions that take place between two separate parties outside of the traditional markets. Since they do not take place within regulated markets such as NYMEX, these often secret trades take place without regulatory oversight. We believe these trades should be transparent and under the same rules as traditional markets, so that no price manipulation takes place.
‘Perhaps 60% of today’s oil price is pure speculation’
Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy
(Obama and the democrates have made the oil speculation profitable by not allowing oil drilling in the US because of their determination to destroy the US economy. Obama uses the epa to "speread the wealth around" though regulations that stop oil production. Obama uses the power of the federal government to increase the cost of food and everything tied to the price of oil and gas.
The US government allows unregulated oil speculation through ICE. Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy. The US government allows this to continue to happen on purpose.
This is why the price of gas goes up. Obama wants US citizens to pay the price though oil "reparations".) Story Reports
Why has oil speculation increased in recent years?
Institutional investors (corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and university endowments) have poured billions of dollars into the commodities markets. These speculative trades have helped to drive up the price oil because the majority of new contracts are betting on increases, rather than decreases. In effect, this swell in "artificial demand" for oil is upsetting the balance between physical supply and demand and, once again, fueling a price "bubble."
What is an index speculator?
An index speculator is a financial player, such as a corporate or government pension fund, sovereign wealth fund, university endowments or other investor, that buys (invests in) the 25 commodities that compose the Standard & Poor's-Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI) and/or the Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index (DJAIG). The value of the index depends on how well the commodities being "tracked" by the index perform in the futures markets.
Should institutional investors be prohibited (or limited) from investing in commodities futures?
The effects of institutional investors have been so great that they have actually altered the price discovery dynamics of today's futures markets. Index speculators buy without sensitivity for the supply and demand of individual commodities, which undermines the price discovery function of the markets. Active trading strategies should be allowed, but they need to be done in a transparent and limited way.
What are position limits?
Currently, a handful of foreign exchanges, most notably the London Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), are trading energy contracts that are identical to those traded in the United States, but are not following U.S. regulations because they claim they are exempt from U.S. law. These exemptions should not exist because they are trading U.S. commodities using terminals based in the United States.
What are swaps trades?
Swaps trades (also known as "over the counter" trades) are commodities transactions that take place between two separate parties outside of the traditional markets. Since they do not take place within regulated markets such as NYMEX, these often secret trades take place without regulatory oversight. We believe these trades should be transparent and under the same rules as traditional markets, so that no price manipulation takes place.
‘Perhaps 60% of today’s oil price is pure speculation’
Oil Futures Speculation Will Destroy World Economy
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Barack Hussein Obama — the man whose name means “crooked” – is juking toward Mecca
Barack Hussein Obama — the man whose name means “crooked” – is juking toward Mecca
Barack Hussein Obama — the man whose name means “crooked” – is juking toward Mecca
Tom Kovach
Although he started with considerable speed, like a sprinter from a starting block, and although some of us have been warning about it since before he even got the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in 2008, it is only in recent weeks that the majority of Americans are willing to believe the now-more-than-obvious: Barack Hussein Obama — the man whose name means “crooked” – is juking toward Mecca. He has been from the beginning. And, he has been working from the beginning to take our country with him.
Just like any other seriously devout Muslim practicing taq’qiya, Obama has attempted, when possible, to mask his agenda as something else. Despite the jokes about his dependence upon teleprompters, even his most fervent critics agree that Obama is quite skilled in the use of coded speech.
........................................................................................
Iran's president believes Allah has chosen him to prepare the world for the coming of an Islamic 'savior' called the Mahdi. Iran's president believes the islamic 'saviour' mahdi is barack hussein obama!
Barack Hussein Obama — the man whose name means “crooked” – is juking toward Mecca
Tom Kovach
Although he started with considerable speed, like a sprinter from a starting block, and although some of us have been warning about it since before he even got the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in 2008, it is only in recent weeks that the majority of Americans are willing to believe the now-more-than-obvious: Barack Hussein Obama — the man whose name means “crooked” – is juking toward Mecca. He has been from the beginning. And, he has been working from the beginning to take our country with him.
Just like any other seriously devout Muslim practicing taq’qiya, Obama has attempted, when possible, to mask his agenda as something else. Despite the jokes about his dependence upon teleprompters, even his most fervent critics agree that Obama is quite skilled in the use of coded speech.
........................................................................................
Listen to internet radio with Andrea Shea King on Blog Talk Radio
Iran's president believes Allah has chosen him to prepare the world for the coming of an Islamic 'savior' called the Mahdi. Iran's president believes the islamic 'saviour' mahdi is barack hussein obama!
