The 911 phone calls from the hijacked plane were never made according to the FBI

UPDATE: some of the links below have changed or been hidden in an attempt to hide the truth.


Please visit http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/#N_14 This link has the proof there were NEVER any phone calls that connected from flight 77 to Ted Olsen!

Barbera Olsen wife of Ted Olsen NEVER talked to him on a cell phone during flight 77. Ted Olsen LIED as did George Bush about the flight 77 phone calls.

The entire "offical" story of what happened on 911 is based on a LIE!

(The smell test has been done on some of the information below and the test indicates the facts propagated in the state run media stink. The 911 phone calls were never made according to the FBI. The FBI has changed its story about the 911 phone calls several times. All the information about box cutters etc was made up. This along with the fact the airspace over New York City and Washington, DC was intentionally left unprotected by the military agency tasked to protect it is big big evidence 911 was a setup.) Story Reports

September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack on America

The airspace over New York City and Washington, DC was intentionally left unprotected by the military agency tasked to protect it. That group is the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).

U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson Lied about 9/11: FBI Now Admits his Wife Couldn’t Have Called Him from Hijacked Plane

(If this is true it would be big big evidence to me that the 911 attack in New York and Washington was a setup. I do know that ted olson lied about his wife making phone calls to him on 911. The FBI admits this.

The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10,” “9/11 Commission, FBI Source Documents, Chronological, September 11,” 2001Intelfiles.com, March 14, 2008

the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred

And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.

This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.)

Olson’s Story Also Rejected by Pentagon Historians

Ted Olson’s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.

According to Olson, his wife had said that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers.”

This is an inherently implausible scenario. We are supposed to believe that 60-some people, including the two pilots, were held at bay by three or four men (one or two of the hijackers would have been in the cockpit) with knives and boxcutters. This scenario becomes even more absurd when we realize that the alleged hijackers were all small, unathletic men (the 9/11 Commission pointed out that even “(t)he so-called muscle hijackers actually were not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5” and 5’7” in height and slender in build”., and that the pilot, Charles “Chic” Burlingame, was a weightlifter and a boxer, who was described as “really tough” by one of his erstwhile opponents.[14. Shoestring, “The Flight 77 Murder Mystery: Who Really Killed Charles Burlingame?” Shoestring911, February 2, 2008

The Flight 77 Murder Mystery: Who Really Killed Charles Burlingame?

Also, the idea that Burlingame would have turned over the plane to hijackers was rejected by his brother, who said: “I don’t know what happened in that cockpit, but I’m sure that they would have had to incapacitate him or kill him because he would have done anything to prevent the kind of tragedy that befell that airplane.”

The Pentagon historians, in any case, did not accept the Olson story, according to which Burlingame and his co-pilot did give up their plane and were in the back with the passengers and other crew members. They instead wrote that “the attackers either incapacitated or murdered the two pilots.”

Conclusion

This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?

The fact that Ted Olson’s report has been contradicted by other defenders of the official story about 9/11 provides grounds for demanding a new investigation of 9/11. This internal contradiction is, moreover, only one of 25 such contradictions discussed in my most recent book, 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press.

(I agree the cell phone calls on 911 that never occurred point to a government deception. The police state "homeland security" laws were a result of 911. The information about what occurred on 911 has been disputed by the FBI.) Story Reports

U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson Lied about 9/11: FBI Now Admits his Wife Couldn’t Have Called Him from Hijacked Plane

The highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany

UN Agenda 21 - Coming to a Neighborhood near You

The highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany

Just as America is passing through a period of economic stress, the Nazis in the 1930s sought to tap into the German psyche and a “return to nature” myth was seen as a unifying measure. The same regime that would later create the means to systematically kill Europe’s Jews shared a lot in common with any number of present-day environmentalist leaders and academics.
.......................................................................................

Nazi Dreams were Green Dreams

Alan Caruba

In a week when Jews will celebrate Rosh Hashanah, the New Year–5771, the connection between the Nazi’s rebellion against the Judeo-Christian worldview and the present-day ideology that drives the environmental movement needs to be exposed.

Anti-Semitism is on the rise in Europe and elsewhere around the world, driven in part by the Islamic hatred of Jews, but also reflected in the liberal antipathy to corporations and the financial community, often portrayed as “Jewish bankers”, as history’s favorite scapegoat for economic problems. The situation mirrors Germany in the 1930s.

Few know of the connection, but it is spelled out in “Nazi Oaks” by R. Mark Musser ($12.75, Advantage Books, softcover, via Amazon.com). Thanks to his research we learn that “the highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany. By 1935, the Third Reich was the greenest regime on the planet.”

“It is no coincidence that sweeping Nazi environmental legislation preceded the racially charged anti-Semitic Nuremburg Laws.”

