The Paycheck Fairness Act would impose unparalleled government control over how employees are paid, among even the nation’s smallest businesses.
Government control of the workers paycheck though allege discrimination. Its a gigantic rev al sharpton/jessie jackson shakdown by the thug obama
White House Backs Bill to Collect Employee Pay Information from Businesses.
The Obama administration is backing legislation that includes regulations requiring U.S. businesses to provide to the government data about employee pay as it relates to the sex, race and national origin of employees.
(Obama wants to control your paycheck. Obama wants to know what you make. Obama wants to use the race card to perpetuate racism in the form of alleged discrimination. Its easy to allege discrimination. This obama law is just a way to control how much the American worker makes. Its another way to raise the minimum wage or contol who is hired through the quota system of alleged discrimination. Its is a government subsidy to democratic voters or potential democratic voters. It is just another giant government slush fund created to micromanage Americans by further enslaving the American population.) Story Reports
The National Association of Manufacturers issued a statement about the Paycheck Fairness Act in April.
“The Paycheck Fairness Act, which purports to prevent instances of illegal gender-based discrimination, could outlaw many legitimate practices employers use to set employee pay rates, even where there is no evidence of intentional discrimination and employers act with reasonable belief that their pay policies are lawful,” the statement said.
“Manufacturers strongly oppose unlawful discrimination in any form, but the Paycheck Fairness Act would impose unparalleled government control over how employees are paid, among even the nation’s smallest businesses,” it added.
“It would drastically alter the Equal Pay Act to allow unprecedented penalties of unlimited punitive and compensatory damages in cases of alleged discrimination,” the statement said.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Gallup caught lying about the generic ballot trend
(In other words its a damn lie. Gallup is telling a lie when they say 99% of the adults in their daily tracking poll are registered voters. Like redstate says, the odds or statistics don't add up for the July 19 poll because of gallup's fabrication. So the July 19 poll was a fabrication and the correction was a fabrication. It has been exposed as an "elite controlled media" LIE!) Story Reports
....................................................................................
Rush Limbaugh
We know there is no media. They're just leftists. These are the propagandists, the pretenders, the apparatchiks. An apparatchik is a Russian colloquial term for a full-time, professional functionary of the Communist Party or government; i.e., an agent of the governmental or party "apparat" (apparatus)
....................................................................................
Gallup caught lying about the generic ballot trend [Updated 6PM ET]
Neil Stevens
Gallup is combining two different sampling methods into one so-called trend of Registered Voters (complete with captioned graph), getting different results, but pretending they show one trend all the same.
On June 2 when Republicans took a big lead in the Gallup generic ballot. It projected conservatively a 45 seat Republican gain in the House. This was a poll of registered voters, according to Gallup’s Survey Methods notes:
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted May 24-30, 2010, with a random sample of 1,594 registered voters, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using a random-digit-dial sampling technique.
Now on July 19 that Democrats are showing a big lead, despite the fact that Gallup’s graph now is titled Candidate Preferences in 2010 Congressional Elections, Among Registered Voters, the sampling is different:
Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking July 12-18, 2010, with a random sample of 1,535 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling.
Catch the difference? The Republicans lead with a sample of Registered Voters, but the Democrats lead with a sample of Adults. Someone who trusted Gallup’s picture would never have noticed.
It is terribly dishonest for Gallup to string together two different polls as one series, as Gallup does not only in their graphs, but in their write-ups as well. Here’s an example from the July 19 release:
The Democrats’ six-point advantage in Gallup Daily interviewing from July 12-18 represents the first statistically significant lead for that party’s candidates since Gallup began weekly tracking of this measure in March.
Notice, they call the series one measure, even though it’s at least two different kinds of polls with two different kinds of sampling pools. You cannot pretend that a poll of all adults and a poll filtered by registered voters are part of the same series, even if the same questions are asked. That’s Polling 101, and whoever’s responsible for the Gallup release should have known this, and certainly whoever’s responsible for oversight of the Gallup releases would know this.
Somebody’s lying.
(The ruling elite control the "media" that no longer exists. Polls and statistics from polls can be easly manipulated. The July 19 gallup poll was manipulated to produce "manufactured" numbers for the democrates and obama. The July 19 poll is an obvious lie. Neil Stevens along with others have exposed the ruling elite lie in the July gallup poll. Obama is nothing but a total lie. Polls and stastics must be manipulated to conceal his total failure as a leader.) Story Reports
(Gallup’s actual polling in the Jul 19 poll is fabricated, and it’s easy to see how Gallup packages results that are designed to mislead readers into seeing trends that just aren’t there. This is what the obama regime does every day. Obama is a total fabrication designed to deceive the American public. If any American relies on the "media", that is controlled by the ruling elite, for their "news", they will be fed a lie to consume as the truth.) Story Reports
Observe the Gallup trend, per Real Clear Politics, with polls of adults distinguished from polls of registered voters, the most honest approach:
Date Pool Lead
7-18 A D+6
7-11 RV D+1
7-3 RV R+6
6-27 RV D+1
6-20 RV D+0
6-13 RV R+5
6-6 RV D+0
Sorted this way the trend is clear: Registered Voters oscillate between near-ties for the Democrats, and big leads for the Republicans. But once we switch to Adults, Democrats suddenly take a big edge of their own.
Is this credible? No, but you’d never know it if you took Gallup’s releases at face value. Even if the truth was there if you dig deep enough, it’s still a lie to misrepresent the data as Gallup has done.
As a final note, I have a prediction: Somebody, perhaps even Gallup, will claim that the Survey Notes were mistaken in this last release, and that the poll was of Registered Voters, but was just recorded wrongly. If this is the case, then that still suggests a serious lapse of quality control at Gallup leading to misinformation being published, and still calls into question every poll release Gallup makes. So I don’t buy it as a defense.
Update: Gallup has now issued a correction alongside the bare changing of ‘adults’ to ‘registered voters’ in the Survey Methods:
Editor’s note: The original version of this story inadvertently referred to national adults rather than registered voters in the survey methods statement. The results reported here and in all Gallup generic ballot trends so far this year are based on registered voters; the survey methods statement now correctly reflects that.
A commenter at RedState.com pointed out a significant flaw in this story: the sample size didn’t change. Originally the post read 1,535 adults, now it reads 1,535 registered voters. However the overall daily Obama Job Approval tracking poll also surveys “approximately 1,500 national adults.” are we to believe that approximately 99% of the adults in daily tracking sample were registered to vote? MSNBC reported in 2008 that about 80% of American adults were registered, and that number will decline from 2008 to 2010 as voters are purged and don’t re-register for the midterm. The odds against this are astronomical, making this poll an incredible outlier for so many to be registered.
(In other words its a damn lie. Gallup is telling a lie when they say 99% of the adults in their daily tracking poll are regeistered. Like redstate says, the odds or statistics don't add up for the Jul 19 poll because of gallup's fabrication. So the July 19 poll was a fabrication and the correction was a fabrication. It has been exposed as an "elite controlled media" LIE!) Story Reports
.....................................................................................
Story #1: Gallup Caught Lying About the Generic Ballot Trend
Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page
July 22, 2010
Story #1: Gallup Caught Lying About the Generic Ballot Trend
RUSH: There was a story recently. The Gallup poll generic ballot showed the Democrats were all of a sudden way ahead of the Republicans. Nobody could figure it out. "What brought this about? What happened?" and the spin from the apparatchiks... I'm really... I'm still looking for a term. It's ingrained in us to refer to these people as "the media." We know there is no media. They're just leftists. These are the propagandists, the pretenders, the apparatchiks. Regardless, these people who pretend to be media, the spin was, "Well, the reason the Democrats have launched themselves ahead of the Republicans in the generic ballot is because the Republicans opposed extending unemployment benefits."
Well, Neil Stevens at RedState.com has looked into it and has a post that Gallup was caught lying about the generic ballot. "The Gallup Generic Ballot is a trusted, widely reported resource. I've analyzed it extensively, and defended it to others. But yesterday, when I covered the poll's latest release, Gallup lied. I was lied to, you were lied to, everyone who's trusted the Gallup name got lied to. How? Gallup is combining two different sampling methods into one so-called trend of Registered Voters (complete with captioned graph), getting different results, but pretending they show one trend all the same."
The bottom line here, without going into all the minutia and detail, is that nothing is real. Nothing is real. And I mentioned the other day: Now we know who these people are. They're activists. They're not reporters. They're not media. Their polls, as we've also known, are also unreal.
Gallup caught lying about the generic ballot trend [Updated 6PM ET]
Obamacare could be repealed before election
What the Liberal Media Aren't Telling You About Obama's Healthcare Plans
Check Here For More Signatures To The Discharge Petition To Repeal Obamacare Latest Information
Obamacare could be repealed before election
A plan that would enable members of the U.S. House of Representatives to repeal Obamacare – whether health care takeover advocate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants it or not – is continuing to gain momentum.
In just the last few days, more names have been added to the discharge petition sponsored by U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.
King told WND today the entire GOP leadership team in the House is on board, as well as the full delegations from California and Texas. He's working on obtaining the last few GOP signatures before turning his attention to the Democrats.
All of the GOP representatives and 34 Democrats opposed Obamacare when it was passed on a narrow 219-212 vote earlier this year. King said 212 representatives, at least, should be in favor of overturning it, since they opposed it before.
Then it will be up to the four, five or six Democrat votes that would be needed to turn from endorsement to rejection for it to advance.
"This is starting to come together," King said today. "All the Republicans [earlier] voted no. We should all be for repeal."
He said he's counting on the 34 Democrats who voted no to "demonstrate the courage of their convictions" by supporting a repeal plan.
Many will be running for re-election, King noted, in districts where the majority of voters want the law repealed. And there are Democrats who voted for Obamacare who face election challenges in a field of voters irritated by the law's new taxes and intrusions into their lives.
King told WND that if the discharge petition is successful, it will be a "resounding message" to Pelosi, who said Congress would have to vote for the health care takeover before people could know what was in it.
King's plan is to "pull out by the roots" the legislation that, among other things, will require citizens to "government-approved" health insurance whether they want it or not.
The fact that support is required from 218 members also means any plan thus endorsed likely would pass the 435-member House.
