(The "fruit Of selma" aka barack hussein obama was adopted by Americans because of the DNC "Creative drafting" used to conjure up the HOAX called obama and sell his facade, a superficial appearance or illusion of something created, to deceive Americans. "Obamacare" was also creative drafting designed to circumvent the US Constitution.) Story Reports
The HOAX called obama explained and exposed.
The "obamacare" plan was adopted by Congress, whose members admitted they did not read the thousands of pages of new requirements, limits and restrictions before their vote.
Lawyers for the state of Virginia, which brought the challenge to the federal law, argued Washington could not demand that someone buy a service or pay a penalty for not doing so.
The judge's ruling said the dispute was not about regulating insurance – or even a universal health insurance.
"It's about an individual's right to choose to participate," the judge said.
"This decision guts Obamacare and represents a decisive and significant victory for America against the largest power-grab by the federal government in U.S. history. The court correctly concluded that forcing someone to buy health insurance is not economic activity and that Congress does not have that authority under the Commerce Clause".
"Creative drafting [has] never been sufficient to offset an absence of enumerated powers," U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson continued. "It is not the effect on individuals that is presently at issue – it is the authority of Congress to compel anyone to purchase health insurance. An enactment that exceeds the power of Congress to adopt adversely affects everyone in every application."
("Creative drafting" was used to conjure up the HOAX called obama and sell his facade, a superficial appearance or illusion of something created, to deceive Americans.) Story Reports
There is absolutely no authority in the Constitution that would allow the federal government to force every person to purchase a particular kind of health insurance.
"The individual mandate at the heart of Obamacare puts the federal government in the business of forcing you to buy health insurance and taxing you if you don't. This is unwise, unaffordable, and as we have argued all along, unconstitutional. If Washington thinks it can get away with this kind of power grab, it will think it can do anything," Boehner said.
"No one should be forced to pay for an unconstitutional federal takeover of health care that will funnel taxpayer dollars into the pockets of abortionists and lead inevitably toward death panels for the elderly and infirm.
Congress showed blatant disregard for the Constitution, and that’s the pivotal issue here," said Alliance Defense Fund Senior Counsel Steven H. Aden.
There is nothing more extreme than having a federal government that refuses to abide by the laws that we the people of the several states delegated to it in the Constitution.
Monday, December 13, 2010
Sunday, December 12, 2010
The HOAX called obama explained and exposed
The HOAX called obama explained and exposed.
Is obama a citizen of the US?
Is obama a fraud?
The DNC certified obama to be eligible to become president by relying entirely on obama's online "certification of live birth".
The Hawaii Department of Health has confirmed that neither Pelosi nor Germond, nor any leader of either the Democratic National Committee or the Hawaii Democratic Party, has ever even asked to see Obama’s birth certificate.
Hawaii Dept Of Health Confirms Democratic National Committee & Hawaii Democratic Party Leadership Did Not Request Obama’s Records
The HDOH has also confirmed that at no time since Obama declared his candidacy has either the HDP or DNC received a letter of verification confirming the facts of Obama’s birth.
No Letter of Verification for Hawaii Department Party or Democratic National Committee
Obama declared his candidacy on Feb 10th 2007, so at no time since Obama declared his candidacy did the HDP or DNC receive a letter of verification regarding the facts of Obama’s birth on which they could have based their certificate of nomination swearing his Constitutional eligibility in Hawaii or the fact that he was the “DULY CHOSEN” candidate for the DNC for other state’s certificates (which requires the candidate to be Constitutionally eligible as per the DNC Rules , p 14, K.1 and 2.
DNC Rules
Page 14 od PDF
K. 1. Based on the right of the Democratic Party to freely assemble and to determine the
criteria for its candidates, it is determined that all candidates for the Democratic
nomination for President or Vice President shall:
a. be registered to vote, and shall have been registered to vote in the last
election for the office of President and Vice President; and
b. have demonstrated a commitment to the goals and objectives of the
Democratic Party as determined by the National Chair and will participate
in the Convention in good faith.
2. It is further determined that these requirements are in addition to the requirements
set forth by the United States Constitution and any law of the United States.
So neither of the two avenues for the HDP or DNC to receive legal confirmation of Obama’s birth facts from the HDOH were used – a UIPA request for a non-certified abbreviated birth certificate, or a letter of verification.
The Hawaii Democratic Party actually ignored their protocols in 2008 in order to specifically NOT certify Obama’s eligibility as they had done for candidates in the past.
If Pelosi based her decision to certify on whether the state party would confirm eligibility, then she had a duty to NOT certify Obama’s eligibility, because the democratic party of the state supposedly holding Obama’s birth certificate REFUSED TO CERTIFY Obama’s eligibility.
In 2000 and 2004 the Hawaii Democratic Party waited until about a month after the National Convention and then signed and hand-delivered to the Hawaii Elections Office their certification that the candidates (1) were chosen by both the state and national parties and (2) were Constitutionally eligible to be President and VP. That was the HDP’s standard procedure, fulfilling both of Hawaii’s 2 requirements for placement on the ballot. It complies with the requirements in HRS 11-113.
Hawaii Office Of Elections Answer Of How Obama Is Qualifed To Be President
In 2008 the HDP signed their certification – with the Constitutional eligibility language removed – at the National Convention, on the day BEFORE Pelosi and Germond signed the DNC certificate.
They then apparently gave their HDP certificate to DNC Attorney Joseph Sandler, who then had a special certificate created and signed by Pelosi and Germond just for Hawaii (since the HDP refused to certify eligibility) and then sent both certifications, with his own letter of transmittal, to the Hawaii Elections Office (Correction: sent or gave his certification and transmittal letter to the HDP who relayed it to the Elections Office).
So instead of acting independently a month after the National Convention (NOTE: they didn’t have a month to get the certs in because of the late convention) and confirming Constitutional eligibility as in the past, the Hawaii Democratic Party acted before the Convention to take out the eligibility language from their standard certificate, signed it, and gave it to Joe Sandler before Pelosi had signed anything – signaling to the DNC that they were not going to certify eligibility.
They coordinated their efforts with Joe Sandler, who sent both documents together to the HI Elections Office (again, the HDP forwarded everything together to the Elections Office). Apparently Sandler, Pelosi, and Germond all knew that Hawaii’s special certification was necessary because the HDP refused to certify Obama’s eligibility.
Why did the Hawaii Democratic Party refuse to certify Obama’s eligibility as they had always done to successfully place presidential candidates on the ballots before?
The Hawaii Democratic Party took OUT their certification which had always been sufficient in the past.
In 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party certification that had always worked was simply swapped out for a DNC certification that had never been tried before.
In 2008 the HDP deliberately removed the eligibility language from their certificate, even though simply leaving it as it always had been would have made the documentation as secure and complete as possible. Why did they do that?
Joe Sandler had been counsel for the DNC in 1996, 2000 and 2004, and the Hawaii election law hasn’t changed since 1993 so there was no reason to believe the protocols always used weren’t sufficient. And if the DNC had questions they didn’t ask anybody about them; Deputy AG Aaron Schulaner didn’t remember anybody from the HDP or DNC asking about the requirement and said it doesn’t matter which of the 2 bodies certified eligibility.
(The Hawaii Democratic Party refused to certify Obama’s eligibility. The DNC had to certify his eligibility.) Story Reports
What legal counsel had approved the changes to the document, when, and why.
