Sunday, September 10, 2017

Hurricane Irma Radar, Storm Track, Predicted Risk





Irma’s proximity to the warm Gulf of Mexico as it moves northward along the west coast of Florida may help it maintain hurricane intensity by the time it reaches northern Florida on Monday. Tallahassee and Jacksonville are likely to get battered by damaging winds and flooding rainfall during this time.

“Irma could track far enough west of Florida that the center remains over the Gulf of Mexico and away from the coast,” AccuWeather Senior Meteorologist Tom Kines said.

If Irma tracks farther west, then it will interact with warmer water for a longer period of time, which could lead to even further intensification. Strengthening could increase impacts along the western coast of Florida and the severity of impacts across the Florida Panhandle.

However, this scenario would also lead to less impacts along the eastern coast of Florida, from Jacksonville to Miami.

Isolated tornadoes will threaten areas on the northeast side of the storm, which will put much of Florida at risk for further damage should a tornado strike.













“Any land within 185 miles of the Irma’s center could see damage and any place within 50 to 60 miles of the center could experience catastrophic damage,”. Accuweather.com

Irma had sustained 185-mph winds for 37 hours


ExactWeather.com   (Not Exact But Close Enough)



Be prepared, may God protect us.





Saturday, September 2, 2017

Moon's Unique Orbit Points To A Creator


The Moon’s Unique Orbit


(Article Credit AnswersInGenesis.org)

The moon has another unique feature that is often overlooked but just as important—its orbit around the sun. To appreciate its specialness requires some explanation.
Generally speaking, smaller satellites move in an elliptical orbit around their planets, a sort of stretched-out circle. However, all the major satellites, including the moon, have nearly circular orbits around their planets. As each satellite orbits the planet, it is also rotating around its own axis. Most satellites, including our moon, orbit their planets in the same direction that the planets rotate on their axes (with one exception among the major satellites, Neptune’s Triton).

Here’s what is interesting. Most major satellites orbit on a plane that matches the planet’s rotation along its equator. (Again, Triton is an exception.) Many minor satellites orbit this way too, though some have extreme elliptical orbits with odd paths around their planet—some like Triton even revolve backward with respect to their planet’s rotation. The moon doesn’t fit any of these categories.

However, the moon orbits on a plane that nearly matches the plane of the earth’s revolution around the sun (see illustration below). No other satellite orbits in the same plane that its planet revolves around the sun. Not one out of 175.




Most satellites in our solar system, such as Neptune’s Triton and Jupiter’s Ganymede, orbit on a plane that matches their planet’s rotation along its equator. The moon isn’t like this. It orbits in nearly the same plane that the earth revolves around the sun.
That’s very different from the earth’s rotation. This would be impossible if the moon evolved from the same spinning cloud as the earth. So secular astronomers assume an outside body struck the earth at a sharp angle, and the moon formed from the debris of this collision.
The Bible explains, in contrast, that the Creator placed the moon in this orbit for a special purpose. It serves a lifegiving role in maintaining the earth’s tilt, which provides seasons and keeps temperatures balanced. No other planet has a moon like this.
This fact has a profound effect on the earth, suggesting design. The earth needs to maintain its tilt in order to have the changing seasons and keep temperatures fairly balanced around the globe. But other bodies in the solar system exert a small gravitational pull that slowly tends to tweak the earth’s axial tilt. Left unchecked, the earth’s tilt would gradually change.

At one extreme, this change in the earth’s tilt would result in no seasons. On the other extreme, seasonal changes would be much more drastic than they are today, with much of the earth shifting from the boiling tropics in one season to the Antarctic’s frigid, sunless winters. Obviously, this would have disastrous consequences for living things.
But this does not happen because of the moon’s unique large size compared to earth and its unique orbit in the same plane that the earth orbits the sun. These two factors combine to allow the moon to stabilize the earth’s tilt to within two degrees. Both factors must be in play for this stabilizing force to work. This is the only planet where this is possible, and since life appears unique to earth, this is the only planet where it matters.