In the decades during which I have seen the rise of the environmental movement in America I have also seen its inherent totalitarian drive to not merely alter society, but to completely control the lives of all Americans. It is fundamentally an attack on the American credo of individual freedom and it has become commonplace to suggest that environmentalism has become a pseudo-religion.

Mark Musser is a 1989 graduate from the Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, widely regarded as one of the premier environmental institutions in the nation. In 1994, he received a Master of Divinity from Western Seminary in Portland and, for seven years, was a missionary in Belarus and the Ukraine. He is currently a pastor.

The history spelled out in Musser’s book needs to be understood in terms of what is occurring in America today. The title of the book comes from the fact that, “With the oak tree being such a powerful symbol of German nationalism and the German natural landscape, Hitler had oaks planted all over the Reich in hundreds of towns and villages.” The practice was dubbed by Nazi environmentalists as “concordant with the spirit of the Fuhrer.”

Just as America is passing through a period of economic stress, the Nazis in the 1930s sought to tap into the German psyche and a “return to nature” myth was seen as a unifying measure. The same regime that would later create the means to systematically kill Europe’s Jews shared a lot in common with any number of present-day environmentalist leaders and academics.

Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics at Princeton University, is on record saying, “Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.”

Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the United Nations Environmental Program, said, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our duty to bring that about?” When you contemplate the many measures taken by the U.S. government against the mining of coal, the drilling for oil, and even the shutdown of a nuclear waste repository, is it not obvious that denying America the energy it requires is one way to destroy its economy?

In one chilling way in particular, the hatred of the human race, does the environmental movement reflect the Nazi’s merciless destruction, not only of Jews, but of millions of others consigned to its concentration camps and the relentless killing wherever they sought conquest.

This is why the Club of Rome could say, “The earth has a cancer and the cancer is Man.” How does this differ from Hitler’s many expressions of hatred for Jews and others, Africans and Asians that he deemed to be “sub-human”?

This is the naked face of environmentalism.

Remember, too, this did not happen a long time ago. The “greatest generation”, some of whom still live, fought the Nazi regime a scant seventy years ago.

President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic warns that “it should be clear by now to everyone that environmental activism is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a ‘noble’ idea.”

Couple that with a torrent of falsified “science” and you have the modern environmental movement.

The single greatest threat to freedom in America is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s current efforts to acquire the authority to regulate a gas that is responsible along with oxygen for all life on Earth, carbon dioxide (CO2).

If the EPA gets that control, it will be able to determine every aspect of life in America because it is the use of electricity, industrial and all other machine-based technology that generates carbon dioxide.

And it is the Big Lie that CO2 is causing global warming that is being used to justify the agency’s quest. There is no global warming. The Earth is in a natural cooling cycle.

The Nazi regime was made up of animal rights advocates, environmentalists, and vegetarians, of which Hitler was all three.

And it led ultimately to mass murder.

2nd Largest Shareholder Of Fox News Is Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal

(Fox News Is only as fair and balanced as its 2nd largest shareholder will let them be. Don't believe everything fox news tells you. Check out the new major stockholder of fox a muslim saudi prince.) Story Reports

Saudi Prince, Now Part Owner of Murdoch's News Corp., Influences Fox News

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal now owns a 7 percent stake in Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., the parent company of Fox News, making him the company's largest shareholder outside of Murdoch's own family. Alwaleed is best known for going to Ground Zero after the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks and personally handing then-mayor Rudolph Giuliani a check for $10 million to help finance relief efforts. Afterwards, Alwaleed released a statement blaming the attacks not on the Saudi airline hijackers, but on U.S. policies in the middle east.

As a result, Giuliani returned the prince's donation, gaining him praise from Fox News for doing so. Now that Alwaleed has a controlling ownership in News Corp., he is gaining influence over Fox News. In 2005, just months after Alwaleed acquired his first 5.4 percent stake in News Corp., Fox News covered riots in Paris under a banner saying "Muslim riots." Alwaleed allegedly called Murdoch and had him change the banner to say "Civil riots." Investigative journalist Joseph Trento also reported that a comment he recently made on a Fox Network morning news show, Fox and Friends, about Saudi Arabian money still financing Al Qaeda, was edited out of the show.

Trento also reports that Alwaleed "has personally donated huge amounts of money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers." In a rare interview with Fox News' Neil Cavuto in January, AlWaleed explained his personal reasons for seeking influence in American politics: the U.S. buys Saudi Arabia's oil, and the bulk of his country's gross domestic product (GDP) comes from oil. Fox News reliably broadcasts misinformation on clean energy, and aggressively fights efforts to move America away from being dependent on a fossil fuels.

Jobless claims data is officially made up by US government and 2 states

Jobless claims data is officially made up by US government and 2 states, California and Virginia estimated themselves. The U.S. government estimated the other seven States.

The continuing claims figure does not include the number of Americans receiving extended benefits under federal programs.