Possibly William H Gilardy, Jr. The attorney who represented Obama’s mother in her divorce from Lolo Soetoro. Gilardy had represented the HDP in lawsuits in the last 15 years, at least 3 different cases.
The amended Hawaii BC which has no legal value and couldn’t be used for any legal purposes, is the certificate of live birth obama has posted on the web.
Because Obama’s genuine BC is amended, Hawaii law (HRS 338-17) says that it has no legal value unless it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative. Obama has fought lawsuits to make sure that his BC could never be presented as evidence, even though it is the only way he can have any birth facts legally determined.
(This is the one key Fact that unlocks the door and unravels the HOAX who calls himself barack hussen obama.
The online certificate of live birth the DNC relied upon to certify obama as quilifed to be president is of NO LEGAL VALUE until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative.) Story Reports
Obama faild to qualify on Jan 20,2008 and is a FRAUD president
The 20th Amendment of the Constitution says that if a President elect “fails to qualify” by Jan 20th, the Vice President elect is to “act as President” until a President qualifies.
Because the required procedure to legally determine Obama’s birth facts has never happened we know that Obama could not have “qualified” by January 20th, and anybody who certified his eligibility documentably perjured him/herself since even his age has never been legally determined and could disqualify him from eligibility for the Office of President.
The President elect becomes President automatically at noon on Jan 20th, but there are 2 Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers: he must take the oath of office and he must “qualify”.
(Obama bungled the oath of office and it was again repeated in SECRET with no video or audio only a snapshot of him taking the oath again. We know obama didn't take the oath of office correctly the first time and we don't know if he did the second time correctly because there is no valid evidence. He in affect had an "ammended oath of office" just like the ammended certificate of live birth on the web.
Both "ammended qualifications" deny him the ability to act as president.) Story Reports
Neither of the two Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers has been verified or completed.
Obama has “failed to qualify” and the only person the 20th Amendment allows to “act as President” is Joe Biden, until a President qualifies. All this is known simply because his birth certificate has been amended and he has never presented it as evidence so it could possibly gain legal evidentiary value.
Is obama a citizen of the US?
Is obama a fraud?
The DNC certified obama to be eligible to become president by relying entirely on obama's online "certification of live birth".
The Hawaii Department of Health has confirmed that neither Pelosi nor Germond, nor any leader of either the Democratic National Committee or the Hawaii Democratic Party, has ever even asked to see Obama’s birth certificate.
Hawaii Dept Of Health Confirms Democratic National Committee & Hawaii Democratic Party Leadership Did Not Request Obama’s Records
The HDOH has also confirmed that at no time since Obama declared his candidacy has either the HDP or DNC received a letter of verification confirming the facts of Obama’s birth.
No Letter of Verification for Hawaii Department Party or Democratic National Committee
Obama declared his candidacy on Feb 10th 2007, so at no time since Obama declared his candidacy did the HDP or DNC receive a letter of verification regarding the facts of Obama’s birth on which they could have based their certificate of nomination swearing his Constitutional eligibility in Hawaii or the fact that he was the “DULY CHOSEN” candidate for the DNC for other state’s certificates (which requires the candidate to be Constitutionally eligible as per the DNC Rules , p 14, K.1 and 2.
DNC Rules
Page 14 od PDF
K. 1. Based on the right of the Democratic Party to freely assemble and to determine the
criteria for its candidates, it is determined that all candidates for the Democratic
nomination for President or Vice President shall:
a. be registered to vote, and shall have been registered to vote in the last
election for the office of President and Vice President; and
b. have demonstrated a commitment to the goals and objectives of the
Democratic Party as determined by the National Chair and will participate
in the Convention in good faith.
2. It is further determined that these requirements are in addition to the requirements
set forth by the United States Constitution and any law of the United States.
So neither of the two avenues for the HDP or DNC to receive legal confirmation of Obama’s birth facts from the HDOH were used – a UIPA request for a non-certified abbreviated birth certificate, or a letter of verification.
The Hawaii Democratic Party actually ignored their protocols in 2008 in order to specifically NOT certify Obama’s eligibility as they had done for candidates in the past.
If Pelosi based her decision to certify on whether the state party would confirm eligibility, then she had a duty to NOT certify Obama’s eligibility, because the democratic party of the state supposedly holding Obama’s birth certificate REFUSED TO CERTIFY Obama’s eligibility.
In 2000 and 2004 the Hawaii Democratic Party waited until about a month after the National Convention and then signed and hand-delivered to the Hawaii Elections Office their certification that the candidates (1) were chosen by both the state and national parties and (2) were Constitutionally eligible to be President and VP. That was the HDP’s standard procedure, fulfilling both of Hawaii’s 2 requirements for placement on the ballot. It complies with the requirements in HRS 11-113.
Hawaii Office Of Elections Answer Of How Obama Is Qualifed To Be President
In 2008 the HDP signed their certification – with the Constitutional eligibility language removed – at the National Convention, on the day BEFORE Pelosi and Germond signed the DNC certificate.
They then apparently gave their HDP certificate to DNC Attorney Joseph Sandler, who then had a special certificate created and signed by Pelosi and Germond just for Hawaii (since the HDP refused to certify eligibility) and then sent both certifications, with his own letter of transmittal, to the Hawaii Elections Office (Correction: sent or gave his certification and transmittal letter to the HDP who relayed it to the Elections Office).
So instead of acting independently a month after the National Convention (NOTE: they didn’t have a month to get the certs in because of the late convention) and confirming Constitutional eligibility as in the past, the Hawaii Democratic Party acted before the Convention to take out the eligibility language from their standard certificate, signed it, and gave it to Joe Sandler before Pelosi had signed anything – signaling to the DNC that they were not going to certify eligibility.
They coordinated their efforts with Joe Sandler, who sent both documents together to the HI Elections Office (again, the HDP forwarded everything together to the Elections Office). Apparently Sandler, Pelosi, and Germond all knew that Hawaii’s special certification was necessary because the HDP refused to certify Obama’s eligibility.
Why did the Hawaii Democratic Party refuse to certify Obama’s eligibility as they had always done to successfully place presidential candidates on the ballots before?
The Hawaii Democratic Party took OUT their certification which had always been sufficient in the past.
In 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party certification that had always worked was simply swapped out for a DNC certification that had never been tried before.
In 2008 the HDP deliberately removed the eligibility language from their certificate, even though simply leaving it as it always had been would have made the documentation as secure and complete as possible. Why did they do that?
Joe Sandler had been counsel for the DNC in 1996, 2000 and 2004, and the Hawaii election law hasn’t changed since 1993 so there was no reason to believe the protocols always used weren’t sufficient. And if the DNC had questions they didn’t ask anybody about them; Deputy AG Aaron Schulaner didn’t remember anybody from the HDP or DNC asking about the requirement and said it doesn’t matter which of the 2 bodies certified eligibility.
(The Hawaii Democratic Party refused to certify Obama’s eligibility. The DNC had to certify his eligibility.) Story Reports
What legal counsel had approved the changes to the document, when, and why.
Possibly William H Gilardy, Jr. The attorney who represented Obama’s mother in her divorce from Lolo Soetoro. Gilardy had represented the HDP in lawsuits in the last 15 years, at least 3 different cases.
The amended Hawaii BC which has no legal value and couldn’t be used for any legal purposes, is the certificate of live birth obama has posted on the web.
