I research news articles and comment. The deep state includes corrupt state and local officials.
Some links are out of date on this blog and information on some of these links has changed.
1803 posts are too many to go through and change a link that is bad or has been purchased by someone other than me.
The Information on links I no longer own or control, I am not in no way responsible for what is on the link. Just beware.
Both are stupid. The guy with the skateboard knew the guy he was hitting with his kid skateboard had a gun.
The guy with the gun should NOT have been out on the street with a gun.
Editor Note.
Kenosha shooting victim, 26, remembered by fellow skateboarders as ‘peaceful person’ ???
Anthony Huber "put his life on the line for others," one friend said. ???
The stupid idiot with the skateboard was NOT a peaceful protestor!
He did NOT put his life on the line for others as some of he fellow kid skateboarders are telling the media. He was joining blm and antifa protestors in the street in a violent way.
He confronted another kid with a gun and got shot.
Here is what I think could happen in the 2020 Presidential election.
Because of widespread national mail in voting fraud and ballot harvesting the election popular vote outcomes may not be known on election night Nov 4, 2020.
Some states will have close votes and others will not.
The democrates will file lawsuits to try to steal the election results all over the nation.
The republicans will also file lawsuits to prevent the democrates from stealing votes all over the nation.
Because of this there will also be various state supreme courts making rulings on their individual state election outcomes.
Some of these rulings will be valid and some will not be valid rulings.
This will mean different state supreme court ruling will be appealed to the US Supreme Court at some point.
On Dec 12, 2000 the US Supreme Court Ruled on the state of Florida Presidential election results.
This resulted in the election of George Bush Jr.
THE SUPREME COURT of the US could vote again in Dec 2020 before the Electorial votes are cast.
The Supreme Court could rule again to override a State Supreme Court decesion.
The US Supreme Court could rule to allow fradulent ballots to be acceptable based on various state laws.
This is only one of the unknown monkey wrenches that could be thrown into the election results in 2020.
Here is a brief overview of the Electorial Vote Process.
Dec 14 Electorial ballots are cast by various electors in all the States.
The governor of each state must certify the electorial ballots in each state before they are sent via registered mail on Dec 15 to the Joint session of congress to be counted.
The absolute deadline for electorial ballot to be received by congress is Dec 28, 2020.
If congress does not receive the certified electorial ballots then that states electorial votes are not counted.
Joint session of congress counting electorial votes. (History)
There appears only to have been one example, in 1961, when the governor of the state of Hawaii first certified the electors of Vice President Richard M. Nixon as having been appointed, and then, due to a subsequent recount which determined that Senator John F. Kennedy had won the Hawaii vote, certified Senator Kennedy as the winner.
Both slates of electors had met on the prescribed day in December, cast their votes for President and Vice President, and transmitted them according to the federal statute.
This was the case even though the recount was apparently not completed until a later date, that is, not until December 28.
The presiding officer, that is, the President of the Senate, Vice President Nixon, suggested “without the intent of establishing a precedent” that the latter and more recent certification of Senator Kennedy be accepted so as “not to delay the further count of electoral votes.”
This was agreed to by unanimous consent.
In the 2020 Presidential election I do not think democrates or Republicans will allow late electorial votes to be counted via unanimous consent etc.
I think it is more likely that some states may not certify electorial votes due to litigation and voter fraud that will occur in 2020.
This is another monkey wrench waiting to keep the election from being concluded on Jan 6 when the electorial votes are counted in ajoint session.
On Jan 6, 2020 in a joint session of congress the electorial votes will be counted.
3 U.S.C. 15 sets the method for objections
Members of congress may object to individual electorial votes or to state rturns as a whole.
The objection to the electorial vote or votes must be made in writing and at least one senator and one representative must endorse the objection.
Both the house and senate must vote seperately and agree to the objection, otherwise the the objection fails and the electorial vote is counted.
(I can't see either the house or the senate agreeing to an objection in the 2020 joint session.)
A candidate for President must receive 270 electorial votes or more to become president.
If no candidate receives 270 or more electorial votes then the house will vote in an Contigent Election immediately following the Jan 6 joint session of congress.
The house will vote for the top 3 presidential candidates who got the most electorial votes.
NOTE THIS.
A majority of votes from EACH STATE DELIGATION is required to cast a vote in the house contigent election.
If there is NO majority of votes from a state delegation that state will not cast a vote in the house contigent election.
This is another potential monkey wrench but it is a small one.
The REPUBLICANS have the MAJORITY of STATE delegations in 2020.
If the house votes it will be the REPUBLICIAN STATE delegation majorities that will elect a President and it won't be slow joe.
BUT..........................
If the house is unable to elect a president by Jan 20, 2021 the vice president elect, selected by Senate contenginet election will become Acting President of the US and that will NOT be horozintal harris.
This is only until the empasse is resolved.
OH NO!
If the Senate Contingent election is unable to elect a vice president by a 51 vote majority, not likely, then the speaker of the house would serve as acting president.
Thats right Nasty Pelosi would be acting president.
If President Trump is elected in 2020 you can be sure that BLM and Antifa will kill and destroy as much as possible.
You can be sure also is sloe joe was elected via ballot harvesting and voter fraud BLM and Antifa will kill and destroy as much as possible.
I can see this possibility so I am packing every day, and I don't mean I am moving.
Bonus Editor Note
Here is the bottom line.
If the election results are close enough to stall the election of a president on Nov 3, 2020 we will see a side show circus until the US Supreme court and the deep state rule in slow joes favor for president.
The deep state shadow government which opposes President Trump and the US Constitution cannot and will not allow the house of representatives to hold a contingent election on or around Jan 6, 2020.
The reason is the Republicans hold the majority of state delegations and would vote for President Trump and he would become President.
So if the election circus comes to town it will end long before Jan 6, 2021 when the electorial votes are counted.
Look for the deep state to move the US Supreme Court to rule before Jan 6, 2021 for sure.
My best guess is about 1 month or so after the Nov 4, 2020 election.
If the election results are NOT close and the democrates, deep state, shadow government see they cannot win on Nov 4, 2020 the Supreme Court of the US will not rule.
