The Fruit Of Selma Barack Hussen Obama aka Barry Soetoro Fake SS Number

Selma has produced the corrput fruit of obama

OBAMA 2007: This is the site of my conCEPtion. I am the fruits of your labor. I am the offSPRING of the moveMENT. So when people ask me whether I've been to Sel-muh befo', I tell 'em I'm comin' home.

("The Fruit Of Selma" has a fake social security number. Not only was "the fruit of selma" never conceived in selama as obama said he was, he also has a FAKED SS NUMBER FROM CON-necticut. Obama was milking black Americans for votes when he declared he was "the fruit of selma" and was conceived in selma. This we know. Obama also has a FAKED SS number.) Story Reports

Information about the "fruit of selma's" FAKE SS Number

The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut, the state where Barrak Hussein Obama never resided and shows him to be 119 years old.

This coupled with the fact that Mr Obama’s grandmother, Madeline Dunham was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court Probate department and had access to the Social Security Numbers of the deceased, constitutes circumstantial evidence casting serious doubt on the legitimacy of Mr Obama and his claims of being born on U.S. territory.”

(On the eve of Election Day 2008 Madeline Dunham suddenly died. I don't believe it was just a coincidence.) Story Reports

Obama currently is using a Social Security number that was issued in Connecticut sometime between 1977 to 1979, even though Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

There is no evidence Obama, his father or his mother ever had a mailing address in Connecticut.

A Jun 2011 government policy change is an attempt to cover up in retrospect the controversy over Obama's Social Security number by making it impossible in the future to trace where a Social Security applicant lived at the time the person applied for a Social Security number.

Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels says, "With Obama, there is obviously a case of fraud going on here. In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."

......................................................................................
Randomizing Social Security numbers represents a fundamental change of a Social Security Administration policy dating back to the first issuance of nine-digit SSNs in 1936, in which the first three digits always have been used to designate the geographical location from which an applicant has applied for a SSN.

Since 1972, the SSA started issuing Social Security cards centrally and the area number has been used to reflect the state from which a person has applied for a SSN, as determined by the ZIP code in the mailing address of the application.

"By randomizing Social Security numbers in the future, the Social Security administration is facilitating identity theft," Daniels said.

The rationale for the change offered by the SSA is that the current numbering scheme with the first three digits designating area of issuance "limits the number of SSNs that are available for issuance to individuals by each state, such that changing the number assignment methodology 'will extend the longevity of the nine digit SSN in all states.'"

With 5.5 million numbers issued annually and 435 million numbers yet to be issued, the Social Security Administration could continue issuing numbers under the current numbering code for another 79-80 years.

Randomization of Social Security numbers also would assist illegal immigrants with the type of identity theft needed to obtain employment illegally.

"Once Social Security numbers are randomized, you have no idea from the person's Social Security number where an immigrant settled into the United States, even if they got here legally,".

President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

The records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.

The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.

To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Susan Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama's were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.

"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii.

There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?

"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."

Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."

There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.

Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.

Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security number," she told WND. "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii."

"It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins," she insisted. "Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime."

Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama's birth date of 08/04/1961. A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama's birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.

Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 Social Security number.

Daniels said she can't be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.

After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama's association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.

Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.
........................................................................................

The whole point is you can't be issued two different SS numbers in two different states. Obama worked in Hawaii and says he was born there. His SS number is from Connecticut around 1978. Obama was issued a SS numner around 1978 from Connecticut yet he NEVER LIVED THERE! The SS number obama is using is STOLEN!

This is exaclty what illegal aliens use to steal identities, FAKE SS numbers.

(1) Obama has a fake ss number

(2) Obama has no documentation that has verified his online certification of live birth.


(3) Obama has not answered the many questions asked in State and Federal courts about his identity.

(4) Is there any reason not to believe obama is an illegal alien? Story Reports

Obama Has Always Been An Illegal Alien And Still Is

Obama’s "American citizen parent", Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.

Obama was born 18 years 8 months after his mother was born. This is another reason why the SS number is FAKED. The documentation obama needed to present to get a SS number would have required a document trail. This document trail would have compromised his true identity. Obama has no valid documentation that validates his FAKE certification of live birth.

NO DOCUMENT TRAIL IS AVAILABLE TO TRACE OBAMA'S TRUE IDENTITY.

Yet there are those that defend this fact.

The US Supreme Court will not verify obama's identity nor will any federal court. The US Congress will not verify obama's identity nor will the State of Hawaii except to issue verbal statments that cannot be verified.

The DNC has verified obama's identity but the DNC will not reveal how it was done.

Kerchner V Obama Filed 1/20/2009

No one in any official capacity has fully vetted the eligibility and Constitutional qualifications of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of our military.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) did not adequately vet and verify Obama’s Article II “natural born citizenship” by having a disinterested third party check his original long-form birth records in the vaults in Hawaii.

The DNC could have requested and obtained certified copies but never did. The DNC has not signed any affidavit that Obama is an Article II “natural born citizen” of the U.S.

Attorney Berg demanded of the DNC that it vet Obama’s Article II “natural born Citizenship” status prior to the DNC Convention but they ignored him at that time.

Nancy Pelosi merely signed an affidavit to each state certifying that Obama was nominated.

The DNC nomination affidavit was different for the State of Hawaii because Hawaii law required that article II be included that obama was a natural born citizen.

The DNC nomination affidavit from pelosi is a total fraud.

Political parties were responsible for vetting Obama in each state. Hawaii was different.

The State of Hawaii is very clear in its Statute. The candidate for president MUST qualify according to the provisions of the United States Constitution.

Okay, the DNC, by sworn Affidavit of Nancy Pelosi did swear to this. So what is the problem? The problem again is that an Affidavit was signed but NO supporting documentation accompanied the ballot application.

It appears that in order to meet Hawaii statutory requirements, Nancy Pelosi signed a notarized nomination certificate affirming that BHO was eligible to serve as president according to the U.S. Constitution, yet she apparently used no court-vetted probative contemporaneous documents to do so. However, by relying on Pelosi’s signature attesting to Obama’s constitutional eligibility, it appears that the Secretary of State of Hawaii placed Obama’s name on the ballot. Without any probative contemporaneous documents (which do not exist) as the basis of Pelosi’s certification of Obama, the nominating form is arguably a forgery.

Nancy Pelosi signed a DIFFERENT Affidavit for the other 49 States. The “other” Affidavit contained NO written clause whatsoever attesting to Constitutional eligibility of the candidate, Barack Obama.

Hawaii had the ability to require proof of “natural born” citizenship from the DNC and Obama by demanding supporting documentation.

The applicable Statute was not enforced by Hawaii.
.........................................................................................
Excerpt from South Carolina Statute:


South Carolina: SECTION 7-11-20.