FineTunedUniverse.com

The moon is exactly the correct size and distance from the sun to make a solar eclipse possible


Solar eclipse

As seen from the Earth, a solar eclipse is a type of eclipse that occurs when the Moon passes between the Sun and Earth, and the Moon fully or partially blocks the Sun. This can happen only at new moon when the Sun and the Moon are in conjunction as seen from Earth in an alignment referred to as syzygy. In a total eclipse, the disk of the Sun is fully obscured by the Moon. In partial and annular eclipses, only part of the Sun is obscured.

The Uniqueness of the Moon

The moon has a number of distinctive characteristics. It is both 400 times smaller and 400 times closer to Earth than the sun is. This means that the moon and sun have about the same apparent size in our sky on average.

This makes total solar eclipses possible. Earth is the only known planet that can experience eclipses where its moon so precisely covers the sun. This has made possible the discovery of the solar chromosphere. The chromosphere can only be seen by eye during a total solar eclipse.

The moon is exactly the correct size and distance from the sun to make a solar eclipse possible.

This didn't happen by accident over millions of years.

This was a precise design by God.

Precise design can be seen all around us.


Psalm 19:1-3 King James Version (KJV)

1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.

FineTunedUniverse.com




EVOLUTION = MILLIONS OR BILLIONS OF YEARS + YOUR IMAGINATION

(Those who believe in the "religion" of evolution or teach evolution cannot explain what happened during the gap of millions or billions of years in their theories.

They leave that part up to your imagination to figure out what they cannot explain.

Millions and billions of years is a catch all term to explain evolution.

If those who teach evolution theories can't explain what went on behind the curtain of the millions or billions of years and leave it up to your imagination to figure out, how can evolutionists expect you to explain their empty useless theories!)

EVOLUTION = MILLIONS OR BILLIONS OF YEARS + YOUR IMAGINATION



Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Hawaii democratic party would not certify obama in 2008


Visit ParrotNewsreports.com




.................................................
WND's Bob Unruh Discusses Democrats Certification Of Nomination For Ineligible Obama


Bob Unruh

Democratic Party or state elections officials certifying Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election could be charged with election fraud.

Former U.S. Justice Department attorney Larry Klayman who founded the government watchdog Judicial Watch explains in a letter that election officials can not be certain of Obama’s eligibility, and the law doesn’t allow them to make assumptions.

The letter to Robert Bauer, general counsel to the Democratic National Committee, points to evidence of Obama’s ineligibility that would make letters from the DNC to states regarding his candidacy problematic.

“There is therefore no longer any state or national official in the Democratic Party who can escape legal responsibility for ignoring the proof herein provided, and a plea of ignorance of the facts will no longer be possible, especially under the informed legal counsel provided by you (and your state counterparts), Mr. Bauer,” Klayman wrote.

“At the same time that you are receiving this legal analysis, each DNC Executive Committee member – as well as each state Democratic Party chair, secretary of state, and state attorney general – is receiving a certified letter advising them of the legal jeopardy in which they place themselves should they proceed – in light of the facts herein presented – to certify to state or national election officials that Barack Hussein Obama is the constitutionally and legally qualified Democratic candidate for president of the United States.”

Such verifications, if created, would be “perjurious,” Klayman said.

The evidence Klayman cites in the letter includes Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s highly publicized request of the state of Hawaii to verify that the likely Democratic nominee is a “natural-born citizen.”

Bennett eventually closed his inquiry without obtaining any pertinent documentation.

Bennett formally inquired of Hawaii for verification of Obama’s birth records, and when he received a statement from state officials announced his inquiry was closed.

“As to whether the president was born in Hawaii, personally I believe he was,” he said. “I actually think he was fibbing about being born in Kenya when he was trying to get into college.”

But Bennett said all clearly was not above board.

