Obama’s Hawaii Years: The truth finally revealed
Andy Martin’s explosive new series on Barack Obama’s Hawai’ian history. Martin’s investigative team in Honolulu finds the dramatic truth about who Barack Obama really is. Martin says his revelations are a “sad story,” but an essential element in understanding the soul of the presidential candidate. The series is sure to ignite a firestorm on the Internet, and further embarrass the mainstream media that have been avoiding any searching inquiry into Obama’s past.
The Obama investigation in Hawai’i
Obama’s Hawai’i Years: The truth finally revealed
Starting Monday, October 20th
ANDY MARTIN
Executive Editor
ContrarianCommentary.com
“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
“OPERATION ALOHA OBAMA” BEGINS TO YIELD THE TRUTH ABOUT BARACK OBAMA
THE COUNTDOWN TO THE REAL OBAMA BEGINS: A THREE-PART SERIES
(HONOLULU, HI)(October 19, 2008) You may have seen the delightfully goofy TV commercials in which former newscaster Bill Kurtis “finds the Internet” and misses the broader historical issues starting him in the face. We came to Hawai’i to find the real Barack Obama, and we think found him.
Over the next four days our conclusions will startle you, drive the New York Times crazy, and change the focus of the presidential campaign from “Who is Barack Obama” to “How did he get away with it for so long?”
At the end, my column on Wednesday the 22nd will be filled with sadness and pity, not anger. Obama’s real story is a sad story, a story that remains to be written and rewritten.
When we landed in Honolulu the local dispute was over whether Obama is “Hawaiian enough.” Hawai’i Governor Lingle had stated in Nevada that Obama’s ties to Hawaii were tenuous. That produced a backlash from Obama megaphones. Congressman Neil Abercrombie quoted Michelle Obama as saying “You can’t really understand Barack until you understand Hawai’i.” http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2008810180356
I agree with Michelle. Hawai’i is where you find the truths about Obama, especially the truths that Obama does not want you to find.
Obama uses Hawai’i the same way he uses everything else in his life. Places, people, experiences, the past are there to serve Obama, not the truth. Maybe he and Mr. Kurtis should get together. For myself, I am interested solely in the facts and the truth.
The hidden truths about Obama will be presented in three parts:
Monday, October 20th: Obama and Islam, Again
Tuesday, October 21st: Obama’s family and what it tells us
(The Dog That Didn’t Bark)
Wednesday, October 22nd: The Two Obamas: Obama’s Secret Family
Obama is in some respects a metaphor for Hawai’i itself: insular, isolated, and detached. Honolulu is a city of dazzling modernity. But Hawai’i is also a place where native Hawai’ians can grow to adulthood without a working knowledge of English. There are contradictions galore in Hawai’i, and Obama is the crown jewel of contradiction and conundrums. But there are consequences to contradictions.
The last time I told the truth about Obama, he unleashed his attack dogs at the New York Times to smear me. We will be filing suit in a few days to expose the New York Times as an Obama handout, not an independent newspaper (see below). And when this series is complete, you can expect the Times and mainstream media (“MSM”) to renew their attacks on me.
My background is clear: since I first went to Viet-Nam forty-one years ago, I have been breaking news and irritating powerful people, ending up on presidential enemies’ lists and the like. But no one has ever successfully attacked my facts. Truth is my passion; accuracy is my overriding goal. I have an unblemished 40-year record spanning the rice paddies of Asia to the deserts of Arabia.
Obama will not like what I have to say in this series. But, no surprise, Republicans may not like what I write either.
This series will be a postpartisan look at Obama. I have no ties to any campaign, and no ties to either party (I vote in Republican primaries). I have deep affection for the frustrated voters in both parties who desperately want the truth. In analyzing candidates we apply different filters and different templates, and often reach different conclusions than the MSM. We are the later day embodiment of Hawai’i Five-0, an old TV series that still holds a place in the hearts of Hawai’ians. We get it right in the end: “Book’em Danno.”
We are the first investigative team to come to Hawai’i. How strange that MSM’s have ignored a place that Michelle Obama calls so critical to understanding her husband. Because of my obsession for factual accuracy and relentless search for the truth about Barack Obama we landed the first team in Honolulu. We have now begun a litigation operation as well as an investigaiton, all targeted on ferreting out the truth about Obama’s past.
In my book “Obama: The Man Behind the Mask,” I try to get behind Obama’s “mask.” The first chapter of the book is a psychological profile of the man. It has served well as an insight into his character and psyche.
Here are some general observations to open the series.
First, MSM often overlook that the Dunham Family, Obama’s mother and grandmother, were strangers in this state. The Dunhams went from Kansas to Washington State. Their daughter grew up and graduated from high school in Washington. (Stanley) Ann Dunham arrived in Honolulu as a disoriented young adult, an outsider in an insular culture. That is why Ann gravitated to the University of Hawai’i, which serves as an oasis of cosmopolitanism for the island state. Nothing in Washington prepared her for Hawai’i.
Out of this confusion and upheaval came Barack Obama, a man of three families: his mother’s family, his grandparents’ family and his secret family.
When I began writing about Barack Obama over four years ago, the only “source” was his brilliant novel about himself, “Dreams From My Father.” The book is a fantasy, not an autobiography, with invented characters and dialogue, and missing periods of his life. Obama is indeed a fascinating story, and we will tell it for the first time. A story of young love, and loss. A story of ultimate discovery and a voyage into an endless unknown of the soul. Will we get it right? I pray that we do, although I missed church at St Andrew’s Cathedral this morning. I will let history be the judge of this series.
And I will close with a stark reminder.
Four years ago I exposed on WMUR-TV (Manchester, NH) who George Bush really was. No one wanted to listen. Bush’s henchmen tried to destroy me (and obviously failed).
Today Americans are caught in an increasing hysteria, a crescendo of projection and fantasy. But the inescapable lesson of history is that there is always a real world looming behind the fantasy. A mask is still a mask; indeed, a mask is always a mask. I have called Obama a masked man in my book, and others call me a masked man (the “Lone Ranger”) for my relentless pursuit of the truth about Obama.
In the end, the real world always wins. Truth triumphs. And fantasy usually leads to bitter disappointment and dismay. If you don’t believe me, just ask George W. Bush.
I leave the good reader to judge my truths about Barack Obama, and act accordingly.
MONDAY: PART ONE, OBAMA AND ISLAM, AGAIN
NOTE: Monday one of the TV networks has assigned a camera crew to follow us in Honolulu, so our anonymity will be somewhat compromised. But our continuing investigaiton will not be. We remain totally independent of any MSM news organization.
———————————————-
We are in the final stages of preparing a defamation lawsuit against the New York Times, and we expect to file by October 27th. Imagine if you will what the Times put on page one: A “report” in which only people who were willing to smear me were contacted, and no one favorable was allowed to appear, in which my successful litigation history was erased from the public consciousness (see www.AndyMartin.com). Rather than a balanced and factual portrayal of a controversial person—I am indeed and indubitably controversial—there was a one-dimensional smear of the crudest kind. And they wonder why the MSM’s are dying.
Luckily, we at ContrarianCommentary.com “own” the Internet.” “We take the road less traveled…’And that has all the difference.’” (Robert Frost) Watch for the libel lawsuit.
———————————————-
Readers of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, say the book is still the only gold standard and practical handbook on Barack Obama’s unfitness for the presidency. Buy it.
Book orders: http://OrangeStatePress.com. Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or the publisher now available.
———————————————
FULL DISCLOSURE: I recently decided to oppose Barack Obama’s election and became Executive Director of The Stop Obama Coalition, http://StopObamaCoalition.com. By default, I became the national leader of the anti-Obama movement. I am not acting as either a Democrat or Republican. I have had no contact whatsoever with the McCain Campaign. I am not a member of any political organization. The views expressed are entirely independent. I am acting as an American citizen who sincerely believes Obama is not the man we need in the Oval Office. We are going to run a very dynamic and aggressive campaign against Obama. I will continue to write my news and opinion columns for ContrarianCommentary.com. /s/ Andy Martin
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Bill Says:
October 22, 2008 at 2:32 am
Andy I hope you get the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama and can verify it is valid with supporting documents as required for the birth certificate to be issued in the first place.
Just having the birth certificate might not be enough. All important is how and when it was issued and to whom. From what i’ve been reading even if it exists the supporting documents are all important, Hawaii State Law “[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
It says legal parents and had declared Hawaii as their legal residence for 1 year prior to birth.
I’m talking about marriage license and the document that shows that their legal residence was Hawaii i year prior to Obama’s birth. If this can’t be proved or certified what good is the birth certificate?
If he was born in Hawaii there should be documents proving this also.
Just having a birth certificate that says Obama was born in Hawaii is not good enough because it is worth nothing if it can’t be verified.
Bill Says
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Monday, October 20, 2008
Here is a blockbuster about to bust about Obama's birth certificate!
This could be an October suprise for Obama!
Obama is leaving the campaign trail to visit his ill grandmother in Hawaii for 3 days. Ya right! He is going to Hawaii to stop the production of this law suit!
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
EMERGENCY EVERYONE 9:13PM Oct 20,08 EASTERN-OBAMA FLYING TO HAWAII TO VISIT "AILING GRANDMOTHER."
WE GOT HIM!!!!!!WATCH HIS EVERY MOVE. HE IS GOING TO BRIBE HAWAII OFFICIALS TO BLOCK THE MARTIN LAWSUIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It makes me wonder if Obama is going to Hawaii because of what Michelle O. allegedly said to API about B.O.'s being adopted.
Now, B.O. would need to prove he legally changed his name froM Soetoro (sp?) back to Obama. Or, that he took the allegiance to the U.S. or something of that nature that is being disputed in the lawsuit. Of course if he took the allegiance he is just a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen which means he can't be president.
Makes me wonder if Michelle Obama opened a can of worms for B.O.? It sure smells like BO.
#################################################################################
ALL THE FACTS HERE: READ THIS
#################################################################################
Lawsuit Filed in Hawaii by Andy Martin Regarding Obama’s Citizenship/Birth Certificate
Message: Barack Obama Birth Certificate Hawaii lawsuit documents
ANDY MARTIN
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639
Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639
Temporary Hawai’i
tel. (917) 664-9329
Plaintiff pro se
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII
CIVIL NUMBER: 08-1-2147-10
(Declaratory Judgment)
Judge Ayabe
COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT;
EXHIBIT 1: SUMMONS
ANDY MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LINDA LINGLE, in her
Official capacity as Governor
Of the State of Hawai’i,
DR. CHIYOME ******* in her
official capacity as Director
of the Department of Health,
Defendants.
_________________________________
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN (“Plaintiff”), pro se, alleges in his Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against the Defendants as follows:
PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN is the author of a book on Senator Barack Obama (“Senator Obama”). He has also been writing columns and commentary about the senator for over four (4) years.
Defendants LINDA LINGLE and DR. CHIYOME ****** are Governor and Director of the Department of Health, respectively.
This Complaint for Declaratory Relief and these proceedings are instituted pursuant to § 632-1, Hawai’i Revised Statutes.
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to § 603-36, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. Plaintiff requested a certified copy of the birth certificate of Senator Obama from the Department of Health and tendered the requisite fee.
2. Defendants refused to provide a copy of said certificate, invoking the confidentiality statutes of the State.
3. The issue of the Senator’s birth certificate has become a controversial topic of intense national speculation.
4. As an author who strives for factual accuracy and attempts to conduct thorough research Plaintiff wants a copy of the Senator’s birth certificate attested to by the State and not a “certificate” which is posted on a web site and which has been debunked as possibly having been altered.
5. One of the more literate and temperate analyses of the unlawfulness of the Defendants’ refusal to issue certified copies of the birth certificate is contained in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.
6. To the extent that the Defendants’ files contain or retain original supporting data for the birth certificate, Plaintiff asks that he also be supplied with that information and/or material as well.
7. It is axiomatic that the birth certificate of a presidential candidate is a document of crucial public concern and significance.
8. While Hawai’i statutes call for a balancing or weighing test where production is considered by a court, most respectfully Plaintiff submits that the balance falls entirely on the side of disclosure where the original birth certificate of a presidential candidate is concerned.
DECLARATORY RELIEF SOUGHT
9. Based on the relevant statutes and constitutional law, including Article One, Section 4 (“freedom of the press”) and § 92F-15 (e) and § 338-18 (a) (9), Plaintiff asks that the Court direct and order defendants to turn over forthwith a copy of Senator Obama’s birth certificate and related files and records, and without any delay.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Andy Martin prays for relief as follows:
A. For a declaration by this Court that Plaintiff is an author and writer and is a person to whom the birth certificate of Senator Obama can and should properly be delivered forthwith;
B. For such other relief as this Court deems just and equitable.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawai’i, October 17, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
ANDY MARTIN
Plaintiff Pro se
ANDY MARTIN
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639
Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639
Temporary Hawai’i
tel. (917) 664-9329
Plaintiff pro se
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII
CIVIL NUMBER: 08-1-2147-10 BIA
EMERGENCY MOTION
FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ANDY MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LINDA LINGLE, in her
Official capacity as Governor
Of the State of Hawai’i,
DR. CHIYOME ******* in her
official capacity as Director
of the Department of Health,
Defendants.