Political parties must verify the qualifications of candidates prior to certifying to the State Election Commission the names of candidates to be placed on primary ballots. The written certification required by this section must contain a statement that each certified candidate meets, or will meet by the time of the general election, or as otherwise required by law, the qualifications in the United States Constitution, statutory law, and party rules to participate in the presidential preference primary for which he has filed. Political parties must not certify any candidate who does not or will not by the time of the general election meet the qualifications in the United States Constitution, statutory law, and party rules for the presidential preference primary for which the candidate desires to file, and such candidate’s name must not be placed on a primary ballot.

South Carolina DID NOT receive an Affidavit from the Democratic National Committee which included words to the effect of meeting “qualifications in the United States Constitution.” Pelosi sent the “other” Affidavit instead.

The State of South Carolina DID NOT enforce their “qualification” Statute either.

In sum, the August 14 letter from SC D state party Chair Carol Fowler Certifying the names and the eligibility of D candidates to appear on that state’s general election ballot appears to be kosher. On the other hand, that November 1, 2007 typed and hand-written memo Certifying the names and eligibility of D candidates to appear on that state’s Presidential Preference primary, signed by both Ms. Fowler and Ms. Hensley, have ‘election fraud’ written all over it.

The candidates to whose eligibility Ms. Fowler attested in that August 14 letter, did not include BO and JB as the Presidential and Vice-Presidential nominees for the party, but all of the ‘down ticket’ Democrats whose names the state D party wanted to appear on SC’s general election ballot, names listed on pages that were attached to her filing with the SCEC

This is how FRAUD occurred in the 2008 SC presidential election. Obama was qualified by the DNC with no supporting documentation

There was NO supporting documentation given to Hawaii or South Carolina.

Both of these states totally relied on the unverified qualification statments of the DNC.

Its just like what the Hawaii wants you to believe today. Unverified qualification statments about obama's certification of live birth certificate.

No one in the United States including the DNC can verify or prove obama is an American Citizen!!!!!!

US Supreme Court Will Not Reveal Obama Is An Imposter

Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama's citizenship

The Supreme Court has again cast aside an appeal that raised doubts about President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, a grass-roots legal issue that has gained little legal or political footing, but continues to persist in the courts.

The justices without comment Monday rejected a challenge from Charles Kerchner Jr., a Pennsylvania man who sought a trial in federal court forcing the president to produce documents regarding his birth and citizenship.

Kerchner's attorney, Mario Apuzzo, had argued in a petition with the Supreme Court that Obama did not fit the definition of a "natural-born citizen" required for the nation's highest office, as defined by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

That clause states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

(The Supreme Court is in denial about the fact obama is NOT a natural born citizen. The above Constitutional clause gives 2 examples of what qualifies a person to be president (at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution). The phrase "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" was added to exempt those who were british citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. The phrase " natural born Citizen" was added to prevent a USURPER that was a dual citizen or a citizen not born of American parents from becoming president. The US Supreme Court knows this. The Court continues the FRAUD of obama because he was a dual citizen at birth, not a natural born citizen as the Constitution requires.) Story Reports

(Obama said Mccain was born to American Citizen(s). Obama said because of this Mccain is a "natural born citizen". Obama was born to ONE American citizen and ONE Kenyan citizen. Because obama has stated a "natural born citizen" has TWO American parents at birth and he did not, obama became a usurper and fraud the day he entered the presidential race. Its that simple. Obama continues to evade the American people. If Mccain is a "natural born citizen" because of his parents obama cannot be a "natural born citizen" because of his parents. Its that simple.) Story Reports

S.RES.511 -- Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

110th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 511
April 30, 2008 Mr. OBAMA submitted the following resolution.

RESOLUTION

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

Solar storm in 2011 or 2012 get ready

........................................................................................
Areas predicted to be most affected in 2012 or is it 2011? Yellow indicates grid collapse and red indicates transformer destruction. (top pic) This is what I call a natural EMP pulse.

Scientists at NASA and elsewhere are increasingly concerned about the potential for a massive solar "mega-storm" that could disrupt power grids in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Solar cycle 24 is headed for a peak sometime in 2011 or 2012, and some forecasters believe there is historical precedent for gigantic coronal mass (CME) ejections that could take down power grids here on earth.

A modern solar flare was recorded Dec. 5, 2006, by the X-ray Imager onboard NOAA's GOES-13 satellite. The flare was so intense, it actually damaged the instrument that took the picture. Researchers believe Carrington's flare was much more energetic than this one.

No one knows for sure if the dreaded "kill shot" could be unleashed in 2012. But the sun will be watched closely for the potential of a rare but devastating solar storm that could drastically change life here on earth for a period of days, weeks or longer.

Solar Shield

Another Solar Carrington Event Repeat Today Would Collapse Civilization.

Every hundred years or so, a solar storm comes along so potent it fills the skies of Earth with blood-red auroras, makes compass needles point in the wrong direction, and sends electric currents coursing through the planet's topsoil. The most famous such storm, the Carrington Event of 1859, actually shocked telegraph operators and set some of their offices on fire. A 2008 report by the National Academy of Sciences warns that if such a storm occurred today, we could experience widespread power blackouts with permanent damage to many key transformers.

...........................................................................................
When a geomagnetic storm hits the Earth, it shakes the Earth’s magnetosphere. As the magnetized plasma pushes the Earth’s magnetic field lines around, currents flow. Those currents have their own magnetic fields and soon, down at the ground, strong electromagnetic forces are in play.
..........................................................................................

Telegraphs Ran on Electric Air in Crazy 1859 Magnetic Storm

Since the beginning of the Space Age the total length of high-voltage power lines crisscrossing North America has increased nearly 10 fold. This has turned power grids into giant antennas for geomagnetically induced currents. With demand for power growing even faster than the grids themselves, modern networks are sprawling, interconnected, and stressed to the limit—a recipe for trouble, according to the National Academy of Sciences: "The scale and speed of problems that could occur on [these modern grids] have the potential to impact the power system in ways not previously experienced."

A large-scale blackout could last a long time, mainly due to transformer damage. As the National Academy report notes, "these multi-ton apparatus cannot be repaired in the field, and if damaged in this manner they need to be replaced with new units which have lead times of 12 months or more."

(Note the above it said 12 motnhs or more to repair transformer damage. Thats 12 months or more with no electrical power.) Story Reports

Space Weather

Solar Super Storm In 2012

2012: Could solar "Katrina" take down the grid?