“I think he has spent $1.5 to $2 million through attorneys to have all the college records and all that stuff sealed,” Bennett said. “So if you’re spending money to seal something, that’s probably where the hanky panky was going on.”

Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio continues to investigate Obama’s eligibility after determining that the image of a birth document posted online by the White House is fraudulent.

Hawaii State Registrar Alvin Onaka “failed” to provide verification to Bennett of Obama’s birth information.

He did, however, verify that “the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”

Mr. Onaka undeniably failed to verify that the image posted at whitehouse.gov “is a true and accurate representation of the original record.”

But Klayman explained state law requires Onaka to furnish “in lieu of the issuance of a certified copy, a verification of the existence of a certificate and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified.”

Klayman said the law leaves Onaka with no option and “the only legal reason for Onaka to not verify those facts is if he can’t legally do so. Since he verified that those claims are on the record in the DOH files, the record itself must not have ‘probative value.’

“The only legal reason for not verifying that the posted long-form ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files’ is if it is not. There is no other plausible explanation,” Klayman said.

Klayman said the only Hawaii statute allowing birth certificates “to be non-legally binding” is the law regarding “late” or “altered” certificates, which states: “The probative value of a ‘late’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.”

“Unless and until Mr. Obama’s original birth record, on file with the Department of Health in Hawaii, is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative body or official, it cannot legally be considered to have probative value. In other words … it cannot stand alone without further corroboration, as required by an ‘administrative body or official,” Klayman wrote.

Klayman’s conclusion is that “no one can state with any legal certainty that candidate Obama is even old enough to be president, much less that he meets the exclusively high bar of ‘natural-born citizen’ status, required by Article II, Section I, Clause 5.”

He noted at this point, “No one can legally swear that Mr. Obama is constitutionally eligible to be president; and because the DNC bylaws require the Democratic presidential candidate to be constitutionally eligible, there is also, therefore, no party official who can legally swear that Mr. Obama is the ‘legally qualified candidate’ of the Democratic Party, under its own bylaws.”

Perjury

For a party official to declare Obama eligible “would be to perjure him or herself,” he wrote.

Klayman told Bauer that in 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party “removed the standard language heretofore employed certifying the ‘constitutional eligibility’ of candidates Obama and Biden.”

“In other words, the state party most keenly aware of Mr. Obama’s existing records would not (and did not) certify their constitutional eligibility,” he said. However, at the same time, “then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, did certify their constitutional eligibility [to present] to election officials in Hawaii, while removing that same standard language [when it was] presented in at least some (if not all) of the remaining states.”

Klayman, whose high-profile legal career has included lawsuits against OPEC, Cuban interests, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez, told WND the letter puts Democrats on notice that certifying Obama’s eligibility without having the actual knowledge opens them up to liability for making false statements.

2008 documents

Canada Free Press first exposed the Democratic National Committee used two separate forms to affirm Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president and then said Democrats failed to certify their candidate’s eligibility in 49 of the 50 states.

WND reported early in Obama’s term on the Democrats’ certification of Obama’s eligibility for the 2008 election.

A commentator at Canada Free Press first exposed the Democratic National Committee used two separate forms to affirm Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president and then said Democrats failed to certify their candidate’s eligibility in 49 of the 50 states.

“In most states,” Williams wrote, “it appears that the DNC never certified constitutional eligibility for Barack Hussein Obama, despite their many claims of proper vetting and certification, all of which we now know to be false.”

Williams posted copies of two documents apparently prepared by Democrats to certify Obama as their nominee for president, one that contains language affirming his constitutional eligibility and filed in Hawaii (where state law requires the specific language) and another omitting the language and filed in the remaining 49 states.

The first includes a verification that Obama and Joe Biden, then candidate for vice president, “are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

The second form obtained by Williams appears identical, but in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone.

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie The Evidence: Click Here to see the two different documents affirming obama's Constitutional eligibility. The one sent to Hawaii in 2008 is different than the other 49 states.

