I research news articles and comment. The deep state includes corrupt state and local officials.
Some links are out of date on this blog and information on some of these links has changed.
1803 posts are too many to go through and change a link that is bad or has been purchased by someone other than me.
The Information on links I no longer own or control, I am not in no way responsible for what is on the link. Just beware.
Today I am announcing I have accepted the expose obama valor medal. It is awarded to extraordinary individuals who presist in the effort to expose the usurper imposter barack hussein obama.
Those who are awarded this medal can be proud of their efforts to educate ignorant Americans about obama's identity.
I have been awarded this medal on behalf of those who defy logic. Americans who have been fed obama propaganda though the state run media and believe obama is real.
The center for circumvention of those that defy logic awards this coveted medal on a case by case basis.
My award reads:
Because of your continued efforts to expose the traitor obama by refuting obvious lies you have succeeded in propagating absolutes which those who would destroy this country abhor.
Absolutes are tools to be used to destroy the propaganda machine of obama and tax free foundations who fund covert subversion of the US through grants.
It is with extreme gratitude and honor the Center For Circumvention Of Those That Defy Logic awards you Story Reports the Expose obama Valor Medal. Display it with pride.
Committee Chairman,
Ino Thatsright
Qua Ortus Certificate?
This medal can be worn by an imposter according to the 9th circus court of appeals.
Although it can be displayed by an imposter the imposter will be exposed if you contact story reports and find out he is the only one that been awarded this high honor.
Obama’s White House Press Corps warned about asking certain questions By Wayne Madsen Online Journal Contributing Writer
Jan 5, 2010
(WMR) -- WMR has learned from a veteran member of the White House Press Corps that the Obama administration has made it known through White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and other White House Communications officials that certain questions posed by the reporters who cover the White House are definitely off-limits.
On the banned list are any questions about Obama’s post-Columbia University employment with Business International Corporation (BIC), a global financial and political information company that WMR previously reported was a front for the CIA.
White House Press Corps members have been quietly told that any questions related to BIC, Obama’s withheld records while he was a student at Occidental College in Los Angeles from 1979 to 1981, or his records at Columbia, are forbidden. At the same time he was attending Occidental, Obama, using the name Barry Soetoro and an Indonesian passport issued under the same name, traveled to Pakistan during the U.S. buildup to assist the Afghan mujaheddin.
WMR has learned from informed sources in Kabul that Obama has been extremely friendly, through personal correspondence on White House letterhead, with a private military company that counts among its senior personnel a number of Afghan mujaheddin-Soviet war veterans who fought alongside the late Northern Alliance commander Ahmad Shah Masood. The firm is also involved in counter-insurgency operations in Colombia, where Obama is building seven new military bases, and Iraq.
In 1981, Obama spent time in Jacobabad and Karachi, Pakistan, and appeared to have an older American “handler,” possibly a CIA officer. WMR previously reported that Obama also crossed the border from Pakistan and spent some time in India. At the time of Obama’s stay in Pakistan, the country was being built up as a base for the anti-Soviet Afghan insurgency by President Carter’s National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and later by President Reagan’s CIA director William Casey.
Obama has suspiciously refused to release his transcripts from Occidental or Columbia University and he has remained cagey about his post-Columbia employment with BIC.
The word from the White House Press Corps is that if anyone were to ask Obama about BIC or possible past CIA work, domestically or abroad, the offending reporter would see a quick pulling of the White House press credential.
The White House website states the following about openness and transparency by the Obama administration:
“My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.
Check out the Obama signature on the form and compare to BO’s “known” signature. They don’t match. Barack Obama DID NOT submit this Selective Service application. It is a forged signature and an attempt at a coverup to make it look like Obama registered.
Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory
(The excerpt below is from the Linda Bentley's story of barry soetoro's selective service registration FRAUD and documents the fact selective service records were created after obama says he registered and were later changed to coverup the fact that he never registered! More documented evidence obama is a foreign agent usurper posing as president! The more I read about obama's known records the more I see an entensive coverup of public documents that have surfaced. Every known public document is in question. Every public document is FAKED! If there are any private documents they must be FAKED also.
Obama's social security number is also in question. Obama has a social security number of a dead man. How can this be? The one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time ) Story Reports
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues .......................................................................................... It became obvious selective service records were created after the fact for Obama and were later changed. However, the computer access date is frozen on Sept. 9, 2008; two days after Obama appeared on Stephanopoulos’ show saying he registered with SS in 1979 when the requirement was nonexistent.
The mistakes made by adding to and changing the fraudulently created record after Coffman’s FOIA request was fulfilled but before the Allen’s was received, provides an audit trail of the fraud. ........................................................................................... Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory
A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed
ARLINGTON, Va. – On Sept. 7, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama appeared on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” and stated, “I had to sign up for Selective Service (SS) when I graduated from high school … And I actually always thought of the military as an ennobling and, you know, honorable option. But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam War had come to an end. We weren’t engaged in active military conflict at that point. And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue.”
Some people did keep in mind that he graduated in 1979 and noted the registration requirement was suspended in April 1975 by President Gerald Ford and wasn’t reinstituted until 1980 by President Jimmy Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The Military Selective Service Act required men born in the calendar year 1961 to register on any of the six days beginning Monday, July 28, 1980.