But the deep state, shadow government democrates and others in congress will use the aforementioned "monkey wrenches" to try and steal the election from President Trump if he wins a majority of electors on Nov 4, 2020.
So even if President Trump wins in a landslide the shadow government in congress and elsewhere will do everything they can to defraud America by subverting the electorial vote process.
The radical communist democrates will do everything they can to mess up the electorial vote counting process.
I don't think they will win in the end.
I don't know how the election results will be on Nov 4, 2020.
I do know the deep state democrates will do everything they can to deny the American people their right to a free and honest election in 2020.
Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich shares his thoughts on the Democratic and Republicanconventions and the presidential race.
As an observer of conventions and presidential campaigns going back to 1956, I am confident in predicting that this week’s Democratic National Convention will be the high-water mark before the collapse of the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris ticket.
As
the ticket collapses, it will start to move into the 1972 George
McGovern range of isolation from the American people. Ironically, the
physical isolation of Biden over the last few months has slowed down the political isolation, which will presently occur.
Three factors will lead to the collapse of the Biden-Harris ticket over the next six weeks.
First, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden is
clearly incapable of functioning as president. Every time he comes out
from hiding in the basement, it is embarrassingly clear that he could
not possibly negotiate with Chinese Communist Party General Secretary Xi
Jinping or Russian President Vladimir Putin to any positive effect.
He
is performing weaker and weaker with each passing week. Even when his
campaign can control every aspect of his events or appearances, there is
something pathetic about Biden’s inability to project strength or
articulate any firm ideas.
I received an email from the
Biden-Harris headquarters which showed a gif of Biden and Harris coming
out of a doorway. Both were looking down or away and not interacting
with anyone (including each other). The email asked, “Have you ever seen
two people who look this ready to lead on Day 1?” I was flummoxed. They
didn’t look ready to do anything.
The question was a parody of
their problem, and the image was embarrassing. I was astounded because
the material had been made by the Biden campaign which had total control
of the product. Biden does not look like he is ready to lead. He is
looking down like he wants to make sure he doesn’t fall down.
Chris Wallace captured the absurdity of a presidential candidate trying
to hide his way to the White House with a “basement strategy,” when he
told Guy Benson, “It’s the damnedest thing I’ve ever seen.”
Harris will prove to be the most disastrous vice presidential nominee
since Sen. Tom Eagleton, D-Mo., had to resign from the McGovern ticket
when it turned out he had been subjected to shock therapy treatments for
mental issues (I am not criticizing mental illness or its treatment,
but in 1972, Americans simply did not want to think of a potential
president having mental illness).
As a presidential candidate,
Harris had wavered between embracing the most radical positions and then
opportunistically changing to more moderate positions when she got
blowback.
She was as unreliable in her policy positions as she was in
her attacks on Biden. She aggressively attacked Biden on four different
occasions and has since repudiated her own words. If Biden is exhausted
and hiding in a basement, his running mate is energetically bouncing all
over the place with no consistency or reliability.
During
the primary, Harris was at 15% support in July 2019. She then dropped
as low as 3.5% support by November 2019, according to Real Clear
Politics. Even in her home state of California, she had dropped to
fourth behind Biden, Warren and Sanders – and was only
attracting 8% support from her own constituents before she dropped out.
In fact, 61% of Californians thought she ought to drop out of the
presidential race, according to a poll by the Berkeley Institute of
Governmental Studies for the Los Angeles Times.
The Democrats (and
propaganda media) believe that she will be powerful in attracting the
African American vote. This is undermined by the objective reality that
in November 2019, after months of campaigning, a Quinnipiac University
poll showed Harris was fourth in attracting Black voters. Biden had 44%,
Sanders had 10%, Warren had 8%, and Harris was down to 6% of the Black
vote.
When Biden was drawing nearly eight Black votes for every vote
Harris was getting, so why would the Democrats think adding her to the
ticket was a smart idea.
Finally, as the depth of radicalism of
the Biden-Harris platform and the Chuck Schumer-Nancy Pelosi legislative
agenda become clear to the American people, they will be increasingly
alienated from the new radical Democratic Party and its candidates. The
increasing radicalism is already beginning to sink in.
Importantly, the real danger to the Democratic ticket is not the
general allegation that Biden-Harris is a radical ticket. The real
danger to the Democrats is the item-by-item alienation of different
groups of Americans based on adopting positions that please radicals but
are deeply opposed by most Americans.
The real change in public
opinion will begin shortly after the Democratic National Convention as
the Trump campaign and its allies (including virtually all Republican
candidates) point out these specific threats to specific groups.
Consider these threats:
1. The Biden-Harris commitment to renew the Obama effort to destroy suburban neighborhoods is
a direct threat to the peace of mind for two-thirds of the American
people – including a large number of African American and Latino
suburbanites.
2.
Biden-Harris' support of using taxpayer money to pay for abortions
through the ninth month of pregnancy is opposed even by many pro-choice
Americans (and is a break with Biden’s entire career of supporting the
Hyde Amendment, which bars taxpayer money from paying for abortions).
3.
The commitment in HR 6800, which 207 House Democrats supported and
Biden endorsed, to pay coronavirus relief payments to some people in the
country illegally is deeply unpopular.
4. Biden’s commitment to
Beto O’Rourke that he could pursue gun control (recall, O’Rourke wants
compulsory confiscation going door-to-door) will alienate virtually all
Second Amendment supporters.
5. The Democratic mayors and district
attorneys (many elected with George Soros’ money) represent a
pro-criminal future that is exploding into violence. As Democrats
continue to publicly praise soft on crime prosecutors and cry “defund
the police,” the choice in November will become pro-police vs.
pro-criminal, and there is a huge majority against violence.
6.
The teachers’ unions own the Democratic Party, and their blackmail
approach to reopening schools is isolating them from Americans.
Remember: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis earned 18 percent of Black female
votes against a Black Democratic opponent on the issue of school choice.
Editor Note
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are both liars and losers.
The democrates know there must be massive voter fraud to elect bide/harris in Nov 2020.
The democrates are counting on ballot harvesting and mail in voter fraud to win the election.