Because Obama’s genuine BC is amended, Hawaii law (HRS 338-17) says that it has no legal value unless it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative. Obama has fought lawsuits to make sure that his BC could never be presented as evidence, even though it is the only way he can have any birth facts legally determined.
(This is the one key Fact that unlocks the door and unravels the HOAX who calls himself barack hussen obama.
The online certificate of live birth the DNC relied upon to certify obama as quilifed to be president is of NO LEGAL VALUE until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative.) Story Reports
Obama faild to qualify on Jan 20,2008 and is a FRAUD president
The 20th Amendment of the Constitution says that if a President elect “fails to qualify” by Jan 20th, the Vice President elect is to “act as President” until a President qualifies.
Because the required procedure to legally determine Obama’s birth facts has never happened we know that Obama could not have “qualified” by January 20th, and anybody who certified his eligibility documentably perjured him/herself since even his age has never been legally determined and could disqualify him from eligibility for the Office of President.
The President elect becomes President automatically at noon on Jan 20th, but there are 2 Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers: he must take the oath of office and he must “qualify”.
(Obama bungled the oath of office and it was again repeated in SECRET with no video or audio only a snapshot of him taking the oath again. We know obama didn't take the oath of office correctly the first time and we don't know if he did the second time correctly because there is no valid evidence. He in affect had an "ammended oath of office" just like the ammended certificate of live birth on the web.
Both "ammended qualifications" deny him the ability to act as president.) Story Reports
Neither of the two Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers has been verified or completed.
Obama has “failed to qualify” and the only person the 20th Amendment allows to “act as President” is Joe Biden, until a President qualifies. All this is known simply because his birth certificate has been amended and he has never presented it as evidence so it could possibly gain legal evidentiary value.
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Black farmers are getting reparations through your tax money simply because they missed deadlines for filing
(The National Black Farmers Association’s own data, indicates 18,000 black farmers exist in the United States.
Under Pigford II 94,000 claims of racial discrimination have been filed thus far.
94,000-18,000= 76,000 HOAX or FRAUD claims
16,000 claims have been paid so far averaging about $50,000
The new money is intended for people who were denied earlier payments because they missed deadlines for filing. Tens of thousands of new claims are expected, and the amount of money each would get depends on how many are successful.
Black farmers are getting your tax money simply because they missed deadlines for filing.
When a taxpayer misses a deadline for filing the government will fine you and add an additional tax penalty.
This additional tax penalty in effect is going to black farmers who were denied earlier claims because they missed deadlines for filing for REPARATIONS
$1.2 billion more is to be paid out in reparations to black farmers in future claims.
This is the "fruit of selma" using his administration to legally pay backdoor UNDOCUMENTED payments to black farmers that don't exist.
18,000 black farmers have been payed 16,000 claims.
This means almost all of them have played the race card to get payed back door reparations.
76,000 "black farmers" have already filed claims and obama sets ups a 1.2 billion slush fund for them to be paid and additional "black farmers" that don't exist!) Story Reports
........................................................................................
Bachmann Urges Colleagues to Investigate Pigford before Funding Claims
Washington, Nov 29 - Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (MN-06) issued the following statement today regarding the Claims Settlement Act, expected to be voted on in the House of Representatives this week:
“I urge my colleagues to consider what the Claims Settlement Act truly presents before voting on the bill this week. This legislation includes over a billion dollars to settle the Pigford II discrimination claims with black farmers.
Unfortunately, Pigford is rife with fraudulent claims and to settle before an investigation can take place does the American taxpayer a disservice. Justice should be served to those who experienced discrimination, but settlement funds should only go to those wronged.
“By the National Black Farmers Association’s own data, only 18,000 black farmers exist in the United States, but under Pigford II 94,000 claims of racial discrimination have been filed thus far.
A number of individuals involved in Pigford, ranging from USDA officials to black farmers themselves, are ready and willing to appear as witnesses before Congress to bring these allegations into the light.
.......................................................................................
For the black farmers, it is the second round of funding from a class-action lawsuit originally settled in 1999 over allegations of widespread discrimination by local USDA offices.
The government already has paid out more than $1 billion to about 16,000 farmers, with most getting payments of about $50,000. The new money is intended for people who were denied earlier payments because they missed deadlines for filing. Tens of thousands of new claims are expected, and the amount of money each would get depends on how many are successful.
The case is known as Pigford after Timothy Pigford, a black farmer from North Carolina who was an original plaintiff.
Lawmakers voted 256-152 to send the measure to President Barack Obama, whose administration brokered the settlements over the past year.
(I would use another word instead of "brokered". The "fruit of selma" contrived the hoax settlements.) Story Reports
$1.2 billion would go to African-Americans who claim they were unfairly denied loans and other assistance from the Agriculture Department.
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, likened the black farmers program to "modern-day reparations" for African-Americans and argued along with Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., that the claims process is rife with fraud.
Rep King: "The new Congress should make an investigation of Pigford fraud a top priority."
Washington D.C.- Congressman Steve King (R-IA) today issued the following statement after the lame duck Congress passed legislation appropriating $1.15 billion to fund the controversial and fraud-plagued Pigford settlement program.
Although estimates suggest that the total universe of black farmers who could qualify for Pigford compensation only encompasses 18,000 people, over 94,000 people have submitted claims under the program. The Pigford funding request was included in H.R. 4783, the Claims Resolution Act of 2010, which passed the House of Representatives on a 256-152 vote yesterday afternoon. Congressman King voted against the legislation.
“The unaccountable lame duck Congress has irresponsibly voted to spend $1.15 billion on a Pigford settlement program that is severely compromised by fraud,” said King.
“This means that people who have never farmed and people who have never been discriminated against by the USDA will be receiving tens of thousands of dollars in cash and debt relief simply for having filed a false claim.
By ignoring Pigford fraud, Congress has allowed the program to change from one designed to address black farmers’ discrimination claims to one that now serves as a modern day slavery reparations program.
The American people should be outraged by this vote and the new Congress should make an investigation of Pigford fraud a top priority.”
(I agree with Rep King. Its a modern day slavery reparations program via the HOAX "president" aka "the furit of selma".) Story Reports
Open letter to Rep King
I agree obama or as he calls himself "the fruit of selma", should be investigated not only for the Pigford settlement program but also his identity.
The DNC certified obama as a legitimate candidate to run for president.
Please investigated how the DNC certified obama under the US Constitution to be a candidate knowing he was a dual citizen at birth.
Also the certification of live birth posted on the web as proof obama is a US citizen cannot be verified by anyone in America except the DNC.
Don't you think that is a reason for obama and the DNC to be investigated for fraud?
Thanks for your time.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Baltimore Orioles outfielder Luke Scott said Obama has no legal documentation
Baltimore Orioles outfielder Luke Scott said say Obama has no legal documentation.
Baltimore Orioles outfielder Luke Scott said Obama has no legal documentation
(Thank you Luke Scott for exposing the HOAX of "the fruit of selma". You are so correct obama has no VALID legal documentation to prove he is a US citizen.) Story Reports
(WJZ) Baltimore Orioles outfielder Luke Scott wasn’t only talking baseball at the winter meetings on Tuesday. He questioned President Barack Obama’s birthplace and claimed he did not represent the United States.
“Obama does not represent America. Nor does he represent anything what our forefathers stood for,” Scott said in an interview with David Brown of Yahoo’s Big League Stew.
