Corsi: FBI Criminal Complaint Being Filed This Week
Donald Trump reached out to WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi, author of "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President," with a long list of questions about where the issue is, and where it seems to be going.
According to Corsi Trump asked him about the book, its evidence and what is happening next in the effort to document whether Obama is, in fact, constitutionally qualified for the presidency under Article 2, Section 1's "natural born citizen" requirement.
"I told him he needs to publicly say that the document in the vault, the original long-form birth certificate, needs to be exposed and examined independently," Corsi said. "The doctor's records, the Kapiolani records of Ann Dunham to corroborate she was in that hospital."
"I told him if you don't press these issues you can't be surprised if there are those who think you're working with Barack Obama [on the dispute]," Corsi added.
(I agree if trump doesn't press the issue about seeing a copy of an original and having it published and validated I will believe trump is working somehow with obama to deceive the public. I have said this before. If trump lets obama get away with the ABSTRACT of a document instead a copy of an original birth certificate as proof obama is not an illegal alien, trump is deceiving the public also.) Story Reports
Subpoena - Must Show Original 1961 Typewritten Birth Certificate For Obama
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Saturday, May 21, 2011
The man-child obama received discipline from Benjamin Netanyahu
The man child obama received discipline from the adult Benjamin Netanyahu.
The man-child sat still with his hand over his mouth pouting.
Reuters - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu bluntly told President Barack Obama on Friday his vision of how to achieve Middle East peace was unrealistic.
"Peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle East reality,"
The man-child sat still with his hand over his mouth pouting.
Reuters - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu bluntly told President Barack Obama on Friday his vision of how to achieve Middle East peace was unrealistic.
"Peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle East reality,"
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Agenda 21 comes to Greenville, SC
Agenda 21 comes to Greenville, SC
Agenda 21 is the PLAN for a "New World Order" through GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Agenda 21 comes to Greenville, SC It is government control of land use using the name "Sustainable Development." When you see these words on tv, in the newspaper or magazines remember it means government control of land and your freedom using UN agenda 21 plan to spread the wealth around and destroy the middle class.
Greenville, South Carolina is a great city in a great state. The area across Caesar's Head Mountain to Brevard, North Carolina is one of the most beautiful places on earth. The people in South Carolina are hard-working, down-to-earth folks who appreciate their freedom, and their private property rights.
Few of the folks know that back during the 1970s, South Carolina was one of a handful of states that yielded to the Progressive push to require comprehensive land use planning. Senators "Scoop" Jackson and Morris Udall tried unsuccessfully to get Congress to adopt a National Comprehensive Planning Act. The same national initiative persuaded Oregon, Florida, and South Carolina to adopt statewide legislation.
South Carolina's law requires counties to develop a comprehensive land use plan, and to update it every ten years.
Even fewer folks know that this comprehensive planning initiative that swept across the country during the 1970s was caused by the United Nations, and promoted by an assortment of U.N.-accredited non-government organizations. The initiative culminated in the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements held in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1976.
This conference produced a 65-page report on land. The preamble to this report declares that:
"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice...
Public control of land use is therefore indispensable."
The United States officially agreed to, and accepted this U.N. Policy document when William K. Reilly, future- EPA Administrator, and Carla A. Hills, future- U.S. Trade Representative, signed the document.
This idea of government control of land use was dressed up with a new name in Our Common Future, the report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development. The new name given to government control of land use in this report is "Sustainable Development."
Sustainable development was further defined at the 1992 U.N. Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro with the adoption of Agenda 21 by delegates from 179 nations who attended the conference. George H.W. Bush signed the document.
When Greenville's comprehensive was updated in 1994, very few people had even heard about Agenda 21, and had no awareness that eight of the nine plan elements closely matched the eight program elements set forth in Chapter 7 of Agenda 21. This match was no accident. The Clinton administration created by Executive Order, the President's Council on Sustainable Development expressly for the purpose of implementing Agenda 21 throughout the federal, state, and local governments — administratively. Tons of money was appropriated and distributed in the form of grants to local governments and non-government organizations, to promote "visioning" processes that led to the development of comprehensive land use plans.