There will be massive voter fraud in Nov 2020 by the democrates.
If President Trump can overcome the massive voter fraud by the democrates in nov 2020 he will be reelected.
This is why the democrates are doing everything they can to allow ballot harvesting and mail in voting.
Absentee voting is not mail in voting and is a valid way to vote.
Absentee voting can be verified.
Ballot harvesting and mail in ballot voting CANNOT be verified and is prone to massive abuse and FRAUD!
Joe biden and kamala harris are certified LIARS.
Joe biden is a basket case. Horizontal harris is not helping him get elected but will only add to his and her defeat.
The GoFundMe page reads: "Millie Weaver, the popular independent journalist, was arrested today in a shocking raid. There is cell phone footage of the arrest, Millie repeatedly asks what the arrest is for, with police providing no answers. Whatever the case, we know Millie will need financial help — to pay for a lawyer and other expenses."
Millie Weaver reveals and unpacks the ShadowNet in this full length documentary. - As of this morning, she was arrested by swat team for what you're about to see.
1 Hr 17 Min Video Documentary about the real deep state and how they are a shadow government controlling the fake news media, riots, corona virus etc.
There are two governments.
The deep state shadow government includes members of congress.
The deep state shadow government is opposing President Trump and all his efforts to save this country from the deep state shadow government plan to destroy America and its institutions etc.
Democrats Running Clandestine PSYOP To Overthrow Trump
Short video about an in depth report on IIA, or Interactive Internet Activities, psychological operations (PSYOPS) ran on social media. Originally designed for military use in foreign conflicts by cyber-security contractors, it is now being deployed by the Democrat party here in the United States to destroy the Trump administration.
Editor Note
The deep state shadow government which includes members of congress and others in and outside of the US government are controlling all the FAKE news you are seeing daily.
Paid government contractors are controlling the fake news cycle.
The democrate machine includes many funding sources and their biggest cash cow is the group black lives matter web site and others. They have unlimited funds to deceive the American public about the covid-19 virus cure, mail in voting, the failed coup to impeach Trump etc etc.
From now Aug 15 until election day Nov 3, 2020 the FAKE news the Interactive Internet Activities, psychological operations (PSYOPS) on social media will continue and increase.
American is in a psychological operations (PSYOPS) war that has the sole purpose of sstopping President Trump from being reelected.
American lives don't matter to the democrates and the deep state shadow government that is trying to overthrow the real US government.
President Trump is totally aware of this.
He has warned America about the deep state.
He has spoken of a cure for the covid-19 Hydroxychloroquine.
He has told us about the group called black lives matter and its communist agenda.
He has warned us about mail in balloting with no way to check the authenticity of any mail in ballot. I am not talking about absentee ballots which can be authenticated. He has warned us that the elected will not be decided on Nov 3, 2020 President Trump has warned us that democrate voter fraud in various forms will cause a delay in the Presidential outcome.
Litigation will cause the Presidential election results to be delayed because of massive voter fraud by the democrates.
In 2000 the presidential outcome was delayed one and one half months.
The supreme court decided the outcome.
The US Constitution lays out the procedure for resolving the Presidential election if there is a problem deciding who won the election. In Nov 2020 we will not wait one and a half months as before to be TOLD who won the election. Notice I said be TOLD in caps. The supreme court will step in and decide the election BEFORE congress can decide the election. This is because under the rules of the US Constitution and how it spells out how the House Of Representatives will actually vote for the Preident in a dispute CANNOT be allowed to happen by the democrates. The house presidential vote does not allow for every member of the house to vote in a vote of who will become president. The vote is by state congressional delegations. The Republicans have a MAJORITY of congressional delegations that will vote to elect President Trump if they were given the chance. They won't be given the chance to elect president Trump. The supreme court and john roberts will make sure this does not happen. I don't have a crystal ball. I can guess at the outcome of the Presidential election 2020. If by a miracle President Trump wins a majority of electors this will not happen. If President Trump does not win a majority of electors the election I suspect will be decided by the john roberts supreme court. John roberts is part of the deep state shadow government also.
A slew of newly-elected officials were sworn into office in Washington, D.C., Jan. 3, 2017 including several Indian Americans.
Kamala Harris, D-Calif. The former state attorney general won the U.S. Senate election Nov. 8 2016 becoming the first Indian American U.S. senator.
Harris, 52, was sworn in by Vice President Joe Biden.
Note she was sworn in as the first Indian American U.S.Senator not as a black woman.
She now claims she is a black woman.
She is a woman of color as they say, an Indian woman not a black woman.
CNN and MSNBC will call her a black woman as she now says she is.
She has dropped the title as an Indian woman.
Kamala Harris is a fraud just like Joe Biden.
Both can't be trusted and both don't tell the truth.
She identity politics has transformed her ethnicity overnight.
Kamala Harris and Willie Brown
Kamala Harris was grandstanding again as she tried to bully Attorney
General Jeff Sessions on Capitol Hill. Sessions, with his smooth
southern drawl, outsmarted and outclassed Harris, who came off as a
screaming shrew, and it’s no wonder with her tawdry past.
Harris has a
dirty little sex secret that is coming back to haunt her, but that’s not
all. She has a long line of corrupt deals, one with Maxine Waters, that
helped her get power and stay in power.
If there ever was a swamp creature in Washington, D.C., it is Kamala
Harris.
In fact, she is the poster politician for all swamp creatures.
Harris has been trying to make a name for herself by screaming and
bullying two of the good guys left in D.C., Admiral Mike Rogers and Jeff
Sessions.
Well, the junior senator from California didn’t come out
unscathed, as her dirty little sex secret has come out.
Brown was 60 years old and Harris was 29 when
their affair began. Harris was so brazen that she came out publicly as
his date at his 60th birthday party, despite his wife of 36 years being
in attendance.
Kamala Harris began her political career as Willie Brown's mistress.
Harris slept with Brown for one reason; she used the corrupt San Francisco mayor to launch her rise to power.
Daily Caller reports,
“As Brown’s time as speaker drew to a close in 1994, he named Harris to
the California Medical Assistance Commission, a job that came with a
$72,000 annual salary. Brown had previously appointed her to the state
Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board.”