On Oct. 13, 2008, J. Stephen Coffman, a retired federal agent, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the SS for a copy of Obama’s SS registration form. His FOIA request was processed on Oct. 29, 2008, two days after the SS claimed it was received.
Coffman received a copy of Obama’s registration form along with a copy of the computer inquiry screen, which showed an access date of Sept. 9, 2008, several weeks prior to Coffman’s request.
It was accompanied by a letter from Richard S. Flahavan, associate director for public affairs and intergovernmental affairs, who stated, “Also, the enclosed computer inquiry screen indicates that his registration number is 61-1125539-1, as previously provided to you.”
The computer printout shows a transaction date of Sept. 4, 1980 (the date Obama’s July 29, 1980 registration was entered into the system) with a last action date of Sept. 4, 1980, signifying nothing else had been received or entered since the original Sept. 4, 1980 registration form.
Coffman found it peculiar his request, according to the computer printout date, was processed on Sept. 9, 2008, several weeks prior to submitting his request.
On Feb. 9, 2009, Kenneth Allen submitted a FOIA request for the same records. He received a response, also from Flavahan, dated March 4, 2009.
Flavahan said a copy of Obama’s SS registration was enclosed along with “the resultant automated file screen,” adding, “Mr. Obama did indeed register with the Selective Service and was assigned Selective Service Number 61-1125539-1 on Sept. 4, 1980.”
The 10-digit Document Locator Number (DLN) 0897080632 is printed or stamped across the top right hand corner of the registration form.
The computer printout provided to Coffman displayed an 11-digit DLN of 8089 708 0632. The computer printouts provided to both Allen and Coffman are both dated Sept. 9, 2008. The copy of the registration form provided to Allen and Coffman are identical.
However, Allen’s computer printout is titled “Registrant File Inquiry Report” while Coffman’s is titled “RIMS History Inquiry Screen.”
And, the DLN on the computer printout received by Allen, also an 11-digit number, reads: 0897 080 6320.
So, while Coffman’s printout had an eight added to the beginning, Allen’s had a zero added to the end.
Once issued, DLNs do not change.
Even though the inquiry screen indicates Allen’s request was processed on Sept. 9, 2008, just like Coffman’s, it reflects a last action date of June 25, 1991, showing a Form 50 change letter had been received and entered then. Records provided to Coffman reflected no such action.
The post office round date stamp on Obama’s registration form also raised legitimacy concerns. The stamp displays “USPO Honolulu, HI Makiki Sta.” with “Jul 29 80” stamped in the center of the circle on three lines. However, the two-digit year is stamped off center as if it should have been a four-digit date.
Last week Sonoran News received a response to a FOIA request for 17 SS records for the purpose of making comparisons.
Every single one of them has a four-digit year stamp, including two registrations processed at the very same post office, one within days of Obama’s.
In fact, Bruce Henderson, now deceased, whose birthday was also in August 1961, registered on Aug. 2, 1980 at the Makiki station and his SS number is 61-1125522-7, just 27 numbers apart from Obama’s.
The 10-digit DLN on his registration form reads: 0897080613 and the 11-digit DLN on the computer printout reads: 0897 080 6130, indicating a zero had been added to the end.
Henderson’s registration was also entered in the same batch as Obama’s on Sept. 4, 1980. Our FOIA request was initially made in October 2009, but after receiving neither a response nor an acknowledgement, a subsequent request was made in December 2009 via certified mail, the receipt of which was promptly acknowledged.
The request was fulfilled by Paula Sweeney from the office of public and intergovernmental affairs and the computer printouts are dated Jan. 15, 2010 and Jan. 20, 2010.
Every single one of the registrations processed in 1980 had a zero added to the end of the DLN on the computer printout, a practice that appears to have changed subsequent to that time.
In fact, a registration dated March 1, 1982 with a 10-digit DLN of 2120360884 stamped on the registration form, has an 11-digit DLN of 8212 036 0884 entered in the computer, which appears to be consistent with registrations added after 1980, and possibly not until 1982.
It became obvious records were created after the fact for Obama and were later changed. However, the computer access date is frozen on Sept. 9, 2008; two days after Obama appeared on Stephanopoulos’ show saying he registered with SS in 1979 when the requirement was nonexistent.
The mistakes made by adding to and changing the fraudulently created record after Coffman’s FOIA request was fulfilled but before the Allen’s was received, provides an audit trail of the fraud.
It would appear Flahavan, who processed both requests, should have caught the glaring incongruities. Instead, he got cocky in his letter to Allen by proclaiming, “Mr. Obama did indeed register with Selective Service …”
The SS website proclaims, “Registration is the law. A man who fails to register may, if prosecuted and convicted, face a fine of up to $250,000 and/or a prison term of up to five years.”
It goes on to say, “Even if not tried, a man who fails to register with Selective Service before turning age 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed,” including federal student loans or grant programs.
A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the executive branch of the federal government, which includes president of the United States.
Registration is also a condition for U.S. citizenship if the man first arrived in the United States before his 26th birthday.
If Obama arrived in Hawaii as a citizen of Indonesia, as his school records and mother’s divorce records indicate, and he didn’t register with SS, he could have been barred from obtaining U.S. citizenship and may not be one now.
However, those covering up Obama’s tracks have done a sloppy job, which means there really is a conspiracy to defraud the American people, not just a theory.