Solar Storm Warning 2012
........................................................................................
(This is interesting and makes sense to me) Story Reports

Dr. Tony Phillips
10 Mar 2006
source: Nasa.gov

Rresearchers announced that a storm is coming--the most intense solar maximum in fifty years. The prediction comes from a team led by Mausumi Dikpati of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). "The next sunspot cycle will be 30% to 50% stronger than the previous one," she says. If correct, the years ahead could produce a burst of solar ctivity second only to the historic Solar Max of 1958.

That was a solar maximum. The Space Age was just beginning: Sputnik was launched in Oct. 1957 and Explorer 1 (the first US satellite) in Jan. 1958. In 1958 you couldn't tell that a solar storm was underway by looking at the bars on your cell phone; cell phones didn't exist. Even so, people knew something big was happening when Northern Lights were sighted three times in Mexico. A similar maximum now would be noticed by its effect on cell phones, GPS, weather satellites and many other modern technologies.

Dikpati's prediction is unprecedented. In nearly-two centuries since the 11-year sunspot cycle was discovered, scientists have struggled to predict the size of future maxima—and failed. Solar maxima can be intense, as in 1958, or barely detectable, as in 1805, obeying no obvious pattern.

The key to the mystery, Dikpati realized years ago, is a conveyor belt on the sun.

We have something similar here on Earth—the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt, popularized in the sci-fi movie The Day After Tomorrow. It is a network of currents that carry water and heat from ocean to ocean. In the movie, the Conveyor Belt stopped and threw the world's weather into chaos.

The sun's conveyor belt is a current, not of water, but of electrically-conducting gas. It flows in a loop from the sun's equator to the poles and back again. Just as the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt controls weather on Earth, this solar conveyor belt controls weather on the sun. Specifically, it controls the 11 year sunspot cycle.

Solar physicist David Hathaway of the National Space Science & Technology Center (NSSTC) explains: "First, remember what sunspots are--tangled knots of magnetism generated by the sun's inner dynamo. A typical sunspot exists for just a few weeks. Then it decays, leaving behind a 'corpse' of weak magnetic fields."

The sun conveyor belt.

"The top of the conveyor belt skims the surface of the sun, sweeping up the magnetic fields of old, dead sunspots. The 'corpses' are dragged down at the poles to a depth of 200,000 km where the sun's magnetic dynamo can amplify them. Once the corpses (magnetic knots) are reincarnated (amplified), they become buoyant and float back to the surface." Presto—new sunspots!

All this happens with massive slowness. "It takes about 40 years for the belt to complete oneloop," says Hathaway. The speed varies "anywhere from a 50-year pace (slow) to a 30-year pace (fast)."

When the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: "The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996," says Hathaway. "Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."

Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.

Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011.

Over the last few decades, western civilisations have busily sown the seeds of their own destruction. Our modern way of life, with its reliance on technology, has unwittingly exposed us to an extraordinary danger: plasma balls spewed from the surface of the sun could wipe out our power grids, with catastrophic consequences.

The projections of just how catastrophic make chilling reading. "We're moving closer and closer to the edge of a possible disaster," says Daniel Baker, a space weather expert based at the University of Colorado in Boulder, and chair of the NAS committee responsible for the report.

It is hard to conceive of the sun wiping out a large amount of our hard-earned progress. Nevertheless, it is possible. The surface of the sun is a roiling mass of plasma - charged high-energy particles - some of which escape the surface and travel through space as the solar wind. From time to time, that wind carries a billion-tonne glob of plasma, a fireball known as a coronal mass ejection (see "When hell comes to Earth"). If one should hit the Earth's magnetic shield, the result could be truly devastating.

The incursion of the plasma into our atmosphere causes rapid changes in the configuration of Earth's magnetic field which, in turn, induce currents in the long wires of the power grids. The grids were not built to handle this sort of direct current electricity. The greatest danger is at the step-up and step-down transformers used to convert power from its transport voltage to domestically useful voltage.

The increased DC current creates strong magnetic fields that saturate a transformer's magnetic core. The result is runaway current in the transformer's copper wiring, which rapidly heats up and melts. This is exactly what happened in the Canadian province of Quebec in March 1989, and six million people spent 9 hours without electricity. But things could get much, much worse than that. Worse than Katrina

The most serious space weather event in history happened in 1859. It is known as the Carrington event, after the British amateur astronomer Richard Carrington, who was the first to note its cause: "two patches of intensely bright and white light" emanating from a large group of sunspots. The Carrington event comprised eight days of severe space weather.

There were eyewitness accounts of stunning auroras, even at equatorial latitudes. The world's telegraph networks experienced severe disruptions, and Victorian magnetometers were driven off the scale.

Though a solar outburst could conceivably be more powerful, "we haven't found an example of anything worse than a Carrington event", says James Green, head of NASA's planetary division and an expert on the events of 1859. "From a scientific perspective, that would be the one that we'd want to survive." However, the prognosis from the NAS analysis is that, thanks to our technological prowess, many of us may not.

The report outlines the worst case scenario for the US. The "perfect storm" is most likely on a spring or autumn night in a year of heightened solar activity - something like 2012. Around the equinoxes, the orientation of the Earth's field to the sun makes us particularly vulnerable to a plasma strike.

What's more, at these times of year, electricity demand is relatively low because no one needs too much heating or air conditioning. With only a handful of the US grid's power stations running, the system relies on computer algorithms shunting large amounts of power around the grid and this leaves the network highly vulnerable to sudden spikes.

(What does this all mean? A solar max is comming in 2011 or 2012. It could knock out the power grid for months. I have heard that a 6 months supply of food should be kept on hand. Also get enough pur water filters to last for 6 months per person. Also make sure you can defend yourself with a gun. Make sure you have ammo on hand and more than one gun.

If the grid is off for a few days it will be the perfect time for obama to declare martial law and take everything you own. This is when you and I will need to make a life changing decision, if you know what I mean vern.) Story reports

Remember this is what a natural EMP would do. A man made EMP would be much worse.

This would be a "crisis" obama would not let go to waste. He would declare martial law and become dictator for life. Those of us who know he is a fraud and resist would be killed or put in camps to keep us quiet.

Why Did Obama Allow WikiLeaks To Publish Classified Documents?

Why Did The Obama Admistration Allow WikiLeaks To Publish Classified Documents?

The obama justice department could have prevented wikileaks from publishing classified documents.

Where did wikileaks get the classified documents?

Wikileaks got the classified documents from the obama administration leaking the documents.

Ask your self why?

Its because obama wants to again smear the US and put American lives at risk.

Wikileaks should be investigated.

The obama administration should be investigated for leaking the classified information.

This was done on purpose just like obama has been trying to destroy the US economy on purpose by bankkrupting the US through debt.

Obama used wikileaks to "spread the documents around" just like he uses the federal reserve to "spread the wealth around".