For the latest reporting week, nine states didn’t file claims data to the Labor Department in Washington because of the federal holiday earlier this week, a Labor Department official told reporters. As a result, California and Virginia estimated their figures and the U.S. government estimated the other seven, the official said.

("Jobless Claims in U.S. Decreased 27,000 to 451,000 Last Week", is a total fabrication just like obama's US citizenship. Obama the IMPOSTER estimated 7 states jobless claims and California and Virgina estimated their own. The "estimation" resulted in a net decrease of 27,000 jobless claims. I heard a local news program report the jobless claims information as UNEXPECTED!. The local talk radio news guy just read the propaganda state run media script and NEVER mentioned the fact that 5.6% or 27,000 of the jobless claims were totally made up.

Many people believe the state run media propaganda and just accept it as fact. Obama wants people to believe the economy is getting better so he just makes numbers up. Its the same type of invalid documentation obama makes up when asking you and I to believe he is a valid legitimate US citizen.

Obama believes he can just make up numbers etc an you will believe it all.

Obama can't estimate the impact tea party patriots will have on his illegitimate presidency.

Obama has UNDER estimated the impact of people like me will have on exposing him as a FRAUD and IMPOSTER.

Numbers can lie if the data is not documented and valid. Its the same with anything else including obama's certification of live birth that CANNOT be validated in any way by anyone seeking proof obama is not an illegal alien. He presents no hospital name or doctor name. No official signatures of any kind.

You may must be willing to take him at his word but every word that comes out of his mouth is a lie or twisted half truth.

Obama recently told America he doesn't have time to go around with his birth certificate pasted on his forehead.

Obama can't go around with a documented, verified 'birth certificate' on his head because obama does NOT have one!

George H.W. Bush infused every federal department with the UN sustainable development principles, and they've been followed by all presidents since

Linkages between the UN, IUCN, WWF, WRI and federal agencies and environmental groups, from Dr. Coffman, “The Greening of America”

Sustainable Development has continued to evolve as that of protecting the world’s resources while its true agenda is to control the world’s resources.

Green Global Dictatorship: Regional Governance, UN Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and the Wildlands Project

The “Greening of America” Notice more bicycle paths and lanes lately in your hometown? It puts a stealth face on the real intentions of your local government which is the implemtation of UN agenda 21 and the removal of your property rights and freedom.

Regional Governance is the method whereby would-be rulers intend to control every aspect of our lives. Without the full implementation of Regional Governance, their plan for world dominance cannot succeed…. (Governance, as opposed to Government, means “control by rules, restrictions, and regulations.”). In order to subvert the sovereignty of the United States and the individual states guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution, a parallel and entirely unconstitutional governance structure, termed “Regional Government,” has been covertly established over the past half century


Agenda 21, the U.N.-sponsored environmental initiative was revealed at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992. Agenda 21 has three main goals: "1. Abolition of private property. 2. Education for global citizenship. 3. Control over human action."

Sen. Christopher Dodd is trying to leave us all another "gift" before he "retires". Dodd and his gay friend frank are also most responsible for the current economic mess America is in.

"The Livable Communities Act" is a name choosen for subversive legislation. It paints a nice face on a law that gives the UN ultimate control of your property and life.

The new law would create a new federal bureaucracy, the Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities, armed with some $4 billion in federal grants, to pressure local communities into a more "green" development agenda.

It can be traced back to the U.N., which at an Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 adopted Agenda 21, outlining the goal of having government control over people.

The program would have grants to underwrite local community planning efforts that direct actions toward a "sustainable development."

The term "sustainable development" is a term used by the UN. It means UN control of your property and life through subversive tactics.

The "greenies' that run around promoting a "clean green" bicycle UN environment are knowingly or unknowingly implementing local UN control of America.

Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty through follwing the UN international maintenace property code and UN agenda 21.

Check Here to see if your city has sold out to the UN Many US cities have subverted your freedom.

Every American must know how the un is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty through "sustainable development" in UN agenda 21. The environmental bible of world government.

ICLEI, now known as Local Governments for Sustainability is in the process of purging their website of United Nations references despite an abundant history of association. There are now over 600 cities and counties within the United States that have contracts with ICLEI.

Do you understand the UN is controlling your local government and not you when your city or county government officals allow the UN to dictate local maintenace property codes?

The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property

The dodd "legislation" is promoted as an effort to fight traffic congestion, strip malls and ugly urban sprawl, and it would "encourage" local communities to create high-density population centers linked by mass transit networks.

Its called 'smart growth by the UN.' The UN and the stealth legislation rammed through congress paints a picture through terms that are deceptive. "smart growth" means UN control of your property and life.

It literally means they draw a circle around the community and say nothing will be developed outside of this wall. Land inside the wall goes up in price as shortages develop. You end up with highrises, with people living on the top floors, stores on bottom floors and offices in the middle. Humans wind up living in the sky. They never touch the ground or leave the building.