_________________________________
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN (“Plaintiff”), pro se, respectfully moves this Court on an emergency basis for an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) directing the defendants to show cause on or before October 22, 2008 at a hearing before this Court why the relief requested by the Plaintiff should not be granted.
1. This lawsuit does not involve complicated or disputed facts.
2. Time is of the essence because Plaintiff would like to write columns and articles about the Birth Certificate before November 3, 2008.
3. Plaintiff is physically present in Hawai’i and is available to appear before the Court in person at any hearing on or before October 22, 2008.
4. There is intense national interest in access to an officially certified copy of the birth certificate in question as well as any related supporting information which the defendants may have in their possession.
5. A proposed OSC is attached to this Emergency Motion.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawai’i, October 17, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
ANDY MARTIN
Plaintiff Pro se
http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2008/10/19/obamas-citizenship-questioned-lawsuit-in-hawaii-filed-requesting-birth-certificate/
Election Crime FBI TIPS Election Crime
If Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen born of the US and he and the DNC have certified him as a natural born citizen would this not be an election crime? The constitution says:
Presidential Requirements:
1)be a natural-born citizen of the United States;
2)be at least thirty-five years old;
3)have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years.
He has filed a lawsuit against Philip J. Berg against the production of his original Hawaiian birth certificate. The DNC has joined in this lawsuit to stop the production of Obama's birth certificate.
Because of this I must question if he is a natural born citizen of the US.
I am asking if the FBI can investigate this or does the FBI have to wait until there is evidence an election crime has been committed?
Of course I have no direct evidence of this only a suspician.
I am not the only one questioning why.
I am not asking if the FBI is investigating this.
Thank you for you time.
(Your Name Here)
***********************************************************************************
***********************************************************************************
THE LONG LIST OF SEALED OR MISSING BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA DOCUMENTS
In addition to the missing Birth certificate, the following docs supposedly are also sealed or missing:
1. Occidental College records - - Not released
2. Columbia College records - - Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper - - "not available"
4. Harvard College records - - Not released
5. Selective Service Registration - - Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule - - "not available"
8. Law practice client list - - Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth - - Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published - - None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles - - None
13. Record of baptism - - Not released or "not available"
14. Illinois State Senate records - -"not available"
Obama is leaving the campaign trail to visit his ill grandmother in Hawaii for 3 days. Ya right! He is going to Hawaii to stop the production of this law suit!
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
EMERGENCY EVERYONE 9:13PM Oct 20,08 EASTERN-OBAMA FLYING TO HAWAII TO VISIT "AILING GRANDMOTHER."
WE GOT HIM!!!!!!WATCH HIS EVERY MOVE. HE IS GOING TO BRIBE HAWAII OFFICIALS TO BLOCK THE MARTIN LAWSUIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It makes me wonder if Obama is going to Hawaii because of what Michelle O. allegedly said to API about B.O.'s being adopted.
Now, B.O. would need to prove he legally changed his name froM Soetoro (sp?) back to Obama. Or, that he took the allegiance to the U.S. or something of that nature that is being disputed in the lawsuit. Of course if he took the allegiance he is just a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen which means he can't be president.
Makes me wonder if Michelle Obama opened a can of worms for B.O.? It sure smells like BO.
#################################################################################
ALL THE FACTS HERE: READ THIS
#################################################################################
Lawsuit Filed in Hawaii by Andy Martin Regarding Obama’s Citizenship/Birth Certificate
Message: Barack Obama Birth Certificate Hawaii lawsuit documents
ANDY MARTIN
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639
Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639
Temporary Hawai’i
tel. (917) 664-9329
Plaintiff pro se
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII
CIVIL NUMBER: 08-1-2147-10
(Declaratory Judgment)
Judge Ayabe
COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT;
EXHIBIT 1: SUMMONS
ANDY MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LINDA LINGLE, in her
Official capacity as Governor
Of the State of Hawai’i,
DR. CHIYOME ******* in her
official capacity as Director
of the Department of Health,
Defendants.
_________________________________
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN (“Plaintiff”), pro se, alleges in his Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against the Defendants as follows:
PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN is the author of a book on Senator Barack Obama (“Senator Obama”). He has also been writing columns and commentary about the senator for over four (4) years.
Defendants LINDA LINGLE and DR. CHIYOME ****** are Governor and Director of the Department of Health, respectively.
This Complaint for Declaratory Relief and these proceedings are instituted pursuant to § 632-1, Hawai’i Revised Statutes.
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to § 603-36, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. Plaintiff requested a certified copy of the birth certificate of Senator Obama from the Department of Health and tendered the requisite fee.
2. Defendants refused to provide a copy of said certificate, invoking the confidentiality statutes of the State.
3. The issue of the Senator’s birth certificate has become a controversial topic of intense national speculation.
4. As an author who strives for factual accuracy and attempts to conduct thorough research Plaintiff wants a copy of the Senator’s birth certificate attested to by the State and not a “certificate” which is posted on a web site and which has been debunked as possibly having been altered.
5. One of the more literate and temperate analyses of the unlawfulness of the Defendants’ refusal to issue certified copies of the birth certificate is contained in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.
6. To the extent that the Defendants’ files contain or retain original supporting data for the birth certificate, Plaintiff asks that he also be supplied with that information and/or material as well.
7. It is axiomatic that the birth certificate of a presidential candidate is a document of crucial public concern and significance.
8. While Hawai’i statutes call for a balancing or weighing test where production is considered by a court, most respectfully Plaintiff submits that the balance falls entirely on the side of disclosure where the original birth certificate of a presidential candidate is concerned.
DECLARATORY RELIEF SOUGHT
9. Based on the relevant statutes and constitutional law, including Article One, Section 4 (“freedom of the press”) and § 92F-15 (e) and § 338-18 (a) (9), Plaintiff asks that the Court direct and order defendants to turn over forthwith a copy of Senator Obama’s birth certificate and related files and records, and without any delay.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Andy Martin prays for relief as follows:
A. For a declaration by this Court that Plaintiff is an author and writer and is a person to whom the birth certificate of Senator Obama can and should properly be delivered forthwith;
B. For such other relief as this Court deems just and equitable.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawai’i, October 17, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
ANDY MARTIN
Plaintiff Pro se
ANDY MARTIN
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639
Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639
Temporary Hawai’i
tel. (917) 664-9329
Plaintiff pro se
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII
CIVIL NUMBER: 08-1-2147-10 BIA
EMERGENCY MOTION
FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ANDY MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LINDA LINGLE, in her
Official capacity as Governor
Of the State of Hawai’i,
DR. CHIYOME ******* in her
official capacity as Director
of the Department of Health,
Defendants.
_________________________________
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN (“Plaintiff”), pro se, respectfully moves this Court on an emergency basis for an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) directing the defendants to show cause on or before October 22, 2008 at a hearing before this Court why the relief requested by the Plaintiff should not be granted.
1. This lawsuit does not involve complicated or disputed facts.
2. Time is of the essence because Plaintiff would like to write columns and articles about the Birth Certificate before November 3, 2008.
3. Plaintiff is physically present in Hawai’i and is available to appear before the Court in person at any hearing on or before October 22, 2008.
4. There is intense national interest in access to an officially certified copy of the birth certificate in question as well as any related supporting information which the defendants may have in their possession.
5. A proposed OSC is attached to this Emergency Motion.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawai’i, October 17, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
ANDY MARTIN
Plaintiff Pro se
http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2008/10/19/obamas-citizenship-questioned-lawsuit-in-hawaii-filed-requesting-birth-certificate/
Election Crime FBI TIPS Election Crime
If Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen born of the US and he and the DNC have certified him as a natural born citizen would this not be an election crime? The constitution says:
Presidential Requirements:
1)be a natural-born citizen of the United States;
2)be at least thirty-five years old;
3)have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years.
He has filed a lawsuit against Philip J. Berg against the production of his original Hawaiian birth certificate. The DNC has joined in this lawsuit to stop the production of Obama's birth certificate.
Because of this I must question if he is a natural born citizen of the US.
I am asking if the FBI can investigate this or does the FBI have to wait until there is evidence an election crime has been committed?
Of course I have no direct evidence of this only a suspician.
I am not the only one questioning why.
I am not asking if the FBI is investigating this.
Thank you for you time.
(Your Name Here)
***********************************************************************************
***********************************************************************************
THE LONG LIST OF SEALED OR MISSING BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA DOCUMENTS
In addition to the missing Birth certificate, the following docs supposedly are also sealed or missing:
1. Occidental College records - - Not released
2. Columbia College records - - Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper - - "not available"
4. Harvard College records - - Not released
5. Selective Service Registration - - Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule - - "not available"
8. Law practice client list - - Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth - - Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published - - None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles - - None
13. Record of baptism - - Not released or "not available"
14. Illinois State Senate records - -"not available"
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Questions Barack Hussein Obama Will Not Answer
Just a Hawaiian birth certificate is not enough because of the requirements of Hawaiian law.
(1) Where was Barack Hussein Obama born?
(2) When was Barack Hussein Obama born?
(3) When were his parents legally married?
(4) Where were his parents legally married?
(5) When did his parents become legal residents of Hawaii?
(6) Where did he live until the age of 21?
(7) If his father adopted him is he a dual citizen?
(8) Is he a natural born citizen or a naturalized citizen?
(9) Can you hold a dual citizenship and be president of the US?
(10) Did Barack Hussein Obama ever take the Oath Of Allegiance?
(11) What agency of the US government certifies a birth certificate for the winner
of the electorial college? (hint: The Congress and Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein)
(12) Can the supporting documents required for a Hawaiian birth certificate be confirmed?
These questions are not being answered by Barack Hussein Obama. They must be answered
to establish if he is a natural born citizen as the constitution requires.
Barack Hussein Obama and the DNC will not reveal his birth certificate as requested
by Philp J. Berg (The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.)
Berg Case against Obama
Senate requirements:
1) each senator must be at least 30 years old, must have been a citizen of the United States for at least the past nine years, and must be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state they seek to represent
Presidential Requirements:
1)be a natural-born citizen of the United States;
2)be at least thirty-five years old;
3)have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years.
To determine if Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen his original birth certificate from Hawaii must be examined and verified to be the original copy.
(1) Where was Barack Hussein Obama born? If not in Hawaii then this would seem to apply but understand the Hawaiian Authorities may be able to Issue a Hawaiian Birth Certificate under these circumstances but they cannot make you a US Citizen.
Hawaii State Law “[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(So it was possible that a birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama was issued to an adult or his legal parents if the parents declared the State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least 1 year prior to his birth or adoption according to Hawaii law.)
A child born in Kenya to and underage US Female and a UK and Colonies Citizen in 1961 was not born a US Citizen under any US Federal Law, under British Law, or International Law. The only way such an Individual could be a US Citizen in terms of the XIVth Amendment, or any Statute, or Code of US Federal Law is by Naturalization.
Again the question is asked, where was Barack Hussein Obama born? Without obtaining the original birth certificate his natural born citizenship cannot be confirmed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really do not understand why the US allows dual citizenship, or why anyone would want it. The oath of allegiance says “I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty” and dual citzenship certainly seems to contradict that. The only reason I can see for keeping a second passport is hedging one’s bets. And I really don’t like the idea of a president who has hedged his bets and given himself an escape route. (The question is: If Barack Hussein Obama became a citizen of a foreign country did he take the oath of allegiance to become a US citizen again? If he did, he became a naturalized citizen even if he originally was a natural born citizen.)
It all goes back to where Barack Hussein Obama was born, and if he was a dual citizen or foreign citizen that was naturalized as an American citizen. His birth certificate needs to be examined to confirm if he is a natural born citizen. The birth certificate is only as good as the supporting documents that were required to produce it. So in reality we must know who requested a birth certificate and what supporting documents were supplied as required by Hawaiian law at the time proving Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen of the US.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I recently requested a copy of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate and was sent the following additional information:
Vital Statistics records, such as birth certificates, are protected by strict confidentiality requirements under Hawaii state law. Chapter 338-18, Hawaii revised Statutes, prohibits disclosure of the records you seek. Specifically, pursuant to subsection (b), the Department of Health shall not permit inspection of public health records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record.
As a US citizen registered to vote in the state of SC I have a direct and tangible interest to know if Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate exists and is valid. The fact Barack Hussein Obama is under the constitution required to be a natural born citizen to be president should satisfy the department of health in Hawaii that I have a direct and tangible interest.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vital Statistics Records Hawaii State Law PDF
Note this section of the law:
A law enforcement officer, as defined by section
710-1Q00(13), who needs vital statistics records as
evidence in a criminal investigation; provided that
the law enforcement officer requests the vital
statistics records by submitting to the department a
siqned statement verifying, under penalty of criminal
prosecution for false swearinq in official matters,
that the vital statistics records are needed as
evidence in a criminal investigation. The request must contain a reference number for the criminal investigation upon which the request is based."