The enemy within is trying to destroy the US from within just like Nikita Khrushchev said they would do.

The enemy within is the "fruit of selma",obama. The "fruit of selma" is a traitor and should be impeached for treason!

Blog talk radio also regulates "free speech" if its not "politically correct"

........................................................................................
Barack obama wants you to believe he is real but his is a FRAUD and IMPOSTER!
.........................................................................................
The IMPOSTER DECECTOR has been disabled on blog talk radio. My new blog talk radio name is HOAX DETECTOR. I recorded a half hour information show today. (I was tired and have a cold so the audio quality is not my best.) You can listen or download it at the following address:

S Res 511 (110) Obama Admits He Is An Imposter – Nov 25,2010

(This link can't be disabled by blog talk radio because it is on obamarecords.com)

In the future I will save my own podcasts on my own blog including blog posts. (See above pod cast.)

I will inform the public of the web address. (See Pod Cast Above.) In dec the fcc it seems is going to try to start regulating free speech.

Blog talk radio also regulates "free speech". If it is not politically correct they will hide the truth just like the devils in congress and obama their leader.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have included in the blog post some of my comments that were on blogtalkradio.

I guess I went over the line when I called a spade a spade and quoted Rush Limbaugh about obama.

I don't consider writing about facts as going over the line but blog talk radio does.

(The Illegitimate FRUIT of Selma Al as obama calls himself, is making sure his FCC bares corrupt fruit also. The FCC is about to make a rule or regulation, a law by fiat, that usurps the power of the people by bypassing the US Congress. The democratic devils in congress have ceded power to the executive branch slowly making this nation an authoricy. I must include the independent and republican devils in congress also.

It is becoming very close to a majority of people, useful idiots, that only want bread and circuses just like rome.) Story Reports also known as the IMPOSTER DTECTOR and now, aka the HOAX DETECTOR.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Imposter Detector | Blog Talk Radio Feed


Todo the dog exposed the "man" behind the curtain in the wizard of oz movie. The man behind the curtain is controlling the mass media. My job is, like todo's, to pull back the curtain and expose the FRAUD and IMPOSTER obama. Want to know who the man behind the curtain is controlling obama? ( Watch for my new podcasts on my personal blog coming soon.)

Sara Palin is correct about "Death Panels" in obamacare bill - Dec 26,2009
Saturday, December 26, 2009 5:30 PM

She said, obama's "bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgement of their level of productivity in society".

The Title IV quality: Subtitle A says the cost of proposed treatment will be divided by the remaining years of your statistical life expectancy. If your per year life cost exceeds the state mandated threshold your won't get health care. So Sara Palin was correct.

Sarah Palin was totally correct. Politifact.com produced the lie of the year not Sara Palin. Sarah Palin politifact or politilie death panels obamacare

Obama supporters act as if the facts don't matter - Dec 19,2009
Friday, December 18, 2009 7:30 PM

Its the same obama pattern over and over, denial or not addressing the facts. Everyday I speak with at least one obama supporter who follows the same pattern their leader obama has taught them. Deny the truth, lie or don't discuss the facts. Closing the Chrysler dealerships is more than just politics it is criminal because as the evidence shows it was used as a way to pay off political debts etc. Obama is a THUG and he will operate as a criminal using the system as a shield.obama supporters obama pattern quo warranto and obama deny the truth chrysler dealerships closed by obama

Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon have joined forces to expose the FRAUD BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA - Dec 09,2009
Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:00 AM

Leo Donofrio deleted his blog suddenly and people were thinking Leo had given up. Today we find out Leo has not given up exposing the FRAUD obama. Stephen Pidgeon another excellent lawyer is also joining forces with Leo to file two new court cases. The “dream team” of Leo and Stephen representing Chrysler dealers forced to close by obama under the troubled asset relief program will be used to challenge the FRAUD obama in US bankruptcy court. In addition to a bankruptcy court challenge, a “quo warranto” case is being filed in Washington, D.C., demanding to know by what authority administration officials set up the financial arrangements with Chrysler and handed out taxpayer money. The “quo warranto” case being filed in Washington, D.C., is demanding to know by what authority administration officials set up the financial arrangements with Chrysler and handed out taxpayer money. Leo Donofrio Bends Stimulus Matrix Steven Pidgeon Quo Warranto challenge in Dc Court Former Chrysler Dealers bankruptcy court challenge

Leo Donofrio Has Punted Quo Warranto - Nov 30,2009
Monday, November 30, 2009 11:00 AM

Leo Donofrio has punted Quo Warranto. He says his blog is taking up to much of his time. I have preserved some of Leo's excellent information on how to expose the FRAUD obama. I will be telling you how as Leo has explained. Leo's blog no longer contains his excellent documented information. Visit www.obamarecords.com for more info on the IMPOSTER. quo warranto leo donofrio fraud obama imposter obama yes we can expose the fraud obama

There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as president. - Nov 17,2009
Monday, November 16, 2009 7:30 PM

Obama says he was informed by his attorney general about the plan to have "show trials" in New York city but that his Attorney General made the decision to try the TERRORISTS in New York city. American did not elect the attorney general but elected obama. Obama states his attorney general is acting on his own. In other words obama nominated the attorney general but that is all. Obama wants you to believe he has nothing to say or do with the "show trials" in New York. Obama is saying he makes no effort to control what the attorney general does with Terrorists who are to be brought to New York for "show trials".

Obama is saying he is not in control yet America elected him as the president to lead his cabinet members. He does not. Why? Either obama is an affirmative action failure trying to run the government or obama is a liar. I think he is both. We have a "president" who admits he is NOT in control of his cabinet members, yet he seems in control and to direct their every move. If he is not that would mean he is asleep at the helm and totally incompetent. A president who is not mentally up to the task of leading this nation. Obama needs to be removed from office because he does not have the ability to effectively act as president because of his mental incapacity. pathological narcissist barack obama show trials imposter terrorists

Dark Days For US Because Of The IMPOSTER Obama - Oct 16,2009
Friday, October 16, 2009 7:00 PM

Hawaii Long Form Original Certificate Of Live Birth CAN BE VERIFIED because it contains, doctor name, hospital, residence of father and mother, and the signatures of certification, Parent or Informant signature, Doctor or Attendant, and date accepted by Local Registrar. A Certificate Of Live Birth CAN BE VERIFIED. A "Certification Of Live Birth", CANNOT. Obama wants you to believe he was born in Hawaii with no verification. Obama has offered proof that CAN'T BE VERIFIED. Obama's "Certification Of Live Birth" redacted document was DOA and still is. Obama is an IMPOSTER and a FRAUD. I HAVE JUST PROVED IT! obama imposter certification obama fraud obama um um um obama cant be verified obama certification of birth is a diversion