She “was described by several people at the Capitol as Brown’s girlfriend,” the Los Angeles Times
reported at the time.
Although that job paid nearly $98,000, Harris’
term was set to expire in five weeks when Brown tapped her for the
Medical Assistance Commission slot. That body met only monthly, and the
$72,000 position was not considered a full-time job.
Willie Brown is a sleaze-bag who led one of the most corrupt mayoral
offices ever seen in San Fransico, but that was fine with Harris, who
went on to steal the election for California’s Attorney General in 2010.
“Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley led Harris by 34,000 votes
after more than 7 million were counted. But after provisional ballots
were counted, she was declared the winner by approximately 50,000
votes,” reports Daily Caller.
At one point, Cooley was up by 62,000 votes, and in panic mode,
Harris reached out to her good buddy California Secretary of State Debra
Bowen, whose role was to certify the votes. That’s when thousands of
Cooley’s votes just disappeared.
Kamala Harris’ path to power is strewn with illicit affairs and
fraudulent elections, and in desperation, she paid Maxine Waters’
daughter Karen $63,000 dollars to appear on mailers with Auntie Maxine. Washington Free Beacon
reports, “The payments were made from Harris’s campaign committee and
transferred to Waters’s campaign committee through a lucrative ‘slate
mailer’ operation run by Waters’s daughter, a program that has proved
profitable for both her daughter and the campaign.”
Liberal loons are grasping at straws on social media, hailing Harris
as the savior they need, and anyone who questions their new “it” girl
gets called a racist and a misogynist. Harris is nothing that any little
girl should aspire to be; she is just another swamp creature who got
there by having sex with a 60-year-old buffoon.
Most people don’t know about how former San Fransico Mayor Willie Brown
enriched his 30-year-old lover, Kamala Harris, in a money scheme. It’s
the one dirty secret the Harris campaign is hoping to keep under wraps.
Now that CNN suggested Joe could “step aside” for Kamala if they win,
Americans must know the truth.
Full length article| Volume 97, P396-403, August 01, 2020
Treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone decreased the mortality hazard ratio by 66% (p < 0.001), and hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin decreased the mortality hazard ratio by 71% (p < 0.001).
Results
Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4–10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53–76 years), 51% male, 56% African American, with median time to follow-up of 28.5 days (IQR:3–53). Overall in-hospital mortality was 18.1% (95% CI:16.6%–19.7%); by treatment: hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin, 157/783 (20.1% [95% CI: 17.3%–23.0%]), hydroxychloroquine alone, 162/1202 (13.5% [95% CI: 11.6%–15.5%]), azithromycin alone, 33/147 (22.4% [95% CI: 16.0%–30.1%]), and neither drug, 108/409 (26.4% [95% CI: 22.2%–31.0%]).
Primary cause of mortality was respiratory failure (88%); no patient had documented torsades de pointes. From Cox regression modeling, predictors of mortality were age>65 years (HR:2.6 [95% CI:1.9–3.3]), white race (HR:1.7 [95% CI:1.4–2.1]), CKD (HR:1.7 [95%CI:1.4–2.1]), reduced O2 saturation level on admission (HR:1.5 [95%CI:1.1–2.1]), and ventilator use during admission (HR: 2.2 [95%CI:1.4–3.3]).
Hydroxychloroquine provided a 66% hazard ratio reduction, and hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin 71% compared to neither treatment (p < 0.001).
Conclusions and relevance
In this multi-hospital assessment, when controlling for COVID-19 risk factors, treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin was associated with reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality.
Read the complete study that proves hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin was associated with reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality.
The FDA is not telling your the full story about hydroxychloroquine nor the truth.
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are FDA-approved to treat or prevent malaria.
Hydroxychloroquine is also FDA-approved to treat autoimmune conditions such as chronic discoid lupus erythematosus, systemic lupus erythematosus in adults, and rheumatoid arthritis.
It has been used for many years safely to treat people.
The FDA is using a flawed study to caution about the use of Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of covid-19.
Pseudo-Science behind the Assault on Hydroxychloroquine
Summary
Scientific literature on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin (AZ), and their use for COVID-19. My conclusions:
HCQ-based treatments are effective in treating COVID-19, unless started too late.
Studies, cited in opposition, have been misinterpreted, invalid, or worse.
HCQ and AZ are some of the most tested and safest prescription drugs.
Severe COVID-19 frequently causes cardiac effects, including heart arrhythmia. QTc prolonging drugs might amplify this tendency. Millions of people regularly take drugs having strong QTc prolongation effect, and neither FDA nor CDC bother to warn them. HCQ+AZ combination, probably has a mild QTc prolongation effect. Concerns over its negative effects, however minor, can be addressed by respecting contra-indications.
Effectiveness of HCQ-based treatment for COVID-19 is hampered by conditions that are presented as precautions, delaying the onset of treatment. For examples, some states require that COVID-19 patients be treated with HCQ exclusively in hospital settings.
The COVID-19 Treatment Panel of NIH evaded disclosure of the massive financial links of its members to Gilead Sciences, the manufacturer of a competing drug remdesivir. Among those who failed to disclose such links are 2 out of 3 of its co-chairs.
Despite all the attempts by certain authorities to prevent COVID-19 treatment with HCQ and HCQ+AZ, both components are approved by FDA, and doctors can prescribe them for COVID-19.
Intro
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was accepted as a COVID-19 treatment by the medical community in the US and worldwide by early April. 67% of the US physicians said they would prescribe HCQ or chloroquine CQ for COVID-19 to a family member (Town Hall, 2020-04-08). An international poll of doctors rated HCQ the most effective coronavirus treatment (NY Post, 2020-04-02). On April 6, Peter Navarro told CNN that “Virtually Every COVID-19 Patient In New York Is Given Hydroxychloroquine.” This might explain decrease in COVID-19 deaths in the New York state after April 15. The time lag is because COVID-19 deaths happen on average 14 days after showing symptoms.
But on April 21, several perfectly coordinated events took place, attacking HCQ’s use for COVID-19 patients.