(In 2008 I posted the same information that the DNC sent two different certifications to the states. Only one had the Constitutional certification and that was sent to Hawaii because it was required by Hawaiian law. The other 49 DNC certifications were sent to the other 49 states with no Constitutional certification included.

Obama has been and continues to be an FRAUD president that cannot validate his US citizenship. Its that simple.)
Story Reports


Obama Records

The DNC did not request any records of obama's identity from Hawaii in 2008. They only relied on the obama campaign short form "certification of live birth" posted on the web. This form under Hawaiian law could have been generated a year later to a parent who had a child born out of the US!!!

........................................
The DNC did not request any records of obama's identity from Hawaii in 2008. They only relied on the obama campaign short form "certification of live birth" posted on the web.


DNC and HDP Did Not Request Obama Records

HDOH Confirms DNC & HDP Leadership Did Not Request Obama’s Records

From: Nellie
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:03 AM
To: Okubo, Janice S.
Subject: UIPA Request – HDP, DNC, Abercrombie UIPA’s
1-26-10

Aloha.

Pursuant to UIPA I request an electronic copy of any and all UIPA requests from Joseph Sandler, Brian Schatz, William H. Gilardy, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Neil Abercrombie, Daniel Inouye, Senator Akaka, Marsha Joyner, or anyone representing the Hawaii Democratic Party or the Democratic National Committee.

Thank you.
Nellie
________________________________________—– Original Message —–
From: Okubo, Janice S.
To: Nellie
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: UIPA Request – HDP, DNC, Abercrombie UIPA’s

Aloha Ms. (redacted),

In order for the department to respond to your request, we require some additional information.

Please provide a specific timeframe for the records you are requesting.

Are the records you are requesting specific to a certain area or part of the department?

What was the subject of the UIPA requests you are referring to?

Please provide names for the people referred to as “anyone”.

We will do our best to provide you with the records you are requesting once we receive the information needed.
Janice Okubo
Hawaii State Department of Health
________________________________________
From: Nellie
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:52 AM
To: Okubo, Janice S.
Subject: Re: UIPA Request – HDP, DNC, Abercrombie UIPA’s

I request copies of UIPA requests dating from January of 2008 until now regarding President Obama’s vital records or Hawaii law or administrative rules, requested by Joseph Sandler, Brian Schatz, William H. Gilardy, Nancy Pelosi, Alice Travis Germond, Howard Dean, Neil Abercrombie, Daniel Inouye, Senator Akaka, Marsha Joyner, or Andy Martin.

Thank you.
Nellie

—– Original Message —–
From: hdohinfo
To: Nellie
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 4:46 PM
Subject: UIPA Request – HDP, DNC, Abercrombie UIPA’s

Aloha Ms. (redacted),

The department has no records responsive to your request.

Hawaii Department of Health
Public Information Office staff

Send mail to:
State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section/UIPA Request
Honolulu, HI 97801
hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov
........................................
HOAX DETECTOR BROADCAST ABOUT THE FRAUD DNC

Listen to internet radio with HoaxDetector on Blog Talk Radio

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Kim Jong-Un Gets Trump's Message - A Butt Kick


Translation:  President Trump has kicked our mentor China in the butt and now China has kicked us in the butt. As your "dear" leader kim jong-un I have gotten the message via the butt kick by china.



Jonathan Cheng WSJ


SEOUL—North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has decided not to launch a threatened missile attack on Guam, Pyongyang’s state media reported on Tuesday, but warned that he could change his mind “if the Yankees persist in their extremely dangerous reckless actions.”

The report, published early Tuesday, could help dial back tensions that had spiraled last week following an exchange of threats between North Korea and U.S. President Donald Trump.

Mr. Trump warned Pyongyang last week that the U.S. military was “locked and loaded” and could engulf the North in “fire and fury,” while North Korea, through its state media, had threatened to fire four missiles in a bid to surround the U.S. territory of Guam in “enveloping fire.”