Obama EO 13489 Does Not Effect His long Form Birth Certificate In Hawaii Or Records - Sep 26,2009
Saturday, September 26, 2009 6:00 PM

A continuing pattern of misdirection by Dr. Janice Okubo Hawaii Department of Health (DoH) Communications Director. .......................................................................................... Leo Donofrio says there appears to be an ideological struggle – between the DoH and the OIP – playing out behind the scenes in Hawaii. Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d) is a law which demands information be released. Leo Donofrio Explains how hawaiian officals are hiding information about the fraud obama on his blog. My topic is talking about Leo's take on what is going on in Hawaii to cover up for the FRAUD obama. Janice Okubo hides the truth about obama. fraud obama birth certificate eo 13489 obama has something to hide Janice Okubo hides the truth about obama

Vice President Cheney failed to call for objections during 2009 Electorial Vote Count. - Sep 19,2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009 6:00 PM

Vice President Cheney failed to call for objections during 2009 Electorial Vote Count. Thanks to Leo Donofrio we can all review why Cheney didn’t call for objections as was required by the statute. "The President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any." Chaney didn't do what he was required to do by the US Constitution. This has been conveniently overlooked by congress and the media.

Dick chaney was in on the fraud of obama

fraud obama no objections from cheney congress did not follow their own law coverup for obama me and my shadow

http://storyreportscomments.blogspot.com/2010/10/blog-post.html

The Devils At The FCC Want To Smother Free Speech Via Net Neutrality

Another obama government lie.

From FCC.GOV

The FCC does not regulate the Internet or Internet Service Providers (ISPs). You may contact your state consumer protection office or if there is possible fraud involved, you may contact the Federal Trade Commission.

(The devils in the FCC are about to give you a christmas present you don't want.) Story Reports


FCC may regulate Internet lines days before Christmas

The devils at the FCC are trying to kill free speech before they loose power in Jan 2011

By Sara Jerome

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has a Christmas gift in store for the phone and cable industry: it may move ahead on its controversial net-neutrality regulations three days before Christmas.

An FCC source confirmed on Friday that the commission plans to push its December meeting back by a week, meaning it will fall on the 22nd of the month. That's the same meeting in which analysts say the agency may move forward on its controversial net-neutrality proposal.

The timing of the meeting is already raising eyebrows. Some see it as a way to move the matter along before the GOP assumes the majority and while Congress is not in session to criticize the effort.

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), ranking member of the telecom subcommittee, questioned the schedule on Friday.

He said "it appears that Chairman [Julius] Genachowski is trying to slip it under the radar and hope no one notices."

Industry sources also suggested that political calculus is involved with the change of date for the meeting.

"While many Americans will be enjoying their eggnog on that day, I'm sure the broadband providers won't be pleased to find this piece of coal in their stockings," an industry source jibed.

Republicans are already mounting a campaign to oppose the potential Internet line regulations, which would aim to rein in how cable and phone companies manage Internet traffic.

“Reigniting the network neutrality debate will only distract us from that work and further jeopardize investment, innovation, and jobs. We ask you not to circulate such an order,” they wrote.

An FCC official also remained steadfast on Friday that net-neutrality rules are a sound policy.

"Net Neutrality is about preventing anyone from regulating the Internet. There are some cable and phone companies out there that want to decide which apps you should get on your phone, which Internet sites you should look at, and what online videos you can download. That’s regulating the Internet -- and that’s what the FCC is trying to stop,” the official said.

(The devils at the FCC are going to regulate, I said regulate the internet by controlling cable and phone companies. The devils at the FCC excuse is that the cable and telephone companies are now regulating what you and I do on the internet so there is an urgent, "crisis that can't go to waste" need for the devils in government to regulate FREE SPEECH. Its also urgent because the new congress is talking over in Jan 2011.) Story Reports
.......................................................................................
by Seton Motley

FCC Power Grab

So there have been of late proclamations aplenty of the expiration of Network Neutrality.

The Republican takeover of the House of Representatives made debilitating Net Neutrality legislation – of the sort Free Press and the Media Marxists have long desired – far, far less likely. That’s the good.

Then there’s the bad. Though Congress is supposed to be the place where these things happen, the pro-NN gaggle long ago gave up on the legislative route – because they couldn’t get it done in Congress.

So way back in 2006 they instead chose to focus their efforts on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), to get Net Neutrality implemented via executive branch regulatory fiat – having made the cold calculation that it would be easier to get three votes from unelected FCC bureaucrats than it would be to get them from 269 of the People’s representatives.

(The Illegitimate FRUIT of Selma Al as obama calls himself, is making sure his FCC bares corrupt fruit also. The FCC is about to make a rule or regulation, a law by fiat, that usurps the power of the people by bypassing the US Congress. The democratic devils in congress have ceded power to the executive branch slowly making this nation an authoricy. I must include the independent and republican devils in congress also.

It becoming very close to a majority of people, useful idiots, that only want bread and circuses just like rome.) Story Reports

November 2nd made this long-pursued FCC Internet power grab – the reclassification of broadband – perhaps MORE likely, not less.

Chairman Genachowski’s next – and maybe last – opportunity to do this is the December FCC monthly meeting. It’s the last such gathering before the new Republican House majority is sworn in. There are four (and perhaps five) possible incoming Republican House Energy & Commerce Chairman – and all of them are opposed to FCC Internet reclassification.

(The FCC devils know their time is short so they are very active because the "fruit of selma, obama", their Illegitimate leader is controlling them.) Story Reports

[S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes.

(Yes obama and his fellow devils in congress want to control what you eat and even grow in your back yard. Notice I'm not calling them Liberals or communists etc but I'm calling a spade a spade. There are DEVILS in congress that want the total destruction of you and the USA.) Story Reports

“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”

~Thomas Jefferson, 1778

"There is No Right to Consume or Feed Children Any Particular Food; There is No Generalized Right to Bodily and Physical Health; There is No Fundamental Right to Freedom of Contract."
~US Dept of Health & Human Services and US Food & Drug Administration, 2010

.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
[S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes.

S 510 is hissing in the grass

Senate bill S510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food. Senate Bill S510 Makes it illegal to Grow, Share, Trade or Sell Homegrown Food

S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food and farming.

History

In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton’s HACCP delighted the offending corporate (World Trade Organization “WTO”) meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP.

In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as Rosa DeLauro, whose husband’s firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510.

S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds.

1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.

2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:

COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.

Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.

3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, “entry of food into the US” covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and “entering into” it by virtue of being produced.

4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.

5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds – How to criminalize them, for more details.

6. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations.

7. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production – put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.