Friday, April 22, 2011
obama hides his true identity born outside of US
How is Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) able to hide his true identity? How was Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama able to get on the ballot in all 50 states?
Information from the daily pen reviewed.
The state of Hawaii “Certificate of Live Birth” document actually conceals a person's full natal identity rather than reveal it.
The Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” is an unauthorized reduction of content otherwise prescribed to confirm the bearer’s natal identity. Hawaii Violates Federal Guidelines.
In the entire 110 year history of the standard, official, federal, U.S. “Certificate of Live Birth” document’s existence, only the state of Hawaii has gone astray from the standard version to such a degree that it actually conceals one’s full natal identity rather than reveal it.
Hawaii’s Permission To Violate Federal Law. Hawaii Revised Statute HRS 338-17.8 states:
“Certificates for children born out of State.(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
The law permits anyone born to parents who claimed Hawaii as their residence within one year of their birth, at any time before or after the enactment of the law, regardless of the actual location of the birth, to receive an original birth record which states that the location of birth is Hawaii, and, therefore, occurred in the U.S. Hawaiian lawmakers have confirmed that the law is not constrained to the date of birth. It is applicable to the date of application for the certificate.
This means this law would enable Obama, anytime after the age of 21 to apply for and receive a newly created original Hawaiian birth certificate after providing evidence that his mother or father merely resided in Hawaii for one year prior to his birth. He could have applied for this certificate any time since is parents are known to have resided in Hawaii since 1960. He could have been born outside of the U.S., however, the State of Hawaii is obligated by law to grant him an original birth certificate stating that Hawaii is his birth place simply because he was able to show that his parents claimed Hawaii as their residence.
(Keep in mind the "original birth certificate" would not contain any information about where obama was born in Hawaii except maybe a city and county. It would not contain a name of a hospital, doctor or any information that could validate a US citizenship. It would be like a certification of live birth on the web that contains no information that can be verified. The big difference also would be it contains information much different that the web versions of the colb. This is why the web version has been faked and found to not be real. Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) must hide the true information about his birth origin. Hawaii has never confirmed the online version is real nor has Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) ever claimed it was his.) Story Reports
How obama hides his true identity
........................................................................................
The DNC used the certificate of nomination to "validate" obama's citizenship to Hawaiian election officals.
Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) held a secret meeting with members of the Elections Commission on friday Oct 24, 2008 in Hawaii.
In order to avoid the destructive political consequences, Obama had to engage a private meeting away from the media. Such a private meeting would also have to be justifiable under Hawaii Revised Statutes Adminstrative Rules 91, 92-4, 92-5, and 3-170-11. Specifically, any correspondence or meeting between any candidate or representative of the candidate and members of the Hawaiian Election commission would have to be held in accord with these rules. However, it is HRS 92-5-8 which affords the permission to hold a secret meeting between members of the Elections Commission and Obama.
In summary, Obama sought a way to be in Hawaii at a time that would:
1. Occur as long after the Official Certification Of Nomination deadline as possible, but no later than October 24th.
2. Allow him to cancel campaign events, but not miss prescheduled debates with McCain or televised town hall meetings.
3. Meet legal deadlines for ballot approval, but not violate deadlines to refute the findings of ineligibility by the DPH.
4. Give the media a "decoy" story to serve as his excuse for being in Hawaii, but not allow the public to discover that the real reason he was in Hawaii was because he was attending executive hearings with the Chief Elections Officer and the DPH per HAR 3-170, HRS 92-4 and 92-5 to contest the DPH's refusal to certify his nomination.
5. Exploit the story of Obama's grandmother's illness, allowing Obama to schedule the trip precisely while citing the doctor's assessment of his grandmother's condition as an excuse to be in Hawaii. However, if Dunham died too soon, or was "not sick enough" to warrant his cancellation of campaign events so close to an election, Obama would be left exposed to media investigation about the truth of all of his activities in Hawaii on October 24th, 2008.
The certification of each candidate’s eligibility falls under the autonomous authority of each candidate’s state affiliated political party authority, with support of the national party authority, while the approval of the candidate’s placement on each state’s ballot then becomes the responsibility of the Chief Elections Officer of each state.
It was Kevin B. Cronin, Senior Elections Officer constitutional authority to oversee elections in the state of Hawaii under the advisement of the Election Commission.