Did Obama actually ever register with the Selective Service? If so, did he register late? If he registered at all, which birth certificate did he present? Would the COLB shown during the 2008 presidential campaign have been enough?
The Sonoran News has stated that “It became obvious records were created after the fact for Obama and were later changed.”
Why has this record been made available to the public through FOIA requests, but his birth certificate, college records, school records, medical records, and passport records have not?
Was an amendment to Obama’s Selective Service file made in 1991 or not?
Why are there two different DLNs for the same SS record?
Why was the record accessed on September 9, 2008, two days after Obama appeared on national TV during the campaign discussing his registration with the Selective Service? Could any FOIA requests resulting from the television interview already have been received at that time by Mr. Flahavan’s office? Was someone trying to cover for Obama and therefore accessed his file soon after his public misstatement of fact?
(A new term needs to be made for those who believe obama also doesn't have a selective service record. ie birth certificate = birther.
Obama Crimes is the latest news on the cases of Phil J. Berg concerning the eligibility of President B.H. Soetoro/Obama. Obama Crimes
Berg Files a Petition for Rehearing Court EN BANC in the Case of Berg as Relator vs. Obama * * * No Surprise that Attorney General Holder Will “not” Prosecute “blacks” in Voting Rights Cases as he has Refused to Prosecute Obama in this False Claims Act Case
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 08/08/2010) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “Constitutional qualifications” to serve as President of the United States. The Policy of United States Attorney General Eric Holder not to prosecute “blacks” in voting rights cases should be no surprise as A.G. Holder has refused to prosecute Barack Hussein Obama in the False Claims Act [Qui Tam] case of Berg as Relator vs. Obama.
Berg said, “The United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, his offices and staff, including the Department of Justice have a clear Conflict-of-Interest in any type of prosecution against Obama.”
“This type case is usually utilized in Medicaid and Medicare cases where fraud is alleged. In the case against Obama, I set forth that Obama is not “natural born” or “naturalized” but an “illegal alien” and therefore, his term as a United States Senator from Illinois was fraud and the salary and benefits Obama received must be returned to the United States Treasury, an amount in excess of One [$1] Million Dollars. I base my claim on the fact that Obama was adopted/acknowledged by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, in Indonesia and Obama’s legal name became “Barry Soetoro.” At age ten [10] when he returned to Hawaii, I allege that he did not go through U.S. Immigration on a U.S. Passport, but did so on his Indonesia Passport, therefore, an “illegal alien.” Also, I allege that “Barry Soetoro” [former Barrack Hussein Obama] has never legally changed his name and therefore, he has committed ongoing fraud by using Barrack Hussein Obama.
“The United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, reports directly to the alleged violator, Soetoro/Obama; gives opinions and legal advice to the alleged violator, Soetoro/Obama; was senior legal advisor to Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential campaign; and served as one of three [3] members on Obama’s Vice-Presidential Selection Committee and thus a major Conflict-of-Interest existed and still exists with my, Berg’s, False Claim or Qui Tam Case.”
Berg’s False Claims Act [Qui Tam] Case was originally filed in the United States District Court, District of Columbia at the end of 2008. The U.S. District Court Dismissed the Qui Tam Action and failed to respond to the issue of the Conflict-of- Interest. Berg Appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, who on June 30, 2010, upheld the District Court’s ruling and in so doing stated that Berg failed to demonstrate that the Department of Justice and the Attorney General, Eric Holder, have a Conflict-of-Interest. This simply is not the case.
Government employees are required to comply with the Code of Federal Regulations, which clearly spell out the issue of Conflict-of-Interest. Just to name a few, Eric Holder’s placement with Obama through Obama’s campaign are in violation of the Code of Federal Regulations; the fact Eric Holder reports directly to Obama, the violator, spells out a clear Conflict-of-Interest under the Code of Federal Regulations; the fact Eric Holder gives opinions and legal advice to the alleged violator, is a clear Conflict-of-Interest under the Code of Federal Regulations; the fact Eric Holder was the Senior Legal Advisor to Obama’s Presidential campaign violates the Code of Federal Regulations under Conflict-of-Interests; and the fact Eric Holder served as one of three [3] members on Obama’s Vice-Presidential Selection Committee are all clear Conflict-of-Interests in violation of the Code of Federal Regulations.
For this reason, Berg has filed a Petition for Rehearing En Banc with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. When a case is brought to the United States Appellate Court, the matter or a three-Judge panel hears matters complained of. When you request a rehearing En Banc, you are asking for the majority of active Circuit Judges to rehear the case En Banc.
Many Appellate Courts, who have a large number of Judges and a large caseload, will divide the Cases (Appeals) into divisions or panels for each case. For example, three [3] judge panels usually hear United States Appeals Court cases. There are times however, at the request of the panel, or one of the litigants, the case is later reheard by the full court, or, En Banc. En Banc is a French word that means “the full Court”. When a Petition for a Rehearing En Banc is filed, the party filing the Petition is asking for the Full Court to rehear the matter complained of on Appeal.
Berg said, “If a Conflict-of-Interest does not exist in this case, Berg as Relator vs. Obama, then the words ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ must be removed from the Code of Federal Regulations and from all legal and other dictionaries.”
Berg concluded, “If we are denied a rehearing En Banc, then I will take this Case to the U.S. Supreme Court as the issues presented are far too important not to address.”