In 2008, Greenville County once again set out to update its comprehensive land use plan. Both the process and product are well documented on the County's website: " Imagine Greenville County: Tomorrow's Vision Today."
Most communities that have developed similar comprehensive land use plans in recent years make their plan legally binding. It is the mechanism through which sustainable development is enforced in many communities. The Greenville plan makes a point of assuring residents that the plan is not legally-binding. It is offered as a guideline for future land use, but it is not legally binding.
It doesn't have to be. Greenville County has a legally-binding Official Zoning Map, and has already adopted most of the available regulatory codes offered by the International Codes Council.
The Comprehensive Plan is the public relations tool used to sell the sustainable development idea to the community. People are told that the Comprehensive Plan was developed from the ground up through citizen participation. The fact is, according to their reports, fewer than 350 people from a population of nearly 450,000 (.0008%) participated in the process.
The fact is that much, if not most, of the plan can be directly attributed to the recommendations in Chapter 7 of Agenda 21. The Chapter title is: "Promoting sustainable human settlement development."
It is unlikely that many of the elected officials, or even those who participated in the development of the Comprehensive Plan, were aware that what they were led to consider was initiated by the United Nations. It is certain, however, that the county's consultant, LandDesigIn, Inc. knew about Agenda 21 and sustainable development. On their website they boast:
"LandDesign and Audubon Lifestyles are united for change — embracing the International Sustainability Council's Principles for Sustainability that promote sustainable solutions for life and business that are reliable, practical, efficient and economically viable."
What's dangerous about sustainable development and Agenda 21 is not that it comes from the U.N., but that it promotes government control over the decisions of free individuals. Government-planned communities and government-planned economies were tried extensively by the Soviet Union throughout most of the 20th Century. The result was catastrophic. To promote the repetition of government-planned communities and government-planned economies in the United States, and expect a different result, is the classic definition of insanity.
Let the free market, powered by free people, decide where to build, what to build, and how to build it. Government's only legitimate job is to see that it is built to adequate safety standards.
(Follow the money an see if your local projects were funded by the UN. Backtrack and ask who did the presentation to you local city coucils etc.)
Agenda 21 comes to Greenville, SC
Agenda 21 is the PLAN for a "New World Order" through GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Read UN Agenda 21
Nothing in America makes sense until you start digging into UN Agenda 21. Then everything make sense. UN Agenda 21 is the thread, or UN blueprint for Global Governance that is currently practiced in every US Government Agency in America today. UN Agenda 21 is a communist/socialist/progressive agenda put in place by a few Progressive Elite to stifle freedom, creativity, ingenuity and economy of the greatest country in the world so Americans will not question this new ruling class determined to create a "New World Order". Agenda 21 is not based on fact actually it is based on failed communist principals and Keynesian Economics calling for increased Government and spending funded by higher taxes.
Agenda 21 is not just Democratic or Republican. It is supported by both. Agenda 21 was never ratified by the US Senate, yet through continued Executive Orders, our government agencies are following this agenda to turn America into a socialist/communist country. Agenda 21 is now dictating our every way of life. Americans are paying the UN to steal our country.
Agenda 21 is the PLAN for a "New World Order" through GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Agenda 21 is the PLAN for a "New World Order" through GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Agenda 21 comes to Greenville, SC It is government control of land use using the name "Sustainable Development." When you see these words on tv, in the newspaper or magazines remember it means government control of land and your freedom using UN agenda 21 plan to spread the wealth around and destroy the middle class.
Greenville, South Carolina is a great city in a great state. The area across Caesar's Head Mountain to Brevard, North Carolina is one of the most beautiful places on earth. The people in South Carolina are hard-working, down-to-earth folks who appreciate their freedom, and their private property rights.
Few of the folks know that back during the 1970s, South Carolina was one of a handful of states that yielded to the Progressive push to require comprehensive land use planning. Senators "Scoop" Jackson and Morris Udall tried unsuccessfully to get Congress to adopt a National Comprehensive Planning Act. The same national initiative persuaded Oregon, Florida, and South Carolina to adopt statewide legislation.