The Democrats are doing everything they can before they lose power in the next election. They're working on a plethora of environmental bills.

What makes the Dodd bill unique is they've mostly done this through executive orders or grant programs, but now this is the first time they've put together a federal bill to put this stuff in place.

There are numerous unpublicized consequences of the Livable Communities Act and similar "sustainable development" legislation. It's a "socialist trap.

The Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities would end up overseeing development in every community. They say it's voluntary, but it really isn't. The $4 billion in grants will be used by radical green groups, who helped write it, to force your city council to comply. If your city says no to the pressure to take the grant money, the radical greens will tell your citizens that their city officials are losing them millions of dollars that is owed to the community. Then, when the council caves into the pressure and takes the money, it will force compliance. That is not voluntary, it is blackmail.

Homeowners would end up paying exorbitant costs and losing control over their own homes. To get the money a community must meet environmental standards. That requires houses to be equipped with new roofs, new windows, and efficient appliances. They did this last year in Oakland. It costs an estimated $35,000 to make a house comply with the environmental regulations. They say homeowners can't sell their houses if they don't meet these standards.

It's the application of new technological breakthroughs to control people.

The legislation traces back to Agenda 21, the U.N.-sponsored environmental initiative revealed at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992.

Agenda 21 has three main goals: "1. Abolition of private property. 2. Education for global citizenship. 3. Control over human action."

Agenda 21 originated in the U.N. 178 nations have signed onto it, including the U.S. in 1992. It's not a treaty, it's a soft law agreement, so it doesn't require treaty ratification.

George H.W. Bush infused every federal department with sustainable development principles, and they've been followed by all three presidents since.

As globalism transitions from global to local (localism) we the people must be ever vigilant, well informed, and prepared to meet the globalists at the grassroots level, then become Vocal Local!

(Be aware of the fact that your local government working with the local environmental waco "greenies" are subverting your freedom and the US Constitution using UN agenda 21 and its goals for a one world government!!!) Story Reports

Every American must know how the UN is creating a shadow government to subvert US sovereignty

The Global Safety Cult and the Abolition of Private Property

Burning a koran is in my opinion useless

(Islam is idol worship. Islam is a caustic blend of paganism and twisted Bible stories. Muhammad, its lone "prophet", who made no prophecies, conceived his religion to satiate his lust for power, sex, and money. He was a terrorist. Islam spreads the lie that Jesus never even died on a cross. That alone makes it demonic.

You can always know a false god. False gods always demand the blood of innocents. Whenever the innocent and just are being slain, there you will find Moloch the god Ba'al; always masquerading. The god of Muslims is revealed as a tyrant who demands Muslims and all others submit to him.

Whereas in the New Testament, Jesus revealed to Christians a God who is a loving Father, who wants us to come to Him via free will. In the Old Testament (Exodus 34:6) the real God revealed Himself as "merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth". He is the Creator of the Universe, the God of Love, and Lord of Life. The God of Israel is this true God. He insists "Thou shall not kill the innocent and just".

When a Muslim declares that Islam is a religion of peace, he/she is either ignorant of the Koran (Qur'an), or is deceitfully thinking of this "peace", as it extends only to those within the Muslim Community. The deceit is that they will not tell you exactly what they mean. According to the Qur'an: "Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another, but ruthless to unbelievers" Surah 48:29. "Kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush..." Surah 9:5. Also see Surah 9:29:

PICKTHAL: "Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture (Christians & Jews) as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.". Please note that there is not a single verse in the entire Christian Bible that contains this "open-ended", universal command to kill/or be ruthless to unbelievers.)

(The koran should not be burned as a publicity stunt to draw attention to the fact that it is antichrist or a counterfeit religion. This is a mistake. To me it is a ploy to divert attention from the need to refute the false religion islam. There are those who are out to gain 15 min of fame at any cost, even American lives. This proposed action by Rev. Terry Jones is similar to a jessie jackson or al sharpton stunt to gain fame. It will only cause more confusion.) Story Reports

Satan The Father of Lies

Though Satan has been defeated by Jesus Christ, he continues as an unrelenting foe in his warfare against God and His people. So it is important that we be aware of the tactics and ways of our great adversary. The apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians: "Lest Satan should get advantage of us; for we are not ignorant of his devices" (2 Cor. 2:11).

The Lord said to the Pharisees who hated Him: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not" (Jn. 8:44-45).

Judas and Satan

A quite different illustration of the way and victory of Satan in his work as an adversary of Christ is seen in Judas Iscariot. He was chosen as the twelfth apostle by the Lord, who knew all along his real character. Jesus once said to the twelve: "Have not I chosen twelve, and one of you is the devil? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon, for he it was that should betray him" (Jn. 6:70-71).