Washington, Aug 4 - Republican Study Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued the following statement after Speaker Pelosi announced the House of Representatives would halt its scheduled August recess and return for legislative business next week. Prior to adjourning for recess, Chairman Price offered a privileged resolution on the floor of the House calling on Congress not to hold a lame duck session after Election Day for the purpose of passing hugely unpopular legislation like a national energy tax, enormous deficit spending bills, and the kickback to Big Labor known as “Card Check.” The House is expected to consider the Price Resolution during next week’s session.
“If the Democrat leadership is willing to bring lawmakers back to Washington in order to pass billions more in ‘stimulus’ spending with tax hikes on job creators, the least they can do is tell the American people that they will not bring lawmakers back for a lame duck session to pass additional tax increases, deficit spending, and special interest giveaways,” said Chairman Price. “This No Lame Duck resolution will allow our Democrat colleagues to make it clear whether or not they plan to govern in accordance with the will of the American people or in spite of it.
“For the past 18 months, Congressional Democrats have further eroded what little trust the American people had in Washington. Their big government agenda has shown the majority to be out-of-touch with the needs and concerns of hardworking Americans, and their policies have created a cloud of uncertainty that has kept job creators on the sidelines. I urge my Democrat colleagues to join Republicans in taking this positive step to restore some trust and confidence. Then we must begin to eliminate the uncertainty that hangs over American small businesses and entrepreneurs.”
Pledging not to assemble on or between the dates of November 2, 2010 and January 3, 2011, except in the case of an unforeseen, sudden emergency requiring immediate action from Congress.
RESOLUTION
Pledging not to assemble on or between the dates of November 2, 2010 and January 3, 2011, except in the case of an unforeseen, sudden emergency requiring immediate action from Congress.
Whereas the 111th Congress has failed in its promise to be the most open Congress in history, but has instead lost the public’s trust by engaging in unprecedented political procedures to advance a partisan agenda; Whereas on January 18, 2006, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi stated in prepared remarks, ‘‘Democrats are leading the effort to turn the most closed, corrupt Congress in history into the most open and honest Congress in history.’’;
(Pelosi is leading the effort to turn the most closed, corrupt Congress, 111TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION, into an obama dictatorship! The 11th Congress led by Pelosi is the most closed and dishonest Congress in history. She like obama are bold face liars who are working hand in hand to destroy our republic. The lame duck session is a "crisis" created by the democrats to pass legislation on an "urgent" basis. Its all a farce just like climate change, ie global warming.) Story Reports
Whereas on November 7, 2006, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi stated, ‘‘The American people voted to restore integrity and honesty in Washington, D.C., and the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.’’;
Whereas on November 16, 2006, incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated, ‘‘This leadership team will create the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.’’;
Whereas on December 6, 2006, incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated, ‘‘We promised the American people that we would have the most honest and open Government and we will.’’;
Whereas incoming Majority Whip Clyburn stated on December 8, 2006 that, ‘‘Democrats will exercise better leadership in the new Congress and work to raise the standard of ethics in this body’’;
Whereas Speaker Pelosi spoke of individual Member’s ethics on January 31, 2007 when she stated, ‘‘These strong [ethics] rules are significant steps toward honest leadership; enforcing these rules is critical to ensuring every Member of Congress lives up to the highest ethical standard’’;
Whereas on January 5, 2010, while at a press conference during the health care debate, Speaker Pelosi stated, ‘‘There has never been a more open process for any legislation’’;
Whereas this statement was reiterated by the Speaker while at a press conference on February 26, 2010, when a reporter prefaced a question about Rangel by noting that Speaker Pelosi had promised to run the ‘‘most ethical and honest Congress in history’’ she interrupted him to say: ‘‘And we are.’’;
Whereas more bills were considered under closed rules, 64 total, in the 110th Congress under Democrat control, than in the previous Congress, 49, under Republican control;
Whereas fewer bills were considered under open rules, 10 total, in the 110th Congress under Democrat control, than in the previous Congress, 22, under Republican control;
Whereas zero bills have been considered so far in the 111th Congress under an open rule;
Whereas 26 bills have been considered so far in the 111th Congress under a closed rule, under Democrat control;
Whereas this Congress is the highest spending Congress in United States history;
Whereas this Congress has presided over the two highest budget deficits in United States history at a time when the public debt is higher than at any other time in history;
Whereas this Congress began its mortgage of the Nation’s future with a ‘‘stimulus’’ package costing $1.1 trillion that failed to lower unemployment, spur economic growth, or actually address the needs of struggling American business and families;
Whereas this Congress continued its free-flowing spending with an increase of $72.4 billion in nonemergency discretionary spending in fiscal year 2009 to reach a total spending level of $1.01 trillion for the first time in United States history;
Whereas this Congress approved a budget resolution in 2009 that proposed the six largest nominal deficits in American history and included tax increases of $423 billion during a period of sustained high unemployment;
Whereas this Congress disregarded the needs and opinions of everyday Americans by passing a national energy tax bill that would increase costs on nearly every aspect of American lives by up to $3,000 per year, eliminate millions of jobs, reduce workers’ income, and devastate economic growth;
Whereas this Congress disregarded the needs and opinions of everyday Americans by passing a massive Government takeover of health care that will force millions of Americans from their health insurance plans, increase premiums and costs for individuals and employers, raise taxes by $569.2 billion, and fund abortions—at a cost of $2.64 trillion over the first ten years of full implementation;
Whereas this Congress nationalized the student loan industry with a potential cost of 30,000 private sector jobs and $50.1 billion over ten years;