Cronin does not have the authority to certify the Constitutional eligibility of a candidate, however, his most powerful authority is his ability, according to HRS 11-113, to mediate conflict over eligibility and, as a result of mediation, officially approve candidates for placement on the state’s ballot even when the state party's vetting authority refuses to certify the legal qualifications of that candidate.
An investigation of Hawaii Revised Statutes, along with documented evidence, reveals that, Cronin, being bound by law from partisan participation, still had the legal authority to circumvent the vetting process for Obama and simply approve his placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot without ever verifying that he was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President.
Shockingly, adminstrative procedures employed by the Elections Office in the State of Hawaii actually helped Obama avoid public scrutiny by simultaneously allowing him the opportunity to personally attend a hearing about his eligibility while visiting his sick grandmother in late October, 2008.
The birth certificate that is on file and online was not enough to verify obama's candidacy by the Democratic Party Of Hawaii. The Democratic Party Of Hawaii has NEVER validated obama as a presidential candidate!
How obama got on the ballot even though the Hawaiian DNC refused to certify him as a candidate in 2008
.........................................................................................
How the obama online colb forgery was made explained in detail.
The"birth" of this conspiracy began on June 10 when Jim Geraghty questioned whether or not Obama was really born in the US. Two days later, on June 12, the first forged copy appeared on the Daily Kos, followed shortly thereafter by a smaller copy (originally 1000 x 1024 pixels) on Obama's own website, BarackObama.com.
When Obama's Fight The Smears website spinoff was launched on June 13, the image copy was moved to that location,and its size was cut in half to what it is now (575 x 585 pixels). Politifact was next according to claims that they also posted their copy on June 13, it was back-dated.
The forgery began its life as an actual scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian"Certificate of Live
Birth," (COLB) that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister).
The image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a JPG file. This is the file that was sent to the person who would do the actual forging. Whoever that person was, he or she was sent the information that was to go on the image.
In the analyses, the discovery was made that there had to be more than one COLB image used to make the forgery.
(Various media obama supporters will inform you that the online version has a signature and date stamp from the registrar. They will then inform you for this reason it is authentic. What they don't tell you is that the online colb never has been confirmed as valid by Hawaii and therefore could not be real. They also never explain why the various online forms of "obama's certificate" have been manipulated and forged.) Story Reports
The online forged colb exposed and explained
........................................................................................
Evidence suggests the State of Hawaii has engaged in a conspiracy based on carefully calculated legal deniability while isolating various officials behind mutually justified administrative secrecy and unaccountability. One official would simply deny personal knowledge while vouching for another official's legal justification for remaining silent or uncooperative with requests by Adams, Abercrombie, Schatz and the American people, for documented verification of Obama's legitimacy.
Where one law indicates that Obama is not a Natural-born citizen, another law prevents any official from confirming it. Where one official of the State of Hawaii indicates that Obama is not a Natural born citizen, another official prevents the release of the information needed to prove it.
Executive Order No. 13489. Obama was ensconced as President on January 20, 2009. Just one day after his inauguration, he signed Executive Order No. 13489 which essentially violates the Freedom of Information Act and prohibits the release of Obama’s personal and presidential records, during and after his presidency, by the National Archives without first being consulted by the National Archives Director and the Attorney General.
The Democratic Party of Hawaii included the explicit statement required by HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B) that the 2000 and 2004 candidates were legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution, but the DPH did not do the same for Obama.
The Democratic Party Of Hawaii intentionally omitted the language stating that Obama is legally qualified under the provisions of the U.S. constitution because he is not.
There is no FILING DATE stamped on this document!
The offical document submitted to the Hawaiian Elections Office was one of fifty authored by the DNC and submitted after August 28, 2008. Yet, the OCON received by the State of Hawaii from the DNC is the only one with no filing date or RECEIVED DATE stamped on its face. A review of OCONs submitted to every other state reveals the Elections Office in those states affixed this stamp on their document.
The omission of this date stamp by the Hawaiian Elections Office is particularly suspicious because, in accordance with HRS 11-113(c), (d) and (e), the RECEIPT DATE initiates a roster of deadlines and correspondence between the Chief Elections Officer, the applicant and the candidate, the first of which is a written notification from Kevin Cronin informing the candidate if they were either approved or denied for inclusion on the ballot. The absence of this RECEIPT or FILING DATE suspiciously obscures the time line which would reveal if the second OCON submitted by the DNC was in violation of Hawaiian law or if it was actually submitted BEFORE the DPH's Offical Certification Of Nonomination.
