Is America allready under Martial Law Yes

Scratch Your Ass All You Monkees Who Voted For Obama As You Ponder Your Future With Your Leader. The US is borrowing money trying to paper over the economic crisis that is actually a result of government creating the crisis in the first place over the years. By putting the economic collapse off it just makes it worse. If the dollar becomes worthless, its all over and martial law begins obama style. The useful idiot will become dictator.
....................................................................................
At various times in U.S. history, the government’s law enforcement branches have used their prosecutorial discretion to target citizens who voice their dissent. The law enforcement targeting of citizens who exercise their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion since 9-11 is certainly no exception.

The USA PATRIOT Act section 802 defines domestic terrorism so broadly that it could apply to an individual exercising his or her freedom of speech, expression, and assembly through acts of civil disobedience. The Department of Justice has not revealed how it is using section 802.




////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Bastard George Bush paved the way for the current Bastard Obama, by the de-facto repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) to wage an ominous assault on American democratic tradition and jurisprudence. President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units {without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."} In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is precise; the term is "martial law."

In Bush's signing statement he declares in essence that he reserves the right not to consult with anyone:

"The executive branch shall construe sections 914 and 1512 of the Act, which purport to make consultation with specified Members of Congress a precondition to the execution of the law, as calling for but not mandating such consultation, as is consistent with the Constitution's provisions concerning the separate powers of the Congress to legislate and the President to execute the laws."

In other words, he can declare martial law and not tell anyone why he's doing it or what he's doing. There is a word for this: dictatorship. Yet, in spite of this outrageous law and his outrageous signing statement, the media have been silent on this. We, the people, however, cannot be silent in the face of these moves towards a fascist state.

UNDERSTAND THIS: A PRESIDENT CAN DECLARE MARTIAL LAW AND NOT TELL CONGRESS! IS AMERICA ALLREADY UNDER MARTIAL LAW? YES.

On the 29th of September, Leahy entered into the Congressional Record that he had "grave reservations about certain provisions of the fiscal Year 2007 Defense Authorization Bill Conference Report," the language of which, he said, "subverts solid, longstanding posse comitatus statutes that limit the military's involvement in law enforcement, thereby making it easier for the President to declare martial law." This had been "slipped in," Leahy said, "as a rider with little study," while "other congressional committees with jurisdiction over these matters had no chance to comment, let alone hold hearings on, these proposals."

In a telling bit of understatement, the Senator from Vermont noted that "the implications of changing the (Posse Comitatus) Act are enormous". "There is good reason," he said, "for the constructive friction in existing law when it comes to martial law declarations. Using the military for law enforcement goes against one of the founding tenets of our democracy. We fail our Constitution, neglecting the rights of the States, when we make it easier for the President to declare martial law and trample on local and state sovereignty."

Senator Leahy's final ruminations: "Since hearing word a couple of weeks ago that this outcome was likely, I have wondered how Congress could have gotten to this point. It seems the changes to the Insurrection Act have survived the Conference because the Pentagon and the White House want it."

The historic and ominous re-writing of the Insurrection Act, accomplished in the dead of night, which gives Bush the legal authority to declare martial law, is now an accomplished fact.


The Pentagon, as one might expect, plays an even more direct role in martial law operations. Title XIV of the new law, entitled, "Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Legislative Provisions," authorizes "the Secretary of Defense to create a Homeland Defense Technology Transfer Consortium to improve the effectiveness of the Department of Defense (DOD) processes for identifying and deploying relevant DOD technology to federal, State, and local first responders."

In other words, the law facilitates the "transfer" of the newest in so-called "crowd control" technology and other weaponry designed to suppress dissent from the Pentagon to local militarized police units. The new law builds on and further codifies earlier "technology transfer" agreements, specifically the 1995 DOD-Justice Department memorandum of agreement achieved back during the Clinton-Reno regime.