Clerk of the House of Representatives: Current House of Representatives signatures
Motion to Discharge a Committee from the Consideration of a resolution
June 16, 2010
To the Clerk of the House of Representatives:
Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XV, I, Steve King of Iowa, move to discharge the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, Education and Labor, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, Rules, House Administration, and Appropriations from the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4972) to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; which was referred to said committees on March 25, 2010, in support of which motion the undersigned Members of the House of Representatives affix their signatures, to wit:
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
1. Steve King Iowa 05
2. Connie Mack Florida 14
3. Michele Bachmann Minnesota 06
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
4. Todd Tiahrt Kansas 04
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
5. Marsha Blackburn Tennessee 07
6. Tom Price Georgia 06
7. Paul C. Broun Georgia 10
8. Jerry Moran Kansas 01
9. Tom Graves Georgia 09
10. Rob Bishop Utah 01
11. Joseph R. Pitts Pennsylvania 16
12. Mike Pence Indiana 06
Thursday, June 24, 2010
13. Lynn A. Westmoreland Georgia 03
14. Glenn Thompson Pennsylvania 05
15. Jeb Hensarling Texas 05
16. Louie Gohmert Texas 01
17. Judy Biggert Illinois 13
18. John Boozman Arkansas 03
19. Kenny Marchant Texas 24
20. Jim Jordan Ohio 04
21. Jason Chaffetz Utah 03
22. Gary G. Miller California 42
23. Bob Goodlatte Virginia 06
24. Doug Lamborn Colorado 05
25. Robert E. Latta Ohio 05
26. Tom Cole Oklahoma 04
27. Trent Franks Arizona 02
28. K. Michael Conaway Texas 11
29. Jo Bonner Alabama 01
30. Dan Burton Indiana 05
Tuesday,June 29, 2010
31. J. Gresham Barrett South Carolina 03
32. John Linder Georgia 07
33. Bill Posey Florida 15
34. Lynn Jenkins Kansas 02
35. Mike Coffman Colorado 06
36. Roscoe G. Bartlett Maryland 06
37. Virginia Foxx North Carolina 05
38. John Campbell California 48
39. Mike Rogers (AL) Alabama 03
40. Randy Neugebauer Texas 19
41. Charles K. Djou Hawaii 01
42. Pete Sessions Texas 32
43. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. Wisconsin 05
44. Howard Coble North Carolina 06
45. Candice S. Miller Michigan 10
46. Steve Scalise Louisiana 01
47. Robert B. Aderholt Alabama 04
48. Phil Gingrey Georgia 11
49. Kevin Brady Texas 08
50. Pete Olson Texas 22
51. C. W. Bill Young Florida 10
52. Tom McClintock California 04
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
53. Joe Wilson South Carolina 02
54. Mac Thornberry Texas 13
55. John R. Carter Texas 31
56. John Shimkus Illinois 19
57. Mary Fallin Oklahoma 05
58. Gus M. Bilirakis Florida 09
59. John Fleming Louisiana 04
60. Jeff Flake Arizona 06
61. W. Todd Akin Missouri 02
62. Peter Hoekstra Michigan 02
63. Donald A. Manzullo Illinois 16
64. Eric Cantor Virginia 07
65. Scott Garrett New Jersey 05
66. John A. Boehner Ohio 08
67. Henry E. Brown, Jr. South Carolina 01
68. Kay Granger Texas 12
69. Parker Griffith Alabama 05
70. Ted Poe Texas 02
71. Cathy McMorris Rodgers Washington 05
72. Rodney Alexander Louisiana 05
73. Fred Upton Michigan 06
74. Jean Schmidt Ohio 02
75. John Sullivan Oklahoma 01
76. Peter J. Roskam Illinois 06
77. Blaine Luetkemeyer Missouri 09
78. Michael C. Burgess Texas 26
79. Ken Calvert California 44
80. Lee Terry Nebraska 02
Thursday, July 1, 2010
81. Patrick T. McHenry North Carolina 10
82. Mary Bono Mack California 45
83. Spencer Bachus Alabama 06
84. Jeff Miller Florida 01
85. John B. Shadegg Arizona 03
86. Gregg Harper Mississippi 03
87. John Abney Culberson Texas 07
88. Dana Rohrabacher California 46
89. David P. Roe Tennessee 01
90. J. Randy Forbes Virginia 04
91. Bill Cassidy Louisiana 06
92. Brett Guthrie Kentucky 02
93. Denny Rehberg Montana 0
94. Sue Wilkins Myrick North Carolina 09
95. Tom Latham Iowa 04
96. Michael K. Simpson Idaho 02
97. John Kline Minnesota 02
98. Ron Paul Texas 14
99. Thomas J. Rooney Florida 16
100. Daniel E. Lungren California 03
101. Darrell E. Issa California 49
102. Harold Rogers Kentucky 05
103. John J. Duncan, Jr. Tennessee 02
104. Todd Russell Platts Pennsylvania 19
105. Duncan Hunter California 52
106. Sam Graves Missouri 06
107. Bob Inglis South Carolina 04
108. Edward R. Royce California 40
109. Ralph M. Hall Texas 04
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
110. Timothy V. Johnson Illinois 15
111. Michael T. McCaul Texas 10
112. Thaddeus G. McCotter Michigan 11
113. Robert J. Wittman Virginia 01
114. Lamar Smith Texas 21
115. Cynthia M. Lummis Wyoming 00
116. Wally Herger California 02
117. Vern Buchanan Florida 13
118. Christopher H. Smith New Jersey 04
119. Geoff Davis Kentucky 04
120. Jack Kingston Georgia 01
121. Brian P. Bilbray California 50
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
122. Zach Wamp Tennessee 03
123. Jerry Lewis California 41
124. Erik Paulsen Minnesota 03
125. Roy Blunt Missouri 07
126. Jo Ann Emerson Missouri 08
127. Frank R. Wolf Virginia 10
128. George Radanovich California 19
129. Steve Austria Ohio 07
130. Greg Walden Oregon 02
Thursday, July 15, 2010
131. Frank D. Lucas Oklahoma 03
132. Adrian Smith Nebraska 03
133. Jeff Fortenberry Nebraska 01
Monday, July 19, 2010
134. Frank A. LoBiondo New Jersey 02
135. Sam Johnson Texas 03
136. Paul Ryan Wisconsin 01
137. John L. Mica Florida 07
138. Michael R. Turner Ohio 03
139. Aaron Schock Illinois 18
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
140. Cliff Stearns Florida 06
141. Devin Nunes California 21
142. David Dreier California 26
143. Christopher John Lee New York 26
144. Kevin McCarthy California 22
145. Bill Shuster Pennsylvania 09
146. Leonard Lance New Jersey 07
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
147. Howard P. McKeon California 25
148. Ander Crenshaw Florida 04
149. Elton Gallegly California 24
150. Rodney P. Frelinghuysen New Jersey 11
Thursday, July 22, 2010
151. Ed Whitfield Kentucky 01
152. Walter B. Jones North Carolina 03
153. Vernon J. Ehlers Michigan 03
Monday, July 26, 2010
154. Thomas E. Petri Wisconsin 06
155. Doc Hastings Washington 04
156. Don Young Alaska 00
157. Ginny Brown-Waite Florida 05
158. Patrick J. Tiberi Ohio 12
159. Mike Rogers (MI) Michigan 08
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
160. Joe Barton Texas 06
161. Adam H. Putnam Florida 12
162. Dave Camp Michigan 04
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
163. Steven C. LaTourette Ohio 14
164. Dean Heller Nevada 02
165. Peter T. King New York 03
Check Here For More Signatures To The Discharge Petition To Repeal Obamacare
(218 is the magic number to possibly bury obamacare. We have 153 now. After the Nov election I'm sure it will be much more. It is a possibility that obamacare could be repealed before the election) Story Reports
Obamacare repeal? 150 House signatures already. Sponsor of repeal plan says it will come down to changing handful of votes
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Obama knows hitler was correct when he said, if you tell a big lie frequently enough it will be believed
(The following quotes are Adolf Hitler's. Obama believes these principles and uses them every time he opens his mouth. Obama knows hitler was correct when he said, "if you tell a big lie frequently enough, it will be believed." This is how obama has forced obamacare through congress. Obama uses hitler's template for propaganda. Obama knows "the broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force.") Every twisted word that comes out of the deranged mind of obama is in the form of a lie. Story Reports
By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise. Adolf Hitler
If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed. Adolf Hitler
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it. Adolf Hitler
The great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one. Adolf Hitler
It is not truth that matters, but victory. Adolf Hitler
The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force. Adolf Hitler
The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it. Adolf Hitler
What good fortune for governments that the people do not think. Adolf Hitler
(Obama is the epitome of evil as was adolf hitler. We know what hitler said. We know what hitler did. Comparing obama to hitler is eye opening. Obama tells lies over and over just like hitler. Obama is acting like a dictator. Obama is evil as was hitler. Obamacare is an evil attempt to control America.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
As the Administration's arguments make clear, we are losing the same freedoms that our founders sought to preserve. The Obama Regime Lawyers Now Assert That Obamacare Mandate is a Tax.
In addition to arguing that the obamacare mandate is authorized by the Commerce Clause the government also justified the mandate by claiming that it was a tax. This assertion contradicts the administration’s previous denial that the mandate is a tax increase.
The Administration's brief acknowledges that the legislation imposes a significant "tax penalty" for those who fail to purchase health insurance (the so-called "individual mandate") that "will raise substantial revenue," while at the same time extending "subsidies and tax credits to the large majority of the uninsured."
The Administration's expansive view of the federal government's power is likewise profoundly disturbing. In order to defend this unprecedented government power grab, the Administration argues that the federal government's authority is essentially unlimited, asserting for example that "Congress's taxing and spending power under the General Welfare Clause is 'extensive.'" However, the federal government has never claimed, and the courts have never held, that the government has authority to essentially dictate one-sixth of the nation's economy. Indeed, while the Administration characterizes the States' lawsuit as meritless and based on "philosophical or political opposition" rather than solid legal grounds, it takes the Administration sixty pages to explain why it has not overstepped constitutional bounds.
Recognizing the tenuous nature of its claims, the Administration's brief seeks to downplay the health care legislation as merely an "expansion" of the existing Medicaid system. Once again, however, the Administration simply ignores reality. The Administration and its supporters repeatedly characterized the health care bill as landmark legislation that "answered the call of history." Indeed, the Administration's own brief acknowledges that the legislation imposes a "comprehensive system of reform" that seeks to regulate "a vast interstate market consuming an estimated 17.5 percent of our gross domestic product."
Perhaps most troubling, the Administration justifies its exercise of this sweeping power by characterizing the American public as either infantile, unable to make appropriate choices regarding its own health care, or as malicious. It argues that the individual mandate is an "essential" aspect of the health care legislation because, in its absence, individuals may make the "wrong" decision and forgo health insurance, potentially leading to a number of negative consequences for their own health and economic welfare. However, the Administration goes even further, arguing that, in the absence of the individual mandate, the American people might "game the system" by "waiting until disease develops or an accident occurs to purchase insurance."
The implications of the government's arguments in defense of the health care legislation are significant. The worldview espoused by the Administration is one in which the power of the federal government is unlimited and in which that power must be exercised because ordinary Americans are simply incapable of managing their own affairs and must have government bureaucrats do it for them.
Fate of Obamacare in Hands of Judge
Fate of Obamacare in Hands of Judge
Suing Obamacare
RUSH LIMBAUGH TRANSCRIPT OF OBAMA DECLARING OBAMACARE IS NOT A TAX
RUSH: Let's go back to September 20th, 2009, This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Obama was being interviewed by a fellow member of the ruling class, George Stephanopoulos, who says, "Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines tax as 'a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.'"
OBAMA: George, the fact this you've looked up Merriam's dictionary, that -- uh, the definition of tax increase indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise you wouldn't have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no!
OBAMA: I mean, what --
STEPHANOPOULOS: I --
OBAMA: If what you're saying --
STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself. Your critics say it is a tax increase.
OBAMA: My critics say everything's a tax increase! My critics say that I'm taking over, uhh, every sector of the economy. You know that. Uh, eh, eh, eh, eh... Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we're going to have an individual mandate or not, but --
STEPHANOPOULOS: You reject that it's a tax increase?
OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.
(Notice what obama has done and continues to do to quell opposition to his lies.
(1) He speaks his lies often.
(2) He almost never answers questions directly.
(3) He makes sure his limited "press conferences" are controlled.
(4) He is only asked limited questions about his radical daily production as president.
(5) Obama or his liberal media deflect any criticism by BRANDING anyone who disagress or points out obama is a liar.
(6) Americans who discover obama is lying and point out this fact are accused of being racist by obama or his liberal media. Obama doesn't utter the word racist, his minions
use this to change the subject.
(7) Obama and his minions also use the "race rard" to curtail free speech and quell the opposition. Obama and his minions use the term "racist" to label Americans who oppose him.
(8) Branding people who are involved with the tea party movement as racists deflect the point that obama is a racist himself and a traitor.)
Don't be afraid of being called a racist. Speak up and tell the truth about obama. Refute his lies and give examples of his lies. That is what I do.
How can anyone refute the video above of obama lying about obamacare?)
Every twisted word that comes out of the deranged mind of obama is in the form of a lie.
Story Reports
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
The state run media buried stories about Rev. Wright
(Rush is right again when he said today there is no national media. Its a state run media propaganda machine. This liberal machine hides the true facts about the FRAUD obama. The mass media propaganda has been exposed as a coordinated effort to conceal the facts.) Story Reports
The state run media buried stories about Rev. Wright
Documents reveal coordinated effort in 2008 by key members of establishment press.
A number of mainstream journalists plotted during the 2008 presidential campaign to shut down coverage of the outrageous comments by Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his close ties to then-candidate Barack Obama, according to a new report.
Jonathan Strong of the Daily Caller reports obtaining records of exchanges on a listserv called Journolist, which includes several hundred liberal journalists, activists and like-minded professors.
The comments included a suggestion from Michael Tomasky, a writer for the London Guardian, who appeared outraged over an ABC interview that questioned Obama about the Wright statements, such as "God d--- America," and the close links between the two men.
"We need to throw chairs now, try as hard as we can to get the call next time. Otherwise the questions in October will be exactly like this," Tomasky wrote. "This is just a disease."
The journalists' attempt to stifle questions directed to Obama was paralleled just this year when a substantial list of "media stars" criticized a book exposing Obama's record – without reading it.
In that case, members of the news media, including from publications such as Time and Newsweek, reacted harshly to the announcement of the No. 1 non-fiction book in America, with multiple reporters sending expletive-laden e-mails to the author's publicist saying they did not want to receive a copy.
(Many in the public know what the lame stream media is and how it has been a mouth piece for liberalism. This is why so many rely on internet sources for the real news and truth about what is going on. Over the last several months I have read different accounts of what the lame stream media was telling the public. I have known the mass media just parrots the lies of obama and the liberal democrates. My past blogs are a record of the mass media lies that I have refuted.) Story Reports
The state run media buried stories about Rev. Wright
Documents reveal coordinated effort in 2008 by key members of establishment press.
A number of mainstream journalists plotted during the 2008 presidential campaign to shut down coverage of the outrageous comments by Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his close ties to then-candidate Barack Obama, according to a new report.
Jonathan Strong of the Daily Caller reports obtaining records of exchanges on a listserv called Journolist, which includes several hundred liberal journalists, activists and like-minded professors.
The comments included a suggestion from Michael Tomasky, a writer for the London Guardian, who appeared outraged over an ABC interview that questioned Obama about the Wright statements, such as "God d--- America," and the close links between the two men.
"We need to throw chairs now, try as hard as we can to get the call next time. Otherwise the questions in October will be exactly like this," Tomasky wrote. "This is just a disease."
The journalists' attempt to stifle questions directed to Obama was paralleled just this year when a substantial list of "media stars" criticized a book exposing Obama's record – without reading it.
In that case, members of the news media, including from publications such as Time and Newsweek, reacted harshly to the announcement of the No. 1 non-fiction book in America, with multiple reporters sending expletive-laden e-mails to the author's publicist saying they did not want to receive a copy.