South Carolina's law requires counties to develop a comprehensive land use plan, and to update it every ten years.
Even fewer folks know that this comprehensive planning initiative that swept across the country during the 1970s was caused by the United Nations, and promoted by an assortment of U.N.-accredited non-government organizations. The initiative culminated in the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements held in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1976.
This conference produced a 65-page report on land. The preamble to this report declares that:
"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice...
Public control of land use is therefore indispensable."
The United States officially agreed to, and accepted this U.N. Policy document when William K. Reilly, future- EPA Administrator, and Carla A. Hills, future- U.S. Trade Representative, signed the document.
This idea of government control of land use was dressed up with a new name in Our Common Future, the report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development. The new name given to government control of land use in this report is "Sustainable Development."
Sustainable development was further defined at the 1992 U.N. Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro with the adoption of Agenda 21 by delegates from 179 nations who attended the conference. George H.W. Bush signed the document.
When Greenville's comprehensive was updated in 1994, very few people had even heard about Agenda 21, and had no awareness that eight of the nine plan elements closely matched the eight program elements set forth in Chapter 7 of Agenda 21. This match was no accident. The Clinton administration created by Executive Order, the President's Council on Sustainable Development expressly for the purpose of implementing Agenda 21 throughout the federal, state, and local governments — administratively. Tons of money was appropriated and distributed in the form of grants to local governments and non-government organizations, to promote "visioning" processes that led to the development of comprehensive land use plans.
In 2008, Greenville County once again set out to update its comprehensive land use plan. Both the process and product are well documented on the County's website: " Imagine Greenville County: Tomorrow's Vision Today."
Most communities that have developed similar comprehensive land use plans in recent years make their plan legally binding. It is the mechanism through which sustainable development is enforced in many communities. The Greenville plan makes a point of assuring residents that the plan is not legally-binding. It is offered as a guideline for future land use, but it is not legally binding.
It doesn't have to be. Greenville County has a legally-binding Official Zoning Map, and has already adopted most of the available regulatory codes offered by the International Codes Council.
The Comprehensive Plan is the public relations tool used to sell the sustainable development idea to the community. People are told that the Comprehensive Plan was developed from the ground up through citizen participation. The fact is, according to their reports, fewer than 350 people from a population of nearly 450,000 (.0008%) participated in the process.
The fact is that much, if not most, of the plan can be directly attributed to the recommendations in Chapter 7 of Agenda 21. The Chapter title is: "Promoting sustainable human settlement development."
It is unlikely that many of the elected officials, or even those who participated in the development of the Comprehensive Plan, were aware that what they were led to consider was initiated by the United Nations. It is certain, however, that the county's consultant, LandDesigIn, Inc. knew about Agenda 21 and sustainable development. On their website they boast:
"LandDesign and Audubon Lifestyles are united for change — embracing the International Sustainability Council's Principles for Sustainability that promote sustainable solutions for life and business that are reliable, practical, efficient and economically viable."
What's dangerous about sustainable development and Agenda 21 is not that it comes from the U.N., but that it promotes government control over the decisions of free individuals. Government-planned communities and government-planned economies were tried extensively by the Soviet Union throughout most of the 20th Century. The result was catastrophic. To promote the repetition of government-planned communities and government-planned economies in the United States, and expect a different result, is the classic definition of insanity.
Let the free market, powered by free people, decide where to build, what to build, and how to build it. Government's only legitimate job is to see that it is built to adequate safety standards.
(Follow the money an see if your local projects were funded by the UN. Backtrack and ask who did the presentation to you local city coucils etc.)