The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel of the National Institute of Health issued recommendations with negative-ambivalent stance regarding the use of HCQ as a COVID-19 treatment. This surprising stance was taken contrary to the ample evidence of the efficacy and safety of HCQ and despite absence evidence of its harm. The panel also strongly recommended against the use of hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin (AZ), the combination of choice among practitioners.
On the same day, a paper (Magagnoli, 2020) was posted on a pre-print server medRxiv, insinuating that HCQ is not only ineffective, but even harmful. This not-yet peer reviewed paper, by unqualified authors with conflicts of interest, received wall-to-wall media coverage, as it if were a cancer cure. It used data from Veterans Administration hospitals, spicing its effects. The paper has shown to be somewhere between junk science and fraud.
Rick Bright, a government official who was probably more responsible for the low level of preparedness to the epidemic than most others, and had been re-assigned to a lower position earlier, emerged as a “whistleblower.” He claimed he had been demoted for opposing hydroxychloroquine, the claim to be soon debunked by documents bearing his signature. The media also gave him a wall-to-wall coverage.
On April 24, the FDA struck its own blow, issuing a stern warning against use of HCQ for COVID-19 treatment.
While these warnings are not binding to doctors, they do produce a chilling effect. Consequently, either patients do not receive necessary treatment, or they receive it with a delay, sharper decreasing its effect. This allows detractors to question HCQ efficacy even more aggressively. Below, I review problems in the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines and other sources, used to wage anti-HCQ propaganda.
NIH Panel Guidelines
The relevant section of (COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel, 2020) is Potential Antiviral Drugs. The antiviral treatment recommendations (more accurately, failure to provide recommendations) include:
“Remdesivir
There are insufficient clinical data to recommend either for or against the use of the investigational antiviral agent remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 (AIII).
Clinical Data to Date: Only anecdotal data are available.“ “AIII” means a strong position based on expert opinion rather than on evidence.
“Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine
There are insufficient clinical data to recommend either for or against using chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 (AIII).
When chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine is used, clinicians should monitor the patient for adverse effects (AEs), especially prolonged QTc interval (AIII).
Clinical Data in COVID-19 The clinical data available to date on the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 have been mostly from use in patients with mild, and in some cases, moderate disease; data on use of the drugs in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 are very limited. [Follows is a description of some studies]“
Notice that CQ and HCQ are addressed together, although these are two different drugs, and HCQ is clearly superior to CQ both in efficiency and safety.
Also notice that the basic recommendation of “insufficient clinical data to recommend either for or against” is given to both HCQ and Remdesivir. However, the recommendation for HCQ goes further to state that when using HCQ, “clinicians should monitor the patient for adverse effects (AEs), especially prolonged QTc interval”. Practically, this means that HCQ should be used only in hospital settings. No such restrictions are set for Remdesivir, for which there is no clinical data available. It goes against all logic.
The demand to use HCQ only in hospital settings means:
HCQ treatment will be delayed until a patient decides to be admitted to a hospital, thus lowering HCQ’s efficiency
Hospitals will quickly become overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients
Then the Panel nixes HCQ+AZ:
“Hydroxychloroquine plus Azithromycin
The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel recommends against the use of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in the context of a clinical trial (AIII).“
This drug combination is the most effective and widely used treatment for COVID-19, and the Panel recommends against it!
The Panel criticizes some studies of patients’ treatment with HCQ+AZ for the absence of a control group. Stephen McIntyre tweeted about this argument long before the Panel used it: “there’s a very large control group of COVID19 patients not receiving this drug combination: hospitals and morgues are full of them.”
There are only two studies, quoted by the Panel against HCQ+AZ, (Molina, 2020) and (Chorin, 2020). Both are misinterpreted by the Panel.
Molina et al.
Despite (Molina, 2020)’s angry tone and aggressiveness, it reports no results contradicting efficiency of HCQ or HCQ+AZ. The paper describes treatment of 11 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, five of which had cancer, one had AIDS, and almost all were in a bad shape: “at the time of treatment initiation, 10 of the 11 patients had a fever and received nasal oxygen therapy.” Using HCQ+AZ, 10 of the patients’ lives were saved. The article’s point of contention is that when they tested these patients, 5-6 days after the treatment initiation, they still found CoV2 RNA in 8 out of 10. Virus RNA is a molecule. Some viral RNA remains in patients for weeks after full recovery, but it is neither harmful nor infectious. Detecting viral RNA depends on the sensitivity of the testing equipment. The study’s title is No evidence of rapid antiviral clearance or clinical benefit with the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients with severe COVID-19 infection seems to be lost on the Panel.
Chorin et al.
The Panel also quotes (Chorin, 2020) as evidence that HCQ+AZ therapy causes QTc prolongation. QTc prolongation is not a health condition itself, but a warning sign that a person is at higher risk of torsades de pointes (TdP), heart arrhythmia, or tachycardia, which might lead to cardiac arrest and death (Simpson, 2020).
Nevertheless, none of the patients, treated with HCQ+AZ, suffered TdP or arrhythmia. Four patients died, but none of them had an arrhythmia. Other studies, in which COVID-19 patients are treated with HCQ+AZ, reported taking patients off this medicine after QTc exceeds 500ms. But the treatment may have already had its effect at that time or later, while HCQ remained in the bloodstream.
This study has no control group. It provides no information on whether QTc prolongation was caused by the disease or the therapy.
FDA Warning
(FDA WARNING, 2020), issued on April 24, piggybacks on the COVID-19 Panel Guidelines. It says
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can cause abnormal heart rhythms such as QT interval prolongation and a dangerously rapid heart rate called ventricular tachycardia.
This statement is confused, and probably not true about hydroxychloroquine. See below.
Be aware that there are no proven treatments for COVID-19 …
I think that HCQ+AZ is a proven treatment for COVID-19. There is a difference between proven treatment and approved treatment. HCQ+AZ is not approved but proven, because many patients have been treated with this combination and have recovered.