The obvious crime in this intentional dissemination of misinformation is that if the DPH was unable to verify Obama’s eligibility, the DNC would have also not been able to verify it. Why would the DNC not share its verification documentation of Obama's candidacy with the Democrat Party of Hawaii's official? If the DNC was actually able to verify Obama's eligibility, the DPH would have also acquired the same documentation to verify it.
If the eligibility of Obama candidacy was provable and verifiable, both party authorities would have included the same appropriate language in accordance with Hawaiian law.
Any conflict among party authorities over candidate eligibility allows the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer the autonomous choice whether or not to include the candidate on the ballot anyway, per HRS 11-113(b), which Cronin did, regardless if that candidate is proven eligible or not. Cronin is not obligated to verify eligibility per HRS 11-113.
Hawaii and the dnc have commited various crimes to coverup obama's true identity.
Information from the daily pen reviewed.
The state of Hawaii “Certificate of Live Birth” document actually conceals a person's full natal identity rather than reveal it.
The Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” is an unauthorized reduction of content otherwise prescribed to confirm the bearer’s natal identity. Hawaii Violates Federal Guidelines.
In the entire 110 year history of the standard, official, federal, U.S. “Certificate of Live Birth” document’s existence, only the state of Hawaii has gone astray from the standard version to such a degree that it actually conceals one’s full natal identity rather than reveal it.
Hawaii’s Permission To Violate Federal Law. Hawaii Revised Statute HRS 338-17.8 states:
“Certificates for children born out of State.(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
The law permits anyone born to parents who claimed Hawaii as their residence within one year of their birth, at any time before or after the enactment of the law, regardless of the actual location of the birth, to receive an original birth record which states that the location of birth is Hawaii, and, therefore, occurred in the U.S. Hawaiian lawmakers have confirmed that the law is not constrained to the date of birth. It is applicable to the date of application for the certificate.
This means this law would enable Obama, anytime after the age of 21 to apply for and receive a newly created original Hawaiian birth certificate after providing evidence that his mother or father merely resided in Hawaii for one year prior to his birth. He could have applied for this certificate any time since is parents are known to have resided in Hawaii since 1960. He could have been born outside of the U.S., however, the State of Hawaii is obligated by law to grant him an original birth certificate stating that Hawaii is his birth place simply because he was able to show that his parents claimed Hawaii as their residence.
(Keep in mind the "original birth certificate" would not contain any information about where obama was born in Hawaii except maybe a city and county. It would not contain a name of a hospital, doctor or any information that could validate a US citizenship. It would be like a certification of live birth on the web that contains no information that can be verified. The big difference also would be it contains information much different that the web versions of the colb. This is why the web version has been faked and found to not be real. Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) must hide the true information about his birth origin. Hawaii has never confirmed the online version is real nor has Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) ever claimed it was his.) Story Reports
How obama hides his true identity
........................................................................................
The DNC used the certificate of nomination to "validate" obama's citizenship to Hawaiian election officals.
Baraka Hussein Abu Oumama (muslim name) held a secret meeting with members of the Elections Commission on friday Oct 24, 2008 in Hawaii.
In order to avoid the destructive political consequences, Obama had to engage a private meeting away from the media. Such a private meeting would also have to be justifiable under Hawaii Revised Statutes Adminstrative Rules 91, 92-4, 92-5, and 3-170-11. Specifically, any correspondence or meeting between any candidate or representative of the candidate and members of the Hawaiian Election commission would have to be held in accord with these rules. However, it is HRS 92-5-8 which affords the permission to hold a secret meeting between members of the Elections Commission and Obama.
In summary, Obama sought a way to be in Hawaii at a time that would:
1. Occur as long after the Official Certification Of Nomination deadline as possible, but no later than October 24th.
2. Allow him to cancel campaign events, but not miss prescheduled debates with McCain or televised town hall meetings.
3. Meet legal deadlines for ballot approval, but not violate deadlines to refute the findings of ineligibility by the DPH.
4. Give the media a "decoy" story to serve as his excuse for being in Hawaii, but not allow the public to discover that the real reason he was in Hawaii was because he was attending executive hearings with the Chief Elections Officer and the DPH per HAR 3-170, HRS 92-4 and 92-5 to contest the DPH's refusal to certify his nomination.
5. Exploit the story of Obama's grandmother's illness, allowing Obama to schedule the trip precisely while citing the doctor's assessment of his grandmother's condition as an excuse to be in Hawaii. However, if Dunham died too soon, or was "not sick enough" to warrant his cancellation of campaign events so close to an election, Obama would be left exposed to media investigation about the truth of all of his activities in Hawaii on October 24th, 2008.