8. It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It takes agriculture and food, which are the cornerstone of all economies, out of the hands of the citizenry, and puts them under the total control of multinational corporations influencing the UN, WHO, FAO and WTO, with HHS, and CDC, acting as agents, with Homeland Security as the enforcer. The chance to rebuild the economy based on farming, ranching, gardens, food production, natural health, and all the jobs, tools and connected occupations would be eliminated.

9. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. This would industrialize every farm in the US, eliminate local organic farming, greatly increase global warming from increased use of oil-based products and long-distance delivery of foods, and make food even more unsafe. The five items listed — the Five Pillars of Food Safety — are precisely the items in the food supply which are the primary source of its danger.

10. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control. The bill postpones defining all the regulations to be imposed; postpones defining crimes to be punished, postpones defining penalties to be applied. It removes fundamental constitutional protections from all citizens in the country, making them subject to a corporate tribunal with unlimited power and penalties, and without judicial review. It is (similar to C-6 in Canada) the end of Rule of Law in the US.

(S510 is similar to obamacare in that it does not define the regulations to be imposed until later. It just what pelosi said about obamacare. Pelosi said it would needed to be passed first before America would know what was in the bill. The devils in congress are passing open ended laws that can be modified at a later date without knowing or caring what they are voting for. The blind leading the blind into oblivion.) Story Reports

Senate Bill S510 Makes it illegal to Grow, Share, Trade or Sell Homegrown Food

Almost Any Convicted Criminal Could Become A TSA Security Screener

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Regulations TITLE 14 CHAPTER I PART 108 Sec. 108.33 Employment history, verification and criminal history records checks

Requirements for Airport Security Screeners

Criminal History

Surprisingly, a conviction for a crime, even a violent felony, does not disqualify someone from working as a screener. FAR 108.33(2) states that a criminal records check must not disclose that the applicant had been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity, in any jurisdiction, during the previous 10 years of a number of crimes such as aircraft piracy, interference with a flight crew or cabin crew member, assault with intent to murder, rape or aggravated sexual abuse, or armed robbery.

This list of crimes includes sedition, treason, extortion, or distribution of a controlled substance.

This regulation implies that so long as the conviction were at least 10 years old, almost any convicted criminal could become a security screener.

Criminal Background Checks

FAR 108.33(c)(5) does not require criminal records checks for every screener applicant, only for those applicants who have specific deficiencies in their employment history, if there are other deficiencies in the application, or if the air carrier finds out that the applicant may have been convicted of certain kinds of crimes.

The required criminal records check is with the FBI, but the regulations do not say anything about records checks from other countries.

Educational Background

FAR 108.31(a)(1) requires that screeners possess a high school diploma, a General Equivalency Diploma, or a combination of education and experience which the certificate holder has determined to have equipped the person to perform the duties of the position.

This implies that the airline can decide that a screener does not have to successfully complete high school.

(Lets review the TSA regulations about how almost any convicted criminal could become a kabuki screener.

(1) Does not necessarily need to complete high school.

(2) The TSA screener can be employed if he or she has been convicted of:

Has been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Aircraft piracy, ie hijacking an airplane!

Assault with intent to murder.

Rape or aggravated sexual abuse.

Armed robbery.

Sedition.

Treason.

Extortion.

Distribution of a controlled substance, ie selling crack etc!

People are talking about TSA screeners groping people and feeling them up.

People need to also be aware that its possible that the TSA screener that is doing the groping could also be a COVICTED CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!

I think the fact that the TSA screener could be a convicted criminal that has committed one of the above crimes and is given a free pass by their employer is what the American public should be rasing hell about!

Its not just the groping its the criminal groper also! Obama TSA "kabuki security")

Story Reports

Obama Is Pure Puff Or Facade With A Superficial Appearance Or Illusion Of Something

Barack Obama's amazingly consistent smile from Eric Spiegelman on Vimeo.

Barack Obama’s amazingly consistent smile

The grin is almost Chesire Cat-like, staying in a fixed position in every shot while the angle of the camera moves. The hands stay in exact position in relation to the body. The angle of the head doesn’t change over 130 frames, either. Either that’s a CARDBOARD CUTOUT, or like most politicians, Obama has learned to pose brilliantly, which is how he got elected President, after all.

Obama Is Pure Puff Or Facade With A Superficial Appearance Or Illusion Of Something

(He is like a guy who drives a polished car with expensive wheel rims but lives in a shack on welfare. Obama has projected a facade that has been appealing to some. Obama has carefully crafted himself as a facade to scam America.

On a film set and within most themed attractions, many of the buildings are only facades.In film sets, they are simply held up with supports from behind.

The term facade is the perfect description for barack hussein obama the IMPOSTER.

Obama projects the face or facade of a fake US citizen. He is held up by supporters from behind the scenes.

Obama is nothing more than a FAKE cardboard cutout.

Story Reports
........................................................................................
Barack Obama: The Accidental Nominee How The Facade Of Obama Was Constructed

Barack Obama: The Accidental Nominee And How The FACADE Was Constructed

Just how did Barack Obama (D-IL), a rather undistinguished IL state senator, get elected to the U.S. Senate, and without doing anything noteworthy in that august body, go on to capture his party’s nomination for president before even finishing out his first term in Congress? A combination of heartlessness and happenstance - and some say, caucus fraud.

In 1996 Barack Obama ran unopposed in the Dem primary for the IL State Senate by challenging the signatures on the nominating petitions of all four of his rivals – including incumbent and party elder Alice Palmer – knocking them all off the ballot. As the Chicago Tribune explained: “Had Palmer survived the petition challenge, Obama would have faced the daunting task of taking on an incumbent senator.”

During his 2004 run for the U.S. Senate, Obama’s lucky streak started with his being able to exploit a provision of the 2002 Campaign Reform Act (AKA McCain-Feingold) that freed him from the law’s fundraising constraints. Obama’s extremely wealthy primary opponent, Blair Hull, self-financed his campaign to the tune of $28 million, triggering the “Millionaire’s Amendment” (struck down by the Supreme Court in June) so Obama’s donors were each allowed to contribute up to $12,000 to his campaign instead of being limited to $2,000. The Los Angeles Times reports:

A review of Obama’s receipts in 2003 and 2004 shows he raised $1.7 million in donations in excess of the maximum then in effect of $2,100, or roughly 28% of the $6 million he raised for the primary. Of that, $360,000 flowed in donations of the new maximum of $12,000, and $450,000 came in donations of $10,000. …

George Soros and at least four other members of his family each gave Obama $12,000 donations that year. Also, among those who gave $10,000 checks was a fellow with another now familiar name, Antoin ‘Tony’ Rezko.

With the money, Obama was able to buy TV ads statewide, as well as the services of one David Axelrod as his chief strategist and media advisor - his very own Karl Rove.