North Korean state media said in its report Tuesday that Mr. Kim had made his decision not to fire on Guam after visiting a military command post and examining a military plan presented to him by his senior officers.

Mr. Kim added that the planned launch could still be carried out at any moment, and said that such a strike would be a “most delightful historic moment” that would “wring the windpipes of the Yankees and point daggers at their necks.”

In Guam, authorities welcomed the apparent lifting of the missile threat from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

“We are happy that the rhetoric has calmed down, that he won’t be pursuing his threats to fire missiles at Guam,” said Lt. Gov. Ray Tenorio. “The comments allay some of the concerns and the fears.”

The U.S. military on Guam would maintain a high level of readiness to respond to any threat, said Greg Kuntz, deputy public affairs officer for Joint Region Marianas.

Guam is home to two major U.S. military bases. The island is situated roughly 3,800 miles west of Hawaii and 2,100 miles south-southeast of Pyongyang.

President Trump tweeted last Sunday that he spoke with South Korean President Moon Jae-In amid mounting tensions with North Korea -- and Trump was “very happy and impressed” with the United Nations Security Council's 15-0 vote to hit Kim Jong Un's regime with tough new sanctions.

The sanctions against the communist nation include a ban on coal and other exports worth over $1 billion -- a huge bite in its total exports, valued at $3 billion last year.

U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley called the resolution “the single largest economic sanctions package ever leveled against the North Korean regime” and "the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.”













Editor Note

Why did kim jong-un back down on nuking the US?

Because President Trump got the useless united nations to vote for sanctions against north korea that included russia and china.

President Trump also did NOT back down to the nut job kim jong-un.

He spoke to him in language un could understand and told he he would be dead meat if he continued to threaten the US.

Next President Trump kicked china in the butt by letting china know he was going to really do something about the trade imbalance with them.

And guess what, tuesday morning all the news changed because china had told north korea it was not going to buy its oil or coal any more.

Kim jong-un got the message and started talking different.

Full credit goes to President Trump and his administration. The butt kicking lesson worked!

A review:

(1) Trump kicks china in the butt to do something about north korea.
(2) China kicks north korea in the butt by telling them to back off on the nukes and also telling them they were not going to buy oil and coal from north korea any more.
(3) Kim jon-un gets the message after a china butt kick and starts talking different about nukes and the US.



























Monday, August 14, 2017

North Korea Diesel Submarines






TERROR BENEATH THE SEA ?

NEW satellite images of North Korea bases appear to show the volatile state is overhauling its missile sub fleet as tension rises during the nuclear stand-off between Kim Jong-un and the US.

Kim Jong-un has been repeatedly threatening to nuke America and it’s feared his next launches will be seaborne.

Long-range ballistic missiles (ISBMs), and their submarine-housed counterparts (SLBMs), are rockets which can carry nuclear bombs and would be capable of striking the west coast of the US including cities such as Los Angeles and Seattle.

However, North Korea is not believed to have developed the technical capacity to mount a nuclear warhead on an SLBM.

The range of north korea's sub launched missle is 600 miles.

The subs are diesel powered, so could be detected and destroyed as soon as the sub left the port.


Korea (DPRK) used plutonium for conducting its first nuclear test on 9 October 2006.














Editor note


Kim jong-un's subs are a threat to Guam and the US.

The good news is the US can detect their movement very easily and destroy the diesel powered sub quickly.

I am sure the US and other countries are watching kim jong-un's every move and especially his old slow diesel subs with nuclear missiles.

Guam is 2,128 miles from north korea.

I am also sure the US can detect a kim jong-un's submarine if it is about to launch a missile.

If un's subs get with in 600 miles of Guam or America the US will take it out and then the story would be something like:

"North korea sub lost at sea or north korea sub has sunk to bottom of sea."

