CongressAuction.com - Place Your "bid" now.
Trump calls out Nancy Pelosi for mumbling behind him during State of the Union
President Trump addresses supporters at Keep America Great rally in New Hampshire.
"I had somebody behind me who was mumbling terribly," Trump mused, as chants of "Lock her up!" broke out.
Before he departed the rally, the president made sure to thank Pelosi for giving Republicans the highest poll numbers they've "ever" had -- or at least since 2005, according to a recent Gallup survey.
Pelosi, who ripped up Trump's State of the Union address as soon as it concluded, was widely criticized especially after videos emerged showing she had visibly torn some of the pages in advance.
"Nine months from now, we are going to retake the House of Representatives, we are going to hold the Senate, and we are going to keep the White House," Trump said to thunderous applause. "We have so much more enthusiasm, it's not even close.
They're all fighting each other. ... They don't know what they're doing; they can't even count their votes."
Perhaps worst of all, Trump said, liberals and the "fake news" media simply "can't take a joke."
Huge crowds gathered in the overflow viewing area outside the packed Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU) arena in Manchester, which can hold approximately 11,000.
Editor Note
Mumbling and bumbling democrats and the FAKE news media continue to slip on their own banana agenda.
The main thing democrats have going for them is the FAKE news media.
A few quotes from the democrates during their rallys or campaign ads:
Joe Biden jokingly branded a young female voter a 'lying, dog-faced pony soldier' during a town hall in New Hampshire Sunday - then claimed he was quoting John Wayne.
Biden insults one of his own supporters again.
Pete Buttigieg “In our White House, you won’t have to shake your head and ask yourself: whatever happened to ‘I was hungry and you fed me. I was a stranger and you welcomed me,’” Buttigieg said, referring to Jesus’ words in Matthew 25:35.
Buttigieg should have quoted,
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Buttigieg is a sodomite
________________________________________________________
Bernie sanders in 2020 is the same bernard sanders of 1977
Sanders had little interest in making a profit from his educational film enterprise. Instead, after his falling-out with Liberty Union, he poured his share of the profits into his pièce de résistance—a documentary on the life of union leader Eugene Debs, who won nearly a million votes running for president from prison on the Socialist ticket in 1920.
“We had gone to New York and lined up Howard Da Silva, who was a big Broadway booming voice actor, to play Eugene Debs’ voice,” Barnett explains. “But that didn’t quite work out, so Bernie ended up doing the narration of Debs’ voice.”
Bernie Sanders is from Brooklyn; Debs was not. The movie also suffered from the filmmaker’s reverence for his subject.
Sanders, one reviewer opined, seemed “determined to administer Debs to the viewer as if it were an unpleasant, but necessary, medicine.”
Bernie Sanders gave a “major speech” explaining what democratic socialism means to him.
Sanders’s 1979 documentary on socialist presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs may offer a more revealing glimpse of Sanders’ socialist vision than his speeches. Sanders wrote, directed, and starred in this documentary.
You can and read the transcript here.
Bernard Sanders is a dangerous communist.
Some of the quotations from Debs which Sanders speaks in his own voice and presents in an entirely positive light in this documentary will take you aback.
For example: “while there is a lower class I am in it, while there is a criminal element, I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.”
Crime here is seen as nothing but a product of exploitative capitalism. Sanders also clearly approves of Debs’ attribution of racial animosity in the South to a plot by employers to undercut “working class unity.”
This is classic Marxist doctrine. Sanders also emphasizes the importance of Marx’s writings to the development of Debs’ socialist thought.
Sanders’ treatment of Debs’ support for Russia’s communist revolution of 1917 is particularly striking. Here, at least, you might expect a bit of distancing or criticism from a truly “democratic” socialist. Yet Sanders obviously admires Debs’ decision to give “unqualified support to the Russian Revolution which had just taken place under the leadership of Lenin and Trotsky.”
When Sanders turns to explaining the decline of Debs’ Socialist Party after 1917, he attributes it to the party’s opposition to World War I and to fear of persecution. Nowhere does Sanders suggest that the Russian Revolution and its aftermath may have raised legitimate concerns about socialism.
Sanders’s honeymoon in the Soviet Union and his trips to Cuba and Nicaragua make a lot of sense in light of his documentary on his communist hero Debs.
Bernard Sanders was and is still, at heart, a neurotic socialist.
Sanders was initially drawn to Sigmund Freud and his theories as a high school student in Brooklyn. He then studied psychology at the University of Chicago and at the New School for Social Research in New York.
He worked at a mental institution in New York City before settling in Vermont for good in 1968. Like many lefties of his time, he was heavily influenced by the Austrian psychologist Wilhelm Reich, a disciple of Freud whose work drew a connection between sexual repression and fascism. When Paris student demonstrators took the street in that year, they held up copies of Reich’s book.
In a 1969 essay for the Freeman called “Cancer, Disease and Society,” Sanders, then 28, contended that conformity caused cancer by breaking down the human spirit and inflicting emotional trauma.
He quoted liberally from Reich’s 1948 book, The Cancer Biopathy, which, he noted, was “very definite about the link between emotional and sexual health, and cancer,” and he walked readers through Reich’s theory about the consequences of suppressing “biosexual excitation.”
In 1969, bernard wrote:
The Revolution is coming and it is a very beautiful revolution. It is beautiful because, in its deepest sense, it is quiet, gentle, and all pervasive. It KNOWS.