The 32-year-old went on to say Obama has no legal documentation.
“He was not born here. That’s my belief. I was born here,” Scott said. ”If someone accuses me of not being born here, I can go — within 10 minutes — to my filing cabinet and I can pick up my real birth certificate and I can go, ‘See? Look! Here it is. Here it is.’ The man has dodged everything. He dodges questions, he doesn’t answer anything. And why? Because he’s hiding something.”
Luke Scott
The real issue behind these people who are gun grabbers, the truth is — based on fact — the reason why is, they want control. They want control of the people. That's what socialism is and communism.
David Brown
So how's Obama doing?
Luke Scott
Obama ... hmm ... Obama does not represent America. Nor does he represent anything what our forefathers stood for. This country is basically built on an attitude. It's a way of life. It's not because you're born here. It's not that you're supposed to take from those who have and give to those who haven't. That kills a country. It killed Russia.
I have friends of mine who are in the ministry who [work] in churches in Russia. If they can describe [the country] in one [phrase], it's "messed up beyond repair."
That's what communism does. Cuba, Venezuela. People are trying to escape these lands like a plague. What would make a human being swim 90 miles in shark-infested waters on a raft made of tires and planks? To leave their culture, their family, their language, their way of life. Everything they've ever known. What would make someone do that?
You don't see people in America doing that. There's no one here in America swimming the Pacific Ocean — or the Atlantic, or the Caribbean — to leave this place. The reason why is because of the freedom. Freedom for a man to mark out his own destiny. It's not, "Hey, you have so much." Hey, that person worked for that. That's not to be taken and given to someone who didn't put in the time, the effort, and do his part.
Obama, he doesn't represent that. He represents, "Hey, everyone. Give me votes and I'll give you stuff." And there's even people on TV who [are asked], "Hey, who you voting for?"
"I'm voting for Obama."
"Why?"
"So I can get more free stuff."
That's not what makes this country great. That's what tears down a people, tears down nations. Hence, the problem we're having in this country, where we're experiencing unemployment. We're experiencing all of these negative things that are happening in our land as a direct result of that type of attitude — of too much government involvement, of moral decay, and of people lacking honor and integrity.
Eighty years ago, 50 years ago, a man would walk up to another man and go in for loan. He'd extend his hand, he'd shake it and he'd look at the man and he'd say, "I'll pay this back." He would do it. You couldn't even ... to even mention that [scenario] today ... is that a cartoon fantasy? That's how far we are removed.
David Brown
Word was bond.
Luke Scott
Yeah. We had a bond. That type of attitude has disappeared as a whole. Now, it's OK for me to cheat, to steal, to step on somebody, to cheat somebody, to do something to make someone [else] fall, so I can get ahead in life. And people accept that and they go home and they sleep at night. Whereas, the former attitude of America was, "I'm going to work my tail off, and if it doesn't work out for me ... "
You know, I didn't have the same opportunity growing up, as some people. I also had more opportunity than others. Whatever is given to that person, whatever you do with it is what makes the difference. And that's what has happened in this country: People want the same result, but they don't want to pay the same price. They want equality, but not by earning it — they want it given to them.
It's a recipe for disaster and it will kill the entire nation.
David Brown
You don't think that Obama wasn't born in the United States, do you?
Luke Scott
He was not born here.
Luke Scott
That's my belief. I was born here. If someone accuses me of not being born here, I can go — within 10 minutes — to my filing cabinet and I can pick up my real birth certificate and I can go, "See? Look! Here it is. Here it is." The man has dodged everything. He dodges questions, he doesn't answer anything. And why? Because he's hiding something.
You know what? People who have bad intentions, people that are deceivers or are not of honor and integrity — that's how they act. I've seen it in every — it doesn't matter what level. It can be in politics, it can be in business, it can be in sports, it can be in the construction field. Doesn't matter. It's all the same attitude. It's the same thing.
People who tell the truth, they're very easy to ... their actions prove it. Something as simple providing a birth certificate. Come on. If you're born here, there's plenty of documents. But you know what? There's no documentation of him. No legal documentation of him. There's been lie after lie after lie exposed, but people put it under the carpet. Hence, the problem we have in this country.
Luke Scott
There needs to be accountability for the truth. I don't care if you're the president of the United States, you need to be held accountable. If you're involved in treacherous acts, or you're saying things that are against, or are selling out our country, you should be brought to trial.
I mean, no one's above the law. There's a lot of people that fought for their country and that's not something to be taken lightly. They gave their life, everything they had, they gave their lives, to give us what we have. That's why I'm so passionate about my beliefs -- because someone died. They gave their life, their blood was spilled, so I had an opportunity to chase a dream and play baseball for a living.
For me, that's not something, "Oh, thank you." No. "THANK YOU." Let me honor you for that by actions by sticking up for what you fought for and passing it on to the next generation and doing my part.
The "Fruit Of Selma" Takes America Hostage Again
The "Fruit Of Selma" Takes America Hostage Again.
......................................................................................
Phyllis Schlafly
EPA's aggressive overregulation is forcing the electric industry to choose between continuing to operate while taking on major capital costs of complying with heavy new burdens or closing down and building new plants that use more expensive sources such as natural gas. The public will surely end up paying higher electric rates (aka a big tax increase).
Since Barack Obama, "the fruit of selma", moved into the White House, the EPA has proposed or finalized 29 major regulations and 172 major policy rules. The EPA is, for the first time, simultaneously toughening the regulations on all six major traditional pollutants such as ozone and sulfur dioxide.
Before Climate-gate exposed the politics behind the "false science" of global warming, a 5-to-4 Supreme Court ordered the EPA to consider regulating emissions based on that unsubstantiated and now largely discredited theory.
(Since the supreme court ruling global warming has been exposed as a total HOAX. The "fruit Of Selma" AKA barack obama has been busy pushing the global warming lie though money, threats, spying, cyberwarfare and a secret global diplomatic offensive to overwhelm opposition to the controversial "Copenhagen accord", the unofficial document that emerged from the ruins of the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009.
Without the secret obama administration thugs supporting the "copenhagen accord "there would have not been the "copenhagen accord" HOAX of global warming or "climate change".) Story Reports
Obama And Hillary Seek Dirt On Nations Opposed To The HOAX Of Global Warming
The Senate's environmentalism expert, Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., warns us that the Obama administration is trying to implement cap-and-trade anyway by bureaucratic regulations. Directives issued by the Environmental Protection Agency are coming down the pike to increase energy costs and kill jobs.
(America has been and still is being held HOSTAGE by "the fruit of selma" aka barry soetoro. The HOAX "president" continues to deny any access to any valid documentation of his American citizenship.) Story Reports
Obama admits he is the "fruit of selma"
Climate Depot exposes The TOTAL HOAX OF GLOBAL WARMING
.........................................................................................
WND
Is Barack Obama constitutionally eligible for the presidency?
We don't know.
Obama is hiding the fact he was born outside of the US and was an illegal alien until 1994, or he is hiding the fact his muther didn't qualify him to be a us citizen at birth because of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952 and she would have had to apply for him to become a NATURALIZED CITIZEN in 1961.
Obama has never proven his eligibility. And, even more tragic, he has never been asked by any controlling legal authority to do so.
The citizens of the United States have a right to know if their president is constitutionally eligible to hold the office.
Obama's hospital of birth, birth documents, passport and Social Security number are all in question, and his legal defense never addresses the merits of the eligibility challenges.