The certification of each candidate’s eligibility falls under the autonomous authority of each candidate’s state affiliated political party authority, with support of the national party authority, while the approval of the candidate’s placement on each state’s ballot then becomes the responsibility of the Chief Elections Officer of each state.
It was Kevin B. Cronin, Senior Elections Officer constitutional authority to oversee elections in the state of Hawaii under the advisement of the Election Commission.
Cronin does not have the authority to certify the Constitutional eligibility of a candidate, however, his most powerful authority is his ability, according to HRS 11-113, to mediate conflict over eligibility and, as a result of mediation, officially approve candidates for placement on the state’s ballot even when the state party's vetting authority refuses to certify the legal qualifications of that candidate.
An investigation of Hawaii Revised Statutes, along with documented evidence, reveals that, Cronin, being bound by law from partisan participation, still had the legal authority to circumvent the vetting process for Obama and simply approve his placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot without ever verifying that he was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President.
Shockingly, adminstrative procedures employed by the Elections Office in the State of Hawaii actually helped Obama avoid public scrutiny by simultaneously allowing him the opportunity to personally attend a hearing about his eligibility while visiting his sick grandmother in late October, 2008.
The birth certificate that is on file and online was not enough to verify obama's candidacy by the Democratic Party Of Hawaii. The Democratic Party Of Hawaii has NEVER validated obama as a presidential candidate!
How obama got on the ballot even though the Hawaiian DNC refused to certify him as a candidate in 2008
.........................................................................................
How the obama online colb forgery was made explained in detail.
The"birth" of this conspiracy began on June 10 when Jim Geraghty questioned whether or not Obama was really born in the US. Two days later, on June 12, the first forged copy appeared on the Daily Kos, followed shortly thereafter by a smaller copy (originally 1000 x 1024 pixels) on Obama's own website, BarackObama.com.
When Obama's Fight The Smears website spinoff was launched on June 13, the image copy was moved to that location,and its size was cut in half to what it is now (575 x 585 pixels). Politifact was next according to claims that they also posted their copy on June 13, it was back-dated.
The forgery began its life as an actual scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian"Certificate of Live
Birth," (COLB) that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister).
The image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a JPG file. This is the file that was sent to the person who would do the actual forging. Whoever that person was, he or she was sent the information that was to go on the image.
In the analyses, the discovery was made that there had to be more than one COLB image used to make the forgery.
(Various media obama supporters will inform you that the online version has a signature and date stamp from the registrar. They will then inform you for this reason it is authentic. What they don't tell you is that the online colb never has been confirmed as valid by Hawaii and therefore could not be real. They also never explain why the various online forms of "obama's certificate" have been manipulated and forged.) Story Reports
The online forged colb exposed and explained
........................................................................................
Evidence suggests the State of Hawaii has engaged in a conspiracy based on carefully calculated legal deniability while isolating various officials behind mutually justified administrative secrecy and unaccountability. One official would simply deny personal knowledge while vouching for another official's legal justification for remaining silent or uncooperative with requests by Adams, Abercrombie, Schatz and the American people, for documented verification of Obama's legitimacy.
Where one law indicates that Obama is not a Natural-born citizen, another law prevents any official from confirming it. Where one official of the State of Hawaii indicates that Obama is not a Natural born citizen, another official prevents the release of the information needed to prove it.
Executive Order No. 13489. Obama was ensconced as President on January 20, 2009. Just one day after his inauguration, he signed Executive Order No. 13489 which essentially violates the Freedom of Information Act and prohibits the release of Obama’s personal and presidential records, during and after his presidency, by the National Archives without first being consulted by the National Archives Director and the Attorney General.
The Democratic Party of Hawaii included the explicit statement required by HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B) that the 2000 and 2004 candidates were legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution, but the DPH did not do the same for Obama.
The Democratic Party Of Hawaii intentionally omitted the language stating that Obama is legally qualified under the provisions of the U.S. constitution because he is not.
There is no FILING DATE stamped on this document!
The offical document submitted to the Hawaiian Elections Office was one of fifty authored by the DNC and submitted after August 28, 2008. Yet, the OCON received by the State of Hawaii from the DNC is the only one with no filing date or RECEIVED DATE stamped on its face. A review of OCONs submitted to every other state reveals the Elections Office in those states affixed this stamp on their document.