We will see that Satan later took possession of Judas and used him as his instrument in the betrayal of Christ to the multitude that arrested him and brought him to the high priest and elders. But before this happened, Judas was a thief, stealing out of the treasury bag of the apostolic band as John 12:6 tells us. He was covetous and loved money. So we find him going to the chief of priests of the Jews and saying to them" "What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. And from that time he sought to betray him" (Matt. 26:14-16).

The next thing we read of Judas is that when the Passover supper was ended, the devil "now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son to betray him" (Jn. 13:2). Though Judas accompanied the Lord in His marvelous ministry three and one-half years, heard all His wonderful words, and witnessed His gracious acts of mercy and miracles, his heart was untouched by all. He carried out his thievery and covetousness which opened his heart to carry out Satan's evil design.

At the last supper, the Lord dipped a morsel of bread in sauce and gave it to Judas. This was a custom of the host to honor a guest and it is indicated as a pledge of love. We read that "after the sop Satan entered into him (Judas). He then having received the sop went immediately out; and it was night" (Jn. 13:15-30). Judas turned his back upon his last appeal of love from the Lord and Satan possessed him to do his work of betraying the Savior to His enemies with an insincere kiss.

How Satan Operates by Demons

We previously noted that Satan is spoken of as "the prince of this world" on three occasions (Jn. 12:31; 14:30; 16:11). The word "prince" here means "ruler." A prince is head of a principality and has a kingdom. So we are told that our warfare is "against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places" (Eph. 6:12). Satan thus heads up a great kingdom of evil. He has a great host of demons that are evil spirits in his kingdom.

In the book of Revelation we read about a future time when there will be war in heaven between Michael and his angels, and the dragon, "called the Devil, and Satan," and his angels. Then Satan and his angels will be cast out of heaven on the earth (Rev. 12:7-9). Also in Revelation 9:1-11 we have a prophetic scene in symbolical language; locusts torment men upon the earth. It is stated that they have a king over them who is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name is Abaddon and Apollyon, which means "destroyer" in Hebrew and Greek respectively. This represents the Devil and his demons, whose purpose in the future day will be to torment and destroy mankind.

These Scriptures tell us clearly that Satan has a great host of fallen angels who are under his rule and control, and that he carries on his diabolic work through these spirit beings who are lying and seducing spirits (see 1 Ki. 22:22; 1 Tim. 4:1).

God of this world. Furthermore, as the god of this world system, Satan has authority over a federation that also includes all of the unsaved and fallen humanity whom he takes captive and uses at his will (2 Tim. 2:26). The apostle John wrote: (1Jn 5:19) And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness. We are also told that "the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not" (2 Cor. 4:4).

God of this world. Furthermore, as the god of this world system, Satan has authority over a federation that also includes all of the unsaved and fallen humanity whom he takes captive and uses at his will (2 Tim. 2:26).

The Bible thus clearly reveals that behind every pagan idol there is a demon and that the sacrifices offered to such idols are offered to demons and not the the one and only true God.

Associated with the whole satanic, pagan system of idolatry were many other demon activities about which Moses of old warned the children of Israel. In the book of Deuteronomy we read: "When thou art come in the land which the Lord they God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you any that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all who do such things are an abomination unto the Lord" (Deut. 18:9-12).

(This would include all of islam. Controlled by the 'god" of this world system, satan. Burning a koran is in my opinion useless.) Story Reports
.........................................................................................

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – The government turned up the pressure Tuesday on the head of a small Florida church who plans to burn copies of the Quran on Sept. 11, warning him that doing so could endanger U.S. troops and Americans everywhere.

But the Rev. Terry Jones insisted he would go ahead with his plans, despite criticism from the top U.S. general in Afghanistan, the White House and the State Department, as well as a host of religious leaders.

Jones, who is known for posting signs proclaiming that Islam is the devil's religion, says the Constitution gives him the right to publicly set fire to the book that Muslims consider the word of God.

Gen. David Petraeus warned Tuesday in an e-mail to The Associated Press that "images of the burning of a Quran would undoubtedly be used by extremists in Afghanistan — and around the world — to inflame public opinion and incite violence." It was a rare example of a military commander taking a position on a domestic political matter.

.........................................................................................

Is obama possessed? Yes. Is obama controlled at will, yes.

I can't wait until Nov 2010 when jessie jackson's wish will come true

(The obama walk. BO looks like he wandered out of a nursing home. I can't wait until Nov 2010 when jessie jackson's wish will come true. Obama will be neutered by the election. I suspect he doesn't have any gonads anyway just like Sara Palin said. The look of an affirmative action failure is on his face. Don't let that fool you he is a Liberal socialist democrat.) Story Reports

From The Steady Drip Blog:

NEVER FORGET WHAT GENERAL GEORGE PATTON SAID ABOUT POLITICIANS

“Politicians are the lowest form of life. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.”