The most likely story is NO story. The US would take the sub out before it could launch any missles and never admit it had done so.

The sub story would be quite different than it would be for the US to contain kim jong-un missiles on land.

On land un would never see what hit his nuke missiles and infrastructure.

The US could send low flying under the radar cruise missiles or stealth bombers etc.

Un would retaliate by trying to launch nukes that were not destroyed.

There is a possibility of some being launched that would need to be destroyed.

It would only take one sent to South Korea to cause the US to then possibly nuke kim jong-un back to the stone age.

Most likely it would be done with neutron bomb. (Only my speculation.)

A neutron bomb, officially defined as a type of enhanced radiation weapon (ERW), is a low yield thermonuclear weapon designed to maximize lethal neutron radiation in the immediate vicinity of the blast while minimizing the physical power of the blast itself.

ERWs were first operationally deployed for anti-ballistic missiles (ABM). In this role the burst of neutrons would cause nearby warheads to undergo partial fission, preventing them from exploding properly. For this to work, the ABM would have to explode within a few hundred feet of its target.

If kim jong-un wants to commit suicide and take his country along with him he can do it at any time.

I am sure the US and South Korea are ready if he does.

Also obama and his thugs have given kim jong-un the green light to put a nuke in a container on a ship or dock somewhere close to or in the US.

This would be a "back door" way for un to set one off in the US.

Is the US prepared for this? I doubt it. Only a facade of preparedness. Remember there are many container ships in US ports and near the coast. Containers are also on rails and trucks, everywhere.

Bottom line is if a war starts with north korea there are a few loose ends that could be disastrous if they are not contained.




Man man watches and waits for the correct time to commit suicide.

The US will then take him out but at what cost? How much collateral damge to US citizens??

Its similar to a swat team neutralizing a nut case with a gun holding hostages.

Kim jon-un is holding us as hostages and the US military is the "swat team" that will be sent to destroy the threat. Will the military be successful and free the "hostages" unharmed?  Only God knows.

So pray that President Trump will make the correct decision and the US military will be successful if kim jong-un decides to end his life and  the lives of others who are innocent. 

You can also be sure that if kim jong-un sets it off the people in the US will panic. That could set the US government off and then maybe partial martial law in certain areas because of shortages of food and water cause by panic.

I suggest you be prepared with some of the following:

Survival tips


Augason Farms Emergency Food Supply 30-Day Pail – 1 Person





Shelf life up to 20 years.
$89.98

Online only
Price includes shipping  Sams's Club

Basic Food Pail
  • Enough food for 1 person, 30 days
  • 307 total servings of food
  • 54,660 total calories
  • 1,822 average calories per day per person

Water:

DASANI Water   Cost varies.  Recently I purchase several 24 16.9 fl oz bottle cases for only $3.69 each. Purchased at Ingles.

(Don't buy at walmart they want $43.48 for 24  16.9 fl oz bottle case.)  A total rip off!

Shelf life 12 months

Purifide by reverse osmosis

No fluoride

No sodium (only a negligable amount of salt for taste)

Magnesium sulfate

Potassium chloride

Additional added minerals for taste






Story Reports Comments
AnyCalculator.com
FineTunedUniverse.com
ExactWeather.com
HeartAttackCentral.com


Friday, August 11, 2017

Keep the force ready and don't get the herd spooked.



The herd is kim jong-un and his generals.



General Thurman worried that the war of words was fueling tensions and adding to the risk of miscalculation.

“We are playing right into Kim Jong-un’s hands,” General Thurman said. “That is what he wants. He wants to be on the world scene.”

“I really would want to tamp down this rhetoric, maintain armistice conditions, keep the force ready and,” he said, “not get the herd spooked.”




New York Times 8/20/2017


Wrestling With North Korea, Trump Finds Perilous Options


WASHINGTON — North Korea’s threat on Thursday to test-fire ballistic missiles soon near the American territory of Guam deepened the challenge confronting the Trump administration: how to defang Pyongyang’s missile programs without risking all-out war.