We have reviewed case reports … concerning serious heart-related adverse events and death in patients with COVID-19 receiving hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, either alone or combined with azithromycin or other QT prolonging medicines. These adverse events were reported from the hospital and outpatient settings for treating or preventing COVID-19, and included QT interval prolongation, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, and in some cases death.
These are manifestations of COVID-19! See (Bansal, 2020) and (Wang, et al., 2020). The media hysteria played its role, too. The articles about the supposed dangers of HCQ, with detailed description of the symptoms, triggered complaints even before the April 24 warning. And there are people who tried to self-medicate – in the situation when authorities make it difficult to obtain prescription for HCQ – and took the wrong drug or overdosed. Also, QT interval prolongation is not an event, but an early warning.
To help FDA track safety issues with medicines, we urge patients and health care professionals to report side effects involving hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine or other medicines to the FDA MedWatch program, using the information in the “Contact FDA” box at the bottom of the page.
Such an urging and advertisement guarantee that the FDA will receive mountains of complaints.
HCQ and AZ Safety
HCQ, CQ, and AZ
HCQ & CQ are two different drugs. HCQ is clearly superior to CQ. HCQ has already been selected over CQ. Discussing these two drugs as if they were co-equal in COVID-19 treatment is misleading and a sign of bad faith.
HCQ and AZ are some of the most widely prescribed drugs and have been prescribed for decades. HCQ is as safe as a prescription drug can be. AZ is an antibiotic, and it is as safe as an antibiotic can be.
Because these drugs have been prescribed so widely, their adverse effects have been studied. A few adverse events associated with them have been reported. Combining these few anecdotal cases, some medical researchers have raised some concern, as a precaution. Doctors understand this. Statisticians understand this. But unscrupulous media uses this information to mislead the naïve public and even public figures
Remdisivir is the opposite. It has been developed very recently and has been scarcely used. There is little information about its adverse effects. The corrupt news networks present this lack of evidence of adverse effects as evidence of the absence of adverse effects.
CredibleMeds
The leading objection against HCQ / HCQ+AZ is possible QTc prolongation. Most professionals refer to (CredibleMeds.org, 2020) which puts both HCQ and AZ in the category of Known Risk of TdP (KR).
I think that HCQ was listed in that category by mistake. A review of the literature reveals only few anecdotal cases. Some of them are poisoning by large overdoses of HCQ. Then there are patients who were on HCQ for years, suddenly got sick and recovered when HCQ was withdrawn. While there are millions of people continuously taking HCQ, only a few cases of cardiac events have been reported. Even if HCQ was the cause of these rare cases, which is usually unknown, it is still statistically insignificant. It is much safer than driving. Other antivirals are known to cause QTc prolongation too but are not being pulled from practice. In the case of HCQ, it seems that a precaution principle has prevailed over statistical reasoning and common sense.
AZ is in the KR category, just like many other antibiotics, including Erythromycin. I have never heard of patients requiring QTc monitoring, when taking Erythromycin.
Attention of the Trump Derangement Syndrome crowd: many widely used psycho-active drugs are also listed in the KR category. That includes anti-psychotic Haloperidol, anti-depressants Escitalopram (Cipralex, Lexapro) and Citalopram (Celexa).
American College of Cardiology
The most reliable source of information about arrhythmia risks is the American College of Cardiology. (Simpson, 2020) in the Cardiology Magazine:
Chloroquine, and its more contemporary derivative hydroxychloroquine, have remained in clinical use for more than a half-century as an effective therapy for treatment of some malarias, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis. … Despite these suggestive findings, several hundred million courses of chloroquine have been used worldwide making it one of the most widely used drugs in history, without reports of arrhythmic death under World Health Organization surveillance.
HCQ is even milder than CQ.
Azithromycin, a frequently used macrolide antibiotics lacks strong pharmacodynamic evidence of iKr inhibition [associated with QT prolongation]. Epidemiologic studies have estimated an excess of 47 cardiovascular deaths which are presumed arrhythmic per 1 million completed courses, although recent studies suggest this may be overestimated.
In other words, after over 50 years of effective use, HCQ and AZ have proven their safety and efficacy. There is no reason for fear, except the fear itself. But some people might be vulnerable, so the article explains how to calculate an individual Risk Score for QTc prolongers. Individuals with higher Risk Score might need QTc monitoring. Also, the authors suggest avoiding other QTc prolonging medications in the time of HCQ+AZ treatment.
The cardiologists who wrote this article did not dismiss the concern. They explained the science pertaining to it and suggest proper mitigation measures.
Other literature also suggests low risk of HCQ and AZ. (Prutkin, 2020):
Limited data on hydroxychloroquine suggest it has a low risk of causing TdP, based on its use for rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and antimalarial therapy. … For these medications [HCQ and AZ], their time window of use is short duration, which is another reason the risk of TdP may be lower
HCQ and AZ have other known contra-indications, but they are out of the scope here.
COVID-19 caused Arrhythmia
Many studies show that COVID-19 causes heart arrhythmia. Cardiac arrest, not directly caused by respiratory damage, is one of the leading direct causes of COVID-19 deaths.
(Bansal, 2020) is a review. It finds that
COVID-19 is primarily a respiratory illness but cardiovascular involvement can occur through several mechanisms.
Acute cardiac injury is the most reported cardiovascular abnormality in COVID-19, with average incidence 8-12%
Both tachy- and brady-arrhythmias are known to occur in COVID-19. A study describing clinical profile and outcomes in 138 Chinese patients with COVID-19 reported 16.7% incidence of arrhythmia. The incidence was much higher (44.4%) in those requiring ICU admission …
It also notes that CoV2 virus might cause cardiac injury directly or indirectly. The possibility of a treatment impact is mentioned as a less likely one.
(Wang, et al., 2020) finds that 44% of the patients transferred to ICU developed arrhythmia. None of them received HCQ or CQ. Most of the patients received an unrelated anti-viral and an antibiotic. Only in 18% of the patients the antibiotic was AZ. At least some of the patients developed an arrhythmia before the treatment.
(Hawryluk, 2020):
Doctors have found that the infection can mimic a heart attack. They have taken patients to the cardiac catheterization lab to clear a suspected blockage, only to find the patient wasn’t really experiencing a heart attack but had COVID-19.