Whereas this Congress passed the DISCLOSE Act in violation of the first amendment, hindering citizens associations’ and corporations’ free speech while leaving all unions exempt from many of the new requirements, in order to try and influence the outcome of 2010 elections;
Whereas in spite of House Budget Committee Chairman’s 2006 statement that ‘‘if you can’t budget, you can’t govern’’, the Democrat leadership has failed to introduce a budget resolution in 2010 as mandated by law, but instead self-executed a ‘‘deeming resolution’’ that increases nonemergency discretionary spending in fiscal year 2011 by $30 billion to $1.121 trillion, setting another new record for the highest level in United States history;
Whereas this Congress has failed Main Street through passage of a financial system takeover that fails to end the moral hazard of too-big-to-fail, does not address the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac behemoths, and creates numerous new boards, councils, and positions with unconstitutionally broad authorities that will interfere with the creation of wealth and jobs;
Whereas this Congress has wasted taxpayer funds on an unnecessary and unconstitutional auto industry bailout, a ‘‘cash for clunkers’’ program, a home remodification program (‘‘cash for caulkers’’), and countless other pork barrel projects while allowing the public debt to reach its highest level in United States history;
Whereas Democrats have recently insinuated that significant legislative matters would deliberately not be addressed during the 111th Congress until after the midterm elections in November 2010;
Whereas the New York Times reported on June 19, 2010 that, ‘‘For all the focus on the historic federal rescue of the banking industry, it is the government’s decision to seize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in September 2008 that is likely to cost taxpayers the most money. ... Republicans want to sever ties with Fannie and Freddie once the crisis abates. The Obama administration and Congressional Democrats have insisted on postponing the argument until after the midterm elections.’’;
Whereas the Washington Times reported on June 22, 2010 that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer stated, ‘‘a budget, which sets out binding one-year targets and a multiyear plan, is useless this year because Congress has shunted key questions about deficits to the independent debt commission created by President Obama, which is due to report back at the end of this year.’’;
Whereas the Hill reported on June 24, 2010 that Senator Tom Harkin, a Democrat from Iowa, suggested that Democrats ‘‘might attempt to move ‘card-check’ legislation this year, perhaps during a lame-duck session. ... ‘A lot of things can happen in a lame-duck session, too,’ he said in reference to EFCA.’’;
Whereas the New York Times published an article on June 28, 2010 titled ‘‘Lame-Duck Session Emerges as Possibility for Climate Bill Conference’’ that declares ‘‘many expect the final energy or climate bill to be worked out during the lame-duck session between the November election and the start of the new Congress in January.’’;
Whereas the Hill reported on July 1, 2010 that ‘‘Democratic leaders are likely to punt the task of renewing Bush-era tax cuts until after the election. Voters in November’s midterms will thus be left without a clear idea of their future tax rates when they go to the polls.’’;
Whereas the Wall Street Journal reported on July 13, 2010 that, ‘‘there have been signs in recent weeks that party leaders are planning an ambitious, lame-duck session to muscle through bills in December they don’t want to defend before November. Retiring or defeated members of Congress would then be able to vote for sweeping legislation without any fear of voter retaliation.’’;
Whereas the Hill reported on July 27, 2010 that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, at the recent Netroots Nation conference of liberal bloggers, in reference to Democrats’ unfinished priorities, ‘‘We’re going to have to have a lame duck session, so we’re not giving up.’’;
Whereas the Hill reported in the same piece on July 27, 2010 that the lame duck session will include priorities such as ‘‘comprehensive immigration reform, climate change legislation and a whole host of other issues’’;
Whereas the Declaration of Independence notes that governments ‘‘[derive] their just powers from the consent of the governed’’;
(These liberal bastards will do anything.) Story Reports
Whereas the American people have expressed their loss of confidence through self-organized and self-funded taxpayer marches on Washington, at countless ‘‘tea party’’ events, at town halls and speeches, and with numerous letters, emails, and phone calls to their elected representatives;
Whereas a reconvening of Congress between the regularly scheduled Federal election in November and the start of the next session of Congress is known as a ‘‘lame-duck session of Congress’’;
Whereas the Democrat majority has all-but-announced plans to use any ‘‘lame-duck Congress’’ to advance currently unattainable, partisan policies that are widely unpopular with the American people or that further increase the national debt against the will of most Americans;
Whereas any such action would be a repudiation of the American people’s expressed will and would not comport with the Democrats’ public statements promising transparency and accountability; and Whereas under the leadership of Speaker Pelosi and the Democrate majority, and largely due to the current trends of Government expansion and freedom retrenchment, the American people have lost confidence with their elected officials, and that faith must be restored:
1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 2 (1) reaffirms the principle expressed in the 3 Declaration of Independence that governments ‘‘[de4 rive] their just powers from the consent of the gov5 erned’’; 6 (2) recognizes the fundamental importance of 7 trust existing between the American people and their 8 elected officials; 9 (3) confirms that adhering to the will of the 10 people is imperative to upholding public trust; 11 (4) states that the American people deserve to 12 know where their current elected officials stand on 13 key legislative issues before Election Day; 14 (5) states that delaying controversial, unpopular 15 votes until after the election gives false impressions 16 to voters and deliberately hides the true intentions 17 of the majority, while denying voters the ability to 18 make fully informed choices on Election Day; and 19 (6) pledges not to assemble on or between the 20 dates of November 2, 2010 and January 3, 2011,
(This republican resolution exposes the fraud and total corruption of the liberal democrats. I consider these people traitors to America.) Story Reports
(The Dodd report to the Reese Committe on Foundations, 1954, explains how foundation grants given to various gantees for purposes contrary to those for which they were established are at the core of un-American activities.