Agenda 21 comes to Greenville, SC
Agenda 21 is the PLAN for a "New World Order" through GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Read UN Agenda 21
Nothing in America makes sense until you start digging into UN Agenda 21. Then everything make sense. UN Agenda 21 is the thread, or UN blueprint for Global Governance that is currently practiced in every US Government Agency in America today. UN Agenda 21 is a communist/socialist/progressive agenda put in place by a few Progressive Elite to stifle freedom, creativity, ingenuity and economy of the greatest country in the world so Americans will not question this new ruling class determined to create a "New World Order". Agenda 21 is not based on fact actually it is based on failed communist principals and Keynesian Economics calling for increased Government and spending funded by higher taxes.
Agenda 21 is not just Democratic or Republican. It is supported by both. Agenda 21 was never ratified by the US Senate, yet through continued Executive Orders, our government agencies are following this agenda to turn America into a socialist/communist country. Agenda 21 is now dictating our every way of life. Americans are paying the UN to steal our country.
Agenda 21 is the PLAN for a "New World Order" through GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Monday, May 16, 2011
Obama’s Certificate Number Is Based On Geography, Not Chronological Birth Order!
Obama’s Certificate Number Is Based On Geography, Not Chronological Birth Order!
Evidence reveals that Obama’s non-sequential birth registration number is the result of his registration being isolated because it was not a traditional hospital birth.
His number was assigned based on the birth being registered in a regional office not used by the hospital which Obama claims to have been born in, rendering the possibility that his “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration issued by the Hawaiian Vital Records office is merely a record of birth registration legally created by the Health Department under HRS 338-17.8, after baby Obama was examined by a doctor, at Kapi’olani hospital, who could attest to his live birth, post-delivery.
These recently discovered sources show that Obama’s birth registration number was assigned by the state’s main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health after his birth registration originated in a regional office not used by the hospital to register births actually occurring within its facility.
Obama’s Certificate Number Is Based On Geography, Not Chronological Birth Order!
Evidence reveals that Obama’s non-sequential birth registration number is the result of his registration being isolated because it was not a traditional hospital birth.
His number was assigned based on the birth being registered in a regional office not used by the hospital which Obama claims to have been born in, rendering the possibility that his “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration issued by the Hawaiian Vital Records office is merely a record of birth registration legally created by the Health Department under HRS 338-17.8, after baby Obama was examined by a doctor, at Kapi’olani hospital, who could attest to his live birth, post-delivery.
These recently discovered sources show that Obama’s birth registration number was assigned by the state’s main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health after his birth registration originated in a regional office not used by the hospital to register births actually occurring within its facility.
Obama’s Certificate Number Is Based On Geography, Not Chronological Birth Order!
Friday, May 13, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Obama Working As An Absentee President
Obama Working As An Absentee President
White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden
“What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound.”
(If this story is true, and I believe it is, it figures. Obama is NOT capable of being president because he must be told what to do. He follows orders from those who control him. He lacks the ability to make an executive decision on his own. He is like a dummy president. A dummy president who has not provided a COPY of a long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii. A dummy preident who has displayed an abstract of a document that can't be verified. It seems nothing obama does can be verified.) Story Reports
Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?
A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.
I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.
Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?
A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.
What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him.
What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go….including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself.
Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval.
Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.
(Obama's "senior" advisor is a rabid fanatical loser. Its like his "advisor" is on crack or something. This is why obama acts in a disjointed manner and even if he did make a decision on his own it would be similar. He is following orders from rabid, fanatical advisors, his comrades. The dummy president and the white house advisors must reach a consensus through valarie jarrett his rabid senior advisor. We have a "third world" executive branch at the present time.) Story Reports
White House Insider: Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden
“What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound.”
(If this story is true, and I believe it is, it figures. Obama is NOT capable of being president because he must be told what to do. He follows orders from those who control him. He lacks the ability to make an executive decision on his own. He is like a dummy president. A dummy president who has not provided a COPY of a long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii. A dummy preident who has displayed an abstract of a document that can't be verified. It seems nothing obama does can be verified.) Story Reports
Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?
A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.
I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.
Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?
A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.
What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him.
What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go….including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself.
Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval.
Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.