(Many in the public know what the lame stream media is and how it has been a mouth piece for liberalism. This is why so many rely on internet sources for the real news and truth about what is going on. Over the last several months I have read different accounts of what the lame stream media was telling the public. I have known the mass media just parrots the lies of obama and the liberal democrates. My past blogs are a record of the mass media lies that I have refuted.) Story Reports
Monday, July 19, 2010
Today's ruling class or political class speak the same language
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution Read This Interesting Article
(The ruling class or political ruling class speak the same language. They are joined at the hip.) Story Reports
Left Coast Rebel
Perhaps after reading, dissecting and pondering Professor Angelo M. Codevilla's verbose but enlightening essay on the American ruling class, you may understand just why many things today 'just don't make sense.' It's long but more than worth the lengthy read.
One of many key excerpts:
Today's ruling class, from Boston to San Diego, was formed by an educational system that exposed them to the same ideas and gave them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as tastes and habits. These amount to a social canon of judgments about good and evil, complete with secular sacred history, sins (against minorities and the environment), and saints. Using the right words and avoiding the wrong ones when referring to such matters -- speaking the "in" language -- serves as a badge of identity.
Regardless of what business or profession they are in, their road up included government channels and government money because, as government has grown, its boundary with the rest of American life has become indistinct. Many began their careers in government and leveraged their way into the private sector. Some, e.g., Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, never held a non-government job. Hence whether formally in government, out of it, or halfway, America's ruling class speaks the language and has the tastes, habits, and tools of bureaucrats. It rules uneasily over the majority of Americans not oriented to government.
(These are the people who must be removed from office in Nov 2010 and Nov 2012 along with all liberal and moderate politicians. The political ruling class will do or say anything to stay in power. They are both republicans and democrates. These people think of themselves as a "ruling class".
They will support each other in the good ole boy fashion. These politicians are the "enemy within" that are destroying our freedoms by rubber stamping obama's socialist programs.) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
By Angelo M. Codevilla from the July 2010 - August 2010 issue
Click The Link Below To Read The Entire Article By Angelo M. Codevilla
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
(The ruling class or political ruling class speak the same language. They are joined at the hip.) Story Reports
Left Coast Rebel
Perhaps after reading, dissecting and pondering Professor Angelo M. Codevilla's verbose but enlightening essay on the American ruling class, you may understand just why many things today 'just don't make sense.' It's long but more than worth the lengthy read.
One of many key excerpts:
Today's ruling class, from Boston to San Diego, was formed by an educational system that exposed them to the same ideas and gave them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as tastes and habits. These amount to a social canon of judgments about good and evil, complete with secular sacred history, sins (against minorities and the environment), and saints. Using the right words and avoiding the wrong ones when referring to such matters -- speaking the "in" language -- serves as a badge of identity.
Regardless of what business or profession they are in, their road up included government channels and government money because, as government has grown, its boundary with the rest of American life has become indistinct. Many began their careers in government and leveraged their way into the private sector. Some, e.g., Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, never held a non-government job. Hence whether formally in government, out of it, or halfway, America's ruling class speaks the language and has the tastes, habits, and tools of bureaucrats. It rules uneasily over the majority of Americans not oriented to government.
(These are the people who must be removed from office in Nov 2010 and Nov 2012 along with all liberal and moderate politicians. The political ruling class will do or say anything to stay in power. They are both republicans and democrates. These people think of themselves as a "ruling class".
They will support each other in the good ole boy fashion. These politicians are the "enemy within" that are destroying our freedoms by rubber stamping obama's socialist programs.) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
By Angelo M. Codevilla from the July 2010 - August 2010 issue
Click The Link Below To Read The Entire Article By Angelo M. Codevilla
America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
Saturday, July 17, 2010
The naacp was founded by communists/socialists and continues to be tool for the radical left wing socialists
(The naacp was founded by communists/socialists and continues to be tool for the radical left wing socialists. There past history is very revealing. The naacp is like the "new" black panthers. The original black panthers have indicated that the "new" black panthers are more radical than they are and the original black panther indicate they want nothing to do with the "new" black panthers and do no condone what they do. The "old" black panthers in fact are almost exactly like the "new" black panthers.
I have not see nor read any repudiation of the founders of the naacp by the current racist socialist naacp. Nor any repudiation of their communist/socialist agenda. Story Reports
W. E. Burghardt DuBois was a native of Massachusetts with a doctorate and two lesser degrees from Harvard. (DuBois, before the turn of the century, was a Stalinist. Later, he formally joined the Socialist Party, resigned and became an active fellow traveler of the Reds, and eventually became a member of the Communist Party. And, today his name is memorialized in the Communists' DuBois Clubs.)
DuBois - in 1905 -and a group of collectivists founded the Niagara Movement. DuBois planned, as an immediate goal, to train a Negro elite - "the Talented Tenth" - which could lead the Negro masses in a militant program to agitate for unconditional political and social equality.
Moorfield Storey, a white attorney from Boston, was the first president of the NAACP. DuBois became the organization's first director of publicity and research and the editor of the organization's monthly magazine, The Crisis. For twenty-four years, The Crisis served as DuBois' regular outlet for unbridled racism. In one of his editorials, he set the tone for the magazine when he wrote that "the most ordinary Negro is a distinct gentleman, but it takes extraordinary training and opportunity to make the average white man anything but a hog."
The naacp was founded by stalinist/socialist member of the communist party W. E. Burghardt DuBois. Out of the Niagara Movement, there emerged - in 1909 - the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. In its early history, the NAACP proved to be a natural attraction for Communists. DuBois, the real leader of the organization, "hailed the Russian Revolution of 1917," and he traveled to the Soviet Union in 1926 and 1936. He especially liked "the racial attitudes of the Communists."
By 1922, the Communists in America had received their orders from the Communist International to exploit Negroes in the Communist program against the peace and security of the United States. In 1923, the NAACP began to receive grants from the Garland Fund which was a major source for the financing of Communist Party enterprises. The grants continued until, at least, 1934.
(Today the "grants" continue but are in the form of welfare/stimulus funds etc.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP)
Francis X. Gannon
"The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremist folly, and that progress in the enjoyment of all the privileges that will come to us must be the result of severe and constant struggle rather than of artificial forcing. No race that has anything to contribute to the markets of the world is long in any degree ostracized. It is important and right that all privileges of the law be ours, but it is vastly more important that we be prepared for the exercises of these privileges. The opportunity to earn a dollar in a factory just now is worth infinitely more than the opportunity to spend a dollar in an opera-house." These were the words of Booker T. Washington- Negro educator, a native Virginian born in slavery, and founder of Tuskegee Institute.
Throughout his adult life, Washington labored to impress upon Negroes that they would have a rewarding role in America's progress if only they developed industrial and agricultural skills through vocational training in a massive "self-help" program among Negroes. From the whites Washington asked for cooperation and understanding which would result in "interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil, and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one. In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress." There were Negro intellectuals who disagreed sharply with Washington. They alleged that Washington was leading his fellow Negroes into a surrender of political rights and a permanent system of social segregation.
The most prominent among the anti-Washington Negroes was W. E. Burghardt DuBois - a native of Massachusetts with a doctorate and two lesser degrees from Harvard. (DuBois, before the turn of the century, was a Stalinist. Later, he formally joined the Socialist Party, resigned and became an active fellow traveler of the Reds, and eventually became a member of the Communist Party. And, today his name is memorialized in the Communists' DuBois Clubs.)
In a total misrepresentation of Washington's views, DuBois said:
"Mr. Washington apologizes for injustice, North and South, does not rightly value the privilege and duty of voting, belittles the emasculating effects of caste distinctions, and opposes the higher training and ambition of our brighter minds... [therefore] we must unceasingly and firmly oppose him."
To offset Washington's "self-help" program, DuBois - in 1905 -and a group of collectivists founded the Niagara Movement. DuBois planned, as an immediate goal, to train a Negro elite - "the Talented Tenth" - which could lead the Negro masses in a militant program to agitate for unconditional political and social equality.
Out of the Niagara Movement, there emerged - in 1909 - the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People with its announced purposes: "To promote equality of rights and eradicate caste or race prejudice among the citizens of the United States; to advance the interest of colored citizens; to secure for them impartial suffrage; and to increase their opportunities for securing justice in the courts, education for their children, employment according to their ability, and complete equality before the law."
The formation of the NAACP was urged by the leading radicals of the era including Jane Addams, John Dewey, William Lloyd Garrison, John Haynes Holmes, Lincoln Steffens, Brand Whitlock, Lillian Wald, Rabbi Stephen Wise, and Ray Stannard Baker. Among the first officials of the NAACP were more radicals including: Mary White Ovington, Oswald Garrison Vilard, Walter E. Sachs, John Milholland, Frances Blascoer, and William English Walling. Other radicals were among the first NAACP members: Florence Kelly, William Pickens, James W. Johnson, Charles E. Russell, and E. R. A. Seligman. (Many of these individuals were already or would soon become enrolled in the newly formed Intercollegiate Socialist Society [which later became the League for Industrial Democracy] and, within a few years, they were prominent in various pacifist groups, including the Fellowship of Reconciliation, and the American Civil Liberties Union. The NAACP gave them one more vantage point - agitation for Negroes' equality - from which they could promote Socialism and other facets of radicalism.)
Moorfield Storey, a white attorney from Boston, was the first president of the NAACP. DuBois became the organization's first director of publicity and research and the editor of the organization's monthly magazine, The Crisis. For twenty-four years, The Crisis served as DuBois' regular outlet for unbridled racism. In one of his editorials, he set the tone for the magazine when he wrote that "the most ordinary Negro is a distinct gentleman, but it takes extraordinary training and opportunity to make the average white man anything but a hog."
(I think the left has taken an ordinary Negro, barack obama, and through the extraordinary training of affirmative action made barack obama into anything other than a real person. Obama has been "created" by socialists to further their cause. He is a product of socialism, an empty suit. Obama is anything but average, he is below average in everything he has done. Obama is a total misrepresentation of a black man. He is a FRAUD who assumes the identity of a black man. Even the hidden affirmative action record of obama could not fully explain the empty suit we hear and see almost daily. Obama is a total media creation hell bent on destroying America.) Story Reports
From 1909 until 1934, DuBois - in this country and abroad - was the most prominent spokesman for the NAACP. In that same period, Mary White Ovington, a white social worker and an official of the organization, was second only to DuBois in propaganda efforts for the organization. The NAACP has also been fortunate in having three very able men serve as executive secretary: James Weldon Johnson (1920-1928), Walter White (1929-1955), and Roy Wilkins since 1955. Wilkins also was editor of The Crisis from 1934 until 1949. Long tenure in office has also been characteristic of the NAACP's presidents - all white men: Moorfield Story (1910-1915), Joel Spingarn (1915-1940), Arthur Spingarn (1940-1966), and, since 1966, Kivie Kaplan.
During its first year, the NAACP recruited 329 members. At the end of twenty years, there were 88,000 members. The peak of membership was reached in 1963 with 510,000 and, at the end of 1968, there were 449,000 members.
In its early history, the NAACP proved to be a natural attraction for Communists. DuBois, the real leader of the organization, "hailed the Russian Revolution of 1917," and he traveled to the Soviet Union in 1926 and 1936. He especially liked "the racial attitudes of the Communists."
In 1920, the question of the Negro in America had been discussed at the second world congress of the Communist International. At that time, the Negro in America was described as a "national" minority rather than a "racial" minority.
By 1922, the Communists in America had received their orders from the Communist International to exploit Negroes in the Communist program against the peace and security of the United States. In 1923, the NAACP began to receive grants from the Garland Fund which was a major source for the financing of Communist Party enterprises. (Officials of the Fund included Communists William Z. Foster, Benjamin Gitlow, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Scott Nearing, and Robert W. Dunn, along with prominent leftwingers Roger Baldwin, Sidney Hillman, Ernest Gruening, Morris Ernst, Mary E. McDowell, Harry F. Ward, Judah L. Magnes, Freda Kirchwey, Emanuel Celler, Paul H. Douglas, Moorfield Storey, and Oswald Garrison Vilard.) The grants continued until, at least, 1934.
There could be no doubt that the NAACP was of particular interest to the Communist Party. At the fourth national convention of the Workers (Communist) Party in 1925, the comrades were told that it was "permissible and necessary for selected Communists (not the party membership as a whole) to enter its [NAACP's] conventions and to make proposals calculated to enlighten the Negro masses under its influence as to the nature and necessity of the class struggle, the identity of their exploiters - - .
In 1928, the Communist International instructed American Negro Communists to work for a Negro-controlled State composed of all contiguous Southern countries having majority black populations - the so-called Black Belt. In 1930, the Communist International instructed the entire Communist Party, USA to organize the Negroes of the South for the purpose of setting up a separate state and government in the South.
The noted Negro journalist George Schuyler, who was familiar with the personnel and operations of the NAACP, has written of this era:
"This was the time the veteran Socialist, Dr. W. E. B. Dubois (then the acknowledged intellectual leader of Aframerica, and editor of The Crisis since 1910), wrote an editorial in January 1934 to plug for segregation. He declared that 'the thinking colored people of the United States must stop being stampeded by the word segregation.' With considerable exaggeration, he held that segregation was 'more insistent, more prevalent and more unassailable by appeal and argument' than ever before; that Negroes must 'fight segregation with segregation,' and he told them to 'voluntarily and insistently organize our economic and social power no matter how much segregation is involved.' This shocked the NAACP directors. But, DuBois continued to urge that Negroes 'cut intercourse with white Americans to the minimum demanded by decent living." (Mr. Schuyler's observations appeared in The Review of the News, December 18, 1968.)