(Obama is scum and so are the people who work for and with him in his administration. This includes all the LIBERAL low life democrats in congress. These people are TRAITORS to America. They have ignored the US Constituion. "Obamacare" is totally unconstitutional.) Story reports

Broader Lawsuit Filed Against ObamaCare

In addition to the lawsuits filed by Virginia and by Florida with another 19 states including Arizona, the Goldwater Institute has filed a private lawsuit against ObamaCare on a much broader basis than that of the state lawsuits which are mostly concerned about the traditional authority of the states to regulate health care. The private lawsuit, Coons v. Geithner, makes the arguments that ObamaCare:

* exceeds the powers of Congress
* violates individual rights
* interferes with the authority of the states
* violates the separation of powers with a bureaucracy lacking sufficient Congressional direction and judicial review

The plaintiffs are Nick Coons, who owns a small business in Tempe, Arizona; U.S. Representatives from Arizona, Jeff Flake, Trent Franks, and John Shadegg; and by the Speaker of the Arizona House Kirk Adams and 28 other Arizona state legislators. Obama, Treasury Sec.Tim Geithner, Health and Human Resources Sec. Kathleen Sibelius, and Attorney General Eric Holder are being sued.

Nick Coons will be forced to buy government approved health insurance by 2014 or face IRS fines. He wants to continue to make his own health care decisions. He also objects to the legislated violations of his medical privacy to an insurance company, the federal government, and others without his permission.

The three U.S. Representatives object to the lack of Congressional oversight of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, which will make assure that costs are controlled and will therefore ration care and care quality. This board will also not be subject to judicial review. Unfathomably, the law also says the board cannot be repealed except for a short window of time in 2017. I cannot understand how a present Congress can override the intentions of a future Congress with any act other than a Constitutional amendment, which requires additional approval from the states.

The Arizona legislators claim they have been forced by the federal government to restore prior cuts they made to their state's relatively generous Medicaid benefits because the federal government had threatened to take away $7 billion in federal payments to the Arizona Medicaid program. They say this violates their First Amendment rights to vote in the best interests of Arizona citizens.

The Obama administration is expected to request that the lawsuit be dismissed since the federal law will not be fully implemented until 2014. U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson already rejected this argument in the state of Virginia lawsuit against the federal government.

While I am delighted that 21 states have challenged the federal government on its over-reach into an area traditionally regulated by the states, I am much more pleased with this lawsuit which seeks to directly defend our individual rights. As I have argued repeatedly, it is impossible to make the case that we have an individual right to life and to the pursuit of happiness if ObamaCare is brought into execution.

We will not even be able to say that we own our own life. We will not be allowed to manage our own health care to maintain our own lives. We will not be free to help those we love to maintain their lives. We will not be free to take medical remedies to ameliorate pain, so we will not be able to pursue our happiness in a most fundamental way. We will not have the freedom to correct medical problems without the consent of the federal government, yet these medical problems may incapacitate us to pursue the interests and values we need to provide us with happiness.

In short, ObamaCare is a prescription all by itself for that illegitimate, tyrannical government we defined in our Declaration of Independence.

ObamaCare gives us much greater reason than our colonist forefathers had to dissolve our allegiance to that illegitimate government and to seek independence from its tyrannical grasp. The several lawsuits and/or a supermajority in Congress capable of repealing ObamaCare are the last hope of saving our Union and our much beloved Constitution.

Posted by Charles R. Anderson, Ph.D. at Tuesday, August 17, 2010
........................................................................................

(As you look at the parasite known as obama ask yourself this question. Is the parasite a US citizen? How do you know he is a US citizen? Can you verify he is a US citzen? What verification are you using?

If you are relying on obama's fight the smears web site don't. This jpeg picture of a certification of live birth can't be verified by the information provided. No hospital name and no doctor name. No signatures of any kind.

If you are relying on what an Hawaiian offical said don't. The statements from Hawaiian officals can't be verified either.

I you are relying on what obama recently said, "I can’t spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead,”.

This is the IMPOSTER'S answer to the millions who question his citizenship and his natural born citizenship status.

If obama was not an IMPOSTER he would answer the multitude of lawsuits asking him to prove he is a US citizen.

If obama were legitimate he would answer the questions about his birth and not avoid the question of his citizenship at all cost.

The fact is obama cannot prove he is a US citizen. Obama has already proved he is not a natural born citizen therefore he has admitted he is a FRAUD!) Story Reports

“Politicians are the lowest form of life. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.”

Obama is an albatross or burden to Americans

Interfering

(1) Prevent (a process or activity) from being carried out properly.

When a non producer ie supervisor, manager or president interferes with a producer a process or activity is prevented from being carried out.

The higher the pay level or the more important the job is, the non producer is expected to produce something other than interference.

When someone is in a position to influence the entire country and produces interference the producers produce less.

A position of authority or high office can be used to enhance production or destroy production on a vast scale.

I look at obama not only as a non producer but an obstacle to more production and prosperity.

The non producer obstacle obama must be replaced to resume production at a normal or higher level.