(Obama's "senior" advisor is a rabid fanatical loser. Its like his "advisor" is on crack or something. This is why obama acts in a disjointed manner and even if he did make a decision on his own it would be similar. He is following orders from rabid, fanatical advisors, his comrades. The dummy president and the white house advisors must reach a consensus through valarie jarrett his rabid senior advisor. We have a "third world" executive branch at the present time.) Story Reports
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Blackout during raid on bin Laden compound
The head of the CIA admitted yesterday that there was no live video footage of the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound as further doubts emerged about the US version of events.
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off.
A photograph released by the White House appeared to show the President and his aides in the situation room watching the action as it unfolded. In fact they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound.
(These 'top" figures in the obama regime continue to stumble and fumble every detail about the osama raid. The pictures released by the white house led Americans to believe obama and his comrades were watching the seals kill osama. It was just another lie.
This is more evidence that the osama obama saga is filled with fiction and spin.) Story Reports
Mr Panetta said: "Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes where we really didn't know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
"We had some observation of the approach there, but we did not have direct flow of information as to the actual conduct of the operation itself as they were going through the compound."
Mr Panetta also revealed that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
(Obama led us to believe he directed the military to kill osama when in fact he did not.) Another lie. Obama is a liar.
Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off.
A photograph released by the White House appeared to show the President and his aides in the situation room watching the action as it unfolded. In fact they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound.
(These 'top" figures in the obama regime continue to stumble and fumble every detail about the osama raid. The pictures released by the white house led Americans to believe obama and his comrades were watching the seals kill osama. It was just another lie.
This is more evidence that the osama obama saga is filled with fiction and spin.) Story Reports
Mr Panetta said: "Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes where we really didn't know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information.
"We had some observation of the approach there, but we did not have direct flow of information as to the actual conduct of the operation itself as they were going through the compound."
Mr Panetta also revealed that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
(Obama led us to believe he directed the military to kill osama when in fact he did not.) Another lie. Obama is a liar.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Obama Spin About Osama Death Continues As Osama Helps Obama Bury BC Issue
Obama regime spin continues as affirmative action results are on display. Does anyone think there are competent people in the obama regime? Only the US military deserves credit considering the blithering idiots in the whitehouse.
White House spokesman Jay Carney is quick to tell reporters, the process of declassifying information about the U.S. military team that assaulted Osama bin Laden’s compound--the “most highly classified operation this government has taken in many, many years,” he said--is a difficult and often frustrating process. Which means that the narrative that has flowed from top U.S. officials to reporters has sometimes been incomplete, ambiguous, or incorrect.
(This is obama regime spin to coverup the fact once again that incompetence is the norm for "top" US "officials" whatever that means. If "top" US "officals" can't get it right why would anyone believe anything that "top" US "officals" say about osama or obama.
The "top" US official obama has said he was born in Hawaii and would prove it. Obama released an ABSTARCT of his birth certificate from Hawaii. The top official obama DID NOT release a COPY of the ORIGINAL long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii.
Obama the "top" offical's certificate of live birth long form cannot be verfied because it has not been released, only an ABTSRACT of a document has been displayed.
Certainly an ABSTRACT of an original document cannot be verified without seeing or knowing what the original document contains. Just think about that a little and it will sink in maybe.
The "top" offical wants you to believe he is a US citizen because he has displayed an ABSTRACT of a document. Obviously it is also a difficult and often frustrating process for the "top" US offical in American to also come clean about his citizenship. Obama has presented an incomplete and ambiguous ABSTRACT of his birth information on purpose to deceive America. He has also used the timing of osama's demise to bury his birth certificate issue.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
“[Bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in. And whether or not he got off any rounds, I quite frankly don’t know.” This statement by Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan at Monday’s press briefing at the White House left unanswered one of the biggest questions of the operation: Was bin Laden armed? Brennan’s answer implied that he was, but at Tuesday’s briefing, Carney settled the debate: “He was not armed,” he said, in a scripted narrative written by the Defense Department. Bin Laden did “resist” U.S. forces, Carney said. He declined to elaborate beyond saying that “resistance does not require a firearm.”