DuBois' views, so overtly compatible with the Communists' plans for a segregated Negro America, were an embarrassment to the NAACP which, of necessity, had to depend upon financial and other support from white America. And, in 1934, DuBois separated from the NAACP. (He returned ten years later but within four years he left the NAACP permanently and devoted his energies full-time working for Communist projects.)
The departure of DuBois from the NAACP did not mean that the organization was averse to Communists. George Schuyler has narrated:
"Meanwhile, the Association [NAACP] was playing patsy with the forces of the Left . . . and were thereby floating on financial beds of ease. Evil associations corrupt good manners, and also good sense. As the Communists, crypto Communists and fellow travelers moved in on the New Deal and took charge, the NAACP was more and more affected. The indefatigable Walter F. White, NAACP executive secretary, was weekly in Washington cultivating white power which was often Red. Then the New York Communist organizers, Manning Johnson and Leonard Patterson, traveled to Washington, contacted the Red faculty members at Howard University, and 'sold' them on organizing an activist National Negro Congress (NNC). Among the first suckered into it was the NAACP's executive secretary. This committed the Association to supporting an outfit tailored originally by the Communist Party of the U.S.A. to destroy it." (The NAACP's affiliation with the National Negro Congress was not an isolated tie-in with the Communists. In 1938, the NAACP was represented in the World Youth Congress, a Communist enterprise. And, in the 1940's the NAACP was affiliated with American Youth for a Free World, the American affiliate of the World Federation of Democratic Youth, a Communist clearing house.)
As was the case with so many Communist fronts, the National Negro Congress foundered amidst the confusion of the Hitler-Stalin Pact.
The National Negro Congress, however, had a short-lived revival. George Schuyler recounted: "With War's end and the return of the Communist Party to its pre-War line (crying for 'Self-Determination for the Black Belt' and trying to invade the province of the NAACP with the hastily-organized Civil Rights Congress), there was no difficulty in getting high Association officials to join. Soon the National Negro Congress, in one of its last gasps, presented a petition to the United Nations charging the United States with genocide on its Negro population - which, curiously, had increased since 1790 to 1940 from 750,000 to 15 million. Not to be outdone, Dr. DuBois, who had again been given executive office by the NAACP, the following year presented a similar petition charging American genocide against the Negroes. It followed the general line of the Communist plea, and Walter White and DuBois traipsed out to Lake Success to present it."
One of the NAACP's most literate apologists was the late Langston Hughes. (From 1925 until his death in 1967, Hughes was openly associated with Communist Party projects and enterprises. In 1956, the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee included Hughes in its list of eighty-two names of the most active and typical sponsors of Communist front organizations. In sworn testimony, former Communist Party functionary Manning Johnson identified Hughes as a member of the Communist Party as of December, 1935.)
In 1962, Hughes wrote Fight for Freedom: The Story of the NAACP. In his book, Hughes said: "Attempts to label the NAACP subversive, Communist-influenced, or out-and-out Communist have continued for a long time. The late Negro professional witness, ex-Communist Manning Johnson, since discredited, testified before two southern legislative committees to the effect that the NAACP was 'a vehicle of the Communist Party designed to overthrow the government of the United States." [Johnson was not a professional witness but a genuinely repentant American who, from his years as a top Negro Communist, testified accurately before, and cooperated fully with, federal and state investigating committees and agencies. He was discredited only by the Communist Party, its fellow travelers, and its dupes. He did identify Hughes as a Communist. He did testify as to the Communist character of the NAACP since he had been assigned the job of bringing Negro organizations into the Communist orbit.)
Hughes, however, in his whitewash of the NAACP (which, by the way, had conferred its highest award - the Spingarn Medal - upon him in 1960), wrote: "Utterly disregarding the truth, these malicious and irresponsible accusations ignore evidence, so clearly on the record, that the NAACP is not and was not Communist and has never even remotely been under Communist influence. Since its earliest years, its top officials from Joel Spingarn and James Weldon Johnson to Walter White and Roy Wilkins have attacked communism in no uncertain terms in both speaking and writing [and] until recently, the official Communist program for Negroes called for the establishment of a separate Negro nation, an idea that was directly opposite to the NAACP's philosophy of integration." (Spingarn and Johnson were officials when the NAACP was receiving grants from the Garland Fund, the outfit which was created to finance Communist enterprises. White, as George Schuyler noted, worked hand-in-hand with the Communists. Wilkins, on the NAACP's staff since 1931, went out of his way to praise the Communist Party for the help it gave to the Negroes. And, from 1937 until 1949, Wilkins was affiliated with a number of Communist fronts and enterprises. He did become somewhat discreet after 1949 [in 1949 and 1950, he was acting executive secretary and, since 1955, he has been the executive secretary of the NAACP] but in 1965 he joined with notorious Communist leaders to memorialize the deceased Communist W. E. B. DuBois. And, Hughes conveniently forgot that the Communists and the NAACP set aside temporarily the idea of a separate Negro nation only because American Negro masses simply showed no interest in such segregation.)
It is true that from time to time the NAACP went through the motions of denouncing Communism and Communists but, at the same time, the NAACP harbored in its roster of officials and in its membership a legion of Communist-fronters, individuals whose prestige and influence made their presence in the fronts of far more importance to the Communist Party than if they were dues-paying members of obscure and secretive party cells. Among these individuals who represented every Communist front, project, and enterprise ever to appear in this country have been: Roger N. Baldwin, George S. Counts, J. Frank Dobie, Dorothy Canfield Fisher, Arthur Garfield Hays, Freda Kirchwey, Alfred Baker Lewis, Archibald MacLeish, Reinhold Niebuhr, A. Philip Randolph, Guy Emery Shipler, Lillian Smith, Norman Thomas, Leonard Bernstein, Eugene Carson Blake, Sarah Gibson Blanding, Ralph Bunche, Morris Ernst, Buell Gallagher, Rabbi Roland Gittelsohn, Frank Graham, Bishop James A. Pike, Carl Rowan, Eleanor Roosevelt, Walter Reuther, Channing Tobias, Algernon D. Black, Bishop G. Bromley Oxnam, Van Wyck Brooks, Henry Hitt Crane, Benjamin E. Mays, S. Ralph Harlow, and Oscar Hammerstein II. Hughes even boasted that the NAACP membership included Jawaharlal Nehru of India, Averell Harriman, Herbert Lehman, Harry Golden, Harry Belafonte, G. Mennen Williams, Chester Bowles, Nelson Rockefeller, Alan Paton, and Adam Clayton Powell - none of whom could be considered as anything less than extremely soft on Communism. Even after the publication of Hughes' book, there appeared on NAACP letterheads such names as Walter Gellhorn, Telford Taylor, William Sloane Coffin Jr., Dick Gregory, Ossie Davis, Steve Allen, Ruby Dee, Aaron Copland, Helen Buttenwieser, Erwin N. Griswold, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, John A. Volpe, Kirtley Mather, Elliot L. Richardson, and Henry Cabot Lodge.
Among those honored by the NAACP with its annual Spingam Medal have been:
W. E. B. DuBois, Mary McLeod Bethune, A. Philip Randolph, William Hastie, Paul Robeson, Thurgood Marshall, Richard Wright, Martin L. King Jr., Ralph Bunche, Walter White, and Langston Hughes.
From its inception to the present, no matter the protestations of Langston Hughes or any other NAACP apologist, the organization's officials and its known members, collectively and individually, have represented the influential left, the leadership of Communist fronts and left-wing political and pacifist groups, and the most effective of the anti-anti-Communist establishment.
In 1946, the NAACP cooperated with the Communist Party as the latter, in one of its most ambitious political projects of all time, established the Progressive Citizens of America - the basis for Henry Wallace's Communist-dominated Progressive Party in the presidential election of 1948. In 1951, when the Massachusetts legislature was considering a bill to outlaw the Communist Party, the Boston branch of the NAACP, through its legislation committee, opposed the bill. The Committee's chairman, Edward W. Brooke (now U.S. Senator), argued that the bill was "against democratic principles and endangers American civil liberties."
The Communists in the United States have certainly recognized the value of the NAACP as an ally. In 1950, Communist leader Robert Thompson boasted: "The emergence of a powerful left, anti-imperialist, anti-fascist current among the Negro people is unmistakable and is clearly discernible in the NAACP. This Left, anti-imperialist trend in the Association insists upon much greater attention by the organization to the pressing economic and political problems facing the Negro masses." (Political Affairs, February, 1950.)
In 1953, an unusual and total endorsement was given to the NAACP by the Communists in their Daily Worker (September 30): "It should be clear that we Communists are the first to insist that the labor movement, all sections of it, should give every possible support to any and all campaigns conducted by the NAACP."
Four years later, a similar endorsement appeared in the Daily Worker (February 19, 1957): "Communists in labor unions are thus pledged to get their unions to support the NAACP, to better express the affiance of labor with the Negro people. Communists in communities are pledged to aid in increasing the membership and financial strength of the NAACP, whether as members or not."
The relationship between the NAACP and the Communist Party has been demonstrable through the activities of those attorneys who have held office in the NAACP, its branches, or the "Committee of 100" which supports the NAACP's Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Among the more prominent attorneys associated with the NAACP have been Morris Ernst, Robert W. Kenny, Earl B. Dickerson, Clarence Darrow, Bartley Crum, Osmond Fraenkel, Hubert Delany, and Loren Miller - all of whom had an unusual affinity for Communist fronts and projects. For ten years prior to his appointment in 1939 to the Supreme Court of the United States, Felix Frankfurter, an unreconstricted Bolshevik, served as a legal adviser to the NAACP. That intimate association never deterred Frankfurter from sitting and writing decisions on cases where the NAACP was directly involved. But, in its entire history, the NAACP owes its most dramatic successes to the work of Thurgood Marshall. From 1936 until 1961, he was with the NAACP as assistant special counsel (1936-1938), special counsels (1938-1940), and director and counsel for the Legal Defense and Educational Fund (1940-1961). [In 1962, Marshall was appointed by President Kennedy to be U.S. Circuit Court Justice for the Second Judicial Circuit; in 1965, President Johnson appointed him to be Solicitor General of the United States; and, in 1967, President Johnson appointed him to the Supreme Court of the United States.]
From 1938 to 1961, Marshall represented the NAACP thirty-two times before the Supreme Court. He won twenty-nine of the cases. His most notable achievement before the Supreme Court came in 1954, when he successfully argued the Brown v. Board of Education case with the resultant revolutionary decision by the Court that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. There were circumstances, however, which dulled Marshall's victory and the Court's decision.
Seven years after Brown v. Board of Education, Dr. Alfred H. Kelly, an historian who served as an aide to Marshall in the preparation of a brief for the case, revealed that Marshall set out to deceive the Court with dishonest historical arguments. In an address to the American Historical Association, Dr. Kelly told how he was asked by Marshall "to prepare a research paper on the intent of the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to the constitutionality of racially segregated schools."
Dr. Kelly then described his research efforts: "As a constitutional historian, I knew, of course, that the Fourteenth Amendment had evolved, in some considerable part, out of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Accordingly, I went to work on the 1866 volumes of the 'Congressional Globe,' reading anew the story of the debates that winter and spring for clues concerning the intent which [Lyman] Trumbell, [John A.J Bingham, [Thaddeus] Stevens and the other congressional Radicals might have had with respect to legalized segregation in particular.
"I did not really expect to find very much of anything
"As any reasonably competent historian could have told the Court and the lawyers on both sides, the historical questions they had framed [in 1953] did not necessarily have very much relevance at all to the issues that seemed consequential then to the embattled Radicals who had hammered out the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment that spring of 1866 ...
"To my surprise, the debates reprinted in the 1866 volumes of the 'Globe' had a good deal to say about school segregation. Unhappily, from the NAACP's point of view, most of what appeared there at first blush looked rather decidedly bad....
"The conclusion for any reasonably objective historian was painfully clear. The Civil Rights Act as it passed Congress was specifically rewritten to avoid the embarrassing question of a congressional attack upon State racial-segregation laws, including school segregation. .
"The paper I prepared for the September conference [with Mr. Marshall in 1953] was not adequate by any standard. I was trying to be both historian and advocate within the same paper, and the combination, as I found out, was not a very good one.
"I was facing, for the first time in my own career, the deadly opposition between my professional integrity as a historian and my wishes and hopes with respect to a contemporary question of values, of ideals, of policy, of partisanship and of political objectives. I suppose if a man is without scruple, this matter will not bother him, but I am frank to say that it bothered me terribly . . .
