Visit (All Calculators are functional.) Over 100 FREE online calculators to use.

Thursday, July 14, 2016

94 year old man earns his sixth degree black belt

Black Belts Matter

94 year old man earns his sixth degree black belt


A local man is making history in a big way.

94-year-old Doctor Harlan Van Over has held many titles in his life. And now, he can add being a sixth degree black belt to that list.

He's the oldest person to test for this level and he says he isn't stopping anytime soon.

Doctor Harlan Van Over is also breaking records. Van Over is now one of about 200 people to achieve the honor of a sixth degree black belt, and he's definitely the oldest to reach this milestone.

"My mind says one thing, but my body says who do you think your talking to," Van Over said.

"I've looked death in the face many times so I don't worry about it," Van Over said.

He is also a World War II veteran.

As a bombardier for the Airforce he was shot down three times over Germany, and lives to tell the tale. He tells 14 News what he learned in the military, carries over to his training.

"You have to have a positive attitude and you have to always try to do the best you can," Van Over said.


Rank and belts are not equivalent between arts, styles, or even within some organizations. In some arts, a black belt is expected in three years, while in others ten years may be common. Testing for black belt is commonly more rigorous and more centralized than for lower grades.

The degrees of Black Belt are divided into three distinct classes. The 1st through 3rd degree are considered the novice stages of Black Belt. Students are still merely beginners in comparison to higher degrees.

At 4th degree, the student crosses the threshold of puberty and enters the expert class.

7th to 8th is composed of the Tae- kwon-Do Masters - the elite who fully understand all the particulars of Taekwon-Do, mental and physical with the 9th degree signifying the pinnacle of what is usually a life time of dedication to the art.

A black belt with a white ribbon running the length of it on one side indicates a junior (under 16 yrs.) Black Belt exponent.

Black belts matter

Monday, July 11, 2016

Obama's Plan To Seize Control (Be prepared)

Obama's Plan To Seize Control Of Our Economy And Our Lives

Jim Powell

The most ominous sign of possible things to come appeared on March 16, 2012, when President Obama signed executive order 13603about “National Defense Resources Preparedness.”

This 10-page document is a blueprint for a federal takeover of the economy that would dwarf the looming Obamacare takeover of the health insurance business. Specifically, Obama’s plan involves seizing control of:

* “All commodities and products that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals”

* “All forms of energy”

* “All forms of civil transportation”

* “All usable water from all sources”

* “Health resources – drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment”

* Forced labor ( or “induction” as the executive order delicately refers to military conscription)

Moreover, federal officials would “issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources.”

Each government bureaucracy “shall act as necessary and appropriate.”

To be sure, much of this language has appeared in national security executive orders that previous presidents have issued periodically since the beginning of the Cold War.

But more than previous national security executive orders, Obama’s 13603 seems to describe a potentially totalitarian regime obsessed with control over everything. Obama’s executive order makes no effort to justify the destruction of liberty, no effort to explain how amassing totalitarian control would enable government to deal effectively with cyber sabotage, suicide bombings, chemical warfare, nuclear missiles or other possible threats.

It’s quite likely there would be greater difficulty responding to threats, since totalitarian regimes suffer from economic chaos, colossal waste, massive corruption and bureaucratic infighting that are inevitable consequences of extreme centralization. Such problems plagued fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, communist China and other regimes. Totalitarian control would probably trigger resistance movements and underground networks like those that developed in Western Europe during the Nazi occupation.

Totalitarian control could provoke more political turmoil than there was in the Vietnam War era of the 1960s. There would probably be a serious brain drain as talented people with critical skills escaped to freedom wherever that might be. Canada?

There’s nothing in executive order 13603 about upholding the Constitution or protecting civil liberties.

In what circumstances, one might ask, would a president try to carry out this audacious plan?

Executive order 13603 says with ominous ambiguity: during “the full spectrum of emergencies.”

Well, the United States is already in a state of national emergency declared by President George W. Bush on September 14, 2001 and extended last year by President Obama.
Survival Tips (ROKU Channel)

Also Visit It contains:

Vital info on water purification, survival medicine, canning, victory garden, self reliance, compass use, star navigation, making knots, self defense, reloading ammo, how to use a revolver and rifle, drying fruits and vegetables, making jerky, survival stress, shelter in place, survival tactics etc.

There are many videos on how to be self reliant when it comes to being informed on how to survive.

Tips For Surviving in the channel store has a wealth of information on how to survive that you need to now. Basic survival information is on demand for your review. Knowledge is power....the power to survive when you need the information most.

Be prepared and learn how to defend yourself viewing various videos on how to use a weapon safely. Learn how to can various foods and make jerky for survival. Be prepared for the future. Learn how to read a compass and the stars. Learn how to purify water.