Lets hope someone in Congress requests Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate and examines the supporting documentation that makes it not just official but under the constitution a valid document to prove Barack Hussain Obama is a natural born citizen of the US.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Phillip J Berg Attorney says:
In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten (10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.
As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely no way Obama could have ever regained U.S. “natural born” status, if he in fact ever held such. Obama could have only become naturalized if the proper paperwork was filed with the U.S. State Department, in which case, Obama would have received a Certification of Citizenship.
(But consider this also Mr Berg any adult could have applied for the certificate.)
Hawaii State Law “[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(So it was possible that a birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama was issued to an adult or his legal parents if the parents declared the State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least 1 year prior to his birth or adoption according to Hawaii law.)
The question becomes can a birth certificate be issued from Hawaii 10 years later. He must still be a minor for an 'adult' to apply for the certificate. Did his grandmother whom he lived with apply for his 'birth certificate'? She could have or any adult as the law reads. I am not a lawyer but even I can see this.
Phillip J. Bergs lawsuit against obama
(1) Where was Barack Hussein Obama born?
(2) When was Barack Hussein Obama born?
(3) When were his parents legally married?
(4) Where were his parents legally married?
(5) When did his parents become legal residents of Hawaii?
(6) Where did he live until the age of 21?
(7) If his father adopted him is he a dual citizen?
(8) Is he a natural born citizen or a naturalized citizen?
(9) Can you hold a dual citizenship and be president of the US?
(10) Did Barack Hussein Obama ever take the Oath Of Allegiance?
(11) What agency of the US government certifies a birth certificate for the winner
of the electorial college? (hint: The Congress and Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein)
(12) Can the supporting documents required for a Hawaiian birth certificate be confirmed?
These questions are not being answered by Barack Hussein Obama. They must be answered
to establish if he is a natural born citizen as the constitution requires.
Barack Hussein Obama and the DNC will not reveal his birth certificate as requested
by Philp J. Berg (The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.)
Berg Case against Obama
Senate requirements:
1) each senator must be at least 30 years old, must have been a citizen of the United States for at least the past nine years, and must be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state they seek to represent
Presidential Requirements:
1)be a natural-born citizen of the United States;
2)be at least thirty-five years old;
3)have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years.
To determine if Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen his original birth certificate from Hawaii must be examined and verified to be the original copy.
(1) Where was Barack Hussein Obama born? If not in Hawaii then this would seem to apply but understand the Hawaiian Authorities may be able to Issue a Hawaiian Birth Certificate under these circumstances but they cannot make you a US Citizen.
Hawaii State Law “[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(So it was possible that a birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama was issued to an adult or his legal parents if the parents declared the State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least 1 year prior to his birth or adoption according to Hawaii law.)
A child born in Kenya to and underage US Female and a UK and Colonies Citizen in 1961 was not born a US Citizen under any US Federal Law, under British Law, or International Law. The only way such an Individual could be a US Citizen in terms of the XIVth Amendment, or any Statute, or Code of US Federal Law is by Naturalization.
Again the question is asked, where was Barack Hussein Obama born? Without obtaining the original birth certificate his natural born citizenship cannot be confirmed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really do not understand why the US allows dual citizenship, or why anyone would want it. The oath of allegiance says “I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty” and dual citzenship certainly seems to contradict that. The only reason I can see for keeping a second passport is hedging one’s bets. And I really don’t like the idea of a president who has hedged his bets and given himself an escape route. (The question is: If Barack Hussein Obama became a citizen of a foreign country did he take the oath of allegiance to become a US citizen again? If he did, he became a naturalized citizen even if he originally was a natural born citizen.)
It all goes back to where Barack Hussein Obama was born, and if he was a dual citizen or foreign citizen that was naturalized as an American citizen. His birth certificate needs to be examined to confirm if he is a natural born citizen. The birth certificate is only as good as the supporting documents that were required to produce it. So in reality we must know who requested a birth certificate and what supporting documents were supplied as required by Hawaiian law at the time proving Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen of the US.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I recently requested a copy of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate and was sent the following additional information:
Vital Statistics records, such as birth certificates, are protected by strict confidentiality requirements under Hawaii state law. Chapter 338-18, Hawaii revised Statutes, prohibits disclosure of the records you seek. Specifically, pursuant to subsection (b), the Department of Health shall not permit inspection of public health records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record.
As a US citizen registered to vote in the state of SC I have a direct and tangible interest to know if Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate exists and is valid. The fact Barack Hussein Obama is under the constitution required to be a natural born citizen to be president should satisfy the department of health in Hawaii that I have a direct and tangible interest.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vital Statistics Records Hawaii State Law PDF
Note this section of the law:
A law enforcement officer, as defined by section
710-1Q00(13), who needs vital statistics records as
evidence in a criminal investigation; provided that
the law enforcement officer requests the vital
statistics records by submitting to the department a
siqned statement verifying, under penalty of criminal
prosecution for false swearinq in official matters,
that the vital statistics records are needed as
evidence in a criminal investigation. The request must contain a reference number for the criminal investigation upon which the request is based."
Lets hope someone in Congress requests Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate and examines the supporting documentation that makes it not just official but under the constitution a valid document to prove Barack Hussain Obama is a natural born citizen of the US.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Phillip J Berg Attorney says:
In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten (10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.
As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely no way Obama could have ever regained U.S. “natural born” status, if he in fact ever held such. Obama could have only become naturalized if the proper paperwork was filed with the U.S. State Department, in which case, Obama would have received a Certification of Citizenship.
(But consider this also Mr Berg any adult could have applied for the certificate.)
Hawaii State Law “[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(So it was possible that a birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama was issued to an adult or his legal parents if the parents declared the State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least 1 year prior to his birth or adoption according to Hawaii law.)
The question becomes can a birth certificate be issued from Hawaii 10 years later. He must still be a minor for an 'adult' to apply for the certificate. Did his grandmother whom he lived with apply for his 'birth certificate'? She could have or any adult as the law reads. I am not a lawyer but even I can see this.
Phillip J. Bergs lawsuit against obama
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Contact Your Senator And Congressman To Submit and Objection To The Qualification of Barack Hussein Obama To Be President
Contact Your Senator And Congressman To Submit an Objection To The Qualification of Barack Hussein Obama To Be President before January 6, 2009 when Congress meets to count the electoral votes in a joint session. Ask Congress to confirm or deny if Obama is a natural born citizen of the US as required by the constitution. Demand Congress examine Barack Hussein Obama's original birth certificate from Hawaii. Yes America you do have standing to do this.
Contacting the Congress here
Counting Electoral Votes in Congress
The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes (Congress may pass a law to change the date). The President of the Senate is the presiding officer. If a Senator and a House member jointly submit an objection, each House would retire to its chamber to consider it. The President and Vice President must achieve a majority of electoral votes (270) to be elected. In the absence of a majority, the House selects the President, and the Senate selects the Vice President. If a State submits conflicting sets of electoral votes to Congress, the two Houses acting concurrently may accept or reject the votes. If they do not concur, the votes of the electors certified by the Governor of the State would be counted in Congress.
Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. All the duties surrounding the issue of counting the electors ballots and selecting the President if no clear winner exits are designated to Congress, the courts have no role to play.
It is not spelled out but if a challenge to a President’s qualifications were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted, Congress would have to deal with the issue.
Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made. There is nothing in the Constitution giving the courts authority to make the decision; lawyers think the courts are always the place for making decisions so they don’t think of other options that fit better with the structure of the Constitution.
It does not matter whether the challenge is to the election of McCain, Obama or anyone else, the process would be the same.
If the defect in the President’s qualifications were to come to light after the President was sworn in then the procedures for impeachment would be appropriate, since running for office in violation of the constitutional requirement for being a “natural born Citizen” would be high Crime or Misdemeanor.
Senate Committee on Rules and Administration
The Senate Committee on Rules and Administration is responsible for issues that include election, campaign finance and ethics reform.
Senate Committee on Rules and Administration
Contact these Senators and DEMAND Certification of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate as a natural born citizen!
The Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, have a problem because they are responsible for the Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements, a job they have conspicuously failed to do. Should he be Elected the poisoned Chalice would pass to Nancy Pelosi because as Speaker of the House she, and the House, have the Responsibility to ensure that the President Elect can Effectively be Sworn In and Legally Assume the Office and Duties of the President.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sir,
Will Vice President Chaney preside or President pro tempore of the Senate the proceedings to count the electoral votes and declare the winners of the election? If there are no objections, the presiding officer declares the result of the vote and, if applicable, states who is elected President and Vice President.
I demand and implore you to object at this meeting and question Barack Hussein Obama's qualifiction for president.
Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. While it is not spelled out who judges the President's
qualification the constitutionally correct place would be in Congress since all the duties surrounding the issue are designated to Congress and no one else is given the authority.
If a challenge were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted Congress would have to deal with the issue. Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made.
I Demand that Barack Hussein Obama present a valid birth certificate that verifies he is a natural born US citizen at the time the electors' votes are counted! US citizens do have standing in the congress.
The Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, are responsible for the
Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements. How have they certified Barack Hussein Obama's compliance?
I also think it is the duty of every US citizen to question the qualifications of persons claiming to be US citizens and asking for your vote to be president of the United States.
Philip J. Berg is doing us all a great service by trying to expose the fraud of Barack Hussein Obama if he is not a US citizen!
I question if Barack Obama is a legal U.S. natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952, to November 13, 1986.
Federal Law requires that the office of President be a natural-born citizen.
US Law very clearly states:
‘ If only one parent is a U.S. Citizen at the time of one’s birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for minimum ten years, five of which must be after the age of 18.’
Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen is a fact.
Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born. This means even though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen of Hawaii being a territory), his mother fails the test for at-least-5-years- prior-to Barack Obama’s birth, but-after-age-16.
In essence, Mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S.
Citizenship. At most, 2 years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years
old at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at the time his mother would have needed to be to allow him natural citizenship from his only U.S. Citizen parent. Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen . . but that would disqualify him from holding the office.
Why hasn't the US Senate produced a resolution recognizing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen?
Philip J. Berg, attorney, is suing Sen. Barack Obama, asking questions about the Democratic presidential nominee's citizenship. Berg doesn't believe he was born in the United States and if the Illinois senator is elected, it would cause a crisis within the U.S.
Constitution.
Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery Pending a Decision on the Motion to Dismiss (which was) filed on 09/24/08.
While legal, Berg stated he is “outraged as this is another attempt to hide the truth from the public; it is obvious that documents do not exist to prove that Obama is qualified to be President.” The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
I am also outraged that the DNC and Obama will not produce a valid birth certificat proving Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution!
I am outraged they will sue to stay discovery to hide Obama's birth certificate.
I have the right to examine his birth certificate as does any other US citizen as does the Congress.
You senator _______, or congressman ________ have the ability to question this as the
electors are counted. Will you please at the minimum protest Obama's and the DNC law suit that deprives US citizens from verifying his natural born cotizenship?
I demand an answer to these questions.
Your Name
Your Address
Your Phone Number
Contacting the Congress here
Counting Electoral Votes in Congress
The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes (Congress may pass a law to change the date). The President of the Senate is the presiding officer. If a Senator and a House member jointly submit an objection, each House would retire to its chamber to consider it. The President and Vice President must achieve a majority of electoral votes (270) to be elected. In the absence of a majority, the House selects the President, and the Senate selects the Vice President. If a State submits conflicting sets of electoral votes to Congress, the two Houses acting concurrently may accept or reject the votes. If they do not concur, the votes of the electors certified by the Governor of the State would be counted in Congress.
Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. All the duties surrounding the issue of counting the electors ballots and selecting the President if no clear winner exits are designated to Congress, the courts have no role to play.
It is not spelled out but if a challenge to a President’s qualifications were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted, Congress would have to deal with the issue.
Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made. There is nothing in the Constitution giving the courts authority to make the decision; lawyers think the courts are always the place for making decisions so they don’t think of other options that fit better with the structure of the Constitution.
It does not matter whether the challenge is to the election of McCain, Obama or anyone else, the process would be the same.
If the defect in the President’s qualifications were to come to light after the President was sworn in then the procedures for impeachment would be appropriate, since running for office in violation of the constitutional requirement for being a “natural born Citizen” would be high Crime or Misdemeanor.
Senate Committee on Rules and Administration
The Senate Committee on Rules and Administration is responsible for issues that include election, campaign finance and ethics reform.
Senate Committee on Rules and Administration
Contact these Senators and DEMAND Certification of Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate as a natural born citizen!
The Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, have a problem because they are responsible for the Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements, a job they have conspicuously failed to do. Should he be Elected the poisoned Chalice would pass to Nancy Pelosi because as Speaker of the House she, and the House, have the Responsibility to ensure that the President Elect can Effectively be Sworn In and Legally Assume the Office and Duties of the President.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE LETTER
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sir,
Will Vice President Chaney preside or President pro tempore of the Senate the proceedings to count the electoral votes and declare the winners of the election? If there are no objections, the presiding officer declares the result of the vote and, if applicable, states who is elected President and Vice President.
I demand and implore you to object at this meeting and question Barack Hussein Obama's qualifiction for president.
Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. While it is not spelled out who judges the President's
qualification the constitutionally correct place would be in Congress since all the duties surrounding the issue are designated to Congress and no one else is given the authority.
If a challenge were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted Congress would have to deal with the issue. Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made.
I Demand that Barack Hussein Obama present a valid birth certificate that verifies he is a natural born US citizen at the time the electors' votes are counted! US citizens do have standing in the congress.
The Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, are responsible for the
Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements. How have they certified Barack Hussein Obama's compliance?
I also think it is the duty of every US citizen to question the qualifications of persons claiming to be US citizens and asking for your vote to be president of the United States.
Philip J. Berg is doing us all a great service by trying to expose the fraud of Barack Hussein Obama if he is not a US citizen!
I question if Barack Obama is a legal U.S. natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952, to November 13, 1986.
Federal Law requires that the office of President be a natural-born citizen.
US Law very clearly states:
‘ If only one parent is a U.S. Citizen at the time of one’s birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for minimum ten years, five of which must be after the age of 18.’
Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen is a fact.
Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born. This means even though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen of Hawaii being a territory), his mother fails the test for at-least-5-years- prior-to Barack Obama’s birth, but-after-age-16.
In essence, Mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S.
Citizenship. At most, 2 years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years
old at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at the time his mother would have needed to be to allow him natural citizenship from his only U.S. Citizen parent. Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen . . but that would disqualify him from holding the office.
Why hasn't the US Senate produced a resolution recognizing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen?
Philip J. Berg, attorney, is suing Sen. Barack Obama, asking questions about the Democratic presidential nominee's citizenship. Berg doesn't believe he was born in the United States and if the Illinois senator is elected, it would cause a crisis within the U.S.
Constitution.
Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery Pending a Decision on the Motion to Dismiss (which was) filed on 09/24/08.
While legal, Berg stated he is “outraged as this is another attempt to hide the truth from the public; it is obvious that documents do not exist to prove that Obama is qualified to be President.” The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
I am also outraged that the DNC and Obama will not produce a valid birth certificat proving Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution!
I am outraged they will sue to stay discovery to hide Obama's birth certificate.
I have the right to examine his birth certificate as does any other US citizen as does the Congress.
You senator _______, or congressman ________ have the ability to question this as the
electors are counted. Will you please at the minimum protest Obama's and the DNC law suit that deprives US citizens from verifying his natural born cotizenship?
I demand an answer to these questions.
Your Name
Your Address
Your Phone Number
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Ponder this question about Barack Hussein Obama
Philip J. Berg, a former University of Toledo law student, is suing Sen. Barack Obama, asking questions about the Democratic presidential nominee's citizenship. Berg doesn't believe he was born in the United States and if the Illinois senator is elected, it would cause a crisis within the U.S. Constitution. Obama's campaign contends he was born in Hawaii. FOX Toledo's Kristi Leigh investigates.
Updated: Information added to expose the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural US citizen
If this is true maybe Barack Hussein Obama does have a Hawaiian Birth Certificate but as this article states under any law it is not valid which would mean Obama is not and never has been a US citizen!
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Understand, the Hawaiian Authorities may be able to Issue a Hawaiian Birth Certificate under these circumstances but they cannot make you a US Citizen. A child born in Kenya to and underage US Female and a UK and Colonies Citizen in 1961 was not born a US Citizen under any US Federal Law, under British Law, or International Law. The only way such an Individual could be a US Citizen in terms of the XIVth Amendment, or any Statute, or Code of US Federal Law is by Naturalization.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another bomb shell shocker could be comming
Michelle Obama tried trawling the “very single mother” canard. Were he illegitimate there is precedent and Statute that says if his parents were unmarried at the time of his birth he would have become a Citizen of the USA at Birth under Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409]. However, as Miller v Albright, 523 US 420 (1998) demonstrates there is, and was, a split in the Supreme Court as to whether this Law is in fact Constitutional under the XIVth Amendment. A new case might change the precedent. For now it stands.
(Under this law one of the unmarried parents must be a US Citizen and Obama's mother at the time of birth had not met the legal requirement)
**********************************************************************************
**********************************************************************************
The article below is explosive and exposes the Obama FRAUD!
**********************************************************************************
Barack Hussein Obama II
By Judah Benjamin, Guest Author
It has been asserted by a number of sources, including Andy Martin, that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in Hawaii. Philip Berg’s Latest Motion to the Court is more explicit since it gives an exact Place of Birth. I must assume that Berg did not simply pluck the Location out of thin air, Mombasa has more than one Hospital, though Coast Provincial General was the best in 1961.
British Birth Certificates have a Standard Format which has been more or less the same since 1837 and they can only be challenged in a British Court. Kenyan Law is explicit and can only be challenged in a Kenyan Court. Indonesian Law is explicit and can only be challenged in an Indonesian Court. Be clear, if Obama was born in Kenya this is not simply a matter for the US Courts, or US Law.
If he was born in Kenya, and his parents were Legally Married [which on the Preponderance of Evidence they were, his father's first "Marriage" being a Tribal, or Village, Marriage, which was not Legally Recognized] due to the age of his mother he would NOT have been a US Citizen. The Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C. 1401. Sec. 301 (g) [Effective November 14, 1986] does not apply, nor does Title III, Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409].
Unless he has taken the Oath of Allegiance as a Naturalized Citizen since he was 18 years old, and if he was born in Mombasa, Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama II would not be a US Citizen, period. The issue of whether or not he was Natural Born under Article II of the Constitution of the United States would cease to matter and he would need to be Deported as an Illegal Alien.
Impeachment as a Senator would seem not to be necessary since he would never Legally have been one, but Diane Feinstein and the members of the Senate Ethics and Rules Committee would be liable to Impeachment. So would their opposite numbers in the Illinois Senate and the appropriate officials of the Illinois State Supreme Court and Bar, so far as I can see.
If Senator Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7.24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, he is not a Natural Born Citizen of these United States and he never was. Philip J Berg, Esq, is correct, under the Nationality Act of 1940, as Revised June 1952 and in accord with United States of America vs Cervantes-Nava 281 F 3d 501 (2002) and Drozd vs INS, 155 F 3d 81, 85-88 (2d Circuit 1998) Senator Barack Hussein Obama II would not ever have been a Legal US Citizen at all, unless he was Naturalized.
If he was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya any Certificate, or Certification of Live Birth, issued for him by the State of Hawaii is a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. At Birth he would have been a UK and Colonies Citizen and in accord with the Kenyan Constitution he would have become a Kenyan Citizen in December 1963. He would not have been a US Citizen.
Alternatively, his UK and Colonies Birth Certificate issued in Mombasa in August 1961 could be a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. The two BCs would need to be compared. By this I mean the Original Vault Copy of the Hawaiian Birth Certificate and not the Amended, Post Adoption, Copy, Legally available to the Senator, assuming he was, as indicated by the Preponderance of Evidence, Adopted by Lolo Soetoro. This case might also need to go through the UK and Kenyan Courts and becomes a Matter of International Law and Controversy.
If Barack Hussein Obama II was born at The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, it is certain that he is not Eligible to hold the Offices of POTUS or VPOTUS and highly probable that he is not Legally entitled to hold the Office of Senator either and that he was not Eligible to be an Illinois State Senator.
In that event the Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, have a problem because they are responsible for the Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements, a job they would have conspicuously failed to do. Should he be Elected the poisoned Chalice would pass to Nancy Pelosi because as Speaker of the House she, and the House, have the Responsibility to ensure that the President Elect can Effectively be Sworn In and Legally Assume the Office and Duties of the President.
Be very clear here, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born at The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, Diane Feinstein’s Committee have already failed in their Duty, as has every Secretary of State in the Union.
Let me repeat myself, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, he is not a Natural Born Citizen of these United States and he never was, he is not even a Citizen by Birth. I had assumed ab initio that Obama was born in Hawaii and that his Hawaiian Paperwork was basically “on the up and up”, I could not conceive that a lie of this magnitude was possible, I thought that the INS would have caught on long since. If he is a US Citizen under these circumstances his Oath of Allegiance must be on Record somewhere. If it isn’t he is not a US Citizen.
Hawaii may Legally be able to Issue a Birth Certificate under these circumstances, according to their own Code, but it would breach of International and Federal Law if they have. It would breach Hawaiian Law if the Place of Birth is spurious.
“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.”
So by that section he could get a certificate claiming Hawaiian birth even if he was physically born outside the US but the Place of Birth would need to be correctly recorded.
Understand, the Hawaiian Authorities may be able to Issue a Hawaiian Birth Certificate under these circumstances but they cannot make you a US Citizen. A child born in Kenya to and underage US Female and a UK and Colonies Citizen in 1961 was not born a US Citizen under any US Federal Law, under British Law, or International Law. The only way such an Individual could be a US Citizen in terms of the XIVth Amendment, or any Statute, or Code of US Federal Law is by Naturalization.
Under Common Law no Person can Testify as to their own Place of Birth, this is established Law upheld by stare decisis. Therefore it would be possible, even given the he was born in Kenya, for Obama to claim that he believed a Hawaiian Birth Certificate made him a US Citizen under the XIVth Amendment and that therefore he was acting in Good Faith running for an Office which he was Constitutionally Incapable of Holding. Unfortunately for him, his actions in regard to the Admission of his UK & Colonies and Kenyan Citizenships and his Indonesian Citizenship by Adoption, his frequent apparent Breaches of the Logan Act, his probable breaches of the Hobbs Act, the Hatch Act, USC Title 18 Part One Chapter 63 § 1346 and the RICO Statute make this Defense wholly Untenable, especially when one considers the fact that he holds a JD from Harvard Law. One may throw in the Misprision Statute for good measure. It is difficult to find any action or statement of Obama’s since 1992 that could be used to suggest Good Faith could be used as a Defense in this Case. I am not saying that Obama is Guilty of any of these Felonies or High Misdemeanors, only that his actions and pronouncements are such as to lead to a reasonable suspicion that he may be.
Under INA §349 “2. taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof after having attained the age of eighteen years.” This is an “Expatriating Clause”, if you hold Dual Citizenship and do this you void your US Citizenship. Well Obama campaigned actively for Odinga in Kenya and apparently also took some kind of Luo Tribal Loyalty Oath. He may also have joined Odinga’s party. Of course his Dual Nationality lapsed in 1982 but INA §349 could, perhaps, still apply here, if he was born in Mombasa. It might even be concluded that Obama was providing grounds to restore his Kenyan Citizenship by Prime Ministerial Decree, which is Legal under the Kenyan Constitution. That would certainly look Expatriating to me, but I do not know how a Court would react.
Text of S. Res. 511: A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen
There is indirect reason to believe that this may be true. “2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States.” was Sponsored by Senator McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy, Obama, Coburn, Clinton and Webb. Why? Why were Democratic Senators trying to pass a Resolution making Senator McCain undoubtedly Legally Eligible when this issue had already been cleared up in 2000 and again in 2004? And why did Senators McCaskill and Obama reportedly insert the following Clause?
“Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;”
This Clause has no particular relevance to McCain and the following Clause, which it is reported McCaskill and Obama attempted to REMOVE shows that:
“; and Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936:”
It seems clear that McCaskill and Obama were attempting to create a blanket Resolution covering ALL Foreign Born candidates. Why do that if not to benefit a Foreign Born Democratic Candidate, who did not have a US Military background?
McCain did not need this resolution, Richardson did not need this Resolution, so far as I can see nobody needed this Resolution unless somebody in the race was born outside the USA and was “Covering his/her Ass” and the only individual in the race that that could apply to was Senator Obama! This in turn would show that the Senator is a liar who has been peddling untruths about his birth for at least 16 years!
Likewise it would explain why Michelle Obama tried trawling the “very single mother” canard. Were he illegitimate there is precedent and Statute that says if his parents were unmarried at the time of his birth he would have become a Citizen of the USA at Birth under Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409]. However, as Miller v Albright, 523 US 420 (1998) demonstrates there is, and was, a split in the Supreme Court as to whether this Law is in fact Constitutional under the XIVth Amendment. A new case might change the precedent. For now it stands.
I do not insist that any of this is true and to me it makes little difference if it is, I hold him Ineligible anyway and have seen no solid Legal Rebuttal of my view from any source, but if he was born in Kenya he has, and can have, no defense of any description and any Document he has from Hawaii is Fraudulent on several levels. To hold the Office of POTUS one must be a Natural Born United States Citizen, if he was born in Mombasa Obama probably isn’t even a United States Citizen much less Natural Born. He would be guilty of Fraud and a list of other offenses and any and all persons who had aided him would be guilty of Misprision, in all probability.