"There was a female who was, in fact, in the line of fire that reportedly was used as a shield to shield bin Laden from the incoming fire,” Brennan told reporters at the Monday briefing. His statement was further backed up by a senior Defense official, who told reporters at a Defense Department briefing that, “One woman, who was used as a human shield by one of the four military-age males on the compound, was killed; he was firing behind her.” The White House started to backtrack on this report Monday night, and by Tuesday, it was debunked by Carney’s statement. There was a woman on the first floor of the compound who was killed “in the cross fire,” he said.
The woman who was killed was bin Laden’s wife, and she had been used as a shield.This information also came out of Brennan’s briefing on Monday, and was also clarified by Carney’s narrative on Tuesday: “In the room with bin Laden, a woman, bin Laden's wife, rushed the assaulter and was shot in the leg but not killed.” The woman who was killed was not with bin Laden, and she was killed in the cross fire of a firefight.
Bin Laden's son Khalid was killed. At Monday’s briefing, Brennan said it was the al-Qaida leader's son Khalid who was killed; by the time the White House released a transcript of the briefing a few hours later, it had been altered to say that bin Laden's son Hamza was killed. The White House did not return calls for comment on whether Brennan misspoke or had received incorrect information.
Bin Laden was shot twice in the head. Many news reports said that bin Laden was shot twice in the head. But a senior intelligence official clarified to National Journal that he was shot once in the head and once in the chest.
(Americans who are STUPID enough to believe top officals in the obama regime including obama will believe everything the "top" officials say in the obama regime even after they say it different two or three times. All liars.
Obama timed the osama raid to help coverup his birth certificate problem. To date NO public information such as osama photo, dna or face recognition verification has been released. Are you stupid enough to believe obama? I don't.
A summary or abstract of a document is a short form or outline of information. The original document contains additional information that can confirm the abstract, short form, information.
Obama has done nothing but display a "warmed over" online certification of live birth as a certificate of live birth and still refuses to display a copy of an original long form certificate of live birth from an Hawaiian hospital that can be verified by anyone in America. Story Reports
Osama helped bury the obama birth certificate issue to hide the fact obama didn't produce a copy of a long form certificate of live brith but only an ASTRACT version that can't be verified. Obama continues to hide his true identity and the "state run media" continues to help deceive America. Obama timed the death of osama to coverup his birth certificate questions. A terrorist helped a traitor.
Ask yourself, why didn't obama produce a copy of the original long form that could be verified?
Ask youself why didn't obama produce any dna, photo or face recognition evidence of the death of osama?
Ask yourself why the "top" officials can't get their storys straight or even agree. Its because they are liars.
White House spokesman Jay Carney is quick to tell reporters, the process of declassifying information about the U.S. military team that assaulted Osama bin Laden’s compound--the “most highly classified operation this government has taken in many, many years,” he said--is a difficult and often frustrating process. Which means that the narrative that has flowed from top U.S. officials to reporters has sometimes been incomplete, ambiguous, or incorrect.
(This is obama regime spin to coverup the fact once again that incompetence is the norm for "top" US "officials" whatever that means. If "top" US "officals" can't get it right why would anyone believe anything that "top" US "officals" say about osama or obama.
The "top" US official obama has said he was born in Hawaii and would prove it. Obama released an ABSTARCT of his birth certificate from Hawaii. The top official obama DID NOT release a COPY of the ORIGINAL long form certificate of live birth from Hawaii.
Obama the "top" offical's certificate of live birth long form cannot be verfied because it has not been released, only an ABTSRACT of a document has been displayed.
Certainly an ABSTRACT of an original document cannot be verified without seeing or knowing what the original document contains. Just think about that a little and it will sink in maybe.
The "top" offical wants you to believe he is a US citizen because he has displayed an ABSTRACT of a document. Obviously it is also a difficult and often frustrating process for the "top" US offical in American to also come clean about his citizenship. Obama has presented an incomplete and ambiguous ABSTRACT of his birth information on purpose to deceive America. He has also used the timing of osama's demise to bury his birth certificate issue.) Story Reports
........................................................................................