Dr. Kelly's work, however, was not completed. He was recalled for help by Marshall, and, along with Robert Ming Jr., a former law professor at Howard University and the University of Chicago, Kelly drafted a brief for Marshall to present to the Supreme Court. And thus began an extraordinary marriage of phony history and highly questionable legal ethics: "I am very much afraid that for the next few days I ceased to function as a historian, and, instead, took up the practice of law without a license. The problem we faced was not the historian's discovery of the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; the problem instead was the formulation of an adequate gloss on the fateful events of 1866 sufficient to convince the Court that we had something of a historical case . . . -
While the NAACP has expended much of its finances and energies upon the support of the demonstrative groups, it has not forsaken its other projects. It continues to agitate for government housing and government "created" jobs for Negroes; for socialized medicine; for forcible integration of public schools; for federal interference with state voting laws, and, for federal interference with intrastate travel laws. In other projects, the NAACP has campaigned against the House Committee on Un-American Activities, against Barry Goldwater, against South Africa, for the peace corps, and for the United Nations.
In July, 1968, in an advertisement in Esquire magazine, the NAACP seemed to revert to the racism that had been characteristic of W. E. B. DuBois. In the ad, the NAACP charged that "white America denies black America its constitutional rights. White America creates the ghetto and slams the door on efforts to escape. White America traps the Negro in a cycle of prejudice and poverty that denies his humanity and destroys his dignity." Meanwhile, the NAACP was holding its fifty-ninth annual convention.
At the six-day convention in June, 1968, the delegates worked on the theme: "the building of economic and political power within the nation's ghettoes." A group of NAACP officials and leaders, organized as the National Committee to Revitalize the NAACP Movement, were obviously disturbed at the organization's loss of influence in the black community because of the rising popularity of black militant groups. These Leaders said: "We must rid ourselves of a solely middle-class image and organize our black stakeless and hopeless; the down and out, the inferiority complex-ridden." They also expressed their shock at "the thundering silence of the association's top leadership on issues of concern to black people."
The remedies suggested by the leaders to restore confidence in the NAACP included the formation of a black-oriented political bloc, similar to labor and farmer blocs; lobbying for more federal handouts for blacks, especially through a guaranteed annual wage plan; and, the introduction into more schools of a "black history" program in an effort "to restore a lost sense of pride and self-worth."
The trouble in the ranks of the NAACP continued after the annual convention. In October 1968, a lawyer on the NAACP staff wrote an article for the New York Times magazine - He was bitterly critical of the Supreme Court for not doing more for Negroes. The utter ridiculousness of the article caused the lawyer to be fired, to protest his firing.
I have not see nor read any repudiation of the founders of the naacp by the current racist socialist naacp. Nor any repudiation of their communist/socialist agenda. Story Reports
W. E. Burghardt DuBois was a native of Massachusetts with a doctorate and two lesser degrees from Harvard. (DuBois, before the turn of the century, was a Stalinist. Later, he formally joined the Socialist Party, resigned and became an active fellow traveler of the Reds, and eventually became a member of the Communist Party. And, today his name is memorialized in the Communists' DuBois Clubs.)
DuBois - in 1905 -and a group of collectivists founded the Niagara Movement. DuBois planned, as an immediate goal, to train a Negro elite - "the Talented Tenth" - which could lead the Negro masses in a militant program to agitate for unconditional political and social equality.
Moorfield Storey, a white attorney from Boston, was the first president of the NAACP. DuBois became the organization's first director of publicity and research and the editor of the organization's monthly magazine, The Crisis. For twenty-four years, The Crisis served as DuBois' regular outlet for unbridled racism. In one of his editorials, he set the tone for the magazine when he wrote that "the most ordinary Negro is a distinct gentleman, but it takes extraordinary training and opportunity to make the average white man anything but a hog."
The naacp was founded by stalinist/socialist member of the communist party W. E. Burghardt DuBois. Out of the Niagara Movement, there emerged - in 1909 - the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. In its early history, the NAACP proved to be a natural attraction for Communists. DuBois, the real leader of the organization, "hailed the Russian Revolution of 1917," and he traveled to the Soviet Union in 1926 and 1936. He especially liked "the racial attitudes of the Communists."
By 1922, the Communists in America had received their orders from the Communist International to exploit Negroes in the Communist program against the peace and security of the United States. In 1923, the NAACP began to receive grants from the Garland Fund which was a major source for the financing of Communist Party enterprises. The grants continued until, at least, 1934.
(Today the "grants" continue but are in the form of welfare/stimulus funds etc.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP)
Francis X. Gannon
"The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremist folly, and that progress in the enjoyment of all the privileges that will come to us must be the result of severe and constant struggle rather than of artificial forcing. No race that has anything to contribute to the markets of the world is long in any degree ostracized. It is important and right that all privileges of the law be ours, but it is vastly more important that we be prepared for the exercises of these privileges. The opportunity to earn a dollar in a factory just now is worth infinitely more than the opportunity to spend a dollar in an opera-house." These were the words of Booker T. Washington- Negro educator, a native Virginian born in slavery, and founder of Tuskegee Institute.
Throughout his adult life, Washington labored to impress upon Negroes that they would have a rewarding role in America's progress if only they developed industrial and agricultural skills through vocational training in a massive "self-help" program among Negroes. From the whites Washington asked for cooperation and understanding which would result in "interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil, and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one. In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress." There were Negro intellectuals who disagreed sharply with Washington. They alleged that Washington was leading his fellow Negroes into a surrender of political rights and a permanent system of social segregation.
The most prominent among the anti-Washington Negroes was W. E. Burghardt DuBois - a native of Massachusetts with a doctorate and two lesser degrees from Harvard. (DuBois, before the turn of the century, was a Stalinist. Later, he formally joined the Socialist Party, resigned and became an active fellow traveler of the Reds, and eventually became a member of the Communist Party. And, today his name is memorialized in the Communists' DuBois Clubs.)
In a total misrepresentation of Washington's views, DuBois said:
"Mr. Washington apologizes for injustice, North and South, does not rightly value the privilege and duty of voting, belittles the emasculating effects of caste distinctions, and opposes the higher training and ambition of our brighter minds... [therefore] we must unceasingly and firmly oppose him."
To offset Washington's "self-help" program, DuBois - in 1905 -and a group of collectivists founded the Niagara Movement. DuBois planned, as an immediate goal, to train a Negro elite - "the Talented Tenth" - which could lead the Negro masses in a militant program to agitate for unconditional political and social equality.
Out of the Niagara Movement, there emerged - in 1909 - the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People with its announced purposes: "To promote equality of rights and eradicate caste or race prejudice among the citizens of the United States; to advance the interest of colored citizens; to secure for them impartial suffrage; and to increase their opportunities for securing justice in the courts, education for their children, employment according to their ability, and complete equality before the law."
The formation of the NAACP was urged by the leading radicals of the era including Jane Addams, John Dewey, William Lloyd Garrison, John Haynes Holmes, Lincoln Steffens, Brand Whitlock, Lillian Wald, Rabbi Stephen Wise, and Ray Stannard Baker. Among the first officials of the NAACP were more radicals including: Mary White Ovington, Oswald Garrison Vilard, Walter E. Sachs, John Milholland, Frances Blascoer, and William English Walling. Other radicals were among the first NAACP members: Florence Kelly, William Pickens, James W. Johnson, Charles E. Russell, and E. R. A. Seligman. (Many of these individuals were already or would soon become enrolled in the newly formed Intercollegiate Socialist Society [which later became the League for Industrial Democracy] and, within a few years, they were prominent in various pacifist groups, including the Fellowship of Reconciliation, and the American Civil Liberties Union. The NAACP gave them one more vantage point - agitation for Negroes' equality - from which they could promote Socialism and other facets of radicalism.)
Moorfield Storey, a white attorney from Boston, was the first president of the NAACP. DuBois became the organization's first director of publicity and research and the editor of the organization's monthly magazine, The Crisis. For twenty-four years, The Crisis served as DuBois' regular outlet for unbridled racism. In one of his editorials, he set the tone for the magazine when he wrote that "the most ordinary Negro is a distinct gentleman, but it takes extraordinary training and opportunity to make the average white man anything but a hog."
(I think the left has taken an ordinary Negro, barack obama, and through the extraordinary training of affirmative action made barack obama into anything other than a real person. Obama has been "created" by socialists to further their cause. He is a product of socialism, an empty suit. Obama is anything but average, he is below average in everything he has done. Obama is a total misrepresentation of a black man. He is a FRAUD who assumes the identity of a black man. Even the hidden affirmative action record of obama could not fully explain the empty suit we hear and see almost daily. Obama is a total media creation hell bent on destroying America.) Story Reports
From 1909 until 1934, DuBois - in this country and abroad - was the most prominent spokesman for the NAACP. In that same period, Mary White Ovington, a white social worker and an official of the organization, was second only to DuBois in propaganda efforts for the organization. The NAACP has also been fortunate in having three very able men serve as executive secretary: James Weldon Johnson (1920-1928), Walter White (1929-1955), and Roy Wilkins since 1955. Wilkins also was editor of The Crisis from 1934 until 1949. Long tenure in office has also been characteristic of the NAACP's presidents - all white men: Moorfield Story (1910-1915), Joel Spingarn (1915-1940), Arthur Spingarn (1940-1966), and, since 1966, Kivie Kaplan.
During its first year, the NAACP recruited 329 members. At the end of twenty years, there were 88,000 members. The peak of membership was reached in 1963 with 510,000 and, at the end of 1968, there were 449,000 members.
In its early history, the NAACP proved to be a natural attraction for Communists. DuBois, the real leader of the organization, "hailed the Russian Revolution of 1917," and he traveled to the Soviet Union in 1926 and 1936. He especially liked "the racial attitudes of the Communists."
In 1920, the question of the Negro in America had been discussed at the second world congress of the Communist International. At that time, the Negro in America was described as a "national" minority rather than a "racial" minority.
By 1922, the Communists in America had received their orders from the Communist International to exploit Negroes in the Communist program against the peace and security of the United States. In 1923, the NAACP began to receive grants from the Garland Fund which was a major source for the financing of Communist Party enterprises. (Officials of the Fund included Communists William Z. Foster, Benjamin Gitlow, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Scott Nearing, and Robert W. Dunn, along with prominent leftwingers Roger Baldwin, Sidney Hillman, Ernest Gruening, Morris Ernst, Mary E. McDowell, Harry F. Ward, Judah L. Magnes, Freda Kirchwey, Emanuel Celler, Paul H. Douglas, Moorfield Storey, and Oswald Garrison Vilard.) The grants continued until, at least, 1934.
There could be no doubt that the NAACP was of particular interest to the Communist Party. At the fourth national convention of the Workers (Communist) Party in 1925, the comrades were told that it was "permissible and necessary for selected Communists (not the party membership as a whole) to enter its [NAACP's] conventions and to make proposals calculated to enlighten the Negro masses under its influence as to the nature and necessity of the class struggle, the identity of their exploiters - - .
In 1928, the Communist International instructed American Negro Communists to work for a Negro-controlled State composed of all contiguous Southern countries having majority black populations - the so-called Black Belt. In 1930, the Communist International instructed the entire Communist Party, USA to organize the Negroes of the South for the purpose of setting up a separate state and government in the South.
The noted Negro journalist George Schuyler, who was familiar with the personnel and operations of the NAACP, has written of this era:
"This was the time the veteran Socialist, Dr. W. E. B. Dubois (then the acknowledged intellectual leader of Aframerica, and editor of The Crisis since 1910), wrote an editorial in January 1934 to plug for segregation. He declared that 'the thinking colored people of the United States must stop being stampeded by the word segregation.' With considerable exaggeration, he held that segregation was 'more insistent, more prevalent and more unassailable by appeal and argument' than ever before; that Negroes must 'fight segregation with segregation,' and he told them to 'voluntarily and insistently organize our economic and social power no matter how much segregation is involved.' This shocked the NAACP directors. But, DuBois continued to urge that Negroes 'cut intercourse with white Americans to the minimum demanded by decent living." (Mr. Schuyler's observations appeared in The Review of the News, December 18, 1968.)
DuBois' views, so overtly compatible with the Communists' plans for a segregated Negro America, were an embarrassment to the NAACP which, of necessity, had to depend upon financial and other support from white America. And, in 1934, DuBois separated from the NAACP. (He returned ten years later but within four years he left the NAACP permanently and devoted his energies full-time working for Communist projects.)
The departure of DuBois from the NAACP did not mean that the organization was averse to Communists. George Schuyler has narrated:
"Meanwhile, the Association [NAACP] was playing patsy with the forces of the Left . . . and were thereby floating on financial beds of ease. Evil associations corrupt good manners, and also good sense. As the Communists, crypto Communists and fellow travelers moved in on the New Deal and took charge, the NAACP was more and more affected. The indefatigable Walter F. White, NAACP executive secretary, was weekly in Washington cultivating white power which was often Red. Then the New York Communist organizers, Manning Johnson and Leonard Patterson, traveled to Washington, contacted the Red faculty members at Howard University, and 'sold' them on organizing an activist National Negro Congress (NNC). Among the first suckered into it was the NAACP's executive secretary. This committed the Association to supporting an outfit tailored originally by the Communist Party of the U.S.A. to destroy it." (The NAACP's affiliation with the National Negro Congress was not an isolated tie-in with the Communists. In 1938, the NAACP was represented in the World Youth Congress, a Communist enterprise. And, in the 1940's the NAACP was affiliated with American Youth for a Free World, the American affiliate of the World Federation of Democratic Youth, a Communist clearing house.)