Instead, Obama relies on procedural objections and compliant judges to get the cases thrown out of court.
Despite a virtual blackout by the mainstream media, Obama's eligibility troubles have spread across America, and public opinion has gradually turned against the "president".
Obama's "Certification of Live Birth" posted on the Internet and falls short of providing proof he is a US citizen.
Why has no doctor or hospital come forward to speak of Obama's birth?
Obama's "official account of his identity and background is riddled with inaccuracy and unanswered questions," the report says. "Even Obama's Social Security number may very well be fraudulent. He has literally spent a fortune in legal efforts to avoid producing the documents that would verify his eligibility."
Lending credibility to the concerns being raised is the intense war fought by attorneys trying to keep information about Obama secret. Besides his original birth certificate, still concealed are his kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, client list from his time in private practice, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, his baptism records and his adoption records.
Obama has gone to great efforts to sell the public on his own version of his life, but his story has been inconsistent.
Assuming Obama's parents were Barack Obama Sr., a British subject of Kenyan origin, and Stanley Ann Dunham, an eighteen-year-old American woman, neither of his parents were qualified to transmit automatic U.S. citizenship to him.
(The law required any U.S. citizen having a child with a non-citizen to have been physically present in the United States for at least five years after the age of fourteen to automatically transmit American citizenship. Neither parent could confer automatic American citizenship to their son if he was born outside of the US.
(1) At least one parent is a citizen of the United States, whether by birth or naturalization.
So obama would qualify to be a NATURALIZED citizen because of his mother. The question is did he ever become a NATURALIZED citizen in 1961?
.......................................................................................
Story Reports
If the fruit of selam did not apply to become a naturalized citizen in 1961 or 1994 he is today an illegal alien
Obama’s "American citizen parent", Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.
Explaination of why obama's "mother" giving birth to obama almost four months after she turned 19, didn't qualify obama jr to be a US citizen because she was 18 years 8 months old at the time of his "birth"
A naural born citizen of the US must have been born to parents who were both citizens at the time of birth.
Obama was an illegal alien because of these facts if his mother didn't apply for him to become a naturalized citizen in 1961.
YES I said obama was an ILLEGAL ALIEN.
Now your probably really confused but let me make it simple for you to understand.
Obama says he was citizen of Kenya and a British subject at birth.
Obama was not an American citizen at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.
Obama's "father" was a Kenyan citizen at the time of the fruit of selma's birth".
Neither parents qualified barack obama to be a automatic US citizen in 1961 if he was born outside of the US.
So what is he now?
Did his Kenyan citizenship expire at age 21?
The Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenya's Constitution specifies that at age 23, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1984.
So what is the citizship status of obama?
It would seem from all the evidence obama was possibly an illegal alien until October 25, 1994. Obama was an illegal alien for 33 years if he was born outside of the US. His mother did not qualify him to be a "citizen" at the time of his birth because of her age! This was because obama was subject to the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952.
The question is did she apply for him to become a NATURALIZED citizen in 1961? We don't know because there is NO paper trail to validate the fruit of selma's citizenship status.
The immigration law currently in effect under the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act, U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401, Sec. 301 (g), as amended by the Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994:
CHILD BORN OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES; APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS
Obama was possibly a naturalized citizen and we know a citizen of Kenya as he has indicated. A dual citizen or possibly an illegal alien. No one in America can verify any documentation in support of "the fruit of selma's" citizenship.
Again obama's parents did not qualify him to be classified as an American citizen but only a naturalized citizen if he was born in the US.
Obama is hiding the fact he was born outside of the US and is an illegal alien or he is hiding the fact his muther didn't qualify him to be a us citizen at birth because of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952 and she would have had to apply for him to become a NATURALIZED CITIZEN in 1961.
This means if obama was born outside of the united states he was an illegal alien until Aug 4, 1994 if his mother didn't apply for him to become a NATURALIZED citizen in 1961.
14th Amendment
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
The Fourteenth Amendment is not conferring “natural born” status on anyone, it only confers simple citizenship and the universal rights given to all citizens, “native born” and naturalized.
(If obama was born outside of the US he was possibly an illegal alien until 1994. If he was born in Hawaii as he claims he possibly became a naturalized citizen in 1994 if he swore an oath of allegiance as required by this Act of an applicant for naturalization.
So obama is either a NATURALIZED citizen or an ILLEGAL alien if he never applied to become a naturalized citizen because of the 1994 Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994. Also the fruit of selama is today an ILLEGAL ALIEN if he didn't apply to become a NATURALIZED citizen when the (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 went into effect.
Ne is not a NATUAL BORN CITIZEN as required by the Constitution.
This is what I believe obama is hiding. After all the research and thought about obama's birth identity it has come down to this.
*****************************************************************************************
Obama is hiding the fact he was born outside of the US and is an illegal alien or he is hiding the fact his muther didn't qualify him to be a us citizen at birth because of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952 and she would have had to apply for him to become a NATURALIZED CITIZEN in 1961.
So obama possibly became a NATURALIZED citizen in 1961 or (1994 if he was born outside of the US).
If he didn't become a NATURALIZED citizen in 1961 he was an illegal alien for 33 years until 1994 when the 1994 Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 went into effect and he could have also applied to become a NAturalized citizen then if he was born in Kenya, for example.
If the fruit of selma didn't apply to become a NATURALIZED US citizen in 1961 or 1994 he is today an ILLEGAL ALIEN!!!!!
*****************************************************************************************
CHILD BORN OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES; APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS
(b) Upon approval of the application (which may be filed abroad) and, except as provided in the last sentence of section 337(a), upon taking and subscribing before an officer of the Service within the United States to the oath of allegiance required by this Act of an applicant for naturalization, the child shall become a citizen of the United States and shall be furnished by the Attorney General with a certificate of citizenship.
Naturalized is the key word. The only citizenship obama could have obtained would be NATURALIZED citizenship.
The US constitution makes it clear you can be a us senator or congressman if Naturalized but Not a US President!
Obama is a HOAX. I have detected this. I am The HOAX detector.
Rush is right, the "fruit of selma" wants credit for the promises he tried to keep to the subversive radical left. Rush also said obama held a "wet diaper" news conference.
Rush is right, obama is a narcissist that just can't understand why the media asked him a few questions they normally would not have asked him. He studdered several times. He repeated the same word for or five times while he was "thinking".
The facade of obama's media makeover is needing attention.
The HOAX who calls himself obama is just a media facade or empty suit employed by the radical Liberal left.
A NO RECORD because the "fruit of selma" can't afford to display any of his records to the public.
Obama Records leave no paper trail that can validate "the fruit of selama" as a legitimate US citizen
Congress must investigate who the "fruit of selma" really is.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Obama And Hillary Seek Dirt On Nations Opposed To The HOAX Of Global Warming
(The "fruit Of Selma" AKA barack obama has been busy pushing the global warming hoax though money, threats, spying, cyberwarfare and a secret global diplomatic offensive to overwhelm opposition to the controversial "Copenhagen accord", the unofficial document that emerged from the ruins of the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009.
Without the secret obama administration thugs supporting the "copenhagen accord "there would have not been the "copenhagen accord" HOAX of global warming or "climate change".
Obama is forcing the global warming "green" carbon emissions HOAX on America through EPA regulations also.
The "fruit of selma" has used the secret global diplomatic offensive to overwhelm the opposition and buy the oppostion off. Obama did the same thing with congress when obamacare was narrowly passed.