“[Bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in. And whether or not he got off any rounds, I quite frankly don’t know.” This statement by Homeland Security Adviser John Brennan at Monday’s press briefing at the White House left unanswered one of the biggest questions of the operation: Was bin Laden armed? Brennan’s answer implied that he was, but at Tuesday’s briefing, Carney settled the debate: “He was not armed,” he said, in a scripted narrative written by the Defense Department. Bin Laden did “resist” U.S. forces, Carney said. He declined to elaborate beyond saying that “resistance does not require a firearm.”
"There was a female who was, in fact, in the line of fire that reportedly was used as a shield to shield bin Laden from the incoming fire,” Brennan told reporters at the Monday briefing. His statement was further backed up by a senior Defense official, who told reporters at a Defense Department briefing that, “One woman, who was used as a human shield by one of the four military-age males on the compound, was killed; he was firing behind her.” The White House started to backtrack on this report Monday night, and by Tuesday, it was debunked by Carney’s statement. There was a woman on the first floor of the compound who was killed “in the cross fire,” he said.
The woman who was killed was bin Laden’s wife, and she had been used as a shield.This information also came out of Brennan’s briefing on Monday, and was also clarified by Carney’s narrative on Tuesday: “In the room with bin Laden, a woman, bin Laden's wife, rushed the assaulter and was shot in the leg but not killed.” The woman who was killed was not with bin Laden, and she was killed in the cross fire of a firefight.
Bin Laden's son Khalid was killed. At Monday’s briefing, Brennan said it was the al-Qaida leader's son Khalid who was killed; by the time the White House released a transcript of the briefing a few hours later, it had been altered to say that bin Laden's son Hamza was killed. The White House did not return calls for comment on whether Brennan misspoke or had received incorrect information.
Bin Laden was shot twice in the head. Many news reports said that bin Laden was shot twice in the head. But a senior intelligence official clarified to National Journal that he was shot once in the head and once in the chest.
(Americans who are STUPID enough to believe top officals in the obama regime including obama will believe everything the "top" officials say in the obama regime even after they say it different two or three times. All liars.
Obama timed the osama raid to help coverup his birth certificate problem. To date NO public information such as osama photo, dna or face recognition verification has been released. Are you stupid enough to believe obama? I don't.
A summary or abstract of a document is a short form or outline of information. The original document contains additional information that can confirm the abstract, short form, information.
Obama has done nothing but display a "warmed over" online certification of live birth as a certificate of live birth and still refuses to display a copy of an original long form certificate of live birth from an Hawaiian hospital that can be verified by anyone in America. Story Reports
Osama helped bury the obama birth certificate issue to hide the fact obama didn't produce a copy of a long form certificate of live brith but only an ASTRACT version that can't be verified. Obama continues to hide his true identity and the "state run media" continues to help deceive America. Obama timed the death of osama to coverup his birth certificate questions. A terrorist helped a traitor.
Ask yourself, why didn't obama produce a copy of the original long form that could be verified?
Ask youself why didn't obama produce any dna, photo or face recognition evidence of the death of osama?
Ask yourself why the "top" officials can't get their storys straight or even agree. Its because they are liars.
Friday, April 29, 2011
Examine The New Fake Obama Birth Certificate
(There are many difference between a real 1961 Certificate of Live Birth and the FAKE one obama has presented to world. There are at lease 15 FAKE Document clues.
The number one obvious fact is that the document obama has presented to the world is NOT A COPY OF AN ORIGINAL LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. It is therefore an ABSTRACT of a record. The document obama has presented can't be verified as real because it is not a true copy of the original. It is only an abstract.) Story Reports
..........................................................................................
A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates with the Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many differences, some with regard to content, others to format.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, in Box 20, "Date Accepted by Local Reg." and Box 22, "Date Accepted by Reg. General," the date is stamped "AUG 11 1961," while the date is stamped on Obama's birth certificate as "AUG -8 1961," with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, the type in Box 8, "Name of the Father" lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, "Age of Father," and Box 15, "Age of Mother," are indented below the "R" in "Barack" in Box 8.