What is most important in this revolution will require no guns, no commandants, no screaming “leaders,” and no vicious publications accusing everyone else of being counter-revolutionary.
The revolution comes when two strangers smile at each other, when a father refuses to send his child to school because schools destroy children, when a commune is started and people begin to trust each other, when a young man refuses to go to war, and when a girl pushes aside all that her mother has ‘taught’ her and accepts her boyfriend’s love.
The revolution comes when young people throughout the world take control of their own lives and when people everywhere begin to look each other in the eyes and say hello, without fear. This is the revolution, this is the strength, and with this behind us no politician or general will ever stop us. We shall win!
___________________________
Bonus Editor Note
Bernard should have been treated in a mental institution instead of working in a mental institution.
He explains his radical communist past writings by saying that was years ago and his views have changed.
Bernie hasn't changed his views. He is still a skunk spewing his communist agenda of lies.
Who will the democrate cream of the FAKE news media crop be?
Joe biden? A liar, idiot, plagiarist, criminal?
Buttigieg? A liar and homosexual?
Bernard sanders? A liar and communist?
Pocohontus warren? A liar and fraud? She uses Identity politics and radical dishonesty.
Democrates don't see these people as having any faults.
This is because most democrates themselves are all the above and identify with some of their traits.
______________________________
Elizabeth Warren Is a Fraud
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) has been telling a story for years. It’s a deeply romantic story about her parents and their young love, fraught with the familial bigotry of an earlier time. Here’s how she told it this week in a video she released in preparation for her 2020 run:
My daddy always said he fell head over heels in love with my mother the first time he saw her. But my daddy’s parents, the Herrings, were bitterly opposed to their marrying because my mother’s family, the Reeds, was part Native American. This sort of discrimination was common at the time. So when my momma was 19 and my daddy was 20, they eloped. And together they built a family, my three older brothers and me.They were a regular Romeo and Juliet of the American plains.
There’s only one problem with Warren’s story:
There wasn’t a shred of evidence that Warren had Native American ancestry, outside of her claims that she did.
For years, she portrayed herself as Native American in legal directories. And she has maintained her Native American ancestry in politics as well.
Whatever credibility Warren had on the issue has been shattered — by Warren herself. Irked at President Trump’s irreverence regarding her purported bloodline, Warren released the results of a DNA study done by Professor Carlos Bustamante of Stanford University.
Those results showed that a Native American ancestor may have existed in Warren’s family tree “in the range of 6–10 generations ago.”
This would make Warren somewhere between 1/64th Native American and 1/1024th Native American.
It’s quite hilarious — and remarkably tone deaf — that Warren thought the study would make her problems go away rather than exacerbate them. But she was counting on a little help from her friends in the media.
They did their best. The Daily Beast headlined, “Elizabeth Warren Fights Trump’s ‘Pocahontas’ Taunt with DNA Test Proving Native-American Roots.”
NBC went with “Elizabeth Warren Releases DNA Results Indicating She Has Native American Heritage.”
MSNBC cheered, “DNA Test Results Allow Elizabeth Warren to Turn the Tables on Trump.”
But at of the day , her narrative had absolutely collapsed:
Even the Cherokee Nation released a statement blasting Warren for her pretentions to Native American group membership.
So, here’s the question: Why was this so important to Warren?
After all, she could rest on the fact that the Boston Globe reported just six weeks ago that Warren’s Native American status wasn’t a factor in her hiring at Harvard Law School.
This was FAKE news because it was a factor.
Why couldn’t Warren just say — as, in fact, she claims in the pages of the Globe — that she claimed Native American ancestry because she believed the stories she was told by her female relatives, and that those claims may have turned out to be false but had no impact in any case on her career development?
Because claiming minority status did and does have value to Warren.
Her Native American ancestry claims was a factor in her hiring at Harvard Law. The University of Pennsylvania listed Warren’s 1994 teaching award in its Minority Equity Report.
Harvard Law listed her as Native American in the university’s annual affirmative-action report; administrators listed her as such from 1995 to 2004. It took real action from Warren herself to be listed as Native American at the institutions at which she worked.
Minority status adds luster to a résumé in academia.
And in politics. Warren knows that without her claims of Native American ancestry, she’s merely another successful white woman in an era in which the base of her party has dismissed white women as part of the privileged class.
Claiming connection with a historically disadvantaged minority is politically useful to Warren — even if that connection is gossamer-thin.
By the intersectional logic of the Left, ancestry is destiny, and those of minority ancestry are bound together by a common fate.
Warren wants to be seen as part of that coalition. She can’t be unless she can claim victimization on grounds of something beyond sex — female status isn’t enough these days.
Thus, Warren, using a perversely race-centric view of the world that suggests one drop of Native American blood renders you Native American, has classified herself with emerging future of the Democratic party rather than with its demographic past.
Perhaps the Left will let her get away with it. Perhaps they won’t.
But the saga of Elizabeth Warren demonstrates once again that the ugly new identity politics dominating the Left drives its own acolytes to radical dishonesty to avoid being cast out of the club.
Ugly identity politics and radical dishonesty other faces include:
Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.
The Brains Behind AOC Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
storyreportscomments.blogspot.comPresident Tump Refers To Pelosi
Operation Remove
CongressAuction.com - Place Your "bid" now.