As was the case with so many Communist fronts, the National Negro Congress foundered amidst the confusion of the Hitler-Stalin Pact.
The National Negro Congress, however, had a short-lived revival. George Schuyler recounted: "With War's end and the return of the Communist Party to its pre-War line (crying for 'Self-Determination for the Black Belt' and trying to invade the province of the NAACP with the hastily-organized Civil Rights Congress), there was no difficulty in getting high Association officials to join. Soon the National Negro Congress, in one of its last gasps, presented a petition to the United Nations charging the United States with genocide on its Negro population - which, curiously, had increased since 1790 to 1940 from 750,000 to 15 million. Not to be outdone, Dr. DuBois, who had again been given executive office by the NAACP, the following year presented a similar petition charging American genocide against the Negroes. It followed the general line of the Communist plea, and Walter White and DuBois traipsed out to Lake Success to present it."
One of the NAACP's most literate apologists was the late Langston Hughes. (From 1925 until his death in 1967, Hughes was openly associated with Communist Party projects and enterprises. In 1956, the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee included Hughes in its list of eighty-two names of the most active and typical sponsors of Communist front organizations. In sworn testimony, former Communist Party functionary Manning Johnson identified Hughes as a member of the Communist Party as of December, 1935.)
In 1962, Hughes wrote Fight for Freedom: The Story of the NAACP. In his book, Hughes said: "Attempts to label the NAACP subversive, Communist-influenced, or out-and-out Communist have continued for a long time. The late Negro professional witness, ex-Communist Manning Johnson, since discredited, testified before two southern legislative committees to the effect that the NAACP was 'a vehicle of the Communist Party designed to overthrow the government of the United States." [Johnson was not a professional witness but a genuinely repentant American who, from his years as a top Negro Communist, testified accurately before, and cooperated fully with, federal and state investigating committees and agencies. He was discredited only by the Communist Party, its fellow travelers, and its dupes. He did identify Hughes as a Communist. He did testify as to the Communist character of the NAACP since he had been assigned the job of bringing Negro organizations into the Communist orbit.)
Hughes, however, in his whitewash of the NAACP (which, by the way, had conferred its highest award - the Spingarn Medal - upon him in 1960), wrote: "Utterly disregarding the truth, these malicious and irresponsible accusations ignore evidence, so clearly on the record, that the NAACP is not and was not Communist and has never even remotely been under Communist influence. Since its earliest years, its top officials from Joel Spingarn and James Weldon Johnson to Walter White and Roy Wilkins have attacked communism in no uncertain terms in both speaking and writing [and] until recently, the official Communist program for Negroes called for the establishment of a separate Negro nation, an idea that was directly opposite to the NAACP's philosophy of integration." (Spingarn and Johnson were officials when the NAACP was receiving grants from the Garland Fund, the outfit which was created to finance Communist enterprises. White, as George Schuyler noted, worked hand-in-hand with the Communists. Wilkins, on the NAACP's staff since 1931, went out of his way to praise the Communist Party for the help it gave to the Negroes. And, from 1937 until 1949, Wilkins was affiliated with a number of Communist fronts and enterprises. He did become somewhat discreet after 1949 [in 1949 and 1950, he was acting executive secretary and, since 1955, he has been the executive secretary of the NAACP] but in 1965 he joined with notorious Communist leaders to memorialize the deceased Communist W. E. B. DuBois. And, Hughes conveniently forgot that the Communists and the NAACP set aside temporarily the idea of a separate Negro nation only because American Negro masses simply showed no interest in such segregation.)
It is true that from time to time the NAACP went through the motions of denouncing Communism and Communists but, at the same time, the NAACP harbored in its roster of officials and in its membership a legion of Communist-fronters, individuals whose prestige and influence made their presence in the fronts of far more importance to the Communist Party than if they were dues-paying members of obscure and secretive party cells. Among these individuals who represented every Communist front, project, and enterprise ever to appear in this country have been: Roger N. Baldwin, George S. Counts, J. Frank Dobie, Dorothy Canfield Fisher, Arthur Garfield Hays, Freda Kirchwey, Alfred Baker Lewis, Archibald MacLeish, Reinhold Niebuhr, A. Philip Randolph, Guy Emery Shipler, Lillian Smith, Norman Thomas, Leonard Bernstein, Eugene Carson Blake, Sarah Gibson Blanding, Ralph Bunche, Morris Ernst, Buell Gallagher, Rabbi Roland Gittelsohn, Frank Graham, Bishop James A. Pike, Carl Rowan, Eleanor Roosevelt, Walter Reuther, Channing Tobias, Algernon D. Black, Bishop G. Bromley Oxnam, Van Wyck Brooks, Henry Hitt Crane, Benjamin E. Mays, S. Ralph Harlow, and Oscar Hammerstein II. Hughes even boasted that the NAACP membership included Jawaharlal Nehru of India, Averell Harriman, Herbert Lehman, Harry Golden, Harry Belafonte, G. Mennen Williams, Chester Bowles, Nelson Rockefeller, Alan Paton, and Adam Clayton Powell - none of whom could be considered as anything less than extremely soft on Communism. Even after the publication of Hughes' book, there appeared on NAACP letterheads such names as Walter Gellhorn, Telford Taylor, William Sloane Coffin Jr., Dick Gregory, Ossie Davis, Steve Allen, Ruby Dee, Aaron Copland, Helen Buttenwieser, Erwin N. Griswold, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, John A. Volpe, Kirtley Mather, Elliot L. Richardson, and Henry Cabot Lodge.
Among those honored by the NAACP with its annual Spingam Medal have been:
W. E. B. DuBois, Mary McLeod Bethune, A. Philip Randolph, William Hastie, Paul Robeson, Thurgood Marshall, Richard Wright, Martin L. King Jr., Ralph Bunche, Walter White, and Langston Hughes.
From its inception to the present, no matter the protestations of Langston Hughes or any other NAACP apologist, the organization's officials and its known members, collectively and individually, have represented the influential left, the leadership of Communist fronts and left-wing political and pacifist groups, and the most effective of the anti-anti-Communist establishment.
In 1946, the NAACP cooperated with the Communist Party as the latter, in one of its most ambitious political projects of all time, established the Progressive Citizens of America - the basis for Henry Wallace's Communist-dominated Progressive Party in the presidential election of 1948. In 1951, when the Massachusetts legislature was considering a bill to outlaw the Communist Party, the Boston branch of the NAACP, through its legislation committee, opposed the bill. The Committee's chairman, Edward W. Brooke (now U.S. Senator), argued that the bill was "against democratic principles and endangers American civil liberties."
The Communists in the United States have certainly recognized the value of the NAACP as an ally. In 1950, Communist leader Robert Thompson boasted: "The emergence of a powerful left, anti-imperialist, anti-fascist current among the Negro people is unmistakable and is clearly discernible in the NAACP. This Left, anti-imperialist trend in the Association insists upon much greater attention by the organization to the pressing economic and political problems facing the Negro masses." (Political Affairs, February, 1950.)
In 1953, an unusual and total endorsement was given to the NAACP by the Communists in their Daily Worker (September 30): "It should be clear that we Communists are the first to insist that the labor movement, all sections of it, should give every possible support to any and all campaigns conducted by the NAACP."
Four years later, a similar endorsement appeared in the Daily Worker (February 19, 1957): "Communists in labor unions are thus pledged to get their unions to support the NAACP, to better express the affiance of labor with the Negro people. Communists in communities are pledged to aid in increasing the membership and financial strength of the NAACP, whether as members or not."
The relationship between the NAACP and the Communist Party has been demonstrable through the activities of those attorneys who have held office in the NAACP, its branches, or the "Committee of 100" which supports the NAACP's Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Among the more prominent attorneys associated with the NAACP have been Morris Ernst, Robert W. Kenny, Earl B. Dickerson, Clarence Darrow, Bartley Crum, Osmond Fraenkel, Hubert Delany, and Loren Miller - all of whom had an unusual affinity for Communist fronts and projects. For ten years prior to his appointment in 1939 to the Supreme Court of the United States, Felix Frankfurter, an unreconstricted Bolshevik, served as a legal adviser to the NAACP. That intimate association never deterred Frankfurter from sitting and writing decisions on cases where the NAACP was directly involved. But, in its entire history, the NAACP owes its most dramatic successes to the work of Thurgood Marshall. From 1936 until 1961, he was with the NAACP as assistant special counsel (1936-1938), special counsels (1938-1940), and director and counsel for the Legal Defense and Educational Fund (1940-1961). [In 1962, Marshall was appointed by President Kennedy to be U.S. Circuit Court Justice for the Second Judicial Circuit; in 1965, President Johnson appointed him to be Solicitor General of the United States; and, in 1967, President Johnson appointed him to the Supreme Court of the United States.]
From 1938 to 1961, Marshall represented the NAACP thirty-two times before the Supreme Court. He won twenty-nine of the cases. His most notable achievement before the Supreme Court came in 1954, when he successfully argued the Brown v. Board of Education case with the resultant revolutionary decision by the Court that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. There were circumstances, however, which dulled Marshall's victory and the Court's decision.
Seven years after Brown v. Board of Education, Dr. Alfred H. Kelly, an historian who served as an aide to Marshall in the preparation of a brief for the case, revealed that Marshall set out to deceive the Court with dishonest historical arguments. In an address to the American Historical Association, Dr. Kelly told how he was asked by Marshall "to prepare a research paper on the intent of the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to the constitutionality of racially segregated schools."
Dr. Kelly then described his research efforts: "As a constitutional historian, I knew, of course, that the Fourteenth Amendment had evolved, in some considerable part, out of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Accordingly, I went to work on the 1866 volumes of the 'Congressional Globe,' reading anew the story of the debates that winter and spring for clues concerning the intent which [Lyman] Trumbell, [John A.J Bingham, [Thaddeus] Stevens and the other congressional Radicals might have had with respect to legalized segregation in particular.
"I did not really expect to find very much of anything
"As any reasonably competent historian could have told the Court and the lawyers on both sides, the historical questions they had framed [in 1953] did not necessarily have very much relevance at all to the issues that seemed consequential then to the embattled Radicals who had hammered out the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment that spring of 1866 ...
"To my surprise, the debates reprinted in the 1866 volumes of the 'Globe' had a good deal to say about school segregation. Unhappily, from the NAACP's point of view, most of what appeared there at first blush looked rather decidedly bad....
"The conclusion for any reasonably objective historian was painfully clear. The Civil Rights Act as it passed Congress was specifically rewritten to avoid the embarrassing question of a congressional attack upon State racial-segregation laws, including school segregation. .
"The paper I prepared for the September conference [with Mr. Marshall in 1953] was not adequate by any standard. I was trying to be both historian and advocate within the same paper, and the combination, as I found out, was not a very good one.
"I was facing, for the first time in my own career, the deadly opposition between my professional integrity as a historian and my wishes and hopes with respect to a contemporary question of values, of ideals, of policy, of partisanship and of political objectives. I suppose if a man is without scruple, this matter will not bother him, but I am frank to say that it bothered me terribly . . .
Dr. Kelly's work, however, was not completed. He was recalled for help by Marshall, and, along with Robert Ming Jr., a former law professor at Howard University and the University of Chicago, Kelly drafted a brief for Marshall to present to the Supreme Court. And thus began an extraordinary marriage of phony history and highly questionable legal ethics: "I am very much afraid that for the next few days I ceased to function as a historian, and, instead, took up the practice of law without a license. The problem we faced was not the historian's discovery of the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; the problem instead was the formulation of an adequate gloss on the fateful events of 1866 sufficient to convince the Court that we had something of a historical case . . . -
While the NAACP has expended much of its finances and energies upon the support of the demonstrative groups, it has not forsaken its other projects. It continues to agitate for government housing and government "created" jobs for Negroes; for socialized medicine; for forcible integration of public schools; for federal interference with state voting laws, and, for federal interference with intrastate travel laws. In other projects, the NAACP has campaigned against the House Committee on Un-American Activities, against Barry Goldwater, against South Africa, for the peace corps, and for the United Nations.
In July, 1968, in an advertisement in Esquire magazine, the NAACP seemed to revert to the racism that had been characteristic of W. E. B. DuBois. In the ad, the NAACP charged that "white America denies black America its constitutional rights. White America creates the ghetto and slams the door on efforts to escape. White America traps the Negro in a cycle of prejudice and poverty that denies his humanity and destroys his dignity." Meanwhile, the NAACP was holding its fifty-ninth annual convention.
At the six-day convention in June, 1968, the delegates worked on the theme: "the building of economic and political power within the nation's ghettoes." A group of NAACP officials and leaders, organized as the National Committee to Revitalize the NAACP Movement, were obviously disturbed at the organization's loss of influence in the black community because of the rising popularity of black militant groups. These Leaders said: "We must rid ourselves of a solely middle-class image and organize our black stakeless and hopeless; the down and out, the inferiority complex-ridden." They also expressed their shock at "the thundering silence of the association's top leadership on issues of concern to black people."
The remedies suggested by the leaders to restore confidence in the NAACP included the formation of a black-oriented political bloc, similar to labor and farmer blocs; lobbying for more federal handouts for blacks, especially through a guaranteed annual wage plan; and, the introduction into more schools of a "black history" program in an effort "to restore a lost sense of pride and self-worth."