* In the Nordyke twins's birth certificate, the type in Box 9, "Race of Father," Box 12b, "Kind of Business or Industry," and Box 14, "Race of Mother," line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
* In Box 16, "Birthplace of Mother," in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, the letters of "Los Angeles, California," are aligned at the bottom margin, while in the Obama birth certificate, the "K" in Kansas rides up and appears only partially struck at the top.
* The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins' birth certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
* The typed letters in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates appear irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes 8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
* In Box 3, "This Birth," the "X" marking "Twins" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, "If Twin or Triple, Was Child Born," while Box 3 in Obama's is struck top right.
* Similar differences in how the "X" strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d and 7e where the "X" on Obama's birth certificate fits squarely into the box, drifting toward the top, and the "X" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug. 5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama's in Box 5a lists the birthdate as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates the "H" in "Honolulu" in Boxes 7a and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in Obama's birth certificate the "H" in "Honolulu" is consistently on line with the other letters in the word.
* The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle, while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line, at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
* The local registrar in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, Box 21, is different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital at this time?
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificate at the bottom have the printed signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the date the copies were issued, "5-5-1966," while the Obama birth certificate has no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the registrar general to be a "true and correct copy" of the original record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department of Health.
* The Norydke twins' birth certificates appear white against black, in the format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in Obama's modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation is seen in the Nordyke twins's photostatic copy.
* As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier.
* Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
* Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke twins' birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.
Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.
This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.
At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.
The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.
The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth certificate was stamped.
The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when their birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama's number?
The number one obvious fact is that the document obama has presented to the world is NOT A COPY OF AN ORIGINAL LONG FORM CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. It is therefore an ABSTRACT of a record. The document obama has presented can't be verified as real because it is not a true copy of the original. It is only an abstract.) Story Reports
..........................................................................................
A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates with the Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many differences, some with regard to content, others to format.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, in Box 20, "Date Accepted by Local Reg." and Box 22, "Date Accepted by Reg. General," the date is stamped "AUG 11 1961," while the date is stamped on Obama's birth certificate as "AUG -8 1961," with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, the type in Box 8, "Name of the Father" lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, "Age of Father," and Box 15, "Age of Mother," are indented below the "R" in "Barack" in Box 8.
* In the Nordyke twins's birth certificate, the type in Box 9, "Race of Father," Box 12b, "Kind of Business or Industry," and Box 14, "Race of Mother," line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
* In Box 16, "Birthplace of Mother," in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, the letters of "Los Angeles, California," are aligned at the bottom margin, while in the Obama birth certificate, the "K" in Kansas rides up and appears only partially struck at the top.
* The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins' birth certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
* The typed letters in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates appear irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes 8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
* In Box 3, "This Birth," the "X" marking "Twins" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, "If Twin or Triple, Was Child Born," while Box 3 in Obama's is struck top right.
* Similar differences in how the "X" strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d and 7e where the "X" on Obama's birth certificate fits squarely into the box, drifting toward the top, and the "X" in the Nordyke twins' birth certificates fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug. 5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama's in Box 5a lists the birthdate as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
* In the Nordyke twins' birth certificates the "H" in "Honolulu" in Boxes 7a and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in Obama's birth certificate the "H" in "Honolulu" is consistently on line with the other letters in the word.
* The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle, while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line, at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
* The local registrar in the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, Box 21, is different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital at this time?
* The Nordyke twins' birth certificate at the bottom have the printed signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the date the copies were issued, "5-5-1966," while the Obama birth certificate has no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the registrar general to be a "true and correct copy" of the original record on file in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department of Health.
* The Norydke twins' birth certificates appear white against black, in the format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in Obama's modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation is seen in the Nordyke twins's photostatic copy.
* As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier.
* Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
* Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
* Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke twins' birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.
Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.
This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.
At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.
The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.
The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth certificate was stamped.
The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when their birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama's number?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)