Obama is a HOAX and global warming is a HOAX.
There is no valid documentation that exists to prove obama was born in America.
There is also no valid documentation to prove that global warming exists.
The HOAX continues.) Story Reports
.......................................................................................
WikiLeaks cables reveal how US manipulated climate accord
Embassy dispatches show America used spying, threats and promises of aid to get support for Copenhagen accord.
Explaining The HOAX Of Global Waming Or Climate Change In Simple Language
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
The Fruit Of Selma Barack Hussen Obama aka Barry Soetoro Fake SS Number
Selma has produced the corrput fruit of obama
OBAMA 2007: This is the site of my conCEPtion. I am the fruits of your labor. I am the offSPRING of the moveMENT. So when people ask me whether I've been to Sel-muh befo', I tell 'em I'm comin' home.
("The Fruit Of Selma" has a fake social security number. Not only was "the fruit of selma" never conceived in selama as obama said he was, he also has a FAKED SS NUMBER FROM CON-necticut. Obama was milking black Americans for votes when he declared he was "the fruit of selma" and was conceived in selma. This we know. Obama also has a FAKED SS number.) Story Reports
Information about the "fruit of selma's" FAKE SS Number
The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut, the state where Barrak Hussein Obama never resided and shows him to be 119 years old.
This coupled with the fact that Mr Obama’s grandmother, Madeline Dunham was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court Probate department and had access to the Social Security Numbers of the deceased, constitutes circumstantial evidence casting serious doubt on the legitimacy of Mr Obama and his claims of being born on U.S. territory.”
(On the eve of Election Day 2008 Madeline Dunham suddenly died. I don't believe it was just a coincidence.) Story Reports
Obama currently is using a Social Security number that was issued in Connecticut sometime between 1977 to 1979, even though Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
There is no evidence Obama, his father or his mother ever had a mailing address in Connecticut.
A Jun 2011 government policy change is an attempt to cover up in retrospect the controversy over Obama's Social Security number by making it impossible in the future to trace where a Social Security applicant lived at the time the person applied for a Social Security number.
Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels says, "With Obama, there is obviously a case of fraud going on here. In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
......................................................................................
Randomizing Social Security numbers represents a fundamental change of a Social Security Administration policy dating back to the first issuance of nine-digit SSNs in 1936, in which the first three digits always have been used to designate the geographical location from which an applicant has applied for a SSN.
Since 1972, the SSA started issuing Social Security cards centrally and the area number has been used to reflect the state from which a person has applied for a SSN, as determined by the ZIP code in the mailing address of the application.
"By randomizing Social Security numbers in the future, the Social Security administration is facilitating identity theft," Daniels said.
The rationale for the change offered by the SSA is that the current numbering scheme with the first three digits designating area of issuance "limits the number of SSNs that are available for issuance to individuals by each state, such that changing the number assignment methodology 'will extend the longevity of the nine digit SSN in all states.'"
With 5.5 million numbers issued annually and 435 million numbers yet to be issued, the Social Security Administration could continue issuing numbers under the current numbering code for another 79-80 years.
Randomization of Social Security numbers also would assist illegal immigrants with the type of identity theft needed to obtain employment illegally.
"Once Social Security numbers are randomized, you have no idea from the person's Social Security number where an immigrant settled into the United States, even if they got here legally,".
President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
The records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.
To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Susan Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama's were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii.
There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."
Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."
There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.
Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.
"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security number," she told WND. "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii."
"It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins," she insisted. "Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime."
Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama's birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama's birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.
Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 Social Security number.
Daniels said she can't be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.
After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama's association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.
Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.
........................................................................................
The whole point is you can't be issued two different SS numbers in two different states. Obama worked in Hawaii and says he was born there. His SS number is from Connecticut around 1978. Obama was issued a SS numner around 1978 from Connecticut yet he NEVER LIVED THERE! The SS number obama is using is STOLEN!
This is exaclty what illegal aliens use to steal identities, FAKE SS numbers.
(1) Obama has a fake ss number
(2) Obama has no documentation that has verified his online certification of live birth.
(3) Obama has not answered the many questions asked in State and Federal courts about his identity.
(4) Is there any reason not to believe obama is an illegal alien? Story Reports
Obama Has Always Been An Illegal Alien And Still Is
Obama’s "American citizen parent", Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.
Obama was born 18 years 8 months after his mother was born. This is another reason why the SS number is FAKED. The documentation obama needed to present to get a SS number would have required a document trail. This document trail would have compromised his true identity. Obama has no valid documentation that validates his FAKE certification of live birth.
NO DOCUMENT TRAIL IS AVAILABLE TO TRACE OBAMA'S TRUE IDENTITY.
Yet there are those that defend this fact.
The US Supreme Court will not verify obama's identity nor will any federal court. The US Congress will not verify obama's identity nor will the State of Hawaii except to issue verbal statments that cannot be verified.
The DNC has verified obama's identity but the DNC will not reveal how it was done.
Kerchner V Obama Filed 1/20/2009
No one in any official capacity has fully vetted the eligibility and Constitutional qualifications of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of our military.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) did not adequately vet and verify Obama’s Article II “natural born citizenship” by having a disinterested third party check his original long-form birth records in the vaults in Hawaii.
The DNC could have requested and obtained certified copies but never did. The DNC has not signed any affidavit that Obama is an Article II “natural born citizen” of the U.S.
Attorney Berg demanded of the DNC that it vet Obama’s Article II “natural born Citizenship” status prior to the DNC Convention but they ignored him at that time.
Nancy Pelosi merely signed an affidavit to each state certifying that Obama was nominated.
The DNC nomination affidavit was different for the State of Hawaii because Hawaii law required that article II be included that obama was a natural born citizen.
The DNC nomination affidavit from pelosi is a total fraud.
Political parties were responsible for vetting Obama in each state. Hawaii was different.
The State of Hawaii is very clear in its Statute. The candidate for president MUST qualify according to the provisions of the United States Constitution.
Okay, the DNC, by sworn Affidavit of Nancy Pelosi did swear to this. So what is the problem? The problem again is that an Affidavit was signed but NO supporting documentation accompanied the ballot application.
It appears that in order to meet Hawaii statutory requirements, Nancy Pelosi signed a notarized nomination certificate affirming that BHO was eligible to serve as president according to the U.S. Constitution, yet she apparently used no court-vetted probative contemporaneous documents to do so. However, by relying on Pelosi’s signature attesting to Obama’s constitutional eligibility, it appears that the Secretary of State of Hawaii placed Obama’s name on the ballot. Without any probative contemporaneous documents (which do not exist) as the basis of Pelosi’s certification of Obama, the nominating form is arguably a forgery.
Nancy Pelosi signed a DIFFERENT Affidavit for the other 49 States. The “other” Affidavit contained NO written clause whatsoever attesting to Constitutional eligibility of the candidate, Barack Obama.
Hawaii had the ability to require proof of “natural born” citizenship from the DNC and Obama by demanding supporting documentation.
The applicable Statute was not enforced by Hawaii.
.........................................................................................
Excerpt from South Carolina Statute:
South Carolina: SECTION 7-11-20.