Thus, the hypothesis that CVOID-19 patients experience QTc prolongation and arrhythmia because of the disease, rather than due to HCQ+AZ treatment, is well founded. AZ may increase the odds of QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients, who would otherwise die from cardiac arrest or multiple organs failure.
The media and professional publications report a sharp increase of mortality from cardiac arrest at home in the last few weeks. Some of these cases are known to be COVID-19, but most of them are not tested. Could many of them be happening due to the cardiac damage caused by COVID-19? Can the cardiac impact of COVID-19 be aggravated by strong QTc prolongers that many people take regularly? There are countless variables confounding this statistic. There is an especially sharp increase in home cardiac arrests in New York, which is usually explained by people’s reluctance to call an ambulance or ER.
(Kochi, 2020) provides in-depth explanation of the cardiac effects of respiratory infections and interaction with QTc prolongation medications.
If you take the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) as part of your treatment for lupus or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), you may be getting cardiovascular protection as an added bonus.
The article is based on (Jorge, 2019). These findings might be applicable only to long term taking of HCQ, not a 5-day course for COVID-19, but the same can be said about the alleged negative cardiac effects.
Articles/Studies criticizing HCQ
Listed here are several other papers, influential in the media, but not in the science. These papers span the range from erroneous to … non-existent.
Magagnoli et al.
(Magagnoli, 2020) is a not peer-reviewed pre-print. It makes a retrospective statistical comparison of the outcome in COVID-19 patients, who received HCQ or HCQ+AZ treatment prior to April 11, in Veterans Affairs hospitals. In the Abstract, it claims that a larger percentage of HCQ treated patients died compared to untreated patients. This ignores the fact that HCQ or HCQ+AZ treatment was given only in the most desperate cases, frequently as compassionate care. Deep inside of the manuscript, it does acknowledge that initial conditions of the HCQ and HCQ+AZ groups was much worse than those of the untreated group, but then ignores it
The original version (archived) of the “study” was published on April 21. It received crushing criticism in the comments and was replaced with another one on April 23, hiding those comments. Casting even further doubt on the credibility of this study, one of the authors disclosed Gilead funding for another research. This work was funded by a NIH grant.
Despite its multiple flaws, lack of peer review, and obscurity of the authors, this pre-print immediately received wall-to-wall media coverage. Given these circumstances, this work looks like a criminal fraud, rather than a scientific one.
Tang et al.
(Tang, 2020) is a not peer-reviewed pre-print. It reports results of a clinical trial in China, in which HCQ was given to patients 16-17 days after onset of the disease. This is too late for an anti-viral to work. Thus, this study describes the incorrect use of HCQ, rather than efficacy or safety of the drug. From the comments:
With an average delay of 16 days from symptom onset to enrollment and treatment in this trial, those patients are pretty much past the viral phase of the disease, where an antiviral treatment would have the most value, and are well on their way to pneumonia and a cytokine storm problem, which is ultimately what kills.
Once again, despite its obvious errors, the study was widely covered, including the New York Times and LA Times. Neither headline nor article addresses the obvious lateness of the drug’s application.
Mahevas et al.
(Mahevas, 2020) is another not peer-reviewed pre-print. Didier Raoult and his colleagues replied to it with a bluntness, rare in scientific journals: Scientific fraud to demonstrate the lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine compared to placebo in a non-randomized retrospective cohort of patients with Covid: Response to MAHEVAS et al. , MedRxiv, 2020. (Brouqui, et al., 2020). (Mahevas, 2020) also gathered many negative comments on MedRxiv.
Oral Statements of Holtgrave & Cuomo
A study of 600 patients at 22 hospitals in New York is being conducted by the University at Albany School of Public Health under the management of dean David Holtgrave. Although the study was not finished, Mr. Holtgrave already announced that the results are negative: “We don’t see a statistically significant difference between patients who took the drugs [HCQ, HCQ+AZ] and those who did not,” according to CNN. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo referred to the results as neither positive nor negative, per CNN and ABC.
No paper, or even pre-print, reporting these results, has been published, as of April 29 (searches on Google Scholar, PubMed, and medRxiv were conducted for Holtgrave hydroxychloroquine; Holtgrave COVID-19).
New York and other “resistance” states make patients jump through hoops to obtain HCQ. As an anti-viral, it should be taken as soon as possible. Dr. Vladimir Zelenko explained that in his letter, which is worth reading in its entirety:
It is essential to start treatment against Covid-19 immediately upon clinical suspicion of infection and not to wait for confirmatory testing. There is a very narrow window of opportunity to eliminate the virus before pulmonary complications begin. The waiting to treat is the essence of the problem.
He refers to patients in the high-risk category – older than 60, having certain health conditions, or shortness of breath. The resistance states established onerous requirements that delay HCQ treatment for days. This sharply lowers the efficiency of the treatment, and possibly increases TdP risks. The mixed results, promised by Mr. Holtgrave, might be caused by this delay.
Russia
On March 28, Russia announced a COVID-19 treatment based on Mefloquine. Mefloquine, invented in the US in 1970s, is another anti-malaria drug, similar to HCQ. In the West, Mefloquine was withdrawn from use after a controversy about its long-term effects. Russia might also use HCQ. From a Russian brochure (Nikiforov, 2020):
These drugs have a comprehensive negative effect on the coronavirus. It may take years of scientific experimentation to understand how and what exactly they affect. Now the fact of a positive effect has been established, and the drugs should and will be used.
The mechanisms of HCQ and HCQ+AZ action are explained (Hache & Raoult, 2020).
WHO
On March 27, WHO erected another roadblock to treating COVID-19 patients with HCQ. WHO stated that HCQ was not only insufficiently tested (which was true at that time), but that it was considered for COVID-19 at much higher doses than for malaria.
In the context of the COVID-19 response, the dosage and treatment schedules for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine that are currently under consideration do not reflect those used for treating patients with malaria. The ingestion of high doses of these medicines may be associated with adverse or seriously adverse health outcomes.