Various foundation grants have been used to subvert the general population for political purposes.
Foundations and those receiving tax free foundation grants have resorted to propaganda in order to achieve their hidden objectives.
THE US GOVERNMENT IS THE LARGEST "FOUNDATION" THAT DESPENSES TAX FREE GRANTS THAT ARE USED FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES TO SUBVERT THE US CONSTITUTION.
Barack Hussein Obama is a product of the US government "foundation" and other foundations.
The foreign imposter obama was produced to further subvert the US Constitution through political means.) Story Reports
(The interlocking pieces of the various foundation puzzle form a picture that represents planning and control of every aspect of American life through a combination of the federal government and the subversive public education system.
In 1934 the american historical association published a report that concluded, "The day of the individual in the US had come to an end and that the future would be characterized, inevitably, by some form of collectivian and an increase in the authority of the state".
Collectivism means the subjugation of the individual to a group—whether to a race, class or state does not matter. Collectivism holds that man must be chained to collective action and collective thought for the sake of what is called “the common good.”
Collectivism holds that, in human affairs, the collective—society, the community, the nation, the proletariat, the race, etc.—is the unit of reality and the standard of value. On this view, the individual has reality only as part of the group, and value only insofar as he serves it.
This is the view of liberal socialist democrates, "the individual has reality only as part of the group, and value only insofar as he serves it." SLAVERY!!!!!!!)
The FRAUD or foreign agent posing as president emphasized "change" over and over again.
He was talking about social change.
The social change obama is implementing now is detrimental to the American people. American sovereignty and indvidual freedom is being destroyed by obama and his fellow traitors to America.
The Dodd report pointed out a group, ie the democratic party, backed by disproportionaly large amounts of money, ie stimulus money funds, tarp fund, BP slush fund, could threaten America. Dodd was so right.)
The Dodd report in 1954 pointed out how foundations use propaganda under the guise of being "essential" to the security of the United States.
Wow that is exactly what the federal government and other foundations tell Americans to get the public to believe they are protecting American's individual freedoms.)
Public education focuses on EMPIRICAL DATA and its application.
PRINCIPLES AND THEIR TRUTH OR FALSITY ARE OF LITTLE CONCERN, IE "climate change", "global warming" etc.
PAST EXPERIENCE WHICH INDICATES THAT THIS APPROACH TO THE PROBLEMS OF SOCIETY COULD LEAD TO TYRANNY, HAS BEEN DISREGARDED.
Social Engineering in the form of public education has spawned the supporters of barack obama.
Dodd's conclusion is that American fortunes created foundations that have financed ideas and practices incompatible with the fundamental concepts of the US Constitution. Dodd's report was created in 1954.)
Hitler used social engineering to indoctrinate the german people in virtues of natzism.
Hitler's state run media fed the german people lies to perpetuate the natzi mith.
What hitler did is similar to what social engineering has done in America. The proof is the election of an imposter as president.
The mith of obama as one who would change America for the better was sold to the American people.
Today the fraud obama insists America is better off and the economy is improving despite all his efforts to destroy economic activity. The state run media propaganda continues to cover for the imposter using imperical data with principles of the truth or falsity, of no concern to social engineers of change.
Obama is the "engineer in chief" of imperical data ignoring the facts while propagating the myth he can be trusted to guard our freedoms.
Obama is engineering our complete and total slavery by destroying our economic system and subverting the US Constitution.
Obama is a usurper whom George Washington would have summarily judged and made an example for all to see as a traitor to the United States!) Story Reports
(5) Upon request of a law enforcement agency certifying that a new birth certificate showing different information would provide for the safety of the birth registrant; provided that the new birth certificate shall contain information requested by the law enforcement agency, shall be assigned a new number and filed accordingly, and shall not substitute for the birth registrant's original birth certificate, which shall remain in place.
(b) When a new certificate of birth is established under this section, it shall be substituted for the original certificate of birth. Thereafter, the original certificate and the evidence supporting the preparation of the new certificate shall be sealed and filed. Such sealed document shall be opened only by an order of a court of record. [L 1973, c 39, §1; am L 1975, c 66, §2(3); am L 1979, c 130, §1 and c 203, §1; am L 1982, c 4, §1; am L 1983, c 65, §1; am L 1984, c 167, §1; am L 1993, c 131, §2] HS 338-17.7 (5) ........................................................................................ "Upon request of a law enforcement agency certifying that a new birth certificate showing different information would provide for the safety of the birth registrant; provided that the new birth certificate shall contain information requested by the law enforcement agency, shall be assigned a new number and filed accordingly".
(All that had to be done was any law enforement agency could request a NEW FAKE obama birth certificate be issued for the "safety of the birth registrant". So what do we have now? Is the certification of live birth obama has presented to the world the original fake birth certificate or is it the new fake birth certificate requested by any law enforment agency to provide for the "safety" of obama?????