Political parties must verify the qualifications of candidates prior to certifying to the State Election Commission the names of candidates to be placed on primary ballots. The written certification required by this section must contain a statement that each certified candidate meets, or will meet by the time of the general election, or as otherwise required by law, the qualifications in the United States Constitution, statutory law, and party rules to participate in the presidential preference primary for which he has filed. Political parties must not certify any candidate who does not or will not by the time of the general election meet the qualifications in the United States Constitution, statutory law, and party rules for the presidential preference primary for which the candidate desires to file, and such candidate’s name must not be placed on a primary ballot.
South Carolina DID NOT receive an Affidavit from the Democratic National Committee which included words to the effect of meeting “qualifications in the United States Constitution.” Pelosi sent the “other” Affidavit instead.
The State of South Carolina DID NOT enforce their “qualification” Statute either.
In sum, the August 14 letter from SC D state party Chair Carol Fowler Certifying the names and the eligibility of D candidates to appear on that state’s general election ballot appears to be kosher. On the other hand, that November 1, 2007 typed and hand-written memo Certifying the names and eligibility of D candidates to appear on that state’s Presidential Preference primary, signed by both Ms. Fowler and Ms. Hensley, have ‘election fraud’ written all over it.
The candidates to whose eligibility Ms. Fowler attested in that August 14 letter, did not include BO and JB as the Presidential and Vice-Presidential nominees for the party, but all of the ‘down ticket’ Democrats whose names the state D party wanted to appear on SC’s general election ballot, names listed on pages that were attached to her filing with the SCEC
This is how FRAUD occurred in the 2008 SC presidential election. Obama was qualified by the DNC with no supporting documentation
There was NO supporting documentation given to Hawaii or South Carolina.
Both of these states totally relied on the unverified qualification statments of the DNC.
Its just like what the Hawaii wants you to believe today. Unverified qualification statments about obama's certification of live birth certificate.
No one in the United States including the DNC can verify or prove obama is an American Citizen!!!!!!
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
US Supreme Court Will Not Reveal Obama Is An Imposter
Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama's citizenship
The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.
The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.
Kerchner's attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a "natural-born citizen" required for the nation's highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.
That clause states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
(The Supreme Court is in denial about the fact obama is NOT a natural born citizen. The above Constitutional clause gives 2 examples of what qualifies a person to be president (at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution). The phrase "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" was added to exempt those who were british citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. The phrase " natural born Citizen" was added to prevent a USURPER that was a dual citizen or a citizen not born of American parents from becoming president. The US Supreme Court knows this. The Court continues the FRAUD of obama because he was a dual citizen at birth, not a natural born citizen as the Constitution requires.) Story Reports
(Obama said Mccain was born to American Citizen(s). Obama said because of this Mccain is a "natural born citizen". Obama was born to ONE American citizen and ONE Kenyan citizen. Because obama has stated a "natural born citizen" has TWO American parents at birth and he did not, obama became a usurper and fraud the day he entered the presidential race. Its that simple. Obama continues to evade the American people. If Mccain is a "natural born citizen" because of his parents obama cannot be a "natural born citizen" because of his parents. Its that simple.) Story Reports
S.RES.511 -- Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
110th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 511
April 30, 2008 Mr. OBAMA submitted the following resolution.
RESOLUTION
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.
The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.
Kerchner's attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a "natural-born citizen" required for the nation's highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.
That clause states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
(The Supreme Court is in denial about the fact obama is NOT a natural born citizen. The above Constitutional clause gives 2 examples of what qualifies a person to be president (at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution). The phrase "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" was added to exempt those who were british citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. The phrase " natural born Citizen" was added to prevent a USURPER that was a dual citizen or a citizen not born of American parents from becoming president. The US Supreme Court knows this. The Court continues the FRAUD of obama because he was a dual citizen at birth, not a natural born citizen as the Constitution requires.) Story Reports
(Obama said Mccain was born to American Citizen(s). Obama said because of this Mccain is a "natural born citizen". Obama was born to ONE American citizen and ONE Kenyan citizen. Because obama has stated a "natural born citizen" has TWO American parents at birth and he did not, obama became a usurper and fraud the day he entered the presidential race. Its that simple. Obama continues to evade the American people. If Mccain is a "natural born citizen" because of his parents obama cannot be a "natural born citizen" because of his parents. Its that simple.) Story Reports
S.RES.511 -- Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
110th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 511
April 30, 2008 Mr. OBAMA submitted the following resolution.
RESOLUTION
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;
Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Solar storm in 2011 or 2012 get ready
........................................................................................
Areas predicted to be most affected in 2012 or is it 2011? Yellow indicates grid collapse and red indicates transformer destruction. (top pic) This is what I call a natural EMP pulse.
Scientists at NASA and elsewhere are increasingly concerned about the potential for a massive solar "mega-storm" that could disrupt power grids in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Solar cycle 24 is headed for a peak sometime in 2011 or 2012, and some forecasters believe there is historical precedent for gigantic coronal mass (CME) ejections that could take down power grids here on earth.
A modern solar flare was recorded Dec. 5, 2006, by the X-ray Imager onboard NOAA's GOES-13 satellite. The flare was so intense, it actually damaged the instrument that took the picture. Researchers believe Carrington's flare was much more energetic than this one.
No one knows for sure if the dreaded "kill shot" could be unleashed in 2012. But the sun will be watched closely for the potential of a rare but devastating solar storm that could drastically change life here on earth for a period of days, weeks or longer.
Solar Shield
Another Solar Carrington Event Repeat Today Would Collapse Civilization.
Every hundred years or so, a solar storm comes along so potent it fills the skies of Earth with blood-red auroras, makes compass needles point in the wrong direction, and sends electric currents coursing through the planet's topsoil. The most famous such storm, the Carrington Event of 1859, actually shocked telegraph operators and set some of their offices on fire. A 2008 report by the National Academy of Sciences warns that if such a storm occurred today, we could experience widespread power blackouts with permanent damage to many key transformers.
...........................................................................................
When a geomagnetic storm hits the Earth, it shakes the Earth’s magnetosphere. As the magnetized plasma pushes the Earth’s magnetic field lines around, currents flow. Those currents have their own magnetic fields and soon, down at the ground, strong electromagnetic forces are in play.
..........................................................................................
Telegraphs Ran on Electric Air in Crazy 1859 Magnetic Storm
Since the beginning of the Space Age the total length of high-voltage power lines crisscrossing North America has increased nearly 10 fold. This has turned power grids into giant antennas for geomagnetically induced currents. With demand for power growing even faster than the grids themselves, modern networks are sprawling, interconnected, and stressed to the limit—a recipe for trouble, according to the National Academy of Sciences: "The scale and speed of problems that could occur on [these modern grids] have the potential to impact the power system in ways not previously experienced."
A large-scale blackout could last a long time, mainly due to transformer damage. As the National Academy report notes, "these multi-ton apparatus cannot be repaired in the field, and if damaged in this manner they need to be replaced with new units which have lead times of 12 months or more."
(Note the above it said 12 motnhs or more to repair transformer damage. Thats 12 months or more with no electrical power.) Story Reports
Space Weather
Solar Super Storm In 2012
2012: Could solar "Katrina" take down the grid?
Solar Storm Warning 2012
........................................................................................
(This is interesting and makes sense to me) Story Reports
Dr. Tony Phillips
10 Mar 2006
source: Nasa.gov
Rresearchers announced that a storm is coming--the most intense solar maximum in fifty years. The prediction comes from a team led by Mausumi Dikpati of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). "The next sunspot cycle will be 30% to 50% stronger than the previous one," she says. If correct, the years ahead could produce a burst of solar ctivity second only to the historic Solar Max of 1958.