This is dangerous misinformation. HCQ dosage for COVID-19 is the same or lower than for malaria (Drugs.com, 2019). WHO was aware of this, because it was already conducting clinical trials including HCQ and a number of other Big Pharma drugs. Yet, as of April 29, this paragraph still appears there. This act alone justifies not only defunding but ignoring WHO.
Google and Facebook adhered to WHO on everything related to COVID-19. Together with Twitter, they purged information favorable to HCQ. These is outrageous behavior for telecommunications and computational services providers.
Remarks
It seems that the main contra-indication for HCQ treatment of COVID-19 is that no treatment is needed for healthy individuals below age 50.
Persons in the President’s circle were claiming that HCQ / HCQ+AZ are unproven treatments. That might have been true a month ago, but not now. These drugs are proven by practice and by failure of its opponents to disprove their efficacy and relative safety.
The Guidelines are accompanied by a financial disclosure of the panel members. Weirdly, this disclosure covers a period of 11 months: May 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020. The latest three weeks were excluded for some reason. Nevertheless, 9 out of 50 members of the panel disclosed financial ties to Gilead. Gilead’s Remdesivir is an inferior competitor to HCQ – more expensive, almost untested, and less efficient (as far as the little testing with it has shown). HCQ is a generic drug with low profit margin. Gilead Sciences directly participates in WHO trials of Remdesivir as a COVID-19 treatment.
HCQ / HCQ+AZ are prescribed by a doctor. They are not OTC and should not be used for self-medication.
HCQ+AZ is the most common treatment. HCQ acts on its own but is much more effective with Zinc; AZ is an antibiotic and a source of Zinc. See Dr. Zelenko’s regimen is HCQ+AZ+Zinc.
Americas Frontline Doctors know Hydroxychloroquine Saves Lives and they want you to know the TRUTH!
The cure is hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin and ZITHROMAX (azithromycin) in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.
Zithromax and hydroxychloroquine are the cure for the corona virus/covid-19.
These 2 drugs must be taken when you first get symptoms of the covid-19.
The Virology Journal - the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health
- published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading - get ready for this - “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.”
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
The government and coroprations who are now and in the future are making money from the induced corona pandemic don't want you to know the truth about the cure for covid-19.
The covid-19 virus is also being used as a political weapon by the communist democrats.
The result is panic, destruction of the US economy and the needless deaths of thousands via the covid-19 virus because the government, mass media, social media are lying about the cure for the corna virus.
President Trump has been telling the American public about the cure for the covid-19.
Americas Frontline Doctors and others have been telling the American public about the cure but twitter, facebook and other social media platforms have removed much of this live saving information and labled it as not true when in fact Hydroxychloroquine Saves Lives and has been proven to save lives when it is taken at the onset of the covid-19 infection.
Hydroxychloroquine has been shown to save lives wherever it is used
Listen to what these doctors have to say. Their advice is saving lives. You need to know if your doctor is hiding the cure or afraid to tell you the truth. These doctors are telling you the truth. I suggest you heed their advice because big tech and social media are hiding this video.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks. The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus.
Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Dr. Didier Raoult, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “it’s game over” for coronavirus.
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “rare and minor” adverse events. “In conclusion,” these researchers write, “we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.”
The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort. HCQ wasn’t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent. Plus, HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc, which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective. At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.
But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6, the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit, and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas.
Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March 20, when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.
On March 23, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100% success rate. That’s not the “anecdotal” evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at, but actual results with real patients in clinical settings.
“Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”
Said Dr. Zelenko:
“If you scale this nationally, the economy will rebound much quicker. The country will open again. And let me tell you a very important point. This treatment costs about $20. That’s very important because you can scale that nationally. If every treatment costs $20,000, that’s not so good.
All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.”
The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree. If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn’t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms, as Dr. Zelenko has done? Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place. To paraphrase Jesus, it’s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick. And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.
While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection, from a medical standpoint, this is stupid. Said one doctor, “As a physician, this baffles me. I can’t think of a single infectious condition — bacterial, fungal, or viral — where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced.”
So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9, by which time 33,000 people had died.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak - caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV - the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks. The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2.
While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
The Virology Journal - the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health
- published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading - get ready for this - “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.”
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Dr. Didier Raoult, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “it’s game over” for coronavirus.
The bottom line or what you need to know most is that THERE IS A CURE FOR covid-19!!
You also need to know the mass media and social media are trying their best to hide this cure information by not allowing the truth to be published by doctors on social media and or trying to discredit valid proven information about the cure for the corna virus.
The cure is hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin and ZITHROMAX (azithromycin) in the
treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early
impairment of contagiousness.
Zithromax and hydroxychloroquine are the cure for the corona virus/covid-19.
These 2 drugs must be taken when you first get symptoms of the covid-19.
If you doctor tells you you have covid-19 and sends you home for 14 days and you do not take these drugs he just as well should be telling you to go home and get sicker everyday until the covid-19 virus puts you into the ICU.
Some doctors out of ignorance or fear of prescribing the drug hydroxychloroquine for treatment of covid-19 will not perscribe what you need.
Hydroxychloroquine has been safely taken by millions for many years for various purposes.
The US government is telling doctors to not perscribe hydroxychloroquine based on flawed studies where this drug was given in much to big of doses and at the wrong times.
The FDA is using these studies as an excuse to keep hydroxychloroquine from your doctor and you.
Doctors on the front lines who see patients with the covid-19 have reported that hydroxychloroquine in combination with zithromax and zinc, is an ABSOLUTE cure for the corona virus!
Everyone should be taking zinc supplements everyday.
You can also get this in many multivitamins. Just read the labels.
Azithromycin (Info On what it is and what it does.)
Like America's Front Line Doctors are telling you, there is no need for anyone to die from the corona virus.
This is the information Dr Fauchy does NOT want you to know.
This is the information the pharmaceutical companies and the FDA don't want you to know.
There is a cure for covid-19.
Hydroxychloroquine can also be taken as a preventive measure to protect from getting the covid-19 according to America's Frontline Doctors https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/
These doctors want you to live.
The mass media, social media, people who don't want you to know the truth that there is a cure for covid-19, don't want you to live!