Until obama the unachiever is removed from office he will continue to be an obstacle and interfere with the US economy and normal production.

Obama is no educated idiot. He is a bump in the road that won't go away. People would like to avoid the bumb but until the bump is replaced or removed it (he) will continue to be an albatross or burden to Americans.

Obama needs to be fired for non production. Obama, Jackson, Sharpton etc are all non producers. They are parasites that feed on America's producers.

If the recent presidential election was a contract with obama he has broken the contract by not producing results as promised. The egg sucker obama takes money from hard working Americans rich and poor. Obama is like a tick that won't let go.

The "contract" needs to be terminated before obama bankrupts the country through mismanagement! It will be terminated in Nov 2010 but the parasite obama will continue to feed off his American hosts as long as he can.

Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe

1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

1 Cor 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

1 Cor 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Genesis Chapter 1

1 Cor 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

1 Cor 1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

James 3:14 But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.

3:15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.

James 3:17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.

1 Cor 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
........................................................................................
Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe. The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe, Stephen Hawking has concluded.

The scientist has claimed that no divine force was needed to explain why the Universe was formed.

In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”

He added: “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”

In his new book he rejects Sir Isaac Newton's theory that the Universe did not spontaneously begin to form but was set in motion by God.

In June this year Prof Hawking told a Channel 4 series that he didn't believe that a "personal" God existed. He told Genius of Britain: "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second. If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."

(Hawking believes there is no GOD. His "god" is the law of science. He has knowledge but lacks wisdom. Divine wisdom can't be empirically deduced by analyzing data and physical evidence. The evidence of a creator is all around him yet he denies the existence of GOD. Hawkings says their is a law of gravity but he can't explain what it is or how it came into existance except by speculation. It is an invisible force that holds every thing togeather. GOD is an invisible being that created gravity the unseen force. Hawkings believes in the unseen force that GOD created. He needs to think out of the "box" and realize that it was no accident or "big bang" that created this invisible force.) Story Reports
........................................................................................

God has given man the ability to study, analyze, categorize, and develop the physical resources of this earth to benefit physical life. But that's where his wisdom ends.

Because of sin, his mind is totally unable to discern the spiritual dimension. He has no power to change his own heart, no understanding to solve his spiritual dilemma, and no resources to satisfy his soul–he is spiritually dead.

1 Cor 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

1 Cor 2:7 But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:

The Greek word translated "mystery" doesn't refer to something strange or puzzling; it's a technical term for the kind of truth man has not previously known but is now revealed. The truth that God saves sinners through the substitutionary sacrifice of His Son is now plain for all to see.

However, no one can come to that truth by himself because of sin. "A natural man [an unconverted person] does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised" (1 Cor. 2:14).

Divine wisdom can't be empirically deduced by analyzing data and physical evidence (1 Cor verse 9). It comes only as a gift God gives when His Spirit reveals His Word to individuals.

Human wisdom is limited. I believe men in their foolishness will never obtain the knowlege and wisdom necessary to solve the creation of the universe through man made science.

Hawking believes the universe spontaneously begin to form on its own. He is asking you to believe matter and energy were created from nothing by nothing.

Hawking says, "If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."

Hawking talks about other demensions etc and other possible universes etc. He doesn't address who GOD is.

God is a non-material personal being, self-conscious and self-determining.

God is someone we can get to know. He, unlike ourselves, doesn't need to be told what to do. On the other hand He tells us what to do and how to live in a manner pleasing to Him. Just because He can't be seen by the human eye doesn't mean He is not there and therefore should be ignored.

Quite the opposite is true, His creation demonstrates His existence. Also, since he cannot be seen, we need to devote ourselves to study everything that has been written about Him so that we can get to know Him like He wants us to and begin to live our lives in a way that pleases Him.

John 4:24
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

John 1:18
No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

Colossians 1:15
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

I Timothy 6:16
Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.

Luke 24:39
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.

Psm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

19:2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.

19:3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.

19:4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,

Romans 1:20

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

God has no image. He cannot be seen by the human eye, but creation points to His existence. His Son, Jesus testified to His existence and desire to be sought by His creatures. He also provided us with an example of how to live our lives seeking and serving God.

The laws of science are man made and limited in their ability to explain creation.

The best that Hawkings can come up with is that creation was a big bang from nothing.

I've got a much better non scientific explanation:

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

A scientific the·o·ry is speculation.

It is something Hawking believes and trusts. Hawking has faith in his own theory.

I believe in Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

My "theroy' or faith in my 'theory' has been proven.

Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Psm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

Praise the Lord!

The Holy Bible (KJV)

Army Major General (Ret) Jerry Curry agrees with Lt Col Lakin that barry soetoro should provide proof of eligibility

.........................................................................................
(In additon to the fact obama is not a natural born citizen the Indonesian school registration above translated to english reveals obama was a muslim. Also for obama to be enrolled in an Indonesian school he had to be adopted by his step father, Lolo Soetoro. Because of this barry soetoro became an Indonesian citizen also.