Supressing dissent and controlling US citizens is what is in place. When the dollar fails as I believe it will any day the full force of the US military is allready in place to stop any protest or dissent. Remember the USA PATRIOT Act section 802 defines domestic terrorism so broadly that it could apply to an individual exercising his or her freedom of speech, expression, and assembly through acts of civil disobedience. The Department of Justice has not revealed how it is using section 802. Americans under the US constitution have an absolute right to question and protest the government. The Bastard Bush and all the Bastards in congress that signed this bill have taken our right of free speech,assembly and expression away.

IS AMERICA ALLREADY UNDER MARTIAL LAW? YES.

(BASTARD John Warner) Defense Authorization Act of 2007.

Bastards stealth maneuver


Military Commissions act 2006
....................................................................................
For the current President, "enforcement of the laws to restore public order" means to commandeer guardsmen from any state, over the objections of local governmental, military and local police entities; ship them off to another state; conscript them in a law enforcement mode; and set them loose against "disorderly" citizenry - protesters, possibly, or those who object to forced evacuation etc.

The law also facilitates militarized police round-ups and detention of protesters, so called "illegal aliens," "potential terrorists" and other "undesirables" for detention in facilities already contracted for and under construction by Halliburton. That's right. Under the cover of a trumped-up "immigration emergency" and the frenzied militarization of the southern border, detention camps are being constructed right under our noses, camps designed for anyone who resists the foreign and domestic agenda of the current administration.

....................................................................................
The law also allows for the prosecution of offenses during armed conflict,(martial law), such as conspiracy, that are not considered war crimes.



Definition of Unlawful Enemy Combatant: ANY US CITIZEN THAT THE US GOVERNMENT DEEMS A THREAT. The government can consider free speech as a "conspiracy". IF YOU DON"T GET ANYTHING ELSE BURN THIS FACT INTO YOUR BRAIN IF POSSIBLE!

Use of Evidence Obtained Through Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment: While barring evidence obtained through torture, the rules permit the use of testimony obtained through abusive interrogation techniques that were used prior to the passage of the Detainee Treatment Act in December 2005 if they are found to be “reliable” – an oxymoron – and if their admission is found to be in “the interests of justice.” Presumably, most judges will find such statements inherently unreliable, but the very fact that they could be admitted raises significant concerns.

Lax Rules on Hearsay: The rules allow for the use of all hearsay evidence so long as it is deemed “reliable” and “probative.” But the burden is placed on the defendant to prove that the evidence is unreliable, a burden that it will be almost impossible for a defendant with limited discovery rights to meet. As a result, defendants could be convicted based on second- and third-hand summaries of key witness statements, without any chance to confront their accusers or challenge the accuracy of their statements in any meaningful way.

Limited Discovery Rights: The rules allow the prosecution to withhold classified sources and methods of interrogations from both the defendant andhis counsel. As a result, it will be extremely difficult for defendants to establish that evidence was obtained through torture or other coercive interrogation methods. Unless military commission judges are extremely vigilant, the prohibition on evidence obtained through torture could be become virtually meaningless.

Right to Exculpatory Evidence: Although defendants have a general right to the disclosure of any exculpatory evidence (evidence tending to show that they are not responsible for the crime of which they are accused), they are not allowed to see any classified evidence, even if it is exculpatory. Rather, they will be shown an “adequate substitute.” If the source of the exculpatory evidence is classified – and not revealed as part of the “adequate substitute” – the defendant could be denied access to important evidence that would establish his innocence.

Military commissions can impose the death penalty if the offense resulted in the death of another, or any period of imprisonment, including life imprisonment.

Many people don't want to hear or talk about the truth of what the governent is doing. They don't want to hear anything "negative" This is in effect what the government is telling Americans what to do. Don't speak or think anything "negative" about the US government. Sitck your head where the sun doesn't shine and allow complete control by the "authority" of the person in charge. Don't question authority. Rely totally on the US government to keep you safe and secure. Because Americans don't rely on themselves for their own safety when the time comes for "the chickens to come home to roost" many Americans will be at the total mercy of the government, individuals or groups of individuals who want total control of your freedom and will do anything to put you under their subjection. IDIOTS elected Obama. IDIOTS will be at the total mercy of the lawless.

Do ya get my drift?