Blair had a healthy lead over Obama, as he was able to boost his name recognition by blanketing the airwaves with ads. A month before the primary elections – just as Obama’s ads were starting to air – a judge unsealed the records from his 1998 divorce (his ex-wife had sought a restraining order against him and he was arrested for battery after she alleged that he threatened to kill her; no charges were filed, however). Anyway, Hull dropped out and Obama ran for the Dem nomination unopposed.

An IL blogger who goes by the name Cao explains that Axelrod – who “railed against the politics of personal destruction” in the 1990s – had more than a little something to do with the unsealing of Hull’s divorce records and the subsequent leaks of salacious details to the media.

Lightning struck twice when Obama’s extremely wealthy Repub opponent, Jack Ryan, was forced to drop out of the race in June after a judge unsealed the records from his 1999 divorce and child custody battle with actress Jeri Ryan, despite both parents objecting to the child custody records being made public. The records included allegations – never proven - that Jack Ryan had taken his wife to sex clubs.

With less than three months before Election Day, Alan Keyes parachuted into IL to run in Ryan’s place. Obama beat him 70 percent to 27 percent.

Before Election Day 2004, while the Repubs were still in disarray, John Kerry asked Obama to give the keynote address at the party’s convention in July. Chicago Magazine reports that “Obama’s selection as keynote speaker was carefully plotted by all sides for maximum effect”:

Obama admitted in interviews at the time that he was “totally surprised” by the speaking invitation … As he put it in his book The Audacity of Hope: “The process by which I was selected as the keynote speaker remains something of a mystery to me.”

A closer look, however, reveals less mystery and more politics. …

It’s difficult to know what role Obama’s race played in getting the keynote slot … [A]t the time of the announcement, black leaders were criticizing Kerry for not doing enough to reach out to African American voters, whose support would be crucial to winning the presidency.

As for the speech itself, in an article titled, “The 17 Minutes That Launched a Political Star,”The Washington Post reports:

The first impression Obama crafted that night still forms the basis of his presidential campaign. In the most visible moment of his life to date, Obama discovered a formula for success in the public eye that he has relied on ever since. He prepared meticulously, but disguised his delivery as effortless. He told the story of his unique background, but offered few original ideas. …

Most of the concepts could have been plucked from any standard stump speech: that every child deserves a shot at a good life; that each American is connected - and responsible - for every other; that government needs to be honest with its people, especially before going to war. One conservative pundit, analyzing Obama’s speech later that night, would sum it up as “pure puff.”

The New York Times observed that “[t]he strange ritual of the Iowa caucuses, the fight over the Michigan and Florida delegations, the battle over the superdelegates - it has been a colorful nominating season, but not the most democratic one.” That’s an understatement.

What do you get when you combine lax caucus rules with bare-knuckle Chicago politics? Caucus fraud – which was rampant, many of the pro-Hillary groups opposing Obama’s nomination allege. A 98-page report that analyses caucuses held in 14 states, including CO, HI, IA, KS and MN, cites numerous examples of voter disenfranchisement, intimidation and fraud: (Obama added to his FACADE)

Voter Fraud (CO): Obama team picked up the packets the night before the caucus and maintained control of them.

Voter Intimidation (CO): Obama surrogates took over the caucuses.

Voter Fraud (HI): Many precincts ran out of ballots so “ballots” were created. Scraps of paper, post-it notes, and anything else voters could find was used as “ballots.” The caucuses ended up with more ballots than participants, a sure sign of voter fraud.

Voter Fraud (IA): There are numerous reports of the Obama campaign busing Illinois residents from to Iowa to participate in the Iowa caucus. Obama campaign openly acknowledges handing out fifty-thousand fliers advising students to “go back to school” to caucus. A look at a map of the caucus results shows Obama had a distinct dominance in the Eastern part of the state.

Voter Fraud (KS): Separate reports from different caucuses reported serious miscounts in the results. The count called out by the Precinct Captain did not match the number of participants in the room or the distribution of participants in the room.

Voter Fraud (MN): Caucus attendees interviewed were sure the count stated did not represent the people in the room.

Voter Disenfranchisement (MN): One woman reported waiting seven hours and still didn’t get a chance to caucus.

The grin is almost Chesire Cat-like, staying in a fixed position in every shot while the angle of the camera moves. The hands stay in exact position in relation to the body. The angle of the head doesn’t change over 130 frames, either. Either that’s a CARDBOARD CUTOUT, or like most politicians, Obama has learned to pose brilliantly, which is how he got elected President, after all.

(Obama is an empty suit or facade. A cardboard cutout that represents the results of voter fraud and "back stage" handling by media consultants. Americans were sold a defective product in the form of a cardboard facade that talked via the teleprompter. Behind the obama facade is an empty suit controlled by george soros, the un, and other puppet masters. The strings that make the obama facade move are the state controlled Liberal media.) Story Reports

Are you shocked to learn congress passed the $700 billion "financial rescue package" that pays private bankers est 700 BILLION a year interest?

"Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders."

– The Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1930s

***************************************************************************************
We the taxpayers will be paying interest to the banks on at least $700 billion annually!!!

Are you shocked to learn congress passed the $700 billion "financial rescue package" that pays private bankers est 700 BILLION a year interst on bank reserves This is a redistribution of wealth or "SPREADING THE WEALTH AROUND" as obama has stated he will do and has done via the "fed" reserve.
****************************************************************************************

1. The Fed is privately owned.

Its shareholders are private banks. In fact, 100% of its shareholders are private banks. None of its stock is owned by the government.

2. The fact that the Fed does not get "appropriations" from Congress basically means that it gets its money from Congress without congressional approval, by engaging in "open market operations."

Here is how it works: When the government is short of funds, the Treasury issues bonds and delivers them to bond dealers, which auction them off. When the Fed wants to "expand the money supply" (create money), it steps in and buys bonds from these dealers with newly-issued dollars acquired by the Fed for the cost of writing them into an account on a computer screen. These maneuvers are called "open market operations" because the Fed buys the bonds on the "open market" from the bond dealers. The bonds then become the "reserves" that the banking establishment uses to back its loans. In another bit of sleight of hand known as "fractional reserve" lending, the same reserves are lent many times over, further expanding the money supply, generating interest for the banks with each loan. It was this money-creating process that prompted Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1960s, to call the Federal Reserve "a total money-making machine." He wrote:

"When the Federal Reserve writes a check for a government bond it does exactly what any bank does, it creates money, it created money purely and simply by writing a check."