The omission of this date stamp by the Hawaiian Elections Office is particularly suspicious because, in accordance with HRS 11-113(c), (d) and (e), the RECEIPT DATE initiates a roster of deadlines and correspondence between the Chief Elections Officer, the applicant and the candidate, the first of which is a written notification from Kevin Cronin informing the candidate if they were either approved or denied for inclusion on the ballot. The absence of this RECEIPT or FILING DATE suspiciously obscures the time line which would reveal if the second OCON submitted by the DNC was in violation of Hawaiian law or if it was actually submitted BEFORE the DPH's Offical Certification Of Nonomination.
The obvious crime in this intentional dissemination of misinformation is that if the DPH was unable to verify Obama’s eligibility, the DNC would have also not been able to verify it. Why would the DNC not share its verification documentation of Obama's candidacy with the Democrat Party of Hawaii's official? If the DNC was actually able to verify Obama's eligibility, the DPH would have also acquired the same documentation to verify it.
If the eligibility of Obama candidacy was provable and verifiable, both party authorities would have included the same appropriate language in accordance with Hawaiian law.
Any conflict among party authorities over candidate eligibility allows the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer the autonomous choice whether or not to include the candidate on the ballot anyway, per HRS 11-113(b), which Cronin did, regardless if that candidate is proven eligible or not. Cronin is not obligated to verify eligibility per HRS 11-113.
Hawaii and the dnc have commited various crimes to coverup obama's true identity.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
How the obama online colb forgery was made
Obama Forged Online Colb Explained
Polarik's final report: Obama's 'Born' Conspiracy - Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud
How the forgery was made
The timing of all these images is something that also confuses a lot of people new to this birth certificate brouhaha. As I mentioned in Part One, the"birth" of this conspiracy began on June 10 when Jim Geraghty questioned whether or not Obama was really born in the US. Two days later, on June 12, the first forged copy appeared on the Daily Kos, followed shortly thereafter by a smaller copy (originally 1000 x 1024 pixels) on Obama's own website, BarackObama.com.
When Obama's Fight The Smears website spinoff was launched on June 13, the image copy was moved to that location,and its size was cut in half to what it is now (575 x 585 pixels). Politifact was next according to claims that they also posted their copy on June 13(although I was not able to find it until June 27, and I suspect it was back-dated). Factcheck's copy comes in a distant fourth in this phony COLB derby:
The forgery began its life as an actual scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian"Certificate of Live
Birth," (COLB) that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister). The image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a JPG file. This is the file that was sent to the person who would do the actual forging. Whoever that person was, he or she was sent the information that was to go on the image. I doubt that the forger was the same person who did the scan (or scans, plural. In my analyses, I discovered that there had to be more than one COLB image used to make the forgery). Whoever did the scan did not have Obama's real birth certificate on hand, nor did he or she pull the birth information out of thin air. Only Obama, himself, knows the full truth of his birth origin, and only Obama would know which parts of it needed to be "modified." Somehow,and by some means, that information needed to be relayed to the forger.
Obama Forged Online Colb Explained
Polarik's final report: Obama's 'Born' Conspiracy - Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud
How the forgery was made
The timing of all these images is something that also confuses a lot of people new to this birth certificate brouhaha. As I mentioned in Part One, the"birth" of this conspiracy began on June 10 when Jim Geraghty questioned whether or not Obama was really born in the US. Two days later, on June 12, the first forged copy appeared on the Daily Kos, followed shortly thereafter by a smaller copy (originally 1000 x 1024 pixels) on Obama's own website, BarackObama.com.
When Obama's Fight The Smears website spinoff was launched on June 13, the image copy was moved to that location,and its size was cut in half to what it is now (575 x 585 pixels). Politifact was next according to claims that they also posted their copy on June 13(although I was not able to find it until June 27, and I suspect it was back-dated). Factcheck's copy comes in a distant fourth in this phony COLB derby:
The forgery began its life as an actual scan of a real, 2007 Hawaiian"Certificate of Live
Birth," (COLB) that belonged to someone other than Obama (No, not his sister). The image acquired by the scanner was then saved as a JPG file. This is the file that was sent to the person who would do the actual forging. Whoever that person was, he or she was sent the information that was to go on the image. I doubt that the forger was the same person who did the scan (or scans, plural. In my analyses, I discovered that there had to be more than one COLB image used to make the forgery). Whoever did the scan did not have Obama's real birth certificate on hand, nor did he or she pull the birth information out of thin air. Only Obama, himself, knows the full truth of his birth origin, and only Obama would know which parts of it needed to be "modified." Somehow,and by some means, that information needed to be relayed to the forger.
Obama Forged Online Colb Explained
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)