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONGRESS AND THE CONSTITUITION
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
Congress is the place to challenge McCain’s or Obama’s qualifications to be President
The New York Times has twice ran articles questioning whether John McCain’s birth in the Panama Canal Zone would disqualify him to be President based on Article II of the U.S. Constitution: “No Person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President”. “Natural born” is not defined. The blogosphere is ripe with speculation that Obama may also fail to meet the qualification, since his supporters posted online an inauthentic copy of a birth certificate purporting to be for Barack Obama. The allegations have raised the specter of a challenge to either candidates’ eligibility to be President. Congress, not the courts are the constitutionally correct place to determine whether a President elect meets all of the qualifications to hold the Office of President.
Both Article II Section 1 and Amendment XII of the US Constitution call for President of the Senate to count the electors votes. There are procedures for Congress to make the choice if no one has a majority. Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. While it is not spelled out who judges the President's qualification the constitutionally correct place would be in Congress since all the duties surrounding the issue are designated to Congress and no one else is given the authority.
It is not spelled out but if a challenge were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted Congress would have to deal with the issue. Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made. There is nothing in the Constitution giving the courts authority to make the decision; lawyers think the courts are always the place for making decisions so they don’t think of other options that fit better with the structure of the Constitution. It does not matter whether the challenge is to the election of McCain, Obama or anyone else, the process would be the same.
If the defect in the President’s qualifications were to come to light after the President was sworn in then the procedures for impeachment would be appropriate, since running for office in violation of the constitutional requirement for being a “natural born Citizen” would be high Crime or Misdemeanor.
The Senate has already expressed the opinion that McCain is a "natural born Citizen" and eligible for the Office of the President. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) introduced the resolution during April of this year after the first New York Times article. Obama might be required to present a Birth Certificate if his qualifications were challenged and then the issue would be resolved. Since all of the authority for counting the electors and dealing with a President elect who fails to qualify rest with Congress, Congress is also the appropriate place to determine the President’s qualifications.
From the Constitution of The United States of America, Amendment XX, Section 3:
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or [if the President elect shall have failed to qualify], then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
***********************************************************************************
HERE IS WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO DO. Write, call, email the congress to demand that Barack Hussein Obama presents a valid birth certificate that verifies he is a natural born US citizen at the time the electors' votes are counted!
Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. All the duties surrounding the issue of counting the electors ballots and selecting the President if no clear winner exits are designated to Congress, the courts have no role to play.
It is not spelled out but if a challenge to a President’s qualifications were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted, Congress would have to deal with the issue.
Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made. There is nothing in the Constitution giving the courts authority to make the decision; lawyers think the courts are always the place for making decisions so they don’t think of other options that fit better with the structure of the Constitution.
It does not matter whether the challenge is to the election of McCain, Obama or anyone else, the process would be the same.
If the defect in the President’s qualifications were to come to light after the President was sworn in then the procedures for impeachment would be appropriate, since running for office in violation of the constitutional requirement for being a “natural born Citizen” would be high Crime or Misdemeanor.
The Senate has already expressed the opinion that McCain is a “natural born Citizen” and eligible for the Office of the President. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) introduced the resolution during April of this year after the first New York Times article. Obama was also a sponsor?
There is no way that Congress is going to deny parents serving overseas the possibility that their children can become President so John McCain is safe.
Obama might be required to present a Birth Certificate if his qualifications were challenged and then the issue could be resolved.
All of the authority for counting the electors and dealing with a President elect who fails to qualify rest with Congress. Congress is the appropriate place to determine the President’s qualifications.
....................................................................................
I also think it is the duty of every US citizen to question the qualifications of persons claiming to be US citizens and asking for your vote to be president of the United States. Philip J. Berg is doing us all a great service by trying to expose the fraud of Barack Hussein Obama if he is not a US citizen!
Lawsuit exposing Obama is not a US citizen
#####################################################################################
#####################################################################################
#####################################################################################
Here is the answer to why Barack Hussein Obama is not an cannot be a US Citizen nor President of the United States!
NATURALIZED CITIZEN CAN NOT BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
***This is the law that protects us, from every person getting in here to have babies, just for citizenship.
Barack Obama is not a legal U.S. natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952, to November 13, 1986. Federal Law requires that the office of President requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents. This is what exempts John McCain, though he was born in the US Panama Canal Zone.
US Law very clearly states:
‘ If only one parent is a U.S. Citizen at the time of one’s birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for minimum ten years, five of which must be after the age of 18.’
Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen is a fact.
Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born. This means even though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen of Hawaii being a territory), his mother fails the test for at-least-5-years- prior-to Barack Obama’s birth, but-after-age-16.
In essence, Mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, 2 years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at the time his mother would have needed to be to allow him natural citizenship from his only U.S. Citizen parent. Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen . . but that would disqualify him from holding the office.
THE CONSTITUTION CLEARLY DECLARES:
Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, any other information does not matter because his mother is the one who must fulfill the requirement to be a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16.
Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the USA for some time frame to protect any citizenship he might have had, rather than living in Indonesia. This is very clear cut and a glaring violation of U.S. Election law.
It is one of the requirements of the U.S. Constitution that the U.S. President be born in the U.S. (See the fourth paragraph of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.) Here's a link to the transcript of the Constitution on the National Archives website:Article II
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;..."
Plus, all the birthplaces of the (to date) 43 presidents are known. See this list:
Birth Places Of The Presidents Note ALL of the Presidents were natural born in the US as required by the Constitution!
“2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States.”
It says “Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;”
It is odd that this was added to the senate resolution
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
It is interesting to note that another previous presidential candidate, George Romney, was also born outside of the United States. He was widely understood to be eligible to be President. Senator Barry Goldwater was born in a U.S territory that later became the State of Arizona so some even questioned his eligibility. Certainly the millions of Americans who voted for these two Republican candidates believed that they were eligible to assume the office of the President. The same is
true today. U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY
No Senator Leahy the same is not true today for Barack Hussein Obama because the previous presidential candidates you cite were born to parents who were both US citizens. Barack Hussein Obama's parents were not both US citizens at the time of his birth. His mother was not old enough according to US law and his father was a citizen of Kenya So this is a bold face LIE that is in the senate resolution. Why?
Why hasn't the US Senate produced a resolution recognizing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen?
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
It is very important to understand this:
Cases in other courts relating specifically to the "natural born citizen" clause
Two United States District Courts have ruled that private citizens do not have standing to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on a presidential election ballot. Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (N.D. Cal. 2008); Hollander v. McCain, 2008WL2853250 (D.N.H. 2008). In dicta in each of these cases, it was also opined that if the plaintiffs did have standing, the likelihood of success on the merits (which is part of the legal test for the issuance of a preliminary injunction) would be low. The opinion in one of the cases also cited to a statutory method[15] by which the eligibility of the President-elect to take office may be challenged in Congress.
Demand that Barack Hussein Obama presents a valid birth certificate that verifies he is a natural born US citizen at the time the electors' votes are counted! US citizens do have standing in the congress.
Natural-born citizen
Court case that is trying to expose the fraud that Obama is a natural born citizen
Updated: Information added to expose the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural US citizen
If this is true maybe Barack Hussein Obama does have a Hawaiian Birth Certificate but as this article states under any law it is not valid which would mean Obama is not and never has been a US citizen!
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Understand, the Hawaiian Authorities may be able to Issue a Hawaiian Birth Certificate under these circumstances but they cannot make you a US Citizen. A child born in Kenya to and underage US Female and a UK and Colonies Citizen in 1961 was not born a US Citizen under any US Federal Law, under British Law, or International Law. The only way such an Individual could be a US Citizen in terms of the XIVth Amendment, or any Statute, or Code of US Federal Law is by Naturalization.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another bomb shell shocker could be comming
Michelle Obama tried trawling the “very single mother” canard. Were he illegitimate there is precedent and Statute that says if his parents were unmarried at the time of his birth he would have become a Citizen of the USA at Birth under Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409]. However, as Miller v Albright, 523 US 420 (1998) demonstrates there is, and was, a split in the Supreme Court as to whether this Law is in fact Constitutional under the XIVth Amendment. A new case might change the precedent. For now it stands.
(Under this law one of the unmarried parents must be a US Citizen and Obama's mother at the time of birth had not met the legal requirement)
**********************************************************************************
**********************************************************************************
The article below is explosive and exposes the Obama FRAUD!
**********************************************************************************
Barack Hussein Obama II
By Judah Benjamin, Guest Author
It has been asserted by a number of sources, including Andy Martin, that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in Hawaii. Philip Berg’s Latest Motion to the Court is more explicit since it gives an exact Place of Birth. I must assume that Berg did not simply pluck the Location out of thin air, Mombasa has more than one Hospital, though Coast Provincial General was the best in 1961.
British Birth Certificates have a Standard Format which has been more or less the same since 1837 and they can only be challenged in a British Court. Kenyan Law is explicit and can only be challenged in a Kenyan Court. Indonesian Law is explicit and can only be challenged in an Indonesian Court. Be clear, if Obama was born in Kenya this is not simply a matter for the US Courts, or US Law.
If he was born in Kenya, and his parents were Legally Married [which on the Preponderance of Evidence they were, his father's first "Marriage" being a Tribal, or Village, Marriage, which was not Legally Recognized] due to the age of his mother he would NOT have been a US Citizen. The Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C. 1401. Sec. 301 (g) [Effective November 14, 1986] does not apply, nor does Title III, Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409].
Unless he has taken the Oath of Allegiance as a Naturalized Citizen since he was 18 years old, and if he was born in Mombasa, Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama II would not be a US Citizen, period. The issue of whether or not he was Natural Born under Article II of the Constitution of the United States would cease to matter and he would need to be Deported as an Illegal Alien.
Impeachment as a Senator would seem not to be necessary since he would never Legally have been one, but Diane Feinstein and the members of the Senate Ethics and Rules Committee would be liable to Impeachment. So would their opposite numbers in the Illinois Senate and the appropriate officials of the Illinois State Supreme Court and Bar, so far as I can see.
If Senator Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7.24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, he is not a Natural Born Citizen of these United States and he never was. Philip J Berg, Esq, is correct, under the Nationality Act of 1940, as Revised June 1952 and in accord with United States of America vs Cervantes-Nava 281 F 3d 501 (2002) and Drozd vs INS, 155 F 3d 81, 85-88 (2d Circuit 1998) Senator Barack Hussein Obama II would not ever have been a Legal US Citizen at all, unless he was Naturalized.
If he was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya any Certificate, or Certification of Live Birth, issued for him by the State of Hawaii is a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. At Birth he would have been a UK and Colonies Citizen and in accord with the Kenyan Constitution he would have become a Kenyan Citizen in December 1963. He would not have been a US Citizen.
Alternatively, his UK and Colonies Birth Certificate issued in Mombasa in August 1961 could be a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. The two BCs would need to be compared. By this I mean the Original Vault Copy of the Hawaiian Birth Certificate and not the Amended, Post Adoption, Copy, Legally available to the Senator, assuming he was, as indicated by the Preponderance of Evidence, Adopted by Lolo Soetoro. This case might also need to go through the UK and Kenyan Courts and becomes a Matter of International Law and Controversy.
If Barack Hussein Obama II was born at The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, it is certain that he is not Eligible to hold the Offices of POTUS or VPOTUS and highly probable that he is not Legally entitled to hold the Office of Senator either and that he was not Eligible to be an Illinois State Senator.
In that event the Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, have a problem because they are responsible for the Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements, a job they would have conspicuously failed to do. Should he be Elected the poisoned Chalice would pass to Nancy Pelosi because as Speaker of the House she, and the House, have the Responsibility to ensure that the President Elect can Effectively be Sworn In and Legally Assume the Office and Duties of the President.
Be very clear here, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born at The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, Diane Feinstein’s Committee have already failed in their Duty, as has every Secretary of State in the Union.
Let me repeat myself, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, he is not a Natural Born Citizen of these United States and he never was, he is not even a Citizen by Birth. I had assumed ab initio that Obama was born in Hawaii and that his Hawaiian Paperwork was basically “on the up and up”, I could not conceive that a lie of this magnitude was possible, I thought that the INS would have caught on long since. If he is a US Citizen under these circumstances his Oath of Allegiance must be on Record somewhere. If it isn’t he is not a US Citizen.
Hawaii may Legally be able to Issue a Birth Certificate under these circumstances, according to their own Code, but it would breach of International and Federal Law if they have. It would breach Hawaiian Law if the Place of Birth is spurious.
“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.”
So by that section he could get a certificate claiming Hawaiian birth even if he was physically born outside the US but the Place of Birth would need to be correctly recorded.
