Exposed , The Fraud of Global Warming

The late Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan called it "boob bait for bubba" — tough-sounding rhetoric designed to placate conservative voters. Boob Bait For Bubba can also be applied to the sponges that soak up the Liberal mass media lies.

People are just like sheep, some people. They will not check the facts nor do they care to check the facts, they just believe what the mass media tells them. Global warming or climate change is a prime example. Yes the globe heats up but it cools down also. Yes the climate changes, this is natural. These two terms have been used to twist the truth about the hoax of global warming. It is very similar to what is happening with obama, people believe what they are told without checking under the "hood". Impulse buying of an idea or phrase just because it is the latest craze, a little jessie j added, makes people look like mindless lemmings willing to do anything for their master. It is mass media slavery Think about what I just said, as you break your thinking bonds and set yourself free by reading the article below. Free at last, free at last thank GOD for the truth, you can be free at last!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember a slick salesman and the mass media equals a lemon. (Story Reports)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claims It Is 'Telling Us What to Think'

TWC founder and global warming skeptic advocates suing Al Gore to expose 'the fraud of global warming.'

By Jeff Poor
Business & Media Institute
3/3/2008 6:11:04 PM

The Weather Channel has lost its way, according to John Coleman, who founded the channel in 1982.
Coleman told an audience at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change on March 3 in New York that he is highly critical of global warming alarmism.

“The Weather Channel had great promise, and that’s all gone now because they’ve made every mistake in the book on what they’ve done and how they’ve done it and it’s very sad,” Coleman said. “It’s now for sale and there’s a new owner of The Weather Channel will be announced – several billion dollars having changed hands in the near future. Let’s hope the new owners can recapture the vision and stop reporting the traffic, telling us what to think and start giving us useful weather information.”

The Weather Channel has been an outlet for global warming alarmism. In December 2006, The Weather Channel’s Heidi Cullen argued on her blog that weathercasters who had doubts about human influence on global warming should be punished with decertification by the American Meteorological Society.

Coleman also told the audience his strategy for exposing what he called “the fraud of global warming.” He advocated suing those who sell carbon credits, which would force global warming alarmists to give a more honest account of the policies they propose.

“[I] have a feeling this is the opening,” Coleman said. “If the lawyers will take the case – sue the people who sell carbon credits. That includes Al Gore. That lawsuit would get so much publicity, so much media attention. And as the experts went to the media stand to testify, I feel like that could become the vehicle to finally put some light on the fraud of global warming.”

Earlier at the conference Lord Christopher Monckton, a policy adviser to former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, told an audience that the science will eventually prevail and the “scare” of global warming will go away. He also said the courts were a good avenue to show the science.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Thatcher Adviser Monckton Warns Global Warming Alarmism 'Kills People If You Get the Science Wrong'
Speaking at international conference, he blames the propagation of the global warming 'scare' on a combination of factors, including the 'the media wanting a scare story.'

By Jeff Poor
Business & Media Institute
3/3/2008 4:02:46 PM

Science is a very powerful thing and it’s important to get it right.

That’s the message Lord Christopher Monckton, a policy advisor for former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher during the 1980s, told an audience at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change on March 3 in New York.

According to Monckton, the movement behind global warming alarmism can be traced to some ugly things, and being wrong about it could have a grave impact on humanity.

“I think the question you’re asking is who’s behind the scare,” Monckton said. “There’s been a long history of scares recently and scientific frauds of various kinds. It began, I suppose, with the eugenics movement in the 1930s which led to Hitler. It followed on with the lyceum movement in Russia under Stalin. It went on with the great leap back under Chairman Mao which led again to tens of millions of deaths. The point you’re making is that this kills people if you get the science wrong.”

Monckton used the banning of DDT, which was linked to the deaths of 40 million children dying from malaria, as an example. The World Health Organization lifted the ban on Sept. 14, 2006, and that was, as Monckton said, “The science standing in front of politics.”

Monckton held the media responsible for the one-sided portrayal of the climate change issue and stated that global warming alarmism can be defeated when refuted by science. He used a recent court ruling in Great Britain as an example that restricted showing Al Gore's documentary, “ An Inconvenient Truth,” in schools.

“You sell far more papers by saying, ‘Gee, wow – World to End; Shock; Sensation’ than you do by saying ‘Climate Continues to [be] Changeable,’ which is the truth,” Monckton said. “So where the media is largely closed on this, but the courts are not and that is the place where if you go and make a reasoned argument based on the science, you can always beat the other side, because their science – and we heard it over and over again today – is simply incorrect.” [Note the over and over part, this is mass media hypnosis, read my other blog article . (Story Reports)]

The idea of the media being “closed” on the subject was supported in the Business & Media Institute’s latest study, “Global Warming Censored,” which found the U.S. network news leaving out skeptics of climate alarmism 80 percent of the time.

Monckton blamed the attention garnered by global warming alarmism on a combination of factors, but said it wasn’t conspiratorial.