If its the new fake birth certificate what was on the original fake certificate?
"When a new certificate of birth is established under this section, it shall be substituted for the original certificate of birth".
(1) The new FAKE obama birth certificate was susbstituted for the original certificate of birth because the original certificate of birth, if it exists, would reveal obama was born outside of the US most likely in Kenya.
(2) or the new FAKE birth certificate included information that covered up some facts that would disqualify obama as eligible to be president.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate. Section 338-17.8
Obama Authorizes Killing American Citizens Without Charge or Trial on Feb 3, 2010 when national intelligence director dennis blair testified before congress.
Obama has erased Habeas corpus, abolished privacy, justified torture, increased taxes, expanded government, and suspended the Bill of Rights. Even a whisper of the word, T-E-R-R-O-R-I-S-M, will activate a multi-billion dollar system of electronic eaves dropping equipment unlike any that tyranny has ever known in the history of mankind.
Remember the obama administration declared people who are members of the NRA and support anti abortion as terrorists, American citizens! Obama also through homeland security declared veterans who have returned from irac and afghanistan as potential terrorists.
"the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks"
"Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists,” it says. “DHS/I&A is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities"
(Obama Has Committed criminal matters involving the Constitutional rule of law. The democrates in congress are in total control as the majority party. The article below points out the impending investigation by Rep. Issa, California and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee when the Republicans take control in Nov 2010.
Constitutional rule of law demands action by the congress. The problem is the majority in control of congress has committed crimes right in front of us all.
The democrate majority in congress will not investigate obama or itself.
The republican manority could try to investigate obama but the process would fail because of the democrate majority. I know Rep Issa, California knows this. The CORRECT time to INVESTIGATE obama is Nov, 2010 when it will be feasible to move the investigations through the house.) Story Reports ........................................................................................ Stand Up For America
The Stand Up America BlogViolation of Oath of Office
Group to File Complaint with FBI on Obama’s Alleged Crimes Published on 08/10/10
Editor’s Note:
Several friends of Stand Up America have compiled yet another method to remove Mr. Obama from office for High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Here is their letter to describe what they seek to do, and how you can get involved.
As most readers of SUA know, Major General Paul E. Vallely US Army (retired) has advocated for DEMAND RESIGNATION of all oath breakers in office, and therefore is in support of any legal manner in which to achieve these ends.
Please read the following letter by Suzanne Short:
Dear Fellow Patriots,
If after you explore this email you feel this is for you, please feel free to share this with others who may also be in the same position. There is absolutely no cost involved to participate. However you will enjoy the pure satisfaction that you have taken a step to help return control of our republic to the rule of law, the constitution and the American People.
Have you had enough email exchanges and find your level of frustration at an unbelievable level? Are you “mad as Hell” at Obama and the entire criminal entity called the 111th Congress?
1 – Do you feel as though you have been unfairly abused by big government?
2 – Disenfranchised by those whom you elected?
3 – Been a victim to race baiting by the Obama administration?
4 – Fallen victim to political correctness?
5 – Had your pockets picked with your eyes wide open?
6 – Lied to and deceived by those elected to protect your best interest?
So are you really going to take it? What? Don’t know what to do?
Read on with anticipation my friends. You may find the following will pleasantly surprise you.
The best part…no one will ask you for any donations or contributions. This is from one patriot to another.
So far over 30 people have joined just based on the development of the preliminary document. A document I will share if you are inclined to participate. See more on this later in this email.
RE: Filing Criminal Complaints – Deadline for filing the final document will be 8/17/2010
Please review the following as it inspired a course of action in which you may wish to participate:
For more information please review the content at Canada Free Press
This article conclusively documents the deliberate criminal violations of our constitution by members of the Obama administration, and other related entities. Some of the more basic violations are addressed in the following US Criminal Code as annotated below: Violation of Oath of Office
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order, which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.
1 – 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.
2 – 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,
3 – 5 U.S.C. 7311 , which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.
4 – The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 , which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311, for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”
Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
Here is another related article that also helped inspire this effort.
The only exception I raise is the suggestion of impeachment as the solution, As I see it, Impeachment is not the correct legal remedy. The suggestion of impeachment, leads me to speculate that the real purpose of this article is to send us off on one more wild goose chase and permitting more time for Obama to further his agenda. Historically, impeachment has never been an effective way in which to deal with these issues of such a criminal nature. It is my view most of what we have seen so far amounts to legal scrimmaging in the judicial system to buy time for Obama to continue to implement his agenda.
Please note the part of the second page of this article. This details that Rep. Issa, California and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is promising criminal investigations when the Republicans take control (assuming that occurs in November). Can anyone explain to me why Obama’s action will be more criminal when the Republicans are in control?
As I see it is a crime. Violation of the Constitution is a violation regardless of who is in power. Again my dear friends…this is not a political question as the courts might wish us to believe. This is a criminal issue.
Even Rep. Issa, based on the statement above (if it was properly attributed by the author) , is guilty of misprision of felony at this very moment! And he is not alone…every member of Congress and the Senate is also guilty! And there are others… US Criminal Code:
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 4
§ 4. Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Crimes, many of them, have been committed right in front of us all. Crimes that require the appropriate government and law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute as indicated, regardless of which party is in power.
These are criminal matters involving the Constitutional rule of law!
Not political in nature!