Understand, the Hawaiian Authorities may be able to Issue a Hawaiian Birth Certificate under these circumstances but they cannot make you a US Citizen. A child born in Kenya to and underage US Female and a UK and Colonies Citizen in 1961 was not born a US Citizen under any US Federal Law, under British Law, or International Law. The only way such an Individual could be a US Citizen in terms of the XIVth Amendment, or any Statute, or Code of US Federal Law is by Naturalization.
Under Common Law no Person can Testify as to their own Place of Birth, this is established Law upheld by stare decisis. Therefore it would be possible, even given the he was born in Kenya, for Obama to claim that he believed a Hawaiian Birth Certificate made him a US Citizen under the XIVth Amendment and that therefore he was acting in Good Faith running for an Office which he was Constitutionally Incapable of Holding. Unfortunately for him, his actions in regard to the Admission of his UK & Colonies and Kenyan Citizenships and his Indonesian Citizenship by Adoption, his frequent apparent Breaches of the Logan Act, his probable breaches of the Hobbs Act, the Hatch Act, USC Title 18 Part One Chapter 63 § 1346 and the RICO Statute make this Defense wholly Untenable, especially when one considers the fact that he holds a JD from Harvard Law. One may throw in the Misprision Statute for good measure. It is difficult to find any action or statement of Obama’s since 1992 that could be used to suggest Good Faith could be used as a Defense in this Case. I am not saying that Obama is Guilty of any of these Felonies or High Misdemeanors, only that his actions and pronouncements are such as to lead to a reasonable suspicion that he may be.
Under INA §349 “2. taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof after having attained the age of eighteen years.” This is an “Expatriating Clause”, if you hold Dual Citizenship and do this you void your US Citizenship. Well Obama campaigned actively for Odinga in Kenya and apparently also took some kind of Luo Tribal Loyalty Oath. He may also have joined Odinga’s party. Of course his Dual Nationality lapsed in 1982 but INA §349 could, perhaps, still apply here, if he was born in Mombasa. It might even be concluded that Obama was providing grounds to restore his Kenyan Citizenship by Prime Ministerial Decree, which is Legal under the Kenyan Constitution. That would certainly look Expatriating to me, but I do not know how a Court would react.
Text of S. Res. 511: A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen
There is indirect reason to believe that this may be true. “2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States.” was Sponsored by Senator McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy, Obama, Coburn, Clinton and Webb. Why? Why were Democratic Senators trying to pass a Resolution making Senator McCain undoubtedly Legally Eligible when this issue had already been cleared up in 2000 and again in 2004? And why did Senators McCaskill and Obama reportedly insert the following Clause?
“Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;”
This Clause has no particular relevance to McCain and the following Clause, which it is reported McCaskill and Obama attempted to REMOVE shows that:
“; and Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936:”
It seems clear that McCaskill and Obama were attempting to create a blanket Resolution covering ALL Foreign Born candidates. Why do that if not to benefit a Foreign Born Democratic Candidate, who did not have a US Military background?
McCain did not need this resolution, Richardson did not need this Resolution, so far as I can see nobody needed this Resolution unless somebody in the race was born outside the USA and was “Covering his/her Ass” and the only individual in the race that that could apply to was Senator Obama! This in turn would show that the Senator is a liar who has been peddling untruths about his birth for at least 16 years!
Likewise it would explain why Michelle Obama tried trawling the “very single mother” canard. Were he illegitimate there is precedent and Statute that says if his parents were unmarried at the time of his birth he would have become a Citizen of the USA at Birth under Title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409]. However, as Miller v Albright, 523 US 420 (1998) demonstrates there is, and was, a split in the Supreme Court as to whether this Law is in fact Constitutional under the XIVth Amendment. A new case might change the precedent. For now it stands.
I do not insist that any of this is true and to me it makes little difference if it is, I hold him Ineligible anyway and have seen no solid Legal Rebuttal of my view from any source, but if he was born in Kenya he has, and can have, no defense of any description and any Document he has from Hawaii is Fraudulent on several levels. To hold the Office of POTUS one must be a Natural Born United States Citizen, if he was born in Mombasa Obama probably isn’t even a United States Citizen much less Natural Born. He would be guilty of Fraud and a list of other offenses and any and all persons who had aided him would be guilty of Misprision, in all probability.
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONGRESS AND THE CONSTITUITION
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
Congress is the place to challenge McCain’s or Obama’s qualifications to be President
The New York Times has twice ran articles questioning whether John McCain’s birth in the Panama Canal Zone would disqualify him to be President based on Article II of the U.S. Constitution: “No Person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President”. “Natural born” is not defined. The blogosphere is ripe with speculation that Obama may also fail to meet the qualification, since his supporters posted online an inauthentic copy of a birth certificate purporting to be for Barack Obama. The allegations have raised the specter of a challenge to either candidates’ eligibility to be President. Congress, not the courts are the constitutionally correct place to determine whether a President elect meets all of the qualifications to hold the Office of President.
Both Article II Section 1 and Amendment XII of the US Constitution call for President of the Senate to count the electors votes. There are procedures for Congress to make the choice if no one has a majority. Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. While it is not spelled out who judges the President's qualification the constitutionally correct place would be in Congress since all the duties surrounding the issue are designated to Congress and no one else is given the authority.
It is not spelled out but if a challenge were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted Congress would have to deal with the issue. Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made. There is nothing in the Constitution giving the courts authority to make the decision; lawyers think the courts are always the place for making decisions so they don’t think of other options that fit better with the structure of the Constitution. It does not matter whether the challenge is to the election of McCain, Obama or anyone else, the process would be the same.
If the defect in the President’s qualifications were to come to light after the President was sworn in then the procedures for impeachment would be appropriate, since running for office in violation of the constitutional requirement for being a “natural born Citizen” would be high Crime or Misdemeanor.
The Senate has already expressed the opinion that McCain is a "natural born Citizen" and eligible for the Office of the President. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) introduced the resolution during April of this year after the first New York Times article. Obama might be required to present a Birth Certificate if his qualifications were challenged and then the issue would be resolved. Since all of the authority for counting the electors and dealing with a President elect who fails to qualify rest with Congress, Congress is also the appropriate place to determine the President’s qualifications.
From the Constitution of The United States of America, Amendment XX, Section 3:
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or [if the President elect shall have failed to qualify], then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
***********************************************************************************
HERE IS WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO DO. Write, call, email the congress to demand that Barack Hussein Obama presents a valid birth certificate that verifies he is a natural born US citizen at the time the electors' votes are counted!
Amendment XX has procedures for dealing with a situation where “the President elect shall have failed to qualify”. All the duties surrounding the issue of counting the electors ballots and selecting the President if no clear winner exits are designated to Congress, the courts have no role to play.
It is not spelled out but if a challenge to a President’s qualifications were made at the time the electors’ votes are counted, Congress would have to deal with the issue.
Evidence could be presented and testimony heard, then a decision would have to be made. There is nothing in the Constitution giving the courts authority to make the decision; lawyers think the courts are always the place for making decisions so they don’t think of other options that fit better with the structure of the Constitution.
It does not matter whether the challenge is to the election of McCain, Obama or anyone else, the process would be the same.
If the defect in the President’s qualifications were to come to light after the President was sworn in then the procedures for impeachment would be appropriate, since running for office in violation of the constitutional requirement for being a “natural born Citizen” would be high Crime or Misdemeanor.
The Senate has already expressed the opinion that McCain is a “natural born Citizen” and eligible for the Office of the President. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) introduced the resolution during April of this year after the first New York Times article. Obama was also a sponsor?
There is no way that Congress is going to deny parents serving overseas the possibility that their children can become President so John McCain is safe.
Obama might be required to present a Birth Certificate if his qualifications were challenged and then the issue could be resolved.
All of the authority for counting the electors and dealing with a President elect who fails to qualify rest with Congress. Congress is the appropriate place to determine the President’s qualifications.
....................................................................................
I also think it is the duty of every US citizen to question the qualifications of persons claiming to be US citizens and asking for your vote to be president of the United States. Philip J. Berg is doing us all a great service by trying to expose the fraud of Barack Hussein Obama if he is not a US citizen!
Lawsuit exposing Obama is not a US citizen
#####################################################################################
#####################################################################################
#####################################################################################
Here is the answer to why Barack Hussein Obama is not an cannot be a US Citizen nor President of the United States!
NATURALIZED CITIZEN CAN NOT BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
***This is the law that protects us, from every person getting in here to have babies, just for citizenship.
Barack Obama is not a legal U.S. natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952, to November 13, 1986. Federal Law requires that the office of President requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents. This is what exempts John McCain, though he was born in the US Panama Canal Zone.
US Law very clearly states:
‘ If only one parent is a U.S. Citizen at the time of one’s birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for minimum ten years, five of which must be after the age of 18.’
Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen is a fact.
Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born. This means even though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen of Hawaii being a territory), his mother fails the test for at-least-5-years- prior-to Barack Obama’s birth, but-after-age-16.
In essence, Mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, 2 years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at the time his mother would have needed to be to allow him natural citizenship from his only U.S. Citizen parent. Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen . . but that would disqualify him from holding the office.
THE CONSTITUTION CLEARLY DECLARES:
Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, any other information does not matter because his mother is the one who must fulfill the requirement to be a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16.
Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the USA for some time frame to protect any citizenship he might have had, rather than living in Indonesia. This is very clear cut and a glaring violation of U.S. Election law.
It is one of the requirements of the U.S. Constitution that the U.S. President be born in the U.S. (See the fourth paragraph of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.) Here's a link to the transcript of the Constitution on the National Archives website:Article II
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;..."
Plus, all the birthplaces of the (to date) 43 presidents are known. See this list:
Birth Places Of The Presidents Note ALL of the Presidents were natural born in the US as required by the Constitution!
“2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States.”
It says “Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;”
It is odd that this was added to the senate resolution
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
It is interesting to note that another previous presidential candidate, George Romney, was also born outside of the United States. He was widely understood to be eligible to be President. Senator Barry Goldwater was born in a U.S territory that later became the State of Arizona so some even questioned his eligibility. Certainly the millions of Americans who voted for these two Republican candidates believed that they were eligible to assume the office of the President. The same is
true today. U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY
No Senator Leahy the same is not true today for Barack Hussein Obama because the previous presidential candidates you cite were born to parents who were both US citizens. Barack Hussein Obama's parents were not both US citizens at the time of his birth. His mother was not old enough according to US law and his father was a citizen of Kenya So this is a bold face LIE that is in the senate resolution. Why?
Why hasn't the US Senate produced a resolution recognizing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen?
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
It is very important to understand this:
Cases in other courts relating specifically to the "natural born citizen" clause
Two United States District Courts have ruled that private citizens do not have standing to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on a presidential election ballot. Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (N.D. Cal. 2008); Hollander v. McCain, 2008WL2853250 (D.N.H. 2008). In dicta in each of these cases, it was also opined that if the plaintiffs did have standing, the likelihood of success on the merits (which is part of the legal test for the issuance of a preliminary injunction) would be low. The opinion in one of the cases also cited to a statutory method[15] by which the eligibility of the President-elect to take office may be challenged in Congress.
Demand that Barack Hussein Obama presents a valid birth certificate that verifies he is a natural born US citizen at the time the electors' votes are counted! US citizens do have standing in the congress.
Natural-born citizen
Court case that is trying to expose the fraud that Obama is a natural born citizen
Friday, October 10, 2008
Send a Freedom Of Information Act Letter To Hawaii
Yes I can and you can do something to expose the fraud of Barack Hussein Obama. What if thousands send letters to Hawaii requesting his birth certificate?
He was born in Kenya because his mother was not allowed to board a plane to Hawaii when she was about to give birth. The plane trip was aborted. The facts point to the conclusion Obama cannot produce a valid birth certificate and will fight in court to hide his true citizenship. I believe he is not a US citizen. Why will he not provide the requested proof of citizenship? Why fight in court to hide the birth certificate? It is obvious, he is a fraud. Obama is a fraud
Below is an example of a letter to send to the Attorney General Department of the Attorney General State of Hawaii Email the Department of the Attorney General to request an answer under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552.
Email The state dept of health also for a copy that does not exist
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Mark Bennett, Attorney General
Department of the Attorney General
State of Hawaii
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Dear Mr. Bennett:
Barack Obama, as U.S. Senator of Illinois and the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, is a public person, and his citizenship status is a matter of significant public concern and is subject to legitimate public scrutiny. The public interest in access to the requested information under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552 should be noted and honored.
This is a freedom of information act request for the birth certificate of Barack Obama, born August 4, 1961. Because Mr. Obama is a public figure and because of the importance of this information to the public welfare the ordinary rules of confidentiality do not apply.
Sincerely,
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Janice Okubo
Department of Health
State of Hawaii
1250 Punchbowl Street Room 326
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Dear Ms. Okubo:
Barack Obama, as U.S. Senator of Illinois and the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, is a public person, and his citizenship status is a matter of significant public concern and is subject to legitimate public scrutiny. The public interest in access to the requested information under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552 should be noted and honored.