Learn basic survival medicine. Learn map reading. Learn how to garden and grow foods. Know what to do in an emergency.

Survival Tips (ROKU Channel)

Thursday, July 7, 2016

FBI Director James Comey Is The Clinton's ACE IN TH HOLE!

Comey’s first brush with them came when Bill Clinton was president. Looking to get back into government after a stint in private practice, Comey signed on as deputy special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee. In 1996, after months of work, Comey came to some damning conclusions

Hillary Clinton was personally involved in mishandling documents and had ordered others to block investigators as they pursued their case. Worse, her behavior fit into a pattern of concealment.

She and her husband had tried to hide their roles in two other matters under investigation by law enforcement. Taken together, the interference by White House officials, which included destruction of documents, amounted to “far more than just aggressive lawyering or political naiveté,” Comey and his fellow investigators concluded. It constituted “a highly improper pattern of deliberate misconduct.”

Comey parlayed the Whitewater job into top posts in Virginia and New York, returning to Manhattan in 2002 to be the top federal prosecutor there. One of his first cases as a line attorney in the same office 15 years earlier had been the successful prosecution of Marc Rich, a wealthy international financier, for tax evasion. But on his last day as President in 2001, Bill Clinton pardoned Rich. “I was stunned,” Comey later told Congress. As top U.S. prosecutor in New York in 2002, appointed by George W. Bush, Comey inherited the criminal probe into the Rich pardon and 175 others Clinton had made at the 11th hour.

Despite evidence that several pardon recipients, including Rich, had connections to donations to Bill Clinton’s presidential library and Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate campaign, Comey found no criminal wrongdoing.

He was careful not to let the investigation be used for political purposes by either party. When pressed for details in one case, he said, “I can’t really go into it because it was an investigation that didn’t result in charges. That may be a frustrating answer, but that’s the one I’m compelled to give.”
Comey Has a Long History of Letting The Clintons Off The Hook
Posted by G.A. Casebeer
The Bern Report

Today, millions of Americans watched in utter disbelief as the director of the FBI, the most powerful law enforcement body in the nation, said that no charges would be recommended in regards to Hillary Clinton’s home-brewed email server setup.

The facts were there. The damning evidence was there. What wasn’t there was someone willing to uphold the law. But this isn’t the first time that Comey has let the Clintons slide. Back in 2002, James B. Comey, was the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York and was investigating a case involving the Clintons and suddenly, with very little explanation closed the case.

The case was concerning the infamous New Square Four, who were convicted of bilking the government out of tens of millions of dollars. Where the Clintons come in is that former President Bill Clinton reduced the sentences of the four Hasidic Jews from New Square, in Rockland County north of New York City. The move was controversial because Hillary Clinton had campaigned in the Hasidic Village, on the suggestion of her staff, The campaigning in fact did pay off as she grabbed 1,400 votes compared to 12 votes for her opponent Rick Lazio.

An investigation into the New Square Four case was announced in 2001 by Mary Jo White of the U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan although at the end of a 15 month investigation, James Comey said:

”The investigation was closed because we thoroughly investigated and determined it wasn’t appropriate to bring charges against anybody in the case,” Mr. Comey said at a news conference on an unrelated case. ”I can’t really go into it because it was an investigation that didn’t result in charges. That may be a frustrating answer, but that’s the one I’m compelled to give.”

While Comey was an attorney in Manhattan he’s successfully prosecuted Marc Rich, a wealthy international financier, for tax evasion. On Clinton’s last day in office in 2001 he pardoned Rich, much to the dismay of many that were close to the case, including Comey. Said Comey in 2001, “I was stunned.”

Comey was now the top prosecutor in New York after being appointed by George W. Bush and as an incoming gift was now in charge of the criminal investigation into the 176 last minute pardons that Bill Clinton had made as he was walking out of the White House.

Many of the pardon recipients, including Rich, had donated to Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate campaign and also to Clinton’s presidential library and allegedly in exchange were granted pardons. But despite the evidence, Comey surprisingly found no criminal wrongdoing.

Today we watched Comey let them off the hook again even as he read a laundry list of improprieties that the FBI found. I’ve seen all over the internet that this guy is a straight shooter and that he takes his job seriously, he even said himself today that no one affected this investigation in any way. But it is hard not to come to the conclusion that there is more to Comey and the Clintons than we are being told.
My comments:

James Comey is the clinton's ACE IN THE HOlE.

He is corrupt just like the clintons.

Comey was appointed by obama because he and the clintons knew Comey would again let the Clinton's off the hook.

Comey is straight shooter and takes his job seriously because he shoots down every criminal investigation about the clintons and takes these opportunities to corrupt the judicial system seriously.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Hillary shows her gay pride walking in pride parade

Hillary shows her gay pride walking in pride parade.