3. The Fed generates profits for its shareholders.

The interest on bonds acquired with its newly-issued Federal Reserve Notes pays the Fed’s operating expenses plus a guaranteed 6% return to its banker shareholders. A mere 6% a year may not be considered a profit in the world of Wall Street high finance, but most businesses that manage to cover all their expenses and give their shareholders a guaranteed 6% return are considered "for profit" corporations.

In addition to this guaranteed 6%, the banks will now be getting interest from the taxpayers on their "reserves." The basic reserve requirement set by the Federal Reserve is 10%. The website of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York explains that as money is redeposited and relent throughout the banking system, this 10% held in "reserve" can be fanned into ten times that sum in loans; that is, $10,000 in reserves becomes $100,000 in loans.

Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.8 puts the total "loans and leases in bank credit" as of September 24, 2008 at $7,049 billion. Ten percent of that is $700 billion.

That means we the taxpayers will be paying interest to the banks on at least $700 billion annually – this so that the banks can retain the reserves to accumulate interest on ten times that sum in loans.

(The obama and the other scum in congress pushed the so called $700 billion financial rescue package or stimulus package that included the provision to pay banks interst on their reserves. This makes the banks HOLD ONTO THEIR RESERVES because we the people are paying the banks interest to do so. This one of the reasons it is hard to get loans. Its more profitable and convenient to just not loan the money when the banks are already making a killing off the American taxpayer because of the obama democrate SCAM!) Story Reports

The banks earn these returns from the taxpayers for the privilege of having the banks’ interests protected by an all-powerful independent private central bank, even when those interests may be opposed to the taxpayers’ -- for example, when the banks use their special status as private money creators to fund speculative derivative schemes that threaten to collapse the U.S. economy. Among other special benefits, banks and other financial institutions (but not other corporations) can borrow at the low Fed funds rate of about 2%. They can then turn around and put this money into 30-year Treasury bonds at 4.5%, earning an immediate 2.5% from the taxpayers, just by virtue of their position as favored banks. A long list of banks (but not other corporations) is also now protected from the short selling that can crash the price of other stocks.


The Fed is privately owned. Its shareholders are private banks. Americans pay the fed interest on banks reserves est 700 Billion a year because of obama and democarate scam included in "stimulus" bill

........................................................................................
The "Federal" Reserve admits scam on its own website READ THIS!!!!

From the "federal" reserve web site:

The Federal Reserve Banks pay interest on required reserve balances--balances held at Reserve Banks to satisfy reserve requirements--and on excess balances--balances held in excess of required reserve balances and contractual clearing balances. The Board of Governors has prescribed rules governing the payment of interest by Federal Reserve Banks in Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions, 12 CFR Part 204).

The interest rate paid on required reserve balances is determined by the Board and is intended to eliminate effectively the implicit tax that reserve requirements used to impose on depository institutions. The interest rate paid on excess balances is also determined by the Board and gives the Federal Reserve an additional tool for the conduct of monetary policy.

The Board will continue to evaluate the appropriate settings of the rates paid on balances in light of evolving market conditions and make adjustments as needed.

The interest rates to be paid on required reserve balances and excess balances are posted to this website generally on the last Wednesday of the reserve maintenance period at 4:30 p.m.

(Are you shocked to learn Americans are paying private banks interest not to loan money? Are you shocked to learn the interest is est at 700 billion a year? Are you shocked to learn congress passed the $700 billion "financial rescue package" that pays private bankers est 700 BILLION a year on just the reserves banks hold?) Story Reports

.........................................................................................

"The Treasury Department, for the first time in its history, said it would begin selling bonds for the Federal Reserve in an effort to help the central bank deal with its unprecedented borrowing needs.

This is extraordinary. Why is the Treasury issuing U.S. government bonds (or debt) to fund the Fed, which is itself supposedly "the lender of last resort" created to fund the banks and the federal government? Yahoo Finance reported on September 17:

.........................................................................................

"The Term Securities Lending Facility is a 28-day facility that will offer Treasury general collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s primary dealers in exchange for other program-eligible collateral. It is intended to promote liquidity in the financing markets for Treasury and other collateral and thus to foster the functioning of financial markets more generally. . . . The resource allows dealers to switch debt that is less liquid for U.S. government securities that are easily tradable."

"To switch debt that is less liquid for U.S. government securities that are easily tradable" means that the government gets the banks’ toxic derivative debt, and the banks get the government’s triple-A securities. Unlike the risky derivative debt, federal securities are considered "risk-free" for purposes of determining capital requirements, allowing the banks to improve their capital position so they can make new loans.
........................................................................................

In its latest power play, on October 3, 2008, the Fed acquired the ability to pay interest to its member banks on the reserves the banks maintain at the Fed. Reuters reported on October 3:

"The U.S. Federal Reserve gained a key tactical tool from the $700 billion financial rescue package signed into law on Friday that will help it channel funds into parched credit markets. Tucked into the 451-page bill is a provision that lets the Fed pay interest on the reserves banks are required to hold at the central bank."

If the Fed’s money comes ultimately from the taxpayers, that means we the taxpayers are paying interest to the banks on the banks’ own reserves – reserves maintained for their own private profit.

(Did ya get that the "fed" reserve is running a scam on the American people because of the the $700 billion financial rescue package signed into law and rammed through congress?) Story Reports

The Fed reserve scam via the obama "stimulus" redistribution of wealth scam

(The GREEDY BASTARDS IN CONGRESS have scammed the American people using a REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH SCHEME CALLED THE "FINANCIAL RESCUE PACKAGE".

THE GREEDY BASTARDS IN CONGRESS have led you to believe it was greedy banks and wall st that scammed the American people.

In fact THE GREEDY BASTARDS IN CONGRESS made it possible for SOME GREEDY BASTARDS in banks and wall st to scam the American TAXPAYER!!!!

Capitalism had nothing to do with the obama scam.)

Story Reports

Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights.

What is capitalism?

Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned. Under capitalism the state is separated from economics (production and trade), just like the state is separated from religion. Capitalism is the system of of laissez faire. It is the system of political freedom.

What is a capitalist?

An advocate of laissez-faire is known as a capitalist, e.g., novelist Ayn Rand is a capitalist; e.g., though economically Engels came from a wealthy background, politically he is recognized as a socialist/communist because of his ideas; e.g., billionaire George Soros is not a capitalist as he does not advocate capitalism, but he advocates some form of a mixed economy statism. Soros like Ted Turner is a "socialist at heart."

Capitalism is a social system based on the principle of individual rights.

The radio program money talks never mentions the est 700 billion interest the American taxpayer is paying private banks on their reserves.

The first and biggest change to save taxpayer money should be to repeal the interest paid to private banks on their reserves.

Bob Brinker never mentions this. He talks about cutting entitlement programs and how Americans will not allow this.

Bob Brinker the host of money talks is also a FRAUD!