This is a freedom of information act request for the birth certificate of Barack Obama, born August 4, 1961. Because Mr. Obama is a public figure and because of the importance of this information to the public welfare the ordinary rules of confidentiality do not apply.
Sincerely,
He was born in Kenya because his mother was not allowed to board a plane to Hawaii when she was about to give birth. The plane trip was aborted. The facts point to the conclusion Obama cannot produce a valid birth certificate and will fight in court to hide his true citizenship. I believe he is not a US citizen. Why will he not provide the requested proof of citizenship? Why fight in court to hide the birth certificate? It is obvious, he is a fraud. Obama is a fraud
Below is an example of a letter to send to the Attorney General Department of the Attorney General State of Hawaii Email the Department of the Attorney General to request an answer under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552.
Email The state dept of health also for a copy that does not exist
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Mark Bennett, Attorney General
Department of the Attorney General
State of Hawaii
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Dear Mr. Bennett:
Barack Obama, as U.S. Senator of Illinois and the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, is a public person, and his citizenship status is a matter of significant public concern and is subject to legitimate public scrutiny. The public interest in access to the requested information under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552 should be noted and honored.
This is a freedom of information act request for the birth certificate of Barack Obama, born August 4, 1961. Because Mr. Obama is a public figure and because of the importance of this information to the public welfare the ordinary rules of confidentiality do not apply.
Sincerely,
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Janice Okubo
Department of Health
State of Hawaii
1250 Punchbowl Street Room 326
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Dear Ms. Okubo:
Barack Obama, as U.S. Senator of Illinois and the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, is a public person, and his citizenship status is a matter of significant public concern and is subject to legitimate public scrutiny. The public interest in access to the requested information under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552 should be noted and honored.
This is a freedom of information act request for the birth certificate of Barack Obama, born August 4, 1961. Because Mr. Obama is a public figure and because of the importance of this information to the public welfare the ordinary rules of confidentiality do not apply.
Sincerely,
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Obama plants seeds of disaster with acorn
Who can we blame for the manufactured financial crisis that is affecting the election? Planting Seeds of Disaster ACORN, Barack Obama, and the Democratic party ACORN and Barack Hussein Obama have in affect manufactured this financial crisis.
(ACORN lobbied, extorted, bought, threatened and played the race card) In all of this mess there is a recurring theme of the 'race card' played or threatened to be played. ACORN is like a jessie jackson or al sharpton super shakedown organization. Over and over again you hear the race card being played or threatened to be played.
If you don't believe me read the story below and you will clearly see why this mess has been created.
Let me list the names as documented in the story below who are to blame for America losing Billions:
Comrade Barack Hussein Obama
Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy
Senator Allan Dixon
House Democrat Henry Gonzales
ACORN Housing Corporation president, George Butts
Clinton Housing Secretary Henry Cisnersos
Fannie Mae’s chairman, chief executive officer, and now prominent Obama adviser James A. Johnson
Vice President Gore
Barney Frank
Senator Chris Dodd
Franklin Raines
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
In June of 1995, President Clinton, Vice President Gore, and Secretary Cisneros announced the administration’s comprehensive new strategy for raising home-ownership in America to an all-time high. Representatives from ACORN were guests of honor at the ceremony. In his remarks, Clinton emphasized that: “Out homeownership strategy will not cost the taxpayers one extra cent. It will not require legislation.” Clinton meant that informal partnerships between Fannie and Freddie and groups like ACORN would make mortgages available to customers “who have historically been excluded from homeownership.”
Disaster
In the end of course, Clinton’s plan cost taxpayers an almost unimaginable amount of money. And it was just around the time of his 1995 announcement that the Chicago papers started encouraging bad-credit customers with “dog-food” wages, little money in the bank, and even histories of bankruptcy to apply for home loans with the help of ACORN. At both the local and national levels, then, ACORN served as the critical catalyst, levering pressure created by the Community Reinvestment Act and pull with Democratic politicians to force Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a pattern of high-risk loans.
Up to now, conventional wisdom on the financial meltdown has relegated ACORN and the CRA to bit parts. The real problem, we’ve been told, lay with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In fact, however, ACORN is at the base of the whole mess. ACORN used the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act and Democratic sympathizers to entangle Fannie and Freddie and the entire financial system in a disastrous disregard of the most basic financial standards. And Barack Obama cut his teeth as an organizer and politician backing up ACORN’s economic madness every step of the way.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
THE FULL STORY STARTS HERE
Planting Seeds of Disaster
ACORN, Barack Obama, and the Democratic party.
By Stanley Kurtz
‘You’ve got only a couple thousand bucks in the bank. Your job pays you dog-food wages. Your credit history has been bent, stapled, and mutilated. You declared bankruptcy in 1989. Don’t despair: You can still buy a house.” So began an April 1995 article in the Chicago Sun-Times that went on to direct prospective home-buyers fitting this profile to a group of far-left “community organizers” called ACORN, for assistance. In retrospect, of course, encouraging customers like this to buy homes seems little short of madness.
Militant ACORN
At the time, however, that 1995 Chicago newspaper article represented something of a triumph for Barack Obama. That same year, as a director at Chicago’s Woods Fund, Obama was successfully pushing for a major expansion of assistance to ACORN, and sending still more money ACORN’s way from his post as board chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Through both funding and personal-leadership training, Obama supported ACORN. And ACORN, far more than we’ve recognized up to now, had a major role in precipitating the subprime crisis.
I’ve already told the story of Obama’s close ties to ACORN leader Madeline Talbott, who personally led Chicago ACORN’s campaign to intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to low-credit customers. Using provisions of a 1977 law called the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), Chicago ACORN was able to delay and halt the efforts of banks to merge or expand until they had agreed to lower their credit standards — and to fill ACORN’s coffers to finance “counseling” operations like the one touted in that Sun-Times article. This much we’ve known. Yet these local, CRA-based pressure-campaigns fit into a broader, more disturbing, and still under-appreciated national picture. Far more than we’ve recognized, ACORN’s local, CRA-enabled pressure tactics served to entangle the financial system as a whole in the subprime mess. ACORN was no side-show. On the contrary, using CRA and ties to sympathetic congressional Democrats, ACORN succeeded in drawing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the very policies that led to the current disaster.
In one of the first book-length scholarly studies of ACORN, Organizing Urban America, Rutgers University political scientist Heidi Swarts describes this group, so dear to Barack Obama, as “oppositional outlaws.” Swarts, a strong supporter of ACORN, has no qualms about stating that its members think of themselves as “militants unafraid to confront the powers that be.” “This identity as a uniquely militant organization,” says Swarts, “is reinforced by contentious action.” ACORN protesters will break into private offices, show up at a banker’s home to intimidate his family, or pour protesters into bank lobbies to scare away customers, all in an effort to force a lowering of credit standards for poor and minority customers. According to Swarts, long-term ACORN organizers “tend to see the organization as a solitary vanguard of principled leftists...the only truly radical community organization.”
ACORN’s Inside Strategy
Yet ACORN’s entirely deserved reputation for militance is balanced by its less-well-known “inside strategy.” ACORN has long employed Washington-based lobbyists who understand very well how the legislative game is played. ACORN’s national lobbyists may encourage and benefit from the militant tactics of their base, but in the halls of congress they play the game with smooth sophistication. The untold story of ACORN’s central role in the financial meltdown is about the one-two punch to the banking system administered by this outside/inside strategy.
Critics of the notion that CRA had a major impact on the subprime crisis ask how a law passed in 1977 could have caused a crisis in 2008? The answer has a lot to do with ACORN — and the critical years of 1990-1995. While the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act did call on banks to increase lending in poor and minority neighborhoods, its exact requirements were vague, and therefore open to a good deal of regulatory interpretation. Banks merger or expansion plans were rarely held up under CRA until the late 1980s, when ACORN perfected its technique of filing CRA complaints in tandem with the sort of intimidation tactics perfected by that original “community organizer” (and Obama idol), Saul Alinsky.
At first, ACORN’s anti-bank actions were relatively few in number. However, under a provision of the 1989 savings and loan bailout pushed by liberal Democratic legislators, like Massachusetts Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy, lenders were required to compile public records of mortgage applicants by race, gender, and income. Although the statistics produced by these studies were presented in highly misleading ways, groups like ACORN were able to use them to embarrass banks into lowering credit standards. At the same time, a wave of banking mergers in the early 1990's provided an opening for ACORN to use CRA to force lending changes. Any merger could be blocked under CRA, and once ACORN began systematically filing protests over minority lending, a formerly toothless set of regulations began to bite.
ACORN’s efforts to undermine credit standards in the late 1980s taught it a valuable lesson. However much pressure ACORN put on banks to lower credit standards, tough requirements in the “secondary market” run by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac served as a barrier to change. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy up mortgages en masse, bundle them, and sell them to investors on the world market. Back then, Fannie and Freddie refused to buy loans that failed to meet high credit standards. If, for example, a local bank buckled to ACORN pressure and agreed to offer poor or minority applicants a 5-percent down-payment rate, instead of the normal 10-20 percent, Fannie and Freddie would refuse to buy up those mortgages. That would leave all the risk of these shaky loans with the local bank. So again and again, local banks would tell ACORN that, because of standards imposed by Fannie and Freddie, they could lower their credit standards by only a little.
So the eighties taught ACORN that a high-pressure, Alinskyite outside strategy wouldn’t be enough. Their Washington lobbyists would have to bring inside pressure on the government to undercut credit standards at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Only then would local banks consider making loans available to customers with bad credit histories, low wages, virtually nothing in the bank, and even bankruptcies on record.
Democrats and ACORN
As early as 1987, ACORN began pressuring Fannie and Freddie to review their standards, with modest results. By 1989, ACORN had lured Fannie Mae into the first of many “pilot projects” designed to help local banks lower credit standards. But it was all small potatoes until the serious pressure began in early 1991. At that point, Democratic Senator Allan Dixon convened a Senate subcommittee hearing at which an ACORN representative gave key testimony. It’s probably not a coincidence that Dixon, like Obama, was an Illinois Democrat, since Chicago has long been a stronghold of ACORN influence.
Dixon gave credibility to ACORN’s accusations of loan bias, although these claims of racism were disputed by Missouri Republican, Christopher Bond. ACORN’s spokesman strenuously complained that his organization’s efforts to relax local credit standards were being blocked by requirements set by the secondary market. Dixon responded by pressing Fannie and Freddie to do more to relax those standards — and by promising to introduce legislation that would ensure it. At this early stage, Fannie and Freddie walked a fine line between promising to do more, while protesting any wholesale reduction of credit requirements.
By July of 1991, ACORN’s legislative campaign began to bear fruit. As the Chicago Tribune put it, “Housing activists have been pushing hard to improve housing for the poor by extracting greater financial support from the country’s two highly profitable secondary mortgage-market companies. Thanks to the help of sympathetic lawmakers, it appeared...that they may succeed.” The Tribune went on to explain that House Democrat Henry Gonzales had announced that Fannie and Freddie had agreed to commit $3.5 billion to low-income housing in 1992 and 1993, in addition to a just-announced $10 billion “affordable housing loan program” by Fannie Mae. The article emphasizes ACORN pressure and notes that Fannie and Freddie had been fighting against the plan as recently as a week before agreement was reached. Fannie and Freddie gave in only to stave off even more restrictive legislation floated by congressional Democrats.
A mere month later, ACORN Housing Corporation president, George Butts made news by complaining to a House Banking subcommittee that ACORN’s efforts to pressure banks using CRA were still being hamstrung by Fannie and Freddie. Butts also demanded still more data on the race, gender, and income of loan applicants. Many news reports over the ensuing months point to ACORN as the key source of pressure on congress for a further reduction of credit standards at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As a result of this pressure, ACORN was eventually permitted to redraft many of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s loan guideline.
Clinton and ACORN
ACORN’s progress through 1992 depended on its Democratic allies. Whatever ACORN managed to squeeze out of the George H. W. Bush administration came under congressional pressure. With the advent of the Clinton administration, however, ACORN’s fortunes took a positive turn. Clinton Housing Secretary Henry Cisnersos pledged to meet monthly with ACORN representatives. For ACORN, those meetings bore fruit.
Another factor working in ACORN’s favor was that its increasing success with local banks turned those banks into allies in the battle with Fannie and Freddie. Precisely because ACORN’s local pressure tactics were working, banks themselves now wanted Fannie and Freddie to loosen their standards still further, so as to buy up still more of the high-risk loans they’d made at ACORN’s insistence. So by the 1993, a grand alliance of ACORN, national Democrats, and local bankers looking for someone to lessen the risks imposed on them by CRA and ACORN were uniting to pressure Fannie and Freddie to loosen credit standards still further.