The trouble in the ranks of the NAACP continued after the annual convention. In October 1968, a lawyer on the NAACP staff wrote an article for the New York Times magazine - He was bitterly critical of the Supreme Court for not doing more for Negroes. The utter ridiculousness of the article caused the lawyer to be fired, to protest his firing.
Friday, July 16, 2010
Kristen clarke naacp lawyer has direct ties to the black panthers
.....................................................................................
Naacp direct tie to new black panther party which is just as racist as the original
(This type of story below is why the obama administration wants to tax and regulate all media outlets including the internet. The naacp and the black panthers are both racist organizations. Its a case of the kettle calling the pot 'black" meaning both are racist organizations.) Story Reports
Kristen clarke naacp lawyer has direct ties to the black panthers.
naacp direct tie to black panthers
Quin Hillyer
Washington Times
In the past 24 hours, more than a few pundits and writers have noted that the NAACP resolution accusing Tea Partiers of racism is hard to swallow when the NAACP seems unconcerned with the New Black Panther voting intimidation case. Their points would be valid by analogy only. Their points are even more valid, though, because of a direct, rather than just analagous, tie between the NAACP and the Panther case.
It was first reported here at the Washington Times that "Kristen Clarke, director of political participation at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in Washington, however, confirmed to The Times that she talked about the case with lawyers at the Justice Department and shared copies of the complaint with several persons. She said, however, her organization was 'not involved in the decision to dismiss the civil complaint.'"
(The naacp has admitted lobbying for the black panthers. Yet the naacp accuses people in the tea party movement of being racist. Its just another case of the naacp playing the race card to divert attention and gain support for their organization at the cost of playing their fellow comrades for fools. Their point is just because a tea party patriot disagrees with barack obama, a "black man", he or she must be a racist. This rhetoric is in itself racist rhetoric from a well known racist organization the naacp. This is not to say that everyone who belongs to the naacp is racist. If I said that, I would be doing the same thing the racist naacp has done.) Story Reports
Ms. Clarke testified to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights a few months back that that account was wrong. But J. Christian Adams, the main lawyer who built the case against the Black Panthers, contradicted her when he testified to the commission on July 6.
Here is the exchange between Mr. Adams and commission general counsel David Blackwood:
MR. BLACKWOOD: During the decision making process about the Panther case, did you hear that anyone at the Department was consulting with any outside groups such as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund?
MR. ADAMS: Well, I did, but we were also consulting with outside groups. We visited the Southern Poverty Law Center. We visited the Anti-Defamation League and would have probably hired them as an expert in this case if it had gone forward. Because of course the Black Panthers, they're a militant, anti-Semitic group. They're not just black nationalists. They hate Jews. And the ADL has an extensive database on this organization.
MR. BLACKWOOD: But the -- Your communications with the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center I assume were related to the substance of the case.
MR. ADAMS: That's correct.
MR. BLACKWOOD: Do you know whether anybody was consulting as to whether to proceed or the merits of the case with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund?
MR. ADAMS: Well, listen. This is not firsthand. But I was told by section management that NAACP members or staffers were talking with the Voting section attorney in March of 2009 and asking, "When is this case going to get dismissed" which, of course, is interesting to hear for the first time that someone's even thinking about dismissing the case that you're in the middle of building. And that was -- It seemed strange. But it didn't really give me much pause other than to think that's a really strange request.
(This was not a "strange" request coming from a racist organization like the naacp. It was a request to kill the investigation because black racists support fellow black racists) Story Reports
MR. BLACKWOOD: Well, all press reports indicated a conversation between Kristen Clark of the Legal Defense Fund and a Laura Coates of the Department. Who is Laura Coates?
MR. ADAMS: She is a line attorney in the Voting section, no relation to Christopher Coates.
MR. BLACKWOOD: And according to the press reports Laura Coates reported this contact, this conversation, with Kristen Clark of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund "to her superiors." Do you know whether that occurred?
MR. ADAMS: I do. And if Mr. Coates were able to comply with his subpoena and testify under oath I'm quite confident that he would be able to share the full details of those communications as conveyed to him.
MR. BLACKWOOD: But you're not in the position to do that.
MR. ADAMS: Other than they existed and you accurately -- and that I characterized them as a request as to when the case was going to be dismissed as conveyed to me by Mr. Coates.
Mr. Coates was the top attorney directly involved in building the case. After he was subpoenaed by the commission, the Justice Department summarily transferred him to South Carolina, which just so happens to be outside the commission's statutory subpoena range. The department has repeatedly refused to compy with or enforce the commission's subpoenas, even though federal law mandates that all federal agencies shall cooperate with the commission.
(This is evidence of a criminal offense by people in the justice dept under the direction of barack obama, a known racist. Don't just gloss over the fact that the "justice brothers" in the justice dept have transferred Mr Coates outside of the commission's statutory subpoena range. Obama is in charge of a THUGOCRACY!) Story Reports
Anyway, if, as has been believably alleged, the NAACP attorney was lobbying or actively hinting to the new Obama appointees or their "friendlies" in the "career" ranks of DoJ that DoJ should drop the Black Panther case, it makes the NAACP's charges of racism against Tea Partiers even more tendentious.
(This is more evidence of obama administration racisim in the form of dropping all charges against racists who would prevent Americans from voting. The charges were dropped just because they were black. This is obama racism along with the naacp org and the black panthers. They are saying they want to kill me just because I am white. This is only a small racist minority who would do this. Nut cases. Most black people I believe know what the new black panthers are. Common sense tells you to be prepared for nut jobs like these crazy black panthers and others who support them. I am prepared, are you?) Story Reports
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Exceptions in Stimulus Bill Allow Sale of Your Health Records
The stimulus bill has a dead link on the cbs website. The cbs website story is correct. When obama signed the "stimulus" bill he also signed provisions for your health care and your health records. I have provided links to the dirty obama stimulus bill and its provisions for your personal health records.(Story Reports)
Read The Stimulus Bill. It Also Contains Health Provisions That Affect Your Privacy And Panels That Will Determine If You Are Worthy Of Live, (Death Panels)
..........................................................................................
‘Exceptions’ in Stimulus Bill Allow Sale of Health Records CBS News
Fred Lucas CBS
Exceptions in Stimulus Bill Allow Sale of Your Health Records
It could become easier to sell and exchange the health information of Americans under the economic stimulus package that President Barack Obama’s signed Tuesday Jul 13, 2009.
The $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that passed Congress last week allocates $19 billion to establish centrally linked health data infrastructure to contain the health information of “each American” by 2014 and to set up the new office of the “National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.”
Though the legislation says there is a “prohibition on sale of electronic health records or protected health information,” there are five pages of exceptions to the prohibition that include research, treatment of an individual, or a decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive the prohibition.
One exception listed in the legislation is if, “The purpose of the exchange is for public health activities.” Another exception is apparently to ensure the data – if sold – are not for commercial reasons, saying, “The purpose of the exchange is for research and the price charged reflects costs of preparation and transmittal of the data for such purpose.”
Another exception is rather broad saying, “The purpose of the exchange is otherwise determined by the secretary in regulations to be similarly necessary and appropriate” in accordance with the other exceptions.
Further, one of the exceptions seemingly states the government can obtain an individual’s health information for the purpose of protecting an individual’s privacy. It reads: “The purpose of the exchange is for treatment of the individual, subject to any regulation that the secretary may promulgate to prevent protected health information from inappropriate access, use or disclosure.”
The legislation also says that the prohibition will be reviewed after 18 months. The review will further explore whether the government “may further restrict the exception described in paragraph (2)(A) to require that the price charged for the purpose described in such paragraph reflects the cost of preparation and transmittal of the data for such purpose, if the secretary finds that such further restriction will not impede such research or public health activities.”
Some of these exceptions are already in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), a law with privacy provisions.
But the exceptions on exchanging or selling information could be more problematic to privacy if health records are digital, said Sue Blevins, president of the Institute for Health Freedom, a group that advocates health privacy issues.
“Digital records without consent is a recipe for invasion of privacy,” Blevins told CNSNews.com Monday. “Consent was gutted with HIPAA, but it is really hard to get out paper records. When they are made electronic, you can share data with a click of a mouse.”
Those who could be able to sell the information would be health care providers, insurance companies and other entities that collect the data.
(Note that your insurance company could sell your PRIVATE information. This is just as bad as the government having access to your PRIVATE information. Americans PRIVATE health information will not be private any more in 2014. Your PRIVATE health information can and will be sold. Your PRIVATE personal information will be available to anyone for a price. The US government will have access to your PRIVATE personal information to use when the "death panels" need to make a decision on who is worthy of live. Obama and his fellow thugs must be stopped in Nov 2010 or obama and his fellow thugs will determine if you live or die. Obama and his thugs will determine if you get ANY health care.) Story Reports
A statement by the Democratic majority on the Senate Finance Committee says the information will not be used to influence treatment and that “Federal law makes your medical records--whether they’re on paper or in a computer--confidential to you and your health provider.”
(This is a total lie. Federal law makes you medical records available to people who want to buy the information as proven in the statements above.) Story Reports
President Barack Obama, when touting the overall stimulus bill on Friday, said, “We'll computerize our health care system, at last, to save billions of dollars and countless lives as we reduce medical errors.”
(Another total lie. Obamacare will cost billions not save billions.) Story Reports
“Making sure that providers can share information on a patient, making sure we can do that effectively and efficiently is a good thing. Having government decide about the course of treatment is not a good thing,” Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.) told CNSNews.com.
“It goes right back to the government’s role should be between a patient and a provider. That information needs to be there for the patient and the provider to make decisions about their health care -- not for government to intercede.”
(Obamacare must be repealed or not funded. The republican majority that will ne elected in Nov 2010 must neuter obama and his care.) Story Reports
Read The Stimulus Bill. It Also Contains Health Provisions That Affect Your Privacy And Panels That Will Determine If You Are Worthy Of Live, (Death Panels)
........................................................................................
This starts on page 186 of the above PDF. Read it for yourself.
Health and Insurance section of the "stimulus bill"
Read the Stimulus bill and find the hidden provisions about your personal health records
1 (e) PROHIBITION ON SALE OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH
2 RECORDS OR PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION
3OBTAINED FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.—
........................................................................................
4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para5
graph (2), a covered entity or business associate
6 shall not directly or indirectly receive remuneration
7 in exchange for any protected health information of
8 an individual unless the covered entity obtained from
9 the individual, in accordance with section 164.508 of
10 title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, a valid au11
thorization that includes, in accordance with such
12 section, a specification of whether the protected
13 health information can be further exchanged for re14
muneration by the entity receiving protected health
15 information of that individual.
16 (2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not
17 apply in the following cases:
18 (A) The purpose of the exchange is for re19
search or public health activities (as described
20 in sections 164.501, 164.512(i), and 164.512(b)
21 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations) and
22 the price charged reflects the costs of prepara23
tion and transmittal of the data for such pur
24 pose.
Page 187
1 (B) The purpose of the exchange is for the
2 treatment of the individual and the price
3 charges reflects not more than the costs of
4 preparation and transmittal of the data for
5 such purpose.
6 (C) The purpose of the exchange is the
7 health care operation specifically described in
8 subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (6) of the defi9
nition of health care operations in section
10 164.501 of title 45, Code of Federal Regula11
tions.
12 (D) The purpose of the exchange is for re13
muneration that is provided by a covered entity
14 to a business associate for activities involving
15 the exchange of protected health information
16 that the business associate undertakes on behalf
17 of and at the specific request of the covered en18
tity pursuant to a business associate agreement.
19 (E) The purpose of the exchange is to pro20
vide an individual with a copy of the individ21
ual’s protected health information pursuant to
22 section 164.524 of title 45, Code of Federal
23 Regulations.
24 (F) The purpose of the exchange is other25
wise determined by the Secretary in regulations
Page 188
1 to be similarly necessary and appropriate as the
2 exceptions provided in subparagraphs (A)
3 through (E).
4 (3) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall pro5
mulgate regulations to carry out paragraph (this
6 subsection, including exceptions described in para7
graph (2), not later than 18 months after the date
8 of the enactment of this title.
9 (4) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (1) shall
10 apply to exchanges occurring on or after the date
11 that is 6 months after the date of the promulgation
12 of final regulations implementing this subsection.
13 (f) ACCESS TO CERTAIN INFORMATION IN ELEC14
TRONIC FORMAT.—In applying section 164.524 of title
15 45, Code of Federal Regulations, in the case that a cov16
ered entity uses or maintains an electronic health record
17 with respect to protected health information of an indi18
vidual—
19 (1) the individual shall have a right to obtain
20 from such covered entity a copy of such information
21 in an electronic format; and
22 (2) notwithstanding paragraph (c)(4) of such
23 section, any fee that the covered entity may impose
24 for providing such individual with a copy of such in25
formation (or a summary or explanation of such in-
Page 189
1 formation) if such copy (or summary or explanation)
2 is in an electronic form shall not be greater than the
3 entity’s labor costs in responding to the request for
4 the copy (or summary or explanation).