As a result you are invited to participate in a plan of action that, in this instance, is a bit unique. Instead of my filing criminal charges against those involved as an individual, I am suggesting a much more aggressive action with a much greater legal impact.
This time, not only will I file criminal charges alone, but I will also invite those of you who are so inclined, to join me in this action.
If you are indeed made of real patriotic material, you know…”the real stuff” and find this idea acceptable and also meets your level of risk tolerance, please respond appropriately to this email and I will forward the additional details to fully participate.
This April 2005 photo provided by Sandy Wilson shows her with her newborn son Christopher in the intensive care unit at Anne Arundel Medical Center in Annapolis, Md. No one knows how Wilson got the flesh-eating bacteria, necrotizing fasciitis. In all of medicine, few infections are as feared as this one. It strikes out of the blue, especially diabetics, cancer patients, transplants recipients and others with weak immune systems — a large and growing group of Americans. It kills 20 percent of its victims and horribly disfigures others.
(This is one story that is really worth reading. Sandy Wilson is an example of a person who never gave up. If she had just gave up I'm sure she would not have survived. Its not all about just her. Many people were and are involved in her recovery. She is the main character in a drama that is just to real.
Obamacare would have made sure Sandy Wilson and similar people would be judged unworthy of life. We know better. Sandy Wilson stands in opposition to obama's "death panel" regulators who would condemn her to death because of the cost of keeping her alive. GOD bless you Sandy, may you live many more years in spite of any efforts by the government to keep you from living because of obamacare.) Story Reports ........................................................................................... By MARILYNN MARCHIONE AP Medical Writer
BALTIMORE (AP) — Waking from a fog of anesthesia, Sandy Wilson found she was a patient in one of the hospitals where she worked as a nurse. She remembered having a baby, and being told she had gotten an infection. But nothing could prepare her for what lurked beneath the sheets.
Flesh-eating bacteria were eating her alive.
"When I looked down at my belly, basically all the skin was gone and I could see my internal organs," she said. "I remember seeing my intestines. I thought, 'There's no way I can live like this ... This is a death sentence.'"
In all of medicine, few infections are as feared as this one. It strikes out of the blue, especially obese people, diabetics, cancer patients, transplant recipients and others with weak immune systems — a growing group of Americans. It kills 20 percent of its victims and horribly disfigures others.
It used to be caused almost exclusively by one type of strep bacteria. Now there's a scary trend: drug-resistant superbugs like the staph germ MRSA increasingly are able to make "flesh-eating" toxins and cause nightmarish infections like Wilson's.
"In the first 20 years I practiced, I may have seen one case," said Dr. Alan Bisno, a retired University of Miami expert who has lectured other doctors on this. "Within a very few years, everybody in the audience had all seen cases."
To treat it, doctors cut away dead tissue, but the infection often advances after they think they've gotten it all.
Inch by inch, it devoured the 34-year-old Wilson. Spleen, gall bladder, appendix. Part of her stomach and ultimately, all of her intestines.
Over five years, she had countless surgeries, including an unusual organ transplant. For much of that time, she lived in hospitals and rehabilitation centers, fed by tubes and unable to give her young son a bath, to read him a bedtime story, to tuck him in at night. She lost her marriage and endured unimaginable pain.
"It was like I was rotting from the inside out. It felt like things were just being ripped out of me," she said.
Click on the links below to read the rest of the story.
The US government just published the Unemployment Rate, it’s 16.5% as per the U-6 measurement system. Why the U-3 is cited in the Media rather than the U-6 is nothing less than mind boggling.
U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force
U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force.
U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate)
U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers
U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other marginally attached workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.
NOTE: Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. For more information, see “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” in the October 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.
The U-6 is actually the closest to the unemployment rate that was accounted for during the great depression.
(Obama did not create the unemployment crisis because of ineptness, or lack of ability. The unemployment rate is much worse than what the state run media is reporting. The true unemployment rate should be sited as the U6 measure of unemployment.) Story Reports
Christina Romer, chair of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, will resign.
Christina Romer, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, has resigned her post to return to her old job as an economics professor at the University of California at Berkeley, the White House said Thursday.
Romer was instrumental in crafting the $862 billion economic stimulus package that Obama signed shortly after being sworn into office. She co-wrote a paper that predicted the stimulus would prevent unemployment rates from rising above 8 percent.
"The opportunity to help shape economic policy these past 20 months, and to work with the other members of the economic team and my colleagues on the CEA, is one I will always cherish," she said.
The jobless rate has hovered near 10 percent and Romer's most recent forecast predicts that it will not drop below 8 percent until the end of 2012.
Romer also said that without the stimulus bill unemployment would rise above 9 percent.
(Obama used romers's stimulus plan and made unemployment worse. Instead of less that 8 percent unemployment there is currently 9.6% U3 unemployment or actually 16.3% using the U6 alternative measure, a more accurate measure of unemployment.
Obama did not create the unemployment crisis because of ineptness, or lack of ability. Obama has made the recession worse on purpose but promised the massive stimulus spending would keep the unemployment rate much lower. In fact the stimulus money has made the unemployment rate much higher and was a total waste of taxpayer money.
Day after day obama lies about the true unemployment rate. Obama's plan was and is the destruction of the US economy through massive spending. In Nov 2010 Obama will be impeaded in his efforts to destroy America.) Story Reports