At this point, both ACORN and the Clinton administration were working together to impose large numerical targets or “set asides” (really a sort of poor and minority loan quota system) on Fannie and Freddie. ACORN called for at least half of Fannie and Freddie loans to go to low-income customers. At first the Clinton administration offered a set-aside of 30 percent. But eventually ACORN got what it wanted. In early 1994, the Clinton administration floated plans for committing $1 trillion in loans to low- and moderate-income home-buyers, which would amount to about half of Fannie Mae’s business by the end of the decade. Wall Street Analysts attributed Fannie Mae’s willingness to go along with the change to the need to protect itself against still more severe “congressional attack.” News reports also highlighted praise for the change from ACORN’s head lobbyist, Deepak Bhargava.
This sweeping debasement of credit standards was touted by Fannie Mae’s chairman, chief executive officer, and now prominent Obama adviser James A. Johnson. This is also the period when Fannie Mae ramped up its pilot programs and local partnerships with ACORN, all of which became precedents and models for the pattern of risky subprime mortgages at the root of today’s crisis. During these years, Obama’s Chicago ACORN ally, Madeline Talbott, was at the forefront of participation in those pilot programs, and her activities were consistently supported by Obama through both foundation funding and personal leadership training for her top organizers.
Finally, in June of 1995, President Clinton, Vice President Gore, and Secretary Cisneros announced the administration’s comprehensive new strategy for raising home-ownership in America to an all-time high. Representatives from ACORN were guests of honor at the ceremony. In his remarks, Clinton emphasized that: “Out homeownership strategy will not cost the taxpayers one extra cent. It will not require legislation.” Clinton meant that informal partnerships between Fannie and Freddie and groups like ACORN would make mortgages available to customers “who have historically been excluded from homeownership.”
Disaster
In the end of course, Clinton’s plan cost taxpayers an almost unimaginable amount of money. And it was just around the time of his 1995 announcement that the Chicago papers started encouraging bad-credit customers with “dog-food” wages, little money in the bank, and even histories of bankruptcy to apply for home loans with the help of ACORN. At both the local and national levels, then, ACORN served as the critical catalyst, levering pressure created by the Community Reinvestment Act and pull with Democratic politicians to force Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a pattern of high-risk loans.
Up to now, conventional wisdom on the financial meltdown has relegated ACORN and the CRA to bit parts. The real problem, we’ve been told, lay with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In fact, however, ACORN is at the base of the whole mess. ACORN used CRA and Democratic sympathizers to entangle Fannie and Freddie and the entire financial system in a disastrous disregard of the most basic financial standards. And Barack Obama cut his teeth as an organizer and politician backing up ACORN’s economic madness every step of the way.
— Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Institute.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Barack Hussein Obama was a member of the democratic socialists of America or "New Party".
I am not surprised.
Barack Hussein Obama was a member of the democratic socialists of America or "New Party".
Monday, October 6, 2008
Butt buddies cause financial crisis
Can you believe this barney frank and herb moses, 2 butt buddies have caused the present financial crisis...a couple of queers it figures.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Chairman of the US House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank, is responsible for oversight of the US mortgage markets administered by government created entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Barney's partner and lover, Herb Moses was a senior executive at Fannie Mae:Lawmaker Accused of Fannie Mae Conflict of Interest
"C’mon, he writes housing and banking laws and his boyfriend is a top exec at a firm that stands to gain from those laws?" A GOP aide told FOX News. "No media ever takes note? Imagine what would happen if Frank’s political affiliation was R instead of D? Imagine what the media would say if [GOP former] Chairman [Mike] Oxley’s wife or [GOP presidential nominee John] McCain’s wife was a top exec at Fannie for a decade while they wrote the nation’s housing and banking laws."
Frank met Moses in 1987, the same year he became the first openly gay member of Congress. "I am the only member of the congressional gay spouse caucus," Moses wrote in the Washington Post in 1991. "On Capitol Hill, Barney always introduces me as his lover." According to National Mortgage News, Moses "helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs."
Of course, such programs led to the mortgage meltdown that prompted last month’s government takeover of Fannie Mae and its financial cousin, Freddie Mac. The giant firms are blamed for spreading bad mortgages throughout the private financial sector and putting the country on the brink of financial meltdown.
The two lived together in a Washington home until they broke up in 1998, a few months after Moses ended his seven-year tenure at Fannie Mae, where he was the assistant director of product initiatives. According to National Mortgage News, Moses "helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs."
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Obama & DNC Hide Behind Legal Issues While Betraying Public in not Producing a Certified Copy of Obama’s “Vault” Birth Certificate
Obama's birth certificate lawsuit
This is amazing. I am amazed the American public is being duped into thinking Obama is an American citizen. Why does the dnc and obama not produce an answer to Mr Philp Berg's question. Is Obama an American citizen or not? Mr Berg says prove it. I say prove it Barack Husain Obama and don't hide behind the dnc and delay the answer. If you are an American citizen answer Mr Berg's lawsuit. Because you and the dnc are stalling and not producing a real birth certificate it leads me to believe you are hiding something. The dnc sends 40 or so lawyers etc to Alaska to dig up dirt on Sara Palin yet they can't or won't produce a valid birth certificate for Barack HUSAIN Obama. The dnc sends lawyers to court to stop the lawsuit that will reveal obama is a fraud and not a US citizen.
Obama "birth certificate" a "horrible forgery"
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Faked Birth Certificate
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama & DNC Hide Behind Legal Issues While Betraying Public in not Producing a Certified Copy of Obama’s “Vault” Birth Certificate and Oath of Allegiance
Country is Headed to a Constitutional Crisis
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 09/24/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss on the last day to file a response, for the obvious purpose of delaying Court action in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Their joint motion indicates a concerted effort to avoid the truth by delaying the judicial process, although legal, by not resolving the issue presented: that is, whether Barack Obama was “natural born.”
It is obvious that Obama was born in Kenya and does not meet the “qualifications” to be President of the United States pursuant to our United States Constitution. Obama cannot produce a certified copy of his “Vault” [original long version] Birth Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.
This is amazing. I am amazed the American public is being duped into thinking Obama is an American citizen. Why does the dnc and obama not produce an answer to Mr Philp Berg's question. Is Obama an American citizen or not? Mr Berg says prove it. I say prove it Barack Husain Obama and don't hide behind the dnc and delay the answer. If you are an American citizen answer Mr Berg's lawsuit. Because you and the dnc are stalling and not producing a real birth certificate it leads me to believe you are hiding something. The dnc sends 40 or so lawyers etc to Alaska to dig up dirt on Sara Palin yet they can't or won't produce a valid birth certificate for Barack HUSAIN Obama. The dnc sends lawyers to court to stop the lawsuit that will reveal obama is a fraud and not a US citizen.
Obama "birth certificate" a "horrible forgery"
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Faked Birth Certificate
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama & DNC Hide Behind Legal Issues While Betraying Public in not Producing a Certified Copy of Obama’s “Vault” Birth Certificate and Oath of Allegiance
Country is Headed to a Constitutional Crisis
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 09/24/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss on the last day to file a response, for the obvious purpose of delaying Court action in the case of Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Their joint motion indicates a concerted effort to avoid the truth by delaying the judicial process, although legal, by not resolving the issue presented: that is, whether Barack Obama was “natural born.”
It is obvious that Obama was born in Kenya and does not meet the “qualifications” to be President of the United States pursuant to our United States Constitution. Obama cannot produce a certified copy of his “Vault” [original long version] Birth Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
An example of a Dumb Ass
Here we have a record of a dumb ass sending
and receiving text messages while on the job. The records obtained from Sanchez's cell phone provider also show that he sent 24 text messages and received 21 over a two-hour period during his morning shift. During his afternoon shift, he received seven messages and sent five. Sanchez sent his last text message at 4:22:01 p.m. According to the freight train's on-board recorder, the accident occurred at 4:22:23 p.m. This idiot might as well been asleep. Because of this the dumb ass missed the yellow then red stop signals just before the accident. Sanchez was too busy on his cell phone to realize he was about to crash.
************************************************************************************
In the case of congress we have a record also. The dumb asses missed the warning in several hearings about freddie mae and fannie mac about to go bust because of accounting procedures. Suck boy barney frank was denying anything was wrong, just like he denied having his butt buddies in his basement but paid their parking tickets outside of his queer house. While ole barney was having his butt buddy parties fannie and freddie were going bust. We have a butt buddy party going on in congress also. They are to busy covering their own butts to fix the real problem, which was caused by congress in the first place. The wrong regulation and too much regulation.
***********************************************************************************
A Los Angeles train driver sent a text message on his mobile phone 22 seconds before his train crashed, killing 25 people, investigators say.
Robert Sanchez, who was among the dead, sent 29 messages while on duty on the day of the crash, phone records show.
The National Transportation Safety Board says it is pursuing "many avenues of inquiry" into the accident's cause.
The Metrolink passenger train missed a red signal just before ploughing into a freight train on 12 September.
It was the deadliest rail crash in the US for 15 years.
"I am pleased with the progress of this major investigation to date," said acting safety board chairman Mark Rosenker.
Teenagers' claims
Mr Sanchez's phone records show that he sent his last text message at 1622:01. The accident occurred at 1622:23, according to the freight train's on-board recorder.
Investigators said they were continuing to correlate times from Mr Sanchez's mobile phone, the train recorders and data from the rail signalling system.
Investigators assess train crash in Los Angeles on 16/09/08
More than 130 people were hurt in the collision
Since the crash, train drivers in California have been banned from using mobile phones while they are on duty.
Anyone found guilty of violating the new order could now be fined up to $20,000 (£11,000).
The Metrolink passenger train was carrying 222 passengers between Los Angeles and Moorpark, north-west of the city, when the crash happened.
Rail investigators have concluded that Mr Sanchez failed to brake at a red signal and smashed into the freight train.
The force of the impact drove the passenger train's engine back inside the first carriage.
Mr Sanchez was among 25 people killed and more than 130 were injured.
The board requested his mobile phone records after two teenage train enthusiasts who befriended the driver told a local TV station they received a text message from Mr Sanchez just before the crash.
In the days after the crash, several teenage train enthusiasts told a reporter that Sanchez sent them a text message just before the collision. Federal investigators spurred by the media reports interviewed two 14-year-old boys, who they said cooperated in the investigation and provided their cell phone data.
One of the teens showed KCBS-TV a message from Sanchez, which had a 4:22 p.m. time stamp. The message read: "Yea ... usually (at) north Camarillo." The Metrolink 111 train he was operating stops in Camarillo, northwest of Chatsworth.
The collision, which also injured more than 130 people, occurred on a track shared by both freight and commuter trains.
Investigators said Sanchez was supposed to stop and allow the approaching freight train to switch onto a parallel track, but instead went past the red signal and crossed the closed switch, putting the commuter train on a collision course.
The Metrolink train was coming around a curve at 42 mph (68 kph) and the freight train was coming out of a tunnel at 41 mph (66 kph).
Federal investigators said the engineers of each train had no more than four or five seconds to react before the crash. The freight engineer activated the emergency brake two seconds before impact, but brakes were never applied on the Metrolink train.
Given the speed of the trains and the time each engineer had to see the other, a collision at that point could not have been prevented.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me equate this to what is about to happen in the election. The man who never was,Barack Husain Obama, Mr Empty Suit to you is about to be elected because of the failure of congress to regulate fannie mae, freddie mac and creation of idot legislation to regulate business. Democrates and the mass media have created a crisis just before the election to insure Barack Husain Obama, a socialist
will get elected. This idiot is exactly like the dumb ass texting while operating a train. Obama will miss the signals to execute a critical step because he too will be text messaging to us about his proposed action or missed opportunity, making excuses as he does when he studders.The mass media will cover for him. America is passing the stop signal now. Americans have texted congress to stop but the butt buddies continue texting to barack husain obama. We are about to crash for the next four years into socialism or worse.
Have you noticed how many people are text messaging,
oblivious to their surroundings.
If the polls are near correct Americans are oblivious to their surroundings.The mass media is text messaging America about the empty suit, butt buddy mass media creations, and the majority of Americans are oblivious to the fact we are about to crash and burn!!!!!
ass
1. Any of several hoofed mammals of the genus Equus, resembling and closely related to the horses but having a smaller build and longer ears, and including the domesticated donkey.
2. A vain, self-important, silly, or aggressively stupid person.
Definition 2, defines barack husain obama and the democrate congress.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another Race Card Played
Like Obama, Ifill, who is black, is quick to play the race card at the first sign of criticism. In an interview with the Washington Post a few weeks ago, she carped: “[N]o one’s ever assumed a white reporter can’t cover a white candidate.”
It’s not the color of your skin, sweetie. It’s the color of your politics. Perhaps Ifill will be able to conceal it this week. But if the “stunning” “Breakthrough” she’s rooting for comes to pass on January 20, 2009, nobody will be fooled.
When they get caught, they squeel and play the race card. This is racist. She is a racist and has played the race card. If A black person plays the race card they are racist. Look what she said, it is obvious. She is biased,ok, it figures, but look at the race card she plays, this exposes her for what she really is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