5 SEC. 4406. CONDITIONS ON CERTAIN CONTACTS AS PART
6 OF HEALTH CARE OPERATIONS.
7 (a) MARKETING.—
8 (1) IN GENERAL.—A communication by a cov9
ered entity or business associate that is about a
10 product or service and that encourages recipients of
11 the communication to purchase or use the product
12 or service shall not be considered a health care oper13
ation for purposes of subpart E of part 164 of title
14 45, Code of Federal Regulations, unless the commu15
nication is made as described in subparagraph (i),
16 (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1) of the definition of
17 marketing in section 164.501 of such title.
18 (2) PAYMENT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNICA19
TIONS.—A covered entity or business associate may
20 not receive direct or indirect payment in exchange
21 for making any communication described in sub22
paragraph (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1) of the
23 definition of marketing in section 164.501 of title
24 45, Code of Federal Regulations, except—
Etc Etc. Yes your personal health records CAN and WILL be sold! Yet obama can't and won't prove he is a valid US citizen!
Read The Stimulus Bill. It Also Contains Health Provisions That Affect Your Privacy And Panels That Will Determine If You Are Worthy Of Live, (Death Panels)
..........................................................................................
‘Exceptions’ in Stimulus Bill Allow Sale of Health Records CBS News
Fred Lucas CBS
Exceptions in Stimulus Bill Allow Sale of Your Health Records
It could become easier to sell and exchange the health information of Americans under the economic stimulus package that President Barack Obama’s signed Tuesday Jul 13, 2009.
The $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that passed Congress last week allocates $19 billion to establish centrally linked health data infrastructure to contain the health information of “each American” by 2014 and to set up the new office of the “National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.”
Though the legislation says there is a “prohibition on sale of electronic health records or protected health information,” there are five pages of exceptions to the prohibition that include research, treatment of an individual, or a decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive the prohibition.
One exception listed in the legislation is if, “The purpose of the exchange is for public health activities.” Another exception is apparently to ensure the data – if sold – are not for commercial reasons, saying, “The purpose of the exchange is for research and the price charged reflects costs of preparation and transmittal of the data for such purpose.”
Another exception is rather broad saying, “The purpose of the exchange is otherwise determined by the secretary in regulations to be similarly necessary and appropriate” in accordance with the other exceptions.
Further, one of the exceptions seemingly states the government can obtain an individual’s health information for the purpose of protecting an individual’s privacy. It reads: “The purpose of the exchange is for treatment of the individual, subject to any regulation that the secretary may promulgate to prevent protected health information from inappropriate access, use or disclosure.”
The legislation also says that the prohibition will be reviewed after 18 months. The review will further explore whether the government “may further restrict the exception described in paragraph (2)(A) to require that the price charged for the purpose described in such paragraph reflects the cost of preparation and transmittal of the data for such purpose, if the secretary finds that such further restriction will not impede such research or public health activities.”
Some of these exceptions are already in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), a law with privacy provisions.
But the exceptions on exchanging or selling information could be more problematic to privacy if health records are digital, said Sue Blevins, president of the Institute for Health Freedom, a group that advocates health privacy issues.
“Digital records without consent is a recipe for invasion of privacy,” Blevins told CNSNews.com Monday. “Consent was gutted with HIPAA, but it is really hard to get out paper records. When they are made electronic, you can share data with a click of a mouse.”
Those who could be able to sell the information would be health care providers, insurance companies and other entities that collect the data.
(Note that your insurance company could sell your PRIVATE information. This is just as bad as the government having access to your PRIVATE information. Americans PRIVATE health information will not be private any more in 2014. Your PRIVATE health information can and will be sold. Your PRIVATE personal information will be available to anyone for a price. The US government will have access to your PRIVATE personal information to use when the "death panels" need to make a decision on who is worthy of live. Obama and his fellow thugs must be stopped in Nov 2010 or obama and his fellow thugs will determine if you live or die. Obama and his thugs will determine if you get ANY health care.) Story Reports
A statement by the Democratic majority on the Senate Finance Committee says the information will not be used to influence treatment and that “Federal law makes your medical records--whether they’re on paper or in a computer--confidential to you and your health provider.”
(This is a total lie. Federal law makes you medical records available to people who want to buy the information as proven in the statements above.) Story Reports
President Barack Obama, when touting the overall stimulus bill on Friday, said, “We'll computerize our health care system, at last, to save billions of dollars and countless lives as we reduce medical errors.”
(Another total lie. Obamacare will cost billions not save billions.) Story Reports
“Making sure that providers can share information on a patient, making sure we can do that effectively and efficiently is a good thing. Having government decide about the course of treatment is not a good thing,” Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.) told CNSNews.com.
“It goes right back to the government’s role should be between a patient and a provider. That information needs to be there for the patient and the provider to make decisions about their health care -- not for government to intercede.”
(Obamacare must be repealed or not funded. The republican majority that will ne elected in Nov 2010 must neuter obama and his care.) Story Reports
Read The Stimulus Bill. It Also Contains Health Provisions That Affect Your Privacy And Panels That Will Determine If You Are Worthy Of Live, (Death Panels)
........................................................................................
This starts on page 186 of the above PDF. Read it for yourself.
Health and Insurance section of the "stimulus bill"
Read the Stimulus bill and find the hidden provisions about your personal health records
1 (e) PROHIBITION ON SALE OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH
2 RECORDS OR PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION
3OBTAINED FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.—
........................................................................................
4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para5
graph (2), a covered entity or business associate
6 shall not directly or indirectly receive remuneration
7 in exchange for any protected health information of
8 an individual unless the covered entity obtained from
9 the individual, in accordance with section 164.508 of
10 title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, a valid au11
thorization that includes, in accordance with such
12 section, a specification of whether the protected
13 health information can be further exchanged for re14
muneration by the entity receiving protected health
15 information of that individual.
16 (2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not
17 apply in the following cases:
18 (A) The purpose of the exchange is for re19
search or public health activities (as described
20 in sections 164.501, 164.512(i), and 164.512(b)
21 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations) and
22 the price charged reflects the costs of prepara23
tion and transmittal of the data for such pur
24 pose.
Page 187
1 (B) The purpose of the exchange is for the
2 treatment of the individual and the price
3 charges reflects not more than the costs of
4 preparation and transmittal of the data for
5 such purpose.
6 (C) The purpose of the exchange is the
7 health care operation specifically described in
8 subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (6) of the defi9
nition of health care operations in section
10 164.501 of title 45, Code of Federal Regula11
tions.
12 (D) The purpose of the exchange is for re13
muneration that is provided by a covered entity
14 to a business associate for activities involving
15 the exchange of protected health information
16 that the business associate undertakes on behalf
17 of and at the specific request of the covered en18
tity pursuant to a business associate agreement.
19 (E) The purpose of the exchange is to pro20
vide an individual with a copy of the individ21
ual’s protected health information pursuant to
22 section 164.524 of title 45, Code of Federal
23 Regulations.
24 (F) The purpose of the exchange is other25
wise determined by the Secretary in regulations
Page 188
1 to be similarly necessary and appropriate as the
2 exceptions provided in subparagraphs (A)
3 through (E).
4 (3) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall pro5
mulgate regulations to carry out paragraph (this
6 subsection, including exceptions described in para7
graph (2), not later than 18 months after the date
8 of the enactment of this title.
9 (4) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (1) shall
10 apply to exchanges occurring on or after the date
11 that is 6 months after the date of the promulgation
12 of final regulations implementing this subsection.
13 (f) ACCESS TO CERTAIN INFORMATION IN ELEC14
TRONIC FORMAT.—In applying section 164.524 of title
15 45, Code of Federal Regulations, in the case that a cov16
ered entity uses or maintains an electronic health record
17 with respect to protected health information of an indi18
vidual—
19 (1) the individual shall have a right to obtain
20 from such covered entity a copy of such information
21 in an electronic format; and
22 (2) notwithstanding paragraph (c)(4) of such
23 section, any fee that the covered entity may impose
24 for providing such individual with a copy of such in25
formation (or a summary or explanation of such in-
Page 189
1 formation) if such copy (or summary or explanation)
2 is in an electronic form shall not be greater than the
3 entity’s labor costs in responding to the request for
4 the copy (or summary or explanation).
5 SEC. 4406. CONDITIONS ON CERTAIN CONTACTS AS PART
6 OF HEALTH CARE OPERATIONS.
7 (a) MARKETING.—
8 (1) IN GENERAL.—A communication by a cov9
ered entity or business associate that is about a
10 product or service and that encourages recipients of
11 the communication to purchase or use the product
12 or service shall not be considered a health care oper13
ation for purposes of subpart E of part 164 of title
14 45, Code of Federal Regulations, unless the commu15
nication is made as described in subparagraph (i),
16 (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1) of the definition of
17 marketing in section 164.501 of such title.
18 (2) PAYMENT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNICA19
TIONS.—A covered entity or business associate may
20 not receive direct or indirect payment in exchange
21 for making any communication described in sub22
paragraph (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1) of the
23 definition of marketing in section 164.501 of title
24 45, Code of Federal Regulations, except—
Etc Etc. Yes your personal health records CAN and WILL be sold! Yet obama can't and won't prove he is a valid US citizen!
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Take This Cognitive Test And See If You Agree
........................................................................................
Watch the test and then decide if I am correct. Don't read below until you take the test.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
This demonstration is much like a good magic trick in which a magician repeatedly makes a ball disappear. A magician can lead the audience to think he's going to make the ball disappear with one method, and while people watch for that technique, he uses a different one. In both cases, the effect capitalizes on what people expect to see, and both demonstrate that we often miss what we don't expect to see.
“Great liars are also great magicians” Hitler
(Americans expect to see the economy improve. Obama uses his twisted logic to repeatedly make any improvment in the economy disappear while telling people it is improving. While people watch the technique of the economy not improving, obama uses a different one. It is a technique hitler also used to deceive the masses. “If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed”. In both cases, the effect capitalizes on what people expect to see, and both demonstrate that we often miss what we don't expect to see. People expect to see the economy improve, they don't expect the economy to be destroyed on purpose. This is what many people are missing. Obama is destroying the economy on purpose.
Get my point?) Story Reports
.........................................................................................
'Invisible Gorilla' Test Shows How Little We Notice
Charles Q. Choi
LiveScience Contributor
LiveScience.com charles Q. Choi
livescience.com – Tue Jul 13, 2010
A dumbfounding study roughly a decade ago that many now find hard to believe revealed that if people are asked to focus on a video of other people passing basketballs, about half of watchers missed a person in a gorilla suit walking in and out of the scene thumping its chest.
Now research delving further into this effect shows that people who know that such a surprising event is likely to occur are no better at noticing other unforeseen events - and may even be worse at noticing them - than others who aren't expecting the unexpected.
The so-called "invisible gorilla" test had volunteers watching a video where two groups of people - some dressed in white, some in black - are passing basketballs around. The volunteers were asked to count the passes among players dressed in white while ignoring the passes of those in black.
These confounding findings from cognitive psychologists Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris detailed in a 1999 study revealed how people can focus so hard on something that they become blind to the unexpected, even when staring right at it. When one develops "inattentional blindness," as this effect is called, it becomes easy to miss details when one is not looking out for them.
"Although people do still try to rationalize why they missed the gorilla, it's hard to explain such a failure of awareness without confronting the possibility that we are aware of far less of our world than we think," Simons told LiveScience.
Gorilla infamy
Of course, these results are utterly counterintuitive, with 90 percent of people now predicting that they would notice the gorilla in the video. The problem is that this video has become so famous that many people know to look for a gorilla when asked to count basketball passes.
In new research, Simons decided to use the infamy of the invisible gorilla to his advantage, creating a similar video that asked for the same results from the audience.
"I thought it would be fun to see if I could monkey with people's intuitions again using almost the same task," Simons said.
Expecting the unexpected
Of the 41 volunteers Simon tested who had never seen or heard about the old video, a little less than half missed the gorilla in the new video, much like what happened in the old experiments. The 23 volunteers he tested who knew about the original gorilla video all spotted the fake ape in the new experiment.
However, knowing about the gorilla beforehand did not improve their chances of detecting other unexpected events. Only 17 percent of those who were familiar with the old video noticed one or both of the other unexpected events in the new video. In comparison, 29 percent of those who knew nothing of the old video spotted one of the other unexpected events in the new video.
"This demonstration is much like a good magic trick in which a magician repeatedly makes a ball disappear," Simons said. "A magician can lead the audience to think he's going to make the ball disappear with one method, and while people watch for that technique, he uses a different one. In both cases, the effect capitalizes on what people expect to see, and both demonstrate that we often miss what we don't expect to see."
"A lot of people seem to take the message of our original gorilla study to be that people don't pay enough attention to what is happening around them, and that by paying more attention and 'expecting the unexpected,' we will be able to notice anything important," he added. "The new experiment shows that even when people know that they are doing a task in which an unexpected thing might happen, that doesn't suddenly help them notice other unexpected things."
Once people find the first thing they're looking for, "they often don't notice other things," Simons said. "Our intuitions about what we will and won't notice are often mistaken."
Simons detailed his new findings online July 12 in the journal i-Perception.
'Invisible Gorilla' Test Shows How Little We Notice
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)