President Trump has made clear that his goal is to deny North Korea the capability to field a long-range nuclear-tipped missile that could strike the United States.

Even a limited strike against a North Korean missile on its launching pad or the shooting down of a missile in midair would pose risks that the North’s leader, Kim Jong-un, might retaliate, setting off a spiral of escalation that could plunge the Korean Peninsula into war.

“In the event of a first strike against Kim, even a non-nuclear option, it is highly likely that Kim would retaliate at least conventionally against South Korea,” said James Stavridis, a retired four-star admiral who is now dean of Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. “This almost certainly would create an upward spiral of violence which would be extremely difficult to manage or to mitigate.”


A major consideration would be whether and when to evacuate American and other allied civilians, which is no small feat as Seoul, a city of about 10 million, is within range of North Korea’s rockets and artillery and the North Korean military is also armed with chemical and biological weapons.


“With all this talk, what I worry about is a serious miscalculation,” said James D. Thurman, a retired Army general who served as the top United States commander in South Korea from 2011 to 2013. “Before we start talking about all these military options, we have to decide what are we going to do with the U.S. citizens over there.”

He estimated that at least a quarter-million Americans would have to be moved.

If the United States was prepared to go beyond a limited strike, it could conduct a surprise attack on North Korea’s missile garrison and weapon storage areas, using American aircraft stationed in Guam, in Japan and on aircraft carriers as well as strategic bombers that would be refueled in flight.

American officials, however, do not have high confidence that the military could find and destroy North Korea’s entire arsenal of long-range missiles and nuclear warheads. It would be up to American missile defenses to knock out any that survived and that North Korea might use to attack the United States or its allies.

The United States could try a similar approach: attacking North Korea’s missiles while warning Mr. Kim that his government would be the next target if he dared to strike back. But few analysts are confident he would be restrained.

Those urging firmer action assert that a military buildup in and around South Korea could give economic sanctions and diplomacy more time to work while providing American negotiators with more leverage.

Mr. Graham asserted that diplomatic efforts would fail unless the United States made clear that North Korea’s deployment of an intercontinental missile would cross a “red line” and that military options were available if the talks faltered.



Editors Note:

The herd is kim jong-un and his generals.


James D. Thurman, a retired Army general who served as the top United States commander in South Korea from 2011 to 2013 is worried about stampeding the kim jon-un herd.

I think he is a rational thinker.

Diplomatic efforts have not worked in th US favor, clinton and obama made sure of that.

Kim jon-un is now in a position to talk turkey to the US and the world.

If kim jong-un lauches a missle toward Guam or the US this will stampede the US herd possibly.

It could push President Trump to do what is is charged to do which is defend the US.

Guam is a US territory with US bases and will be protected just like the US.

The potential fire storm I see is kim jon-un making a real bad move with his military and shooting a missile toward Guam.

Even if it was a test I think President Trump would be compelled to move against kim jong-un.

Lets all pray that President Trump makes the right decisions.

In the 1961 cuban missle crisis all the US generals wanted to nuke cuba which would have resulted in ww3 and the mutual destruction of the US and Russia.

The US generals gave Kennedy stupid bad advice.

Kennedy did not take their advice and because of this the cuban crisis did not result in the destruction of the US and Russia etc.

I am sure President Trump is getting much advice and can only hope its better advice than was given by the generals in 1961.

This is again why I say to pray for President Trump.

At least one general has some good advice this time, General James D. Thurman.

President Trump should take his advice.










Tuesday, August 8, 2017

God is in control

People are worried about north Korea and their nukes.

People are worried about what Trump will do.

Some people forget God is in control.  He knows what is best for us.

There is no need to worry about anything.

We just need to trust in the Lord and ask that his will be done.

Don't trust in what man does.

At this time pray for our country and President Trump.

Read the Bible also.  http//www.goodnewspost.com