“Now here we are once again with another scare,” Monckton said. “It’s the same people behind it. It’s the international left. It’s the media wanting a scare story. … It’s not so much a conspiracy I think, as a coincidence of outer interests who is set to take and advance their causes collectively by getting behind this nonsense.”

Monckton told the audience that the science will eventually prevail and the “scare” of global warming will go away.

“They’ve got the science wrong and it will gradually penetrate to the general public that they have got the science wrong and once the penny drops – that will be the end of this scare too,” Monckton added. “We’re not far away from it now.”

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global Warming Censored

Networks Stifle Debate, Rely on Politicians,
Rock Stars and Men-on-the-Street for Science

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A study from the Business & Media Institute

By Julia A. Seymour and Dan Gainor

Global warming crusader Al Gore repeatedly claims the climate change “debate’s over.” It isn’t, but the news media clearly agree with him. Global warming skeptics rarely get any say on the networks, and when their opinions are mentioned it is often with barbs like “cynics” or “deniers” thrown in to undermine them.

Consistently viewers are being sent only one message from ABC, CBS and NBC: global warming is an environmental catastrophe and it’s mankind’s fault. Skepticism is all but shut out of reports through several tactics – omission, name-calling, the hype of frightening images like polar bears scavenging for food near towns and a barrage of terrifying predictions.

The Business & Media Institute analyzed 205 network news stories about “global warming” or “climate change” between July 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2007. BMI found a meager 20 percent of stories even mentioned there were any alternative opinions to the so-called “consensus” on the issue.

• Disagreement Squashed: Global warming proponents overwhelmingly outnumbered those with dissenting opinions. On average for every skeptic there were nearly 13 proponents featured. ABC did a slightly better job with a 7-to-1 ratio, while CBS’s ratio was abysmal at nearly 38-to-1.

• Can I See Some ID?: Scientists made up only 15 percent of the global warming proponents shown. The remaining 85 percent included politicians, celebrities, other journalists and even ordinary men and women. There were more unidentified interview subjects used to support climate change hype than actual scientists (101 unidentified to just 71 scientists)

• What’s It Going to Cost?: All “solutions” have a price, but the cost of fighting global warming was something you rarely heard on the network news. Only 22 stories (11 percent) mentioned any cost of “fixing” global warming. On the rare occasion cost came up, it came from the lips of a skeptic like Kentucky state Rep. Jim Gooch (D), who said one climate change bill in Congress “would cost $6 trillion.”

• CBS the Worst: Journalist/global warming advocate Scott Pelley helped CBS be, by far, the worst network. Pelley argued in 2006 that he shouldn’t have to include skeptics in such stories because “If I do an interview with [Holocaust survivor] Elie Wiesel, am I required as a journalist to find a Holocaust denier?” In 2007, he helped ensure only four skeptics were included by CBS – and not a single one was a scientist. Compare that to the 151 people used by the network to promote global warming hysteria. The wildly one-sided outcome was not surprising given remarks by some of its other journalists. Harry Smith declared that “There is, in fact, global climate change” on the Aug. 7, 2007, “Early Show.”

• ABC the “Best”: Despite its over-the-top climate hypocrisy of jet-setting journalists around the world to cover climate change, ABC included more skepticism (36 percent) in its broadcasts than either NBC or CBS. Still, the network has plenty of work to do. Bill Weir made the outrageous claim during the Nov. 18, 2007, “Good Morning America” that “all these scientists” urge immediate action to stop global warming. Weather personality Sam Champion even referred to the most recent U.N. climate report as “unequivocal” and “definitive.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now do you see, you are being told what to believe. This is what the Liberals are doing to your thought process. The LIBERAL MASS MEDIA is feeding you this Bull and you are eating it, and believing it it good for you. Just like a helpless baby dependening on mother media to fill you mind with more mush. If you can still think maybe you can feed yourself something good that will not harm you in the long run.
LIKE I SAID, YOU NEED TO LOOK UNDER THE HOOD before you buy the Liberal Media Lie. (JJ type ryme) These simple rymes are what the rev al and jessie have used as pre hypnotic suggestions to further the Liberal mass media lies. Just hearing something that sounds good doesn't mean it is true but if mass media snake oil in the form of al gore or obama etc, tell you what they want you to believe it must be true, right. Wrong, don't be like sheep willing to believe what the Liberals and mass media are telling you. LIARS come in all forms, shapes and sizes and colors. It is up to you what you buy. Remember the term, buyer be ware. Why do you buy the lie? Repetition, why do you buy the lie, why do you buy the lie...........This is how a skilled politician can sway a crowd

Action figures in 'video games' produced by the Liberal mass media using repetition and hype to prop up their domination of your mind without you realizing your slavery. The nation is becoming more Liberal mass media slaves by default. The underground railroad are blogs committed to setting the 'slaves of mass media' free. There is a bounty on our heads, george sorous has made this clear. We must be careful and resist at all costs like the 'slaves' that were hunted, but with the help of the underground railroad were set free. In this case it the the slavery of you mind that will be set free! [look for the sign of a flashy smile and empty promises and avoid these obstacles] A mind is a terrible thing to waste. (Story Reports)