That was a solar maximum. The Space Age was just beginning: Sputnik was launched in Oct. 1957 and Explorer 1 (the first US satellite) in Jan. 1958. In 1958 you couldn't tell that a solar storm was underway by looking at the bars on your cell phone; cell phones didn't exist. Even so, people knew something big was happening when Northern Lights were sighted three times in Mexico. A similar maximum now would be noticed by its effect on cell phones, GPS, weather satellites and many other modern technologies.
Dikpati's prediction is unprecedented. In nearly-two centuries since the 11-year sunspot cycle was discovered, scientists have struggled to predict the size of future maxima—and failed. Solar maxima can be intense, as in 1958, or barely detectable, as in 1805, obeying no obvious pattern.
The key to the mystery, Dikpati realized years ago, is a conveyor belt on the sun.
We have something similar here on Earth—the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt, popularized in the sci-fi movie The Day After Tomorrow. It is a network of currents that carry water and heat from ocean to ocean. In the movie, the Conveyor Belt stopped and threw the world's weather into chaos.
The sun's conveyor belt is a current, not of water, but of electrically-conducting gas. It flows in a loop from the sun's equator to the poles and back again. Just as the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt controls weather on Earth, this solar conveyor belt controls weather on the sun. Specifically, it controls the 11 year sunspot cycle.
Solar physicist David Hathaway of the National Space Science & Technology Center (NSSTC) explains: "First, remember what sunspots are--tangled knots of magnetism generated by the sun's inner dynamo. A typical sunspot exists for just a few weeks. Then it decays, leaving behind a 'corpse' of weak magnetic fields."
The sun conveyor belt.
"The top of the conveyor belt skims the surface of the sun, sweeping up the magnetic fields of old, dead sunspots. The 'corpses' are dragged down at the poles to a depth of 200,000 km where the sun's magnetic dynamo can amplify them. Once the corpses (magnetic knots) are reincarnated (amplified), they become buoyant and float back to the surface." Presto—new sunspots!
All this happens with massive slowness. "It takes about 40 years for the belt to complete oneloop," says Hathaway. The speed varies "anywhere from a 50-year pace (slow) to a 30-year pace (fast)."
When the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: "The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996," says Hathaway. "Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."
Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.
Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011.
Over the last few decades, western civilisations have busily sown the seeds of their own destruction. Our modern way of life, with its reliance on technology, has unwittingly exposed us to an extraordinary danger: plasma balls spewed from the surface of the sun could wipe out our power grids, with catastrophic consequences.
The projections of just how catastrophic make chilling reading. "We're moving closer and closer to the edge of a possible disaster," says Daniel Baker, a space weather expert based at the University of Colorado in Boulder, and chair of the NAS committee responsible for the report.
It is hard to conceive of the sun wiping out a large amount of our hard-earned progress. Nevertheless, it is possible. The surface of the sun is a roiling mass of plasma - charged high-energy particles - some of which escape the surface and travel through space as the solar wind. From time to time, that wind carries a billion-tonne glob of plasma, a fireball known as a coronal mass ejection (see "When hell comes to Earth"). If one should hit the Earth's magnetic shield, the result could be truly devastating.
The incursion of the plasma into our atmosphere causes rapid changes in the configuration of Earth's magnetic field which, in turn, induce currents in the long wires of the power grids. The grids were not built to handle this sort of direct current electricity. The greatest danger is at the step-up and step-down transformers used to convert power from its transport voltage to domestically useful voltage.
The increased DC current creates strong magnetic fields that saturate a transformer's magnetic core. The result is runaway current in the transformer's copper wiring, which rapidly heats up and melts. This is exactly what happened in the Canadian province of Quebec in March 1989, and six million people spent 9 hours without electricity. But things could get much, much worse than that. Worse than Katrina
The most serious space weather event in history happened in 1859. It is known as the Carrington event, after the British amateur astronomer Richard Carrington, who was the first to note its cause: "two patches of intensely bright and white light" emanating from a large group of sunspots. The Carrington event comprised eight days of severe space weather.
There were eyewitness accounts of stunning auroras, even at equatorial latitudes. The world's telegraph networks experienced severe disruptions, and Victorian magnetometers were driven off the scale.
Though a solar outburst could conceivably be more powerful, "we haven't found an example of anything worse than a Carrington event", says James Green, head of NASA's planetary division and an expert on the events of 1859. "From a scientific perspective, that would be the one that we'd want to survive." However, the prognosis from the NAS analysis is that, thanks to our technological prowess, many of us may not.
The report outlines the worst case scenario for the US. The "perfect storm" is most likely on a spring or autumn night in a year of heightened solar activity - something like 2012. Around the equinoxes, the orientation of the Earth's field to the sun makes us particularly vulnerable to a plasma strike.
What's more, at these times of year, electricity demand is relatively low because no one needs too much heating or air conditioning. With only a handful of the US grid's power stations running, the system relies on computer algorithms shunting large amounts of power around the grid and this leaves the network highly vulnerable to sudden spikes.
(What does this all mean? A solar max is comming in 2011 or 2012. It could knock out the power grid for months. I have heard that a 6 months supply of food should be kept on hand. Also get enough pur water filters to last for 6 months per person. Also make sure you can defend yourself with a gun. Make sure you have ammo on hand and more than one gun.
If the grid is off for a few days it will be the perfect time for obama to declare martial law and take everything you own. This is when you and I will need to make a life changing decision, if you know what I mean vern.) Story reports
Remember this is what a natural EMP would do. A man made EMP would be much worse.
This would be a "crisis" obama would not let go to waste. He would declare martial law and become dictator for life. Those of us who know he is a fraud and resist would be killed or put in camps to keep us quiet.
Why Did Obama Allow WikiLeaks To Publish Classified Documents?
Why Did The Obama Admistration Allow WikiLeaks To Publish Classified Documents?
The obama justice department could have prevented wikileaks from publishing classified documents.
Where did wikileaks get the classified documents?
Wikileaks got the classified documents from the obama administration leaking the documents.
Ask your self why?
Its because obama wants to again smear the US and put American lives at risk.
Wikileaks should be investigated.
The obama administration should be investigated for leaking the classified information.
This was done on purpose just like obama has been trying to destroy the US economy on purpose by bankkrupting the US through debt.
Obama used wikileaks to "spread the documents around" just like he uses the federal reserve to "spread the wealth around".
The enemy within is trying to destroy the US from within just like Nikita Khrushchev said they would do.
The enemy within is the "fruit of selma",obama. The "fruit of selma" is a traitor and should be impeached for treason!
The obama justice department could have prevented wikileaks from publishing classified documents.
Where did wikileaks get the classified documents?
Wikileaks got the classified documents from the obama administration leaking the documents.
Ask your self why?
Its because obama wants to again smear the US and put American lives at risk.
Wikileaks should be investigated.
The obama administration should be investigated for leaking the classified information.
This was done on purpose just like obama has been trying to destroy the US economy on purpose by bankkrupting the US through debt.
Obama used wikileaks to "spread the documents around" just like he uses the federal reserve to "spread the wealth around".
The enemy within is trying to destroy the US from within just like Nikita Khrushchev said they would do.
The enemy within is the "fruit of selma",obama. The "fruit of selma" is a traitor and should be impeached for treason!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)