What does this all mean. It means obama at some point because he became an Indonesian citizen had to renounce his Indonesian citizenship and become a NATURALIZED citizen. He never has done this.

This is also another hidden fact about obama and the document above proves it.

Obama has never said he was adopted or that he was a citizen of Indonesia because he was enrolled in an Indonesian school yet this had to be.

Not only is obama NOT a natural born citizen obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia now or has become a naturalized citizen and is hiding this fact claiming he is a US citizen.

This is why it is critical that obama be exposed as an IMPOSTER.) Story reports
.........................................................................................
Army Major General (Ret) Jerry Curry a decorated combat veteran has issued statement saying he agrees with Lakin that the President should provide proof of eligibility.

Many of the President’s supporters have encouraged Obama not to release the information claiming it would not silence the critics. Curry dismissed that claim saying the President should say “here it is, you wanted it you got it, now get off my back.”

A recent CNN poll showed that only 42 percent of Americans feel that the President was definitely born in the United States. When asked how he feels the president should respond to the many Americans who have expressed doubt about his eligibility, Curry said as a leader the President should “look the American people in the eye” and say “I am under a cloud because there are some folks that think I am illegitimate. If you will tell me what you think I need to provide to cause you to throw this mess out the window, and to understand that I am legitimate then I will provide what you folks want because the most important thing is this country and carrying out the constitution.”

(58 percent of Americans have doubts as to where obama was born. A majority of American also question obama's identity. Only 42 percent of the respondents said they believed the President was definitely born in the United States while probably in the United States received 29 percent meaning 6 in 10 Americans are uncertain about Obama’s birth.) Story Reports

Major General Paul Vallely has also publically supported Lt. Col. Lakin saying in a radio interview “I think many in the military – and many out of the military – question the natural-birth status of Barack Obama. … I'm not convinced that he's a natural-born
citizen.”

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews said those who continued to doubt Obama’s eligibility were guilty of racism saying they want “to destroy this president not because of what he does but because of who he is, not because of where he was born but what his race is when he was born” and wanting to “assassinate him with their lies.”

(Chirs matthews is playing the race card for obama. Anyone who questions obama's citizenship is labeled a racist. Also anyone who questions ANYTHING obama does is labeled a racist. All Americans who doubt obama is a citizen are not doubling obama is a citizen because he claims to be a black man. I and others doubt obama's eligibility because he has NOT provided ANY proff of his US citizenship that can be validated. No hospital name or doctors signature, or parents signatures that can be verified.

Also in senate Resolution S 511 that obama cosponsored it confirms a natural born citizen is a citizen who parents were American citiens at the time of birth.

Only one of obama's parents was a US citizen at his birth. His father was a Kenyan citizen at obama's birth.

Also obama claims that he was a Kenyan citizen until age 22 because his father was a Kenyan citizen.

Obama has admitted he was a DUAL CITIZEN at birth and that only one of his prents was an American citizen at the time of his birth. Again obama admits he is NOT a natural born citizen as the US Constituiton requires to be eligibile as a valid president.

Obama is an IMPOSTER president and has actually admitted this fact by admitting he was a DUAL citizen at birth and admitting a natural born citizen is one born to American citizen(s) at birth as Mcain was.

This is what is amazing to me. Obama has admitted he is a FRAUD and he is defended to this day by those play the race card. Those that defend obama just because he claims to be a black man and don't answer the question, "where is the birth certificate proof that can be validated" are not defending the IMPOSTER in a valid manner.

They know obama has admitted he is an IMPOSTER yet they defend him on the basis of race only. They think the best defence is race bating. It doesn't work.

Americans want to know how obama can be elected president yet he is not a natural born citizen. They want to see a validated long form certificate of live birth with the hospital and doctors names. They want obama to come clean and come out of the shadows.

Be a man obama. Be all that you can be. Shed your dual identity and reveal who you really are. Explain the birth certificate that you say you don't have time to go around with plasted on your forehead.

Explain to America and validate the hospital you were born in. Explain and validate the doctor who signed you certificate of live birth. Explain why you continue to spend thousands of dollars in court costs refusing to reveal your real identity.

I'll explain it, its simple, you are a FRAUD and IMPOSTER!


Could it be all this is really about obama is still an Indonesian citizen or that he is a naturalized citizen?

It could be.

For some reason people seem to get the fact that a naturalized citzen cannot be president.

Also for some reason many people don't get the fact the a anyone who is not a natural born citizen cannot be president.

Note that obama has never mentioned anything about natural born citizenship or naturalized citizenship about himself.

The only office in America that requires that a person be a natural born citizen and not a naturalized citizen is the office of president of the US.

All other offices including senate and house of rep only require that a person be a naturalized citizen.) Story Reports