Christian Perspective Pt 1 (Lev 18:22)

Christian Perspective Pt 2 (Lev 18:22)


Leviticus 18:1-30

Lev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Cops can swipe you credit card and take all your money. (Its the law)

"Whats In Your Wallet?"

Police Use Device to Strip Money from Drivers' Debit Cards

‘License, Registration, and Assets, Please’: How Oklahoma Cops Swipe Away Your Money During a Traffic Stop

Yes its true. All but 2 states Nebraska and Wisconsin allow cops during a traffic stop to take all your money out of the bank and keep it. Citizens must take extraordinary legal measures to get their money back.

When a police cruiser lights up behind you, a driver usually fears two things: a costly speeding ticket, or a roadside breathalyzer test.

The driver probably isn’t worrying about having the contents of his or her bank account seized, followed by a long and possibly fruitless journey to recoup their lost cash, but that’s the power local law enforcement has over its citizens.

And technology is now making it easier to use that power more and more often.

If you’re nervous, look shady, or give police any reason to suspect you could be involved in a crime, civil asset forfeiture (CAF) laws allow law enforcement officers to seize your cash and bank account — even without a criminal charge. Under the federal equitable sharing program, the bulk of those assets can then be spread to local law enforcement, giving officers an incentive to find something wrong with your car, your behavior, and your story.

Only two states — Nebraska and Wisconsin — require officers to prove potential criminal activity “beyond a reasonable doubt” before going through with CAF. And because it’s a federal program, equitable sharing allows law enforcement to side-step state laws on money gathered through forfeiture.

The Oklahoma Highway Patrol has a new tool to help them separate a driver from their assets. Their troopers are already using an Electronic Recovery and Access to Data Machine (ERAD), which gives them easy access to funds on drivers’ bank cards and prepaid cards. OHP began using 16 ERAD devices in May, according to News9 (via The Free Though Project).

“We’re gonna look for different factors in the way that you’re acting,” Oklahoma Highway Patrol Lt. John Vincent told the news station. “We’re gonna look for if there’s a difference in your story. If there’s some way that we can prove that you’re falsifying information to us about your business.”

Vincent added that if a driver can prove they have a “legitimate reason” for having the money — be it in their glove box or bank account, they’ll get it back.

It isn’t just local law enforcement that benefits from the funds gained through asset forfeiture and equitable sharing. News9 found that the maker of the scanner devices, ERAD Group, Inc., signed a contract to be paid $5,000 for the purchase of each device and related software, and 7.7 percent of all the money the OHP seized.

Critics say the practice amounts to theft, as law enforcement doesn’t have to prove a driver’s assets were tied to criminal activity. Because police can seize assets without a criminal charge, the case amounts to a civil procedure — a dispute between law enforcement and a person’s property. Getting the money back can be difficult.

Oklahoma Senator Kyle Loveless (R) is fighting the practice, telling the news station that abuse has already occurred. He pointed to cases where single mothers, a cancer survivor, a Christian band and others had their assets seized.

According to the Washington Post, the U.S. Department of Justice suspended equitable sharing in December of last year, but restarted the program in April. The newspaper’s editorial board slammed the program, stating, “Any link between the volume of seizures and the windfall to police departments must be broken. Otherwise police departments will be tempted to push the rules as far as they can.”

Asset forfeiture funds at the Justice Department and U.S. Treasury ballooned during and after the recession, growing from under $1 billion dollars in 2006 to about $4.5 billion in 2014.

Even if the feds scrap the program, state CAF laws remain with the potential for abuse. Brad Cates, a former director of the Justice Department’s Asset Forfeiture Office, wrote in the Wall Street Journalearlier this year that CAF laws had turned into “policing for profit.”

Telling any group to ditch their cash cow always leads to resistance, so expect this battle to play out in the long-term. In the meantime, drivers — in Oklahoma especially — will continue to fear an officer’s ERAD machine as much their sidearm.


Bottom line:

Government can take all your money out of the bank if they want to. All government has to do is suspect the story you tell them about the money you have in in the bank is not true.

Federal law permits states to become electronic bank robbers just because they don't like they way you look or talk!!!!

The manufacturer of the erad card scanner gets 7.7% of all the money the cops steal also!!!!

This amounts to "legal" theft by the government!!

Cops can scan you credit card and take all your money out of the bank if you look at them wrong!!!!!

Most of the incidents arise in so-called “forfeiture corridors” in states like Texas and Pennsylvania, where police officers confiscate cash from motorists, even though many of them were using the cash for legitimate small businesses or personal matters.

Typically, the police do not even bother filing a criminal drug charge, but instead just bring a forfeiture case to keep the cash. In the event the motorist who once held the cash wants to recover it, he or she is required to intervene in the case, the time and cost of retaining an attorney and attending court is often not a viable option. The cops win almost every time.